WEBVTT - #205 Westpac CEO Anthony Miller: My First Podcast with a Major Bank Leader

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Him, I Boris and this is straight talk. I'm about

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to do a podcast with Anthony Miller. He's the CEO

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Westpac Group, which encompasses a lot of banks.

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I should make an initial disclosure. The disclosure is that

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>my company Yellow Big Road Group, of which I'm the

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>chairman of Made Shoulder, has a relationship with Westpac. They

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>are a warehouse provided to us in relation to our

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>own product with our global partner, which is Magneta, through

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a business called Resi Homelands or the Resi product.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 2>So that's a disclosure you need to make.

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And I also will happily disclose that I've been maybe

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:41.959
<v Speaker 1>forty year customer of Saint George Bank, right back from

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>the days it was building society right through today. It's

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>now sitting under the Westpac Group as still as a bank,

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but using the Westpac Group's banking license. So that's my disclosure.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Other than that I have no relationship with Anthony. I

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>have many a couplications before, but.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>In his capacity as a sea of a bank. So

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>look for to this podcast.

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty exciting, pretty cool to actually be able to

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>interview a CEO of one of the four b banks

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in Australia and from my point of view, one of

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>my favorite banks.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.279
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Miller, well and straight talk.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Mate, thank you thanks for having me.

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>This is pretty unusually it's a I find it as

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>quite an exciting opportunity to sit in front of a

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>someone who's the CEO of one of the largest banks

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in this country. And of course, you know, for our audience,

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, Australian banks are some of the most profitable

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>banks in the world by virtual market capitalization if you're

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>relative to that, and maybe that don't make the biggest

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>profits in the world, but they in a relative sense,

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they are some of the most profitable banks in the

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>world and definitely some of the highest rated banks in

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the world.

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 2>And you're sitting at the helm of Westpac.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely and I've been in the role two hundred and

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 3>sixteen days Mark, so enjoyed every single day so far.

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty amazing.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I understand you come from fairly humble background. Maybe can

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>just tell me where's Anthony Miller come from?

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Where we were born?

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 3>But sure so I was. I was born in Canberra

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 3>and for various reasons, we moved around a lot as

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I grew up. So I lived in Canberra Darwin, Alice Springs, Doubo, Canberra, Brisbane,

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 3>and I finished high school in Brisbane. My last two

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 3>years of high school were in Brisbane. And so often

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 3>people think I'm a Queenslander, and I suppose two years

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 3>of high school and five years of UNI sort of

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 3>formative years, and certainly have a lot of affection for Queensland,

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>but I spent a lot of time outside Queensland growing up.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Under the state of origin rules. That doesn't qualify years

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>to Queensland, or does.

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>It not quite. The way it broke down is that

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 3>when State of Origin first came on in nineteen eighty,

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>I lived in New South Wales double Hoo, and I

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 3>was mad Keen Rugua League supporter and it was seared

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 3>in my memory that, you know, the frustrations that Queensline

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 3>just kept beating us for those first four or five

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 3>years until so they beaten But well that's right, and

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 3>they had some grades, you know Wally Lewis and you

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 3>know mountvin Ingram goodness, you know Eddie's Prime. So it

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>was almost impossible to win. And so therefore I'm a

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 3>little bit partial to see New South Wales competing state

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 3>of a blue shirt on yes, that's right. But I'm

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a fan of the queens Land Red's

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>rugby team because I had the privilege to going to

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 3>school and people like Johnny Eels and guys like Mark

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Connors that I knew from UNI all played for the Reds,

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 3>so I follow the Reds pretty closely. So so I'm

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 3>sort of a little bit of it each way.

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Bet there, no, no, no, no, come on, come on,

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 2>come on, and no, no, you can't do that.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.839
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that too, which, Okay, which NRL team

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>do you follow?

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Paramatta Eels deals And I've been with the Paramatta Eels

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 3>since nineteen seventy five when my dad sat me down

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 3>and said you can go for any team you want

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 3>as long as it's the Eels.

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:44.279
<v Speaker 2>That's fairly democratic.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 3>And then and then I was sport because in seventy

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>six they made the Grand Final. And then it just

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 3>felt like for me until I was about seventeen, that

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 3>every year the Paramatta Eels were either in the Grand

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Final or just missed out on the Grand Final, or

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>won a Grand Final. And then since then, you know,

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 3>it's been pretty barren.

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>In terms of your fan brothers, sisters. What's the deal?

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 3>So I'm the ordest of six six kids, six kids. Yeah,

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 3>so myself, then my two sisters and then three youngest,

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 3>three boys, six kids. Wow. Yeah, you know, it was

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 3>a really really lucky, you know, really good upbringing, a

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 3>great family. Mom and dad still going really strong. They're

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 3>still live. Yeah, absolutely, Wow, that's still going strong. We

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 3>celebrated dad's eightieth a couple of weeks ago. He's got well,

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 3>they've got six kids, and they've got twenty three grandchildren,

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 3>great grandchild.

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 3>And all fit, healthy, all all good people going after

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 3>life in the right way.

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>You have in your family, as I understand it, either

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>one or two brothers who were fairly decent with using

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>their hands.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So my one of my brothers, Paul, was a

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 3>great boxer. He represented Australia at the Sydney two thousand

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Olympics and Manchester conwalf Games and he won a gold

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 3>medal a super middleweight in two thousand and so he

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 3>was a very good boxer. All my brothers they can

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 3>handle themselves pretty well, younger brothers, that's right. Yeah, So

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 3>I got to stay humble when I'm at home. And

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 3>and then one of my sisters. Both my sisters were

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 3>great sports persons and one of them won a gold

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 3>medal at the Sydney Olympics in water polo. Really yeah,

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>so they left me nothing in the gene covered in

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.799
<v Speaker 3>terms of you know, they just all of them super

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 3>talented at sport and achieved so much.

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 2>Did you play sport?

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I was a really enthusiastic swimmer, really swimmer. Yeah,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 3>and I like I played all my sort of sports

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 3>at young football and AFL rugby league, rugby union. I

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 3>was really committed to being a swimmer, and you know,

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 3>I trained twice a day. I was trained with Joe

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 3>King at Leander in Brisbane. Hayley Lewis was one of them.

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so she was in the squad.

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 3>She was in the squad. Yeah. She was a terrific

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 3>swimmer and obviously represented Australia. I wanted to represent Australia,

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 3>just wasn't good enough.

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>But because a lot of swimmers in up playing water polo. Yeah,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is that how your sister's gone on a water polow.

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I think a little bit of the influence was that

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 3>we were a mad keen swimming family and so at

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the pool and good swimmers. I think Gail, you know,

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 3>my sister who was a water PLoP player. She could

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 3>have been a champion swimmer, could have been a champion

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 3>any sports. She is just such a natural athlete and

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 3>such a capable, hard working training kind of person, So

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 3>any sports she chose, I think she probably would have

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 3>succeeded in.

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>As a parent myself of a swimmer who was like

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>one of my sons was an elite swimmer. One of

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the things I learned is about swimmers is that there's

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a massive amount of commitment to the to the craft

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and also for the parents for that matter too. What

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think you've learned in a character sense from

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>a being a swimmer, but more importantly watching your parents

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of adopt or adapt into the commitment of having

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a son who wanted to be a swimmer.

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, great, great question. I mean, in terms of summing,

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm forever grateful that I was very committed to it,

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 3>and also the fact that I didn't get there. I

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 3>have no regrets because I trained really hard. I just

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 3>wasn't good enough. But I got so much out of

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 3>it in terms of friends, but also fitness, and also

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 3>just I knew how to set a goal and how

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 3>to relentlessly go.

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>After And maybe you could explain it a little bit

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>because most people probably haven't been to US. I haven't

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>had the experience of it. So your summer holidays was

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>committed to training when all you're made.

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 3>To do it all year round. So I swam all

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 3>year around, but the.

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Trials were and a jenerary.

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly right through summer summer holidays. Five am in

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 3>the water, finished session seven, seven thirty in the morning,

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't do much during the day. Then I'd train in

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the afternoon. I'd be swimming anywhere between sort of ten

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 3>to fourteen kilimeters a day. I was really going for it.

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 3>What was this stroke? Look, breaststroke I wanted. I was

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 3>competitive as a breastroker. I tried pretty hard at individual

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 3>medally as well, but breastroke was my main sport, particularly

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:14.679
<v Speaker 3>a main stroker.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 2>And then you swim at minimum six days a week.

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 3>That's right, it'd be twice a day every day, and

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 3>then Saturday once this sad day.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So which means when your mates when you were fifteen

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>six and your mates is just starting to go to

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>movies or whatever together and you can't do that sort

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of stuff because you're getting up four o'clock.

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 2>So you have to give a fair bit up. Is

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 2>it because you're the sort.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Of personality is that you were compliant as a because

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I got four sons, only one that was any good

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>at this was the most compliant sun.

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 2>In other words, you never challenged me. Don't make it up.

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 2>We got to go.

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Was it because you were a compliant kid, or was

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>it because you were a driven kid?

