WEBVTT - Danica De Giorgio | 26 September

0:00:01.600 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News Australia.

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>This is to Nika Degeorgio, Hello and welcome to the

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.479
<v Speaker 2>show coming up tonight. The political elites and left wing

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 2>media don't want you to have a debate on migration.

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Wait till you hear the attacks on Liberal MP Andrew Hasty.

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Plus what a strange country we live in when even

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the Sex Discrimination Commissioner doesn't seem to understand the basic

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>biology of the sexes. And less than forty eight hours

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 2>after albow selfie with Donald Trump, the US President hits

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>our pharmaceutical industry with a one hundred percent tariff. But

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.279
<v Speaker 2>first tonight, I fear we will never be able to

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>have an adult conversation about migration in this country. The

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 2>political elites and the left wing media don't want you

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>to have this conversation. It does not fit with the

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>left's narrative, no matter the costs to everyday Ozzie's and

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 2>of course when you do raise it, you're tarnished as

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 2>some sort of right wing nut job. Now, I was

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>astonished at the sheer hypocrisy by tel Allegra Spende yesterday.

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.839
<v Speaker 2>She is the member for one of the most affluent

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 2>electorates in this country. Wentworth in Sydney's Eastern suburbs, which

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 2>has avoided the.

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 3>Pressure of mass migration.

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 2>Yet she claims, quote, the debate around immigration is being

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 2>abused and weaponized. Australian citizens have always decided our immigration

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 2>policy and for many years all sides of politics agreed

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 2>on a non discriminatory policy shaped by our national interests

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>rather than prejudice. Well, this is an absolute load of

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 2>nonsense because nobody, nobody ever voted.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 3>For a big Australia. Yet here we are living in

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 3>a big Australia.

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Multiculturalism and mass migration have in fact act being thrust

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 2>upon us by both sides of politics, with no room

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 2>for debate about the sort of country we want to become.

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 2>The Till then went on to claim that disturbing echoes

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 2>of the racist division of the past have crept into

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>the political mainstream and there it is the r word racism.

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 2>And this is exactly why the left don't want you

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to have this debate.

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 3>They don't care about.

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Your concerns about mass migration in Australia. They care more

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 2>about the people we are bringing in on a daily basis.

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 3>The biggest threat.

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 2>To this country is the elites and powerful voices who

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>want to downplay our values and way of life under

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the guise of healthy and sustainable multiculturalism. In fact, politicians

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 2>across the divide have quite literally killed off the Great

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Australian dream through reckless policies like immigration and net zero,

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 2>while retreating from debate out of fear of being tortured

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 2>with the R word. So thank goodness for Liberal MP

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Hasty. In a social media post this week called

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>the Real Reason you can't afford the Home, He said, quote,

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 2>we are starting to feel like strangers in our own home.

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Labor talk about a housing supply crisis, but this is

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>a housing demand crisis driven by unsustainable immigration.

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 3>It's that simple. Yet a legraspender.

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Demonized him, likening him to a British white supremacist in of.

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 4>Powell, who was a white supremacist in Britain in his

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 4>famous Rivers of Blood speech, used the expression you know,

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 4>we're starting to you know, where that people were made

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 4>strangers in their own country. And this language from Andrew

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Hasty certainly reflects, either intentionally or unintentionally, some of the

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 4>language of that very famous speech.

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, these are not far right views, nor are they

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 2>extreme views.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 3>In fact, the same expression was.

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Used recently by UK Prime Minister Kirstamer, one of the wokest,

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>most left wing politicians of our time.

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Now in a diverse nation like ours, and I celebrate

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that these rules become even more important. Without them, we

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>walks forward together.

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 2>The reality is Andrew Hasty is not wrong, and good

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 2>on him for having the courage and conviction to say

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 2>it like it is.

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Allegra loves migration because it doesn't apply to her.

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>According to the twenty twenty one census, of the one

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty six thousand residents in the electorate of Wentworth,

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 2>almost fifty eight percent of the electorate was born in Australia,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>followed by England on seven point three percent and South

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Africa at three point nine percent. Hardly an example of

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 2>diversity when you compare it to say Blaxland in the

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 2>southwest of Sydney. Of the more than one hundred and

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 2>eighty eight thousand residents there, forty three percent are born

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, eight percent in Vietnam, six point six percent

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 2>in China and six percent in Lebanon, While Blaxland has the.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Biggest Arabic speaking.

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Community in Australia, so the Champagne teal in Wentworth has

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 2>a clear majority of Australian born citizens, therefore lacking in

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the need for infrastructure and housing to keep up with

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the demand of mass migration. I mean, how would Allegra

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 2>feel about migrants being parachuted into the million dollar homes

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 2>and high rise towers in her electric Perhaps Oh, wait,

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 2>poor migrants can't afford it, and gee, the West could

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 2>surely do with some reprieve. Almost three out of four

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 2>people in Western Sydney want less migration to help free

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 2>up more housing. Now we know more than one point

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 2>one million migrants have come into this country since Labour

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 2>was elected. In fact, March this year saw massive immigration numbers.

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Net overseas migration was one hundred and ten thousand, well

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 2>above recent averages. And the issues that Andrew Hasty is

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 2>talking about are everyday issues, worrying everyday people, especially in

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the middle of a cost of living crisis. It's not

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 2>racist to have a conversation about mass migration when our

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 2>housing and infrastructure is under pressure. It's not racist to

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>have the conversation when every day Aussies are locked out

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 2>of the housing market. It's not racist to have the

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 2>conversation when the face of Australia has changed and our

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 2>social cohesion is buckling.

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.239
<v Speaker 3>And look, the Public Broadcaster was just as bad.

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Their headlined today Andrew Hasty taunted overclaim that higher immigration

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>is making Australians strangers.

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 3>In our own home.

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Over at The Guardian, they went with future Liberal leader

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 2>or party disruptor Andrew Hasty and the rise of the

0:06:54.720 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Maga right, claiming that the wamp offers a divisive brand

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 2>of politics.

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 3>This is nothing more than a political attack on.

