WEBVTT - What the share market pullback tells every investor

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby, who was editor at The Australian. Welcome aboard everybody,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>all investors, I expect feeding just a little bit nervous

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>this week. It's not every day we have share market

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>session to kick off the week where we have the

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>worst session in four years, which we had this week

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, three and a half percent off the market,

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>definitely rocky times. We see the NASDAC is already in correction.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>The S and P that's the main US market is

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 1>down about seven and a half percent as we speak

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, and we will see what it does this evening,

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it goes into a full blown correction or not.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Very hard to say. We can see just middle of

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the day Tuesday that the Australian market is stabilizing a little.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>But I can tell you that the slightest answering, I

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>should say, in the US features and we will fall

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with them, faithfully, we will fold. Don't you worry. We

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>fall lemming like every time we did three and a

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>half percent on Monday, and that is barely what happened

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>on the US overnight Monday. Perhaps on our market. But

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>more broadly, I want to talk about for the diversified investor,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>For the investor who is like most of you, I'm

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 1>sure has shares, probably has property in some fashion, has

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.839
<v Speaker 1>other assets. Then you might have gold, you might have cash,

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you might have alternative assets. How do we handle a

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>period of instability which we've seen some of, which we

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>may see much more of because the conditions that have

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>triggered this selloff are unclear. There is no single trigger,

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and on that basis, it could happen again at any time.

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, who could we have as a guest

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>on the show to talk about the broader situation. It

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>needed someone who was a diversified investor themselves. I thought, Hey,

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Keane, who has been on the show before. He is,

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of course the personal finance guru and news corporation. He

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>operates out of Adelaide. In the end of We're all

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in the same big, happy family, and we finally met

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in person. Irl. Great to have you on board today.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Tell me we'll talk about all things, not just the

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>market downturn, but how that could affect everything, How it

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>could affect, for instance, interest rates, how that could in

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>turn affect property. I was entertained by the fact that

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you had a piece awfully well timed where you mentioned

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that you had sold all your shares recently. Now that's

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>not quite a Warren Buffett like move where you sold

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>all your shares just before the downturn. You have lots

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of shares. You just sold all your ordinary shares and

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.839
<v Speaker 1>you've switched entirely to ETFs to exchange traded funds. That's

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a big call, right, tell me? Is that forever? And

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>why did you do it?

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? And I absolutely I have sold every direct share

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>that I've built up and owned, but that's been a

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 2>gradual thing over that it started buying maybe twenty five

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 2>years ago. But this is the first time in a

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 2>quarter of a century I do not have one individual share

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 2>to my name. And I'd like to say it was

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 2>timed the share market were out perfectly, but no, it

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 2>was purely a strategic and getting old decision. And unlike you,

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a self managed super fun but as

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 2>I've got older, my superbalance has grown as everyone's done,

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 2>and that is through a lot of index funds. So

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 2>I invest in a lot of Australian overseas as you said,

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 2>diversified investments through a lot of index funds through super

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 2>but not yet self managed. But that is something I

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 2>am considering for both shares and property in the next

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of five to ten years purely. And so the

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>reason I've looked to sell out of the direct share

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 2>ownership is purely because if you're holding it this stuff

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 2>in super, the tax benefits that you get from it

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 2>when you do retire from work and switch your money

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>to several times about that, I'd like to I've investment

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 2>properties outside of cheaper, but would like to own one

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 2>in the future as well, purely for that capital gains

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>tax benefit. It's just you're talking tens of thousands of

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>dollars of savings by doing that. So I do love shares,

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I write about shares every day, and I do plan

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 2>to get more in the future. But it's just a

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 2>matter of strategy, age timing. Moving that direct share ownership

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>withinside throppernuation. As I get closer to my mid eight

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.799
<v Speaker 2>fifties and sixties, it will work better.

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to think anymore. You have vtfs. There's

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>an element of truth on that, isn't it. You can

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>put them. You can say, okay, I've got my sessings. Really,

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care if come bank ors of fifty

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>percent for PHP fours fifty percent anymore? Is am I

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>simplifying it?

