WEBVTT - The Media Show | 16 August

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Media Show, with Jack couting Hello and

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the media. Showed tonight we'll look at the

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>meltdowns at CNN and a last minute legal change to

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>an ABC investigation. But first Vice President Kamala Harris has

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed the full weight of the US media behind her,

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>which has created an appearance that she is significantly ahead

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump. But cracks are starting to appear. Some

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>more brave voices in the media have started asking why

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Harris won't do any substantive interviews.

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Would it kill you guys to have a press conference?

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Why hasn't she had a press conference? Listen?

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 4>The Vice president and Governor Walls have been busy criss

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 4>crossing this country since the launch of this campaign and

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 4>adding a Governor Walls to the ticket. You saw the

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 4>ways in which they went across the battleground states last week,

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 4>generating rallies of a thousands, ten thousand here, fifteen thousand there.

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 4>But Michael, you know a campaign rally is not a

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 4>press Do you mind if I cut in?

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you know, a.

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Campaign rallies on a press conference. Why hasn't she had

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:06.559
<v Speaker 3>a press conference?

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 6>She's the vice president, she can handle the questions, why

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 6>not do it?

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 3>We absolutely are going to do it. You hear her take.

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 4>Questions as she's out on the stump, and she's as

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 4>she said last week, we're going to be having a

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 4>sit down interview here before the end of the month

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 4>of what she is going to be focused on and

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 4>what this campaign is going to be focused on, is

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 4>communicating directly with the voters that are actually going to

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 4>decide the pathway to two hundred and seventy electoral votes.

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 3>That's why she got a press conference plus week three

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 3>that passed me.

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 4>That's why we're doing a bus tour in Pennsylvania as

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 4>we head into Chicago, and it's why we'll sit down

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 4>for an interview before the end of the month to

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 4>make sure that we can have a deep dot conversation

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 4>about the vision the Kamala Harris has for where she

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 4>wants to take this country in the contrast that we're

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 4>going to have with Donald Trump. We're gonna have plenty

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 4>of opportunities to do that throughout the micro but one.

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 7>Interview by the end of the month this month, the

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 7>rest of the campaign, I don't I.

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 8>Don't want to, you know, belabor this, but one interview

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 8>before the end of the month.

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's that's not a lot. I mean, can

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 3>you commit to a press conference before.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:01.559
<v Speaker 9>The end of the month.

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 4>We will commit to directly engage with the voters that

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 4>are actually gonna decide this election. And that is going

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 4>to be a complete with rallies, with sit down interviews,

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 4>with press conferences, with all the digital assets that we

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 4>have at our disposal.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And it isn't just political pundits noticing that Harris is

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to win this election by literally hiding from scrutiny.

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>ESPN host Stephen Smith says that Harris has got his

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>vote already, but it's called on her to do the

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>right thing and be present for interviews.

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 10>Joe Biden step down step aside as the presumptive Democratic

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 10>nominee on July twenty first. Okay, now I'm gonna look

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.839
<v Speaker 10>at this right now. I'm looking at my calendar because

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 10>I just want to make sure you know, July twenty

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 10>first was a Sunday. We've had one week, two weeks,

0:02:53.840 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 10>three weeks and one day, says Joe Biden. Stepped aside place.

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 10>We've seen Kamala Harris as their pet rally and it

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 10>can't just be the Conservatives.

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Right is right.

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 10>I'm talking to my sister here. Come on now, you're

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 10>running for the president's theory the United.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 3>States of American. You got my vote.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 10>You're running for the president's theater the United States of America,

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 10>which you're hiding for.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Harris has plenty of policy and consistencies which need to

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>be probed by reporters. Her record is a hardline prosecutor

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is an issue, as well as contradictions between how she's

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>dealt with the border crisis between twenty twenty and today.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 3>We can't do that if she hides.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And even if you detest Trump, you should be furious

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>about the prospect of somebody waltzing into the White House

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>with barely any scrutiny just because the media hates the

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>other candidate.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 3>That is a democracy. That is just a farce.

