WEBVTT - Psychopaths, murder and unmasking incels:  Dr Nathan Brooks Pt.1

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The public has had a long held fascination with detectives.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Detective sy aside of life. The average person is never

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>exposed her I spent thirty four years as a cop.

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five of those years I was catching killers.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for a living. I was a

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and honest, just like the people I talked to. Some

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the content and language might be confronting. That's because

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Join me now as I take you into this world. Today,

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I had a conversation about an area of criminal investigation

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I find fascinating. I sat down and spoke with doctor

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Brooks, who is a forensic psychologist. Although based overseas,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we're fortunate enough to say speak with him in person today.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Nathan discussed with a sum of the high profile and

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>sensitive cases wherein acts of extreme violence, multiple people have

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>been killed. We looked at these crimes, what caused these

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>crimes and whether these crimes could have been prevented. I

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot from today's chat and I found it

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fascinating delving into the minds of people who cause unimaginable

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>pain to victims and communities. We talked about serial killers

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and the emerging, frightening trend of lone actors responsible for

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>mass casualties. Nathan gave me a fascinating insight into this world.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Dr Nathan Brooks, Welcome to I Catch Killers.

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Gary. Thank you for having me.

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm excited to have you on the podcast, and

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I know our listeners are fascinated by the type of

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>work that you do, forensic psychology. It fascinates what goes

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on in the mind.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a fascinating career and I've been really fortunate

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 2>to find myself now in the police and look at

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 2>the applic of that because it's really where forensic psychology

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>gets to come to.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>The fore Yeah. I think so many people talk like

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of people come up and say,

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>how do you become a homicide detective? But just as

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>many I'd love to work as a psychologist in that field.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think the FBI shows and some of the

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Hollywood shows that we've seen over the years have really

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 2>pushed and made people gravitate to wanting to become a

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 2>forensic psychologist. The hard thing is it's a long road

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 2>to get qualified, and even more challenging is once you

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 2>get qualified, there's actually very few jobs around. If you

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 2>wanted to get into the police, there's certainly lots of

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>jobs working in the correctional space, but if you want

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 2>to get into police, it's very hard.

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>There's not many spots. We were fortunate that you talked

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>about the FBI and that were fortunate that have Professor

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>An Bergers on the show, but she the original mind

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Hunters working with John Douglas and that profile and offenders,

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and I found that chat fascinating.

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>It is, I mean, it's remarkable, and I think we

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 2>forget now that the work that they pioneered really around

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the early eighties nineteen eighties, it has paved the way

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 2>for how we bring psychology into investigations now, and it's

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 2>easy to forget that. I think time in decades passed

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and new people come along, but we forget that. You know,

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>they set that up. But even if you do look

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>at the FBI model now, a large part of the

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 2>FBI is still around that behavioral analysis unit or team

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 2>that they have, and there's four or five different branches

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>to that now. So that really evolved for the FBI,

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 2>and it certainly has changed the landscape a lot.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Something that I picked up from the conversation I had

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>with Anne about serial killing, and that was their focus

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to start with all serial offenders, but they're also looking

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>at trying to profile the mass killings where people strike

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>out and the lone actors. Do you agree that sort

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of landscapes changed in a way from serial killing into

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>these mass killings.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 2>It certainly has, and the US, as it seems, with

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these really horrific crimes, has really been

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 2>the place where we've seen some of those major differences

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 2>in a shift. So there was the serial killers throughout

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the probably the nineteen seventies through to the nineteen nineties,

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 2>which were really challenging over there, and we saw incidents

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 2>of that across other countries across the world, but certainly

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 2>not in the same severity or the same frequency. And

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 2>then from around the nineteen nineties onwards to where we

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 2>are today, there's gradually been a reduction in serial crime,

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.559
<v Speaker 2>but an increase in what we would say these mass

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>casualty events, and they are occurring with really high frequency

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 2>over in the US and then again across other international countries.

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing that the numbers are also rising at the

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>same time.

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>With serial killing. Do you think part of the practice

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of law enforcement agencies and a better understanding of it

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>has in part the advantages we've got in forensic science

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and everything else that comes into play these days. Do

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you think that is a reason for the reduction.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 2>We've certainly seen with the forensic science, DNA, improved technology,

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 2>mobile phones, CCTV, it's harder to go and commit crimes

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 2>now without leaving some sort of trace or footprint. And

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 2>when serial killing was really rife back in that eighties period,

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 2>we didn't have some of those advancements, so that made

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 2>it very easy for people to go undetected. At the

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 2>same time, we've developed much more specialized expertise in policing,

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 2>such as the Behavioral Analysis Unit in the FBI, and

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 2>most countries now have some form of specialist unit for

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 2>major crimes or serial offending. So I think technology and

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 2>bringing in specialist experts has really changed the landscape around that.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>The rise of mass casualty type attacks that caused the

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>chaos that they do in the tragedy that they do.

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>My concern is how hard it is to anticipate those,

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and I know that's a lot of the work work

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that you do. Would you agree with that it's harder

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to anticipate that type of attack?

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 2>It is tricky, as we'll probably talk about today. A

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 2>lot has changed in how police approach that now. So

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 2>for a long time, the police in response was always

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 2>detect and intervene. So if there's an issue, will intervene,

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 2>and generally that's by arresting or charging the person. Now

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 2>the model's change to making sure that we can screen

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the issue, then try and understand the issue, then put

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>some form of prevention in place, and then basically review

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 2>that and then start again. So we've gotten to the

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 2>place where we're much more proactive around that now rather

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 2>than reactive, so we're not waiting for incidents to happen.

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 2>And when we do identify people that are concerning it's

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 2>about trying to understand the nature of that concern and

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 2>then put some form of support and prevention process around them.

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>But of course the limitation of that is we only

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>know what we know, so we only know about the

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.239
<v Speaker 2>people that are coming through to us and we're getting

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 2>the information around. If we don't get that though, and

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>there's someone out there that we're unaware of, then we're

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>very vulnerable.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay. And the intervention side of it. I spent a

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>long time in as a homicide detective and my frustration

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>looking back at the career is that you come in

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>when it's too late, unless you're working the case with

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a serial killer, but invariably it was a murder and

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you're coming in at the end. So this intervention identifying

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>risk factors, I would imagine it'd be very rewarding.

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>It's hard. I think you'd have to ask the police

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>that are doing the real groundwork there because it has

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 2>it's required police to nearly take on social worker type roles,

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>which I think so probably fine, challenging or not necessarily

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>what they got into the role for and realizing that

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 2>exit to get out and talk to people and engage

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:14.119
<v Speaker 2>with them and be supportive and put plans in place

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and be available to talk to them if they need to,

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 2>ring them, go outter coffee with them, try and help

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 2>mold and shape them into a more pro social pathway.

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 2>And get in front of them and change the way

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 2>that they maybe perceive police. And I think that is

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 2>why we're seeing some good results. But again, as I

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 2>was mentioning before, it is only who we know that

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 2>we get to do that response with.

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we've jumped straight into it. Let's find out a

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit about yourself. What got you into this field

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of expertise and what studies have you done to become

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a forensic psychologist.

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 2>So study for a long time. I think I did

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 2>about eleven years all up with the pH d, which

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I've never intended to at the beginning.

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Easy task.