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 2>I think you're right. I think the one thing that

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 2>will hold me back from going direct shares again in

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 2>the future, through a self managed fund or just through

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 2>a retail or what other the fund that opposite direct

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 2>share investment is do I want do you want the headache?

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Do you just want to trust what the markets are doing?

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Because I've been burnt. I heard you talking, I think

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 2>last week on your podcast about Goodman Group how to

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>the star and the market as a real estate investment trust.

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 2>Now I bought them in the GFC and lost ninety

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 2>percent of my money before I sold out and then

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 2>and they've gone gangbusters since. Had I held them, which

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 2>I didn't for various reasons, would have gone great. But

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>it's just the damage and that the damage it does

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 2>to your confidence as an investor when you have those

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 2>sorts of losses. I don't know. I'm not sure that

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 2>I want to go through all that again. And it's

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 2>like with the fall we've had in recent days, everyone

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 2>super is going to take a hit, but that's everyone

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 2>super pretty much all those that are invested in share markets.

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>So you're comforted by the fact that you won't do

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>any worse than everyone else's basicity than the index from

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:52.799
<v Speaker 1>here on or better.

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right. But shares are great and a lot

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 2>of people love that watching it, and I have loved

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 2>it in the past, But is it right for my

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 2>stage of life? And I know you've also spoken about

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 2>as people. Do you get older, it's do you want

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 2>to spend your time watching the moves of individual stocks

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 2>every day? Or do you want to spend your time

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 2>enjoying sort of life and retirement and not having to

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>worry about the self managed super fun compliance and all

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>that sort of stuff.

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Does your attitude towards property and how much property you have?

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Does it change when you see one of these shock

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>share market selloffs?

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 2>You don't see We saw a fifty five percent fall

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 2>in the ASX during the global financial crisis. I've never

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 2>seen anything like that in any of the property markets.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 2>Makes me relieve that I'm more exposed to real estate.

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 2>But the property market in Australia is sort of a

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 2>real variation in what you get. I'm running a column

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 2>this week. In the past twelve months we've had Perpose

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 2>done plus twenty five percent and Melbourne which is down

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 2>a couple of percent. So that's a massive variation in

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 2>proper as well. But you don't tend to check your

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 2>prices every day. You see it as a long term investment.

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 2>But different people have different preferences as to what they like.

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 2>And I've got a bit of trouble with readers in

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 2>the past writing that I prefer property over shares any day,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 2>but very happy to own shares and index funds through

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 2>superannuation and have that exposure to the market.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting on the share you've gone for the you've

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>gone for the indexing and got away from the sort

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of details and the individual variation of shares property. You

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>don't really have that choice. I'm just thinking of the

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>point you're making that I can stand here and tell

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone the property prices are up four percent across Australia

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this year so far. You're laughing at that. If you're

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in Perth, you're saying, hey, we're up twenty percent, and

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're in Melbourne you're saying, hang on a second,

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. In this city, we're down one percent.

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And you live in Adelaide. Adelaide is doing well. If

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Adelette keeps going the way, it's going to have a

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>higher average than Melbourne within a matter of weeks. They're

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely light. The average dwelling value is in the high

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>seven so maybe seven eighty thereabouts. Its neck and neck

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, Do you, as a property investor seek to

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>diversey to diversify your risk as you've done with the shares?

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you try and basically not have all your eggit

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and basket and have a property that isn't that are

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in different places?

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, most definitely two states. At the moment. I always

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 2>thought that there's no way I would ever be able

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 2>to afford property in Melbourne because of the price is there.

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 2>But having watched that difference, that sort of difference just narrow.

