WEBVTT - Danica De Giorgio | 24 October

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Why On Sky News Australia, This is to Nika de Giorgio.

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to the show coming up tonight, Chris

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Bowen's secret climate files. Why won't he release details about

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Australia's emissions reduction targets? Victorian Premier decint To Allen leaves

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 2>a door open to bail changes, but her cabinet says no,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 2>no wonder the States had a mess. Shadow Police Minister

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 2>David Southwick will join me shortly, and King Charles becomes

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the first British monarch to pray with a pope in

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 2>five hundred years.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 3>But first tonight. The Coalition has.

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 2>A real chance next week to come to a position

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 2>on net zero when MPs meet on Friday to discuss

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 2>the policy. Now, look, I've got to say this slow

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 2>and steady approach by Susan Lee and her twelvemonth review

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>into energy is quite frankly boring and uninspiring at a

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>time when labor is destroying our energy future.

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 4>This government's energy policy is a train wreck, and every

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 4>day we stand up there and we.

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Hold them to account.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm pretty sure the answers that are coming back to

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 4>our surveys, we'll be telling our team, the costs are

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 4>going up, that affordability is worse, and that it's getting

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 4>harder and harder to pay your bills, your energy bills

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 4>and balance your family budget under this government which doesn't

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 4>care about productivity and doesn't care about rising prices.

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, the reality is we know this, You at home

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 2>know this. The question for Susan Lee is what are

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>you going to do about it? We desperately need an

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 2>alternative government with an alternative approach, a strong opposition to

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 2>hold labor to account, not one with unclear positions, disunity

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>and a labor light approach. Now labor can and is

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>doing whatever it wants to wreck this country, and in

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 2>particular when it comes to our energy rid because it can.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Our power bills are going up and up.

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 3>There was a.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Record heat wave across New South Wales this week. In

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 2>surprise surprise, the electricity grid did not cope. Thousands of

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 2>residents across the state were left without power. And we're

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 2>only in October, it's not even summer yet yet. We

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 2>are bending over backwards financially and environmentally to save the

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 2>world from the alleged climate change armageddon.

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Why are we the ones.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Doing the heavy lifting energy policies are sending us broke

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 2>and backwards. It is time to dump net zero. Former

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister Tony Abbott has called on the Liberal Party

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 2>to ditch what he described as a strait jacket. Here

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>he was speaking with my colleague Peter Kredlin.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 5>There is no climate crisis, and to the extent that

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 5>climate is changing, we shouldn't assume that mankind is the

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 5>main factor in it. Reducing emissions is nice to do,

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 5>but the net zero straight jacket is doing all sorts

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 5>of damage to our country and we've just got to

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 5>get away, get away from it.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 3>And look he's not wrong. You can't be in and

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 3>out on this.

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not the hokey pokey where you put

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 2>your right arm in and you take it out again.

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Our energy future cannot be compromised. And the reality is

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the opposition took this policy of net zero twenty fifty

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 2>to the last two elections and still lost.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 3>So have some courage to make a position now.

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 2>This week Chris Bowen addressed the Financial Reviews Energy and

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Climate Summit, and here is how the paper summed up

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.279
<v Speaker 2>the event. It says Chris Bowen tells us the economics

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 2>for investing in renewables remain utterly convincing, but new wind

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and solar farms have stalled, and we've heard about little

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>other than the challengers for the past two days. Another

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>analysis went on to say that speaker after speaker try

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 2>to be positive, but the replacement of an aging fleet

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 2>of coal fired power plants with a combination of large

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 2>scale renewable energy firmed by gas and batteries isn't happening

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>fast enough. The rollout of transmission infrastructure isn't where it

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>needs to be.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 3>New supply isn't.

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Coming into the market nearly quick enough to meet rising demand.

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>How much more evidence does the opposition need to get

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 2>us off this renewables only magic carpet right? Meanwhile, the

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 2>minister in charge of this mess is up to his

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 2>tricky tricks again. Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 2>and his bureaucrats are refusing to release critical advice around

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the challenges and potential pitfalls of Labour's net zero plans.

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Now the Minister and his department have repeatedly resisted Senate

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 2>attempts to compel them to release a government brief prepared

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>for mister Bowen in the wake of the May election.

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>This brief has been the subject of a freedom of

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 2>information request and multiple Senate orders to produce the documents.

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 2>According to The Australian, the advice would likely have canvassed

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 2>issues around Australia's current and future emissions reduction targets, advice

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 2>to government on nuclear energy, as well as a challenger's

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 2>facing Labour's push to secure next year's COP thirty one conference.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 3>But to no avail.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 2>Chris Bowen is keeping his secret files secret. Clerk of

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the Senate Richard Pye, has declared Labour has no grounds

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>to withhold.

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 3>This brief, So why the secrecy? I mean, if.

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Bowen has nothing to hide about our energy transition, why

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>is he hiding this? And all it can be put

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 2>down to is that the evidence is stacking up against him.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>We were told our power bills would go down under renewables.

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 6>Reducing power prices by two hundred and seventy five dollars.

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 7>Reducing power prices by two hundred and seventy five dollars.

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 8>By twenty twenty five, two hundred and seventy five dollars

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 8>a year one.

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 6>Hundred and seventy five dollars a year will get.

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Power prices down by two hundred and seventy five dollars.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 7>A year, two hundred and seventy five dollars for the

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 7>average house lower in twenty twenty five than today.

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, instead they've gone up by one thousand dollars. Labor

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 2>also told us about how confident they are that we

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 2>will reach our emissions reduction targets.

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 7>Net zero by twenty fifty is not enough, but it's

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 7>the beaar entry point to a conversation.

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 6>We have legislated net zero by twenty fifty. We have

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 6>one energy policy and we are delivering it.

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.679
<v Speaker 8>The world is changing and the speed of that change

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 8>is accelerating as we move towards net zero by twenty fifty.

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 7>Net zero by twenty fifty is the absolute bare minimum

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 7>required to avoid one point five degrees of warming. Hence

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 7>the government and the country remain committed to it.

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 8>We've got our own ambitious set of commitments to get

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 8>to net zero by twenty fifty.

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 6>A plan that we have legislided, a plan we took

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 6>to an election of net zero by twenty fifty.