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And look, initially I probably went in a bit

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 2>blind and thought psychology was interesting, and I was very

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 2>much keen on sports psychology and the way things aligned.

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 2>At the time, sports psychology wasn't available, so the option

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 2>was really standard normal psychology where you sit there and

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 2>talk to people, or forensic which seemed much more intriguing

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 2>and exciting, and I gravitated to that and I liked

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 2>the challenge. I was doing triflons at the time, so

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 2>I was very probably goal focused and liked to be tested.

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 2>And then as I got into forensic psychology, I then

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 2>came across psychopaths, and I did my PhD on psychopaths,

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>and it was fascinating because they were folks that did

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 2>everything different to what normal people did. And you know,

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 2>we grow up and we learn about people, but we

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 2>don't really ever learn about psychopaths unless you've had certain

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 2>experiences or challenging upbringing where you might have been targeted

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 2>or victimized by them. But psychopaths are the ones that

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 2>stay calm and cool under pres They are the ones

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 2>that are a few steps ahead. And that was really

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 2>intriguing to look at those fellows, and that kept me

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 2>really pushing through forensic psychology and then wanting to work

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 2>with high risk and high harm offenders that present with

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 2>some pretty I think difficult offending behavior and difficult interpersonal styles.

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And so for much of my early career I spent

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>a long time in the treatment space with probably thirty

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 2>different offenders a week. I was working with for several

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 2>years and then moved into specializing in higher sex offenders,

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 2>and then had a brief stint working in academia lecturing

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>in forensic psychology before jumping into the New Zealand Police.

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Where did you get the access to that many criminals

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to work with was that through creative services, So.

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Part of it was through coreative services, but I was

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>working as a contracting forensic psychologists in a private capacity

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 2>for quite a few years, and corrections are always needing

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 2>private independent practitioners to assist them, but also to send

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 2>them send offenders for treatment in the community. So a

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of it was there's the treatment aspect, but in

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 2>many ways it's actually having conversations with offenders and trying

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 2>to build a relationship with them where they haven't actually

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of stability or predictability in their life,

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of the time it's just holding space

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 2>for them to actually feel like they could have a

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>trusting relationship with someone and open up and talk about

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the problems in their life because many of them have

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 2>never had that opportunity.

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Didn't have the people that they could turn to. No,

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the obvious question that I ask if you've done a

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>PhD in psychopaths, nature and nurture, have you got a

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>learning like that question gets asked so many times and

0:11:58.080 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>different views.

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a combination of both. I don't think. I don't

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 2>think exclusively it's genetics, but there's certainly a genetic aspect

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 2>to that, and then the environment can either really dial

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 2>up those traits and make them much more maladaptive or dysfunctional,

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 2>or potentially it could keep them somewhat contained. I always

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 2>go back to the scenario that you can have potentially

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 2>the genetic makeup to be psychopathic, but if you've got

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 2>a good upbringing, a good education, you learn pro social

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 2>ways to express those tendencies. If you're able to go

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 2>and do sport, if you're able to find ways to

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 2>community Kate, it could be driving fast car, skydiving, you

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.719
<v Speaker 2>can find ways to manage those if you have a

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 2>level of self awareness as well. I think people become

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 2>very much handicapped though, if they have some of those

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>tendencies and then they are also dealt with a difficult childhood,

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 2>because it really puts that person on really a one

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 2>way path to offending or something else.

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting you answer it that way. I had the

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>fortune to speak to a neuroscientist from the United States

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that did pet scans on the whole range of people

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that were considered psychopaths, and they were some of the

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>country's most notorious psychopaths that had been brought down for

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the crimes that they've done. And without going into the

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>neuroscience because I've got no idea what I'm talking about.

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>He basically said with a PET scan of their brain

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that they had a common feature in there. So he

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>needed a reference point and did scans on people that

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>weren't identified as a psychopath. James Fallon was his own. Yes,

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>PET scanned his own brain and that had the same predisposition,

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>all the same that features as the psychopaths. And he

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>reasoned that he grew up in a loving environment, a

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>nurturing environment where he was cared for and that and

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that probably steerred him in those formative years till the

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>age of three or whatever, steered him in a direction.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And then with the people that had the psychopaths that

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>had played out in the criminal world, they didn't have

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that nurturing around them, they didn't have that family environment.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>They said that might make a difference. So I take

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on what you're saying that's a combination of both.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, and that his book's really interesting where he

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 2>does talk about that. Yeah, he had the brain structure

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 2>as he described to be the same as serial killers

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 2>looking that he was assessing. But yeah, he certainly I

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 2>think he says he pushed push, pushed lots of boundaries,

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and he could be quite dominant and overbearing at times.

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it didn't go into becoming full fledged violence.

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was channeled in a positive way. Or he

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>could talking to psychopaths. And you said, how some people

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that plays out? Is my understanding, it's just a general

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>talk that you know, some of the headed industries are psychopaths,

0:14:55.320 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>successful soldiers, all sorts of different even sportsmen, all sorts

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of personalities might have that psychopathic trait, but they stir

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it towards another thing. Is that Is that true?

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting, you know, having a level of boldness

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 2>and ruthlessness, some of those traits can be quite desirable

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 2>for certain occupations, maybe even the police.

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just pulling back on I was thinking that, but

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 2>And you do get some psychopathic folks that are skilled

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>enough to again modify those traits and rather than going

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 2>and violently stabbing someone, they might go and ruthlessly cul

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 2>people in organizations. So there's some really interesting books. You know.

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 2>John Ronson wrote a book and he talked about our

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Dunlap who has known aed Texas I think Texas chainsaw

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Our or something like that. Who would go into organizations

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 2>and he worked for Sunbeam for a while and basically

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 2>just he would just go in and cut and fire

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of employees in a very ruthless way. Bernie Madoff,

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 2>who was the head of the Nasdaq ran I think

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 2>it was a thirteen billion dollar ponzi scheme over a

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 2>couple of decades over in New York. He's often considered

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the poster boy for corporate psychopaths. So we do see

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 2>that Summer are quite capable of channeling those traits without

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>needing to get their hands dirty in.

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That spec Understand what you're saying, Yeah, it's interesting and

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the different way they steer their life. So the work

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you do with New Zealand place, what'said involved? What do

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you engage with?

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 2>So I'm an operational psychologist in our behavioral science unit

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>over there, and we have two operational psychologist roles that

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 2>serves the country and within that we also run the

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>VY Class, so the Violent Crime Analysis Linkage system where

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>we track stranger sex crimes across the country and that's

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 2>got three analysts that are staffing that, and then we

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 2>also have a sworn senior sergeant that sits over the

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 2>top of our unit as well, and so our unit

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 2>really is brought into major crime investigations to provide operational support,

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 2>particularly when we have very serious crimes just homicide, could

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:22.199
<v Speaker 2>be terrorism offenses, major sexual offenses, all the way through

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 2>to arsons and other sorts of offending, and we provide

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 2>a range of different services. Sometimes it's very much advice

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 2>on the fly as a homicide is evolving or emerging

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 2>in the early stages of the investigation. Other times it

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 2>will be risk assessments around what do we need to

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 2>know about this person and how concerning are they to

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 2>the community. We also occasionally will do the classic criminal

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 2>profile of a who done at crime, but most of

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 2>them are solved very quickly now so there's not the

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 2>need for criminal profiles. And then also things like cold

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 2>case reviews and a lot of work around interviewing as well.

