WEBVTT - Credlin | 23 September

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Peter Credlin, live from News 24.

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Certainly am here. Good evening. Welcome to the program. Here's

0:00:09.820 --> 0:00:13.120
<v Speaker 2>what's coming up tonight on Credlin. Another counter-terrorism arrest in

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.740
<v Speaker 2>Melbourne today. This time it's an alleged ISIS member who

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.940
<v Speaker 2>spent six months in Egypt before returning home to Australia.

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.490
<v Speaker 2>All smiles as the Prime Minister gets his selfie fix

0:00:23.550 --> 0:00:27.110
<v Speaker 2>at the UN, but the US President not looking so happy,

0:00:27.590 --> 0:00:30.950
<v Speaker 2>turning on the pressure to Australia over Labor's digital laws

0:00:31.150 --> 0:00:34.970
<v Speaker 2>and free speech. More tonight on the Australian War Memorial

0:00:35.010 --> 0:00:38.870
<v Speaker 2>being used as a political platform, including the dumping of

0:00:38.890 --> 0:00:43.090
<v Speaker 2>the Australian National Anthem. And the Coalition unveils its energy

0:00:43.150 --> 0:00:46.449
<v Speaker 2>plan and finally looks ready to pull the renewables rug

0:00:46.570 --> 0:00:50.989
<v Speaker 2>from under Chris Bowen and this net zero obsessed government.

0:00:52.030 --> 0:00:57.790
<v Speaker 3>We need to take a chainsaw to Labor's green, ideologically

0:00:57.950 --> 0:01:00.770
<v Speaker 3>driven approach to energy.

0:01:02.830 --> 0:01:06.190
<v Speaker 2>But first, as the latest News 24 Pulse poll has revealed,

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.490
<v Speaker 2>with a deeply unpopular leader, Labor is in trouble. No

0:01:10.550 --> 0:01:13.590
<v Speaker 2>surprise then that Anthony Albanese has grabbed the opportunity for

0:01:13.610 --> 0:01:16.819
<v Speaker 2>a trip to the UN rather than face a booing

0:01:16.900 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 2>crowd and Kylie Minogue at the MCG this weekend. Shag, marry, date.

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.220
<v Speaker 2>Kylie Minogue, Nicole Kidman or Rhonda Birchmore?

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:28.699
<v Speaker 4>Kylie, clearly.

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 2>You'd marry Kylie and shag her and date her?

0:01:31.540 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 5>All of the above.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:32.900
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:01:35.730 --> 0:01:37.690
<v Speaker 2>That's why he's not there at the MCG for the

0:01:37.750 --> 0:01:41.050
<v Speaker 2>AFL grand final. But Albanese is under no threat of

0:01:41.110 --> 0:01:44.220
<v Speaker 2>removal as long as the right of politics remains split.

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.500
<v Speaker 2>And that's both the dismal reality and the challenge for

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.220
<v Speaker 2>anyone wanting our country to be better. After a decade

0:01:52.260 --> 0:01:55.220
<v Speaker 2>of climate wars, the coalition has finally given us the

0:01:55.270 --> 0:01:58.670
<v Speaker 2>bare bones of an energy policy today to keep coal

0:01:58.710 --> 0:02:00.970
<v Speaker 2>in the system, to get more gas out of the

0:02:01.010 --> 0:02:04.430
<v Speaker 2>ground as quickly as possible and essentially to scrap all

0:02:04.570 --> 0:02:07.970
<v Speaker 2>subsidies for renewables because if they're really cheap, they don't

0:02:08.010 --> 0:02:12.550
<v Speaker 2>need them, and to end the nuclear ban. Finally, net

0:02:12.590 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 2>zero is dead and the Turnbull-Morrison era of climate nonsense

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:22.380
<v Speaker 2>consigned to history. But now the coalition needs a fair

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 2>income immigration policy too. Because energy and immigration are the

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>policy areas where the Albanese government is most damaging our country.

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.500
<v Speaker 2>It's also where One Nation has the advantage over the

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:40.070
<v Speaker 2>Coalition for consistency and credibility. Unlike the Coalition, which has

0:02:40.130 --> 0:02:44.570
<v Speaker 2>been against and then for and now against net zero emissions,

0:02:45.090 --> 0:02:49.090
<v Speaker 2>One Nation has always opposed it. And unlike the Coalition,

0:02:49.169 --> 0:02:53.010
<v Speaker 2>which successfully stopped illegal migration under PMs Howard and Abbott,

0:02:53.630 --> 0:02:58.350
<v Speaker 2>But eventually lost control of legal migration, One Nation's always

0:02:58.410 --> 0:03:02.130
<v Speaker 2>been concerned about both and the impact of migrants on

0:03:02.169 --> 0:03:06.750
<v Speaker 2>the economy and their effect on social cohesion. As revealed

0:03:06.790 --> 0:03:09.510
<v Speaker 2>by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in their annual report

0:03:09.570 --> 0:03:13.650
<v Speaker 2>last week, our net overseas migration, the NOM, was 292,000

0:03:13.650 --> 0:03:14.850
<v Speaker 2>in the 12 months to March this year. In the

0:03:14.930 --> 0:03:24.669
<v Speaker 2>Howard era, the long-run average was 110,000. So let's be clear,

0:03:24.710 --> 0:03:28.310
<v Speaker 2>a norm averaging around $ 300, 000 a year puts downward pressure

0:03:28.370 --> 0:03:32.730
<v Speaker 2>on wages, upward pressure on housing, it strains physical and

0:03:32.830 --> 0:03:36.290
<v Speaker 2>social infrastructure, and at least for the migrants who come

0:03:36.330 --> 0:03:39.050
<v Speaker 2>here and just live in Hotel Australia, take all they

0:03:39.090 --> 0:03:44.370
<v Speaker 2>can get, well, it erodes social cohesion. Angus Taylor began

0:03:44.430 --> 0:03:46.790
<v Speaker 2>his time as opposition leader saying that he'd restore our

0:03:46.810 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 2>standard of living, he'd protect our way of life, and

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 2>that the migrant situation Migrants come into this country while

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 2>the numbers were too high and the quality was too low.

0:03:58.060 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 7>Our top priority in the Liberal Party and my top

0:04:01.460 --> 0:04:04.260
<v Speaker 7>priority as a new leader and Jane's as well is

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.590
<v Speaker 7>to protect Australians' way of life and to restore their

0:04:07.620 --> 0:04:10.790
<v Speaker 7>standard of living. You've heard some strong comments from me

0:04:10.810 --> 0:04:14.410
<v Speaker 7>in the last 24 hours on immigration and immigration, clearly

0:04:14.470 --> 0:04:16.890
<v Speaker 7>the numbers have been too high and the standards have

0:04:16.930 --> 0:04:17.510
<v Speaker 7>been too low.

0:04:19.490 --> 0:04:22.349
<v Speaker 2>Now on this, the public are clearly with Angus. Numerous

0:04:22.410 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 2>polls have the majorities wanting lower or much lower migration. Likewise,

0:04:28.980 --> 0:04:32.219
<v Speaker 2>there are significant and growing poll concerns about the impact

0:04:32.260 --> 0:04:36.700
<v Speaker 2>of mass migration on social cohesion. As well as fueling

0:04:36.740 --> 0:04:39.870
<v Speaker 2>support for One Nation and the polling trend line makes

0:04:39.910 --> 0:04:43.890
<v Speaker 2>that obvious, the Bondi massacre has obviously drawn attention to

0:04:43.950 --> 0:04:47.830
<v Speaker 2>migrant communities that have lived here for decades without assimilating

0:04:47.850 --> 0:04:53.299
<v Speaker 2>Australian values. For too long in Canberra, ever-increasing migrant numbers

0:04:53.339 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 2>have been a lazy tool to artificially inflate growth forecasts

0:04:57.300 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 2>and to stop the economy slipping into recession, even though

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.990
<v Speaker 2>in per capita terms that's precisely what's happened. This practice

0:05:05.029 --> 0:05:10.229
<v Speaker 2>has masked record high government spending and profligate waste, especially

0:05:10.270 --> 0:05:14.350
<v Speaker 2>under the Albanese government, but also under Morrison too. Now

0:05:14.430 --> 0:05:18.490
<v Speaker 2>Taylor has to stand up and declare the racket must end.

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.460
<v Speaker 2>To keep the coalition competitive, he must spell out precisely

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.700
<v Speaker 2>how he will reduce migrant numbers while demonstrating how to

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:31.339
<v Speaker 2>keep productive industries strong, such as agriculture, that rely on

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.849
<v Speaker 2>overseas workers to do the jobs that Australians just won't do. Now,

0:05:35.790 --> 0:05:40.890
<v Speaker 2>perhaps ending access to welfare for able-bodied, working-age people would

0:05:40.930 --> 0:05:43.950
<v Speaker 2>be a good start. He's also got to tackle the

0:05:44.010 --> 0:05:47.910
<v Speaker 2>elephant in the room, and that's who we permit to

0:05:47.990 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 2>migrate here. If politicians don't think that voters could join

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:56.690
<v Speaker 2>the dots between recent terrorism-related arrests and the countries of

0:05:56.820 --> 0:06:01.750
<v Speaker 2>origin that sponsor Islamist extremism, well, they are kidding themselves.

0:06:02.510 --> 0:06:06.830
<v Speaker 2>Look at the latest arrest today. A Somalian-born man, now

0:06:06.890 --> 0:06:11.460
<v Speaker 2>Australian citizen, arrested because police allege he's a member of

0:06:11.660 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 2>ISIS and has been, they claim, trying to recruit people

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 2>online to and give advice as to how to avoid

0:06:19.500 --> 0:06:23.469
<v Speaker 2>detection when planning a mass terrorism event.

