WEBVTT - Round 4 waiver wire pickups | Drafted (SuperCoach Draft Podcast)

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Gooday, and welcome back to Drafted Talk and all things

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:14.319
<v Speaker 1>super Coach Draft this Sunday night, March thirtieth, twenty twenty five.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, boy Dossy here talking waver I pick ups

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>four round four. I'm here with Alekdog and Leakedog outside

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of Carlton related emotions. Mate, how are you?

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm well mate? Another weekend of draft gone, another weekend

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 2>of pretending real the football team I support didn't play.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>No, it's good. It's good.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 2>It's good. Won both my main leagues. And that's the

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 2>important thing, isn't it.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>That is good. I believe I beat Patch, our good

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>friend from the show this week in our draft league.

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>So always always a good thing to get at w

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of you mates. But for those wondering at home, we

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't do a show last week. This podcast won't be

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a weekly feature on your feed, but will jump on

0:00:57.960 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>when we can. Even We'll try and get Patch on

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it some point in the season as well. But we

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>are talking all things draft because we do love the

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>game and you can still make a league if you're

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit late to the party on Super Coach Draft

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>as well, and grab your mates, especially if your classic

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>team's gone. To absolute no good like like mine is

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>turning out to be. You can always have a bit

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of fun in draft. But one thing Lecdog you will

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>be doing every single week is your weekly article called

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>cop them and drop them like the name all come

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>up with by you there Leck, but you'll be able

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to find that exclusively on Code Sports for all your

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>draft needs. And Lecdog you've been nailing your picks of late.

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes it's going well early and not to toot my

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 2>own torn and horn, and we do track in the

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>article the results from the previous week. But as a

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 2>sneak peak, if you want your advice on who to grab,

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I pretty much nailed it this week. Jack Henry eighty eight,

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Jake Bowie Bowie one sixteen CJ only fifty eight slight

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 2>this there, but I still I did say he was

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>a Benchi Nathan Odris school one oh four, Georgi Georgiades

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>who was dominant and scored all these points in about

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 2>five minutes. Seventy eight and Taylor Walker at ninety one

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 2>were the were the cops from last week. If you

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 2>grabbed any of them, you'd probably be pretty happy. And

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 2>then the drops of the of the guys who did

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 2>play Lake Acres twenty five, Andrew McGrath thirty four, Aaron

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Norton fifty three, and then Tim Turanto, who I suggested

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 2>was a trade not a drop. Ninety four points so

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty good, pretty good scoring record, and every article we

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.839
<v Speaker 2>tracked the previous week's performance, so you can hold me accountable.

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you subscribe, I think that's been my favorite

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>part so far. And you were, to be fair pre show,

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you were turning your own horn to me. You were saying,

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>how how well you did last yow, that's why we

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted to bring it up. But yeah, it is good

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>to see you're holding yourself accountable their lex so check

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>that out on Code Sports. We do have a super

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Coach draft section there on the side now, so I'll

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>put that link in the description. But let's get to

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:08.399
<v Speaker 1>our top five waivers heading into round four post round three,

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and like I said, we are recording Sunday night, so

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>if things do change around, you know, that's not our fault.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It's Sunday night. So lekdog. I'll let you start with

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the first one, and the way we do this will

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>just go one by one here, So who's your number

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>one wave? Will I pick up.

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm going to cheat because again it's it's Jake Bowie.

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 2>So he was in the article last week. He's still

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>in under Let me have a little twenty fours and

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 2>he's just got a plumb roll. It was a bit

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 2>higher up the ground this week, but essentially halfback, maybe

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>pushing it a little bit up onto a wing, but

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty much half back. And he's just been dominant. One

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 2>sixteen last week, ninety seven the week before, and I

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 2>think he had about a ninety two old double chick

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 2>now about a ninety two in that first week as well,

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>so he's been on fire ninety six. He's got a

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 2>great role Melbourne in't defending well through the middle of

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the ground and not putting a heap of pressure on

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>so he is getting plenty of opportunities and just a

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 2>really under owned player. And for a guy who, even

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 2>if you look at just his pure average ninety six

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>point five before this weekend, if someone's averaging that, I

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 2>would have expected them to be picked up in more

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 2>teams than he has been. So grab him if he's there.

