1 00:00:03,680 --> 00:00:07,080 Speaker 1: From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm christinaming it. 2 00:00:07,080 --> 00:00:12,840 Speaker 1: It's Thursday, April twenty four, twenty twenty five. The social 3 00:00:12,840 --> 00:00:16,000 Speaker 1: media feeds of young Australian men are brimming with posts 4 00:00:16,040 --> 00:00:20,440 Speaker 1: by masculinity influencers and its wreaking havoc on their opinions 5 00:00:20,480 --> 00:00:24,160 Speaker 1: of women. A new study shows the content also negatively 6 00:00:24,200 --> 00:00:34,080 Speaker 1: influences young men's health choices on substances like steroids. The 7 00:00:34,159 --> 00:00:37,760 Speaker 1: Climate two hundred political funding group has pumped another fifty 8 00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:41,680 Speaker 1: thousand dollars into the campaign of teal Zoe Daniel, a 9 00:00:41,720 --> 00:00:44,760 Speaker 1: move suggesting the election race in the Victorian seat of 10 00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:48,519 Speaker 1: Goldstein is tightening. You can read all the latest from 11 00:00:48,520 --> 00:00:51,160 Speaker 1: the campaign trail right now at the Australian dot com 12 00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:58,080 Speaker 1: dot au. Peter Dutton has unveiled the coalition's defense policy 13 00:00:58,120 --> 00:01:01,040 Speaker 1: with just over a week to go in the election campaign. 14 00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:05,320 Speaker 1: The opposition leader has promised to spend twenty billion dollars 15 00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:09,440 Speaker 1: on new defense capabilities, but he's been vague on the details. 16 00:01:10,120 --> 00:01:14,160 Speaker 1: So will a national security cash splash help his prospects 17 00:01:14,200 --> 00:01:23,160 Speaker 1: at the polling booth. That's today's episode in march Elbridge, 18 00:01:23,240 --> 00:01:26,560 Speaker 1: Colby Sat down for a very public job interview. 19 00:01:27,200 --> 00:01:29,680 Speaker 2: The hearing will come to order. Thank you all for 20 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:31,360 Speaker 2: being here this morning. The committee meet. 21 00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:34,040 Speaker 1: Colby was Donald Trump's pick for a top job at 22 00:01:34,040 --> 00:01:37,920 Speaker 1: the US Department of Defense, and for hours he was 23 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:41,600 Speaker 1: quizzed by members of a United States Senate committee about 24 00:01:41,640 --> 00:01:45,000 Speaker 1: his views on a range of issues from foreign policy 25 00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:46,240 Speaker 1: to defense spending. 26 00:01:46,680 --> 00:01:51,720 Speaker 2: If confirmed, mister Colby would oversee the developments of policy 27 00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:54,120 Speaker 2: and strategy for the Department of Defense. He would assume 28 00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:58,320 Speaker 2: these responsibilities during the most dangerous security environment since World 29 00:01:58,360 --> 00:01:58,960 Speaker 2: War Two. 30 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:03,840 Speaker 1: Elbridge Colby got the job, and his laser focus on 31 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 1: Beijing means Australia's defense strategy hasn't escaped his scrutiny. He 32 00:02:09,600 --> 00:02:12,640 Speaker 1: wants Australia to ratchet up defense spending in a big 33 00:02:12,680 --> 00:02:16,880 Speaker 1: way to three percent of GDP, given the inherent threat 34 00:02:16,919 --> 00:02:19,040 Speaker 1: posed by our proximity to China. 