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Hasty, and all because he dared to challenge the

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 2>left's narrative. The Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke professed modern

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Australia must be strange to a Liberal party that stubbornly

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>refuses to enter the twenty first century, or what exactly

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 2>does the twenty first century look like for labor Because

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the current twenty first century Australia is anti Israel protests

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 2>week in week out, flags of terror groups being waved

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 2>in the streets, synagogues fire bombed and the Aussie flag

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>set alight and the one time Australia fights back at

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the recent marches for Australia.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Every day Aussie is a labeled racist.

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps if they'd rocked up to the march with a

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>portrait of the Ayatola of Iran and enchanted death to

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the IDF, perhaps the Left would have had a more

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 2>favorable and understanding position. But look alegra Spender can of

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 2>course wipe her hands of the cultural tension that sometimes

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 2>comes from mass migration because.

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 3>It does not directly apply to her electorate.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Hasty went on to say the Liberal Party will

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 2>be in exile for a long time until we act

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 2>in the interests of Australian people. That means getting immigration

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 2>to a sustainable level. If we don't act, we can

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 2>expect anger and frustration.

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 3>We might even die as a political movement. So be it.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 2>What is the point of politics if you're not willing

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 2>to fight for something? And this should be a vote

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 2>winner for the Liberals. A resolved poll last week showed

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 2>support for Pauline Hansen's One Nation has surged to a

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 2>record high of twelve percent, particularly off the back of

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 2>migration issues. The longer the Liberal Party equivocates on this,

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 2>they risk ending up like the Conservative.

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Party in the UK.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 2>All but dead in the water and being toppled by

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Nigel Faraja's reform. Migration is a vote driving issue. Our

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 2>values and way of life are worth protecting, and the

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 2>sooner the elites and left wing media wake up to

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 2>this the better. Now this week, the Prime Minister rewarded

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 2>hermus and at the same time betrayed our values on

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the world stage when he went to the United Nations

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 2>and recognized a Palestinian state. Johnny Mean out for more

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 2>on this is the Shadow Attorney General, Julian Lisa, Julian, good.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 3>To catch up with you.

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>We haven't yet spoken to you this week since this

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 2>all unfolded in New York.

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 3>So when I start.

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 2>By asking you, how would you describe what the Prime

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Minister went and did on the world stage.

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 5>I think this was an example Deniker of our shambalic

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 5>foreign policy on display. You know, we have abandoned our

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 5>venues and abandoned our friends by this decision. We're abandoning

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 5>the only Western liberal democracy in the Middle East, the

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 5>state of Israel. In doing this, we're abandoning our foreign

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 5>policy traditions, which is that we don't recognize states until

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 5>they're actually come into existence. We're abandoning a friend ally

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 5>and security partner by at the very moment where the

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 5>Hamas terrorist organization is still holding nearly fifty hostages to

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 5>ransom in Gaza, while it is still controlling large parts

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 5>of Gaza, that Hamas is being rewarded by the grant

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 5>of statehood to the Palestinians. By what mister Albanezi has done,

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 5>we've made it very clear that when we come to government,

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 5>we will reverse this decision. And the reason that we'll

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 5>reverse this decision is that you need to have if

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 5>you're going to have a two state solution, and I

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 5>support a two state solution. The recognition point comes at

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 5>the end. It comes at a period after the hostages

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 5>have been returned, after Hamas plays no further part in Gaza,

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 5>after the Palestinian actors recognize Israel's fundamental right to exist,

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 5>and after those important final status issues like borders in

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 5>Jerusalem have been worked out. You don't do this now.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 5>All mister Albanezi was doing was getting pats on the

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 5>back from other hard left leaders around the world. You know,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 5>the Labour Party used to talk about an independent foreign

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 5>policy for Australia, but we're really having our foreign policy

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 5>dictated to here by the left wing British government, the French,

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 5>the Canadians, and by Labor party conferences that for fifty

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 5>years have been having resolutions on this issue. Each year

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 5>more and more anti Israel. So this is a sad

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 5>time and it's a missed opportunity. You have to remember, Denika,

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 5>Australia was attacked by the Iranian regime in at least

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 5>two terrorist attacks that occurred on our shore. Why wasn't

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 5>the Prime Minister at the United Nations proposing resolutions condemning

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 5>the people of the Iranian regime. Why wasn't he there

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 5>seeking support of like minded countries to bring the Iranian

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 5>regime to justice for its sponsorship of terrorism abroad, its

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 5>attacks on our country, and its human rights abuses at home.

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 5>That's what an Australian Prime Minister should be doing at

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 5>the United Nations at this time.

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and I just think this wasn't just a betrayal

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 2>again of Jewish Australians, but also a betrayal of all

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 2>of our values.

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 3>To go and do this on the world stage is

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 3>quite frankly embarrassing.

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you about this story exclusively revealed

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>by my colleague Chris Kenny Last night, dozens of refugees

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 2>from Gaza touchdown in Australia a week ago and were

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 2>personally met by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke at the

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 2>airport Julian.

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 3>This is astonishing. The Minister's had some sort of a

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 3>private meet and greet with these people. Where is the transparency?

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that's a good question, Denik. I think

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 5>the Minister's got some serious questions to answer here. Why

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 5>is he rolling out the red carpet to this particular

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 5>group of people. Why is he failed to be transparent

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 5>about it? And there's no publicity about this from him

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 5>and no explanation from him as to why he's done this.

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 5>And when you look at the government's shambolic record in

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 5>relation to people coming out of the Gaza war zone

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 5>or remember they first created a class of tourist visa

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 5>for them to bring them from the Gaza war zone.

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 5>There were real questions about the adequacy of the checks

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 5>that were being made. Then they tried to create a

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 5>special humanitarian class of visa for them. Apparently the minister

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 5>was personally interviewing applicants. The whole handling of this seems

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 5>to be not really about Australia's interest but about mister

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Burke's domestic political interests. And I think the government needs

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 5>to come clean about what's really happening with the refugees

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 5>that are being brought from the terrorist controlled Garza war zone.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 3>No, look, I completely agree. I mean why sweep it

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 3>under the rug.