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I know you're familiar with her, doctor Sarah Ule.

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I work closely with her in New South Wales Police

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and I not use her on all the investigations I

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>had some there wasn't a need for the role that

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>she could fulfill, the tricky ones, the ones that it's

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>not blatantly obvious for what has occurred here, or an

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of a crime scene as you said, or we've

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>interviewing of what's the bets buttons to push? Is that

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Carrotle's stick? Which way to approach that? I found it

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>so beneficial and I'm surprised, and I've been out of

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>New South Wales Police for a couple of years. I

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the status is now, but we didn't

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>properly resource that. Like I think it is a tool

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that can be really used in the difficult investigations. I

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>see that's the role where you guys come in.

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I found that it is really well received and certainly

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 2>over in New Zealand it's a major crimes the lead

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 2>investigators and also the investigated team, but they often really

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 2>are quite receptive of that advice. It's rare that we

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 2>get pushed back, and I think that the challenges. Of course,

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 2>it's your reputation and what you provide for a product

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 2>and service. In some ways, people keep coming back to

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 2>you if you provide good service, but if you provide

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, poor service, or go to sort of far

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 2>one way or the other way, or you know, don't

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 2>quite tailor it to what the investigation needs. The unit

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 2>can become vulnerable in that respect. So it's there's a

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 2>constant process there of needing to make sure what you're

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 2>doing really holds up and supports investigations.

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's also important that investigators understand what

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you can bring to the investigation. Yes, I saw some

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>misunderstandings in working with Sarah. Other investigators thought this is

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>what they can provide to the investigation, but wasn't the

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>type of thing that she could.

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's the risk that someone thinks that you're going

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 2>to come out and say of it or find the

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 2>magical clue. And you know, policing is as you know,

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a combination of different areas of specialty coming together

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 2>to get the end product and the end outcome. And

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 2>it's really you know, one person or one unit. It's

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 2>a cumulative effort. And sometimes I think even if we're

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 2>adding one percent towards helping the investigation and you've got

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 2>another unit adding one percent, those small one percents come

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:27.719
<v Speaker 2>together and they can be the difference.

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>They're the things that make a difference with a case

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>being solved or not. You invariably get one shot at

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it and then if you miss it, and that one

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>or two percent. But with Sarah, I found that what

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I liked working with a forensic psychologist was a different take,

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a different perspective. We get a little bit of group

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>think in policing. We tend to think the same and

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it's good to have someone independent, someone outside the circle

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that looks at it from a different view. And quite

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>often with Sarah, have you considered this? And I'd be

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at it. Go No, I haven't a very good idea, see,

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>but I found that beneficial. It was a really powerful,

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>powerful tool to have.

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's good to sometimes have someone that can step

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 2>back and bring that different perspective. And often psychologists are

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 2>going to look at the person and try and in

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 2>some ways deconstruct the puzzle and then rebuild it and

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 2>look at what does that then give us for the investigation,

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 2>So that might be understanding the functionality of the behavior

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>all the way through to let's go and approach the

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 2>person and try this style of engagement, because that's the

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 2>type of individual they are. And if we go in

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 2>really hot and in our suits and quite brazen and

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 2>kick the door in, that's not going to get their

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>response and they're not going to engage with this and

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 2>then we're going to miss the opportunity to interview with them.

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Serial killing, the type of investigations we're talking about. I

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>read your book Mass Casually over the weekend and it's

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you me up to speed on quite a few things,

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and I found a fascinating, fascinating read and putting sort

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of might take in it from a homicide detective and

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts and theories. What I found particularly interesting was

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the onset of the loan actors in the way that

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to leave their mark. Sadly, because when someone

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>commits an offense of mass casual these a lot of

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>lives are destroyed. What's your involvement in that type of work?

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 2>So our unit really is the main unit within New

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 2>Zealand that would service persons of concern, whether it be

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 2>a sort of a fixation or grievance point of view,

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 2>or also a terrorism aspect. So we would provide the

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 2>operational consultation on those matters. And that's an ongoing area

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 2>as it is in Australia, where there's people that are

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 2>often presenting with concerns or concerning behaviors and the task

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 2>then is to try and understand the extent of that concern.

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 2>I always think it's good to boil it down to

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 2>looking at two factors, so their intent and their capability.

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 2>So do they have the intent to act violently or

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the intent to act on these concerning thoughts or beliefs

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 2>or whatever they might be exhibiting, and do they have

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the capability to progress with that behavior? So that might

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 2>be all the way through to the capability to carry

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 2>out an attack, capability to plan, the capability to resource.

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 2>So where they sit on the intent and capability scale

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 2>is important. And then of course as the intent increases

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and the capability increases, then we get quite concerned.

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Right. If I can refer to a couple of things

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>from the book, that one that I found particularly interesting

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>was the Toronto vehicle ramming attack where a number of

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>people A person that's gotten in the.

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Car, Alec Manassian.

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>That's the one twenty five year old killing eleven people

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and then during fifteen others. Could you just describe what

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>happened and then we'll break that investigation down.

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So he was a twenty five year old. He

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 2>was studying I can't remember the exact I think it

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 2>was a computer science degree and had just graduated and

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 2>was about to start his first first day of professional

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 2>work for his career, and he heed a van. He

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 2>made the decision to book that a couple of weeks earlier,

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 2>picked it up and drove into downtown Toronto and through

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 2>a heavy pedestrian area in the city and struck numerous

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 2>people so killed eleven, injured fifteen, and initially they thought

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 2>it was an Islamic inspired attack. Once they had him

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 2>in custody, they then began to look through his various

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 2>online accounts and discovered a really interesting post that he'd

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 2>made earlier that morning which talked about this in cell rebellion.

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 2>And I've spoken with Rob Thomas, who was the lead

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 2>interviewer of Manassian, and he mentioned that a lot of

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the planning went into preparing for an Islamic state type

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 2>of offender. And then as the day progressed, they discovered

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 2>that it was actually this in cell ideology that had

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 2>been a heavy motivating factor for that, and that really

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 2>was I think one of the first public examples that

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 2>we got of an in cell and spied attack. It

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 2>was sort of known, I guess in the underground space

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 2>and in online forums, but it really brought it to

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 2>the fore and that then interview of Manassin where he

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>talks about chad's and stacy.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Fascinate fascinating breakdown what the in cels are for people

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>that don't know.

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 2>So in cells are those that are self described as

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 2>being involuntarily celibate, so they're unable to find a sexual

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>or intimate part. And they would say that that it's

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 2>forced on them in many ways due to the social

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 2>hierarchy and social structure. And this is where it gets

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 2>a little distorted in a little extreme, where they attribute

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 2>that to basically a set group of men having access

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 2>to the majority, so roughly eighty percent of the women.

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 2>So these our for males with the chisel jewels and

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>abs and biceps of the chads, and the blonde barbie

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.479
<v Speaker 2>type as you know, as you imagine, is known as

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 2>the staceys. And so it's really this hierarchy of chads

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:43.239
<v Speaker 2>and Staceys, and the in cells want to be aut

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 2>to date and have sex with the staceys, but because

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>of the sort of social and evolutionary nature, they're unable to.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 2>So there's also another level, which is the Bicki's that

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of a step or rank below staceis, and the

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>in cells don't desire the Beckies, they want the they

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 2>want the Staceys. And we also have normies as well

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 2>that sit above above in cells and normis are the

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 2>ones that are not necessarily attractive and not necessarily succeeding.