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Looked at Hobart a few years ago, was like soaring

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 2>the prices there, and now that now their medium price

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is one hundred thousand sort of less than any other

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 2>state capital city. So there are cycles in each city

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>and diversifying works great as a direct property investor, but

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>also great as a property investor from our land tax

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 2>point of view as well, because of the different land

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 2>tax raisings in the different states, so you'll often find

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 2>investors trying to diversify to a different state. So I

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 2>had planned for Perth, but I've missed the boat on

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 2>that one. But Melbourne would potentially be on the radar

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 2>in the next year or two, and you've spoken recently

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 2>about over supply there, so I'll be keeping an eye

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 2>on that, but definitely diversify.

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, very interesting. I want to talk to you about

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of quite topical issues how this market proversivet

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>could affect why they're investing. Will be back in a moment.

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome back to the Australians Money Puzzitive podcast.

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm James Kirby talking to Anthony Keene today, my Colie

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in News Corporation on the finance section of all the

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>papers and digital assets that we have guest on the

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>show before. Always happy to have him back, Anthony. I

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>was just thinking that one of the things we have

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>at the moment is there's a fairly line boble market.

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>We've got some softening in the property market, and traditionally,

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a share market, a serious share market diversity,

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>people will move to property. I can give you instances

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>back over the years very clear instances where that happened. Now,

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how bad this will get, but it's

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>been a pretty bad week so far on the market.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>That the worst week for four years, And you could

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>argue it wouldn't take much more to knock more off

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>global markets, particularly the US, because there are always risks

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>in the market, but there are distinct risks emerging just now.

0:10:54.559 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>They're geopolitically, particularly US presidency, particularly wars in different parts

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of the world. These are things that can knock a

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>market out very easily. It's fragile. I think we could

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>say that, and we had a sharp sell off, which

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>could extend What I want to draw out from you,

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>as someone who invests right across the board in all classes,

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>what might happen? What can a share market downturn do

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for broad investments? Apart from the fact that your shares

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have lost value, it takes some energy out of the market, right,

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>What might happen with interest rates for all investors if

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we have an extended share market sell off.

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a really good question, James, because I think

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 2>you're right. If this market sell off continues, and Stephens,

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 2>we saw it during COVID, we saw it before that

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>in the GFC when interest rates just drop really sharply,

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>that's going to obviously not be good news for the

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>people that have been in loving their five percent plus

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 2>returns on cash in the last couple of years, because

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 2>if the Reserve Bank cuts rates quickly, obviously those rates

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 2>will fall. But I think in the past as well,

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 2>it could be great for bonds. Now I've never invested

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 2>directly in bonds. Most people have probably never invested directly

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 2>in bonds, but you might have a portion in your

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>super But I remember because as high interest rates, you

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 2>can get great returns from bonds when they're sharp falls

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 2>in central bank interest rates because of that inverse way

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>that they work. So might be great for that. Falling

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 2>rates might be beneficial for property if it becomes easier

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 2>to borrow to invest in real estate as well, So

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 2>there's potential there.

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.599
<v Speaker 1>It could be actually easier to finance investments.

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Could be yes, but there's also going to be a

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 2>lot of gloom and a lot of people losing a

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of confidence and stuff. And let's hope we don't

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 2>have anywhere near the falls we had in that sort

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 2>of flash crashing COVID. All the huge falls we had

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 2>back at around two thousand and eight, two thousand and nine.

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>You with your move to ETFs, if you saw a

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>flash crash, a harder crash than we've had. Let's say

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we're down. Let's say that the US market is down

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>approximately seven and a half percent is to drop so far,

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but let's say it dropped really sharply and we did

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent drop or so in the US market. Would

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that disturb your plan about ETFs forever? Would you say, gosh,

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>this is there are bargains here. I can't resist it.

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's right, and a lot of them. A lot

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>of the brokers and the ches specialists I've been speaking

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 2>to you have literally been waiting for a fall, for

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>a breather, whether it's ten or twenty percent. And I've

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 2>had this money sitting on the sidelines. Because market drops

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent, you're effectively buying at a discount. I've still

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 2>got scars from the GFC. James. I listened to all

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 2>of that and bought it a ten or twenty percent

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 2>discount heavily, very heavily, and then we'll lost another thirty

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 2>five percent on my money and took years and years

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 2>to get That was nice.

