Speaker 1: Welcome to the Lake Debate.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Not So Late Debate.
Speaker 2: I'm Liz Storer and I'm so glad you've joined us
Speaker 2: this evening. And on my left and right you will
Speaker 2: see mister Joe Hildebrand Gabriella.
Speaker 1: Power joining us this evening.
Speaker 2: Coming up tonight, we've got a cracker show. Our Sky
Speaker 2: News favorite Nationals MP Keith Pitt is bidding farewell to Parliament.
Speaker 2: Very sorry to see him go. He's one of the
Speaker 2: good ones. Labour's new anti New Clear ad takes hysterics
Speaker 2: to an all new high, claiming that nuclear power will
Speaker 2: cause cancer, strokes and heart attacks.
Speaker 1: This is not a joke. You've got to stick around
Speaker 1: for this.
Speaker 2: It'll be gracing your own screens. Shortly, an Environment Minister
Speaker 2: Tanya Plivsk under fire for claiming that Late hasn't approved
Speaker 2: any new coal mines. All that coming up, but first today,
Speaker 2: the Victorian Liberal Party met in Parliament to decide whether
Speaker 2: Moira Deeming's membership should be reinstated. You would be very
Speaker 2: familiar with the story of Moira Deeming. She was attending
Speaker 2: a rally in March of last year called Let Women Speak.
Speaker 2: It was all to do with women's rights. The rally
Speaker 2: was gate crash by a pile of nut job neo
Speaker 2: Nazis and weirdly, literally without any foundation. The leader of
Speaker 2: the Victorian Liberals, John Persudo, decided to penalize her by
Speaker 2: kicking her out of the party, claiming that she had
Speaker 2: something to do with these neo Nazis, that in fact,
Speaker 2: she had Neo Nazi sympathies. As you will recall, also,
Speaker 2: just a week ago, Moira won her case against John Pursuto,
Speaker 2: with a judge ruling that there was absolutely no foundation
Speaker 2: to these nonsense claims that she had anything to do
Speaker 2: with the neo Nazis who had gate crashed a rally
Speaker 2: she was attending.
Speaker 1: And yet, would you believe it, the vote.
Speaker 2: In the Victorian Liberal Party room to restore her membership
Speaker 2: this morning did.
Speaker 1: Not get up.
Speaker 2: The vote was tied fourteen fourteen, and John Pursuto, talk
Speaker 2: about a man who can't simply say sorry when he's
Speaker 2: so comprehensibly been proven wrong.
Speaker 1: He used his casting vote to.
Speaker 2: Make it fifteen fourteen, therefore meaning Moiradeeming's membership will not
Speaker 2: be restored to the Liberal Party. The Parliamentary Liberal Party,
Speaker 2: Gabby I cannot believe this move.
Speaker 1: I don't know how he even.
Speaker 2: Got fourteen votes deciding No, you've just been told by
Speaker 2: a judge you don't have a leg to stand on
Speaker 2: John Persudo's costs. He's got to give More Redeeming, not
Speaker 2: only three hundred thousand dollars, but he's got to couple
Speaker 2: her legal fees. We're being told this bill could in
Speaker 2: total come to about two million dollars.
Speaker 3: We're going to come up with that.
Speaker 4: But no, he's a dead man walking, and I'll be
Speaker 4: so pleased to see him go. The way he's treated
Speaker 4: More Redeeming has just been appalling. This is all John
Speaker 4: Pursudo's falt. He started this entire sarga. He kicked her
Speaker 4: out of the party, he lost in the court case
Speaker 4: that was handed down last week.
Speaker 3: He refused to apologize.
Speaker 4: He's had every opportunity to make up for his mistakes,
Speaker 4: to embrace her, to let her back in. And this
Speaker 4: is clearly dispersonal. This is about his egos, about his pride.
Speaker 4: He doesn't want to keep someone like more Redeeming at
Speaker 4: her back in the party where she has just been.
Speaker 4: She has shown true leadership every step of the way
Speaker 4: throughout the last year, year and a half, however long
Speaker 4: this has been dragging on for you know, as I
Speaker 4: said that, the way she's been treated has just been appalling,
Speaker 4: and she's shown to be such a strong leader. But
Speaker 4: you know what John Pseudo is doing, it's just tearing
Speaker 4: the Liberal party apart, which is not a good thing
Speaker 4: for the Liberals when you've got a federal election coming
Speaker 4: up just around the corner.
Speaker 3: No, it's it's disgraceful.
Speaker 2: And this will definitely play into that, Joe, because victorians
Speaker 2: are watching this play out. If this is this is
Speaker 2: a man who just should eat humble pie.
Speaker 1: And yet I was astounded to find.
Speaker 2: Out he's got that much support in the party room.
Speaker 2: How many more people? What do they genuinely believe that
Speaker 2: she does have neo Nazi sympathies?
Speaker 1: Why else would you say no, even.
Speaker 2: Now we are standing by that she shouldn't be allowed
Speaker 2: back in, even that we know the premise on which
Speaker 2: she was kicked out is entirely false.
Speaker 5: Well, it's politics, so the facts have absolutely nothing to
Speaker 5: do with it. It is all about positioning. It is all
Speaker 5: about Perseudo's judgment. And again, every single step of the way,
Speaker 5: he was given two choices and you know two roads,
Speaker 5: one paved with gold with a beautiful rainbow at the
Speaker 5: end of it, and another one through a dark and
Speaker 5: spooky forest. And every single time he chose Plan B,
Speaker 5: he gets it wrong, and got it wrong every single time.
Speaker 5: He didn't need to even if he wanted to express
Speaker 5: his admonition or whatever of more redeeming. He could have
Speaker 5: made it known that he'd said that, you know that
Speaker 5: he didn't share her views, or distanced himself from or
Speaker 5: distance the actual party from her position, but let it
Speaker 5: come into the front. He could have done that. The
Speaker 5: thing is that in Victoria, obviously it is much more
Speaker 5: is much more of a left wing state. John Pursudo
Speaker 5: is from the moderate left faction of the Liberal Party.
Speaker 5: More redeeming is from another. The moderates have the numbers
Speaker 5: in the Victorian Liberal Party room. And so again he
Speaker 5: could have easily taken a far less severe action than
Speaker 5: actually kicking her out of the party. He overreacted. He
Speaker 5: seemed to react emotionally. I don't know if you thought
Speaker 5: he was getting all these trans votes off the Labor
Speaker 5: Party that would otherwise have gone.
Speaker 1: To Indeed, what does he think he's getting out of it?
