Speaker 1: Opinion on Sky News Australia starts now.
Speaker 2: A lot of this is Outsiders.
Speaker 1: Good morning and happy Mother's Day to all the mothers
Speaker 1: of Australia, my own mother, Claire, whom I love, Happy
Speaker 1: Mother's Day, my great friend Rita here, Happy Mother's Day, Rita,
Speaker 1: and to all of you outsiders mums out there, we
Speaker 1: love you all. Welcome to Outsiders, the show that is
Speaker 1: to woke, virtue signaling and identity politics on steroids. What
Speaker 1: US Republican Senator Lindsey Graham is to exposing the cowardice
Speaker 1: and lack of moral clarity in the Biden administration's disgusting
Speaker 1: actions withholding weaponry from Israel in their fight against Hamas.
Speaker 3: Are you worried that if you make a decision to
Speaker 3: deny weapons at Israel, say they need that, it would
Speaker 3: send a signal to a MOAS and Iran.
Speaker 4: To keep pushing Sarah.
Speaker 5: We want to make sure that we're providing the right
Speaker 5: kinds of weaponry.
Speaker 4: Okay.
Speaker 3: Would you have supported dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima
Speaker 3: and Nagasagi, General Brown in World War Two?
Speaker 6: Well, center, I think you just based on this situation.
Speaker 4: Where it well we know, I mean it's happened. We know.
Speaker 3: I'm not asking that they did it. Do you think
Speaker 3: that was disproportionate?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 7: Yes, it seems that America's top brass under Joe Biden
Speaker 7: and actually support taking decisive military action to defeat a
Speaker 7: deadly enemy.
Speaker 3: If we go back in time says hey, we got
Speaker 3: two atomic bombs?
Speaker 4: Should we drop on? What would you say?
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, I think the leadership was interested in curtailing there?
Speaker 4: What's Israel interested in?
Speaker 3: Do you believe Iran really wants to kill all the
Speaker 3: Jews if they could? The Iranian regime in Do you
Speaker 3: believe Hamas is serious when they say we'll keep doing
Speaker 3: it over and over again.
Speaker 4: Do you do you agree that they will if they can?
Speaker 4: I do?
Speaker 6: Okay?
Speaker 3: Do you believe that Hezblah is a terrorist organization also
Speaker 3: been on the destruction of the Jewish state?
Speaker 4: He is a terrorist terrorist worm?
Speaker 1: Okay?
Speaker 3: So Israel's been hit in the last few weeks by Iran,
Speaker 3: Hesblah and a mass dedicated to their destruction, and you're
Speaker 3: telling me you're going to tell them how to fight
Speaker 3: the war.
Speaker 8: Can anybody else believe that Lindsey Graham is the voice
Speaker 8: of world clarity? But it looks like at most point
Speaker 8: must be choosing their top Cadetsi's days based on moral
Speaker 8: relativism and cultural Marxism.
Speaker 3: Do you still think it was a good idea General
Speaker 3: Austin to get out of Afghanistan.
Speaker 4: I support the President's Yeah, I think you do. I
Speaker 4: think it was a disastrous decision.
Speaker 3: If we stop weapons necessary to destroy the enemies of
Speaker 3: the State of Israel at a time of great peril.
Speaker 9: We will pay a price.
Speaker 4: This is obscene, It is absurd.
Speaker 3: Give Israel what they need to fight the war they
Speaker 3: can't afford to lose. This is Hiroshima and Nagasaki on steroids.
Speaker 6: There you go, well said Senator.
Speaker 1: And now, while a Biden administration stumbles around from one
Speaker 1: embarrassment to the next, let's grab the latest outside of news.
Speaker 6: So Recha and James, Australia, yet.
Speaker 1: Again under Penny Wong, has embarrassed this nation, disgraced this nation,
Speaker 1: siding against Israel and with Israel's enemies.
Speaker 7: Reta, Yes, decided not to vote with our greater allies
Speaker 7: Israel and America decided not to abstain, decided to vote
Speaker 7: against our greater allies, effectively award her mass for the
Speaker 7: murderous behavior we have seen October seven and since then
Speaker 7: and before then, they maintain that this is not rewarding
Speaker 7: her mass. In fact, Penny Wong was at great pains
Speaker 7: to explain, this is the opposite of what.
Speaker 6: Her mass wants.
Speaker 7: Yet the Mask wants to eradicate the entire entirety of Israel.
Speaker 7: They want every Jew gone, but it is still rewarding them.
Speaker 7: It's not giving them everything they want, but it's giving
Speaker 7: them more than they already had.
Speaker 1: Let's have a listen to this attempt at justification by
Speaker 1: the Australian Foreign Minister.
Speaker 10: I want to say, this is a clear rejection of
Speaker 10: the goals and methods of Hamas. A two state solution
Speaker 10: both Israel and Palestine is the opposite of what Hamas wants.
Speaker 10: Hamas does not want peace and it does not want
Speaker 10: long term security for the state of Israel.
Speaker 8: How on earth is this a rejection of Hamas? I mean,
Speaker 8: coming from you know, Patty Wong. I think we can
Speaker 8: understand that you can make these sort of moral backflips,
Speaker 8: but it is unbelievable to listen to this nonsense. I mean,
Speaker 8: the only way that you can go about talking about
Speaker 8: any sort of two States solution is to say that
Speaker 8: first Hamas must be eliminated. They have absolutely zero place
Speaker 8: in any future Palestinian governance organization, you know, set up
Speaker 8: whatever they wind up doing. So two states, fine, but
Speaker 8: get rid of Hamas first. But I've got some breaking
Speaker 8: news here. The Washington Post has just reported in the
Speaker 8: last few minutes that the Biden administration, and we're talking
Speaker 8: about a bit later on in the program, working urgently
Speaker 8: to stave off a full time Israeli, full scale Israeli
Speaker 8: invasion of Rafa, is offering Israel valuable intelligence on Hamas targets,
Speaker 8: where their military are, where the leaders are, where their
Speaker 8: tunnels are. I get so they have been so the
Speaker 8: Biden administration has been holding with back intelligence from Israel.
Speaker 8: They never thought Israel would press the case so far
Speaker 8: to go into Gaza and get rid of Hamas. And
Speaker 8: they always thought that, well, we don't need to give
Speaker 8: them this information. The Biden administration stands accused now of
Speaker 8: protecting Harmas and Iran. They've played this double game from
Speaker 8: the very start of their administration. This goes back to
Speaker 8: the Obama days and Joe Biden, whose side are you on?
Speaker 8: This is the urgent question everybody needs to ask.
Speaker 7: I think we all know Joe Biden doesn't know what
Speaker 7: date it is. Is the continuation of that Obama administration
Speaker 7: there whoever's pulling the Biden u compet strings, huppet strings,
Speaker 7: I mean he is a puppet. He would have no idea,
Speaker 7: he would have no decision making here. But the bureaucracy,
Speaker 7: the swamp, whatever you want to call it, is that
Speaker 7: continuation of the Biden And we know the Obama regime
Speaker 7: was fully invested in Iran, doing the Iranian Deal, emboldening Iran,
Speaker 7: and we had a few years of respite from that
Speaker 7: under Trump, but they've gone back to it.
Speaker 11: And this is why we're in this eduest.
Speaker 8: There is real serious concerns about who is even in
Speaker 8: the Biden administration making foreign policy. You know that the
Speaker 8: Special Envoy on Iran has had his security clearance revoked
Speaker 8: because of concerns about well, we don't know exactly what yet,
Speaker 8: but I mean the fact that Iran has had such
Speaker 8: a massive intelligence effort trying to penetrate the United States.
Speaker 8: And we see this with their influence operations that play
Speaker 8: out on campuses and elsewhere. This is really sinister stuff here,
Speaker 8: you know.
Speaker 1: Totally The reality is Israel has to defeat Hamas, has
Speaker 1: to go in there, has to take out the entire
Speaker 1: terror network and finish it for all time. Only then
Speaker 1: will there ever be peace in the Middle East, once
Speaker 1: the terrorists are destroyed. And the idea that the Biden
Speaker 1: administration is running around we saw earlier those various top
Speaker 1: brass saying, oh, we think maybe they could have this weapon,
Speaker 1: but not that weapon. Now they're trading which bits of
Speaker 1: intelligence they're going to give absolute disgrace. Donald Trump has
Speaker 1: come out and he said very very clearly that the
Speaker 1: entire Biden administration's approach, not only to Israel but throughout
Speaker 1: the Middle.
Speaker 6: East is an absolute disgrace.
Speaker 1: Let's go back to Australia. Here's Pennywong again trying further
Speaker 1: double flips. I mean she should be in the circus
Speaker 1: doing on the trapeze.
Speaker 6: The way she manages to twist the facts around.
Speaker 1: The reality is Folks Australia over the weekend on Friday
Speaker 1: has voted in the United Nations to push towards the
Speaker 1: recognition of Palestine as a state. His Pennywong trying to
Speaker 1: justify this. This goes against everything, This is rewarding terrorism,
Speaker 1: as Tony Abbot has pointed out, and Scott Morrison has
Speaker 1: come out with a terrific statement saying this is the
Speaker 1: most hostile act by any Australian government in history towards Israel.
Speaker 1: Well done, Scott Morrison, absolutely true. His Penny Wong again
Speaker 1: backflipping doing whatever she does.
Speaker 10: This vote is not about whether Australia recognizes Palestine. We
Speaker 10: will do that when we think the time is right.
Speaker 10: What we would say and what I do say, is
Speaker 10: Australia no longer believes that recognition can only come at
Speaker 10: the end of a peace process. It could occur as
Speaker 10: part of a peace process.
Speaker 1: This is insane, This is completely in vot It.
Speaker 6: Makes no sense whatsoever.
Speaker 1: She says, We're not voting for a recognition of Palestine,
Speaker 1: Palestinian state.
Speaker 6: But that's what you just voted for. And along with.
Speaker 1: They run and tad, Jakistan and China and Russia, that's
Speaker 1: who you voted for. Canada didn't vote for it, the
Speaker 1: UK didn't vote for it. Even Papu and New Guinea
Speaker 1: didn't vote for it. Yet Australia has sided with the
Speaker 1: worst of the worst. This is a complete a rejection,
Speaker 1: if you like, of our friendship with Israel, and it
Speaker 1: is a rewarding of Tarrappa and a rewarding to Hamas
Speaker 1: encouraging them.
Speaker 6: To go forward.
Speaker 1: Now this is a disgrace. Australia stands at the embarrassed.
Speaker 1: I'll be talking more about that.
Speaker 6: Light up, James Well.
Speaker 8: I was just going to say, you know, it really
Speaker 8: occurs to me here that when you listen to the
Speaker 8: way that they play this double game here, Pennywong's playing
Speaker 8: the same sort of thing here, you know, put as
Speaker 8: out all the domestic political concerns which are driving a
Speaker 8: lot of this labor policy right now. We can talk
Speaker 8: about that later. But the other thing too is that
Speaker 8: it is so ironic to me that, you know, so
Speaker 8: many people on the left side of politics love to
Speaker 8: pay lip service to the idea of democracy being under threat,
Speaker 8: the West being under threat, you know, Russia, China, whatever,
Speaker 8: But when it comes to Israel, and here we have
Speaker 8: a democracy, a liberal democracy that is under existential threat,
Speaker 8: and a friend of ours under existential threat by a murderous, totalitarian,
Speaker 8: thugish regime. The strings being pulled in Iran, a murderous, thuggish,
Speaker 8: theocratic regime that hates not just Jews, but the entire West,
Speaker 8: including democracies like ours. You know, the rhetoric on other
Speaker 8: issues where democracy and West and the freedom is under
Speaker 8: threat really falls completely flat. This blind spot that they
Speaker 8: have on Israel. And I think it comes from the left,
Speaker 8: not only that there's this anti Semitism on the left,
Speaker 8: but also that throughout the left there's a real rejection
Speaker 8: of the Western Enlightenment project. They don't like it, they
Speaker 8: don't trust it, and you know, they want to see
Speaker 8: and I'll.
Speaker 7: Be talking about that a little bit after the break.
Speaker 7: But of course there are domestic considerations. Yeah, there are
Speaker 7: a lot more Muslim voters, and they're often concentrated in
Speaker 7: seats held by Labor. They're worried about a backlash there.
Speaker 7: We saw similar concerns in the UK, but I think
Speaker 7: it goes deeper than that with Labor and the left
Speaker 7: in general. This is in their DNA. They do have
Speaker 7: this anti West sentiment, this neo Marxist mind.
Speaker 11: Frame where they look at it. And that's why this
Speaker 11: shouldn't shock us. It might disappoint us, but it shouldn't
Speaker 11: shock us. This is who they are.
Speaker 6: This is who they are.
Speaker 1: Josh Burns, the Jewish Labor member of Parliament has come out.
Speaker 6: So Penny one, congratulations, although well.
