WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 7 May

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>On scoring leaves Australia. This is the Wider Panalty Show.

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panety Show. Coming

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 2>up tonight. Do the Liberals need to be a broad

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>church or should they embrace the culture wars. Adam Crichton

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 2>will be here to cover the day's top headlines, including

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>the dangers of premature celebration. We've got footage of the

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Teals in Goldstein celebrating heart before reality set in. I'll

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>speak to Rachel Wong about the behavior of some AEC

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>staff threatening to call the police on a candidate talking

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>about her late term abortion policy. The wonderful Matilga Sagon

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>has the latest from the US and the equally eloquent

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 2>Ralph Sholhammer. We'll explain a new threat to democracy in

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 2>Germany with efforts to ban the right wing AfD Party

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>and lefties losing it. Shows democrats love illegal immigrants so

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>much that they an't care if they are murdered by one.

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 3>If I get murdered by an undocumented immigrant, please tell

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 3>my children I did not care that they were undocumented.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 2>But first, the seat of Goldstein in Victoria has been

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>returned to the Liberals after Zoe Daniel claimed it for

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 2>the Tills in the twenty twenty two election, with Tim

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Wilson becoming the first MP to reclaim a Till seat. Now,

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Zoey Daniel is being widely mocked online for indulging in

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 2>premature celebrations on the weekend, claiming a seat that was

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 2>no longer.

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 4>Hers right.

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Being Goldstein.

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Hope Winds.

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 5>The Liberal Party threw everything out us guys, and we

0:01:52.920 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 5>are standing here to celebrate it.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Naane response to her loss, though Daniel remains stoic, some

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 2>might say, remains in denial, writing on Instagram that while

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>the media has called the result in Goldstein, I will

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 2>wait for further counting out of respect for my scrutinyars

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and the democratic process. Joining me now for more on

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 2>this is senior fellow and chief Economists at the IPA,

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Adam crist And Adam. If she wasn't such a uniquely

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 2>terrible MP, and she's my local MP, I may have

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>a little sympathy here, but you never go the early

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 2>crow amateur mistake now.

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 6>Book, I think the mockery was very justified. It's so embarrassing.

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 6>I mean, on a human level, I do feel sorry

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 6>for her a little bit but it shocks me that

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 6>amongst all those supporters and staff, all the political stuff,

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 6>someone didn't say, hang on, a second's kind of close,

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 6>and there's a lot of prepole of voting still to

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 6>be counted. The same with Kuong, same thing they celebrated

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 6>as well, and you know, Ryan may lose that seat too.

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 6>But I think the broader point here is why do

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 6>we still.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Not know who's won on a Wednesday night.

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 6>Surely the AEC can hire a funeral people to count

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 6>these votes.

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know this isn't India.

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 6>You know these aren't tens or hundreds or millions of votes.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 6>They should be counted in India have actually count them

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 6>very well. Yeah, so I kind of don't understand while

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 6>we're waiting so long, because this changes the whole political narrative.

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 6>Of course, if we had have known on Saturday night

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 6>or even Sunday that these two seats were close to

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 6>these two till seats, I think it would have changed

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 6>the narrative for the Liberal Party, which of course is

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 6>a very bad narrative.

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 4>They've been flow.

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 2>But if we have a landslide regardless, but perhaps a

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 2>just a slightly less.

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, look, I just said that we should no sooner

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 6>and surely it wouldn't cost the AEC too much.

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 4>More More, I think.

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 2>You've got to take into account mail in ballots, and

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 2>if they're waiting for Australia Post to deliver mail that

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>was perhaps posted Friday, then I think that one can

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 2>understand that the number of people who are voting early

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>these days, it's all is, it's a lot. It used

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 2>to be something that you would just do if for

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>some real reason you couldn't vote on Saturday. But that

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>brings me to an important point being told that members

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>of the Jewish community, particularly the more devout members who

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 2>observe Sabbath, they don't vote on Saturday. They do tend

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 2>to be overrepresented in the mailing votes early votes, and

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 2>perhaps this is part of the reason why we are

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 2>seeing this swing that got Tim Wilson over the line

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 2>and may still get merely a Hamer over the line

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>in q On.

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 4>There's also preferences too.

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 6>I think the big point for this election is that

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 6>preferences really matter now more than ever.

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, of course it was a huge win.

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 6>For Labor, but actually their primary vote was lower than

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 6>what Julia Gillard got in twenty ten when she just

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 6>scraped in. So I'm just talking about first preference votes.

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 6>So it's all about preferences. Now, preferences really matter. I

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 6>think going forward, people need to understand that what they

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 6>do on their head a vote card really matters.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Now to the so called more it libs or

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the bedwetters as they're also known, well, they've lost their

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 2>collective minds about the so called Trump factor. In the election,

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 2>news dot com dot aus reporting that in the final

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 2>days of the election, Peter Dutton's inner circle was blaming

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump for the coalition's looming collapse. A senior Liberal

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 2>MP told the site, Honestly, easily, the single biggest factor

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 2>is Trump, Adam, that sounds like a rather convenient excuse.

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like labor blaming Russia for high energy costs. Locally,

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton lost because he was weak, had weak policies.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 2>No one could remember the policies, no one really understood

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 2>what they were had they differentiated from labor. He was

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.919
<v Speaker 2>about as Trumpian as Adam Batt.

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Look, I have to completely agree with you there.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 6>I think Trump was a factor in the election, and

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.119
<v Speaker 6>it certainly hurt the coalition factor.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 4>Robert Media yeah, yes, he.

