Speaker 1: From the Sky New Center. This is Paul Murray Live.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Showy Gooday, good evening, A last show and
Speaker 1: the man Cave for a couple of weeks. We're off
Speaker 1: to the United States tomorrow. Our shows start on Sunday night.
Speaker 1: Now I make you this promise. Obviously that's the biggest
Speaker 1: story in the world. But will continue talking about news
Speaker 1: in Australia, including Parliament coming back and talking about upgrade Elbow.
Speaker 1: So we'll be across it all over there and here.
Speaker 1: I can't wait for you to join me Sunday Night
Speaker 1: from the United States. But first let's deal with what
Speaker 1: is happening here, and that is that a family's heart
Speaker 1: has been broken. A community needs all of our strength
Speaker 1: and love right now. You may have heard the news
Speaker 1: yesterday that there was a car accident that involved four
Speaker 1: little kids at a primary school. We learned today that
Speaker 1: an eleven year old little boy has died. And we
Speaker 1: learned today about the little boy's name. His name is
Speaker 1: Jack Davy and he was the victim of the crash
Speaker 1: of the Auburn South School. Look at that beautiful face.
Speaker 1: Strength and love to his family. Just before we got
Speaker 1: into all the bells and whistles and all the rest
Speaker 1: of it about politics. Today, there's a family, there's a
Speaker 1: school community, and not to mention the other kids that
Speaker 1: were hurting all of this, but our strength and love.
Speaker 1: Lucy is a family friend and she has started up
Speaker 1: a gofund me for the family. But she's speaking on
Speaker 1: the behalf of those who knew this little man.
Speaker 2: I have no words, to be honest with you.
Speaker 3: They're the most beautiful family.
Speaker 1: The local butcher and the veggie shop down the road.
Speaker 4: They could see parents just running because all we saw
Speaker 4: was you know, police cars, ambulances everything today.
Speaker 1: His mum and dad and sisters attended the school and
Speaker 1: out the front of it there was all sorts of
Speaker 1: floral tributes. He was apparently quite a basketball fan. He
Speaker 1: was a football player. In fact, he was on the
Speaker 1: Australian team, the undertwelves team. A massive loss for that community.
Speaker 1: If you would like to support the family, because of
Speaker 1: course things are tough, difficult, as no emotion is going
Speaker 1: to fix anything here or no money fixes anything. But
Speaker 1: if you'd like to please donate by the GoFundMe website.
Speaker 1: Simply support the Davy family, I think is the way.
Speaker 1: The actual title of it is, but support the Davy
Speaker 1: dave Y family. Look for a tribute to little eleven
Speaker 1: year old Jack. Strength and love to the family. Bloody
Speaker 1: ell that's awful, all right, to the rest of the
Speaker 1: day's stuff. And Carmala Harris cannot get out of the
Speaker 1: shadow of Joe Biden, so much so that it is
Speaker 1: going to be pretty difficult for her to win the
Speaker 1: American election because despite all of her attempts to pretend
Speaker 1: she's different, she of course has been the co pilot
Speaker 1: of the plan that has got so badly of course,
Speaker 1: over the past four years. In fact, latest polling shows
Speaker 1: that on the right Track Wrong Track question, sixty four
Speaker 1: percent of Americans believe the country's headed in the wrong direction.
Speaker 1: That's a thirty six point difference between those who think
Speaker 1: things are headed in the right the wrong direction. We
Speaker 1: have learned this week that Joe Biden has offered to
Speaker 1: stand side by side with Kamala Harris. But Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: knowing that the stench of political death is in and
Speaker 1: around this blow that she's just ignoring the calls, he
Speaker 1: will not be by her side. But he found a
Speaker 1: way to get in the news today and it may
Speaker 1: well cost her the election, Tony garbage ac flowed down.
Speaker 1: There is his supporters. Sorry you thought basket of deplorables
Speaker 1: was bad? That's just straight out right and attacking. Now,
Speaker 1: of course he didn't mean it, and he gets a
Speaker 1: do over because he's a lefty. But that's what he said. Oh,
Speaker 1: everyone will write it off because you know he doesn't
Speaker 1: know what he's saying. I'm sorry, that's what he said.
Speaker 1: He says the quiet part out loud. And we all
Speaker 1: know that the most passionate stuff that we've seen in
Speaker 1: the American election has been the hating on Trump and now,
Speaker 1: of course the hating on the supporter is because the
Speaker 1: supporters deny them ongoing power, that being Biden or Harris.
Speaker 1: Harris gave a big speech today in Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: I'll give some details on that no moment of his time,
Speaker 1: but surprise, surprise, the headlines read that the speech was
Speaker 1: overshadowed by the bloke who says that the other half
Speaker 1: of the country are garbage. May well be a problem.
Speaker 1: As for the lefties, they are going full passive aggressive.
Speaker 1: He was one having a go at a Republican today
Speaker 1: on CNN. He has his own campaign agenda. It is
Speaker 1: not Project twenty twenty five.
Speaker 5: No, it's a tender forty seven, which is exactly the
Speaker 5: same as Project twenty twenty five. And you can see
Speaker 5: that as many times as you want, Scott, but it's
Speaker 5: not true. So just to stay here and say I've
Speaker 5: said this a million times and it's not his plan.
Speaker 5: His plans are that's a very smug way to look
Speaker 5: at me, my friend. The thing is is that what
Speaker 5: we're doing is we're talking.