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, unreal, I've got him in my top five. He's

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>down at fifth for me, but it's only because he's

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.799
<v Speaker 1>actually been my boyfri so so long and I've probably

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>gone way too early on him and he's let me

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>down in the past, so I'm not willing to go

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.679
<v Speaker 1>there just in case things fall off the rails again

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>like they have for me in the past. But yeah,

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I love the role, love the player, So an awesome pickup.

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, still way under owned at the moment now,

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I just will say, for percentage wise, I think we're

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>going under sixty percent owned as our threshold here, likek

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of I've kind of stuck under. I've actually

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>got under forty five ish percent at the moment, So

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>hopefully these guys, you know, they might not be a

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>valuable in your league, but well maybe I've got a

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of lower percentages at the end as well to

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>talk through.

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I don't think I've got anyone sort of

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 2>above forty, so we'll.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, get so this guy may be missed due to that,

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>but forty point four percent is my number one player

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's Jace Bergoyn, so.

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:22.119
<v Speaker 2>Move him off my list.

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>Unbelievable that he's this lowly owned at the moment, but

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a role change clearly playing a bit

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>more defense now. He took three kick ins on the weekend,

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>but also one hundred percent time on ground. This guy's

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>just so clean with the peal. Love the way he plays,

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and look if they're going to start using him, if

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Port's going to start using him as their distributor now

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that Dan Houston's gone, you know, alongside Kane Farrell, because

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it seemingly looks like they need some help back in defense.

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Scored one hundred and twenty one on the weekend, started

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the season slow with a fifty, and then moved into

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that role one hundred and twenty seven hundred and twenty

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>one since, so he should hopefully we'll see how DPPs

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>are tracking, but you'd presume that he's going to get

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>dual position status, and that happens after round five this year,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>so it's a round earlier, so you don't even have

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to stash him in your midfield for too long. It's

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 1>for two extra rounds and then he should hopefully be

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a defender. So he's my number one wavell I pick

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>up this week if he's there, grab him.

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 2>He's just a jet, isn't he He's just so good.

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a gun. Who have you got second Leck.

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 2>This is a my boy. This is a guy who's

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 2>in thirty seven point five percent of teams. This is

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 2>a John Noble. He was in all my preseason thankings.

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I own him in every single keeper league I play.

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You were talking hibout big time preseason. I remember that.

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he's come out so obviously. Gold Coast have

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 2>only played the two games seventy eight and then the

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 2>one twenty on the weekend playing half back, but predominantly

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>playing on sort of the left side of the ground

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 2>if you're looking from defense, and he pushed really high

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 2>the ground and was impacting, you know, forward to the

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 2>ball as well. But we know that he can sort

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of slop back and opposite Dan Rioli, all of a sudden,

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 2>they've got a couple of happens. And I guess the

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 2>hype for me on him preseason was you don't acquire

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 2>a guy like that for the price they paid unless

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 2>you've got a role for him. And very clearly to

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 2>me that that's plumb halfback roles there, and he's a

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 2>kicker first. So that's what I love about him.

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, beautiful, he's he I think he was a special

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>mention on my list or maybe top five. Yeah, No,

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>he was a special mention for me, but I know

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>he's your boy, so fair enough that he's cracked in there.

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I've still just don't know what to think of the Suns,

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but I do have a son as my number two

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and drafted in a lot of probably our leagues and

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of I guess coach, you know, the experienced

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>super coaches, I would say, have this guy on their team.

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>But Bailey Humphrey forty two point five percent of leagues

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>he has owned in but one hundred and eleven on

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the weekend and off to a flying start, playing much

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>more midfield this year, getting a lot of midfield exposure.