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, joining me on the show this week is the

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Australians Darren Davidson and Sky News contributor James Bolt. Darren,

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>let's with you the way I think Joe Biden as

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>well did in the last election. There was all these

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>notions of he was hiding in the basement. It's a

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>proven tactic for the Democrats. But even her own supporters

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>now are saying, even if it works, even if politically

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it is advantageous, it's not really the right thing to do.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 8>It's not I think. I mean Biden was hiding behind

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 8>COVID and that's how he was able to do that

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 8>campaign from the basement. Obviously, COVID is no longer an

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 8>issue for anybody, and that reality's gone. I think it's

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 8>really bizarre that she's all but telling Americans that they'll

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 8>have to elect her to find out what she really

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 8>believes in. That's bad enough on domestic policy and on

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 8>foreign policy. That's really really dangerous at the moment that

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 8>we're in right now, because the world's never been more

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 8>dangerous than it is right now for many, many, many years.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 8>Americans shouldn't have to read between the tea leaves to

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 8>find out what her position is on the withdrawal from

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 8>Afghanistan in twenty twenty one, China's piling grabs in the

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 8>South China Sea, Russia, Ukraine, Around's nuclear build up, and

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 8>like you go on, and so it really is beholding

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 8>on her to come out and do some media interviews.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 8>And what makes it even worse, Actually the grabs you

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 8>ran were good. The CNN Ankor was pretty pretty robust there.

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 8>But generally the media in the States has given kamal

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 8>of a free ride. I agree, So that makes the

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 8>situation even worse.

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree, And James, look, those were the rare clips

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that we found to kind of show this level of scrutiny.

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I will note that The Guardian has made this point.

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Lots of other journalists have made the point that she

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>does appear to be hiding, but others in the press

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>just seemed so just overwhelmed by joy that the polls

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>are now going in their favor, that they're just they're

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>turning a blind eye and they don't want her to

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>have this scrutiny because they need her to win, that's

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the thing.

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 7>And to be honest, to be fair to Kamala Harris,

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 7>she did actually sit down for an interview today, and

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 7>I don't know if you guys saw the hard hitting

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 7>journalists that she finally ask the tough questions her running

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 7>mates in walls is the person asking her all the

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 7>questions that the media haven't been able to ask her yet. Sorry,

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 7>got on for if we're finally sitting down to a

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 7>big interview, But you're right, it's simply not enough. It

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 7>should be one hundred percent of journalist should be standing

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 7>up there saying we need to hear from Kamala. And

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 7>the only reason that you wouldn't is because you think

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 7>that the ultimate goal of beating Donald Trump is a

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 7>more worthy goal than your own journalistic journalistic importance. And

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 7>this really means for me that the election is going

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 7>to be a referendum on how powerful the media still is.

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 7>Because if this media can obvious gay Kamala Harris say

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 7>that she's a candidate of change even though she was

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 7>vice president for four years and the borders are and

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 7>that the candidate who couldn't even make it to the

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 7>primaries in our own state of California in twenty twenty

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 7>is somethingly popular with voters. If that candidate can win

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 7>off the media doing those sort of pr for her,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 7>then the media is far more powerful than I thought

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 7>than I think it is.

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and James, I mean on your point as well,

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the campaign saying let's commit to one sit down interview.

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not the same as a press conference where people

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>are firing questions. There's the chaos, and Darren, let's bring

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you in. Because I think Kamala Harris doesn't have the

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>best track record of having concise answers. And yes, Donald

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump has his weaknesses that everybody knows, and I think

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>he gets more criticism than any other candidate out there,

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>probably in history, probably more unfair criticism as well. But

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they know that she has this verbal weakness where sometimes

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>she waffles, she talks about abstract notions in a way

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that are a bit cringe worthy. That's probably why they

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>would prefer a more controlled sit down than a press conference.

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the word salads are unbearable. The point about

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 8>Trump is, I mean he often choose from the hip

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 8>on foreign policies. Comments about dictators are pretty witless sometimes.

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 8>But actually his first term record, particularly on Iran and

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 8>at least, was actually pretty favorable and pretty good and strong,

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 8>particularly compared to Biden Harris and their performance in the

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 8>foreign policy arenas. So from that perspective, Americans deserved to

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 8>hear how commander will keep the country safe in such

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 8>a treacherous world.

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well said, Well, moving on now, because Donald Trump

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>has had a COmON sation with Elon Musk this week

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and some journalists lost their mind over it.

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 6>Yan with forty minutes of silence and then a bro

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 6>apocalypse of politics. No matter how you frame it or

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 6>what caused the glitch, what was finally said between Donald

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 6>Trump and Elon Musk at last night's Big X event

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 6>can largely be defined as a rant filled with familiar

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 6>lines and lines of attack.

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 11>Kamala wouldn't have this conversation.

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 9>She can't because she's not smart.

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, she's not a smart person. He is a

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 2>radical left San Francisco liberal and now she's trying to

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 2>protect Now she's looking like she's she wants to be

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 2>more Trump than Trump, if that's possible.

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it's possible.

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 2>But he wants to be more Trump than Trump. She's terrible,

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 2>but he's getting a free run.

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 6>All right, But did it too what it was designed

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 6>to do, which was to put the brakes on Harris's momentum.