Speaker 1: About a little more before we are done. One week
Speaker 1: to go, before we are standing there in Washington, DC
Speaker 1: bringing the results live all day next Wednesday here on
Speaker 1: scot News. Upgrade our by what a world of pain
Speaker 1: he is in tonight he may have gone into media
Speaker 1: hiding today. Well I'll give you the tip. This thing
Speaker 1: is a world of pain and the story changes by
Speaker 1: the hour.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 1: The heart of this is not just too close a
Speaker 1: relationship between Anthony Ebernezi and the former CEO of Quantus,
Speaker 1: but of course an over reliance of the relationship and
Speaker 1: what free stuff I upgrades can come the way of
Speaker 1: the now Prime Minister, but in this case more importantly
Speaker 1: former Transport minister. Now, remember we told you last night
Speaker 1: in chapter and verse that the issue is not whether
Speaker 1: he picked up the phone and spoke to Joyce directly
Speaker 1: or texted him, or sent smoke signals or sent carrier pigeons,
Speaker 1: whether he spoke to the cleaner or he got his
Speaker 1: cleaner to talk to Joyce's cleaner. The point is the
Speaker 1: ministerial code of conduct couldn't be clearer, which is that
Speaker 1: you cannot ask for gifts and tens of thousands of
Speaker 1: dollars worth of upgrades would well and truly be that
Speaker 1: well Tonight major news at skynews dot com dot au
Speaker 1: as the Prime Minister tries to kick up some dust here,
Speaker 1: remember it's about him asking for the upgrades for the
Speaker 1: Prime Minister. Anthony Abernese's office has released a cryptic message
Speaker 1: to the media denying that he called. Now remember yesterday
Speaker 1: in his press conference he sort of was well, maybe
Speaker 1: te but that he never called the courtis CEO. He
Speaker 1: danced around all of this yesterday in a series of
Speaker 1: press conferences, and a spokesperson for the Prime Minister has
Speaker 1: now publicly denied the question outright about whether or not
Speaker 1: mister Alberzi had called the former airline's boss. However, I'm
Speaker 1: reading from skyonies dot com that are you here? The
Speaker 1: cryptic message failed to confirm whether Alberanzi had used other
Speaker 1: forms of communication to solicit free upgrades from mister Joyce,
Speaker 1: or whether his officer had made representations to the then
Speaker 1: COURTUS CEO. The statement we got the Prime Minister did
Speaker 1: not ever call Alan Joyce seeking an upgrade. You see
Speaker 1: the Prime Minister's office think therefore he is off the
Speaker 1: hook because he did not directly contact the CEO. Or
Speaker 1: we'll wait and see the claims of the book, which
Speaker 1: presumably have gone through all of the lawyers, suggest that
Speaker 1: there was direct contact. All travel has been appropriately declared
Speaker 1: and matter of the public record. Now there's a problem
Speaker 1: here because the Prime Minister wants the story to be
Speaker 1: about who contacted who. No, no, no, I repeat, it
Speaker 1: is about him contacting quantus at all at a time
Speaker 1: when he was the Transport Minister. It also comes on
Speaker 1: top of more stories about more upgrades. Again skynews dot
Speaker 1: com dot A you make it your homepage. They're right
Speaker 1: on top of all of this. Now they add to
Speaker 1: the claims that have already been discussed via this book
Speaker 1: of five different examples of him putting his hand out
Speaker 1: for the upgrade, that being two thousand and nine, from
Speaker 1: Sydney to Los Angeles, return in April of twenty ten,
Speaker 1: from Sydney to Rome, return, a trip apparently to Europe
Speaker 1: in twenty eleven, from Honolulu and the United States to
Speaker 1: Sydney in December the twenty twelve, and a trip to
Speaker 1: Dubai in March of twenty thirteen. Again, while they wanted
Speaker 1: to be about who called who, it ain't about that.
Speaker 1: Did he ask in any way, shape or form for
Speaker 1: the upgrade? Did he ask Joyce directly? Did he ask
Speaker 1: the cleaner? Did he send a smoke signal? If he
Speaker 1: asked for it, then he's in breach of at least
Speaker 1: one of those two sections of the Ministerial Code of
Speaker 1: Conduct that we showed you last night. The simple question
Speaker 1: for the Prime Minister that he will have to answer
Speaker 1: next week in Parliament is do you believe that ministers
Speaker 1: should abide by the Ministerial Code of Conduct? Yes or no?
Speaker 1: Would you sack a minister should they breach the Ministerial
Speaker 1: Code of Conduct? Yes or no? Would accepting gifts from
Speaker 1: the biggest company in the area that you have responsibility
Speaker 1: for be a breach of the Ministerial Code of Conduct.
Speaker 1: Yes or no? Would you seeking gifts from the biggest
Speaker 1: company in the ministerial area that you had responsibility by
Speaker 1: a beach of the minister or code of conduct? Yes
Speaker 1: or no? Again, whack that necessarily Code of Conduct up
Speaker 1: because people talk about it. I want you to know
Speaker 1: the words section three point one point eight. Ministers and
Speaker 1: their official capacity may therefore accept customary official gifts, hospitalities,
Speaker 1: token of appreciation, but must not seek or encourage any
Speaker 1: form of gift in their personal capacity. Well, we've got
Speaker 1: five examples of them that are in the book, a
Speaker 1: couple more by the reporting of Andrew Clonell and others
Speaker 1: here at Sky News. Then there's the second bit, which
Speaker 1: is a section three point twenty one of the Ministerial
Speaker 1: Code of Conduct. The same words, same meaning when he
Speaker 1: was working as a Minister for Rudd and as a
Speaker 1: Minister for Gillard. Ministers must not seek or accept any
Speaker 1: kind of benefit or valuable consideration, either for themselves or others,
Speaker 1: in connection with performing or not performing any element of
Speaker 1: their official duties as a minister. You can't get, let
Speaker 1: alone ask gifts from the biggest company in the area
Speaker 1: of which you supposedly a responsibility. So I mentioned one, two, three, four,
Speaker 1: five examples of him doing it, him being caught red handed.
Speaker 1: He wants to make it about who contacted her. No, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: he got them, which puts him in breach of three
Speaker 1: point twenty one. But also I would suggest a three
Speaker 1: point one eight, which is that you must not seek
Speaker 1: or encourage these things. Becomes the issue again Andrew Clonell
Speaker 1: or so other I should say, camridden with a bit
Speaker 1: more detail here about other upgrades on top of the five.
Speaker 7: We can reveal that the Prime Minister, on one flight
Speaker 7: in January the twentieth, nineteen ninety nine, received an upgrade.
Speaker 1: On a flight from.
Speaker 7: Christ Church to Sydney, that is the first one that
Speaker 7: was from economy to business class. Also received an upgrade
Speaker 7: from economy to business return from Sydney to Hong Kong
Speaker 7: in April of nineteen ninety nine. He can see that
Speaker 7: one on your screen. That's a Quantus flight as well.
Speaker 7: In February of two thousand to mister Alberinezi and his
Speaker 7: then wife Carmel Tevertt received upgrades from economy to business
Speaker 7: for two Quantus FLO flights for what is cited in
Speaker 7: the declaration as a family holiday to Thailand, and then
Speaker 7: in September of two thousand, mister Albanezi declares a number
Speaker 7: of flights, three of them in total for himself and
Speaker 7: Miss Tebbett. There's a one upgrade from economy to business
Speaker 7: flying on Quantus from Sydney to Singapore. An upgrade from
Speaker 7: economy to first class on a British Airways flight from
Speaker 7: Singapore to London should be the next one, and then
Speaker 7: an upgrade from economy to business class as well flying
Speaker 7: on a Quantus flight from London to Sydney.
Speaker 1: Now, all of that exercise, apart from showing he's got
Speaker 1: a sweep tooth for this stuff, the stuff in opposition
Speaker 1: doesn't matter, right, It's all about whether he's a minister.
Speaker 1: Hence the main five allegations which come out of the book.
Speaker 1: Prime Minister tries to distract with who asked who reality
Speaker 1: is if it was asked for at all in any way,
Speaker 1: shape or form to anyone in the organization on his
Speaker 1: behalf or directly bang, he's on the wrong sid this.
Speaker 1: He would have to sack his own Transport Minister for
Speaker 1: doing it. And presumably you can't go back to the
Speaker 1: time machine when it comes to the former prime ministers.