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 7>Of course, net zero by twenty fifty is the end goal,

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 7>but you've got to have important targets in the meantime, Yet.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 2>We've been worn time and time again by experts that

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 2>we will not reach our emissions reduction targets as they

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>are via an experiment of transmission lines, giant wind turbines,

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>green hydrogen, solar farms and batteries.

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 3>The situation is so bad.

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Ross Gano, a longtime advisor to the Labor government and

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 2>a backer of renewable energy, said Australia is currently on

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 2>a trajectory to miss its renewable targets because of low

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>investment and output in grid scale solar and wind.

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>Not by a little but by a big margin.

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Yet, as we know, Labour has now drummed up a

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 2>sixty two to seventy percent by twenty thirty five target

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 2>with absolutely no clue what it means for your power

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 2>bills and how much it will cost you.

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 9>What will the total cost of net zero be by

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 9>twenty fifty Prime Mini.

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 6>At third, Well, it depends what figures you look for

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 6>if you look for investment for twenty thirty five, The

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 6>Business Council of Australia saying that the cost will be

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 6>around about four hundred to five hundred billion dollars if

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 6>you ask for what our policy is yesday we announced

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 6>it an additional eight point three billion dollars of investment,

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 6>meaning our total investment is seventy five billion dollars.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 10>Can you name figure? Yeah?

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 7>Six hundred billion was the cost of Peter Dutton's plan.

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 7>Yesterday we announced an eight point five billion dollar investment

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 7>that takes total government expenditure to around seventy five billion.

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 11>What will be the total cost of net zero by

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 11>twenty fifty.

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 7>In terms of the budget. That's seventy more than seventy

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 7>five billion dollars that we've outlined. The total cost of

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 7>not achieving net zero, as is outline in the National

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 7>Risk Assessment, is many times more than that.

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 9>We've got a bit annoyse coming in.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 7>I think that's a good rap. Thanks guys.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So, while your bills continue to go up and

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 2>up under the net zero fantasy, Chris Bowen's game of

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 2>heide and seek of briefing documents does not cut it.

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 2>What is in your secret climate file?

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Chris?

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Australians want and deserve to know, Joddy. Now for more

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 2>on this is Shadow Attorney General Andrew Wallace. Andrew, good

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 2>to see he as always, thanks for joining me. Look first,

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 2>he has his own set of facts. Now Chris Bowen

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>and his bureaucrats are simply refusing to release information that

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>we're told underpins their whole net zero agenda. I mean,

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 2>even the Clerk of the Senate, this is the top

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 2>level parliamentary officer, has said Labour's got no ground to

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>withhold this brief, and yet Andrew somehow it's still locked away.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 12>Well, Denika, this is an incoming government brief. So this

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 12>is a brief that would be provided to the government

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 12>after the last election, which would set out the challenges

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 12>that lay ahead.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 10>For the government.

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 12>There would be all sorts of nuggets in there about

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 12>the costs of the government's net zero plans, and jeezn't

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 12>it it's pretty strange that the government would want to

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 12>try and keep that from the Parliament, even more.

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 10>So from the Australian people.

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 12>I smell arout here, Daneika, and we've got the master

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 12>of missing disinformation himself, Chris Bowen. This is a government

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 12>who have consistently promised transparency, accountability, and now they won't

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 12>be upfront with the Australian people about how much their energy.

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 10>Policy is going to cost the Australian public.

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not only how much is going to cost the

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Australian public, but how much energy bills are actually going

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 2>to come down by that? Everything has been kept very

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 2>secret right now, which is highly suspicious. Now, Andrew, the

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 2>rubber is really going to hit the road for your

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 2>party next Friday with a party room meeting to thrash

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 2>out the division on net zero. Now, obviously you know

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 2>we're probably not likely to get a policy position next week,

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 2>but surely it is time that the Coalition settles this

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 2>matter because every day it's causing more and more division.

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 12>Well, Deniko, I just want to pick you up on

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 12>something there, and that is we don't have a party room.

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 10>Meeting next Friday.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 12>It's just it's a policy committee meeting for those people

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 12>that are interested in this very very important policy area.

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 12>It's not a whole of the joint party room. It's

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 12>in fact one of the many policy committee meetings that

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 12>are going on across all of the portfolios that Susan

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 12>has set up that we are working hard across all

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 12>these portfolios to build policies to take to the next selection. Now,

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 12>as far as your concerns, we've spoken about this quite

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 12>a lot, and I understand your concerns.

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 10>I understand that Australians.

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 12>Want to know what our policy is on net zero,

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 12>but we're going through a very very detailed process that's been.

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 10>Led by Dan Tien. We can't rush this.

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 12>We've got to get it right and so don't expect

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 12>an outcome next Friday. It's going to take time. We're

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 12>only less than six months since the last election. There's

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 12>a lot of groundwork we need to do. There's a

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 12>lot of consultation we need to do. We need to

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 12>make sure of all policies that we land this one right.

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 10>So we don't want to rush it.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, you know, Susan Lee's standing out there

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 2>even today saying, okay, you know Lab's wrecking our energy grid.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 3>The reality is is we know that we know Labor.

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I have absolutely no clue how to keep the lights

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 2>on in this country.

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 3>But what we want to know is what is the.

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Coalition going to do about it? And that I think

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 2>is the key issue here.

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 12>Look, we are absolutely driven and committed to ensuring that

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 12>our energy grid, our national energy grid, is a ford

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 12>and that it provides dispatchable base load power.

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 10>We don't want to see.

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 12>Businesses, large scale businesses closing down.

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 10>As we are starting to see.

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 12>We don't want to see them becoming totally reliant on

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 12>government subsidies as we're seeing under this government. Australians deserve

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 12>this is twenty twenty five, for God's sake, Danika. When

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 12>people turn on their air conditioner or their heater, they

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 12>expect to be.

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 10>Able to use them. We don't expect the power to

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 10>go out. But that's exactly where we're heading under Chris Bowen.

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 12>We need to ensure that we have a reliable grid

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 12>that provides dispatchable power, but importantly that it provides affordable

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:45.239
<v Speaker 12>energy to Australians.

