WEBVTT - Sharri | 15 April

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Why. On Sky News This is Sharry.

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Good Evening tonight. Under scrutiny from the Australian Electoral Commission,

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the influencers paid by the Teals are forced to disclose

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 2>their endorsements. Plus I'll tell you the real reason a

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Legraspender pulled out of a debate against Roeknox. Also on

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 2>the show, the internal Liberal polls that show Dutton is

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>ahead in outer suburban areas and can still win. I'll

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 2>speak with James Patterson about this in a moment. Plus

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Albanese's backflip on Tanya Plebisak, how he was forced into

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 2>confirming she will still have a job if he wins government.

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 2>And just when you think the Greens can't get any worse,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>they're forced to reschedule a dance party planned for Anzac Day.

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Roman Bishop and Steve Price will get stuck in shortly.

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Also on the show, the link documents that Facebook is

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 2>monitoring children and exploiting their anxieties and insecurities. All of

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:06.919
<v Speaker 2>this coming up, but first tonight. Young influencers endorsing TLMP

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Allegraspender have now been forced to disclose that their posts

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 2>were paid partnerships. These disclosures are highly embarrassing for the

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 2>weightworth MP who's built her reputation on integrity in politics.

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 3>And you've told me you want more integrity in politics.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 3>You want protections for our whistleblows, you want to ban

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 3>gambling pads, and you want to see better behavior in

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 3>our parliament from our leaders in our country. These are

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the priorities you've told me that are important, and this

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 3>is what I fight for.

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 2>And here's the irony Allegraspender's office has told a business

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 2>owner that she wouldn't debate her liberal rival Ronox because

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a lack of editorial standards at Sky News. We

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 2>were meant to be hosting the debate. This fascical response

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 2>came literally at the same time as she was caught

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 2>out paying influences without proper disclosure in potential breach of

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 2>AAC rules. Spender reluctantly admitted on Friday that influencers who

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 2>were endorsing her were paid, but she didn't admit this

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 2>as a matter of transparency and accountability. It was under

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 2>repeated questioning on the ABC. What does that mean?

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Does that mean in collaboration you've paid her to make

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:24.839
<v Speaker 4>the video? What does that actually mean?

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so We've worked with a sort of agency and

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of influencers and you know, content creators to

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 3>try and reach different audiences. Because what I've noticed really

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 3>in this in this particularly this election, is that a

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of people have switched off politics.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 4>So you did your campaign pay her?

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Then?

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 3>So the so our campaign has paid an agency who's

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 3>paid some influences or content creators to you know, collaborate

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 3>on different posts.

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so ultimately she probably got paid by that agency.

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so.

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Don't you love the reluctant transparency. It took three questions

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 2>before that admission that yes, the influencer was paid. Now,

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 2>the agency she referred to is called Sentiment. And here

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 2>was some of that paid content that was meant to

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>be simply organic support from the younger demographic you're about

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 2>to see. TikTok creator Luke Gallagher.

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 6>I live in Wentworth and I'm voting for the independent

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 6>allegrospender and I'm here to tell you why.

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, that video was deleted and then re uploaded yesterday

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 2>with a disclosure that says this content was made as

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 2>part of a paid partnership with a legraspender Edgecliff And

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>here's another influencer endorsement for a legraspender.

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 5>This is the first time Millennials and gen Z outnumbered

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 5>the Boomies. So let's talk about what happens when majority

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.119
<v Speaker 5>of Ozzie's ditched the two party system. Bye bye, Meet

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 5>a legraspender. She ran as an Indian twenty twenty two.

0:03:59.000 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 7>Not for her.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 5>She had a perfectly lovely life. People just kept begging

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 5>her to do it, and nobody else was at the time.

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 5>He took the seat right out from under some liberal

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 5>guy Paul Bloke and now fights. I'm in fights for

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 5>actual climate action, political integrity and lowering cost of living.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>She's chill, She's chill, so chill.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 2>That influencer Millie has one hundred and thirty seven thousand followers,

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 2>and she was paid to produce content for Spender. And

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 2>here's another of her posts where she endorses the Teal

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 2>and then describes Peter Dutton's policies as terrifying.

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Somamp is a legal spender and she votes consistently for

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 3>strong climate action, housing affordability, and protection.

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 5>Of minority groups. I'm very happy with my representative and

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 5>I will be voting for her to stay in power.

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 2>To keep doing what she's doing. If we compare that

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 2>to someone like mister Dutton, he's.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 5>Voted for increasing indexation of hex, against transgender rights and

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 5>to cut penalty rates for workers terrifying.

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 2>So Dartanique was terrifying and Allegra is so chill. And

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 2>by the way, this influencer, Millie, also was invited to

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Canberra for the budget.

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 7>What gives you hope?

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 5>You know better than anyone in Australia right now, what

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 5>gives you hope for the next generation?

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 7>Not just as a politician but as a person.

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 2>She was part of a group of thirteen content creators

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>invited by the Albanezy government into the budget lock up,

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 2>and some of the group even had their travel and

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 2>accommodation costs covered by labor Well. The AAC has now

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 2>issued new rules for influencers, saying that they need to

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 2>disclose any payment involved to produce the political material. Now

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>this influence of Millie didn't initially disclose that her content

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>was paid. She said it was in collaboration, but now,

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 2>like Luke, she's updated her posts to read that this

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 2>content was made as part of a paid partnership with

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 2>a legraspender. Edgecliff. Now, as you know, most influencers routinely

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 2>declare just as a matter of course, if their content

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>is paid when they're spooking a handbag or skin creep.

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 2>So it's bizarre this didn't happen automatically in the case

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 2>of those paid by Allegra Spender. So what was her

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 2>response to all of this? Well, stunningly, despite being caught

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 2>out secretly paying influences without the proper disclosure, she said

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 2>she wouldn't apologize for this lack of transparency.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 3>As is appropriate for any professional. We paid merely for

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 3>her time, but the content she chooses to post is

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 3>all her own. Sounds fair enough, right, I'm not going

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 3>to apologize for finding new ways to connect with young

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 3>people and for finding for their future on issues like housing,

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 3>climate change, and mental health. Doing politics differently means changing

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 3>the status quo.

