WEBVTT - Credlin | 28 October

0:00:02.250 --> 0:00:07.910
<v Speaker 1>Peter Credlin, live from News 24.

0:00:08.420 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Good evening. Welcome to the program. Here's what's coming up

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 2>tonight on the program. It's official. Victoria's an economic basket case.

0:00:15.260 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 2>A new report out today paints a bleak picture for

0:00:18.300 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 2>business in the troubled state. And it comes as the

0:00:20.980 --> 0:00:24.350
<v Speaker 2>state's interest bill on the debt hits almost $ 25 million

0:00:24.370 --> 0:00:29.820
<v Speaker 2>a day. More tonight on the Golf Grant saga with

0:00:29.910 --> 0:00:33.630
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albanese and ministers tying themselves in knots over the

0:00:33.630 --> 0:00:37.130
<v Speaker 2>$ 6 million deal for his mates at Marrickville. Not only

0:00:37.150 --> 0:00:40.530
<v Speaker 2>has the Prime Minister misled the House, but so too

0:00:40.630 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 2>his minister today, Catherine King. Plus, almost a decade since

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 2>the infamous bike boy car crash involving Daniel Andrews and

0:00:50.140 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 2>his wife Catherine, well now the heat's on the former Premier.

0:00:54.020 --> 0:00:58.220
<v Speaker 2>Victoria's current police commissioner now referring the case to IBAC

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.660
<v Speaker 2>for investigation. And the latest inflation data's in, another hit

0:01:02.700 --> 0:01:06.780
<v Speaker 2>for everyday Australians and small business. More pain on the way,

0:01:07.220 --> 0:01:11.209
<v Speaker 2>but from the government, it's just platitudes and excuses.

0:01:12.050 --> 0:01:15.729
<v Speaker 3>These are tough economic times right around the world. And

0:01:15.770 --> 0:01:18.850
<v Speaker 3>they're far from over. We have a plan to get

0:01:18.890 --> 0:01:21.460
<v Speaker 3>through it. and the government that I lead will continue

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 3>to do everything we can to shield Australia from the

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 3>worst of the impact.

0:01:28.459 --> 0:01:30.660
<v Speaker 2>But first, it's not the crime that gets you, it's

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.839
<v Speaker 2>the cover-up. And that's the problem for the Prime Minister

0:01:33.900 --> 0:01:37.919
<v Speaker 2>with the continuing scandal of his $ 6 million grant to

0:01:37.940 --> 0:01:42.690
<v Speaker 2>the Marrickville Golf Club. Last month, when Anthony Albanese's 14

0:01:42.690 --> 0:01:47.150
<v Speaker 2>years of undeclared honorary membership at the club was exposed, well,

0:01:47.190 --> 0:01:51.770
<v Speaker 2>he scrambled to explain... why a simple clubhouse upgrade could

0:01:51.810 --> 0:01:56.290
<v Speaker 2>warrant a multi-million dollar spend. Questions were also asked about

0:01:56.330 --> 0:01:59.550
<v Speaker 2>his personal links to the club, 200 metres from his

0:01:59.670 --> 0:02:04.430
<v Speaker 2>own Marrickville investment property, and the probity around a closed

0:02:04.630 --> 0:02:08.970
<v Speaker 2>grants process that was invite-only. Now, at the time, analysis

0:02:08.990 --> 0:02:11.370
<v Speaker 2>from the Centre for Public Integrity found that 73% of

0:02:12.210 --> 0:02:16.290
<v Speaker 2>the funding was allocated to Labor-held or key marginal seats.

0:02:16.870 --> 0:02:21.500
<v Speaker 2>And when pushed in the Parliament... Albanese made two admissions

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 2>that have come back to haunt him. Firstly, he said

0:02:25.100 --> 0:02:30.100
<v Speaker 2>that he was not the decision maker for the $ 560

0:02:29.060 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>million local and community grants program. That was the Minister

0:02:34.090 --> 0:02:38.730
<v Speaker 2>for Infrastructure, Catherine King, he said. And secondly, that the

0:02:38.770 --> 0:02:42.090
<v Speaker 2>grant to the Marrickville Golf Club was costly because it

0:02:42.150 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 2>included long overdue sewerage works to prevent runoff from the

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.060
<v Speaker 2>club's septic system and into the nearby Cooks River, telling

0:02:51.070 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the House this on 9 September.

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.540
<v Speaker 4>It's existed for a long period of time, almost 100 years,

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 4>and they have a septic tank which, because when it

0:03:03.100 --> 0:03:07.250
<v Speaker 4>is on the floodplain, when it floods in Marrickville, raw

0:03:07.330 --> 0:03:10.390
<v Speaker 4>sewage flows into the Cooks River.

0:03:10.990 --> 0:03:13.370
<v Speaker 1>That is what the funding is for.

0:03:15.090 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 2>That is what the funding is for, he said. I mean,

0:03:18.660 --> 0:03:21.540
<v Speaker 2>the problem for Albanese is that the first time he

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 2>connected that grant to Sewerage Works was just one month ago,

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.500
<v Speaker 2>back then in September. At no earlier time from the

0:03:31.540 --> 0:03:34.940
<v Speaker 2>first instance when he announced the $ 6 million back on

0:03:34.980 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the 27th of April last year, until last month in

0:03:39.300 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 2>the House, did the word Sewerage ever appear. It's not

0:03:44.020 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 2>in any of the Prime Minister's media releases, transcripts, podcasts, newsletters,

0:03:50.020 --> 0:03:55.190
<v Speaker 2>websites or interviews. He's never mentioned it once before last

0:03:55.250 --> 0:03:57.810
<v Speaker 2>month in the House. Nor was it ever on the

0:03:57.890 --> 0:04:00.850
<v Speaker 2>table with the Marrickville Golf Club or the Inner West

0:04:01.030 --> 0:04:05.130
<v Speaker 2>Council that's now led by former Albanese staffer, the Mayor,

0:04:05.550 --> 0:04:06.460
<v Speaker 2>Darcy Byrne.

0:04:07.250 --> 0:04:09.650
<v Speaker 5>Because we've just found out that the Prime Minister of Australia,

0:04:09.750 --> 0:04:13.860
<v Speaker 5>Anthony Albanese, has committed that if re-elected, an Australian Labor

0:04:13.900 --> 0:04:17.620
<v Speaker 5>government will commit $ 6 million to the full renovation of the.

0:04:17.580 --> 0:04:18.659
<v Speaker 6>Marrickville Golf Club.

0:04:19.100 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 5>We've got here Andrew Tai, the president of the club,

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 5>Matt Howard, your local councillor, who helped to fight to

0:04:24.220 --> 0:04:26.910
<v Speaker 5>keep it as an 18-hole course, and Juliette Barr, a

0:04:27.029 --> 0:04:30.380
<v Speaker 5>long-time champion of saving Marrickville Golf Course. Andrew, I want

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.090
<v Speaker 5>to ask you, what will this mean for the club?

0:04:32.330 --> 0:04:33.930
<v Speaker 2>Oh, this is a fantastic day for the club.

0:04:33.970 --> 0:04:35.990
<v Speaker 7>We are going to be able to bring all these

0:04:36.029 --> 0:04:37.850
<v Speaker 7>wonderful community events to the club now.

0:04:37.870 --> 0:04:40.510
<v Speaker 5>We'll be able to refurbish the clubhouse and welcome everybody

0:04:40.550 --> 0:04:43.430
<v Speaker 5>down here. And you're already going gangbusters. There's so many

0:04:43.490 --> 0:04:46.529
<v Speaker 5>events and live music and cultural events taking place here.

0:04:46.810 --> 0:04:47.770
<v Speaker 5>Now we're going to see even more.

0:04:47.890 --> 0:04:49.740
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's great. The community has really embraced the club.

0:04:49.770 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 2>We really appreciate it.

0:04:50.740 --> 0:04:53.300
<v Speaker 5>We've been an open club for years and years and years,

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:54.540
<v Speaker 5>and this is going to bring everybody down.

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:55.140
<v Speaker 8>It's going to be great.

