Speaker 1: On Scyne Lives Australia. This is the Wider Penalty Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Riata Paney Show.
Speaker 3: Coming up tonight, former Australian of the Year Grace Tame
Speaker 3: at risk of being dumped by Nike after questionable social
Speaker 3: media posts.
Speaker 2: And while we.
Speaker 3: Join me shortly to cover the day's top headlines, advertising
Speaker 3: expert Richard Ralph Smith will tell us the three fatal
Speaker 3: errors the Liberals made in their election advertising. Kosher Gator
Speaker 3: will have the latest from the US, and later in
Speaker 3: the hour They're Always Amusing.
Speaker 2: Alex Stein will tell us why he was attacked.
Speaker 3: By lgbt QIA activists and talking about Left is losing it.
Speaker 2: Tonight's segment comes with a warning.
Speaker 4: It felt so I don't know electric and yet still
Speaker 4: so natural.
Speaker 3: But first, the Prime Minister has a rubbish cause from
Speaker 3: the Trump administration to lift astra is defense spending to
Speaker 3: three point five percent of GDP from the current two percent.
Speaker 3: After US Defense Secretary Pete Hegxed made the demand to
Speaker 3: Defense Minister Richard Miles during a meeting at the Shangri
Speaker 3: La Security Dialogue in Singapore. Here's what the PM had
Speaker 3: to say, earlier today.
Speaker 5: We determine our defense policy. Here where a sovereign nation
Speaker 5: that need to have pride in our sovereignty and in
Speaker 5: our capacity to make decisions in our national interest, in
Speaker 5: our national interest, that is what we will do.
Speaker 3: Former Army Chief Peter Leahy has warned that the government's
Speaker 3: insistence on keeping defense spending low is an abrogation of
Speaker 3: the primary responsibility of our elected representatives to provide for
Speaker 3: the defense and security of the nation and the safety
Speaker 3: of our servicemen and women.
Speaker 2: Those who wear.
Speaker 3: Australia's uniform place great trust in those who task and
Speaker 3: equip them. This trust is not being honored. This comes
Speaker 3: after close ally Japan doubled its defense budget amid expectations
Speaker 3: that China will only get more aggressive, with Pete Hegsett
Speaker 3: warning that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could be imminent.
Speaker 2: Joining me now for more on this.
Speaker 3: As Deputy Executive Director of the Institute of Public Affairs,
Speaker 3: Daniel Ward Dan, just take a look at what's happening
Speaker 3: with the NATO countries. They have increased their spending as
Speaker 3: Trump asked them to do, demanded that they do. Can
Speaker 3: Australia really afford to be this reckless and recalcitrant.
Speaker 6: Well, I think you know it's fair enough for the
Speaker 6: Prime Minister to say that we'll decide what our own
Speaker 6: defense policy is based on our own circumstances. But the
Speaker 6: case for Australia to increase our defense spending is not
Speaker 6: predicated necessarily in what the US is asking us to do,
Speaker 6: but because we need to do it anyway, and we
Speaker 6: should have been doing this a long time ago. Our
Speaker 6: spending has been too low for too long, and the
Speaker 6: money that we have allocated toward defense and our national
Speaker 6: security has not been spent in an effective manner. We
Speaker 6: are hopelessly unprepared for the challenges that we face in
Speaker 6: our region and around the world, and this is only
Speaker 6: set to get worse unless there is a dramatic and
Speaker 6: urgent change to how we approach our defense policy. Obviously
Speaker 6: closely related to this reader, it's not just our national
Speaker 6: defense but also our energy security, and for as long
Speaker 6: as we're committed to policies like net zero, our capacity
Speaker 6: to have our own sovereign manufacturing capabilities is going to
Speaker 6: be undermined. So this is caused not just to increase
Speaker 6: our defense spending, but to have a complete rethink about
Speaker 6: our energy policy as well.
Speaker 3: And it's all good and well for the Prime Minister
Speaker 3: to talk tough about sovereignty, But where was that tough
Speaker 3: talk Dan when Chinese warships were doing their little exercises
Speaker 3: unannounced close to the Australian border. I mean, I just
Speaker 3: find it very inconsistent from the Prime Minister to talk
Speaker 3: tough when a close ally wants us to increase our
Speaker 3: defense spending, but he goes missing when the aggressive when
Speaker 3: the aggressive attitude is coming from China.
Speaker 6: Well, that's exactly right, and it's not just issues pertaining
Speaker 6: to China, as you rightly identify, but also the number
Speaker 6: of international agreements which we are signed up to or
Speaker 6: are due to sign up to, for example, in relation
Speaker 6: to future pandemics. I haven't heard the Prime Minister talk
Speaker 6: about our national sovereignty in relation to the World Health Organization.
Speaker 6: Nor have I heard him talk about national sovereignty as
Speaker 6: it relates to climate change commitments. For example, the Paris
Speaker 6: Climate Agreement is handing over a massive amount of power
Speaker 6: to unelected international bureaucrats. So you're quite right to point
Speaker 6: out that the Prime Minister is being very selective when
Speaker 6: he discuss it discusses issues relating to our political and
Speaker 6: national sovereignty.
Speaker 3: Now, Western Australian Senator Drenda Cox, who was elected as
Speaker 3: a member of the Greens not too long ago, has
Speaker 3: made a shocked affection to the Labor Party, making this
Speaker 3: announcement alongside the Prime Minister just yesterday Today.
Speaker 7: I'm resigning from the Australian Greens to join the Labor
Speaker 7: Party to sit as a later senator as part of
Speaker 7: the Albanese government.
Speaker 2: It is not a decision I've taken lightly. Now.
Speaker 3: This is a member of parliament who was hit with
Speaker 3: workplace misconduct and bullying allegations back in October last year,
Speaker 3: with twenty of her staff reportedly quitting their jobs.
Speaker 2: In a period of about three years.
Speaker 3: But I've got to ask you, Dan, put aside the
Speaker 3: personalities here. She was elected as a Greens member, but
Speaker 3: people voted for the Greens and she was.
Speaker 2: There to represent them.
Speaker 3: Is it okay for her to be defecting within a
Speaker 3: matter of weeks or she should be standing down and
Speaker 3: the Greens select someone else to represent them.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I think so, reader. I think Australian's pretty sick
Speaker 6: and tired of this. I haven't looked at what her
Speaker 6: personal vote was, how many below the line votes she
Speaker 6: got in the Senate, but I can't imagine it was
Speaker 6: enough anywhere near enough to get her own quota to
Speaker 6: get in. So you're right that she was elected as
Speaker 6: a Greens member, not as a member of the Labor Party.