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>He's available as a forward. So while I don't think

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>these massive scores necessarily are sustainable for the season, the

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Suns are off to an absolute flyer. So we've had

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>some pretty big scores across the board in their midfield

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. But look, he's going to be playing

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at least some midfield exposure and some pretty decent center

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>bounce numbers as well from Bailey humphreyhim. When you've got

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a forward that is doing that, look you just get

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>them up. You get them in your team straight away

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>early in the season. So look, I know he's probably

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>not available in your legue, but forty two point five

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>percent he might be. So if he is, go grab

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>him your third lecdog.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 2>My third is I'm just switching things around here on

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 2>the fly, and this is I'm okay, I'm going to

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 2>switch to this man. It's going to be Dan Curtin

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and played the first round for Adelaide sort of in defense,

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 2>didn't score much, scored twenty six points, but then the

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 2>last two weeks has played forward and in an Adelaide

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 2>team that's packing a lot and defending not a lot

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 2>and scoring a lot, his little niche role in the

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 2>forward line has generated some points eighty two last week,

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 2>ninety this week. He's available in a hell of a

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of teams. I'm just scrolling down to actually try

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 2>and find him. You can't find him. I think he's

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>in sub ten percent of teams. Let's pull him up,

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 2>and he's in that four point four percent of teams

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 2>of leagues, and he's available as a forward. And I

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 2>think anyone who's available is a forward at this point

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>in the season that has a little bit of upside

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>or is in a little bit of form is someone

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to jump on because I'd rather feel him

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>than like your Sampal Peppers and that sort of player.

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, huge for huge for the keeper league's perspective as well.

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>That seemed like a breakout game in particular this week

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>against North But yeah, once to keep an eye out.

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I have as much faith as

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you do. Perhaps is that the role or the scoring continuing,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Adelaide another team that's just killing it to

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>start the season. My number three, and a bit of

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>bias from my beloved West Coast Eagles, and they did

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>just play moments ago. So I don't even know if

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>this final score is going to be scaled at all.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But Ryan Marrich played amazing game this game against Freemanner

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Western derby one hundred and twenty three points.

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And he has got the defensive distributor role at West

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Coast at the moment. It was flagged in pre season,

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>but then I don't he didn't play in the first

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>week and it was sort of like, oh, what's going

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>on there? Doesn't have you know, he's clearly out of

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the out of favor, but he's come in the next

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>two and put up some solid scores. He was sorry

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>he was sub the first week, scored well in very

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>low time on ground. It was like a thirty three

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in a quarter basically. Since then, had two really solid

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>games and come out with a massive game this week.

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing that I like about it as well,

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>like other than just the fact he's taking kickins, he's

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy back there. He makes some mistakes, but he's

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty years old, so you know, yea hope that they

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>persist with him. The thing that happened in that game

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>as well though, was Jeremy McGovern was injured. I think

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it was a groin that he did there, so job

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>security should be there long terms. Harry Edwards was subbed

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>oubt so you know he's up in the favor. You'd

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine if he's taking kickings and got that role. But yeah,

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Ryan Marrick only three point four percent of

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>teams at the moment available as a forward and he's

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>got that prime distributing role. So yeah, one one that

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm really high on and probably hoping to pick up

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in many leagues this week bloody beautiful.

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, he was definitely on my list. So if we're

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 2>going to stick in that under selected forward line. I've

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 2>got a bit of a curly one. His name's been Long.

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 2>He's in two point four percent of teams. He scored

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven points against Melbourne and ninety six points against

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 2>West Coast. The points were pretty high against Melbourne and

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 2>he only kicked one goal, where as he kicked four

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 2>goals against West Coast. So he's generating points from basically possessions,

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 2>and he kicks a hell of a lot more than

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.599
<v Speaker 2>the handbles. He really has no reason to handball. So

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 2>he's currently inform goal Coaster currently inform. He's a forward.

