WEBVTT - Melbourne property: Bargain basement or 'Loserville'?

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to the Australians Money Becuzzle podcast.

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 2>James Kurty here with the editor at The Australian.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome aboard everybody, and I have mister week.

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>James Girard who handled and ran the show. Two episodes

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>last week, very good. I've listened to them both, very

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. I want to pick up something actually that

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about on the show for some time.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And look, this could be on the show. We talked

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>this time last year and for a long time about

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>how Perth, for instance, as a property investor, if you

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>were prepared to invest.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 2>Interstate Perth was the market to be in.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it really has been an exceptional market

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who did that, to the point actually that

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>this week they're talking about parts of the market in overheating.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>It's a small market in relation to the bigger market

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about today, which is Melbourne. So

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne's the second biggest market in the country. It's five

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>million people. It's going to be bigger than Sydney relatively soon.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.919
<v Speaker 1>It's a sort of inexorable march of the housing estates

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>at the edges of the city, which can't happen in

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Sydney because of national forests.

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 2>But what it means.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>Is that it should be a hot property market.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>It's not.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the opposite. It's the weakest market in Australia. And

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the question from an investor point of view is now,

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>is this the bargain not just of the year, but

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>is this one of the real bargains perhaps of the

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>decade in property for investors in Australia or actually is

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the state sinking as some would suggest and searching the

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.559
<v Speaker 1>numbers in property are pretty bad. It's the weakest price

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>market increases, is the weakest in Australia. It is the

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>weakest investment market. And beyond investors are leaving the state.

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And we see that right across all the news media

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>reporting there quite faithfully in recent times.

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 2>So I thought, well, let's have a look at that.

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's also have a look at immigration cuts, what they

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>might do for property or do against property, and a

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>few other issues that I want to pick up on

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>with our guest today who is a regular on the show,

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Brammel of Bruce Brammel, Financial Financial Advisor, author and

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>operator extraordinaire.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 3>How are you, Bruce, Well, thanks James yourself.

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Good, thank you. Well, you should know you've written books

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on this area. You're in the thick of it and

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you are in Melbourne based property and financial advisor. So

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Brammel, I put you on the hot season. I say,

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is this market just slowly thinking or is it actually

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for investors all around Australia. It's the second

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>biggest city and it's it's hanging behind everybody. Is it

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>going to catch up?

0:02:59.160 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 3>Look?

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 4>I think inevitably it will. I'm probably a straw hats

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 4>in winter sort of guy. It go to investment. I

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 4>think in a relative sense Melbourne is probably undervalued at

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:16.399
<v Speaker 4>the moment from an investment Since James, I've only ever

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 4>believed that there are three markets worthwhile pursuing because they've

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 4>got economies that are big enough. When they are Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane.

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.679
<v Speaker 3>At the moment the property prices are Sydney.

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 4>What probably prices should be is Sydney big gap, Melbourne

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 4>reasonable gap, Brisbane, followed by I don't really care too

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 4>much after that but Adelaide. But there are the three

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 4>property markets that I speak to clients about and that

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 4>we are assist clients.

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Buying in.

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 4>At the moment, the gap is Sydney big gap Brisbane

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 4>and Melbourne is sitting third. Now in my opinion, that

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 4>is a pricing error that's against the natural order of the.

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Natural order of things.

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Is Sydney big gap Melbourne gap reason gap to Brisbane. Now,

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 4>back in about twenty fourteen, following the state government up

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 4>there and they closing schools and they're shutting hospitals and

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 4>sacking teachers and nurses, the same as Canada done in Melbourne.

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 4>In the early mid nineties, Brisbane's property price fell to

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 4>about fifth or six That was Sydney Melbourne. I think

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 4>at the time it was sort of Perth, Camera Adelaide wherever.