Speaker 6: And to do this so soon after the election, I
Speaker 6: think suggests that perhaps something was in play beforehand. I
Speaker 6: don't know, but it seems that it's unlikely that this
Speaker 6: kind of transition will take place in such a short
Speaker 6: space of time. The other point that I would make
Speaker 6: I watched Anthony Abernice's press conference today in Perth and
Speaker 6: it was interesting and revealing what he said. He said
Speaker 6: that if you're serious about social change in Australia, then
Speaker 6: you need to support the Labor Party. Now, what this
Speaker 6: suggests to me to mean is that Labour's social values
Speaker 6: are the social values of the Greens. They're the social
Speaker 6: values of treaty of truth telling, of reparations payments. I
Speaker 6: believe that they will proceed with a voice to Parliament,
Speaker 6: as Penny Wong said they would do prior to the
Speaker 6: last federal election, and I think it's time for Labor
Speaker 6: just to be honest with the Australian people and have
Speaker 6: a formal coalition agreement with the Greens. If they're just
Speaker 6: going to adopt Green's members as part of their party,
Speaker 6: then they should do it in an open and transparent manner.
Speaker 3: Well, they're in a coalition with the Greens, Let's be honest.
Speaker 3: The Greens and Labor depend on each other and Labour
Speaker 3: wouldn't be where they are without the Greens support. So
Speaker 3: whether it's an official coalition agreement as the Libs and
Speaker 3: Nets have or an unofficial one like Labor and Greens,
Speaker 3: it works pretty much in the same way.
Speaker 2: Let's talk about Victoria.
Speaker 3: Former Premier Jeff Kenned has made another some would say
Speaker 3: desperate attempt to try to save John Pursudo, the former
Speaker 3: opposition leader, pend a letter to the Victorian Liberal Party's
Speaker 3: Administrative Committee begging them to pay the entire two point
Speaker 3: three million debt that mister Pursudo now owes Liberal MP
Speaker 3: Moor Deeming. If he doesn't come across with his money,
Speaker 3: if he doesn't find it somewhere dan he faces bankruptcy,
Speaker 3: which means it will step down from parliament. Jeff Kenned argues,
Speaker 3: not supporting the pursuito family now denies the fundamental values
Speaker 3: the party was founded upon. It is wrong to ask
Speaker 3: him to foot the bills to bankrupt him and his family,
Speaker 3: wrong to ask him to borrow money from the capital
Speaker 3: funds we might have at our disposal. I implore you
Speaker 3: to act decisively. We must put the issue to bed quickly.
Speaker 3: Remember money can always be replaced, a change of government cannot.
Speaker 2: I've got a lot of thoughts on.
Speaker 3: This one, Dad, but I'm interested in yours. My first
Speaker 3: thought though, is has Jeff forgotten who the victim here is.
Speaker 3: It's Moira Deeming, it is not John Persudo.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Look, I mean I have a lot of respect for
Speaker 6: Jeff Kenned and everything he's done for Victoria, but I'm
Speaker 6: not sure this is quite the right way to go.
Speaker 6: You know, Moira Deeming is entitled to seek compensation as
Speaker 6: per the court order. You know, she's well within her
Speaker 6: rights to do that. And also the Liberal Party was
Speaker 6: founded on the value of freedom of speech, which is
Speaker 6: what Moyra was exercising. And she was really, you know,
Speaker 6: the victim of what happened to her and went through
Speaker 6: that legal process. So you know, this has been a
Speaker 6: disaster for the Victorian Liberal Party from the very beginning,
Speaker 6: and I think it really shows what happens when firstly
Speaker 6: you lose sight of what your values are, secondly when
Speaker 6: you become intimidated by your political opponents. It was very
Speaker 6: clear from the court documents that one of the reasons
Speaker 6: why the decision was taken to go after more redeeming
Speaker 6: was because of concerns that Daniel Andrews was going to
Speaker 6: exploit it for political purposes, as of course he would,
Speaker 6: being a very effective political operator. But look, look what's
Speaker 6: happened now. I mean, this all happened because they didn't
Speaker 6: stand up to Daniel Andrews and the Labor government. So look,
Speaker 6: they just need to draw a line under this and
Speaker 6: try to get clean air as they head to the
Speaker 6: next election in November of next year.
Speaker 3: They showed such poor political judgment in this case. It
Speaker 3: was actually an opportunity for them to lay a glove
Speaker 3: on Dan Andrews. And that's fairly rare during Dan Andrews's
Speaker 3: political career that the Libs would hurt him any way.
Speaker 3: But they had an opportunity there because this is an
Speaker 3: eighty twenty issue, and they decided to side with the
Speaker 3: twenty percent, along with Labor and the Greens just idiotic
Speaker 3: in the extreme. I want to ask you about former
Speaker 3: Australian of the Year Grace Tame. She has come under
Speaker 3: five for her anti Israel social media content, which has
Speaker 3: now put her partnership with Nike at risk. The megasports
Speaker 3: brand has said via a spokeswoman, Nike does not stand
Speaker 3: for any form of discrimination, including anti Semitism. We take
Speaker 3: this matter very seriously and are in touch with Grace's
Speaker 3: team to understand the matter further.
Speaker 9: Now.
Speaker 3: The Australian has done some great reports on this story.
Speaker 3: They reported that Tame reposted a statement from Palestinian writer
Speaker 3: Mohammed el Kurd in which she appeared to condone the
Speaker 3: murder of two Israeli embassy officials in Washington and angrily
Speaker 3: attacked journalists who reported that the slayings were an act
Speaker 3: of anti Semitism.
Speaker 2: Yes, the former.
Speaker 3: Australian of the Year is a endorsement of El Kurd
Speaker 3: and the message she published last week is deeply troubling.
Speaker 2: He wrote.
Speaker 3: The media class is scrambling to reframe the shooting that
Speaker 3: targeted to Israeli's state officials as a random anti Semitic attack.
Speaker 3: Tame reposted this to her two hundred and sixty thousand followers,
Speaker 3: even though it was undeniably and by the alleged shooter's
Speaker 3: own admission, a response to the ongoing Israeli assault on Gaza,
Speaker 3: which killed one hundred and seven Palestinians in the last
Speaker 3: twenty four hours alone. Dan, it's astonishing to me that
Speaker 3: she would endorse share this in any way back a
Speaker 3: position that is so extreme.
