Speaker 1: Lately welcome the late to play.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 3: Good evening, I'm James Macpherson, with Liz Staurra and Caleb
Speaker 3: Bond coming up. A school teacher sues the Education Department
Speaker 3: after injuring herself playing basketball in high heels. Who could
Speaker 3: possibly have predicted that? Plus when we look at the papers,
Speaker 3: a Chinese swimmer's performance at the Olympic Games called not
Speaker 3: humanly possible, and a new South Wales coal fired power
Speaker 3: station's output at a five year high as renewables fail
Speaker 3: to keep sydneysiders warm. But first, we want to kick
Speaker 3: off the program by showing you new footage of the
Speaker 3: attempted Trump assassination. This vision, filmed by a victim of
Speaker 3: the shooter just three minutes before shots were fired, shows
Speaker 3: the shooter clearly visible and with a clear line of
Speaker 3: sight to Donald Trump. Have a look now, James Copenhager,
Speaker 3: who took that video just three minutes before shots were fired.
Speaker 3: He was actually shot twice in the arm and the abdomen.
Speaker 3: He's recovering, but the video is further evidence that Thomas
Speaker 3: Crooks could be easily seen, despite testimony from Secret Service
Speaker 3: snipers who said they never spotted him until just seconds
Speaker 3: before shots were fired. Now, obviously some people believe there's
Speaker 3: some kind of conspiracy here. Others believe it's just a
Speaker 3: litany of gross ineptitude. I guess we don't know, and
Speaker 3: we may never know. But Caleb videos like this, they
Speaker 3: certainly raise a whole lot more questions, don't they.
Speaker 4: Oh, they certainly do. I can understand why they didn't
Speaker 4: see him there. I can't see you either, James mcpherston,
Speaker 4: are you even on.
Speaker 1: This guest with me?
Speaker 4: Seriously, the more we see this stuff, and I mean
Speaker 4: it's it's obviously taken weeks for this vision to come
Speaker 4: out because the poor bugger was shot himself. But the
Speaker 4: more you look at it, the more you got to
Speaker 4: say it was either the most monumental cockup in the
Speaker 4: history of cockups let's go back forty million years worth
Speaker 4: of them, it would be the worst you've ever found,
Speaker 4: or it was allowed to happen. Seriously, how could he
Speaker 4: have taken that vision and all those other people who
Speaker 4: were standing behind Trump of course, would have been able
Speaker 4: to see that. We know that there were people on
Speaker 4: the other side of the fence who weren't inside the rally,
Speaker 4: who were aware that he was on the roof, and
Speaker 4: that they had tried to alert police to the fact
Speaker 4: that he was there. Then you had a copper who
Speaker 4: went up the ladder and looked at the bloke and
Speaker 4: then just scurried down the ladder because he pointed the
Speaker 4: gun at him.
Speaker 1: It is just incredible.
Speaker 4: They should have known he was there, and they should
Speaker 4: have taken that shot about five minutes before he took
Speaker 4: a shot at Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: There's just no two ways about it.
Speaker 5: They did know he was there. I don't care what
Speaker 5: anybody says.
Speaker 6: How can that many other people know he was there,
Speaker 6: but the people tasked with looking after him, the people
Speaker 6: that were being screened at, the guys who were texting
Speaker 6: each other saying suspicious.
Speaker 5: Person alert, just didn't know he was there.
Speaker 6: And now they've got to explain away who the guy
Speaker 6: is and the random footage and.
Speaker 5: Why he didn't spot him he was running around on
Speaker 5: the roof. At least the shooter.
Speaker 6: Was crouched down with a rifle trained on him. That
Speaker 6: footage was taken just three minutes before Thomas Crook fired.
Speaker 6: So you mean to tell me you want us to
Speaker 6: believe that you didn't know Thomas Crook was there crouched
Speaker 6: down with his rifle trained on Trump at that point
Speaker 6: in time, and you didn't notice someone running around on
Speaker 6: a rooftop like that is going to draw the eye.
Speaker 6: We don't normally see people walking around on rooftops. And
Speaker 6: it was so obvious that was captured in this guy's
Speaker 6: that's just phone footage. He wasn't there some ubute camera.
Speaker 6: You mean to tell me he could pick it up.
Speaker 6: And the Secret Service, we've watched all the where they
Speaker 6: were positioned, the counter snipers in relation to the not
Speaker 6: counter sniper, the actual sniper, as well as Trump stage.
Speaker 6: There's just no explaining it away that we couldn't see
Speaker 6: this guy who we now know about running around in
Speaker 6: the background. Also, how did it take this long for
Speaker 6: us to find out about.
Speaker 5: This little piece of the story.
Speaker 6: You'd think with the FBI on the case, the Secret
Speaker 6: Service on the case, the local police on the case,
Speaker 6: all supposedly trying to get to the bottom of the story,
Speaker 6: and how this could have been such a colossal failure.
Speaker 5: The least you can do is send a call out saying, everyone.
Speaker 6: Who was at this rally, we want your footage, we
Speaker 6: want your photos, we want to find out who's responsible,
Speaker 6: if they had help, etc.
Speaker 5: And so on. You would think that would be a.
Speaker 6: Pretty basic part of the inv investigation. And no weeks later,
Speaker 6: they are still insisting that everyone believed that a twenty
Speaker 6: year old, unassisted with mental health problems managed to best
Speaker 6: the Secret Service, the local police, the FBI, and they're
Speaker 6: all just like, oh, well, you know, look, it's just
Speaker 6: a colossal failure. As a saying that I like to
Speaker 6: repeat at times like this, this many coincidences isn't a coincident.
Speaker 4: It's frankly a shame that they shot Crooks dead because
Speaker 4: he could be a great asset to the Secret Service
Speaker 4: or the CIA or the FBI with his abilities to evade.
Speaker 4: Then he could have told them.
Speaker 1: All his tricks.
Speaker 3: Well, of course, so little is known about Thomas Crooks.
Speaker 3: That's the other weird part about this story. Very still
Speaker 3: just finding out about social media accounts from when he
Speaker 3: was fourteen or fifteen. You'd think he would have known
Speaker 3: in that position he was going to be shot dead,
Speaker 3: and yet he left no explanation apparently for his actions,
Speaker 3: and that his parents haven't been much help either, although
Speaker 3: they've been counseled by legal representatives to say nothing at
Speaker 3: this stage that hasn't stopped reporters trying to find out
Speaker 3: something from mum and dad. Matthew and Mary have look
Speaker 3: at this interview or attempted interview with the shooter's father
Speaker 3: and have listened to his response.
Speaker 1: Explain why your son is there's a limited social server.
Speaker 1: Is there any statement you'd be willing to share with
Speaker 1: us right now?
Speaker 7: Mister Crooks, I got to be.
Speaker 5: Suspicion.
Speaker 3: I don't know, okay, but I reckon if my son
Speaker 3: had done what his boy did. I know you don't
Speaker 3: want to be hassled by media, but I've got a
Speaker 3: pe as the only thing you say. Wouldn't you just
Speaker 3: continually say I am so sorry, I am.
