WEBVTT - Sharri | 13 November

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News.

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Shari Good Evening. Calib Bond in for Shari tonight.

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Coming up on the program, Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek under

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 2>more pressure over her dodgy decision to hold a billion

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 2>dollar gold mine. Now one of the biggest labor affiliated

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 2>unions has spoken out. Gary Hartgrave and Darren Barnett will

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 2>join me to talk about that. Also on the show,

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 2>a teenager who attacked the office of a Jewish MP

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 2>won't be given a criminal record. Peter Wertheim from the

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Executive Council of Australian Jury will be on the show.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>And are you over the age of fifty and drive well,

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>you might be in a bit of trouble because a

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 2>new report is suggesting that you should be forced to

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>refresh your memory with some mandatory lessons. Car Expert founder

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Paul Marrick. We'll discuss that with me later now. Tanya Plibiseik,

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>of course, as I said before, pressure is mounting on her,

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 2>the Environment Minister, over her decision to stop the mcphillamy's

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>gold mine in New South Wales after the biggest union

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 2>in the country sorry condemned her reasoning. The Australian Workers' Union,

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 2>of course, inextricably linked to the Labor Party, has voted

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 2>to censium as Plibasik for blocking the billion dollar min

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and over concerns its tailing dam would be detrimental to

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Aboriginal heritage. The Daily Telegraph reported today that the AWU

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 2>members passed the motion at the union's national conference in

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Perth yesterday, accusing her of not providing any real evidence

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 2>to support her decision. The motion read quote the minister's

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>declaration relies on a little used provision that affords the

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.199
<v Speaker 2>Minister wide discretion to make a decision regarding an area

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 2>after receiving a report seeking to preserve that area from

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 2>injury or desecration. However, in issuing the declaration blocking the

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 2>mcphillamy's mind, the Minister failed to produce any evidence used

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 2>to justify their decision. This amounts to a lack of

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>transparency transparency sorry, and gives rise to uestions around rigor

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 2>and fairness in the decision making process. AWU New South

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Wales Secretary Tony Callanan also told The Daily Telegraph that

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>the decision to block the mcphillamy's mine without a shred

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 2>of evidence is an insult to the workers of Blaney

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>and every community that depends on mining. When six hundred

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 2>livelihoods are on the line, the least the government can

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 2>do is be transparent. AWU members and the entire mining

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 2>community deserve better than decisions made in the dark. The

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>AWU stands with the people of Blaney and demands a

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 2>fair process. The Minister should put all the evidence on

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>the table for all to see. The workers of Blaney

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:49.519
<v Speaker 2>deserve far better. The AWU won't stand by while six

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred jobs are lost because of political games played behind

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 2>closed doors. And that's the real point here. Was the

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 2>decision to block a billion dollar mine on the Bay

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 2>of Aboriginal Heritage, even though it wasn't opposed by the

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 2>local Aboriginal Land Council a decision based in fact and

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 2>what is best for the environment, or would it be

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 2>because it would best appeal to the voters of miss Pipersix,

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 2>inner city seat of Sydney. We know, as I just

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>said that the local Aboriginal Land Council, the body authorized

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to advise on matters of cultural heritage and the like,

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 2>was not opposed to the project. His former New South

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Wales Aboriginal Land Council Chairman Roy RC.

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Just for the record, PRIs the Orange Low Abage Land

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Council wasn't opposed to the mind exactly right.

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't opposed.

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 3>So what that says to me is that obviously they

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 3>were happy with the surveys, the side assessments, etc.

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Etc.

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:56.839
<v Speaker 3>So what's happened here is the Minister at the Commonwealth

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 3>level as listened to another group and that's very very concerning.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 2>We know that one of the indigenous people whose submission

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 2>helped inform Miss pliber SC's decision, artist Nai Reynolds, sent

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>in a series of her own paintings to explain why

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the mine should not be allowed to go ahead. We

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.799
<v Speaker 2>know that the artists who painted the blue Banded Bee

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Dreaming story mural that was used in Miss Plibertsex's evidence

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>to halt the mine was a member of the main

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>group that fought against the mine, and that the Orange

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Local Aboriginal Land Council had never previously heard of this story.

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Miss Plibersek, in her reasons, said she was satisfied that

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.799
<v Speaker 2>the proprietary and pecuniary impacts to the proponent and others

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 2>do not outweigh the irreversible damage and permanent loss to

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 2>the Aboriginal cultural heritage in the declared area, despite the

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 2>fact that supposed cultural heritage is disputed. She also said,

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 2>as I'm sure you know that the mining company Regis

0:04:58.040 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 2>should just find another way to do the project.

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 5>I haven't blocked a gold mine. I've said that the

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 5>tailing stam that's proposed for the Goal mine can't be

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 5>built on the headwaters and springs of the Belubula River.

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 5>My decision applies to sixteen percent of a two and

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 5>a half thousand hectare site, and I've made very clear

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 5>that if the company goes ahead and moves the tailing stam,

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 5>and they've said they've investigated thirty different design options for

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 5>the tailing stam, then the project can go ahead.

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 2>But Regis has now gone to the federal court to

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 2>have the decision overturned because it says the mine is

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 2>now unviable. MSS Blibisk still hasn't truly answered why this

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 2>decision was made. She hasn't given any real evidence. She

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 2>hasn't answered the competing stories between Aboriginal groups, or why

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 2>she took the word of artists over the local Aboriginal

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Land Council and now the biggest union in the country,

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Labor Aligned Union says that she is playing political games.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Is she the environment minister or the Minister for sandbagging

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 2>life votes against the Greens. Well, it's now been confirmed

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 2>that next year cigarettes will need to have a health warning,

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 2>not only printed on the packet with that lovely baby

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 2>pooh green color, but on the cigarettes themselves. By April,

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 2>every cigarette has to have a warning on it. This

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 2>is some of what you can expect.

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 6>Some examples of the messages that might be used or

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 6>that are open for public consultation are toxic addiction poisons

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 6>in every puff causes sixteen cancers, damages your lungs.