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 3>Or both? Well? Look, I think I think I was compliant.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 3>I suppose you know, I like to think I was

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 3>a good boy, but I was driven. Yeah, I was

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 3>very focused on I had a goal. I wanted to

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 3>represent Australia. I trained twice a day. I trained really hard.

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 3>In some ways, I didn't trade smart. I trained hard

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 3>and without sort of nuance and you know, giving the

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 3>right things like rest and recovery, the right weight that

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 3>they deserved. But that was back in the mid to

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 3>late eighties where everyone thought you just just put the

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 3>miles in and you'll get there.

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 2>We're keeping log books in those days.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I kept a bit of a log of you know,

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 3>the sessions, but I didn't keep copious notes.

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 2>You weren't doing pulse rates and stuff like that.

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, we were doing in training sessions and there

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 3>was a lot more science coming into if you were

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>coaching and swimming training then, and the Institute Sport had

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 3>been a big contributor to that sort of delivery of

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 3>science into it. But I was very focused on just

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 3>on the training, and I enjoyed the training. To be

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 3>honest with you that you know it was quite social.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It is you think not, but at the end of

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen hundred have a little bit of a chat.

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactually right, and then look, you know I'm ad

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 3>at all boys school and then assuming cent training, there's

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 3>lots of girls, so that was also a little bit

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 3>of a wow. This is a bit of an interesting dynamic.

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 2>So what do you I mean?

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I can I often ask my son, but he'll tell

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>me this. But what do you think you might have

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>gained in terms of character or your character from putting

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>in many kilomas in the pool, many early mornings, making

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of sacrifices. Maybe they weren't sacrifices, but when you

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>look back in hindsight, had to make a call, what

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>do you think you might have gained in terms of

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>your character today in what you do at the bank

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for example? And I don't mean anything specific, but how

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>how did that shape Anthony Miller today.

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>What I think? How would I? Yeah, that's again a

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 3>good challenge, certainly, the idea that you've just got to

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 3>sometimes go through a lot of hard work to get

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 3>the game, and that you know there's going to be

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 3>periods of time where it's just a real grind, and

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>that there there's not the sugarcoat of every day and

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 3>everything's positive always because you're just in the middle of

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 3>hard work, training hard you're for going going out with

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 3>your friends because you want to be able to train

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 3>at your best the next day. But then there's great

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 3>rewards at the end of it. And then equally, the

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 3>thing I enjoyed, I really liked your training. I like

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 3>the sense of, you know, putting one hundred percent in

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 3>and just feeling like you've exhausted yourself. And maybe it's perverse,

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 3>but I took satisfaction out of being a really hard

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 3>trainer and took great pride in that I was one

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 3>of the better trainers and the team. And then one

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 3>of the things I did learn was, you know, it's

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 3>all very well to be good and hard training, but

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 3>at that moment when you have to stand on the

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 3>block and compete in the race. You know, you've got

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 3>to have your head in the game. You've got to

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 3>be in that moment ready to deliver. And that's one

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 3>of the other great challenges of assuming, is that you

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 3>can train for six months through summer and then you've

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>got two and a half minutes to win, and your

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 3>entire summers defined by two and a half minutes.

0:11:57.920 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 2>In the last race of this it could be one

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 2>hundred exactly right.

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 3>And you know if you don't get everything perfectly right

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 3>in the race, you know someone can beat you. And

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 3>so you know you have to be so focused on

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 3>am I doing it all? Am I doing it all right?

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Am I getting it all done? And so that sort

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 3>of constant challenge of is this right? Am I really

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 3>pushing myself as I should? Have I done everything as

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 3>I should That constant challenge you imposed on yourself is

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 3>sort of like a skill that's really helpful later on

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 3>in whatever you decide to do. So I sort of

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 3>feel like assuming that I was pretty privileged to be

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 3>able to be a swimmer. I thought it really did

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 3>give me a lot of opportunities and also the fitness

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 3>and health consequences of just being able to swim ten

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 3>to fourteen kilometers a day sets you up for life.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right in a health sense.

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think also you've got to have at least

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>one parent who's completely committed to that process for the kid,

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's actually quite when I look back, it's all

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>encompassing being a parent of a swimmer in the end.

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>For me, like I was happy to get my kid

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of a car and get when he got his license

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>so he could at least get himself at training at

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>four thirty in the morning.

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 2>If I then say to.

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>You today in terms of your job of the bank,

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, Westpac sits on a number of banks,

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>well they're not. There's not a number of banks, but

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a number of brands, that's right. So you know

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>you've got Saint George, that's right, your bank essays, a

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>bank essays Bank of Melbourne and Bank of Melbourne and

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 1>anyone else.

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 3>And so in terms of bank or bank like offerings.

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 3>RAMS also has its own system as well. So what

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.119
<v Speaker 3>really Westpac is an amalgam of you know, different banks

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 3>sitting under the one group that is Westpac Group. Yeah,

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 3>and so it's really actually a collection of banks within

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 3>the group.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they all talk to different customers and they

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to different emotions from different sorts of customers. Like

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Melbourne is very Melbourne, Yes, Saint George is

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of not so much Melbourne's Sydney, more Sydney than

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>anything else. I think, you know traditionally, because I remember

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Sir George about I was a customer of Saint George

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Building Society, Are you okay? And I went through every

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and then Saint George Building Society merged with another credit

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>union or building society. Come overhood it was, and then

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>they then ultimately it became St. George Bank, and then

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Saint George Bank was taken over under Gail Kelly by Westpac.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>That's well taken control by Westpak and now as a

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>result that I'm now with Westpak, but I'm still with

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>St George. But I know it's sitting on the west

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Bank brand. And as a as someone's sitting on top

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of such a it's a large group.

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 2>What do you would you say that.

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>The event Isswen, lots of other things happened in your

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>life will talk about at a moment, but were they

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>do they build resilience? View? Because like as a bank boss,

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine I think you'd be putting a bushfires

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I mean there'd be a lot of dramas,

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like within the bank or maybe didn't you

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>come in you came in after west PAC's major drama,

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the drama that sort of occurred during after nineteen twenty nineteen.

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 3>I think, yeah, no, certainly. I joined Westpac at the

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 3>end of twenty twenty and that was just in that

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 3>sort of a difficult twelve months where you know, there

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 3>was obviously infractions under the money laundering and OSTRAK matter,

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 3>and then there was quite a bit of work that

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Westpac as a group had to do, which was you know,

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 3>fixed or immediate processes, and so for a few years

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:19.119
<v Speaker 3>there it was very you know, very much focused on getting.

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Its house in order. We're doing it fifteen hundreds.

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly right, and so that was just that's just

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 3>hard work, grinding way that's right, and more importantly, it's

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 3>just getting back to the basics and making sure the

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 3>way we deliver products and service to the customers were

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 3>done at a standard that met community and regulatory expectations.

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 3>And so you know, the bank did a lot of

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 3>work on that, and that was also while challenging, also

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 3>quite enjoyable in the sense of just you know, as

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 3>a leadership team, all of us at the time just

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 3>very focused on how do we just get Westpac the

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 3>group back to where it should be, which is, you know,

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a really good bank, performing well and delivering for customers.

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And share holders, which, by the way, I'll come back

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to the customer shareholder thing, because that's a hard one

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to balance. Well, there's a balance, but it's a difficult one.

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you about how you do that. Yeah,

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>if I just go back to you left school and

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>what did you do.

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 3>So I finished school in eighty seven and I went

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 3>to university and I did a degree at the time,

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 3>which was a little bit unusual. And you might remember

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 3>the late eighties, Japan was the second largest colony world

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 3>had just come out of nowhere through the seventies and eighties,

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 3>and Japan was buying everything in Queensland. It just felt

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 3>like tourists exactly right.

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 2>So it was a massive development and everything, Yesdney as well, okay.

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well certainly in Queensland. And so when I finished school,

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 3>I suppose you know, my father had studied law, so

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I was a little bit drawn to I'll study law.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 3>But I decided to do an arts law degree, and

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 3>it was the first time it had been offered. There

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 3>was only eleven of us in the first class. And

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 3>it was a combination of Asian studies majoring in Japanese

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 3>language and some other so that's the outside of it.

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 3>That's the outside of it, plus a law degree. And

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 3>the law degree was at QUT and the Arts or

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 3>Asian Studies degree was at griff of the University. So

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 3>the two universities had combined and so to be sort

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 3>of like Monday at QUT Tuesday at Griffith or vice versa.

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 2>And they were physical in those days.

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Exactly right, quite two different campuses, one in the city,

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 3>one out at sort of Mount Gravat. So that was

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 3>a really interesting combination. And so I went after that.

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 3>And my intention was when I finished that degree that

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 3>I'd probably go and pursue, you know what it calls,

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 3>like a career, perhaps working in Japan, or I'd go

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 3>and study further in Japan.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And as it turned out, that didn't eventuate. Did you

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>learn to speak Japanese?

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 3>I study Japanese, that's right. I would say my Japanese

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 3>is poor, you know, one of the one of the

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 3>challenges is that once you study languages, you've got to

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 3>go and live and immerse yourself in the culture. And

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 3>I didn't get to do that straight after university and

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 3>so missed my window to really cement the language. But then,

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 3>as it turns out, through my career later on, I

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 3>was in Japan a lot for business. I really enjoyed

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 3>working in Japan, and I had teams reporting to me

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 3>out of Japan, so I've had a lot of exposure

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 3>to Japan over the course the last thirty years.