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 2>They're kind of just floating by in life. And underneath

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 2>them are the in cells who are basically deprived of

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 2>all the joys and successes in life because they've been

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 2>disadvantaged by looks and various other aspects. And as you

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 2>step back, it's just it blows your mind, because it's

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 2>a bit like you're reading a teenage science fiction magazine

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 2>or its game characters in some sort of sci fi

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 2>sci fi game. And but we've seen so many of

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:52.120
<v Speaker 2>these ideologies that have even the Sovereign Citizen movement for example,

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 2>where there's all these different rules and laws and norms,

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 2>and it's very confusing to get your head around.

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they're on the increase or decrease in Australia.

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a hard one to answer whether they are on

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 2>the increase. I certainly don't think that the numbers are

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 2>reducing at all. We're seeing more and more just fringe

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 2>social groups are attracting people, and people are identifying with

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 2>others on an online space because they are not having

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 2>those face to face conversations now. So I think in

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 2>cell culture and those that are struggling with socially and

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 2>also on intimate relationships maybe conversing with others in these groups,

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're necessarily seeing any more violent or

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 2>misogynistic views increases or directly from these groups at the present.

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the numbers are staying pretty stable around about

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 2>that five percent, but we may be seeing more people

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 2>that are identifying with the underlying themes and messages around that.

0:28:55.440 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I wonder with the advent of dating apps that seems

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to be the norm of people meeting people these days,

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and the picture of the profile and all that, a

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of people be getting rejected without even understanding who

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>they are or what they are, and I can see

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>some resentment perhaps building building from that.

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that that's a piece that probably hasn't

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 2>really been answered. And you raise a really good point.

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, what's the implication of not only face to

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 2>face rejection but online rejection as well, and how does

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 2>that amplify that. An interesting point is we've got in cells.

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 2>There's also fem cells, which are female in cells, and

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I think a couple of years ago I saw it.

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Can't we put the in cells together with them?

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's the females that are having a similar challenges

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 2>and they're not liking the available males to them, and

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 2>they are involuntarily celibate. And yeah, I saw recently, you know,

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 2>there was a TikTok I think with twenty six million

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 2>likes or hashtags around fem cells. So we're certainly seeing

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 2>more and more unusual and maybe fringe sort of groups

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 2>popping up.

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, see how it plays out because the social norm

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>has changed, isn't the way that only in the last

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of decades. It's changed significantly how people used

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to meet and because like the in cell's sitting in

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>isolation and what you described, you can picture many lonely

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>people in that situation. But the world is set up

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>now that they can reach out and that their views

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>can be validated, so they can get on social media

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>or what they're before them, and their views can be

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>magnified by the people that are supporting their ideologies. Is

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that a fair or a simplistic assessment of it?

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think we're finding more and more groups pop

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 2>up and various online communities now that people are identifying

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 2>with and that's okay because it's not necessarily unhealthy. So

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 2>jumping onto an insell forum by itself is not a problem.

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 2>But there's been debate around, particularly in Australia or in

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand, you should in cell forums or even identifying

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>with the in cell ideology be classified as terrorism at

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 2>the moment. It's not. What the research tends to say

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>is it's about five percent of people that are on

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 2>in cell forums that are very misogynistic and promoting quite

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 2>violent rhetoric towards females. So it is only a small proportion.

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Where we get worried though, is there's always someone out

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 2>there that may be very vulnerable though to those ideas

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 2>and that messaging and then progress to carry out a

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 2>violent act.

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, I suppose, And we're not saying that that initially

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>thought as a terrorist attack, but it's not being called

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a terrorist attack. But that's very similar to how terrorist

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>groups bring in the extremists, isn't it, yeh, a shared

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>ideology that they've got like minded people and then it

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>starts to escalate from there.

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it doesn't necessarily need to be in ideology,

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing more and more people that are just promoting

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 2>just violent, violent intentions, self harm, the idea of trying

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 2>to dominate others. The FBI recently talked about the seven six'

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 2>four group that are basically a group that are promoting

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 2>dominance and control and satanistic. Practices there's a right wing

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of white, supremacy lean and Neo nazi spect to,

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 2>it but a lot of it is about trying to

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 2>get absolute dominance and control over, someone so that may

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 2>be getting someone to self harm or make engravings on

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 2>themselves of someone's, initials all the way through to encouraging

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 2>them and trying to basically coerce them into carrying out

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 2>a violet. Acts, so, unfortunately we're seeing with the rise

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 2>of The internet and certain subcultures that we are getting

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 2>more and more pockets of violence emerging with.

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>That, okay with The toronto, massacre was there any red

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>flags or indicators that when we look back and hindsight

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a wonderful, Thing but is there anything that jumps

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>out to. You we've identified in cell was the seed

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that generated the, Attack but was there any things that

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>warning signs that you could see looking at.

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 2>It it's really tricky looking back at that one Because Alec,

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 2>menassian he was a fellow that had struggled throughout his.

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Schooling he had an autistic spectrum, disorder never really was

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 2>able to form strong social. Relationships he was bullied throughout

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 2>his schooling even though he was quite intellectual and quite academically.

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Successful socially he. Struggled but he wasn't talking openly in

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 2>person to anyone about his ideological positions or his views

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 2>about Female it was largely done from the confines of his.

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Room and that is the. Challenge so our responses to lone,

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 2>actors it has improved a, lot but it is very

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 2>contingent on information. Flows so With, manassian the challenge there

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:13.240
<v Speaker 2>was he basically was, isolated kipt to, himself wasn't sharing

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 2>this and planned it in. Secrecy and, again you, know

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 2>someone Like Anders bravic over In norway is a very

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.959
<v Speaker 2>good example where we do occasionally get what we would

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 2>say are Black swan types of, incidents so outlies where

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 2>we don't get a lot of leaked information or shared

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 2>information with others about and.

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>You're talking that the concert At norway is that the So.

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Anders bravic in twenty, eleven carried out that the bombing

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 2>at the news at The Norwegian government building and then

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 2>got on a boat To Utoya island and went over

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 2>there it was a young labor party camp and carried

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 2>out the mass shooting there AND i think it was

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 2>around around seventy seven people that he killed in.

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Total and he you were saying and then sorry in

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the rupted you just to clarify the. Event but he

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>was very, isolated was.

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 2>He so he spent years preparing and planning for that.

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Attack he he used his savings to basically, plan, prepare

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 2>purchase various tops of, ingredients, firearms tactical equipment over a

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 2>number of, years trained himself in using, weapons groundown fertilizer

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 2>pellets for several months to create a bomb that he

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 2>set off in The Norwegian government building and used multiple

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 2>different sort of aliases, online have packages delivered in certain

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 2>locations and in other locations with various bits of. Equipment

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 2>so he wasn't an exceptional outlier because he was so

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 2>meticulously planned and he viewed it very much as a

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 2>cat and mouse game with police where he was intending

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 2>to carry out this mass casualty, attack but at the

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 2>same time he was preparing like a warrior and trying

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 2>to keep any types of warnings to the minimum to

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 2>not alert.

