Speaker 1: Lord, this is Outsiders.
Speaker 2: Good morning, and welcome to Outsiders the show. That is
Speaker 2: to alban Easy's woeful labor Party, the hypocritical waste of space,
Speaker 2: Teals and the noxious Greens. What the late great Tom
Speaker 2: Petty was to writing unforgettable tune that is just perfect
Speaker 2: for satirizing.
Speaker 1: He's an old gay.
Speaker 3: As Demandia can't lead us and the country is screwed.
Speaker 3: Tell some big glays barely speak exnglish, sniff's chin and
Speaker 3: their mom's here too.
Speaker 4: Yes, that spoof of Tom Petty's free Fallen hit from
Speaker 4: the nineties is satirically credited Joe Biden and the Alzheimer's
Speaker 4: on Common Man Records and was put out on Truth
Speaker 4: Social by none other than Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Goes the wrong way when he leaves his speeches, gets lusty.
Speaker 5: In the White House yard. All the dem.
Speaker 1: Say that we should re elect him?
Speaker 6: How can he run.
Speaker 1: When walking is hard? All we need?
Speaker 7: Now, who's a great hook at a memorable chorus to
Speaker 7: sum it all up?
Speaker 8: Jokey joke, And while Joe Biden keeps on stumbling all
Speaker 8: over himself.
Speaker 2: Let's grab the latest outside of his news. Well, what
Speaker 2: a big surprise. James and Rita that the Left eating
Speaker 2: themselves on the weekend as usual. Victorian Premiere jain To
Speaker 2: Alan says she is disgusted by the pro Palestine activists
Speaker 2: who gate crashed the Victorian Labor State Conference where six
Speaker 2: ridiculous motions on Gaza were carried on Saturday.
Speaker 1: Have a look.
Speaker 2: What a surprise reads are the Victorian labor parties struggling
Speaker 2: with pro Palestinian activists who'd have thought, well.
Speaker 4: They've panded strongly to them, but they want more and more.
Speaker 4: And it's very interesting to see the Victorian Premier come
Speaker 4: out so strongly say she's disgusted by the homophobia, anti semitism,
Speaker 4: of the violence of what she has seen at the
Speaker 4: State conference and Mooney Valley race course. But you look
Speaker 4: at the resolutions that were put forward and how strongly they.
Speaker 5: Were passed by the membership there.
Speaker 4: That tells you everything you need to know. This isn't
Speaker 4: just some fringe group. These votes are getting up and
Speaker 4: let me tell you one of these ones. It's a
Speaker 4: utilized international forums to demand an end to the perpetual
Speaker 4: military occupation and human rights violations which are in flag
Speaker 4: or and violation of international law and advocate for the
Speaker 4: implementation of you and resolutions will provide a solution for
Speaker 4: peace and security. Do they want Australia to come out
Speaker 4: and demand that Israel cease these operations, to basically declare
Speaker 4: Israel guilty of gross human rights violations. I mean, it
Speaker 4: is just incredible to see this happening. And as I
Speaker 4: think Josh Burn said and other Jewish advocates have said,
Speaker 4: you're essentially here rewarding Hamas for their behavior by that, because.
Speaker 1: That's what the Labor Party have done.
Speaker 7: James Well, I mean, you know, Rita, you said that
Speaker 7: these resolutions are about asking Israel to cease various activities,
Speaker 7: but ultimately what they're about is asking Israel to cease
Speaker 7: to exist. I mean, because that's of all of this,
Speaker 7: all of this stuff is very pro Hamas in the
Speaker 7: at the end of the day, it all winds up
Speaker 7: playing into Hamas's hands, I mean, calling for Israel to
Speaker 7: release its quote political prisoners. Remember that Sinwar, the guy
Speaker 7: who's the head of Hamas, was exchanged in one of
Speaker 7: those prisoner swaps years ago, I think for Gilad Shalit.
Speaker 7: And the amazing thing though about this, though, is that
Speaker 7: you know, you look at this, you look at what's
Speaker 7: going on, and this is what happens. In some ways,
Speaker 7: I kind of like to see the consequences of the actions,
Speaker 7: because Labor in Victoria particularly has flirted for years, you know,
Speaker 7: not just with the anti Israel stuff, not just with
Speaker 7: you know, the fringe anti Semitic stuff, but also with Marxism,
Speaker 7: with anti Westernism, because that's ultimately you know, I think
Speaker 7: if we just are reductive about this and talk about
Speaker 7: this as a conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, the
Speaker 7: way it's playing out in the West, it's a much
Speaker 7: bigger fight, and it's a fight within the West because
Speaker 7: you know, the people who are out demonstrating against Israel
Speaker 7: and against America and for Iran and for Hamas, you know,
Speaker 7: they're Westerners, right, So this is a war that's going
Speaker 7: on within the West, and those forces have all been
Speaker 7: stoked by left wing parties Labor here, the Democrats, the
Speaker 7: hard left in the United States to get to where
Speaker 7: we are today. It's like, well, they've created this monster,
Speaker 7: they have created the master of these demonstrations, and now
Speaker 7: they're reaping what they've sold with this at this Labor conference.
Speaker 7: But unfortunately, now they have no ability to put this
Speaker 7: horrendous gen back in the bottle.
Speaker 4: Well, and if they thought that vote at the UN
Speaker 4: that broke seventy plus years of bipartisanship was going to
Speaker 4: silence these factions.
Speaker 5: Well they were very wrong.
Speaker 4: Indeed, all it has done is embolden them, have them
Speaker 4: demanding more and more, and they're vulnerable. And they know
Speaker 4: they're vulnerable because they've got several electorates with large Muslim
Speaker 4: populations which could determine the outcomes of those elections. So
Speaker 4: they know that this is a buind they're in. But
Speaker 4: you have to ask if those voters are going to
Speaker 4: vote on this issue and this issue alone, they're not
Speaker 4: going to give the vote to the coalition. Do they
Speaker 4: really think they're going to lose these seats to the Greens,
Speaker 4: because the Greens are their biggest threat there. I know
Speaker 4: they may have independents who run on a single issue,
Speaker 4: as we saw happen in the UK recently with the
Speaker 4: council elections.
Speaker 5: But I do wonder also whether they jumping at.
Speaker 4: Shadows James, whether they really are in danger of having
Speaker 4: these voters abandon them on this issue.
Speaker 9: Where are they going to go?
Speaker 7: Well, there is a lot of concern I know in
Speaker 7: Western Sydney, certainly after what happened with Dye Lee in Fowler,
Speaker 7: which of course was supposed to be Christina Kanneely's seat
Speaker 7: at the last election and she came out as a
Speaker 7: strong community independent there there is a big concern that
Speaker 7: these independent candidates rise up and if they do, you know,
Speaker 7: they split the vote.
Speaker 6: You know they can split that vote.
Speaker 5: James, it's what a preferential system.
Speaker 7: So yeah, but the prefaces don't necessarily flow. And if
Speaker 7: they're furious, and if they're furious at Labor for what
Speaker 7: they perceive as being too pro Israel, you know they've
Speaker 7: got a big problem. And this is why you know,
Speaker 7: you had that whole situation last week or the other
Speaker 7: week where Jason Clair got spacked down by Anthony Albanezi
Speaker 7: over this because he went far too out there for
Speaker 7: his cinem I think Blaxland out in Western Sydney.
Speaker 4: You say he went fi that a Labor senator for
Speaker 4: Tima Payman come out and say from the River to
Speaker 4: the Sea, the phrase that Anthony Albernizi said encourages violence.
Speaker 6: Well, this is a real test.
Speaker 2: Why hasn't Anthony Albanezi come out and got rid of
Speaker 2: Fatima payment. It's absolutely disgraceful. West Australian centator. She's twenty
Speaker 2: nine years old. This is where multiculturalism has taken us.
Speaker 2: Labor has built this kind of coalition of all the
Speaker 2: fringe groups that they can find, and it's coming back
Speaker 2: to bite them hard, as it is doing in England,
Speaker 2: where you now have, for example, in a place that's
Speaker 2: supposedly as trendy and progressive as Brighton and Hove, they
Speaker 2: now have a mayor who is a hardcore Muslim activist.
Speaker 2: And the reality is you cannot ultimately combine hardcore Muslim
Speaker 2: values with hardcore lgbt IQ, progressive et cetera.
Speaker 1: Values. It doesn't work.
Speaker 2: But Labor has built this coalition. Now it's coming hard
Speaker 2: to bite them. You've got at those demonstrations at the
Speaker 2: Labor Party in Victoria. They're accusing the activists, the pro
Speaker 2: Palestinian activists, the Labor Party are accusing them of being homophobic,
Speaker 2: et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, all the things they themselves,
Speaker 2: Labor have failed to pull into control in the last
Speaker 2: decade or so. David Shubridge the Greens MP here in
Speaker 2: New South Wales. He is well reter tweeted from the
Speaker 2: River to the Sea Palestine Shelby Free. That's a member
Speaker 2: of the New South Wales Parliament and one who holds
Speaker 2: enormous sway in the New South Wales palm.
Speaker 1: What are they going to do about that, James?
Speaker 6: Well, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 7: But I want to go back to this part of
Speaker 7: a payment thing because this is a real test for
Speaker 7: Anthony Albanzi.
Speaker 6: And you know, sure is alban easy. You know, his.
Speaker 7: Personal views on this I think are pretty sensible. I
Speaker 7: think that he is not, you know, part of the
Speaker 7: hall from the River to the Sea group.
Speaker 2: But because it was his idea, it was James to
Speaker 2: signed to vote.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I know, Recogi the same guys well as well. No,
Speaker 7: I mean if you look at his history on this stuff,
Speaker 7: if you look at his history of itself, this is.
Speaker 2: Never siding Palestinian rallies way back in when he was
Speaker 2: a student.
Speaker 7: Yeah, okay, but this this issue with this is this
Speaker 7: issue with payment.
Speaker 6: This is the test. This is the test.
Speaker 7: Is he going to h kick her out? If he doesn't, then,
Speaker 7: you know, because he.
Speaker 5: Knows about them in a.
Speaker 7: Jack Yeah exactly, But not only that, Senate votes, Senate votes,
Speaker 7: the whole thing comes down to the fact that the
Speaker 7: Senate is such a precarious place right now for the government,
Speaker 7: so they can't even if he wanted to, he can't
Speaker 7: ditch her, He can't get rid of anybody because they
Speaker 7: cannot afford to not be able to get legislations of
Speaker 7: the Senate, which is such a crazy loge of people already.
Speaker 6: So this is a huge issue for them.
Speaker 7: But on the multiculturalis point Row and I think you've
Speaker 7: made it really important point. But there's more to it
Speaker 7: than just the conflict within the left between these different factions.
Speaker 7: It's the fact that they have celebrated not just three years,
Speaker 7: for decades now, this idea where you maintain a loyalty
Speaker 7: to someplace other than Australia, that's wherever you're from. So
Speaker 7: the idea then is that you suddenly have people coming
Speaker 7: in and voting on issues that have nothing to do
Speaker 7: with Australia. And this is going to be the great
Speaker 7: challenge for Australia going forward is and there's a big
Speaker 7: migration review that's coming up. The government is working on
Speaker 7: it right now. There's going to be a big review
Speaker 7: coming up on how do we go about making people
Speaker 7: Australia's and I think the government's going to fluff this completely.
Speaker 6: Let's have a.
Speaker 2: Look at young Fatima here, Let's have a listen to her.
Speaker 2: This is where multiculturalism is landed Australia in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 10: This is a genocide and we need to stop pretendingwise
Speaker 10: from the river to the sea, Kalestine will be free.
Speaker 2: So here's a young lady whose parents came from Afghanistan,
Speaker 2: were welcomed into Australia, into Western Australia, wonderful part of
Speaker 2: the world, most embracing, warm embrace, and has had all.
Speaker 1: The advantages of Australian citizenship.
Speaker 2: Of great education, great lifestyle there in Wa. I'm sure
Speaker 2: the parents are happier there. I'm assuming that they're happier
Speaker 2: there in Wa than they were in Afghanistan. And yet
Speaker 2: this young lady has reached the point where she's quite
Speaker 2: happy to call for the genocide of Jews and the
Speaker 2: abolition of the state of Israel on the other side
Speaker 2: of the world, courtesy of her position in the Australian Parliament.
Speaker 2: If Australia thinks that's a successful multicultural outcome, I'm afraid
Speaker 2: I disagree.
Speaker 4: I'm sure she would have been aware of the media
Speaker 4: reports making it clear that her Prime Minister Anthony Albanzi
Speaker 4: was unequivocal in condemning that statement from the River to
Speaker 4: the Sea, saying that he's agreeing that it's one that
Speaker 4: motivates violence. So for her to say those words.
Speaker 1: After all, that deliberately provocable.