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, doing politics differently, she says. Well, by this, does

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 2>she mean potentially flouting the rule and instead engaging in

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 2>cash for comment, because that's what the coalition is calling this.

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 9>Alger Spender has been paying social media influences to promote

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 9>her cause.

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 7>Has she crossed the line?

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think when it comes to.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 9>The whole Teal movement. The whole thing's a conjob and

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 9>that's why people are now seeing through the Teals.

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>And Spender held an event at the pub with that

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 2>influencer Millie last night, but the media were blocked from entering. Again,

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>so much for transparency. Well, her fellow teal in the

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Victorian seat of ku Jong Josh Fridenberg's old seat, Minnie Ryan,

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 2>has now clarified her position on the matter after that

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>dreadful train wreck interview on the ABC where she didn't

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 2>quite know what she thought about this scandal.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 10>Oh, I don't want to have an opinion on it, really,

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 10>I think, well.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 11>You don't think you think voters does to know that

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 11>if someone they're watching is saying great things about a politician,

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 11>whether they're being paid by that politician.

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 7>I have to give some thought. It's not something I've

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 7>given great thought to myself. Obviously, I haven't engaged in

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 7>anything like that myself.

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to give that some thought.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 7>Well, I would think that it would be clear.

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 12>I think.

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 7>I'd have to give it some thought.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Done so, despite everyone despite her being obsessed with everyone

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 2>calling her a doctor, Minnie Grian wasn't smart enough to

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 2>think of an answer to that question on the spot,

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 2>and that was Sunday. It took her two days before

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 2>she worked out what to say about this, and finally

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>today she posted a statement saying that, having now had

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity to look at this issue, I fully support

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 2>the aac's position statement from last Friday that influencer content

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 2>paid for by politicians should be clearly labeled as such.

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 2>So this is what accountability looks like. The teals have

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 2>to be dragged kicking and screaming to it. Interesting then

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.479
<v Speaker 2>that when a Sydney businesswoman, the owner of a florist

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 2>in Double Bay, which she told me that she phoned

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Allegra Spender's office to ask why she'd pulled out of

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>the Sky News debate against Roeknox, and this is what

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 2>she told me. That Spender's office said, Allegra doesn't have

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>any faith in the editorial standards on Sky Now. As

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, Sky News hosted fair and balanced debates between

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister and the Opposition leader, between the Treasurer

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 2>and the Shadow Treasurer. There's been no suggestion, even from

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 2>our worst critics, that these debates weren't anything other than

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 2>even handed and objective so it's unclear what concerns a

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 2>legraspender could possibly have about the editorial standards at Sky News.

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps she's worried about more of that pesky transparency and accountability. Well,

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 2>let's turn to the bombshell reports from today that Russia

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 2>wants to have a military base with a long range

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 2>aircraft in Indonesia. This would be a mere four hundred

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 2>kilometers from Australia's mainland. The geostrategic threat from a hostile

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 2>dictatorship so close to Australia would of course be significant. Now,

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Albanezy had nothing of substance to say earlier today when

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 2>he was asked about this, except that he was being briefed.

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 2>He truly is utterly hopeless.

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 12>Have a look, we have a good relationship with our

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 12>friend in Indonesia and we're seeking further clarification. Obviously do

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 12>not want to see Russia an influence in our region.

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 2>He never knows what's going on. He is never across

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the detail. He's stumbling, mumbling his way through the answers.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton meanwhile said it would be a catastrophic failure

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 2>of diplomatic relations if Albanzi was oblivious to Russia's reported move.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 9>We would want to hear from the Prime Minister about

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 9>what if it's have been undertaken. Obviously, surely they must

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 9>have known about this before it's been made public, and

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 9>if not, then that is a catastrophic failure of Penny

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 9>Wong and Anthony Alberzian.

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Now it's taken hours and hours and hours to actually

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 2>get to the bottom of this, and now Defense Minister

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Richard Miles Tonight says that Indonesia has told him the

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 2>reports are not true, that they won't host a Russian aircraft.

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 2>He said he's spoken to his counterpart and he's told

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 2>him in the clearest possible terms that the reports of

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 2>the prospect of Russian aircraft operating from Indonesia are not true.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in now Shadow Home Affairs Minister and Coalition

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 2>campaign spokesman James Patterson. James, great to see you again.

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 2>Are you convinced by this assurance from Richard Miles Tonight.

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 6>Well, I certainly hope that it's true, and it would

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 6>be welcome news if the Indonesian government had ruled out

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 6>any Russian air Force access to Indonesian military bases.

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's not sufficiently clear.

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 6>I think from the minister's statement that that is the case,

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 6>and I look forward to official confirmation from the Indonesian

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 6>government that not only will Russian aircraft not be based

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 6>in Indonesia, but they won't have any sort of visiting

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 6>or access arrangements at all. Because Indonesia is an incredibly

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 6>important national security partner for Australia. We work very cooperatively

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 6>with them on things like people smuggling, account terrorism, anti

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 6>narcotics trafficking and other important issues, and we want to

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 6>make sure that relationship main strong. The thing that concerns

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 6>me most from today, though, Shari, is that it's very

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 6>clear that until this was reported in the media, the

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 6>Australian government, the Obernezi Gap and had no idea that

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 6>Russia had made this request of Indonesia, and they were

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 6>rushed into a panicked phone call to try and get

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 6>to the bottom of this. Well, a good relationship should

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 6>make sure that you know about these things in advance,

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 6>and good intelligence should make sure that you know about

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 6>these things in advance. But it does seem like a

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 6>pretty significant failure on this government's watch.

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's turn to the polls now, which show a

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 2>labor that is on the ascendancy. It shows the coalition

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>falling behind now. The Nationals leader David little Proud was

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 2>on with Chris Kenny earlier tonight and he said something

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 2>really interesting. He said that the national polls weren't an

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 2>accurate reflection of the election or what the internal Liberal

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 2>polls are showing here.