Speaker 4: So or you could just not say anything at all,
Speaker 4: like he was already walking away, like he didn't have
Speaker 4: to turn around.
Speaker 1: Sorry sorry gents. Look, I'd really love to stop and
Speaker 1: talk to you, but I'm absolutely busting for a whiz.
Speaker 4: Like come on, if I were him, I wouldn't even
Speaker 4: be showing my face in public, like I would be
Speaker 4: that distraught at what had happened. I'd be hold up
Speaker 4: in a room somewhere and never leaving.
Speaker 3: To be perfectly.
Speaker 4: Honest, but it's just a bizarre thing to say to
Speaker 4: reporters because and I know, and I say this as
Speaker 4: a reporter myself who's bounced people outside court rooms. And
Speaker 4: I've bounced people outside courtrooms and have my mobile phone
Speaker 4: taken from me and thrown in a water fountain. What,
Speaker 4: so I know what adversarial sort of encounters you in.
Speaker 4: That's I wasn't going to go into that, but now
Speaker 4: you know. But it is so ill advised to turn
Speaker 4: around and say something like that.
Speaker 1: Because of course there's going to be the piece of
Speaker 1: footage that everyone takes notice of.
Speaker 4: That's why we're now talking about it on television in Australia.
Speaker 4: Is this guy so dumb as to not realize that
Speaker 4: announcing that he needs to go and use the bog
Speaker 4: is going to be the store.
Speaker 6: He's clearly not some slick media trained He's just an
Speaker 6: average joe. He's probably no experience in front of a camera.
Speaker 5: In his entire life, and utterly overwhelmed he has.
Speaker 6: He's gone through absolute hell and probably doesn't know. Many
Speaker 6: people don't in those situations know how to behave when
Speaker 6: confronted with it, because they're like, I don't actually want
Speaker 6: to take responsibility for my son's actions. I had no
Speaker 6: awareness of this at the time, so you do have to.
Speaker 5: Feel sorry for him, you really do.
Speaker 6: But speaking of someone who is polished when it comes
Speaker 6: to the media.
Speaker 5: Trump found himself summoned.
Speaker 6: Before what was going to be several black women being
Speaker 6: journalists asking him tough questions, and gosh, were they tough.
Speaker 6: You will not see Kamala Harris ever asked a single
Speaker 6: question even an ounce as hostile as what Trump was
Speaker 6: pummeled with. He pointed out early on in this interview
Speaker 6: that you guys told me that my opponent would be here,
Speaker 6: that we'd be doing this together. He said he was
Speaker 6: there under false pretenses, and yet he was gracious enough
Speaker 6: to go ahead.
Speaker 5: With the interview.
Speaker 6: Check out his answer when he was asked, do you
Speaker 6: think Kamala Harris is a DEEI hire.
Speaker 8: I've known her a long time, indirectly, not directly very much,
Speaker 8: and she was always of Indian heritage and she was
Speaker 8: only promoting Indian heritage. I didn't know she was black
Speaker 8: until a number of years ago when she happened to
Speaker 8: turn black, and now she wants to be known as black,
Speaker 8: So I don't know is she Indian or is she black.
Speaker 5: She is always black.
Speaker 8: College I respect either one, but she obviously doesn't because
Speaker 8: she was Indian all the way and then all of
Speaker 8: a sudden, she made a turn and she went she
Speaker 8: became a black.
Speaker 6: Just to be clear, of course, if that reporter is wrong,
Speaker 6: Kamala hasn't always identified as black at all. Here's a
Speaker 6: little cooking interview she did with actress Mindy Carling back
Speaker 6: in twenty nineteen.
Speaker 9: Okay, so what we're going to cook today is an
Speaker 9: Indian recipe? Yes, because you are idiots, yes, okay. And
Speaker 9: I don't know that everybody knows that, but I find
Speaker 9: that wherever I go and I see Indian people at
Speaker 9: the supermarket on the street, everyone's like, you know, Kamala's Indian, right,
Speaker 9: It's like our thing. We're so excited about to have
Speaker 9: you running for president.
Speaker 6: And back in twenty twenty, CNN did an entire segment
Speaker 6: on Kamala Harris's Indian roots.
Speaker 2: My mother, who raised me and my sister, was a
Speaker 2: proud woman.
Speaker 3: She was a brown woman.
Speaker 5: She was a woman with a heavy accent.
Speaker 6: Of course, this doesn't stop her from now passing herself
Speaker 6: off as black in order to, you know, or get
Speaker 6: on side more of the black vote, though I don't
Speaker 6: suspect that she'll struggle in that respect. Here she is
Speaker 6: at a rally in Atlanta. See if you can recognize
Speaker 6: the accent and.
Speaker 4: You are not just when in twenty twenty and we
Speaker 4: don't do it again in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 5: Lady, who are you trying to be? That was so
Speaker 5: Obama like.
Speaker 6: That was so you could hear him in that sentence.
Speaker 5: It was like, have you been listening? Have you been.
Speaker 6: Watching the Greatest Orators clips? And being like, yeah, I
Speaker 6: can mimic this. People will love me too.
Speaker 4: It's a bit like when Alexandra Kazia Cortez goes and
Speaker 4: speaks in the Bronx and she really turns on her
Speaker 4: hood voice, right, and she's not the first one who's
Speaker 4: done it. But see, the thing is that she has
Speaker 4: as we just show, she's previously talked about her Indian heritage,
Speaker 4: and she does have black heritage in that her father
Speaker 4: was a Jamaican African man.
Speaker 1: But what they're doing is duplicitous.
Speaker 4: They refer to her as black as though it's inferring
Speaker 4: that she is African American.
Speaker 1: Which she is not. I mean, you trace her lineage back.
Speaker 4: Her father of four bears were not brought to America
Speaker 4: as slaves. That's not what we're talking about here. Her
Speaker 4: father is from Jamaica. But they know what they're doing
Speaker 4: when they set her up as a black man as
Speaker 4: a black woman.
Speaker 1: Sorry, don't run with that headline.
Speaker 5: Don't run with the head They thought it would get
Speaker 5: them more vocal. That is quite true as trans black.
Speaker 4: And look, you never know these days, she may wake
Speaker 4: up tomorrow and identify.
Speaker 1: As a black man.
Speaker 4: They know exactly what they are doing when they run
Speaker 4: with it. But she scarcely talks about her Indian heritage anymore.
Speaker 4: And that's the point that Trump was trying to make.