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 4>But Brisbane was sitting about fifth or sixth, and we said, well,

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 4>there's a pricing are going on here. So through twenty fourteen, fifteen,

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 4>sixteen seventeen, I think into eighteen, we've brought a lot

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 4>of property with clients in Brisbane and that's proved to

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 4>be corrects. Brisbane suddenly subsequently post twenty twenty and twenty

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 4>twenty one started moving back into sort of third spot

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 4>where it should and has now overtaken Melbourne in the

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 4>last six months.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Or so it is now sitting second.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 4>The natural order of things is out of Melbourne's Probably

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 4>prices are being impacted by a bunch of things, including

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 4>the land tax increases which have come through in recent time.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 4>It's only in the last few weeks or a month

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 4>or so I think that the people started being started

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 4>to hit with their bills. But obviously people been known

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 4>have known that this was coming for some time and

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 4>have been reacting to that.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>But you're getting basically you're getting higher interest rates and

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you're getting higher taxes combining the same time.

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 4>I think for a lot of you know, there's a

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 4>lot of people who have been hit with land tax

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 4>for the first time in Melbourne. If you're an investor,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 4>when they dropped it from land tax from thresholder three

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 4>hundred thousand to fifty thousand, it's just going to pick

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 4>up anybody who has anybody. Yeah, but a lot of

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 4>people who might have were already paying land tax multiple

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 4>properties or something like that. You know, they're probably saying

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 4>a doubling of the land tax that they are paying.

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 4>And land tax is a tax deduction, so the state

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 4>government receives the money, but you get back a portion

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 4>of it from the from the federal government, so you know,

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 4>but it's still it's an extra increase at the time

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 4>of fire, inflation and higher interstrates or normal interest rates or.

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you were a marginal, if you were only

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>hanging on, it could push you out.

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I think that's what we're saying in Melbourne at

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 4>the moment, in particular. You know, people who are seeing

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 4>those those higher costs of things. It starts having, it's

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 4>having more. Is it part of having an impact that

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Your question is is it a bargain of our time

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 4>or people who are buying are they are they loss?

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 4>I think sort of medium to long term. I think

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Melbourne is probably underpriced in a relative sense compared to

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 4>the other term markets which we would invest in, which

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 4>is Sydney in Britain.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so but you don't TechEd in the way that

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>you detected and encouraged investors who were open to investing

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in the country into Brisbane. Are you at the

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>start of that process now or has it even begune

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>investing in Brisbane investing in Melbourne? Melbourne on the basis

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that the natural order will restore itself.

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yep, that's that's one of the reasons. So there

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 4>was a period back I think it was two.

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Thousand and one, two three, somewhere around there where.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 4>The city or might have been the late nineties. I

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 4>think it was early noughties where where Melbourne got within

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 4>three thousand dollars of Sydney. Yeah, I think it was

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 4>three hundred and six versus surrounding and three or maybe

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:44.679
<v Speaker 4>thro round and three versus three hundred for median property price.

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 4>And that was another signal that the natural order things

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 4>should be Sydney big gap, Melbourne reasonable gap to And

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 4>that was probably a screaming buy time for Sydney property

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 4>prices because in a relative all, in a relative sense,

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 4>so relative sense they had to pick up and sure

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 4>enough for data wasn't a financial law.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>It's almost still still a journalist.

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 4>But there there are times where you just say the

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 4>natural order of things fall out of place, and I

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 4>think we're probably in one of those situations now with Melbourne.

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 2>That's really interesting.

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's like the property version of the of

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the share market. Isn't this where they have the reversion

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to the mean, and that that can be a very

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>reliable way through for value investors and the other thing,

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, is that interstate investing is so much easier now.

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you really had to be quite a sophisticated

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>operator once upon time to do that, but these days,

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>with everything online and digital, et cetera, it is not

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>difficult at all. I have done it, and the difference

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact it was Brisbane, and the difference between having

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a properly investment properly in Melbourne and Brisbane was very

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>very very little. When I sold that properly, there was

0:08:55.679 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it was. There was some particular state differences, but they

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>were not significant at all. And I think more and

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>more people are are doing that and that notion I

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>think we can be in the active investor in property books.

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure a lot of our listeners are of this.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Frame of mind that they are.

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Agnostic if you like, as to where the property is,

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and if you take that strict investment criteria and that approach,

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>then I think it is definitely worth having a look

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>at the Melbourne market now in the way that we

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.839
<v Speaker 1>were talking about looking at Earth a year a year

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half ago. Okay, one other thing I suppose

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>on the big picture, Bruce for property, if you take

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it that the prices how home prices in particular, and

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the entire and the entire economy, if you like, have

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>been underpinned by immigration and immigration numbers, and it does

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>explain to a significant degree the the one percent vacancy

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>rates and the relatively strong price increases in homes, even

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>though rates were going up all through that process. Then

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>if there's immigration cuts and they are starting now with

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>two things, an attempt to bring the broad number back

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to traditional sort of levels rather than from the exceptional

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>levels they were at post COVID, and a big cutback,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>big cutback in international students, which is already hitting share market.