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 10>So there's a lot of work to do.

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 12>It's not something you can just click your fingers on

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 12>and produce a policy.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 10>But bear with us, we're working hard on it.

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I understand that everyone's saying everyone, all liberal MPs

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 2>are saying, bear with us, with us.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 3>I just wonder though, for how long for Andrew?

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, But look, as I said, I don't even

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.719
<v Speaker 2>if it was just a policy position, you know, I

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>don't think anyone's saying come out with a huge, you know,

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 2>a big policy now, but just having a position at

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the very least.

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 12>Well, Danika, our policy position is this, we need to

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 12>provide an energy grid, an energy system in this country

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 12>that provides dispatchable base load power that's affordable for Australians

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 12>and Australian businesses. That's what we're working on. The detail

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 12>will follow, all right.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Before we let you go, I want to ask you

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 3>about this.

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 2>In new report for the US Studies Center finding that

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>our missile defense systems are quite inadequate to protect us

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 2>against Chinese missiles.

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 3>And if that's not concerning enough, we learned that.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>The ADF has embarked on an austerity drive, delaying projects

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 2>and slashing costs.

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Andrew, okay, fine.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I will say that the Prime ministers had to win

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 2>this week in Washington in Orcust, but that's years off.

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Right now, this sounds like we are very exposed.

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 12>Well, Danika, we absolutely are utterly exposed.

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 10>There's no doubt about that.

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 12>I've been on the Defense Committee now for probably five

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 12>or six years. Our ground based air defense systems a

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 12>laughing stock. Our northern bases, our bases that provide intelligence

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 12>services and communications equipment, their ability to be able to

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 12>project air power from our northern bases, all of these

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 12>places are at risk. Intercontinental ballistic missiles. Now, this is

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 12>not some sort of dream time. We're seeing these attacks

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 12>take place in other parts around the world, like in Ukraine.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 12>We live in the most dangerous geostrategic time since nineteen

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 12>forty five, and we have critical, critically important assets in

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 12>the north of Australia and they are absolutely exposed. They

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 12>are literally undefended at the moment, and that is criminal.

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 10>This government needs to act.

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 12>It's putting all of its money into Orcus and it's

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 12>ripping the guts out of defense. The author of the

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 12>one of the authors of the Defense Strategic Review, Peter Dean,

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 12>has identified this very issue himself that we are utterly

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 12>exposed with our lack of ground air defense systems. And

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 12>you know, you're absolutely right what you said before, Deneka,

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 12>and that is this absolute cannibalism that is going on

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 12>in defense where we see reserve hours being cut from

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 12>two hundred hours a month under one hundred and fifty hours.

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 10>We're seeing pilots being effectively.

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 12>Grounded and not being able to get air time to

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 12>be able to train because we can't afford to.

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 10>Put them in the air. This is madness.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>It is it's a huge, huge worry and leaves us

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 2>even more exposed at a time where you know we

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 2>are wide open. Andrew Wallace, We've got to leave it there.

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Nice to see you as always. Thanks very much for

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 2>joining me on the show this evening. Well remember last

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>week when Victorian Premier just sent to Alan told us this.

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 12>The CBD of Melbourne is safe, and I wish to

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 12>reiterate that the Melbourne CBD is safe.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Well it was a joke then and an even bigger

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.719
<v Speaker 2>joke now. Labour seems to have lost control of crime

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 2>and serious questions are being asked about the leniency of

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>bail applications after three teenagers accused of a machete attack

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 2>at Luna Park this month were set free on bail,

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 2>despite the magistrate acknowledging the allegations were extremely serious. Joining

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 2>me now is Victoria's shadow Police Minister, David Southwick.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 3>David, thank you for your time.

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 2>Look, the Premier is leaving the door open to further

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 2>bail changes, we're told, but that in spite of all

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 2>we've seen, some of her cabinets still don't want to

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 2>see the laws tightened. Surely this is completely at odds

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 2>with community expectations.

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, gratefully with you, Denika you're absolutely right. So the

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>government's very much divided on toughening out bay laws.

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 10>And don't forget.

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>We had the Premius say we've got the toughest bail

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>laws in the nation. Yet we're seeing, as you mentioned,

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>an offender that had allegedly two other machete attacks being

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>bailed again. I was at Luna Park yesterday actually where

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the attack took place. That's a family friendly area, that's

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhere that people take their kids and enjoy. I was

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>outside the big mouth of Luna Park, which some would

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>say that he's smiling. I would say very much that

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>young offenders are smiling and laughing at this government because

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 1>they have weak laws and if you break the law

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in Victoria, you're out and about, certainly before police even

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>finish their shit. Police are exhausted, they're frustrated. Victorians have

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>had enough, they've had a gut full. It's a law

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 1>of state. And you mentioned as well, you know the

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>rocks being pelted at police. It's all happening in Victoria.

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.719
<v Speaker 1>It's hopeless. It gives no confidence for anyone wanting to

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>restart Victoria. And we've got to ensure that the state's

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>safe and it absolutely is not.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, you're right.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is exactly what Victoria's you know, toughest

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 2>bail laws.

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 3>In the country looks like.

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 2>And it's been an absolute disaster from day one.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 3>What does the opposition want to see.

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Done right now to crack down on really what feels

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 2>like daily stories of serious knife crime.

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you're committing a serious crime, and particularly when

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>somebody is going into your home with a machete or

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>taking a knife at another person on the street, there's

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>got to be consequences and that's not happening. The government

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>produced a whole lot of bail laws, but they are

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>exclusions with young offenders. It's the young offenders that are

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>actually committing these crimes. Now. I don't care whether you're

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>fourteen forty. If you're taking a knife to a person

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and threatening their life, then you should not be allowed

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>back on the street to recommit those offenses. There's got

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to be consequences and we need to ensure that victims

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:16.239
<v Speaker 1>are put first and community certainly can go about their

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>lives not having to look over their shoulders. That again

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is not happening and we've got to change it up.

