WEBVTT - Pete Hegseth says China will invade Taiwan. Is he right? 

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Claire Harvey.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>It's Friday, June sixth, twenty twenty five. Australia's guidelines on

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>transgender kids have been slated by a family court judge

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>who has removed a child from a mother who wanted

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>doctors to prescribe puberty blockers. Australia's warplanes and navy ships

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>are vulnerable to the same kind of drone attack that

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine successfully used to destroy Russian fighter jets. That's the

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>warning from defense experts. Those exclusives are live now at

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the Australian dot com. Dot Au warnings this week that

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a war over Taiwarn is getting closer. America wants Australia

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to spend much more on defense, but Anthony Albanezi says

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that won't be happening today. What's really going on beneath

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the talk of war? Foreign editor Greg Sheridan joins us

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's Defense secretary. Pete Higseth is one of those

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>colorful characters who, it seems can only exist in American politics.

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>A former soldier and Fox News presenter who had to

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>fight off allegations about his past to be confirmed as

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 1>a member of cabinet.

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>If there's one thing I've sort of been offended by,

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't get offended by much.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Is this idea that.

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't take classification or I don't take clearances seriously.

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Nobody takes it more seriously than me.

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>The job makes him one of the most significant figures

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in world affairs, complete with an American flag handkerchief in

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the breast pocket of his tailor made suits, and he's

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just rocked geopolitics with a blunt declaration about China.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially huse military force to

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>alter the balance of power in the Indo Pacific.

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 3>It's public that she has ordered.

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 2>His military to be capable of invading Taiwan by twenty

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven.

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Hexseth is making a frank request of Australia and the

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>rest of America's allies pony up with more cash to

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>defend yourselves and Taiwan. Hegseth wants allies like Australia to

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.679
<v Speaker 1>spend three point five percent of their GDP on defense.

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>For US, that would be a seventy five percent uplift

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on our current spend. Greg Sheridan is the Australian's Foreign editor. Now, Greg,

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we like to do on the

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>front is dig through what these colorful characters like Pete

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Heigseth say. What's your interpretation of what he really wanted

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>allies like Australia to hear from that speech that he made.

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>One of the things he said was that there is

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 3>potentially an Chinese military action against Taiwan. Shijinping himself has

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 3>told the Chinese military that they need to be ready

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>to be able to take Taiwan by force if they

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 3>so decide by twenty twenty seven. Nothing is inevitable. And

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 3>one of the reasons Hegseth would have said it was

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 3>to make it less likely. The more you convinced the

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Chinese that the Americans might respond that there'd be a

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 3>very big cost if the Chinese did this, the less

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 3>likely they are to do it. So Hegseth is a

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>colorful character, but he is actually in accordance with what

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 3>previous senior American officials under the Biden administration were also

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 3>saying about China and Taiwan.

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's political brand for a very long time has

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>really been isolationist that America would look after itself first

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and couldn't be relied on any more to be the

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>world's policeman solving problems everywhere else. That had been interpreted,

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>probably before or the US presidential election, as a signal

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that Taiwan might be on its own and that the

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>US might look the other way if China invaded. What

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think we can say now about what Trump

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and hexth really think.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 3>America has always said that China should not use force

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 3>to change the status quo. The Australian government says that too,

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 3>But there always was a little bit of strategic ambiguity

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 3>about whether America would actually automatically military come to Taiwan's

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 3>aid because America also wanted to constrain Taiwan about what

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 3>it did. It didn't want Taiwan to declare de jura independence,

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 3>even though Taiwan has only been ruled by Beijing for

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 3>four years since eighteen ninety five. But then some presidents

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>defy the principle of ambiguity. Joe Biden. The one clear

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 3>thing he used to say in his very confused presidency

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 3>was that he would come to the military aid of Taiwan,

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 3>and his spokespeople would then rush out and say no,

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the President didn't mean to say that, and he wasn't

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 3>changing our policy of strategic ambiguity. But in fact, I

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 3>give Biden more credit than that. I think Biden was

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 3>using his dodderiness as a cover to send a clear

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 3>warning to Beijing. If you move on Taiwan, we'll move

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 3>on you. And going to war with the United States

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 3>is a very dawting prospect. Now, Trump has always been

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 3>reluctant to take any military action, But now everybody accuses

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 3>Trump of being a bit of a hypocrite. The so

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 3>called taco trade. Trump always chickens out. If one thing

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 3>could ensure that Trump one day won't chicken out, it's

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 3>being accused that he always will chicken out. And I

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 3>think in the first administration he took military action against

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 3>ISIS and against Iranian military commanders to show that he could,

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 3>and in the second administration he's taken military action against

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 3>the Hooties to show that he can. He obviously would

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 3>hate a war with China, so would any civilized human being.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 3>In the past that he probably wouldn't do military intervention,

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 3>He'd do economic intervention. He'd crush China economically. So Trump,

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I think we can say is sending out ambiguous messages.