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>You sound like someone who's been through the war, Anthony,

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that you were you forever. Look, I'm so glad you've

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>brought this up because I know a lot of our

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>listeners have not really experienced the grueling experience of a

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>share market fold. When I say a share market fold,

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about was worse. It was much worse

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>than the COVID dropped. The GFC was. It rattled confidence

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in the deepest possible way. Banks folks, banks were being

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>saved in the UK and the US here and then

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on top of that you had the worst type of market.

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>They says, it felt fifty five percent, but it took

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>two years to do that. It peaked in late two

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>o seven. It was the middle of March two oh

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>nine when we hit the bottom, and of course we

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't know we'd hit the bottom because it seemed to

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have been going down forever. So it's one thing to

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>be an investor goes through the COVID crash, which was

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>short and sharp, and the stock markets were flying back

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>up within months of the initial downturn. Much harder to

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>go through something like the GFC, where there's two solid

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>years for people, where the stocks just slowly sink. Child

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>child down by fifty percent. That's really difficult. So that'd

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you both, Anthony, and I bet it does shape you.

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Did it push you more towards property investing than it

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>might have? Than you might have?

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it did. And look there's been I've been

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 2>fortunate being from Adelaide that Adelaide tends not to have

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the heavy downturns in real estate prices that the big

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Eastern capitals do. But that said, before these did, I

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 2>went about eight or nine years before these recent sort

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 2>of run up since around the sort of COVID period

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 2>of zero growth, holding onto a property and getting zero

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>growth but still having to pay all the holding costs

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 2>and the fees and things. So but you hold My

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 2>view is if all you've got to do with your

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 2>whole real estate, if you go through two price cycles,

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 2>two price booms, then you're set up for life. Because

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 2>of the magnitude and the size of the money that

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 2>invested in one individual property. Most people would not put

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 2>five one hundred and six seven hundred thousand dollars just

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 2>into one individual share or even a portfolio. A lot

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 2>of people don't do that. Property gives you that leverage.

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 2>So I think you're right they did. I've still owned

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 2>shares for all through the recovery, and Jesus was a

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 2>long recovery as well. We only to the all odds

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 2>in the ASX two hundred only a few years ago.

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 2>It took over ten or twelve years just to get

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>back to where they were in November two thousand and seven.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Whereas steady issue goes, property market just kept plotting higher

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>and as I said, flat for a long period while

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I was watching other states go higher. But it's been

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 2>says Tener. Look, I'd be nervous about investing in SA

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 2>or Wa at the moment, even Queensland to a degree

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>because of the size of the gains that they've had.

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Nothing keeps going up forever. But you've got that argument.

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 2>You've got various arguments for the under supply of a

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 2>state national aid, the huge population growth. I just think

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the fundamentals are still there. And a roof over your

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 2>head is the best investment you can make, whether it's

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 2>your own home or whether it's an investment property or two.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 2>I really believe that for a long time because of

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 2>the security that it gives you.

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, terrific, We've take sure break. We're going to have

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>some great questions from Alex and Christopher and Margaret and

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>if we get to it, orpheus back in a moment. Hello,

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Australians Money Puzzle podcast. I'm James Kirby.

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to Anthony Keene. We have some great questions here.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Alex says, I'm in my early thirties. I've been contributing

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>into super with the goal of starting a SMA super

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>fund to buy a house in Sydney. The thirty year

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>long price growth for capital cities it's five percent, assuming

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I can even find a house in Sydney. This asset

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>with the priests did three million in thirty years time,

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>at which point on realize gains and earnings would be

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 1>taxed to thirty percent war Boardly, it seems like the

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>two tax hacks of super and negative gearing will be

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>phased out in the not too distant future. How is

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this fair? Okay atleast Alex at least has packed an

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>awful lot into that question. A couple of things. He says.