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 2>So did you ever practice as a lawyer?

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 3>So I did. I finished university and I was a

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 3>bit unsure about where I was going to go, and

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 3>I was actually playing a little bit of rugby at

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Brothers Rugby Club in Britain, and a guy called Paul

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Tully and another guy who was working at the law

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 3>firm Grand Deal Love encouraged me to join their law firm.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 3>So I joined their law firm for a couple of years,

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 3>which was great because I was sort of unsure about

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 3>what I wanted to do and where I wanted to go,

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 3>and they gave me an opportunity just to work for

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years qualify as a lawyer. And I

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 3>did that and that was that was that was great times.

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 2>As a young lawyer.

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Did I guess you just again put just wim me

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>hot on and you know, you just have to grind away,

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>do sixteen hours a day, get paid crappy money.

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Do do they do college law in quis? How does

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 2>it work?

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 3>No? No, you could do that, but back then it

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 3>was an article class. You're an article class because you're

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 3>at the bottom of the food chain. And in some

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 3>ways that was also, in hindsight, a great thing because

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I had to do lots of menial jobs as well

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 3>as you know, potentially some of the more interesting legal

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 3>and so you just get into work and you start

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 3>from scratch and you just work. And the idea of

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 3>just having to do hard work and eventually things will

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 3>come your way was sort of like, well, okay, I

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 3>understood that, you know, I grew up on that premise,

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 3>and so I really enjoyed it and I got a

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 3>lot out of that. And then what had happened was,

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:39.959
<v Speaker 3>you know, they were very good to me, and I

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 3>was enjoying what I was doing there, and I got

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 3>married and had a wonderful I had first baby, very

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 3>very early, and I sort of sat back and forward.

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to be in a lawyer in Brisbane? Now?

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Is this? Is this why I studied art law? Is

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 3>this what I thought I was going to do? And

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 3>the answer was, actually, I think I want to go

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.479
<v Speaker 3>and look out for more and try something else. And

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 3>so as a result of that decision, I applied for

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 3>a job and I got a job here in Sydney

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 3>with Mallison's, you know, the big law firm, and that

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 3>was very gracious so then to give me a chance.

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 3>And I went from sort of a small suburban, you know,

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 3>small highly specialized firm in Brisbane that's really actually bossomed

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 3>since since that time, to Mallison's very large firm in Sydney.

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 3>And I was put into the banking and finance practice,

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 3>which I hadn't worked in before, and I was assigned

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 3>to a team. And the partner who I worked for,

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 3>he was really tough, but he was really good for

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 3>me in the sense that in what way well he

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 3>was just so demanding and exacting in terms of accuracy

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 3>and detail and work. And I think that was really

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 3>good for me because it just set a bar immediately.

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 3>You've got to be at this standard if you're going

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 3>to prosper in this place. And you know, that was great,

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 3>and I just put my head down and I just

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 3>I just worked my way through that.

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Again. Well yeah, I just kept going.

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 3>And I just and by and after a period of time,

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 3>excuse me, he he was incredibly gracious and generous to me,

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.719
<v Speaker 3>allowing me to do more and more and gave me

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot more run of the place. And I saw

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 3>some magnificent partners who I was just so impressed with

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 3>how they handled and conducted themselves. It just really lifted

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 3>me up and asked me to, you know, think about

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:27.239
<v Speaker 3>the kind of person I want to be, the kind

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 3>of professional I want to be in the standard I

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 3>need to set myself. And so I got a lot

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 3>out of that. And in working at that law firm,

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I had some exposure to various banks and then eventually

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 3>I moved to one of those banks, and that's how

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 3>I went from law into finance effects.

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people don't realize that there are

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>in those big law firms like Mallicon's. I mean most

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>of them think of it was a bit of a factory.

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But and it just greet.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Me if I'm wrong. We're talking about the early nineties.

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 3>This was ninety six. I came to Sydney into ninety six.

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So a firm like Mallison's, they're probably already merged with

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Jakeson.

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 2>That's Malison Stephen and and now they're now something else.

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>But but they got so big relatively speaking, at the

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>time it was the market was dominated by them and

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>two or three out the law firms in terms of size,

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and they got all the big jobs. Yes, the big

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>banks that the big work. You would have been in

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the big four law firms. Does that does

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>that somehow inform you as to or does that how

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to somehow shape you as to your future career that

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you end up in one of the big four banks

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>you were one of the big you were at the

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>big investment banks too prior to that, or the big

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>foreign banks who were very active here in Australia. We'll

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about that in a second. Does do you think

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that has some impact on your career path? Did you

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>say to yourself, Look, I've always been a a I've

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>experienced at a big law firm. I've now been experienced

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>at the big non re tail banks here in Australia

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>and let's call maw it was deutsch Bank and whose

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>gold missacks. Yeah, so globally two of the biggest banks,

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly Deutsche and the US and in terms of certain

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>areas anyway, did that start to make you think this

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>is the source of environment we've got to stick to

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>or did you ever.

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Think to someone?

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't I going back to a small local law firm

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 2>like the one in Brisbane?

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 3>Oh no. So so when I got to Mallison's and

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, I really enjoyed my time there, and I

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 3>really enjoyed as I got to do more, and I

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 3>really and what.

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Was it you enjoyed though about it?

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 3>Well, they're all high quality people and who were every day,

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, going hard at it.

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Your colleagues or the colleagues.

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Colleagues above and below and around. So it was a

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 3>very sort of performed kind of environment.

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Yea.

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.239
<v Speaker 3>And it was really interesting and you know, big end

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 3>of town kind of works. That was quite for a young,

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 3>impressionable guy from Brisbane. It was like, wow, yeah, this

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 3>is exciting, and so I really enjoyed it. It was

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 3>also the case that I never really had any plans.

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 3>I never I sort of oh, that's really good. I'm

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 3>going to try that. And I ended up going into finance,

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 3>for example, by accident. I didn't start with that initiative.

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 3>But then I had a conversation with Credit Sweese and

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 3>they said, oh, you know, I want you. You know,

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 3>we're looking for a lawyer. Want you join us? And

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.479
<v Speaker 3>I joined it as an in house lawyer, and then

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 3>I moved into banking quickly thereafter. And it was because

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 3>they said I want you to try this, and I said, yeah, okay,

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 3>I'll try that. I was never sitting back and saying

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 3>here's my plan. I'm going to work in a big

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 3>four law firm. Then I'm going to move into a

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 3>big investment bank, and then I just never had it

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 3>mapped out in my head. And in some respects I

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 3>was just enjoying.

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 2>The play was in front of you, exactly what, And

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 2>I really.

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Enjoyed the people and working and the intensity required. And

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 3>then as I got into that, and you're competing hard

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 3>to perform and deliver, people then graciously and generously give

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 3>you opportunities, or at least I was in that respect.

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 3>And so that's how my career developed was without design,

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 3>It was just developed as a result of just people

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 3>giving me a chance at things, and I decided, yeah,

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 3>I'll try that, and I'll try that.

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And so it's funny you should say this, because I

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 1>wondered to myself, is Anthony Miller's propensity and preparedness to

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>work hard and work with intensity and all those things

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about? Then? Is that something that was socially

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>formed on him by putting him through swimming regimes or

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is that something that his personality always was going to

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>do and when he ended up going to work, he

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>was actually had the propensity and the preparedness to do it.

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 3>So I think there were three forces. One is definitely swimming,

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, trainee experience, experiences, I know I can do

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 3>it exactly. And then I think I was a little

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 3>bit built that way. And then fairly my parents work.

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 3>They worked hard, they put a hundred percent in, and

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 3>I was never It was always clear to me, It

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 3>was always clear to all my brothers and sisters that

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Mum and Dad were working really hard and they worked

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 3>really hard to make sure we had opportunities, and there

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 3>was no way I was ever going to let them

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 3>down by not having one hundred percent effort into whatever

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 3>we did or whatever goal or whatever opportunity was given

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 3>to me, I was always going to give it one

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent and do whatever it took. And I sort

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 3>of like, almost I felt an obligation to make sure

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 3>that if I was going to do something, I was

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 3>going to do it really well, because how could I

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 3>look Mum and Dad in the eye and not have

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 3>put one hundred percent into something like a sense of duty,

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 3>a sense of duty, sense of obligation. But that's only

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 3>because they work so hard and they you know, we

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 3>didn't have a lot, but we wanted for nothing when

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 3>we were growing up, and the eldest six kids and

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 3>everyone was given a real good school. Everyone was given

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 3>any sport opportunity they wanted to pursue they could, and

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, you've got swimmers, footballers, boxes, water pilot players,

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 3>any sport anywhere. Mom and Dad would take whoever it

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 3>was to that sport and then back them one hundred percent.

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 3>And so I think we all felt an obligation to,

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, work hard and take every opportunity and give

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 3>it one hundred percent. So I think there's three forces.