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 3>We don't know how he would react to Chinese military

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 3>action against Taiwan, but it's not the worst thing that

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese don't know either. They could take military action

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 3>against Taiwan confident that Trump won't react, or they know

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 3>there's a chance they'll get that calculation wrong, and then

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 3>they would be in a military conflict with the United States.

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 3>And having that degree of uncertainty in the Chinese mind

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 3>is perhaps not altogether a bad thing.

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you think the changing landscape in Ukraine, where

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump is trying and failing to negotiate a peace, influences

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Americas thinking about China and Taiwan.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I think at one level, you can certainly say that

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 3>if the West had been completely weak on Ukraine, it

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 3>would have convinced the Chinese that the West will never intervene.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Taiwan is inherently a very difficult island to invade, but

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Taiwan is also a difficult place to resupply for its

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 3>allies because you'd have to come in against Chinese sea

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>and air blockades. The only nation that could do that

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 3>is the United States. The United States could break through

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 3>any Chinese blockade, but it would be a very bloody business.

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 3>The Chinese, of course, may take military action against Taiwan.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Far short of invasion, they may simply blockade the island

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 3>and try to sort of, so to speak, starvan into submission.

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean. The Americans in the Indo Pacific Command in

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Hawaii have developed battle plans for creating a healthscape for

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese, where through drones and missiles, the Americans could

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 3>attack a thousand Chinese targets a day. This is really

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 3>an incalculable potential conflict and the consequences for all of us,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 3>including for Australia, would be utterly horrendous. And the best

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 3>way to avoid it is to convince the Chinese that

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 3>it's too costly, that they'd be better off not doing

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 3>it than engaging in that uncertainty coming up.

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>So why don't we just spend more on defense? One

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that's loud and clear from Pete Hexf and Donald

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump is that they want all their allies, including Australia,

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to spend a lot more on defense. Anthony o Aneasy

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>scene very quick to shut that down.

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Now, what we'll do is well determine our defense policy,

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 3>and we've invested just across the fall it's an additional

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 3>ten billion dollars in defense.

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Do we need to get to three point five percent

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of GDP as a defense spend to keep ourselves safe?

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Gregan also to participate in a US let alliance.

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Clear the amount of money we spend on defense is

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 3>a joke. We have some symbolic capabilities, we have no

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 3>capability to defend ourselves. We are one hundred percent reliant

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 3>on the Americans. We won't take responsibility for ourselves, we

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 3>won't take responsibility for anybody else, and we just believe

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the Americans will always win. They'll always be there, they'll

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 3>always be committed to our security, and they'll always take

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 3>care of us. Next year, the federal government'll spend seven

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred and seventy seven billion dollars. We currently spend fifty

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 3>five billion on defense. If we went up from two

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 3>to two and a half percent of GDP, you'd have

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to add another thirteen billion, and that would be very

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 3>vital money. Because we have no ammunition, we have no missiles,

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 3>we have no drones, we have no counter drones. The

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Ukrainians have just shown us what you can do with drones.

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 3>They've destroyed billions of dollars of Russian warplanes with smart drones,

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 3>instead of which we spend one hundred years purchasing three

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 3>exquisite ships, each worth twenty billion dollars or something, so

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 3>you can't possibly send them into battle, because if you

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 3>lose one, you've lost a third of your navy. And

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the design of that is so that we can make exquisite,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 3>tiny niche deployments with the Americans in expeditionary operations in

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.239
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East or somewhere else. It's not to defend ourselves,

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 3>it's not to be a credible alliance partner. But one

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 3>day the Americans will say to themselves, you know what,

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 3>if the Australians aren't interested in defending themselves, we aren't

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 3>interested in defending them either, and they'll go home. And

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 3>then we have no capacity at all. Where the thirteenth

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 3>or fourteenth biggest economy in the world. If we put

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 3>our minds to it, we could certainly produce an asymmetric

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 3>defense which would make it very difficult for any power,

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 3>even a superpower, to come and do us harm. We

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 3>haven't done any of that. It's just an act of

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 3>gross national irresponsibility.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg. You always managed to make me laugh even when

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about military sustainment or nuclear armourged and so

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. We really appreciate your time. Greg

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Sheridan is The Australian's Foreign editor. You can read his

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>analysis and all the latest on world affairs anytime at

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the Australian dot com dot au