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 13>He was, I don't think the national polls are reflective

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 13>of the hyper local campaigns are taking place there and

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.719
<v Speaker 13>I think to your point, it's exactly about cost of

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.599
<v Speaker 13>living about in particularly as you get out of the

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 13>inner suburbs where there is not necessarily a bigger cost

0:13:57.840 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 13>of living crisis as these you get at further out,

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 13>they're not feeling it as much. And I think what's

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.599
<v Speaker 13>important is that what we're not walking away from the

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 13>national polls and what they reflect what we're seeing now

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 13>we're internal polling, is that as you get out where

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 13>Australians are struggling and we're saying to them we're going

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 13>to give you a tax cut of twelve hundred dollars

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 13>an individual twenty four hundred family.

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 2>James. He also said this was more like the twenty

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 2>nineteen election than twenty twenty two, So is he right?

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Or your internal polls showing the Coalition ahead in those

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 2>out of suburban seats.

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 6>Sure, you won't expect me to disclose internal polling on

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 6>your program tonight, but let me point to something that's

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 6>in the public realm that shows something very interesting about leaders.

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 6>Peter Dutton was in three seats in Melbourne today. He

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 6>was in McEwen, he was in Hawk and he's in Gorton.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 6>One of those is a traditional marginal seat in McEwen,

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 6>but we haven't held it for some time. Hawk is

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 6>a new seat, but it covers territory that's been safe

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 6>flavor and we've never held the seat of Gorton. And

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 6>that's where Peter Dutton spent his time today and he

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 6>got a terrific reception show that even the press gallery

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 6>wrote it up. Where was the Prime Minister today, Well,

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 6>he was in Franklin in Tasmania, and he was in

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 6>Cooper in Victoria. Now, your most scarce resource in a

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 6>campaign is your leader. And it's a very strange thing

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 6>to send your prime minister to safe labor held seats

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 6>if you've got no concerns at all. So perhaps the

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 6>Greens are surging in Cooper and there are danger of

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 6>losing it there. Perhaps the Independent in Franklin is a

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 6>grave danger of taking the seat off Julie Collins there, and.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>That could be a very big upset.

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 6>And if the Prime Mister has to spend time and

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 6>money defending seats like that, well it makes other contests

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 6>much more competitive.

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you said that that you wouldn't talk about

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 2>internal polling, but of course the Nationalist leader did. He

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 2>said that your internal polling showed that Darton was ahead

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 2>in those outer suburban areas. But we're hearing a lot

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 2>of public criticisms about the coalition's campaign, including that the

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 2>work from home policy wasn't dumped early enough, that other

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 2>policies were announced too late, that the tv ads didn't

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 2>start soon enough. What do you say to cons earned

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 2>coalition voters that the election is slipping away from the coalition?

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, what is the path to victory?

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 6>I would say that when people hear our message, they

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 6>are incredibly receptive to it, to it and to us,

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 6>and they're inclined to vote for us. And particularly when

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 6>they hear that we're going to cut people's petrol and

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 6>diesel tax by fourteen dollars a tank, they're going to

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 6>vote Coalition when they hear that will give them twelve

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 6>hundred dollars of their taxpayer's money back is a cost

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 6>of living repaate.

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>They're inclined to vote Coalition.

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 6>When they hear that we're going to push more gas

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 6>into the system to drive down prices, they're going to

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 6>vote for the Coalition. When they hear about our comprehensive

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 6>housing plan to get first home buyers back into the

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 6>market for a first time in a long time, they're

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 6>very open to vote into the Coalition. So we've got

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 6>to sell to make over the next two and a

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 6>half weeks.

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>We know that. But when people hear.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 6>Our message, they are very receptive to it and very

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 6>inclined to vote for us.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Chris Kenny revealed on his show earlier today that although

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the Labor government officially opposes your taxation benefit for first

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 2>home buyersmps are actually able to claim these deductions personally. So, James,

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 2>do you think that the Prime Minister and other ministers

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and coalition figures as well should declare, if they're receiving

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>this benefit that they object to first home buyers having.

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, I certainly hope that there's no Labor MP claiming

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 6>a benefit that they want to deny to a first

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 6>home buyer. But when it comes to the Coalition, we're

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 6>very clear we think we need significant change to our

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 6>tax system to facilitate first time buyers getting into the market.

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 6>We want to give them a leg up, we want

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:33.719
<v Speaker 6>to give them advantage in the market. We want them

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 6>to be able to go to an auction and bid

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 6>with confidence knowing that they'll be able to get a

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 6>significant tax rebate if they're a first time buyer buying

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 6>a new home, to the tune of eleven to twelve

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 6>thousand dollars a year, which would be transformative for a

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 6>lot of young people who feel that been locked out

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 6>of the market. In conjunction with our other policies to

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 6>boost supply and reduce demand by cutting back on immigration,

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 6>that's what the offering we're making to young Australians to

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 6>restore that hope of home ownership. And we think that

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 6>we and they hear that message, they'll increasingly vote for

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 6>the Coalition.

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 2>But if labor's objecting to this tax benefit and they're

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 2>personally receiving it, then shouldn't they publicly disclose that disclose that.

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 6>Certainly that would be certainly that would be an active hypocrisy,

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 6>and probably not the first one from this Labor Party.

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.719
<v Speaker 6>They're often ones to claim benefits for themselves that they

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 6>deny to others. But for us, we are about getting

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 6>Australians into the home into the home mark all right,

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 6>I just.

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 2>Want to ask you about my report from the start

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>of the program where the Teals have been paying influences

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.479
<v Speaker 2>to endorse their policies. Now you personally wrote to the

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 2>AEC Commissioner asking for an investigation. What are your concerns

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 2>here and is the coalition paying any influencers to produce

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 2>positive content?

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, the only content that the Coalition publishes in the

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 6>election campaign is authorized and released by the coalition. We're

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 6>not covertly paying anyone to say nice things about us

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 6>without declaring it.