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Can we just take a moment to acknowledge just how

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:45.119
<v Speaker 2>stupid that is? Does anyone in government, in public health

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 2>anywhere believe this is actually going to stop anyone from smoking? Seriously,

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 2>if you've managed to get past the decades of public

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 2>health education, the anti smoking ads, the fact that cigarette

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>adds are banned, the brow beating from the health teachers

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 2>at school, the concern chats from friends and family, Oh,

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 2>I think you should give up? Have you tried giving up?

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 2>That's bad for you? You know? Of course, you know

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 2>there's the dirty looks from busybodies on the street, the

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 2>lecture every time you go to the doctor, the fact

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 2>that you have to huddle in some hidden corner somewhere

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 2>to smoke in public, and of course those graphic warnings

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 2>on the front of the packet. And somehow, if you've

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>managed to get past all of that, you open up

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the packet, you pull out a diarry, You see a

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 2>trite slogan written on the side of the filter, and

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 2>you go, that's it. I can't smoke. I've just realized

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 2>that it's bad for me. I mean, there are only

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>two reasons anyone is still smoking. They're either thoroughly addicted

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 2>and no matter how hard they try, they can't give

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 2>it up, or they thoroughly enjoy it, and no matter

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 2>how hard you try to make them give it up,

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 2>they won't. No one is sucked into smoking anymore, a

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 2>minority activity hated by most people. Writing that death is

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 2>near on the side of a cigarette isn't going to

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 2>turn the dial. Honestly, how can anyone with even half

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 2>a brain think that this is actually going to do

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 2>anything except perhaps drive even more people to the illegal

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>tobacco market, which is huge. It's about a third of

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>the entire tobacco market in Australia on current estimations. Now,

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>that's tax that the government misses out on on those cigarettes,

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 2>and its money, as I've talked about many times before,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 2>that ends up in the hands of organized crime gangs

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>that then use it for their grizzly activities including murder

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and sex trafficking, so on and so forth. Now, one

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 2>of the problems with this new health warning business is

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 2>that in order for it to be done, manufacturers have

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 2>to buy new equipment and they have to change their

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 2>practices to move in line with the new rules. These regulations,

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 2>by the way, were only sent out at the end

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 2>of life last month and they come in in April.

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 2>It's not all that long, it's less than six months,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and shops will be allowed to sell existing stock for

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 2>three months from April, but after that anything left over

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 2>will have to be pulped and any new stock will

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 2>have to have the warnings on them. Now, because of

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the tight time frames to get all this done, there's

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 2>concern from retailers that there will be a temporary supply

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 2>crunch on cigarettes, which would make people even more likely

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to seek out the illicit product. Yes, even though it

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>is illegal, you can buy it in pretty much any

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.599
<v Speaker 2>convenience store or tobagonists in the country. And if you

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 2>talk to the independent supermarkets and they have, they'll tell

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 2>you that they are losing money hand over fist on cigarettes,

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 2>not because fewer people are smoking, but because their customers

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 2>are going to illegal shops down the road. And would

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 2>you believe it, the people who would normally go into

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 2>a supermarket and buy cigarettes also buy other things in small,

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 2>local independent supermarkets, losing revenue that they could spend on

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 2>employing local people. So did the Health Department take into

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 2>account the illegal market when they made their decision?

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I suppose that whether rubber hits the rona

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 7>raises before in this committee, is every smoker I know

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 7>these days buys what's colloquly known as chop chop, not

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 7>necessarily chopped up, but just buy illegal tobacco. Presumably this

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 7>is going to play into that market's hands, mayn't it.

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 7>I mean, has there been an analysis of that that

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 7>if wholesom manufacturers can't make these legal obligations, the market

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 7>will just get filled with illegal tobacco. Has that risk

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 7>been considered?

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 4>Senator? I think Australia has one of the strongest records

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 4>in tobacco control in the world, which I think we're

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 4>rightly proud of.

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 7>But that doesn't answer my question with all respect, because

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 7>I'm sure I totally agree with that, but everybody would

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 7>agree with that.

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 2>No answer there, so Matt Canavan tried again.

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 7>Question is whether or not the Department, as part of

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 7>good policy making practices, has analyzed the risk of these obligations,

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 7>especially the accelerated time frame to introduce these regulations, could

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 7>have an impact on encouraging more tobacco.

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Senator, So, I think the role of the Department in

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 4>terms of the Health portfolio is to continue the best

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 4>measures possible to avoid people taking up smoking, whether that

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 4>is legal or illegal tobacco. The best measure against people

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 4>is dissuading them from smoking in the first place, which

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 4>has been the focus of this legend.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 7>Can you answer my question with all respect not just.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 4>It's not Health's job to do that. I mean it's not.

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 7>Health job to evaluate the risks health comes.

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Finance Minister Katie Gallahers says it's not a matter for

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the Health Department. They wonder that they come up with

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 2>such hair brained ideas. Now you can take this to

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 2>the bank. This will do nothing to stop people from smoking.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 2>It's all about health. Well, what about the health of

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 2>people that he's threatened every day by organized crime gangs which,

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 2>thanks to the ridiculous price of cigarettes caused by the

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 2>federal government's extortion at taxes, now has a lucrative market

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 2>in illicit tobacco. How stupid do they think? We are

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>down in Victoria where more than one hundred tobacconists have

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 2>been firebombed thanks to gangs fighting over control of the

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 2>illicit tobacco market. The Allen government is now planning to

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 2>introduce the strictest tobacco licensing laws in the country to

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 2>try to shut down illegal sellers. But this shouldn't be

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the state's problem. This is a mess created by the

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>federal government through extortion at tax and they ought to

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 2>be the ones to clean it up. Lots to get

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 2>through tonight, Let's jump straight into my panel, Sky and

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>News contributor Gary Hardgrave and form of Press Secretary to

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Julia Gillard, Darren Barnett. First, let's talk about the news

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 2>from the AWE today. They've had to go at Tanya

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Plibastique over the decision over the mcphillamy's gold mine. Gary.