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Authorities, okay with the view of not being. Caught isolation

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>seems to be one of the. Things and isolation is. Hard,

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>well you can't legislate against, isolation but it seems to

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>be a common theme in these people that or in an,

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>event and that could be a breakup of a. RELATIONSHIP

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>i Had Tim watson mun On The Criminal psychologist talking

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>about The Hottle street massacre where a person that was

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 1>rejected in the army his car broke. Down it was

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of a build up when you look at it looking,

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:46.839
<v Speaker 1>backwards you, go, okay this was, okay there's breaking point

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden the. Damage the damage is

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>done with a lot of these a lot of these.

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Things it is the. Isolation so how do we encourage

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 1>people to come forward if someone's acting, strangely if they're,

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>isolated it's very hard to pick up.

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 2>On, yeah there's a couple. ASPECTS i think fixations are,

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 2>important grievances and then the isolation component that you spoke

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 2>about as.

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Well fixation grievances and.

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 2>Isolation, yes, yeah and the isolation as tricky as, well

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 2>because what we find is that a lot of lone

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 2>actors do have social, interactions so they're not isolated in

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 2>the traditional sense where they have no conversations with anyone

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 2>and they're just sitting at home. Alone many will have

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 2>supportive family. Members they may even be in a, relationship

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 2>but what's missing is the social, Reciprocity so they don't

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:49.760
<v Speaker 2>get the same things out of social relationships that often

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you AND i, Would so they don't get their enjoyment

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.439
<v Speaker 2>out of the. Relationship they don't feel that strong sense

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 2>of connection or. Longing so there's often something just missing

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 2>there that makes them feel isolated and disconnected from, others

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:12.280
<v Speaker 2>rather than the classic sense of this person's just isolated

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 2>and not around.

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Others, okay so even in an environment they can internally feel, yes,

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>yeah we're referring to these people for the mass casualties

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>as loan. Actors it used to be called lone. Wolf

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>what was the logic behind the changing of the way

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that we identify, This, Yeah SO.

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 2>I think around the nineteen nineties late, nineties THE us

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 2>were populating the turn lone wolf and it got a

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 2>bit of pushback because it added a level of mysteriousness

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 2>to these, fellows and you, know they were someone that

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 2>was planning in secrecy and carrying out a, mission and

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the sort of mystique ended up in some WAYS i

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 2>think fueling them. Encouraging, yeah, Absolutely and that was then

0:38:56.840 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 2>rebranded really probably in the academic space to loan, actors

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 2>so those that basically are acting alone or with minimal outside.

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Influence and we cavet at that though now BECAUSE i

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 2>would say that it's those that are self initiating towards

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 2>violence and they're not doing that at the direction of someone,

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 2>else but they could very easily be online communicating in

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 2>a group and getting ideas or sharing extreme views with.

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 2>People so they are self initiating to, violence but they

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 2>may not be loan or alone in that classical.

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>SENSE i think that there's an importance and it always

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>worries me AND i now work in the media coming

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>from law, enforcement if we give too much of a

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 1>profile to someone who's committed a horrendous. Crime AND i

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 1>think lone wolf could be a pretty Cool i'm a lone.

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Wolf the lone actor doesn't sound quite as. Cool and

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about the one, percent that might be

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the one. Percent that makes a difference that someone that

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:02.359
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get a fantasy about being seen as a lone.

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Wolf, yeah AND i Think australia And New zealand have

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 2>done it pretty. Well certainly over in THE us with

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 2>the high rates of school shooting as workplace, incidents there's

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 2>just this constant stream of news coverage which really sort

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 2>of sensationalizes the action in some.

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Ways with loan actors my, understanding and most of the

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>play out in the media tend to be. Male is

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>there a predominance of male loan actors or can? Female

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is there female loan actors as?

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Well looks mostly. Males it's quite heavily steered towards. Males

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 2>around about ninety to ninety five percent of loan actor

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:44.800
<v Speaker 2>attackers are. MALE a good example of a female probably

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 2>here In australia would have Been Momina schomer down In,

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 2>victoria WHO i think is the first female charged with

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:56.280
<v Speaker 2>the terrorism In, australia and she stabbed her homestay, host

0:40:56.800 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 2>obviously identifying with The Islamic jehardy ideology and had influences

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:07.760
<v Speaker 2>from several others that were affiliated with Other islamic based,

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 2>attacks but she traveled solely To australia to carry out an.

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Attack did she tax and mind in custody as? Well

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>there was another attack and the sister over yep from

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>their homeland attacked the police officer of making.

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 2>The year your spot. On so she, RECENTLY i think

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 2>it was a Blonde canadian female in custody that she

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:34.280
<v Speaker 2>attacked and afterwards made comments About allah would be happy

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 2>with her for, THAT i think with a pair of gardening.

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Shares and then, yeah the time that she was, charged

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 2>police over there went to speak with her sister and

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 2>when they arrived at the, door the sister came out

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 2>with a knife and tried to attack the. Officers, no

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 2>it was.

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>The fact that both sisters continents apart that there's something

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's got into their ideology and going out the.

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Attacks, yeah AND i think that the differences with males

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 2>and females in respect to this form of violence probably

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 2>is very similar to what we see with a lot

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 2>of different forms of. Offending, yeah you, know males are

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 2>often the ones doing the more serious, homicides and they

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 2>certainly perpetrate homicides at at much higher rates than. Females

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 2>and in some, ways you, know males tend to act

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 2>out their emotions and females are often internalizing. Those SO

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 2>i think we see different ways of coping with emotion

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 2>and dealing with. Problems and for, men when they have,

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 2>struggles it is acted out and it's, expressed often in harmful,

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 2>ways in quite destructive. Ways and we do talk about

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 2>there being copycat effects and it can take.

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>IT i was going to ask, that like when you

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>see a series and then shortly after there's another, one

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and especially in THE, US i think we're all aware

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of that with the school, shootings and do you think

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that that the copy can come into?

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 2>PLAY i no doubt that we've seen many attacks that

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 2>have been copied over the, years and As Bravic Brenton

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 2>tarrant In New zealand have certainly given inspiration and also

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 2>tactical knowledge to other perpetrators that have then gone on

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 2>to carry out attacks after. That we also probably have

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 2>a contagion aspect as, well you, know like the social.

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Contagion and for a long time media outlets didn't report

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 2>suicides because suicides are known to have a contagion, aspect

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 2>where if you've got friends that then others that know

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 2>that person that at increased risk of, suicide particularly they've

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 2>got mental health. Vulnerabilities we know that if suicides are

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 2>in the, media it actually leads to people thinking about

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 2>the idea. More AND i think no doubt that it's

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 2>a similar thing with mass casualty. Attacks that the more

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 2>that we see that people are trying to resolve life

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 2>problems in this, way then the more it. Normalize it

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 2>normalizes that and that's quite.

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Frightening, yeah, well you saw it with, schools and with

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>schools if a child has committed, suicide it was always

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a concern that other, kids friends and all, that and

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it's something that you, know, again if we can will

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it back or reduce minimize the risk factors all the.

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Better terrorism has distinct from low and actors BECAUSE i

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:28.839
<v Speaker 1>think we've all been caught up in you, know we're

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>living in times when there are terrorist attacks and have

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>been some significant, ones and then the loan actor attacks

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes they get a little bit caught. Up it's

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 1>all the same, thing, like if it's a mass casually

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it must be a terrorist. Attack what's the difference between the.