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's the problem here.

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 6>The Teals run on a platform of integrity and transparency,

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 6>but this is not true. Sparent and integrity is doing

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 6>the right thing even when you think someone's not watching.

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 6>But when Allegrath Spender thought no one was watching, she

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 6>thought she could get away with secretly paying influences to

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 6>say nice things about her without disclosing that to voters.

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>It's similar behavior that we've seen from.

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 6>Other teals, like Manique Ryan's husband, who thought when no

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 6>one was watching, it was okay to steal your political

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 6>opponent's signs. And that's why a lot of people are

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 6>waking up to the teals. They're realizing that what they bought,

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 6>what they've got, is not what they paid for, and

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 6>it's time for them to take a different choice at

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 6>this election and return liberal members to the Federal Parliament

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 6>who will actually fight for their communities, who will actually

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 6>have a seat around the table, who can actually make

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 6>a difference.

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, James Patterson, really appreciate your time and insights

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 2>as always. Thanks so much. And by the way, I've

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 2>got Roe Knox coming up on the show a bit later,

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 2>so we'll get back to that teal topic then. But

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 2>now let's bring in farm a Speaker of the House,

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Bronwan Bishop and Sky News host Steve Price. Great to

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 2>see you both now. The Prime Minister snubbed Tania Plibsek

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday, then yesterday he wouldn't even guarantee that she'd

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 2>have a job after the election. Well today he was

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 2>under pressure over this, over their relationship, and he finally

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 2>said yes, she'll be in cabinet. It was a capitulation

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 2>of salts. Have a look.

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 12>I got the same answer yesterday that i'll give today,

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 12>which is I expect Tenure Polibacy will be a senior

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 12>cabinet minister. She's an important member of my team.

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Bronman Albanizy is no champion of women. He didn't want

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 2>any investigation into the mean girls. He played a key

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>role in toppling Australia's first female prime minister, and now

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 2>he's treated Tanya Plibisec like this. It would be a

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>scandal if it was a coalition figure, you know, who

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>had rebuffed a senior woman like that at a campaign launch.

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, I was pretty fucked.

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 7>I really was.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 10>Of course, that was no gentle pushback. It was very

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 10>physical and it did show animosity. There's no two ways

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 10>about it. And you're right about him being the key

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 10>driver to get rid of Julia Getar. I distinctly remember

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 10>seeing him convening a group of people in a restaurant

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 10>just before it all happened. They happened to be sitting

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 10>down near the Ladies' Loo, so I went down to intervene.

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 10>It was quite obvious with Dicky bee Kish, they had

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 10>all their numbers around and they were busy plotting away.

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 10>But it's not the only one. I mean, when Susan

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 10>Lae was under attack in the Parliament, Albernezy was heard

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 10>to say, smash her up. You know, it's not nice terminology,

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 10>your words to that effect. But he pretends to be

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 10>out there being the friend to all and whatever. But

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 10>that's not nice behavior, and particularly Titania, who is well

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 10>respected as a person, and of course his competition for him.

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, Steve, if this was a coalition

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 2>figure who had pushed away one of the most popular

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 2>senior women at a campaign lodge, it would be a

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 2>massive story with claims there was a women problem.

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, imagine if Scott Morrison, Tony Abbott, Peter Dutton had

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 11>done it, it would be a huge story. Look, I

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 11>think and Bromin probably knows these two better than I do.

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 11>But there is mutual loathing between the pair of them.

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 11>I mean, Tanya doesn't like Anthony Albanesi about as much

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 11>as Anthony Albanesi doesn't like Tanya. I mean, this, of

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 11>course is the Prime Minister who, when he won the election,

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 11>ripped education out of Tanya plivosex hands and gave her

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 11>the environment and said go down to Tasmania and fix

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 11>up the salmon problem. I mean, she didn't want to

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 11>have anything to do with environment. It's a poison chalice,

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 11>horrible portfolio to have, and so he dumped her in there.

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 11>He said today that she'd be in a future cabinet

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 11>if they win the election on the third of May.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 11>God knows what portfolio he's going to give her, and

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 11>could it get any worse than the environment. And when

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 11>you go back and look at that vision again of

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 11>him today, I just asked you to have a look

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 11>at the facial expression of Kate Gallagher, the senator who's

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 11>over his left shoulder and every time he speaks about

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 11>a range of things. Today it struck me. I don't

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 11>know if it struck you the same, Shari. She was

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 11>looking at him as if, what the hell are you

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 11>talking about?

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>He did notice that. I did notice that, because he

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 2>was trying to tell some story that he obviously thought

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 2>was amazing about goal for his dogs, like some kabood

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 2>or birthday party. What was on about, honestly, and she

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 2>was just looking quite concerned over shoulders.

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 11>I actually did daggers Daggers.

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, browin Albanezy has been accused of measuring up the curtains.

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 2>He claims he wants to run for a third term. Look,

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 2>the Poles are in his favor. But we've heard David

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Little Proud come out tonight. Perhaps he said something he

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 2>wasn't meant to when he said their internal liberal research

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 2>showed they were ahead in the out of suburban areas.

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 2>James Patterson wouldn't repeat that. But what do you make

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of all of this, of where it's headed.

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think Obaniece has become very cocky. He's feels

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 10>he's head, he's going to get there, and when he

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 10>starts me in that mood, he gets very careless. And

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 10>that rambling business about walking Toto in the park and

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 10>Marckle was just bizarre an example of it, Seriously, it was.

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 10>But I think if you look at this question of arrogance,

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.959
<v Speaker 10>it does perhaps indicate there could be a fall before

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 10>the next eighteen days are up. I just feel that

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 10>when we see these Poles showing so much of a

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 10>lead to the Labor Party, which has happened in such

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 10>a short period of time, I think the Poles have

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 10>become themselves part of the campaigning they used to demoralize people.

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 10>And to be honest, I've spent two days in Perth

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 10>over the weekend, indeed I did, and they're not demoralized.