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And as I say, young people using social media, they're

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about how to get off. They're actually using AI

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to suggest what they might say in

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a court so they can get off and get back

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on the streets. Simply, that's not good enough, and we've

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>got to lock up violent offenders, no matter what the age.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree, you know, it does not matter what

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 2>age they are. Teach these kids a lesson before we

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 2>let you go. It's not just your federal counterparts that

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 2>are fighting it out over net zero, but you're also

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 2>in a bit of a bind. Victoria's opposition leader Brad

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Batton is coy about committing to net zero by twenty

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 2>forty five with a policy announcement before next year's election.

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Surely net zero by twenty forty five is feasible, and

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 2>what's more, you need to be calling out the twenty

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 2>thirty five target this is of seventy five to eighty percent,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 2>given that that in itself is actually unlikely to be met.

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Look, I mean, we'll have policy when it comes to targets.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But what I will say on this, because I did

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>have the energy portfolio, is we've got to have supply

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and competition, and this government back when I had that portfolio,

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we said more on shore conventional gas. If the government

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>would have accepted what we had suggested, we would have

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>more supply and lower prices and not the energy crisis.

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 10>That we're in.

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 3>That's what we need.

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Competition supply will bring prices down and provide certainty, and.

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 10>The government needs to do that.

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>The fact that we've got a ban on new homes

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for being able to use gas, I think says it

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>all in Victoria. We've got to change it up and

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm big on ensuring that there is the right types

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of energy mix and we transition to clean energy. But

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, all going through the roof, like Daron,

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Victoria is not the answer. Competition is, Supply is, and

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>let's get the market in to do the job, not

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the government, which we know everything the government touches falls

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to a miss and that's not the way to run

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>our energy system.

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 2>No, it's happening across the country as well. David Southwick,

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 2>appreciate your time, Thanks very much for joining me for

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 2>coming up after the break. Hubris has set in for

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the PM as he returns to Australia from his US trip,

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 2>dotting a Rock and Roll T shirt.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Would you believe I'll discuss this and more with my

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 3>panel next Welcome back.

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I came across this research being described as groundbreaking

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 2>by left wing think tank the Australia Institute Today, and

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if it got its talking points straight from

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese Communist Party. The report claims to reveal how

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 2>tensions in the South China see a quote misunderstood and

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 2>misrepresented in Australia. The paper is written in Mandarin and

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 2>translated into English by Frank One, a postdoctoral fellow at

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 2>the Institute. He says that the often repeated claim that

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 2>China is aggressively expanding into the territory of neighboring countries

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 2>is an oversimplification. China's territorial and maritime claims in the

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 2>South China Sea have remained largely consistent since nineteen forty nine.

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 2>While China has become more assertive in exercising those claims

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 2>in recent years, its actions have not been solely responsible

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 2>for tensions in the region, he says, assertive or more

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 2>like aggressive, whether it be Chinese Coast Guard ships using

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 2>water cannons on other countries vessels to performing reckless maneuvers

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.479
<v Speaker 2>and repeated attempts to ram other vessels like those from

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 2>the Philippines.

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 3>In fact, reports of.

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Aggressive and dangerous conduct by Chinese vessels in the South

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 2>China Sea have surged over the past few years. In August,

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 2>a China Coastguard vessel collided with a Chinese Navy ship

0:23:56.119 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 2>while pursuing a Philippine Coastguard vessel. This illegal behavior has

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 2>been going on for the better part of a decade,

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 2>not to mention its ongoing threat of war with Taiwan,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 2>prompting US Secretary of warpete Hegseth to warn that an

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 2>invasion could be imminent. And you know, just this week,

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 2>a Chinese fighter aircraft released flares close to an r

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 2>double AF aircraft that had been patrolling in the South

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 2>China Sea. On this the paper claims this marked the

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 2>second time when China publicly accused Australian military aircraft of intruding.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 3>In its airspace.

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 2>These developments would have confirmed the suspicion expressed by a

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 2>senior academic in the National Institute of South China.

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Sea Studies that Australia's.

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 2>Involvement and that of Japan would cause additional complications for China.

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 3>What if one of the flares had blown up our aircraft.

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean someone could have died thanks to China's reckless

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 2>and aggressive actions.

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 3>And that our double af aircraft was.

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Not even flying in Chinese airspace. So this was by

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 2>no means just an intrusion. But Frank says Australia sales

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 2>its warships into the South China Sea to challenge China's

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 2>maritime claims Now, I'd argue, if China has recently exercised

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 2>its right in international waters adjacent to Australia, why can't

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 2>we exercise similar rights in Southeast Asia? Because China's continued

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 2>aggression and illegal activities in the South China Sea are

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 2>a threat to freedom and to democracy worldwide and obviously

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 2>to us here, and perhaps left wing think tanks should

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 2>wake up to it. Johny now is New South Wales

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Independent MP Taniam Halek and former New South Wales Police

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Minister David Elliott.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Hart of both of you.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Happy Friday, as always, thanks for joining me. I want

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>to get your thoughts on this, David, as a former

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 2>defense personnel yourself, what's your reaction to this piece by

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 2>this left wing think tank?

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, their apologists and that happens with the left wing media,

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 8>is that they will always want to challenge what the

0:25:55.880 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 8>West is doing because it suits their narrative. But they're

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 8>completely off campus because, as you said, China cannot come

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 8>towards adjacent to Australia's sovereign borders and have maneuvers and

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 8>then complain about the rest of the world doing it

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 8>in South China Sea legally doing it in the South

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 8>China Sea. So, I mean, we don't know why Australian

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 8>defense assets are up there. I'm actually quite impressed that

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 8>they are up there. It shows that the Commonwalth government

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 8>is being assertive. We obviously have to be very very careful,

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 8>but we've also got commitments through a number of treaties

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.959
<v Speaker 8>that we support our allies up there, including Japan and

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 8>South Korea and indeed Taiwan. So we've got to make

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 8>sure that people know that, you know, we're not rolling

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 8>over and allowing them to attend our international waters, international

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 8>wars adjacent to our sovereign borders, and we're not prepared

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 8>to do the same exactly.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 2>I just thought it was a very bizarre article. The

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>think take Now, look, let's move on. It's been a

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 2>big week for elbow over in the US hasn't it.

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 2>He's given himself a pat on the back. It's like

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 2>a victory lap. Touching down in Sydney yesterday with his

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 2>Joy Division Rock and Roll T shirt on. Look, Tanya

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 2>humorous as has well and truly set in. How would

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 2>you rate his meeting with Donald Trump this week?