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>For instance, IDP, the big, the big private education down

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>by a third or so, about two thousand jobs already

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>lost in that sector of private education. But for a

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>property investor, do you think it will hit property prices?

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And where might it hit property prices?

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Immigration reduction?

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so you started off this question was talking about

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 4>the big picture, So there's no direct correlation between.

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 3>One thing moving on the next.

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 4>But at the moment, the biggest problem is supply can't

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 4>be increased. They're struggling to increase supply. There there are

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 4>restrictions on supply. Getting you properly on board so what

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 4>can they control asing governments, as in federal government, they

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 4>can control demand, and part of that demand comes from

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 4>bringing in how many hundreds of thousands of people that

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 4>we bring into the country each year.

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Reducing the number by whatever it is, tens of thousands

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 4>but one hundred thousand, whatever the case may be, will

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 4>slow down the increase in demand for the property. That's

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 4>sort of basic.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Economics one O one, and that should we should have

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 3>an impact.

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't mean the properly prices are going to fall, No,

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't mean that that's going to happen normally. You've

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 4>got to have a couple of things line up to

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 4>forth property prices to fall. But it certainly takes upward

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 4>pressure some of the upward pressure. You take out one

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 4>hundred thousand people a year for the next two years,

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 4>five years, or whatever, then there's you've got an extra

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and five hundred thousand fewer people needing to

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 4>find a place to live. So it should have an impact.

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 4>It might just slow the rate of growth of probably prices,

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 4>It might make them stagnate, it might make them go backwards,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 4>But does it hit property prices. It will have an

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 4>impact on property prices. It doesn't mean it's going to

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 4>make it go backwards. It might just having an impact

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 4>on property prices and just slow the what might have

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 4>happened from nine percent growth per year down to six

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 4>percent growth per year, or it might have been negative.

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 4>So yes, you know, you take away some demands. It

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 4>has to have an impact on property prices, but it

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 4>doesn't mean it's going to fall.

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Now, as an advisor, tell me about your clients,

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>do they do they if they're looking at the numbers,

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they see that the property prices are running broadly similar

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to sub prices. At the moment, the ASX is going

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 1>to come in at about nine percent for the year.

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Any chucking dividends and there's you're certainly on thirteen percent.

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So better than property again for the second here in

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a row. But property doing better than most people would

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>have fought with the rates and not falling though that

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>people had expected that they would. So when you get

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>when you get the glance in the door and there

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>are active investors, they have a broad portfolio.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Are they what's the mood?

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Are they inmfessed the fact that property is still is

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>still going up onto these conditions, and what did they

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is there any sense of bout outcut they have.

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sort of a fewer conversations about I guess about

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 4>new money but going into investment markets than there might

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 4>have been in times gone past or but it seems

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 4>to be picking up again, as in it was quite.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>More about managing what you had and making adjustments to

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 3>what you had.

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Certainly, you know during COVID there was a period there

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 4>with the same don't that's obviously three four what are

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 4>we four years ago now? And coming out of that

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 4>there seem to be some opportunities and there were.

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 3>The same thing straw hats in winter.

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 4>You try to buy assets when they're undervalued rather than

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 4>when they might be a reasonable valuation or even a

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 4>full valuation. And you know, that's what you're constantly trying

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 4>to do as an investor. If you're making active investment decisions,

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 4>which property residential property has to be an active decision.

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 3>You can't index. You can't index it.

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 4>So I think in recent times people are sort of okay,

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, I will manage to get through the higher

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 4>industrates for those people that have I'm not saying this

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 4>is everybody by any stretch of the imagination. There's more

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 4>pain out there than there is people seeing things very positively.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 4>But for those people who are seeing it positively and

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 4>they're looking to to do some investing, property is not

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 4>right for everybody. It scares a lot of people off

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 4>to talking about death and tenants and all the things

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 4>that necessarily.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Come with property.