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 6>Has certainly been factor with the media. You know, Trump

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 6>is not popular here. We can have to recognize that,

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 6>and that's due to the media, I would say, but

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 6>it certainly doesn't explain the scale of this loss, which

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 6>is absolutely historic. And I think it's largely down to

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 6>the leadership. The leader, Peter Duttan, as much as I

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 6>like him personally, was just not an appealing character for

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 6>a large sway of Australian society and I think that

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 6>was hard. It was just to change. And then the policies,

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 6>as you say, were also terrible. I mean, for me,

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 6>the two that really stuck out was trying to fix

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 6>a permanent cost of living crisis with two temporary policies.

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 4>The fuel excise cut only last twelve months.

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 6>After twelve months goes back up again, and the twelve

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 6>hundred dollars cash rebate.

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 4>That just felt like a handout, which it.

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Was, which it was. As a Senator alex Antiks Thatt

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 2>on Outsiders on Sunday, some of the policies look like

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 2>mobile phone contracts where you get something for twelve months

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 2>and then it's taken away. I mean, really, that's not

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 2>how you fix the country. You mentioned that Donald Trump

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 2>is not popular in this country and the media is

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 2>to blame. We're are going to get to the infighting

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 2>within the Libs and the leadership battle, but first I

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 2>just want to play this utterly unhinged, ill informed rant

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 2>on Trump in the Australian media. This is an example

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>of what people on FM radio are hearing. This is

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 2>just so asinine. This is Gold FM heard on multiple

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 2>markets including Sydney and Melbourne.

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 7>Do I read something yesterday that said, that's a thing

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 7>that said Trump officially has entered the psychotic emperor phase.

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 7>He's not coming back the Pope image?

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Was it?

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 7>That was the line? He's crossed it and he's just

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 7>kept walking. He's not trolling anymore. This is clinical delusion.

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 7>The tariffs on movies, reopening Alcatraz, so these aren't policies.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 4>This is a man.

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Wants to reopen Alcatraz as a federal prison.

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Right Okay?

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 7>So and he said they say here, look, this is

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 7>what the same thing went on to say. Margat is

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 7>clapping along like it's a church revival. No one is

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 7>driving the bus anymore.

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Jonesy and Amanda sounds like radio for people with room

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 2>temperature IQ. The pope, which is what's center over the edge.

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>It was a joke. I mean they seriously think Noald

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Trump wants to be the next pope. I mean I

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.559
<v Speaker 2>think it sounds like that's what they believe. But what's

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 2>your reaction? Because it's not isolated. You do hear commentary

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 2>on US politics in this country that is so comically

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 2>ill informed that you dismiss it. But then people who

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 2>aren't that much into politics hear that and believe it.

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 6>Look, I think the Australian liberal media here or left

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 6>wing media here, they read the US leftic media and

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 6>then they filter it once again with the left wing slants,

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 6>and by the time it gets to Australians it's just

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 6>completely unhinged.

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 4>And I think this is a classic example of that.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 6>It's just regurgitating the standard bland slogans and sound.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 2>We'll even get on as ABC that is so undt

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 2>that the ladies of the view would make maybe born Also.

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 6>It's just ridiculous because if these people deeply care about Christianity,

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 6>I mean, they're just making up the fact that they

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 6>feel offended from the pope em engine.

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 2>I don't think like listening to that, she seemed to

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 2>think it was some sort of a line that was

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>cross and it wasn't actually offensive because it was a

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>bad joke that I think she seems to think he

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 2>wants to be No.

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 4>I think so.

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 6>Look, Trump's the first president where we've had it really

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 6>so and he's decided to use it in an amusing way.

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 6>It never used to exist, but it's a new thing,

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 6>and he's obviously a funny It's funny.

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean I find it funny.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Who doesn't it's funny?

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean it's hard not to find it funny.

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 4>I think, clearly not trying to be pope. No.

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>And if you want to find things to be genuinely

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>aghast about, I'm sure you can find them if it'd

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 2>be bothered reading for five minutes, but picking things like that.

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 2>And then they had the most absurd discussion about this

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 2>new tariff on films that are made outside of the US,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 2>again not realizing that every argument that we're making is

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 2>precisely the reason why he's introducing this tariff, because it's

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 2>an America first policy. It's not supposed to help Australia,

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 2>it's not supposed to help Canada. It's supposed to help

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 2>American filmmaking. Let's get back to the wets in the

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Party pushing for a more moderate leadership ticket, which

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>would include Susan Lay as leader and Ted O'Brien as

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 2>shadow treasurer. Adam there are accusations flying all over the

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 2>place about who is white, anting who, and there are

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 2>certainly fingers being pointed at Susan Lay. She's been accused

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>of consistently undermining the leader and the party.

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 6>Well look, I don't know the internals of the Liberal Party,

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 6>of the factions and all that sort of squabbling, but

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 6>the accusation that it was a far right.

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Campaign is kind of absurd. I don't see how they

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 4>could they could possibly become more moderate. I mean, if

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 4>you just look at the fiscal outlooks.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the coalition released their own fiscal outlook just

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 6>a few days before the election, and it was exactly

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 6>the same, if not worse than Labors in terms of

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 6>debt and deficit.

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 4>So you know, it was basically a labor like campaign,

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 4>you know.

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 6>So the argument that, oh, gosh, they were too far

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 6>right is just complete nonsense. I think, you know, if

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.719
<v Speaker 6>they lost, because you know, I mean, if you want

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 6>to say it was the policy platform that lost in

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 6>the election. It was because they were too much like labor,

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 6>not the other way around. So I think that's a

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 6>lesson that has to be learned.

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the lesson that is never learned though, whenever

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 2>the Liberals do go moderate and they become labor light

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 2>there less and they lose invariably when they do that,

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the lesson is, oh, we need to go more left.