Speaker 1: Done, you've managed to alienate and split left wing Jews
Speaker 1: from the Labor Party. He's come out with a strong
Speaker 1: statement opposing the decision by Penny Wong the vote by
Speaker 1: Australia in the United Nations. I say again, I've said
Speaker 1: it many times before. Labor, the Greens and the Teals
Speaker 1: are no friend of the Jews in this country.
Speaker 6: Of you are a.
Speaker 1: Supporter of Israel, supporter of Judaism, Jewish connections to Judaism, whatever,
Speaker 1: you should not and must not be voting Teal, Green
Speaker 1: or Labor because they are not your friend.
Speaker 6: They are your enemy. Understand that clearly.
Speaker 1: That is why we have elections, and that is why
Speaker 1: this mob must be turfed out at the next election
Speaker 1: along with the Teals.
Speaker 6: Let's talk about the budget. We're exciting. We've got a
Speaker 6: labor budget on Tuesday. I can't wait. What are they
Speaker 6: going to do to destroy the economy this time?
Speaker 1: Oh, by the way, you can't make a Mars bar
Speaker 1: in this country.
Speaker 6: It's too expensive. Mars have gone.
Speaker 1: Oh we can't afford the energy here, we can't afford
Speaker 1: the wages here.
Speaker 6: We can't do business here.
Speaker 1: We're going to go off to other countries around the
Speaker 1: world where we can make Mars bars. That is the
Speaker 1: reality of labour's future Made in Australia. It means a
Speaker 1: future disappearing manufacturer, manufacturing disappearing from Australia. That's what this
Speaker 1: labor government is doing. Whether it's high tech businesses, whether
Speaker 1: it's renewables businesses.
Speaker 6: They are going out of business. We'll get more of
Speaker 6: it on Tuesday. But what's wrong one?
Speaker 7: But it's called the Future Made in Australia Fund. The
Speaker 7: name doesn't match the actual rule.
Speaker 6: I'm shocked.
Speaker 7: This is an expansionary budget at a time where we
Speaker 7: don't need an expansiory budget because the last thing we
Speaker 7: need is further inflationary pressure that's going to keep interest
Speaker 7: rates up. There's now talk that the next interest rate
Speaker 7: move is going to be up and knocked down. We
Speaker 7: were expecting two to three, perhaps four cuts this year.
Speaker 7: I don't think anybody thinks that's going to happen now,
Speaker 7: So we've got people tightening their belts or the interest
Speaker 7: rate rises are definitely having an impact. Anyone who's buying
Speaker 7: a home or even renting rents have gone up, So
Speaker 7: the people are tightening their belts, but the government is
Speaker 7: spending like drunken sailors and adding to that inflaflationary pressure.
Speaker 7: I just cannot understand why you would deliver this sort
Speaker 7: of budget in this current environment.
Speaker 1: But what's James, What in anything they've ever done since
Speaker 1: Kevin Rudd was Prime minister gives the Labor Party, in
Speaker 1: particular Gym Charmers and Anthony Albanizi the ability to believe
Speaker 1: that they can pick successful businesses.
Speaker 11: They've never held the job in their lives.
Speaker 1: I mean Anthony Albini was a DJ spinning spinning records
Speaker 1: or something or other.
Speaker 6: None of them have ever worked in a business. None
Speaker 6: of them ever seen a spreadsheet.
Speaker 1: No, no man that I had to sit there and
Speaker 1: actually make the numbers at up so that people get
Speaker 1: paid and people make it profit.
Speaker 6: They've never done it.
Speaker 1: And yet they're sitting there picking winners for the future
Speaker 1: industrialization and manufacturing industries in this country.
Speaker 6: What a joke. This is a fast jam.
Speaker 8: Well yeah, I mean, look, the whole future being in
Speaker 8: Australia policy is it's a nonsense. I mean, first of all,
Speaker 8: it's going to be one of these sort of off
Speaker 8: books funds so it doesn't wind up counting against the budget.
Speaker 8: You know, there's all these accounting tricks that they use.
Speaker 8: But beyond there, you know, manufacturing in Australia is a
Speaker 8: very tricky thing. And the thing is with Jim Chalmers
Speaker 8: is I think that he is smart enough to know
Speaker 8: that he's got a problem here. He knows that what
Speaker 8: he's doing here, he's being forced to drive with one
Speaker 8: foot on the gas and the other foot on the
Speaker 8: break here because you know, I mean, what he's doing, guys,
Speaker 8: what he's doing, guys, is that he's got this situation
Speaker 8: where on the one hand he's got the net zero
Speaker 8: and Chris Bowen and everything making everything more expensive, and
Speaker 8: that that's driving up inflation that you've got to throw
Speaker 8: more money at that to counteract that. But then throwing
Speaker 8: more money to that creates more inflation, which creates more
Speaker 8: interest rate pressure. And at the same time, also the
Speaker 8: other thing to watch, you know, they're going to just
Speaker 8: straight up lie to us about cutting immigration in this
Speaker 8: budget because we know the last time they said, oh
Speaker 8: well it's going to come down to whatever, and it
Speaker 8: did not come down at all. It's at record record
Speaker 8: highs that's all pressure everywhere, which is another huge political
Speaker 8: problem for this government. But you know, this is the
Speaker 8: whole contradiction. The whole budget here is going to be
Speaker 8: absolutely filled with contradiction. A lot of people are going
Speaker 8: to fall for those going to say, oh, you know,
Speaker 8: we're going to do this to that. Most businesses fail
Speaker 8: in the private sector when you add a public sector
Speaker 8: element onto it, which they're trying to do with manufacturing.
Speaker 8: It's ridiculous. We already have seen a foretaste of the
Speaker 8: silliness of this. You know, the quantum computer that they're
Speaker 8: going to pay a billion dollars for the staction can
Speaker 8: be owned by the Americans. You know, we're going to
Speaker 8: build solar panels here where China's got the whole market
Speaker 8: with cheap labor and they can do it for one
Speaker 8: tenth the price, and the world is already slavely and
Speaker 8: the whole world has flooded with solar panels.
Speaker 6: You know, these guys.
Speaker 2: The idea that these guys.
Speaker 8: At Alba is essentially going to run a venture capital
Speaker 8: fund for manufacturing is absolutely hilarious.
Speaker 11: Hilarious.
Speaker 7: As Rowan said, you're not dealing with some genius business
Speaker 7: minds who've got to proven track record of success. You've
Speaker 7: got a bunch of unionists, lifetime politicians and wiser staff
Speaker 7: as a latest socialist left faction is running the show
Speaker 7: and they're going to be picking what's going to work
Speaker 7: in private enterprise.
Speaker 1: The reality Reata and James is the Australian public are
Speaker 1: wising up. I mean, let's not forget they only got
Speaker 1: thirty two point six percent of the vote to begin with,
Speaker 1: so they were.
Speaker 6: Never wildly popular.
Speaker 1: But already, James, according to a poll, a quarter of
Speaker 1: those who voted for Labor at the last election are
Speaker 1: going not making that mistake again. Don't say we didn't
Speaker 1: warn you, by the way, folks, But anyway, that's a
Speaker 1: different story. So so this Paul James, well look it
Speaker 1: just shows, it just continues to show that this is
Speaker 1: a first term government that's in real third term territory.
Speaker 6: Here.
Speaker 8: You know, there's no there's there seems to be no energy,
Speaker 8: no imagination. There's a whole bunch of problems that have
Speaker 8: already accreted onto them and they don't have any sort
Speaker 8: of will to do anything about them. So this sort
Speaker 8: of slow and steady, cautious thing that Albanezy came in
Speaker 8: with remember that which was coded for I actually don't
Speaker 8: have any ideas besides the vote. I know what I'm doing,
Speaker 8: you know what's what's so? So now they're they're just
Speaker 8: going back to the old drawing board, pulling every sort
Speaker 8: of old idea out from the drawers about oh, well
Speaker 8: let's let's subsidize manufacturing. Yeah, that'll work.
Speaker 7: But they all want to be legacy politicians. Albot had
Speaker 7: the choice, he was going to change the constitution insert
Speaker 7: race into it. Charmers again seems to be one who
Speaker 7: wants to have big ticket items that are going to
Speaker 7: be credited to him in the years to come.
Speaker 11: And it may be, but it may not be the
Speaker 11: way you was. Just care for what you wish for.
Speaker 7: But this seems to be part of the problem, this
Speaker 7: grandiose vision they have of themselves.
Speaker 11: Remember that, say Jim Chalmers wrote about.
Speaker 1: And reimagine reimagining capitalism when they're certainly doing that larm
Speaker 1: bells ringing every ly.
Speaker 8: Well, the thing is too, is that a lot of
Speaker 8: this too comes from this desire by the left here
Speaker 8: and labor and genres in alban Easy to rewrite the
Speaker 8: fundamental laws of economics. So they found they found a
Speaker 8: bunch of academic economists you know who are in university,
Speaker 8: is writing papers and books to suggest that there's actually
Speaker 8: a new way to new capitalism, a new way for
Speaker 8: money to work. And actually this has been tried over
Speaker 8: and over.
Speaker 2: It work.
Speaker 1: And the best of all is President Javier Mila in
Speaker 1: Argentina is having massive success with the economy there that
Speaker 1: was going down the toilet after decades of doing what
Speaker 1: we're doing in Australia. Now Javier Mila has come out
Speaker 1: he said, go back to basic free market principles. That's
Speaker 1: what he's doing is tearing out all the social and
Speaker 1: it is working. He's having proven success. And he's also
Speaker 1: which is brilliant, turning against the whole bricks Chinese kind
Speaker 1: of Brazilian so called alternative version to the Western capitalist systems.
Speaker 7: I mean, he's the results achieved in a relatively short
Speaker 7: period of time only I think it took office in December,
Speaker 7: so we're talking a very short period of time. But
Speaker 7: we're talking about a country that is economically ruined after
Speaker 7: decades of this socialism pyrhanism. And he has had an
Speaker 7: impact on the inflation rate there which is a sky high.
Speaker 7: He's had massive austerity measures, just cutting government down to
Speaker 7: what is required, not all these. Did you remember that
Speaker 7: Graphi had where he just went through and just demolished
Speaker 7: department after department that was not needed. So it's early
Speaker 7: days yet, but so far the results are astonishing.
Speaker 11: And remember when.
Speaker 7: He was elected the media meltdown in the West.
Speaker 11: You know, Argentina's Trump is going.
Speaker 7: To destroy the kind was already destroyed. He's saving the country.
Speaker 7: But the hyperbole and scare mongering we had, same as
Speaker 7: when Maloney was elected in Italy. Every time there's actually
Speaker 7: a populist uprising, the media seems to be terrified of
Speaker 7: people democratically electing someone who wants.
Speaker 1: To media's hero. Greta Tunberg has disgraced herself and the
Speaker 1: entire climate change cult.
Speaker 6: She has gone got.
Speaker 1: The Kefir out there. She gro Palestine's anti Israel. She's
Speaker 1: clearly hates Jews. She's out there at the euro Vision
Speaker 1: Song contest. Have a quick look, but this is who
Speaker 1: you are supporting. Don't forget all the school kids were
Speaker 1: told she's our hero, the great climate change visionary leader
Speaker 1: who's going.
Speaker 6: To show the world how to go forward. This is
Speaker 6: who this person is.
Speaker 1: Have a close look, because if you're still enthralled to
Speaker 1: the climate change cult, this is who you're dealing with.
Speaker 12: Here to show that we think it is outrageous and
Speaker 12: inexcusable for Eurovision to let Israel participate while committing a genocide.
Speaker 12: What a country behaves in a way that is unacceptable,
Speaker 12: then Eurovision excuse them. So why not Israel?
Speaker 1: Great, great work, They're fantastic, fantastic.
Speaker 7: Still love how this girl has gone from being a
Speaker 7: climate change expert with this deep understanding of science to
Speaker 7: a Middle East expert without ever going to school.
Speaker 11: Because remember she's pretty much missed most of her school.
Speaker 1: That's how they prefer, the left preferred if you are
Speaker 1: not educated. We're going to take a shot break and
Speaker 1: we'll be back. We've got Regi's rally to check, We've
Speaker 1: got Matt Canavan, We've got lots coming up on Outsiders.
Speaker 1: Happy mother's Dad's well.
Speaker 6: In a typical.
Speaker 7: Welcome back to Outsiders with your hosts Rowan Dean, James Morrow,
Speaker 7: and I'm Ruda Panney from The Rita Paney Show Monday
Speaker 7: to Thursdays Ada, The Rita Paney Show, Goxcell When's It
Speaker 7: on Monday to Thursdays at eleven and we should never
Speaker 7: forget never Lefties losing it every Friday at nine thirty
Speaker 7: pm and talking about Lefty's losing it. Let's check in
Speaker 7: with Green Senator and also their resources spokeswoman. During the
Speaker 7: COX this week, she was defending the use of the
Speaker 7: anti Semitic chant from the River to the Sea and
Speaker 7: vowing to continue to use it at anti Israeli rallies.
Speaker 13: I did notice one of the banners at this protests
Speaker 13: said from the river to the sea. This is a
Speaker 13: phrase it's getting a bit of controversy. Is that something
Speaker 13: you've been supporting or chanting and why if so?