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 4>But for those people who are comfortable with the debts

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 4>with dealing with tenants, with constant changes to the laws

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 4>and in regards to what landlords are going to provide,

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 4>then there's the potential to get into property. But anybody

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 4>who's getting into property needs to understand that you really

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 4>have to have a mindset of buying a property for forever,

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 4>or at least having your head ten years.

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Why because the costs of getting into and out of

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 3>property are in Australia fairly obsaane.

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 2>You're talking years ten years as your benchmark.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 4>Ten years, yeah, percent rough lyag you will take to

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 4>get into a property, particularly in Victoria, South Australia. Surprise

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 4>the other day to time at certain places more expensive

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 4>than Victoria, but get somewhere between sort of four and

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 4>four and six percent stamp.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Duty is to get in to get out of the property.

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 4>You've got about three percent in agencies and marketing, advertised

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 4>and all those other things there. So the cost you're

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 4>getting into an out of a property is seven to

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 4>ten percent, so you're very difficult back money on that

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 4>in the short term. Property needs to be a medium

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 4>term investment. Well long term it needs to be a

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 4>long term investment. It depends on how you say made

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 4>him a long term But anybody that's going on to properly,

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 4>I say, you've got to have a minimum of ten years,

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 4>but the preferable hole in time for properties forever.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we'll hold that thought right there.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll take short break and we'll come back pick up

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on that issue. Hello and welcome back to the Australians

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Money Puzzle podcast. I'm James Kirkby, the Wealth editor at

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>The Australian. I'm talking to Bruce Bramble, who is a

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>financial advisor and author and regular contributor to news Corps

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in the area of investment and wealth, and we were

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>just talking just repeat the number of you would Bruce.

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>It was really interesting about buying proper five your costs,

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever the cost of the property is, five percent of

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that cost is going to be you need five percent

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of that cost going in and you need about three

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>percent going out of the far side, is that what

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you were saying?

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, roughly, Yeah, somewhere we're going four and six probably

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 4>north about north of five, largely five five and a

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 4>half percent to get in the sand duty's and potentially

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 4>if you're using advis advocate another two percent on top

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 4>of that roughly some of them flat feet, but around

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 4>that five to six percent mark.

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 3>And to get out.

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, the cost of selling advertising agents charged about

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 4>one point five.

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 3>To two percent plus JC, so it's a good portion

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 3>of it.

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 4>But then you've got advertising and marketing and some other

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 4>costs and conveyancing and whatever.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 3>Else on top of that.

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Tope, yes, you you're to get out, you're probably around

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 4>that three somewhere between two and a half and three

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 4>and a half percent most of the time to get

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 4>out of to get out of a property.

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's very very interesting.

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>As you said, you can't index it. You it's a

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a big ticket acquisition and you have to go

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in boots and all the bass day every time. You

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>can't buy a bit of a property as to say,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>or unfortunately it's not a bit of one. So one

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>thing that's come up on the show before we go

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to questions is several people who who I do admire

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and respect on the show making the point that the

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>units the house prices overshot through COVID and post COVID

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>because of that whole thing of space being so exceptionally valued,

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>personal space being so exceptionally valued when we were all

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>locked in our homes, but that the units fell behind,

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>way behind. And in that same theme of reversion to

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>the mean that we're talking about, how the sort of

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>natural order of things, the units haven't been doing as

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>well as units normally do for some years, and there's

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a strong sense that they may catch up looking forward.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>If someone was coming to you and said I can

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>buy a property anywhere in the country, I don't mind

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>where I'm ready to go. The only thing I want

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:04.959
<v Speaker 1>to make a decision on is a unit over a house.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I know the basics. I know that a unit is easier,

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>it is costs less to buys is simply because they

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>costs less, nothing to do with value. I know that

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they're less maintenance. I know homes are a standard on

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>home is a lot more maintenance, and I have been

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 1>hearing that units are set to do better per annum

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for a while than houses. In catching up post called

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>but what would you say to that person?

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 4>First of all times, we're going to ask you some

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 4>definitional questions here if you don't mind. So your house

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 4>is pretty simple, ass is a is a you know,

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 4>a property or a building on land. There's no touching

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 4>dale or whatever. Are you suggesting that a unit is

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 4>more like medium density high than city where walls are

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 4>touching and all that sort of stuff, because there's.