Speaker 4: She's done this sort of full pivot from the Indian
Speaker 4: bit to the black bit because she's decided that being
Speaker 4: black is more electorally advantageous to Trumpet that around. The
Speaker 4: only thing I have to say though about Trump, I mean,
Speaker 4: he fronted up to the National Association of Black Journalists,
Speaker 4: and I'm assuming that when the word was sent out
Speaker 4: to the Dems that they could have someone there. They
Speaker 4: were assuming it would be Joe Biden. And Kamala has
Speaker 4: since taken over that position and is off doing her
Speaker 4: own thing. But the only thing that worries me about
Speaker 4: it is that he should have had the presence of
Speaker 4: mind to know that that answer was not going to
Speaker 4: play well in front of that audience, Like it just
Speaker 4: wasn't going to land, and you could hear the reaction
Speaker 4: of the crowd when he did it.
Speaker 1: The point he is making is not wrong.
Speaker 4: It probably just wasn't the right time to make it
Speaker 4: in front of that crowd.
Speaker 3: So that crowd wouldn't have appreciated. But of course, thankfully
Speaker 3: for Trump, the clips gone viral and most people would
Speaker 3: agree with what Trump's saying, and that is that the
Speaker 3: progressive left continually manipulate reality to fit with whatever narrative
Speaker 3: is convenient in that moment. For instance, if they're talking
Speaker 3: to LGBTQ community members, well they don't know what a
Speaker 3: woman is. I mean, none of us are biologists. But
Speaker 3: then as soon as Kamala Harris is running for president,
Speaker 3: they can't run enough women for Kamala Harris events because
Speaker 3: suddenly they're very clear on what a woman is. In
Speaker 3: like fashion, when Kamala is talking to the Indian community,
Speaker 3: well she's Indian. When she's talking to the African American community,
Speaker 3: she's black, and she needs to be a woman, and
Speaker 3: she needs to be black, because God knows, she's got
Speaker 3: no policy, she's got no record to speak of.
Speaker 4: But she guys have a record to speak of, but well,
Speaker 4: it's not a record.
Speaker 3: So she talks about her gender and her race, and
Speaker 3: when her outraged opponents says, hang on a second, you're
Speaker 3: just talking about race and gender, she accuses him of
Speaker 3: being focused on race and gender. So Trump is absolutely right,
Speaker 3: and we just hope and pray most Americans are smart
Speaker 3: enough to recognize this is the typical progressive left playbook.
Speaker 3: Divide everybody up into niche categories, appeal to each one,
Speaker 3: and entity politics generate enough power.
Speaker 5: It only works on the left though.
Speaker 6: Right but she's already got all those votes in the bank.
Speaker 6: I think most people will have decided their votes now already.
Speaker 5: It's very obvious she's.
Speaker 6: Going to be the Democratic nominee. Nobody else is putting
Speaker 6: their hand up. She'll get a boost, I imagine in
Speaker 6: popularity post the DNC, which is due this month, however
Speaker 6: long that lasts, and then we've got the election in November,
Speaker 6: where all will become obvious. But as Paul Murray when
Speaker 6: over tonight. She's actually doing a lot better than most
Speaker 6: of us would ever like to believe possible for someone
Speaker 6: who is objectively as dumb as a post. This woman
Speaker 6: is not to be underestimated. As much as we'd love
Speaker 6: to think that Americans would just laugh her off the ticket,
Speaker 6: it's simply not happening.
Speaker 3: I mean her rally so, I mean, she's got so
Speaker 3: many people at the rallies. Of course she gives them
Speaker 3: free pizza and puts on rap music with Twerky, so
Speaker 3: that kind of helps generate the crowd that I didn't
Speaker 3: get you in.
Speaker 1: This is not at all I've seen you in a
Speaker 1: free pizza before. Come on, it's just a.
Speaker 3: Typical Democratic playbook. I mean, we all remember Joe Biden
Speaker 3: saying that if you don't vote for me, you ain't black.
Speaker 3: He's refresher. Listen, you got to come see us when
Speaker 3: you come to New York, VP. Biden, Well, it's a
Speaker 3: long way until November. We got more questions, You got
Speaker 3: more questions.
Speaker 2: But I tell you, if you have a problem figuring
Speaker 2: out whether.
Speaker 3: You're PREMI or Trump and you ain't black, it's not
Speaker 3: really racist. But of course, when Joe Biden nominated Kamala
Speaker 3: Harris as his VP. He talked about the fact that
Speaker 3: this morning, having nominated her as my vice president, that
Speaker 3: little brown girls all around the country will wake up
Speaker 3: with great hope. So they've always played this race card,
Speaker 3: and Donald Trump wasn't criticizing or attacking her race. He
Speaker 3: was criticizing her race baiting, which is what the Democrats
Speaker 3: always do.
Speaker 6: Exactly, he was basically saying, make up your mind, which
Speaker 6: one is it?
Speaker 5: Usree Indian? Now you're black. You can't be both. Technically
Speaker 5: she actually is both.
Speaker 6: But make up your mind or just be honest with people.
Speaker 6: Why wouldn't that work if you just said, look, actually
Speaker 6: I'm half and half.
Speaker 3: Guys out there, the obsession with this is so stupid, right, so.
Speaker 6: You got all identity politics is stupid.
Speaker 3: I've got two African born sons. They're both black, and
Speaker 3: I've always said to them since a little but the
Speaker 3: least interesting thing about you is the fact that you're black.
Speaker 3: And I mean I wish I was black because they
Speaker 3: look a lot cooler.
Speaker 1: And with earrings, I'm handsome that you.
Speaker 3: They've got swag that I will never have. They always
Speaker 3: say to me, Dad, you can't borrow the sauce. The
Speaker 3: source is not.
Speaker 5: But that's very kind of them. You don't want to
Speaker 5: try that.
Speaker 3: Far more interesting than the color of their skin is
Speaker 3: their character, their ideas, the things that they're good at,
Speaker 3: all the things they bring to other people. The color
Speaker 3: of their skin is the least important thing, but the
Speaker 3: Democrats always make it the most important thing, as if
Speaker 3: it equals competency.
Speaker 7: All.
Speaker 3: It's the problem with identity.
Speaker 4: Which I have to say that they gained despite your
Speaker 4: your influence, James.
Speaker 1: They've they've done really well, but having.
Speaker 3: You as it now, absolutely the good thing about adopting
Speaker 3: kids is that anything good you can say, but that
Speaker 3: was nurture exactly.
Speaker 1: It all comes down to him. It all comes down
Speaker 1: to your good word.
Speaker 4: But of course, you know they've made a race such
Speaker 4: a part of the Kamala campaign because now you've got
Speaker 4: white dudes for Kamala and you've got white chicks for Kamala.
Speaker 5: Imagine if they had white dudes for Trump.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, I want to be like white.
Speaker 6: Supremacy, white supremacy, But it's white guys.
Speaker 5: That come under the like every plon.
Speaker 3: We showed the commercial the Democrats are running. Was that
Speaker 3: last night or the night before where they're categorizing white
Speaker 3: guys for Trump and they're all like serial killers, pedophiles.
Speaker 5: Exactly.
Speaker 4: The one person who tried to kill Trump, I'm suspecting
Speaker 4: wasn't a fan of his anyway. Let's stick to the
Speaker 4: US for a moment where they've struck a plea deal
Speaker 4: with the man who was the mastermind of nine eleven.