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Two, yeah it's a really good. Question and in some

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 2>ways terrorism is more at a legislative criminal prosecution. Level

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 2>we often see that there's many common, threads so there

0:44:57.200 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 2>could be fixations and grievances and. Ideologies, now it's often

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 2>the presence of an ideology that leads to something being

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 2>classified as, terrorism and we also look at it in

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 2>terms of what was the intended outcome and often is

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 2>there an intention to create social and political, change and

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 2>that's often where the ideology is paired with, that and

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 2>that would then become classified as. Terrorism we've seen, though

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 2>that many mess casualty attacks are not perpetrated with clear

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 2>intentions to create social and political. Change they are instead

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 2>a result of grievances or fixations and other, factors sometimes

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 2>coupled with aspects of, ideology but they don't necessarily meet

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 2>the classification for. Terrorism so it is a bit of

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 2>a fine, line AND i think the risk is we

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.800
<v Speaker 2>focus too much on terrorism and miss that there's actually

0:45:54.880 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 2>more universal threads amongst all of these. Individuals and sometimes

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:03.239
<v Speaker 2>it's terrors, specific but other times it's just intended to

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 2>really be a form of revenge, retribution trying to restore

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 2>natural order or response to perceived.

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Injustice, well i'd take on board what you said earlier

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:17.320
<v Speaker 1>on about, grievances how that plays a, part and that's you,

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 1>know we've all been slighted in some, way and there's

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 1>ways of dealing with your anger and your, grievances but

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine people that haven't got the emotional skills

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to handle. That it just becomes a fixation That i've been,

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Wronged i'm going to get.

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Revenge, Yeah and we talk about querulous individuals to those

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 2>that just constantly make complaints that are unable to be,

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:44.879
<v Speaker 2>pleased that are distrusting and suspicious and. Paranoid and, look

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 2>there are people out there like, that but they don't

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 2>ever resort to. Violence and that really raises the question

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 2>around what is it that is tipping people over the into,

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Violence and it's often it is the violent. Identification so

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 2>they start in some way trying to see themselves as

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 2>someone that's going to make a big statement to bring

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 2>an ultimate conclusion to an, event and then we do

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 2>pair that with ideology in certain, times then we really

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 2>get this quite sort OF i, guess concerning mix or

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 2>factors that come. Together and one of the MODELS i

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.800
<v Speaker 2>quite like is this idea of the bathtub, model where.

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 1>It was bath tub all the, staircase the staircase you explain.

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>THAT i found that quite.

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Interesting so the bath tub is the idea that we

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:35.280
<v Speaker 2>have a couple of different water faucets that are pouring

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:37.840
<v Speaker 2>into a bath, tub and that can be different motivating.

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Factors so sometimes it's sometimes it's, political sometimes it's personal,

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 2>factors sometimes it's social, factors and they gradually pour in

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:49.239
<v Speaker 2>over time and fill up the bath. Tub it might

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 2>be that your relationship breaks, down you get fired at,

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 2>work you then start looking at concerning media on the,

0:47:58.560 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 2>internet and gradually they all just.

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Or three of. Those, sorry, no you're not looking at.

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Me i'm not going to do, Anything so.

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Start filling up the. Bathtub and where it goes wrong

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 2>is there's no release style on the, bathtub so it

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:15.400
<v Speaker 2>just fills up over. Time and EXAMPLE i used in

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 2>the book of that Was Thomas, mayor who Kills Joe

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 2>cox over in THE, uk and he's a guy that

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:27.880
<v Speaker 2>had long term right wing Neo nazi views and they

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 2>just simmled away for roughly twenty. Years but then When

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 2>brexit came, about that really just fueled things for him

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 2>that tipped him over the. Edge and then we look

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:40.359
<v Speaker 2>at something like the, staircase and that looks at really

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:45.320
<v Speaker 2>how things transform for someone over. Time and the idea

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 2>is that you walk into the base of the. Staircase

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 2>so you walk into the first door because things are

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 2>not quite going right or the way that you'll you

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 2>want them to in, life and you walk into the

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 2>door looking for an, answer looking for a, solution and

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 2>you get to the first level or the ground, floor

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and then if you don't find any solutions, there you

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 2>walk up the next, level and, gradually as you keep

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:13.800
<v Speaker 2>going up the, levels your options narrow and Violence, ultimately

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:17.280
<v Speaker 2>once you get to the fifth, level becomes the only

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.279
<v Speaker 2>solution and the last resort answer to your. Problems so

0:49:21.800 --> 0:49:24.279
<v Speaker 2>we see that as the person climbs the, staircase not

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 2>only do the options and solutions, dwindle but they're thinking

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 2>about the situation changes and they come to accept that

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 2>the only way through this or the only justifiable response.

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Is violence and breaking it down in the simple concept

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of the bath tub and the. Staircase does that help

0:49:44.040 --> 0:49:46.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the times you might be doing the thread,

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:48.839
<v Speaker 1>assessment is that the type of thing that you're looking

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:52.320
<v Speaker 1>at the build up or, okay how dangerous AND i

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 1>really take on. Board one of the aspects that you

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>say is, capability because that's a big. FACTOR i look

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 1>from a homicide investigator point of, view opportunity made even,

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>capability could have the, opportunity could have the, motive but

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:08.479
<v Speaker 1>if they haven't got the, Capability so that's another fact

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that comes into.

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 2>It it is an unfortunately capability though is becoming as

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 2>we've seen with say The BOND dii junction. Attack now

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 2>it's just a, cheap easy available weapon and someone can

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:26.280
<v Speaker 2>do an enormous amount of. Harm but we don't dismiss

0:50:26.320 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 2>capability because it is still very, important and things like

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the Cross church attack highlight something like capability. Factors but

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:39.840
<v Speaker 2>we do need to balance that then with, intent so you,

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:44.840
<v Speaker 2>know how strongly is this or how strong is this person's,

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Intent and then if we are concerned about the, intent

0:50:48.120 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 2>well then we know that they could be capable of

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 2>doing a low capability. Attack so it is a bit

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 2>of a balancing act where we need to look at all.

0:50:56.800 --> 0:50:59.879
<v Speaker 2>FACTORS i always, think how died up are the dial

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:02.960
<v Speaker 2>for this? Individual how concerned do we need to? Be

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 2>so as you, know the more concerning things that we,

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:09.840
<v Speaker 2>see then, generally as a loose, principle you would be

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:12.400
<v Speaker 2>you'd be saying that you, know there's a lot of

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:14.800
<v Speaker 2>risk or threat that needs to be mitigated here.

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Looking at just pick a, case if you'd be familiar

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with The linp cafe With Man, Momus, yes looking back

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:29.239
<v Speaker 1>that and people know we've spoken about on here we

0:51:29.320 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>had one of the hostages from the siege that was

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in the cafe the whole time and some of the police.

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Involved but looking At Man, momus like you look back

0:51:40.560 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and you go red, flag red, flag red. Flag but that's.

0:51:44.800 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Hindsight it's a wonderful. Thing is there anything that you

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:49.520
<v Speaker 1>see in that if you're familiar with it at? All

0:51:49.640 --> 0:51:52.840
<v Speaker 1>something About Man momis's background that if you were assessing

0:51:52.960 --> 0:51:56.279
<v Speaker 1>him prior to him committing this, offense is what sort

0:51:56.280 --> 0:51:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of vindicators would concern?