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 2>I know that definite definition of units is very messy.

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 2>It includes townhouses. It shouldn't. Let's just talk about apartments.

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Make it sense them.

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, okay, So I'd separate them into three so houses

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 4>at the other end, apartments or flats, and in the

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.479
<v Speaker 4>middle is what I call units, which might be you know,

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 4>the old quarter acre block that got split in.

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 3>There's three sort of townhouse unity sort.

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Of things on it that might have a bit of

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 4>common common area, but there's no real you know, they've

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 4>got their own yard and they're not.

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 3>They're not. So i'd sort of call those three.

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 4>So from an investment perspective, again, I split property into

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 4>two sorts of property, into a residential property to two

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 4>short one is a home. Home is going to meet

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 4>an emotional need that needs to be where you want

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 4>to live, which might be you know, a lifestyle or

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 4>near schools or near family or your work or something

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 4>like that. That's homes need to meet need to meet

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 4>emotional needs. An investment is about one thing and one

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 4>thing only, and that is making money, and you want

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 4>to maximize new chances of doing that.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, I'm a very strong believer that the single one

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 3>of the.

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 4>Main ways that property appreciates in value is.

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Via land content.

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 4>So minute we have one of the rules that we

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 4>use for purchasing helping clients purchase property is minimum land

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 4>content of thirty percent. That's specifically designed to knock out

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 4>what we're just referring to as flats and apartments. Yes,

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 4>because it is land that appreciates. Buildings depreciate. Buildings literally

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 4>fall apart from the moment that you since before they're built,

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 4>So you've got to spend an ever increasing amount of time.

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 3>So from an.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:46.199
<v Speaker 4>Investment perspective, if in a relative sense, if units have

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 4>done poorly or not as well as houses in the past, my.

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Belief is that they will always be the case.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.959
<v Speaker 4>However, you can a get to a stage where our

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 4>units have underperformed more than they should have under before

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 4>versus house and lane. There might be some relative value there.

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 4>But again, as we're just sort of talking about area

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 4>of the cost of getting into an out property and

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 4>trying to get that coal rights is very diffult.

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So you're skeptical. You're skeptical about whether it's really changed.

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting just for what it's worth.

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 2>There was two there were two theories.

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>You'd be like about why units will outpace standard on

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 1>properties in the immediate future. One was the catch up

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>basically reversion to the mean. But the other one was

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that the theory always had been, you know, they don't

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>buy apartment because if you buy an apartment doesn't investor.

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that they can always build more. And

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>but the argument this year and next year was they

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>can't do more. That the building is approval process in

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Australia's basically ground to a hold. There's less been approved

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this year than last year nationally, and that was an

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting argument which I'm sure the listeners will make up

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>their own minds about just but just to finish off

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on that one, okay, I why don't we take the

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>first question of the day from Ramnish or a M

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>n I s h Ti Ramnish, My wife and I

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>own an investment property inter state. There you are, you

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>see in another state. Agnostic as to where Ramnish bought

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>his land with development potential five townhouses. He thinks, by

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the way, any answer here is never advised. Okay, this

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>is information only. But here's the killer, he says, we

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>don't have development experience. Have you come across arrangements or

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>joint ventures between landowners and builders where the landowner contributes

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the land and the developer builds the townhouses. I expect

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that goes on all the time, but I don't know

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the mechanics of it.

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Would could you be familiar with that pose?

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Look, I have sparkled to a few organizations. I guess

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 3>I have a time where.

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 4>They whether they've targeted, you know, the older strivings. Who

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 4>might have you an old house on a big court

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 4>acre block possibly bigger, where the house is built at

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 4>the front of the back, and there's the opportunity to

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 4>release some capital by getting a developer come in and

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 4>develop a second unit or something like that. Or the

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 4>property and the sort of personal owns the land, it

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 4>gets gets paid out so I have no doubt that

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 4>there would be developers out there who would consider doing that.

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 3>They're talking about the actual example that you've given here.