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 3>I think the assuming definitely think a little bit of

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 3>my own personality and DNA and then clearly that obligation

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 3>or responsibility to mom and dad.

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any memories of any one particular individual

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>who was a great mentor to you outside your parents

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>at work in either the law firm or Creswiz or

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>gold Misax or at Deutsche, was there someone who sort

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of took you under their wing and said, you know,

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna try and this kid along. Yeah.

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think I was I was lucky in particularly

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 3>in my career, that there's been a few people who

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 3>took some interest in me and just gave me a

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 3>little bit of extra coaching and insights. And there was

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 3>a I was working for one partner at Mallison's, a

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 3>guy called Michael Gammons who was very good to me,

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 3>and he was really really fixated on accuracy and detail

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 3>and that helped me improve and I improved a lot

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 3>as a professional and as an individual. And there was

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 3>another partner in the law firm who had a big

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 3>impact on me, and he didn't probably didn't realize it.

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 3>And I did catch up with him on a few

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 3>occasions after I'd left the law firm and shared this

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 3>with him. And he passed away on here a couple

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 3>of years ago, and his name was John Stumbles, and

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 3>he was the sort of senior partner in the banking

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 3>and finance practice. And he was such a nice, decent guy,

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 3>incredibly thoughtful and compassionate and incredibly driven, but just so classy.

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 3>And I just every time I saw him in action

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 3>and every time he spoke, I thought, Gee, this guy

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 3>is so impressive. And then he started to just give

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 3>me a little bit of coaching and a little bit

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.719
<v Speaker 3>of encouragement, and he'd sort of pulled me inside and say, look,

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, as you're doing this work, i'd be you know,

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 3>think about this as you deliver yourself into that meeting Anthony,

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 3>or would be mindful of the fact that this is

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 3>what people will be looking for. And so I was

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 3>very grateful for that coaching from a guy who had

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 3>I had put on a pedestal because he was just

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 3>so classy and so good at what he did. So

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 3>I was lucky there. And then when I joined Goldman's

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 3>there was a couple of people there who, again, you know,

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 3>it's a highly high intensity, high performance environment, and a

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 3>couple of people took the time out to give me

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 3>feedback and sort of highlight what my strength is or

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 3>what my weakness is and what I should work on,

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 3>and so I was very grateful for that.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting you should say that, particularly that as a

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 2>younger man in a law firm impressed with somebody's let's

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 2>call it kindness and generalists because generally speaking, the sort.

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Of more.

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's incorrect, but the more accepted proposition of someone

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>who's very, very successful in an organization like a big

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>firm is that you have to be a bit of

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a bugger to get up there, you know, like you

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>have to be tough and mean and all those sorts

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of things. When someone like you says that they were

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>impressed as a younger man with someone who actually played

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>good qualities kindness, gentleness, but also constructive criticism, how much

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of that have you taken away from that and put

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>into your cell phone what you do now?

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that's again a good sort of challenge. Like

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm incredibly driven, I think in the business today, that's right.

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm very I'm very competitive. I want to win, but

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to win unfairly. I don't want to

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 3>have an unfair advantage and win. I want to I

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 3>want everyone to have the same opportunity and you know,

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 3>competing in a race, it's no good if you're given

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 3>every advantage and the others have no such chance to compete.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 3>It's not really a racist.

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 2>You're talking about internally.

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:47.239
<v Speaker 3>Now that's internally, that's externally. But you know, competing. I

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 3>do enjoy competing and I do enjoy winning. But equally,

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 3>if I've tried my best and I wasn't good enough,

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 3>then so be it. And so therefore, you know, you

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 3>can and should be able to be an effective executive

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 3>and an effective leader, and things like making sure everyone

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 3>is fairly treated, making sure everyone is heard, going out

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 3>a way to help someone who's a little bit less

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 3>fortunate in opportunities in the office or opportunities where it

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 3>might be seems to me to be like something that

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 3>absolutely should be allowed and should be endorsed and should

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 3>be accepted. And that doesn't mean you can't be compassionate,

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 3>which I think is really important and really important virtues

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 3>to be compassionate, but compassionate and thoughtful, but also really

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 3>demanding of yourself and then also able to then say

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 3>to other people, let's lift your standard. And asking someone

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 3>to lift their standard is not unfair inappropriate. If you're

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 3>a person who's thoughtful, compassionate, understanding and prepared to the

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 3>same as I did the same. And so I suppose

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 3>so with that.

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Leadership by example, I think I think.

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a little bit of that. Yeah, I think also,

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, and I think about leadership and what I

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 3>have to do at the bank, there's an element of

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 3>leadership and we're going in this direction. Equally, as a leader,

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 3>I've also got a responsibility to make sure people have

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 3>the best opportunity to improve and develop and grow. And

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 3>so leadership is a little bit of service as well.

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's not as a leader that's your reward

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 3>and look at you and everyone needs to do what

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 3>you say. But actually, no, I'm a leader and my

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 3>job is to then help everyone prosper, everyone progress, everyone improve.

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 3>And so I think that sort of leadership where it's

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 3>anchored around you know, look at this dominant personality and

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 3>look at how successful they are, and there's this idea

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 3>that they're a bit of a bugger and they're a

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 3>bit hard nosed. No, I'm not interested in that. I'm

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 3>much more focused on that leader who we're here to deliver.

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 3>We're going to win, but we're going to do it

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 3>together and what can I do to help you to

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 3>contribute to where we've got to get to as a team.

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 3>So that's how I think about it. That's how I

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 3>try and balance it.

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.239
<v Speaker 1>We often say, I mean, you would remember this from

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>when your brother was boxing styles wind fights, so you

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a long version, then you try to

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>describe your style. But let's say, as a leader, what

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>would how would you describe it in a shorter version, like,

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, how would you describe yourself as a leader?

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>There therefore as a leader, like the way you lead

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the bank, because you know how many stuff you got,

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>like how many people in the group.

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 3>We've got just under thirty eight thousand in the group.

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 3>You're not sort of looking at.

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's call it the latest people have been employed in

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the last eight hundred or something, and you're not sort

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of talking to each on them.

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:39.959
<v Speaker 2>That's impossible.

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So you've got to build leadership teams as well below you.

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.479
<v Speaker 1>So do you build leadership teams as a leader that

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>follow your style of leadership? I mean, do you sort

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of self select or do people self select based on you?

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You do you do you pick people in your own

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>image as a leader?

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Good? Good question, I think I think it's all a

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 3>little bit of all of the above, if I can

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 3>answer it that way, which is, you know, what I'm

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 3>very focused on at Westpac, and what's really important to

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 3>me is I want a team, a leadership team, because

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I think a great team is always going to be

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 3>so much more successful. So what I'm really focused on

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 3>is an executive team who have great teamwork, have each

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 3>other's backs, clear on what we collectively are going after

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 3>where we want to take this bank. What I've also

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 3>been focused on, for example, as I've brought people into

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 3>the executive team, is making sure that other executives got

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 3>an opportunity to meet and to interview those perspective candidates.

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Not just your call that's exactly right. I want us

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 3>to say, is this a team member. We want part

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:49.439
<v Speaker 3>of our team who will commit and share with us

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 3>both the challenge and the upside of what we want

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 3>to go after. And so I've been very focused on that.

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 3>And what's been very interesting to me is that you know,

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 3>we've got a goal we want to take Westpac, but equally,

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 3>the executives who've joined us and who want to join us,

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.240
<v Speaker 3>and as we build this right across the bank, everyone

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 3>wants to join a team. They want to be part

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 3>of a team. That is what we are focused on

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 3>and what we're trying to create. And so that's been

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 3>really really invigorating and encouraging to see that kind of response.

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Because like, you know that you have a limited pool

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>where to choose your executive team out of. I mean,

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>unless you bring him in from over sous, perhaps you are.

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>But let's say we're just looking at the Australian landscape

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and that you know the people who are available for

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a spot that you need to fill based on what

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you want your leadership to to look like. Sometimes you

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>have to go and see who's out there in the marketplace,

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Like we're doing Rabia League at least time, but the

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>rooster is we're always finding you know, who someone fits

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>into our system. Yeah, but because you know, someone could

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>be a great player, have all the talent in the

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 1>world for a particular spot position, could be sand a wing, whatever,

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.919
<v Speaker 1>But unless they fit into our system, won't we won't

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>employ Our system has a lot to do with character, style,

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Is that something you get an opportunity to

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 1>do at a bank like yours, Because I've noticed I

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>saw on the paper today that someone's left one of

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the big banks is coming over to join you guys.

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so how do you do To use that analogy,

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 3>I sometimes use this description of you know, let's get

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 3>the right athletes in the right seats, but we've got

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 3>to have it. It's got to be a team. And

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 3>we've got some exceptional talent at Westpac, and so it's

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 3>been a real pleasure and delightful to see and elevate

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 3>some of them and have them promoted and you can

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:43.439
<v Speaker 3>see just outstanding performance. But there's definitely been a couple

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 3>instances where we thought, you know what, it's probably appropriate

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 3>just to bring in someone who can bring a little

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 3>bit of more open minded thinking or some different thinking

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 3>into the team. And so that's why we have recruited

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 3>a couple of external executives, and we will continue to

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 3>always look at the talent of the internally and externally

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 3>is to make those decisions. But the number one rule

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 3>or discipline I've been focused on is making sure that

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 3>they will work as a team and they will fit

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:14.919
<v Speaker 3>in with the team, which is why, you know, having

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 3>other executives help in the decision as to who we

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 3>wanted to bring in and why is in my mind

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty important.

