WEBVTT - Killer Robots and AI on the Battlefield: the Pentagon vs Anthropic

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Dario Amida runs the three hundred and fifty billion US

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar tech company Anthropic. In January, he wrote an essay

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>calling it the adolescence of Technology, a line he lifted

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>from the Jodie Foster film Contact.

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 2>If you should meet these vegans and wel delmented only

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 2>one question to ask of them, What would it be?

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I suppose it would be how did you do it?

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 3>How did you evolve? How did you survive this technological

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 3>adolescence without destroying yourself?

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I was always a science fiction fan as a kid,

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>so you know, I watched this movie when when I

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 2>was growing up, and just the you know, the idea

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>pose really really seemed to fit the situation we're in

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>with AI, where you know, we have this we're starting

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 2>to get these immense powers with AI.

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Dario warns, the world isn't ready for AI.

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's a bit like a you know, a

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of teenager. You have all these new powers and abilities,

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 2>mental and physical, but you know you haven't necessarily adapted

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 2>to them yet, and so you know, this is I

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>feel like this is something that we're going through.

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>This year, Anthropic has been locked in a battle with

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon over whether it's clawed chatbot can be used

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>for mass surveillance and fully automated weapons. Now it's rival

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Open AI has stepped into the ring and cut its

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>own deal with the government. I'm Nicole Johnston and you're

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 1>listening to seven AM today David Rowe from the Australian

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Strategic Policy Institute on Tech titans, robodogs and should AI

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>help the Pentagon fight wars. It's Monday, March nine. David,

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>could you start by giving us a bit of background

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>about this AI company, Anthropic, and how it ended up

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in such a bust up with the Pentagon.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 4>So Anthropic is one of the big three AI labs,

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 4>the leading AI labs in the United States and hence

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 4>the world. Anthropici, which is building very very capable AI systems,

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 4>was of interest to the Pentagon. The Pentagon signed a

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 4>contract under Joe Biden's administration with Anthropic for Anthropic to

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 4>provide AI at a classified level, so you know, the

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 4>sort of the most secret, the most elite, the most

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 4>high end type of work. It's key founders, Dario Miday

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 4>and his sister Daniella Amiday, put a couple of hard

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 4>conditions on its arrangement with the Pentagon.

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 5>And so we have said to the Department of War

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 5>that we are okay with all use cases basically ninety

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 5>eight or ninety nine percent of the use cases they

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 5>want to do, except for two that we're concerned about.

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 5>One is domestic now surveillance. Case Number two is fully

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 5>autonomous weapons. This is not the partially autonomous weapons that

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 5>are used in Ukraine or you know, could potentially be

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 5>used in Taiwan today. This is the idea of making

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 5>weapons that fire without any human involvement.

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 4>When Trump took over, the Pentagon said no, we're not

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 4>happy with that. We want you to agree that we

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 4>can use your systems for quote, all lawful purposes.

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 6>Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave CEO Dario Onmaday until the

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 6>end of the week to sign a document ensuring the

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 6>military would have full access to the company's AI model.

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 6>Officials are considering invoking the Defense Production Act to force

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 6>Anthropic to do what the military wants.

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 4>Anthropic thought about this for a while and then said no, sorry,

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 4>we're not comfortable with this. We insist on our two conditions,

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 4>and then everything went pair shape from there. One other

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 4>thing that is worth noting is that Anthropic is also

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 4>the least favorite of the Trump administration's AI companies.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 7>President Trump didn't wait for the five pm deadline to pass,

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 7>announcing that three forty seven pm he's cutting off AI

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 7>giant Anthropic, posting on truth social the United States of

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 7>America will never allow a radical left walk company to

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 7>dictate how our great military fights and wins wars.

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump himself also announced that Anthropic could not be

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 4>used by any US government agency. So we're now in

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 4>a position where arguably the most capable of the US

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 4>companies doing this kind of work is now effectively cut

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 4>out from providing those sorts of support to US war fighters.

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So we then had Sam Altman from the Open AI

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>or chat GPT step in and he kind of deal

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Pedagon.