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 11>Look, I think Alberanizi is probably right to have a

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 11>bit of a spring in his step.

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 3>It's got a bit fun, been a good week.

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 11>I mean, this is a groundbreaking, rare earths and critical

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 11>minerals deal with the US. He's also been able to

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 11>cement to the Orcus, although that should never been in

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 11>any doubt and it came out largely unscathed out of

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 11>this meeting. I'm ensure Rad received a bit of a spray,

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 11>but you know, we all had a chuckle and we

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 11>will trightly enjoy them, I think in Australia. But it

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 11>hasn't stopped the US and Australia from executing I think

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 11>a terrific deal for Australian.

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 3>So I think the joy.

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 11>And that's the shirt that he's running around with at

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.479
<v Speaker 11>the moment, is in Alberanze. It will be short lived

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 11>because the reality is for US. Unlike the US, Australia

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 11>is bogged down with bureaucratic red tape and green tape,

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 11>in particular in relation to the net zero targets. That's

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 11>not bogging down the US, and the US will want

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 11>rapid development of this deal in Australia. You've already had

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 11>the Greens issue a statement the other day Shoebridge and

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 11>a Shoebridge issue a statement concern that any of the

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 11>their requirements changed for this deal. But what we don't

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 11>want is any of this green tape to be a

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 11>statuary handbrake on what is a large resource and energy

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 11>intensive projects. That's what these are, and we want the

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 11>wind for for Australia. So I think the big thing

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 11>for ALBERNIZI will be nowt to make sure that green

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 11>tape that is strangling Australia often in our minerals and

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 11>mining divisions, doesn't impede or be a barrier for this

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 11>terrific deal for US.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 2>That is a fair point. Look, and it has been

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.479
<v Speaker 2>a funny week. It was a funny meeting. Let's talk

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 2>about Kevin Rudd. You've got Susan Lee this week saying

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Rud's got to go now.

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 3>But if you've got.

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 2>One backbencher after another, David saying no, no, no, that

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 2>was the wrong call.

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 3>It's getting a bit aw well.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 8>It reminded me when I was a child, and you know,

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 8>when you got in trouble, mums would say, you know,

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.479
<v Speaker 8>you've suffered enough because you've been embarrassed by it all.

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 8>And I do think that Kevin Rudd has suffered enough.

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 8>He looked very sheepish, but he brought it all on himself.

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 8>And it's a message for people going into politics. Be

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 8>careful about the butcher kick on the way up, because

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 8>the ones you're kissing on the way down. And it

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 8>seemed that Trump was not going to be for turning.

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 8>But I think, I mean, I'm prepared to give the

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 8>Prime Minister the credit for the meeting. Of course they're

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 8>all saying Kevin did all this work. Well, that's what

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 8>he's paid to do. And the Prime Minister is the

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 8>one who's carrying the political risk in all of this

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 8>and he did it. But that T shirt he mustn't

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 8>have got the me mate, because I'm told by Labor

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 8>that suss Street is paranoid about Hubris and they, particularly

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 8>after the federal election in the New South Wales by

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 8>election win earlier in the year. Sussex Street has told

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 8>the Parliamentary Labor Party be careful of hubris that will

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 8>bring us down. And coming off the VIP plane wearing

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 8>a T shirt was not something you would expect from

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 8>a world leader.

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 2>No, absolutely not joy division as well, he's loving himself

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 2>and that's that's the problem right now.

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 11>And he had got his peak this week.

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 3>In case that's Dan Hill.

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, Parliament returns next week, so let's see how it

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 2>goes now. Look, Australia's Border Force has sees more than

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 2>half a billion cigarettes and millions of vapes in just

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 2>three months.

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 3>This is one of the biggest hauls on record.

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Between July and September this year, officers intercepted five hundred

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 2>and eighty six million cigarettes and more than three million vapes. Tanya,

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 2>what does this say about criminal networks in this country?

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 11>Well, they're well and truly entrenched in Australia, aren't they.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 11>I mean five hundred and eighty six million cigarettes, three

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 11>million vapes? Just what a three month period.

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Shocking.

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 11>This is on the back of what's something like one

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 11>hundred and one hundred and five five bombings of tobacconists

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 11>in Victoria.

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 3>We might remember that.

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 11>Was usually long ago, that was about a year ago,

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 11>and that was also organized crime that was involved in that,

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 11>and turf over who owns what amongst the criminals and

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 11>look they're still in control. I think they've just it's

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 11>extraordinary how much the criminal syndicates are running.

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 10>This trade in Australia.

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 11>Obviously there's a demand. I think there needs to be

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 11>a reset and a relook at how much we can

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 11>keep going with the excise to do that, we do

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 11>put on tobacco and we don't manufactural grow any tobacco

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 11>anymore in Australian We certainly don't make vapes. But this

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 11>is something that needs to be I think considered again

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 11>by the Australian government. Need to re look at this

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 11>because there is a demand for the product, otherwise they

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 11>wouldn't be involved in it.

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 3>And think that's a fair point cost managing this.

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 11>I can only imagine what Warder Control has to spend

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 11>just to be able to find what they do find,

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 11>let alone what they don't find.

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I agree, Well what do you put this

0:31:59.000 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 3>down to day?

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 8>This is prohibitional over again, I mean, we just haven't

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 8>learned from history. This is I mean, I'm not a smoker,

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 8>but I'd be horrified if we had prohibition. I think

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 8>that the government really needs to work out where the

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 8>sweet spot is with taxation. And yes, we need to

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 8>do things that would discourage people from smoking, like we

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 8>need to do anything that is causing us harm. But

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 8>I think the government is allowed these by overtaxing this product,

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 8>the government has allowed the criminal element to take control

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 8>of this money laundering.

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 2>I completely I agree with you. It is a big problem,

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 2>a huge problem. Let's end on a bit of fun.

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 2>In your column in the Daily Telegraph this week, David,

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 2>you wrote about what constitutes a good leader in Australia. Jah,

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I wish we had a good leader right now. You've

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 2>given us a list. Go on, who's your best?

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Pick? Here your top go on.