Speaker 5: It's very difficult to say. I think I think it
Speaker 5: was just terrified of the Liberal Party being seen in
Speaker 5: the era of Dan Andrews, of the Liberal Party being
Speaker 5: seen as you know, reactionary or I don't.
Speaker 1: Know, seen now.
Speaker 5: And then then he goes to so then then more
Speaker 5: Deminic takes legal action against him. So then he then
Speaker 5: he basically defames her and says things that are not
Speaker 5: not able to be verified and not true. And of
Speaker 5: course again so he's he's sloppy with what he says.
Speaker 5: His testimony to the trial was criticized by the drug judge.
Speaker 5: But he's actually offered a chance to get out of
Speaker 5: the court case that is facing him. I think she
Speaker 5: offered to settle for something like eighty thousand bucks or
Speaker 5: ninety thousand bucks, I forget what it was. He knocks
Speaker 5: that back. He then goes to trial, goes to the court,
Speaker 5: goes to the case Losers is up it for three
Speaker 5: hundred thousand plus all the legal costs, God knows what
Speaker 5: they are. And then again still doesn't get it. And
Speaker 5: so we still still won't say sorry, still want to
Speaker 5: know you could have said, right, okay, well that's it.
Speaker 5: The law has made it clear. The just is, may
Speaker 5: I respect the justice system more as welcome back to
Speaker 5: the party. He doesn't do that. Instead, he goes around
Speaker 5: and saying, oh, no, this isn't going to affect me
Speaker 5: because I'm a fighter. I'm a fighter, which reminds me
Speaker 5: of Margaret Thatcher's great quote, which is, if you.
Speaker 1: Have to go around say their names in the same if.
Speaker 5: You have to go around that is, you have to
Speaker 5: go around telling people how strong you are, you're not
Speaker 5: very sure correct. In other words, if you have to
Speaker 5: tell people you're a fighter, you don't tell people you're
Speaker 5: a fighter exactly. You just fight and you decam. So
Speaker 5: he's stuffed up there and then right up until this vote, right,
Speaker 5: so it's fourteen all. Now, this is actually not this
Speaker 5: is actually a massive blow to his leadership because his
Speaker 5: majority in the party room is supposed to be a
Speaker 5: hell of a lot more than fourteen, and so this
Speaker 5: means that whole bunch of his supporters are turning away
Speaker 5: from him and going towards Maredeeming. Of course, by now
Speaker 5: is just a trojan horse for anyone but Persudo for
Speaker 5: screwing the leader. He's then got the fourteens vote, tied
Speaker 5: his one chance to save his leadership is to use
Speaker 5: his casting vote for a magnanimous gesture to say yes
Speaker 5: on my own volition, with my own vote, my own
Speaker 5: personal vote. I'm going to welcome Maradeeming back in the
Speaker 5: Liberal Party, and this will create peace in our time
Speaker 5: and we can now unite and focus on the one
Speaker 5: threat that should matter to us all. And what does
Speaker 5: he do? He votes against it? What does he think
Speaker 5: he is going on? Fifteen fourteen? He thinks that's going
Speaker 5: to be the end of the matter, votes against it,
Speaker 5: even when clearly all the momentum is on her side.
Speaker 5: You know, he shuts the tiny little shutters to the
Speaker 5: tsunami that's coming towards him and thinks, I'll just go
Speaker 5: back and watch it, Telly.
Speaker 3: Now that's that.
Speaker 5: And so again, every single step of the way, he
Speaker 5: has made the absolute wrong decision, not based on any facts,
Speaker 5: not even based on any morality, but based on his
Speaker 5: own best interests. So his judgment is so poor he
Speaker 5: is actually killing himself, killing his own leadership, as in
Speaker 5: the part of his stubborn.
Speaker 2: Would want such a man who has displayed such director
Speaker 2: to be premiere of Victoria.
Speaker 1: Goodness me, if there was any hope it.
Speaker 2: Is gone, but rumor has it both the left and
Speaker 2: the right of the Labor Party and Victoria are working
Speaker 2: on a new leadership team.
Speaker 1: Strength to their arm. Did I say liberal, you.
Speaker 3: Said Labor Party and the Labor Party.
Speaker 5: I'm also working on a new leadership team.
Speaker 3: But yes, they.
Speaker 2: Areship team in Victoria. Let's be honest, easy mistake to
Speaker 2: make staying in Victoria.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: A kindergarten has sent an email to parents saying we're
Speaker 2: not having Mother's Day and Father's Day anymore and a
Speaker 2: bid to be more inclusive. We're just going to have
Speaker 2: one day and call it Family Day, because you know
Speaker 2: it's really inclusive when you're excluding ninety seven percent of
Speaker 2: the population. The email read, Thus, next year, we'll be
Speaker 2: holding Family Day to honor all caregivers, all significant figures
Speaker 2: in your children's lives. Children will be encouraged to express
Speaker 2: gratitude and recognize those who play a supportive role in
Speaker 2: their lives. We won't be holding titled celebrations like Mother's
Speaker 2: Day or Father's Day, but we will have a fabulous
Speaker 2: family Day celebration. I am so sick of this scaddy,
Speaker 2: the erasure of mothers, fathers, anything gender specific. We saw
Speaker 2: this in the bill that Parliament recently passed regarding anyone
Speaker 2: under sixteen can't access social media.
Speaker 1: Not one mention of parents in that entire bill.
Speaker 2: We also know alban ezy ones universal daycare, give us
Speaker 2: your kids and get back to work asap, ladies. I
Speaker 2: really don't like what this government is doing. And the
Speaker 2: early childhood Management Services in Victoria is.
Speaker 1: Partly funded by the government. No surprises there.
Speaker 2: In terms of this erasure across the board of mothers
Speaker 2: and fathers.
Speaker 3: It makes no sense as well.
Speaker 4: So what the rest of Australia, the rest of the
Speaker 4: world get to celebrate Mother's Day, Father's Day except these
Speaker 4: kindergartens the then allowed to use the words mothers and fathers.
Speaker 4: It's actually disrespectful, you know, being a mother, being a father.
Speaker 4: Be probably one of them yet to become a mother,
Speaker 4: but it would be one of the most It's the
Speaker 4: most important job really in the world.
Speaker 3: People. I have so much pride to raise children.
Speaker 4: To have that taken away from you no longer allowed
Speaker 4: to be even not allowed to mention the words mothers
Speaker 4: and fathers.
Speaker 3: What's next? They even going to get rid of Family Day.
Speaker 4: It just seems like it's this slippery slope, and of
Speaker 4: course it's coming from Melbourne. I feel like nearly every
Speaker 4: one of these stories are we debate these issues.
Speaker 5: It's cultural Marxism, the home of cultural markets.