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't know any groups that do that, but I'm

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 4>sure somebody would assive warning sign or red flag. If

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 4>you're considering doing this, you need really good legal advice

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 4>to make sure that it's watertight. You're dealing with developers

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 4>and a whole bunch of risks that you wouldn't otherwise

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 4>face if you were doing it yourself, or you would

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 4>still face, but even higher risk I guess in this

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 4>sort of situation here, So make sure you get really

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 4>strong legal advice before entering into any agreement. So, off

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 4>the top of my head, I can't think of any

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 4>that I know that they do this, but there's bound

0:24:57.880 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 4>to be. There's bound to be.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So Step one is get your setup a top class

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>property lawyer, and no doubt the property lawyer will know

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>who's to in the game if.

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 4>They are potentially Yeah, but i'd probably put some feelers out.

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 4>We'll probably put some feelers out and go and speak

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 4>to a few developers who might.

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Want to do it, But do not sign anything without

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 3>having your lawyer do it. Properly.

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'd find somebody who prepent you, potentially prepare to

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 4>do it for you, and then and then get legal advice.

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 3>Really seriously lost signing you.

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Very good information there, and ramnish neither option is easy,

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>so another option is easy, and obviously both options can

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>be a rewarding long term.

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I hope that was helpful. Okay, we'll take a short break.

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll be up with the last two questions in one moment. Hello,

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast.

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 2>James Kirby Here, it's Tuesday. We're talking property.

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to Bruce Brammel, comncial advisor. Andrew asks if

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I had a mortgage. This is one of these We

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 1>get these sort of ques questions all the time. We

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>have awfully clever listeners who are always doing computations. Andrew says,

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>if I have the mortgage for a thousand a week

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and interest rates went up so that my payments were

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hundred per week, what is the end journey of

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>my extra five hundred. I don't believe it goes to

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>bank profits, but maybe it goes to treasury bonds. In

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 1>other words, is the extra interest that mortgage owners are

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>paying off simply going to restore the money printing done

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>during COVID. Is it a tax without being called a tax? Well, Andrew,

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how the banks should give you a

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>loan that they don't make any money off, or they'd

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>have to close down. So your interest farmers are going

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to have to be bigger than cash. And that's only

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>fair that the RBA official rate is there and then

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the rates go from there. But I don't think it's

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>avoidable really. I think you just have to take that

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 1>on the chain. The question is which bank I suppose

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is screwing you worth?

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 2>It's much more transparent than it used to be.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>You can go on any of these compare sites. We

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>often talk to people in that area, where you can

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>simply just take a look at the different rates that

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>are out there and either cash or mortgages, and once

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you digest what bells may be attached to bills and

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>business are attached to particular deals on both sides, whether

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you have the cash on deposit or whether you're borrowing.

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>It's much more transparent than it used to be, isn't

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it Blues? I mean, we used to have no idea

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever people used to phone one bank after or another.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Now you can just go on a site and compare.

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, and the other side of it is the amount

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 4>of business that is written or the proportion of business

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 4>that is written by our mortgage brokers, has increased steadily

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 4>and is now sitting a bit under seventy five percent mortgage.

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>There are three quarters, three quarters of the wall banks

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>are going through mortgage brokers.

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, my colleague he called that the normally the other

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 4>diet sort of seventy one and a half percent.

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Of something of all of all lines.

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 4>To deal with sort of Andrew's question in a little

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 4>bit or just on top of what you've said, James,

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 4>is that banks sort of tend to make a reasonably

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 4>concert They're competing.

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 3>And always trying to lift it there.

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 4>But the margin that they make is fairly similar through

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 4>through economic cycles. Goes up a bit and down a bit,

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 4>but they're trying to make let's call it one hundred

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 4>and eighty two hundred basis points.

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Yep is what they need to make known as a

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 3>net interest margin them.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't really change an awful lot, does it.

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting interest rates are three and they've got to

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 4>make you know two percent on it or two hundred

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 4>basis points on it. Then the depositors and bond holders,

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 4>they're not they're not treasury bonds. But there are other

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 4>fixed interest investments where where people who have got money

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 4>to to buy fixing interest securities and essentially lend them

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 4>money to corporates and governments and banks and insurers, but

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 4>are chasing sort of a return there.

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 3>But if they're charging three percent for mortgage, then.

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 4>They're probably paying out about one one percent to fixed

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 4>interest investors.

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 3>If indust rates go from three to.