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, the longer this goes on, the dodgy it

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 2>seems to be Tanua. Pipistick still has not answered why

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 2>there are discrepancies between the advice she took from one

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 2>Aboriginal group and the advice that comes from the actual

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 2>local Aboriginal Land council. Why can't she simply tell us

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 2>what's going on.

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 8>Because she has no idea what she's doing. This woman

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 8>is a walking, talking sovereign risk to Australia. She is

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 8>the member for Sydney. She lives in an isolated view

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 8>of the world, she thinks, and she's keeping the Greens

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 8>at bay in her electorate. There's coverning her seat, so

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 8>to speak. She thinks she knows best. She's morally and

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 8>intellectually superior to anybody who actually wants to do something

0:13:55.760 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 8>practical like well, create jobs, create mining job. She did

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 8>the same thing to a marvelous proposal to deal with

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 8>a Jetty landing area and turn it into a marvelous

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 8>housing development in the eastern Bayside areas around Brisbane. In Cleveland,

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:19.239
<v Speaker 8>she killed off eleven billion dollars worth of likely economic

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 8>activity in that area alone. It was going to create

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 8>many thousands of jobs and homes for hundreds, if not

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 8>more people. I mean, this woman really doesn't get it.

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 8>She doesn't understand and I think she's second only to

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 8>Chris Bowen when it comes to a genuine risk to

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 8>economic viability. That's a big statement. And it all comes

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 8>back to the bloke who appointed her, the bloke and

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 8>the seat next door and the other inner city seat

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 8>in Sydney, in Gradlar. I mean, this is a government

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 8>that doesn't know real Australia at all, presumes it does,

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 8>cherry picks the advice they want to suit the narrative

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 8>in their own area. It's a real peril and she's

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 8>got to go, and I hope the Greens will knock

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 8>her off and put her out of a misery.

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Frankly, well, I'll declare that I live in Graindler and

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I will personally say that I don't live in real Australia.

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I've seen some of my neighbors, but Darren, obviously the

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 2>AWU is aligned to a different faction to Tania plibisk.

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 2>But how worried should she be about the union movement

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 2>getting involved in this fight?

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 9>It is actually a pretty significant step, Okaylie, I agree

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 9>with that. And therefore, whether it's through national conference or

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 9>whether it's through the soft pressure that comes via the

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 9>union movement into the Labor Party, you don't want affiliated

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 9>unions being opposed to decisions that are made by government.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 9>But a couple of things to unpack. Firstly, the Greens

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 9>won't win Tanya's seat while she's there, and I don't

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 9>think the decision is based on any particular view towards

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 9>assuaging the voters of her electorate. I think what you'll find, Gary,

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 9>I hope you agree with me. The EPBA came in

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 9>early two thousands seek Robert Hill was Environment Minister and

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 9>I've never heard an environment minister since who loves that act.

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 9>It's a difficult act to administer. It's a very opaque document.

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 9>It's a complicated set of rules and criteria, and I

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 9>think that's part of the reason why Labour's trying to

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 9>bring in a national EPA and some other new rules.

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 9>So I think you can criticize a lot of decisions

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 9>under the EPBC. Maybe Tanny's got it right, maybe she's

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 9>got it wrong, and we will see when that pressure

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 9>comes to her head. Whether the decision remains or whether

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 9>her argument that sixteen percent of the land in question

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 9>is what she is trying to protect. Maybe that prevails,

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 9>we will see she will lose some skin, but I

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 9>spect she'll dig down on her decision and unless there's

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 9>new evidence, we're not going to see a change.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 2>And that's a bit it will play out in the courts,

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 2>of course. Now there's another ordinary poll result for the

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Albanezi government that the latest sec Ugate of the Nation

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 2>survey found that the coalition has overtaken labor on cost

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 2>of living management for the first time since the election,

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and seventy two percent of voters also said that cost

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of living was their top issue, which is no great surprise,

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 2>but Garia, I think it proves people are losing confidence

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 2>in the ability of the federal government to actually deliver

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 2>any kind of financial benefit to them.

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 8>A part of the problem is government is infering in

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 8>everybody's lives in every possible way these days, and what

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 8>people really want is for government to get out of

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 8>their lives. You know, we can trust private citizens to

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 8>work out what's best for them. We actually don't need

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 8>to be losing enormous amounts of the wages that our

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 8>bosses pay in the form of compulsory superannuation. We should

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.479
<v Speaker 8>be allowing people to actually make use of their money

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 8>now today to deal with the problems they have today,

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 8>to invest into the future. And that means for younger Australians,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 8>let them access their super and let them actually get

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 8>that super in place to buy a house and once

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 8>that house, if they sell it at a later stage,

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 8>they can repay their super account at a later point.

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 8>I mean, why is it that government wants to control

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 8>all of our actions and I think the cost of

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 8>living thing. Every time they put pressure on supermarkets and

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 8>say we're going to crack down on supermarket pricing, the

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 8>first person in the supply chain, the farmers or the

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 8>producers of that item, they're the ones they're going to

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 8>suffer the most. So again, I think people are able

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 8>to work this thing out like what they've done in America,

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 8>where they've gone against woke and stood for the workers.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 8>And that's where I think a lot of people's heads

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 8>are at right now. I think there's a big wave

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 8>coming and that's going to swamp this government because it's

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 8>lost its way. It's just simply lost its way.

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the Prime Minister should be worried, Darren,

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 2>because if you look at our western allies, the US,

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 2>the UK leaders that have presided over cost of living

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 2>crises have been booted and the one bit of relief

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 2>that Albo would be hoping for, which is of course,

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 2>is an interest rate cut, may will not happen by

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the time he goes to a federal election. I think

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 2>this is actually starting to be the biggest thorn in

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>his side.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 9>Look, the numbers are not the trend is not his friend.

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 9>I think it's fair to say. And the numbers it's

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 9>still close thirty to twenty nine percent, but equally that

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 9>margin was much greater as little as a few months ago.