35 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:24,959 Speaker 3: You know, the idea of empowering our Australian in some sense, 36 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:27,400 Speaker 3: perhaps our closest ally in the world. They've been with us, 37 00:02:27,440 --> 00:02:29,760 Speaker 3: even in our less advisable wars. As the way I 38 00:02:29,800 --> 00:02:32,400 Speaker 3: put it, it's a great idea for them to have 39 00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:32,880 Speaker 3: a taxa. 40 00:02:33,160 --> 00:02:35,840 Speaker 1: The labor government has so far resisted pressure from the 41 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:40,440 Speaker 1: United States to boost defense spending, but on Wednesday the 42 00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:43,360 Speaker 1: Coalition went some of the way to answering the call. 43 00:02:44,080 --> 00:02:47,560 Speaker 4: Australia has an important role to play on the global 44 00:02:47,600 --> 00:02:50,760 Speaker 4: stage and in our own region, and today we make 45 00:02:50,880 --> 00:02:54,000 Speaker 4: a very significant announcement of over twenty billion dollars to 46 00:02:54,200 --> 00:02:56,959 Speaker 4: defense over the course of the next five years, which 47 00:02:57,000 --> 00:03:01,200 Speaker 4: will bring spending up to two point five percent of GDP. 48 00:03:05,720 --> 00:03:09,080 Speaker 1: CAM Opposition leader Peter Dunton unveiled the coalition's long away 49 00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:12,960 Speaker 1: to defense policy in Western Australia on Wednesday. So what 50 00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:16,000 Speaker 1: does twenty billion dollars bias well Christen. 51 00:03:16,040 --> 00:03:22,079 Speaker 5: It helps bias nuclear submarines, It helps buy Australia long 52 00:03:22,200 --> 00:03:24,960 Speaker 5: range missiles that can be fired from the shore here. 53 00:03:25,440 --> 00:03:28,240 Speaker 5: It helps pay for a lot more people to join 54 00:03:28,280 --> 00:03:31,560 Speaker 5: the forces because they're not meeting their retention targets. So 55 00:03:31,840 --> 00:03:34,320 Speaker 5: really there's a whole scope of things that this money 56 00:03:34,320 --> 00:03:37,400 Speaker 5: could be put towards where it's very much needed. So 57 00:03:37,720 --> 00:03:40,440 Speaker 5: this is a long term pledged by the Coalition to 58 00:03:40,480 --> 00:03:42,920 Speaker 5: lift defense spending from two percent of GDP to two 59 00:03:42,960 --> 00:03:45,480 Speaker 5: point five and five years and the big one to 60 00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:48,480 Speaker 5: lift it to three percent of GDP in ten years now, 61 00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:51,840 Speaker 5: that is a quality of difference. That's a lot more money. 62 00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:55,600 Speaker 1: Cameron Stewart is the Australian's chief international correspondent. 63 00:03:56,360 --> 00:03:58,040 Speaker 5: But you're going to need this sort of money to 64 00:03:58,120 --> 00:04:01,920 Speaker 5: pay for this equipment because you're nuclear submarines for example, 65 00:04:02,120 --> 00:04:04,760 Speaker 5: are going to cost an eye watering amount of money. 66 00:04:05,040 --> 00:04:08,360 Speaker 5: And so without actually having an increase in defense spending 67 00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:11,520 Speaker 5: a substantial one, the ADF would actually go backwards in 68 00:04:11,560 --> 00:04:14,160 Speaker 5: its capability rather than forward. So this is really, I 69 00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:20,440 Speaker 5: think something that is fairly essential in the longer term. 70 00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:23,479 Speaker 1: Of course, Cam this benchmark of three percent of GDP 71 00:04:23,680 --> 00:04:26,960 Speaker 1: is advocated by NATO and endorsed by the United States, 72 00:04:27,320 --> 00:04:29,960 Speaker 1: but neither of the major parties have plans to fund 73 00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:33,520 Speaker 1: defense at that level in the near or medium term. 74 00:04:34,279 --> 00:04:35,640 Speaker 1: Is it actually necessary? 75 00:04:36,200 --> 00:04:39,640 Speaker 5: It's a debate which has changed a lot in recent 76 00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:43,840 Speaker 5: years because of China's hegemonic activity in the South China Sea. 77 00:04:44,240 --> 00:04:47,360 Speaker 5: It's sort of buying off of Pacific island nations and 78 00:04:47,400 --> 00:04:50,680 Speaker 5: its general aggression in the region. Frankly, and then of 79 00:04:50,720 --> 00:04:53,240 Speaker 5: course you put on top of that the Ukraine War 80 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:58,200 Speaker 5: and the increasing alliance between Russia, China, Iran and North Korea. 