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 2>We were too scary and right wing and too wrapped

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 2>up in the culture wars. And we've seen that in Victoria,

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 2>we've seen it in WA and I do fear it's

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 2>going to happen federally because they always listen to the

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 2>worst advice imaginable.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 6>But I mean, obviously, whoever becomes leader, I mean it's

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 6>basically who wants to lose the next election kind of thing.

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 4>It's a hospital class, isn't it.

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 8>Really.

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 4>It's so I do sympathize with.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 6>You know, some of the rumors are that certain people

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 6>aren't going to run, and that's probably why.

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.119
<v Speaker 2>But it's going to be a long and hard rebuild.

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>So you do need to make this next decision right.

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 2>You can't just write off the next couple of years.

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 2>You need to start the work now, and that's where

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 2>they faulted. And that's what we've been saying on this

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 2>program all year. They just haven't done the work to

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 2>be ready for this election. Before you go, there's already

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 2>power plays happening within the newly re elected Labor government.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 2>The powerful environmental wing of the party is pushing the

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister to adopt eight seventy plus percent emission reduction

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 2>target by twenty thirty five, and they also want to

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 2>pass the so called Nature Positive laws within a year. Adam,

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>this would be disastrous for the nation on so many

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 2>different fronts. The Nature Positive proposal just in itself would

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 2>frustrate just a add every major development, from mining projects

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to large scale building developments, hospitals, newer states, everything.

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 6>Look, we really have to hope that sensible voices in

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 6>the Labor Party prevail on these issues. It's certainly a

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 6>much expanded party room. I don't know whether the new

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 6>Labor MPs are more kind of centrist or left. I'm

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 6>still I'm still yet to read analysis on that. Hopefully

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 6>more centrists and they want to keep their seats the

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 6>next election, and so that actually could be a.

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Moderator force on the Labor Party.

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 6>All of these new MPs there will be in seats

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 6>that could change back next time. They won't want to

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 6>do anything too extreme. I think that's a good thing, but.

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 2>That sounds like wish for thinking.

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, but just ontin thermissions.

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 6>Very briefly, look, I mean if they legislate seventy it's

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 6>not going to happen anyway.

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 4>The forty three is not going to happen. They've actually

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 4>only already will.

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Back up the country trying to get there. That's the fear.

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 2>Of course, it's not going to happen. But how much

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 2>that's true.

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 4>They will do it a lot as a long the

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:24.719
<v Speaker 4>way that is.

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 2>True, Adam christ And thanks for your time. Thanks Joining

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 2>me now is Women's Forum Australian CEO Rachel Wong. Rachel,

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 2>let's start reports that Labor and the Greens in New

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 2>South Wales are rushing through legislation introduced by Greens MLC

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 2>doctor Amanda Cone to expand access to abortion in New

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 2>South Wales. A rally protesting the move was held earlier

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 2>this evening. What do you make of this bill and

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the push to get it through the New South Wales

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Parliament within the next week or so. Why is there

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:58.359
<v Speaker 2>such a need for this urgency.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 10>There is no genuine need or level of urgency whatsoever.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 10>This is not a necessary.

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Piece of legislation. Quite the opposite. We already have abortion for.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 10>Any stage, for any reason in New South Wales, and

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 10>I'm quite frankly, really confused as to why the New

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 10>South Wales Labor government finds it necessary to align with

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 10>the Greens and support the Greens on such a radical

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 10>piece of legislation.

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, what will be the changes if this goes through?

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>If their abortion is already available at every stage of

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 2>pregnancy and readily available, what is this legislation going to do?

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 10>So, the big thing that this bill will do is

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 10>make doctors and hospitals who are opposed to abortion for medical,

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 10>ethical or religious reasons, it will force them to violate

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 10>their conscience and be involved in ensuring abortion in New

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 10>South Wales, ensuring access to abortion, and so that aspect

0:14:58.320 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 10>of the bill has been talked about quite a lot.

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 10>The free of conscience issue, which is a big one

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 10>because obviously freedom is a very different right for Australians

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 10>and we shouldn't be forced to do things that we

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 10>believer are morally or ethically wrong. Another aspect of the

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 10>bill that hasn't been talked about quite so much is

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 10>the way that it will put women at grave risk.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 10>So at the moment in New South Wales, medical abortions

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 10>can be performed, but they need to be performed by

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 10>a doctor. This bill will expand the legislation to allow

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 10>nurses and midwives and other unnamed health practitioners to perform

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 10>medical abortions. And the idea that Colin has is that

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 10>this will allow women in regional and rural areas to

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 10>have better access. But the reality is these women that

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 10>Colin wants to help are the women who are going

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 10>to be most at risk from this legislation, because these

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 10>are the women who have less access to medical support

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 10>and help if they have adverse complications following a medical abortion.

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 10>And as we saw come out of the US last week,

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 10>the biggest study of medical abortion to date has shown

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 10>that women more than one in ten women experience adverse reactions,

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 10>serious adverse events, including life threatening events, following medical abortion,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 10>and this just has not been something that's communicated to

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 10>women the way it should be in terms of the

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 10>rest involved, and expanding abortion in this way is extremely

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 10>dangerous and responsible.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Now Rachel. Worrying vision has emerged of Australian Electoral Commission

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 2>officials instructing Family First candidate Ray Ramsey to stop promoting

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 2>her anti late term abortion policy out of Victorian polling booth.

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 2>They say that they had complaints that had three complaints.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>So one of the video shows, let's have a look

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.479
<v Speaker 2>at a couple of these interactions.

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 9>You have had a number of complaints that you have

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 9>been using disruptive rhetoric. Talking about killing babies was the

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 9>one that came to me. I am just here to

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 9>ask you to tone it down. If you do not

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 9>and we continue to see received complaints, we're going to

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 9>have you again. You've had at least three complaints.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Did I talk about late JOm abortion, ma'am.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 9>I am not here to get into politics. I am

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 9>just here to give you a warning.