Speaker 6: Well?
Speaker 14: I do support and have participated in the change from
Speaker 14: the river to the sea. This is something that I
Speaker 14: think supporters of Palestine are very clear about, and in
Speaker 14: fact this is sufficient in the way that we have
Speaker 14: this conversation. It's grounded in peace and freedom. We are
Speaker 14: urging the government to step up their action to condemn
Speaker 14: Israel about its actions in Gaza, and I think that
Speaker 14: we will continue to chant from the river to the
Speaker 14: Sea to ensure that freedom and peace are delivered. And
Speaker 14: I don't have any objection to that.
Speaker 7: So, after no doubt, learning about the violent sentiment, the
Speaker 7: hateful sentiment.
Speaker 11: Behind that phrase. She wants to keep chanting it anyway.
Speaker 7: And Tom Connoll the interview there bless him, did try
Speaker 7: to remind her that perhaps calling for the annihilation of
Speaker 7: the only Jewish state is not.
Speaker 11: All that peaceful.
Speaker 13: In this phrase was actually said by Colored Micheale that
Speaker 13: the founder and former leader of Hamas, and this was
Speaker 13: as part of not wanting Israel to exist, that that's
Speaker 13: not a peaceful phrase at all, and that context is
Speaker 13: it Does that give you pause for thought about using it?
Speaker 6: Well, look, I'm.
Speaker 14: Not an expert on Middle Eastern.
Speaker 13: History, Senator, you have a bit more standing than most
Speaker 13: to be cautious about phrasing. As I said, this was
Speaker 13: used by the founder of Hamas.
Speaker 6: This phrase.
Speaker 2: He went on to say.
Speaker 13: That also from the south of the North, I mean,
Speaker 13: obviously what it means for many Jewish people is a
Speaker 13: Jewish state wouldn't exist because it would be Palestine from
Speaker 13: the Jordaanean River to the Mediterranean Sea. That's the entire
Speaker 13: of the area.
Speaker 14: Well, I think we're splitting hairs over language. And I think, well,
Speaker 14: I mean, we don't even talk about the genocide. And
Speaker 14: you know, the international Court and Justice and South Africa
Speaker 14: bringing that case to the International Court, and the impact
Speaker 14: of genocide in Gaza.
Speaker 7: She's not an expert on the Middle East nor what
Speaker 7: the word genocide means, obviously, but surely she can categorically
Speaker 7: condemn terror group her Mass when given the opportunity to
Speaker 7: do so.
Speaker 13: Surely, and it's used by the founder her Mass. I'm
Speaker 13: assuming you have no support at all for her Mass
Speaker 13: and their role in things, and including in those October
Speaker 13: seven attacks, and the fact that they don't want a
Speaker 13: Jewish state to exist. That's pretty clear from her Mass,
Speaker 13: isn't it.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 14: I think that what's starting to be used is a
Speaker 14: smoke screen in that and the continuation of that now
Speaker 14: in relation to our role, the Australian Government's role in
Speaker 14: relation to it's condemning and there's sanctions of the of
Speaker 14: Netnyahu and his war cabinet needs to be the next action.
Speaker 7: That didn't sound like a categor glory call condemnation of
Speaker 7: her Mass.
Speaker 11: Let's give her one more chance.
Speaker 7: Here she is again given an opportunity to condemn her Mass,
Speaker 7: or at least acknowledge that her Mass are murderous, sadistic.
Speaker 13: Terrorists, and I mean, let me just put this to
Speaker 13: you before before we go to clarify this. I mean,
Speaker 13: there's nothing peace seeking about her mass.
Speaker 2: Is there?
Speaker 14: But look again, I would say my participation in all
Speaker 14: of those rallies has been about a non violent approach,
Speaker 14: a peaceful approach to ending the war in Gaza.
Speaker 6: And I want to be very.
Speaker 14: Absolutely and I have spoken, I have spoken too many
Speaker 14: protesters in this country.
Speaker 7: Oh dear, it speaks volumes about the warped moral compass
Speaker 7: of the Greens. The Senator Cox would defend the use
Speaker 7: of that contemptible chant, even after priming a sanphony. Albanezy
Speaker 7: belatedly condemned it as one that promotes violence and has
Speaker 7: no place in Australia.
Speaker 11: But too many within labor.
Speaker 7: Have shown themselves to be indifferent to the poet of
Speaker 7: the Jewish community, both here and in Israel. As for
Speaker 7: the Greens, the Jewish community must know one thing by now,
Speaker 7: the modern left are not their friends. Many within the
Speaker 7: Jewish community have been enthusiastic allies are so called progressive activists,
Speaker 7: but that support is not mutual and it was never
Speaker 7: going to be, certainly not among the anti West advocates
Speaker 7: who see every issue through the oppressor oppressed lens. The
Speaker 7: Greens in particular have shown an appetite for rabid anti
Speaker 7: Zionism that is ugly intolerant, but sadly entirely in keeping
Speaker 7: with the neo Marxist worldview of the left. And now
Speaker 7: to a stunning judgment in the County Court in Victoria one,
Speaker 7: the Victorian government and Victorian police hierarchy would rather you.
Speaker 11: Not know about.
Speaker 7: Gain Or has ruled police worthy aggressors and employed unjustified
Speaker 7: violence during an anti lockdown protest in May twenty twenty one.
Speaker 11: As reported in The Herald's Son.
Speaker 7: That judgment has called into question police tactics and prompted
Speaker 7: calls for prosecutors to consider laying charges against the police involved.
Speaker 7: In her stinging judgment, Judge gain Or rule the arrests
Speaker 7: on that day were unlawful, saying those arrested did nothing
Speaker 7: to warrant the violent police response, which was captured by
Speaker 7: body worn cameras.
Speaker 11: She called the response from the police immediate and violent,
Speaker 11: and noted footage of the group in.
Speaker 7: The half hour leading to the arrests showed no behavior
Speaker 7: which warranted police forming a view that the crowd was
Speaker 7: going to engage in violent behavior. She said, I'm satisfied
Speaker 7: that the police were the aggressors in the situation and
Speaker 7: that they employed unjustified violence. And now let's take a
Speaker 7: stroll down memory lane and look at life in Victoria
Speaker 7: in the COVID era. And as you watch this, remember
Speaker 7: remember that the vast majority of the media and the
Speaker 7: gutlass Victorian liberal opposition were completely on board with all
Speaker 7: of this.
Speaker 15: Yeah, she's pregnant, dying stuff now And Okay, they're footing, they're.
Speaker 16: Not shooting, kidding me.
Speaker 6: It's been eighteen months.
Speaker 2: You what for us? They turned you into a Nazi
Speaker 2: over not I'm not even struggling.
Speaker 6: Oh, fantastic reader.
Speaker 1: And as you know, we have played that footage repeatedly
Speaker 1: since the COVID era and during the COVID era, and
Speaker 1: as you will remember, we were pretty much the only
Speaker 1: people in Australia's mainstream media who were speaking out against
Speaker 1: all the abuses, from mandates to masks, a.
Speaker 6: Lot of it.
Speaker 1: In fact, one of those politicians who was brave enough
Speaker 1: as well to speak up at the same time, a
Speaker 1: great friend of the show was Senator Matt Canavan. So
Speaker 1: we're going to chat chat to Matt now as Astrazenka
Speaker 1: has decided to withdraw it's COVID nineteen vaccine following an
Speaker 1: admission to various side effects.
Speaker 6: Matt Canavan, how are you mate.
Speaker 1: It's great to see you looking, fantastic part of the
Speaker 1: world that you always find yourself in, whereas we're down
Speaker 1: in rainy old Sydney on a wet's Mother's day. There
Speaker 1: you go, So AstraZeneca returns.
Speaker 6: Off the shelves. Now tell us your thoughts.
Speaker 17: Well, look happy Mother's Day. And I know my mum
Speaker 17: is an avid outsider's watchers, So hi.
Speaker 2: Mum, and.
Speaker 17: Yes, look amazing news this week that now, years after
Speaker 17: we're all told I think the term was from memory,
Speaker 17: safe and effective. Remember that everything was safe and effective,
Speaker 17: we had nothing to worry about. Now one of the
Speaker 17: major vaccines has been pulled from the market. Now ask
Speaker 17: themselves are blaming low demand, but I think most people
Speaker 17: have woken up to these vaccines and a number of
Speaker 17: regulatary authorities around the world have restricted the use of
Speaker 17: Astrazenica because of concerns over side effects, including blood clotting.
Speaker 17: Now now three years ago, three years more than three
Speaker 17: years ago, I raised concerns. I called for Astrazeneka to
Speaker 17: be suspended in March twenty twenty one when the initial
Speaker 17: reports came through of blood clotting events leading to deaths
Speaker 17: in some cases. At the time, I was pilloried by
Speaker 17: the media, by my colleagues, titles irresponsible. I was going
Speaker 17: against the science every name under the sun. And there
Speaker 17: are very few of those people, in fact, none that
Speaker 17: I've seen, who have this week come out and said,
Speaker 17: oh look, sorry, Matt, we were wrong.
Speaker 2: He got it right. There's no apologies here, and I'd
Speaker 2: accept an apology. That's all we need. We all make mistakes.
Speaker 17: But the lesson here about the last few years, the
Speaker 17: important lesson for us right now is that a healthy
Speaker 17: society should never seek to silence dissenting opinions. And we're
Speaker 17: seeing that again right now while we have an e
Speaker 17: Safety commissioner out of Controllee Safety commissioner seeking to silence
Speaker 17: criticism of the transgender to child abusing transgender movement, seeking
Speaker 17: to silence discussion following a terrorist attack or what the
Speaker 17: police have described a terrorist attack in Western Sydney on
Speaker 17: the bishop there. We we haven't seem to have alert
Speaker 17: our lesson. We must allow free and open debate or
Speaker 17: keep making the massive mistakes we did during COVID.
Speaker 1: Absolutely alleged terrorist attack there in western Sydney. The Matt
Speaker 1: you were on Outsiders with Craig Kelly, myself, Rita and
Speaker 1: James calling for AstraZeneca to be removed.
Speaker 6: I remember it.
Speaker 1: Very well, and Regre and I were equally defamed and
Speaker 1: demonized in the Australian Senate reach and I are waiting
Speaker 1: today for our apology as well, aren't we retailed?
Speaker 11: Well, yes, I am waiting. I'm not expect anytime to
Speaker 11: drag us to a senaty.
Speaker 6: We wanted to. They wanted to go all over us
Speaker 6: because we said we.
Speaker 2: Wanted to come back. I'll I'll put the call in
Speaker 2: the other senators want you to come.
Speaker 18: Along now exactly with your now exactly, can we.
Speaker 11: Speak with parliamentary privilege in a Senate hearing.
Speaker 6: I'd love to.
Speaker 1: Maybe you can organize that, and maybe you can organize
Speaker 1: that verus as well.
Speaker 11: That's on the table. I am on board one hundred percent.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 7: One of the things I'm concerned about is the the
Speaker 7: legal rights of people who perhaps have vaccine injuries or
Speaker 7: fear that they've had adverse reaction. What is the what
Speaker 7: exactly is the the recourse they have because these vaccines
Speaker 7: were introduced with these companies almost having protection against legal
Speaker 7: legal action.
Speaker 11: So is that going to change.
Speaker 7: Is there going to be any sort of inquiry into
Speaker 7: rethinking those initial decisions.
Speaker 17: Well, a colleague of mine, Ralph Ralphabet from the Tory,
Speaker 17: has introduced a bill to remove an immunity going forward
Speaker 17: for drug companies, and they or I should say the
Speaker 17: what Ralph does is seek to remove the power of
Speaker 17: the Health Minister to provide such immunity.
Speaker 2: And I completely.
Speaker 17: Agree with that bill, support that build In terms of
Speaker 17: what's gone past, there were immunities agree to, legal immunities
Speaker 17: agreed to. The vaccines didn't seem to give you or
Speaker 17: I much immunity, but the Health Minister gave the drug
Speaker 17: companies legal immunity their legal immunity right, So so they
Speaker 17: got legal immunity from prosecution or for a claim. Now,
Speaker 17: what we don't know the scandal here is, despite questions
Speaker 17: that I and others have asked in the Senate, we
Speaker 17: don't know exactly what the terms of.
Speaker 2: That legal immunity are. Now.
Speaker 17: My view is that even if they are given a
Speaker 17: certain amount of legal immunity, I've asked about well, what
Speaker 17: if they were what if they misled or deceived people.
Speaker 17: What if fis a knowingly or one of these companies,
Speaker 17: any of these companies knowingly said things that they knew
Speaker 17: were untrue.
Speaker 2: They are they immune then?
Speaker 17: And I can't get an answer because they rest back
Speaker 17: on this absurd commercial and confidence situation. So that's what
Speaker 17: I really want to know. I mean, obviously, they provided
Speaker 17: immunity at a time of uncertainty or role that was
Speaker 17: happening fast. But if they lied to people, if that
Speaker 17: can be proven, like a big tobacco company has, say,
Speaker 17: for example, in the past, surely, surely a government should
Speaker 17: not give them any kind of legal immunity from legitimate
Speaker 17: prosecution from those who have been injured by these vaccines.