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm willing to take a punt or a risk on

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 2>a guy like this in the forward line, even if

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 2>he's on my bench. He's a guy I'm looking to grab.

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's gonna last, but I think we'll

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 2>let gold Coaster upen about. He's someone I'm willing to ride.

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I really like that we have different players, and I

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's because we sort of set little different thresholds.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>But this so far, like again, not much crossover here,

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>which is awesome. To get some more names on the podcast.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I've gone again a bit higher in ownership again but

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>under forty percent. Thirty two point two percent at the moment.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Hugo ga Sea, a player that's talked about a fair

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>bit in classic circles as well this preseason, had a

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>chance to really score well this week with no Jack

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Steele as a late out, but still the signs were

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>really good here able to score has midfield role, and

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>he was the sub last week. You'd hope that after

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.839
<v Speaker 1>that performance he avoids it for a little bit, and

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>I'd be I'd be willing to spend a waiver just

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to see if he holds that role for a while,

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>because his potential was amazing. Obviously super high on him

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in keeper leagues, but his potential is amazing for this year.

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>Should he just hold onto that role, and the Saints

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>look pretty good with him in there, so look, I'd

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.599
<v Speaker 1>be again, I'd be willing to spend it just to

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>see if he can, if he can hold onto that

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>role even with Jack Steel back in the side, if

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>he can get his scoring up a little bit around

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this mark. But yeah, an amazing game from Hugo Garcia.

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a bit of rage trading for classics or people

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 2>drop him last week and they're probably not super happy

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>with that decision at this stage. I've got another more

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 2>highly owned player thirty three point four percent to round

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 2>out my top five mid only Tom Atkins, midfielder from

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Geelong eighty five ninety six and a one oh five

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 2>to start the season, fourteen tackles, eleven tackles and twelve

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 2>tackles fourteen the most recent, twelve the first. He's being

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>a defensive stopper in the midfield and he doesn't even

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 2>need to touch the ball to get points because he's

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>just generating tackles. So I think for now, midfield is

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 2>actually really shallow for mid only players, and he's one

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>that I have my eye on if he's available.

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that cat's midfield. It's it's not super deep outside

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>those top players, so he's getting a pretty nice role

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in there as well. My fifth to round it out

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in fact Jake Bowie, so you mentioned him up

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the top twenty twenty four percent owned, big fan of

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>him as well, but a couple of special mentions. I

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>suppose I do have a guy that's massive at the

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>moment in salary cap leagues, and Sam Davidson available as

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a forward looked out standing on the weekend, mature age

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>rookie coming into the system one hundred and twenty nine

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>points for the Western Bulldogs. Bit salty. I didn't play

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>him on field, and you'll probably hear about that on

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the Phantom's Lair talking about that. But yeah, he's one

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that I'm you know, i'd be probably willing to spend

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>because he's lower owned in Draft League seventeen point nine percent,

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so you you know he's going to be more available

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>than some of these guys were talking off the top.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And there's a word that I used to use and

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>still do use at times, observable first in this setting

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and hit boy, he wants the pill. He wants that

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Sharon bad So, Sam Davidson, you know, I think he's

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a good option in draft as well. I like it.

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I like it. And if we're going to jump into

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 2>honorall we mentions s guy and similar Van is sort

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 2>of Murphy Red. That's sort of that rookie priced super

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 2>coach classic type player that's available in plenty leagues. But

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>the name I want to throw at you this is

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 2>a Kerball and I only know about him because I

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 2>have him in a dynasty league where we have to

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 2>to play a key position players each week. Anthony Camerini

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 2>from Saint Kilda has been switched from a undersized full

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 2>forward to essentially a full back or an attempt to

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 2>try and fill a Josh Battle type hole in that

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Saint Kilda side. And then we've only got a small

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 2>sample size. Fifty six in round one was him playing

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 2>as a forward, and then he's put up a seventy

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 2>eight and a ninety five in defense. Now, one was

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 2>a win against Geelong and the other was against a

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 2>win against Richmond, who you know, he was kind of

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 2>running around with Tom Lynch and then basically doing whatever

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 2>he wanted. I don't think it's a long term play.