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a candidate. I'm allowed to shame of policies.

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 9>If we continue to get complaints, I will have to

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 9>take further.

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Actually, that's all I'm saying to me. We will have

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to call the police.

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 9>You're going to call the police on me if it's

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 9>continuous keep.

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 8>Mentioning my late chamb abortion polishish.

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>If you can disrupt voters.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 4>Do you understand I understand what you're shamed, but I

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 4>don't think you have that power.

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 6>I definitely do just that point before now if I

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 6>can please.

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Ask, can I shay that?

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 5>What can I say our publishing else, every every other

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 5>of you.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not allowed to mention abortion.

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 11>Just for now.

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 5>I've had some complaints and I just want to run

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 5>it up the team.

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you wouldn't I thank you, Rachel. That's one of

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 2>her policies. Is she not allowed to talk about it

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 2>because two or three people have complained? Can I go

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 2>and complain that I don't want Green's candidates talking to

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>people because they're global warming scare mongering is upsetting the

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 2>children a bit. It seems absurd that a candidate can

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 2>be silenced in that.

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 10>Way, Absolutely insane, reta and honestly quite terrifying for Australia.

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 10>And as you point out, there is one hundred percent

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 10>a double standard here. This is literally one of the

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 10>bodies that has been tasked as safeguarding our democracy and

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 10>to see them shutting down a candidate's freedom of speech

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 10>during the federal election, I think is just absolutely atrocious

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 10>and of course Australians are free to oppose her views

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 10>and they're free not to vote for her, and they

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 10>could have done that or not done that, as the

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 10>case may be inside the polling booth. But you know,

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 10>latein abortion, this is not a fringish. We had bombshow

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 10>revelations coming out of South Australia last year in Queensland

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 10>as well about how babies are being left to die

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 10>after Latin abortions, to the degree that there was a

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 10>bill put forward in South Australia which only lost by

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 10>one vote, to protect babies born after twenty eight weeks.

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 10>And there've been horrific stories by midwives who have you

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 10>had to see babies being left to die after these abortions,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 10>and so this is this is a genuine, you know,

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 10>policy that has obviously put forward in good faith to

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 10>deal with a genuine issue that we're having in our society.

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 10>And you know, it's just it's not acceptable for these

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 10>Electoral Commission staffers to have shut this woman down. I

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 10>think there needs to be an investigation and into this

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 10>kind of thing happening during especially during elections, and you know,

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 10>look that's saladsing clearly something that is reflective of a

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 10>broader issue. In our culture and our institutions when it

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 10>comes to censorship.

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 2>And just before you go, Rachel, I want to play

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 2>you this footage of Till mp ZO Daniel or former

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 2>til MPZO and Daniel. You can add her to the

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 2>long list of supposed women rights campaigners who can't tell

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 2>you what a woman is.

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 4>I think I've done a lot of stuff for women.

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 12>Is that right?

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 5>And general equality was one of my central issues at

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 5>the last campaign.

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 4>What is a woman?

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 13>Though?

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 14>Can you define it?

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I think anyway done it.

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 2>They continue to treat it like it's a gotcha question.

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Rachel Wong, thank you so much for your time tonight.

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Mia still to come left he is losing it.

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Plus a bombshell story revealing how the FBI books it's

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 2>investigation of the congressional baseball shooting downplaying the gunman's anti

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Trump motives. Batti Junga sa Gone joins me. Next, you're

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 2>watching the Reader Panny Show and it's time for lefties

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 2>are losing it and it's time to checking again on

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 2>the Lunatic Asylum masquerading as a news network known as MSNBC,

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 2>And let's listen to this hot take from Joe Scarborough.

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 15>AOC may be more progressive than a lot of people.

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 15>I also understand that she's one of the most articulate,

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 15>exciting people in the democratic fields. He goes out with

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 15>Bernie and yeah, she just draws so many People's very good,

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 15>very effective in hearings.

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 16>They need somebody young like AOC. And again it's not

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 16>about ideology, you know.

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 12>They she can carry the message forward for a Democratic party.

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 16>That really needs to reach out the younger Americans.

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, let's have a look at just how articulate and

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 2>impressive IOC is prepared to be dazzled by her red

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 2>genius even as a waitress. If any of you.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 8>All else have gotten gone like completely mad, like like

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:45.479
<v Speaker 8>whatever you know and like or whatever, like just like

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 8>it's like like it's like this like like like what

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 8>people are starting to see, at least in the occupation

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 8>of Palestine.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 10>You use the term the occupation of Palestine.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 2>What did you mean by that?

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 12>Oh?

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 8>I think what I meant is like the settlements that

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 8>are increasing in some of these areas, in places where

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 8>or Palestinians are experiencing difficulty and access to their housing

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 8>and homes.

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 6>Do you think you can expand on that.

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean I think i'd also just I am

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 8>not the expert gio politics on this issue, you.

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Know, Oh dear, that's AOC over the years. She really

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 2>is the future. Please make her the leader because I

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 2>think she'll make Krmala look like a visionary. Now, Joe

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Scarborough has form for saying spectacular stupid things. It's a

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 2>requirement of all the MSNBC anchors to say silly things

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>or just lie to their audience. Remember when he said

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 2>this not long before Joe Biden was forced to announce

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 2>the end of his re election campaign.

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 16>I've said it for years now.

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 15>He's cogent, but I undersold him when I said he

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 15>was cogent. He's far beyond cogent. In fact, I think

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 15>he's better than he's ever been intellectually analytically, because he's

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 15>been around.