0:06:24.350 --> 0:06:29.469
<v Speaker 8>Today, the Victorian counter-terrorism team, comprised of the AFP, Victoria

0:06:29.529 --> 0:06:33.490
<v Speaker 8>Police and ASIO, have arrested a 65-year-old man who we

0:06:33.529 --> 0:06:35.790
<v Speaker 8>will allege is a member of ISIS. The man will

0:06:35.810 --> 0:06:40.830
<v Speaker 8>be charged with membership of a terrorism organisation, possessing and

0:06:40.890 --> 0:06:44.700
<v Speaker 8>controlling violent extremist material and using a carriage service to

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 8>cause offence.

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:52.289
<v Speaker 2>Not linked to ISIS, a member of ISIS is the allegation.

0:06:53.089 --> 0:06:55.830
<v Speaker 2>In a world that's more globally connected than any other

0:06:55.870 --> 0:06:59.290
<v Speaker 2>time in human existence, events in a little town called

0:06:59.410 --> 0:07:03.890
<v Speaker 2>Piddington in the UK and their anger about the housing

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:08.979
<v Speaker 2>of some 1,500 adult male illegal migrants near a rural

0:07:09.100 --> 0:07:14.260
<v Speaker 2>hamlet of 350 locals, well, that matters to perceptions of

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:18.630
<v Speaker 2>what governments end up doing when they lose control of

0:07:18.690 --> 0:07:21.050
<v Speaker 2>both our borders and culture.

0:07:21.750 --> 0:07:25.370
<v Speaker 5>My concerns are the sheer scale of this. So we

0:07:25.530 --> 0:07:26.830
<v Speaker 5>are a very small village.

0:07:26.990 --> 0:07:29.070
<v Speaker 2>I'll be afraid. I mean, and I like going around

0:07:29.110 --> 0:07:33.650
<v Speaker 2>the park, which is also very close. And it will be, well,

0:07:33.770 --> 0:07:35.930
<v Speaker 2>I'll be totally scared and at risk.

0:07:36.730 --> 0:07:38.550
<v Speaker 8>We're already doing self-defense classes.

0:07:39.810 --> 0:07:42.550
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's watching this stuff on their devices. And what's happening

0:07:42.570 --> 0:07:48.030
<v Speaker 2>in the UK feels very, very real here. Taylor's challenge

0:07:48.070 --> 0:07:51.510
<v Speaker 2>would be to say what must be said while avoiding

0:07:51.570 --> 0:07:55.170
<v Speaker 2>outbreaks of disunity from left-wing liberals who think that we've

0:07:55.290 --> 0:07:58.850
<v Speaker 2>no moral right as a rich country to exclude would-be

0:07:58.910 --> 0:08:02.410
<v Speaker 2>migrants from relatively poor ones. Now, if they can't get

0:08:02.470 --> 0:08:05.270
<v Speaker 2>on board, then it's beyond time they drop the charade

0:08:05.570 --> 0:08:09.420
<v Speaker 2>and join Labor. Luckily, there's a way forward, namely to

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.140
<v Speaker 2>insist that everyone who comes to this country must be

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 2>able to demonstrate that their presence in Australia will be

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.850
<v Speaker 2>as good for us as it would undoubtedly be for them.

0:08:19.710 --> 0:08:21.990
<v Speaker 2>After all, the chance at life in Australia remains the

0:08:22.050 --> 0:08:25.250
<v Speaker 2>global golden ticket. And we've got to get back to

0:08:25.390 --> 0:08:29.450
<v Speaker 2>prizing this ourselves to ensure we leverage it to get

0:08:29.500 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the world's best and brightest, people who love what we

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 2>stand for and want to join us, rather than those

0:08:35.860 --> 0:08:40.830
<v Speaker 2>who want to come here, use us or change us. Essentially,

0:08:40.870 --> 0:08:44.329
<v Speaker 2>this means only providing long-term visas to those with a

0:08:44.370 --> 0:08:47.850
<v Speaker 2>definitive job to go to from day one at fair

0:08:47.890 --> 0:08:51.930
<v Speaker 2>market wages, because working and paying taxes is the best

0:08:51.990 --> 0:08:56.700
<v Speaker 2>way to integrate and ultimately to assimilate into Australian society.

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 2>If you're on a tourist visa or a study visa,

0:09:00.100 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 2>when it ends, you go home. You go home and

0:09:02.820 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 2>apply again if you want to come back to Australia,

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.020
<v Speaker 2>thus ending the road of visa hopping onshore. And when

0:09:10.070 --> 0:09:14.310
<v Speaker 2>it comes to our refugee intake, how about prioritising the

0:09:14.370 --> 0:09:19.390
<v Speaker 2>persecuted Christian minorities currently being slaughtered by Islamists in places

0:09:19.450 --> 0:09:24.790
<v Speaker 2>like Nigeria? Taylor will never be able to rhetorically outgun

0:09:24.850 --> 0:09:28.630
<v Speaker 2>his rival on the right, who will always sound more

0:09:28.750 --> 0:09:32.370
<v Speaker 2>hardline than a party of potential government that has to

0:09:32.390 --> 0:09:37.620
<v Speaker 2>balance concerns about social cohesion with concerns about keeping migrant-dependent

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.660
<v Speaker 2>industries alive. But Taylor's got to do a whole lot

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 2>more than just be a little less worse than Labor,

0:09:44.980 --> 0:09:49.900
<v Speaker 2>because it's this policy timidity that began under Labor-like Malcolm

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:54.970
<v Speaker 2>Turnbull that's responsible for the decade-long exodus of the Liberal base.

0:09:55.950 --> 0:09:59.330
<v Speaker 2>A big migrant intake, and ours is one of the

0:09:59.410 --> 0:10:03.300
<v Speaker 2>largest intakes, the developed world, that does not automatically mean

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:08.060
<v Speaker 2>a higher GDP. Every country ahead of us on the

0:10:08.300 --> 0:10:13.290
<v Speaker 2>IMF's latest GDP table has a smaller percentage of foreign-born

0:10:13.410 --> 0:10:17.530
<v Speaker 2>population than we have in Australia, meaning it's one thing

0:10:17.590 --> 0:10:21.020
<v Speaker 2>to bring people into this country But it's whether they

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:25.890
<v Speaker 2>lift or lean, to borrow Robert Menzies phrase, when they

0:10:25.929 --> 0:10:33.569
<v Speaker 2>get here, well, that is what matters. All right, let's

0:10:33.590 --> 0:10:36.390
<v Speaker 2>go to camera now for the headlines with our political reporter,

0:10:36.470 --> 0:10:37.250
<v Speaker 2>Ruben Spargo.

0:10:38.220 --> 0:10:38.650
<v Speaker 5>Good evening.

0:10:38.820 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 9>The prime minister has met President Donald Trump on the

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 9>sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York. A

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 9>selfie of the pair was taken only hours before the

0:10:46.940 --> 0:10:50.580
<v Speaker 9>US President criticised Anthony Albanese's tech agenda.

0:10:51.059 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 6>I'll always stand up for Australia's national interests and the

0:10:54.730 --> 0:10:58.210
<v Speaker 6>digital duty of care is something that we've foreshadowed for

0:10:58.290 --> 0:10:59.270
<v Speaker 6>some period of time.

0:10:59.850 --> 0:11:03.310
<v Speaker 9>It was the first face-to-face meeting between the pair since October.

0:11:03.830 --> 0:11:06.750
<v Speaker 9>Former Victorian Premier Jacinta Allen will be called to give

0:11:06.910 --> 0:11:11.140
<v Speaker 9>evidence at the state's Construction Royal Commission. Documents revealed she

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:15.940
<v Speaker 9>was briefed about concerns surrounding major infrastructure projects in 2023.

0:11:15.940 --> 0:11:19.790
<v Speaker 10>The core message recited in this brief is as follows.

0:11:20.490 --> 0:11:25.130
<v Speaker 10>MTIA has recently received anecdotal reports of criminal elements potentially

0:11:25.190 --> 0:11:26.070
<v Speaker 10>becoming involved.

0:11:26.330 --> 0:11:28.809
<v Speaker 9>The Royal Commission opened with a warning to those with

0:11:28.929 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 9>something to hide. Come forward or be found out.

0:11:32.140 --> 0:11:36.540
<v Speaker 2>All right, fresh poll in today. Sky, Sky, good to

0:11:36.580 --> 0:11:39.950
<v Speaker 2>see you again. News 24 Pulse Poll. shows Prime Minister

0:11:39.990 --> 0:11:44.370
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albanese's crash to his lowest and worst ever approval

0:11:44.470 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>rating following weeks of scandals. A bit here from me

0:11:48.700 --> 0:11:52.980
<v Speaker 2>about golf courses, controversies and government backdowns. Here to tell

0:11:53.020 --> 0:11:56.689
<v Speaker 2>us more, News 24 Chief Election Analyst Tom Connell.

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 5>Peter, there has to be a real question.

0:12:04.500 --> 0:12:07.979
<v Speaker 11>Is Anthony Albanese's net satisfaction rating becoming a bit of

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.300
<v Speaker 11>a problem for Labor? This particular poll already has a

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.990
<v Speaker 11>big drop in support. So the number satisfied with his job, 33%,

0:12:14.990 --> 0:12:21.189
<v Speaker 11>down three, dissatisfied up to 62%. Net satisfaction, so the positive,

0:12:21.330 --> 0:12:24.450
<v Speaker 11>minus the minus, minus 29%. Scott Morrison after the summer

0:12:24.470 --> 0:12:27.210
<v Speaker 11>of bushfires when... Voters weren't shaking his hand. He was

0:12:27.250 --> 0:12:29.790
<v Speaker 11>at minus 22. So this is a problem. Let's compare

0:12:29.809 --> 0:12:32.710
<v Speaker 11>it to November as well. As you can see, since then,

0:12:33.170 --> 0:12:36.270
<v Speaker 11>minus nine satisfied, plus 12 dissatisfied.