Speaker 9: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Well, the first thing is good on Nike for doing this.
Speaker 6: I mean, quite often we rightfully call out big businesses
Speaker 6: for dividing us and doing the wrong thing. Well, Nike
Speaker 6: is at least, you know, standing up and is asking
Speaker 6: for an explanation from Grace Tame, and that's the right
Speaker 6: thing for them to do. I think it's a shame
Speaker 6: for Grace Tame because she has rightly been acknowledged for
Speaker 6: the work that she's done in advocating for and raising
Speaker 6: the profile of victims of domestic violence and abuse, and
Speaker 6: that's a very important cause. But for her to go
Speaker 6: down the road of political activism I think has really
Speaker 6: let down the important work that she did. Of course,
Speaker 6: she famously wore the f Murdoch t shirt when she
Speaker 6: was meeting with the Prime Minister some time ago and
Speaker 6: has a history of political activism. Now, if she wants
Speaker 6: to do.
Speaker 7: That, that's up to her.
Speaker 6: I mean, it's entirely up to Grace Tame if she
Speaker 6: wants to go down that road. But I don't think
Speaker 6: you can at one time be an advocate for a
Speaker 6: very important cause and at the same time also see
Speaker 6: yourself as a political advocate for what are very divisive
Speaker 6: cultural issues as well.
Speaker 3: Yes, indeed, and I think as Australian of the Year
Speaker 3: she's not in that role anymore. But I think you
Speaker 3: have to be a political you have to be a
Speaker 3: unifying figure. You can't be a divisive activist. And we've
Speaker 3: too often put given that on our two divisive activists.
Speaker 3: It started well before Grace Tame, Dan Wild, thank you
Speaker 3: so much for your time tonight, joining me now to
Speaker 3: discuss how the Coalition got its advertising campaign so terribly wrong.
Speaker 2: Is DPR and.
Speaker 3: Co advertising co founder Richard Ralph Smith. Richard, you've come
Speaker 3: up with three key areas the Coalition failed with its
Speaker 3: election messaging.
Speaker 2: Take us through it.
Speaker 10: Yeah, okay, Well, in marketing terms, we can speak brand,
Speaker 10: product and retail, and so if you think about brand.
Speaker 10: That's a long term, strategic investment in what you stand for.
Speaker 10: At the other end of the spectrum, you've got retail,
Speaker 10: which is intended to be a short term, tactical expenditure
Speaker 10: designed to drive immediate sales. What the Liberal Party did
Speaker 10: is they had all their attention over here and ignored
Speaker 10: their brand almost entirely.
Speaker 3: So you're saying the substance wasn't there. They actually didn't
Speaker 3: have the policies to sell. It wasn't the selling that
Speaker 3: they failed it. It was the stuff that matters. They
Speaker 3: are what they stand.
Speaker 10: For exactly even above the policy level, the values and
Speaker 10: the principles that give rise to the policies in the
Speaker 10: first place. And that's something you don't like. John Howard
Speaker 10: used to say, you don't fatten a pig on market day,
Speaker 10: You've got to do that years in advance. And so
Speaker 10: Australians now no one is buying the Liberal brand. The
Speaker 10: reason they're not buying the Liberal brand is that nobody's selling.
Speaker 11: It, you know.
Speaker 3: And that is what we've been saying on Sky News,
Speaker 3: one of the few media outlets who's been pointing out
Speaker 3: that the Liberals, well since the Voice where they had
Speaker 3: the Trump for they did stand for something and articulated
Speaker 3: that position very well. They haven't stood for anything. Where
Speaker 3: is the policy differentiation? Where are they taking it up
Speaker 3: to labor and giving the electro to clear choice and
Speaker 3: saying this is who we are what we stand for.
Speaker 3: And you're right, it's too late to do it during
Speaker 3: an election campaign. You need to have come to that
Speaker 3: position organically throughout. You can't just show up and say
Speaker 3: we are this.
Speaker 10: You have to drive it and you have to believe
Speaker 10: in it. And even at the highest brand level that
Speaker 10: they really spoke about was their line for the election campaign,
Speaker 10: Let's get Australia back on track. Yeah, okay, so what's
Speaker 10: the track?
Speaker 8: Where does it lead?
Speaker 9: Yeah?
Speaker 3: It's a gym that you included net zero that would
Speaker 3: not even deviate on a policy areas as harmful to
Speaker 3: their brand as net zero and I think they still
Speaker 3: understand that now. Talking about social media, because so many
Speaker 3: now consume their news consumed information via social media, I've
Speaker 3: got to say Labour's campaign wasn't particularly great, but the
Speaker 3: Coalition seemed to particularly str.
Speaker 2: In that space.
Speaker 3: How can they reach younger voters effectively through social media?
Speaker 10: Well, the important thing is don't try so hard to
Speaker 10: fit into your environment that you change who you are.
Speaker 10: It really comes back again to being confident about who
Speaker 10: you are and saying these are our principles and then
Speaker 10: finding a way to express it in a way that's
Speaker 10: new and true for young people. Trying to find a
Speaker 10: way to really articulate that without trashing your brand by
Speaker 10: doing things such as that ridiculous disk track which was
Speaker 10: entirely debranding.
Speaker 3: For the Liberals, Yeah, that was a little bit cringe
Speaker 3: labor though landslide victory, so they can take all the plauded.
Speaker 3: What did they do well or were they just lucky
Speaker 3: to have really little opposition at this election?
Speaker 10: I think in large part it is the latter. This
Speaker 10: was not a contest of high minded ideals expressed brilliantly
Speaker 10: by two top notch opponents. They didn't do anything particularly
Speaker 10: well from a brand point of view. What they did
Speaker 10: do is define Peter Dutton on their terms very very well,
Speaker 10: and they had the most powerful negative line of the campaign,
Speaker 10: which was he cuts you pay. And they managed to
Speaker 10: again frame nuclear in their own terms, making up their
Speaker 10: own numbers, convincing people of those numbers and saying this
Speaker 10: is what is going to cost six.
Speaker 3: Negative campaigns are enormously effective. People say they don't like it,
Speaker 3: that don't like when politicians or political parties go negative,
Speaker 3: but the proof is there that they work, and that's
Speaker 3: why labor go to these sorts of campaigns, whether it's
Speaker 3: many scale, nuclear or cuts.