Speaker 4: And she is challenging Anthony Albanese and this is a
Speaker 4: massive test of his leadership. Do you mean what you say?
Speaker 4: Can do you do your words?
Speaker 1: Are you a leader? Are you a leader?
Speaker 2: But let me also just finish the point here that
Speaker 2: it's come out this week in Afghanistan, the Taliban, the
Speaker 2: cruelty of the Taliban to young women, to your girls
Speaker 2: is beyond belief.
Speaker 1: Yet here's a.
Speaker 2: Woman whose parents are from Afghanistan. I haven't heard her
Speaker 2: criticizing the Taliban. I haven't heard her defending the women
Speaker 2: of Afghanistan who are in a dreadful, dreadful state at
Speaker 2: the moment.
Speaker 1: Why doesn't she think about that?
Speaker 7: James, Well exactly, I mean, you know, and you said
Speaker 7: before Rowan, you said, well, she's a product of Australian education.
Speaker 7: Well yeah, and actually I think that that's the way
Speaker 7: a lot of educators would like to see people come
Speaker 7: up and come out of it seeing things like that. Yeah, no,
Speaker 7: I mean, she would never sit in the parliament in Afghanistan,
Speaker 7: to the staff they even have in parliament, because she's
Speaker 7: a woman, you know. And yet here she is and
Speaker 7: she's and she's attacking Western values in Israel and all
Speaker 7: of this.
Speaker 4: Well, there are millions of women who are subjugated in
Speaker 4: Muslim majority countries. And it's not just Fatima. The feminist
Speaker 4: movement in general is very much silent on their plant.
Speaker 4: And you see these women who with green hair and
Speaker 4: fringes cut like this, donning kafirs and he jabs and
Speaker 4: marching and doing solidarity, wearing he jabs in solidarity.
Speaker 5: And you wonder.
Speaker 4: You know, there are women in Iran, Afghanistan, all across
Speaker 4: many countries where they are risking their lives fighting to
Speaker 4: be frequent people.
Speaker 7: These are the s This is the same political tribe
Speaker 7: here of people who will happily go out Today they're
Speaker 7: in kafirs and they're demonstrating from Palestine. You know, yesterday
Speaker 7: they would have been putting on handmaid's tail outfits and
Speaker 7: demonstrating against the Morrison government. I mean This is how
Speaker 7: utterly inconsistent the Left is when it comes to women.
Speaker 7: But the thing is, the left constantly, constantly sacrifices women
Speaker 7: to the goals of its broader kind of revolutionary cause.
Speaker 7: Sometimes you know they're in favor of women when it
Speaker 7: can be used, only when it can be used as
Speaker 7: a political attack against Conservatives, I guess right. But the
Speaker 7: moment you know that's over, you know, then it's all
Speaker 7: back to situation.
Speaker 5: We saw that when Trump was elected.
Speaker 4: We have these massive marches across the Western world. Right
Speaker 4: here in Sydney and Melbourne, the pussy hat marches. Yeah, well,
Speaker 4: I mean, I don't know if I which one I prefer,
Speaker 4: the pussy hats or the the burkers.
Speaker 5: They seem to be favoring these days.
Speaker 4: But then when it comes to LGBTQ rights conflicting women's rights,
Speaker 4: they take the side of the LGBTQ activists them. And
Speaker 4: when it comes to Islamists and women being systematically oppressed
Speaker 4: under Islam, they take the side of the Islamists. So
Speaker 4: it is completely incoherent, but it's in keeping with having
Speaker 4: this anti West position.
Speaker 7: It's that anti West, it's anti West, and it's all
Speaker 7: about power. You know, so whichever group is going to
Speaker 7: be the next one to get them to power, that's
Speaker 7: where they go with.
Speaker 2: Well, one of the great tragedies as well of multiculturalism
Speaker 2: was the attempt, if you like, during the Voice campaign
Speaker 2: last year by large elements and organizations within the Jewish
Speaker 2: community to kind of advocate for the voice, saying yes
Speaker 2: for the voice.
Speaker 1: One one organization didn't that was the Australian Jewish Association,
Speaker 1: but most most did.
Speaker 2: And yet come October seventh, where was the gratitude. No,
Speaker 2: the Indigenous activist movement, not Indigenous Australia are only to
Speaker 2: the indigenous activists all immediately sided again with Hamas and.
Speaker 1: Hamas and the Palestinians are one and the same.
Speaker 2: Let's stop beating around the bush and trying to delineate
Speaker 2: between Hamas and the Palestinians. Hamas are the elected government
Speaker 2: of the Ghazan branch of the Palestinian community and have
Speaker 2: their largely full support. And we now learned as well
Speaker 2: in the last few days that Fatar and the Palestinian
Speaker 2: authority did have activists involved in the Hamas atrocities of
Speaker 2: October seven.
Speaker 1: So let's stop this kind of this whole separate thing.
Speaker 1: There is a there.
Speaker 2: Are clear links between Hamas and the broader Palestinian communities.
Speaker 4: I think it's unfair to say all Palestinians back harm.
Speaker 4: There was an election, they would probably still be re
Speaker 4: elected in the West Bank, strongly in the West Bank,
Speaker 4: and that's why they haven't had elections in the world
Speaker 4: spend for a long time. So, but I mean, there
Speaker 4: are obviously people there who keep their opinions very quiet,
Speaker 4: because if you speak out against a mass in Gaza,
Speaker 4: you are.
Speaker 1: You're finished, exactly kill And those people need to be supported,
Speaker 1: those people need to be.
Speaker 7: Well, it's just the thing like like you know, we've
Speaker 7: seen horrific video this week coming around out on x
Speaker 7: for the Twitter of Hamas shooting Palestinians, attacking Palestinians or
Speaker 7: trying to get some of the aid that the West
Speaker 7: is trying to send in. So, you know, let's not
Speaker 7: have any qualms about the fact that Hamas is a
Speaker 7: really you know, it's a mafia thug like organization that
Speaker 7: rules the places with an irony. Yes, it's a very
Speaker 7: much a Nazi type organization. But that said, what you
Speaker 7: say is correct, Paul. After Paul Survey Aversory has shown,
Speaker 7: you know, large support for Hamas, and we only had
Speaker 7: to see the vision of on October seventh when they
Speaker 7: brought hostages back in the back of pickup trucks, in
Speaker 7: the back of youtes, the cheering, the celebration, the beating
Speaker 7: with sticks, the reports we've had from hostages who have
Speaker 7: made it out of Gaza that they were tormented by
Speaker 7: civilian Garzians. You know, there were reports that teachers, all
Speaker 7: sorts of people were involved in keeping them captives. So yes, no,
Speaker 7: your point, Rod is absolutely correct that you know the
Speaker 7: Palestine Gazans largely support exactly what happened.
Speaker 1: Trust if you.
Speaker 2: Are going to be a pro Palestinian activist, you've got
Speaker 2: to be prepared to understand the distinctions. You've got to
Speaker 2: be prepared to either condemn Hamas, which we're not hearing
Speaker 2: enough of. And therefore, as we said another David Shubridge,
Speaker 2: for coming out with genocidal pro Palestinian statements, if they're
Speaker 2: not prepared to.
Speaker 7: The demonstrators need to be saying is saying a simple thing.
Speaker 1: They should be.
Speaker 7: Saying, Hamas, release the hostages and surrender, and that is
Speaker 7: what will be the best outcome.
Speaker 4: Fence I don't know what will the world you to
Speaker 4: existing at protests every single week, sometimes multiple protests in
Speaker 4: a week in this country, UK US, across much of
Speaker 4: the West, and we have seen footage of Loan protestes,
Speaker 4: particularly in London, and we've shown the footage right here
Speaker 4: holding up her Massa terrorists sign and being shot, not
Speaker 4: just shouted down, physically attacked.
Speaker 5: Having their sign ripped from their hands.
Speaker 4: And often the Loan protests are holding up a her
Speaker 4: Massa terror sign is the one who's being arrested, so
Speaker 4: they are not only not saying it, they're hostile to
Speaker 4: anybody who would say it. And I think to make
Speaker 4: that distinction, because I think it's a distinction that should
Speaker 4: be made that Palestinian cause and the her Mask cause
Speaker 4: are not the same thing. Then you should be very
Speaker 4: clear at these protests to say we are anti her maass,
Speaker 4: have anti Hamas signs, have free the hostage as signs.
Speaker 5: But we don't see that at.
Speaker 7: That post because it's always Israel's fault. That's what it
Speaker 7: comes down to.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: The reason I was talking about the the Voice was
Speaker 2: that efforts to close the gap between Indigenous Australians and
Speaker 2: the rest of the country and a reporting the Australian
Speaker 2: newspaper yesterday quote stalled during the Voice enterprise there you go.
Speaker 1: So all that effort by the alban Easy government and.
Speaker 2: Those who are responsible for closing the gap that means
Speaker 2: bringing raising the living standards and prosperity of Indigenous Australians.
Speaker 2: They are the ones now saying, you know what, Labor,
Speaker 2: all our efforts, you know, were stalled by the Voice.
Speaker 1: So well done, Labor.
Speaker 2: You even stuffed that up ideology, idiocy and incompetency at
Speaker 2: every turn.
Speaker 7: Well Rowan, you do you know I think that you know,
Speaker 7: in some ways, yes, it's bad that the Voice campaign
Speaker 7: stalled progress on closing the gap. We all want to
Speaker 7: close the gap. But can you just imagine how bad
Speaker 7: it would be if the Voice had actually passed, like
Speaker 7: you want to talk about something that would stop closing
Speaker 7: the gap. It would be spending all of this money
Speaker 7: on this huge bureaucracy that would then go pay itself
Speaker 7: to go, you know, take reports and do things, interfere
Speaker 7: with parliamentary legislation and do everything else it was going
Speaker 7: to do, and not actually do anything to close the gap.
Speaker 7: I mean, you know, like this is that was a
Speaker 7: good result. Let's not forget the fact that this was
Speaker 7: a very very.
Speaker 2: Great result, but labor ignoring it, just flowering ahead in
Speaker 2: all the different states with their own voices. But the
Speaker 2: point is the reality is that this sort of virtue
Speaker 2: signaling we're left wing ideological campaign actually has negative impacts
Speaker 2: on Indigenous Australians who are there on the ground and
Speaker 2: they're the ones calling it out there you go.
Speaker 4: We had so much focus in recent weeks on the
Speaker 4: treatment of women, violence against women, so many women being
Speaker 4: victims of domestic violence in particular, and again we saw
Speaker 4: the activist class there be largely silent about the overrepresentation
Speaker 4: of Indigenous women in those statistics. Now more than thirty
Speaker 4: times likely Indigenous women are of being hospitalized due to
Speaker 4: domestic violence the non Indigenous women. That is such a shameful,
Speaker 4: incredible statistic, that the stats there are just off the charts,
Speaker 4: and yet there's this hesitancy to talk about it, to
Speaker 4: put it on the record because they want to, I
Speaker 4: don't know, because they scared of being called racist. I
Speaker 4: don't know if they're scared of being pointing the finger
Speaker 4: at a community who really does need to address this issue.
Speaker 4: But the likes of just Internamba jimber Price have talked
Speaker 4: about this four years and they've also about they do,
Speaker 4: but they also talk about how things like the Voice,
Speaker 4: the Australia Day Debate, the Flag Debate, all this nonsense
Speaker 4: actually takes the attention away from the areas that need
Speaker 4: the focus. But when do you ever hear these activists
Speaker 4: talk about this issue. I would have thought that would
Speaker 4: be that and the Plan of Children would be the
Speaker 4: number one and two issues.
Speaker 2: You talk about the hypocrits who don't care about the
Speaker 2: real problems that they pretend to.
Speaker 7: The problem is so many of the activists who are
Speaker 7: you know, working in the domestic violence space, you know,
Speaker 7: critically on the political side of things. You know, it's
Speaker 7: not so much about solving the problem where there are
Speaker 7: real problems, but it's doing this whole sort of societal
Speaker 7: remaking of society tearing that we've got we've got to
Speaker 7: we've got to go and you know, re educate all men.
Speaker 7: You know, we've got to talk about toxic masculinity. We've
Speaker 7: got to you know, do this and that, and it's
Speaker 7: about that sort of vibe. It's not about actually going
Speaker 7: where there's real issues. Horrible issues and solving those hard
Speaker 7: problems on the ground, because it's much more interesting for
Speaker 7: them to sit in conference rooms and talk about, you.
Speaker 6: Know, how terrible male society is. We've got to remake
Speaker 6: that and the.
Speaker 4: Conduct of boys at privately. Ye risk a jokes. I
Speaker 4: mean they're very, very keen to draw a direct line
Speaker 4: between risk a jokes and UNPC language and violence against women.