81 00:04:58,279 --> 00:05:00,479 Speaker 5: And on top of all of that, you've got a 82 00:05:00,680 --> 00:05:05,480 Speaker 5: very uncertain US administration now with Donald Trump, where alliances 83 00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:08,520 Speaker 5: have become much more transactional. And so you put it 84 00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:11,640 Speaker 5: all together and there's a real argument now in a way, 85 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:14,520 Speaker 5: I think there wasn't five years ago to lift this 86 00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:18,160 Speaker 5: fence spending to a very high level, like three percent 87 00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:21,479 Speaker 5: of GDP. But I think really there has to be 88 00:05:21,520 --> 00:05:25,440 Speaker 5: a qualitative change in the debate about defense spending now 89 00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:28,120 Speaker 5: simply because of global events. And that is a view 90 00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:31,920 Speaker 5: shared by an enormous amount of very respective experts, from 91 00:05:32,279 --> 00:05:36,920 Speaker 5: Kim Beasley to Dennis Richardson to Peter Dean. Almost every 92 00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:40,520 Speaker 5: senior defense analyst thinks this is necessary. And you know 93 00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:42,440 Speaker 5: they're not making this stuff up, and there really are 94 00:05:42,600 --> 00:05:45,720 Speaker 5: genuine threats out there. But as you say, this requires 95 00:05:46,200 --> 00:05:50,760 Speaker 5: sacrifice on the part of governments to make choices that 96 00:05:50,839 --> 00:05:52,120 Speaker 5: will hurt other portfolios. 97 00:05:52,880 --> 00:05:56,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, Peter Dutton was quite vague on what defense capability is. 98 00:05:56,440 --> 00:05:58,279 Speaker 1: This twenty billion dollars will buy. 99 00:05:59,040 --> 00:06:01,440 Speaker 4: I don't think there's a government in our history that's 100 00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:05,360 Speaker 4: been elected outlining what contracts they'll sign in relation to defense. 101 00:06:05,440 --> 00:06:07,960 Speaker 4: The decisions about who we purchase from is not something 102 00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:09,320 Speaker 4: that we've made from our position. 103 00:06:10,080 --> 00:06:13,080 Speaker 1: And he hasn't provided any clarity on where that money 104 00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:16,040 Speaker 1: will come from. That's attracted criticism from the Prime Minister, 105 00:06:16,120 --> 00:06:20,000 Speaker 1: who says Labor has been transparent about defense and other costs. 106 00:06:21,360 --> 00:06:24,000 Speaker 1: Is this the kind of detailed voters should be hearing 107 00:06:24,160 --> 00:06:25,839 Speaker 1: ten days before they go to the polls? 108 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:28,480 Speaker 5: Well, I think certainly Peter Dutton should have released his 109 00:06:28,560 --> 00:06:31,720 Speaker 5: defense policy weeks if not months ago. Frankly, I mean 110 00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:35,680 Speaker 5: it's a defense policy that really marks the coalition has 111 00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:39,080 Speaker 5: been more serious about national security than the Abenese government, 112 00:06:39,160 --> 00:06:42,599 Speaker 5: so you think that would be a selling point, especially 113 00:06:42,640 --> 00:06:46,240 Speaker 5: the time when we've had Chinese navorships encircling Australia, We've 114 00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:51,720 Speaker 5: had questions about Rassia seeking access to Indonesian bases for warplanes. 115 00:06:51,800 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 5: We've had a lot of stuff happening in the national 116 00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:56,719 Speaker 5: security space, and I would have thought that this would 117 00:06:56,800 --> 00:06:59,560 Speaker 5: really help Dart until have put the policy out far earlier. 