0:12:36.290 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 2>That's a huge move.

0:12:37.250 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 11>So he was minus eight in only November and he

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:42.340
<v Speaker 11>shifted to minus 29.

0:12:42.340 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 2>That's a huge shift.

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 11>Where is he losing support? Well, breaking it down by

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 11>voter cohort, first of all, some massive discrepancies. And you

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:50.540
<v Speaker 11>might say, well, no surprise.

0:12:50.580 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 5>Of course, he's plus 67 with Labor. and much worse.

0:12:53.860 --> 0:12:56.140
<v Speaker 11>But the concern here is Labor has lost primary vote,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:58.810
<v Speaker 11>maybe a little bit to the coalition, maybe not, but

0:12:58.870 --> 0:13:02.449
<v Speaker 11>certainly to One Nation. And that rating, minus 94, basically

0:13:02.570 --> 0:13:05.309
<v Speaker 11>everyone saying he's doing a bad job, indicates maybe it

0:13:05.350 --> 0:13:07.910
<v Speaker 11>will be hard to win them over. The other problem

0:13:07.970 --> 0:13:10.890
<v Speaker 11>is where it's happening in terms of voter type. So

0:13:11.100 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 11>Outer Metro, remember, his overall rating, minus 29. It's worse

0:13:14.780 --> 0:13:17.780
<v Speaker 11>than the Outer Metro at minus 33, much worse for

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.699
<v Speaker 11>those low-middle-income households at minus 39. and also bad at

0:13:21.740 --> 0:13:26.610
<v Speaker 11>minus 35 for TAFE educated. So outer suburban seats, working class,

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.010
<v Speaker 11>low and middle income, these seats, Labor have a lot

0:13:30.030 --> 0:13:32.530
<v Speaker 11>of them at the moment, and these numbers indicate they

0:13:32.550 --> 0:13:33.209
<v Speaker 11>could be in trouble.

0:13:39.750 --> 0:13:41.150
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's bring in my panel. We'll pull that

0:13:41.210 --> 0:13:43.050
<v Speaker 2>apart and a whole lot more. Senior Fellow at the

0:13:43.090 --> 0:13:46.970
<v Speaker 2>Menzies Research Centre, Nick Cater, and News 24 host Jamie Rogers.

0:13:48.010 --> 0:13:50.990
<v Speaker 2>Just on that, Nick, those numbers there from Tom Connell,

0:13:51.350 --> 0:13:53.949
<v Speaker 2>what's interesting in that last slide, the demographic of the

0:13:54.010 --> 0:13:59.309
<v Speaker 2>people moving fast away from Labor, that's Labor's old working

0:13:59.450 --> 0:14:01.949
<v Speaker 2>class base. This is why they're so exercised.

0:14:04.179 --> 0:14:04.870
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's right.

0:14:05.710 --> 0:14:09.550
<v Speaker 12>One Nation has bled to labour before in past incarnations,

0:14:09.630 --> 0:14:12.090
<v Speaker 12>but it's happening big time now. And I think this

0:14:12.170 --> 0:14:14.209
<v Speaker 12>is where most of the increase for the One Nation

0:14:14.250 --> 0:14:16.490
<v Speaker 12>vote has been coming in the last few months. Some

0:14:16.510 --> 0:14:19.510
<v Speaker 12>of the coalition are not in a great position, but

0:14:19.550 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 12>they're stable. They're holding their ground and perhaps even gaining some.

0:14:23.010 --> 0:14:26.180
<v Speaker 12>So I would be really worried if I was Anthony

0:14:26.220 --> 0:14:29.140
<v Speaker 12>Albanese on this. There's a lot of metropolitan seats, outer

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.700
<v Speaker 12>metropolitan seats around Sydney, around Melbourne. Adelaide even and Brisbane,

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.900
<v Speaker 12>that the coalition would have a real battle winning. You

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.740
<v Speaker 12>wouldn't get them over in one election, you would think.

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 12>But the One Nation, I think, have every chance of

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.500
<v Speaker 12>winning some of those seats, places like in the Illawarra,

0:14:47.660 --> 0:14:50.510
<v Speaker 12>up in the Hunter Valley in the far west of Sydney.

0:14:50.570 --> 0:14:50.750
<v Speaker 5>So.

0:14:50.770 --> 0:14:58.330
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I might have lost him there. He's frozen. I'll

0:14:58.350 --> 0:15:00.910
<v Speaker 2>go to you if I can, Jamie, that the government, sorry,

0:15:00.930 --> 0:15:04.670
<v Speaker 2>the opposition announced its energy plan today and it's really

0:15:04.830 --> 0:15:08.230
<v Speaker 2>ripping into renewables. Now, we've long argued this should be

0:15:08.290 --> 0:15:11.390
<v Speaker 2>on the agenda, that they need to really differentiate themselves

0:15:11.430 --> 0:15:14.850
<v Speaker 2>from Labor. Here's the shadow energy minister, Dan Tehan.

0:15:18.820 --> 0:15:24.540
<v Speaker 3>We need to take a chainsaw to Labor's green, ideologically

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:30.250
<v Speaker 3>driven approach to energy. For the Coalition, our energy policy

0:15:30.330 --> 0:15:36.290
<v Speaker 3>starts with abundance and has three non-negotiables. The focus has

0:15:36.330 --> 0:15:39.950
<v Speaker 3>to be on affordability, it has to be on reliability

0:15:40.380 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 3>and it has to be on security.

0:15:44.390 --> 0:15:47.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's eight priorities here. There's a big one, the

0:15:47.450 --> 0:15:51.270
<v Speaker 2>repeal of the Climate Change Act of 2022 to remove

0:15:51.350 --> 0:15:56.290
<v Speaker 2>legislated net zero targets, scrapping the safeguard mechanism, revoking four

0:15:56.500 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 2>offshore wind energy zones and removing, of course, that prohibition

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:05.100
<v Speaker 2>on nuclear energy. Well, it's been a long time coming.

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:07.140
<v Speaker 2>What did you make of it today, Jamie?

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.820
<v Speaker 13>Well, Peter, I watched Dan Tehan today and I heard

0:16:10.860 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 13>him earlier this morning on radio and I thought, demolition Dan.

0:16:14.900 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 13>I liked what I was hearing, especially the removing net

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 13>zero targets and lifting this nuclear ban. The concern, though,

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.650
<v Speaker 13>is the fact that we are still staying in Paris.

0:16:25.750 --> 0:16:28.750
<v Speaker 13>And Dan did explain it on radio as a way

0:16:28.890 --> 0:16:31.270
<v Speaker 13>to make sure that we can stay in control of

0:16:31.470 --> 0:16:33.650
<v Speaker 13>pretty much our destiny by keeping a seat at the

0:16:33.710 --> 0:16:36.020
<v Speaker 13>table and At the time when he was explaining it,

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:37.540
<v Speaker 13>it did seem to make sense to me. But now,

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 13>as I'm saying it to you, it's actually not really

0:16:39.700 --> 0:16:42.570
<v Speaker 13>quite making sense. But he came across brilliantly. And I

0:16:42.610 --> 0:16:44.470
<v Speaker 13>think this is exactly the sort of fight that we

0:16:44.510 --> 0:16:47.890
<v Speaker 13>need to see from the coalition. My only concern now, though, Peter,

0:16:47.930 --> 0:16:50.380
<v Speaker 13>as well, is they drop these policies and then they

0:16:50.390 --> 0:16:52.700
<v Speaker 13>stop talking about it. So now they've got to go

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.980
<v Speaker 13>hard and make sure that they get cut through and

0:16:55.020 --> 0:16:58.500
<v Speaker 13>that the electorate and voters can see what their plan is.

0:16:58.980 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 13>Because as Dan rightly pointed out, Australians at the moment

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.350
<v Speaker 13>are choosing between whether to have the lights on or

0:17:04.369 --> 0:17:07.550
<v Speaker 13>whether to feed their family. And in a country like Australia,

0:17:07.630 --> 0:17:11.030
<v Speaker 13>where we are abundant with natural resources, it's the sad

0:17:11.090 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 13>reality that we face chasing this green ideology path. So

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 13>I think that the coalition are heading in the right direction.

0:17:18.060 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 13>I want to keep seeing more of this policy prosecution,

0:17:20.940 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 13>because let's not forget, when nuclear was the only policy

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.810
<v Speaker 13>for the coalition January last year, they were dominating in

0:17:27.850 --> 0:17:31.490
<v Speaker 13>the polls. And then they backtracked and almost got scared.

0:17:31.530 --> 0:17:34.070
<v Speaker 13>And as soon as Labor came out with that $ 600

0:17:33.550 --> 0:17:37.669
<v Speaker 13>billion scare campaign, with nuclear. No one stopped it and

0:17:37.970 --> 0:17:41.939
<v Speaker 13>corrected Labor. And unfortunately, we know the results there. So

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 13>I think this is a good direction. I've liked what

0:17:44.260 --> 0:17:46.659
<v Speaker 13>I've seen so far. So it's the fight's on.

0:17:48.460 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I just want to see them prosecuted day in, day

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 2>out for more than a week. I mean, the problem

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 2>is they pick something up, they drop it tomorrow. I mean,

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.550
<v Speaker 2>Abbott wore out his welcome everywhere he went with the

0:17:58.609 --> 0:18:01.420
<v Speaker 2>four or five plans he had over six years. before

0:18:01.460 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>he was elected, you've absolutely got to drum the message in. And, look,

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.859
<v Speaker 2>I was in Horsham on the weekend. I was in

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.030
<v Speaker 2>Birdship for a funeral of an aunt yesterday. God bless

0:18:11.070 --> 0:18:13.949
<v Speaker 2>her soul, a wonderful woman. But all the way up

0:18:14.010 --> 0:18:16.310
<v Speaker 2>that road, up the calder I was driving this time,

0:18:16.330 --> 0:18:18.750
<v Speaker 2>it was the Western Highway on the weekend, but up

0:18:18.790 --> 0:18:22.429
<v Speaker 2>the calder, there were signs everywhere about renewables. I mean,

0:18:22.470 --> 0:18:26.850
<v Speaker 2>these communities now... are absolutely fighting this stuff hard, Nick.