Speaker 10: They work better for the incumbent than they do for
Speaker 10: the opposition. And in this situation, you know, the environment
Speaker 10: was that we had a really uncertain geostrategic ron happening.
Speaker 10: We had you know, China conducting live fire exercises three
Speaker 10: hundred k's off the coach of Sydney. We had Trump
Speaker 10: firing off tariffs every which way. People were feeling nervous
Speaker 10: and sort of leaning towards the incumbent, and that would
Speaker 10: have required the liberals to define something really really compelling
Speaker 10: based on liberal values to do it. It was an
Speaker 10: uphill battle in the first place, yes, but they just
Speaker 10: couldn't do it. I think they were sort of this
Speaker 10: time late last year, they were in the lead in
Speaker 10: terms of the polls, and also Peter Dutton's preferred prime
Speaker 10: minister rating was in a really really good space. He
Speaker 10: looked like a leader. Late last year it was as
Speaker 10: if they were defending a lead that didn't really.
Speaker 2: Exist, and I think they got.
Speaker 10: Failed to deliver on a brand plan.
Speaker 3: They were playing like they were in front, and I
Speaker 3: think that we're getting some poor polling data that they
Speaker 3: were relying on and ignoring everything else around them.
Speaker 2: Richard Ralph Smith, thank you so much for your time tonight.
Speaker 9: All right, thank you.
Speaker 2: Still to come.
Speaker 3: Lefties a losing it? Plus will we see record amounts.
Speaker 2: Of corporate virtue signaling during Pride Month?
Speaker 3: Kosher Gator has the details. You're watching the Reader Panny
Speaker 3: Show and it's time for Lefty's Losing It. I don't
Speaker 3: know how to apologize for what I'm about to show you,
Speaker 3: but just know this hurts me as much as it's
Speaker 3: going to hurt you. Let's have a look at trump
Speaker 3: deranged Rosie O'Donnell, who has fled the country because of potus,
Speaker 3: but she has returned from Ireland to film this hot
Speaker 3: mess for Sex and the City spin off.
Speaker 2: Just like that, enough talking, let's just dive right in.
Speaker 4: It felt so I don't know electric and yet still
Speaker 4: so natural. I never dreamed my first time could be
Speaker 4: both those things.
Speaker 2: First time.
Speaker 4: You were a virgin, Yes, I'm a nun.
Speaker 3: Yes, that was Rosi o'donald playing a virgin none called
Speaker 3: Mary who ends up in bed with Miranda played by
Speaker 3: Cynthia and Nixon, the worst character on Sex and the City.
Speaker 3: I think you'll agree, and that show jumped the shark
Speaker 3: many many moons ago.
Speaker 2: But at least Rosi o'donald.
Speaker 3: And Cynthia Nixon could share their deranged hatred of Trump
Speaker 3: together in between takes. Both are ardent Trump haters and mothers.
Speaker 2: Of non binary or trans children.
Speaker 3: Remember Cynthia Nixon boasted about having her daughter's healthy breast removed.
Speaker 2: They call it top surgery. My hand had his.
Speaker 12: Top surgery, ass NYU a number of years ago. Please
Speaker 12: work pastic His surgeon was the best we could have imagined.
Speaker 2: It's time to check in with Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: The former president has his good days and he has
Speaker 3: his bad days.
Speaker 2: But every day is a delusional day. Listen to this.
Speaker 1: And there's also been a lot of discussion recently about
Speaker 1: your mental and physical capabilities while you were in office.
Speaker 13: You can see that I'm mentally incompetent and I can't walk,
Speaker 13: and I can beat the.
Speaker 1: Hell out of both of them. Do you want to
Speaker 1: reply to any of those reports, and also to the
Speaker 1: fact that there are some Democrats who are now questioning
Speaker 1: whether you should have run for reelection in the first place.
Speaker 2: Run against me that.
Speaker 4: Because I'd have beaten it.
Speaker 1: Do you have any regrets?
Speaker 11: No, I don't know.
Speaker 9: Your guests.
Speaker 3: Naylon Mask has had enough of his fellow billionaires talking trash.
Speaker 2: Listen here as he gives Bill Gates.
Speaker 3: An almighty spray after Gates made all sorts of unfounded
Speaker 3: claims about us aid.
Speaker 2: He starts by calling Gates a liar.
Speaker 14: I know you've said that already I.
Speaker 7: Wanted and I'm just who does Biggates think he is
Speaker 7: to make comments about the welfare of children, given that
Speaker 7: he is before quented Jeffrey Epstein, Okay.
Speaker 9: Well.
Speaker 14: He's he's he said he regrets those.
Speaker 8: And he's he spent he spent a lot.
Speaker 14: He spent a lot of his own money on on
Speaker 14: philanthropy around the world over the years. My question to
Speaker 14: you is have you looked at the data to check
Speaker 14: if he might be right that the cuts to US
Speaker 14: A I. D might cost millions of lives.
Speaker 7: Yes, I'd like him to preshure us any any evidence whatsoever.
Speaker 3: None whatsoever, And bono you know him from you two.
Speaker 3: He was making the same bas claims on Joe Rogan,
Speaker 3: and Rogan was not having it.
Speaker 15: Just recent report, it's not proven, but there's surveillance enough
Speaker 15: suggests three hundred thousand people have already died from just
Speaker 15: this cutoff, this hard cut of usaid.
Speaker 16: The problem is, for sure, there have been a lot
Speaker 16: of organizations that do tremendous good all throughout the world. Also,
Speaker 16: for sure it was a money laundering operation. For sure,
Speaker 16: there was no oversight. For sure, billions of dollars are missing.
Speaker 16: In fact, trillions that are unaccounted for that were sent
Speaker 16: off into various they don't even know where because there's
Speaker 16: no receipts. The way Elon must describe that, he said,
Speaker 16: if any of this was done by a public company,
Speaker 16: the company would be delisted and the executives be in prison.
Speaker 16: But in the United States, this is a standard. When Biden
Speaker 16: left office, when it was clear that Trump won, in
Speaker 16: the seventy three days, they spent ninety three billion dollars
Speaker 16: from the the Department of Energy on just radical loans,
Speaker 16: just throwing money into places and there's no oversight.