118 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:03,000 Speaker 5: Surprised that A it's been put out so late, but 119 00:07:03,160 --> 00:07:05,960 Speaker 5: b as you mentioned, he was very vague about the 120 00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:09,400 Speaker 5: costings on it, saying that non recurrent spending could be 121 00:07:09,520 --> 00:07:12,920 Speaker 5: used towards funding that increase in defense spending. But the 122 00:07:12,960 --> 00:07:15,600 Speaker 5: fact is that's not going to be nelly enough by itself, 123 00:07:15,640 --> 00:07:18,440 Speaker 5: because you certainly don't get to three percent of GDP 124 00:07:19,040 --> 00:07:22,640 Speaker 5: for defense without cutting other portfolios at some point. Now, 125 00:07:22,640 --> 00:07:25,520 Speaker 5: Peter Dutton, obviously political reasons, does not want to go 126 00:07:25,600 --> 00:07:27,800 Speaker 5: down that path. He doesn't want to be criticized for 127 00:07:27,880 --> 00:07:30,760 Speaker 5: cutting other programs just ahead of an election. But what 128 00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:33,960 Speaker 5: it meant in the end was it all sounded fairly vague. 129 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:38,280 Speaker 5: It almost sounded aspirational from the Coalition rather than something 130 00:07:38,320 --> 00:07:41,080 Speaker 5: that has been thought out carefully with dollars and cents. 131 00:07:41,120 --> 00:07:43,640 Speaker 5: And that is the political weakness for Dunden of the 132 00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:46,040 Speaker 5: way that he's put this program together and the way 133 00:07:46,040 --> 00:07:46,680 Speaker 5: he's sold it. 134 00:07:49,360 --> 00:07:51,640 Speaker 1: The campaign so far has been fought on cost of 135 00:07:51,680 --> 00:07:55,880 Speaker 1: living relief. Will this talk of defense capability and percentages 136 00:07:55,880 --> 00:07:59,000 Speaker 1: of GDP cut through for voters on May three camp? 137 00:07:59,440 --> 00:08:03,600 Speaker 5: Traditionally, the defense and foreign affairs and national security don't 138 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:06,760 Speaker 5: tip the scales in an election unless a major conflict 139 00:08:06,840 --> 00:08:09,760 Speaker 5: is actually been fought, and I don't think it will 140 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:12,200 Speaker 5: tip the scales in this situation, and not least because 141 00:08:12,240 --> 00:08:14,520 Speaker 5: the Coalition has put out the policy so late as well, 142 00:08:14,560 --> 00:08:17,000 Speaker 5: so it's not going to reverberate very much. Look, I 143 00:08:17,040 --> 00:08:19,920 Speaker 5: think in the end cost of living pressures will be 144 00:08:19,960 --> 00:08:22,680 Speaker 5: more influential with voters. But look, there will be at 145 00:08:22,680 --> 00:08:25,120 Speaker 5: the margins some benefit, I think to the coalition, because 146 00:08:25,160 --> 00:08:27,640 Speaker 5: I think there is a cohortive voters out there who 147 00:08:27,680 --> 00:08:30,320 Speaker 5: are uncomfortable with global events and the way that they've 148 00:08:30,320 --> 00:08:33,560 Speaker 5: turned around in recent times, and who are uncomfortable with 149 00:08:33,679 --> 00:08:37,439 Speaker 5: the clear lack of preparedness of the Australian Defense Force 150 00:08:37,679 --> 00:08:39,640 Speaker 5: and the fact that also a lot of light minded 151 00:08:39,679 --> 00:08:43,120 Speaker 5: countries around the world are actually increasing their defense spending 152 00:08:43,480 --> 00:08:46,720 Speaker 5: far faster than the Labor government has promised it will increase. 153 00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:49,520 Speaker 5: A whole bunch of countries in Europe are really lifting 154 00:08:49,559 --> 00:08:52,520 Speaker 5: their defense spending now. So Australia looks like a lagged 155 00:08:52,600 --> 00:08:55,280 Speaker 5: at the moment, and given global events, I think that's 156 00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:56,199 Speaker 5: a bad look. 157 00:08:59,480 --> 00:09:03,439 Speaker 1: Coming up. Why the aspiring Defense Minister was on the defensive. 