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 10>I mean I liked all of them.

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 8>I think I think the intellect of John Howard and

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 8>Peter Cosgrove was superior. Gladys obviously had a lot of charm,

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 8>Bronwin has was you know, certainly let everybody know where

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 8>she stood. My favorite one of I don't have favorites

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 8>of exposes, but I did sure.

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 3>The team.

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 8>I did love working for Mike bed he had magic. Mike,

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 8>I like I had magic, and he had a lot

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 8>of charm and was a good one and he was yeah,

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 8>and he could be won everybody over.

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 3>And you're almost out of time, and I'm like, God,

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 3>I've got a chair. Good leaders. I work for Anne,

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 3>good leaders.

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 11>Okay, I worked for the Labor Pasa seven years.

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 3>I've got no good stories at all. I haven't got

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 3>what constitutes a good leader.

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 11>What do you recond Look, I think being patient, resilient,

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 11>being measured might be definitely a good example a bad guy.

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there you go, the glory, Gloria, the glories.

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Of your South lives.

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 2>There you go, Tanya Mahal of David Elliott. Thanks as always,

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you again next week. Have a nice weekend

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 2>coming up. After the break, King Charles becomes the first

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 2>British monarch to pray with the pope in five hundred years.

0:33:57.880 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Plus the winners and losers of the week, including the

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 2>reader is Raeli hostage to proposed.

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 3>To his girlfriends. That's next. I'm back.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in my next guest, LLENP and P. Garth Hamilton, Hi, Garth,

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.720
<v Speaker 2>thank you for joining me. You've written an opinion article

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 2>in The Australian Today calling for those on the center

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 2>right of politics to reach out to actually work with

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the union movement, which, as we all know, is very

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:24.919
<v Speaker 2>much in bed with labor. And now you point out

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the two issues of net zero and mass migration, which

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 2>are largely at the detriment of blue collar workers, and

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I've got to say, Garth, look, I agree with you

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 2>that there's certainly ground you could take from labor on

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 2>these two fronts.

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 3>But we've all seen.

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Labor all too willing to concede everything to the unions

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.839
<v Speaker 2>on ir which I can't see the Coalition doing, nor

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 2>it should.

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 9>No, when you're absolutely right, I think we should be

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 9>reaching out to union members and making that differentiation.

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 10>Very clearly.

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 9>Union members are just Australians with jobs, and right now

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 9>those jobs are under threat from policies like net zero.

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 9>We've seen that play out across the nation. It's really

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 9>important that we do differentiate ourselves and ek we've got

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 9>an opportunity in the Liberal Party to walk away completely

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 9>from net zero so that we can look those workers

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 9>in the eye and say we have a different proposition

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 9>to you from labor. We will always put good jobs

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 9>and good pay above the ideology of climate change and

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 9>that zero. We will put you first. And that's something

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 9>that labour can't say right now. And we know within

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 9>those labor movements, within those union movements, they're having those conversations,

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 9>they're having those problems. We've seen this play out for

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 9>a long time now, and I think it's the opportunity

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 9>for Liberal pay to stand up and say who we

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 9>are and create a vision for ourselves as a party

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 9>that supports workers.

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 10>Oh.

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I think you make an absolutely fair point, and I

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 2>want to stick on net zero because the cost is

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 2>getting out of hand. You've been pushing new data based

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 2>on Princeton University research that shows the capital costs of

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 2>hitting climate targets is between seventeen and twenty two billion

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars a month, which is extraordinary and in practical terms,

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 2>that's eight hospitals or four hundred new aged care homes.

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Look garth.

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Too often this debate is framed in abstract terms.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Why are more people not framing it in very practical ways.

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 9>Like this, Well, this is exactly what I want to

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 9>do and take the net zero conversation out of the bush.

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 9>And that's have done a very good job of talking

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 9>about what net zero does to farming communities. I want

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 9>to bring the conversation into the city and talk about

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 9>the impact on infrastructure, the loss costs that we have

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 9>by paying these exorbitant costs. This report was done by

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 9>Princeton University, University of Melbourne and the University of Queensland,

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 9>three very reputable universities. Chris Bowen tries to tell everyone

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 9>that's misinformation. I know who I'd rather trust. It's not

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 9>Chris Bowen. That figure of twenty billion dollars a month

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 9>is incredible and when you break it down into basic

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 9>infrastructure things that we need around the country right now,

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:53.320
<v Speaker 9>it's startling. We've just built into Woomba, or we're building

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 9>a new hospital, it's going to be about two billion dollars,

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 9>just a little bit over. So for that figure of

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 9>twenty billion a month, we could be building a new

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 9>hospitals a month around Australia and goodness meet with the

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 9>ambulance ramping, with the overcreating, with the worn out facilities

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 9>that we see in hospitals all around Australia. These things

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 9>are needed, but it could be other things. It could

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 9>be high schools, age care facilities, roads that have been

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.839
<v Speaker 9>worn down. There's so many things in our community where

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 9>we look around and we think Australia is falling behind.

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 9>We're going backwards. Our standard of living isn't what it was.

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.919
<v Speaker 9>This is why the money is going to net zero.

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 9>It's going overseas, it's taking jobs with it overseas. I

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.320
<v Speaker 9>think we really need to understand this isn't a freebeat.

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 9>Net zero doesn't come for free. It comes at a

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 9>huge cost to this country and that's why I'm so

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 9>opposed to it.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think you're absolutely spot on it. It's good

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 2>to see it laid out in practical terms. Eight hospitals

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:45.919
<v Speaker 2>or four hundred new aged care homes. I think that's

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 2>a really good selling point because this scheme is sending

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 2>us broken backwards every day. Garth Hamilton, we have to

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 2>leave it there. Thank you for your time, as always,

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it.

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 10>Thank you well.

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.919
<v Speaker 2>King Charles and Pope Leo the Fourteen have taken part

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 2>in a joint prayer inside the Sistine Chapel as part

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 2>of the monarch's historic two day visit to Rome. The

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 2>pair prayed together in a mark of strong ties between

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the Church of England and Catholic Church in an event

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.319
<v Speaker 2>that has not occurred in five hundred years.

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 9>Glory with the Father and the time and expence, as.

