WEBVTT - The environmentalists at war with Chris Bowen

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:08.319
<v Speaker 1>From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm christinaming it.

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It's Thursday October nine, twenty twenty five. Three justices of

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the New South Wales Supreme Court will today hand down

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>their decision on a bid by a pro Palestine group

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>to demonstrate at the Sydney Opera House. The Palestine Action

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Group wants to assemble as many as ten thousand people

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>at the Opera House on Sunday, but the New South

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Wales Police argued in court on Wednesday it's a public

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>safety disaster waiting to happen. Taxpayers will bail out Glencore's

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Mount isaacopper smelter to the tune of six hundred million dollars,

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>but its Swiss bosses say it might still close before

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of next year. Those stories alive right now

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>at the Australian dot Com dot a U. Chris Bowen

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is at war with a group of environmentalists who say

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Australia's renewables rollout is a mess. The Minister alleges this

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>reading misinformation about the sheer space needed to realize the

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Albanese government's ambitious renewables plans, but he can't or won't

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>explain the numbers coming out of his own department. Today

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we unpack the report and the response that's got everyone

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>scratching their heads. At the end of last month, The

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Australian's Rural and Regional correspondent Matthew Denholm reported this.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>The stunning scale of Australia's renewables rollout can be revealed.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>One thousand projects costing one point three three trillion dollars,

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 2>including twenty five thousand more wind towers with forty five

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 2>thousand kilometers of associated roads, and two hundred and fifty

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 2>million solar panels on four hundred and six thousand hectares.

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>The figures Australia's first comprehensive glimpse of the true scale

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>of the renewables revolution, have been compiled by conservationists and

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 2>communities pushing for a better planned roll out.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Based on mapping done by rainforest Reserves Australia, the space

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>taken up by solar panels will need to increase from

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>just under thirty thousand hectares to more than four hundred

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and thirty thousand to meet the Albanese government's renewables goals.

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>In his reporting, matt explained it like this.

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Effectively equivalent to almost all of metropolitan Sydney, parts of

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the Lower Blue Mountains and beyond Richmond and Campbelltown.

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>The same was done with wind turbines, this time using

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the city of Brisbane to demonstrate the scale. On the

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>same day, Minister Chris Bowen posted this on social media.

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Some anti renewable pro nuclear activists have worked out how

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 3>much land renewables will take and it's pretty confronting. Now

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 3>take the area equivalent to Sydney's metropolitan zign. Now, if

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 3>that was true, it would be around half of one

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 3>percent of Australia's land mass. But guess what doesn't stack up?

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Wait? What so?

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Chris Bowen, in his social media video shows the data

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 4>captured by The Australian and really he says, this is

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 4>not something that stacks up. In his words, Sarah Eisen

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 4>is a senior political reporter with The Australian. He says,

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 4>in reality, they have drastically overestimated the amount of space

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 4>we're going to need for these projects.

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 3>The New South Wales Agricultural Commissioner has looked at how

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 3>much land renewables will take based on the plans of

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 3>the Australian energy market operator, the people who actually run

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 3>the grit, and they found it's about four percent of

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 3>what is in the newspaper today.

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>So where did this twelve percent figure come from? Over

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the past few days, the Australian has tried to get

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom of it.

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 4>So The Australian asked Chris Bowen this exact question, because

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't clear from the social media video. Twelve percent

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 4>is of very specific figure and what we were told was

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 4>that this figure comes from the New South Wales Agricultural

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Commissioner's report, and we were sent that report. But what

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 4>that report focuses on is only New South Wales coverage.

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 4>A lot of the graphics, a lot of the charts

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 4>and everything says this is how much land mass in

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 4>New South Wales will be needed. Upon asking again how

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 4>that twelve percent figure was landed on, we did receive

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 4>an incredibly long response, but it didn't answer the question.

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 4>We have been able to determine that of the eight

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 4>hundred nine hundred odd projects that have been mapped, around

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 4>six or so are not going ahead. They've been discontinued

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 4>or paused, so there may be some merit in re

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 4>looking at that, but it still leaves the question open

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 4>of how the claim that what was represented by this

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 4>group and reported on by the Australian that that is

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 4>way overblown, that in fact, the reality is that the

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 4>land use twelve percent of that reporting half a dozen

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 4>projects that are paused at the moment or won't go ahead.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 4>That still doesn't reduce that land mass enough to give

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 4>us the answer of how we got to that twelve

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 4>percent figure that keeps being used. We also asked if

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 4>in fact the Minister was confused by these two pieces

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 4>of data, if he did in fact mean that he

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 4>was referring to New South Wales specific data when our

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 4>reporting was about national data and that's also what the

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 4>mapping was showing. That wasn't responded to. We asked if

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 4>any kind of apology or attraction was necessary. Instead, we

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 4>heard that he was concerned about misinformation being spread by

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.119
<v Speaker 4>this group and the sorts of links that this group

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 4>has to that nuclear anti renewable lobby or side of politics,

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 4>so to speak.