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 9>So there is work to do for the Albanesi government,

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 9>that's for sure. And I think that rate cut is

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 9>an important part of their re election strategy, that that's

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 9>what they're waiting for before they pulled the trigger for

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 9>an election. I look through that poll. They do say

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 9>that sixty six percent of voters or two thirds of voters,

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 9>that it would not impact their vote if there was

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 9>a rate cut. I'm not sure about that. I think

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 9>if people thought we had turned the corner economically, the

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 9>support would be much stronger. So it's to me it's

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 9>very much a question of when will we get a

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 9>rate cut and will it be in time ahead of

0:19:58.040 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 9>the election.

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 2>They'll certainly be begging for a rape cut. And I

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 2>mean I said more than a year ago that if

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 2>you had a rape cut there would be an early election.

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Now I don't know that we're actually going to get

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 2>her an early election, but you know, I would have

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 2>thought that was the easiest thing to do very quickly

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 2>before we go. I don't know whether you saw this

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 2>story today. I couldn't get over it. Some people need

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 2>to get it through their heads. I think that Donald

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Trump is actually the president the majority of American voters

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 2>just chose. I mean, you think putting a Maga hat

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 2>on would be pretty safe thing to do now, Not

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 2>for singer a Hailey Mary. She's an Australian singer, lead

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 2>singer of the Jezebels. They had a bit of success.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>She put a photo up online of herself in a

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 2>Maga hat in a post opposing the Misinformation Bill, and

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 2>she's now effectively been canceled. She told The Herald's son

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 2>that the fallout was everything you could imagine. I probably

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 2>no longer have a music career in the way that

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I knew it. I've lost some friends, though I hope

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 2>that's temporary. I've lost some of the infrastructure of my business, publicity,

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 2>band members, room members, a show, my album launch revenue,

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 2>and quite a few followers. You know, Gary, this wouldn't

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>happen if you put on a Waltz Harris hat. Apart

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 2>from looking like a loser, you wouldn't get this kind

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 2>of response.

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 8>I got three Make America Great hats at home, and

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 8>I was thinking about wearing them out, but I've been

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 8>warned that maybe I might not get good service or

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 8>someone wants to shout me at coffee. And by the way,

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 8>I think that Donald Trump will be a revelation that

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 8>will reshape the world for good. And I'm really excited

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 8>about what's to come. The announcements he's made today. The

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 8>way people are dissing Pete Hexseth as the new Defense

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 8>Secretary's got me where this bloke actually cares about veterans,

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 8>loves his country. I think he's a fantastic, from the

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 8>troops up kind of Defense secretary, and he's not part

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 8>of the Washington swamp. We need people like that in Australia,

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.239
<v Speaker 8>and somebody said to me before we see today, the

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 8>only person they can think of that would stare down

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 8>wasting government like Elon Musk has challenged to do and

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 8>Ramaswami would be Gina Reinhart. You think Peter Dunn't got

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 8>offer the gig? I don't think so.

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Gary Darren, thank you so much for your time. All right,

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 2>let's move on, shall we? Cop twenty nine? The big

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 2>climate conflab in Azerbaijan seems to be going well because

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 2>China has demanded that developed countries, including Australia, cough up

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 2>one point eight trillion dollars a year to help out

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 2>developing nations with climate change. And the best bit, China

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have to contribute a cent because it is still

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 2>considered a developing country. So we and the UK and

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the US, et cetera, would have to pay China, one

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest economies in the world, to fix the

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>global temperature NPMP and former Speaker Andrew Wallace joins me,

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Now you know I actually have to kind of hand

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 2>it to jijingping here with this idea that we would

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 2>be giving money to them. I'm sorry, I think we've

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 2>just lost Andrew there, We'll go to a quick break

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 2>and come back. Don't go away. My apologies for that

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 2>brief interruption. It would see Andrew Wallace has lost power.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I believe he's on the phone to Blackout Bowen right now,

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 2>trying to sort that out so we can get him

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 2>back later. Now it sounds like racing cars might be

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 2>saved for a little while longer. Willowbank Raceway near Brisbane

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 2>has banned electric vehicles from the track because it says

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 2>they're too dangerous to compete.

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 2>This has happened at racetracks in the US and the

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 2>UK too. Willowbank Raceway said one of the big problems

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 2>with evs was that batteries released toxic and flammable gas

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 2>after a collision, and there was no guarantee that a

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 2>car could be completely off after a crash, so the

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 2>chassis could essentially be electrified and kill medics if they

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 2>were trying to pull a driver from a car. To

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 2>discuss this further, I'm joined by the founder of car

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 2>expert dot com, Paul Marrick. Paul lad to see it happening,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 2>because I mean, hell, imagine going along to a racetrack

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 2>and watching an electric vehicle go down a drag strip

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 2>or something. I don't think it would have quite the

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 2>same effect, but it does raise questions that should then

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 2>be applied to the road, I think. I mean, if

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 2>they're concerned that on a racetrack they can't ensure that

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 2>the car is not live after a crash and that

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>it could potentially harm or electrocute first responders, that would

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>presumably be the same on the road too. Yeah.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, And what we're seeing as well is a lot

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 10>of apartments, apartment building owners and body corporates are actually

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 10>banning the installation of electric vehicle charges. A lot of

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 10>this has stemmed as well from e scooters and other

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 10>sort of lithium powered devices catching fire and hurting people.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 10>And it's the same story here at racetracks. They just

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 10>don't know how to deal with these things, and as

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 10>a result of that, insurance costs are going through the

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 10>roof and it's forcing a lot of these racetracks a

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 10>just banned electric vehicles entiring.

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I can't imagine how you could potentially have electric race cars.

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know they go fast, but surely a

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 2>large part of what attracts people to a racetrack and

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 2>to cars in general is the noise that they make.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I know they'll say I will put a computer in

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>it that makes a noise through a speaker or something,

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 2>But to me, it's just not the same. It can't

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>be the same. People wouldn't want to watch I wouldn't

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 2>think electric cars going silently around Bathurst, would they? Yeah?