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 4>What happened after that, Yeah, So it was only a

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 4>matter of days, a couple of days before OpenAI announced

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 4>that it was signing this agreement the US military. What

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 4>is confusing everyone is that Sam Altman says that those

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 4>two conditions that Anthropic was insisting on are part of

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 4>their contract with the Pentagon. So the Pentagon, having refused

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 4>to agree to making exceptions for autonomous lethal strike and

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 4>domestic mass surveillance. It's now agreed to those same conditions

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 4>with Open AI somewhat suspicious and has not surprisingly led

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 4>to a lot of skepticism in the AI community and

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 4>people commenting about this. One other thing worth remembering is

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 4>that the personal history kind of goes back between Altman,

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 4>Ammi Day and others. It's a kind of like a

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 4>big dysfunctional family tree. The whole you know, the top

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 4>end of the AI community in Silicon Valley. They all

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 4>know each other, they've all worked together. Well, there's a

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 4>lot of kind of personal rivalry, there's a lot of

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 4>in some cases personal animals between the main players. So

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 4>that just sort of feeds into this sense of, you know,

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 4>you've got two competing companies with potentially conflicting or different

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 4>sets of values, and that this is a real kind of,

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, stand off between tech titans.

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>David, if we could have a look at the bigger picture, now,

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Anthropic has these two red lines about how its technology

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>is used. But isn't AI already being used on the

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>battlefields in Gaza, Ukraine possibly across the Middle East right now?

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So could you describe for us how militaries are employing it?

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 4>So at the moment. Most military uses of AI are

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 4>actually about information processing and turning an ocean of data

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 4>into a comprehensible picture that human operators can use to

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 4>make better decisions in real time, often under huge amounts

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 4>of pressure.

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 8>Chasing us human vatching with your tonk doesn't it work?

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 9>Are about to witness a live operation.

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 4>There is some move towards automation of operations like strike operations,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 4>so the Russians, for instance, in Ukraine, are thought to

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 4>be introducing more and more automation into dropping a bomb

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 4>or or firing on that target.

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 9>We see a Ukrainian tank moving at speed towards the factory.

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:36.239
<v Speaker 9>It's deep inside the kill zone and Russian attack drones

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 9>will try to destroy it.

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 4>But for the time being, using machines to decide on

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 4>a target and fire on that target without any human

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 4>involvement is still considered to be an ethical red line

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 4>for most countries around the world for very obvious reasons.

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it goes to the heart of the idea

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 4>of the sanctity of human life. If we start saying

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:11.239
<v Speaker 4>that we will allow non sentient, non conscious, morally unaccountable

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 4>machines to make life or death decisions about human beings.

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 4>That is a huge rubicon to cross. That is something

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 4>that is not happening yet.

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>So is that essentially the argument that Anthropy has for

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>how it's technology is being used. It's all about ethics

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>for them.

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, although interestingly, Anthropic Statement didn't actually say they were

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 4>against using autonomous strike per se. They said that the

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 4>technology is at the moment not good enough to do

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 4>it reliably and without making mistakes. So it was very

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 4>interesting that for a company that is known for its

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 4>safety consciousness with AI seem to be taking a slightly

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 4>flexible position on the idea of killer robots.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Coming up the Frightening Future of War run by AI David,

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I was actually in China last year and I saw

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the robodogs, for example, that they've developed. Could you tell

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>us more about some of this technology killer robots as

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you describe them, What is really out there on the

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>battlefield now?

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 4>So, I mean, those robodogs are fascinating because they make

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 4>fantastic videos. They look amazing. How useful they actually are

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 4>in battlefield situations is still pretty dubious.

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 8>London Mail, the soldiers scan the skies and use handheld

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 8>drone detectors.

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the Big revolution in warfighting, which we've seen,

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 4>particularly through Russia's invasion of Ukraine, is towards aerial drones.

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 8>The radio alerts us it's tracking back. The drone detector

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 8>doesn't stop bleeping.