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 4>For fifty years.

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 15>Start your tape right now, because I'm about to tell

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 15>you the truth and FU if you can't handle the truth.

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 15>This version of Biden intellectually analytically is the best Biden ever,

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 15>not a close second.

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 4>And I've known him for years.

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 15>The Brazinskis have known him for fifty years. If it

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 15>weren't the truth, I wouldn't say.

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 2>It best, Biden. Evan f you if you can't handle

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the truth, dear, dear, Now, Joe Scarbrough was telling the

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 2>dem witted MSNBC audience long after that that Kamala had

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>it in the bag. She was going to beat Trump.

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 16>When you start seeing numbers, real numbers, like what's going

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 16>on in Georgia, suddenly you feel like telling Democrats that

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 16>are bitching and moaning about what the Harris campaign's doing.

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 12>Hey, calm down, you know what. Victory is in sight

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 12>in less than three weeks. If you go out, work hard,

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.199
<v Speaker 12>and do your job.

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 15>The opponent is imploding and Harris is doing better than ever.

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 2>Victory is in sight. Sadly it wasn't. It was a

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:31.959
<v Speaker 2>landslide loss that was in sight. But you know what,

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 2>we never got any apologies for those truths. But we

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 2>did get an apology in recent days from MSNBC after

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 2>they aired this bit of fake news.

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 11>What do you make of that that he's just been

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 11>a little less visible than I think a lot of

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 11>people Trump observers expected he would be.

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, well, reportedly has been visible at nightclubs far more

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 15>than he has been on the seventh floor of the

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 15>Hoover Building.

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh really, it wasn't long before we got this correction.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 11>Circle back to a segment from Friday Show. Frankfort Gluesy

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 11>was on that morning during this hour discussing the work

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 11>of administration officials.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>At the end of that.

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 11>Segment, for Glucy said the FBI director Cash Pttel has

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 11>reportedly been more visible at nightclubs than at his office

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 11>at FBI headquarters. This was a misstatement. We have not

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 11>verified that claim.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 2>And here is another MSNBC favorite, this time appearing on

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 2>another platform. This is Ellie miss stew And this lefty

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 2>losing it loves illegal immigration so much he doesn't even

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 2>care if an illegal immigrant kills him. He wants you

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 2>to know that.

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Why do I care what their status was when they

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 3>committed the crime, if you can prove they committed a crime.

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 3>I say in the book, if I get shot, if

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 3>I get murdered by an undocumented immigrant, please tell my

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 3>children I did not care that they were undocumented.

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Right now, to New York Attorney General Letitia James, who

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 2>was elected on a platform of getting Donald Trump, and

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 2>he was facing serious investigations over alleged mortgage fraud. Well,

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 2>she's on the war path.

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 14>You want me to sit in my seat and stand

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 14>idly by and allow this craziness to happen. You could

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 14>come after me if you want, But you elected me

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 14>to stand up.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 2>You elected me to.

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 7>Use the law.

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 2>You elected me to go to court.

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 17>You elected me.

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 14>To continue to challenge this administration. You elected me to

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 14>stand up for the least of God's children. You elected

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 14>me to continue fighting on Wow.

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now is journalist and author Batia Ungasagan Battia

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Letitia James. She's facing a serious investigation, but she's at

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 2>the moment leading a coalition of twenty states ensuing the

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration over its cuts to the Department of Health

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and Human Services.

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 17>It's so amazing how the defenders of democrat see you know, trademark,

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 17>you know, are always out here accusing Trump of not

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 17>believing in you know, the three branches of government and

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 17>not believing in our democracy, when it is they who

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 17>believe that the executive should effectively have zero power. I mean,

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 17>what law has he broken by suggesting that he wants

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 17>to limit the staff of the federal government. The whole

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 17>thing is ridiculous, and it just shows once again how

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 17>the Democrats have no platform. They have no agenda. It

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 17>is all just performance art, and in let Teacha James's case,

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 17>she's obviously trying to distract from the fact that she

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 17>got caught out doing the exact crimes that she pretended

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 17>Donald Trump was doing when she went after him. He

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.239
<v Speaker 17>was not actually committing any crimes. But she has been

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 17>accused very credibly of mortgage fraud, as you say, and

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 17>so you know, performance art distraction. This is the name

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 17>of the game when it comes to the Democrats today.

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 17>That's really all they have at this point.

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 2>The law fed that we're using it before the election campaign,

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 2>and since the landslide victory, it seems to be all

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 2>they have is just trying to obstruct Trump through the courts,

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 2>going to the most activist judges they can find to

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 2>try to frustrate the agenda. Is it working though, Is

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 2>it causing this chaos that is frustrating the Trump administration?

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 17>I don't think it's working at all, Rita. And the

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 17>reason I say that is because most of their efforts

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 17>with the law have been around the issue of immigration.

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 17>That's the one area where Donald Trump's numbers are still very,

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 17>very good. The American people are with him on immigration.

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 17>He is winning on that issue, despite the fact that

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 17>the Democrats have gone overboard trying to protect all of

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 17>these gang bangers that Trump is so eager to get

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 17>out of the country.

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 2>This is a bombshell story. Let's look at the New

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 2>York Post report on this. The FBI botched its investigation

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 2>of the twenty seventeen congressional baseball shooting, downplaying the government's

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 2>anti GOP the anti Republican motives. Despite having handwritten evidence,

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 2>they wrongly claimed that it was a suicide by copp attack.

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 2>This is the findings of a report by the House

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Judiciary Committee, the Intelligence Committee, and Intelligence Subcommittee on Oversight

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 2>and Investigation. They come through around three three thousand case

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 2>file documents on this attack that wounded six people, including

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the current House Majority Leader Steve Scalese, who was very

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 2>lucky to survive that shooting. Let's hear from him.