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 1>But in your game, do you have like understood or

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>agreed anti poaching rules? I mean, I mean, like how

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>do you find these people? Or do you meet them

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at a function? Or do really good question this dude's

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>good or that girl's great. Yeah, let's go for us.

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 3>So look at a couple of things. I mean, obviously

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 3>we have recruitment firms that help us at the market.

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 3>I do think it's my responsibility as a leader and

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 3>any leader of any bank, and I certainly see the

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 3>leaders of Westpact their job is to constantly understand the

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 3>quality of the team they have, the quality of the

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 3>talent out they're in the marketplace, and to be constantly

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 3>asking themselves, have I've got the balance right? Are we delivering?

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 3>And constantly testing and challenging as to whether it's working

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 3>and working as it should and making sure that the

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 3>team's performing. And equally, have you got the right people

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 3>in the right seats with the right ability and attitude

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 3>to deliver? And so and so Therefore you know that

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 3>idea of finding talent is if you will, probably my

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 3>number one job description retaining and investing in people is

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 3>probably really my number one job description. And then all

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the leaders in the bank have that same obligation, which is,

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 3>we've got to make sure we've got the best talent,

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 3>We've got the best people on the best seats. And

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 3>if I think about banking and where we are today, Mark,

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 3>and you think about the world in which we operate,

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, more and more it's going to be automated

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 3>more and more. It's digital. Ninety six percent of what

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 3>people do with Westpac is digital. And then you think

0:38:57.480 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 3>about the regulator who says, I want you to be

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 3>the same. I don't want you to have more risk

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 3>appetite in one area versus another bank that ain't like that.

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 3>So and then you put something like AI over the

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 3>top of it, and what you have is everything's becoming

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 3>much more homogenized and so it's being driven to be

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 3>the same. And so therefore, how are we going to

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 3>be different and how am I going to differentiate Westpac

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 3>in the marketplace? And it's going to be back to

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 3>the future. It's your people and how good they are,

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.359
<v Speaker 3>and more importantly, the discretionary effort they bring in every

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 3>day and the way they feel trusted and empowered and supported.

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 3>That's where we've got to go. And that's why I'm

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 3>very focused on how I build a team and how

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 3>that team then leads the company, and how everyone in

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 3>the company understands we've got your back, because the way

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 3>we're going to win is by having the best people

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 3>with the best in work environment, giving us their best

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 3>every day.

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 2>So what is a win for you, Anthony?

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>So, like in other words, who are your stakeholders mean

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a broad a sort of group of stakeholders, But who

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>are your stakeholders? And what is it that most of

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>them are looking for? They're looking for, you know, the

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>profit cash profit you're going to report. Are they looking for,

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a share price or what.

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Are they looking for?

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 3>And so our goal is a number one and I'm

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 3>just number one in what regard number one? And so

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 3>that's exactly right. It doesn't mean it's the largest. And

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 3>what I'm looking for is that, you know, from a

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 3>customer customer service proposition, everyone goes, gee, they're the number one,

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 3>and we're not there at the moment. There's some pockets

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 3>of the bank which are number one in customer metrics,

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, but we're not universally where we need to be,

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 3>and so we're after that. So that's our goal. I

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.800
<v Speaker 3>don't think you can be number one unless you have

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:48.760
<v Speaker 3>the best employee proposition. So I want to be the place,

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and I want to create an environment worst pac and

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 3>we have a great environment, great people, but I want

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 3>it to be the number one place that people want

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 3>to work. So I want to create the number one

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 3>employee proposition and people come to work. And if you've

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 3>got the best people coming to work, giving their best

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 3>every day, then that underwrits your ability to provide that

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 3>customer outcome, that outcome that you want, which is number

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 3>one customer. If I get those two right, then I

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 3>think what I do is I deliver the right return

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to shareholders and that's that consistence, sustainable growing return to

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 3>shareholder in terms of dividend and obviously share price growth.

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 3>And so that's the other element of what I think

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 3>is number one. And we need to deliver better return

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 3>on equity. We need to deliver better cost income ratio.

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Those are all if you will indicators, and if we

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 3>can get those right, then I think that will If

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 3>you will allow us to claim and be recognized as

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 3>number one, doesn't mean we're the largest. It doesn't also

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 3>necessarily mean we're always the most profitable. But we are

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 3>getting that balance right customer, employee and shareholder, and if

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I get that right, then we will be number one.

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you see the regulator as a stakeholder because the

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>regular represent Australia absolutely, and so because we give you,

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we give you a license. When I say we, Australia

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 1>has given you a license to be, to be, to

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>take deposits and to be what they call an adi

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>or a bank so to speak. And the Regulator is

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the policeman around this sort of stuff. Policemen also, but

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not as not that bad as more they do

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other things as well.

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Now they stakeholder representing.

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 3>All of us. I think that's right. I mean, I

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 3>would you know, in the context of if I'm going

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:28.839
<v Speaker 3>to be number one in terms of customer service, I've

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 3>got to need a standard. I've got an obligation to

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 3>the community and to the regulator in terms of how

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 3>to deliver our services. So I feel it's entwined if

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to be number one in that customer proposition

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 3>that I'm providing that I'm absolutely viewed by the regulator

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 3>and by the community in the same way that I'm

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 3>meeting those standards that I need to meet because you're

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 3>absolutely right, you know, a license to operate a bank

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 3>as a bank is a privilege and we need to

0:42:57.239 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 3>and do recognize it as such, and so therefore need

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 3>to make sure and everything we do we meet the

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 3>standards that the regulator stroke community expects of us.

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So many many years ago, and I think it was

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>around about my recollection was about two thousand and one

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:15.919
<v Speaker 1>or two. The very well known and you'll remember Blood Pit, won't,

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>but it was a very well known CEO of ABHI.

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 1>His name was Don Argus. Yes, and Don was asked

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it was an interview for the AFR. He said,

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>they said to him whatever they said to what keeps

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you up at night? What keeps you awake at night?

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And his response was a foreign entity who has the

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:38.920
<v Speaker 1>big balance sheet coming into Australia and either buying a

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>bank or competing with a bank, And he quoted General.

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 2>Electric at the time.

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:46.280
<v Speaker 1>General Electory at the time was the world's largest company

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>by market CAPP was probably the biggest finance financier in

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the world in terms of you know, asset finance, and

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not today, but it was then.

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Because the Gypsy's sort of changed that.

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But and interesting enough general actorly do you come into

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Australia If I asked Anthony Miller today, what's something that

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>keeps you awake at night in terms of the banking sector,

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 1>not not just West but but the banking sector. What

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest challenge to you today?

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Look, I mean there's a couple of things. So if

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 3>I could sort of have a bit of liberty to

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 3>say from one thing, I think you know one thing

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm very focused on. I think all the chief executives

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:30.840
<v Speaker 3>of the banks are, and chief executives right across Australia,

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 3>which is cyber and cyber crime, cyber security data. It's

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 3>just such a challenging environment. And we're not just if

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:47.280
<v Speaker 3>you will, dealing with say criminals or you know, unfair

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 3>business practices. We're dealing with nation states assaulting the country.

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 3>And so that's that's a complexity and a challenge that

0:44:56.280 --> 0:45:00.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't think previous CEO sort of any era had

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 3>to had to contemplate. And the challenges we face as

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 3>we deal with cyber threats to the country are such

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 3>that you know that that does deeply worry me. The

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 3>other aspect of I suppose what I do worry about is,

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 3>essentially banking is increasingly, as I described it, homogenized, commoditized,

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 3>and so is it something that we could be further

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 3>disintermediated by or impacted by as a large technology company

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 3>looks to via their phone essentially say just deal with

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 3>me on everything, and I will outsource and if you

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 3>will have a white label offering, and I'll have a

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 3>deposit over here, and I'll get a bank which will

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 3>just be technically the deposit adi institution, but you'll do

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 3>it all via me, and you'll do it all via

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 3>my phone, for example, like Google. That's right, Google and

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 3>other one of the technology giants, exactly right, And so

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:02.840
<v Speaker 3>do they then if you will into the financial services

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:07.320
<v Speaker 3>or the regulated banking sector, and I do worry about that.

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 3>I do think other executives worry about that. I do

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 3>also reflect on the fact that, however, if that's where

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 3>they do go, then they will be captured by regulation

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 3>that they're not captured by today, and they don't want

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 3>that kind of regulation, And then that will be a

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 3>very interesting proposition to put to people, is do you

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 3>want these people providing banking services without necessarily the same

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 3>responsibilities in the other sides, that's right, and then all

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden, being a regulated bank and being very

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 3>good at how you deliver on your regulatory obligations to

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 3>both regulator and community becomes not a burden, as it

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 3>isn't as advantage, but is part of your comparative advantage

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 3>and in fact is something that we should be embracing

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 3>and celebrating because if we do that well, then that

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 3>reinforce is that license top rate and that right top right,

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:04.960
<v Speaker 3>and reinforces our position in the marketplace.