0:51:58.520 --> 0:52:01.719
<v Speaker 2>You, yeah that's, look that's a really good. Question and

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the coronial inquest that looked at The Link cafe siege

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:09.840
<v Speaker 2>had some really good findings and one of them was

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the need for a Fixated Threat Assessment, center which came

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:18.279
<v Speaker 2>into place in twenty seventeen In New South wales AND

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 2>i Think queensland was the first state to bring that

0:52:21.120 --> 0:52:26.920
<v Speaker 2>in Because monus he had the grievance and the fixation

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:30.360
<v Speaker 2>And Michelle, pathay who's done a lot of work in

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:33.560
<v Speaker 2>the F tach space and set up The queensland F

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:37.279
<v Speaker 2>tach and also The VICTORIAN. TACH i saw a presentation

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:41.360
<v Speaker 2>that she did and she talked About monus and we

0:52:41.480 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 2>looked at him through the terrorism. Lens and that's one

0:52:44.600 --> 0:52:49.360
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest shortfalls probably of our management or response

0:52:49.440 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 2>To monus was he was a fixated and grievance fueled.

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Individual but we were making all our assessments and judgments

0:52:57.680 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 2>on him based on is he a whole risk of

0:53:00.520 --> 0:53:06.640
<v Speaker 2>a terrorism? Offense and the worry was that wein we're

0:53:06.680 --> 0:53:10.120
<v Speaker 2>missing him as a person and what was actually motivating

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 2>and driving? Him and so it was the grievance and

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 2>the need for notoriety and significance rather than the presence

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:21.840
<v Speaker 2>of a strong. Ideology so we got caught up in

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 2>does he have the ideology and the desire to act

0:53:26.160 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 2>violently for that, ideology rather than is this an individual

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:34.160
<v Speaker 2>that's got the psychological makeup and the psychological factors that

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:38.479
<v Speaker 2>are fueling him towards? Violence AND i think now looking

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:40.880
<v Speaker 2>back at, that we've seen that had you, know the

0:53:41.000 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 2>emergence of f tax and more specialized, police particularly you

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:50.160
<v Speaker 2>know psychologists and. Psychiatrists we've come a long way since.

0:53:50.200 --> 0:53:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Then, yeah looking for the dangers of those fixated. PERSONS

0:53:55.000 --> 0:53:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the work that you're doing now and

0:53:56.480 --> 0:54:00.200
<v Speaker 1>break it down into prevention and. Intervention And i've just

0:54:00.520 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 1>got some of the discussion points here policing. STRATEGIES i

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:07.759
<v Speaker 1>suppose you touched in part on that that the way

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:10.239
<v Speaker 1>we were looking at man momus was more from a

0:54:10.320 --> 0:54:13.279
<v Speaker 1>terrorist point of view than a fixated person with a

0:54:13.560 --> 0:54:17.879
<v Speaker 1>grievance that might play out risk. Assessments that's the work

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're. In break us down for a risk. Assessment

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:23.000
<v Speaker 1>what IF i was seeing here GOING i am so

0:54:23.280 --> 0:54:25.840
<v Speaker 1>angry at The New South Wales police for how my

0:54:25.960 --> 0:54:28.759
<v Speaker 1>career came to an, end what sort of assessments would

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you be making without getting too? Personal MAYBE i should

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:36.200
<v Speaker 1>have used another, example but, Okay i'm, angry BUT i

0:54:36.320 --> 0:54:39.920
<v Speaker 1>think my, Situation i'll just move on and get on

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:44.239
<v Speaker 1>with my. Life another. Chapter so what type of things

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:45.480
<v Speaker 1>would be a warning sign to?

0:54:45.560 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 2>You and that's part of, it isn't is that rigidity

0:54:48.560 --> 0:54:53.719
<v Speaker 2>and the cognitive. Rigidity do you have the ability to

0:54:54.400 --> 0:54:58.680
<v Speaker 2>think about other, options other, solutions other ways of coping

0:54:59.560 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 2>or is it tunneling down to you becoming very fixed

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 2>and very stuck and very fueled by this? Injustice and

0:55:11.800 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 2>so we do look at we look at factors like.

0:55:15.120 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 2>Fixation how psychologically preoccupied is someone with this issue or this?

0:55:19.920 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Person how aggrieved are they so how strong is that

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 2>grievance for some of these folks that they wake up

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:33.000
<v Speaker 2>every day living and breeding. This then you look at the,

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:36.160
<v Speaker 2>intent so you, know do they have an intent to

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 2>progress that? Issue and then do they have the capability

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 2>to act on? That so that is a simple way

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:46.319
<v Speaker 2>of looking at. It another way is to think about

0:55:46.360 --> 0:55:49.239
<v Speaker 2>it from a threat perspective and Read, malloy who's a

0:55:49.280 --> 0:55:51.799
<v Speaker 2>forensic psychiatrist over in THE us has done some really

0:55:51.880 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 2>good work and he talks about eight key warning. Behaviors

0:55:55.040 --> 0:55:58.280
<v Speaker 2>and so the first one's, pathway so is the evidence

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:01.880
<v Speaker 2>of planning and preparation for some sort of. Act we

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:06.960
<v Speaker 2>then have, fixation so that psychological. Preoccupation then there is,

0:56:07.320 --> 0:56:12.520
<v Speaker 2>identification so is the person experiencing a shift in their

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:15.719
<v Speaker 2>identity so that they are now starting to see themselves

0:56:15.800 --> 0:56:18.919
<v Speaker 2>more as a as a warrior or someone that's being

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:22.719
<v Speaker 2>driven towards a. Mission so often that commando type of

0:56:23.200 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 2>identity that they're developing novel. Aggression so are they engaging

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:35.200
<v Speaker 2>anything to test their ability to the? Results how we

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:39.640
<v Speaker 2>also have. Leakage so have they made any remarks to

0:56:39.719 --> 0:56:43.400
<v Speaker 2>anyone about an intent to carry out an active? Harm

0:56:44.160 --> 0:56:47.000
<v Speaker 2>we have a directly communicated threat as? Well have they

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:52.279
<v Speaker 2>made any threats to? Anyone last resort as? Well so last?

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Resorts often have they reached their end of?

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Tether is?

0:56:56.440 --> 0:56:58.400
<v Speaker 2>This are they at the position where they think.

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:02.719
<v Speaker 1>This, loss loss of family and just what else have

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 1>they got left in the?

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Eye this is never going to be, resolved AND i

0:57:06.600 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 2>need to do something about. IT i need to make

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:11.400
<v Speaker 2>a final statement and make my. Mark and often that

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:15.759
<v Speaker 2>making your mark is often quite crucial in this in

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:19.400
<v Speaker 2>these sorts of, offenses because unfortunately we see that it's

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:23.480
<v Speaker 2>often people that don't have significance that are wanting, significance

0:57:23.800 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 2>and that the act becomes part of gaining that. Significance,

0:57:27.880 --> 0:57:29.880
<v Speaker 2>okay it's, interesting that's.

0:57:29.920 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 1>FASCINATING i love like the structure you put into such

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a because it's such a gray area with so many different.