Speaker 1: But he's going to be on the wrong side of
Speaker 1: this thing. Again. Albo lets himself off the hook. But
Speaker 1: people need to understand the double standard. They need to
Speaker 1: understand that if his own Transport minister did this, he
Speaker 1: be compelled to sack them. But when he did it,
Speaker 1: he's going to say there's nothing to see here. Again,
Speaker 1: interesting to note some of the reviews the Prime Minister's
Speaker 1: defense here, this sort of smoke bomb strategy of pretending
Speaker 1: it's all down to the word call versus text versus
Speaker 1: carry a pigeon versus message in the mail or good
Speaker 1: vibes in the air, Sidy morning herald upgrade Albow the
Speaker 1: attack against his critics just makes it worse. This was
Speaker 1: an example of that garbage from yesterday.
Speaker 8: Did you call Alan Joyce personally for these upgrades?
Speaker 9: But the idea Cornish have a number in terms of
Speaker 9: bookings that are private bookings and in terms of the
Speaker 9: only discussions that I can recall with Alan Joyce, certainly
Speaker 9: we discussed not through calls. We discussed the first flight
Speaker 9: from Australia to Dubai on an A three eighty.
Speaker 1: So again Prime Minister's obvious wants to make it all
Speaker 1: about call section three point one eight. He's on the
Speaker 1: wrong side of it five times. Three point twenty one.
Speaker 1: He's on the wrong side of it five times. His
Speaker 1: ministers were out there trying to push it uphill today.
Speaker 4: I think the Prime Minister has gone out of his
Speaker 4: way multiple occasions this week to answer questions about this issue.
Speaker 4: If people have got allegations to make about this, we
Speaker 4: would invite them to make those allegations.
Speaker 2: But he is otherwise accounted for himself properly.
Speaker 3: Prime Minister has complied with all of the rules that
Speaker 3: have been in place for many, many years.
Speaker 1: These people, if there's any allegation to make the allegation, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's in the book. It's been in the press conferences.
Speaker 1: We've read the examples of how he's on the wrong
Speaker 1: side of the Ministerial Code of Conduct. I'll get to
Speaker 1: the National Corruption Commission in a second here, but a
Speaker 1: little taste of public opinion via the Daily Telegraphs website
Speaker 1: in the past couple of days. Unsurprisingly, things may well
Speaker 1: be within the rules, but it's the pub test that
Speaker 1: ends up counting. Now, prom and Bishops on the show tonight,
Speaker 1: Inevitably there'll be an attempt to talk about her situation.
Speaker 1: Remember she was entitled when it came to the use
Speaker 1: of the helicopter, but because the pub test was invoked,
Speaker 1: she of course had to give up her job as
Speaker 1: the speaker. The same pub test applies to the Prime minister.
Speaker 1: Number of people that have been filling out an online
Speaker 1: survey the Daily Telegraph's website four hundred and sixty seven
Speaker 1: ninety five percent say the Prime Minister calling the boss
Speaker 1: of corners for an upgrade? Does it passed the pub test? Again?
Speaker 1: Don't get caught on this whole call not call business.
Speaker 1: Did he ask quantus? Not whom at quantus? Meantime social
Speaker 1: media comments he has to go, says one commentator, while
Speaker 1: another described Alberezi as not only astraight as worst prime minister,
Speaker 1: but also its most accident prone. It's time for Albow
Speaker 1: to go to call an election. Now we don't more
Speaker 1: in any more of this labour greends rubbish. Did you
Speaker 1: tell anyone that he grew up in Housing Commission flat?
Speaker 1: He's certainly making up for lost time. My favorite, Darren,
Speaker 1: this is not the spirit of Australia. And then remember
Speaker 1: part of the connection between the Prime Minister and Quantas,
Speaker 1: specifically its former leadership, was the decision to deny Qatar
Speaker 1: Airways more opportunities to fly into Australia. That of course
Speaker 1: would mean more opportunities to fly overseas and theoretically cheaper
Speaker 1: tickets if it actually took place now. At the time,
Speaker 1: the Labor Party said they were helping Quantus's bottom line,
Speaker 1: and then they got a do over, and another do
Speaker 1: over and another do over. But we remember the sticky paper.
Speaker 1: All of this was at the time the finn said
Speaker 1: Qatar Airways was surprised by Labour's decision. Well what about
Speaker 1: today and the courier mail ministers gifted Countus upgrades after
Speaker 1: blocking rival airline. So many of the people who were
Speaker 1: sitting around the cabinet table if this was discussed, well
Speaker 1: look what they suddenly got rewarded with, which, in and
Speaker 1: of itself, I would suggest gets very close to the
Speaker 1: ministerial code of conduct. Seven Labor ministers and assistant ministers
Speaker 1: were gifted complimentary flight upgrades from Quantus in the months
Speaker 1: after the Abeneze government blocked the rival airline from expanding
Speaker 1: in Australia. Nothing to see here. The upgrades, which included
Speaker 1: international trips are contained in the recent MP declarations of
Speaker 1: Mark Butler, Bill Short and Mark Dreyfusenika Wellspad Conroy, Matt
Speaker 1: Keo and Andrew Giles. Again they'll all say it's within
Speaker 1: the rules, but of course there's the pub test which
Speaker 1: is completely different than the rules. And then there's the
Speaker 1: ministerial Code of Conduct that only now people are pulled
Speaker 1: out of the draw and are actually realizing how often
Speaker 1: so many of the things that are well in front
Speaker 1: of the plane class take for granted are direct contraventions
Speaker 1: of the very rules under which they are able to
Speaker 1: have their jobs. Unsurprisingly, Peter Dutton's more than happy to
Speaker 1: talk about this today, tomorrow, all the way in the
Speaker 1: next week.
Speaker 6: Well, certainly on the face of reading the Gillard government
Speaker 6: minister or a code of conduct, the Prime Minister has
Speaker 6: breached that by his own admission, and.
Speaker 1: Then you'll love this bit as you know whether or
Speaker 1: not this makes us well Question time next week and
Speaker 1: then off to the National Corruption Commission, which is where
Speaker 1: Peter Dutton may well end up sending it.
Speaker 6: I think it's a matter that should be referred by
Speaker 6: the Prime Minister. I think the Prime Minister should take
Speaker 6: the initiative to refer this matter to the Integrity Commission,
Speaker 6: because I think there are lots of questions about mister
Speaker 6: Albinez's credibility and his integrity in relation to the Katar decision.
Speaker 1: Guess who's got the quantas chairman's club treatment as well
Speaker 1: the very people who run the National Anti Corruption Commission. Again,
Speaker 1: great reporting today, Andrew Clenell, Well what about this?
Speaker 10: I mean, Peter Darton Karen he wants Anthony Albinese to
Speaker 10: refer himself to the National Anti Corruption Commission over his
Speaker 10: flight upgrades and his relationship with Quanas. Turns out the
Speaker 10: people who'd be adjudicating on that themselves are members of
Speaker 10: the Chairman's lounge. If Joe Aston's book didn't tell you,
Speaker 10: this has reached into every section of the bureaucracy, society,
Speaker 10: politics and business in Australia. This little example does.