0:18:27.510 --> 0:18:30.820
<v Speaker 2>In Birdship, there was no lines, no mines, no turbines.

0:18:30.859 --> 0:18:35.500
<v Speaker 2>That's the sign. Absolutely everywhere. I think this fight on

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.820
<v Speaker 2>renewables is fast becoming lost for Labor.

0:18:41.020 --> 0:18:42.060
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think it definitely has.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.300
<v Speaker 12>I mean, this has shifted a big way, Peter, in

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 12>the last year, particularly in rural areas. I mean, you

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 12>and I know we've been following this for four years

0:18:50.550 --> 0:18:54.450
<v Speaker 12>or longer, the anger that was building up in the bush,

0:18:54.490 --> 0:18:56.629
<v Speaker 12>but that was not getting through to the cities and

0:18:56.670 --> 0:18:59.429
<v Speaker 12>it certainly wasn't getting through to Canberra. Now it is,

0:18:59.510 --> 0:19:03.869
<v Speaker 12>it's become a national issue. What is happening to our countryside,

0:19:03.910 --> 0:19:07.109
<v Speaker 12>what is happening to our Our farmland and some of

0:19:07.190 --> 0:19:11.050
<v Speaker 12>our native bushland is an absolute disgrace. And once at last,

0:19:11.090 --> 0:19:13.209
<v Speaker 12>that's on the political agenda. So I think this is

0:19:13.250 --> 0:19:15.930
<v Speaker 12>a real, real negative for Labour. And you can see

0:19:15.950 --> 0:19:19.929
<v Speaker 12>in the coalition's policy, they are onto this. They recognise

0:19:19.950 --> 0:19:21.670
<v Speaker 12>that this has to change and we have to get

0:19:21.750 --> 0:19:25.260
<v Speaker 12>back to a more sensible energy policy that focuses on

0:19:25.700 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 12>cost and availability, one and two.

0:19:30.090 --> 0:19:33.110
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to that fight I discussed yesterday, last week

0:19:33.130 --> 0:19:37.850
<v Speaker 2>with Jess Collins, Senator Collins, about Sydney's Victoria Barracks. Well,

0:19:38.330 --> 0:19:42.350
<v Speaker 2>today Chris Minns has weighed in. He's talking about support

0:19:42.390 --> 0:19:46.530
<v Speaker 2>to slap a Heritage Council order on the property so

0:19:46.570 --> 0:19:50.300
<v Speaker 2>it can't be sold, but it must be protected. Jamie,

0:19:51.140 --> 0:19:52.950
<v Speaker 2>I think the Prime Minister's got a real fight on

0:19:52.990 --> 0:19:55.590
<v Speaker 2>his hands here. Well, he does, and I've got to

0:19:55.630 --> 0:19:57.230
<v Speaker 2>say well done to Chris Menz.

0:19:57.350 --> 0:19:59.270
<v Speaker 13>I probably would have liked him to have started this

0:19:59.290 --> 0:20:00.859
<v Speaker 13>fight a little bit earlier, but he's done it.

0:20:01.570 --> 0:20:02.190
<v Speaker 2>Credits due.

0:20:02.530 --> 0:20:05.370
<v Speaker 13>And the sad thing, though, here, Peter, is the prime

0:20:05.410 --> 0:20:07.949
<v Speaker 13>minister is the one person who can stand up and

0:20:08.030 --> 0:20:10.929
<v Speaker 13>stop the sale of these defence assets. He needs to

0:20:10.990 --> 0:20:14.430
<v Speaker 13>show some leadership and back our defence sites. I actually

0:20:14.450 --> 0:20:17.409
<v Speaker 13>took my boys to Lancer Barracks in Parramatta. And as

0:20:17.450 --> 0:20:19.990
<v Speaker 13>soon as you walk through the gates, you can feel

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 13>how special these sites are. And when you bundle in

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.500
<v Speaker 13>HMAS Penguin and Victoria Barracks, this is part of our

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 13>national heritage that the Labor government are just so flippantly

0:20:29.700 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 13>going off and selling. So we need to all sign

0:20:32.420 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 13>James Patterson's petition that you can do online. Last time

0:20:35.700 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 13>I checked, it was more than 80,000 signatures. And Jess

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 13>Collins is also organising a protest down at HMAS Penguin

0:20:42.980 --> 0:20:45.500
<v Speaker 13>on October 11. So the more people that are out

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 13>there and the more that we all stay vocal, we

0:20:47.810 --> 0:20:50.310
<v Speaker 13>can show this government that it's just unacceptable and it's

0:20:50.330 --> 0:20:53.669
<v Speaker 13>an absolute disgrace that they're selling off these precious sites,

0:20:53.690 --> 0:20:55.470
<v Speaker 13>because once they're gone, they're gone.

0:20:56.590 --> 0:20:58.850
<v Speaker 2>They're gone forever. I need to leave it there. I'm sorry,

0:20:58.869 --> 0:21:01.260
<v Speaker 2>I've got a hectic show and Obviously, I want to

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 2>get to that Islamic State arrest today. Thank you to

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.220
<v Speaker 2>you both. Now, the continuing debate over the role and

0:21:07.260 --> 0:21:10.859
<v Speaker 2>purpose of the Australian War Memorial and whether its expansion

0:21:11.060 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 2>into the history of colonial frontier conflict risks changing what

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:20.590
<v Speaker 2>the institution is fundamentally about. Last week, you'll recall, I

0:21:20.609 --> 0:21:24.110
<v Speaker 2>brought you the concerns from retired Lieutenant Colonel Peter O'Brien,

0:21:24.130 --> 0:21:29.890
<v Speaker 2>a Vietnam veteran and co-convener of the campaign Defend Sacred Ground.

0:21:30.630 --> 0:21:33.430
<v Speaker 6>This should go to the people, but they have done

0:21:33.450 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 6>it behind closed doors. They had a meeting where it

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 6>was agreed. The minutes of that meeting have not been

0:21:38.580 --> 0:21:41.859
<v Speaker 6>made available. It was done in secret and now it's

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.820
<v Speaker 6>being thrust upon people. And I would bet that if

0:21:44.980 --> 0:21:47.530
<v Speaker 6>this came to a plebiscite, we would get the same

0:21:47.570 --> 0:21:49.970
<v Speaker 6>result that we got in the voice referendums.

0:21:51.770 --> 0:21:55.060
<v Speaker 2>Well, now former Prime Minister Tony Abbott has weighed into

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:59.180
<v Speaker 2>the debate, arguing that frontier bloodshed is part of Australia's

0:21:59.340 --> 0:22:02.909
<v Speaker 2>national story, but that the war memorial is not the

0:22:02.970 --> 0:22:06.850
<v Speaker 2>appropriate place to commemorate it. Tony Abbott joins me now

0:22:06.910 --> 0:22:07.610
<v Speaker 2>from Perth.

0:22:08.109 --> 0:22:08.429
<v Speaker 5>Tony.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.020
<v Speaker 2>In addition, obviously, to being a former Prime Minister, you

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.219
<v Speaker 2>were a member of the War Memorial Council. That's what

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:20.020
<v Speaker 2>we call the board of the shrine. So I'm assuming

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 2>you've got plenty of understanding of what was discussed on

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:27.500
<v Speaker 2>this issue. I've been contacted by a huge number of

0:22:27.580 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Australians who are very angry that this proposal is even

0:22:31.740 --> 0:22:34.189
<v Speaker 2>on the table. What can you tell us?

0:22:36.020 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 14>Well, Peter, my very strong recollection is that no final

0:22:39.740 --> 0:22:43.100
<v Speaker 14>decision was made, certainly in my time, to go down

0:22:43.140 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 14>this path, because the Australian War Memorial, it's our greatest

0:22:46.940 --> 0:22:52.859
<v Speaker 14>national shrine. It should be a place which honours those

0:22:52.900 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 14>who have worn our uniform.

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 15>It is a tribute to our nation in uniform.

0:22:57.660 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 14>It should always be a place of unity and pride,

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.550
<v Speaker 14>not a place of division and shame.

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 15>And unfortunately, there's an attempt on now to hijack the.

0:23:08.050 --> 0:23:12.650
<v Speaker 14>War Memorial by the Invasion Day Brigade, by people who

0:23:12.710 --> 0:23:15.810
<v Speaker 14>think the only thing that matters about our country is

0:23:15.830 --> 0:23:20.050
<v Speaker 14>Aboriginal dispossession. Now, I accept that there was bloodshed on

0:23:20.070 --> 0:23:23.190
<v Speaker 14>the frontier, and it's fair enough to remember that at

0:23:23.230 --> 0:23:26.619
<v Speaker 14>the right place. But the right place is not the

0:23:26.710 --> 0:23:30.820
<v Speaker 14>Australian War Memorial. I say hands off the Australian War Memorial.

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 14>And we shouldn't have changed by stealth here. We've had

0:23:33.940 --> 0:23:37.750
<v Speaker 14>too much change by stealth, change to have three flags,

0:23:37.810 --> 0:23:41.530
<v Speaker 14>not one, change to have acknowledgements of country at every

0:23:41.590 --> 0:23:45.790
<v Speaker 14>official event. We've got too much of this change by stealth.