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 10>Look, I mean it'd be a safe environment for babies,

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 10>you'd be able to sleep, not not having to worry

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 10>too much about that, But definitely for petrol head you've

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 10>got to have noise. I mean, it is just not

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 10>the same to have these things as quiet as they are.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 10>There was actually a video released yesterday on the Internet

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 10>of Geomi, which is a smartphone manufacturer that's now got

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 10>into making cars. One of their cars had a major

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 10>break failure on a racetrack and had this catastrophic crash.

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 10>And to me, it's just one of these things that

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 10>just baffles logic. If you can't hear it, it's not exciting.

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 10>It should be putting yourself at risk.

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure the great Paul Murray, who is back in

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the Man Cave tonight, by the way, would have some

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 2>thoughts about that. Some other driving news, a controversial reporter

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 2>suggested that Australians aged over fifty should be subjected to

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 2>mandatory driving lessons. This is a study from the University

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of New South Wales in Sydney. It suggests that drivers

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 2>with or without clean driving records should be re examined

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>in order to make the road safer in Australia and

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 2>make sure that their skills are still up to scratch

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 2>or what do you think of that for an idea.

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 10>Look, I know it's going to be a little cheap

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 10>coming from me who's just under fifty, but to me,

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 10>it's just like a pilot. If you told me that

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 10>the pilot at the front of the plane last died

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 10>his pilot's test fifteen twenty thirty years ago, I go,

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 10>I don't think I want to be on this plane.

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 10>And I think for all drivers, let alone people over fifty,

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 10>you really should be getting reassessed more regularly because it

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:00.439
<v Speaker 10>is one of these things. Road rules change constantly, and

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 10>you want to be on top of it. You want

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 10>to know what's going on. And I think it's only

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 10>fair that we are having more and more regular testing,

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 10>especially for older Australians who may have first got their

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 10>licenses decades ago.

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree. I don't think it particularly matters about

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 2>age either. To be perfectly honest, if it was a

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 2>rule that you had to have another assessment every ten

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 2>years when you renew your license or something, I think

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 2>that would be perfectly reasonable, because you know, you do

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 2>tend to get stuck in your habits and forget a

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 2>few rules and whatever, and surely you want everyone to

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 2>be as safe as possible on the road. Paul, thank

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 2>you for coming on the program. Now back to where

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 2>I was before we had the power outage, COP twenty nine.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 2>The big climate conflict going on in Azerbaijan is going well,

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 2>apparently because China has demanded that developed countries, including Australia,

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 2>cough up one point eight trillion dollars a year to

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 2>help out developing nations with climate change. And of course

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 2>China wouldn't have to contribute a cent because it's still

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 2>considered a quote unquote developing country, So we, the UK,

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>the US, et cetera, would have to pay China, one

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest economies in the world, to apparently fix

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the global temperature LNPMP, and former Speaker Andrew Wallace joins me,

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Now you've made it out of the power outage.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Mate, I have chailed that was very wild and will

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we here, I got to tell you that much.

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Good. Now, I've actually got to give Jijiping a little

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 2>bit of credit here because I think he's just gently

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 2>needling the Western world about the way that they are

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 2>carrying on about climate change, saying, you know, why don't

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 2>you put your money where your mouth is. You've got

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 2>to pay us, you know, one of the biggest emitters

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 2>in the world if you want climate change to be fixed.

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 2>In a funny way, I think it actually shows up

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 2>how ridiculous a lot of the response to climate change

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 2>at a governmental level is.

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, Lookail, this is a country that is classifying as developing,

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 11>and yet it has a hundred satellites.

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have many satellites Australia owns and operates. Go on,

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you none. None. None.

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 11>So we've got a developing country that's so called developing

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 11>country China, that has a very very mature space industry,

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 11>and Australia is regarded as a developed country, and yet

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 11>the federal government continues to rip funding out of the

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 11>space program in Australia such that we have zero zero satellites, So.

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>You tell me.

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 11>Can anyone explain to me why we are still having

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 11>to consider China as developing Australia as developed and we

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 11>are having the.

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Fund and prop up.

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 11>It just makes no seeds, Absolutely, it makes no sense.

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 2>That's ridiculous. So you may as well call it a

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 2>coal rebate because of coause we sell our coal to

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>China because we can't burn it here that it'd be

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 2>bad for the world. But it's okay if China burns

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 2>it so they can give us the money for the

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 2>coal and then we can give it back to them

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 2>in some sort of climate subsidy. Great idea. Now, labor

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 2>social media legislation. It's probably one of the only bills

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 2>that will be passed between now and Christmas. The opposition

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 2>has a course back to ban for under sixteens, and

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 2>on the face of it, you know, I'd have to

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 2>say it's hard to oppose. Who isn't sympathetic to the

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 2>idea that kids shouldn't be on social media. We know

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.479
<v Speaker 2>the harms, but I feel like this has been rushed.

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 2>There's no clear idea of how it will work. The

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 2>planned trial hasn't even happened yet. You've got serious concerns

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 2>that have emerged out of Senate estimates about how verification

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>systems would work. I think we're all sympathetic to the idea.

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm just not sure the government has gone about it

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the right way.

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 11>Well, Caleb, I don't think the government has gone about

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 11>it the right way.

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>On that, I agree.

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 11>With you, But I am a big supporter of increasing

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 11>the age to sixteen.

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I was.

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 11>Pushing for this from as early as twenty twenty one,

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 11>so I've been working in this space for a long time.

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really important that people understand the dangers

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and perils that we're seeing.

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 11>On social media now, particularly for young people under.

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>The age of sixteen.

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 11>Young people just simply don't have the maturity to be

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 11>able to be dealing with the sort of pressures that

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 11>they are that's being brought to bear on them. We

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 11>saw the Primary School Principles coming out today supporting the

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 11>increase in age to sixteen. But the reality, Caleb, is

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 11>that the Prime Minister has been dragged, kicking and screaming

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 11>on this. Twelve months ago, Peter Dutton and David Polman

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 11>moved a Private members bill calling for an age verification

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 11>trial and the Prime Minister rejected that, Labor rejected that.

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 11>Now six months ago, Peter again, Peter Dutton again tried

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 11>to push through a bill which would see and in

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 11>fact Peter Dutton committed in his first one hundred days

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 11>to ensuring that age sixteen for social media.