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And here's the twist. Rainforest Reserves Australia has recently revised

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>its two year renewal mapping report to expand the space.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It says the government's renewables ambitions will require. The Conservation

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Group now estimates existing and planned renewables projects like wind

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and solar will cover more than four hundred and eighty

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>three thousand hectares nationally. What has been Chris Bowen's response

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>In the Department's response to that development.

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 4>The response is that there is even more concern now

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 4>that this data is very much publicly available. Now that

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 4>they can see all of that data, they have even

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 4>more concerns and believe they are even more flaws. We

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 4>have asked what they are. We are yet to receive

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 4>a response. It may still come. This is a very

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 4>large data set that's taken over two years to compile,

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 4>but it was something that in their perspective, only raised

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 4>more concern rather than say, prompting an apology or a

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 4>retraction about the original video from Crispawn.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Rainforest Reserves Australia fired back at Bowen's claim their calculations

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>were way off the mark. In a press release. They

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>called the claim unsupported, vague, unclear, and appears to mix

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>up the new South Wales only data with its national figures.

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>They told The Australian they're standing by their mapping and

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.119
<v Speaker 1>have called on Chris Bowen to share his department's data

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with them for review.

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 4>There are a lot of conservationists that are very positive

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 4>about this work. Christine Milner comes to mind as someone

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 4>who's saying we need to move away from colin gas,

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 4>as this group says we do as well, But she's

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 4>similarly concerned about this blind move towards large scale renewable

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 4>projects that maybe we're not considering the damage they're doing

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 4>because they're called renewable projects or clean energy projects, and

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 4>the worry that that's going to get away from us.

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 4>So you are hearing actually a fair bit of encouragement

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 4>from progressives and progressive circles for sure when it comes

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 4>to this kind of project.

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Coming up. What about the other half of Chris Bowen's claims.

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>The mapping that informed the Australians reporting was done by

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Queensland conservationist Stephen Nowakowski. He says he's been arrested for

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>his boots on the ground activism and ran for the

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Greens in Cans in the early two thousands. Sarah Chris

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Bowen said in the video posted to social media in

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>response to The Australians reporting that Stephen Nolakowski and Rainforest

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Reserves Australia.

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Are anti renewable pro nuclear activists.

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Is Stephen Nolkowski or rainforest Reserves Australia either of those things,

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>anti renewables or pro nuclear.

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, they're conservationists that are concerned about the rollout of

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 4>large scale renewable projects that come, as they say, potentially

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 4>at the costs of really rich ecological or agricultural land.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 4>And now, like many conservationists, they are saying we need

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 4>to move away from coal and gas, there is no question,

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 4>but it cannot be at the expense of biodiversity. So

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 4>they're the sorts of people who are concerned about land

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 4>being impacted in such a way that it causes more

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 4>damage than relief when it comes to our push towards

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 4>net zero. I think maybe pro nuclear is something you

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 4>could argue. It was something that mister Nawakowski was quite

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 4>clear and transparent about that, despite this being a hard

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 4>thing to admit, he thought that maybe nuclear did need

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 4>to be considered, that it needed to be in the mix.

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 4>He's one of the few Australian conservationists that feel that way,

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 4>and he has been quite upfront about how it is

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 4>somewhat of a turnaround or a shock. However, I think

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 4>to say anti renewable would be quite a stretch. He's

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 4>a conservationist, is how he's described himself, wildlife photographer. It's

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 4>incredibly concerned about the biodiversity of Australia and he's also

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 4>raised plenty of concerns as well about coal and fossil

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 4>fuel and the ongoing role that they have to play.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 4>But to say that he or this group are some

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 4>kind of incredibly pronuculiar, staunchly anti renewable lobby and that

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 4>is their agenda, I don't think quite represents the truth

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 4>behind this particular organization.

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Eisen is a senior political reporter with The Australian.

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>You can read her reporting and analysis, as well as

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>all the nation's best news, sport, politics and business right

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>now at The Australian dot com dot au