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 10>They're working so hard and I can just say those

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 10>candidates are in the field, they've got their chipper. They're

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 10>there because they know Western Australia is under threat if

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 10>a labor has returned, the Nature positive legislation, the Northwest Shelf,

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 10>keep the sheep, those are issues that are very real

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 10>to people in Western Australia and they know that they're

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 10>in trouble if labor gets real increasing.

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I think you're right that the Poles can set a mood,

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 2>they can become a self fulfilling prophecy. And Steve, you know,

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 2>the Poles were wrong in the recent US election, completely wrong.

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 2>They were wrong in twenty nineteen with Morrison's when they've

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 2>been wrong at other points in time in the past

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 2>as well. Not to say that they definitely will be

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 2>wrong now, but just to take them with a grain

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 2>of salt, particularly when you hear the leader of the

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Nationals say it's not what our internal research is telling us.

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's interesting you mentioned twenty nineteen Sharry, I'll take

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.479
<v Speaker 11>you and Bronnie back to that election because Bill Shorton

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 11>talk about people measuring up curtains for the lodge or

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 11>Kurabilly house. I mean Bill and Chloe Shorten apparently had

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 11>the removal trucks parked out in the front of their house

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 11>in Essendon ready to go on Sunday morning. And of

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 11>course you know Morrison won three seats and short and

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 11>lost one. That was the unlosable election. Shorton should have

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 11>been Prime Minister. He thought he was going to win.

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 11>He was full of hubris, a little like the way

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 11>Bromin's describing Anthony Albanesi at the moment. There's a long

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 11>way to go in this. Yes, Stutton's behind, but I

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 11>just I mean one thing I'd point out the Canberra

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 11>Press cutty. Imagine how painful it would be on the

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 11>traveling bus going around with Anthony ALBANIZI every day to

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 11>stand up there. And I watched on Sky News' election

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 11>channel yesterday the full Adelaide media conference that he did

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 11>with with Premier melanawskis the waffle let the bloke goes

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 11>on with the funny stories that he wanders off down

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 11>on sort of windy roads telling us about I mean,

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 11>golf courses in his seat. I mean, what who asked?

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 11>What's it all about? I mean, he just he's not inspiring.

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 11>He gives no one. I don't think he gives anyone

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 11>inspiration that Jesus blokes he's strong and tough and he

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 11>could lead the country. I mean, he turns me off.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 11>I've got to say he's.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 2>A waffler, you know what I have to say. The

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 2>polls say he's ahead, but I haven't met anyone except

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 2>for Richo and Joe Hildebrand, who says to me, I

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 2>think Albo's doing a great job. I'm going to vote

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 2>for him again. Richo and Joe hilda Brand are literally

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the only two people who tell me they're going to

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 2>vote for him. So I don't know where all these

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 2>voters come from. No one else thinks he's doing a

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 2>good job. I mean, I talk about politics all day,

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 2>every day with everyone I see in every location, and

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 2>everyone's angry at Albanezy, even if they've been lifelong labor supporters.

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I don't know where these votes these

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 2>are come from, who are being picked up in the

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 2>national polls. But I have to get to this story.

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Before we go to the ad break. The Greens were

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 2>planning an outrageous Anzac Day rave dance party fundraiser. It

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 2>has now been rescheduled after there was outrage today Ron

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 2>when this was being called the Greens party party promoted

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 2>as a ticketed fundraiser. I mean, you can't get more

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 2>disrespectful than this.

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 10>Only the Greens would contemplate metaphorically dancing on the graves

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 10>those who served our country. Only the Greens who hate

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 10>this country. Only the Greens who want to deny the

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 10>sacrificer was given not only by people in war, but

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 10>by people who struggle to build this nation, this modern

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 10>Australia as we know. So they're not to be given

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 10>any credit about anything. They truly are a vile party

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 10>and should be last on everybody's ticket.

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I mean you think they can't get worse than

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 2>they go and do something just appalling life?

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely?

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, Brow and Bishop Steve Price, thanks both so much.

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you next week.

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks.

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, still to come evidence Facebook is spying on anxious children,

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 2>plus the police have been called in over Liberal candidate

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Roe Knox's posters being defaced. She'll join me live next

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back, with the integrity of the teals is under

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 2>scrutiny this campaign. Minnie Grian's husband was caught tearing down

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 2>posters of her young female Liberal rival Emilia Hamer, and

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Allegraspender has been exposed for paying influences to post positive

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 2>content in a scandal the Coalition has dubbed cash for

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 2>comment with a Liberal candidate for Wentworth, Roe Knox, is

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 2>up against these tactics and she joins me, now Roe,

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 2>good to see you again.

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, great to be on the show.

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Chari Peter Duttan's come out and said that you would

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 2>be a minister in his government if there is a

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 2>coalition government. That's the sense of how the campaign's going.

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 2>What is your internal research telling you?

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 14>Yes, So the campaign on the ground is going really well.

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 14>We're getting a huge amount of positive feedback. And when

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 14>Worth ready for a change, they really want to have

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 14>a seat at the table again. They want to have

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 14>a member of Parliament who's in a cabinet, who has

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 14>abilities to vote on policy, influence policy.

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 7>And be in the party room.

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I reported earlier tonight that a florist, a business owner

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 2>in Wentworth in Double Bay, rang Allegra Spender's office asked

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 2>her why she pulled out of the debate, and this

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 2>business owner was told that she didn't trust the editorial

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 2>standards at Sky News. Why do you think Allegra would

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 2>have such a problem with Sky News when we hosted

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 2>fair and balanced debates that were good enough for Alban

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Easy and Jim Chalmers.

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 14>Look, I can't speak for Allegra spender Shari, but I

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 14>think it's more that she's got a problem with debating me,

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.959
<v Speaker 14>in debating our campaign team, rather than actually a problem

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 14>is Sky News. And my view is I'd really welcome

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 14>her to review this decision. I'd welcome Simon Homes of

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 14>Court to let a debate. I think it's really really important.