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You guys are with the banking section, particularly the big

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>five banks including mcquarie. You're the biggest tax payer in

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the country, probably as a group, definitely one of the

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:18.480
<v Speaker 1>most influential.

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Where do you see.

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Your banks or your grouping bank, your bank group obligations

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 1>relative to nation building and national policy in relation and

0:47:34.560 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 1>things like super tax. Do you feel as though you

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 1>have a position or do you think you feel as

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>though you should get on the front foot about it

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>As a bank, I'm talking about.

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 2>As an institution.

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 3>That's a that's a that's a and that's a challenge

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:50.359
<v Speaker 3>for us. A question that we ask ourselves is, well, look, well,

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 3>certainly we're a big company and in big industry and

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:57.320
<v Speaker 3>have a big role to play in the Australian community

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 3>and economy, and we have a license stop rate, and

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 3>we need to be very fixated on we're delivering the

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:06.879
<v Speaker 3>right standard of service to our customers and we're meeting

0:48:06.960 --> 0:48:10.439
<v Speaker 3>that community and regulatory expectation in doing that. And we've

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 3>just got to make sure we're superb at that. And

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 3>if we're superb at that, then I think we've earned

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 3>the right to be able to contribute to the public

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:23.720
<v Speaker 3>discourse around particular things like tax maybe industry relations, maybe

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 3>policy settings, etc. But I think we've got to make

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 3>sure we're very very good on delivering that service to

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 3>the standard our customers want and the community expects if

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:38.359
<v Speaker 3>we're going to contribute to these discussions. And I would

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 3>say that perhaps you could. You know, over the last

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:43.759
<v Speaker 3>ten years there's been a period of time where the

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 3>banks haven't been at the standard needed to and Royal

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:51.319
<v Speaker 3>Commission and other things revealed that. But I do think

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 3>we perhaps particularly with COVID and what's happened in the

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 3>last few years, hopefully people do feel banks are working better,

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 3>working hard to deliver customer service to the right standards.

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Community expects and so therefore we can and should contribute

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more to some of these bigger topics

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 3>and bigger discussions. But we've got to be a little

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 3>bit honest with our sales marketing on until we've got

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:16.839
<v Speaker 3>that standard. We got ourselves to that standard consistently, we're

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 3>going to be careful.

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:18.840
<v Speaker 2>The Glas Houses argument, this.

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Is exactly right, and we've just got to be a

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 3>little bit humble about how we put our selves forward

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 3>into these into these kind of debates. I do think,

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 3>for example, Westpac is Australia's oldest company. First, they're going

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:35.239
<v Speaker 3>to help us bank first and oldest bank, and the

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 3>fact is that our success has been tied to the

0:49:38.320 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 3>growth and progress of this country, and so we have

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 3>a heavy responsibility to contribute to Australia's growth and support Australia.

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things I would sort of say

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:52.360
<v Speaker 3>that we've done is we've committed to retaining our businesses

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 3>in Papua New Guinea and Fiji because that's part of

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 3>what is important to Australia's natural interests as we go forward.

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 3>And we've therefore got a great working relationship with Canberra

0:50:05.000 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 3>in making sure how we do things and what we

0:50:07.800 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 3>want to do in P and G and FIG is

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:14.440
<v Speaker 3>something that they're comfortable with and is serving the national

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:16.839
<v Speaker 3>interest as we go forward. And I think that's been

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:19.400
<v Speaker 3>to me and I think that I'm very proud of that.

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm very proud of the Voice Pact doing that. And

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 3>that's an example of the kind of things we know

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:29.359
<v Speaker 3>we need to do more of in helping Australia, because

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:32.839
<v Speaker 3>if Australia prospers, then being a bank with the market

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 3>share we have, we naturally prosper as a results, and

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 3>so thinking much more nationwide is sort of also part

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:39.920
<v Speaker 3>of my job description.

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, two more quick questions. The first one is.

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Cryptocurrency and all the usual players in relationship cryptocurrency and

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a bigcoin, et cetera, ethereum.

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:54.520
<v Speaker 2>What's the bank's position in relation to that?

0:50:55.040 --> 0:51:00.759
<v Speaker 3>So the underlying technology where continuously working with our peer

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 3>banks international and domestic the Reserve Bank on how we

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 3>might use that technology, particularly in the context of international

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 3>payments for example, and tokenization of deposits and our sets

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:16.800
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden could reduce a lot of friction

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 3>quick couldn't make it all quicker and more efficient. What

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:23.799
<v Speaker 3>we've got to be careful of is you know, as

0:51:23.840 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 3>things go faster and more efficiently, you know, frauds and

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 3>other matters are affected more effectively and efficiently. And so

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:33.920
<v Speaker 3>we've got to make sure that, you know, as we

0:51:34.320 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 3>go further with this, that we are still retaining certain

0:51:37.120 --> 0:51:41.760
<v Speaker 3>protections that community and customers expected us. In the context

0:51:41.800 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 3>of cryptocurrency itself. Uh, you know, we continue to see

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:53.280
<v Speaker 3>an enormous amount of fraud and scam activity in generation

0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 3>around cryptocurrency, and so we are conservative in terms of

0:51:59.600 --> 0:52:04.400
<v Speaker 3>facilitating payments into crypto exchanges and payments out of crypto

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 3>exchanges using these train well the Westpac banking system, and

0:52:08.080 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a statement probably applies to all these

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:14.840
<v Speaker 3>train banks because there is just such a hyperpensity for fraud,

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:18.320
<v Speaker 3>scam and criminal activity that we're very cautious about that.

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 3>And so until that is addressed, it's hard to see

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 3>how we just go and embrace that asset class in

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 3>a way that some of the uses of it are

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:32.360
<v Speaker 3>advocating we should go. And so and one of the

0:52:32.440 --> 0:52:35.360
<v Speaker 3>other interesting things for me is this interesting and emerging

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 3>challenge for the United States, which is it's embracing on

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:43.320
<v Speaker 3>the one hand, bitcoining crypto. But the US's pre eminence

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 3>in the world is one of the reasons for that

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 3>is it's US dollar, and the US dollar is the

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:52.239
<v Speaker 3>currency that everyone goes to and goes between as they

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:56.919
<v Speaker 3>do their international trade or if you will, complete transactions.

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:02.799
<v Speaker 3>So why would you you gebilize jeopardize that by encouraging

0:53:04.040 --> 0:53:08.920
<v Speaker 3>something such as a bitcoin as an alternative where there

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 3>is no ability to truly monitor, trace and if you will, govern,

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 3>And that would only start to weaken US position globally.

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 3>And so I'm finding that a little bit of an

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:22.839
<v Speaker 3>interesting development, which is, you know, US Hedgemeny is at

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 3>risk if you allow bitcoin the full run or the

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 3>cryptocurrency universe to have the full run of international payments,

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:32.000
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. So how do we get that balance right?

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 3>That's to me a little bit unclear, and it also means,

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:39.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, let's be thoughtful crypto.

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:41.719
<v Speaker 1>So basically your position to let it play out and

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. It's one of those areas where I

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:45.239
<v Speaker 1>don't think you have to be first, you just got

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to be right. Yeah, and so let's be right. So

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 1>final final question, more of commentary. I noticed when we're

0:53:53.680 --> 0:53:56.960
<v Speaker 1>doing the work on this podcast. Some two books you've read.

0:53:57.600 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I've read many books. But two books you

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:02.000
<v Speaker 1>read is called Why Nations Fail, and the other one

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is called The Count of Monte Christo.

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:04.919
<v Speaker 2>But I just want to look at Why Nations file

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 2>that book.

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:09.520
<v Speaker 1>That book was actually quite an interesting book and I

0:54:09.640 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 1>remember it as well. But it was sort of proffering

0:54:14.000 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a position that nations that fail are the ones that

0:54:17.880 --> 0:54:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of only look after the elite and lock out

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:26.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone having an opportunity, fair opportunity to innovate through innovation,

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to become.

0:54:27.280 --> 0:54:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Better what they do?

0:54:29.200 --> 0:54:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Is that a Is that a book?

0:54:31.080 --> 0:54:31.239
<v Speaker 3>Big?

0:54:31.440 --> 0:54:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Does that book sort of somehow describe how Anthony Miller

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:37.320
<v Speaker 1>feels and thinks about just about how things should happen

0:54:37.360 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 1>in the world.

0:54:38.040 --> 0:54:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, it is a book. I've read it a

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 3>couple of times and have reflected on it. Certainly, you know,

0:54:46.960 --> 0:54:50.160
<v Speaker 3>the nation's failing because the essentially the gap between the

0:54:50.320 --> 0:54:53.840
<v Speaker 3>have and have not gets too far. But more importantly,

0:54:53.880 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 3>they have nots don't think they have any hope. I

0:54:57.200 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 3>don't think they have any opportunity. And so that's a

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:06.720
<v Speaker 3>really critical challenge, exam challenge for society today.