Speaker 1: How does somebody who sits in judgment of other people
Speaker 1: about corruption put themselves in a position to accept the
Speaker 1: soft power of the biggest company in an area that
Speaker 1: is being administered by the government the areas of the
Speaker 1: transport sector. And well done again to the Financial Review
Speaker 1: and one of their reporters who was able to work
Speaker 1: out where are the teals better standards in Parliament all
Speaker 1: the rest of it? Or are they just lining up
Speaker 1: for their own upgrades? And because they're not ministers, there's
Speaker 1: no such thing as a code of conduct. And of
Speaker 1: course they wouldn't go to the pub for a pub test.
Speaker 1: That's too beneath them. Apperol splits somewhere else. As for inflation,
Speaker 1: today we got another example of grim Jim charmers trying
Speaker 1: to put on the smile to pretend that everything is awesome,
Speaker 1: everything is fine, everything is okay. Now, this idiot last week,
Speaker 1: remember he's not an economist, He's a person whose doctorate
Speaker 1: is about how the spinning of Paul Keenning's economy went.
Speaker 1: He told us last week that a Middle East ceasefire
Speaker 1: would help bring down inflation fed income. Well, he got
Speaker 1: some news today, which is they have been able to,
Speaker 1: via the decisions in the federal budget to well pay
Speaker 1: off the power companies bribe their way to a headline,
Speaker 1: a headline dutifully reported by mates in the media.
Speaker 11: Flation has fallen to its lowest level in three years.
Speaker 2: The treasure of banking the win.
Speaker 4: Inflation is back in the band.
Speaker 12: Ice pressures are continuing to ease, with the latest starter
Speaker 12: showing Australia's annual inflation rate has fallen to two point
Speaker 12: eight percent, broadly in line with expectation.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, that's the grab. The grab Wood chose was
Speaker 1: the guy who was walking into camera. Look, I get
Speaker 1: it. It happens live everywhere else. Good on her for following
Speaker 1: the autoqure. I don't have one here. It's all off
Speaker 1: the top of the head, which I think they will
Speaker 1: be obvious after the best part of fifteen years anywhere
Speaker 1: we're paying for it. We'll talk about a potential cultural
Speaker 1: reform of the ABC in a moment or two. Time Again,
Speaker 1: as for Jim Chalmers, everything's awesome. Everything's great now. Remember
Speaker 1: when we talk about inflation coming down, prices are still
Speaker 1: going up. It's just they used to go up like
Speaker 1: this and now they're only going up like this. But
Speaker 1: still put it all together, and they have gone up.
Speaker 1: They have gone up by a huge amount since this
Speaker 1: mob came to power.
Speaker 4: Today's numbers show that we are on track for a
Speaker 4: soft landing in our economy. We are confident, but not
Speaker 4: complacent about the substantial progress that we are making as
Speaker 4: a country. Inflation is back in the band.
Speaker 1: Now, as I told you, they've spent one hundreds of
Speaker 1: millions of dollars of your money to pay the power company,
Speaker 1: so they don't hand on the price increases of the
Speaker 1: government's policies to you. But even then it's three hundred dollars,
Speaker 1: it's twenty five dollars a month, it's seventy five dollars
Speaker 1: a quarter. It doesn't really touch the sides, but it
Speaker 1: certainly is able to stop when it comes to the
Speaker 1: increases that are being felt by people at the retail level.
Speaker 1: If you think this is me just making it up,
Speaker 1: here's the Australian Bureau Statistics today. The statement is still
Speaker 1: on their website where they talk about the Energy bill
Speaker 1: rebates that these rebates had the effect of reducing electricity
Speaker 1: costs for households in September of twenty twenty four. Not
Speaker 1: bad because yes it's gone down, but it's completely artificial.
Speaker 1: It's bs inflation has not gone down. They have bought
Speaker 1: a way to make it look like it is going down.
Speaker 1: And when the money runs out, guess what keeps going up?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, And because of the little swindle when it
Speaker 1: comes to power prices, everything to the left went down.
Speaker 1: Everything else went up. They also were saved by petrol
Speaker 1: prices starting to come down. But apparently a ceasefire in
Speaker 1: the Middle East would help inflation even oh I think
Speaker 1: in these people. So the inflation number that they were
Speaker 1: very excited about today had a two in front of it.
Speaker 1: Core inflation had three in front of it, about three
Speaker 1: point five percent. Remember they need between two and three,
Speaker 1: not between three and four. However, in the past month,
Speaker 1: tobacco up twelve point nine percent, food and vege up
Speaker 1: nine percent, rents up six percent, education up six percent,
Speaker 1: alcohol and tobacco together up six point three percent. Insurance
Speaker 1: insurance insurance. This thing keeps going through the room ruth
Speaker 1: month on month, So the month of September this year
Speaker 1: competed the month of September last year, up six point
Speaker 1: one percent. Health, new homes, food products, non alcoholic beverages,
Speaker 1: food and non alcoholic beverages, gas and other feels, all
Speaker 1: of it way higher than the headline number. So please
Speaker 1: don't buy this garbage. Prices are not going down with
Speaker 1: power prices. Its artificial, which runs out at the end
Speaker 1: of twelve months and then they go back up again,
Speaker 1: and everything else is not increasing at the extra rates.
Speaker 1: That it has been increasing. But if you take it
Speaker 1: from the start of the Albanesian charmers reign over the
Speaker 1: economy to today, you are way higher than you would
Speaker 1: normally be over a three year run of a federal government.
Speaker 1: Which is why when it comes to supermarkets, stop telling
Speaker 1: people everything's cheaper. What about a story about what it's
Speaker 1: like to live in a remote part of Queensland where
Speaker 1: a lady by the name of Karen Chong. I think
Speaker 1: we've got a photo here. She imagines herself relaxing with
Speaker 1: a simple icy pole. She can't afford to do it.
Speaker 1: It's not in the budget. Money just goes just like that,
Speaker 1: like spilling a bucket of water. She's talking about an
Speaker 1: icy pole, and try and stand there and tell us
Speaker 1: in camber, everything's awesome when the sugar in Queensland can't
Speaker 1: have an icy pole. We can only afford to buy
Speaker 1: what we need. When I go, I buy a couple
Speaker 1: of fruits, a couple of bananas. She says. She spends
Speaker 1: eighty percent of her job seeker money gets on groceries.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and when it comes to power bills, the
Speaker 1: artificial low that is currently being experienced now because your
Speaker 1: tax not the federal government's money, the taxpayers money is
Speaker 1: being spent to keep these things low holdso little electricity
Speaker 1: prices are jumped in winter because of, in part, the
Speaker 1: amount of money it costs to have the renewable system
Speaker 1: in place. So if the government's able to somehow push
Speaker 1: down the inflation number by faking a reduction in power prices,
Speaker 1: is it going to affect the Reserve Bank? Answer NA,
Speaker 1: because they're looking not at the fiddleable parts of this.
Speaker 1: Instead they're looking at core inflation. Core inflation at three
Speaker 1: point five is the highest in some parts of the
Speaker 1: western world.
Speaker 12: It is clear that Australia is at the back of
Speaker 12: the pack in dealing with this persistent inflation. Our core
Speaker 12: inflation is higher than the Euro Area, Sweden, Norway, Japan,
Speaker 12: New Zealand and Canada. And we see right across the
Speaker 12: world interest rates coming down, but not in Australia.