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 2>That the constituentings he's pulling the strings, he's not letting

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 2>her debate.

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 14>I think it was very unusual that she'd agreed to

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 14>do a debate and then pulled out from a debate.

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 14>And my view is the people that wentworth they deserve

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 14>to hear what their candidates stand for.

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 2>There's a big issue with your posters being pulled down,

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 2>and I'm told dozens, if not maybe even hundreds of

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 2>posters have been removed. This is very frustrating for your

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 2>volunteers in particular what's going on here.

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 7>Look, it's very hard.

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 14>We don't know who's pulling them down, but disproportionately our

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 14>posters are being pulled down over other campaigns, and my

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 14>personal view is everyone should keep up everyone's posters.

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 7>We should. This is part of the democratic process and it's.

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 14>Really disappointing that our volunteers will finish up a long

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 14>date work, they'll go and put out some posters and

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 14>quite often in the morning they're all gone and replaced

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 14>with other posters.

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 2>The police have even become involved because some of your

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>posters have been quite severely defaced, swastikas, Nazi symbols and

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 2>even dog smear. What's the police involvement here? What action

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 2>are they taking?

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 14>So we've reported, particularly the anti Semitic ones straight to

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 14>the police because they've also used symbols that are now

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 14>outlawed in New South Wales. I don't have an update

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 14>from the police yet, but I can certainly check in

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 14>and get one of those. But I've never seen anything

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 14>like this in a federal campaign before.

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 7>Because it's not just a couple, it is.

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 14>A massive number of our posters have been to faced

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 14>in this manner.

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it personally upsetting to you because you're not used

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 2>to this sort of treatment. You know, you've been a

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 2>private individual. Do you find it upsetting?

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 14>I find it upsetting that people think it's acceptable to

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 14>do this when it's posted for.

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 7>A democratic campaign.

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 14>And I think the prevalence of it the fact that

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 14>the Israel issue has come into our electorate and that

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 14>people think it's acceptable to put these things that are

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 14>so hurtful, particularly for Jewish people in our seat.

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 2>I've been reporting tonight and it's been a big issue

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 2>this week about Algraspender paying influences for positive content that

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 2>was a disclosure issue. What's your view on this?

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 14>So, Shari, obviously the Teals have run on pillars of

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 14>integrity and transparency, and I don't see integrity or transparency

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 14>in paying for endorsements and not disclosing it appropriately. And

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 14>my view is as well, these personal endorsements are so

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 14>powerful that to not disclose it a brittle is I

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 14>think it shows a complete lack of transparency and integrity.

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 14>And I can assure you, Sharhi, that all our endorsements

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 14>on our social media are not paid for their people

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.760
<v Speaker 14>of the community that really really want to change.

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 7>They really want to change for the better.

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 2>There's also been concerns about a wealthy US based trader,

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Killian. He's reportedly this has been reported in The

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.959
<v Speaker 2>Australian given half a million dollars to the tials since

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two. This has come our own investment vehicle

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 2>built from shares in foreign companies. Do you think there

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 2>are concerns about this, whether this amounts to foreign funding

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 2>at all?

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 14>So there are concerns with a whole suite of Climate

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 14>two hundred where that funding money has come from. My

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 14>view is this is something that Climate two hundred and

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 14>Legraspender have to answer the question on.

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 7>They have to prove, in.

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 14>The interest of transparency and integrity that this funding is

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 14>accords with all rules and it was done in a

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 14>proper manner.

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean we as you say, they ran on a

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 2>platform of integrity and transparency. But the original source of

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 2>this of these donations then isn't quite clear is.

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 14>It seems it seems murky and also I noted that

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 14>the entity didn't have GST status, but the actual donations

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 14>are so large, so I think once again this is

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 14>a question that needs to be answered by Climate two

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 14>hundred and by a Leger spenders campaign.

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, so just to finish off tonight where we started,

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 2>you would still like to debate a Legraspender. You're calling

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 2>tonight for her to do a debate.

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 7>I would love to debate a Legraspender.

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 14>I think will be fantastic for our community to see

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 14>what their candidates stand for.

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, no one has suggested that Sky News debates

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:56.760
<v Speaker 2>haven't been objective of even our worst critics Criikee The Guardian,

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 2>no one has.

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 14>Suggested they weren't fair. So yeah, I don't think it's

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 14>an issue with integrity at Sky. I think it's an

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 14>issue that Allegrosbinder doesn't want to have a debate.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, we'll enjoy the rest of the campaign. Bronox good.

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.439
<v Speaker 7>Great to see Shari and still to come.

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Albin Easy. You can't answer questions about how he'll pay

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 2>for all his election promises. A senior former insider from

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Treasury will join me on the show. Plus the leak

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 2>documents that show Facebook is monitoring and cashing in on

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 2>children's anxiety. That story after this quick break. Well there's

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 2>a spotlight now on Facebook's dark arts its exploitation of

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 2>children has been exposed. Internal confidential documents show that Facebook

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 2>can detect when children are feeling stressed, defeated, overwhelmed, stupid, nervous,

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 2>useless and like of failure. It's even boasted about this

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 2>insight to media agency, saying that it can then target

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 2>children who are feeling like this. Now, these allegations first

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 2>emerged in twenty seventeen, but now a whistleblower has given

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 2>evidence to the US Senate Judiciary Committee about some of

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 2>these strategies.

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 15>Here she was, and so what the company was doing

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 15>was letting these advertisers know that these thirteen to seventeen

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 15>year olds were feeling depressed and saying now is a

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 15>really good time to serve them an Advertisementor if a

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 15>thirteen year old girl would delete her selfie, that's a

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 15>really good time to try and sell her a beauty product.

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 2>It's just appalling exploitation. Now joining me now to discuss

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 2>is the Australian Newspapers Managing editor and commercial director Darren Davidson,

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 2>who's investigated this story in the past and written about

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 2>it today. Darren, thanks for your time. So Facebook, as

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 2>we heard there and as you've reported it boasted to

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 2>me agencies in internal documents that it can target kids

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 2>when they feel worthless and insecure. So can you give

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 2>us a bit more detail on how they then exploit

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 2>children who are in this state.