158 00:09:03,559 --> 00:09:22,040 Speaker 1: On Wednesday. On Friday, Anzac Day, Australians will gather to 159 00:09:22,040 --> 00:09:25,440 Speaker 1: commemorate the lives lost during the First World War and 160 00:09:25,559 --> 00:09:28,679 Speaker 1: pay their respects to servicemen and women who've served in 161 00:09:28,760 --> 00:09:33,720 Speaker 1: other conflicts and peacekeeping missions. At the Defending Australia conference 162 00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:38,120 Speaker 1: in Adelaide last month, Shadow Defense Minister Andrew Hasty, himself 163 00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:41,920 Speaker 1: a former troop commander, invoked this spirit to explain how 164 00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:45,280 Speaker 1: the ADFS recruitment crisis might be solved. 165 00:09:45,920 --> 00:09:49,000 Speaker 6: We are having a recruiting crisis and we're slipping behind 166 00:09:49,040 --> 00:09:51,760 Speaker 6: each year that goes by. I think we need to 167 00:09:52,360 --> 00:09:57,959 Speaker 6: challenge this generation of Australians to service fairy old school 168 00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:01,800 Speaker 6: values of serving your country, defending your country, being part 169 00:10:01,800 --> 00:10:04,520 Speaker 6: of this great Anzac tradition which has been handed down 170 00:10:04,559 --> 00:10:05,880 Speaker 6: to it. So I think that's really important. 171 00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:11,280 Speaker 1: But in twenty eighteen, Andrew Hasty was singing a different song. 172 00:10:11,880 --> 00:10:15,400 Speaker 6: And my personal view is that the fighting DNA of 173 00:10:15,760 --> 00:10:20,200 Speaker 6: a close combat unit is best preserved when it's exclusively male. 174 00:10:20,280 --> 00:10:22,600 Speaker 6: Now that's not a popular view, but you ask my 175 00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:23,719 Speaker 6: personal view there it is. 176 00:10:24,760 --> 00:10:27,800 Speaker 1: On Wednesday, at the highly anticipated launch of the Liberal 177 00:10:27,840 --> 00:10:31,280 Speaker 1: Party's Defense policy, those comments came back to haunt the 178 00:10:31,320 --> 00:10:34,679 Speaker 1: aspiring Defense minister. Do you think women should serve in 179 00:10:34,720 --> 00:10:37,120 Speaker 1: combat roles in the ADF? Are you saying that women 180 00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:40,199 Speaker 1: have lower stands? Is that what you're saying is that right, 181 00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:42,120 Speaker 1: that women aren't strong enough to deal with that sort 182 00:10:42,120 --> 00:10:45,920 Speaker 1: of combat you described. Hasty has walked those comments back 183 00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:50,080 Speaker 1: somewhat to align with the Liberal Party's official position, but 184 00:10:50,200 --> 00:10:53,120 Speaker 1: he won't say if his personal views have changed. 185 00:10:54,000 --> 00:10:56,840 Speaker 6: Yeah, the coalition policy is that all combat roles are 186 00:10:56,880 --> 00:10:59,480 Speaker 6: open to women. It's been a long standing position. The 187 00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:01,600 Speaker 6: one thing that we will insist on his high standards 188 00:11:01,640 --> 00:11:04,800 Speaker 6: because in combat, there's no points for second place, so 189 00:11:04,840 --> 00:11:06,240 Speaker 6: we need to be able to win every fight that 190 00:11:06,280 --> 00:11:09,080 Speaker 6: we go into. That's why we'll uphold high standards. 191 00:11:09,120 --> 00:11:13,719 Speaker 1: Thank you, cam Andrew. Hasty has been noticeably absent from 192 00:11:13,720 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 1: the Coalition's election campaign so far, with some people speculating 193 00:11:18,040 --> 00:11:21,440 Speaker 1: that's because of these resurfaced comments about women in combat roles. 