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Now I've just finished, or just about to wrap up

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of months, a social media requiry.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 11>I've listened to the testimony of parents talking about some

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 11>of their kids who have taken their own lives because

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 11>of this bullying.

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>And we're talking about very, very young children.

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 11>You know, the way the Privacy Act in the US

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 11>is worded is that and that's the only reason why

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 11>these platforms is US platforms have an age of thirteen.

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Is the US Privacy Act sets that age.

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 11>But we know that in Australia and across the world,

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 11>many parents are basically assisting their kids to fraudulently get

0:32:54.800 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 11>access to social media in much younger than thirteen. And

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 11>it was really heartening to see these principles of the

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 11>private primary school principles coming out and supporting this lifting

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 11>the age to sixteen. But it's only because the parents

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 11>and news corps and the opposition put up such a

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 11>state that the Prime Minister finally relented. He has been

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 11>utterly weak on this. He's been dragged, kicking and screaming,

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 11>but they haven't.

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Put a lot of thought into it. But ultimately it.

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 11>Will be the platforms that will have to be satisfied

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 11>that someone is sixteen. What we're really concerned about in

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 11>the opposition is these exemptions that Michelle Roland is now

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 11>talking about. We don't think these exemptions should apply. We

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 11>don't think that the social media platforms have demonstrated any

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 11>social license whatsoever. They've really demonstrated that the kids are

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 11>nothing more than an opportunity to raise money for them.

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Andrew, I'm sorry we've got to move on, but to

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 2>good luck those storms up there. I hope you don't

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 2>get blown away. Let's bring in now Peter Wertheim, the

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 2>co CEO of the Executive Council of Australian Jury. Now

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 2>you're arguing this watered down hate speech bill from the

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 2>federal government, which of course was a long time coming,

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 2>doesn't go far enough. You say that the wording of

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the proposed legislation doesn't include enough forms of hate speech.

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Explain what is your issue with the current state of

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the legislation.

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 12>Well, I take myardstick or starting point with some of

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 12>the events that have occurred in recent times. Cast your

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.720
<v Speaker 12>mind back to last year October the ninth, twenty twenty

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 12>twenty three, when we had a major demonstration at the

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 12>fore court of the Opera House. The rhetoric was violent,

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 12>the behavior was menacing and intimidating. In keeping with that rhetoric,

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 12>I would have thought that, judging by the reaction to it,

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 12>including on Sky News which did a big exposie of

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 12>that whole incident, people would have expected that that kind

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 12>of conduct would already be against the law and should

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 12>have been prosecuted. And yet there was no prosecution. There

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 12>was no legal action taken in relation to it at all.

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 12>So I guess our starting point has to be do

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 12>we believe that behavior in that category should be prosecutable?

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 12>And if the answer is yes, then we have to

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 12>gauge any potential legislation against that sort of behavior and

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 12>see whether it would be prosecutable under that legislation. And

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 12>the current bill does not have a provision in there

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 12>which would enable a prosecution of that sort of behavior

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 12>to occur.

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 2>So at the moment, the bill is basically suggesting that

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 2>any that is a direct incitement to violence you are

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 2>suggesting someone should do something would be considered hate speech,

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:12.280
<v Speaker 2>but perhaps a more indirect version of incitement to violence

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 2>would not be included. Is that correct?

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 12>I think that's the way it's advertised, But difficultly with

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 12>a sort of legislation Caleb, is that it's not always

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 12>as advertised. The use of the word incitement has a

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 12>particular meaning in common parlance. Most people would have thought

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:36.760
<v Speaker 12>that the behavior we saw at the opera House Forecourt

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 12>would have fallen within the meaning of incitement, and yet

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 12>the legal meaning is much narrower and much more constricted.

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 12>It's quite technical. I can get into the weeds of

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 12>it if you like, but it doesn't necessarily correlate to

0:36:56.160 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 12>the way most people use the word incitement in common parlance.

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 12>And so for that reason, when you use the word

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 12>incitement as the test for whether it's incitement to violence

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 12>or even incitement to hatred in the criminal context, where

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 12>you have to prove intention to incite beyond reasonable doubt,

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 12>you're setting a very high bar, and a bar which

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 12>most prosecutors find impossible to overcome. And that's the reason

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 12>why the sorts of behaviors that we've been discussing have

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 12>gone unpunished.

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Somehow, I suspect this might go the same way as

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 2>the religious discrimination bill. No one seems to be happy

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 2>with it. Peter, thank you so much for your time.

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Coming up after the break, Elon Musk has scored a

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 2>huge gig in the Trump administration. What this means for

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 2>the United States and Australia with former Defense intelligence analyst

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Paul Munt later, but first, the boat smuggling debarcle is

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 2>about to rear its ugly head again after another load

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 2>of foreign and has found their way onto our shores.

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.919
<v Speaker 2>My political panel Daniel Molino and Keith Pitt join me next.

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Plenty more headlines to get across. Joining me in that

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 2>endeavor Labor MP Daniel Molino and Nationals MP Keith Pitt.

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 2>Now four foreign nationals washed ashore on Croker Island, which

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:22.800
<v Speaker 2>is northeast of Darwin on Sunday night. The Northern Land

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Council confirmed this yesterday. They said the men were found

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 2>by some local Aboriginal people. We don't know where they

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 2>came from, only that they are no longer in Australia. Daniel,

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 2>does this not just prove that our efforts to stop

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 2>boats coming ashore simply isn't working.

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 13>Well, thanks for having me on, Caleb, No, it doesn't

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 13>show that. The first thing I'd say is that the

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 13>current government, as with the previous government, doesn't confirm or

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:54.879
<v Speaker 13>comment on the details of operational matters, and that's been

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 13>our stance for a long time. The second thing is

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 13>that even under the previous government, which had the Operation

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 13>Sovereign Boarder's Framework, which has continued, voter rivals occurred. For example,

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 13>there was one in twenty eighteen in Danetree, so voter

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 13>rivals occurred under the previous government. Also, the main point

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 13>is that the policy framework has continued across and there

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 13>is no way under the current framework that people arriving

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 13>in Australia in that manner will be able to stay.