Speaker 4: But drawing a line between women who are thirty times
Speaker 4: more likely to end up hospitalized due to domestic violence
Speaker 4: and the issue, no, that's too much now.
Speaker 2: Also this week, to this shame of the Australian government,
Speaker 2: they passed the Digital ID Bill. So a digital ID
Speaker 2: has established an economy wide digital ID system which allows
Speaker 2: financial organizations and providers to apply and join the government's
Speaker 2: digital ID platform. It sounds they tell you it's all voluntary,
Speaker 2: the benefits will.
Speaker 1: Be for an easier way to do things.
Speaker 2: Et cetera, all of which may be true. But the
Speaker 2: problem is a digital ID is absolutely the gateway to
Speaker 2: a technocracy and digital tyranny, intentional or otherwise, the sort.
Speaker 1: Of tyranny we saw during COVID.
Speaker 2: In Canada, when people have had their bank accounts and
Speaker 2: their access to money, completely denied them by the government
Speaker 2: because the government didn't approve of them.
Speaker 1: That was just a foretaster in China.
Speaker 2: Of course, the whole social credit system, a digital idea,
Speaker 2: allows complete control of the population.
Speaker 1: This is the problem. We're talking about it a bit
Speaker 1: more later.
Speaker 2: But the coalition voted against it, but really did nothing
Speaker 2: to stop it happening, because of course they were the
Speaker 2: ones who introduced the originalid legislation in the last parliament.
Speaker 2: Quickly rita our favorite mister proscutto, Oh what's Mary thin?
Speaker 2: He's apologized privately settled two of the three defamation cases.
Speaker 2: As part of the settlement, mister Pursuito issued a lengthy
Speaker 2: public apology to Kelly j Kean Posey Parker, who we've
Speaker 2: had here on Outsiders, and Melbourne woman Angela Jones we've
Speaker 2: also had here on Outsiders.
Speaker 6: What do you make of it?
Speaker 4: Rita surprise the two ladies accepted this apology. I thought
Speaker 4: the apology was weak. He then did an interview where
Speaker 4: he didn't really seem to defend the apology or it
Speaker 4: was a very bizarre performance from him. Again post apology,
Speaker 4: when the media asked him, does he actually stand by
Speaker 4: the apology, but the more a deeming case, the main
Speaker 4: case that continues, and that is going to be fascinating
Speaker 4: to behold because she is one who I think would
Speaker 4: want more than a week apology.
Speaker 5: I think she wants some measure of.
Speaker 4: Justice, and I think they have tried to negotiate an
Speaker 4: apology in the past or some sort of an acknowledgment
Speaker 4: of mistakes being made. But he didn't come to the party.
Speaker 4: From what I understand, I mean, let's not forget he
Speaker 4: put out a dossier. His office put out a dossier.
Speaker 4: I mean, how silly would you have to be to
Speaker 4: put this stuff in writing? Like the lawyers must just
Speaker 4: be rubbing their hands.
Speaker 5: Go over, here we go, the work starts.
Speaker 1: So what can we say?
Speaker 2: Coming up after the break Reader's reality check, Plus we'll
Speaker 2: be chatting to Natasha Housdorff.
Speaker 1: Are those Israeli settlements legal or not? Let's ask the
Speaker 1: experts a tick.
Speaker 4: You're watching Outsiders with your hosts Rowan spontaneous Combustion, D James,
Speaker 4: Smoldering Coals Morow and Amrita Pane here here to warn
Speaker 4: you that the fun police are coming for something else.
Speaker 4: You may love, something that you enjoy in the privacy
Speaker 4: of your own home.
Speaker 5: Not content with reading Australia wonderfully.
Speaker 4: Useful plastic straws and bags.
Speaker 5: The fun police, or should that be the safety police, are.
Speaker 4: Coming for your wood heaters and open fireplaces. Yes, ASTHMA
Speaker 4: Australias behind a push to ban wood fires in new homes.
Speaker 4: The charity that receives millions in government funding every year,
Speaker 4: posted this demand on social media site x We're urging
Speaker 4: governments to ban wood heaters in new homes in residential
Speaker 4: areas for healthier living and cleaner air. Wood heaters emit
Speaker 4: harmful pollutants into neighborhoods that damage health. Efficient electric heating
Speaker 4: supports healthier homes and communities.
Speaker 5: How about a big, fat no.
Speaker 4: How about we do not ban something as essential as
Speaker 4: fire in the name of safety. For one, wood heaters
Speaker 4: and fireplaces are one of life's great pleasures. Who doesn't
Speaker 4: love throwing another log in the fire while enjoying a
Speaker 4: glass of red and a good book on a cold
Speaker 4: winters evening. In Victoria, the idiot state government has already
Speaker 4: banned gas connections in new homes. That ban came into
Speaker 4: place this year, meaning any new residential buildings that includes
Speaker 4: all subdivisions and public and social housing will be exclusively
Speaker 4: connected to electricity to supposedly save us from catastrophic climate change.
Speaker 4: Of course, our bills are also set to skyrocket further
Speaker 4: so no gas heating and now ASTHMA Australia wants to
Speaker 4: ban wood heaters too. Let's hear from ANGELA can't write,
Speaker 4: Policy manager at ASTHMA Australia.
Speaker 5: She was on throe aw this week.
Speaker 11: We definitely want to see more access to renewable energy
Speaker 11: and more secure renewable energy supply. I guess again we're
Speaker 11: looking at thirteen percent of people and the focus being
Speaker 11: on residential areas, so we need to have secure renewable,
Speaker 11: affordable energy for the vice majority of people who are
Speaker 11: currently using electric heating and of course cooling in summer
Speaker 11: with increasing heat waves and temperatures.
Speaker 5: Oh dear, talk about an own goal.
Speaker 4: ASTHMA Australia, which has probably never had any backlash or
Speaker 4: bad publicity well suddenly being racial on social media by
Speaker 4: irate asthmatics telling them to stay in their lane.
Speaker 5: Let's look at some examples. Katie said, no, thank you.
Speaker 4: I'm asthmatic, have been my whole life and I don't
Speaker 4: want to see any forms of energy to heat or
Speaker 4: cool our homes. Bad Timmy said, no, thank you. I
Speaker 4: have asthma. I love wood heaters and firepits.
Speaker 5: Get out of our lives.
Speaker 4: If people with asthma don't like smoke, hide inside. Denise said,
Speaker 4: I have chronic asthma. I don't need your silly interference.
Speaker 4: Don't take our wood heaters. And Paul summed up the
Speaker 4: sentiments of many when he wrote, imagine making a post
Speaker 4: that could destroy your entire organization because you're so disconnected
Speaker 4: from the very people you're apparently trying to help. Indeed,
Speaker 4: and if you are suffering from asthma, then you have
Speaker 4: my sympathy of course, but you're not getting my fireplace.
Speaker 2: Well, we've been talking about the division in the Middle
Speaker 2: East which continue to tear apart the fabric of our
Speaker 2: society and around the West as well, with anti Semitism
Speaker 2: at its highest rates since the Second World War. So
Speaker 2: let's bring in the director of UK Lawyers for Israel,
Speaker 2: Natasha Hausdorff, who's here in Australia, I'm pleased to say,
Speaker 2: and is at the moment in Melbourne. Natasha, great to
Speaker 2: see you, Thanks for coming back on Outsiders. Many many
Speaker 2: things we could talk about, but I just wanted to quickly.
Speaker 2: You are a lawyer, you're an expert on this topic.
Speaker 2: One of the things that often comes up is, oh,
Speaker 2: the settlements. Israel's got these settlements, so you know they're illegal,
Speaker 2: they shouldn't be there.
Speaker 1: Can you give us your take briefly on the.
Speaker 2: Legality or otherwise of the settlements throughout Judea, Samaria and
Speaker 2: other parts of Israel.
Speaker 12: Good morning, Well, it's very good to be with you.
Speaker 12: Of course, the allegation of illegal settlements is primarily based
Speaker 12: on two full premises, and they are both to do
Speaker 12: with the application of international law. The first is with
Speaker 12: respect to the status of the territory. And what I
Speaker 12: would urge any lawyers or even interested individuals to do
Speaker 12: is simply seek the proper and equal application of international
Speaker 12: law to Israel as to any state, because there is
Speaker 12: a universal rule of customary international law that determines the
Speaker 12: borders of newly emerging states at the declaration of independence
Speaker 12: in Israel's case, on the fourteenth of May nineteen forty eight.
Speaker 12: Israel has just marked its independence day earlier this week,
Speaker 12: and that rule dictates that a newly emerging state inherits
Speaker 12: the pre existing administrative lines of whateverever unit preceded it.
Speaker 12: Simply put, in nineteen forty eight, when Israel came into
Speaker 12: existence as an operation of that universal rule, it would
Speaker 12: have inherited the pre existing lines that included the West
Speaker 12: Bank and East Jerusalem, what so many misguidedly referred to
Speaker 12: as occupied territory. Now, of course, that territory was occupied
Speaker 12: between nineteen forty eight and nineteen sixty seven by Jordan.
Speaker 5: But when Israel.
Speaker 12: Recovered that territory, it applied a temporary administrative framework to
Speaker 12: it in pursuit of a future peace agreement with Jordan,
Speaker 12: and in anticipation that under the Land for Peace formula
Speaker 12: it would be expected to provide some of that territory
Speaker 12: in exchange for peaceful coexistence with its neighbor. Of course,
Speaker 12: that temporary administrative framework has remained, but the critical thing
Speaker 12: is is that it doesn't change the underlying status of
Speaker 12: the territory. What we have seen since then is the
Speaker 12: creation of a Palestinian autonomy in areas A and B
Speaker 12: of the West Bank. They enjoy self governance in the
Speaker 12: West Bank Palestinian Arabs as they did and continue to
Speaker 12: unfortunately in the Gaza Strip. We've seen the consequences of
Speaker 12: that with the violence I must takeover in two thousand
Speaker 12: and seven. But the fundamental misapplication of international law here
Speaker 12: concerns the status of the territory and the misrepresentation of
Speaker 12: that as occupied. There's another false premise here, which is
Speaker 12: to do with the application of Article forty nine to
Speaker 12: six of the fourth Geneva Convention. This is a prohibition
Speaker 12: on forcible transfer of populations in occupied territory. It's important
Speaker 12: to note that it was drafted in response to the
Speaker 12: Jewish experience in the Holocaust, where they were forcibly deported
Speaker 12: to labor camps and concentration camps and death camps. And
Speaker 12: this provision is being abused and it is being used
Speaker 12: in order to justify this cannard of illegal settlements and
Speaker 12: illegal settlers. It's important to note that these are individuals
Speaker 12: who have moved to jay in Samaria and the West
Speaker 12: Bank of their own volition, as an expression of their
Speaker 12: own free will. This is not state transfer. So just
Speaker 12: alone on those two fuse premises, I think it's important
Speaker 12: that we seek a proper application of international law, not
Speaker 12: to say that it's mind boggling that this idea that
Speaker 12: Jews should not live in certain places just because they
Speaker 12: are Jews has gained currency and legitimacy, and I think
Speaker 12: quite apart from the application of international law and the
Speaker 12: proper application of that, we need to be pushing back
Speaker 12: on such a morally repugnant suggestion.
Speaker 7: Fantastic, James, Well, this morally repugnant suggestion, as you call it,
Speaker 7: I mean, this is historically quite unique. When you talk
Speaker 7: about populations that have moved from one place or another
Speaker 7: have been resetlled after award. So it all comes down
Speaker 7: to an Arab rejectionism, doesn't it. That's quite unique that
Speaker 7: when Israel was formed, unlike any other state that came
Speaker 7: out of the empires that fell after the wars of
Speaker 7: the twentieth century, this was the only one that has
Speaker 7: had and continues to have this third, fourth, fifth generation
Speaker 7: of rejectionism by its neighbors. And this seems to be
Speaker 7: supported by a large segment of the international community, which
Speaker 7: seems really bizarre to me, given as the same international
Speaker 7: community that was responsible for helping to create Israel as
Speaker 7: something for the Jewish people as not a colonial but
Speaker 7: really a decolonizing movement out of the record of the
Speaker 7: automn Empire.
Speaker 12: And the significance of the Jews being the indigenous people.
Speaker 12: I've been learning a lot about indigenoity in the week
Speaker 12: that I've spent now in Australia, and that's a critical message.
Speaker 12: Of course, it's UNRA and the support that is provided
Speaker 12: by the international community for that organization that has perpetuated
Speaker 12: exactly what you're describing. The only people for whom refugee
Speaker 12: status has passed down generation to generation is the Palestinian Arabs,
Speaker 12: and it is historically been on the premise that once
Speaker 12: Israel is destroyed, they will be resettled in Israeli towns
Speaker 12: and territory. But there is an added misapplication of international
Speaker 12: law here. You've referred to situations of occupation and indeed
Speaker 12: transfer of settlers in a real sense, not in the
Speaker 12: false allegations that we're seeing the respect of Israel. But
Speaker 12: this does exist around the world, and Professor Eugen Kondrorovitch
Speaker 12: has conducted a detailed study of all of those instances.