0:04:56.930 --> 0:04:59.470
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there are dozens of social media posts like

0:04:59.529 --> 0:05:04.150
<v Speaker 2>that and not one mention of sewerage. So clearly it's

0:05:04.190 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 2>a cut and dried case of a Prime Minister misleading

0:05:06.380 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 2>the House. Or is it? This week, again under pressure

0:05:10.540 --> 0:05:15.620
<v Speaker 2>in the Parliament, Albanese has tried to retrofit that claim

0:05:15.660 --> 0:05:18.990
<v Speaker 2>of sewerage works to say he wasn't aware that the

0:05:19.110 --> 0:05:22.250
<v Speaker 2>scope of the grant had changed from what he told

0:05:22.290 --> 0:05:24.190
<v Speaker 2>the House last month.

0:05:25.790 --> 0:05:29.090
<v Speaker 3>Will the Prime Minister give Australians a straight answer, admit

0:05:29.130 --> 0:05:33.650
<v Speaker 3>he misled the House and correct the record? Now, Mr Speaker,

0:05:33.690 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 3>during election campaigns, people make commitments. I have said that

0:05:38.620 --> 0:05:39.420
<v Speaker 3>was not correct.

0:05:40.220 --> 0:05:41.060
<v Speaker 9>It was not correct.

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 3>The state government have moved in and are funding the project.

0:05:45.900 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 2>OK, well, that doesn't stack up either. Even before New

0:05:50.020 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 2>South Wales announced last September, September 25, that it would undertake...

0:05:54.630 --> 0:05:58.250
<v Speaker 2>the necessary sewerage and septic tank works at a cost

0:05:58.290 --> 0:06:04.779
<v Speaker 2>of some $ 270, 000, neither Albanese, the golf club or the

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Inner West Council had ever included sewerage works in any

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.940
<v Speaker 2>upgrade plans, meaning that Albanese can't claim that the plans

0:06:13.980 --> 0:06:17.430
<v Speaker 2>have changed, that the scope of works had been varied

0:06:17.890 --> 0:06:21.750
<v Speaker 2>when sewerage works were never involved in the first place.

0:06:22.580 --> 0:06:27.060
<v Speaker 2>A review of the Inner West Council minutes from 2025

0:06:27.060 --> 0:06:32.740
<v Speaker 2>and 2026, that confirms it also. So too, as I said,

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.580
<v Speaker 2>multiple social media posts involving the Mayor, Byrne and Club

0:06:36.620 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 2>President Andrew Tai. A lot of crowing about the big

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.810
<v Speaker 2>win of $ 6 million from their number one patron, Anthony Albanese,

0:06:43.850 --> 0:06:48.630
<v Speaker 2>but not one word, not mentioning at all, sewerage. Until

0:06:48.650 --> 0:06:51.550
<v Speaker 2>that is, of course, the Prime Minister clutched at the

0:06:51.589 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 2>words under pressure in the House last month. And those

0:06:55.940 --> 0:07:00.679
<v Speaker 2>sewerage claims were then backed in by Minister Catherine King

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.690
<v Speaker 2>in a News24 interview on Sunday where she said this.

0:07:05.589 --> 0:07:08.050
<v Speaker 10>Did the money end up going to sewerage works, as

0:07:08.089 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 10>the PM has said in the Parliament?

0:07:12.420 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 11>Well, I have to go back. Yes, that is the works.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.690
<v Speaker 11>There's two levels of works. So both of it is

0:07:18.770 --> 0:07:22.510
<v Speaker 11>to look at the water outflow from the golf club

0:07:22.610 --> 0:07:25.350
<v Speaker 11>itself and to deal with the sewerage issue. And there's

0:07:25.410 --> 0:07:28.620
<v Speaker 11>also some facilities. The scope of works is still being developed,

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.540
<v Speaker 11>but that is my understanding very clearly that it is

0:07:31.620 --> 0:07:34.820
<v Speaker 11>both for the sewerage works and some of the facilities

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:35.940
<v Speaker 11>development out there.

0:07:37.740 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay. But again, that's not the truth. Three days earlier,

0:07:43.180 --> 0:07:48.300
<v Speaker 2>so last Thursday, the 22nd of October, a senior official

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:52.230
<v Speaker 2>in her own department gave evidence to a Senate inquiry

0:07:52.250 --> 0:07:55.570
<v Speaker 2>that's probing the integrity of the whole program. This is

0:07:55.650 --> 0:07:59.850
<v Speaker 2>Jacinta McDonald. She's the Assistant Secretary in the Department of Infrastructure,

0:07:59.870 --> 0:08:02.450
<v Speaker 2>and she told the hearing this.

0:08:03.370 --> 0:08:06.290
<v Speaker 12>The grantee must deliver the design and upgrade of the

0:08:06.310 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 12>Merrickville Golf Club. including the following deliverables. The club precinct refurbishment,

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:18.620
<v Speaker 12>which includes a range of elements, installation of a stormwater

0:08:18.660 --> 0:08:23.110
<v Speaker 12>harvesting system, including storage tanks and pump, creation of a

0:08:23.150 --> 0:08:27.550
<v Speaker 12>botanical garden and biodiversity area, and an upgrade of the

0:08:27.590 --> 0:08:33.350
<v Speaker 12>existing electrical capacity to 200 amps. The sewerage works are

0:08:33.410 --> 0:08:35.170
<v Speaker 12>not in the scope of this grant.

0:08:35.190 --> 0:08:36.730
<v Speaker 6>This grant focuses on the stormwater.

0:08:38.210 --> 0:08:40.410
<v Speaker 2>Look, I almost feel sorry for Catherine King. I mean,

0:08:40.429 --> 0:08:43.370
<v Speaker 2>what's a minister to do? Tell the truth and throw

0:08:43.429 --> 0:08:47.290
<v Speaker 2>a boss under the bus or fudge it and hope

0:08:47.390 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 2>no one bothers following up? Well, unfortunately for her, Senate

0:08:51.670 --> 0:08:55.500
<v Speaker 2>estimates was the next day and a lie was exposed

0:08:55.940 --> 0:08:59.060
<v Speaker 2>when the Assistant Secretary again was back under oath and

0:08:59.580 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 2>once more confirmed that sewage works were never included at

0:09:04.220 --> 0:09:07.260
<v Speaker 2>any time in the golf club project.

0:09:08.010 --> 0:09:10.110
<v Speaker 12>So as part of the approval brief that was provided

0:09:10.150 --> 0:09:13.620
<v Speaker 12>to Minister King, we outlined the scope of the project.

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.340
<v Speaker 6>And the scope of the project.

0:09:17.059 --> 0:09:21.260
<v Speaker 13>Did it include sewerage works or not sewerage works, which

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:25.260
<v Speaker 13>is why I wanted to confirm your evidence from last week?

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 2>It does not include sewerage works.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:28.230
<v Speaker 12>Righto.

0:09:30.410 --> 0:09:33.429
<v Speaker 2>But it gets worse for the Minister. Macdonald went on

0:09:33.490 --> 0:09:37.210
<v Speaker 2>to admit under questioning that the Department had provided their Minister...

0:09:37.290 --> 0:09:42.150
<v Speaker 2>with an approvals brief to duly sign off the $ 6

0:09:41.590 --> 0:09:46.300
<v Speaker 2>million Marrickville grant and that sewerage works were not in it.

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 13>Has Minister King's office ever requested advice from the department

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.220
<v Speaker 13>as to whether the $ 6 million grant is or is

0:09:53.340 --> 0:09:55.250
<v Speaker 13>not funding the sewerage problem?

0:09:57.270 --> 0:09:59.650
<v Speaker 12>So the department provided the minister with the approval brief

0:09:59.670 --> 0:09:59.970
<v Speaker 12>for the project.

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Which outlined the scope.

0:10:02.300 --> 0:10:04.540
<v Speaker 6>And the scope that the Department.

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 13>Sees is being funded doesn't include sewerage work.

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:10.380
<v Speaker 6>Does or it doesn't?