Speaker 1: It absolutely is.
Speaker 5: But it's crazy. I mean to be honest, I think
Speaker 5: the Mother's Day and Father's Day are a bit of
Speaker 5: a wank. And you know, it's just an excuse to
Speaker 5: do something.
Speaker 2: Now, you'll change your minds when your kids rolled, you
Speaker 2: can afford your presence.
Speaker 1: My dad loves.
Speaker 5: There, you go. It's just a waiting day. But again,
Speaker 5: just the idea that someone would see this as something
Speaker 5: that needs to be done just strikes me as someone
Speaker 5: who just does not have enough real problems, Like the idea,
Speaker 5: how can I make the world a better place? I
Speaker 5: know I'll get rid of Mother's Day.
Speaker 2: Deliberately enforcing ideology on three and.
Speaker 1: Four year olds.
Speaker 5: It is so ridiculous. And so there's there's now going
Speaker 5: to be instead of Mother's Day and Father's Day, there's
Speaker 5: going to be two family days. So hey, kids, it's
Speaker 5: family Day the first and then.
Speaker 2: They're just handing the one, just having the ones, so
Speaker 2: they're harving the celebration.
Speaker 5: And then so everyone else. So the kids are going
Speaker 5: to go to their thing. It's going to be Mother's
Speaker 5: Day everywhere else but at the at Thedergartens, but at
Speaker 5: Eltham North, at s Heana Preschool, everyone's just going to go.
Speaker 5: It's just nothing and what the kids want to get
Speaker 5: your family.
Speaker 2: What's also what's really galling is that over half of
Speaker 2: the kindergartens that fall into the ECMS have already implemented this.
Speaker 2: So this email by Saint Helen's has brought it to
Speaker 2: everyone's attention Saint Helen.
Speaker 1: Or I should say, has brought it to everyone's attention.
Speaker 2: But ecms have come out and said, oh no, over
Speaker 2: over fifty percent of our kindergartens, our preschools have done
Speaker 2: this already.
Speaker 1: That's even worse. What do you mean that this.
Speaker 2: Is just something that you've rolled out whole sale on
Speaker 2: little minds. Absolutely no talk about it to the parent,
Speaker 2: who I'm sure hated. In fact, there have been plenty
Speaker 2: taken into their socials to say, how dare you raise us?
Speaker 2: I am my child's mother, I am my child's father.
Speaker 2: Who the heck do you think you are taking our
Speaker 2: day off us?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 4: Also the grandmothers and the grandfathers that want to get
Speaker 4: around this as well.
Speaker 3: What they're not allowed to be part of it?
Speaker 5: Well, interestingly, Saint Helena's, if I'm not mistaken, Saint Helena
Speaker 5: was the mother of Constantine the Great, the first Christian
Speaker 5: Roman emperor, so she was.
Speaker 1: Very much f Elena would be robbing.
Speaker 5: She is the one who went to Jerusalem and mapped
Speaker 5: out the Via dollar Rosa. I think this is which
Speaker 5: is meant to be the path that Jesus took with
Speaker 5: the cross, which actually has no bearing on any historical
Speaker 5: evidence whatsoever. It wasn't actually the right path, but she
Speaker 5: just sort of walked around and said, oh, that looks nice.
Speaker 3: I don't bet it went there.
Speaker 5: And she's incredibly important to the Catholic Church as a mother,
Speaker 5: but she doesn't get any Mother's Day.
Speaker 1: It is just absolutely appalling.
Speaker 2: This is where we are now in the name of inclusivity.
Speaker 2: No mother's, no father's, the end of story, according to
Speaker 2: the ECMS in Victoria, disgusting. But to the United States now,
Speaker 2: where we told you last night about this ginormous omnibus bill,
Speaker 2: the Dems are trying to get through the House. It's
Speaker 2: just a month to the day now before the Trump
Speaker 2: administration takes over in the White House and they're very nervous.
Speaker 2: So they put together this fifteen hundred page omnibus bill
Speaker 2: which had everything in it from funding for twelve biolabs,
Speaker 2: refunding of the government's censor censorship agency, the GEC.
Speaker 1: It stops the.
Speaker 2: Trump's doj from investigating Congress. It gave the representatives a
Speaker 2: forty percent pay rise, and I'm just getting started.
Speaker 1: This thing was huge, but it was going to go through.
Speaker 2: Until Elon mask tweeted on X his Scott Jennings telling
Speaker 2: us about what ensued after Elon Musk hit send.
Speaker 7: Yeah, he's very influential. I actually talked to a member
Speaker 7: of Congress today about this whole situation, and he said
Speaker 7: that when Musk sent out his tweet, the first tweet
Speaker 7: about this whole deal, like.
Speaker 1: He's never seen so much pork in his license.
Speaker 7: Instantly, instantly, the phone started ringing in the congressional office
Speaker 7: and people from the district started calling. And so that's
Speaker 7: real power that, you know, the power to communicate and
Speaker 7: then have it instantly translate into in that case, grassroots action.
Speaker 7: So you can see why members of Congress are you know,
Speaker 7: running around freaking out a little bit about about what's happening.
Speaker 2: Elon mask has two hundred and seven million followers on
Speaker 2: x so plenty of Americans were alerted to what the
Speaker 2: Democrats were up to with this gigantic nonsense bill.
Speaker 1: So this meant that it fell.
Speaker 2: Over All the MPs were hearing from people saying, if
Speaker 2: you pass this, we will get rid of you. So
Speaker 2: the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, got busy very quickly.
Speaker 2: He's a Trumper. He was also working with JD Vance,
Speaker 2: now Vice President elect.
Speaker 1: And check out this picture that.
Speaker 2: Elon Namusk posted illustrating the size of the original bill
Speaker 2: and what they had managed to do to.
Speaker 1: It within a matter of.
Speaker 2: Hours, that how much they had reduced it by and
Speaker 2: yet did that pass. No, there were thirty eight Republicans
Speaker 2: that turned on their own party. All the Gems opposed
Speaker 2: it save for two, but that was predictable.
Speaker 1: Here's JD.
Speaker 2: Vance talking to the press just minutes after the new
Speaker 2: and improved bill also failed.
Speaker 8: The Democrats just voted to shut down the government even
Speaker 8: though we had a clean cr because they didn't want
Speaker 8: to give the president negotiating leverage during his first term
Speaker 8: or during the first year of his new term and
Speaker 8: number two, because they would rather shut down the government
Speaker 8: and fight for global censorship. They've asked for a shutdown,
Speaker 8: and I think that's exactly what they're doing.