Speaker 12: No Boro, Keerrabach, Northern Cyprus, Russia with respect to Abkhazia
Speaker 12: and Georgia, just to name a few. In none of
Speaker 12: those instances and situations of real transfer of individuals and
Speaker 12: real occupation. Is this allegation made. So again we're faced
Speaker 12: with international law which is being made up and falsely
Speaker 12: applied to Israel, and that has consequences for the international
Speaker 12: legal system more broadly, not just Israel.
Speaker 4: I would suggest we've seen an enormous increase in very
Speaker 4: overt anti city him violent acts.
Speaker 5: We've had police.
Speaker 4: Worn Jews that they are going to be arrested for
Speaker 4: looking openly Jewish during a Palestinian march. And I think
Speaker 4: we've got some footage that has just emerged from London
Speaker 4: of a Jewish man again being identified as a Jew.
Speaker 9: And Chaste Nasa.
Speaker 4: In that scene, the man is identified as a Jew
Speaker 4: and he has to essentially run for his life because
Speaker 4: there's aggressive people.
Speaker 5: Coming after him. What is the solution to that?
Speaker 4: How do you combat that sort of hate and propensity
Speaker 4: for violence.
Speaker 12: Well, the first thing is to recognize it and to
Speaker 12: acknowledge that this modern form of anti Semitism, anti Israel Center,
Speaker 12: or the hate of the Jewish state is not acceptable.
Speaker 12: And the mask slips in those sorts of situations when
Speaker 12: individuals who say, oh, we have no problem with Jews,
Speaker 12: we just object to Israel. Well, those anti Zionists are
Speaker 12: utilizing this modern acceptable face of anti Semitism, and the
Speaker 12: fact that the mask has slipped in so many of
Speaker 12: these recent situations underscores the importance of US drawing a
Speaker 12: line and saying racism of any form is unacceptable. And
Speaker 12: so long as law enforcement and governments around the world
Speaker 12: is seeking to make excuses or hate of the state
Speaker 12: of Israel, which is ultimately due hate, then unfortunately, I
Speaker 12: think we're going to see instances that you've just played
Speaker 12: repeated over and over again.
Speaker 2: Natesha house Storf, thanks so much for coming on Outsiders.
Speaker 2: Hope you enjoy Australia the rest of your trip here,
Speaker 2: and many people have enjoyed seeing you and meeting you,
Speaker 2: and thanks so much for coming on Outsiders this morning.
Speaker 1: What's more, coming up will be chatting as well to
Speaker 1: Richie Kemp. Colonel Richard Kemp will be with us very shortly,
Speaker 1: Wrighty in the studio, don't go away.
Speaker 2: Outside, Well, the world of net zero just gets crazier
Speaker 2: and crazier. I'll be talking about the new vehicles emissions
Speaker 2: standards that pass shamefully in the Parliament this week. The
Speaker 2: Australian Parliament but James, more problems than.
Speaker 1: Just legislation with evs. It would appear.
Speaker 7: Oh well, you know rowand Rita. My good friend Tim
Speaker 7: Blair has a great saying. He always says, nothing green
Speaker 7: ever works. And here's a great example out of this
Speaker 7: out of the UK. So basically, these car manufacturers are
Speaker 7: experimenting with eco friendly breake cables. You know, these are
Speaker 7: the things that connect your pedal, your break pedal when
Speaker 7: you want to stop your vehicle to the breaks and
Speaker 7: then for you know, not dying when you drive anyway.
Speaker 7: They've replaced the durable petroleum based substance that they make
Speaker 7: these strong things with to hold the brake fluid with
Speaker 7: an eco friendly substance that's based on soy. I guess
Speaker 7: who has a taste, so foxes. And in these towns
Speaker 7: in Britain, people are going home and then they're parking
Speaker 7: their car and their driveway and the foxes go, oh gee,
Speaker 7: this looks like a taste. Little they cover, they nibble,
Speaker 7: and then all the brake fluid leaks out. Your brakes
Speaker 7: don't work. And so now people in Britain are having
Speaker 7: to put these basically giant car nappies on their cars
Speaker 7: to keep the foxes from getting it in their crappies.
Speaker 7: It's a big tarpaul and you drive in and you
Speaker 7: basically tap it up like a dumpling to keep the foxes.
Speaker 4: Because those foxes, anyone who's had chickens in the backyard
Speaker 4: is they can get in anywhere.
Speaker 1: So that's all those movies with the car. What's happened,
Speaker 1: it's not It's not a husband or the wife, it's
Speaker 1: the foxes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we've all said we've got problems with a glut
Speaker 2: of evs.
Speaker 1: Around the world.
Speaker 2: So just as Chris Bowen is trying to get you
Speaker 2: to buy an EV, in fact, there's gluts of.
Speaker 1: Them all around the world. There's reports. This is pretty funny.
Speaker 1: In California.
Speaker 2: Have a look at this is the e charging stations
Speaker 2: again something as James said, something green that does not work.
Speaker 1: The E charging.
Speaker 2: Stations rely on these cables to charge them in. But
Speaker 2: here's a bank of them. Look carefully at what's missing
Speaker 2: from all these E charging stations and we'll explain why
Speaker 2: when you get to the end.
Speaker 1: Come on, cut all the Tesla charging cables. You would
Speaker 1: think that it's a protest or's some symbol of activism,
Speaker 1: but it's not it's the Bay Area.
Speaker 6: These things have a lot of copper in them of
Speaker 6: recycling and catching them.
Speaker 2: So all those e charging stations, none of them have
Speaker 2: the plugs because vandals and thieves have gone and stolen
Speaker 2: the copper.
Speaker 4: Who would have predicted that, because we know that happens
Speaker 4: where It's happened with the public transport, we train lines.
Speaker 5: Copper gets stolen, it.
Speaker 6: Happens with cattle. The converters in California.
Speaker 4: Completely predictable, completely predictable. But in the eagerness to thrust
Speaker 4: this crap on us, they don't worry about the consequence.
Speaker 4: And one of the big things you've got to worry
Speaker 4: about EVS is the value of the car once it's
Speaker 4: out of warranty, and that battery may need to be
Speaker 4: replaced at some point, because those batteries can cost forty
Speaker 4: thousand dollars depending on the moment of the car.
Speaker 7: Absolutely, and we all know what happens, you know with
Speaker 7: your phone with a battery. You know, like you're charged
Speaker 7: charge targe and then it gets less and less charge,
Speaker 7: you know. So it's not like I matter if you
Speaker 7: had a car where your fuel tank got smaller every time.
Speaker 4: We're going to have a glut of evs that first
Speaker 4: lotch that people bought the early adopters who are out
Speaker 4: of warranty and they're going to be resold.
Speaker 5: What is the resale value is?
Speaker 4: Do you want to take on an EV where the
Speaker 4: battery may have to be replaced and you've got to
Speaker 4: pay for it out of your pocket?
Speaker 2: Well even the BBC in Britain are now saying, whoops,
Speaker 2: it looks like the EV market is collapsing, just as
Speaker 2: Australia and Cris bow and a rushing and forcing you
Speaker 2: ridiculous legislation which will force up which will force dealers
Speaker 2: to try and persuade you to buy an EV as
Speaker 2: the bottom line.
Speaker 5: That's what the Journey the Baby are wrong.
Speaker 4: Obviously because I heard Chris Bowen say everyone wants evs.
Speaker 4: The stats well, this is a fasclusive Rowan the baby.
Speaker 2: The docks of Europe are loaded with these cheap Chinese evs.
Speaker 13: That know.
Speaker 7: But this is a really interesting thing, Rowan, This is
Speaker 7: a really interesting thing about this. You know, China is
Speaker 7: trying to pump out.
Speaker 5: And conquer it the way you said China there.
Speaker 7: There, but the EV is reader. They're coming from China.
Speaker 7: And that's true. It's a fact, you know. And these
Speaker 7: BYD thinks. This is really fascinating because in the US
Speaker 7: right now, Joe Biden's pushing legislation and is going to
Speaker 7: basically put one hundred percent tariff on these cheap of
Speaker 7: Chinese ev imports, which shows to me that Trump has
Speaker 7: already won the economic debate on protecting America and American
Speaker 7: markets from these cheap Chinese products that are going to
Speaker 7: flood the economy, destroy all of their manufacturing and you know,
Speaker 7: leave everybody with these chromny cars.
Speaker 1: And we're trailing along in the wake of this disaster.
Speaker 2: The damage that Chris Bowen and this insane climate ideology
Speaker 2: is doing to this country and we'll do for decades
Speaker 2: or certainly for years to come unless we change the
Speaker 2: government is just unbelievable.
Speaker 1: But blame it on climb change Rita. It's not. It's
Speaker 1: all the things you can blame on China. You've got
Speaker 1: three of them for us.
Speaker 6: Haven't you got.
Speaker 5: Everything?
Speaker 4: I mean, anything that's happening that you don't like, from
Speaker 4: excuse me, from heart attacks to low TV ratings. They
Speaker 4: can connect to climate change. It's become the all purpose
Speaker 4: solution or issue that you can blame any societal ill
Speaker 4: on anything that happens that you don't.
Speaker 1: Like, blame it on climate change.
Speaker 2: Now, let's go for a little bit of wacademia, the
Speaker 2: wacky world of academia out.
Speaker 6: This is so good.
Speaker 2: Who'd have guessed what happens to millennials when they go
Speaker 2: on a hunger strike.
Speaker 1: Have a listen.
Speaker 13: Over the past pulp of days, we have committed ourselves
Speaker 13: to the peaceful yet extreme form of protests of hunger striker.
Speaker 13: This has led to rapid wheat luss, mental and physical exhaustion,
Speaker 13: difficulty moving, our standing and chess games. One striker was
Speaker 13: forced to keep our campus hospital and medical care for recoveryment.
Speaker 2: Hunger strike would lead to wait well lost and difficulty
Speaker 2: getting up and moving.
Speaker 4: Can we just be clear a lot of these campus
Speaker 4: hunger strikes for twelve hours a day. It's basically issue lasting.
Speaker 4: It's basically what a lot of people do. But they
Speaker 4: do it for sixteen or eighteen hours a day. If
Speaker 4: you're intermittent fasting, they're only doing twelve.
Speaker 5: I mean presumably if you're a legal.
Speaker 1: If you're vegan, you're starting from a pretty anyway.
Speaker 7: You know, these are people whose normal diet is sort
Speaker 7: of you know, bug beans and stuff with the rabbit
Speaker 7: food aisle of the pet spark. But so you know
Speaker 7: they are starting off a really low basis. It is
Speaker 7: so perfectly, you know, exam an exemplar of the whole
Speaker 7: sort of performative nature of this thing. We're going to
Speaker 7: do something really tough until actually gets tough.
Speaker 6: No no, no, no, then we're not going to do that. Well.
Speaker 2: Also, the wonderful world of Woke brings us some great
Speaker 2: lefty lunacy here. Now who would like to take this story?
Speaker 2: The gay animal series that important supportive big So I know.
Speaker 5: It's an important issue.
Speaker 4: I think we need more documentaries on the lgbt Q
Speaker 4: I a plus plus plus community in the animal kingdom,
Speaker 4: and I think we've got some have Have we got
Speaker 4: a grab?
Speaker 6: Yes, everything you had taught us a kid is wrong.
Speaker 1: You make what you want.
Speaker 2: Gaye penguins, bisexual lions, sex changing clown fish.
Speaker 6: This is a queer planet.
Speaker 9: Queenness has always existed.
Speaker 12: It's only in humans that we have such a stigma
Speaker 12: about it.
Speaker 13: The idea of just having two fixed sexes is clearly
Speaker 13: out of style.
Speaker 9: Mother nature is pretty open minded. Sex is not just
Speaker 9: for reproduction.
Speaker 14: It's clear that no matter where you look on our planet,
Speaker 14: nature is full of queer surprises.
Speaker 6: To be honest, we should all probably get laid a
Speaker 6: little more than we do.
Speaker 4: I don't know about you, but I want to hear
Speaker 4: more about these bisexual lines.
Speaker 9: What are they up to?
Speaker 2: The there you go.
Speaker 4: I'm going to try to milk a bull later for
Speaker 4: me because apparently this is just the thing.
Speaker 2: It's just the thing now, Okay, we're going to take
Speaker 2: a short break after that.
Speaker 1: We can't top that. That's that's lefty lunacy peak. Thank you, James.
Speaker 1: That's peak lefty lunacy. We'll be back in a tick,
Speaker 1: Richard Camp. Lots more talking we got to talk about
Speaker 1: here on Outsiders.