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 16>The idea is that they can pinpoint exact moments when

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 16>young children, particularly females, are feeling anxious. As you said, depressed.

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:27.319
<v Speaker 16>Worthless was one of the emotional fields that Facebook's sophisticated

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:31.800
<v Speaker 16>the algorithm can target. The document I obtained talked about

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 16>young girls building confidence between a Monday and a Thursday,

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 16>and then from Friday through the weekend they would being

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 16>what they called broadcast mode, talking about their achievements and

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 16>things like that. And the document essentially outlined how media

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 16>agencies and barf for their clients, and in this case,

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 16>in this document it was a bank and a chewing

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 16>gun manufacturer could actually target young girls and adolescents and

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 16>children as young as fourteen and thirteen during these moments

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 16>when they might be more susceptible to advertisements. And I

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 16>was astonished when I got hold of that document. As

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 16>you know, we reported it in The Australian at the time,

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 16>and it's now resurfaced eight years later in this US

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 16>Congress investigation into Facebook. Sarah Wynn Williams, who you just

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:22.319
<v Speaker 16>saw there in the grab, she was actually dispatched by

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 16>Cheryl Sandberg that then second in command to Mark Zuckerberg,

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 16>to essentially kill my story. And in the book which

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:32.760
<v Speaker 16>I've been reading over the past week, Sarah talks about

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 16>her attempts to actually do that. They gave me a

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 16>misleading statement, another misleading statement, And in the days after

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 16>the story was published, I was phoned by two journalists

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 16>in Australia, one at Fairfax and one at the ABC,

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 16>who told me that Facebook had contacted them and personally

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 16>sort of attacked me and attempted really to smear me,

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 16>an attempt to stop dissuade other journalists and media outlets

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 16>from following our story.

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 2>And it's taken years for this to be, you know,

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 2>center staged for Sarah Winn Williams to give evidence in

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 2>such a public way in a congressional committee. How seriously

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 2>is this now being taken by well the Trump administration,

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 2>but also both sides of politics in the United States,

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 2>And what's being done about this now? Because parents right

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 2>around the world are already so concerned about the impact

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 2>that social media is having on their children.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 16>I totally agree. I mean, I think parents are in

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 16>this kind of sticky situation of feeling a little bit

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 16>helpless about what to do in regards to screens. I mean,

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 16>many schools will have tablets in the classrooms now, and

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.280
<v Speaker 16>we've kind of moved and transitioned from sort of play

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 16>based activities to screen based playtime now and then that's

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 16>kind of that's quite sad. I think a lot of

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 16>parents would like to see legislative action to actually address

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 16>and deal with this problem. I think our Anthony Albert

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 16>Easi's proposals to ban social media for under fourteen's will

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 16>probably resonate quite strongly in this federal election in a

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 16>few weeks time. It is gaining traction in the US.

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 16>That inquiry is also centered on Facebook's links to China,

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 16>so that's a focus for them as well. But I

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 16>think there is a groundswell of opinion now around the

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 16>world and a bit of momentum behind this to actually

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:25.800
<v Speaker 16>do something about this and bring Facebook to account. I

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 16>think the other idea that's been floated on Australia by

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 16>our executive chairman at the Newsical of Australian, Michael Miller,

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 16>is for a social license for platforms like Facebook to operate.

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 16>And I think that idea is now starting to gain

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 16>a bit more popularity as well. It's considered quite radical

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 16>at the time, but I think it's now becoming something

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 16>that people are prepared to accept and adults if politicians

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 16>on both sides of the fence to get behind the idea.

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, Dahan has the same policy of

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:55.760
<v Speaker 2>course on children under the age of fourteen being banned

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 2>from having access to social media here I think actually

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 2>announced it. Sorry to fact check you on that, Darren,

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:05.439
<v Speaker 2>but you got to get the policy sequence right here.

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:09.919
<v Speaker 2>There's also this movement though in Australia, and I've had

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the parents on my program even to stop children having

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 2>access to smartphones until at least year eight. So this

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 2>movement to give for parents to give their kids dumb

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 2>phones so they can still contact them for security reasons

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:27.760
<v Speaker 2>if they need to. But it just means that children

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 2>don't have access to the social media apps. And given

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:35.360
<v Speaker 2>what we're now hearing in a very public way in

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 2>US Congress that these apps like Facebook, the most common,

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:41.959
<v Speaker 2>probably one of the most common apps in the world,

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 2>is exploiting children like this when they are feeling most vulnerable.

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's terrifying really concerning just a quick fightal comment, Darren.

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 16>I think that's a great idea, the one that you

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:57.280
<v Speaker 16>just haven't lind there about phones. I think all parents

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 16>know instinctively that something quite founders happened with the introduction

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:03.840
<v Speaker 16>on the smartphone back in two thousand and seven. And

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 16>we've had this period over the last ten years where

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 16>you know, we've seen handful effects and it's one of

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:11.240
<v Speaker 16>the biggest I think challenges we are facing society today

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 16>social media and handful effects is having on children.

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Indeed, all right, Garon Davidson, great, have you on

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the program, Thanks for your time. Now still to come.

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:25.359
<v Speaker 2>How does the Prime Minister plan to pay for his

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 2>election spend? A thonon? Well, former senior Treasury insider will

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:36.720
<v Speaker 2>join me next. Well, it's been a sugar hit spenderth

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 2>on this election campaign, and today the Prime Minister was

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:43.280
<v Speaker 2>pressed on how exactly he's going to pay for it all.

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 13>You've ballparks so far at the halfway mark, announced roughly

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 13>forty billion dollars of new spending in this campaign.

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Will all of that be borrowed money?

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 7>Or is this just the cost of an election campaign.

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 12>We put a lot into my EPO and we did

0:43:57.320 --> 0:43:59.320
<v Speaker 12>a lot of work in the lead up to the budget.