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 13>His wife said at the beginning, is now as.

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Russell Meyer's royal editor for The Mirror, was there and

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 2>joins me, now, Russell, good to see you as always.

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Why was this such an important moment for the King?

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think when you look at King Charles's legacy,

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 13>which he is undoubtedly doing, and not just because of

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 13>his cancer treatment, but of course he's a man in

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 13>his approaching his late seventies, he's very very in tune

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 13>with what sort of legacy he will leave behind, and

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.959
<v Speaker 13>it's very very important for him to meet the poet

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 13>he met Pope Benedictine. Then he is meeting Pope Leo

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:08.879
<v Speaker 13>as well, because he is the head of the Church

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 13>of England and Pope Leo coming in as the head

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 13>of the Catholic Church. You know, this ecumenical service that

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 13>they had between them is really history making, and I

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 13>think King Charles is looking at this hit the history

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 13>of his legacy as well, and being in the Vatican,

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 13>it was very very much steeped in history. That though

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 13>way they were very much in tune with what the

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 13>presentation of this visit to the Vatican was.

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 2>And look, I've got to say, the King and Queen

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 2>may be in Rome, but they just can't escape the

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 2>ongoing scandal surrounding Prince Andrew, can they. You've written in

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 2>the Mirror today what a stain it has been to

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:48.280
<v Speaker 2>have led up to this visit to the Holy See

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 2>and an historic meeting with the Pope to face more

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:54.879
<v Speaker 2>scandal concerning his disgraced brother Prince Andrew. Do you think

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 2>that this trip, while obviously very significant, has actually been

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 2>overshadowed by Prince andrew ongoing indiscretions.

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 13>I don't think there's anything that they can say otherwise,

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 13>whether that's the Palace or in the politicians looking into it.

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 13>You know, the fact that members of Parliament in London

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 13>are discussing the affairs of the royal family tells you

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 13>that we are living in quite bizarre times because certainly

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 13>this scandal from Prince Andrew and his relationship with Jeffrey

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 13>Epstein has been going on for many, many years, and

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 13>I think what the Palace tried to do last week

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 13>was certainly to draw a line under it. But it's

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 13>done anything But what we've had is four or five

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 13>days of front page headlines commentary about the finances of

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 13>the Royal family. Questions over Prince Andrew's use of Royal Lodge,

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 13>which is a thirty room mansion in the grounds of

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 13>Windsor Great Park, and certainly how on earth he has

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 13>afforded this luxury lifestyle that he's leaded and why that

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 13>has sort of moved on for his associations with Glenn Maxwell,

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 13>Jeffrey Epstein and so on. So very very unwelcome news

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 13>for in Palis and the King, and the commentary surrounding

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 13>the visit to the Vatican, which was supposed to be

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 13>this huge, huge, momentous historic event was overshadowed unfortunately.

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, you mentioned there that MPs are talking about it.

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I find this extraordinary because they're pushing for an inquiry

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 2>into Prince Andrew's residence at Royal Lodge, where he has

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 2>lived for more than twenty years without paying rent. Even

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, has indicated that he's open

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 2>to MPs actually questioning Andrew in person. Russell, could we

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 2>see a situation where Prince Andrew is hold in front

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 2>of a committee.

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 13>Well, indeed, certainly that the Public Account's Committee could bring

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 13>him in. That would be very, very embarrassing, not only

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 13>for Andrew. We've seen how he performs under pressure in

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:51.919
<v Speaker 13>interviews after that infamous BBC Newsnight interview, so the Royal

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 13>Family will not want him anywhere near public camera. But

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 13>that isn't the only problem for Prince Andrew and the

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:01.799
<v Speaker 13>rest of the family, because after relinquishing these titles, the

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 13>sense of public revulsion over his not only his living arrangements,

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 13>but the fact he is still essentially front and centis

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 13>still popping up at events for the Royal family. But

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 13>the Metropolitan Police are now looking into claims that he

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 13>had used his position to smear his sex abuse acuse,

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 13>a Virginia Geffrey, in conjunction with Jeffrey Epstein. So not

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 13>only had he lied in the interview by saying that

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.760
<v Speaker 13>he cut off contact with Epstein, he was actively trying

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 13>to smear her. So that is a jeue due problem

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 13>for Andrew and the Royal family. Could he be involved

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 13>in a police investigation. Could he be hauled into questioning

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 13>by the police as well as MP's. It's certainly very

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 13>interesting to see what the next developments will be.

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 14>Wow.

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like a complete mess and just more complete

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and utter embarrassment for the royal family. Meanwhile, Russell, a

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 2>friend of Sarah Ferguson, has revealed that she's on the

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 2>cusp of a nervous breakdown as her daughters are being

0:42:56.960 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 2>dragged into the scandal over her association with Jeffrey Epstein.

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 3>What what can you tell us?

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 13>Well, of course this situation has affected Sarah Ferguson. She's

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:11.800
<v Speaker 13>been forced to relinquish her titles. I think it's quite unfortunate,

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 13>you know that we have to discuss people's mental health

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 13>in all of this because it will no doubt take

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 13>a huge effect on the people involved and those around them.

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 13>You know, they've got a family to think about. Their

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 13>daughters haven't said anything, They've been rallied around the family.

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 13>But what what is next for Sarah and Andrew? And

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 13>we do the public want to see them disappear from

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 13>a public view?

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 10>Yes? I think so.

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 13>I think that certainly Andrew will have to explain himself.

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 13>The King has tried to move him on from raw Lodge.

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 13>He understands that the damage is doing to the monarchy.

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:50.240
<v Speaker 13>And if Andrew and Sarah, who is still living together,

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 13>in this great and favor mention, were to just slip

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 13>off into the to the distance and not be heard

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 13>from again, it's probably best for all parties.

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 2>I think at this point you're absolutely right, best to

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 2>just go quietly at this point, Russell Meyer is nice

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 2>to see you as always, Thanks very.

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Much for joining me on the show.

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 11>My pleasure.

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 10>Thank you.

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's that time of the week where we saw

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 2>the winners from the losers. And helping me to do

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 2>that is former Liberal Senator Holly Hughes. Holy Happy Friday.