0:23:46.150 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 14>If any change is ever going to happen at the

0:23:49.140 --> 0:23:54.180
<v Speaker 14>Australian War Memorial, ask the people, ask the people. Don't

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:59.650
<v Speaker 14>have it snuck in behind closed doors, particularly in given

0:23:59.690 --> 0:24:02.909
<v Speaker 14>that the composition of the council has changed dramatically over

0:24:02.950 --> 0:24:03.910
<v Speaker 14>the last 12 months.

0:24:05.710 --> 0:24:09.310
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there's a number of highly political appointees on the council.

0:24:09.990 --> 0:24:12.310
<v Speaker 2>Peter O'Brien, when we spoke to him last week, said

0:24:12.350 --> 0:24:18.230
<v Speaker 2>that he had legal advice from an eminent QC that,

0:24:19.060 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 2>and this was the best of the advice, that doing this,

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.460
<v Speaker 2>putting this into the War Memorial in this way, would

0:24:25.540 --> 0:24:30.710
<v Speaker 2>actually contravene the act of So if that's accurate, how

0:24:30.730 --> 0:24:31.909
<v Speaker 2>does this even go ahead?

0:24:34.260 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 14>Well, there is a view at the memorial that what

0:24:40.580 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 14>is now proposed is broadly consistent. Now, I think that

0:24:45.700 --> 0:24:50.580
<v Speaker 14>means in practice it's inconsistent with the strict terms of

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:55.180
<v Speaker 14>the Act. I guess to try to work this out,

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 14>someone would have to bring an action. But as we know,

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 14>an action in court, first, you've got to have standing

0:25:02.260 --> 0:25:05.619
<v Speaker 14>and second, you've got to have a lot of financial resources.

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 14>I think the moral case is absolutely overwhelming that no

0:25:12.900 --> 0:25:18.310
<v Speaker 14>government and no War Memorial Council should suddenly change the

0:25:18.369 --> 0:25:21.869
<v Speaker 14>fundamental nature of our War Memorial, which is to honour

0:25:22.109 --> 0:25:26.750
<v Speaker 14>those who wore our uniform and no one wearing Australia's

0:25:27.030 --> 0:25:32.980
<v Speaker 14>uniform was ever involved in any violence against Aboriginal people.

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.470
<v Speaker 14>And at no stage, going right back to Governor Phillip

0:25:36.850 --> 0:25:41.270
<v Speaker 14>in 1788, was there a war against Aboriginal people.

0:25:41.570 --> 0:25:44.750
<v Speaker 15>Sure, there was bloodshed on the frontier, on both sides

0:25:44.790 --> 0:25:45.550
<v Speaker 15>of the frontier.

0:25:46.330 --> 0:25:50.810
<v Speaker 14>Settlers killed Aboriginal people, Aboriginal people killed settlers, but.

0:25:50.710 --> 0:25:54.230
<v Speaker 15>It was never a war in any meaningful sense.

0:25:55.890 --> 0:25:59.190
<v Speaker 2>Well, just across Lake Burley Griffin from the War Memorial,

0:25:59.230 --> 0:26:02.570
<v Speaker 2>as you well know, is the Australian National Museum. If

0:26:03.410 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 2>there was such a need to tell this story, and

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:10.540
<v Speaker 2>let's make sure it's accurate, both sides suffered bloodshed. Well,

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 2>put it over at the Australian National Museum. Ultimately, and

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.660
<v Speaker 2>I know there is an independent charter for the War Memorial,

0:26:20.140 --> 0:26:23.610
<v Speaker 2>but ultimately the hundreds of millions of dollars that To

0:26:23.660 --> 0:26:27.470
<v Speaker 2>do this extension, this new development, comes from taxpayers, provided

0:26:27.530 --> 0:26:30.250
<v Speaker 2>to them by the government. Surely the Prime Minister's got

0:26:30.270 --> 0:26:31.730
<v Speaker 2>to speak up and step in now.

0:26:33.390 --> 0:26:34.510
<v Speaker 15>Look, I agree.

0:26:35.730 --> 0:26:38.810
<v Speaker 14>This would not happen if the Minister or the Prime

0:26:38.850 --> 0:26:41.410
<v Speaker 14>Minister were to have a quiet word in the ear

0:26:41.490 --> 0:26:43.909
<v Speaker 14>of Kim Beazley, the Council Chair.

0:26:43.970 --> 0:26:48.030
<v Speaker 15>Now, I know Kim Beazley well. He's a very decent man.

0:26:48.750 --> 0:26:52.180
<v Speaker 14>He and I have had discussions about this recently. He

0:26:52.220 --> 0:26:55.020
<v Speaker 14>and I differ on this matter, but in the end,

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 14>Kim Beazley and the Council will do what the Minister

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.060
<v Speaker 14>and the Prime Minister would like, and both the Minister

0:27:02.380 --> 0:27:05.590
<v Speaker 14>and the Prime Minister, I think, have a duty to

0:27:05.710 --> 0:27:10.469
<v Speaker 14>our country. The War Memorial belongs to all Australians and

0:27:10.510 --> 0:27:13.790
<v Speaker 14>it should not be hijacked to talk about a part

0:27:13.830 --> 0:27:18.990
<v Speaker 14>of Australian history that was never part of the work

0:27:19.380 --> 0:27:22.020
<v Speaker 14>of the armed forces of the Commonwealth of Australia.

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.180
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Well, just to add insult to injury, one of

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.530
<v Speaker 2>my viewers, Peter Bruce, terrific bloke, sent me a lovely email,

0:27:30.190 --> 0:27:33.990
<v Speaker 2>had gone through a process with the war memorial where

0:27:34.050 --> 0:27:36.570
<v Speaker 2>he wrote to them and said, how on earth do

0:27:36.590 --> 0:27:40.050
<v Speaker 2>we have a welcome to country for a recent opening

0:27:40.130 --> 0:27:43.770
<v Speaker 2>event and not play the national anthem? This was in

0:27:43.810 --> 0:27:47.230
<v Speaker 2>relation to the opening of Anzac Hall and the new atrium.

0:27:47.790 --> 0:27:50.109
<v Speaker 2>He said his father had served in New Guinea. He

0:27:50.170 --> 0:27:52.869
<v Speaker 2>wanted an explanation. Well, he got something back. He said

0:27:52.890 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't a proper answer, but the memorial eventually told him,

0:27:56.230 --> 0:27:59.380
<v Speaker 2>and I quote, in terms of protocol, the Australian National

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Anthem was not played at either of the two previous

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:07.420
<v Speaker 2>events opening new sections of the development. It is, however,

0:28:08.100 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 2>almost always, it says, not definitively, just almost always played

0:28:12.740 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 2>at commemorative events. Now, come on, Tony, this is not

0:28:15.900 --> 0:28:16.340
<v Speaker 2>good enough.

0:28:18.130 --> 0:28:19.470
<v Speaker 15>Look, you're right, Peter.

0:28:19.670 --> 0:28:21.790
<v Speaker 14>I think a lot of people were a little bit

0:28:21.850 --> 0:28:26.310
<v Speaker 14>dismayed that the anthem wasn't played. I can only assume

0:28:26.390 --> 0:28:30.430
<v Speaker 14>it was an oversight, to be honest. I know Matt Anderson,

0:28:30.470 --> 0:28:34.020
<v Speaker 14>the War Memorial director, very well. I just have to

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:40.900
<v Speaker 14>assume that somehow it was left out by mistake. Certainly

0:28:40.980 --> 0:28:44.900
<v Speaker 14>lots of people have commented upon its absence, and I

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.430
<v Speaker 14>can't imagine... that there will be another big event at

0:28:48.470 --> 0:28:51.510
<v Speaker 14>the War Memorial that doesn't involve our national anthem.

0:28:52.550 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, can you write to him as a former Prime Minister,

0:28:55.100 --> 0:28:58.500
<v Speaker 2>maybe co-opt a couple of other former Prime Ministers, to

0:28:58.540 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 2>put it in writing to say that you speak on

0:29:00.780 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 2>behalf of the majority of Australians, that you want to

0:29:03.660 --> 0:29:06.860
<v Speaker 2>see the War Memorial play the national anthem at any

0:29:07.060 --> 0:29:09.310
<v Speaker 2>significant event? Can't you put it on the table?

0:29:10.970 --> 0:29:12.830
<v Speaker 15>Well, look, I'm happy to do that, Peter.

0:29:13.830 --> 0:29:16.690
<v Speaker 14>As I said earlier, My main concern at the moment

0:29:17.210 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 14>is to ensure that the War Memorial remains an institution

0:29:21.980 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 14>that all of us can take pride in. And if

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 14>it starts to go down the rabbit hole of the

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:35.550
<v Speaker 14>so-called frontier wars, I think that would be an absolute tragedy. Sure,

0:29:36.230 --> 0:29:38.890
<v Speaker 14>not every part of our history is perfect. I absolutely

0:29:38.930 --> 0:29:42.060
<v Speaker 14>accept that. But our country has far more to be

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 14>proud of than to be ashamed of. In any event,

0:29:45.220 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 14>we've all got to build on our strengths if we

0:29:48.690 --> 0:29:51.510
<v Speaker 14>are going to go forward together into the future. And

0:29:51.550 --> 0:29:55.050
<v Speaker 14>the work of the Australian Armed Forces from 1901 until

0:29:55.090 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 14>today is part of the wonderful heritage of this country.