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 13>And that's something which continues under this government and that's

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 13>why this arrangement will continue to work.

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Keith.

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 14>Your response to that, well, for those playing long at home,

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 14>if you're counting Hanny illegal arrivals, there are. In terms

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 14>of boats, you've run out of fingers and toes. It's

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 14>twenty three and before the last election we had the

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 14>albans as anything alban Easi's leader. The opposition say that

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 14>nothing would change, there won't be any difference, it will

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 14>all be the same. And yet we've seen that this

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 14>has been switched on again by people smugglers. You can't

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:59.439
<v Speaker 14>get away from facts twenty three illegal arrivals in terms

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 14>of votes and in terms of ones when they get

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 14>here all Unfortunately, when it was minus the Giles, they

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 14>get let out. This is an ongoing problem. We know

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:09.879
<v Speaker 14>what happened last time. No one wants to see death

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 14>at sea. And yet in terms of funding and everything

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 14>else that's needed to make border force successful, we see

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 14>money pouring into things like as you said earlier, China,

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 14>they wanted trillion dollars now for climate and don't forget

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 14>that this government signed up to that. They've signed up

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 14>to it expecting it to be in the billions and

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 14>now it's in the trillions.

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I think at the very least we should give a

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 2>big hooray to with the indigenous people up north. I

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:36.839
<v Speaker 2>think this is at least the second occasion where they've

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 2>been the waist to find out that these people have

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 2>come ashore. Now, in other news, the Albanezy government has

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 2>set up a National Productivity Fund, which means the states

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 2>and territories will have to compete for money for plans

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 2>to boost productivity growth. Nine hundred million dollars is up

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 2>for grabs for things like planning and zoning reform. Here's

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the treasure of Jim Charmers.

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 15>We're not seeking productivity growth at the cost of higher

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 15>unemployment or by insisting Australians work longer for less. We're

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:10.399
<v Speaker 15>trying to apply a new thinking to the challenge by

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 15>broadening our ambitions beyond the tired old slogans on debates

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 15>central to industrial relations.

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Daniel, one of the biggest problems we're facing as a

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 2>country right now is slow productivity growth. A lot of

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 2>what you see in terms of employment increasing employment is

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 2>in the care sector, which happens to be largely funded

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 2>by the federal government through the Ndis Is this nine

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.240
<v Speaker 2>hundred million dollars actually going to change anything?

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 13>So the first thing I'd say is that look, productivity

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 13>growth has become harder right around the world in advanced economies.

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:50.320
<v Speaker 13>And I think there's a Martin Wolf article in the

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 13>Financial Times today which goes to the heart of this,

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 13>which is the productivity growth in the services sector is

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 13>harder to achieve than in manufacturing and agriculture, and that's

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 13>something we've seen over decades, so it's not a surprise

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 13>that that's something we're seeing here. The second point is

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 13>I think these payments could make a huge difference and

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 13>they're really worth exploring. When you go back to the

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 13>Fred Hillmer reforms in the nineteen eighties and nineteen nineties,

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 13>when you look at the report that Ian harbohanded down

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 13>to the previous government on competition, incentive payments to the

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:23.280
<v Speaker 13>states were central.

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>To both of those approaches.

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 13>This is something which I think we can probably get

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 13>bipartisan support on. It's important for two reasons. Firstly, it

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 13>incentivizes states, and secondly, it recognizes the fact that a

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 13>lot of the hard lifting in terms of policy change

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 13>that's required is going to have to be undertaken by

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 13>state governments. And yet a lot of the increases in

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 13>revenue through income tax and corporate tax will go to

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 13>the Commonwealth government. So it's only fair that the Komonwealth

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 13>government should pass on some of that benefit. So I

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 13>think this is very sensible and I think it will

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 13>help well if.

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 2>We want to have that discussion about money going to

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 2>the Commonwealth government. We could always go back to the

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 2>pre war set up where the state had control of

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:04.399
<v Speaker 2>income tax. For that to discussion for another day. But Keith,

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't quite understand why we the taxpayer need to

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:12.240
<v Speaker 2>pay the states to reform things like their planning systems.

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Shouldn't they just be doing that anyway.

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 14>Well, no matter what the question is, Labour's answer is

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 14>always spend more taxpayers money. And I can tell you

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 14>where productivity can be improved, and that is in policy

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:28.319
<v Speaker 14>settings from the cabinet of the Australian government. You don't

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 14>need to spend enormous amounts of money to fix this.

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.320
<v Speaker 14>You need to stop doing things like sending our industrial

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 14>relations programs back to the nineteen seventies. We've got interest

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 14>rates which have had twelve increases, We've got electricity and

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 14>gas costs out of control. It makes people uncompetitive. The

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 14>fundamentals of business don't change. For them to be successful,

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 14>they have to be competitive internationally if they're looking to export.

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 14>And we have a government that is hell bent on

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 14>giving the unions everything that they want, spending more taxpayer money,

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 14>which is driving up inflation. And the RBA and themselves

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 14>have said this is an issue and yet here we

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 14>go as another nine hundred million for the states who

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 14>have thought it.

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Now, the PM doesn't seem to think it's worth catching

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 2>up with Donald Trump before he becomes the US president again.

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Albaneze hask not back the suggestion from the opposition that

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 2>he had to stop in Florida to see Trump on

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 2>his way to the APEC leaders meetings in Rio de

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Janeiro this week. Daniel ort he, you know, I know

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 2>he's had a phone call, but aught he actually have

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 2>a face to face discussion. I don't think there'd be

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 2>any harm in it, would there.

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 13>Well, look, I think it's interesting that some of the

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 13>people calling for this have also been the same people

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 13>who roundly criticized the PM for traveling too much. So

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 13>there's a bit of interest there that brazenly self promoting here.

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:43.239
<v Speaker 13>I'm just in the process of finishing up a book

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 13>on PM president relations back to Federation, and I've actually

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 13>interviewed all former pms on their relations with presidents, including

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 13>Turnbull and Morrison's relations.