0:10:11.660 --> 0:10:15.890
<v Speaker 2>It does not include sewerage work. I mean, you've got

0:10:15.910 --> 0:10:20.180
<v Speaker 2>to wonder what other documents these Ministers sign that spending

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:25.570
<v Speaker 2>millions and billions that seemingly they don't comprehend. Or how

0:10:25.750 --> 0:10:30.329
<v Speaker 2>hard King's willing to lie to protect the Prime Minister.

0:10:30.990 --> 0:10:33.170
<v Speaker 2>Here she is today in Question Time.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.579
<v Speaker 8>Last Thursday, the minister's own department confirmed to a Senate

0:10:38.620 --> 0:10:43.140
<v Speaker 8>inquiry that Labor's $ 6 million grant to the Marrickville Golf

0:10:43.179 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 8>Club was not to fix sewerage flows. Then, on Sunday,

0:10:48.870 --> 0:10:53.250
<v Speaker 8>the minister told Andrew Clennell on News 24 the $ 6

0:10:52.850 --> 0:10:57.530
<v Speaker 8>million grant was to fix sewerage flows. Can the minister

0:10:57.590 --> 0:11:00.610
<v Speaker 8>explain why her department said one thing to the Senate

0:11:01.210 --> 0:11:04.950
<v Speaker 8>and she said something completely different to the Australian people.

0:11:05.370 --> 0:11:07.790
<v Speaker 11>And as I said multiple times during that interview, I

0:11:07.809 --> 0:11:10.450
<v Speaker 11>would have to check exactly what was being delivered through

0:11:10.470 --> 0:11:12.550
<v Speaker 11>that grant. So if you actually had have listened to

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 11>the interview, I understand that the Prime Minister addressed this

0:11:16.340 --> 0:11:23.219
<v Speaker 11>issue in question time yesterday. But to repeat, but to repeat,

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.380
<v Speaker 11>when this funding commitment was made in April 2025, part

0:11:28.220 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 11>of the commitment included.

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, calm down, Catherine. I can assure you I've listened

0:11:34.830 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 2>to the interview, and as I've shown you, here's the

0:11:37.710 --> 0:11:40.949
<v Speaker 2>announcement again from April last year. April, she mentions April,

0:11:41.470 --> 0:11:44.370
<v Speaker 2>from the Prime Minister, and there's no mention of Sirij.

0:11:44.910 --> 0:11:48.810
<v Speaker 2>The word does not appear in his press release. So

0:11:48.850 --> 0:11:52.710
<v Speaker 2>not only has Albanese misled the House, but his minister

0:11:52.750 --> 0:11:57.450
<v Speaker 2>today has also misled the Parliament. But it doesn't end there.

0:11:57.470 --> 0:12:01.650
<v Speaker 2>Back to Albanese's assertion last month that Catherine King was

0:12:01.690 --> 0:12:06.420
<v Speaker 2>the decision-maker. Well, again, serious questions arise here with another

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.900
<v Speaker 2>of her answers on Sunday. When asked who was involved

0:12:10.940 --> 0:12:15.420
<v Speaker 2>in the process of awarding these grants, King admitted that

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.710
<v Speaker 2>Labor Party head office was involved in deciding where the

0:12:18.770 --> 0:12:19.410
<v Speaker 2>money went.

0:12:20.290 --> 0:12:24.550
<v Speaker 10>Was Labor's head office involved in that process?

0:12:25.670 --> 0:12:26.530
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, absolutely.

0:12:26.550 --> 0:12:29.829
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, absolutely, because it's an election commitment process.

0:12:29.870 --> 0:12:31.030
<v Speaker 6>It's a political process.

0:12:31.070 --> 0:12:32.290
<v Speaker 14>So, of course.

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.060
<v Speaker 11>you know, that is done through the party machinery, not

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 11>through government machinery.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.220
<v Speaker 10>So you've got this MPs go to the party machinery,

0:12:41.260 --> 0:12:45.610
<v Speaker 10>give their wish list. The party machinery decides it's all right,

0:12:46.210 --> 0:12:49.330
<v Speaker 10>as opposed to you, the infrastructure minister, and then post-election

0:12:49.350 --> 0:12:51.010
<v Speaker 10>you put it through the formal process.

0:12:52.110 --> 0:12:52.570
<v Speaker 1>Is that right?

0:12:53.950 --> 0:13:02.569
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we have to. There's a process for administration. Yeah, absolutely. So, yeah, absolutely. Now,

0:13:03.059 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Understand this. What King confirms in that exchange is that

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>unelected Labor Party operatives, well, they make the call regarding

0:13:12.070 --> 0:13:15.370
<v Speaker 2>the allocation of half a billion dollars of taxpayer funding

0:13:15.929 --> 0:13:18.130
<v Speaker 2>with the department just brought in at the back end

0:13:18.510 --> 0:13:21.410
<v Speaker 2>to get the money out the door. That's all they did. Remember,

0:13:21.429 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 2>this was an invite-only grants program. It's not as if

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 2>they even had to assess grant applications or measure them

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:34.540
<v Speaker 2>against a transparent set of guidelines. Labor HQ had already

0:13:34.580 --> 0:13:37.700
<v Speaker 2>decided who was going to get what, what seats were

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 2>going to get the money, with Labor MPs like the

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:44.420
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister rushing out those press releases in the last

0:13:44.650 --> 0:13:48.530
<v Speaker 2>days of the election campaign. The Department... Well, they were

0:13:48.570 --> 0:13:53.130
<v Speaker 2>just window dressing a process that a highly respected constitutional

0:13:53.170 --> 0:13:58.410
<v Speaker 2>expert in Antumi has already labelled as grey corruption. Now,

0:13:58.460 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 2>you can see now why this whole sordid mess needs

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:06.179
<v Speaker 2>to be urgently referred to the National Anti-Corruption Commission, don't you?

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 2>After all, Albanese can hardly object having declared this to

0:14:12.220 --> 0:14:15.750
<v Speaker 2>the Parliament in October 2020.

0:14:15.750 --> 0:14:19.170
<v Speaker 3>Is the reason why the Morrison Government hasn't introduced legislation

0:14:19.220 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 3>for a National Integrity Commission because of the corrupt sports

0:14:23.020 --> 0:14:28.140
<v Speaker 3>rort scheme, the Leppington Triangle land scandal, stacking the AAT

0:14:28.180 --> 0:14:30.780
<v Speaker 3>with Liberal mates, the Liberal mate that paid more than

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 3>a million dollars for market research, wasting $ 20, 000 on Cartier watches,

0:14:36.220 --> 0:14:39.860
<v Speaker 3>and the Minister of Energy's involvement in countless scandals. Too

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:40.660
<v Speaker 3>many to mention.

0:14:43.820 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 2>He's got the hide. to circulate a dirt sheet questioning

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:52.090
<v Speaker 2>the integrity of Helen Haynes. Talk about pot calling kettle black.

0:14:56.730 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 2>More on that. We'll speak to Senator Bridget McKenzie, who's

0:14:59.500 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 2>been in the fight in the Estimates hearings over all

0:15:01.420 --> 0:15:03.860
<v Speaker 2>the detail. But let's get the camera now for the headlines.

0:15:03.980 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Our political reporter, Rym Spargo. Good evening.

0:15:07.580 --> 0:15:10.430
<v Speaker 15>Pressure is mounting on the Reserve Bank to raise interest

0:15:10.510 --> 0:15:13.750
<v Speaker 15>rates on Melbourne Cup Day as inflation moves in the

0:15:13.770 --> 0:15:17.290
<v Speaker 15>wrong direction. The headline rate jumped to 4.3% in the

0:15:17.340 --> 0:15:22.020
<v Speaker 15>year to September, underlying inflation edged up to 3.6%.

0:15:22.020 --> 0:15:25.580
<v Speaker 2>Increasing more in other countries than here. but we know

0:15:25.620 --> 0:15:27.350
<v Speaker 2>that this doesn't make it any easier.

0:15:27.420 --> 0:15:29.970
<v Speaker 4>They know they're the ones who are paying the price

0:15:30.270 --> 0:15:33.710
<v Speaker 4>for his active inflation agenda and his spending addiction.