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 4>Seven, then the generally those fixed interest investors are going

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 4>to be demanding an extra four percent for their money.

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 4>So no, it's not it's not a tax on the

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 4>know on people with mortgages. The return doesn't go to

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 4>the banks, it doesn't go to the government. It tends

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 4>to go to either depositors or fixed interests investors who

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 4>are putting up the money which are fixed interests essentially

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 4>loans to governments and corporates and insurance companies and infrastructure

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 4>projects and all that sort of stuff. So they're the

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 4>ones who tend to be picking up the tends to

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 4>be somebody on the other side. People people need to

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 4>borrow and people have got they need to invest, and

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 4>that's the tent.

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 2>There's very good answer.

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all kinds back around a strength dividends, doesn't it really?

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>On the banks there was periods for their payout ratio.

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Was unbelievably high.

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>There was periits for they were paying out certain eighty

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>percent on on that. So so that if you wonder

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what keeps the self the self funded investors taking along

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in Australia, it's there are frank dividends which invariably, I

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>might say, and most and most reliably does actually come

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>from the banks.

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I hope that was useful to you. Andrew.

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Similarly, another another colorful, another colorful question from Dave. This

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is this question is funny. I'm a loyal listener since inception.

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Dave. Often on my tractors, he said, iPods

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>on his tractor, and I don't think I've missed one.

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Good. Seems to me.

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Interest rates are a dumb ass way to reign in inflation.

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>That's his first point. We'll take that on board, and

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>then and then we'll take his second point, which is

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhat idiosyncratic, but he yes, yes, it's generally seeing that

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are a very crude, rough way to reign

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in inflation, but it's how they do it.

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 2>And I would say to you, Dave, once upon a time.

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>A year old enough to remember, they used to do

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in a much more brutal way. And famously the US

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Fed reserve under whole Vulker in the Vulkra regime, I

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think was the seventies, inflation was really out of control.

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>He managed to get inflation under control by a brutal

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>on signaled interest rate rises where basically the America woke

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>up one day in interest rates were like much higher

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and it forced the country intro recession. And yes, it worked.

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But these days banks don't do that. They signal. Do

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you notice they call it what they called it jaw boning,

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and they signal continually, and.

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 2>He noticed it increases in rates. So we had many

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 2>of them.

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Each one was only a quarter of a percent. So

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't do that anymore. So it's not as bad

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>as it used to be, but it's it's one of

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the least worst options I think available to the bankers,

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to the central bankers. Now, the question, he says, is

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>why not leverage supersystem to whack another ten on high

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>earners and keep it aside and available when the next

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>downturn comes. This protect the heavy lifting from wage earners.

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I start people like me spending with Gay abandon when

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I should be putting my head in. I'm an olive producer,

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>though olives are not my main game. That's why he's

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that a tractor obviously right. Well, yes, yes, so Dave's

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>suggestion not unusual now in the future or in the past.

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Is PA's the rich somehow yet at them again that

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>never stops. The three million super plan is very much

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the latest example of that, Dave. I don't know what

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>your particular, your particular idea, Dave is like really on

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the on the far end of the spectrum, I think

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>for this sort of thing. But while we're on it,

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and why we have Bruce on the show, Bruce, you

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>might just could you explain why there's such a rumpus

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>over this new super tax that kicks in a three

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>million You would have thold there's not a lot of

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>people that have three million and super But have you

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a sense of why the tax is so controversial, what

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>your clients think it's.

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 4>I think the legislation came out in recent weeks and

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 4>I haven't. I haven't read it, and I haven't read

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 4>enough about it to make to do it. But the

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 4>reason that there was a lot of consternation about it was, well,

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 4>how exactly is this going to work? You know, is

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 4>a tax only on income of capital above three million

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 4>dollars or that you're going to be paying the thirty

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 4>percent on?

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Exactly?

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 4>How was this going to be done? And the usual

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 4>way of writing new laws and bills is to put

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 4>something out there, go back to industry to find out

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 4>what they think about it, poke holes in it, et cetera.

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 4>And you know, I think that's sort of that will

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 4>continue to happen on this occasion. I'm not sure exactly

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 4>where it's gone. But the reason, yeah, there was so

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 4>much consternation is that it was sort of an announcement

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 4>of this new extra fifteen percent tax going from fifteen

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 4>and thirty percent above three million dollars, but the rules

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 4>were sort of, yeah, we'll fige out the rules later.