Speaker 3: Well, folks, it's June, and that means it's Pride month,
Speaker 3: and they started celebrating early in West Hollywood. Not sure
Speaker 3: that's suitable for young kids in the audience there. But
Speaker 3: it's not just the public nudity, it's the corporate virtue
Speaker 3: signaling we're going to see in the coming weeks. Yes,
Speaker 3: a whole month of far left foolishness, but for some
Speaker 3: it's never enough.
Speaker 2: Watch this Karen a whine about Target getting.
Speaker 3: Rid of their LGBTQIA plus plus display and replacing it
Speaker 3: with a pro American one.
Speaker 17: Happy Pride Month. In my Target that used to have
Speaker 17: the pride section, it's now all USA. Yay USA. And honestly,
Speaker 17: my dad serves the military, and I'd love to be
Speaker 17: really proud of this nation, but it's hard to be
Speaker 17: proud of.
Speaker 2: It under Donald Trump.
Speaker 17: But hey, you know, while you're here, pick up a
Speaker 17: USA bikini, you know why not? Yeah, Target's really taken
Speaker 17: this anti DEI thing to another level.
Speaker 3: Oh Dear God forbid anyone should have pride in their country.
Speaker 3: I'm sure your granddad risked his life so Target could
Speaker 3: sell breastbinders to young girls.
Speaker 2: Let's bring in Sky News contributor Kosher.
Speaker 3: Gaeta Kosher, there's been a cultural shift in the US,
Speaker 3: It's undoubted. And are we going to see things like
Speaker 3: Pride Month marked differently from the corporate world.
Speaker 2: Are we going to have the same.
Speaker 3: Sort of activism and enthusiasm as we have seen in
Speaker 3: previous years.
Speaker 9: Seemingly not.
Speaker 11: It looks like we have finally broken the camel's back
Speaker 11: on this issue. It almost just send it as quickly
Speaker 11: blink and you missed it as it ascended just in
Speaker 11: the last five years. And you see, you know, the
Speaker 11: Silicon Valley titans and the high finance people and cultural
Speaker 11: icons all coming out and endorsing Trump in this election.
Speaker 9: Everything sort of trickles down from that, I think.
Speaker 11: And you haven't seen mass backlash or young people rioting
Speaker 11: and leaving their hypie Silicon Valley jobs or New York
Speaker 11: jobs or anything like that. And you don't see corporations
Speaker 11: putting the little black square, a little ratio square on
Speaker 11: their LinkedIn profiles. So maybe we are past the worst.
Speaker 9: Dare I say?
Speaker 3: I think the corporates are seeing there is actually a
Speaker 3: price to pay, and it's probably a bit more clever
Speaker 3: to be a political and not alienate at least a
Speaker 3: portion of your customer basis significant portion and I think
Speaker 3: USAID really exposed just how much of this far left activism,
Speaker 3: this far left movement was funded unwittingly by tax payers.
Speaker 3: It wasn't just some organic grassroots movement.
Speaker 11: That's been one of so many examples of just as
Speaker 11: much as we know what's going on in the culture,
Speaker 11: there's so much more. And when you think you've got
Speaker 11: the whole picture, there's yet more that we don't know.
Speaker 11: And you say, idea, it was about fifty billion dollars
Speaker 11: a year in spending, It's like a billion dollars a week.
Speaker 11: It's not a small amount, and even worse, as you say,
Speaker 11: because more than the money and the wastage financially, what
Speaker 11: it was doing domestically and all around the world. And
Speaker 11: it's completely been gutted. Ninety percent of contracts have been terminated. Yes,
Speaker 11: it was challenged in a court. There are a few
Speaker 11: challenges still working its way up, but by and large
Speaker 11: this organization has been fundamentally changed, and I think everybody
Speaker 11: is for the better, and maybe we can do something
Speaker 11: without tax payer money. Yeap.
Speaker 3: People's eyes have been opened, even those of us who
Speaker 3: are very engaged in this space. I was shocked by
Speaker 3: the money that was being spent taxpayers money all around
Speaker 3: the world pushing this far left activism.
Speaker 2: Bizarre use of taxpayers money.
Speaker 3: And whilst we're talking about usiidal On mass the man
Speaker 3: who was responsible for cutting so much of that waste
Speaker 3: and fraud, well, he had some parting words for members
Speaker 3: of the media, pointing out that they are the ones
Speaker 3: responsible for so many of the slings and arrows that
Speaker 3: have come his way, and they are discredited.
Speaker 8: The President mentioned that you had to deal with all
Speaker 8: the slings and arrows during your time.
Speaker 7: It does there's this New York other people, you know,
Speaker 7: some of the media re organizations, Let's room work, the lingers.
Speaker 8: Well, so.
Speaker 1: There is a New York Times before today that accuses
Speaker 1: you of blurring way between.
Speaker 18: New York Times.
Speaker 7: Is that the same publication that got a Bulletzer prize
Speaker 7: for a false reporting on the Russia Gate? Is it
Speaker 7: the same organization? I got to check my tots, so
Speaker 7: I think they.
Speaker 8: I think the.
Speaker 7: Judge just ruled against New York Times for their lies
Speaker 7: about the Russia Gate hoax, and that they might have
Speaker 7: to give back that Fullitzer price that New York Times.
Speaker 3: Let's move on, and we've seen this from Trump administration
Speaker 3: across the board almost whether it's heg Zeth, where it's
Speaker 3: Rubio Musk there, who you know isn't a politician, but
Speaker 3: he had a fairly significant role. They are just hitting
Speaker 3: back the media hard. They've taken on Trump's attitude towards
Speaker 3: the media, and you've got to say it's pretty effective.
Speaker 9: For sure.
Speaker 11: It's not your grandmother's Republican Party and this whole group
Speaker 11: starting the Trump leading he really showed people how to
Speaker 11: fight and when things go as bad as they've gone,
Speaker 11: you're kind of past nice manners and niceties and all
Speaker 11: those things we saw from John McCain and Mitt Romney
Speaker 11: and even Ronald Reagan. It was just a different world
Speaker 11: that we're living in and here you've got to be
Speaker 11: willing to roll up your sleeves and fight, and they
Speaker 11: kind of relish it.
Speaker 9: So it's not everybody's cup of tea.
Speaker 11: Always running to people who don't like it or wish
Speaker 11: the demeanor would be different.
Speaker 9: But I think it's very effective.
Speaker 3: And a lot of people, actually, if they want to
Speaker 3: go back to the gop of Mitt Romney or McCain
Speaker 3: or good luck to them, because that's the GoPay of losers.