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 18>They ultimately let us know what their conclusion was, and

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 18>that's when they said it was class his suicide by

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 18>cop And I'll tell you I was offended. I think

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 18>all of us there were highly offended that that was

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 18>the conclusion that the FBI in twenty seventeen came to

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.959
<v Speaker 18>because it wasn't what happened on the baseball field. He

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 18>went there with the intention of killing all of us

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 18>on the baseball field, and he had a list in

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 18>his pocket of other Republicans he wanted to kill. It

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 18>was very politically motivated and it was clear they suppressed

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 18>a lot of facts and what the FBI report that

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 18>cash Ptel's FBI came out with today shows they suppressed

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 18>factual evidence to reach a different conclusion.

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Patilla, this is just a shocking, shocking example of why

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the FBI needs reform, why has become so mistrusted by

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 2>huge segments of the community. This man went there to

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 2>kill Republicans.

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, you know, it's so funny because there there's this

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 17>canard in the United States that's promulgated by the left

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 17>that political violence is something that happens on the right.

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 17>And the reason that they are able to get away

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 17>with this lie is because it is the right that

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 17>is heavily armed in America. But the vast majority of

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 17>the political violence in this country comes from the political left,

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 17>the vast majority, and this is a perfect example of that.

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 17>To where the FBI itself was engaged in this alleged

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 17>cover up of left wing anti conservative political violence because

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 17>it doesn't fit the narrative that they have been pushing

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 17>to smear Republicans and smear Conservatives as being violent when

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 17>these are people who own a lot of guns and

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 17>never ever use them in a political manner.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, the examples of left wing violence in America just

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 2>in recent years are enormous. We saw those BLM riots

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 2>that destroyed neighborhood cities, around two billion dollars worth of damage,

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 2>around twenty people killed, dozens more seriously injured. We have

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 2>they heard had any condemnation of that, and yet the

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Democrats went on about the January sixth riots for five years.

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 2>It's all we've been hearing about since it occurred. The

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Antifa riots. Right now, we're seeing Tesla dealerships and individuals

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 2>who are in Tesla's having their property vandalize. The examples

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 2>of us not to mention the campus protests, and let's

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 2>talk about the campus protests, because there's been some consequences

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 2>to that. Columbia University is going to have to cut

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 2>around one hundred and eighty staff members because the Trump

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 2>administration has announced it's canceling four hundred million dollars in

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 2>federal funding. The Columbia University announced these cuts overnight. The

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Ivy League school was targeted for these cuts because of

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 2>its failure to protect Jewish students from anti Semitic harassment.

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm having a trouble feeling sorry for Columbia here.

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:28.719
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, that's absolutely right. The things that the Trump administration

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 17>is asking from these universities are things that they already

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 17>owe their students in exchange for federal funding. We have

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 17>civil rights laws that they are expected to follow, which

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 17>they really failed to do in the case of Jewish students.

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 17>I'm not one who felt that Jewish students were actually unsafe.

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 17>I don't like that language. I think it diminishes the

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 17>power that we have in our community. I don't think

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 17>they were physically unsafe. But what they worried or was

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 17>they were discriminated against buy administration that treats all of

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 17>its students one way and its Jewish students another way,

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 17>and it expected them to just eat the harassment that

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 17>they were facing. And that is discriminatory. And as a result,

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 17>the Trump administration is withdrawn it's funding. It's such an

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 17>amazing moment. I mean, you know, as a Jewish American

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 17>to see the President standing up from my rights. It's

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 17>a really, really wonderful thing that's happening. Unfortunately, many many

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 17>Jews in America are on the left and are Democrats,

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 17>about two thirds to three quarters of the community, and

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 17>so they don't really recognize what a gift this is.

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 17>That does not diminish the fact that the Trump administration

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 17>is standing up for our community in a very unique

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 17>and unprecedented way, and I am very grateful for it.

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Trump administration has stood up for the Jewish

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 2>community in America in an unprecedented way, but also for

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 2>the State of Israel that the support has given Israel

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 2>during the first Trump administration and continues to get. And yet,

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned there but here, the majority of Jewish

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.439
<v Speaker 2>Americans vote left, and they still did even after all

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 2>the violence we saw on campuses or the left wing violence.

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 2>The fact that Kamala Harris did not pick the best

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 2>VP candidate, Shapiro because his Jewish you served in the IDEF,

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and she thought that was going to cause us some problems,

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.280
<v Speaker 2>despite the fact it was the governor of Pennsylvania, crucial

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 2>swing state. I could go on, what is it going

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 2>to take for the Jewish community to break that you'd

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 2>call it a toxic relationship with the Democrats. The Democrats

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:50.479
<v Speaker 2>have got deep seated anti Semitic issues within the party.

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 17>So I'm so glad you asked me that because I'm

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 17>currently writing my third book on this exact topic, why

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 17>Jews are Democrats and why the Left is turning on

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 17>the Jews. The reason that Jewish Americans are overwhelmingly Democrat

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 17>is the same reason any group in America is overwhelmingly Democrat,

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 17>which is they A lot of American Jews have a

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 17>college degree. So about thirty percent of Americans have a

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 17>college degree. Sixty percent of American Jews have a college degree.

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 17>So what you would expect from that college being the

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 17>number one predictor for Democrat politics would be that the

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 17>community would be twice as likely to vote for the Democrats.

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 17>And that's exactly the numbers you see. However, this is

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 17>all changing because my community, the Orthodox community, is a

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:35.240
<v Speaker 17>lot less beholden to the woke ideology in the universities.