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>First of all, that negative gearing could go in the

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>near future. I don't know about that. Actually, there's absolutely

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>no evidence about that, Alex at all. This is never advised.

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>This is only information. But you could argue quite strongly

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that the ALP lost the election they might have won

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>on the basis that they went near negative gearing and

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>had a plan to reform it. Certainly, that and the

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Frank dividend reforms combined was an expensive exercise for them,

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think there's the political will to go

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>near negative gearing for some time. It's not even been discussed,

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>not by either party. However, on Super, you make the

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>point that he's making the point folks that the new

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>supertax which kicks in a three million and then you

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>pay fifteen percent new tax over on any earnings over

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>three million, that that is going to be it's going

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to hit his property plans in Super over the long

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>period of time because it's not indexed, there's no plan

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to index it. I would say to you, Alex, yes,

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not fair that that new tax isn't indexed. It

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>should be indexed. It also shouldn't be on unrealized gains.

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>It should be on realized gains, and if they count

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that it should be deemed. But I would just say

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a long you're talking about a long period of

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>time and whether a particular supertax was or wasn't indexed

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in thirty years time is unlikely to make a major

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>impact on your property returns, he says bravely. But that's

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>my view. What do you think, Anthony, I.

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Agree with you on the negative gearing side. I think

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 2>that once bit and twice shy with with the Labor Party,

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 2>but also with these new unfair sort of tax plans.

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm a bit of an optimist on that, and I

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 2>figure we are going to have a coalition government at

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 2>some time in the next ten or twenty years, and

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 2>I think that they're going to fight back against some

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 2>of the most unfair parts of that those rules. I

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 2>really think that it's not going to last. So thinking

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 2>of what government's saying today is probably going to be

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 2>completely different sort of ten twenty thirty years from now,

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 2>and I think it eventually everything does revert back to

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.719
<v Speaker 2>fairness as well. It just might take time. And if

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 2>you get your own you're go unlucky enough to get

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 2>caught out at the period where it is unfair. And

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 2>we might see that next year with some several horror

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 2>stories that unfold in the next year or two. Once

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 2>that new tax comes in people being forced to sell stuff.

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. I think you might have some farmers that

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>go brook or something or have terrible stories, and that

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>will be enough to turn the public to actually, first

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of all, have a look at it, see what is

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>actually wrong with it. It's hard to feel sorry for

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>people who have three millions, super I take that on

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>board in two seconds. But also taxes, taxes should have

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a certain shape and they should be broadly equitable, as

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you say, across the board. Okay, do you want to

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>read the question from Christopher?

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So Christopher is wondering what we think will be

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the impact of a Trump presidency on the Australian dollar.

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 2>That's the easier or decent US ATF that focuses on

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 2>US energy stocks because he expects that they're about to

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 2>go gang busters if it's Trump gets in. John may

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 2>to have a thought. Yes, sure, yes, I was. It

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 2>was Yeah, I think he might be on the money

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 2>as far as demand for US energy stock. So I

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 2>heard that Donald Trump and his frenzied crowd chanting at

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 2>one of his rallies or speeches Drill baby drill, Drill

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 2>baby drill. That was what that was calling for. And

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 2>so that does. But as far as the impact on

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the Aussie dollar, some of the stuff that I've read,

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a currency specialist, but obviously, like you, I

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 2>get a lot of stuff comes across my desk all

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the time, and there seems to be talk that may

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 2>not be very good for the Aussie dollar or global

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 2>exports overall for anybody, because of the talk of heavy

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 2>trap tariffs in that Trump might bring in, particularly the

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 2>wards China. And I do know that the Aussie dollar

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 2>is one I think it's the fifth most traded currency

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>in the world, largely because it's a proxy for investing

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 2>in global trade and investing in China in particular. They'll

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 2>buy the Aussie dollar based on the sort of China.

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 2>So if we have this massive trade war with US

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.239
<v Speaker 2>and China and huge tariffs and things, I don't think

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be good for the Aussie dollar.