Speaker 17: And people want all drugs have side effects, All of
Speaker 17: them do. And that was the most absurd thing of
Speaker 17: these last few years. We were hoodwinked, or some people
Speaker 17: were hoodwinked into believing that these vaccines, apparently the first
Speaker 17: drugs ever in the world invented, had no side effects
Speaker 17: and could not at all lead to anyone having the
Speaker 17: most critical responses.
Speaker 8: James, indeed, and I want to just talk also before
Speaker 8: we let you go Matt about what else we've got
Speaker 8: coming up this week, which is the budget on Tuesday.
Speaker 8: And it's funny you mentioned, you know, the e Safety
Speaker 8: Commissioner trying to get what we think and everything. Well,
Speaker 8: we've also got this future Made in Australia idea coming out.
Speaker 8: We're going to have more details on that Tuesday night,
Speaker 8: which is going to try and control how the market
Speaker 8: works in this country. A direct capital from what the
Speaker 8: market thinks are good investments to what Jim Chalmers and
Speaker 8: a bunch of Treasury bureaucrats and presumably a bunch of
Speaker 8: labor people think are good investments. Now this just seems
Speaker 8: like protectionism by another name. Daniel Would, the head of
Speaker 8: the Productivity Commissioner, slam this. Where do you come down
Speaker 8: on this whole idea that the government should be telling
Speaker 8: us where money should be invested.
Speaker 2: Well, I think this is the absolutely wrong approach.
Speaker 17: I mean, you couldn't get perhaps a worst group of
Speaker 17: individuals to spend your money in these ways than a
Speaker 17: bunch of politicians in Canberra. I'm actually all for the
Speaker 17: government seeking to promote Australia manufacturing. I'm all for US
Speaker 17: tacking action against the illegal subsidies that China continues to
Speaker 17: provide its own manufacturers. But this is not the way
Speaker 17: to go about it. They're not the way to go
Speaker 17: about it. To have a bunch of politicians in like
Speaker 17: a Utopia episode, and that's how it works.
Speaker 2: They're very good actually, that Utopia series, sitting around.
Speaker 17: Going yeah, we should invest in this company because I
Speaker 17: know Jim and I know I know Bob, and they're
Speaker 17: good people.
Speaker 2: Let's invest in them. That's the wrong way to do it.
Speaker 17: A better way to do it would be to put
Speaker 17: tariffs on this Chinese steel and other products that are
Speaker 17: coming into a country. The substence we can do that
Speaker 17: under the WCO. Let's do that and protect our jobs.
Speaker 2: There. A better way to do it be lower taxes
Speaker 2: and lower red tape. Industry, get rid of it.
Speaker 17: And then the final thing, maybe just I'm just being
Speaker 17: a bit crazy here, maybe we should try and get
Speaker 17: our energy prices down. That will probably help all Australian
Speaker 17: manufacturers as well if we invest again in coal and
Speaker 17: gas and look to nuclear long term as well, and
Speaker 17: drop this mad obsession with renewable energy. That's what's driving
Speaker 17: our manufacturing business is offshore right now, They're going to
Speaker 17: the US, because the US produced more oil than any
Speaker 17: country in any year ever last year, last year under
Speaker 17: the Bide administration, and oil and gas prices as a
Speaker 17: consequence are lowest as low as ever been in the US.
Speaker 17: And our manufacturer is like intertect pivot, like Oraca going
Speaker 17: off our shores over there. While we stay obsessed with
Speaker 17: you wanting to change the temperature.
Speaker 1: Of the globe reckoned, they're heading overseas.
Speaker 7: Retail quickly, Matt, you mentioned that alleged terror incident in
Speaker 7: a Sydney church. In the past week, we had another incident,
Speaker 7: but the police authorities are reluctant to categorize it as
Speaker 7: a terror incident, despite the assailant posting very clear motivations
Speaker 7: for the attack he was about to commit. I mean,
Speaker 7: when is a terror incident not a terror incident?
Speaker 17: Well, I don't think we're going to successfully combat this
Speaker 17: new era of Islamicist terrorism unless we can actually call
Speaker 17: it for what it is.
Speaker 2: And I know if the.
Speaker 17: WA Premier has called it, has said that the attack
Speaker 17: has all the hallmarks of a tear incident. The news
Speaker 17: of US police, as I said earlier, use similar language
Speaker 17: around the attack on the bishop. But there's seems to
Speaker 17: be this institutional and resistance from describing what's going on,
Speaker 17: and of course there's pressure from Muslim groups now to
Speaker 17: even drop the term religiously motivated, not even just Islamism,
Speaker 17: and the facts on the ground there are there aren't
Speaker 17: too many Methodists marterring themselves right now, and I think
Speaker 17: it's all types of religiously motivated extremism. If there are
Speaker 17: other religious groups engaging, so of course we should crack
Speaker 17: down there. There have been some far right wing groups
Speaker 17: that have gone silly and done stupid things recently. They
Speaker 17: should be cracked down on, but so should. We need
Speaker 17: to be able to call this for what it is,
Speaker 17: which is a perverted and extreme and radical form of
Speaker 17: Islam that is unfortunately being propagated by some by some
Speaker 17: senior clerics to vulnerable young Australians. We have to talk
Speaker 17: about that if we're going to defeat it. If we
Speaker 17: can't even talk about it, forget about it, it will keep
Speaker 17: happening and we won't be as safe and as secure
Speaker 17: as we should be in this great country.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, Matt Canavan, always fantastic to chat to you on
Speaker 1: this happy Mother's Day.
Speaker 6: To missus Canavan as well, mother.
Speaker 1: She's fantastic and all the mum's out there in Australia.
Speaker 6: Thanks so much for too, and you're absolutely mate. Okay,
Speaker 6: take care.
Speaker 1: Coming up, we've got David Bell talking about the World
Speaker 1: Health Organization Pandemic Treaty. Can't wait dinner.
Speaker 6: Well.
Speaker 1: Negotiations between United Nations member nations for the World Health
Speaker 1: Organizations Pandemic Preparedness Treaty have resumed this week after reports
Speaker 1: of countries struggling to agree on a draft proposal.
Speaker 6: I wonder why that might be.
Speaker 1: Joining us now with the latest is doctor David Bell,
Speaker 1: formerly a World Health Organization medical officer, who's here in
Speaker 1: Australia speaking and warning David about this pandemic treaty. Welcome
Speaker 1: to outsiders, David, thanks for coming along.
Speaker 6: We'll tell us in a.
Speaker 1: Nutshell why Australian should be worried about these I know
Speaker 1: there are two aspects to it, but basically the World
Speaker 1: Health Organization pandemic treaty preparations.
Speaker 19: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Thanks Amy On Well, you saw those clips you showed
Speaker 5: from Melbourne from a couple of years ago, and it's
Speaker 5: worth remembering that was a virus that kills people on
Speaker 5: average at the age of eighty or greater and people
Speaker 5: who are already sick. But that was reaction to it.
Speaker 5: So these treaties they basically had decision making for what
Speaker 5: is a pandemic emergency and what the response would be
Speaker 5: to the World Health Organization from national governments and the
Speaker 5: decision making we saw they've already you know that they
Speaker 5: declared an emergency for monkey pox, which was they did
Speaker 5: that when there was five people dead in the whole world,
Speaker 5: So it was a pretty low threshold. And so it's
Speaker 5: based on a fallacy that we have increasing risk of pandemics,
Speaker 5: increasing number of outbreaks. There's a report out from the
Speaker 5: University of Leeds recently that shows that this is actually
Speaker 5: using the data that the WHOG twenty though World Bank
Speaker 5: u is that it's the opposite, that actually, for the
Speaker 5: last ten to twenty years we have a reducing risk
Speaker 5: for all sorts of reasons and we can just detect
Speaker 5: pathogens better. So the treaty is all the two instruments.
Speaker 5: They're putting together a system where about thirty to forty
Speaker 5: billion dollars of public money, which is about ten times
Speaker 5: what you spend on the WHO now will build this
Speaker 5: huge surveillance system that will find viral variance that I
Speaker 5: have lockdown. So I have one hundred day MR and
Speaker 5: a vaccine you just discussed a similar vaccine and the
Speaker 5: problems with that, and that will be the path back
Speaker 5: to freedom. And the profits from this will go to pharma.
Speaker 5: So it's really a huge business scheme on an international
Speaker 5: level we haven't seen before to channel public funds into
Speaker 5: pharmaceutical companies and investment houses that own them and in
Speaker 5: the process impoverish the population and take away the basic
Speaker 5: freedoms we thought arouse.
Speaker 8: James David, I just want to ask you about the WHL.
Speaker 8: We saw their performance during the COVID pandemic, and we
Speaker 8: saw the way Ted Ross and other officials basically slow
Speaker 8: walked any investigation of China and the origins of that.
Speaker 8: And now we have people talking about H five and
Speaker 8: one and a bird flu virus and.
Speaker 2: Things like that.
Speaker 8: Why on Earth would anybody trust the WHL.
Speaker 5: Because they still think it's the sort of organization it
Speaker 5: was maybe seventy eighty years ago where you know, the
Speaker 5: countries gave it money and based on what are the
Speaker 5: worst diseases where you can make the most difference, and
Speaker 5: what countries asked for it would respond and do something useful,
Speaker 5: and that's all of changed.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 5: About eighty percent of its funding is specified, which means
Speaker 5: the funder just tells the organization what to do. It's
Speaker 5: not an independent organization. It's a tool of the funders.
Speaker 5: And about twenty five percent of the funding is private.
Speaker 5: That's either pharmaceutical corporations or big investors in pharmaceutical corporations.
Speaker 5: So it's become a tool of these corporations. It's they
Speaker 5: use as a public private partnership to improve the returns
Speaker 5: on their investment. It's not and that's why they would
Speaker 5: do it, because this is about in the end, it's
Speaker 5: about making a lot of money retail.
Speaker 7: Well, we saw the world follow China's example and employ lockdowns,
Speaker 7: abandon their pandemic plans that they had in place, and
Speaker 7: just follow China. How much influence does China exert over
Speaker 7: the World Health Organization?
Speaker 5: Well, it exerts a lot, and in a way it
Speaker 5: should because it's one point three billion people and who
Speaker 5: should represent the people of the world. But in saying that,
Speaker 5: it obviously shouldn't be able to tour the people of
Speaker 5: the world what to do or to have influence at
Speaker 5: all on what they do. So China has a lot
Speaker 5: of influence. They give very little money. They in the
Speaker 5: last two years they gave less than Nigeria or I
Speaker 5: think a couple of times. Yeah, but they have a
Speaker 5: huge influence on politically, on who gets the top job,
Speaker 5: the Director general. So you know, through diplomatic means you
Speaker 5: can it's a vote by countries. You influence low income
Speaker 5: countries et cetera on how they vote and in return
Speaker 5: they'll get some deals from China. So that's what all
Speaker 5: countries do.
Speaker 1: So very quickly, David, before we go, what would be
Speaker 1: your advice, or speaking directly to the Australian government, what
Speaker 1: would you be saying.
Speaker 5: Well, at a minimum, put off this vote. That they're
Speaker 5: still negotiating these they're supposed to be legally binding documents
Speaker 5: and you know, two weeks out from the vote, they're
Speaker 5: still negotiating. They have there's really no idea what the
Speaker 5: finance behind it is, et cetera. That they haven't decided
Speaker 5: what they're going to do with these documents. But I
Speaker 5: mean it's based on a fallacy. Essentially they should vote no,
Speaker 5: but at a very minimum they should put this off
Speaker 5: and have a better think about it.
Speaker 6: Before we go forward.
Speaker 1: David Bell, thanks so much for talking to us on
Speaker 1: Outsiders and warning us there about the World Health Organization.
Speaker 6: You've got that government. Vote no. Liberal Party, let's hear
Speaker 6: from you. Vote no. How often we been saying this
Speaker 6: for years. Let's get the Liberal Party strongly opposed to this.
Speaker 6: I know Peter Dutton is. Let's get them absolutely.
Speaker 1: Opposed to pushing forward with this World Health Organization madness. Now,
Speaker 1: let's grab a little bit of netsany If you're going
Speaker 1: to go on a vote, it may as well be
Speaker 1: a very big one. Read Mark Zuckerberg, who cares about the.
Speaker 7: Climate well, like most of these catastrophers climate change activists
Speaker 7: who want everyone else to change their lifestyles, it doesn't
Speaker 7: apply to him.
Speaker 11: He's got the private jet. Now, he's got a three
Speaker 11: hundred million dollar mega yacht.
Speaker 7: Not even a super yacht. Is a mega yacht? There
Speaker 7: it is in I think that's in Florida for Loda Dale,
Speaker 7: and wow, that is I think you can land a
Speaker 7: helicopter on that. It looks bloody massive.