0:15:33.750 --> 0:15:36.810
<v Speaker 15>The Treasurer is refusing to commit to net savings in

0:15:36.870 --> 0:15:39.970
<v Speaker 15>next month's mid-year budget update. The Speaker of the House

0:15:39.990 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 15>has issued a scathing rebuke after a coalition MP swore

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.500
<v Speaker 15>at the Prime Minister in Parliament. Anthony Albanese was being

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 15>pressed to justify $ 8. 7 billion in spending on the climate

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 15>change department.

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:58.110
<v Speaker 3>Increasing numbers and frequencies and intensity of extreme weather events.

0:15:59.330 --> 0:16:00.690
<v Speaker 1>Now those.

0:16:00.850 --> 0:16:01.830
<v Speaker 6>Order, order.

0:16:02.290 --> 0:16:07.630
<v Speaker 2>Swearing in the parliament is completely unacceptable. I won't accept it.

0:16:08.110 --> 0:16:09.250
<v Speaker 13>Australia won't accept it.

0:16:09.700 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 15>Milton Dick later delivered a warning to both the Prime

0:16:12.540 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 15>Minister and opposition leader.

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:15.340
<v Speaker 2>You're going to stop yelling at me.

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Order.

0:16:17.060 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 2>No leader of the opposition has behaved like that.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.500
<v Speaker 15>The Prime Minister can assist by lowering the temperature as

0:16:21.540 --> 0:16:23.420
<v Speaker 15>well with the language being used.

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Order.

0:16:24.490 --> 0:16:28.470
<v Speaker 15>MPs have been asked to show greater respect in political debate.

0:16:30.450 --> 0:16:32.390
<v Speaker 2>Fair play to the Speaker too. All right, let's get

0:16:32.410 --> 0:16:35.690
<v Speaker 2>into the inflation data out today. A bleak picture painted

0:16:35.710 --> 0:16:38.950
<v Speaker 2>for the Australian economy. Here was the opposition leader's opening

0:16:39.050 --> 0:16:40.550
<v Speaker 2>salvo to the Parliament.

0:16:41.370 --> 0:16:45.290
<v Speaker 9>Last year, your Treasurer boasted... The worst of the inflation

0:16:45.330 --> 0:16:50.670
<v Speaker 9>challenge is now well and truly behind us. Today, inflation

0:16:50.750 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 9>went up again to 4.3% as Australians brace for a

0:16:57.460 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 9>17th interest rate increase under Labor. Will the Prime Minister

0:17:02.540 --> 0:17:07.389
<v Speaker 9>acknowledge reality, accept his Treasurer was wrong and admit Labor's

0:17:07.590 --> 0:17:12.090
<v Speaker 9>out-of-control spending is forcing families and small businesses to pay

0:17:12.150 --> 0:17:13.730
<v Speaker 9>more for everything.

0:17:15.390 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in our News 24 business editor, Ross Greenwood. Well,

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.060
<v Speaker 2>fair enough with all of the commentary there, of course,

0:17:22.100 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 2>from the opposition leader. I know there was a debate

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.740
<v Speaker 2>that this has been driven, and it is, by high

0:17:28.900 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 2>fuel prices. Of course, the concern is if you look

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 2>around the world, Ross, everybody's impacted by these high fuel costs.

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 2>No one's got numbers looking as bad as ours do.

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:44.270
<v Speaker 2>No one's had 17 rate hikes before. or 16, likely 17,

0:17:44.270 --> 0:17:47.090
<v Speaker 2>like Australia has. And our cash rate, well, it's one

0:17:47.109 --> 0:17:50.830
<v Speaker 2>of the highest in the developed world. So when is

0:17:50.869 --> 0:17:54.930
<v Speaker 2>the Treasury, the government, going to take some responsibility here.

0:17:55.340 --> 0:17:58.859
<v Speaker 7>Well, you'd have to say never, right? That's the issue.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 7>You'd understand that they won't. And effectively, they will continue

0:18:02.220 --> 0:18:06.010
<v Speaker 7>to deflect that this is basically something that's been inherited

0:18:06.050 --> 0:18:09.190
<v Speaker 7>from overseas. Now, the Treasurer does say we have an

0:18:09.250 --> 0:18:11.750
<v Speaker 7>inflation issue of our own. Now, too right we do,

0:18:12.350 --> 0:18:15.739
<v Speaker 7>because it's not only caused by the fact that the

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 7>the government itself has clearly spent a lot more money

0:18:19.260 --> 0:18:21.899
<v Speaker 7>and continues to spend, not just in terms of its

0:18:22.140 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 7>own expenditure, but in the indirect handouts that it makes.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 7>And so, therefore, if it gives money to you and

0:18:28.500 --> 0:18:32.300
<v Speaker 7>you spend that money, that is private spending, not government spending.

0:18:32.340 --> 0:18:34.959
<v Speaker 7>And so it all gets blurred. But here is the

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 7>bottom line of this. If every nation on Earth is

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 7>also undergoing the same inflationary pressures caused by the Middle East,

0:18:43.460 --> 0:18:46.489
<v Speaker 7>and by the Ukraine wars, then they should all be

0:18:46.550 --> 0:18:48.690
<v Speaker 7>raising interest rates the same as we are. And as

0:18:48.730 --> 0:18:51.450
<v Speaker 7>you make the observation, if we go to, I don't know,

0:18:51.710 --> 0:18:54.650
<v Speaker 7>we go to the UK, they have zero interest rate

0:18:54.710 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 7>rises this year. Go to the United States, one interest

0:18:57.740 --> 0:19:01.340
<v Speaker 7>rate rise this year. Canada, Zero interest rate rises this year.

0:19:01.700 --> 0:19:06.610
<v Speaker 7>New Zealand, two. Europe, two. Australia, about to be five.

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.149
<v Speaker 7>And that says that something is not equal in the

0:19:10.210 --> 0:19:13.810
<v Speaker 7>world in the way in which different nations have absorbed

0:19:13.850 --> 0:19:17.830
<v Speaker 7>the inflation that's come as a result of these increases

0:19:17.890 --> 0:19:21.010
<v Speaker 7>in fuel prices. So, therefore, it actually suggests that there

0:19:21.070 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 7>is something different happening in Australia's economy, which is really

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.239
<v Speaker 7>that the government has allowed wages... and prices to get

0:19:29.300 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 7>out of control. This is the government, after all, it

0:19:31.580 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 7>celebrates when wage rises occur, when the Fair Work Commission

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.510
<v Speaker 7>hands out above inflation rate wage rises. But those things

0:19:39.619 --> 0:19:43.570
<v Speaker 7>actually lead to a slowing of our economy, an increase

0:19:43.590 --> 0:19:47.990
<v Speaker 7>in our unemployment rate, and ultimately, therefore, really the demise

0:19:48.109 --> 0:19:49.850
<v Speaker 7>and a Reserve Bank that's got nowhere else to go.

0:19:49.980 --> 0:19:52.740
<v Speaker 7>simply because the government hasn't pulled the leaves it could

0:19:52.780 --> 0:19:55.619
<v Speaker 7>have done to basically make the Reserve Bank's job easier.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.909
<v Speaker 2>OK, and when we've got an inflation rate running as

0:19:59.950 --> 0:20:03.290
<v Speaker 2>it is now at 4.3%, how do we get wage

0:20:03.369 --> 0:20:08.500
<v Speaker 2>rises coming through the public servants of 25% 35, there

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 2>was a push yesterday for a 35% wage hike. You've

0:20:12.420 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 2>got small businesses, John Howard makes a point yesterday, barely

0:20:16.540 --> 0:20:19.390
<v Speaker 2>able to survive. They're not giving themselves a wage rise

0:20:19.730 --> 0:20:23.590
<v Speaker 2>at all, let alone 35%. He spoke about a bloated

0:20:23.650 --> 0:20:27.710
<v Speaker 2>public service. He spoke about a productivity across the economy

0:20:27.750 --> 0:20:31.930
<v Speaker 2>that's near non-existent. I mean, we are really struggling. Yeah.