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Layers but you actually need the, structure don't. You, well

0:57:40.680 --> 0:57:43.400
<v Speaker 1>as you're breaking down the. Structure it helps me even

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the bathtub and the. Staircase, okay if you told me

0:57:46.760 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the science behind it, All i'll probably get, Lost BUT

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:51.720
<v Speaker 1>i understand what you're, saying and you really do need the.

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Structure government. Influencers we had the shooting situation down In

0:57:58.600 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>tasmania and we restricted guns and made a very strong gun.

0:58:03.760 --> 0:58:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Policy is that the type of thing you're talking with government. Influencers.

0:58:08.240 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah government influences are the fascinating and sometimes concerning at

0:58:14.200 --> 0:58:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the same, time and they can be spot on or

0:58:18.240 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 2>really missed the. MARK i think understanding the lone actor

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 2>landscape In, australia it's hard to have that conversation Without Port.

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Arthur so where we are now and maybe the lack

0:58:30.760 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 2>of significant incidents that we, have AND i say that

0:58:34.720 --> 0:58:38.920
<v Speaker 2>cautiously is probably largely a result of the decisions that

0:58:39.000 --> 0:58:42.840
<v Speaker 2>were made back in nineteen ninety six around the. Firearms

0:58:44.400 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 2>if we think about even The Link cafe ces or

0:58:47.920 --> 0:58:51.720
<v Speaker 2>some of the other even The bondai attack, recently had

0:58:51.760 --> 0:58:55.480
<v Speaker 2>those people been able to get high caliber, firearms it may,

0:58:56.520 --> 0:59:01.400
<v Speaker 2>yeah very very. Different and the potentially the argument there

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 2>for the Christ church terrorist attack may that have happened

0:59:04.400 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 2>In australia if our firearm policy hadn't ever been, changed

0:59:09.240 --> 0:59:12.880
<v Speaker 2>because part of the part of that was the accessibility

0:59:13.080 --> 0:59:16.320
<v Speaker 2>of firearms at the. Time so governments have a really

0:59:16.360 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 2>important part to. Play my concern is that we try

0:59:21.560 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 2>and restrict our way out of, things and there's a

0:59:25.960 --> 0:59:27.120
<v Speaker 2>balance there between.

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 1>You because you could create another potential offend.

0:59:31.280 --> 0:59:35.320
<v Speaker 2>That absolutely the everyday person is doing the right thing

0:59:35.400 --> 0:59:38.480
<v Speaker 2>and they are losing a lot of their freedoms because

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of restrictive measures that are put in. Place AND i

0:59:41.560 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 2>always think, that you, know people need to have a

0:59:46.520 --> 0:59:50.760
<v Speaker 2>level of. Autonomy we can't regulate and control our way

0:59:50.840 --> 0:59:53.200
<v Speaker 2>out of, everything AND i think it's good to put

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:57.720
<v Speaker 2>safeguards and parameters in, place but becoming too restrictive and

0:59:57.800 --> 1:00:03.160
<v Speaker 2>too intrusive risk thin creating another problem on the flip

1:00:03.240 --> 1:00:07.880
<v Speaker 2>side of that with someone then getting aggrieved and FEELING.

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I, think and TALKING, covid THE covid, RESTRICTIONS i saw

1:00:13.720 --> 1:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>PEOPLE i knew that the way they were, reacting you

1:00:16.520 --> 1:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>could almost see the, tension the anger build up and

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the frustration build up in them in the, restrictions and

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you could see how that could play out in the

1:00:25.600 --> 1:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>extreme And i'm not saying my, friends BUT i just

1:00:28.080 --> 1:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>saw how many people are, affected and affected each and

1:00:30.960 --> 1:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>every one of. Us you had the isolation and then

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the restrictions and loss of, control and people are losing

1:00:37.400 --> 1:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>their livelihood or losing contact with their. Families those type

1:00:42.480 --> 1:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of RESTRICTIONS i think is just sort of pouring fuel

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>on the.

1:00:45.520 --> 1:00:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Fire, Yeah So i'm always big on empowering and educating,

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:53.240
<v Speaker 2>People and THEN i think governments ideally put the safeguards

1:00:53.280 --> 1:00:56.360
<v Speaker 2>and the parameters in, place but people still need that.

1:00:56.480 --> 1:01:00.040
<v Speaker 2>Autonomy AND i think rather than restricting and, controlling we

1:01:00.080 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>should try and educate and. Teach and there's the, argument,

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:06.960
<v Speaker 2>say with the restrictions for social media that are looking

1:01:07.080 --> 1:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>like coming in for, adolescents which which is, positive adolescents

1:01:11.640 --> 1:01:15.040
<v Speaker 2>will still go and find other platforms like discord and

1:01:15.360 --> 1:01:18.080
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of online groups that they can still access

1:01:18.240 --> 1:01:21.760
<v Speaker 2>and still find extreme. Content so what about if we

1:01:21.920 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>taught people or children to use social media, safely you,

1:01:25.160 --> 1:01:28.280
<v Speaker 2>know something like a social media. License we teach people to,

1:01:28.440 --> 1:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>drive you, know we teach them how to do things

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 2>in a safe. Manner SO i think there's a role

1:01:33.400 --> 1:01:36.040
<v Speaker 2>there where we can empower rather than.

1:01:36.120 --> 1:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Restrict, well giving that degree of, autonomy it takes a

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sting out of any, restrictions doesn't. It you've got a

1:01:41.920 --> 1:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit of. Control, okay you've just got to go

1:01:43.760 --> 1:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>through this, pathway but you can get. THERE i see

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>what you're. Saying i've never thought of it that, way but,

1:01:50.240 --> 1:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>yeah we shut down the social media for the, kids

1:01:54.400 --> 1:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get access to. Things.

1:01:55.920 --> 1:01:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, yeah and again it's the masses that are probably

1:01:59.680 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>doing the right thing that are impact in. IT i

1:02:02.040 --> 1:02:04.240
<v Speaker 2>think it's a good conversation to have because there are

1:02:04.360 --> 1:02:08.480
<v Speaker 2>always pros and, cons but the ones that seek this

1:02:08.680 --> 1:02:10.480
<v Speaker 2>out will still be able to find. It.

1:02:10.800 --> 1:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay look we might take a break. Here when

1:02:14.720 --> 1:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we get, BACK i want to talk in detail about

1:02:17.360 --> 1:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the Christ church massacre and put in or discuss some

1:02:20.760 --> 1:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of the things we've discussed here and how that played

1:02:22.800 --> 1:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>out in the build up to the. Case i'd also

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>like to talk about. STALKING i know part of you

1:02:29.280 --> 1:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the reason you're over here that you're delivering a lecture on.

1:02:32.480 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Stalking i've always thought from a policing point of, VIEW

1:02:35.200 --> 1:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>i always had concerns when people were. Stalking it starts, off,

1:02:39.080 --> 1:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>well nothing's really, done but the way that they become

1:02:42.400 --> 1:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>fixated on the person they're. Stalking always concerned, me And

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>i'm sure there's a lot of other things we've got

1:02:48.280 --> 1:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk. About i'm finding it quite quite. Fascinating so

1:02:51.440 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a break and we'll be back shortly for part.

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Two Thanks, Gary cheers.

1:03:00.880 --> 1:03:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Two Nine ka