Speaker 2: They've managed to even turn this down, even though it
Speaker 2: was largely all the things that they had wanted to
Speaker 2: implement in the past. They simply did this to spite
Speaker 2: the Republicans. And now they are absolutely losing it, saying
Speaker 2: we are justified in doing this.
Speaker 1: Read on a bill.
Speaker 9: They signed it, and you know what, they got scared
Speaker 9: because President Musk told them, rather than Musk said, don't
Speaker 9: do it. Don't do it, shut the government down. Imagine
Speaker 9: what does he know?
Speaker 1: He knows a heck of a lot, lady.
Speaker 2: And now all the Americans that you were trying to
Speaker 2: pull this bill on know as well. But when I
Speaker 2: say they're losing it, I mean they are really losing it.
Speaker 6: Everybody agreed, and then it was blown up by Elon Musk,
Speaker 6: who apparently has become the fourth branch of government. And
Speaker 6: that's just an intolerable way of proceeding under representative democracy.
Speaker 1: And the hysterics continue.
Speaker 10: The Musk Johnson proposal is not serious, it's laughable, extreme maga.
Speaker 10: Republicans are driving us to a government the shutdown.
Speaker 2: Now, it may be disappointing that the bill didn't get up, Gabby,
Speaker 2: but one thing I noted about this new and improved bill,
Speaker 2: While it was massively reduced in terms of spending, it
Speaker 2: was essentially exactly the same.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So I'm a little bit confused on that. Oh.
Speaker 4: I think they're all upset that they didn't get their
Speaker 4: pay rise, I should say, because that was one of
Speaker 4: the things that got cut out. But isn't it amazing
Speaker 4: just to see fifteen hundred pages just get reduced to
Speaker 4: just over one hundred and all the things that they
Speaker 4: got that they got rid of, Kamala's electric bus program,
Speaker 4: those twelve bio labs that you mentioned yesterday, the pay rises,
Speaker 4: and now they're having a hissy fit. And I love
Speaker 4: how they are hysterical about Elon Musk. They're so threatened
Speaker 4: by him because what is the smartest guy possibly in
Speaker 4: the world, and because.
Speaker 2: They alerted people to what they were trying to do.
Speaker 4: Incredible politicians are getting caught in the acts right now
Speaker 4: because Elon Musk is just shining a spotlight onto what
Speaker 4: they were actually doing. And it was amazing to see
Speaker 4: how quickly this all played out from him posting that
Speaker 4: on X and how quickly people were picking up the
Speaker 4: phone and calling their representatives, and now this is what's
Speaker 4: playing out. But you know, of course the Democrats had
Speaker 4: to reject it, so they're essentially just voting against disaster
Speaker 4: relief aid for farmers, and you know, because they didn't
Speaker 4: have the pay rise in there, and they're mad and
Speaker 4: they wanted someone to blame, and so instead of blaming themselves,
Speaker 4: it's what Elon Musk's fault.
Speaker 2: At least this way, Joe, it's the Dems that have
Speaker 2: shut down the government, not the Republican.
Speaker 5: So I remember the good old days, but it was
Speaker 5: the Dems who were trying to keep the government open
Speaker 5: and the Republicans trying to shut it down.
Speaker 1: Forty eight hours ago.
Speaker 5: Oh no, Barack Oba was president.
Speaker 1: God love it then as well.
Speaker 5: But the amazing thing is it's interesting that people are saying, well,
Speaker 5: once Elon Musk tweeted, oh well, there was just nothing
Speaker 5: we could do then, as though the matter was then
Speaker 5: completely out of their hands. They're all in favor of
Speaker 5: this bill. And I was about to die on a
Speaker 5: ditch for it, and stand on a hill with my
Speaker 5: American flag fluttering in the breeze. But then we started
Speaker 5: getting phone calls, and so we had to just abandon
Speaker 5: it completely. It's like, if there was actually any merit
Speaker 5: in it, those phone calls as annoying as they may
Speaker 5: have been, and the emails as annoying as they may
Speaker 5: have been, and there are deliberate campaigns too, just bombard
Speaker 5: MP's officers with emails and to basically just for the people. No,
Speaker 5: that's right, that's fine, and they can be annoying. But
Speaker 5: the idea that you then that suddenly that thing that
Speaker 5: you were all in favor of is now suddenly a
Speaker 5: terrible thing that you don't support anymore. Where's that written down?
Speaker 5: If the bill was any good in the first place,
Speaker 5: then then people said, oh no, that's not true. No
Speaker 5: it's actually fine, you know rites, Oh no, there's no
Speaker 5: way that's in there. And the way you go, it's
Speaker 5: the faith that clearly this was such a turgid piece
Speaker 5: of the proverbial that as soon as the slightest sort
Speaker 5: of amount of light was shown on it, it just
Speaker 5: it was literally just a giant, gleaming turd that no
Speaker 5: one was able to defend and people just literally ran
Speaker 5: away from it within minutes.
Speaker 2: And it's very really exposed them because, as you said, Gabby,
Speaker 2: everyone knows the bits that were taken out, So now
Speaker 2: you know that is what you were really supporting.
Speaker 4: They're upset that Americans now know the truth of what
Speaker 4: was actually involved in what's actually involved in that spending bill.
Speaker 2: Yeah, indeed, but you can't beat the view for hysterics
Speaker 2: here they are talking about the fact.
Speaker 11: That they believe that Musk and JD Vance are getting
Speaker 11: together planning to bump Trump off and this is just
Speaker 11: the beginning of their plans.
Speaker 1: To take over. I think Eli must believes he is president.
Speaker 1: I do. I've called him vice president. I called him
Speaker 1: president because I don't know what JD is doing.
Speaker 11: I hardly I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't remember last time we even talked about JD.
Speaker 2: Great, he's planning the presidency when he's going to get
Speaker 2: rid of Trump.
Speaker 1: So you think it's Musk, It must Advance possible.
Speaker 9: Hey, you know stair away from the stairways, we put.
Speaker 1: The laying out to tripping wall down a stairs. Watch out.
Speaker 2: Now we've got Musk derangement syndrome. But last gone goes
Speaker 2: to the Babylon b the satirical newspaper in the US.
Speaker 1: He's taken a big.
Speaker 2: Stab at the Dems, who are all upset over mass tweeting.
Speaker 2: Dems explain they don't want billionaires controlling our media unless.
Speaker 12: It's Bezos, Zuckerberg, Gates, Bloomberg, Buffett or Soros, because of
Speaker 12: course all those guys are raging lefties staying in the States.
Speaker 1: Now it's been revealed by some of.
Speaker 2: The biggest Biden administration insiders.