0:20:32.130 --> 0:20:34.429
<v Speaker 7>Now, if you look at the various estimates, there are,

0:20:34.510 --> 0:20:38.270
<v Speaker 7>since this government was appointed, an extra between 38,000 and

0:20:38.270 --> 0:20:42.660
<v Speaker 7>40,000 additional public servants. I've done a rough calculation on that.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.139
<v Speaker 7>I'd say $ 120, 000 a year. I know that's lowballing it,

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:44.780
<v Speaker 7>but that's $ 4.

0:20:44.619 --> 0:20:45.100
<v Speaker 10>6 billion a year.

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.170
<v Speaker 7>In extra expenditure on those wages and salaries. And so

0:20:52.210 --> 0:20:54.630
<v Speaker 7>when the Treasurer says, well, tell me ways in which

0:20:54.670 --> 0:20:58.050
<v Speaker 7>we can cut expenditure, well, there's 40,000 people who didn't

0:20:58.090 --> 0:21:01.429
<v Speaker 7>have a job previously, give or take, who clearly the

0:21:01.470 --> 0:21:03.770
<v Speaker 7>public service, is it more efficient? Is it working more?

0:21:04.570 --> 0:21:06.510
<v Speaker 7>better for you? Well, I'm not sure it is, but

0:21:06.770 --> 0:21:09.950
<v Speaker 7>the reality is there's clearly trimming that can be made.

0:21:10.340 --> 0:21:13.260
<v Speaker 7>The second factor also is when it comes to productivity. Well,

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:18.580
<v Speaker 7>if the government had made really our country more competitive

0:21:18.940 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 7>and really allowed other businesses to invest significant amounts of money...

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.820
<v Speaker 7>in this nation, well, guess what? Our productivity would improve.

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.550
<v Speaker 7>If our productivity were better, the Reserve Bank would not

0:21:28.590 --> 0:21:31.310
<v Speaker 7>be pressured to put the interest rates up as it

0:21:31.390 --> 0:21:34.210
<v Speaker 7>is now. And the real problem here is not only

0:21:34.250 --> 0:21:37.350
<v Speaker 7>will it be a per capita recession, but chances are,

0:21:37.450 --> 0:21:40.609
<v Speaker 7>as time goes on, if these interest rate rises continue

0:21:40.650 --> 0:21:43.590
<v Speaker 7>to smash our economy, that there ultimately could be a

0:21:43.750 --> 0:21:46.270
<v Speaker 7>real recession as well. And the chances of that are

0:21:46.310 --> 0:21:48.530
<v Speaker 7>now starting to rise. Most economists don't have it as

0:21:48.550 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 7>their central case, but the reality is that this government

0:21:51.650 --> 0:21:56.100
<v Speaker 7>now could face a recession and higher interest rates and

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.020
<v Speaker 7>higher unemployment at the very time that they go into

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:00.340
<v Speaker 7>the polls in 18 months' time.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I'm out of time, Ross, but I reckon the

0:22:03.500 --> 0:22:06.610
<v Speaker 2>only bet we've got that is a sure back on

0:22:06.650 --> 0:22:10.609
<v Speaker 2>Cup Day is that we will have our 17th rate hike.

0:22:11.030 --> 0:22:13.830
<v Speaker 7>I think that's pretty much the odds on favourite that day.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anyone would give you odds for anything

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 2>other than an increase. Thank you, Ross. All right, let's

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 2>go now to the panel. Lots of other stories around.

0:22:22.140 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 2>News24 host James Morrow, senior reporter Carolyn Marcus. Welcome to

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.010
<v Speaker 2>you both. Okay, the politics on this, James. Let's go

0:22:29.030 --> 0:22:31.369
<v Speaker 2>to the politics. Put the economics to one side, the

0:22:31.630 --> 0:22:36.609
<v Speaker 2>budget pressures, et cetera. 17 rate hikes all on Labor's watch,

0:22:37.030 --> 0:22:40.970
<v Speaker 2>you know, foregone conclusion come next Tuesday. You've got the

0:22:41.010 --> 0:22:45.429
<v Speaker 2>blame being sheeted home by the government to absolutely everybody.

0:22:45.450 --> 0:22:49.580
<v Speaker 2>This is not going to wash anymore. Everybody out there

0:22:49.660 --> 0:22:52.899
<v Speaker 2>knows that the government's got a big part of the

0:22:52.940 --> 0:22:56.479
<v Speaker 2>blame here and they want to see someone take responsibility.

0:22:56.990 --> 0:22:59.750
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, Peter, it's really fascinating here because there's

0:22:59.810 --> 0:23:02.470
<v Speaker 1>something that links this story to, of course, the other

0:23:02.530 --> 0:23:05.290
<v Speaker 1>big story, which is the story about the golf course grant.

0:23:05.730 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And in both of these cases, they illustrate this government's

0:23:10.220 --> 0:23:14.940
<v Speaker 1>major character flaw, which is that it is preternaturally unable

0:23:15.180 --> 0:23:18.940
<v Speaker 1>to take responsibility when things go wrong on their watch

0:23:19.100 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's their fault. And people are not falling for

0:23:22.270 --> 0:23:24.649
<v Speaker 1>this now. You know, I think Ross Greenwood did a

0:23:24.650 --> 0:23:27.670
<v Speaker 1>very good job saying, Other countries aren't raising their interest

0:23:27.690 --> 0:23:29.709
<v Speaker 1>rates anywhere near as much, even though they all have

0:23:29.730 --> 0:23:33.250
<v Speaker 1>the same fuel pressures. People here are cottoning on to

0:23:33.290 --> 0:23:38.780
<v Speaker 1>the fact that spending, government spending, the bloated size of government,

0:23:38.950 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the so-called care economy, is driving the private sector to

0:23:44.300 --> 0:23:46.740
<v Speaker 1>the wall and it is driving prices through the roof.

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:48.940
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're starting to see this come through in

0:23:48.980 --> 0:23:51.220
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the polls. The most recent are News

0:23:51.290 --> 0:23:54.230
<v Speaker 1>poll from maybe two weeks ago said 55 percent of

0:23:54.310 --> 0:23:57.590
<v Speaker 1>Australians said cut government spending. There was a Roy Morgan

0:23:57.630 --> 0:24:00.670
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago. It had put government spending

0:24:00.850 --> 0:24:03.790
<v Speaker 1>at the second biggest concern, right below cost of living.

0:24:04.470 --> 0:24:08.290
<v Speaker 1>Australians get it. And this is a huge problem because

0:24:08.350 --> 0:24:11.690
<v Speaker 1>now Chalmers is saying, oh, well, we might not cut anything.

0:24:12.130 --> 0:24:14.350
<v Speaker 1>And they look very weak and they look like they're

0:24:14.369 --> 0:24:17.429
<v Speaker 1>being controlled by world events. Oh, don't blame us. It's

0:24:17.470 --> 0:24:20.010
<v Speaker 1>the fuel prices. Oh, don't blame us. It's Donald Trump.

0:24:20.090 --> 0:24:22.100
<v Speaker 1>We need something better than that, Peter.

0:24:23.550 --> 0:24:25.929
<v Speaker 2>And the vote buying is the back of the spending.

0:24:25.970 --> 0:24:28.970
<v Speaker 2>Let's be clear about that. You've got an update for us, Carol,

0:24:29.010 --> 0:24:32.379
<v Speaker 2>on the alleged Bondi government, Naveed Akram. The case was

0:24:32.430 --> 0:24:34.340
<v Speaker 2>back in the court. What's the latest here?

0:24:34.980 --> 0:24:38.899
<v Speaker 16>Well, we won't have a hearing again for another four months, Peter.

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.700
<v Speaker 16>Viewers are going to have to wait until the end

0:24:41.740 --> 0:24:44.580
<v Speaker 16>of February to see where this case is up to.

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 16>After prosecutors asked for a mammoth 17-week extension for In

0:24:49.820 --> 0:24:53.820
<v Speaker 16>this matter now, Naveed Akram was set down for a.

0:24:53.940 --> 0:24:56.050
<v Speaker 2>Brief mention in court this morning.