Speaker 3: And those days are over. The voters have no appetite
Speaker 3: for that. So never mind whether Trump's there or not.
Speaker 3: The voters don't want that. They don't want to have
Speaker 3: polite losers. Now, we saw the way the media treated
Speaker 3: Elon Mask after his salute from the Heart. They were
Speaker 3: calling him a Nazi, saying he was doing some sort
Speaker 3: of a Hile Hitler salute, which was just so dishonest. Well,
Speaker 3: Democrat Cory Booker did something well pretty much exactly the
Speaker 3: same in the last couple of days, and there was
Speaker 3: no condemnation, no accusations.
Speaker 2: Many didn't even report on it.
Speaker 3: And Kosh, I guess this goes to the point of
Speaker 3: why they feel like the media deserves to be treated
Speaker 3: with this stain, because it's just discredited itself.
Speaker 9: Time and again.
Speaker 11: And when you think they can't sink any lawa you
Speaker 11: can see these examples. And it's not even about hypocrisy,
Speaker 11: it's about hierarchy. So Cory Brooker, you see, is a
Speaker 11: higher in the totem pool where he gets extra protections
Speaker 11: that the others side doesn't. And there's many people who've
Speaker 11: done this, and I think the good thing is that
Speaker 11: media has been democratized because of the Internet and social
Speaker 11: media that these clips do get out there other programs
Speaker 11: like yours and the social media covers it, and that
Speaker 11: just further delegitimizes the mainstream media unless they wise up
Speaker 11: to that, but they don't seem to be doing it
Speaker 11: as far.
Speaker 3: And sticking with the media, yesterday we had CNN claimbing
Speaker 3: that the Colorado terror attack was carried out by a
Speaker 3: white man. And here we have NBC going to great
Speaker 3: lengths not to use the words where it's like Jews
Speaker 3: or even pro Israel, calling the victims of the attack
Speaker 3: Gaza hostage awareness marches.
Speaker 2: I mean, really kosher.
Speaker 11: If the backdrop wasn't as tragically, it is almost funny.
Speaker 11: And they really are the kings and queens of linguistics.
Speaker 9: They always have been.
Speaker 11: So you have the Gaza awareness marchers, you had the
Speaker 11: Maryland Dad that famous case, and even back in during
Speaker 11: then President Oba Hillary Clinton's I'm reminded of the story
Speaker 11: of the terrorist attack in Colombo, Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday,
Speaker 11: and both of them referred to them as Easter worshippers
Speaker 11: because they couldn't use the word Christians. So they are
Speaker 11: very aware of words and which words they use, which
Speaker 11: words they don't use. But again to your point earlier,
Speaker 11: in this day and age of just podcasts and media
Speaker 11: and social media, we all are discussing it and seeing
Speaker 11: right through it. So I just think it's a losing strategy,
Speaker 11: but they seem to be addicted to it.
Speaker 9: Now.
Speaker 3: In recent weeks, we've had a governor's house fire bombed,
Speaker 3: We've had two Israelian busy workers murdered in cold blood,
Speaker 3: and now this attack in Colorado several pro israel protests
Speaker 3: is set alight, badly hurt. If there was a right
Speaker 3: wing group or movement behind these sorts of attacks, it
Speaker 3: would be leading news coverage all around the world. It
Speaker 3: would all be as such a crisis that needs to
Speaker 3: be addressed. But it seems like we've got a fairly
Speaker 3: permissive attitude when it comes to violence from the left.
Speaker 3: We saw that throughout the BLM riots and we're seeing
Speaker 3: it again with this anti Israeli movement.
Speaker 11: It feels like it's the next dimension on this continuum
Speaker 11: where we talked at the top about culture and the
Speaker 11: culture is shifting and corporates aren't virtually signaling as much.
Speaker 11: Then we've talked about the media losing its potency and
Speaker 11: legitimacy because we can all see through their games. And
Speaker 11: now this is where it gets really serious, where it's
Speaker 11: actual violence taking place, and that double standard again still continues.
Speaker 9: And as you say, BLM or even.
Speaker 11: The Antifa rights before that in Portland elsewhere. So this
Speaker 11: feels like the last printerier. If the right can somehow
Speaker 11: crack this and just reclaim the narrative around that which
Speaker 11: they're doing the current administration in terms of their line
Speaker 11: order agenda, that will be another big win in this
Speaker 11: continuum that we're on.
Speaker 2: And we say that everywhere there was Antifa.
Speaker 3: You mentioned there was some violence in California where they
Speaker 3: were there to protest against I think some Christians who
Speaker 3: were gathering, And we see it right here in Australia
Speaker 3: when we have the let women speak much and there's
Speaker 3: always some sort of a counter protest because they're not
Speaker 3: allowed to speak without the far left activist disrupting them.
Speaker 2: On Colorado, there's been.
Speaker 3: A lot of commentary in the past twenty four hours
Speaker 3: about this image summing up the modern Democrat Party.
Speaker 2: Let's have a look at it, Kosha, what do you
Speaker 2: say to this. There's a lot happening in that in
Speaker 2: that picture.
Speaker 11: Oh my goodness, I could say modern Democrat Party in
Speaker 11: an AI simulator, and I don't think it would come
Speaker 11: out very different from that. You've got the flag in
Speaker 11: the background, it's like perfectly framed. In the middle, you
Speaker 11: have this violent person. It's the heinous ax he committed.
Speaker 11: He's shirtless, he's not in particularly good shape. He's an
Speaker 11: illegal immigrant. Yeah, throwing him all the top cocktail, And
Speaker 11: I think it does sum it up everything we just
Speaker 11: talked about, the cultural virtue signaling, the way the media
Speaker 11: is covering it, and then the violence from the left
Speaker 11: that's been getting away, but not for long. We'll see
Speaker 11: what's going to happen. Some judge is likely going to
Speaker 11: block his deportation. But cases like this only help the
Speaker 11: cause politically on the other side because these are not
Speaker 11: sympathetic figures.
Speaker 2: And Trump's made that point.
Speaker 3: The Muhammad Solomon, the alleged attacker, there's an Egyptian national
Speaker 3: in the US illegally.
Speaker 2: He overstate his visa, entered the.
Speaker 3: US during the Biden administration sort asylum in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 3: was granted the right to work. Is the Biden administration
Speaker 3: in any way to blame for this. They let millions
Speaker 3: through unvetted, and you're going to get characters like this
Speaker 3: amongst them.