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 4>So that's the big area where some form of robot

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 4>is being used. Those sorts of things like land based

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 4>vehicles like robotic dogs, for instance, they're not a big

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 4>part of war fighting at this point. However, we're seeing

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 4>less remote controlled type activities where we actually have a

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 4>human operator sitting there essentially with a kind of a joystick,

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 4>and we're giving more independence and autonomy to machines on

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 4>the ground. Worth also noting that China is very very

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 4>capable at this They are leading the world when it

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 4>comes to robotics. The Russians also have learned a lot

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 4>from the Ukraine War and have been making improvements on

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 4>that front as well. There's also a concern that they

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 4>will have lower ethical standards than democracies. So Australia, I'm

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 4>pretty confident we'll stick to some of those red lines

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 4>around things like automation of lethal force. I'm much less

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 4>confident that China will, and I have next to no

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 4>confidence that Russia will, so I guess the big strategic

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 4>peril here is that our standards are forced to start

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 4>to slip, even in democracies because there is pressure from

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 4>our adversaries. That means that we risk not being able

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 4>to keep up in a battlefield scenario. If you take

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 4>humans out of the loop entirely, you can operate at

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 4>a much, much faster pace, and one of the big

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 4>concerns is that there will just be a slippery slope

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 4>that we all gradually have to go down in order

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 4>to keep up in a war situation.

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>David, it's not only Ukraine and China, it's also Iran.

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing how effective their drones are at the moment.

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>But over the weekend we had Sam Oltman. He called

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>for a debate about who should have more power over

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>advanced to AI, whether it should be in the hands

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of governmental big tech. What do you think how should

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 1>that debate be discussed.

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 4>I would describe the Pentagon anthropic blow up as a

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of first salvo in a conversation that I suspect

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 4>that we're going to be having for the rest of

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 4>our lives. The difference with AI companies today is that

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 4>they are making things that are entering every aspect of

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 4>our lives. So we have to ask the question, do

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 4>we want that kind of influence over our lives to

0:12:55.200 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 4>be entirely generated by the private sector, where the government

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 4>then either acts as a large customer like the military

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 4>does in buying products from the private sector, or as

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 4>a regulator from time to time, where the government says, Okay,

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 4>we're going to set limits on how those products can

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 4>be sold and used. Or do we think that this

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 4>is such a fundamental transformation to our lives that we

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 4>actually need some kind of partnership between the state and

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 4>the private sector in the way this stuff is actually built,

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 4>the way it's sold, the way it's integrated, and the

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 4>way ultimately that is going to influence how we live

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 4>our lives. My view is that AI is sufficiently transformative

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 4>that we all need to have a say in how

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 4>it's going to affect our lives. It can't just be

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 4>a private sector product in which the government then sets

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 4>some kind of laws or regulations around it. It's much

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 4>bigger than that.

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>And finally, David, how do you envisage the battlefields of

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the future.

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 4>I envisage one in which machines and automation are going

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 4>to play at the overwhelming majority of the roles. The

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 4>question is to what extent humans remain in the loop.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 4>If it's just about technical proficiency, then I reckon within

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 4>ten to twenty years there wouldn't be humans involved anymore.

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 4>If we decide that it is a moral and ethical

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 4>question that humans need to remain involved, then we can

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 4>ensure that that's the case. But it will take an

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 4>active decision on our part. Without active ethical discussion, warfare

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 4>will end up being a fight between two lots of machines,

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 4>and only when those machines are fully destroyed will people

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 4>actually start fighting. And then follow that to its logical

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 4>conclusion and we'll get back to sticks and stones. But

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 4>in a nutshell, well, it will be machines fighting machines

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 4>unless we insist on human involvement for moral and ethical reasons.

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>David, thank you so much for talking to us.

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much.

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Also in the news, people in Katherine are assessing the

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>damage after the town's worst flooding in twenty eight years.

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Homes and businesses have been inundated with water which reached

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>as high as roof level in some areas. Locals have

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>been evacuated to Darwin with the Bureau of Meteorology warning

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>more rainfall is possible over the next few days, which

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>could see the Catherine River rise even further, and the

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>May budget will have no cash for wind or solar farms.

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>According to reports, new spending on the renewable rollout has

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>been halted in an attempt by the federal government to

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>claw back savings. That's despite concerns Australia is behind on

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>its target to reach eighty two percent green energy by

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty. I'm Nicole Johnston. This is seven am. Thanks

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>for listening.