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Well that's not objective reporting. It's just angry and unhinged.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen to what actually took place during

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the conversation.

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 11>More of a believer, I think, and a lot of

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 11>people have said that to be a lot of great

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 11>people have said that to me, actually, but it was

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 11>it was amazing that I happened to be turned just

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 11>at that perfect angle, and all because I put down

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 11>a chart on immigration that showed that the numbers were

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 11>so great.

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 3>I love that chart even Maybe it's a sign.

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's a sign immigrations.

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 12>You highlighted a serious issue at that moment, you know here,

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 12>But but you knows of your head, James.

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a combination here of the Trump arrangement,

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>since right where no matter what he does, what he says,

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it has to be met with hostility. But I also

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>think there is a little bit of relevance deprivision here

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>because CNN didn't get this long form conversation. Both of

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>these two blokes don't really want anything to do with

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this media organization, so they've managed to talk directly to

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.719
<v Speaker 1>voters on their own terms. And that kind of infuriates

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 1>some people in the media, Yeah.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 7>Because they want to see themselves as a gay keepers

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 7>and to be honest, to be fair to seeing in there.

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 7>At least the journalist or the producer whoever wrote that

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 7>script did actually take the time to sit down and

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 7>watch the interview. I've got to clip here from someone

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 7>who doesn't even need to wait for Donald Trump to

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 7>say something before he actively calls him to be shut down.

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 13>Elon Musk is slated to interview Donald Trump tomorrow tonight.

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 9>On on X.

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 13>I don't know if the President has gone today. Feel

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 13>free to say if he is or not. But I

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 13>think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue,

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 13>it's you know, it's.

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 12>An America issue.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 13>What rule does the White House or the President have

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 13>in sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that,

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 13>or sort of intervening in there.

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 9>You've heard us talk about this many times from here,

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 9>about the responsibilities that social media platforms have.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 7>That's without him saying anything, just you know what it's

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 7>about to happen, so it should be shut down.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 3>That is a White House beat reporter.

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 7>You want to talk about someone who should be the

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 7>vanguard of defending free speech and holding power to account.

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 7>It's this person in the room saying, what are you

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 7>guys doing? And that is someone just saying, actually, you know,

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 7>the state should use its power to silence a political energy.

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I love how Korean Jean Pierre the Press sect is

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>just saying, well, thank you for this question, which I

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>very much want to answer, not about anything we're doing,

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>but about stopping literally stopping our political opponent from having

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>a conversation. I mean, and this is where it gets

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of creepy from my point of view. Yeah, they

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>probably got a lot of stuff wrong in that interview, right,

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not going to defend that. But when you're

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking to somebody for hours, for an extensive period of time,

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you go back and you find verbal missteps

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and you try and paint the conversation as being dangerous.

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>So I listened to that conversation. Therefore there is a

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>danger to me listening to that. That is just so

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>against what any journalist should want. I mean, what happened

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>just to be able to talk to people, listen to

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 1>people and form your own opinion.

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, agree, I mean, it's interesting he's returned to Twitter

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 8>after leaving the platform many years ago, and it just

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 8>shows that he's adopting a very different approach in this election.

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 8>And he's good for him for showing a willingness to

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 8>actually go onto new platforms and be interviewed. Look, you know,

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 8>Eli Masco would much rather see the journalist's interview him

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 8>and a you know, Silicon Valley tech billionaire mogul. But

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 8>at least he's putting himself out there and I think

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 8>we'll probably see a lot more of that from Trump

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 8>and the run up to you.

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, for me, for one, I found it interesting,

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think you need to agree with every

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>single word uttered between two people talking to find it interesting.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>They're both quite fascinating people with different backgrounds. Why would

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to put it to the White House that

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>they should censor.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 7>That, well, because you want him to lose. And I

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 7>just like to take it back to the first point

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 7>is that you've got one candidate who can talk for

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 7>two hours, and you know he's going to get things wrong,

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 7>he's going to muddle things up a bit, but he

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 7>can't talk for two hours versus a candidate they actively

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 7>have to hide from you because you're going to find

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 7>out that that's going to comparisonjustaposition between the two. Let's

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 7>move on, because breakdowns of Raygun has broken her silence.

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 7>It's been a wild week for the academic turned olympian.

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 7>Let's see what she had to say.

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 9>I didn't realize that that would also open the door

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 9>to so much hate, which has frankly been pretty devastating. Well,

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 9>I went out there and I had fun. I did

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 9>take it very seriously, I worked my butt off preparing

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 9>for the Olympics and I gave my all.

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 13>Truly.