Speaker 1: Clearly concerned about his carbon footprint. But while he's out
Speaker 1: there sailing the seas, he might well run into all
Speaker 1: these disastrous solar panels which you're floating around the place.
Speaker 6: You see, this is an Indian.
Speaker 1: Solar far the biggest in the world, or a floating
Speaker 1: solar farthing.
Speaker 6: What went wrong? As storm? You do get storms at sea?
Speaker 20: Really?
Speaker 6: Wow? There you go.
Speaker 7: I am so upset that you've shown that footage because
Speaker 7: there's every chance that Chris Bowen's going to see.
Speaker 11: It and it's going to be a new idea.
Speaker 6: Oh yeah, all out.
Speaker 11: I can just see our shoreline.
Speaker 6: Carpets straight off Bondai Beach. Tris there you go.
Speaker 1: Give it to the war clues, the Teals, the Teals Electorate,
Speaker 1: the Manly Electorate, the Northern Beaches Electric, they're all Teals electrics.
Speaker 6: Let's get those.
Speaker 1: Windmills floating around off Palm Beach and Whale Beach and
Speaker 1: see how much of the voters like that. The Magna
Speaker 1: Carta the greatest expression of our freedoms and freedom of
Speaker 1: the individual man and woman against the tyranny and oppression
Speaker 1: of those.
Speaker 6: Above us Rita James.
Speaker 1: The Magna Carta has been coming under attack from the
Speaker 1: usual suspects.
Speaker 6: Just stop oil, James.
Speaker 8: Well yeah, and I think we've got some vision of
Speaker 8: them attacking this let's have a look here. We don't
Speaker 8: have that okay anyway, So again this is just stop oil.
Speaker 8: People are having a go, have a look.
Speaker 11: This famous document is about.
Speaker 1: Them can come true.
Speaker 6: And standing up against it. Look at this answer.
Speaker 8: I mean number one, people like this are allowed to
Speaker 8: keep attacking these things and have it be filmed. So
Speaker 8: shame want everybody who's filming these things and not starting
Speaker 8: number two, where are the guards? Number three? There needs
Speaker 8: to be we talk about hate crimes, for crimes against
Speaker 8: you know, race and gender and sexuality. Let's have a
Speaker 8: hate crime for those who attack the symbols of the West.
Speaker 11: Absolutely, ladies need to be in jail.
Speaker 6: Jul jail, jail break. We'll be back shortly. Lots more
Speaker 6: to talk about here on Outsiders.
Speaker 1: Hello, you're watching Outsiders with Rita Panahee, with James Morrow
Speaker 1: and with myself Rowan Dean.
Speaker 6: Well this weekend.
Speaker 1: I accuse the Federal Labor Government of Australia and all
Speaker 1: their supporters of betraying every single Jewish woman, girl, baby,
Speaker 1: man or boy in this country.
Speaker 6: I accuse the.
Speaker 1: Federal Labor Government of Australia and all their supporters of
Speaker 1: giving encouragement and moral support to gang rapists, mass murderers, torturers,
Speaker 1: sexual deviance and pedophiles.
Speaker 6: I accuse the.
Speaker 1: Federal Labor Government of Australia and their supporters of giving
Speaker 1: encouragement and moral support to the legions of anti Semites
Speaker 1: and Jew haters currently parading throughout the universities of our
Speaker 1: nation and.
Speaker 6: On the streets of our cities.
Speaker 1: And I accuse the Federal Labor Government of Australia and
Speaker 1: their supporters of the most disgusting and egregious failure of
Speaker 1: moral character and human decency. Our Federal Labor Government is
Speaker 1: a national disgrace and has shamed us once more on
Speaker 1: the world stage. I implore anybody who has ever been
Speaker 1: prepared to give this Federal Labor Government or their supporters
Speaker 1: like the Teals and the Greens, the benefit of the doubt,
Speaker 1: to now recognize that this is a govern fueled by
Speaker 1: hatred of Israel and rife with a total disdain for
Speaker 1: the safety, security, hopes and dreams of Jews in this
Speaker 1: country and across the world. On Friday, at the behest
Speaker 1: of Labour's Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Australia voted yes to
Speaker 1: a motion to give favorable consideration to Palestine becoming a
Speaker 1: member of the United Nations. In doing so, Australia publicly
Speaker 1: aligned itself with the enemies of Israel against the friends
Speaker 1: of Israel. Penny Wanog is a disgrace. Former Prime Minister
Speaker 1: Scott Morrison, and I applaud him for doing this, has
Speaker 1: dubbed the controversial UN vote as quote the most hostile
Speaker 1: policy act of an Australian government to the State of
Speaker 1: Israel in our history end of quote. Scott Morrison says
Speaker 1: that this is what the terrorists wanted and that this
Speaker 1: is why Hamas attacked Israel. Tony Abbott agrees with him,
Speaker 1: describing the votes Penniwong's vote as quote rewarding the October
Speaker 1: seven atrocities, and I wholeheartedly agree and applaud.
Speaker 6: Them both for those comments.
Speaker 1: The Australian Jewish Association is rightly appalled, putting out a
Speaker 1: statement last night saying, and I quote Labour lied to us.
Speaker 1: They promised there would be no difference in Israel related policies,
Speaker 1: meaning from the coalition. This vote, says the Australian Jewish
Speaker 1: Organization will embolden terrorism, violence and fuel even more anti
Speaker 1: Semitism locally and potentially more widely, the Australian government has
Speaker 1: an effect served a victory to Hamas.
Speaker 6: Says the Australian Jewish Association, all.
Speaker 1: Decent Australians should condemn aligning our country with such e
Speaker 1: evil end of quote. Sadly, I have to say, I
Speaker 1: am horrified, but not surprised by this disgusting betrayal by
Speaker 1: Pennywog and Anthony Albanisi. They could have voted against the proposal,
Speaker 1: as did the United States, as did Argentina under the
Speaker 1: brilliant and inspiring leadership for President Javier Mila, as did
Speaker 1: even Papua New Guinea, our nearest neighbor, all of whom
Speaker 1: voted against the motion.
Speaker 6: We could have abstained from.
Speaker 1: The resolution, as did Canada, as did Britain, as did
Speaker 1: many European nations. But no, Penny Wong and Anthony Albanisi
Speaker 1: decided to position Australia to stand shoulder to shoulder with
Speaker 1: anti Semitic jew hating nations like Iran, Yemen, Tajakistan, Russia, Oman,
Speaker 1: El Salvador, North Korea and China.
Speaker 6: Great work, Pennywog.
Speaker 1: You can judge a country by the company it keeps,
Speaker 1: and you, Pennywog, have thrown us in.
Speaker 6: With the worst of the worst.
Speaker 1: Foreign Minister Wong, of course, was running around ABC's studios
Speaker 1: yesterday claiming that the vote does not.
Speaker 6: Reward on us.
Speaker 1: Really, But as I said, I am horrified but not surprised.
Speaker 1: Virtually every single relevant Middle East action Penny Wang and
Speaker 1: Anthony Albanizi have taken since they miserably clawed their way
Speaker 1: into government with a poultry thirty two percent of the
Speaker 1: primary vote has.
Speaker 6: Been hostile to Israel.
Speaker 1: You do not treat your friends the way these undergraduate
Speaker 1: Neo Marxists have treated the people of Israel.
Speaker 6: And the Jews of Australia.
Speaker 1: At every turn and whenever the opportunity has arisen, Pennywog
Speaker 1: has spat in the face of the Jews of Australia.
Speaker 1: Jews have been in Australia since the first Fleet, Australia's
Speaker 1: Jews who have been at the forefront of this nation's political, scientific,
Speaker 1: military and academic achievements for over two centuries. Yet Pennywog
Speaker 1: has seen fit to trample all over Australia's Jews and
Speaker 1: the Greens and the Teals are no better. At the
Speaker 1: urging of the Teals, including a Legrispender, Zoey Daniels, Kate
Speaker 1: Cheney and the rest of them. Pennywog resumed for a
Speaker 1: second time funding ANWAH, the United Nations agency with proven
Speaker 1: links to Hamas. Pennywog was praised by Hamas literally praised
Speaker 1: on Twitter by the Terrorists News network themselves when she
Speaker 1: changed Australia's diplomatic language by abandoning the term disputed territories,
Speaker 1: which is used to describe parts of Judea and scenario
Speaker 1: which are disputed, and instead, thanks to Pennywog, calling them
Speaker 1: occupied territories, in other words, demonizing Israel and rewarding terrorism.
Speaker 1: Now that I'm askedful again be popping the bubbly rejoicing
Speaker 1: at Wong's latest pro Palestinian gesture. Here is the Israeli
Speaker 1: ambassador to the U and condemning the actions of those
Speaker 1: nations voting for the resolution, including shamefully Australia.
Speaker 21: Not a single Palestinian leader, not even one, has condemned
Speaker 21: the October seventh massacre. He calls the Hamasis brothers. And
Speaker 21: this is who you want to bestow the rights of
Speaker 21: a state upon a terror entity. As long as you,
Speaker 21: as long as so many of you are you hating?
Speaker 21: You don't really care that the Palestinians are not peace
Speaker 21: loving despite your obligation to the UN Charter. You are
Speaker 21: here today to expose what the Charter truly means to you.
Speaker 21: When it comes to the lives of Israelis and Jews.
Speaker 21: The UN Charter means nothing to you, not the caput.
Speaker 1: Penny wang Onsa claims that voting yes will increase the
Speaker 1: likelihood of a two states solution. She even goes so
Speaker 1: far as to say Palestine can be a state without
Speaker 1: a peace process being complete. She is either ignorant, beyond
Speaker 1: belief or deliberately deceiving the Australian public. He is a
Speaker 1: tiny part of a brief history lesson about Israel from
Speaker 1: Ben Shapiro.
Speaker 20: So in nineteen ninety three, they signed the Oslo Accords,
Speaker 20: and that is where you get Bill Clinton presiding over
Speaker 20: one of the least successful international negotiations in the history
Speaker 20: of international politics. The Oslo Cords have been a complete
Speaker 20: and utter failure. Shaking hands with a mass murdering terrorist,
Speaker 20: Yasir Araphat, and this was going to initiate a new
Speaker 20: period of health and accord, and there's going to be
Speaker 20: peace All that the PLO had to do was acknowledged
Speaker 20: that Israel existed and had a right to exist, stop
Speaker 20: educating their children in terrorism, and sees the violence. They
Speaker 20: couldn't do any of those things right, so none of
Speaker 20: that happened. Instead, there's an uptick in violence, pretty dramatic
Speaker 20: uptick in violence. After the Oslo Accords. In nineteen ninety eight,
Speaker 20: Israel again attempts to make some sort of concessions to
Speaker 20: the Palestinians, this time under the first tenure of Prime
Speaker 20: Minister Benjamintanyahu. Israel does not want to govern these areas.
Speaker 20: Israel is not interested in governing millions of Palestinians in
Speaker 20: the Gaza strip or in Juday and Samaria. Two thousand,
Speaker 20: Israel engages in the Camp David negotiations. Bill Clinton is
Speaker 20: still president at this point, and the Prime Minister of
Speaker 20: Israel is now a guy named Ehud Barak.
Speaker 6: A hud Barak offered everything.
Speaker 20: A Hubarak offered complete control over the Temple Mount with
Speaker 20: just like a little bit of a recognition that Israel
Speaker 20: has a historic claim religiously to the Temple Mount Arafat
Speaker 20: turned down flat. He offered control over virtually all of Judaea,
Speaker 20: and Samaria. He offered control over the Gaza strip right
Speaker 20: a Palestinian state whom done Arafat does not even negotiate.
Speaker 20: He just launches a massive round of violence. I remember
Speaker 20: this because I was actually in Israel right about the
Speaker 20: time they launched the Intafada, and there were suicide bombings
Speaker 20: on a fairly regular basis. They blew up a Spiro's
Speaker 20: pizza shop. I was supposed to be at that corner
Speaker 20: like a couple of hours later. This was a thing
Speaker 20: that was really scary. It was really violent. Remember, he
Speaker 20: launched that not after Israel did something aggressive. He launched
Speaker 20: that after Israel offered him everything he could possibly want
Speaker 20: if he wan't a dan blier who just wanted Israel
Speaker 20: wiped off the map. This, again, is the great lie,
Speaker 20: is that there is desire for a two state solution
Speaker 20: from the Palestinian side. So far, there has been no
Speaker 20: evidence whatsoever that this is the case.
Speaker 1: On every occasion the Palestinians have been offered a state
Speaker 1: alongside Israel, they have turned it down. In twenty fourteen,
Speaker 1: I visited Israel with a group of Australian journalists, about
Speaker 1: ten of us. We were there for a week, which
Speaker 1: included a trip into Ramala on the West Bank to
Speaker 1: meet official Palestinian representatives. After a lengthy and frankly and
Speaker 1: incredibly incredible, hard to believe presentation, we got to ask questions.
Speaker 1: I asked this official spokesperson for the Palestine the authorities
Speaker 1: to describe what the two state solution he was so
Speaker 1: eagerly promoting would actually look like. First, I asked him
Speaker 1: what the two states would actually be called. He said,
Speaker 1: the first state would be called Palestine, of course, and
Speaker 1: how many Jews would be allowed to live in Palestine?