Speaker 4: Kalid Shaik Muhammad, who's been holed up in Guantanamo Bay
Speaker 4: for some twenty four years or nearly twenty four years,
Speaker 4: has finally agreed to plead guilty to terrorist defenses for
Speaker 4: masterminding nine to eleven on the agreement that he won't
Speaker 4: have to face the death penalty. Now you have to
Speaker 4: ask the question, after nearly twenty four years in Guantanamo Bay, A,
Speaker 4: why has he finally decided I'm going to fesce up.
Speaker 4: He could have fesced up at any point, but of
Speaker 4: course he would have been faced the death penalty. But
Speaker 4: you would have thought for a terrorist, facing the death
Speaker 4: penalty actually makes you the martyr that you want to be.
Speaker 4: And what is in it for the DOJ, the Harris
Speaker 4: Biden DOJ to finally get this blokeout of Guantanamo Bay.
Speaker 1: JD.
Speaker 4: Vance, Trump's pick for vice president, was asking exactly that
Speaker 4: question today.
Speaker 2: Today I heard that the Biden Harris Department of Justice
Speaker 2: cut a deal with Al Qaeda terrorists co lead Sheik
Speaker 2: Muhammad to avoid the death penalty.
Speaker 1: Was reported today.
Speaker 2: Now as someone who enlisted in the Marines to serve
Speaker 2: after nine to eleven. That is ridiculous, but it's not surprising.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 2: Just think about the point that we've gotten to. Joe
Speaker 2: Biden and Kamala Harris have weaponized the Department of Justice
Speaker 2: to go after their political opponents, but they're cutting a
Speaker 2: sweetheart deal with nine to eleven terrorists. We need a
Speaker 2: president who kills terrorists, not negotiates with them.
Speaker 4: Two of his co accused have also been included in
Speaker 4: this sweetheart deal. The chief prosecutor on the case, through
Speaker 4: Admiral Aaron c Raff, wrote in a letter that in
Speaker 4: exchange for removal of the death penalty is a possible
Speaker 4: punishment that these three accused have agreed to plead guilty
Speaker 4: on all of the charged defenses, including the murder of
Speaker 4: the two thousand, nine hundred and seventy six people listed
Speaker 4: in the Chard Sheep.
Speaker 1: But of course those who have.
Speaker 4: Family who were killed in nine to eleven, you can
Speaker 4: understand are upset by all of this. Daniel Dilara, his
Speaker 4: brother died in nine to eleven. He said, I'm very disappointed.
Speaker 4: We waited patiently for a long time. I wanted the
Speaker 4: death penalty. The government has failed us. I mean, what
Speaker 4: would it have hurt them to just keep the bloke
Speaker 4: in Guantanamu Bay until he eventually carcked it. They never
Speaker 4: had to get a guilty plea out of him, really,
Speaker 4: they know he did it, Just leave him there and
Speaker 4: let him rot.
Speaker 3: The thing that shocked me is that this still is
Speaker 3: still going on. I mean, I'd kind of forgotten about it,
Speaker 3: assumed it had all been, you know, taking care of
Speaker 3: and putting the dust beIN. Twenty three years later, they're
Speaker 3: still trying to work out what exactly to do with
Speaker 3: people who murdered near on three thousand Americans on American soil.
Speaker 3: And so now they don't face the death penalty, they'll
Speaker 3: get life in prison. We don't know where they'll be incarcerated, although,
Speaker 3: you know, knowing the Democrats, they'll probably be put in
Speaker 3: a midtown hotel and given a credit card with a
Speaker 3: thousand dollars on it. That's what they do with everybody
Speaker 3: else these days. If you were a relative of someone
Speaker 3: killed on September eleven, you would be absolutely ill ageable
Speaker 3: that your government has taken twenty three years still hasn't
Speaker 3: executed justice. And when they do, it's sloppy justice. That
Speaker 3: reflects the fact that moral clarity is sadly lacking in
Speaker 3: the United States in pretty much every area.
Speaker 5: Well when it comes to the DOJ. When it comes
Speaker 5: to the Department of.
Speaker 6: Justice, I like to say the jokes in the name America,
Speaker 6: because it really is. Whenever these guys are like, oh,
Speaker 6: we're prosecuting this, We're prosecuting that, it was two seconds ago,
Speaker 6: or at least it feels like we were talking about
Speaker 6: the doos Jase against Boeing.
Speaker 5: I mean, what kind of case was that? Zero justice
Speaker 5: for the victims' families.
Speaker 6: So you've had several planes hit the ground, killing everyone
Speaker 6: on board, they get away with a.
Speaker 5: Rap on the knuckles. The DOJ could.
Speaker 6: The very long list that I could reel off the
Speaker 6: top of my head of these cases that they say, oh,
Speaker 6: we're prosecuting, We're on the case, and then you find
Speaker 6: out what was the outcome, and nobody thinks that's justice whatsoever.
Speaker 5: And now the.
Speaker 6: American taxpayer gets to pay for three square meals a
Speaker 6: day and a roof over these guys's head until they
Speaker 6: die a natural death.
Speaker 3: And you can bet they'll have human rights favists and
Speaker 3: lawyers looking after their every need.
Speaker 5: Oh they have. That's why they've lasted this long.
Speaker 3: But let's not forget that the terror attack that brought
Speaker 3: down the Twin Towers was organized by El Kader right,
Speaker 3: who would have imagined in the days after nine to
Speaker 3: eleven that many years later President Joe Biden would leave
Speaker 3: Afghanistan and gift Al Kaider billions of dollars worth of
Speaker 3: military equipment and then cut a sweet deal with the
Speaker 3: Al Qaider operatives who trained the hijackers, financed the hijackers.
Speaker 3: One of these men came up with the idea behind
Speaker 3: the nine to eleven attacks, and they allow them a
Speaker 3: plea deal, as if you would give them any deal
Speaker 3: at all.
Speaker 4: Well, the only reason I can possibly think of as
Speaker 4: to why they would do this is at the instruction
Speaker 4: of Biden and Harris, because they think it might play
Speaker 4: well to go into an election saying we finally got
Speaker 4: an admission of guilt out of the mastermind of nine
Speaker 4: to eleven.
Speaker 5: That's the only.
Speaker 4: Reason I can think of that you would do it.
Speaker 4: But I'm not sure it plays the way they think
Speaker 4: it would play that.
Speaker 3: There's two things on that. The first one is that
Speaker 3: far from take credit for this, and this was one
Speaker 3: of the weird things, the White House immediately put out
Speaker 3: a statement sort of stepping back from it, saying this
Speaker 3: was nothing to do with us. This is the justice
Speaker 3: system working itself out. Could you imagine Donald Trump stepping
Speaker 3: away from something like that. I mean, he would be
Speaker 3: there with the rope saying, let me be the hangman.
Speaker 5: Well, no, no, hey, Donald, hang on a minute.