Speaker 11: Percent I think this really personifies what we know. So
Speaker 11: we know the numbers and the ridiculous new eleven million
Speaker 11: plus that were allowed to pour in through four years,
Speaker 11: and then the particulars of this case where he was
Speaker 11: caught even by the ace Agans in the Biden administration,
Speaker 11: but was let go because that was the policy wele
Speaker 11: catching release and then he was rewarded with legal work
Speaker 11: access even though he oversteed his visa. So you're just
Speaker 11: creating magnets and rewarding So every issue that we talk
Speaker 11: about August presonified in this case, and then he goes
Speaker 11: and does what he did, So it really just puts
Speaker 11: a huge red line, I think, under this issue in
Speaker 11: a way that had never happened before. And hopefully the
Speaker 11: current administration can take advantage of that momentum and do
Speaker 11: something about it.
Speaker 3: Now, before you go, we talked about that cultural shift
Speaker 3: across the US, Let's have a look at another example
Speaker 3: of that. This is something we wouldn't have seen a
Speaker 3: few years ago, certainly wouldn't have seen it in Trump's
Speaker 3: first term.
Speaker 2: What yere as football legends.
Speaker 3: And current Pittsburgh Steelers stars pay tribute to Donald Trump
Speaker 3: in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 14: I'd like to present to this to a Hall of
Speaker 14: Fame President, please accept that.
Speaker 15: How about this president of ours?
Speaker 5: Huh?
Speaker 2: Just wanted to say, God bless you President Trump, and
Speaker 2: God bless you Pittsburgh.
Speaker 3: Now, that was Pittsburgh Steeler's legend and Vietnam warvet Rocky
Speaker 3: Blayer and current quarterback Mason Rudolph and defensive back Miles
Speaker 3: Killer Brood. I mean, that is something we wouldn't have
Speaker 3: seen kosher just a few years ago. Those players, current
Speaker 3: players would have been canceled. They would have made all
Speaker 3: sorts of uproar. No one really was bothered by any
Speaker 3: of that. I didn't say too much backlash at all.
Speaker 9: So true.
Speaker 11: You know, there's that old adage I think attributed to
Speaker 11: Andrew Breitbart that politics is downstream from culture. Every once
Speaker 11: in a while, in a case like Donald Trump, who's
Speaker 11: very unique, it almost was like culture is downstream from politics,
Speaker 11: and just his whole story even before politics and since
Speaker 11: then the comeback, being the under dog, being counted out
Speaker 11: and coming is like classic American stuff.
Speaker 9: Everybody loves that.
Speaker 11: Story, even though they've been trained not to admit it,
Speaker 11: and this carries a lot of weight when you have
Speaker 11: NFL stars and Hall of Fame legends doing that. The
Speaker 11: other piece two, since it's a Steelers Pittsburgh that is
Speaker 11: a key constituency of Trump Pennsylvania and particularly that town.
Speaker 11: The Steelers and miners didn't go to Republicans since Ronald
Speaker 11: Reagan forty years and he in both terms turned that around,
Speaker 11: and I think that's sort of the other piece of it,
Speaker 11: and the Steelers, of course exemplify that part of his constituency.
Speaker 3: Kosher Gator, thanks for your time tonight coming up, But
Speaker 3: why was Alex Stein attacked by LGBTQIA activists?
Speaker 2: It joins me next to explain, welcome back.
Speaker 9: Now.
Speaker 3: We've seen morale and recruitment numbers in the US Army
Speaker 3: saw in recent months after President Donald Trump's election triumph,
Speaker 3: and get ready to see those numbers saw further because
Speaker 3: the ad campaigns have changed a bit. They've gone from
Speaker 3: this under the Biden administration.
Speaker 19: Although he had a fairly typical childhood, took ballet, played violin,
Speaker 19: I also marched for equality. I like to think I've
Speaker 19: been defending freedom from an early age.
Speaker 2: Yep, that was under Biden. This is the latest.
Speaker 16: No more distractions, no more electric tanks, no more gender confusion,
Speaker 16: no more climate change worship.
Speaker 8: We are laser focused on our mission of war FI.
Speaker 13: We will measure our success not only by the battles
Speaker 13: we win, but also by the wars we end, and
Speaker 13: perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into.
Speaker 8: It's called peace through strength.
Speaker 13: Through our power and might, we will leave the world
Speaker 13: to peace. Our friends will respect us, our enemies will
Speaker 13: fear us, and the whole world will admire the unrivaled
Speaker 13: greatness of the United States military. We will replenish the
Speaker 13: pride of our armed forces and the recruitment crisis.
Speaker 10: We don't fight because we hate what's in front of us.
Speaker 8: We fight because we love us behind us.
Speaker 13: God bless you, God bless our armpornsers, God bless our
Speaker 13: men and women serving overseas, and God bless the United
Speaker 13: States of America.
Speaker 3: Joining men as comedian and host of Primetime with Alex
Speaker 3: Dahn on Blastava, Alex it MAXs you want to sign up.
Speaker 2: That is some inspiring stuff.
Speaker 8: No doubt about it.
Speaker 20: And now that young soldiers don't have to worry about
Speaker 20: being basically under the thumb of a person with gender
Speaker 20: dysphoria that's mentally ill. I think they have a lot
Speaker 20: more confidence in joining the Armed Services. So I'm happy
Speaker 20: that people like Rachel Levine are now banned from joining
Speaker 20: the United States Armed Services. So Pete Haig Seth and
Speaker 20: Donald Trump have given the American people, and especially the
Speaker 20: young American.
Speaker 8: People, faith into our arm services. It's beautiful.
Speaker 20: I love to see it, and I can't wait for
Speaker 20: more young people to sign up and actually support our
Speaker 20: country in a positive way and not some sort of
Speaker 20: weird LGBTQ gender mafia way.
Speaker 3: Well, talking about l g b t Q I a community.
Speaker 3: You've really been embraced by that community.
Speaker 2: It is Pride Month.
Speaker 3: Let's just have a look at how you've been embraced.
Speaker 20: Protect How are you going to protect a kid I cutting.
Speaker 9: Off in genital No?
Speaker 2: No, look at this.
Speaker 8: Do you think I should kill me?
Speaker 18: I hope you live forever.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry that you want me to kill myself.
Speaker 3: Alex, that don't seem to like you.