Speaker 1: I asked, He did not hesitate.
Speaker 6: None.
Speaker 1: He said not one. I asked, no, not one, he reiterated.
Speaker 1: I then asked him what the other state would be called.
Speaker 1: He shrugged dismissively and said he did not care. Call
Speaker 1: it whatever you want. And then I asked him how
Speaker 1: many Jews would be allowed to live in that state.
Speaker 1: There was an awkward silence. He muttered something to one
Speaker 1: of his colleagues.
Speaker 6: They conferred for a little bit, and then he said
Speaker 6: just a handful his words in front of.
Speaker 1: A group of Australian journalists from the ABC, various newspapers
Speaker 1: and Sky. I was the only person in that room
Speaker 1: who reported those words, an official Palestinian spokesperson admitting to Western.
Speaker 6: Journalists that only a handful.
Speaker 1: Of Jews would be left in the second of those
Speaker 1: two states.
Speaker 6: That's what from the River to the Sea means.
Speaker 1: Israel is a vibrant, energizing, extraordinary, multicultural and multi racial democracy,
Speaker 1: not unlike Australia. The people of Israel are only interested
Speaker 1: in one thing. No, it's not world domination. No, it's
Speaker 1: not colonizing the Palestinians. No it's not apartheid. No, it's
Speaker 1: none of that undergraduate rubbish. Israel and the Jews are
Speaker 1: interested in one thing only, and that is surviving as
Speaker 1: a state and living in peace with their neighbors.
Speaker 6: That's it. And do you want to know why that is, Well,
Speaker 6: here's why.
Speaker 22: The Jewish population in Morocco was about two hundred and
Speaker 22: sixty five thousand in nineteen forty eight, while today it's
Speaker 22: only about two thousand.
Speaker 4: Let's continue.
Speaker 22: In Algeria in nineteen forty eight, about one hundred and
Speaker 22: forty thousand Jews live lived today only about fifty Intonisia
Speaker 22: in nineteen forty eight, about one hundred and fifty thousand
Speaker 22: Jews live today only about fifty. In Libya in nineteen
Speaker 22: forty eight, about thirty eight thousand Jews live today, there
Speaker 22: is not even one. In Egypt in nineteen forty eight,
Speaker 22: about seventy five thousand Jews lived today only about forty.
Speaker 22: In your Men in nineteen forty eight, about fifty five
Speaker 22: thousand Jews live today only about fifty. About one hundred
Speaker 22: and fifty thousand Jews lived in Iraq in nineteen forty eight,
Speaker 22: today only seven. In Syria in nineteen forty eight, about
Speaker 22: forty thousand Jews lived today not even one Jew. About
Speaker 22: twenty thousand Jews lived in Lebanon in nineteen forty eight,
Speaker 22: today only about one hundred. And now get the following figure.
Speaker 22: How many Arabs lived in Israel in nineteen forty eight
Speaker 22: about one hundred and fifty six thousand, and how many
Speaker 22: Arabs live there today two million, one hundred and seventy
Speaker 22: eight thousand.
Speaker 1: On October seventh, a mass set abouts openly attempting the
Speaker 1: genesis of the Jewish people. Twelve hundred people were slain
Speaker 1: in the most horrific, grisly, degrading and evil fashions, with
Speaker 1: hundreds taken hostage. The leaders of Hamas have promised to
Speaker 1: repeat that vile pogram again and again and again if
Speaker 1: given the chance, and they mean it.
Speaker 23: It's this.
Speaker 1: Grub went on to say that October seventh would happen
Speaker 1: again and again until Israel no longer exists, because he
Speaker 1: claimed it's very existence, the very existence of Israel.
Speaker 6: He says, this is illogical and the nation must be
Speaker 6: wiped away. You can't get any clearer than that.
Speaker 1: You can't get more despicable, despicable than that, and you
Speaker 1: cannot get more grotesque than that.
Speaker 6: No, but put a lot of the philosophia.
Speaker 23: Was the sil Vermont was the alone will either about
Speaker 23: dimmer Yes, And here are.
Speaker 1: The Hamas thugs worth are reputed eleven billion dollars, all
Speaker 1: of it donated by the West, living the high life
Speaker 1: in Qatar, jet setting around the Middle East while hostages
Speaker 1: Jewish hostages live and die in horror in the tunnels
Speaker 1: beneath Gaza. These are the people whose interests Penny Wong
Speaker 1: has now aligned Australia with.
Speaker 6: It is an absolute disgrace. Allow me to.
Speaker 1: Say to every Jew here in Australia and around the world,
Speaker 1: we do not support the Australian government's vote. We do
Speaker 1: not support the Australian government's cowardice, and we do not
Speaker 1: support the Australian government's brazen deceptions and stupidity. Labor has
Speaker 1: betrayed you, and Labor has betrayed all of us. I
Speaker 1: say to the Jews of the world, we will do
Speaker 1: our dandas to rid ourselves of this appalling and internationally
Speaker 1: embarrassing Labor Greens Teal government at the next election, and
Speaker 1: we will vote in the coalition government who, like the
Speaker 1: vast majority of Australians, do not I repeat, do not
Speaker 1: despise the Jews. We the vast majority of Australians, stand
Speaker 1: firmly on the side of Israel and our Jewish friends,
Speaker 1: brothers and sisters. Joining us now is Victor Davis Hansen
Speaker 1: from the Hoover Institute, Senior fellow and author, and he's
Speaker 1: got a great new book out well called wait for It.
Speaker 6: The End of Everything.
Speaker 1: Can't get more definitive than that, The End of Everything,
Speaker 1: How Wars Descend into Annihilation, which was released last Tuesday. Victor,
Speaker 1: fantastic to have you here back on Outsiders.
Speaker 6: We've been talking about obviously, your book.
Speaker 1: Is very timely and it's warning of how civilization do
Speaker 1: collapse and do get annihilated, and you go through several
Speaker 1: historical civilizations that cease to exist that were wiped out.
Speaker 1: So tell us a bit about the book, and then
Speaker 1: we'll talk about how it relates to the modern era.
Speaker 6: But tell us first about your book.
Speaker 24: Well, wars usually end in some kind of negotiation and
Speaker 24: the defeated, except terms sometimes in Attila the hunter ginghis
Speaker 24: khan will come through and kill a lot of people.
Speaker 24: Of course, final solution Hitler. But even Japan and Germany
Speaker 24: survived World War Two. But every once in a while,
Speaker 24: an entire civilization is wiped out by war. And I
Speaker 24: looked at four examples. There's more. The ancient city of
Speaker 24: Thebes in classical Greece that was wiped out to the
Speaker 24: foundation by Alexander the Great Carthage in the Third Punic War.
Speaker 24: After a third year three year siege, Scipiomilianus level it
Speaker 24: to the ground. Constantinople, the entire Christian Byzantine Greek speaking
Speaker 24: population ceased to exist as an entity. Thirty years after
Speaker 24: the fall of Constantinople, which became kind of the DNA
Speaker 24: was changed and minarets were slapped on Haga Sophia became
Speaker 24: the capital of the Ottoman Empire. And then I looked
Speaker 24: finally at Hernan Cortes's destruction of the Aztec Empire, and
Speaker 24: he leveled to note Chitlan, the capital, down to the foundation,
Speaker 24: and used the rubble to build Mexico City. And then
Speaker 24: within fifty years there was no idea of Aztec language civilization.
Speaker 24: And then very quickly I came up with I found
Speaker 24: they were common denominators. All of these societies didn't recognize
Speaker 24: they were in decline. They had all sorts of problems
Speaker 24: with their militaries. They had no idea of the intent
Speaker 24: or the capability of their enemies. They were living on
Speaker 24: delusions of lost grandeur. They kept thinking even if they
Speaker 24: did resist the Romans or the Macedonians or the Muslims
Speaker 24: and they lost, there would be negotiations as there.
Speaker 6: Had been in that past.
Speaker 24: They bragged their walls had never been breached in constant
Speaker 24: Ople or Carthage, and finally the So there was a
Speaker 24: lot of naivete, a lot of living in fantasies, a
Speaker 24: lot of utopianism about the nature of the people outside
Speaker 24: the walls. And then an epilogue, I kind of surveyed
Speaker 24: the contemporary landscape of what mister Erdojan has said to
Speaker 24: Greeks and Armenians, what mister Chai has said in China
Speaker 24: to Taiwan, of course, the Putin and the Russians to Ukraine,
Speaker 24: and especially what a series of Iranian leaders have said
Speaker 24: to Israel. And all of them are existential threats from
Speaker 24: you know, You're going to wake up one morning and
Speaker 24: Athens is going to be blanketed with rockets. So there
Speaker 24: are Israel is a one bomb state where half the
Speaker 24: world's Jews make it convenience. Such thing and the denial
Speaker 24: contemporary people think, you know, Kim Jong un is and
Speaker 24: not he would never launch what he says he will.
Speaker 24: But in history this happens on occasion. I think we
Speaker 24: should be aware of how it does, why it does,
Speaker 24: and why we should take it seriously.
Speaker 8: James Well, Professor, the big save of your book seems
Speaker 8: to be denial about that decline, about whether your allies
Speaker 8: will come to get you. And you know the nature
Speaker 8: of your enemy is the West. Our nations, you know,
Speaker 8: like the United States, in a similar sort of denial,
Speaker 8: and in a place like Australia. You know, I'm thinking
Speaker 8: about the Venetians not coming to aid in Constantinople. Are
Speaker 8: we in a real sort of similar, sort of historical
Speaker 8: parallel right now today.
Speaker 24: I think more than half our country is worried about
Speaker 24: just what you outline. We're thirty five trillion dollars in debt,
Speaker 24: We're borrowing at trillion dollars every hundred days. We are
Speaker 24: short forty five thousand recruits, mostly white males of the
Speaker 24: lower classes, that this administration has libel even though they
Speaker 24: died at twice their demographics. In Iraq and Afghanistan, we
Speaker 24: have ten million people who cross the border. We have
Speaker 24: no idea who they are. There is no border, and
Speaker 24: our defense budget is short. Artillery shells javelins were built
Speaker 24: by the Chinese five to one. And yet we say
Speaker 24: that all of our friends in the area where you live, Australia, Philippines, Taiwan,
Speaker 24: Japan and South Korea are part of the Western Protectorate
Speaker 24: and we have responsibilities. But I don't think we could
Speaker 24: fulfill them with our present capability or to be frank,
Speaker 24: this administrative I don't feel that we have any deterrence
Speaker 24: after Afghanistan, or the Chinese balloon fiasco, or the Ukrainian
Speaker 24: gods and wars. We have too many opportunistic enemies that
Speaker 24: feel that we won't or cannot do anything.
Speaker 7: Well, if we are in this civilizational decline, who's the
Speaker 7: biggest threat? Is it China or is it the rise
Speaker 7: of Islamism?
Speaker 6: What is the.
Speaker 11: Fact that we need to be most aware of.
Speaker 24: Well, we have two threats in the West. One, of course,
Speaker 24: is an external enemy that has a population of one
Speaker 24: point four billion. It's a communist dictatorship and it violates
Speaker 24: all international rules. It's taken over the South China see,
Speaker 24: and it feels that in the long term it's destined
Speaker 24: to defeat the West. That we're affluent, we're decadent. Our
Speaker 24: fertility is its fertility is bad as well. But we're
Speaker 24: in decline and it's opportunistic. And then we have what
Speaker 24: I would call more insidious enemy of radical Islam.
Speaker 9: And we have in the.
Speaker 24: United States quarter million students and most of these campuses,
Speaker 24: for example, where that virulent anti Semitism takes place is
Speaker 24: spearheaded by people either from the Middle East on campus
Speaker 24: or on work visas that are not even students, and
Speaker 24: they're the people who are yelling go back to Poland,
Speaker 24: roughing up Jews on campus, terrorizing other students and using
Speaker 24: useful idiot American students as or ponds. So those two
Speaker 24: threats and kind of an internal And I think immigration
Speaker 24: is a big problem in the West. We haven't solved that.
Speaker 24: No Western countries solved that. They just are incapable of
Speaker 24: saying we'd like to assimilate you, we'd like to integrate you,
Speaker 24: we'll intermarry you. All you have to do is come
Speaker 24: legally with a background audit in diverse numbers and numbers
Speaker 24: that we can assimilate. But you're not just going to
Speaker 24: flood into our country and then create a tribal enclave.
Speaker 24: And yet we can't say that to.
Speaker 1: So Victor, you're writing suggesting probably that there ain't a
Speaker 1: copy of your book making its way to the White House,
Speaker 1: But do you think there's a copy on a bedside
Speaker 1: down in mar Lago somewhere that might be being flicked through.
Speaker 1: And d S hope that Trump could be would if
Speaker 1: he wins the next election, we'd be able to reverse
Speaker 1: some of this decline.
Speaker 24: Well, he did before he got for all the crudity
Speaker 24: that he was accused of, and he can be crude.