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it might even pay off next week.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>But he's one I'm watching. It's a role change. He's

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 2>scored two decent scores and he's a forward and at

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 2>some stage soon he'll be for defense eligible. So he's

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 2>just one that I'm looking at. He's in almost literally

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 2>no one's team in Super Coach Draft.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'd be happy like picking him up free agency.

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>You're definitely not spending a waiver, but now, no, no, no,

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you could pick him up later in the week and

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>stream if you're really struggling in that forward line and

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>hope it pops for a few weeks. I'm just looking

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>at their injury report as well, someone like a Googal

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Howard to fill that role. Still five ish weeks away

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on their last injury report, So yeah, it's a decent shout.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Can't say I've been thinking about him too much in

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>my plan. Think about him a lotad that you mentioned

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>off the top as well in special mentions, but he

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was in your article last week. I think you said

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>tex Walker still ten percent owned. Yeah, improved, improved chromb

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>side there as well. I think he's one of his

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>early scores was he got subbed off I think in

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>the first game in a bit lower time on ground

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>from memory. So his last two games outside of that one,

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>he's scored really well. So texts could be good in

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that forward line for the Crows if we're going to

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.479
<v Speaker 1>see more of it up there. The Wizard. The Wizard

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>has been I mean, he's been unreal. One hundred and

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty four on the weekend. You've got to give him props.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Started off with a stick inca in the season, but

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>they've got the buy this week, which is why I

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention them him as a pick up this particular week.

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be a topsy turvy ride

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>with any small forward as well, So I probably wouldn't

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>necessarily recommend it, but gee, you're probably going to get

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>some of these ceiling scores, which is unbelievable from a

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>small forward player that I will just my last special

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>mentions Cam McKenzie twenty nine percent. Again, I didn't mention

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>him just because they the Hawks do have the buy

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this week, but I think his role in that midfield

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>looks pretty solidified now, And if Cane Corns's words have

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>anything to say about it, I think he said he's

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>One of his tweets was that he's a future Brownlow medallist,

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>so that's you know, if you have any sway with

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Big Cano. He's talking a lot about fantasy this year,

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>mainly in a negative light, but if you're if you're

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that way swayed, I think Cam McKenzie could be a

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>nice little player this year as well for your midfield.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I think he's got a pretty solid locked

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 2>in role. I mean, he's definitely got lots in spot

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 2>on the team. James Warple needs to come back, but

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Conor McDonald came out of that forward line. He has

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 2>moments at the midfield, so there's definitely minutes available currently.

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Lefdog. Well that's that's all we have for

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the waivers this week. Again, you can catch copham and

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>drop them from Lekdog. That is his waver Wire article

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>weekly exclusive on Code Sports, so check that out every week.

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, we'll jump on for a pod from

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>time to time when we can, but you can grab

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that every single week of the season with the great

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>left Doog here, so great to jump on again. Let Dog.

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Good luck for the Blues this week, mate, Hopefully your

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>fortunes turn around a bit.

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks mate. Good luck with us coast, aren't you?

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 2>I am so are we both currently bottom two on

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the latter YEP.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Commiserations mate, and all the best in draft though, all

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the best in draft all right, guys, enjoy leave us

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>a rating and review if you're enjoying these draft episodes,

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>subscribe on YouTube, comment whatever you want. Hit us up

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter as well. I'm at hk dos Lefdog. You're

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>right left Dog on Twitter as well. A bit more

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>active this year as well. Well, Let Dog on the Twitter.

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Sphere, so I haven't come out for a time. It's

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 2>a little bit.

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Jump on board and we'll talk to you soon.