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 12>So a range of things that have been seen as

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:10.880
<v Speaker 12>new investments are not are things that we've already account for.

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Finance Ministercata Gallagher then offered up this equally abysmal reply.

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 8>Any concern that any of you have over the budget

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 8>should be focused on Peter Dutton and he's six hundred

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 8>billion dollars of spending that he's going to have to

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 8>make for the nuclear Well, this is a contest.

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 7>This election campaign is the contest.

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 8>We're very proud of our budget and what we've been

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 8>able to do with our budget and the commitments we've made.

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Classic case of deflection will form a Treasury Assistant Secretary

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 2>David Pearl joins me. Now, David, thanks for your time. Look,

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 2>there seems to be no care for responsible spending, of

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 2>fiscal restraint or even proper answers about how are they

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 2>going to pay for this? Do those responses that we

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 2>just heard concern you.

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 4>They do, Shari, but they don't surprise me.

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Obviously.

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 4>The focus groups aren't showing that people in marginal electorates

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 4>are complaining about deficits and debt.

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:13.240
<v Speaker 1>But just to be more serious.

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Clearly the government's election spenderon is not being funded. If

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 4>there is a funding strategy, Shari, it's a combination of

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 4>bracket creep which both the Government and the Opposition continue

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 4>to support, and future debt on our children's generation.

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's so worrying, and we know the budget figures

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 2>show that next financial year it's forecast to hit a

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollars in debt. David, I want to ask you

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.719
<v Speaker 2>about the economy more broadly. We know inflation isn't back

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 2>to target bound yet, but now we're seeing this discussion

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 2>about whether there could be a rate cut as a

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 2>result of Trump's tariff. So how do you see the

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Australian economy and inflation for the remainder of this year.

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, the economy I don't think is out of the

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:08.399
<v Speaker 4>woods as far as inflation is concerned. The RBA at

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 4>its last meaning was concerned Shari about a still tight

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 4>labor market which hasn't been loosening at all, and moderate

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 4>rage growth but productivity still flatlining. Activity is also picking up,

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:25.760
<v Speaker 4>and overlaid on that, Shari, of course, is both major

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 4>parties spending plans in the election. So leaving aside the

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 4>uncertainty associated with Trump's tariffs, I don't think that we're

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:39.800
<v Speaker 4>clearly over inflation. And of course, if both the government

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 4>and the opposition were committing to tightening spending, it would

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:47.880
<v Speaker 4>be much easier for the RBA Board to cut rates

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 4>and inflation would be much lower.

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 2>So you of course saying that that irrespective of who wins,

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 2>all of this big spending could be inflationary. Basically it

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 2>could ultimately see rates either held for longer or possibly

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 2>even hiking again.

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, the other point I wanted to make, Shari is

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 4>that if you look at the supply side of our economy,

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 4>we've had too much demand in recent years because of

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:19.840
<v Speaker 4>government spending. But on the supply side where effectively imposing

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:24.720
<v Speaker 4>a tariff on energy, and we've reregulated our industrial relation system,

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:28.320
<v Speaker 4>so the supply or growth potential of the economy is less.

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 4>And that's why even though disposable incomes have fallen more

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 4>in Australia than any other OSD country, we still are

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 4>not out of the woods as far as inflation is concerned.

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 4>So it's a collapse of supply, but the weak demand

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 4>is not defeeding inflation, So that is a concern. The

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Trump tariff, as you know, Shari could affect inflation either way.

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 4>If a flood of Chinese and other goods heait Australian shaws.

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 4>If Chinese demand for Australia raw materials drops, then that

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 4>would be deflationary. But of course if there are global

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 4>supply change, supply chain disruptions, then that would have the

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:14.320
<v Speaker 4>opposite effect. So again I don't think the RBA should

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 4>be cutting prematurely. They should be waiting for the hard data.

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:20.839
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you about housing policy. We saw

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 2>the treasure during another debate with Angus Taylor last night.

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 2>He was asked if anybody had actually moved into one

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:27.880
<v Speaker 2>of the houses.

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 11>Have a look, is a single person living in one

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 11>of these houses? From this program we've built a couple

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 11>of as a single person actually moved into one of these.

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:37.720
<v Speaker 2>We've built a couple of thousand houses.

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 9>There's twenty eight thousand more in heavy pipeline right now,

0:48:40.160 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 9>and there'll be fewer your supposal, because you want to

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:45.320
<v Speaker 9>cut the Housing Australia Future Fund so that free to

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 9>use viewer homes.

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Not a single person who's living in one of these houses.

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's concerning, isn't it That billions literally are

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 2>being promised for one point two million new homes by

0:48:57.280 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the end of the decade, just in five years time,

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:03.480
<v Speaker 2>and yet not one new house has actually been constructed.

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:05.400
<v Speaker 2>According to Katie Gallagher's own admission.

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, again, it's not a surprise because it reminds me

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 4>of Bob Hawk's election promise many years ago that no

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:17.359
<v Speaker 4>child shall live in poverty. Governments and oppositions roll out

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 4>these promises and these ambitious targets, but if you look

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:23.359
<v Speaker 4>at the nitty gritty details, as housing experts have made

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:27.640
<v Speaker 4>clear in recent days, local government planning and zoning, shortage

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 4>of materials, and a whole range of other supply side

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:35.840
<v Speaker 4>factors are limiting our capacity to provide additional housing to

0:49:35.880 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Australian people. So again, the government just gets the headline

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 4>that it's going to build these houses, but the consequences

0:49:42.600 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 4>of that dishonesty won't be clear until after the election.

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, David Pearl, always good to have your

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 2>independent analysis on the show. Thank you very much for

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 2>joining us. All Right, well, we've got another two weeks

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 2>until the election campaign. Two and a half weeks make

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 2>sure you're watching Sky News every single night, especially the

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:04.759
<v Speaker 2>next man coming up. So all we've got time for today.

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I'll see you tomorrow night, right here at eight o'clock.

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 2>But right now, my mate, the wonderful Paul Murray