0:30:02.140 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, I've got you in the hot seat. I'm not

0:30:03.460 --> 0:30:04.980
<v Speaker 2>going to let you go. We were having a quick

0:30:05.020 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 2>discussion before about the Coalition's energy policy. We discussed the

0:30:09.340 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Paris Agreement. Of course, the Paris Agreement was agreed to

0:30:15.570 --> 0:30:18.890
<v Speaker 2>in your time as Prime Minister, but I recall a

0:30:18.950 --> 0:30:22.700
<v Speaker 2>handwritten note you wrote on the Cabinet decision saying, that

0:30:22.740 --> 0:30:26.380
<v Speaker 2>said something to it, the effect that everybody else had

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:29.500
<v Speaker 2>to meet their targets or we were out and that

0:30:29.580 --> 0:30:31.700
<v Speaker 2>our targets could only be met, it was 26 to

0:30:31.700 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 2>28 percent, which is a long way from where they

0:30:34.500 --> 0:30:39.290
<v Speaker 2>are now, could only be met without any damage to

0:30:39.310 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 2>the Australian economy. Is my recollection right? And given we

0:30:44.980 --> 0:30:48.940
<v Speaker 2>have had damage, given those targets are now double, given

0:30:48.980 --> 0:30:51.170
<v Speaker 2>that no one in the world is really doing anything,

0:30:52.450 --> 0:30:53.130
<v Speaker 2>can't we now.

0:30:53.030 --> 0:30:53.750
<v Speaker 5>Just walk away?

0:30:53.770 --> 0:30:55.130
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:30:55.650 --> 0:30:58.610
<v Speaker 14>Well, Peter, we don't need to pull out of Paris

0:30:59.230 --> 0:31:04.620
<v Speaker 14>because we have long ago met the Paris targets and

0:31:04.660 --> 0:31:08.300
<v Speaker 14>we only agreed to meet the 26% to 28% Paris

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 14>targets because the advice I got was that we would

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:17.670
<v Speaker 14>meet them without any new expenditure and any new policy. So, yes,

0:31:18.330 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 14>net zero is economic insanity. It's energy madness. It's economic suicide.

0:31:25.500 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 14>But Paris is, as it were, in the past because

0:31:29.020 --> 0:31:31.219
<v Speaker 14>we long ago achieved our Paris targets.

0:31:31.260 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 15>I think it was in 2022.

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:33.980
<v Speaker 2>You're saying it's a dead letter. You're saying it's a

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 2>dead letter.

0:31:34.340 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 15>It's a dead letter. It's ancient history now.

0:31:37.260 --> 0:31:41.580
<v Speaker 2>All right. I'll leave it there. I will put up

0:31:41.620 --> 0:31:44.690
<v Speaker 2>on the screen, though, information. Thank you, Tony. Information for

0:31:44.730 --> 0:31:46.910
<v Speaker 2>people who want to get in and support this campaign.

0:31:46.930 --> 0:31:52.310
<v Speaker 2>Tony Abbott's joined it now. Of course, you can see DefendSacredGround.com.

0:31:52.790 --> 0:32:00.500
<v Speaker 2>So there's no AU there. DefendSacredGround.com. Please, please, please get involved.

0:32:00.580 --> 0:32:04.220
<v Speaker 2>We don't need a war memorial. to be damaged in

0:32:04.260 --> 0:32:07.180
<v Speaker 2>this way. After the break, the latest on the arrest

0:32:07.220 --> 0:32:10.940
<v Speaker 2>of an alleged ISIS member, not supporter, member in Melbourne

0:32:11.420 --> 0:32:19.810
<v Speaker 2>and what it means for Australia's terror threat level. Coming up,

0:32:19.830 --> 0:32:23.030
<v Speaker 2>President Trump ramping up pressure on the Australian government over

0:32:23.090 --> 0:32:26.670
<v Speaker 2>digital reforms and free speech. But now to the arrest

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 2>of a Melbourne man. He's from Carlton, actually. Happened in Melbourne.

0:32:31.700 --> 0:32:36.670
<v Speaker 2>65-year-old individual arrested by counterterrorism police who alleged he was

0:32:36.810 --> 0:32:41.390
<v Speaker 2>a principal distributor of ISIS propaganda among a group of associates.

0:32:42.070 --> 0:32:45.230
<v Speaker 2>As I say, the clincher here is he's not ISIS linked,

0:32:45.630 --> 0:32:48.690
<v Speaker 2>but police have charged him with being an alleged member

0:32:48.790 --> 0:32:52.260
<v Speaker 2>of ISIS. Here to discuss it, former AFP Detective Superintendent

0:32:52.300 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 2>David Craig. David, welcome. This bloke is accused of pledging

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 2>allegiance to ISIS and distributing around 10,000 files online for

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 2>the terrorist organisation, including instructions on how to plan a

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:07.860
<v Speaker 2>terror attack.

0:33:07.900 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Have a listen.

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 8>Border force tipped off the AFP about this man in 2020,

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 8>or at least his phone was seized a year before. A,

0:33:16.430 --> 0:33:18.090
<v Speaker 8>why was he allowed to continue on to.

0:33:18.050 --> 0:33:20.550
<v Speaker 5>Travel to Egypt, which is not far from Syria.

0:33:20.270 --> 0:33:21.130
<v Speaker 7>And the conflict zone?

0:33:21.590 --> 0:33:24.230
<v Speaker 8>And why has it taken almost six years to arrest

0:33:24.250 --> 0:33:28.250
<v Speaker 8>this man? So when Border Force seized his phones at

0:33:28.270 --> 0:33:32.510
<v Speaker 8>the border, they hadn't fully examined, they had enough suspicion

0:33:32.590 --> 0:33:35.850
<v Speaker 8>to seize him, and then he was allowed to leave

0:33:35.890 --> 0:33:36.370
<v Speaker 8>the country.

0:33:36.430 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 7>How long was he then overseas before he returned?

0:33:38.780 --> 0:33:39.900
<v Speaker 8>Approximately six months.

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, he's had long stints overseas in Egypt. We

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.510
<v Speaker 2>can't tell where he... went from Egypt, if he did

0:33:48.610 --> 0:33:52.540
<v Speaker 2>leave Egypt. As we know, that's a stone's throw from Syria,

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 2>from Gaza, from Iran, everywhere else. It's a hotspot over there. David,

0:33:56.740 --> 0:33:59.900
<v Speaker 2>what was your impressions from what you heard this afternoon?

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:06.890
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, if convicted, Peter, this person represents the

0:34:06.990 --> 0:34:11.370
<v Speaker 1>absolute rot in our country that we don't need. This

0:34:11.450 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>is allegedly a purveyor of hatred, of Islamic hatred being

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>distributed with over 10,000 files or 10,000 files to people,

0:34:21.580 --> 0:34:25.020
<v Speaker 1>inspiring hatred, giving police.

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.140
<v Speaker 5>Methodologies away on how to avoid detection.

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 1>If this person is convicted, I would hope that they

0:34:30.860 --> 0:34:34.830
<v Speaker 1>can pack him up and deport him back to Somalia

0:34:35.290 --> 0:34:37.370
<v Speaker 1>where he can spend the rest of his days once

0:34:37.390 --> 0:34:40.170
<v Speaker 1>he's finished his jail term here. This is a very

0:34:40.270 --> 0:34:44.540
<v Speaker 1>dangerous individual that is perpetuating hate and has done for

0:34:44.580 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a considerable period of time.

0:34:47.860 --> 0:34:50.509
<v Speaker 2>It was interesting today in that exchange with the Assistant,

0:34:50.730 --> 0:34:53.890
<v Speaker 2>Acting Assistant Commissioner there on the TV from the AFP.

0:34:54.530 --> 0:34:58.469
<v Speaker 2>One of the journalists asked her, was he a foreign-born individual?

0:34:58.790 --> 0:35:02.350
<v Speaker 2>Was he Australian-born, I think was a term that was used.

0:35:02.790 --> 0:35:05.610
<v Speaker 2>And the response from the AFP was, he is an

0:35:05.660 --> 0:35:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Australian citizen. They completely dodged answering the question about his

0:35:11.980 --> 0:35:15.110
<v Speaker 2>nationality at birth. I think that's relevant.

0:35:16.190 --> 0:35:17.089
<v Speaker 5>Highly relevant, Peter.

0:35:17.110 --> 0:35:19.549
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if he's a dual citizen, he should be,

0:35:20.090 --> 0:35:24.150
<v Speaker 1>if he's convicted, if the alleged behaviour is proven in court,

0:35:24.610 --> 0:35:27.090
<v Speaker 1>he should be stripped of his Australian citizenship and deported

0:35:27.110 --> 0:35:29.430
<v Speaker 1>at the end of his sentence. We don't need this

0:35:29.510 --> 0:35:33.070
<v Speaker 1>sort of person peddling this sort of hatred in our country.

0:35:33.110 --> 0:35:35.390
<v Speaker 5>This is an imported problem and we don't need it.

0:35:36.989 --> 0:35:39.870
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, interesting you say that because I thought to myself,

0:35:40.450 --> 0:35:44.149
<v Speaker 2>six months in Egypt for an Australian citizen is That's

0:35:44.170 --> 0:35:45.550
<v Speaker 2>a bit unusual. I don't think you can get a

0:35:45.590 --> 0:35:48.390
<v Speaker 2>visa that long. So I jumped on the website and

0:35:48.469 --> 0:35:50.510
<v Speaker 2>found out that you could get a 60 to 90

0:35:50.510 --> 0:35:54.110
<v Speaker 2>day visa. You can get a longest day visa of,

0:35:54.290 --> 0:35:57.739
<v Speaker 2>you know, three, four, five months, but you have to

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:01.860
<v Speaker 2>leave the country, leave Egypt after 60 days. So the

0:36:01.900 --> 0:36:03.939
<v Speaker 2>fact that he was in Egypt for such a long

0:36:04.420 --> 0:36:07.700
<v Speaker 2>period of time probably says to me that he has

0:36:07.780 --> 0:36:12.549
<v Speaker 2>some sort of permanent residency or perhaps citizenship. in Egypt. Again,

0:36:13.030 --> 0:36:16.830
<v Speaker 2>we've got to get tough on anyone who has multiple

0:36:17.330 --> 0:36:21.350
<v Speaker 2>rights to citizenship. If they don't want to join our team,

0:36:21.410 --> 0:36:23.469
<v Speaker 2>if they don't want to live by Australian values, if

0:36:23.530 --> 0:36:27.190
<v Speaker 2>that's what the court finds in the end, out they go.