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 2>You know there was no formal announcement, so that to

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 2>me sends off alarm bells. We also know that Anthony

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Arberesi has bid for a seat on the UN Security Council,

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 2>which will require him to commit hundreds of millions of

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 2>dollars in new aid to Africa.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Julian Donald Trump.

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Has very publicly questioned the role of this body. He

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 2>quite frankly hates it. Should we be backing it in

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 2>for a seat at the table?

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, the coalitions offered its support for it, and I

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 5>think people should remember last time we were on the

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 5>Security Council, it was something that Kevin Rudd had put forward,

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 5>but we were in office at the time it actually

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 5>took place, and we did things like put forward resolutions

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 5>lead the world in relation to the condemnation of human

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 5>rights abuses in North Korea and the downing by Russia.

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 5>Of the Malaysian Airlines flight over Ukraine which so many

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 5>Australians were murdered. So it can be a body where

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 5>it is very important for Australia to have a voice

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 5>at and we've been on the body from time to time.

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 5>But we shouldn't be sacrificing our foreign policy traditions, or

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 5>our values or our friends in order to get there.

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 3>No, Look, I think you're absolutely right. I've got to

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 3>ask you.

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Is Andrew Hasty a threat to the Liberal leadership of

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Susan Lee.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 5>Andrew Hasty is a fundamentally important part of our team,

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 5>somebody who makes a wonderful contribution as the Shadow Home

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 5>Affairs Minister, and he's somebody that I believe will continue

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 5>to make a very important contribution to the team. Susan

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 5>Lee is our leader. We all support the leader in

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 5>the work that she is doing at this time.

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 6>I we've in.

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 5>Her own words, got smashed at the last couple of

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 5>elections and we're in a period now where we're reflecting

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 5>on where to go. We're looking at the policies that

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 5>we took to the last election and we're going through

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 5>a process now with debating about you know, where we

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 5>should go in terms of policies for the future. As

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 5>we've said many times, our values haven't changed, but our

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 5>policies need to. And so this is just the process

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 5>that we're going through at this time.

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Are you bothered by Andrew Hasty being very public on

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 2>issues like migration and net zero?

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think this is a period of time where

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 5>you want to have debates in political parties with different

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 5>people having a range of different views, and we've set

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 5>up processes to say those matters and those policies will

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 5>be well and truly settled before the next election.

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, we look forward to it. Julian, Lisa,

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 2>good to catch up with you. Thanks so much for

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>joining me on the show this evening.

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Appreciate it.

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 2>While we live in a very strange country where the

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 2>sex Discrimination Commissioner seems to not understand the very basic

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 2>biology of the sexes and A Cody does not stand

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 2>up for women. In fact, she does not even know

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 2>what a woman is. Now this week she spoke at

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the National Press Club, taking to the stage wearing a

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 2>badge with her.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Pronouns on it. She her and in.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Case you're interested, so already as you can see there,

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 2>it's all going very swimmingly.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Now. She was asked about sex based rights.

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>For women, and her answer was just as confusing as

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the assertion that men can be women.

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 7>The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 7>against Women, so seed or is absolutely it's the Women's Convention,

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 7>but in understanding as we have developed. It was signed

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 7>back in nineteen seventy year nine, I believe, since it's

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 7>been in force in Australia, it has also been interpreted

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 7>by the committee that looks at the meaning and the

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 7>understanding of each of the articles of the Convention. So

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 7>that includes and its specifically said, it includes cultural, rationally

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 7>marginalized women, It includes lesbians, It includes First Nations women,

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 7>women with disability and trans women. So it absolutely includes

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 7>all women, because that is who women are.

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 6>We're not one version of women.

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Well where to even begin? We are not all one

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 2>version of women. I mean, how many versions of women?

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Does she think that there is? Sex is immutable? There

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 2>are two sexes, male and female. And look, that does

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>not make me some sort of incredible genius saying that

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 2>it is basic biology and basic fact. Trans women are

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 2>not women, they are biological men. Fancy the sex discrimination

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 2>can be not even knowing the very definition, and it's

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 2>not the first time she's had some sort of fantasy

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 2>about what a woman is. In the case of Giggle

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 2>versus Tickle, where biological man Roxane Tickle argued he had

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 2>injured feelings after being booted out of a female only

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 2>app by founder Sal Grover, Council for the Commissioner Celia

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Winnett argued that the word woman in the Sex Discrimination

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Act included trans women. Now, being an activist for the

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 2>trans community while being the Sex Discrimination Commissioner, while failing

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 2>to promote a biological definition of sex based rights, makes

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 2>you a total failure at your job and a Cody,

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 2>in my view, is not up to the job if

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 2>she cannot fulfill her very function of protecting women. Joining

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 2>me now is Giggle founder Sal Grover so good to

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 2>catch up with you. How many different versions of women

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 2>are there? I mean the Sex Discrimination Commissioner named several.

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, first of all, can I just say like brilliant,

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 6>intrue like with you one she listed women and men.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you can add anything in front of women

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 6>as an adjective. We're still all just women. The moment

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 6>you add trans in front of the word woman, you

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 6>are talking about men. This is the problem with gender

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 6>ideology is that they think that you know, we that

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 6>we will picture a woman if they just say the

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 6>word woman. And in some cases that's happened that they're

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 6>right about that. So that's where they push it so hard.

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 6>And that's why us on the other side pushed so

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 6>hard that they're just men, like you, men can't be women.

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 6>It's just as simple as that, like you, just as

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 6>you said in your introduction, like they're just men. And

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 6>so to sit there and compare First Nations women to men,

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 6>it's actually incredibly insulting, Like does she actually realize what

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 6>she's saying there?

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I just don't even think she does, and explain the

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 2>background to us because she was asked at National Press

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Club about the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 2>of Discrimination against Women.

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 3>What does it say and how.

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Does it actually relate to the issues at hand here

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to protecting women's spaces and rights.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 6>So the woman who asked her the question, Migihour, asked

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 6>her a brilliant question, and it was basically about anacoding

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 6>not meeting with women's interest groups that do advocate for

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 6>single sex spaces and how this fits in with her

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 6>obligations to seed Or. So the background on this it's

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 6>complicated and simple at the same time. Basically, Australia has

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 6>a Sex Discrimination Act because we became a signatory to Seedor,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 6>which is the Convention of the Elimination Discrimination against Women.