0:24:56.090 --> 0:24:59.770
<v Speaker 16>He didn't have to appear on video link from custody,

0:24:59.930 --> 0:25:02.899
<v Speaker 16>but the prosecutors say they need a lot more time

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 16>in order to consult Naveed. victims and next of kin

0:25:07.660 --> 0:25:11.990
<v Speaker 16>who were involved in the Bondi massacre about the exact

0:25:12.090 --> 0:25:17.109
<v Speaker 16>charges they intend to proceed with. So he's facing 78

0:25:17.109 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 16>offences at the moment. We now know that the prosecution

0:25:22.740 --> 0:25:27.060
<v Speaker 16>will submit more evidence about some of the purchases that

0:25:27.540 --> 0:25:31.140
<v Speaker 16>Navid Akram and his father, Sajid Akram, who was shot

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:35.669
<v Speaker 16>dead by police during the incident, some of the purchases

0:25:35.710 --> 0:25:37.810
<v Speaker 16>they made in the lead up to the attack are

0:25:37.830 --> 0:25:41.330
<v Speaker 16>going to form part of the evidence. But prosecutors wanted

0:25:41.410 --> 0:25:45.300
<v Speaker 16>more time to consult families. And that's why we're going

0:25:45.340 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 16>to have to wait even longer to see what happens

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:48.100
<v Speaker 16>in this case.

0:25:49.810 --> 0:25:52.270
<v Speaker 2>James, a new survey out today, yet another one, saying

0:25:52.290 --> 0:25:56.100
<v Speaker 2>a majority of Australians believe our immigration intake's too high.

0:25:56.630 --> 0:26:00.220
<v Speaker 2>And this comes as Tony Burke faces more questions over

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.179
<v Speaker 2>his Nauru solution following the report in The Australian that

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:07.450
<v Speaker 2>the Congolese serial rapist has been permitted to remain in

0:26:07.530 --> 0:26:12.430
<v Speaker 2>Australia under a Direction 110 order. This is an individual

0:26:12.470 --> 0:26:17.580
<v Speaker 2>known only to us as JKWL. Shocking offences committed against

0:26:17.630 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 2>his then 13-year-old daughter. But he gets to stay in

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:26.699
<v Speaker 2>Australia because of concerns about his wellbeing. That's why he's

0:26:26.740 --> 0:26:30.830
<v Speaker 2>not deported. He's a convicted child rapist, a serial rapist,

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.330
<v Speaker 2>but they're worried about his welfare and not the rest

0:26:34.350 --> 0:26:34.909
<v Speaker 2>of the country.

0:26:35.859 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Ah, yes, Peter, the fruits of postmodern liberalism here. This

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 1>is where we wind up here. You've got this person,

0:26:42.740 --> 0:26:45.790
<v Speaker 1>but not only him. We know from Direction 110, which

0:26:45.850 --> 0:26:49.869
<v Speaker 1>replaced the old Direction 99, which was the old orders

0:26:49.950 --> 0:26:53.609
<v Speaker 1>to the then-AAT, now Administrative Review Tribunal, on what do

0:26:53.630 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you do about people of this sort of thing who've

0:26:57.580 --> 0:27:00.460
<v Speaker 1>been convicted with serious cases. More than half of them,

0:27:00.500 --> 0:27:03.940
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, I think, 114 out of 227 who've

0:27:04.460 --> 0:27:10.619
<v Speaker 1>been put before the ART on similarly horrific, grotesque charges

0:27:10.859 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>have been allowed to stay. As you say, because what? Oh,

0:27:13.660 --> 0:27:16.020
<v Speaker 1>because we have to be kind to them. We have

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.500
<v Speaker 1>to be nice to them. And, you know, I think

0:27:18.540 --> 0:27:20.940
<v Speaker 1>most Australians will look at this and say, If you

0:27:20.980 --> 0:27:23.710
<v Speaker 1>do crimes like this and you get deported back to

0:27:23.910 --> 0:27:27.350
<v Speaker 1>your home country and something happens to you, this is

0:27:27.430 --> 0:27:28.950
<v Speaker 1>not our problem.

0:27:30.550 --> 0:27:32.949
<v Speaker 2>There's something wrong with that minister's department because this is

0:27:32.990 --> 0:27:35.899
<v Speaker 2>the same department who wouldn't give us an update on

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 2>the convicted terrorists due to come out on Monday and

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:41.540
<v Speaker 2>whether or not the government was applying for a control

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:46.430
<v Speaker 2>order because... of concerns about his privacy. Kerry, here's another

0:27:46.470 --> 0:27:48.649
<v Speaker 2>one for you. This one's a shocker. The Albanese government

0:27:48.670 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 2>today standing by a taxpayer-funded website that tells pedophiles not to,

0:27:55.119 --> 0:28:01.310
<v Speaker 2>and I quote, beat themselves up for sexual fantasies about kids. Now,

0:28:01.450 --> 0:28:03.810
<v Speaker 2>this is a module on the website that's linked to

0:28:03.830 --> 0:28:07.859
<v Speaker 2>the Stop It Now Australia website. It reads, I quote again,

0:28:08.220 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 2>for many people, it is simply not realistic to never

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:18.340
<v Speaker 2>have sexual fantasies about children. Now, how the heck are

0:28:18.380 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 2>we paying for this?

0:28:20.369 --> 0:28:24.460
<v Speaker 16>It makes me feel physically ill, Peter.

0:28:24.460 --> 0:28:24.590
<v Speaker 14>$ 9.

0:28:24.460 --> 0:28:27.979
<v Speaker 16>4 million of taxpayer money has gone towards setting up

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 16>this website and a hotline. And ongoing, there'll be $ 4

0:28:32.260 --> 0:28:36.830
<v Speaker 16>million a year of our money going towards subsidising this. Now,

0:28:37.210 --> 0:28:40.510
<v Speaker 16>it's not a one off example that you've just read

0:28:40.590 --> 0:28:44.209
<v Speaker 16>out to readers. I mean, there's plenty of examples you

0:28:44.250 --> 0:28:47.590
<v Speaker 16>can find looking through this site where it appears to

0:28:47.690 --> 0:28:52.890
<v Speaker 16>normalise having sexual fantasies about children. In one instance, it

0:28:53.020 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 16>compares trying to stop thinking about that and fantasizing about

0:28:59.340 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 16>it with gay conversion therapy. And it advises people who

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:08.830
<v Speaker 16>might have these thoughts to walk it off or do

0:29:08.850 --> 0:29:13.310
<v Speaker 16>a jigsaw puzzle. I mean, I know the attorney general

0:29:13.370 --> 0:29:16.530
<v Speaker 16>has said that this was a recommendation out of the

0:29:16.570 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 16>Royal Commission into institutional responses to child sex abuse. But

0:29:21.220 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 16>this is not OK. People who have these kinds of thoughts...

0:29:25.900 --> 0:29:30.500
<v Speaker 16>should be reporting themselves for professional help or to authorities.

0:29:30.540 --> 0:29:31.850
<v Speaker 6>They're criminal thoughts.

0:29:32.170 --> 0:29:34.490
<v Speaker 2>They are perverse and disgusting.

0:29:34.850 --> 0:29:37.830
<v Speaker 16>We shouldn't be normalising them and we certainly shouldn't be

0:29:37.890 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 16>putting our money towards telling the pedophiles to just go

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:43.540
<v Speaker 16>and do a 1,000-piece puzzle.

0:29:45.940 --> 0:29:49.140
<v Speaker 2>It is shocking and I'm staggered that it hasn't been

0:29:49.180 --> 0:29:51.220
<v Speaker 2>a feature of Parliament in the last couple of days.

0:29:51.660 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for the updates. We'll leave it there. After

0:29:53.660 --> 0:29:57.390
<v Speaker 2>the break, the golf funding scandal... The Prime Minister cornered

0:29:57.510 --> 0:30:00.410
<v Speaker 2>again today in the Parliament. We'll speak to the woman

0:30:00.450 --> 0:30:03.510
<v Speaker 2>after the break who's led the questioning in Senate Estimates.