Speaker 1: We're talking about his aids, his donors.
Speaker 2: They've spilled the tee to the Wall Street Journal saying
Speaker 2: that in fact Biden's lack of mental acuity. They've been
Speaker 2: covering it up since day one. Now, this was something
Speaker 2: that was blown wide open by James O'Keefe, who you remember.
Speaker 2: He is quite famous for these undercover videos where they
Speaker 2: get someone of significance who usually thinks that they're on
Speaker 2: a romantic date and plug them for info.
Speaker 1: Here is Henry.
Speaker 2: Appel, a National Security Council advisor inside the White House,
Speaker 2: spilling the tea regarding Biden's very lacking mental acuity throughout
Speaker 2: his tenure as president to what he thought was a
Speaker 2: hot date.
Speaker 8: Well, here's sueing.
Speaker 13: Joe.
Speaker 14: Biden is like, she's like really like progressed. I can't
Speaker 14: believe it wasn't a bigger scandal player.
Speaker 1: He went tells story.
Speaker 2: He went on to tell stories of him himself, noticing
Speaker 2: Biden's obvious decline throughout.
Speaker 1: The years he's been president.
Speaker 14: My boss was on an international show with him, like
Speaker 14: you're up or something. The phone ring in office, and
Speaker 14: I was like, welvi, President Henry.
Speaker 15: He was like, he's like he's safe there.
Speaker 14: He's like, oh, traveling with you.
Speaker 7: He's on the same crypt you are.
Speaker 1: And this was clearly an ongoing problem.
Speaker 14: How weeks ago, I was like the last on an
Speaker 14: office call from my boss yet, and so I picked
Speaker 14: the phone and save this president Like Henry on phone,
Speaker 14: he's up to the day, but I try to again him.
Speaker 7: I was in line for you.
Speaker 14: He like asked us a question and I was like,
Speaker 14: I don't know, Like, let me get free. I sent
Speaker 14: you did that's enough.
Speaker 3: Police secret service detail.
Speaker 14: I'll like, like ten seconds later again it's Henry.
Speaker 2: The same, offers Wall Street Journal that, in fact, as
Speaker 2: early as spring twenty twenty one, they were already readjusting
Speaker 2: his schedule very regularly to account for his quote good
Speaker 2: days and bad days end quote Gabby. It doesn't come
Speaker 2: as a surprise to anyone who was paying any attention
Speaker 2: over the last few years that this was always the case.
Speaker 4: Absolutely, and it's one of the biggest political scandals that
Speaker 4: you've got the president of the United States that hasn't
Speaker 4: been mentally well for three years and there's just been
Speaker 4: this protection racket around him, and the media has been
Speaker 4: a big protection racket. They've been complicted in it, apart
Speaker 4: from outlets like Sky News that have been calling it out.
Speaker 4: So you've been watching us, you would have seen the
Speaker 4: line in real time, which has been quite scary. But
Speaker 4: some of the details, look, it's not fresh news. A hey,
Speaker 4: he's got cognitive decline, but some of the details in
Speaker 4: this is absolutely insane. That they do have to accommodate
Speaker 4: for his good days his bad days. Some days you'd
Speaker 4: have to finish at four pm. He just gets too tired.
Speaker 4: Well we've seen that recently when he's fallen asleep on
Speaker 4: the world stage. But he's just taken part in an
Speaker 4: interview where he's asked about his presidency, and in true
Speaker 4: Joe Biden's style, he says he has no regrets.
Speaker 7: Any other regrets that you have anything you wish you
Speaker 7: would have done differently, Well.
Speaker 6: I guess if I thought a lot about it is
Speaker 6: something I've done specifically, but not generically.
Speaker 4: But we have been watching this in real time for years,
Speaker 4: and it has been so embarrassing. Kamala Harris has been
Speaker 4: complicit in this. I'd like to know who else was
Speaker 4: around Joe Biden and why they were essentially lying to
Speaker 4: the American people this whole time. Joe Biden, what have
Speaker 4: you been doing this entire time? Lying to the people?
Speaker 3: But this is back Joe Biden in twenty twenty. Take
Speaker 3: a look.
Speaker 14: We alle these shoots to be self evident.
Speaker 3: Oh many women creative by go you know the you
Speaker 3: know the thing, you know the thing. Here he is
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: If it holds near and dear to you that you.
Speaker 7: Like to be able to.
Speaker 4: Anyway, and here he is in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 16: Erica is a nation that can be defined in a
Speaker 16: single word.
Speaker 5: I was gonn put him.
Speaker 4: The evidence has been there from the start. It's been
Speaker 4: so embarrassing for America. Who on earth was supporting him
Speaker 4: right up until June?
Speaker 5: You know, well, That's the thing. I can I can
Speaker 5: actually believe it or not understand how you would need
Speaker 5: to get Biden as a candidate, because you've stuffed up
Speaker 5: your entire preselection process and you have you've just got
Speaker 5: these crazy AOC green New Deal types on the left
Speaker 5: who are unelectable, and then you've got the old sort
Speaker 5: of dinosaur establishment and you haven't got anyone in the middle.
Speaker 5: So they've stuck with Joe Biden as the candidate because
Speaker 5: he's the only one that can beat Trump. Then it's
Speaker 5: day one in the White House and you realize, holy crap,
Speaker 5: this guy really does have dementia. What do we do?
Speaker 5: I can actually understand thinking, all right, great, we're just
Speaker 5: going to have to manage this. What is absolutely unforgivable
Speaker 5: is that he was allowed to run again, that he
Speaker 5: was allowed to say that he was going to go
Speaker 5: for the presidency again. Immediately say absolutely no way. That
Speaker 5: is the absolutely unforgivable thing that Democrat strategists or strategist
Speaker 5: is just far too strong a word for whoever's in
Speaker 5: charge there did and again it's just so unforgivable. And
Speaker 5: as the and the fact that they stuffed it up
Speaker 5: so much lived in denial thought they could fake it,
Speaker 5: pull the ball over the American people's eyes. Then they're
Speaker 5: stuck with Karmela who is the only candidate, probably as
Speaker 5: bad as Joe Biden, and so they just dealt themselves.
Speaker 5: I mean, how you deal yourself out of government. You've
Speaker 5: got everything, You've got all the cards in your hands, aces, aces, aces.
Speaker 1: Fail out in every front, and you manage to.
Speaker 5: Just throw it all away. It is disgraceful. And anyone
Speaker 5: who knows or cares anything about politics should just be
Speaker 5: running this mob out of.
Speaker 1: Town, throw it all the way.
Speaker 2: While spending one point five billion dollars trying to win.