Speaker 1: But a ceasefire or make it better. That's the treasurer
Speaker 1: of Australia treating you like a mushroom in the dark
Speaker 1: and feeding you the same diet feed income. Now, of course,
Speaker 1: the overall issue about the amount of renewables being built
Speaker 1: around the country. In part again paid for by your
Speaker 1: tax payers money. We won't see it in the budget
Speaker 1: because Chris Bowen's oh so clever trick is to put
Speaker 1: it off budget as if there's any difference in terms
Speaker 1: of the actual amount of money being borrowed from places
Speaker 1: like China to buy solar panels and wind farms from China. Oh,
Speaker 1: you're built with slave, lady, But don't tell anyone now. Remember,
Speaker 1: despite the fact that we are building all of this
Speaker 1: stuff everywhere, and even though there's a giant solar farm
Speaker 1: outside of Broken Hill, you see, none of the power
Speaker 1: gets to Broken Hill. Instead, it all has to go
Speaker 1: back to Sydney to make the lovies feel better. You
Speaker 1: know what happened there in the past few days. They've
Speaker 1: literally got this giant solar panel thing just to the
Speaker 1: side of the town, yet engine cord to the town instead,
Speaker 1: all of it makes its way towards Sydney. Ridiculous. Well,
Speaker 1: perfect example about how local people in regional areas get
Speaker 1: screwed over those blackouts in Broken Hill. Well, what about
Speaker 1: what's happening when it comes to the giant power lines
Speaker 1: which all need to be relaid renewable energy meaning there
Speaker 1: a different types of power lines than the ones right now.
Speaker 1: The compensation that's available to the farmers despite the fact
Speaker 1: that of course the air access becomes grossly compromised to
Speaker 1: their land. That will be compromised for when the towers
Speaker 1: touch the ground. That's it. Nothing else. Well remember the
Speaker 1: OSNET protesters, the ones around in and around Ballarat. Well,
Speaker 1: Victorian farmers are found out today that guess what. The
Speaker 1: line is very big, very dirty, and in fact will
Speaker 1: be traveling two hundred and forty kilometers from the transmission centers.
Speaker 1: It'll be going through two hundred and fifty farms and
Speaker 1: other private properties. That is Victoria, New South Wales. Another
Speaker 1: one on its way. This one's two hundred and thirty
Speaker 1: nine kilometers through our parts of New South Wales. One
Speaker 1: of the local farmers is affected by all of this
Speaker 1: along the Murray River says, we'll have it running six
Speaker 1: hundred meters from the house, cutting off three point sorry,
Speaker 1: cutting three point five kilometers through our dairy land and
Speaker 1: irrigation country. We put an aeroplane over the wheat for
Speaker 1: stripe rust and do the same to top dress our
Speaker 1: rice and for spraying. It will cut access to our driveway.
Speaker 1: We'll have to drive back and forth under it about
Speaker 1: six times a day. It'll be an I saw and
Speaker 1: my wife is rather upset Arnold on the behalf of
Speaker 1: his family. Happy wife, happy life, unhappy wife. We get
Speaker 1: the rest. Now, of course you would think that all
Speaker 1: of these projects will they help all of these local areas.
Speaker 1: Of course they don't. The energy has to be sent
Speaker 1: back to the cities. Why because the cities have to
Speaker 1: feel good about themselves. Now, of course the Teals, all
Speaker 1: of those particular MPs or green MPs or lefty labor
Speaker 1: or lefty liberal MPs. None of them are suggesting that
Speaker 1: there should be a trade off of a doggy park
Speaker 1: for a solar farm. None of them are suggesting that
Speaker 1: North and South Head in Sydney, both in Teeal Territory,
Speaker 1: should have windmills on it. No, no, no, no no. In fact,
Speaker 1: these are the people who even oppose high rise buildings
Speaker 1: being built in their areas because I'm among other things,
Speaker 1: oh would look terrible, Zoey Daniel again, any planned to
Speaker 1: replace some doggy parks with some wind farms in her
Speaker 1: part of Australian Nah, just screw over regional Victoria. And
Speaker 1: even if all this stuff's built in the area, you
Speaker 1: don't get access to the power because the power lines
Speaker 1: are got to go back to teal area so they
Speaker 1: can feel good and smug about themselves. She says, by
Speaker 1: the way, about building tall buildings crash through a crash
Speaker 1: is not a sustainable housing policy. We need our communities
Speaker 1: to be part of the solution to the problem, not
Speaker 1: living in fear of it. Well did o'dal? The same
Speaker 1: exists when it comes to where the renewable projects will
Speaker 1: be built, the power lines that bring them back into
Speaker 1: the cities, and the people who get screwed over. You
Speaker 1: want to talk abot crash or crashed through. They are
Speaker 1: taking to the streets in regional Victoria. I know you
Speaker 1: don't give a tuppence because it's not your electorate, but
Speaker 1: the people who sit there smugly saying more more and
Speaker 1: more and more more, who don't want anything to change
Speaker 1: in their area, but they're happy for the whole joint
Speaker 1: to get screwed over. As soon as you get away
Speaker 1: from the country or from the major cities, well on
Speaker 1: the behalf of those people, you can shove it as
Speaker 1: far as you can. One way to go until the
Speaker 1: American election. Let's get to that now. Now A couple
Speaker 1: of other details I want to get you to on
Speaker 1: all of this. Today, Donald Trump had a spectacular message.
Speaker 1: I was watching the channel on news tonight. They don't
Speaker 1: even mention that this was part of his day because
Speaker 1: they're so far down the rabbit hole of Trump does
Speaker 1: nothing good right. Economy number one, immigration number two, abortion
Speaker 1: number three. One of the reasons why this in particular
Speaker 1: is such a massive issue is not just because you know,
Speaker 1: you've got ten million people living in the country shouldn't
Speaker 1: be in the country because they didn't fill out the
Speaker 1: paperwork to be there. Like me going to the United States,
Speaker 1: I'm not just turning up in Mexico and walking through
Speaker 1: a river. You fill out all the bits of paper,
Speaker 1: you get the visa, you go through the front door.
Speaker 1: That's the way it's supposed to work. And I'm just visiting,
Speaker 1: let alone somebody who's wanting to move to the area
Speaker 1: fed income. Well. Of course, among the millions of people
Speaker 1: who have crossed into the country illegally are people who
Speaker 1: have committed horrific crimes, including today, he made an announcement
Speaker 1: that the federal government will set up a new compensation
Speaker 1: scheme that if your family is affected by somebody who
Speaker 1: went to the country illegally and they committed a serious crime.
Speaker 1: You will receive compensation from the federal government because the
Speaker 1: person shouldn't be here. And what type of crimes are
Speaker 1: we talking about? He released a new ad today. This
Speaker 1: could en should win in the election. A twelve year
Speaker 1: old girl was assaulted and murdered. This is the ad
Speaker 1: that is making its way around swing states, and I
Speaker 1: say it is impossible to push back against.