Speaker 2: Hello, you're watching Outsiders with the Rita, the tweter made Panahee, our.
Speaker 1: Persian Princess and very own Empress of.
Speaker 2: X James prick him with a fork, Morrow and myself
Speaker 2: at Row and Dan. Yes. This week, after many many
Speaker 2: years of total lonely abstinence and social media chastity, I
Speaker 2: decided it was time to get back in the saddle
Speaker 2: once more and re embrace the sword of Rubby. Fascinating
Speaker 2: exhilarating world of Twitter X yep, I started tweeting again.
Speaker 2: As an aside, I don't think Elon Musk thought through
Speaker 2: the name change from Twitter to x very well. As
Speaker 2: a brand name, Twitter is unique and came with its
Speaker 2: own in built nouns and even a verb. You can tweet,
Speaker 2: You get a tweet, but can you X and X.
Speaker 1: That'sn't wone work. But I digress.
Speaker 2: I decided to get back into tweeting for two very
Speaker 2: simple and related issues. Firstly, since Elon Musk took over Twitter,
Speaker 2: he has been true to his word and fought valiantly
Speaker 2: against censorship and against the pernicious cancel culture that had
Speaker 2: turned the magical potential of social media into for many people,
Speaker 2: a totalitarian hellhole.
Speaker 1: Indeed, the reason I stopped using social media.
Speaker 2: I canceled my Facebook page, gave up on Instagram, and
Speaker 2: abandoned Twitter several years ago was because of the ever
Speaker 2: present threat of being canceled by some howling mob than
Speaker 2: demonized for some perceived politically incorrect misstep. You cannot have
Speaker 2: a free market of ideas and genuine freedom of expression
Speaker 2: if your thoughts and opinions are to be policed by
Speaker 2: the government. Censored by big business or canceled by fear
Speaker 2: of a totalitarian, woke lynch mob. It is impossible to
Speaker 2: overstate the importance of Elon Musk in defending our liberties.
Speaker 2: Whether we like it or not, Digital technology is the
Speaker 2: new public square, and it is up to all lovers
Speaker 2: of democratic freedoms to ensure that that public square remains
Speaker 2: a place in which ideas and opinions, and more importantly,
Speaker 2: criticism of the establishment, holding the powerful to account and
Speaker 2: challenging authority not only exists but thrives. Should social media
Speaker 2: be patrolled and police to remove unacceptable pornography, of course,
Speaker 2: and to protect kids in the vulnerable, absolutely we need
Speaker 2: to do that.
Speaker 1: To guard and to guard against incitement of violence.
Speaker 2: Of course, all of that As with any public square,
Speaker 2: that has always been the case, So that's not new.
Speaker 2: With free speech and freedom expression. There have always been
Speaker 2: legitimate rules and boundaries. But in the so called battle
Speaker 2: of ideas, for a society to evolve to be the
Speaker 2: best it can be, it is just as important, maybe
Speaker 2: even more important, to publicly hear the bad ideas as
Speaker 2: well as the good ones, because it is only through
Speaker 2: exposure to the bad ideas that we are forced to
Speaker 2: confront and evaluate them and all ideas. A classic example
Speaker 2: this week was on Twitter when a former United Nations
Speaker 2: contributing author and retired UCL professor Bill McGuire put out
Speaker 2: this tweet in which he said, quote, if I am
Speaker 2: brutally on honest, the only realistic way I see emissions
Speaker 2: falling as fast as they need to to avoid catastrophic
Speaker 2: climate breakdown is the culing of the human population by
Speaker 2: a pandemic with a very high fatality rate.
Speaker 1: Now should that have been banned? No, of course not.
Speaker 1: I want to know exactly what.
Speaker 2: These mad Malthusian Marxists are thinking and saying. But the
Speaker 2: tweet was subsequently withdrawn by McGuire himself. Not because I
Speaker 2: regret it, he said, but because people took it the
Speaker 2: wrong way.
Speaker 1: I don't think so.
Speaker 2: It was an appalling idea and was rightly exposed as such,
Speaker 2: no censorship required. Better still, it exposed maguire's his of
Speaker 2: crazy climate cult extremism, such as his belief that human
Speaker 2: caused global warming could lead to more earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.
Speaker 2: Like to ask Ian Plimer about that one. In my opinion,
Speaker 2: the man is a full blown nutsjob. This character Maguire
Speaker 2: convinced the planet is doomed because of global boiling.
Speaker 1: He obviously wasn't in Sydney yesterday, by the way, but.
Speaker 2: He's not that much nuttier, I would argue than every
Speaker 2: single individual in the Labor Party, all of the Greens
Speaker 2: and all of the Teals. But the other more important
Speaker 2: reason that finally galvanized me into wanting to re engage
Speaker 2: with social media on a regular basis is because of
Speaker 2: the recent appalling censorship of social media by the federal
Speaker 2: Labor government and their so called E Safety Commissioner, originally
Speaker 2: appointed by Malcolm Turnbull. Enough, said Julie Iman Grant, our
Speaker 2: E Safety Commissioner was supposedly appointed to stop the things
Speaker 2: I just spoke about earlier, pornography, unacceptable material for kids,
Speaker 2: incitement to violence and so on. Now in that pursuit,
Speaker 2: I wish her well and will gladly support appropriate measures
Speaker 2: is she has any. But instead, what is now terrifyingly
Speaker 2: clear is that Ms Grant, who by the way, formally
Speaker 2: worked for Twitter and appears to have some kind of
Speaker 2: grudge against Elon Musk, and her office, appeared to believe
Speaker 2: it is their job to censor political material and political opinions,
Speaker 2: and indeed her most prominent actions have been to attempt
Speaker 2: to ban firstly a midwife who said, correctly in my opinion,
Speaker 2: that men cannot lactate, will ban it.
Speaker 1: She then banned the Canadian.
Speaker 2: Activist Chris Billboard Chris we had on the show the
Speaker 2: other day when he objected it again correctly in my opinion,
Speaker 2: to the appointment of a certain transgender individual to the
Speaker 2: World Health Organization. And then, most famously, she attempted a
Speaker 2: worldwide band on anyone seeing the footage of the attack
Speaker 2: on Bishop mar Mari Emmanuel in his own church. The
Speaker 2: bishop himself said, everyone ash you see it again quite
Speaker 2: rightly in my opinion. A federal court judge last week
Speaker 2: overturned that ban. All three of those bands were in
Speaker 2: my view, completely unacceptable and should disqualify Miss Inman Grant
Speaker 2: from holding such an important position. But it got worse
Speaker 2: this week when Labor, with the help of the Teals,
Speaker 2: Yes all you Teal voting so called free speech advocates,
Speaker 2: the Teals and the Greens with Labor past this disgraceful
Speaker 2: and appalling digital id bill. The Coalition were lukewarm in
Speaker 2: their opposition to it. They voted against it, but they
Speaker 2: should have been out there shouting it down from the rafters,
Speaker 2: and they should be out there committing to repeal it
Speaker 2: the moment they win government.
Speaker 1: Let's hear it.
Speaker 2: Our children and our grandchildren will never forgive us for
Speaker 2: allowing such draconian powers to be given to governments and
Speaker 2: to bureaucrats. As someone pithily pointed out on Twitter, quote,
Speaker 2: if the government sends me an identification card, I shall
Speaker 2: return it with the letter to explain that I do
Speaker 2: not need it.
Speaker 1: I already know who I am.
Speaker 2: That was a Tasmanian Douglas Graham, protesting about the Australia
Speaker 2: card all the way back in the Bob.
Speaker 1: Hawk days in nineteen eighty seven. Nothing has changed. We
Speaker 1: do not need the government to control our identity.
Speaker 2: So from now on I will be imparting what meager
Speaker 2: pulls wisdom I have every day on Twitter on X
Speaker 2: so you can follow me on at runde if you
Speaker 2: feel so inspired. But let me also share with you
Speaker 2: just a few of the highlights of what I have
Speaker 2: seen on X this week, and they all fall into
Speaker 2: the same basket. The wisdom of women on the topics
Speaker 2: of the day, let's hear it from a grandmother about
Speaker 2: her concern about shared bathrooms at schools.
Speaker 15: If you use this bathroom, and you follow one of
Speaker 15: my beautiful granddaughters into this bathroom, you will need this bathroom.
Speaker 15: Grandmothers don't put up with that, and wait till you
Speaker 15: meet Grandpa.
Speaker 1: Can't argue with that.
Speaker 2: Will the safety commissioner deem it unacceptable and ban it?
Speaker 2: She has form in that department. How about this very
Speaker 2: simple and elegant protest about the economic achievements of Joe
Speaker 2: Biden and indeed Anthony Albanizi and Jim Charmers.
Speaker 1: But if you really want to know why social.
Speaker 2: Media is so important, here is the best financial and
Speaker 2: political commentary.
Speaker 1: I saw all week.
Speaker 14: Girls, what's just happened?
Speaker 9: So there's an ice cream.
Speaker 16: Bound there s just two ice screams with two chewing
Speaker 16: gums in it.
Speaker 5: It's a bloody nine pounds for two of the nine
Speaker 5: chords for two.
Speaker 16: Yet nine quid that is going to get norway one
Speaker 16: that comes on my streets. I have a one pound
Speaker 16: a pie or two you're going to get.
Speaker 2: Nor annoy in.
Speaker 6: That's well, But.
Speaker 5: Say you only just bloody card stood dating that cash.
Speaker 16: Bloody yell that's well, but look well but yeah that
Speaker 16: he can in it.
Speaker 1: Britain, there's your future, Maggie Thatcher. God knows you need her.
Speaker 2: The future democratic well being of the West lies in
Speaker 2: the innate rebelliousness and common sense, hopefully of youth nine
Speaker 2: quid for two ice creams.
Speaker 1: I share her outrage.
Speaker 2: Let's hope the e Safety Commissioner doesn't try and ban her.
Speaker 2: In the meantime, come and join me every day on
Speaker 2: Twitter if you feel so inclined at Rowndan. When the
Speaker 2: flame of freedom is flickering so low around so many parts.
Speaker 1: Of the world, we must use the freedoms we have
Speaker 1: or lose them well.
Speaker 2: Israeli forces ram up operations in northern Gaza and the
Speaker 2: eastern outskirts of Rafa in hopes to target hamas Is
Speaker 2: terrorist infrastructure. Right here on the desk with us is
Speaker 2: former British Commander Colonel Richard Kemp. Richard's so great to
Speaker 2: have you here in Australia with us on the desk.
Speaker 2: You're often up there on that wall there and we
Speaker 2: always enjoy seeing you. We loved the display of guns
Speaker 2: last time in your home, which was just stunning. That
Speaker 2: was such the colonial backdrop was fantastic. James wants it
Speaker 2: for his from library.
Speaker 1: I love it shipped over the Colonel. Great to see
Speaker 1: you here in Australia.
Speaker 2: So just wanted to you know, everybody wants to know
Speaker 2: what's the end game, ken Israel defeat Hamas and what
Speaker 2: on earth the Americans playing at.
Speaker 17: Before I answer that, I'd like to say it's really
Speaker 17: great to be here in Australia. I always enjoy coming here,
Speaker 17: such a wonderful country. And secondly, you mentioned the common
Speaker 17: sense of youth. I've had the pleasure of visiting many
Speaker 17: schools here in Australia since i've been here, including Kesatora
Speaker 17: here in Sydney, and I've encountered a great deal of
Speaker 17: common sense of youth and it gives me a good
Speaker 17: deal of optimism and for the future when these particularly
Speaker 17: the Jewish children I've met, are so confident, so articulate,
Speaker 17: and so knowledgeable as far as whether Israel can defeat
Speaker 17: Hamas in Gaza, I think that's what's going to happen.
Speaker 17: We've seen the IDEA fighting extremely effectively. I've been inside
Speaker 17: Garza several times while the war's going on with the
Speaker 17: IDEF and I've seen their actions on the ground extremely effectives.
Speaker 17: When they come up against real soldiers as opposed to
Speaker 17: civilians in their homes, they do one of three things.
Speaker 17: They either run away, they die, or they surrender, and
Speaker 17: when they surrender, they spill the beans. So I'm optimistic
Speaker 17: and confident about Israel's success in Gaza once it really
Speaker 17: embarks on the full campaign in Rafa. As for what
Speaker 17: the US is doing, I think the US is doing
Speaker 17: two things. First of all, in trying to pressure Israel
Speaker 17: to stop fighting an obsession with not going into Raffa
Speaker 17: and dealing with that and therefore not finishing off for
Speaker 17: mass I think firstly, they're playing to the domestic electorate,
Speaker 17: which the majority support Israel eighty percent I think according
Speaker 17: to recent polls, but there are many who don't, and
Speaker 17: Biden wants their votes as well and is prepared to
Speaker 17: put that above the survival of Israel. And secondly, they're desperate.