Speaker 20: No, Rita, but I mean there aren't a lot of
Speaker 20: pharmaceutical drugs, and luckily for me, the estrogen hormone keeps
Speaker 20: them pretty docile and pretty weak, so they're not too tough.
Speaker 8: So thank goodness, I didn't look to do.
Speaker 9: That.
Speaker 3: Didn't look so docile where they were pouring water. I
Speaker 3: hope it was water on you and coming after you.
Speaker 3: Must be frightening. I know you joke about it, but
Speaker 3: we've got a bunch of people.
Speaker 2: All worked up coming at you.
Speaker 3: You must fear for your safety occasionally. But I want
Speaker 3: to ask you about CNN. They had some disturbing news
Speaker 3: to impart to their views.
Speaker 18: Plus eight point advantage for the Republican Party.
Speaker 9: How is that possible?
Speaker 8: Democrats?
Speaker 18: How is that possible? After all the recession, because after
Speaker 18: the stock market's been doing all of this, after all
Speaker 18: the terrorists that Americans are against, and Republicans still hold
Speaker 18: an eight point lead on the economy.
Speaker 16: Are you kidding me?
Speaker 17: This is a CNN This is new CNN pulingd How
Speaker 17: was that?
Speaker 11: When we look for trends, how is that trending with
Speaker 11: other data that you're pulling in.
Speaker 18: Yeah, if it was just this one CNN pul that
Speaker 18: would be one thing. But take a look at Reuter's ipsos.
Speaker 18: What do we see here? Party with a better economic plan? Well,
Speaker 18: it may have twenty twenty four, just before Donald Trump
Speaker 18: was reelected president, Republicans had a nine point advantage. Look
Speaker 18: at where we are now. In May of twenty twenty five,
Speaker 18: the advantage actually went up by three points. Now Republicans
Speaker 18: have a twelve point advantage when it comes to the
Speaker 18: party with a better economic plan Alex.
Speaker 3: They just can't understand why their own polling is showing
Speaker 3: Trump winning on the economy.
Speaker 20: Yeah, it's really not a hard equation to figure out.
Speaker 20: And if you really just look at our economy now,
Speaker 20: the fact that people actually have some faith that they
Speaker 20: can actually go work and that industries are coming back
Speaker 20: here in America, its just created so much of a
Speaker 20: better lifestyle for the American people. And you know, when
Speaker 20: it comes to the polling though, of course, these Democrats
Speaker 20: are now changing. I mean, nobody predicted Donald Trump to
Speaker 20: win in a landslide. So it just tells you that
Speaker 20: even though the mainstream media is going to tell you
Speaker 20: that the liberals are in charge, that everybody loves, you know,
Speaker 20: Kamala Harris and progressiveness, that's not the case. There's been
Speaker 20: a major shift and it's really in the conservative shavor
Speaker 20: right now.
Speaker 3: Well, those figures on who's best for the economy are
Speaker 3: just overwhelmingly leaning Donald Trump's way, and he's had some
Speaker 3: good data recently. Inflation is down, real wages are up,
Speaker 3: and the tariffs haven't been the disaster that we were
Speaker 3: told they were going to be. Just tell me how
Speaker 3: that's seen in the US right now, particularly the tariff policy,
Speaker 3: because obviously around the world we're very concerned about the tariffs.
Speaker 20: Well, of course, Rita and I try to talk to
Speaker 20: people that are in industries here in America, and the
Speaker 20: car business isn't hurting that bad. But you know where
Speaker 20: I've heard is hurting so far is Las Vegas.
Speaker 8: They've lost a little bit of their international travelers, and
Speaker 8: so they said, I swear Rita, that's what they said.
Speaker 20: They said, Las Vegas is down a little bit right now,
Speaker 20: but other than that, the economy is pretty good, and
Speaker 20: if Las Vegas is down, it's probably better for society
Speaker 20: if you ask me.
Speaker 3: Well, we've got some more good news with a big
Speaker 3: drop in fentanyl crossing the border.
Speaker 2: Washington Post calls.
Speaker 3: It mysterious, this drop, but I don't think, alex it
Speaker 3: is all that mysterious, and it's certainly going to save many,
Speaker 3: many lives.
Speaker 20: Reader doesn't it make you sick how they can just
Speaker 20: pretend to be so naive. I mean, just the fact
Speaker 20: that Donald Trump was able to shut down the border
Speaker 20: in one day and make our country infinitely more safe
Speaker 20: when it comes to all of the drugs in fentanyl,
Speaker 20: and not only fentanyl, cocaine, meth amphetamines, all kinds of
Speaker 20: drugs that are being you know, just taken into our
Speaker 20: country by coyotes. So this is not a hard problem
Speaker 20: to solve, and Donald Trump basically solved it, and for
Speaker 20: them to try to placate it like it's some sort
Speaker 20: of mystery, it just shows you how dumb the mainstream
Speaker 20: media really is. And no offense the people the Sky
Speaker 20: News are great, they are not so much.
Speaker 9: Now.
Speaker 3: We call it the leftist mainstream media. It's Donald trumpet
Speaker 3: any credit at all. We know they hate him, and
Speaker 3: it's just relentless negative coverage of all things Trump. But
Speaker 3: for things like the border and you know, the fentanel
Speaker 3: numbers dropping the economy, is there any credit going the
Speaker 3: Trump administration's way yet?
Speaker 20: Seriously, the only complaint that I have seen in Trump's
Speaker 20: administration right now, because you know, I go to these
Speaker 20: college campuses and I debate is the deportation of Abrego Garcia,
Speaker 20: and honestly, a Brego Garcia, the Trump administration. You know,
Speaker 20: they admit that they didn't give him fully due process,
Speaker 20: but he came here illegally, so he got kicked out illegally.
Speaker 20: And that's one person that's not the overwhelming majority of
Speaker 20: you know, the situations when it comes to deporting people.
Speaker 20: So other than that, I mean, when it comes to
Speaker 20: the economy, when it comes to January sixth, when it
Speaker 20: just comes to the overall you know, feelings that people have,
Speaker 20: when it comes to our safety and especially our geopolitical relationships.
Speaker 20: You know, people who have never been more satisfied than
Speaker 20: in the past four years than we are today, especially
Speaker 20: under you know, Joe Biden, sleepy, Joe alex Stein.
Speaker 3: Thank you for your time, and that's all the time
Speaker 3: we have. I'll see you tomorrow at eleven. Newsnight is
Speaker 3: up next