Speaker 8: I woke up to notice she wasn't in her bed.
Speaker 8: I'm in my heart trying not to lose my mind
Speaker 8: because I don't know where she is. I finally remembered
Speaker 8: her phone had a location on and her phone was
Speaker 8: pinging just two minutes down the road, right behind the skatepark.
Speaker 8: I start driving to the direction the phone was being
Speaker 8: pinged at, and I see a couple of cop cars
Speaker 8: with lights on. I see yellow tape, and immediately my
Speaker 8: heart drops and sinks to the bottom of my stomach.
Speaker 1: Just poor people. You can imagine every awful, horrific detail
Speaker 1: that you are most afraid of. This is what happened
Speaker 1: to this twelve year old kid. The person should have
Speaker 1: never been in the country. Appointment by a mom in
Speaker 1: the ad.
Speaker 8: I truly believe this all could have been prevented under
Speaker 8: her being vice president of this country. My daughter's life
Speaker 8: was ripped away from her.
Speaker 1: No, no, nothing. This is why it matters. This is
Speaker 1: why elections matter. This is why I don't care about
Speaker 1: whatever names Kamala Harris wants to say during her speeches.
Speaker 1: They failed. That little girl dies many others as well.
Speaker 1: They deserve to get the biggest possible boot, and I
Speaker 1: hope we're there to cover it for you in a
Speaker 1: week's time. As for Harris, you saw her speech in
Speaker 1: Washington today. Surprise, Surprise, was all about you. January sixth, Hitler,
Speaker 1: all of that garbage that's around MSNBC so impressed by
Speaker 1: the speech, have a look at this for frothing on television.
Speaker 2: This is a damn good speech.
Speaker 13: This strikes me as essentially the bookend to her Democratic
Speaker 13: National Convention speech. She is speaking to people who may
Speaker 13: not have been inclined to vote for her, who may
Speaker 13: not have felt comfortable with her, who may not have
Speaker 13: felt like there was worthy it was a worthy cause
Speaker 13: to get up off the couch and go vote for anybody.
Speaker 1: I hate these people. I hate these people because Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: As we know how responsibility borders are the result of
Speaker 1: the Biden Harris administration policies when it came to opening
Speaker 1: up the border. Is the little girl's got killed. Oh
Speaker 1: look at this, it's wonderful. The lightings amazing, and she's
Speaker 1: saying all of the things that we say on MSNBC
Speaker 1: and some foodback. Look please, America fingers crossed. We all
Speaker 1: get the result that certainly I and many others watching
Speaker 1: this program have been hoping for for some time. So
Speaker 1: let's quickly run through where we sit one week out.
Speaker 1: Book is certain that Trump is going to win. Now
Speaker 1: technically thirty three percent is a chance, but currently the
Speaker 1: money shows now have a look at this about how
Speaker 1: it's changed, where basically we're back to where we were
Speaker 1: at the absolute height of probability when he was running
Speaker 1: against Biden, melting before our very eyes. The bookies show
Speaker 1: you here the different margins by which they think that
Speaker 1: the swing states are all going to go. You're going
Speaker 1: to have a look that Georgia, Nevada, Arizona pretty clear
Speaker 1: wins are pretty easy ones. Pennsylvania sixty one percent, Wisconsin
Speaker 1: fifty nine percent, Michigan fifty two. Suffice to say, if
Speaker 1: he wins all of these, he wins the presidency. The
Speaker 1: Blue Wall, which we show you each and every night clockwise, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: those top right, those of the Blue Wall. If he
Speaker 1: wins one of them, he wins the presidency, most likely
Speaker 1: held onto North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, Democrats win Nevada, but
Speaker 1: it won't matter because by then the election will have
Speaker 1: been called one way or the other. Paulling tonight, Trump
Speaker 1: winning Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia. If most
Speaker 1: of that happens, he wins the presidency, meaning he's got
Speaker 1: plenty left over. Began Kelly is the star we talked
Speaker 1: to tonight.
Speaker 2: I do think people should take a deep breath. It's
Speaker 2: kind of amusing to me.
Speaker 14: I'm not going to lie to see all the leftists
Speaker 14: absolutely melting down, like they're crying. Literally every day on
Speaker 14: MSNBC they're crying, Paul, There's no crying in politics.
Speaker 1: Stop that.
Speaker 14: Grow up, put your big book, girl and boy panties
Speaker 14: on and get through the next week or months and
Speaker 14: we'll know eventually who won the race, and it could
Speaker 14: be Trump newsflash morning Joe.
Speaker 2: It could be Trump upgrade out.
Speaker 1: By the debate. Next Stephen Conroy will try to push
Speaker 1: it up hill Bromin, Besh, we'll push it right back
Speaker 1: to where it belongs more in a sect here on
Speaker 1: Port Murray Live. I've been waiting for this. I've been
Speaker 1: waiting for this. Roman Bishop is here. Let's talk about
Speaker 1: upgrade albow. The man who's here to help and Jesus
Speaker 1: doesn't have a job tonight is Stephen Conroy. So let's
Speaker 1: get into all of this Bromin before the debate starts.
Speaker 1: As we have discussed before with the Chopper situation, technically
Speaker 1: inside the rules, the pub test clearly and we all
Speaker 1: know what took place. Okay, he's going to say it's
Speaker 1: within the rules, it's all been declared. Who cares. The
Speaker 1: reality is they're very clear breaches the ministry or code
Speaker 1: not once, but five times. And do you read anything
Speaker 1: into the specificity around the statement out of the Prime
Speaker 1: Minister's office about whether he called or didn't call. Yes,
Speaker 1: I did see.
Speaker 11: And first of all, the two situations are rather different
Speaker 11: because for me there was no personal benefit.
Speaker 1: Correct, I was going to work. You weren't doing it.
Speaker 1: On a holi ita no good point.
Speaker 11: So and the question is more than the public what
Speaker 11: about the wedding question? Because of the.
Speaker 1: Well get to it in a second. You'll you have
Speaker 1: your chat because.
Speaker 11: Of the code of conduct. And I would remind people,
Speaker 11: of course that gladys Bury Jeeklin lost her job because
Speaker 11: she was found she had breached the code of conduct.
Speaker 1: Well and barri Our Farrell went over a bottle of
Speaker 1: wine because because in an eye cake inquiry forgot about
Speaker 1: that as a gift. This is all declared, it's all
Speaker 1: above the rules. But I'm sorry the clear breaches of
Speaker 1: the code barrier.
Speaker 11: Farrell didn't declare that was the problem the world, But
Speaker 11: the question of the code of conduct was very much
Speaker 11: the issue before the IKAK. The difficulty here is that
Speaker 11: the Prime Minister would be the only one who could
Speaker 11: sack himself. Well, I'm not going to do that, correct,
Speaker 11: But the whole juxtaposition of being the minister in charge
Speaker 11: of the being the regulating minister for the airline and
Speaker 11: all of this comes in the juxtaposition with the House
Speaker 11: having been bought, with the Treasurer anxious to push out
Speaker 11: his line on inflation not getting any clear air. They'll
Speaker 11: be very unhappy campus. I can tell you that, and
Speaker 11: they'll be counting numbers. The troubler says, three of them
Speaker 11: out there counting numbers. If they had good time, it
Speaker 11: might be different.