Speaker 17: Biden particularly desperate to appease Iran. He doesn't want Israel
Speaker 17: to finish off Iran's major proxy in that area, and
Speaker 17: it's all part of his long term plan to empower
Speaker 17: and give Iran more authority in the region. And it's shameful,
Speaker 17: it's disgraceful.
Speaker 7: Jan Well, we've had some breaking news in the last
Speaker 7: couple of hours that Benny Gant, the opposition politician form
Speaker 7: defense minister in the War cabinet, has issued a deadline
Speaker 7: of June eighth to the Netnyahu government to say you've
Speaker 7: got to find a way to wrap this war up.
Speaker 7: This is a huge problem for net Nyahu, but also
Speaker 7: is Benny Gance being used by the Biden administration as
Speaker 7: a way to try and get somebody more amenable to
Speaker 7: their pro Iran position into power in Israel if net
Speaker 7: Nyahu is so insistent on defeating Iran rather than allowing
Speaker 7: its proxies to run rampant, which seems to be what
Speaker 7: this White House is keen to do.
Speaker 17: Yeah, I mean the Biden White House ever since it
Speaker 17: came into office, or more accurately, ever since the new
Speaker 17: Netanyahu government came into office during Biden's tenure, has been
Speaker 17: trying to bring that government down literally. And that's bad
Speaker 17: enough in normal times, but for a very close ally
Speaker 17: to try and bring down the government of its ally
Speaker 17: democratic elect government during a war is absolutely disgraceful. And
Speaker 17: that's what Biden's been trying to do, and we've heard
Speaker 17: remarks from him from Chuck Schumer, one of his close allies,
Speaker 17: so from the Secretary of State, to that effect.
Speaker 1: I don't think there's any precedent for.
Speaker 17: An ally trying to bring down a democratic elect government
Speaker 17: during a war.
Speaker 4: Well, we've seen the US be behind regime change in
Speaker 4: a number of countries, but you wouldn't expect it to
Speaker 4: be an ally. But on Rafa, it's taken seven months
Speaker 4: for Israel to go there.
Speaker 9: Did they take too long?
Speaker 4: Why didn't they do this earlier, especially given the plight
Speaker 4: of the hostages.
Speaker 5: And they could be held.
Speaker 17: I don't like to second guess responsible democratic government and
Speaker 17: armed forces like Israel, because we don't know all of
Speaker 17: the facts involved. But I think in general terms, when
Speaker 17: you fight a war, one of the most important things
Speaker 17: is speed and shock action to dislodge and to undermine
Speaker 17: the enemy and to destroy the enemy. And that's very important,
Speaker 17: but that has to be balanced also with not throwing
Speaker 17: away as really sold as lives, so you have to
Speaker 17: operate with a degree of core. And secondly, in this
Speaker 17: particular case, we're talking about a very dense civilian population
Speaker 17: which Israel has to protect and speed can sometimes work
Speaker 17: against that. The IDEF does everything they can to minimize
Speaker 17: civilian casualties, despite the lies you hear on other elements
Speaker 17: of the international we.
Speaker 4: Win downgraded the casualty count quite dramatically in recent days.
Speaker 4: Do we have a clear picture of what the civilian
Speaker 4: casualties are in that conflict?
Speaker 17: The only information we have comes from and the only
Speaker 17: information the UN has and everybody else, including the White House,
Speaker 17: comes from Hamas. And we don't know whether their figures
Speaker 17: are accurate, whether they're underplaying it overplaying it. The likelihood
Speaker 17: is they're inflating the figures, as they have done in
Speaker 17: the past. But what we do know, I think, if
Speaker 17: we assume for a moment their figures are roughly accurate,
Speaker 17: is that the ratio of civilian casualties to military casualties
Speaker 17: is significantly lower in this war than I think any
Speaker 17: other comparable conflict that I know. There's something like they're
Speaker 17: less than one civilian to every competent killed, which is bad,
Speaker 17: but when you're fighting an enemy that is among the
Speaker 17: civilian population and trying to get you, as Hamasa, to
Speaker 17: kill the civilians, it's a very impressive figure. Terrible though
Speaker 17: it is, and it compares to less than one to one,
Speaker 17: compares to five to one and three to one in
Speaker 17: respect to US casualty ratios in Afghanistan and Iraq. So
Speaker 17: it's a great achievement by the idea in my opinion.
Speaker 2: So, Richard, you've spent quite a bit of time in
Speaker 2: Israel recently, So how is the population, what's been the
Speaker 2: psychology of the aftermath of October seventh?
Speaker 1: And is the population behind the war?
Speaker 2: I mean, James just referred to the politics of it,
Speaker 2: But what did you get from the sense of Israeli
Speaker 2: people themselves.
Speaker 17: Yeah, on my previous visits to Israel over the last
Speaker 17: few years, has been deep division in Israel, as is
Speaker 17: in most countries in the world, including of course Australia.
Speaker 17: But when I arrived on the ninth of October, and
Speaker 17: I've been there pretty much ever since the ninth, I
Speaker 17: saw a completely unified country, full square behind defeating her
Speaker 17: mass after the horrors of the seventh of October.
Speaker 1: The only divisions.
Speaker 17: Really exist in Israeli society that I've detected today are
Speaker 17: first of all, between those who think everything should be
Speaker 17: done to get the hostages out and those who think
Speaker 17: everything should be done to destroy her mass. The two
Speaker 17: things to an extent are in conflict, but not entirely.
Speaker 17: I think the Israeli government has achieved pretty much the
Speaker 17: right balance in those two objectives as far as I
Speaker 17: can see. The other division is between those who hate
Speaker 17: Prime Minister Nesniyahu and those who support him, and that
Speaker 17: this campaign against him has been going on for a
Speaker 17: long long time, and I would have hoped that in
Speaker 17: this war, that you know, those that the anti Nesnoo
Speaker 17: faction could have unified behind him for this conflict and
Speaker 17: then maybe take it up again afterwards. But generally speaking,
Speaker 17: I think the majority of the population are right behind
Speaker 17: the government and the war that's going on now.
Speaker 2: And we've frequently spoken about the threat of Iran nuclear
Speaker 2: weapons and so on.
Speaker 1: That threat is just obviously increasing, increasing, increased. What's your
Speaker 1: fears or take on where Iran is sitting now? What
Speaker 1: are them allers thinking?
Speaker 17: Well, Iran, of course is one hundred percent behind everything
Speaker 17: that's going on now in Gaza in Israel. Hamasa's an
Speaker 17: Iranian proxy as is Isamia had the junior terrorist partner
Speaker 17: in Gaza, his Ballara in the north, which has been
Speaker 17: attacking Israel daily since the seventh of October is another
Speaker 17: Iranian proxy, as are various proxies all around Israel. They
Speaker 17: call it the ring of Fire. So Iran has got
Speaker 17: its fingers on all of it. And of course Russia
Speaker 17: and Iran and China in Iran are closely linked, and
Speaker 17: no doubt there's Russian and Chinese hands behind this as well.
Speaker 17: But the biggest fear I think Israel can defeat without problem,
Speaker 17: all of these networks. I say without problem. There will
Speaker 17: be problems, but they can do it. The nuclear issue,
Speaker 17: which you mentioned, is the really big one, and Iran
Speaker 17: is on the cusp of developing nuclear missiles. That's not
Speaker 17: going to be stopped under President Biden. Maybe a subsequent
Speaker 17: president will do something more effective. But meanwhile, Israel's got
Speaker 17: to maintain its military and covert campaign against the Iranian
Speaker 17: nuclear program.
Speaker 7: And finally, on that campaign and that program, what are
Speaker 7: the chances that if Netnyahu sees himself under existential threat
Speaker 7: here and under pressure from the United States, he decides
Speaker 7: to escalate this conflict further and strike directly at Iranian
Speaker 7: nuclear target trudge, which are not very harded and so on.
Speaker 7: But they've done this sort of thing before.
Speaker 17: Yeah, I know Nataniel who quite well, and I think
Speaker 17: I don't think he is the kind of person who
Speaker 17: is going to lash out for his own survival. He
Speaker 17: will if he obviously he will if he feels that
Speaker 17: Israel's survival is at stake, he will escalate against Iran
Speaker 17: if that is necessary. But meanwhile, I think he's taking
Speaker 17: a much more measured approach and working hard now to
Speaker 17: deal with Hamas subsequently with his ballad decisively I think,
Speaker 17: and then of course attention will turn on Iran.
Speaker 1: Richard, I just.
Speaker 2: Quickly want to ask you before you go about London
Speaker 2: and what happens in the UK if Kirs Starmer, which
Speaker 2: looks like happening, gets in.
Speaker 17: Yeah, well, the Labor Party remains Corbyn's party. It's got
Speaker 17: a different leader, it's got different kind of wallpaper around it,
Speaker 17: but it's the same party. And let's not forget Kirs
Speaker 17: Starmer was four square behind Corbyn when.
Speaker 1: He was the leader of the party.
Speaker 17: The Labor Party have been actually remarkably strong on Israel
Speaker 17: since this war began. They've basically followed the British government line,
Speaker 17: which has been quite good, but it's for electoral purposes.
Speaker 17: Once they get into office, their tone will change, and
Speaker 17: I believe that under a Labor government Britain will become
Speaker 17: probably Israel's worst enemy in Europe.
Speaker 1: Wow, that's terrifying, Colon Richard Kemp.
Speaker 2: Always great to chat to you and enjoying some Sorry
Speaker 2: so about such serious topics, but that's the world we
Speaker 2: live in.
Speaker 1: Enjoy the rest of your time in Australia. Great to
Speaker 1: have you here.
Speaker 2: After the break, We've got James's Donkey votes. Lots more
Speaker 2: to talk about here on Outsiders.
Speaker 6: Hello, you're watching Outsiders.
Speaker 7: I'm James Morrow here as always with Rowan Dean and
Speaker 7: Rita Panahee. And you know, one of the great evils
Speaker 7: of so called progressive politics, whether it is the Labor
Speaker 7: Party in Australia or the Democrats in America, is that
Speaker 7: they treat everyone, particularly members of minority groups, not as
Speaker 7: individuals but as members of a tribe and say that
Speaker 7: you have to vote for us because we will protect
Speaker 7: your group interests, rather than trying to compete for every
Speaker 7: individual's vote as an individual. And it looks like that
Speaker 7: may finally be started to crumble though in the United States,
Speaker 7: where black voters, like voters of all sorts of other descriptors,
Speaker 7: appeared to be abandoning Joe Biden as the complete shambling
Speaker 7: train wreck of a presidency that he is. Don't take
Speaker 7: my word for it.
Speaker 6: Here's CNN.
Speaker 14: Look at this number for Donald Trump, twenty two percent.
Speaker 14: Where was Donald Trump at this point four years ago?
Speaker 14: In the pulse he was just nine percent of the vote,
Speaker 14: So he seemed more than a doubling in his support
Speaker 14: among African Americans. This margin, which was in the seventies
Speaker 14: just four years ago, look where it is now, sixty
Speaker 14: nine minus twenty two. That puts it in the forties.
Speaker 14: My goodness, gracious, if this held through the general election,
Speaker 14: obviously we're still months away, this would be by far
Speaker 14: the best performance for Republican candidate among black voters in
Speaker 14: a generation, two generations, probably since nineteen sixty.
Speaker 7: Well, this has got Biden's handl in an absolute panic now,
Speaker 7: as you'd imagine, and they've rushed the president out on
Speaker 7: what else, a great, big pandering tour to try and
Speaker 7: stem the bleeding. This has included stops at the National
Speaker 7: Museum of African American History and Culture, a speech to
Speaker 7: an INAACP dinner in Detroit, and graduation addresses at Morehouse College,
Speaker 7: which is known colloquially as a historically Black college or
Speaker 7: university aka an HBCU. How did the president go there?
Speaker 7: By the way, getting through that little acronym, this.
Speaker 18: Investments health hbg's used everything from bill student housing to
Speaker 18: study climate science, to create health research labs, prepare black
Speaker 18: students for labs and industries of the future.
Speaker 7: Yes, yes, the good old hb g's uses or whatever
Speaker 7: he was trying to say there. That was Biden, by
Speaker 7: the way, speaking to the NAACP, which guess what he's
Speaker 7: always been supportive of.
Speaker 18: My name is Joe Biden, and I'm a lifetime member
Speaker 18: of the NAACP.
Speaker 7: Well, yeah, sure, okay, And you know, obviously the whole
Speaker 7: speech was filled with a few minutes of typical word salad.
Speaker 18: That's why my administration is taking the most significant action.
Speaker 18: That was Danny Trump and the Supreme Court tried to
Speaker 18: stop me to provide student debt relief, most supreme ever.