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And we have that with young people's right. I feel

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that relative to people, say my age, the boomers, that's right.

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:17.400
<v Speaker 3>And then in particular, perhaps the example that most brings

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:20.719
<v Speaker 3>this out, which is housing and access to housing. And

0:55:21.200 --> 0:55:24.480
<v Speaker 3>so you know, I own my house, and everyone of

0:55:24.560 --> 0:55:27.600
<v Speaker 3>my age and generation, you know, we all got opportunities

0:55:27.800 --> 0:55:29.840
<v Speaker 3>and we have brought property, and I think we've enjoyed

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 3>the wealth effect of house and house prices growing, but

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 3>we're currently not building enough or creating enough house or

0:55:40.520 --> 0:55:44.640
<v Speaker 3>unit supply so that everyone feels they're a chance of

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 3>getting it. Doesn't mean you guarantee that they get it,

0:55:47.080 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 3>but they've got to feel like this hope that they'll

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:51.000
<v Speaker 3>get it. And so one of the things that I

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:53.880
<v Speaker 3>drew out of the Wye Nations file is that unless

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:58.240
<v Speaker 3>we are working much harder at ensuring those who don't

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 3>have property, as an example, feel there's at least hope

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 3>and there's things in place that give them a chance

0:56:05.840 --> 0:56:09.880
<v Speaker 3>of getting access to property, then that's a real problem

0:56:09.920 --> 0:56:12.520
<v Speaker 3>and we've got to solve that. And those who have

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:15.600
<v Speaker 3>property and those who are, if you will, in the

0:56:15.760 --> 0:56:18.520
<v Speaker 3>incompor position that many of us are today, we have

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:20.480
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a responsibility to say, well, what else

0:56:20.520 --> 0:56:23.560
<v Speaker 3>can we do? Now? What should we be doing to

0:56:23.719 --> 0:56:27.520
<v Speaker 3>ensure that others have the same opportunities we had our

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:30.400
<v Speaker 3>bit circumstances different and you know, the environments different, But

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:32.399
<v Speaker 3>we've got to give them the same opportunities, the same

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 3>hope that we all had that drive our behaviors to buy,

0:56:36.239 --> 0:56:38.360
<v Speaker 3>and they obviously enjoy owning property.

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I asked you because and to some extent,

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I've sort of set you up a little bit. But

0:56:41.840 --> 0:56:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and then I apologize to that. But it goes back

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to my earlier question about banks having a say on policy,

0:56:46.880 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>because if I just use young people, anyone under the

0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 1>age of thirty, who's looking at and by the way,

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to sound like a heretic saying this, but

0:56:57.280 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 1>would be thinking themselves like I can't afford to go

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and bid against ants the middle because Anthony Miller's got

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're not the boss of Westbak, you're just a

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:07.760
<v Speaker 1>school teacher, headmaster at a school. But you've accumulated two properties.

0:57:09.000 --> 0:57:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Your income from the two properties now is being added

0:57:12.360 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to your other income from your wage, and given negative gearing,

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Miller might get approved for more money to buy

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the property against one of my young producers. He's only

0:57:21.720 --> 0:57:24.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, and Anthony Miller is going to use negative

0:57:24.240 --> 0:57:24.680
<v Speaker 1>gearing to.

0:57:24.720 --> 0:57:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Build up more of a portfolio.

0:57:26.280 --> 0:57:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I'm not against eve viearing. I

0:57:28.000 --> 0:57:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great thing that's being great for Australia.

0:57:30.400 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, this summit that's being held

0:57:33.200 --> 0:57:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a productivity summer, they're they're going to address tax reform

0:57:37.240 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and as I sound, going to sound like a heretic,

0:57:38.760 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 1>but to some extent, wealth has been created in this

0:57:42.520 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 1>country by using sort of tax concessions that really only

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 1>benefit blokes like you and me today and women like

0:57:49.840 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you and I, you know, like people in our position,

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and it is largely unfair for the younger people because

0:57:57.800 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 1>whilst they can use negative gearing, they actually don't ever

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:02.000
<v Speaker 1>call a five for loan. And we're always going to

0:58:02.000 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>be a to able to add bid them because then

0:58:03.680 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the eggy gearing, we're going to be able to say,

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I want that property and my income

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is better than yours, mister twenty one year old. Therefore

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I can always abid you, and as a result of

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:14.240
<v Speaker 1>our bidding, you never get on the ladder.

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 3>We can't.

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we can solve more housing. I mean,

0:58:17.720 --> 0:58:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it seems like an issue we can't solve. When we

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:22.960
<v Speaker 1>saw somebody coming out of Treasury which is leaked somehow,

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:25.600
<v Speaker 1>they saying that Treasures already advised the government that they

0:58:25.680 --> 0:58:28.040
<v Speaker 1>will not meet there one point two million housing guide

0:58:28.280 --> 0:58:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the new houses. So if we can't solve the housing issue,

0:58:32.360 --> 0:58:35.800
<v Speaker 1>affordability issue for younger people. And you know, younger people

0:58:35.800 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 1>are big, big cohort in your business. I mean they're

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:41.320
<v Speaker 1>very important to you because they're the next generation. You know,

0:58:41.720 --> 0:58:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we're all going to die off at some stage. You've

0:58:43.280 --> 0:58:45.520
<v Speaker 1>got to fill the bucket back up with younger people.

0:58:45.960 --> 0:58:48.240
<v Speaker 1>And you've got to attract younger people, which is tasting

0:58:48.320 --> 0:58:51.200
<v Speaker 1>back to the question I should before and given you

0:58:51.280 --> 0:58:57.080
<v Speaker 1>know your you know why nations fail book, it's because

0:58:57.160 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 1>institutions governments talking about not restructuring or changing the structure

0:59:06.080 --> 0:59:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of the system to allow people to get back on

0:59:08.840 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the ladder younger people.

0:59:11.080 --> 0:59:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Where do you think?

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:14.480
<v Speaker 3>So I come back to that idea that people need

0:59:14.560 --> 0:59:17.800
<v Speaker 3>to feel that they have an opportunity, that there's hope.

0:59:18.720 --> 0:59:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I do think we have not done anywhere near what

0:59:21.280 --> 0:59:24.440
<v Speaker 3>we should be doing to create more supply in the

0:59:24.480 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 3>context of housing. And so when you talk about there's

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:30.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of us within this element of incumbency that

0:59:30.320 --> 0:59:32.760
<v Speaker 3>can therefore just keep buying and thus squeezing out those

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:35.960
<v Speaker 3>who don't, you certainly can try to temper that demand

0:59:36.000 --> 0:59:38.480
<v Speaker 3>by limiting how many properties you might own, and obviously

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:42.000
<v Speaker 3>that just creates our cottage industry of arbitrage, etc. And

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:45.200
<v Speaker 3>what we've done and continue to perhaps put too much

0:59:45.280 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 3>weight on, is how do we solve the demand side

0:59:47.760 --> 0:59:50.440
<v Speaker 3>in Australia. So why don't we lend more money or

0:59:50.520 --> 0:59:52.840
<v Speaker 3>give more money to first home buyers or cap interest

0:59:52.960 --> 0:59:55.160
<v Speaker 3>grant and they're all good things, and we should do

0:59:55.200 --> 0:59:56.800
<v Speaker 3>all of those things. But what we've got to do

0:59:57.080 --> 0:59:59.800
<v Speaker 3>is solve supply. And if I just keep this simple

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:03.000
<v Speaker 3>sort of proposition in front of us, which is supply

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:06.560
<v Speaker 3>at the right price point, so that all those people

1:00:07.080 --> 1:00:09.800
<v Speaker 3>who can't at the moment by a property can see

1:00:10.320 --> 1:00:13.400
<v Speaker 3>there is an opportunity or potential opportunity and they have hope.

1:00:13.400 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 3>We've got to create that. And so if I think

1:00:16.200 --> 1:00:19.400
<v Speaker 3>about the median income in Australia is about ninety thousand dollars,

1:00:20.120 --> 1:00:25.520
<v Speaker 3>as a bank you would land probably five times someone's

1:00:25.600 --> 1:00:29.760
<v Speaker 3>income subject to expense verification maybe six times subject too

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:35.840
<v Speaker 3>expense verification against their income a mortgage. So therefore that

1:00:36.000 --> 1:00:38.200
<v Speaker 3>tells you we need a lot of houses in that

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:41.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of five hundred to six hundred thousand dollars zip code.

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:46.920
<v Speaker 3>If we're going to solve what is currently available in

1:00:47.080 --> 1:00:50.640
<v Speaker 3>terms of financing and matching the two that's right. And

1:00:50.760 --> 1:00:52.400
<v Speaker 3>so then you break it down and say, okay, we

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:54.840
<v Speaker 3>need more five hundred and six hundred thousand dollars houses,

1:00:55.800 --> 1:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>and so median income median house prices in Australia over

1:00:59.160 --> 1:01:01.160
<v Speaker 3>million dollars at one point six million dollars in Sydney

1:01:01.960 --> 1:01:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Regional Australia as median house price is five hundred thousand dollars.