Speaker 6: Though he did have four years as president and did
Speaker 6: nothing with these guys, the got a hang He had
Speaker 6: his opportunities, okay, But the.
Speaker 3: Action is being taken now, and it's this administration that
Speaker 3: were very quick to put out a statement saying this
Speaker 3: had nothing to do with us. The other point about
Speaker 3: this is I think the reason why they're scared to
Speaker 3: go to trial and pursue the death penalty is because
Speaker 3: lawyers will argue that these guys were water boarded, that
Speaker 3: they were put under duress, and that was how the
Speaker 3: confession obtained, and so I think they're a little concerned.
Speaker 1: How it might go.
Speaker 3: But that just goes back to the fact if you
Speaker 3: fly aeroplanes and buildings killed three thousand people, how much
Speaker 3: legalies did it.
Speaker 1: But they never had to run the case.
Speaker 4: They could have just left them in Guantanamo Bay until
Speaker 4: they're carct it.
Speaker 6: So now they get to day in a different prison.
Speaker 4: They've been much nicer than Guantanamo Bay.
Speaker 5: The only difference is like, oh, thanks for the guilty plea.
Speaker 4: Yeah, exactly, That's all they're all they're extracting is the
Speaker 4: guilty plea. But so the admission of guilt, Yes, we
Speaker 4: say we did nine to eleven, but like twenty four
Speaker 4: years down the line, I don't think anyone was hanging
Speaker 4: on it's.
Speaker 1: Not the admission of guilt.
Speaker 4: It would have been a better version of justice to
Speaker 4: leave them in Guantanamo Bay where they get water boarded
Speaker 4: and tortured and whatever else until they finally die.
Speaker 3: Whoever the last person was to visit Jeff Epstein, You
Speaker 3: get him to go and visit them in Guantanamo Bay.
Speaker 3: Problem solve. If you want moral clarity, you can't go
Speaker 3: better than Israel. They took care of a couple of
Speaker 3: terrorists this week and dealt with things strongly in order
Speaker 3: to keep their people safe, taking out the Hesbala military
Speaker 3: commander at a strike in Beirut and the military leader
Speaker 3: of Hamas in a strike on Terehran. Now, predictably, the
Speaker 3: Ayatola has come out saying that they will retaliate against Israel.
Speaker 3: Have listened to this tweet, he wrote, following this bitter
Speaker 3: tragic event which he's referring there to the killing of
Speaker 3: Hamas political leader, which has taken place within the borders
Speaker 3: of the Islamic Republic. I just got to stop there
Speaker 3: for a second. This is amazing how the Iotolra is
Speaker 3: suddenly concerned about international sovereign boarders, after financing a thousand
Speaker 3: Terrists to go into Israel, after attacking Israel in April
Speaker 3: with three hundred drones, suddenly always all about protecting borders
Speaker 3: and respecting international sovereignty. Sorry, let me go back to
Speaker 3: the tweet before I was rudely interrupted by the Ayatolas idiocy.
Speaker 3: He said, this event taking place within the borders of
Speaker 3: the Islamic Republic, It's our duty to take revenge the
Speaker 3: criminal terrorist Zionist regime martyred our dear guest, yes, who
Speaker 3: was also the leader of a terrorist organization that raped, beheaded,
Speaker 3: slaughtered and kidnapped civilians. This dear guest in our territory
Speaker 3: and has caused our grief, but it has also prepared
Speaker 3: the ground for a severe punishment, which is kind of
Speaker 3: hilarious considering he's making out like this will be the
Speaker 3: thing that finally rouses Iran against Israel. They've been calling
Speaker 3: Israel a cancer of virus. They've been calling for Israel
Speaker 3: to be wiped off the map for years. They've been
Speaker 3: developing nuclear weapons to take care of Israel. They've been
Speaker 3: sponsoring numerous organizations to continually make war against Israel. As
Speaker 3: I said in April, long before this guy was assassinated
Speaker 3: in Tehran, they sent three hundred drones and missiles across into.
Speaker 6: Let's be clear, though they can keep bringing up the
Speaker 6: drone strike, what is clear was they did that a
Speaker 6: month after Israel bombed the Iran consulate in Damascus, Syria.
Speaker 3: They've always got a good reason, the Iranians, They've always
Speaker 3: got a reason why they.
Speaker 6: Suddenly had they did retaliate Israel had gone into Jamascus,
Speaker 6: Syria to bomb the Iranian consulate. They knew, of course,
Speaker 6: that would require Iran's ire, and that's what came thick
Speaker 6: and fast.
Speaker 5: Let's me fair when we tell these stories.
Speaker 3: I'm being very fair around. I've always been committed to
Speaker 3: the destruction of Israel. That event she suddenly aroused him,
Speaker 3: his absolutely gone, and that.
Speaker 6: Drone strike was just like they woke up one day. No, No,
Speaker 6: Israel had even tried to negotiate and say, look, we
Speaker 6: know we blew up your concholate in Damascus, Syria, but
Speaker 6: for a bit of easygoingness in Gaza, do you want
Speaker 6: to do a deal?
Speaker 5: My point is, and that was never going to happen.
Speaker 3: The io toll of pretending like this recent assassination has
Speaker 3: suddenly roused their ire and now they must take revenge
Speaker 3: is absolutely garbage.
Speaker 5: They're never hidden there.
Speaker 4: I told Saying that we're going to seek revenge is
Speaker 4: almost something of a non story. I mean, of course
Speaker 4: that's what he was going to say. It was always
Speaker 4: going to happen, Right, Israel goes after someone in their borders,
Speaker 4: of course they're going to retaliate. We all knew that's
Speaker 4: where this was going to go. But I think if
Speaker 4: you look at the broader context in the rest of
Speaker 4: the world, and we'll go to the US because of course,
Speaker 4: if there were to be all out war, the US
Speaker 4: and the rest of the Western world would be drawn
Speaker 4: into this. This is one the reasons I really hope
Speaker 4: Donald Trump is elected president at the end of this year,
Speaker 4: because despite what Jadi Vance has said about going into Iran,
Speaker 4: and I don't think that's the view that Donald Trump
Speaker 4: would take. Trump has very much staked the beginning at
Speaker 4: least of his presidency on ending war. He's promised to
Speaker 4: end the war in Russia Ukraine, for instance. He would
Speaker 4: not want to see another war on his watch, and
Speaker 4: I think he would work very hard to absolutely everything
Speaker 4: he possibly could to avoid any kind of all out
Speaker 4: war in the Middle East. If you've got Harris there
Speaker 4: as president, and we know how much money that Biden
Speaker 4: has given to Iran.
Speaker 1: Since he was elected in twenty twenty, I.
Speaker 4: Mean, they would essentially be shoveling money into all already
Speaker 4: have been shoveling money into Iran that they then misappropriate
Speaker 4: to go to war in the Middle East, to which
Speaker 4: the US then gets dragged into. Trump's the only man
Speaker 4: who can save us from that.