0:30:08.340 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, the Police Chief in Victoria has now referred

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:15.180
<v Speaker 2>the Bike Boy scandal involving the former Premier Daniel Andrews

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:19.020
<v Speaker 2>off to the state's Anti-Corruption Commission for investigation. I'll get

0:30:19.060 --> 0:30:22.220
<v Speaker 2>you that update. But now to Labor's dodgy grant scheme

0:30:22.260 --> 0:30:24.030
<v Speaker 2>and the $ 6 million that was dished out to the

0:30:24.070 --> 0:30:27.670
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister's mates, at the Marrickville Golf Club. Joining me,

0:30:27.690 --> 0:30:31.430
<v Speaker 2>someone who's prosecuted the case before the Senate, Victorian Senator

0:30:31.450 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Bridget McKenzie. Well, Bridget, you know, fantastic work. You've got

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the public servants. I don't expect they're going to make

0:30:38.980 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 2>friends with their minister telling the truth last Thursday and

0:30:42.260 --> 0:30:46.660
<v Speaker 2>again this Monday. It would appear that sewerage has never

0:30:46.700 --> 0:30:50.570
<v Speaker 2>been involved in this at all. anywhere, and we go

0:30:50.610 --> 0:30:53.210
<v Speaker 2>back to the announcement from the Prime Minister, that press

0:30:53.270 --> 0:30:56.450
<v Speaker 2>release a couple of days before the election last April,

0:30:56.690 --> 0:31:00.030
<v Speaker 2>he never mentioned sewerage. He only ever put it on

0:31:00.050 --> 0:31:03.370
<v Speaker 2>the table last month because he was feeling a bit

0:31:03.410 --> 0:31:06.850
<v Speaker 2>of heat in the House. Well, it's proven to be wrong.

0:31:07.450 --> 0:31:09.450
<v Speaker 2>He has misled the Parliament then.

0:31:11.870 --> 0:31:12.970
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, Peter.

0:31:13.070 --> 0:31:18.110
<v Speaker 13>He has misled the Parliament and the Coalition today pressed

0:31:18.150 --> 0:31:18.610
<v Speaker 13>the case.

0:31:18.670 --> 0:31:20.969
<v Speaker 6>We pressed the case again.

0:31:20.990 --> 0:31:25.470
<v Speaker 13>Yesterday because, as you rightly say, the Prime Minister had

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.620
<v Speaker 13>only mentioned sewerage once the story broke that there was

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 13>a problem with this grant. His own press release doesn't

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 13>mention it. The minutes of the local council welcoming the

0:31:37.740 --> 0:31:42.550
<v Speaker 13>announcement during the election campaign do not mention sewerage works

0:31:42.630 --> 0:31:46.130
<v Speaker 13>at all. And the department itself has made it very,

0:31:46.190 --> 0:31:48.750
<v Speaker 13>very clear that sewerage is not in the scope of

0:31:48.810 --> 0:31:49.490
<v Speaker 13>the project.

0:31:49.810 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 6>And as you know, Peter....

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.390
<v Speaker 13>What you would have done when this was mentioned in

0:31:54.450 --> 0:31:57.290
<v Speaker 13>Parliament back in your day when you were running the PMO,

0:31:57.350 --> 0:32:00.170
<v Speaker 13>you would have got on the phone in the office,

0:32:00.270 --> 0:32:02.690
<v Speaker 13>got on the phone to Minister King's office and said.

0:32:03.130 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 6>Is sewerage part of this project? And you would have

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:07.060
<v Speaker 6>been told no.

0:32:07.580 --> 0:32:10.260
<v Speaker 13>And instead what happened in the Prime Minister's office is

0:32:10.300 --> 0:32:13.420
<v Speaker 13>they went on the attack, developed a dirt sheet for

0:32:13.580 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 13>anybody that was questioning the integrity of this grant, whether

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 13>it was Helen Haynes, whether it was opposition members of

0:32:20.940 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 13>Parliament like Dan Tehan or Ben Small, or indeed go

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.660
<v Speaker 13>on the attack for the media who actually had the

0:32:27.740 --> 0:32:30.580
<v Speaker 13>gall to run the gauntlet up to the PM on this.

0:32:32.420 --> 0:32:35.770
<v Speaker 2>So Catherine King said to my colleague Andrew Clennell on

0:32:35.830 --> 0:32:39.900
<v Speaker 2>Sunday that sewerage was in the works. But when you

0:32:40.020 --> 0:32:43.660
<v Speaker 2>pushed the public servants on Monday, they said, no, it

0:32:43.700 --> 0:32:46.900
<v Speaker 2>wasn't and never has been. But more than that, they

0:32:46.940 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 2>said that there is an approvals brief with the minister

0:32:49.460 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 2>for her to sign, or she signed it already, that

0:32:52.550 --> 0:32:55.510
<v Speaker 2>makes that very clear. So how on earth does she

0:32:55.570 --> 0:32:58.450
<v Speaker 2>say sewerage is in when the department says, well, no,

0:32:58.470 --> 0:33:02.050
<v Speaker 2>the brief that authorises the $ 6 million doesn't have sewerage

0:33:02.090 --> 0:33:05.490
<v Speaker 2>in it? You've got to wonder what these ministers are

0:33:05.650 --> 0:33:08.170
<v Speaker 2>signing and if they're not across the detail?

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:11.860
<v Speaker 13>Well, you have to be across the detail when you're

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:16.780
<v Speaker 13>signing the brief. And Minister King today in question time, again,

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.770
<v Speaker 13>attempted to cover up for the Prime Minister and for

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:25.030
<v Speaker 13>his denials that Surge was somehow always.

0:33:24.710 --> 0:33:27.470
<v Speaker 6>Part of this project. That is not the case. There

0:33:27.530 --> 0:33:28.230
<v Speaker 6>is no.

0:33:28.170 --> 0:33:34.340
<v Speaker 13>Evidence available, whether through FOIs, through Senate estimates... you know,

0:33:34.390 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 13>questioning public officials or indeed in the public domain that

0:33:37.940 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 13>Sue Ridge has been a part of this project. And

0:33:39.820 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 13>so the Minister herself, Minister King, in trying to cover

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 13>up for the Prime Minister today in question time, has

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.940
<v Speaker 13>herself misled the Parliament and she needs to do the

0:33:50.980 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 13>right thing.

0:33:52.180 --> 0:33:53.260
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, absolutely.

0:33:53.740 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 2>I'll play that again if you don't mind. Here's Catherine

0:33:56.140 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 2>King in the Parliament today.

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 11>I understand that the Prime Minister addressed this issue in

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:08.660
<v Speaker 11>question time yesterday. But to repeat, but to repeat, when

0:34:08.700 --> 0:34:13.350
<v Speaker 11>this funding commitment was made in April 2025, part of

0:34:13.390 --> 0:34:18.330
<v Speaker 11>the commitment included... Well, Bridget.

0:34:18.350 --> 0:34:20.990
<v Speaker 2>It never did. I've been for every document like you.

0:34:21.010 --> 0:34:21.070
<v Speaker 8>No.

0:34:21.670 --> 0:34:24.330
<v Speaker 2>If she thinks it has and if he thinks it has,

0:34:24.790 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 2>why doesn't the opposition tomorrow demand they table the evidence?

0:34:28.340 --> 0:34:33.260
<v Speaker 2>Where does it say sewerage anywhere over the last 18 months?

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.049
<v Speaker 13>Well, they won't be able to table such a document, Peter,

0:34:38.070 --> 0:34:40.210
<v Speaker 13>because I don't think such a document exists. I think

0:34:40.250 --> 0:34:44.830
<v Speaker 13>the Prime Minister has attempted to punch this out. As

0:34:44.910 --> 0:34:47.780
<v Speaker 13>I said, first mention of sewerage was when the story

0:34:47.860 --> 0:34:54.300
<v Speaker 13>broke on the $ 6. 05 million grant to Marrickville Golf Club.

0:34:54.340 --> 0:34:56.989
<v Speaker 6>And remember, he didn't hold an honorary membership.