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 17>The ultra Orthodox community doesn't go to college at all

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 17>and is much more likely to be conservative. Of course,

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 17>we have conservative social values, and so you know, in

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 17>thirty years and forty years, most American Jews will be

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 17>Republicans just because the Orthodox have so many more children,

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 17>and a lot of the non Orthodox marry out and

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 17>their children are not Jewish at all. So the community

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 17>is really rapidly changing.

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 2>Right now, Let's get back to that law fare we

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 2>were speaking about and attempts to obstruct the Trump Administration's policies.

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 2>That Trump administration has had some good news this week

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 2>with a Supreme Court yesterday siding with the with Trump

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 2>in lifting a lower court order this is going to

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 2>that was pausing the transgender military ban from taking effect.

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 2>This means Trump's orders will proceed. Tell me about this

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:31.240
<v Speaker 2>decision and why this policy was introduced in the first place.

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 17>This is one of those issues where the administration just

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 17>has the support of eighty percent of Americans. I think

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 17>there is a feeling that transgender individuals are on a

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 17>lot of medications. There is the question of gender dysphoria,

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 17>which is a mental illness, and many trans people that

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 17>is how they describe what it means to be transgender.

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:00.240
<v Speaker 17>And these are just things that you don't necessarily want

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.919
<v Speaker 17>to have to be thinking about in a military context

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 17>of heightened security, intense emotions, intense physicality. Men, I think

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 17>very much are are trained to be protectors. If they're

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 17>in a situation, a combat situation and their fellow soldier

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:24.839
<v Speaker 17>is a woman or looks like a woman and could

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 17>be mistaken for a woman, you know, this is authorny situation.

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 17>And I think right now the military is sort of

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 17>re orienting itself under the guidance of Trump and Pete

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 17>hegseth to be more traditional in its values and its

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:42.720
<v Speaker 17>approach and its esthetic and in terms of recruitment, giving

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:45.959
<v Speaker 17>men a feeling of pride and being protectors and being

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 17>part of the military. So I think that the Trump

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 17>administration politically is on very solid ground. This is not

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 17>like saying you can't be gay in the military. It's

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 17>very different because it's a very There's this feeling among

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 17>the Democrats the left they think of LGBT as one thing,

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 17>but normal people, like regular middle class, working class people,

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 17>they really don't see it that way. They see gay as,

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:19.800
<v Speaker 17>you know, being totally consistent with all their other conservative values.

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 17>They know gay people, they go to church with gay people,

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.240
<v Speaker 17>and they see trands in a very different light, especially

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 17>when it comes to things like transgender people in women's

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 17>sports or in women's bathrooms or talking to their children

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 17>or in the military.

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 2>There is and there is a separation happening within that community.

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 2>Some would like it to be a more profound separation,

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 2>but certainly there are plenty of people who are the

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 2>LGBs end of the spectrum who have no time for

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the letters and their activism. Buttel Gasagon,

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for your time tonight. Thank you,

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Rita god Brush still to come. A threat to democracy

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:04.720
<v Speaker 2>in Germany amid efforts to ban the right wing AfD party.

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Ralph Solhammer has the details welcome back. Now we hear

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 2>about threats to democracy, Well, here is a real example

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the growing efforts in Germany to ban the AfD party.

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 2>The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, a

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 2>German intelligence agency, has released a statement saying that following

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 2>an investigation, they now classify the AfD as a confirmed

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 2>right wing extremist endeavor and a racist and anti Muslim organization.

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 2>The Germans by agency claims central to our assessment is

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the ethnically and ancestrally defined concept of the people that

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 2>shapes the AfD, which devalues entire segments of the population

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:02.720
<v Speaker 2>in Germany. And via relates their human dignity. It aims

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 2>to exclude certain population groups from equal participation in society,

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 2>subject them to unconstitutional discrimination, and thus assign them a

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 2>legally devalued status. Joining me now is lecturer, commentator, podcaster,

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the head of the Center of History at the Matthias

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Corvinus College in Budapest, Ralph Scholhammer, Ralph. That sounds like

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 2>a very politically charged description. They're not something you would

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 2>expect from an intelligence agency. What is your response to

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 2>those claims from the Federal Office for the Protection of

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the Constitution.

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 1>What I think the most remarking remarkable thing is that

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>all of this is based on a one thousand page

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>report that they refuse to publish. So you have this

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>odd situation. Imagine yourself being a member of the AfD

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>or the head of the AfD, and somebody comes to

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you and says, we now have the legal rights to

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:04.320
<v Speaker 1>spy on you, to cut funding to why atape your communications?

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And you say, but based on which grounds? And then

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they say, unfortunately, we cannot tell you because that is

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.319
<v Speaker 1>not for public knowledge. It's a very odd that would say,

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 1>an almost studinesque approach, and it shows you as We

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>have discussed in your show many times that very often

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>those who constantly talk about threats to democracy are themselves

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:24.879
<v Speaker 1>the greatest threat to democracy. It's a very serious case

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of projection.

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 13>I would say, oh, absolutely, what are the grounds they've given,

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 13>What explanations are there for keeping this eleven hundred page

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 13>intelligence report secret.

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Surely the public is entitled to know why they've come

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 2>up with this assessment that the AfD is an extremist organization.

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, the problem is that in order to band the AfD,

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>which is where they want to go, you would have

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to prove that the AfD in fact wants to overthrow

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the democratic system in Germany. Unfortunately for them and fortunately

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.760
<v Speaker 1>for the supports of the AfD, there is no indication

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that these are the plans of the AfD, like there

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>are no statements, there is nothing in the party plan.