Speaker 3: Look Caryl Harris recently gave a speech where she was
Speaker 3: telling people we ought not to talk about Islamic terrorism.
Speaker 3: We don't want to use that term. So everybody knows
Speaker 3: should be weak as dishwater. The other thing, though, is
Speaker 3: you have to wonder whether Iran really can take revenge.
Speaker 3: I mean, that three hundred drone and missile attack was
Speaker 3: pretty lame. Israel shot down pretty much every single one
Speaker 3: of them. Iran have been talking for a long time
Speaker 3: about doing something to Israel. They've never managed to do it.
Speaker 3: They always work through proxies, and Israel have called their bluff.
Speaker 6: I don't know about downing that drone strike that we
Speaker 6: saw in May, because a lot of experts have said
Speaker 6: that Iran was actually running a bit of a drill.
Speaker 6: They needed to find out what Israel's iron dome capabilities were.
Speaker 6: Fifteen percent of their missiles actually did get through and
Speaker 6: cause some damage. But what they have now is Israel's
Speaker 6: measure as to how.
Speaker 5: Much they can get away with.
Speaker 6: And certainly if they join forces as we've been talking about,
Speaker 6: they could in the future have a big gang up
Speaker 6: with Hesbula Iran calling in However, many other jihadi's they
Speaker 6: want to to just have an all in war, which
Speaker 6: of course is why Israel is relying very heavily on
Speaker 6: America in the event that that happens, because if that happens,
Speaker 6: Israel knows I will have bitten off far more than
Speaker 6: I can chew, and I need America's help. But I
Speaker 6: think it's really clear. Sorry, it's really important to make
Speaker 6: something clear when I speak to this issue going forward,
Speaker 6: because it is more than possible to support Israel and
Speaker 6: oppose net Yahoo. And let's remember, most Israelis love their country,
Speaker 6: but oppose this man. We all know the minute they
Speaker 6: get to go to the polls on election day, net
Speaker 6: Nyaho is a goner. So to say that in order
Speaker 6: to support Israel, one must support net Yahoo would be
Speaker 6: to accuse most Israelis I'm not supporting their own country.
Speaker 6: I hope we can all agree that would be an
Speaker 6: absolute nonsense. So let it not be said of me.
Speaker 6: I believe that what the Ayatola is saying here, he
Speaker 6: is going to keep his word. Trust me, as is
Speaker 6: Hesbelah because they warned if Israel retaliates what's happened in
Speaker 6: the Golden Heights, which Hesbela, not like them, did not
Speaker 6: take credit for that bombing that occurred.
Speaker 5: And it is questionable.
Speaker 3: Because they they found out it wasn't Jews that were killed.
Speaker 5: No, no.
Speaker 6: Conflicting reports anyway. That aside, Hesbela made sure Israel was
Speaker 6: very well aware.
Speaker 5: If you retaliate, be root is our red line.
Speaker 6: And the fact that Netnya, who considered it worth the
Speaker 6: absolute access of resistance, he is now going to cop
Speaker 6: the brunt of you said that he took out these
Speaker 6: two evil pigs.
Speaker 5: No one's morning. They're passing to keep his people safe.
Speaker 6: I simply cannot believe that when you consider the hell.
Speaker 5: That now awaits them.
Speaker 6: They've already got bomb shelters open, they're preparing for the worst.
Speaker 5: This is the very opposite of what you do.
Speaker 6: If Netnya, who was seeking peace, he would not provoke
Speaker 6: his neighbors like this.
Speaker 5: And America begs hims not to do this.
Speaker 6: Because their number one priority is to keep this. As Netna,
Speaker 6: who promised it's humans, changed his tune.
Speaker 5: It's not met.
Speaker 6: As Netna who promised keep it versus hamask keep it
Speaker 6: in Gaza. We do not need a regional war. And
Speaker 6: to say that popping the heads of two evil guys
Speaker 6: who are going to be replaced by two more evil guys.
Speaker 5: As soon as they're dead. Is was worth what is
Speaker 5: now going to happen.
Speaker 3: There's three problems. Firstly, to keep them anything that's really
Speaker 3: to keep the peace, you've got to have a partner
Speaker 3: in peace, and there is no partner in peace anywhere
Speaker 3: in the Middle East for Israel, all them.
Speaker 5: It is not true.
Speaker 6: They have treaties with Egypt, Jordan is currently can I
Speaker 6: just finishing to say planning Israel's defense They do have friends,
Speaker 6: that's just sorry.
Speaker 3: It's all their so called peace partners, whether it's her Mass,
Speaker 3: whether it's Israel, whether it's Lebanon who continue to give
Speaker 3: Hesbalah free reign, are committed to the destruction of Israel.
Speaker 3: They're not peace partners. Second, keep it in Gaza. You
Speaker 3: can't keep it in Gaza because this thing is being fueled,
Speaker 3: this thing is being planned, it's being financed by Iran.
Speaker 3: So it was always bigger than just Gaza. And Third,
Speaker 3: Israel know that at some point, and everybody knows this,
Speaker 3: at some point, you're going to get a war in
Speaker 3: the Middle East, So Israel have a choice.
Speaker 5: We just that's not true, Matte. We haven't had to
Speaker 5: row in the Middle East.
Speaker 3: For many the reason we're trying to stop Iran.
Speaker 6: Getting nuclear about October seventh.
Speaker 3: The reason we're trying to stop Iran getting nuclear weapons
Speaker 3: is because Iran are sworn to the destruction of Israel
Speaker 3: and everything.
Speaker 5: Israel has three hundred warheads.
Speaker 3: And everybody for warheads, and everybody fears if Iran gets there,
Speaker 3: they will use them, because that's their stated goal. So
Speaker 3: Israel is saying we either sit here like sitting ducks
Speaker 3: and just wait, or we do things on our terms
Speaker 3: and we teach these nations that we won't tolerate things
Speaker 3: and credit to them for that. That's the sort of
Speaker 3: government I would want if our nation was under attack,
Speaker 3: and it's not just letn Yaho. Any Israeli prime minister
Speaker 3: worth their salt would take out terrists wherever they are
Speaker 3: to let them all know you will never get away
Speaker 3: with this, will never go soft on you. Moral.
Speaker 6: I think he's already proved that well and truly, and
Speaker 6: I just think for any reasonable person to agree that
Speaker 6: popping the heads of two evil guys who are going
Speaker 6: to be replaced by two just as evil guys is
Speaker 6: going to be worth the all out war that he
Speaker 6: has I would say, intentionally provoked because he knew that Hesbela,
Speaker 6: he knew that.
Speaker 5: Iran are now duty bound to respond.
Speaker 6: I don't see how any reasonable person can argue that's
Speaker 6: worth what's now coming to Israel.