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, very good, all right. I hope that's used for

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to you, Christopher, it's I think it's beyond out that

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>if Trump won, and this will get placed since the

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>market instantly. But if Trump wins, it's beyond doubt it's

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>good for EID and plus a few stocks. And it's

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>also doubt that it's not good for ESG related investments,

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>especially where ESG investments have been packaged up into some

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of a thunder and ETF. But that's a flip side, Okay, Margaret,

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Mr GA or e T. I'm a new listener to

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>your podcast and I wonder if you can offer me information. Recently,

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>my super fund had a data outage that was caused

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>by a third party. It took more than a week

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to resolve. Give me time to ponder how safe is

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>my super What if there was a malicious attack and

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>my super disappeared. I completely understand this question how somebody

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>would ask this, And she also says, I understand the

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>banks have some kind of insurance known as the Financial

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Claim Scheme which will cover up to fifty k Okay,

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>two different things there, Margaret. Yes, old cash in Australia

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>held in banks or to be precise, approved positive taking institutions,

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 1>which is more than just banks, is guaranteed by the

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>government explicitly to the tune of two hundred and fifty

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>thousand per person per bank. Okay, So that's there, But

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that to one side. Nice thing to know now about

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 1>how safe is your super I think we'll just focus

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>on how safe is your super in relation to malicious

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>attacks shall we say it attacks or scams. The reality

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>is that this is wide open and the funds have

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>had problems. I had a piece in the paper in

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the section which I used this week, which was actually

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a guest piece by Heather Gray Afka the Austrian Financial

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Complaints Authority, and she makes the point that this is

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>very in super in the big super in the industry

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>super funds or the other funds. It's a small issue numerically,

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>but that small number of people who have been unfortunate enough,

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>whether there has been some scams or it issue, whether

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>they were malicious or not, it has been a problem

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 1>inside and for the people who were for the handful

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of people who have been exposed to the it's danger

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>inside super fund, that's been the problem. So she makes

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the point that it's a small number of people that

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>have had any issues in super with it or it scams,

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but those people it's big news for them because she

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>mentions figures. She actually puts some figures on at eighty

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars I think was the precise nuver she put

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on one of the issues inside Super. I don't think

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>anyone knows, Anthony that I don't think anyone can stand

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>in front of your super fund and say, listen, this

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fund is immune from it attacks because it's they're always coming,

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they're always breaking through.

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and I agree, it is really hard to say it.

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 2>We haven't been really tested with a major attack like

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 2>we saw with health insurance details a year or so ago.

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 2>That wouldn't have thought that that would happen, but it did. It.

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Supers always that risks to markets and things, and this

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 2>is just another potential risk. But I think that the

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 2>bigger risk might be just people being scammed from people

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I know. They have been reported scheme of shading people

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 2>out of the money by getting them to transfer to

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 2>an early relay scheme or fan or some other thing

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 2>and then stealing it that way.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and that's money coming out of super but while

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the money is safely inside super. Just for what it's worth.

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>This piece from Heather Gray Margaret said that AFKAR received

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>eleven thousand complaints in relation to scams last year. Only

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty out of eleven thousand came from superannuation fund members,

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and she says why these complaints are smaller number the

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>average loss claimed in them was eighty eight thousand and

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>ranged as high as three hundred and forty four thousand.

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's been struck by lightning. Right, It's very unlikely,

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but if it happens, it's trouble for the people involved.

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll come back to this another time. I

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>think this is worth a deeper dive. Thank you very

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>much for the questions. That's about as far I think

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>as we could go on that one today. All right, Orpheus,

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 1>do you want to try Orpheus's question, Anthony?

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Orpheus says that a lot of your guests and

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 2>discussions are about how to make money through investing, but

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 2>he asked, what about protecting your final wealth and standard

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 2>of living if a health event or death cuts your

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 2>working life short. He's talking about life insurance or protecting

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 2>your ability to end an income and pay down debt

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 2>if you do become sick or injured and can no

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 2>longer work, or if you pass away. Wants to talk

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 2>about life TPD, trauma and income protection. Insurance cover both

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 2>inside and outside of super and would like to sort

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 2>of this.