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 6>It's a UN convention. It was created in nineteen seventy nine,

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 6>We signed it in nineteen eighty three, put it in

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 6>like enacted it in our law in nineteen eighty four. Now,

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 6>in nineteen eighty four, there was nothing about men being women.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 6>They never thought to mention it because of course they didn't.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 6>Who would. Cut to twenty thirteen when Julia Gillard's did

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 6>amendments to put gender identity into the Act. Now in

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 6>those amendments they never mentioned trans women. Once again, they're

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 6>not mentioned. It's just gender identity is mentioned. Then cut

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 6>to more recent times when Anna Cody has intervened ingogo

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 6>Vy Tickle on the side of Tickle saying that men

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 6>who claim for women are women, they should have access

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.239
<v Speaker 6>to women only spaces, and she's relying on Seedor for this.

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 6>The problem is SIDOR is a UN convention. It has

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and eighty nine signatories. For any changes to it,

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 6>all one hundred and eighty nine signatories have to agree

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 6>it has never happened. Men are not considered women under

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 6>SEED or it is an utter lie to say that

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 6>they are. There is one tiny sentence in one accompanying

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 6>document that says and other status, and they are relying

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 6>on that other status to be trans women slash men

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 6>who claim to be women. If seed or intended men

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 6>to be who claimed for women to be considered women

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 6>in international law, they would have said it. They've had

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 6>every opportunity to. They never once have. So at best,

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 6>she is misleading the Parliament, the courts and the media

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 6>on this specific issue. She's relying on Seedort. She is

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 6>wrong about it. I'm also relying on seedort and part

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 6>of my case because it hasn't happened where we are

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 6>in breach of seedawt in Australian law, if we are

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 6>including men as women. And as you said, she's not

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 6>fit to be the Sex Discrimination Commission. It's why I

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 6>think she should resign, not just because she doesn't know

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 6>what sex is, because she is misleading three different institutions

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 6>on what the convention that her actualies on says.

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Look I think it's just extraordinary as well that the

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Sex Discrimination Commissioner doesn't know what the sexes are.

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 3>But it's just a.

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Basic function really of the job. It's astounding. Now, look,

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 2>I've got to ask you this because it's been revealed

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred and sixty six people in New South Wales

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 2>have changed their sex on their birth certificate without gender

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 2>affirmation surgery.

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 3>This is of course under self by d laws.

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Since July one, sal of those four hundred and ninety

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 2>six men have changed their sex to female.

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Because the problem is it's that easy.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 2>But the point of this is that all of these

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 2>men can now enter female only spaces.

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there's a few things here. So first of all,

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 6>Sitzan's Doe an absolutely amazing job in getting this information

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 6>and so all credit to her for doing it. Second

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 6>of all, so it is quite humorous aside from everything else,

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 6>it's quite humorous that when these people go and change

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 6>their birth certificate, the data on who does it is

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 6>based on their biological sex. So it just goes to

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 6>show there's absolutely no escaping biological sex. Then yes, to

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 6>answer your question, yes, all of these men, So five

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 6>hundred men in New South Wales can now access female

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 6>in this spaceis to be honest, all of any man

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 6>can because they can just claim it. The Sex Discrimination Commission,

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 6>in my case, argue it didn't matter whether you have

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 6>a certificate, whether you don't, nothing matters. They can just

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 6>go in. It's just the claim that matters. But if

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 6>they've actually legally changed it, they can do whatever they want.

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 6>They have the upper hand. We have absolutely no right

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 6>to say no to them as women if these men

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 6>are in our spaces, and the only reason they would

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 6>do it is to go into women's spaces. Because you

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 6>don't need to change your birth certificate as a man,

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 6>to wear a dress, to call yourself a woman, to

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 6>wear makeup, to do anything you think a woman does.

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 6>You can do all of that. We actually do live

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 6>in a pretty liberal, free society where if that's what

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 6>your expression is, have fun do it. But to go

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 6>into a female only space, you're going to need the law.

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 6>And so that's why they've done it, and that's why

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 6>it's sinister and we're fighting back.

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's extraordinary we're here and this day

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 2>and age, but yeah, we are, Sour Grover. Good to

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 2>catch up with you, with you as always. Thank you

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining me on the show this evening

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 2>for coming up after the break. Andrew Hasty pause cold

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 2>water on speculation he's got his eyes.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 3>On Susan Lee's job. All that and more with my

0:24:55.160 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 3>panel next welcome back.

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now is my panel in New South Wales

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Independent MP Tanya Mahalik and former New South Wales Police

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Minister David elliott Ty.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you both happy Friday? Let's speak in now.

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 2>We're going to start with the Shadow Home Affairs Minister

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Hasty.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 3>He's been this week.

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Pouring cold water on any rumor that he's looking to

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 2>take the top job from Susan Lee.

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 5>Have a listen, look, I support Susan. Anyone who's speculating

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 5>otherwise is being mischievous.

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know about that. I mean, David, I

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 2>spoke about this in my editorial tonight. He's full on,

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 2>front and center about migration. He's been talking about net zero.

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 2>The Liberals haven't put forward any policy ideas, but what

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 2>do you think is at the right time?

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 8>Listen, I mean, I'll put one in for the for

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 8>the army mafia.

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 3>This guy's an.

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 8>Army officer and decorated. He's a man of his word.

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 8>He is not campaigning or agitating to be the leader. However,

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 8>if it's if it's if it's called upon him to

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 8>take a leadership role, he will be the first one

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 8>to step up. And there's a difference. I know in politics,

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 8>everybody thinks that you're out to night your leader. He

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't be. But there is no doubt in my mind

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 8>that he's making sure that people know that he's got

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 8>the credentials to be the leader. I think that I

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 8>think there is a growing number of people in conservative

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 8>politics that want him there. He certainly captures a demographic

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 8>that we've lost and he could certainly bring them back.