Speaker 2: The woman, of course, was Kamala Harris, and apparently we
Speaker 2: haven't seen the last of her. It sounds like a threat,
Speaker 2: but that's what the Dems are telling us. Try this
Speaker 2: on for size if you needed further proof that politics
Speaker 2: is not a meritocracy. She's set to receive a whopping
Speaker 2: twenty million dollars for a tell all book. They want
Speaker 2: to know what are the skeletons in the White House,
Speaker 2: in the Biden White House. Give us all the juice, lady,
Speaker 2: she's the insider, she would know get this. According to
Speaker 2: a Kamala insider. Virtually the moment Kamala lost to Trump,
Speaker 2: the office began pouring in from the publishing world for
Speaker 2: her to to do the definitive book on what really
Speaker 2: went on between Joe and Kamala, what went right and
Speaker 2: what went wrong inside.
Speaker 5: The Oval Office Wall right chapter would pretty.
Speaker 2: Sure and all the ups and downs of her campaign.
Speaker 2: They are throwing around advanced numbers in the twenty million range,
Speaker 2: maybe more.
Speaker 1: With other publishing rights.
Speaker 2: Other insiders from publishing houses are saying.
Speaker 1: Look, it might even be more than that. There could
Speaker 1: be a movie deal. There could be a.
Speaker 2: Netflix deal, like the Obamas signed magazines.
Speaker 1: There's going to be a lot of money in this
Speaker 1: for Herbert Gabby.
Speaker 2: She's going to have to hire a ghostwriter because if
Speaker 2: that woman talks rights like.
Speaker 1: She talks, it would just be uster gimberish.
Speaker 3: The whole book will be I grew up a middle
Speaker 3: class kid. Yeah, that will be it.
Speaker 4: No, she's got a lot of explaining to do. So
Speaker 4: she goes ahead and gets this book deal, and then
Speaker 4: we get a book from her.
Speaker 3: I'll absolutely read it, and I'd like to.
Speaker 4: Know a little bit more what she couldn't explain throughout
Speaker 4: the election campaign. What would she do on her first
Speaker 4: day in the job. She couldn't answer that one, apart
Speaker 4: from some opportunity economy whatever that was supposed to mean.
Speaker 4: But there are a few questions that have gone unanswered.
Speaker 4: Why did she lie about Joe Biden's cognitive decline? What
Speaker 4: did she actually see? She's obviously never going to answer
Speaker 4: any of this. No, Why did she choose Tim Waltz
Speaker 4: to be her running role, the guy that's known for
Speaker 4: putting tampons in men's bathrooms? Why did she choose him?
Speaker 4: Did she regret that? Did she regret not going on
Speaker 4: Joe Rogan? Does she regret spending one point five billion
Speaker 4: dollars and losing a lot of questions? How awkward is
Speaker 4: it between her and Joe Biden? Now it's quite clear
Speaker 4: that Joe Biden absolutely hates.
Speaker 2: That would all make a great book, Which is how
Speaker 2: you know none of that would be in the book, Joe.
Speaker 5: No, this is this is how I can almost I
Speaker 5: can almost tell you in advance. It will be that
Speaker 5: Joe Biden was completely and utterly incapacitated, and I was
Speaker 5: the one who was secretly running things and doing all
Speaker 5: the good things. It was his hero it's his fault
Speaker 5: for doing all the bad things. Then she will blame
Speaker 5: him for hanging around too long and not giving her
Speaker 5: enough time to establish herself with the American people. And
Speaker 5: that's why she lost the election, not just because she's
Speaker 5: a nauseating fool. And and she will not be able
Speaker 5: to explain how if she actually had to face a primary,
Speaker 5: she was going to win that primary, given that the
Speaker 5: previous primary she faced against Joe Biden, she did not
Speaker 5: pick up a single vote. That will be conveniently glossed over.
Speaker 5: I was the one who actually did all the all
Speaker 5: the good stuff, and Joe Biden robbed me of my
Speaker 5: chance to become president because he refused to let go being.
Speaker 3: The borders are. She's got to take ownership.
Speaker 5: For that way, He'll say, there was nothing I could do.
Speaker 5: Joe Biden threw me in, knowing that I had to
Speaker 5: take all the bad publicity for it, and it was
Speaker 5: all his fault. But good stuff that you like, whatever
Speaker 5: that is, I did that.
Speaker 2: Honestly, what does anyone try to be great at whatever
Speaker 2: they're doing?
Speaker 1: Twenty million dollars.
Speaker 2: For a book deal from a woman who would fail
Speaker 2: finger plainting, who indeed failed to flip a single county.
Speaker 1: She's the first presidential candidate to do that since nineteen
Speaker 1: thirty two. And if you're wondering, Trump flipped fifty four.
Speaker 1: Back home.
Speaker 2: Now to Sydney, where, my goodness, are we going to
Speaker 2: get our New Year's Eve fireworks? This is a massive,
Speaker 2: multimillion dollar event that hundreds of thousands of people attend
Speaker 2: each year.
Speaker 1: But guess what. Guess who's ruining it for us? You
Speaker 1: guessed it the fireworks.
Speaker 2: And safety concerns over ongoing rail industrial action.
Speaker 1: Thanks for nothing, Unions.
Speaker 2: Here's Police Commissioner Karen Webb today explaining, Look, if these
Speaker 2: guys don't budge, I've got no choice but to advise
Speaker 2: the government to cancel.
Speaker 15: I haven't ruled out that I will recommend to government
Speaker 15: that we cancel the fireworks. Each year, we police us
Speaker 15: Eve on the basis that two hundred and fifty thousand
Speaker 15: people can come into the city and then safely leave
Speaker 15: the city. Leaving the city is based on access to transport,
Speaker 15: including trains, and if trains aren't available and people can't
Speaker 15: leave the city, I have very large concerns of the
Speaker 15: risk that will create to the public.
Speaker 2: Firm but fair Joe can you all make Mens save
Speaker 2: our fireworks?
Speaker 5: He's certainly doing his darndas and I dare say the
Speaker 5: Police Commissioner would have been speaking at the behest of
Speaker 5: the government just to communicate to the union how seriously,
Speaker 5: how serious they're action is. So what has happened? Mens
Speaker 5: took the union to court to try to get an
Speaker 5: injunction to stop them taking strike action. The court found
Speaker 5: against the government and for the unit said no, you
Speaker 5: can go on strike and that's the letter of the law.