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, the rules. And what they're.

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Enraged people was the notion that unlike other taxes all

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>across the system, even inside super this one would be

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on what they called paper profits, on on realized games. Yeah,

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and if you have unrealized losses, you don't get them back.

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>It carries forward like like CGT and I think that's

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but it looks like it's coming down the line.

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 2>It looks to me like nothing's going to stop it.

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't I don't think so.

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 4>No, they'll find a way of making it work. They

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 4>generally do, so, Yeah, it's not it's not something that

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 4>is likely to be stopped. The history of super innovation

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 4>and rule changes and law changes over the years is

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, something that I've covered.

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 3>At nauseam in various ways over over a long period

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 3>of time. But they're constantly juggling around a little bit

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 3>in order to try to make it fairer. And you know,

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 3>when this particular rule came out.

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Was announced that they're going to be moving towards it,

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 4>it's probably only impacting one or two percent of the population,

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 4>was I think roughly the number. And even the people

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 4>who were in that situation were you were understanding, Okay,

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 4>well you know, I probably nobody's going to cry for

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 4>me about this.

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 2>So no one's going to march to the streets for you.

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no one's going to march the stratos. You sort

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 4>of got to move it and deal deal with it.

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 4>I do remember this, James, back in in another time

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 4>in place when you and I were doing some things together.

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 4>There was when they announced the transfer balance cap at

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 4>one point six billion dollars the time, who had he

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 4>and his wife about thirty million dollars in a.

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Self manage super fun in a pension.

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 4>So they were earning, you know, they had thirty million dollars,

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 4>probably more than that a little bit later on that

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 4>was earning let's say seven to ten percent a year.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 4>It was sort of, you know, a a very large

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.439
<v Speaker 4>amount of money that they were earning off this two

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 4>to three million dollars a year on which absolutely zero

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 4>tax was being paid, and reduced the transfer balance cap.

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:11.839
<v Speaker 4>They had to roll back all but one point six

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 4>million each, so three point two million, so about twenty

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 4>seven million that had to go back, and it was

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 4>then taxed to ten or fifteen percent, and that so

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 4>that that two to three million roughly that they were earning,

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 4>they were going to start paying ten or fifteen cent.

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 4>I had a chat chats with him about it at

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 4>the time, and it was just sort of, you know, look,

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 4>we had a pretty good run there for for a

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.879
<v Speaker 4>long time. We paid no tax on a very Chancela said,

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 4>And I think I think ultimately most of the people

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.359
<v Speaker 4>who were in that band of having more than three

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 4>million dollars, which can be six million for a couple,

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 4>it's three million dollars each for a couple of Super time,

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 4>I sort of understand that, Yeah, okay, well there's there's We.

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Probably had a pretty good run for a pretty good

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 3>period of time.

0:36:55.760 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 4>And I don't see many people sort of mining heavily

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 4>about us.

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Yes they are, it's interesting, you say, and it's it's

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>actually what I've poked a lots of top advisers about this,

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>and they generally say what you're saying, Bruce, that that

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>people who are lucky enough to have that level of money,

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and remember for a couple of effectively, once you're over

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>six million and super, that's when when the new tax

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>comes in. But what they say is, we knew there

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>was every chance that taxes have drives on Super. We

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>just didn't know that we're going to do it on

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>on realize games, on paper games, which does you know

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you could really be caught very very badly if you were,

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're.

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 2>An earnest investor in startups and all that sort of thing, and.

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:38.359
<v Speaker 1>You certainly you know you don't have them, you don't

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>have the mind that you have in your pocket, but

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you're paying tax on it before you get it. That

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you can see how that would actually plain people on that.

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 1>I think is the residual argument and is not over yet.

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, terrific, Bruce Pick you very much, great to have

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 2>your honors.

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Chimes, And that was Bruce Brammell of course of

0:37:55.360 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Brammel Financial h and he is an advisor regularly

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on the show and contribuser as well to the finance pages.

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, folks, thank you, and let's have some more questions,

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the email and money puzzle at the Australian

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com dot au.

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:12.879
<v Speaker 2>Talk to you very soon.