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 8>But having said all of that, I mean, we all

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 8>want Susan to succeed and you know, and I think

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 8>I don't think it's a it's a bad thing for

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 8>him to be out there saying this is what I believe.

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 8>I'm in the Liberal Party, So in the tradition of

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 8>the broad Church, people might come back to the party

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 8>as a result of him being there.

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean he's certainly, like I've heard talk back

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 2>lines on two GB light up this week. Every time

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 2>he speaks. The people out there are going he is great.

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 2>What we need to get him in. But what do

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 2>you think, Tanya, would it be appropriate right now or

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 2>as David said, gives Susan le a go.

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 9>I think they've given Susan a go and it hasn't worked.

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 9>I don't think think the Liberal Party can afford to

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 9>keep losing in the primaries as they are with Susan.

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 9>There is a big shift happening in the Liberal Party

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 9>and the problem they have is their voters are just

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 9>leaving them. They're going to one nation, which is a

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 9>huge problem. It's a huge problem for the Liberal Party

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 9>when they're losing and bleeding to the right, and it

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 9>has a ripple effect. It's affecting him at the state level,

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 9>at local government level, and you only have to, as

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 9>you say, quite rightly, listen to two GB go out

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 9>there and listen to the punters. People are crying out

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 9>for a new leader.

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 3>In the Liberal Party.

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 9>I'm sorry. Susan reminds me of the Jody MacKaye moment

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 9>that the Labor Party had in New South Wales, Okay,

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 9>and it was a big mistake for the Labor Party

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 9>that it wasn't the right choice that actually went backwards

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 9>when they had Jadie Mackay, and it's the same here

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 9>with Susan lay. It is not the answer. They're just

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:54.959
<v Speaker 9>going to have to bite the bullet and negotiate an

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 9>exit path for her. Now that may not be now,

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 9>that may not be at the end of the year,

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 9>but it's going to have to be in the next

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 9>six months because they can't continue to lose ground as

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.719
<v Speaker 9>they have to the right. It is a huge problem.

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 9>You've got tradees walking away from the Liberal Party, You've

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 9>got men walking away, women have already left, and yell

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 9>people down to eighteen percent votes for anyone under thirty.

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 9>It's the Liver Party is a bad situation. And the

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 9>question the Liver Party has to ask is can they

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 9>continue to keep the status quo?

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Well they can't. Well, yeah they can't.

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know if it's the right time really

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 2>for Andrew Hasty to put his hand up just well,

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, was it the right.

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Time for Jamble? It's what about John Howard. He did

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 3>it a couple of times.

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 9>He took the reins and actually lost to Bob Hawky

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 9>might recall then came back. I mean Tony Abbott had

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 9>to take it a couple of times. Before he became

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 9>Prime minister. That's what happens if you're a leader and

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 9>you've got it in you and you can cut through,

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 9>which I think Andrew Hasty can cut through to Look,

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 9>I haven't come throughhaps I wouldn't want to stop him.

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, all right, look watch this space. I think he

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 2>would make a terrific leader. And I really appli caught him,

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 2>as I said earlier on the show, for having a

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 2>stance to come out and be bold and be courageous

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 2>on issues that people seem to be too scared to

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 2>have a debate about light migration.

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 3>But look, let's go to the US.

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump has slugged our two billion dollar pharmaceutical sector

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 2>with a one hundred percent tariff. That means any sort

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 2>of our product sold in America from October one will

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 2>have to cop the tax. David, you know he was

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 2>out there having a selfie this week Albo with Donald

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Trump didn't quite work. Snub twice on the world stage.

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Apparently they've got a meeting next month. What have we

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 2>got to offer America?

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 8>Do you think we have failed our relationship with the

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 8>United States? And this is this is proof. I mean,

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 8>there is no way that George w Bush and John

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 8>Howard would have seen this sort of decline in the relationship.

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 8>And when you think about the tradition of one hundred

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 8>and twenty five years on hundred and fifty years of

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 8>engagement between Washington and Australia, it's very very sad. I

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 8>think that, you know, Kevin Rudd has failed us as

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 8>an ambassador. The commentary that was made, and this is

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 8>a very good lesson for young politicians. Be careful who's

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 8>asked you kick on the way up, because there'll be

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 8>the one you kiss on the way down. And what

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 8>happened with with with Kevin Rudd and with Anthony Abernezi,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 8>the stuff they said about Donald Trump when he was

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 8>down is now resonating around the echoing around the walls

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 8>of the Oval Office, and they're giggling at us. They

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 8>are giggling at us. So if I was the Prime Minister,

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 8>I'd be going to a conservative. I'd be saying, listen,

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 8>can you go to Washington? Can you take over our relationship?

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 8>Mea Kolpa. We were disrespectful to the Republican Party and

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 8>now we've realized because this is going to cost lots

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 8>of jobs in Australia, going to cost labour jobs.

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes it is.

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 8>This is going to cost working man's, working working class jobs,

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 8>and it is exactly the opposite that what I would

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 8>have thought that a traditional labor government would have done,

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 8>particularly Post Off with them.

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, they've trashed the relationship. Kevin Rudd does remain the

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 2>elephant in the room. They're not going to put the

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 2>pharmaceutical benefit scheme up as any sort of bargaining chip.

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 3>We're not going to left our defense spending, so we're

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 3>just going to keep getting slugged with tariffs.

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, and it doesn't seem to concern alban Esi in

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 9>the slightest. She seems to be pretty relaxed about it.

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to be up.

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 9>To industries like the Australian pharmaceutical industry now to really

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 9>actually start putting the boot back into albow, because it's

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 9>all these industries that are copying these tariffs that actually

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 9>have to ask the question, is alban Easy actually looking

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 9>out for the interests of Australian industries. Kevin Rudd?

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Is he the right.