194 00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:25,080 Speaker 1: This question about personal views took up a decent chunk 195 00:11:25,120 --> 00:11:28,319 Speaker 1: of that long press conference, and he didn't exactly stick 196 00:11:28,360 --> 00:11:32,040 Speaker 1: the landing. Is that damaging for the coalition ten days 197 00:11:32,040 --> 00:11:34,720 Speaker 1: out from the election end at a time when Newspolt 198 00:11:34,840 --> 00:11:37,720 Speaker 1: data shows women voters are abandoning the opposition? 199 00:11:38,360 --> 00:11:40,800 Speaker 5: Look, it doesn't help. It was a fairly awkward press conference. 200 00:11:40,920 --> 00:11:43,320 Speaker 5: I thought. I'm not sure Hasty handled it in the 201 00:11:43,360 --> 00:11:47,440 Speaker 5: best possible way. He's been fairly straightforward about his changed 202 00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:50,520 Speaker 5: views on that and The bottom line with this, of course, 203 00:11:50,600 --> 00:11:55,079 Speaker 5: is that many women do serve in frontline combat roles already. 204 00:11:55,120 --> 00:11:59,120 Speaker 5: They're fighter pilots, they fly Air force hercules in war zones, 205 00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:04,199 Speaker 5: they press buttons that fire torpedoes on submarines and on warships. 206 00:12:04,520 --> 00:12:07,160 Speaker 5: You know, he's talking about hand to hand combat in units, 207 00:12:07,160 --> 00:12:11,120 Speaker 5: and that's always been a big debate within Defense Force itself. 208 00:12:11,520 --> 00:12:14,760 Speaker 5: But look, Hasty has said, look, this is very clear 209 00:12:14,760 --> 00:12:17,880 Speaker 5: in our women in frontline and combat roles is absolutely 210 00:12:17,880 --> 00:12:20,400 Speaker 5: what we support. So yes, it's a bit awkward for 211 00:12:20,480 --> 00:12:23,160 Speaker 5: him because he didn't say that seven years ago. But 212 00:12:23,320 --> 00:12:25,400 Speaker 5: I don't think it's a deal breaker for a lot 213 00:12:25,440 --> 00:12:28,280 Speaker 5: of people. I think he's clarified it to a reasonable extent. 214 00:12:28,280 --> 00:12:30,200 Speaker 5: But it certainly was an awkward moment for him. 215 00:12:30,880 --> 00:12:33,480 Speaker 1: Can beggars really be choosers when our Defense Force is 216 00:12:33,480 --> 00:12:36,240 Speaker 1: in the grips of a very real recruitment crisis. 217 00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:39,640 Speaker 5: This goes back to money. Really. It's always been a 218 00:12:39,640 --> 00:12:42,200 Speaker 5: cyclical problem in Australia because the moment you get a 219 00:12:42,200 --> 00:12:45,320 Speaker 5: mining boom, for example, all of the technical experts within 220 00:12:45,360 --> 00:12:48,160 Speaker 5: the ADF tend to run off to better paid mining jobs. 221 00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:52,319 Speaker 5: They've got to actually throw a lot of money at recruitment, 222 00:12:52,679 --> 00:12:54,480 Speaker 5: and that's simply something they're going to have to do 223 00:12:54,559 --> 00:12:57,720 Speaker 5: because not only is there a retention crisis right now, 224 00:12:57,800 --> 00:13:00,440 Speaker 5: but this is going to get way worse because they 225 00:13:00,520 --> 00:13:04,880 Speaker 5: need to recruit many thousands more to actually complete the 226 00:13:05,400 --> 00:13:10,599 Speaker 5: August nuclear submarine project of actually building nuclear submarines eventually 227 00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:13,640 Speaker 5: in Australia. I mean that is a massive national enterprise. 228 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:17,120 Speaker 5: It will require tons more people to join the force 229 00:13:17,200 --> 00:13:19,160 Speaker 5: and their miles of that at the moment. So unless 230 00:13:19,160 --> 00:13:21,360 Speaker 5: they throw a lot of money and a lot of 231 00:13:21,400 --> 00:13:27,120 Speaker 5: effort at everyone, men, women, anyone, especially technically skilled workers, 232 00:13:27,240 --> 00:13:28,560 Speaker 5: we are going to be in real trouble. 233 00:13:39,200 --> 00:13:43,320 Speaker 1: Cameron Stewart is The Australian's chief international correspondent. You can 234 00:13:43,360 --> 00:13:46,720 Speaker 1: read all our experts, reporting and analysis on defense anytime 235 00:13:46,760 --> 00:13:48,679 Speaker 1: at the Australian dot com dot au