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:11.160
<v Speaker 3>So if we're going to go after house price houses

1:01:11.760 --> 1:01:15.200
<v Speaker 3>units at the right price point, why aren't we thinking

1:01:15.240 --> 1:01:17.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot more about how we create more opportunity in

1:01:17.800 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 3>regional Australia just given the price point there meets so

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:24.720
<v Speaker 3>much more of what we need to solve. Second thing

1:01:24.880 --> 1:01:27.120
<v Speaker 3>is is that maybe we have to continue to work

1:01:27.160 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 3>harder at densifying and providing a lot more properties in

1:01:30.360 --> 1:01:33.400
<v Speaker 3>the city rather than the big home which obviously costs

1:01:33.440 --> 1:01:35.840
<v Speaker 3>an amount and well, because of costs and because of

1:01:35.920 --> 1:01:38.320
<v Speaker 3>a whole host of other issues are more expensive than

1:01:38.600 --> 1:01:40.280
<v Speaker 3>five to six hundred thousand dollars, how do we create

1:01:40.280 --> 1:01:43.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot more five hundred to six hundred thousand dollars properties?

1:01:43.800 --> 1:01:46.280
<v Speaker 3>And we're not putting that exam question in front of

1:01:46.560 --> 1:01:50.840
<v Speaker 3>everyone in the property ecosystem to deliver. And I think

1:01:50.880 --> 1:01:53.000
<v Speaker 3>if we then said let's go after that, you'd be

1:01:53.120 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>surprised at what could be achieved if that's the goal.

1:01:55.920 --> 1:01:58.960
<v Speaker 3>And more importantly, we say to every single council, your

1:01:59.080 --> 1:02:01.720
<v Speaker 3>job is to make sure that there's fifty new units

1:02:01.840 --> 1:02:04.560
<v Speaker 3>or houses at the price point at five and six

1:02:04.640 --> 1:02:08.280
<v Speaker 3>affordable house, Yeah, but not affordable in the sense of,

1:02:08.840 --> 1:02:12.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, a slightly pejorative Oh it's a low socio demographic.

1:02:12.400 --> 1:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>No.

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>No, this is just price of property at the right

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:18.360
<v Speaker 3>price point to meet to demand that at the moment

1:02:18.480 --> 1:02:19.479
<v Speaker 3>is not being Do you think.

1:02:19.400 --> 1:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>The word affordable is probably the wrong word to use

1:02:21.280 --> 1:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>because it is pejorative, It sort of sounds like and

1:02:24.800 --> 1:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to develop as.

1:02:25.680 --> 1:02:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Some people will feel like, you know, it's a little

1:02:27.600 --> 1:02:32.680
<v Speaker 3>bit sort of patronized affordable housing. No, no, no, just

1:02:32.720 --> 1:02:34.800
<v Speaker 3>got to get more property at the right price point.

1:02:35.120 --> 1:02:36.479
<v Speaker 3>For people who can pay that price.

1:02:36.560 --> 1:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a better narrative, much better narrative because the people

1:02:39.400 --> 1:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>whore buying it, I don't want to be thinking the

1:02:40.560 --> 1:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>buying affordable housing. They want to think I've bought the

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>price because that's the price I can afford. It might

1:02:44.600 --> 1:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>be a bit smaller, might you know, might have you know,

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>slightly one bathrooms, but it might be just slightly different

1:02:50.320 --> 1:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to be affordable from the developer's point of view. But

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what it makes sense. And I think the change

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in the narrative is really important. And you know the

1:02:57.600 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>industry more than better than anybody.

1:03:00.080 --> 1:03:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Know who you are. We've certainly got good insights on

1:03:02.920 --> 1:03:05.200
<v Speaker 3>the industry and we know better than anyone. But we've

1:03:05.240 --> 1:03:07.439
<v Speaker 3>got good insights on the industry, and we're very keen

1:03:07.560 --> 1:03:11.080
<v Speaker 3>to support the industry. And you know, and the job creation,

1:03:11.320 --> 1:03:14.680
<v Speaker 3>the nation building opportunities in building let's put more into

1:03:14.720 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 3>regional Australia. And then you think about regional Australia, Northern Australia.

1:03:18.080 --> 1:03:19.880
<v Speaker 3>We need a lot more of our population living in

1:03:19.960 --> 1:03:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Northern Australia for a whole host of reasons, not the

1:03:24.080 --> 1:03:26.200
<v Speaker 3>least of which is it's not it's a reasonably elegant

1:03:26.240 --> 1:03:30.040
<v Speaker 3>potential way to deal with cost of housing at the

1:03:30.120 --> 1:03:33.520
<v Speaker 3>right price point for the demand that we have. The

1:03:33.600 --> 1:03:35.480
<v Speaker 3>only other thing I'd say about that book which I

1:03:35.600 --> 1:03:38.240
<v Speaker 3>thought was really important was, and you drew on it

1:03:38.720 --> 1:03:41.040
<v Speaker 3>in some of your observations, that what you when you

1:03:41.080 --> 1:03:45.480
<v Speaker 3>read the book is about the power of having innovation

1:03:46.280 --> 1:03:49.960
<v Speaker 3>and the way private property or intellectual property laws and

1:03:50.160 --> 1:03:54.000
<v Speaker 3>protecting people who come up with great ideas and giving

1:03:54.720 --> 1:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>and thus stimulating and challenging people to innovate and come

1:03:59.280 --> 1:04:00.840
<v Speaker 3>up with new things. So and that's one of those

1:04:00.880 --> 1:04:04.320
<v Speaker 3>things which you know we should continue to ask ourselves.

1:04:04.360 --> 1:04:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Are we're doing enough? And I think we have great

1:04:06.880 --> 1:04:10.560
<v Speaker 3>intellectual property protections in Australia, but are we creating enough

1:04:11.320 --> 1:04:14.880
<v Speaker 3>of an environment and enough room for people to try things,

1:04:15.040 --> 1:04:18.600
<v Speaker 3>create things, trial and error, because we've got to innovate

1:04:19.080 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 3>and we've got to be really open minded and courageous

1:04:21.520 --> 1:04:26.080
<v Speaker 3>about trying things if we're going to I suppose, succeed

1:04:26.200 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 3>as a nation. And if there's one thing you sort

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:30.920
<v Speaker 3>of could argue the US has as an advantage of

1:04:31.000 --> 1:04:33.919
<v Speaker 3>everyone else in the world, is they believe every day

1:04:34.640 --> 1:04:36.840
<v Speaker 3>that they're going there's a chance to get ahead. They

1:04:36.960 --> 1:04:39.840
<v Speaker 3>believe in the American dream, and they believe in the

1:04:39.920 --> 1:04:42.720
<v Speaker 3>idea that they can innovate and they can create. And

1:04:43.440 --> 1:04:46.920
<v Speaker 3>obviously their technology industry and what the innovation and the

1:04:47.240 --> 1:04:50.000
<v Speaker 3>ambition they have is extraordinary, and that is to underpin

1:04:50.160 --> 1:04:52.800
<v Speaker 3>so much of the success in the United States. We

1:04:52.920 --> 1:04:55.400
<v Speaker 3>need to encourage that a lot more in Australia, in

1:04:55.440 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 3>my view, and create a lot more context where people

1:04:59.440 --> 1:05:02.880
<v Speaker 3>feel to go and try to try an experiment. And

1:05:03.000 --> 1:05:05.120
<v Speaker 3>one of the issues in Australia is sometimes I think

1:05:05.160 --> 1:05:08.320
<v Speaker 3>we're a bit tough on each other, hiding behind that

1:05:08.480 --> 1:05:11.720
<v Speaker 3>idea of the tall poppy syndrome where we drag people

1:05:11.800 --> 1:05:13.640
<v Speaker 3>down for trying. I think we've got to start to

1:05:13.720 --> 1:05:17.360
<v Speaker 3>really endorse and celebrate and get behind people who are

1:05:17.400 --> 1:05:20.560
<v Speaker 3>trying things and create a much more positive culture around that.

1:05:21.440 --> 1:05:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Anything like that.

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>That's actually pretty cool that you actually said that, because

1:05:24.320 --> 1:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>innovation and the innovation nation, which is what Malcolm turn

1:05:29.000 --> 1:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Will try to turn Astralia into when he was the

1:05:30.880 --> 1:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Prime minister here is probably my biggest bug beer. I

1:05:34.560 --> 1:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>think we've lost a little bit of that, and not

1:05:36.920 --> 1:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're without talent.

1:05:38.840 --> 1:05:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean I think we've got enormous talent.

1:05:40.960 --> 1:05:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Amazing.

1:05:41.720 --> 1:05:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Just liberate that talent and give it every run of

1:05:43.800 --> 1:05:46.280
<v Speaker 3>the place. Well mate, thanks very much. I really appreciate

1:05:46.280 --> 1:05:48.360
<v Speaker 3>it things. Thank you. That's very gracious to as so,

1:05:48.440 --> 1:05:50.280
<v Speaker 3>thank you very ch I'm.

1:05:50.160 --> 1:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Actually privileged to have a CEO and your of your

1:05:52.840 --> 1:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>elk into the organization, so thanks so much.

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:55.080
<v Speaker 3>And that