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Good to see you. Thank you for joining me tonight. Now,

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 2>your winner of the week is Anthony Albanezi after his

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:24.320
<v Speaker 2>successful meeting with Donald Trump.

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 14>He's had quite the week.

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Really.

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 15>I think that meeting went as well as could possibly

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 15>been quote for by him. I think the only thing

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 15>he and his team may have been a little bit

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 15>disappointed in was the fact that so much of the

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 15>coverage was swallow up by Kevin Runn and his previous

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 15>commentary around the president. But certainly I think Albin easy

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:48.800
<v Speaker 15>whether it was the August the critical Minerals deal, both

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 15>of those things were really good things for him to

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 15>be able to bed down. I had to say I

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:56.879
<v Speaker 15>was a bit of a cynic. I thought that this

0:44:56.960 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 15>meeting may actually never happen. I think he I have

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 15>been wanting to try and avoid meeting with Donald Trump

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 15>in person, certainly in an event that could have been embarrassing.

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:09.879
<v Speaker 15>But look from his perspective, I think a win as

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 15>well as it could have. And as Australians we should

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 15>all be pleased. I'm no fan of alb and Easy,

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 15>but as Australians we should all be pleased that into

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 15>our relationship to the US is clearly on the very

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 15>strong footing.

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh look, I agree.

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 2>I think we're all maybe expecting maybe Anthony but Easy

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 2>to get addressing down.

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 3>But it ended up being the elephant in.

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 2>The room Kevin Rudd, which I thought was quite delicious.

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:35.480
<v Speaker 2>But overall it was a very successful trip. But you

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 2>know he's come back now he's got to face the

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 2>music because there's a lot of issues on the home front.

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 2>So let's see how this week in Parliament pans out, now, Holly,

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 2>my winner this week is former Israeli hostage Elliot Cohen.

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 2>He was released from Harmask captivity eight months ago and

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 2>this week he proposed to his long term girlfriend, who

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 2>survived the Nova Music Festival Massacre.

0:45:55.160 --> 0:46:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Have a look at this Lucky Holly.

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I just thought that was just so nice. After everything

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 2>that the pair have been through, they've found happiness and

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 2>now they're going to get married.

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was beautiful.

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 15>What do you think absolutely beautiful that your winner of

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 15>the week is the winner of the week.

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 14>That is just absolutely beautiful.

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 15>And you know, when we were packing to start our

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:40.359
<v Speaker 15>move the other week, I found.

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 14>My yellow pin that I have worn for.

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 15>Many many months and years now that it was acknowledging

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 15>the hostages. And it's so lovely that that Kim didn't

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 15>have to come out with me and be something that

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 15>I had sort of easy access to because it's so wonderful.

0:46:56.640 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 15>I mean, obviously devastating those that didn't return alive, but

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 15>the ones that were all alive are now returned and

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 15>back with their families, and this is just absolutely beautiful and.

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 14>I'm just so happy for them.

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 15>And I hope that all the hostages manage to find

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:13.720
<v Speaker 15>some peace and happiness in their lives as.

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:14.360
<v Speaker 14>They move forward.

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I completely agree, perfect sentiment. Now you'll loser this week

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 3>is the push for net zero. It's doomed.

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:21.320
<v Speaker 14>I think net.

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 15>Zero well finished gone, And I mean, you know, I've

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 15>been saying since Fili of Parliament beyond that, you know,

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 15>I really felt net zero was a bit of a

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 15>red herring in the fact that there is absolutely no

0:47:32.440 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 15>achievable pathway to it in reality, and it's now a

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 15>sort of a catchphrase that most people don't even really

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 15>understand what it means. But I think, you know, I

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:43.479
<v Speaker 15>gave up an easy the winner of the week because

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:45.840
<v Speaker 15>part of that is the critical minerals deal. Now, the

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:47.880
<v Speaker 15>thing about critical minerals, it's all good to get the

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:49.240
<v Speaker 15>critical minerals out.

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:50.879
<v Speaker 14>It's about the refinement of them.

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:54.280
<v Speaker 15>And if we really want to be the West sufficient

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 15>when it comes to critical minerals, we are going to

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:58.720
<v Speaker 15>have to put our big boy pants on and actually

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 15>start to look at refining them ourselves, not sending them

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:05.320
<v Speaker 15>to China for refinement when ninety percent of refinement is occurring.

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 14>And so for any of that to happen.

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:09.479
<v Speaker 15>They are going to have to get over a whole

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:12.360
<v Speaker 15>lot of their next zero aspirations because we're going to

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 15>make this work.

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 14>It ain't going to be under their safegallemy.

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 2>No, and it's sending us broken backwards in the process.

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 2>So I couldn't agree with you more absolutely. Now my

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 2>loser this week is the Bureau of Meteorology. I don't

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 2>know if you've seen their new website update, Holly. I

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 2>think it is an absolute shocker. I was confused when

0:48:30.200 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 2>I went on there the other day, and it looks

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 2>as though I'm not the only one. Social media has

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:38.280
<v Speaker 2>been flooded with complaints and it's cost US four million

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.759
<v Speaker 2>dollars to do it as well. Why wouldn't they just

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 2>stick to what works, Holly. We're almost out of time.

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 2>But have you seen it? What do you think of it? What?

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 15>As my husband says, he wants to be someone who

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 15>works at the BOMB sometimes because you can just have

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:50.440
<v Speaker 15>a guess.

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 14>And there's zero consequences if you're wrong. How we know

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 14>what it's going.

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 15>To be in one hundred years time when we can't

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 15>work at what it's going to be on Saturday afternoon,

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 15>but you know the BOMB. I just prefer them to

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 15>get their predictions right on what's actually going to happen,

0:49:04.280 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 15>as opposed to worrying too much about their website.

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 14>But again, agree, thanks dollars, yours are my money for what?

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 10>For what?

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Exactly? More confusion? Absolutely ridiculous. Holy Hughes, have a nice weekend.

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for your time this evening.

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:17.239
<v Speaker 3>That's it for me.

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I'll be back seven pm for Deneka and James on Sunday.

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:21.399
<v Speaker 2>Steve Price is up in a moment.

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:21.839
<v Speaker 3>Good night,