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 9>I'm on it to have been a part of the

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 9>Australian Olympic team, meant to be part of Breaking's Olympic.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Debut, Darren, I get uncomfortable when people try to frame criticism.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>And I've criticized Her've criticized her academic work. I think

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it is childish. I don't think it's academia. I don't

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's intelligible. I don't think it should be funded

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>by the taxpayer, subsidized by the taxpayer. Now us criticizing

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>her and that performance where she's she chose to hop

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>around like a kangaroo.

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 3>No one made her do that, right.

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And is it fair to say that that's a hater,

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's this there's a hatred behind that, because what

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of saying is if you critique me, then

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to slaner you and label you as some

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of hateful bigot. I think that's I think that's

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>much worse than just criticizing somebody.

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 8>I feel like we're all being gasol a little bit here.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 8>It's a good thing about all of this and the

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 8>attention that Raygun has gone that is that it's actually

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 8>opened up this big debate around funding and how this

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 8>even happened in the first place. And I think that's

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 8>a positive development. But I've got much rather everyone. We

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 8>were all talking about the extraordinary metal talent, particularly from

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 8>the female yes, and the extraordinary talent dedication, the dedicated

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 8>training over many years that's taken them to this point

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 8>when those medals and the great coaching they've had, that's

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 8>what we really should be talking about instead of celebrating

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 8>someone failing in a really embarrassing way in a sport.

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 3>That isn't really a celebrating mediocrity.

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>It really is when we have these great athletes and

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>James spring you in here, because we do have these

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>people that are just the most incredible thing. I mean,

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to win eighteen Golds and you know there were some

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.359
<v Speaker 1>very close matches like the women's water polo, the stingers

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>with the silver as well, some incredible moments, and then

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got the AOC, the Australian Olympics Committee putting out

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>these lengthy statements defending this.

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Person and I don't think it's appropriate.

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, the thing you have to realize is that she

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 7>tried to do a bunny hop and do a kangaroo thing.

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 7>So of course we are going to talk about that

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 7>because how.

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Did that happen?

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 7>So and the idea that it's like shocking to wear

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 7>that this feedback. I don't know if you guys have

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 7>ever like really sucked at something on a public stage.

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 7>But it's not afterwards that you realize that things are

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 7>about to go bad. It's when you see the guy

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 7>before you. So that's when she should have tweet things

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 7>are about to go bad for me right now because

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 7>that person.

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Was really based on that. It was it was a

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>bit nasters. If she's not being honest, she doesn't seem

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to realize that she had no place from a caliber

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>point of view, she wasn't up there.

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 7>Yes, and yet if she's not in the ABC New

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 7>Year's Eve coverage this week, then this year and what

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 7>are we doing?

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're going to take a quick break. But when

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we're back Four Corners an investigation which had to make

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a last minute legal kill. Welcome back this week four

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Corners and it's investigation to Network seven.

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 3>And if you missed it, this was the promo.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 9>Is one of the most soul crushing places you can

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 9>work in, smoke and mirrors.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 5>Channel seven likes to portray itself as a family.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 9>It's a very dysfunctional family.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 3>In Silence for Life Breaking seven Silence, the fear is visceral.

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 8>And I haven't seen anything like it. I wouldn't just

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 8>call it the second Chance Club. I'd call it the third,

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 8>fourth and fifth Chance Club.

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 9>They shouldn't be in business if that's what they're doing

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 9>to young women. How do they sleep at night?

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>That promo, which featured Amber Harrison, the former lover of

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>X seven boss Tim Warner, attracted a legal letter and

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>was eventually deleted from the Internet. The program went to

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>air without the Harrison segments, ironically, which had her complaining

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that she was being silenced for life. The Sydney Morning

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Herald's Callum Jasmin reported a last minute omission of a

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>key interview from the ABC's Four Corners investigation into workplace

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>culture at the seven network undermined the purpose of the program,

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>says former company executive distant Amber Harrison, who's part in

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the program failed to go to air now. Harrison said

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>it's curious that after being featured in the promram, my

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>interview was pulled without explanation. This omission left a significant

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>story untold, especially considering the hype surrounding the show and

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the high caliber of journalism Louise Milligan is known for.

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring the panel back into discuss Darren. That's a

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>very uncomfortable interview that Harrison has given about Louise Milligan,

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the star of this program, who, presumably, if this interview

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is anything to go by, never called Amber Harrison to

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>explain why this interview was asked. But all of that aside,

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>why would it go to air with the promo without

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>taking the consideration all these legal implications and then having

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to chop it out last minute.

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 3>It's not a great look.