Speaker 7: Most supreme ever. Followed by, of course, the obligatory Where
Speaker 7: am I going to get off the stage? Now?
Speaker 6: Well done?
Speaker 7: By the way, whoever was in charge of putting the
Speaker 7: tape markings on the floor, you did an absolutely stunning
Speaker 7: job there. It was very easy for him to follow.
Speaker 7: Now there's a lot of reasons though why Joe biden
Speaker 7: support among black voters is cratering. Number one, of course
Speaker 7: being the economy. But former Oklahoma Speaker of the House T. W.
Speaker 7: Shannon recently took it further, having this to say, I think.
Speaker 19: The Democrats recognize they are losing their group, their grip
Speaker 19: on the black vote. Listen, there are two reasons why
Speaker 19: black voters are running toward Donald Trump.
Speaker 6: Number One, they remember COVID. They remember it was the Democrats.
Speaker 19: Who were saying, you can't go to work, you can't
Speaker 19: go to your job, and you can't send your kids
Speaker 19: to schools. And Republicans were saying, we want to protect
Speaker 19: your job and we want your kids to go to school.
Speaker 19: And they also know that Joe Biden has replaced African
Speaker 19: Americans for illegals.
Speaker 6: The open border.
Speaker 19: Crisis is not by hopping circumstance. It is a direct
Speaker 19: attack on black voters, and black people recognize it. They're
Speaker 19: asking the question, why is it that Jamal is locked up,
Speaker 19: but Julio's running around doing whatever he wants to in
Speaker 19: this country with benefits from the government.
Speaker 6: So there we have. We've got the economy.
Speaker 7: We've got COVID and illegal immigrations, disproportionate impacts to in
Speaker 7: a phrase, on African American communities. But then, of course
Speaker 7: there's another issue with this, and that is Joe Biden himself.
Speaker 7: He may have claimed to have been brought up in
Speaker 7: the past in the Black Church when he wasn't, of course,
Speaker 7: attending the Jewish Schole, the Sheite Mosque and the High Temple.
Speaker 1: But let's just.
Speaker 7: Remember that Joe Biden's history when it comes to Black
Speaker 7: Americans is well, shall we say, little checkered, and has
Speaker 7: been involved calling young black men predators and pushing a
Speaker 7: nineteen ninety four crime bill that led to the mass
Speaker 7: incarceration of black Americans.
Speaker 18: Our kids are just as bright and just as talent
Speaker 18: as white kids.
Speaker 2: I mean, we've got the first sort of.
Speaker 11: American who is articulate in.
Speaker 16: Clean.
Speaker 20: Biden, recalling his early Senate career, bringing up two segregationist senators,
Speaker 20: Herman Talmadge and James Eastland, who called African Americans an
Speaker 20: inferior race. I was in a caucus with James O.
Speaker 6: Eastland.
Speaker 20: Biden said, he never called me boy. He always called
Speaker 20: me son. At least there was some civility, We got
Speaker 20: things done.
Speaker 4: The senators that he is speaking of with such adoration
Speaker 4: are individuals who made and built their reputation on segregation.
Speaker 9: The kukluts Klans celebrated the election of one.
Speaker 6: Of them using the word boy in the way he
Speaker 6: did can cause hurt and pain, and we need a
Speaker 6: presidential nominee and the leader of our party to be
Speaker 6: sensitive to that.
Speaker 18: My Democratic colleagues don't like me saying this. I think
Speaker 18: the two party system is good for the South and
Speaker 18: good for the Negro, good for the black. Other than
Speaker 18: the fact that they still call me boy, I don't
Speaker 18: think they've I think they've changed their mind.
Speaker 7: And amazingly, there are six more minutes of that compilation
Speaker 7: of Joe Biden saying things that are frankly pretty racist,
Speaker 7: which should give you an idea of where all this
Speaker 7: is going.
Speaker 6: But never mind, let's be fair.
Speaker 7: Let's give the President, Joe Biden the last word here,
Speaker 7: as we recall his famous pitch to African American voters
Speaker 7: in twenty twenty, Hi.
Speaker 18: Tellin if you have a problem figuring out whether you're
Speaker 18: PREMI or Trump and.
Speaker 1: You ain't black.
Speaker 2: Well, indeed, great stuff, thanks James, Well We are joined
Speaker 2: now by Wrong Speak Publishing founder Adam Coleman. Great to
Speaker 2: have you here on outside, as Adam got the book
Speaker 2: behind you. Black Victim, Black Victor, And let's talk about
Speaker 2: Joe Biden where he sits in that black.
Speaker 1: Victim or black pantheon.
Speaker 2: What's obviously the news has been pretty consistent this week
Speaker 2: that black men in particular are supporting Donald Trump. But
Speaker 2: is Biden seriously losing the black vote.
Speaker 21: Yes, think he's losing the black vote for the same
Speaker 21: reasons as a gentleman in that clip of stating, it's
Speaker 21: mostly economic reasons. We have less buying power, and whoever's
Speaker 21: in power, we're going to blame. So Joe Biden's in power,
Speaker 21: he's held responsible for our economic distress. So I think
Speaker 21: that is the number one reason. I do think immigration
Speaker 21: is becoming a major issue for all Americans, especially Black Americans,
Speaker 21: because over sixty percent of Black Americans live within these
Speaker 21: urban city areas, and that's where all these people are going,
Speaker 21: especially in Democrat cities in the North like Chicago and
Speaker 21: New York City, and so you're starting to see resources
Speaker 21: taken away from the people within these cities and basically
Speaker 21: brought over to support these particular people who aren't even
Speaker 21: supposed to be here. And it's even worse because Joe
Speaker 21: Biden has not controlled the border and he's held responsible
Speaker 21: for it. And then on top of that, Joe Biden
Speaker 21: doesn't want to provide any sort of resources for the
Speaker 21: cities to support the distress of the city. So I
Speaker 21: think all types of people, including Black Americans within these cities,
Speaker 21: are blaming Joe Biden for this.
Speaker 4: But yes, Trump is almost doubling what the Democrats, what
Speaker 4: the Republican nominee typically would get from from that black demographic,
Speaker 4: but it's still eighty percent. What are the main reasons
Speaker 4: that the African American vote is so strongly behind the Democrats,
Speaker 4: even if it's fracturing a little bit at the moment.
Speaker 1: I think the.
Speaker 21: Biggest issue is that it is cultural. Like I said before,
Speaker 21: most Black Americans, you know, over sixty percent of Black
Speaker 21: Americans live within or in the surrounding Democrat controlled cities.
Speaker 1: So in these cities they're not.
Speaker 21: Being there's not much competition for their vote for coming
Speaker 21: from the Republican party. And I say this from experience.
Speaker 21: Many Black Americans don't even know Republicans. You know, there
Speaker 21: are idea of what a Republican is is basically what
Speaker 21: they see on television, and that's not the best way
Speaker 21: to gauge what a political party supports. By listening to
Speaker 21: a left wing media apparatus that gives you some sort
Speaker 21: of filtering of what Republicans want. So honestly, I think
Speaker 21: local elections are extremely important. The problem is that, and
Speaker 21: I understand it from a fiscal standpoint, but the problem
Speaker 21: is that Republicans for decades, like you said, generations, have
Speaker 21: not shown up in many of these cities. Chicago, for example,
Speaker 21: hasn't had a Republican mayor since the early nineteen hundreds.
Speaker 21: New Orleans hasn't had a Republican may since the eighteen hundreds.
Speaker 5: Two of the most crime riddle in America. In fact,
Speaker 5: I think they want in two.
Speaker 7: But I want to ask you, though, like let's let's
Speaker 7: move it beyond though the general sort of broad you know,
Speaker 7: political ballot box sort of part to the way the
Speaker 7: racial tensions are still being exploited in other areas. And
Speaker 7: there was a fascinating case this week where a Facebook
Speaker 7: executive was sentenced to five years in prison for you know,
Speaker 7: this scam, and they were a DEI diversity executive, and
Speaker 7: they had a scam. They're ripping people off, the ripped
Speaker 7: the companies off, five million bucks going to jail. But
Speaker 7: they used the sort of the shield of DEI and
Speaker 7: racism to avoid criticism and prosecution. And I mean that
Speaker 7: just subs up to me the way that these sorts
Speaker 7: of efforts, which are really about dividing people, are then
Speaker 7: used as cover for all sorts of other things.
Speaker 6: What do you think, Adam, No.
Speaker 21: You're exactly right. In my piece for the New York Posts,
Speaker 21: I highlight how basically DEI is a sham. It's run
Speaker 21: by a sham ideology. You can't prove if DEI is working.
Speaker 21: You know, how do you show the cost benefit analysis
Speaker 21: of DEI.
Speaker 6: You can't.
Speaker 21: But at the end of the day, d I wants
Speaker 21: more money. They want more money to support the industry
Speaker 21: in itself. They want more trainings, they want more meetings,
Speaker 21: more paper work to show what. At the end, nothing
Speaker 21: but everybody gets paid, where all the consultants get paid.
Speaker 21: And someone like this woman Smiles who got prosecuted and
Speaker 21: thankfully there was some sort of justice was broughtest she's
Speaker 21: basically facing five years for being a Connor artist and
Speaker 21: the reason she was able to get away with is
Speaker 21: because you don't question DEI within corporate America. Why is
Speaker 21: the budget at DEI offices two times the budget of
Speaker 21: officers that actually make money within corporations? You're not supposed
Speaker 21: to ask these questions, and so I think that's the
Speaker 21: general weakness that you're seeing within corporate America.
Speaker 2: Adam, I wanted to ask you about Donald Trump, the
Speaker 2: various trials that he's going on. He made comments earlier
Speaker 2: in the week which has sent many on the usual
Speaker 2: suspects at CNN and elsewhere absolutely berserk, where he said
Speaker 2: that many Black Americans identified paraphrasing Donald Trump. Obviously, but
Speaker 2: he was saying many Black Americans identified with Donald with
Speaker 2: him because they'd been persecuted in the same way that
Speaker 2: he was being persecuted by an af flawed justice system.
Speaker 2: The left have gone crazy, called him a racist, etcetera, etcetera.
Speaker 1: But do you think there's any legitimacy in that argument.
Speaker 19: Of his.
Speaker 21: I think there might be some who carry this viewpoint
Speaker 21: that the justice system is overwhelmingly against Black Americans when
Speaker 21: facing justice, and maybe there is some sort of persecution
Speaker 21: against them. Whether that's the case or not that can
Speaker 21: be debated, but I'll say this, you know, I use
Speaker 21: the I used the measuring stick of what does my
Speaker 21: mother think? Because my mother is not political, she doesn't
Speaker 21: pay attention to everything that's going on, and unprovoked, my
Speaker 21: mother asked me, why are they going after Donald Trump?
Speaker 21: This doesn't make any sense? And so to me, you know,
Speaker 21: black woman who's sitting here, I don't even think she
Speaker 21: voted for him, and she even says this doesn't seem right.
Speaker 21: Why are they going after him? I think that says
Speaker 21: a lot. I think a lot of people are saying,
Speaker 21: you know, when you're going after Donald Trump for hush
Speaker 21: money where he's likely not going to get any sort
Speaker 21: of jail time or anything any severe punishment, right, is
Speaker 21: they're just trying to drag him through the mud and
Speaker 21: make them spend a whole bunch of money on lawyer fees.
Speaker 21: I mean, to me, this seems politically motivated. Anybody who's
Speaker 21: not part of this sin can see that it's politically motivated,
Speaker 21: whether you like him or not. And I'm hearing story
Speaker 21: off the story from random people who are saying the
Speaker 21: same thing as my mother, that this seems highly politically motivated.
Speaker 21: It seems very obvious as to what's going on, and
Speaker 21: they don't like it.
Speaker 2: Adam, I think we should always listen to our mothers
Speaker 2: and I love the idea of the Missus Colemban metric.
Speaker 2: I think we should get missus Coleman on at some
Speaker 2: point to talk about this very thing. But I absolutely
Speaker 2: we want to hear from her point of view because
Speaker 2: she's spot on there.
Speaker 1: Adam Coleman, thanks.
Speaker 2: So much and say gooday to Australia, to your mum,
Speaker 2: Agay b.
Speaker 1: Thanks Adam. After the break, Canbra Clown Show lots to
Speaker 1: talk about. Roll up, roll up, step right this way.
Speaker 1: It's the craziest show on Earth.
Speaker 2: It's the Canbra Clown Show, which this week saw unrivaled
Speaker 2: big spending under the Burley Griffin big Top in what
Speaker 2: The Spectator Australia labeled jimflation, the art of pumping more
Speaker 2: and more government spending useless subsidies and welfare entitlements into
Speaker 2: the out of control economy until the entire Australian economic
Speaker 2: bubble bursts.
Speaker 1: Helping pop the balloon.