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>You're a diversified investor, Anthony, do you have all those insurances?

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes? And Orpheus is right because he says it's an

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 2>unsexy but essential need to protect wealth. And you're right,

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and there are arguments of having it both within and

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 2>outside of Super.

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you your Do you have your insurances? Are they

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>inside super or outside?

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Mostly inside Super? And that's purely from apart from some

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 2>trauma cover which you cannot have inside Super, but death

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 2>covered TPD and in protection you can have that withinside Super.

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 2>And it's yes, my children are getting older and finishing

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 2>school now, but I've been in the process in the

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 2>last couple of years of winding down some of that

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 2>cover within Super because you've always got Some people can

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 2>waste a lot of money with huge insurance cover through

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Super because obviously the cover school fees and the like

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 2>if you do pass away. But when those or big

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 2>mortgage is the same sort of thing you gotta cover.

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 2>But people can get get caught being over insured later

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>in life. That said, the vast majority of ossies are

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 2>underinsured and don't have enough and think that maybe the

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 2>default one hundred and something thousand dollars of cover they

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 2>might have in their industry super fund or whatever, it's

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>going to be enough, and it's not. If anything happens,

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 2>so yet definitely worth looking at, definitely worth speaking to

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 2>a specialist about that.

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, terrific. And I would say, as you see, very true,

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of people are under insured. However, I

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>would say to our audience, who I instinctively feel would

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>be across the basics of this anyway, watch out that

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you're not over insured. As Anthony says, as you get

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>older and you have all these insurance settings, particularly if

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you have income protection insurance or even life insurance, and

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a substantial amount in SUPER, then you

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask yourself, why did I get this? Once upon

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a time, fifteen twenty years ago, I got all these

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>insurances because I really needed to cover things because I

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>was really exposed, right I didn't fully own my house,

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>or I didn't have much in Super, et cetera, et cetera.

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that still the case? An insurance BROKERA, I'm afraid

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it will never tell you to have less SUPER, to

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have less insurance, not in my experience anyway. They don't

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>actually suggest you buy less. And if you say to them,

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should have less. If the doctor says that

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they shouldn't smoke, and you said could I if I

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>had one a year, would it make a difference. They say,

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>just don't smoke at all. An insurance broker will say

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. They will say. If you say, should

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I still have all this insurance? They say, why not?

0:29:58.040 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Just in case? But that's not an argument. That's not

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a powerful argument, that's not a proper argument. I would

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>review your individual circumstance each year and be very careful

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that you don't overensure. It's an oddly seductive thing when

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they say, listen, you're insured for two billion or one million,

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and the figures get high and it sounds great, and

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you say, gosh, yes, I suppose I'm worth that. But

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you pay through the nose for that. As Anthony says,

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on it, and keep an eye on

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it as your life changes. If you've got a house

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:33.719
<v Speaker 1>full of kids, that's one thing. If you don't, it's

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a completely different set of circumstances. I have an advisor

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.959
<v Speaker 1>on this show who says, basically, once you're in your

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>early sixties, if you have a substantial amount in super

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't need life insurance at all because your super

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>fund can cover it, and you can save yourself thousands

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a year which you could invest in your super fund.

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a plan that we might think about for another day,

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but we will leave that one hanging out there for

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone to kick around until we talk again. Hey, Anthony,

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much, lovely to have you on the show.

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me. James been great.

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>That's Anthony Keenfolks. He's the Person of Finance writer on

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>News Corporation, colleague of mine. Do keep the emails coming.

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>If you want to support the show, just mention it

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to one of the person. Just mention it to one

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>person this week. That's what we would really appreciate and

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much if you do. If you'd like

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to correspond, ask a question, complain, whatever you want. The

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>email is there the Money Puzzle at the Australian dot

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>com dot au and I will talk to you soon.