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 8>I think Arma deserved an explanation and heads up ahead

0:18:57.200 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 8>of the program airing on Monday evening that she wasn't

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 8>going to a peering up all of that time, and

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 8>presumably disclosing things that she probably felt uncomfortable talking about

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 8>that were difficult to talk about after that only happened.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 8>What's seven six years ago now or maybe a little

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 8>bit longer.

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 3>But what did you think in general about the program?

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was reheated seconds.

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 8>There were noly revelations given all the publicity and the

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 8>build up and thess stories about the program. I've watched

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 8>it as it was had on Monday night. I just

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 8>found the whole thing. Stuff we've all known and we've read,

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 8>and it's been reported already. It was just a rehash.

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 3>James, what are your thoughts?

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I got So the good news for me is

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 7>that it sort of told me that this is an

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 7>industry that is cleaning itself up. I mean, you talk

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 7>to people that are like, you know, veterans of the media,

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 7>and what it took the ABC going.

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Back in the time capsule together on Channel seven.

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 7>You sounds like it was just what people did on

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 7>a standard work day, you know, fifty sixty years ago.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 3>So it's good to know that.

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean, some of the stories are pretty aerbic, and

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:00.959
<v Speaker 7>some of the story and a bit like I need

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 7>to hear the other side as well, But overall I

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 7>kind of felt, hey, we are getting somewhere in an

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 7>industry where.

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>It was also Louis Milligan interviewed about two hundred people,

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and if that was the best that could come out

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of it, it's actually not the worst look for seven.

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So I just think this is an industry that

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 7>is getting to a pretty good place.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, let's move on now. Prime Minister Anthony Albanezi

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>has been accused of spreading misinformation once again, this time

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>involving our country's top spy, ASIO chief Mike Burgess. Here

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is what our Prime Minister had to say in question

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 1>time yesterday.

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 5>I'll refer to what the ASIO Director General himself has said.

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 5>If they've been issued a visa, they've gone through the process,

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 5>they're referred to my organization and ASIO does it seem.

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 3>But what did Burgess actually.

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 5>Say, Brith they've been issued at visa, they've gone through

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 5>the process. Part of that visa process is with criteria

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 5>hit they're referred to my organization and AZIO does its thing.

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>And Opposition leader Peter dun And seized on the mistake

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in parliament, but Albanesi was not apologetic.

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 8>It's been brought to my attention that the Prime Minister,

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 8>in quoting the Direct General of Security earlier, misquoted the

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 8>Director General.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I would ask you to invite the Prime Minister to correct,

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 3>to correct the requisite is in given this is the

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 3>first available opportunity for him to do that.

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 5>The leader of the Opposition has confirmed the accuracy of

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 5>what I've said, what I have not done. Mister Speakers,

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 5>read out the entire inside this.

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Transcript, Darren, It's not a great look for a man

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that's trying to introduce misinformation legislation, getting the facts right, transparency,

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 1>it's been a huge part of his political platform. The

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>time and time again we're seeing Albanese is either making mistakes,

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>refusing to apologize, or in the words of Peter Dudden,

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>deliberately misleading for political gain.

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 3>What are your thoughts?

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Look, I think rather than defending a process that's

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 8>clearly flawed at a very chaotic time, he should just

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 8>be addressing, honestly, the questions around this. It's not clear

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 8>that you know people, it's not clear that the approval

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 8>process was thorough enough, and whether we did in fact

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 8>consult Israeli and intelligence agencies over some of those people,

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 8>and the big jump in those visa refusals as well

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 8>kind of indicates that there was a problem, and that's

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 8>you know, it was a very chaotic time. It was

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 8>a crisis where not to have this hadn't happened. It

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 8>caught everybody unawares, and there's no harm in just admitting that.

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, it's almost the defense of nature.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the way that he gets his back up when

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>he's asked about this, when I think Australians just want

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the transparency and back to my earlier point, he kind

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of ran on this as a platform like I'm going

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to be transparent and clean up Parliament. But when there's

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a question over procedural you know, the mechanics of how

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>visas are into, he gets his back up and then

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it becomes a cultural war issue rather than

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a mechanical question.

0:22:58.080 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, he's not good on the back foot. It's not

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 7>just this, it's when he's been press conferences and journalists

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 7>are going Adam, he can get a bit shifty. We

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 7>saw the famous Women's March where he was copying a

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 7>barrage from one of the speakers and then decided to

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 7>return fire and that made her cry like he's not

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 7>someone accustomed. Strangely enough, for a guy that has risen

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 7>to Prime minister, he's not accustomed to defending himself and

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 7>to keeping his call when he's under pressure.

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 3>It's bizarre.

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>James Darren, thank you for joining us. That's all the

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>time we have for tonight. Thank you for joining us.

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week at the same time.