0:36:28.950 --> 0:36:32.690
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and the AFP and Home Affairs shouldn't be shying

0:36:32.730 --> 0:36:34.870
<v Speaker 1>away from this, and certainly not the Prime Minister either.

0:36:35.310 --> 0:36:38.009
<v Speaker 1>As we know, all three that I just mentioned then

0:36:38.610 --> 0:36:41.050
<v Speaker 1>have shown a lack of spine in relation to confronting

0:36:41.110 --> 0:36:45.390
<v Speaker 1>radical Islam, which this is if it's proven in court,

0:36:46.430 --> 0:36:48.890
<v Speaker 1>and we need to expel this from our country.

0:36:50.690 --> 0:36:53.089
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what do you make of the calls now for

0:36:53.110 --> 0:36:58.340
<v Speaker 2>a new threshold to be inserted between possible terror threat

0:36:58.380 --> 0:37:01.489
<v Speaker 2>level and the probable terror threat level?

0:37:03.469 --> 0:37:05.170
<v Speaker 5>Peter, I think it's a good idea.

0:37:05.230 --> 0:37:09.689
<v Speaker 1>We've been at probable now since August 2024. I think

0:37:10.070 --> 0:37:13.130
<v Speaker 1>there's an issue with remaining in the probable state because

0:37:13.190 --> 0:37:17.930
<v Speaker 1>people become desensitised to it. We've been in that level

0:37:17.989 --> 0:37:21.270
<v Speaker 1>during the Bondi attack. We've been at that level while,

0:37:21.430 --> 0:37:25.509
<v Speaker 1>as we've learnt last week on your show, four disrupted

0:37:26.190 --> 0:37:29.980
<v Speaker 1>major terrorist attacks plots that were in the final stages

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.939
<v Speaker 1>of planning. And yet we've remained at the same security level,

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the same threat level. We need an intervening level. And

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that level should be probable hyphen heightened so

0:37:41.660 --> 0:37:45.370
<v Speaker 1>that there can be two levels within probable before we

0:37:45.410 --> 0:37:48.549
<v Speaker 1>go to expected, which is an absolutely expected level.

0:37:49.090 --> 0:37:50.950
<v Speaker 5>Rock sure there's going to be an attack.

0:37:51.350 --> 0:37:54.129
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important because it alarms people if there

0:37:54.190 --> 0:37:56.390
<v Speaker 1>is an escalation and yet we can drop it back

0:37:56.489 --> 0:38:00.830
<v Speaker 1>from probable heightened to probable if the circumstances allow.

0:38:02.590 --> 0:38:04.950
<v Speaker 2>So probable plus, I suppose, is how I'd call it

0:38:04.969 --> 0:38:07.770
<v Speaker 2>in a layman's term. Hey, what about the report yesterday?

0:38:07.930 --> 0:38:14.010
<v Speaker 2>A 14-year-old boy charged with violent extremist offences after allegedly

0:38:14.050 --> 0:38:17.540
<v Speaker 2>planning attacks at three locations in Miraburra This is on

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:22.900
<v Speaker 2>the Fraser Coast in Queensland. Police allege he was acting independently.

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:28.410
<v Speaker 2>I mean, a 14-year-old, terror attacks alleged, alleged, alleged, acting independently.

0:38:28.739 --> 0:38:29.930
<v Speaker 2>How does that stack up?

0:38:31.570 --> 0:38:34.210
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, Peter, tonight on your show, we've sort

0:38:34.230 --> 0:38:39.870
<v Speaker 1>of covered the entire spectrum from an alleged 65-year-old Somali

0:38:39.910 --> 0:38:44.850
<v Speaker 1>Muslim radical ISIS member to a 14-year-old boy in remote

0:38:44.950 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Queensland as the consumer. One was the purveyor of the

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>hatred and one was the consumer. I'm not saying they're

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the same ideology. What I am saying is it's the

0:38:54.620 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>same online radical process.

0:38:59.350 --> 0:39:00.800
<v Speaker 5>They are certainly....

0:39:01.530 --> 0:39:05.089
<v Speaker 1>It's the ecosystem in which counter-terrorism needs to operate now.

0:39:05.489 --> 0:39:11.250
<v Speaker 1>The radical online radicalisation from people that peddle hatred and

0:39:11.310 --> 0:39:14.280
<v Speaker 1>ideology and the consumer at the other end that picks

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.660
<v Speaker 1>it up and is prepared to act violently upon it.

0:39:18.580 --> 0:39:19.280
<v Speaker 15>It is, David.

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 2>It is the scourge of our generation. And this is why,

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:23.930
<v Speaker 2>you know, again, I'm so angry that the Prime Minister

0:39:24.590 --> 0:39:27.170
<v Speaker 2>never gave any public evidence to the Royal Commission and

0:39:27.190 --> 0:39:30.700
<v Speaker 2>we didn't even get evidence from the head of the AFP.

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:34.940
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's very disappointing, Peter, and in fact the fact

0:39:34.980 --> 0:39:37.940
<v Speaker 1>that the head of the AFP hasn't fronted the media today,

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:40.469
<v Speaker 1>you would remember the days when we had real leadership

0:39:40.510 --> 0:39:43.510
<v Speaker 1>in the AFP with Mick Kelty standing up, leading the way,

0:39:43.570 --> 0:39:46.330
<v Speaker 1>letting people know exactly where the AFP stands and what

0:39:46.350 --> 0:39:48.250
<v Speaker 1>people could expect from from law enforcement.

0:39:48.330 --> 0:39:51.250
<v Speaker 5>At this stage, we haven't even got a deputy commissioner.

0:39:51.270 --> 0:39:55.890
<v Speaker 1>We've got an acting assistant commissioner representing a serious ISIS

0:39:55.969 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>member threat, allegedly.

0:39:57.460 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll leave it there. Thank you, David Craig. Quick

0:40:01.900 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 2>break after the break. We'll get into the very tough

0:40:05.340 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 2>comments today from the president in relation to Labor's digital

0:40:09.820 --> 0:40:12.660
<v Speaker 2>duty of care reforms. We'll get into that. But the

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.569
<v Speaker 2>president really fighting on the issue of free speech. That's

0:40:15.610 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 2>coming up. Still to come, Words Matter with Kel Richards. Wednesday,

0:40:22.060 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 2>of course, happens every Wednesday. Now, of course, to the

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister in New York. And he was there with

0:40:27.700 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 2>among 20 other world leaders who were demanding international frameworks

0:40:33.739 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 2>on AI safeguards. But he got a lot of pushback

0:40:38.100 --> 0:40:42.090
<v Speaker 2>from the president and also the new US ambassador to Australia,

0:40:42.489 --> 0:40:45.930
<v Speaker 2>who's asked for clarity about the government's digital duty of

0:40:45.989 --> 0:40:50.469
<v Speaker 2>care legislation, saying exactly what is harm? What risks are

0:40:50.510 --> 0:40:53.790
<v Speaker 2>we talking about? And then, of course, there was a

0:40:53.850 --> 0:40:59.090
<v Speaker 2>warning today from the AFP acting assistant commissioner at the

0:40:59.130 --> 0:41:03.010
<v Speaker 2>press conference in relation to the arrest of the ISIS

0:41:03.150 --> 0:41:04.710
<v Speaker 2>member so alleged.

0:41:06.170 --> 0:41:09.930
<v Speaker 8>The message is this viewing this violent extremist material is

0:41:09.969 --> 0:41:16.029
<v Speaker 8>not harmless online content. It desensitises people and normalises violence and,

0:41:16.130 --> 0:41:17.950
<v Speaker 8>as I said, mass executions.

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:23.380
<v Speaker 2>Bringing in now Senator Sarah Henderson, Shadow Communications Minister. Just

0:41:23.540 --> 0:41:26.730
<v Speaker 2>on this point, Sarah... I know the government says we

0:41:26.750 --> 0:41:29.290
<v Speaker 2>need this digital duty of care because we've got young

0:41:29.330 --> 0:41:33.469
<v Speaker 2>people committing suicide. We've got child pornography on the internet.

0:41:33.530 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 2>We've got radical Islamic terrorism on the internet. But we

0:41:37.820 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 2>get people put in jail for child online exploitation. And

0:41:41.460 --> 0:41:46.780
<v Speaker 2>we saw that arrest today in relation to this ISIS-linked individual.

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.340
<v Speaker 2>Certainly that's the police claim. We've already got all of

0:41:49.380 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 2>these laws. They work. So why do we need this

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:53.859
<v Speaker 2>digital duty of care bill?

0:41:57.290 --> 0:41:58.270
<v Speaker 15>Well, Peter, good evening.

0:41:58.390 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 16>And the short answer is we don't, because as you say,

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 16>most of the most serious online harms are already prohibited

0:42:05.300 --> 0:42:09.649
<v Speaker 16>under the criminal law or regulated under the Online Safety Act.

0:42:09.950 --> 0:42:12.350
<v Speaker 16>The difference with the digital duty of care is this

0:42:12.450 --> 0:42:16.930
<v Speaker 16>is a political censorship bill. This is all about shutting

0:42:16.969 --> 0:42:21.140
<v Speaker 16>down the opponents that Albanese and others do not want

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.219
<v Speaker 16>to hear from. And he belled the cat today in

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 16>New York when he gave a speech talking about, let's

0:42:27.060 --> 0:42:31.760
<v Speaker 16>take this to the next level, combating misinformation and disinformation

0:42:31.900 --> 0:42:35.100
<v Speaker 16>and the extreme views on the left and the right.

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 16>So make no mistake, this is an egregious attack on

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:41.100
<v Speaker 16>free speech, and that's why it's been condemned by the

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 16>US administration.