Speaker 24: He got the Europeans to spend one hundred billion more
Speaker 24: in defense. He raised our budget by one hundred billion dollars.
Speaker 24: There was no North Korean missiles launched. Isis was destroyed,
Speaker 24: He killed mister Solomani, the Hutis were declared terrorists, Hamas
Speaker 24: and Hezblaw were quiescent. We had a closed border by
Speaker 24: twenty twenty. He stopped and so, I mean, there wasn't perfect,
Speaker 24: but he redid a lot of the things that Obama
Speaker 24: had done. And the Middle East was quiet. It was
Speaker 24: so quiet that Jake Sullivan, mister Biden's National Security of advisor,
Speaker 24: said just before October seventh that his Middle East portfolio
Speaker 24: was quiet. They inherited a quiet Middle East. He didn't
Speaker 24: say from home, but he admitted.
Speaker 2: That it's quiet.
Speaker 11: But Trump right now is.
Speaker 7: Being persecuted, prosecuted politically, this criminal case in New York.
Speaker 7: How do you see that they are determined to have
Speaker 7: him criminally convicted, perhaps even sent to jail.
Speaker 11: What do you say unfolding there?
Speaker 24: Well, everybody in the United States knows if he hadn't
Speaker 24: gone for reelection, there would be no case. Everybody knows
Speaker 24: these these so called crimes have never been indicted. Nobody's
Speaker 24: ever been indicted for any of them. No ex president
Speaker 24: has had his house rated. No ex president has been
Speaker 24: in dited for a phone called. No ex president has
Speaker 24: been indicted for real estate assessments which the bank enjoyed,
Speaker 24: made a profit, and the loans were paid back in
Speaker 24: timely fashion. No ex president has had a campaign violation
Speaker 24: made into a felony. If it was a violate, Barack
Speaker 24: Obama had three hundred thousand dollars in campaign violations. No
Speaker 24: one suggested that should be criminal rather than a civil offense.
Speaker 24: So everybody understands. I think the majority of Americans what
Speaker 24: this is an effort of lawfare, because what the left
Speaker 24: cannot achieve at the ballot box. Joe Biden is calling
Speaker 24: about thirty eight percent approval. None of his policies are
Speaker 24: get fifty one percent approval. And they feel they can
Speaker 24: tie Donald Trump up all summer long, destroy him financially, psychologically, physically,
Speaker 24: run up a billion dollars in legal fees, and they
Speaker 24: don't care about the country. We're the laughing stock of
Speaker 24: the world. We lecture people in Africa and Asia and
Speaker 24: Latin America about the wonders of American jurisprudence and lying
Speaker 24: justice and all this crap that we have abandoned, and
Speaker 24: so we I think a lot of us are very
Speaker 24: embarrassed and we want the United States to return to
Speaker 24: a legal society. We're also very afraid because the federal
Speaker 24: under this administration, the fbis, CIA, the DOJ have been
Speaker 24: weaponized in a way that we've never seen. Very hard
Speaker 24: to accept. The Left, you know, it's all for equality
Speaker 24: and equity and peace and love, but they're very hardcore
Speaker 24: using the federal government to go after their political enemy.
Speaker 6: It is strange days.
Speaker 1: Indeed, Victor will be rushing out to buy the book.
Speaker 1: So I urge people the end of everything, how Wars
Speaker 1: descend into annihilation, which you've just released. Absolutely probably slightly
Speaker 1: depressing read in parts, but you're not aware of the
Speaker 1: problem unless you identify the problem.
Speaker 6: And well done for doing that.
Speaker 1: And as I said, let's hope that there's a copy
Speaker 1: down in mar Laga. Thanks so much, Victor, and great
Speaker 1: to chat to you.
Speaker 6: Coming up.
Speaker 1: What's more, we've got James's Donkey bides Nity.
Speaker 8: Hello, you're watching Outsiders. I'm James memory Lanemorrow here as
Speaker 8: always with Rita Roll the tape, Pennehy and Rowan. Remember
Speaker 8: when Dean, and today we're gonna play a little game
Speaker 8: of compare and contrast. I'm gonna play two clips, one
Speaker 8: of Joe Biden ten years ago and one from just
Speaker 8: the other day. First, Joe Biden speaking on the topic
Speaker 8: of Israel in twenty fourteen.
Speaker 6: Let's go, it's.
Speaker 4: More than merely a moral.
Speaker 25: Obligation we had, It's a security necessity. It's for both
Speaker 25: Israel's sake and for the United States.
Speaker 4: The security of Israel the.
Speaker 25: United States is inextricably tied. And we will never, ever
Speaker 25: ever abandon Israel out of our own self interest.
Speaker 8: I mean, you could just see how much the man
Speaker 8: has declined looking at him ten years ago, and now
Speaker 8: could you imagine the President trying to even pronounce the
Speaker 8: word inextricably today. But now let's look agt at Joe
Speaker 8: Biden speaking to CNN just a few days ago on
Speaker 8: the same topic.
Speaker 26: Israel I made it clear that if they go into Rafa,
Speaker 26: they haven't gone on Raffa yet. If they going to Rafa,
Speaker 26: I'm not supplying the weapons that have been used historically
Speaker 26: to deal with Rafa, to deal with the cities, to
Speaker 26: deal with that problem. It's just wrong. We're not going
Speaker 26: to supply the weapons and the artillery shells.
Speaker 11: Use that have been used artillery shells as well.
Speaker 8: Yeah, so much vigor there. Now two things stand out
Speaker 8: pretty obviously from these two clips. Number One, there's the
Speaker 8: incredible decline of course in Joe Biden's vigor, his mental acuity.
Speaker 8: The man has aged and in age incredibly by the
Speaker 8: office and time. But two, the more important thing, I
Speaker 8: think for our purposes is the huge backflip when it
Speaker 8: comes to Israel, threatening the government of Israel that the
Speaker 8: US would withhold aid and this is key if they
Speaker 8: go into Rafa in the Gaza Strip to finish off Hamas. Now,
Speaker 8: this is of course a tremendous gift to Hamas and
Speaker 8: their masters in Tehran. Donald Trump said as much and
Speaker 8: more in the past few hours posting on truth Social
Speaker 8: Crooked Joe Biden, whether he knows it or not, just
Speaker 8: said he will withhold weapons from Israel as they fight
Speaker 8: to eradicate Hamas terrorists in Gaza. Hamas murdered thousands of
Speaker 8: innocent civilians, including babies, and are still holding Americans hostage.
Speaker 8: If the hostages are still alive yet, Crooked Joe Trump
Speaker 8: says is taking the side of these terrorists, like he
Speaker 8: has sided with the radical mobs taking over our college
Speaker 8: campuses because his donors are funding them. Biden is weak, corrupt,
Speaker 8: and leading the world straight into World War iie, remember
Speaker 8: this war in Israel, just like the war in Ukraine,
Speaker 8: says would never have started if I was in the
Speaker 8: White House. Trump said, But very soon we will be
Speaker 8: back and once again demanding peace through strength. That was
Speaker 8: Donald Trump just a few hours ago. But there is
Speaker 8: even beyond all of this, with this backflip on Israel,
Speaker 8: a bigger issue that we need to get into.
Speaker 6: And that is why.
Speaker 8: Biden made this move. And I think the reasons why
Speaker 8: this move remain are obvious for all to see because
Speaker 8: in doing so as well, he may have landed himself,
Speaker 8: Joe Biden, in some trouble. Indeed, some analysts are now
Speaker 8: saying that this could be and would certainly be more
Speaker 8: likely if the parties were reversed, an impeachable of events,
Speaker 8: given that the likely reason Biden with healthy Aid was
Speaker 8: to help not American foreign policy or national security interests,
Speaker 8: but to assist the Democrats in the unenviable task of
Speaker 8: shoring up the Muslim vote in key states like Michigan,
Speaker 8: where US support for Israel has voters furious because remember,
Speaker 8: this is exactly this whole political quit pro quo what
Speaker 8: Donald Trump was accused of doing when the Democrats tried
Speaker 8: to impeach him for threatening Ukraine's President Vladimir Zelensky, telling
Speaker 8: Zelensky that he might withhold military aid to help in
Speaker 8: the fight against Putin's invading armies if Jalensky didn't cooperate
Speaker 8: with an investigation into Hunter Biden's oil and gas business
Speaker 8: activities in Ukraine. So again, let's dive into the archives.
Speaker 8: Here's Joe Biden on the Jimmy Kimmel program September twenty nineteen.
Speaker 25: The idea that someone would call a head of a
Speaker 25: foreign state ahead of time with whole significant military.
Speaker 6: Aid that's badly needed.
Speaker 25: In order to prevent the Russian separatists who are in
Speaker 25: Ukraine from taking over Ukraine and then ask basically to
Speaker 25: can you cooperate with Rudy Giuliani's coming over, talked about
Speaker 25: getting the Justice Department engaged in this. I mean such
Speaker 25: a blatant.
Speaker 26: Abuse of power that it's just I don't think it
Speaker 26: can stand.
Speaker 22: Yeah, it's well, do you think it is an impeachable.
Speaker 22: This particular instance is an impeachable offense.
Speaker 25: Based on the material that they acknowledged today, it seems
Speaker 25: to me it's awful hard to avoid the conclusion that
Speaker 25: it is an impeachable offense and a violentce of constitution responsibility.
Speaker 8: Well, hang on, what's that you say, mister president? Withholding
Speaker 8: foreign military aid from a democratic ally facing an existential
Speaker 8: war for your own domestic political purposes is an impeachable offense?
Speaker 6: Why I never?
Speaker 8: And throughout the twenty twenty campaign, Joe Biden hit this
Speaker 8: theme again and again, saying time and again that in
Speaker 8: threatening to withhold aid, Donald Trump was guilty of a
Speaker 8: quote abuse of power unquote and that he quote thought
Speaker 8: he was above the law unquote.
Speaker 6: Yet suddenly, now the.
Speaker 8: Tune has changed. Biden can withhold aid from an ally
Speaker 8: he spent his whole career defending for what are clearly
Speaker 8: blatantly political reasons, and everything is it seems okay? Well,
Speaker 8: I don't know about you, but I'd love to see
Speaker 8: this thrashed out in a presidential debate, and I suspect
Speaker 8: Donald Trump would too, as he threw down this challenge
Speaker 8: this week.
Speaker 6: Come on, Joe, let's do it. Anywhere, anytime, any place, And.
Speaker 8: I think Joe Biden may have accepted did he just
Speaker 8: accept Well, gosh, I cannot wait for that. And I
Speaker 8: know I'm not qualified to give financial advice on this program,
Speaker 8: but it might be a good idea to go very
Speaker 8: long on.
Speaker 1: Popcorn, Fantastic, James Well, w academia and the wacky world
Speaker 1: of academia. Let me just quickly say congratulations to Jennifer Westcott,
Speaker 1: the vice chancellor of the Western Sydney University, therefore actually
Speaker 1: coming out one of the only vice chancellors to come
Speaker 1: out against the anti semitism on these campuses. And also
Speaker 1: congratulations to Greg Craven for a great things on that topic.
Speaker 1: But let's talk about wacademia rita. Blackface is back screens
Speaker 1: or is it? Well?
Speaker 7: Yeah, three, Well, two of the teens you'll see here
Speaker 7: kicked out of their elite school in California for indulging
Speaker 7: in blackface. Well, they've just been awarded a million dollars
Speaker 7: because they were just actually masks they were wearing to
Speaker 7: help with your skin tone. So if you've got acne
Speaker 7: as a teenager, it's recommended you wear these masks.
Speaker 11: And that's what that was.
Speaker 7: But over zealous bureaucrats at the school call these boys
Speaker 7: racists and expel them.
Speaker 6: Fantastic.
Speaker 1: Well, there were another school there was someone calling for
Speaker 1: beheading the school president.
Speaker 6: Why would that have been James?
Speaker 8: Oh, Well, because of hostel classes over ending their gaza
Speaker 8: in Cabia, the sprung up all over the country of
Speaker 8: the US.
Speaker 6: Georgia.
Speaker 8: Washington University has had some of the worst ones. By
Speaker 8: the way, they've been projecting all sorts of images about
Speaker 8: you know, basically proving that really what their movement is
Speaker 8: not about. It's not about you know, ending the war
Speaker 8: in Gaza. It is really actually about overthrown, violent overthrow
Speaker 8: of the United States.
Speaker 6: This is what they're teaching in these schools people.
Speaker 7: And we saw that right after October seven, when some
Speaker 7: of these academics were very bold in stating, well, what
Speaker 7: did you think decolonization was going to look like?
Speaker 11: Did you think it was going to be a fun ride.
Speaker 7: So they've been very, very explicit in saying what we
Speaker 7: saw in October seven, that violent sadistic uprising is part
Speaker 7: of how they see they're going to defeat the West.
Speaker 7: It's not going to be just you know, submission and
Speaker 7: done peacefully.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, we canna take a short break when we come
Speaker 1: back to the Canbra Clown Show. A bit of a
Speaker 1: trip in the past on this one.