Speaker 5: And the union then appeared to kind of try to
Speaker 5: away after the backlash became apparent that they were going
Speaker 5: to rule I mean short of ruining Christmas, sort of
Speaker 5: canceling Christmas the New Year's e fireworks. I mean, this
Speaker 5: is something that has shown all around the world. Hundreds
Speaker 5: of thousands of Sydney Siders love it. Millions of people
Speaker 5: watch it right across the carp Now, I conn of
Speaker 5: that's right. And these guys, the RTPO seems to be
Speaker 5: going out of its way to make it. And again
Speaker 5: I like the RTBU, it's great unit, but they're making
Speaker 5: themselves the most hated people in Australia by this and
Speaker 5: the Karen Webb, the police Commissioner has now clearly sought right.
Speaker 5: You want to play hardball, I'll play hardball. You do
Speaker 5: this and we will cancel New Year's Eve and it
Speaker 5: will be on you. It will be your fault. And
Speaker 5: she's right because the vast majority of alcohol fueled acts
Speaker 5: of violence that hurt people, kill people, have people end
Speaker 5: up in hospital. They occur at taxi ranks, they occur
Speaker 5: at transport hubs, they occur at kebab shops when people
Speaker 5: are struggling to get home, when they're waiting, when they're frustrated,
Speaker 5: when they're bought. So you put two hundred and fifty
Speaker 5: thousand people in the city no trains, no way to
Speaker 5: get home, or not enough. That is an absolute cocktail
Speaker 5: for an a bomb.
Speaker 3: We've got to go to a break.
Speaker 2: But when we come back, Labour's hysterical new ad warning
Speaker 2: that nuclear power causes cancer, heart attacks in strokes, well
Speaker 2: we all know Labor is running scared from nuclear power
Speaker 2: because they know it bests their plans for their green
Speaker 2: dream ten to one. They've put up cartoons of three
Speaker 2: eyed fish and kept us laughing for quite a while.
Speaker 1: But this latest.
Speaker 2: Initiative takes the cake ladies and gentlemen, nuclear power causes strokes,
Speaker 2: heart attacks and cancer.
Speaker 1: Would't you believe it is their new ad?
Speaker 17: There are definite increases in cancer, strokes and heart attacks
Speaker 17: with nuclear power. Renewable energy, we have much safer alternatives,
Speaker 17: and for a health perspective, nuclear makes no sense. There
Speaker 17: are significantly increased rates of cancer, heart attacks, and strokes
Speaker 17: amongst the workforce in the nuclear industries.
Speaker 2: Well, Gabby, I'm sure people in France are really concerned
Speaker 2: to hear about this, given they get seventy percent of
Speaker 2: their electricity from nuclear power.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's probably news to them, isn't it. Noah, they
Speaker 3: must be riddle.
Speaker 1: With health, these diseases. They had no idea.
Speaker 4: But this woman, doctor Margaret Beavis I think it is,
Speaker 4: is a former Green's candidate. She's been an anti nuclear
Speaker 4: activist for some time, labor rolling this scare campaign out
Speaker 4: just you know, in the months.
Speaker 3: Before we get this federal election. It's so irresponsible.
Speaker 4: Other doctors have come out today saying how irresponsible this is,
Speaker 4: encountering many of her arguments there and then Olbos had
Speaker 4: to defend questions today about what does this mean for
Speaker 4: workers working on orchids.
Speaker 5: This is such an incredibly stupid own goal when the
Speaker 5: Prime Minister needs absolutely everything to be going right for
Speaker 5: him to be able to win the election in just
Speaker 5: a few months time for alp Head offers, which is
Speaker 5: dominated by the left, and that tells you all you
Speaker 5: need to know to run out this sort of absolute
Speaker 5: Horseshit is the stupidest thing you could possibly get. It's
Speaker 5: almost an act of sabotage. I think they're probably too
Speaker 5: stupid to realize that the chances it is so stupid
Speaker 5: that the momentum is or at least was with Labor
Speaker 5: on this issue. Peter Dutton's costings were being absolutely rubbished
Speaker 5: by experts. There was no detail on the impact it
Speaker 5: would have on power bills, which a lot of people
Speaker 5: said would actually probably go up even higher than they
Speaker 5: already are. They were on you know, whatever the rights
Speaker 5: or wrongs of any of that. You know, they were
Speaker 5: having a field day with this. Chris Bowen is running
Speaker 5: rings around Peter Dutton and now they have completely utterly
Speaker 5: switched it round to the point where when Bowen and
Speaker 5: Anthony Albaneese even asked about this video, which is authorized
Speaker 5: by the Labor Party National secretary, they won't even back
Speaker 5: its contents, They came back its contents, they say, oh, well,
Speaker 5: you know it's part of the debate. As part of
Speaker 5: the debate. Politicians aren't there to promote debate. Politicians are
Speaker 5: there to take a position and prosecute that position, and
Speaker 5: they've been doing it pretty well over the last week
Speaker 5: or so and now this is just completely lined up,
Speaker 5: completely undermined it. It is the most undergraduate, idiotic thing.
Speaker 5: And again, did you think maybe that when you're saying
Speaker 5: people who work with nuclear are going to get cancer
Speaker 5: and strokes and die, that you're talking about Australian service
Speaker 5: men and women who are going to be working on
Speaker 5: the nuclear powered submarines that the Australian government under Anthey
Speaker 5: Albanezi has signed up to buy as part of the
Speaker 5: Orcus arrangement. You have just to defense personnel that you're
Speaker 5: risking their lives.
Speaker 1: You are fools.
Speaker 2: Can't say it any better than that here from a
Speaker 2: hearty panel. Moving on to Environment Minister Tanya Pliposex.
Speaker 1: She's also not.
Speaker 2: Doing Albanzy government any favors. She tweeted today how proud
Speaker 2: she was that her government had not signed on to
Speaker 2: any new call FID power plans.
Speaker 1: Here's the offending tweets. First, Firstly, she writes, these guys.
Speaker 2: Approved eight new coal mines and were laughing about climate change. Secondly,
Speaker 2: she writes, let's fast forward ten years in twenty twenty four,
Speaker 2: labor has approved zero new coal mines. What a difference
Speaker 2: a decade makes. And then, of course she was absolutely
Speaker 2: savaged in the comments because the very day that she
Speaker 2: thought it was a good idea to toot her own
Speaker 2: horn about this was the very day she extended the
Speaker 2: life of four coal fired power plan.
Speaker 4: Look, this goes back to what we were saying earlier
Speaker 4: in the program with the spending bill in the US,
Speaker 4: the power of X. She thinks it's a great idea
Speaker 4: to post something on X on Twitter, and she gets
Speaker 4: community noted quite quickly. There's now correction saying, no, she
Speaker 4: actually extended these cold fire Yeah, she's extending projects. So
Speaker 4: she didn't want to tweet out what she was doing
Speaker 4: this afternoon, did she? Whatever day it was, she didn't
Speaker 4: want to tweet out, you know, I'm actually extending.