0:42:43.770 --> 0:42:48.810
<v Speaker 2>So he's using the cover of child pornography, child exploitation,

0:42:48.870 --> 0:42:54.700
<v Speaker 2>all the things we're against, suicide idolising and information to

0:42:54.739 --> 0:42:58.300
<v Speaker 2>young people to radicalise them online. All of that's already

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 2>against the law. So this is a really cheap shot

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:04.300
<v Speaker 2>by the government to come at sort of our natural

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 2>sympathies to see the end of all of that But

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:09.830
<v Speaker 2>by basically getting it in before the next election, mind you,

0:43:09.850 --> 0:43:13.570
<v Speaker 2>to basically shut down legitimate debate on the internet or

0:43:13.590 --> 0:43:17.140
<v Speaker 2>for people hearing, you know, that the bloke lies, that

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 2>he isn't doing what he promised, that the budget's in

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:22.580
<v Speaker 2>bad shape, that the borders are not controlled. That's what

0:43:22.620 --> 0:43:23.260
<v Speaker 2>this is about.

0:43:26.100 --> 0:43:28.310
<v Speaker 16>It is, and as I say, that speech that he

0:43:28.330 --> 0:43:32.729
<v Speaker 16>gave today, they've now removed that damning, extraordinary section from

0:43:32.750 --> 0:43:37.730
<v Speaker 16>the transcript on the Prime Minister's media website. So talk

0:43:37.770 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 16>about disinformation on the Prime Minister's own website. No, I've

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 16>just checked, and that section of the speech where he referenced...

0:43:47.020 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 16>Misinformation and disinformation and the extreme views on the left

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:53.620
<v Speaker 16>and the right, that has been removed from his website

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:54.430
<v Speaker 16>from that speech.

0:43:55.010 --> 0:43:58.029
<v Speaker 2>So the Greens have belled the cat on this.

0:43:58.170 --> 0:44:01.630
<v Speaker 16>They talked about using this, that they should and can

0:44:01.690 --> 0:44:04.710
<v Speaker 16>shut down the views of their political opponents, the Coalition

0:44:05.250 --> 0:44:10.140
<v Speaker 16>and One Nation. This is a cover. for an egregious

0:44:10.260 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 16>attack on free speech. This is the stuff of communist China.

0:44:15.300 --> 0:44:19.420
<v Speaker 16>This is not the laws of a first world democratic

0:44:19.460 --> 0:44:23.140
<v Speaker 16>country and it's extraordinary what the government is doing and

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:28.270
<v Speaker 16>it's disgusting that they're using children, harnessing the protection of children,

0:44:28.870 --> 0:44:30.350
<v Speaker 16>for their insidious agenda.

0:44:32.050 --> 0:44:36.590
<v Speaker 2>And, look, from my understanding of it, Sarah... A reasonable

0:44:36.630 --> 0:44:41.149
<v Speaker 2>debate about safeguards around AI and how it's rolled out

0:44:41.190 --> 0:44:45.310
<v Speaker 2>and its impact on the workforce is very different than

0:44:45.350 --> 0:44:48.390
<v Speaker 2>a debate about free speech, than this digital censorship, than

0:44:48.410 --> 0:44:52.350
<v Speaker 2>this misinformation, disinformation. But the Prime Minister is trying to

0:44:52.390 --> 0:44:55.009
<v Speaker 2>conflate the two. It looks like that to me. Is

0:44:55.030 --> 0:44:56.629
<v Speaker 2>that how, am I reading it right?

0:44:59.950 --> 0:45:03.070
<v Speaker 16>He certainly is, and he's also conflating this notion of

0:45:03.150 --> 0:45:05.710
<v Speaker 16>my feed, my way, where you can so-called turn off

0:45:05.750 --> 0:45:08.930
<v Speaker 16>the algorithm, which of course is not possible, turning off

0:45:08.969 --> 0:45:14.089
<v Speaker 16>the personalised algorithm. That's actually not in this bill. There's

0:45:14.110 --> 0:45:17.859
<v Speaker 16>just some rulemaking power. So he's mixing up different issues.

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:21.739
<v Speaker 16>The real story here is that the minister has unfettered

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 16>powers to decide any category of harm that should be

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:28.980
<v Speaker 16>shut down. It is all about shutting down what people

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:32.590
<v Speaker 16>can say and see online. It's all about shutting down

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:37.169
<v Speaker 16>the political opponents of Labor. They are desperate. They will

0:45:37.250 --> 0:45:40.810
<v Speaker 16>do anything, Peter, and this bill is dangerous and must

0:45:40.850 --> 0:45:41.290
<v Speaker 16>be stopped.

0:45:43.010 --> 0:45:44.930
<v Speaker 2>When the bloke's got the worst ever rating of any

0:45:44.989 --> 0:45:48.069
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister in living memory, I can see he's going

0:45:48.090 --> 0:45:50.589
<v Speaker 2>to stop at nothing to stay in office. Sarah, thank you.

0:45:51.350 --> 0:45:53.090
<v Speaker 2>All right, after the break, we'll get into words with Kel.

0:45:53.110 --> 0:45:55.379
<v Speaker 2>We'll come back to other things. Of course, the Victorian

0:45:55.410 --> 0:45:59.100
<v Speaker 2>Royal Commission into the CFMEU. It's not all unions, mind you.

0:45:59.540 --> 0:46:01.980
<v Speaker 2>Started today. I'll have a big update for you on

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 2>that tomorrow night. It was just sort of the opening

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.700
<v Speaker 2>salvo tonight, but tomorrow there'll be more. See you in

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 2>a moment. Mr Richards, it's been a busy day. I

0:46:14.700 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 2>want to get straight in it with you. Thank you

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 2>for being here. The first one up is from me,

0:46:20.989 --> 0:46:22.830
<v Speaker 2>and I tell you, I throw things at the TV.

0:46:23.870 --> 0:46:27.870
<v Speaker 2>Comparable was how I was taught to pronounce the word,

0:46:27.890 --> 0:46:32.469
<v Speaker 2>not comparable. comparable, but maybe I belong in another century.

0:46:32.790 --> 0:46:35.689
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no. You are spot on. There is one

0:46:35.830 --> 0:46:38.830
<v Speaker 4>standard and correct pronunciation, and that is to stress the

0:46:38.850 --> 0:46:44.250
<v Speaker 4>first syllable, comparable. The American pronunciation is comparable, spitting out

0:46:44.290 --> 0:46:47.489
<v Speaker 4>that middle. But don't do any of that. Stress the

0:46:47.510 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 4>first syllable. It's the American influence. Really sad. So either

0:46:50.660 --> 0:46:53.460
<v Speaker 4>show me your American passport or say comparable.

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 2>OK, politicians and media types, please take note that one

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:01.660
<v Speaker 2>does my head in. Hey, guts for garters. Ron says,

0:47:02.140 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 2>where's this one come from, Kel? I'll have your guts

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:05.260
<v Speaker 2>for garters.

0:47:05.620 --> 0:47:08.280
<v Speaker 4>Comes from the reign of the Tudor kings and queens

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 4>in England when one of the punishments was to be hanged,

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 4>wrought and quartered. Now, that involved a cutting out and

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:18.459
<v Speaker 4>exposing the intestines of the poor, unfortunate victim, although still

0:47:18.500 --> 0:47:21.020
<v Speaker 4>half alive. That's where the guts come from. The garters

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 4>from the fact that Tudor men would wear garters to

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:27.300
<v Speaker 4>hold up their hose or, Now, it was never a

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:30.339
<v Speaker 4>serious threat. No intestines were ever turned into garters, but

0:47:30.380 --> 0:47:35.390
<v Speaker 4>it made a nice, alliterative, blustering revenge threat, guts for garters.

0:47:36.930 --> 0:47:38.609
<v Speaker 2>Now, I like this one from Dee. She wants to

0:47:38.630 --> 0:47:40.730
<v Speaker 2>know the history of duck shove.

0:47:41.310 --> 0:47:45.279
<v Speaker 4>Oh, this is ours. This was invented in marvellous Melbourne

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:48.680
<v Speaker 4>in 1859, and it came from the behaviour of cab drivers. Now, obviously,

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 4>at that time, horse-drawn cabs, handsome cabs, And apparently they

0:47:52.700 --> 0:47:54.989
<v Speaker 4>used to shuffle and compete to get to the best

0:47:55.030 --> 0:47:57.450
<v Speaker 4>places in the cab rank. And the way they behaved

0:47:57.510 --> 0:48:00.710
<v Speaker 4>was described as duck shoving. And that put the word

0:48:00.750 --> 0:48:04.460
<v Speaker 4>into circulation, presumably from having watched lines of little ducks

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 4>pushing each other as they waddled towards the water. But

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:10.820
<v Speaker 4>it was Melbourne cab drivers that gave us the word.

0:48:12.170 --> 0:48:12.580
<v Speaker 15>I love it.

0:48:12.910 --> 0:48:14.830
<v Speaker 2>It might be about the duck boards. You know duck boards,

0:48:14.850 --> 0:48:16.450
<v Speaker 2>wooden duck boards? Oh, yes, yes. Could have been that

0:48:16.489 --> 0:48:18.890
<v Speaker 2>too when people stand up next to those to get

0:48:18.930 --> 0:48:21.140
<v Speaker 2>into the cabs because I suspect Melbourne was as wet

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:24.540
<v Speaker 2>and miserable back then as it is sometimes today. Beautiful

0:48:24.580 --> 0:48:25.739
<v Speaker 2>as well. Beautiful as well.

0:48:26.140 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 4>Leaving it out.

0:48:27.140 --> 0:48:28.819
<v Speaker 2>That's it for me. Thanks, Kel. See you next week.

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Here's the Andrew Bolt Show.