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 9>Ambassad Of course he isn't. This is a by the way,

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 9>this has been brewing for about six seven months. We

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 9>know the pharmaceutical tariff has been on the table for

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 9>at least since March in an issue, and two billion

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 9>dollars is no small amount that we make from exporting

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 9>ninety percent, I think, to the American market. So these

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 9>companies are going to have to probably manufacture some of

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 9>their product in the US to keep this sort of

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 9>product being sold in America. They're not going to let

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 9>go of that, let goal of the industries that they

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 9>have they're the export market. But David's right, it'll cost

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 9>jobs in Australia because people lose their job here as

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 9>a manufacturing goes.

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.479
<v Speaker 3>To the US, which is the saddest part out of

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 3>all of this. Now, look, bware home owners.

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 2>More than thirty experts and economists have agreed that the

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 2>RBA will be holding the cash rate at three point

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 2>six percent. This comes after inflation, of course, jumped in

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 2>September from two point eight to three percent. Look, you know,

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 2>not great news if you're a mortgage holder.

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 3>But I just think it's it's.

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 2>A broader issue, David, that we are still in the

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 2>middle of a cost of living crisis under this government.

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 8>We certainly are, But the problem for the government is

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 8>that anybody out of the age of fifty remembers Paul

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 8>keating sixteen percent interest rates. So there's a lot of

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 8>pain to come if they don't get this right. And ironically,

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 8>the inflation figures this week were driven by the cost

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 8>of renewable energy. But I was told that we were

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 8>going to get separately try to hang on, So I

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 8>don't know how that happens. And I mean, it breaks

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 8>my heart to think that there are Sydney working families

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 8>that can't afford their mortgage. It really does. It goes

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 8>against the grain of anybody needed to come from a

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 8>Western Sydney working class family. We just we lived for

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 8>the day we made the last mortgage payment. It's just

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 8>not going to happen. And I don't blame the government necessarily.

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 8>I do blame to a lesser extent. You know, the

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 8>wages hikes that the Union's forced upon the Labor Party

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 8>when they in return for them backing them into government.

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 3>I do not agree to them.

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 8>That's exactly right. I know, I know, but they agreed

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 8>to them with one hand behind their back. So I mean,

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 8>I think it's also indicative of the attitude that the

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 8>Labor Party has about microeconomic reforms, just not exist.

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I feel like they've cured off the great Australian dream.

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Of course, everything that they can't get their housing policy

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 2>in order, immigration net zero has been a disaster.

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 3>And now we're left of this situation and they're.

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 9>Big spending in a seventy five billion announced for the

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 9>renewable industry. And of course the RBA is watching this,

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 9>watching this carefully. Jim Chalmers today has essentially put himself

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 9>on the back that look, inflation is not as bad.

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean putting himself on the back.

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 9>It's extraordinary that he can't read the room. Because the

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 9>RBA is airing on a side of caution because they

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 9>are concerned that unemployments on the rise in Australia, they

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 9>are concerned that energy prices continue to go through the roof,

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 9>and they are concerned that the government continues to spend

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:29.359
<v Speaker 9>in a way that it's not.

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Controlling any any leavers in the.

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 9>Economy at all right now, so I think the RBA

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 9>has no option but to hold, and they will hold.

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 9>All the economists agree that there's nowhere else for them

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 9>to go. But the question has to be what's what's

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 9>Jim Chalmers doing? What's alb and easy doing to support

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 9>a potential interest rate cut down, the bound great.

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 2>And government spending is at the worst level since World

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 2>War Two, so it's just an absolute disaster. We've going

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 2>to leave it there. David Elliott, Tania Mahale, good to

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 2>see you both. Thank you so much for joining me

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 2>on the show. As always, coming up after the break,

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the UK's Big Brother Plan forcing every adult to get

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 2>a digital ID card, and our winners and losers of

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the week, including Sarah Hanson Young's tirade against Donald Trump.

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Manhunt for Desi Freeman after two Victorian police officers were

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 2>gunned down is still going a month on. It's one

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 2>of Australia's largest ever police operations, but despite this, authorities

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 2>have still not managed to locate the armed fifty six

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 2>year old after thirty.

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 3>One days in the rural town of Poor Punker.

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Searches and patrols have become the norm as police desperately

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 2>look for clues. For more on this, I'm now joined

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 2>by doctor Xanthe Mallett, criminologist at the Central Queensland University,

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Zanthy Good to.

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 3>Catch up again.

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 2>How surprised are you that this manhunt is still ongoing

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 2>after a month is this rare good evening.

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 10>Well, I had to expected them to find him early.

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 10>But we have to remember here the terrain is very difficult.

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 10>It's very bushy, very dense, and Desi Freeman knew it

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 10>very well, so he was always at an advantage against

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 10>those looking for him. It was going to make the

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:12.280
<v Speaker 10>aerial searches particularly difficult, for example, because it is so dense.

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 10>So a month is a long time. But certainly the

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 10>police will not be giving up. They will keep going

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 10>until they find him.

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about that, because they were early on

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 2>in the piece there was a theory that Desi Freeman

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 2>had perhaps escaped to a bunker, concealed himself in caves,

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 2>mine shafts or huts on Mount Buffalo.

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 3>How likely are these theories?

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 10>Well, that's certainly still possible because he was a prepper,

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 10>remember as well as a sovereign sitizen, which means he

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 10>prepared for the worst case scenarios. So it may well

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 10>be that he had places that he knew that he

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 10>could hide with cachets of potentially weapons, food, water, etc.

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 10>And he may be able to stay there for a

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 10>protracted period. So that is still certainly something they will

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 10>be looking at.

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 2>As you mentioned earlier, I mean he prepared, but he

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 2>was also known to spend weeks on end in the bush.

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 2>But even then, at some point, XANTHI, he'd run out

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:03.399
<v Speaker 2>of supplies.

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 3>He would need help, right, yeah.

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 6>I would think so.

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 10>I can't think of any instances where somebody who's been

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 10>on the run for such a long time and hasn't

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 10>reached out to anybody. So at some point, I imagine

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:16.760
<v Speaker 10>if he is still alive, he will have to contact

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 10>somebody for assistance. But he may be well prepared to

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 10>last a few weeks, but I think after that things

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 10>are going to start getting difficult for him.

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 3>And give it, it's gone on for so long. What

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 3>would be the police tactic now? Well, they're going to

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 3>keep looking.