Speaker 3: The life of these plants.
Speaker 4: She's trying to spin this message, she's trying to win
Speaker 4: over votes, and it's.
Speaker 3: Coming across a very hypocritical.
Speaker 5: It's great that Tanya Plise is approving minds instead of
Speaker 5: blocking them, right, that was fantastic.
Speaker 2: Yeah, out of necessity, will be in the dark if
Speaker 2: she doesn't. But seriously, if these politicians were just a
Speaker 2: little bit transparent otherwise known as honesty, then maybe you
Speaker 2: would win back some public trust. But every time you
Speaker 2: get caught out trying to pull the wall over people's eyes,
Speaker 2: you get caught out, either by the media or just
Speaker 2: average Joe blogs who knows what you're up to and
Speaker 2: takes to your own social media pages to savage you,
Speaker 2: and rightly so.
Speaker 4: And they can't get away with it in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 4: And that's the lesson they're they're learning the hard way.
Speaker 4: They think they can spin a message now quite quickly,
Speaker 4: people will catch on and fact check you in real time.
Speaker 14: I know.
Speaker 5: There is this thing called the Internet which makes it
Speaker 5: quite hard to pretend that you're doing completely opposite things
Speaker 5: to two completely different audiences. It does tend to sort
Speaker 5: of catch up with you. Also, I've heard.
Speaker 2: It used to be so much easier for you, and
Speaker 2: now it just doesn't work anymore. A single tweet from
Speaker 2: Elon Musk and your massive omnibus bill is gone. Similar
Speaker 2: is happening here in Australia.
Speaker 1: I like it staying here in Australia.
Speaker 2: National's MP Keith Pitt, who you will be very familiar
Speaker 2: with as he has graced our screens for many years.
Speaker 2: He's one of the good ones in Federal Parliament. He's
Speaker 2: bidding farewell to parliament. Here he is saying goodbye.
Speaker 16: Political parties that have no purpose will they rapidly disappear.
Speaker 16: And it's tough being a member of the Nationals for
Speaker 16: regional seat or are always the minority numbers in a
Speaker 16: coalition of the Liberal Party always have significant more numbers
Speaker 16: than the Thats And that's why you've got to have
Speaker 16: bold policies. You've got to take bold positions and you
Speaker 16: have to fight for what matters.
Speaker 2: Of course, he didn't bow out without savaging David Little
Speaker 2: Proud for supporting the government's net zero plans. So he's
Speaker 2: not hung up his hat and walked away with the.
Speaker 1: Announcement that he's leaving.
Speaker 2: I have no doubt he'll be pulling punches till his
Speaker 2: last day and office.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 4: In interesting to hear is pretty critical of David Little
Speaker 4: Proud and then in his statements saying that political parties
Speaker 4: without purpose will soon disappear.
Speaker 3: So you could be right there.
Speaker 4: But it's back with net zero and the nuclear debate
Speaker 4: as well, you know, with the problem I should say
Speaker 4: with this the scare campaign that we saw from labor
Speaker 4: just tying that in all together is that they want
Speaker 4: net zero, but they don't want to implement net zero technology.
Speaker 4: So you've got anyway people like keep Keith Pitt speaking
Speaker 4: out against net zero and making this his big statement today.
Speaker 1: He's going to be such a loss for common sense.
Speaker 1: I really like a solid voice for a long time.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and it is very difficult. Again, I think it
Speaker 5: tells you everything you need to know about the climate
Speaker 5: debate that where you have people like the nets, it's
Speaker 5: almost you know, NAT's labor that basically have the seats
Speaker 5: that are most affected by the transition. And so you know,
Speaker 5: the big regional areas that have the coal mines are
Speaker 5: often that seats or the town centers that rely on
Speaker 5: coal mines and coal miners and workers are often held
Speaker 5: by labor. And again these are the guys who pay
Speaker 5: the price for the aspirations of you know, the inner
Speaker 5: city greenies who think it would be all green all
Speaker 5: the time, won't have anything in their backyard. So that
Speaker 5: is the benchmark. I suppose Keith Pitt is the benchmark
Speaker 5: for Okay, how do you actually sell this to this man?
Speaker 5: How do you tell this man who represents people who
Speaker 5: could lose their jobs, how do you make it worthwhile
Speaker 5: to them? And that is the that is the path
Speaker 5: of government needs to take one hundred percent.
Speaker 1: We've got to go to a break now.
Speaker 2: But when we come back, check out the Christmas display
Speaker 2: in Abu Dhabi Airport. It puts every single Australian airport
Speaker 2: to shame. So that time of the year where we're
Speaker 2: all told you can't say Merry Christmas, you might offend minorities. Well,
Speaker 2: check out this video that was loaded up duex by
Speaker 2: fellow Sky host Rita Panahee pointing out the fact that
Speaker 2: there they are in a Muslim country in Abu Derby,
Speaker 2: full on celebrating Christmas in their airport. More Christmas spirit
Speaker 2: than you'll find it any Australian airport.
Speaker 4: Even the music they're playing in the background and everyone's
Speaker 4: getting around it.
Speaker 3: People are gathering around the christy and sad for.
Speaker 4: Us that you have to go to Abu Dhabi Airport
Speaker 4: to get a bit of Christmas atmosphere.
Speaker 3: You're not going to find that. And what is it,
Speaker 3: Derevin Council that was?
Speaker 5: I know as an Irish Catholic, I also find Merry
Speaker 5: Christmas offensive. We say happy Christmas because merry Christmas just
Speaker 5: means you got drunk.
Speaker 2: Absolutely well, speaking of not offending anyone by saying Merry Christmas,
Speaker 2: here's a comedian made of mind who's figured out.
Speaker 1: How to pull that off.
Speaker 5: Hate to offend people.
Speaker 13: So this whole last holiday season, I didn't let out
Speaker 13: one Merry Christmas, that's true. Instead I said, mede the
Speaker 13: birth of the one and only true God, Jesus Christ,
Speaker 13: the still a blessing of grace and peace upon your household,
Speaker 13: to the belittlements of every other false religion, lest you
Speaker 13: be gay.
Speaker 3: That's what I say, quality, brilliant, and that.
Speaker 2: Is exactly what I'm thinking when I say merried Christmas.
Speaker 1: We've got to go now.
Speaker 2: These two will be back next week, but from me,
Speaker 2: a very merry and holy Christmas to you and yours.
Speaker 2: Coming up next the Royal Report, Caroline Dear Russa