Speaker 1: All right, Stephen, Why is there nothing to see here?
Speaker 1: Why does it not completely matter when for obvious reasons,
Speaker 1: the pub test is a very different, amorphous thing. But
Speaker 1: once it starts getting applied to you, I doubt there's
Speaker 1: a politician who's ever survived.
Speaker 3: Look so, firstly to all of you yours, if you
Speaker 3: take advice from Brohman on the internal machinations of the
Speaker 3: federal Caucus, the Labor Party.
Speaker 1: You're delusional.
Speaker 3: So Broman can talk about counting numbers. She knows nothing
Speaker 3: about the Labor Party county numbers. That's the first point. Secondly,
Speaker 3: all week, well this has been going on. What everyone
Speaker 3: has said is the key issue is that he phoned
Speaker 3: up and solicited from Alan Joyce. Nobody else is done
Speaker 3: the breach.
Speaker 1: That's the breach.
Speaker 3: Barnby Joycepa Barneby Joyce this morning. Barnaby Joyce this morning
Speaker 3: said the real problem is that he phoned up. I mean,
Speaker 3: Barnary goes, I've accepted up grades. Deputy prime minister in
Speaker 3: charge of a lot of different things. Okay, I'm not
Speaker 3: saying Barnary broke any rules whatsoever. Okay, so let's be clear.
Speaker 15: Well, what you've got to do is actually for it
Speaker 15: to be referred to n you've actually got a show
Speaker 15: it's not going back when he was the Transport minister
Speaker 15: between two thousand and seven and two thy and thirteen.
Speaker 15: You have to show that he somehow benefited Quantas. What
Speaker 15: about you can't But there's not one, not one person
Speaker 15: after a week of toiling around in the trash as
Speaker 15: they said, oh I know this decision back in two
Speaker 15: thousand and nine when Albow favored Quantas was because he
Speaker 15: received an upgrade back when he was minister.
Speaker 1: So no one's provided a single piece of evidence is
Speaker 1: there was some fine out of one gold Warmley trash.
Speaker 3: Importantly, he has now made it absolutely clear at no
Speaker 3: stage did he ever phone Allan Joyce and I enjoyed
Speaker 3: his sophistry earlier.
Speaker 1: What about text? What about emails? Life? But he's But
Speaker 1: that's that's my point. See, this is my point. Problem. Sorry,
Speaker 1: I don't know why I'm holding the glass of lots
Speaker 1: top anyway, this is my point, right, it's not about
Speaker 1: you know, he wants to make it did I call right?
Speaker 1: The whole point was he could have asked his clean
Speaker 1: he could have asked all made it if we did
Speaker 1: around and out. Well, that's that's their argument. That's good
Speaker 1: luck right now, you know, and pretty obviously I'll support
Speaker 1: them over elbow. But I've just got my own question here,
Speaker 1: which is, again, it doesn't matter who was contacted. If
Speaker 1: he asked for it is in breach. It does matter,
Speaker 1: and he asked anyone because it's a brief. The allegation
Speaker 1: is the entity.
Speaker 16: No, the allegations in the I'm sorry, let's the allegation
Speaker 16: in the book makes a unsourced allegation that he called
Speaker 16: Joyce and solicited.
Speaker 1: But that's not the problem. That's categorically but that's not
Speaker 1: the problem.
Speaker 11: It's just.
Speaker 1: All right now, I want to brodman.
Speaker 3: As you well know, QUANT does have an entire unit
Speaker 3: that deals with all of the politicians, all of their travel,
Speaker 3: et cetera.
Speaker 1: And if you are an upgrade your in parliament, contravention
Speaker 1: of the of the of the rules as the Transport minister,
Speaker 1: isn't that the whole thing here.
Speaker 16: That's.
Speaker 1: In the book, and he if his own in the bore. Okay,
Speaker 1: go go the.
Speaker 3: Allegation in the book because he called Alan joyce, that's
Speaker 3: that catadog he ruled out. Okay, And the way the
Speaker 3: system works is you phone up and will back me
Speaker 3: up on this. You phone up the phone number and
Speaker 3: you make your booking and then you know, asked.
Speaker 1: About it yesterday, you said no, hell no, if that
Speaker 1: was If that's what he knew it to be the
Speaker 1: fact that he had to double check in his memory
Speaker 1: here Bromwin would suggest he had to make sure that
Speaker 1: everyone got their story straight.
Speaker 11: Well, that's the thing.
Speaker 3: A great bit of conspiracy theory.
Speaker 1: Ask me, have I ever called Alan a single? From
Speaker 1: my life? A single? But he did not say? No
Speaker 1: call and all the rest of it here, all right,
Speaker 1: other stuff I want to get to. Let's talk about
Speaker 1: inflation Reserve Bank. We are in a per capita recession.
Speaker 1: They have to come interest rates. I know that presents
Speaker 1: some political alleged upside for the federal government. I don't
Speaker 1: think so, Stephen. We're at that moment now, but we
Speaker 1: keep hearing that the goalposts are our core inflation, not
Speaker 1: overall inflation. And let's be honest. One of the ways
Speaker 1: where we're got inflation.
Speaker 3: Where's that in their mandate? Well, but also the government's
Speaker 3: got a mandate that doesn't say core inflation or trim inflation.
Speaker 3: They literally are moving the goalposts because I've made mistake
Speaker 3: after mistake after mistate.
Speaker 1: They pushed them too high. They pushed us into a
Speaker 1: capital recession.
Speaker 3: And now when all the statistics show that inflation has
Speaker 3: come down from seven or eight percent down to inside
Speaker 3: the target range, they go, no, no, no, the target range.
Speaker 1: Doesn't apply to inflation.
Speaker 3: It applies to trimed inflation or the new word from
Speaker 3: angers start a brilliant, brilliant gentlemen, He says, the core
Speaker 3: inflation without defining what core inflation is, which is in
Speaker 3: the mesion that the same as trim inflation.
Speaker 1: All right, so problem before Megan Kelly and I just
Speaker 1: I took too long toime. So I apologize. But you know,
Speaker 1: names on the door. It's one of the joys when
Speaker 1: you're the chef and making the pizzas. Give us, give
Speaker 1: us an idea here, Bromin, what do you think hurts
Speaker 1: more the comedian talking about Puerto Rico or the president
Speaker 1: talking about Trump supporters.
Speaker 11: Well, I think there's an additional factor in there, and
Speaker 11: it's called Bad Bunny. Yes, and Bad Bunny has a
Speaker 11: following of forty five million people. Correct, He's Puerto Rican,
Speaker 11: hugely popular.
Speaker 1: Three hundred thousand Porto Ricans in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 11: Correct. And he got his message out within minutes of
Speaker 11: that comedian making that statement. So I think the fact
Speaker 11: that Biden stuffed up this afternoon counter that, does counter that.