Speaker 2: Was, of course, our other favorite financial clown, Katie Gallagher
Speaker 2: explaining how crazy left wing gender ideology shaped the budget.
Speaker 22: This is a budget that has the Australian people right
Speaker 22: at the center. This is the first one that aligns
Speaker 22: it to our gender equality strategy, so you'll see that
Speaker 22: in that document and you should see this as continued
Speaker 22: progress on the list of things. Each budget we've been
Speaker 22: trying to gently and sometimes not so gently shift the
Speaker 22: dial on support for women and promoting the gender into Australia,
Speaker 22: because you know that's fit for everyone, not just women.
Speaker 2: Silly me and I always thought the point of a
Speaker 2: budget was to make the economy work better for business,
Speaker 2: not just for women. Although it's worth pointing out these
Speaker 2: three women here have always done very well out.
Speaker 1: Of Labour's policies supporting women.
Speaker 2: Here is a rather scary juxtaposition I have shown before
Speaker 2: Katie Gallagher.
Speaker 1: No less.
Speaker 22: The digital ID system being safer and trustworthy and voluntary.
Speaker 22: Government's position on COVID nineteen vaccinations is that it is voluntary.
Speaker 1: Yes, thank you, Katie.
Speaker 2: Meanwhile, Chris bobobo and was chortling away this week, please
Speaker 2: just punch with himself for having gotten his preposterous new
Speaker 2: Vehicles emissions standards legislation through Parliament under which carmakers who
Speaker 2: exceed their carbon emissions limits face a financial penalty woo.
Speaker 2: And if that's not bad enough, a sixty million dollar
Speaker 2: fund of your money will be established for electric vehicle
Speaker 2: chargers in car dealerships tradees.
Speaker 1: Beware this will hit you hard. Make no mess. Stake
Speaker 1: about that, and tazzy tradees.
Speaker 2: You can thank this clown, the one on the left,
Speaker 2: Senator Tammy Tyrrell, up until now most famous for declaring
Speaker 2: that she's not the clown on the right. I'm not
Speaker 2: Jackie is her most famous comment to date. Well, this
Speaker 2: is the person whom all tazzy trades and mainlined mainland trades,
Speaker 2: farmers and those who rely on cars and trucks rather
Speaker 2: than EV toys can now thank for the soaring cost
Speaker 2: of their vehicles because it is she, Tammy Tyrrell, who
Speaker 2: idiotically allowed this climate cults build these emission standards to
Speaker 2: go through Parliament. Bobo Bowen also got excited on Twitter
Speaker 2: about oppositionally the Peter Dutton, declaring in a tweet that
Speaker 2: quote Peter Dutton mentioned me personally four times in his
Speaker 2: budget reply. Yes, Chris, there's a reason for that, And
Speaker 2: allow me to let you in on a little secret.
Speaker 2: You see Chris, you are the coalition's secret weapon because
Speaker 2: it is you who will win the coalition the next election,
Speaker 2: just like you won it for them in twenty nineteen.
Speaker 2: But Chris went on, and here's the best bit quote
Speaker 2: from Chris Bowen. It's nice that Peter Dutton mentioned me
Speaker 2: personally four times in his budget reply, but it would
Speaker 2: have been better if he had.
Speaker 1: Mentioned Cori I'm a change at.
Speaker 2: Least once, because in his twenty four years in Parliament
Speaker 2: he has mentioned coor I'm a change just four times. Well, Bobo,
Speaker 2: you've convinced me there's a reason to vote for Peter Dutton,
Speaker 2: if ever there was one. Speaking of clowns, Burko was
Speaker 2: perfecting his favorite routine this week. It's called making up
Speaker 2: what Angus Taylor really said. Here we go have a
Speaker 2: listen to what Tony Burke says in Parliament about what
Speaker 2: Angus Taylor said here on sky.
Speaker 23: Because the Shadow Treasurer was asked by Laura Jays about
Speaker 23: his attitude to why they're opposed to multiple employer bargaining
Speaker 23: and he answered this, it pushes up wages. It pushes
Speaker 23: up wages. He went on.
Speaker 1: He went on with more, saying this is a bad
Speaker 1: place to go.
Speaker 2: Now, let's see what angers really said to Laura Jays
Speaker 2: and guess what turns out it's pretty much the complete opposite.
Speaker 11: How would multi employer bargaining actually push up prices in
Speaker 11: the cost of living?
Speaker 24: Well, it pushes up wages and pushes up prices. I mean,
Speaker 24: this is the point that the Reserve Bank has been
Speaker 24: making that if you get in a race between wages
Speaker 24: and prices, two things happen. Prices go up and wages
Speaker 24: ultimately real wages ultimately lose.
Speaker 2: Now that's what I call a real load down and
Speaker 2: sneaky circus act and misleading Parliament in my opinion, how
Speaker 2: do you know Tony Burker is telling Porky's his lips
Speaker 2: are moving. We also learned this week that's sometimes a
Speaker 2: slip of the tongue reveals what's really going on.
Speaker 1: This week, the Digital ID bill.
Speaker 2: Passed through Parliament a national disgrace, and the Libs shamefully
Speaker 2: barely lifted a finger to stop. For sure, they voted
Speaker 2: against it, but where was the arguments against it? Labor,
Speaker 2: of course, are claiming that digital ID is all voluntary.
Speaker 1: I played that clip earlier, just like they said about
Speaker 1: the vaccines. It's not only.
Speaker 22: Voluntary, but it's a secure way and a reduced way
Speaker 22: of providing a lot of documentation to a range of
Speaker 22: different businesses or governments.
Speaker 5: Okay, and you're guaranteeing that it's not going to be compulsory.
Speaker 1: You've used the word.
Speaker 5: Voluntary a few times there.
Speaker 22: Yeah, because I know there's a lot of miss out
Speaker 22: there about the digital ID that it's you know, that
Speaker 22: it's somehow government tracking you or holding all this information
Speaker 22: about you, and it's none of those things, and that
Speaker 22: the information you provide can't be used for any other purpose.
Speaker 2: And as I played before, yes, just like the vaccines,
Speaker 2: all voluntary. All right, totally voluntary Katie. But then why
Speaker 2: did your colleague Stephen Jones make this is unfortunate slip
Speaker 2: of the tongue this week.
Speaker 1: Whoops, there's the m word mandate.
Speaker 25: So it creates the choice and creates the mechanism through
Speaker 25: which a voluntary use of a digitalized DO system can
Speaker 25: be maintained and mandated in this country.
Speaker 2: Oh, mandated. Speaking of clowns, walk out. What is the
Speaker 2: new nickname for this comedian?
Speaker 1: Yes, Murray?
Speaker 2: What managed to unite Australia's farmers into passing a no
Speaker 2: confidence vote in Labor. He also was the reason the
Speaker 2: unprecedented walkout by farmers at Murray Watt's post budget agricultural
Speaker 2: speech this week. As you can see here on your screens,
Speaker 2: the reason for the walkout because of the government's disgraceful
Speaker 2: plans to shut down the live sheep by sea industry. Yes,
Speaker 2: as Senator Matt Canavan said, the single biggest allocation of
Speaker 2: news spending on agricultural in the budget was to shut
Speaker 2: down an entire industry. Indeed, between the two of them,
Speaker 2: walk out what and blackout Bowen, they're bringing this country's
Speaker 2: rural communities and farming industries to their knees.
Speaker 1: It's even worse than that. Labor went into the last
Speaker 1: election needing to win.
Speaker 2: In Wa, so Albo himself seem to suggest that that
Speaker 2: policy to kill off the live sheep export trade was
Speaker 2: no longer labor policy.
Speaker 1: Why has Labor committed to ending live sheep exports?
Speaker 6: And will you put a timeline as to when that
Speaker 6: end will take place?
Speaker 9: No, we won't and we haven't in our policy. Our
Speaker 9: policy has changed.
Speaker 6: What a turn around, Tony.
Speaker 1: There's Anthony Albinexi moments ago.
Speaker 6: Our policy has changed.
Speaker 2: His quote labor obfiscation, half truth lies whatever. What would
Speaker 2: George Costanza say about all of.
Speaker 9: That, Jerry, just remember.
Speaker 1: It's not a lie if you believe it.
Speaker 2: Well, we always like to have the good news stories
Speaker 2: here as well, of course on Outsiders, and congratulations to
Speaker 2: Banister Dairy who on Friday night won a swag of awards.
Speaker 2: They are a wa West Australian farm. There a fantastic product.
Speaker 2: Banister Dairy once.
Speaker 1: Swept the board literally with all the awards. There a
Speaker 1: great absolutely absolute Oh it is.
Speaker 4: Delicious because I love my dairy like nothing else. And
Speaker 4: I tell you, Banister Downs, if you can get it,
Speaker 4: it is excellent, excellent, fantastic.
Speaker 2: Well there's your ad, there's Rita Panahee absolutely and I've
Speaker 2: met the people from that farm and they work so hard.
Speaker 2: Great Australian success story. Meanwhile, we learn, as you know,
Speaker 2: Albo is trying to make a future for Australians and
Speaker 2: driving industry away. Cadburys want to leave, Mars want to leave, leave,
Speaker 2: Kell and Over want to leave because of the high
Speaker 2: cost of energy.
Speaker 6: James, Well, yeah, and I mean this is the whole thing.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 7: They say, oh we want to bring back manufacturing in Australia.
Speaker 7: But it's nonsense because of course we've got high energy
Speaker 7: prices being made worse by this government, inflexible industry relations
Speaker 7: laws made worse by this government. So you know, when
Speaker 7: you add to that the fact that we are quite
Speaker 7: far away from any major market, this is a trifecta
Speaker 7: of disaster for anybody who's trying to, you know, do
Speaker 7: this thing. We're What they're trying to do is essentially
Speaker 7: copy that Joe Biden Inflation Reduction Act, which by the way,
Speaker 7: is not an inflation reduction Act.
Speaker 6: But that's that's right.
Speaker 19: You know.
Speaker 7: I have an idea, though, what about instead of here's
Speaker 7: the thing we can do. The US government seems to
Speaker 7: look very keen to outsource its research into gain of
Speaker 7: functions of viruses, and we could end And this week
Speaker 7: we've had some really interesting news here that before Congress,
Speaker 7: Lawrence Tabak, who was the deputy Director of the National
Speaker 7: Institutes of Health, admitted that the government had been funding
Speaker 7: gain of function research programs and a little lab in
Speaker 7: wu Han, China. Now Elon Musk has quite correctly, i think,
Speaker 7: called for doctor Fauci to be arrested as a result
Speaker 7: of this because we know from time and again through
Speaker 7: all the documents have been released, there was efforts to
Speaker 7: cover up, to avoid Freedom of Information Act requests to
Speaker 7: keep people from knowing what role FAUCI, the NIH, these
Speaker 7: other weird bodies that were getting funded by various sort
Speaker 7: of different organizations had in funding the research into the coronavirus.
Speaker 7: To me, I've always said, this suggests to me why
Speaker 7: America and a lot of other countries were not so
Speaker 7: keen to have a big investigation into exactly where COVID
Speaker 7: came from.
Speaker 4: Well, this is after years of false years, years of falsehoods, lies,
Speaker 4: doctors being intimidated, scientists being intimidated, people being called conspiracy theorists.
Speaker 6: Misinformation, people cancel.
Speaker 4: From social media, all this nonsense about misinformations information. Finally
Speaker 4: admitting that the US funded dangerous virus features at this
Speaker 4: COVID lab, and think about it, what are the chances
Speaker 4: that we would have a COVID pandemic breakout in a
Speaker 4: city Wuhan that has a massive lab studying COVID viruses.
Speaker 6: A market that's misinformation.
Speaker 4: All of us should feel silly for not immediately connecting
Speaker 4: the lab to this virus outbreak.
Speaker 1: Very early on, took.
Speaker 5: Me a good six to eight weeks. But six to
Speaker 5: eight weeks was all it was.
Speaker 1: But even for those six clowns years.
Speaker 2: But the other funny story out of the UK, James
Speaker 2: come as a big surprise reader, and James that all
Speaker 2: those signs, remember all those signs, social distance and see
Speaker 2: stand over here, come over here, get better.
Speaker 1: None of them work. None of them work.
Speaker 7: But also another NIH official Friends College admitted that there
Speaker 7: was zero evidence where they said, oh, everyone's got to
Speaker 7: be six feet apart. Well, actually there was no evidence
Speaker 7: at all behind all that. So all that marking is
Speaker 7: on the pavement nonsense.
Speaker 5: Oh there's Karen screaming at you. See get away, get away.
Speaker 1: That's it for outsiders. Go and have your glass of
Speaker 1: Banister Down's milk. It's fantastic. Rita tells you that's it.
Speaker 1: We'll see you next Sunday. Here and outsiders