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 10>You know, the lost two of their own. A third

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 10>officer was seriously injured, so they may scale back the

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 10>operation at some point because of resourcing issues, for example,

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 10>but they're not going.

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 6>To stop looking for him.

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 10>But the problem they have is he could be hunkered down,

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 10>somebody could be harboring him, or he could actually be deceased.

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 6>If he's deceased, he's going to be even more.

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 10>Difficult find because there won't be any sightings of him,

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 10>but they will keep the small contingent on this going

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 10>forward because they will keep looking for this man.

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 3>And how hard must this be for police?

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, two of their own word gone

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 2>down and now they have to search for this man.

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 3>It must be incredibly difficult.

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, absolutely, but that's why they're absolutely so committed to

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 10>catching him. They know that he is allegedly dangerous, he

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 10>potentially has weapons because they were not at the scene,

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 10>so you know, they have to keep looking because if

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 10>he is still in this community, he could still be

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 10>a danger to that community and other officers. Sovereign citizens

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 10>hate the police. We know that, so this will be

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 10>a particularly difficult search. It's a dangerous search, but they

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 10>are absolutely committed to finding Desi Freeman.

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Look, it's been interesting to see it all unfold.

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Xanthiy Mallett. We've got to leave it there.

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate your time as always, Thank you so much for

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 2>joining me on the show. Well, Anthony Arbaneazi as touchdown

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 2>in the UK and is meeting with Prime Minister Kiir Starmer.

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.959
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now is News Corp Europe correspondent and Sky

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 2>News contributor Sophie Ellsworth.

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Sophie, thank you for joining me.

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, I want to say Kira and Albow, they'll

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 2>be in good company with one another, both lefties, both

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, this week living out their fantasies and recognizing

0:38:58.920 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 2>a Palestinian state.

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 3>But what can we expect from this visit.

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 11>It's great to be with you, Janeka. Look, Prime Minister

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 11>Anthony Alberanezi arrived here in central London last night Thursday

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 11>night local time. It's now Friday morning here and he

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 11>has a series of meetings scheduled for today. He's also

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:23.280
<v Speaker 11>attending a Global Action summit with some of the world leaders,

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 11>including the Canadian Prime Minister Mark Karney. So there's a

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 11>series of meetings on the agenda, including meeting with Sakia

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 11>Starmer and also Conservative leader Kemmy Badenoch. So he's got

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 11>a busy day ahead here, Janeka, in his first day

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 11>of the three days that he is here in the UK.

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that ORCUS will be on the agenda, Sophie,

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean we know that it's being reviewed currently by

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the us KAS. Starmer has always been very vocal in

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 2>his support of this agreement. Will that be a topic

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 2>of conversation?

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely, Jeneka you would expect that would be high on

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 11>the agenda. Look, both of these prime ministers are politically aligned.

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 11>They share common views, common values, and they're really at

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 11>odds with prime with President Donald Trump as we know,

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 11>and issues such as recognizing Palestinian statehood. So it would

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 11>be interesting to see what comes of today. But these

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 11>are important meetings, particularly with Orcus expected to be high

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 11>on the agenda.

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Now, look, I've got to ask you about this story.

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 2>I was shocked to read that big brother Keir Starmer

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 2>is watching quite literally every adult in Britain will require

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 2>a digital ID under plans to tackle illegal immigration. You know, Sophie,

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how this does tackle illegal immigration. Donald

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Trump managed to do it without a digital ID. But

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 2>what's been the reaction over there?

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Wells very divided.

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 11>Danika, the Prime Minister Secure Starmer is expected to announce

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:54.240
<v Speaker 11>this digital ID brit card.

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:55.880
<v Speaker 6>It's called that Will.

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 11>The plan is to roll it out by the end

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 11>of the decade, before the next election. There has been

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 11>concerns that this is big Brother watching a UK residence,

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 11>but they're saying that to have this card, it will

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 11>collate everything into one basically identity card and make it

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 11>easier for people who are looking for jobs. They can

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 11>show this as an ID card and also when they're

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 11>signing up to services. But there has been a mixed

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 11>reaction and how will it stop illegal migration? Sekre Starma

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 11>is talking today about how Labor has failed on tackling migration.

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 11>So he's really changing the tone here because he knows

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 11>that this is one of the biggest issues that Reform

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 11>UK are having severe cut through in the British public.

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 11>With the fact that the illegal migration issue must be tackled.

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're almost out of time, but I want to

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 2>ask you about that because good news for Nigel Faraj

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 2>and a new poll.

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Have a look at this from sky.

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 12>UK in put to Reform UK on course to be

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 12>the next government in nongel Fich of course to be

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 12>the next prime minister. This is what the House of

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.399
<v Speaker 12>Commons would look like and the party with the most

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 12>seats Nigel for Raw farrages Reform up to three hundred

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:10.280
<v Speaker 12>eleven seats, Sas up three hundred and six incredible result

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 12>for them, one hundred and forty four seats for Kiir

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 12>Starmer's Labor Party. That would mean them losing two thirds

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 12>of their seats.

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 2>Three hundred and eleven. That's extraordinary, Sophie.

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 11>It is Denika. Now they've only got four MPs. In

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 11>the House of Commons, there's six hundred and fifty seats,

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 11>so they've got an awfully long way to go. But

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 11>this is what is causing a labor and the Conservatives

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:38.879
<v Speaker 11>a lot of headaches because Reform is having to cut

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 11>through with their tackling of migration and there's tough stance

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 11>on this. So this is why Sekeir Starmer is coming

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 11>out and making announcements in relation to migration, probably more

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 11>than the otherwise would, because he knows that the British

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:55.240
<v Speaker 11>public are very concerned about this and all the polling

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 11>is pointing to Reform as the ones that the British

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 11>public are happiest with and that they want in office.

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 11>But we are four years out from the next general election.

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not surprised.

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 2>People do want change and clearly reformers providing it.

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Sophiel's work. Good to see, thanks so much for joining me.