Speaker 11: But it was still a madness to have a comedian
Speaker 11: on that.
Speaker 1: Show, let alone an insult comedian who, again I don't
Speaker 1: dislike much of his gear. I wouldn't have put him
Speaker 1: where they put him, though. We'll talk again next week
Speaker 1: when I'm in the States. You're here and we're all
Speaker 1: looking forward to the result. Thank you very much, guys.
Speaker 1: Quick break back with more Meghan Kelly about all things American.
Speaker 1: Takes a whole lot more. Next on Pull Maurray Law.
Speaker 1: One way to go to the US Election. I'm going
Speaker 1: to Applan tomorrow. I can't wait to meet Megan Kelly.
Speaker 1: Will do so for you Nick's wake But in the
Speaker 1: meantime we continue at Chat's Wakeley here on the Tailly Megan,
Speaker 1: the super Bowl is just a wake A.
Speaker 14: Why Yeah, it's so bizarre and exciting and frustrating and
Speaker 14: nerve wracking for many.
Speaker 2: I would say on my show today, you know, I
Speaker 2: also have some worries about it.
Speaker 14: I definitely wanted to go Trump's way of me that
Speaker 14: clear in the past, but I do think people should
Speaker 14: take a deep breath.
Speaker 2: Like it's kind of amusing to me.
Speaker 14: I'm not gonna lie to see all the leftists absolutely
Speaker 14: melting down, like they're crying. Literally every day on MSNBC
Speaker 14: they're crying, Paul, There's no crying in politics.
Speaker 1: Stop that.
Speaker 14: Grow up, put your big book, girl and boy panties on,
Speaker 14: and get through the next week or months, and we'll
Speaker 14: know eventually who won the race, and it could be Trump. Newsflash, Morning, Joe,
Speaker 14: it could be Trump. I just think, like I'm not
Speaker 14: one of those people who think the fate of the
Speaker 14: Republic depends on how this goes. It's definitely going to
Speaker 14: be a massive battle if Trump loses to maintain America
Speaker 14: as we know it. But I believe that we can
Speaker 14: fight that battle and we could win it even without
Speaker 14: the presidency. But it is it's always sort of a
Speaker 14: tell to see these leftists who just melt down over
Speaker 14: the wrong word choice here or there in like a
Speaker 14: full emotional breakdown mode right now, And it definitely tells
Speaker 14: you that they are feeling what we're feeling, which is
Speaker 14: the momentum is.
Speaker 3: With him now.
Speaker 1: I think Trump had a spectacular event today. He was
Speaker 1: meeting with what are called angel mums, and these are
Speaker 1: the moms of people that have been killed by illegals
Speaker 1: in the country. The ad I shut it a bit
Speaker 1: earlier in the day was absolutely heart wrenching. That and
Speaker 1: his economic message, Well, that's what's going to win it
Speaker 1: for him. But what do you think he could do
Speaker 1: to lose it between now and me?
Speaker 14: Yeah, more stuff like the Madison Square garden thing won't help.
Speaker 2: I don't know if that would make him lose it.
Speaker 2: Think what happened at MSG will make them lose it either.
Speaker 14: But you know, to me, it reminded me of when
Speaker 14: I was in college and I dated the captain of
Speaker 14: the Syracuse lacrosse team, who was a great guy, and
Speaker 14: we went on a lot of dates, double dates with
Speaker 14: lacrosse players. Great times when the lacrosse team would get
Speaker 14: together and have a party, all seventy of them, like
Speaker 14: mostly the guys chilling out having beers, but I wanted
Speaker 14: nothing to do with that.
Speaker 2: That was too much for me as a woman.
Speaker 14: You know, a bunch of men all together drinking and
Speaker 14: having a great time and getting rowdy. I get it,
Speaker 14: there's a place for that. Most women would not want
Speaker 14: to be in the middle of it. And I had
Speaker 14: the same feeling watching that MSG rally, like there is
Speaker 14: no place for me or women like me who don't
Speaker 14: like Kamala but don't want to hear her referred to
Speaker 14: as the Antichrist and don't want to have her called
Speaker 14: out as a potential hooker. I mean, like, I don't
Speaker 14: like the woman, I don't like these kind of to this.
Speaker 2: This unnecessary.
Speaker 14: There's a lot of fertile ground if you want to
Speaker 14: mock Kamala Harris on stuff she's actually running on is
Speaker 14: this stuff is just gratuitous and says something about you,
Speaker 14: the commentator.
Speaker 2: So that was a total fail.
Speaker 14: That that strain of what happened at MSG and took
Speaker 14: away from what was in many ways a very great rally.
Speaker 14: Trump did great. It wasn't Trump this time, it was
Speaker 14: the people setting him up. So that was that was unfortunate.
Speaker 14: I don't know that that's going to make Trump lose
Speaker 14: I think people have already kind of baked in their
Speaker 14: opinions at this point. You know, they're like the left
Speaker 14: is like people are protesting. Puerto Ricans are protesting, and
Speaker 14: they show the videotape it's like five people standing outside
Speaker 14: of a Starbucks. I eh, I think we're good. But
Speaker 14: you don't want to do anything to hurt yourself in
Speaker 14: the last seven days, So be careful, like now is
Speaker 14: the time to be perfect. And I think Trump's other
Speaker 14: message of I will protect you, while some didn't respond
Speaker 14: well to it, I did because a president does have
Speaker 14: that power.
Speaker 2: In large measure. A president is the commander in chief.
Speaker 14: You know, a president can get us involved in international
Speaker 14: conflicts where my child has to go either one now
Speaker 14: my boys or my girl. A president can help keep
Speaker 14: illegal immigrants off the streets of America so that little
Speaker 14: girls like Jocelyn Angaro do not get murdered in the
Speaker 14: middle of the night. And a president can encourage a
Speaker 14: stricter hand in law enforcement and encourage at the local
Speaker 14: level das who are not soft on crime, who actually
Speaker 14: put bad guys in jail and keep them there. It's
Speaker 14: not exactly a federal law enforcement matter, though it could
Speaker 14: be so in all those ways, Trump can keep us safe,
Speaker 14: and that's I think what he's going with because the
Speaker 14: Left wants us to believe abortion, abortion, abortion, that's how
Speaker 14: women are going to die under Trump, and they're completely ignoring.
Speaker 14: You know, before my daughter or anybody's daughter gets to
Speaker 14: the point where, God forbid, they think about an abortion,
Speaker 14: we need to keep them safe. We need to get
Speaker 14: them to the age of majority, We need to get
Speaker 14: them through a robust and happy childhood. And allowing an
Speaker 14: open border, allowing soft on crime policies, das and so
Speaker 14: and in laws doesn't help. I care much more about
Speaker 14: that than I do about what exactly will be the
Speaker 14: way in which my daughter could get an abortion when
Speaker 14: she's thirty, you know then, So I just think the
Speaker 14: Democrats have their priorities mixed up on that, And I
Speaker 14: think the average American, including my swing voter friends you
Speaker 14: know in the Midwest, will respond to what Trump's doing
Speaker 14: right now on safety