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 2>We've got too much farming heads and my.

0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 13>Lessons from that are that I think the way to

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 13>succeed with Trump is going to be firstly to show

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:03.399
<v Speaker 13>him on each of the issues that comes up. What's

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 13>in it for the US, secondly to be straightforward and

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 13>thirdly to build trust. And so I think that's the

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 13>approach we need to take as issues come up. I

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 13>think we need to approach it in that way, and

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:16.280
<v Speaker 13>I think we'll do very well. He's very open minded

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 13>to dealing with Australia in a positive way.

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I believe, gents, we're only got ten seconds before the break, Keith.

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Should he meet.

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:26.280
<v Speaker 14>Him well as soon as possible.

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 2>We're supportive.

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 14>The best thing Kevin Rudd could do is reach out

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:30.759
<v Speaker 14>to Jenna Reinhart make a special.

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:33.959
<v Speaker 2>Enjoying gents, thank you so much for your time. After

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the break, Donald Trump, we're just talking about him. His

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:40.280
<v Speaker 2>cabinet is starting to take shape after a wave of announcements.

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 2>It includes, of course billionaire buddy Elon Musk and what

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 2>are we going to do about Kevin Rud all of

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 2>that with Paulmnk Right after this, let's go back to

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the United States. Donald Trump has announced that billionaire richest

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 2>man in the world, Elon Musk, and of course former

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:02.919
<v Speaker 2>GOP presidential candidate Vivic Aswami will have roles in his administration.

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 2>They're going to lead the Department of Government Efficiency, which

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the President elect said will dismantle government bureaucracy, slash excess regulations,

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:17.720
<v Speaker 2>cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure federal agencies. In other words,

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:21.799
<v Speaker 2>the Manhattan Project of our time. Let's bring in our

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 2>former defense intelligence analyst Monk Paul. I suspect there are

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 2>a few bureaucrats in the US tonight who might be

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 2>quietly changing their underwear at the thought of what's going

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 2>to happen here. How much would this change the way

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 2>government operates in the US, do you.

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 16>Think, Well, a great deal depends of course, on how

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 16>precisely and efficiently do I say it's carried out. So

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 16>let's be in no doubt that party politics and ideology

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 16>are such a site. The US is running massive deficits,

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:58.320
<v Speaker 16>and they're not sustainable, and the real thrust of those deficits,

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:01.800
<v Speaker 16>the real cause of them, is unfunded entitlement. So something

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 16>has to be done. An Elon Musk, in his customary way,

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 16>is such a visionary and an innovator, says let's do

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 16>something about this like we mean it. So I think

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 16>that he's been appointed to this role, is itself a

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 16>very interesting development, But the question of precisely how to

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 16>go about it when he's starting from scratch and doesn't

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 16>himself have a substantial staff to work with to do

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 16>the enormous amount of reviewing that would have to go

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 16>into such a program gives one pause because there are

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 16>a lot of ways to get this wrong. I would

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 16>hope the administration's not intimidated by the scale of the task,

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 16>and that they set about it in a systematic way

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 16>that remains to be seen.

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 2>And if there's anyone who can do it, I think

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 2>it's Elon Musk. I just wish we could have one

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:46.280
<v Speaker 2>of these here. We've found out today we've spent another

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:49.839
<v Speaker 2>five billion dollars on more public servants, one person who

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is sort of trying to save his career as well

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:56.120
<v Speaker 2>under the Trump administration. Of course, our very own Kevin Rudd,

0:47:56.400 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 2>one of Trump's senior advisors, Dan Scavino Junior, post to

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 2>this on X It's a pretty pointed warning. I would

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:06.880
<v Speaker 2>have thought to our ambassador to the United States, the

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 2>time is running out.

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 16>Yes, well, in a sense, it would probably be running

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 16>out even without Donald Trump winning the election, because Kevin

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 16>is a labor appointee and we may well have a

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 16>liberal or coalition government by halfway through next year. But

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 16>the reality is that Kevin has a bad habit of

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 16>expressing strong opinions personal opinions out of turn and Kim

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 16>Beasley made a very sage remark at the time when

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 16>Kevin is appointed, saying that that Kevin needs to learn

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 16>the role of an ambassador is not to express opinions,

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 16>it is to cultivate relationships. But I think Kevin can't

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 16>help himself, and the birds or the chickens are coming

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 16>home to roost. It'll be interesting, therefore, to see what

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 16>actually falls out of this in the next couple of months.

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've got fifty seconds left. I've been surprised by

0:49:06.360 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 2>the reaction of some very learned people who've actually said,

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:13.240
<v Speaker 2>will there's really nothing much to worry about here, including

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:18.359
<v Speaker 2>his defenders has been Tony Abbott, which I was surprised by.

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 16>It is interesting. I'm not sure what motivated that. Maybe

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:30.640
<v Speaker 16>it's an xpm's club, because Turnbull has been defending him

0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:34.319
<v Speaker 16>as well, you know, and Turnbull pointedly and I think

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 16>very correctly, declined to endorse Kevin's desire to become Secretary

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:42.280
<v Speaker 16>General of the United nations. Heaven knows, the UNS dysfunctional

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:47.439
<v Speaker 16>enough as it is without having Kevin at the steering wheel.

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:55.279
<v Speaker 16>So I think it's it's probably fair to say that,

0:49:56.360 --> 0:50:00.880
<v Speaker 16>whatever one's criticisms of him, Kevin is a high intelligent perts.

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 16>And then he's doubtless done some good things while there.

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 16>One of the things, as you know, he's just done,

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 16>is he's published on Sidy and Pinion.

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm sorry we've run out of time. He

0:50:11.719 --> 0:50:14.360
<v Speaker 2>is knowledgeable on China, but somehow I suspect this is

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:16.279
<v Speaker 2>going to be a problem. Thank you for joining me,

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:18.200
<v Speaker 2>and thank you all at home for joining me. Scherry

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:21.440
<v Speaker 2>will be back tomorrow night. And he's back. Paul Murray

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:22.959
<v Speaker 2>is here in the man Cave.