Speaker 3: We got to go to a break. When we come back,
Speaker 3: we'll look at what's making news in the papers, including
Speaker 3: a Chinese swimmer who wins gold. But to everyone's saying
Speaker 3: that swim was not humanly possible. It's coming up in
Speaker 3: just the moment. All right, welcome back. Let's take a
Speaker 3: look at what's making news in tomorrow's papers. But before
Speaker 3: we get to tomorrow's papers, there's news making way right
Speaker 3: now with a massive prisoner swap CALEB between Russia and
Speaker 3: the United States.
Speaker 4: And these are unconfirmed reports. This has been put up
Speaker 4: by the Australian literally three minutes ago.
Speaker 1: But to Evan Gershkevich, who.
Speaker 4: Was a journalist at the Wall Street Journal had been
Speaker 4: accused by Russia of espionage back in twenty thirteen. He
Speaker 4: was jailed a couple of months ago July nineteen in
Speaker 4: a Russian court was meant to be sent off to
Speaker 4: a penal colony. But there are unconfirmed reports out tonight
Speaker 4: that there could be a prisoner swap. This is coming
Speaker 4: from the Telegraph in the UK with former US Marine
Speaker 4: Paul Wheelan. That would be between the US and Russia.
Speaker 4: And now the charges were trumped up. I mean, you know,
Speaker 4: he was a journalist working in Russia. There was no
Speaker 4: evidence that he had done anything wrong. He was detained
Speaker 4: for quite some time since March twenty thirteen. They ran
Speaker 4: a kangaroo court trial on him a month ago and
Speaker 4: locked him up for whatever reason. I suspect political reasons.
Speaker 4: But the news that he could well now be freed
Speaker 4: obviously will be welcome to him and welcome to all
Speaker 4: of us here at News Corp. He's part of the
Speaker 4: News Corp family. But news that I don't think was
Speaker 4: expected to happen quite so quickly. It was barely a
Speaker 4: month ago that he was locked up, and they've already
Speaker 4: come up with reportedly some kind of a deal to
Speaker 4: free him.
Speaker 3: And it wouldn't involve just him. There reporting that this
Speaker 3: could involve thirty prisoners from both sides, which would be
Speaker 3: the largest prisoner swap since the end of the Cold War.
Speaker 3: Back in twenty ten, there was a prisoner exchange involving
Speaker 3: fourteen people but as is reported, this one may involve
Speaker 3: up to thirty people.
Speaker 6: So yeah, well, more details to come, I'm sure. Right
Speaker 6: now we've just got the scraps. But it's always very
Speaker 6: interesting to question what's behind these swaps, who negotiated them,
Speaker 6: how we reached this point, Like you say, Caleb, if true,
Speaker 6: if these reports are confirmed, that is record time.
Speaker 1: It is record time.
Speaker 4: The US probably not the DOJ in this particular case,
Speaker 4: but they've been up to a lot of stuff very recently,
Speaker 4: it would say. Let's get into some of the other
Speaker 4: news floating around today. Now this broke this evening. We'll
Speaker 4: get into a lot of the Olympic news on the
Speaker 4: front of the papers. But before we get to the papers,
Speaker 4: you probably know that we've been talking about the last
Speaker 4: few nights two boxers who've been given clearance to compete
Speaker 4: at the Olympics. They say that they are female, but
Speaker 4: they were banned for competing at the World Boxing Championships
Speaker 4: last year because they undertok DNA testing, which found that
Speaker 4: they had X Y chromosomes, which would of course indicate
Speaker 4: that they are biological men.
Speaker 1: Would you believe it?
Speaker 5: This evening?
Speaker 4: One of those people, Imman Califf, is Algerian boxer went
Speaker 4: into the ring with an Italian female boxer, Angela Quarini,
Speaker 4: and it took all of forty seconds for missus Karini
Speaker 4: to go into the corner and pull out of the fight.
Speaker 4: I think we're all waiting for something like this to
Speaker 4: happen after all the publicity, the gender storm, as the
Speaker 4: headline says there that was created around.
Speaker 1: All of this.
Speaker 4: It took all of forty seconds for Califf's opponent to
Speaker 4: feel like, I'm not safe here and I'm getting out
Speaker 4: of here. Doesn't that tell you everything?
Speaker 3: In the first forty seconds, the Italian Angela Quarini was
Speaker 3: punched in the nose, called the fight off, and then
Speaker 3: when asked why, she said, and I quote may people say,
Speaker 3: don't go into the fight. It's dangerous. She's a man.
Speaker 3: Maybe it's this, So there you go, there you go.
Speaker 3: She's called.
Speaker 6: Now I'm going to see an apology. We're going to
Speaker 6: see a backpedal from the Olympic committee that said, ah,
Speaker 6: we're absolutely okay with just making men bashing women a
Speaker 6: spectator sport. That's totally fine. Are they now going to
Speaker 6: allow the second one to compete? This is the first
Speaker 6: one to take the ring. His female component only lasted
Speaker 6: forty seconds. Are they now going to backpedal, because if
Speaker 6: they have any sceric of decency, we'll see them take
Speaker 6: action and very swiftly to say how bad turns out
Speaker 6: having woman on your passport, as this committee argued and
Speaker 6: we talked about last night, turns out having women on
Speaker 6: your passport doesn't actually make you a woman and means
Speaker 6: one punch in the face. And this woman is choosing
Speaker 6: her life over competing in the.
Speaker 5: Sport that she has trained for years for this moment, and.
Speaker 6: She has to miss out because some narcissistic bloke has
Speaker 6: decided to identify as a woman woman, and she misses
Speaker 6: out on everything.
Speaker 5: She could have been a medalist. Who knows now we
Speaker 5: never will.
Speaker 4: And obviously put in harm's way. Let's go to some
Speaker 4: other Olympic news. Is on the front of the Daily
Speaker 4: Telegraph tomorrow, I think the story that's been on all
Speaker 4: of our lips. It says China's defeat of Charmers deemed
Speaker 4: not humanly possible. Fast and furious is the headline. Emphasis
Speaker 4: on the furious Ozzie swimming legend Kyl Chalmers. By the way,
Speaker 4: good Adelaide boy just like me, though I'm not as
Speaker 4: adept in the swimming pool, could not have been more
Speaker 4: gracious despite being denied gold by a performance labeled not
Speaker 4: humanly possible. China's Pan Zanli smashed the one hundred meter
Speaker 4: world record byero point four of a second, infuriating some,
Speaker 4: including elite Australian coach Brett Hawk. And it was mister
Speaker 4: Hawk who said that it was not humanly possible. Now,
Speaker 4: everything that we know about Russia and the alleged doping
Speaker 4: in which it has engaged, particularly in relation to its
Speaker 4: swimming and we talked about this last night, the case
Speaker 4: that came to light earlier this year.
Speaker 3: So you said Russia, you mean China?
Speaker 1: Which is Russia.
Speaker 4: God, I've got Russia on the mind from the last
Speaker 4: three That wouldn't be so two sort of dictatorial regimes.
Speaker 4: They may well be involved in doping as well. China,
Speaker 4: they're doping stuff.
Speaker 1: So the story that we learnt back in April.