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, it is that time of the week where we

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 2>sought the winners from the losers. And helping me to

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.800
<v Speaker 2>do that this week is former Liberal senator Holly Hughes. Holly,

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for joining me. Now let's start

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 2>with your winner. You've got South Australian Premier Peter Malanowskis,

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 2>who had this to say about eco activists this week.

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 13>Have a listen the eco purists that fill Instagram with

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 13>screeds demanding an end to gas production, they should be

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 13>careful what they wish for and for the rest of us.

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:44.280
<v Speaker 13>Are we going to let energy policy in our country

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 13>be determined by the socials, well by the science. If

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 13>there's gas out there, this is the time to get

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 13>it out of the ground.

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:58.720
<v Speaker 3>And Holly, that's come from a labor premier.

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:01.799
<v Speaker 14>I know, I know a little bit controversial for a

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 14>liberal to pick a labor state premier, but his eco

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 14>purist speech was just fantastic.

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 6>His support for the Narrabaye.

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 14>Project, which I was trying to work it out. I

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 14>think I moved to Mare about sixteen years ago and

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:18.560
<v Speaker 14>that was when they were starting to talk about that

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 14>project and it's still not up and going. So this

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:25.280
<v Speaker 14>has been insane the roadblocks that were put in its way.

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 14>But to see this premiere come out support Santos obviously

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 14>from South Australia, but a new South Wales gas project

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 14>was fantastic. But as you know, I was there all

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 14>this week at Sky with the Lake debate and really

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 14>sort of putting him over the top for me was

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 14>We also did a story on these technical colleges that

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 14>he is bringing back into force in South Australia, which

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.759
<v Speaker 14>is just fantastic for our youth. They're learning skills, it's

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 14>a whole different approach to senior school education and really

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:56.239
<v Speaker 14>sort of boosting that pipeline. So I got to say,

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 14>I think Maley had the week of them all.

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree, And you know what, good on him

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 2>for actually just speaking out and speaking his mind and

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 2>technically going against the other labor premiers across the country.

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's great.

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 2>Now I had to give my winner this week to

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Greta Thunberg's flotilla.

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 3>It's been an absolute shocker.

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'd think she's had many wins this week, I think,

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 2>because well, firstly, the flotilla's boats were attacked by drones

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and communications jamming while sailing south of Greece. Activists reported

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:26.720
<v Speaker 2>that Abba music began playing through the radios at full blast.

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 3>Apparently, Holly, it was lay all your Love on me

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 3>for hours. I love that. Now, how could you complain? Well,

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:36.319
<v Speaker 3>why would you complain? I agree? And never party? I mean,

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 3>I agree, I.

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Mean Greta dancing well God, but look now one of

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 2>its activists has publicly come out as queer. He's accused

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 2>his opponents of exploiting his sexuality. It's led to one

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of the coordinators resigning because in Gaza's same sex activity

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 2>is criminalized. It's been an absolute shambles, Holly. But you

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 2>know what, Congratulations Greta. You're my winner of the week

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:58.360
<v Speaker 2>because everything is just going swimmingly for you.

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 6>So couldn't happen to a nicer person?

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Exactly? Absolutely? I agree.

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Now your loser this week is all Australians after Albo's

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:11.320
<v Speaker 2>woeful and pathetic selfie that he took over in New York.

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:14.919
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think Albini's trip, this, Alberdezi's trip this week

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 14>has really just shown all Australians are losing out when

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 14>it comes to our international relations. Not only was that

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 14>selfie with Trump just bizarre, the fact that we saw

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:30.880
<v Speaker 14>that glorious coverage of French President Emmanuel mccran just getting

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 14>on his mobile and calling up Trump going hey mate,

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 14>I'm stuck because of your motigate. But then Albin Easi's

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 14>speech to the UN could be sold to Spotify as

0:46:41.840 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 14>a sleep aid.

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it was just absolutely appalling.

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:48.279
<v Speaker 14>I mean, at least most of the world's representatives had

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.239
<v Speaker 14>the good grace not to show up for it. But

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 14>you know, when you've got the president of the largest

0:46:55.560 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 14>Muslim nation in the world, Indonesia, standing with Israel, just

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 14>know how wrong Alban Eazy is in his plea really

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 14>for domestic politics around this recognition of Palestine.

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 2>And the selfie was just cringe in itself, the big smiles.

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Please, Honestly, it was so fake.

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 2>It was like I have to get this photo to

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 2>prove to Australia that I mates with Donald Trump.

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 3>That's what it was screaming. Now.

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 2>My loser of the week was Sarah Hanson Young for

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 2>her response to Donald Trump's UN speech.

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Have a listen, You've got.

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 15>The president of the United States who gave an hour

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 15>long rant at the UN unhinged. It's clear that under Trump,

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 15>the United States has absolutely gone that shit crazy.

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh gee, Holly, talk about dramatic please, So can.

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 14>I just tell you every now and then on your

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 14>reflection I think of the bullet that I dodged not

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:51.880
<v Speaker 14>sitting on those opposition benches still, but when I was

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 14>in the Senate, I would.

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:55.280
<v Speaker 6>I did shifts as.

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 14>The acting Deputy President, which meant I sat in the

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 14>President's share, and every now and then I would have

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 14>to sit there during one of Senator Hanson Young's fifteen

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 14>minute contributions in the chamber. I also had the pleasure

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 14>of Marine Feruki and many others of which.

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:12.719
<v Speaker 3>You can make God poor, you absolutely painful.

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 14>So I can't say that I miss hearing those tones

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 14>and the rubbish that comes out of any of those

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 14>Green senator's mouths. And of course she has been the

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 14>Queen of Sunce in the past.

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 2>We've got to go, We've got to go. But you look,

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 2>you're absolutely spot on. I think your dodged a bullet

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:29.839
<v Speaker 2>in that sense. I totally agree. Holy Hughes, thank you

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining me. Good to see you have

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 2>a great weekend. Thank you for your company.

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:36.280
<v Speaker 3>I'll be back at seven pm on Sunday for denekro

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:37.760
<v Speaker 3>and James. Stay tuned.

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Caroline Marcus is up next, filling in for Steve Price.