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>You can say they are far right, extreme right, ultra

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>megamaga rite, whatever the term is. But all of this

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is permitted under the constitution. The problem would only be

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>if they would say, we want to change the democratic

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>system in Germany and create the dictatorship, but in a

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 1>re erect a fascist state, whatever it is. But they

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 1>don't so what they come up with is, and you

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:31.359
<v Speaker 1>already alluded to this in your introduction, is that they

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>define Germany or being German as an ethnic concept. Well,

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not entirely new, and you see this all around

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the world. But the argument of the AfD has been

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that being German, just like being Australian, is more than

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>having a German or Australian or Austrian or you name it,

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>passport right. They believe that loyalty, commitment, cultural integration is

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a long term process. You might disagree with this approach.

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>You might agree with this approach, but it's definitely not illegal,

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's definitely not the constitutional. And the other thing

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is which I find quite odd given the events, and

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we also have discussed in a show in the past

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>what happened in Germany over the last couple of years,

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of what happened in Europe over the last couple of years.

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:13.879
<v Speaker 1>To be critical of mass migration from Muslim countries, that's

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a majority opinion, and I think there are very good

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:18.800
<v Speaker 1>grounds to be critical of it, because the social cohesion

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>trust in society, the burden on the social systems, on schools,

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>on educational systems due to that kind of migration has

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 1>been enormous and this is what the AfD is against. Again,

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you can share the view, you can disagree with the view,

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:36.279
<v Speaker 1>but all of it is within the constitutional bounce.

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I mean, this is the top issue in Europe, arguably,

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 2>the mass migration that's changed the face of so many

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 2>places across the continent. And if the people can't have

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 2>a say on whether they support this mass migration, whether

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 2>they want to see more of it, then really, what

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 2>is the point of the democratic process right now? What

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:03.400
<v Speaker 2>is the day's support in Germany? They certainly did well

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 2>at the recent elections. Are they amongst the most popular parties?

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, according to the most recent tolls we have, they

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:15.279
<v Speaker 1>are the most popular party. I mean they currently come

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in the polls at around twenty six twenty seven percent,

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>about three percentage points ahead of the Conservative Party. Maybe

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we have time to talk a little bit about Freedich

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:27.800
<v Speaker 1>metsis the future chancellor's massive disaster yesterday in German Parliament

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>where he could not secure a majority to become chancellor

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in the first round of voting, something that has never

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:36.439
<v Speaker 1>happened in the history of Germany since nineteen forty five.

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And what we can see here and that's a trend,

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and not just in Germany. We see it in France,

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw it in Romania, we see it in the UK.

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 1>We saw it with Donald Trump before his election November

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty four. There is an attempt to weaponize

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the legal system, the judicial system, anything at the disposal

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of the status coaldes to prevent alternatives to come to

0:45:57.520 --> 0:45:59.720
<v Speaker 1>power by legal means. And this is a real problem

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 1>because my big issues always want, which is that if

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you prevent people to vote in alternatives. It's kind of

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>funny that the German name is the alternative and for Germany,

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't matter if it's Trump, Lupen Faraj, you

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>name it, because at some point people say, if the

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 1>system does not allow me to affect change within the system,

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:21.799
<v Speaker 1>then we need a new system. So again, as I

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>said before, those who pretend to protect democracy have become

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>its biggest threats because people are increasingly frustrated and there

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is nothing more dangerous to democracy than if a growing

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>number of people feels that the vote makes no difference.

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is the direction which we're going.

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, you mentioned some examples there, from North America to Romania,

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 2>France and Germany, what is next for Germany? What is

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 2>their government going to look like? And what are the

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 2>chances that the most popular party is going to be

0:46:57.360 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 2>labeled an extremist organization. I guess next step is that

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 2>may be excluded from the democratic process. They may not

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 2>be allowed to run in elections, and we've seen candidates

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 2>be excluded in countries like Romania.

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Well. Lenin once said that if the Germans want to

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>storm a train station, the first buy a ticket. And

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 1>what he wants to say about what he meant by

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this is that the Germans are not pre sae revolutionary people, right,

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and this has been a strength of them. They are

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>usually they play by the rules, but if they get

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>angry and if they explode, as we know historical clear right,

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it can get very very nasty. And we sometimes underestimate

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>how quickly societies can be pushed to the brink. I'm

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>sure that maybe some of your viewers and listeners are

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>familiar with David Beatts is a British strategist at King's College,

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and he makes this claim that many European societies are

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>probably much closer to the brink of civil undrest and

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>civil war than we realize. And I think this is true.

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:58.400
<v Speaker 1>For now. People are still holding back because a crucial

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 1>number still believe that their votes does in fact make

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a difference, that the democratic process is in fact working.

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 1>But Germany is a great example. If you try to

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:11.919
<v Speaker 1>outlaw the most popular party, you're basically disenfranchising almost one

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>third of the people or one third of the voters

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that cannot just blow over. There's this odd idea within

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the traditional parties in Germany. They sincerely believe that, they

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>say this in interviews, that if we band the AfD,

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>all those voters are just come back to us. But

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:30.239
<v Speaker 1>they left you because they no longer trust you for

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:33.399
<v Speaker 1>good reasons, like mister Mertz, if you make promises, did

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you forget twenty minutes after the last polling station has closed?

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:39.280
<v Speaker 1>But people will not just come back to you. First,

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 1>they will retreat from the political process. Then they will

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 1>get angry, and if they don't have an alternative the

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>voting booth, they will try to, let's say, voice their

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:49.839
<v Speaker 1>dissatisfaction in other ways. And yes, of course this could

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:50.959
<v Speaker 1>get violent at some point.

0:48:53.480 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Ralph Schulhammer, appreciate your insights, Thanks so much for your

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 2>time tonight. That's it from May app next is news,

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 2>not a see you at eleven tomorrow night.