Speaker 6: Roll up, Roll Up, It's the Canbra clown Show.
Speaker 1: And this week we hop in the time machine and
Speaker 1: travel back to one of the greatest circus acts.
Speaker 6: Ever seen on this continent.
Speaker 1: And it was, of course, the Canberra Coronavirus COVID Clown Show,
Speaker 1: starring none other than an entire cast of premieres, prime ministers,
Speaker 1: chief health officers, all posing as COVID clowns. Here are
Speaker 1: some of the highlights. It's none other than Scomo himself
Speaker 1: with one of his classic, funniest one liners.
Speaker 6: That's the sort of country we live in.
Speaker 17: People make their own decisions about their own health and
Speaker 17: their own bodies.
Speaker 1: That's why we don't have mandatory vaccination in relation to
Speaker 1: the general population here.
Speaker 6: And he delivered it with a straight face.
Speaker 1: Unlike any good comic, Scomo knows how to keep telling
Speaker 1: the same old gag and making it sound fresh each time.
Speaker 6: We do not have a mandatory vaccination policy in this country.
Speaker 4: We do not have that.
Speaker 6: We are not proposing to have that.
Speaker 1: That is not changing, right, Okay, and of course no
Speaker 1: COVID performance would be complete with Antscomo's little sidekick here,
Speaker 1: the Chief Medical Officer, Paul Kelly.
Speaker 27: In this situation, I can absolutely say that I remain
Speaker 27: confident in the astrosenka vaccine, that it's safe, and that
Speaker 27: there is at this point no evidence that it causes
Speaker 27: blood clots. No evidence that it causes blood clots.
Speaker 6: Hmmmm.
Speaker 1: One of the biggest clowns came, of course, from Victoria.
Speaker 6: Here he is across our state.
Speaker 28: We have championed the astrosenka vaccine and anyone who suggests
Speaker 28: otherwise is simply wrong. Nine hundred and forty thousand double
Speaker 28: dosed Victorians with astrosenica. It is safe, it is effective.
Speaker 28: Go online right now. There are literally thousands of astrosenka
Speaker 28: appointments available for you.
Speaker 1: But the comedians at the COVID clown Show weren't just
Speaker 1: happy to reassure you that astrazenka was one hundred percent safe.
Speaker 1: They also ran with the line that if you were unvaccinated,
Speaker 1: you were to blame for the pandemic.
Speaker 28: Who just confirms that this really is a pandemic Now
Speaker 28: of the unvaccinated, there.
Speaker 19: Is ample supply of astrozenica so anybody, anybody should come
Speaker 19: forward and get vaccinated. We don't want to see anybody
Speaker 19: vulnerable without vaccine, vaccines. I mean, this is I've said
Speaker 19: a couple of times, really a pandemic and epidemic of
Speaker 19: the unvaccinated.
Speaker 1: Oh really, you got that, a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
Speaker 1: Talk about abusing your position of authority and demonizing innocent people.
Speaker 6: Oh sorry, Schomo disagrees.
Speaker 29: You know, we live in a country where we're not
Speaker 29: going to go around demonizing those who want to make
Speaker 29: their own choices.
Speaker 6: I think that's very important.
Speaker 4: That's not how our government sees it.
Speaker 1: Said it with a straight confused you will be. Of course,
Speaker 1: many of our best performers were simply stealing their lines
Speaker 1: from all those COVID clowns overseas. But still, remind me again,
Speaker 1: who were the culprits in all of this clown show?
Speaker 30: You are the unvaccinated, You are the problem. It is
Speaker 30: the unvaccinated who are the problem, period, end of story.
Speaker 30: The only people that you can blame, the only people
Speaker 30: you can blame.
Speaker 6: This isn't shaming, this is the truth.
Speaker 30: Maybe they should be shamed, but the unvaccinated.
Speaker 8: Show blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks.
Speaker 30: Anyone you came into contact with will blame you, as
Speaker 30: will the rest of us who have done the right
Speaker 30: thing by getting vaccinated.
Speaker 29: Because frankly, we know that we can't trust to be unvaccinated.
Speaker 2: I think it's time to.
Speaker 8: Get our moral house and order. Anderson, it's the unvaccinated
Speaker 8: who are the threat.
Speaker 6: Right, thank you? The unvaccinated other threat?
Speaker 1: Yes, he's former British lay Prime Minister Tony Blair joining
Speaker 1: in this public lynching.
Speaker 6: It's clear you know vaccination works.
Speaker 1: The absence of vaccination, your failure to get vaccinated.
Speaker 6: Doesn't just put you at risk. I think this is
Speaker 6: what is important. In a way. If this were just
Speaker 6: a personal decision for.
Speaker 18: People, and you get vaccinated, you don't get vaccinated, it's.
Speaker 6: You who suffers if you don't. But it's not you
Speaker 6: who suffers if you don't, Simply it's also other people.
Speaker 13: To get vaccinated is actually part of your it's almost
Speaker 13: part of your civic duty.
Speaker 1: By the way, everything that that clown said in that
Speaker 1: clip was complete nonsense. We now know that the vaccines
Speaker 1: were never initially tested for preventing transmission, and indeed they
Speaker 1: did not do so. Here is a hilarious but tragic
Speaker 1: compilation of the history of those public assurances about the
Speaker 1: efficacy of the vaccines in different contexts, taken from news headlines,
Speaker 1: starting at one hundred percent effective certain studies, until well,
Speaker 1: just watch you might need another show, and on and
Speaker 1: on it went until just last week the mainstream media,
Speaker 1: we're announcing this.
Speaker 29: The major COVID vaccine is being withdrawn from the global
Speaker 29: market after its maker is admitted it can lead to
Speaker 29: a very serious side effect. About thirteen million doses of
Speaker 29: the Astrazeneka job we're administered in this country, but the
Speaker 29: company has now officially withdrawn it from all markets.
Speaker 17: It comes as the drug maker faces a major class
Speaker 17: action in the UK, where it admitted in court their
Speaker 17: vaccine can lead to fatal blood clots in those who
Speaker 17: received it.
Speaker 6: Well.
Speaker 1: Well, and even funnier or more tragic, was this. Here's
Speaker 1: Chris Cuomo back in twenty twenty during COVID demonizing people
Speaker 1: who were taking ivormectin as a preventative medicine.
Speaker 30: People who are getting drugs for animals and horse.
Speaker 9: And people telling them to what person you know you
Speaker 9: talk about like you cancel culture and who to shame
Speaker 9: ivermectin a de wormer.
Speaker 30: Really, they are shaming themselves. No one has to shame them.
Speaker 30: They're shaming themselves.
Speaker 6: To be shamed, they need to.
Speaker 25: Be called out and shamed, called out in shamed.
Speaker 1: And yet here is the very saying Chris Cuomo just
Speaker 1: last week on Joe Rogue, I'll tell.
Speaker 9: You something else that's gonna get you a lot of hits.
Speaker 9: I am taking a what do they call it, like
Speaker 9: a regular dose, you know whatever they're trying to build
Speaker 9: up of ivermectin. Ivermectin was a boogeyman early on in COPD.
Speaker 4: You couldn't talk about it.
Speaker 9: That was wrong. We were given bad information about ivermectin.
Speaker 4: The real question is why.
Speaker 1: Yes, And I'd like to know why too, because I
Speaker 1: was one of those people who were shamed and defamed
Speaker 1: and demonized along with Rita and the Australian Senate no less,
Speaker 1: for comments I had made on this show about ivermectin.
Speaker 1: Will those leftist grubs in the Senate apologize to me?
Speaker 6: I won't hold my breath.
Speaker 1: How the worm, or rather the worm tablet, has now
Speaker 1: turned off. Label prescribing of ivormectin is now no longer
Speaker 1: banned in Australia, although the.
Speaker 6: TGA does not endorse it. For the treatment or prevention
Speaker 6: of COVID.
Speaker 1: Nineteen AstraZeneca has been withdrawn. Meanwhile, as Rita spoke earlier
Speaker 1: in Victoria, a judge this week slammed police for their
Speaker 1: unjustified violence Yes, yes, that's right, unjustified violence at COVID
Speaker 1: lockdown protests. And the former Liberal Health Minister Greg Hunt
Speaker 1: has attacked the states and territories all looking like it's
Speaker 1: all happening now, for taking unilateral decisions during COVID that
Speaker 1: were not backed up by science, says Greg, what a farce.
Speaker 1: The COVID clown show rumbles on, and don't think we've
Speaker 1: heard the last of it yet. Personally, I believe we
Speaker 1: need a Royal commission into the abuse of power during COVID,
Speaker 1: the abuse of power by politicians, scientists, public servants, medical
Speaker 1: bureaucrats and big farmer. And following that, I believe some
Speaker 1: of the worst of the COVID clowns should be behind bars.
Speaker 1: Whereas Paul McCartney would say, sent inside forever.
Speaker 18: Sympence, hyperbol extreme exaggeration, hyperbole.
Speaker 1: Rita Eurovision song contest about.
Speaker 11: Yes, that's been runner and won.
Speaker 7: But so much controversy this year because Israel made the
Speaker 7: finals and so many of the artists taking part have
Speaker 7: been horrendous to this poor girl who was booed throughout
Speaker 7: the performance. She was apparently in tears afterwards. And one
Speaker 7: of those leading this sort of anti Israel sentiment is
Speaker 7: the Irish contestant.
Speaker 11: Let's have a let's have a look at her. She
Speaker 11: thinks she's special. Do you know what makes me special?
Speaker 4: I'm a queer and I'm.
Speaker 11: Well done, Ireland, that's the best you got. But she
Speaker 11: wasn't all.
Speaker 7: That happy when she heard that Israel had done particularly well.
Speaker 16: I cried with my team.
Speaker 7: What's interesting because with Eurovision there's the jury vote and
Speaker 7: then there's the audience vote to different countries vote, and
Speaker 7: it was the audience vote that really boosts the Israeli performer.
Speaker 7: So I think she finished fifth overall. She was only
Speaker 7: twelfth after the jury vote, so that tells you something.
Speaker 7: But hearing Australia, which also participates somehow in Eurovision, it
Speaker 7: gave its jury votes to that Irish.
Speaker 1: Last classy, classy, let's talk about Waitrose.
Speaker 6: James.
Speaker 8: Well, yeah, look this is something here I thought's pretty interesting,
Speaker 8: and I think it ties in row into an awful
Speaker 8: lot of stuff you've spoken about on climate and various
Speaker 8: policies that are coming. They said the era of cheap
Speaker 8: food is over. This is ahead of a supermarket because
Speaker 8: of course climbit change is going to make it impossible
Speaker 8: to have cheap food anymore. This is, of course the
Speaker 8: great kind of anti human agenda that's worked behind all
Speaker 8: of this stuff. You know, most people would think cheap
Speaker 8: food feed people, people don't starve. This is great human
Speaker 8: civilization flourishing. There's this mentality that cheap food is bad
Speaker 8: because people get eat we have more people.
Speaker 6: It's terrible. They hate us, they hate us, they hate it,
Speaker 6: and they hate the poor people. They want the poor people.
Speaker 6: This stuff for the moment.
Speaker 1: But talking about food or quality food, the good news reader,
Speaker 1: is to do with the world of Australian cakes, which
Speaker 1: have a long and proud history.
Speaker 7: Apparently, oh yeah, apparently this is the sort of Bruce
Speaker 7: Pasco view of history that the ABC has embraced.
Speaker 11: Because apparently our traditions.
Speaker 7: Of cake making stretch back thousands of years. So that's
Speaker 7: just something else that I didn't know until this new
Speaker 7: revisionism that that.
Speaker 6: Is just is a recipe?
Speaker 11: Does is there a womanically?
Speaker 1: Yes, a woman's recipe for a woman's weekly recipe for
Speaker 1: a cake going back.
Speaker 6: Thousands of years? Great stuff.
Speaker 1: Just to quickly want to have a look at these
Speaker 1: two Irish girls, I think there are rish Are they
Speaker 1: being quizzed about gaza?
Speaker 6: This is grooming, this is child abuse.
Speaker 2: Have a listen.
Speaker 6: They might be in England.
Speaker 31: Actually, I'm ten years old and I'm supporting Palestine because
Speaker 31: it's not fair to just literally just kill people for
Speaker 31: the sake of it. They're saying that they're used, but
Speaker 31: they aren't because Jewish people some do support Palestine, they're
Speaker 31: actually Zionists, and that this is a genocide. So you know,
Speaker 31: why not?
Speaker 6: Can you tell me about the history of Palatine, the.
Speaker 32: Israal Palestine is in nineteen forty eight, do you had
Speaker 32: made the plan to make Palestine's done Israel's and create
Speaker 32: the state of Israel, which is not true. By doing this,
Speaker 32: they kill the Palestinians to make only israel people in
Speaker 32: that state.
Speaker 6: I dear, I'm.
Speaker 1: Woo for you.
Speaker 6: Happy Mother's Day. And that's it fro outsiders. We'll see
Speaker 6: you next Sunday. A nine and thanks for watching see it,