Speaker 4: Julian Linden in the in the Daily Telegraph, a story
Speaker 4: that had been suppressed by both China and the World
Speaker 4: Anti Doping Authority or Agency as it's called, from before
Speaker 4: the Tokyo Olympics, where twenty three Chinese swimmers had tested
Speaker 4: positive to a heart drug that allows more blood to
Speaker 4: flow to the heart. They determined that all of those
Speaker 4: positive tests were just contamination and no one was told
Speaker 4: about the fact that it had happened.
Speaker 1: Then we had the story we learnt about yesterday.
Speaker 4: Where two Chinese swimmers were suspended for a year and
Speaker 4: they didn't tell anyone that that had happened until they
Speaker 4: determined that the steroids they had tested positive too had
Speaker 4: in fact been in a burger they had eaten and
Speaker 4: washed down with fries and soft drink. They blamed that
Speaker 4: on Australian beef in twenty twenty one, despite the fact
Speaker 4: that there was a bad put on Australian beef being
Speaker 4: imported into China in twenty twenty And now we are
Speaker 4: to believe that this particular gentleman was able to beat
Speaker 4: Kyle Charmers by the biggest margin in this particular event
Speaker 4: in ninety six years now. I'm not suggesting that he
Speaker 4: has doped, but my god, there might be the question
Speaker 4: on a few of our lips, could this guy have doped?
Speaker 1: Seriously?
Speaker 3: And this is the problem with the way the Olympic
Speaker 3: Committee are doing things right because Let's imagine he hasn't doped.
Speaker 3: So the guy's just swung the race of his life,
Speaker 3: the best in almost one hundred years, and everyone's like, yeah,
Speaker 3: we're not social and it's because of the way that
Speaker 3: the IOC do everything so secretively.
Speaker 1: Well it's not the IOC in this case.
Speaker 6: It's wow, yes, right, they're all tested. So in order
Speaker 6: for him to actually have doped and successfully made it
Speaker 6: into the pool, jumped up on something giving him superhuman
Speaker 6: strength to win, indeed more than when create a new record,
Speaker 6: won this bit.
Speaker 5: Surely the testing, that's the whole purpose of the testing.
Speaker 4: Well, not necessarily, not necessarily, And this is where the
Speaker 4: whole business with China Arder comes into.
Speaker 1: That's China's antidoping agency. Because if we go back to
Speaker 1: that case before the.
Speaker 4: Tokyo Olympics where those twenty three swimmers tested positive to
Speaker 4: that drug that flows more blood to the heart. Now,
Speaker 4: if you use that in the lead up the preparation
Speaker 4: for something like the Olympics, you could argue that gives
Speaker 4: you an advantage at the Olympics, even though you're not
Speaker 4: drugged up at the time, because it allowed you to
Speaker 4: train to a higher level and so you could well
Speaker 4: do something like that in this particular case, and knowing
Speaker 4: the fact that Chinada has actively covered up these cases before,
Speaker 4: you'd had to ask the question, could a Chinese swimmer
Speaker 4: legitimately dope in the lead up to the Olympics that's
Speaker 4: not revealed by Chinader.
Speaker 1: You go to the Olympics with nothing.
Speaker 4: In your system, but you've been given an advantage in
Speaker 4: the leader.
Speaker 6: Well, it's important to so that Kyle Chalmers hats off
Speaker 6: to him, the OSSI who's now summer saying, oh he
Speaker 6: was wrobbed.
Speaker 5: This guy couldn't have possibly done this.
Speaker 6: He's been so gracious about it, he says, I trust
Speaker 6: that he's done everything you possibly can to be there.
Speaker 4: I e.
Speaker 6: At the Olympics, and he deserves that gold medal, and
Speaker 6: I did everything I possibly could to challenge for that
Speaker 6: gold medal.
Speaker 5: So he's been very gracious.
Speaker 6: He's not actually casting any aspersions whatsoever.
Speaker 5: Well, he can't kid me the first person too. I
Speaker 5: know I would be I'd like you beat me yet cheated.
Speaker 4: He can't do it publicly, but I can, and that's
Speaker 4: why I've done it. And that's what my column is
Speaker 4: in the Advertiser as well tomorrow make sure you check that.
Speaker 4: And just a reminder before we go to the break.
Speaker 4: Unconfirmed reports tonight that Evan Gershkevich, a wall I was
Speaker 4: going to say, Wall Street journal journalist who was detained
Speaker 4: in Russia, may well be freed in a prisoner swap
Speaker 4: deal with the US.
Speaker 3: Very good, Well, we're going to go to a break.
Speaker 3: When we come back, a schoolteacher sues the education department
Speaker 3: after she injures herself playing basketball. It's coming up in
Speaker 3: a second. Welcome back, Well, Lis on TikTok. I don't
Speaker 3: know if you are, but.
Speaker 6: That they already have no he certainly well, he deeply
Speaker 6: regrets it now. Twenty nine year old craigmore Man was
Speaker 6: hooning happily through McLaren Vale, showing himself filming himself rather
Speaker 6: doing one hundred and seventy seven k's in a sixty
Speaker 6: k zone. He was so proud of this he wanted
Speaker 6: to boast about it by putting.
Speaker 5: It on TikTok.
Speaker 7: Here's the video.
Speaker 6: And thanks to his solid belief in how cool he
Speaker 6: was being, the police rocked up days later, took his car,
Speaker 6: took his license.
Speaker 5: And the dudes in big trouble.
Speaker 6: You guys, always pick on me when we have those
Speaker 6: arguments about whether or not we should make it illegal
Speaker 6: for these kids to.
Speaker 5: Post their wrongdoings.
Speaker 6: In this case, he was twenty nine years old. But
Speaker 6: to make these kinds of posts illegal and I have
Speaker 6: always argued no, because it helps the cops. It's just like,
Speaker 6: thanks for telling me everything about yourself. Now I can
Speaker 6: just look you up, rock up at your door and arrest.
Speaker 5: You all whatever I need to do for the felony
Speaker 5: that you've committed. Case in points, gentlemen, all the lights he.
Speaker 3: Got on social media. It was totally worth.
Speaker 4: We need a new segment Dope of the Day.
Speaker 3: Speaking of which, there's a Victorian teacher who's suing the
Speaker 3: education department after she injured herself playing basketball in heels.
Speaker 3: Now she's suing the department because they failed to tell
Speaker 3: her to remove the heels and put on sports shoes. Moreover,
Speaker 3: she says they should have shown her that she didn't
Speaker 3: need to jump into the air, oh, shooting a basketball.
Speaker 3: Can you believe this? She got a forensic engineer to
Speaker 3: give evidence in the case. He measured the size of
Speaker 3: the heels, worked out she should have been sports shoes.
Speaker 3: The judge said he was not qualified as a forensic
Speaker 3: engineer to rule on shoes. The case continues. That's it
Speaker 3: from us, but stick around. That readA Pennehey show is
Speaker 3: coming right up.