0:34:57.630 --> 0:35:00.109
<v Speaker 13>Forgot that the sewerage got paid for by the New

0:35:00.150 --> 0:35:04.910
<v Speaker 13>South Wales government. He makes a mistake and puts sewerage

0:35:04.950 --> 0:35:07.969
<v Speaker 13>into the public domain and instead of admitting it, he

0:35:08.510 --> 0:35:10.779
<v Speaker 13>thinks he's going to punch right through it and intimidate

0:35:10.820 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 13>anyone who dares to question it. Well, we're going to

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.739
<v Speaker 13>continue to pursue this. We've got another hearing on the

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:19.100
<v Speaker 13>12th for the Senate inquiry that we're doing. We've got

0:35:19.140 --> 0:35:22.620
<v Speaker 13>the ANAO coming. We've got Prime Minister and Cabinet coming

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:24.020
<v Speaker 13>because we're going to get to the bottom of those

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:28.370
<v Speaker 13>codes of conduct questions. And we've got the Merrickville Gotfield

0:35:28.630 --> 0:35:32.430
<v Speaker 13>Club themselves coming. So we are going to get to

0:35:32.469 --> 0:35:36.250
<v Speaker 13>the bottom of this because, as the public officials showed,

0:35:36.670 --> 0:35:41.310
<v Speaker 13>these are similar to court proceedings. You are under oath

0:35:41.690 --> 0:35:44.450
<v Speaker 13>to provide truthful evidence to senators and we're going to

0:35:44.469 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 13>get to the bottom of it.

0:35:46.650 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Just really quickly, I want to get your comment on

0:35:49.860 --> 0:35:53.220
<v Speaker 2>this admission from Catherine King on Sunday.

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:58.550
<v Speaker 11>Candidates and MPs, are asked to put forward, obviously, their

0:35:58.830 --> 0:36:02.050
<v Speaker 11>election commitments and what their preference is in their local areas.

0:36:02.250 --> 0:36:06.490
<v Speaker 10>Was Labor's head office involved in that process?

0:36:07.630 --> 0:36:08.489
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, absolutely.

0:36:08.510 --> 0:36:11.780
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, absolutely, because it's an election commitment process.

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 6>It's a political process.

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.700
<v Speaker 11>So, of course, you know, that is done through the

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.299
<v Speaker 11>party machinery, not through government machinery.

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 2>OK, she admits it's political. I wonder if she realises

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.050
<v Speaker 2>what she's done, that head office was calling the shots,

0:36:27.310 --> 0:36:31.870
<v Speaker 2>not elected officials, not government bureaucrats, that it was a

0:36:31.910 --> 0:36:35.310
<v Speaker 2>closed process, Bridget. No one could apply. So it's a

0:36:35.430 --> 0:36:40.569
<v Speaker 2>highly political process now confirmed by the minister. Surely this

0:36:40.630 --> 0:36:42.450
<v Speaker 2>now goes to the anti-corruption watchdog.

0:36:44.300 --> 0:36:48.940
<v Speaker 13>Well, Peter, I found that whole interview staggering that she

0:36:49.580 --> 0:36:55.570
<v Speaker 13>admitted the Labor HQ and candidates were essentially picking projects.

0:36:55.610 --> 0:36:59.870
<v Speaker 13>We heard similar evidence from Finance Minister Katie Gallagher last

0:36:59.969 --> 0:37:02.710
<v Speaker 13>night in Senate Estimates when I went to why some

0:37:02.730 --> 0:37:06.489
<v Speaker 13>of the projects were actually listed in PFO 2025 and

0:37:06.510 --> 0:37:09.580
<v Speaker 13>what process did they actually go through. She tried to

0:37:09.620 --> 0:37:13.259
<v Speaker 13>tell me they didn't go through a budget process. They

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 13>went through a Labor Party process. So there's a lot

0:37:16.420 --> 0:37:19.710
<v Speaker 13>more to play out on the involvement of Labor HQ

0:37:20.310 --> 0:37:25.069
<v Speaker 13>over the processes that we all go through in committing

0:37:25.090 --> 0:37:28.370
<v Speaker 13>to funding and approving election commitments.

0:37:28.530 --> 0:37:29.649
<v Speaker 6>We all need to make them.

0:37:29.710 --> 0:37:32.310
<v Speaker 2>We're in a democracy, but we need to deliver them.

0:37:33.850 --> 0:37:35.940
<v Speaker 2>I'll be tuning in on the 12th of November for

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 2>round two. Thank you, Bridget McKenzie. All right, before we

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 2>go to the break, I want to give you an update,

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 2>an exclusive story today from Seb Costello in The Herald Sun.

0:37:43.540 --> 0:37:47.260
<v Speaker 2>This is the bike boy crash involving the former Victorian

0:37:47.300 --> 0:37:51.100
<v Speaker 2>Premier Dan Andrews, his wife Catherine as well, well, now

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 2>referred to Victoria's anti-corruption watchdog IBAC. It's come about because

0:37:55.880 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the Victorian Police Chief Commissioner, Mike Bush, has been handed

0:38:00.060 --> 0:38:04.570
<v Speaker 2>new evidence from another former Chief Commissioner, Cal Gleer in July,

0:38:04.590 --> 0:38:07.529
<v Speaker 2>who Bush has had a look at it, assessed it,

0:38:07.930 --> 0:38:11.290
<v Speaker 2>and he's sent it on to IBAC. It follows, of course,

0:38:11.330 --> 0:38:16.750
<v Speaker 2>a four-year private investigation into the 2013 crash and a

0:38:16.790 --> 0:38:20.910
<v Speaker 2>report from the former Victorian Police Assistant Commissioner, Ray Shuey,

0:38:21.530 --> 0:38:26.460
<v Speaker 2>pointing to, he says from evidence, an overt cover-up to

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 2>avoid implicating a political figure. This goes back nine years now.

0:38:32.230 --> 0:38:35.810
<v Speaker 2>It's on its way to IBAC. Daniel and Catherine Andrews,

0:38:35.850 --> 0:38:40.109
<v Speaker 2>of course, say consistently they have not done anything wrong. Well,

0:38:40.150 --> 0:38:42.989
<v Speaker 2>now it's up to IBAC and perhaps the courts to adjudicate.

0:38:44.250 --> 0:38:46.989
<v Speaker 2>After the break, Victoria officially the worst state in the

0:38:47.090 --> 0:38:51.870
<v Speaker 2>country to do business. No surprises there. After that, after

0:38:51.890 --> 0:38:59.209
<v Speaker 2>the break with the panel. Welcome back. A new report

0:38:59.230 --> 0:39:02.210
<v Speaker 2>from the Business Council of Australia has ranked Victoria as

0:39:02.250 --> 0:39:04.669
<v Speaker 2>the worst state in the country to do business in

0:39:05.090 --> 0:39:08.170
<v Speaker 2>for the third year in a row. It found Victoria

0:39:08.210 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 2>needs to fix land tax, stamp duty and planning efficiency.

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 2>But it also says businesses are dogged by the rate

0:39:15.300 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 2>and threshold of payroll tax, licensing and regulatory requirements. Joining

0:39:20.900 --> 0:39:23.989
<v Speaker 2>me now on my panel, News24 host Jamie Rogers and

0:39:24.010 --> 0:39:27.569
<v Speaker 2>the Deputy Executive Director at the IPA, Dan Wild. Well,

0:39:27.610 --> 0:39:30.620
<v Speaker 2>not only that, Jamie, news today that 60% of the

0:39:30.660 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 2>state's record $ 200 billion of debt and it's $ 25 million

0:39:35.100 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 2>a day on interest, well, that's held by foreign investors.

0:39:40.660 --> 0:39:43.819
<v Speaker 17>And, Peter, that's up from the historic average of 27%,

0:39:43.820 --> 0:39:48.730
<v Speaker 17>which is a huge jump. But to your point in

0:39:48.750 --> 0:39:51.290
<v Speaker 17>your opening statement is why would a business want to

0:39:51.390 --> 0:39:55.150
<v Speaker 17>operate in Victoria? There are so many high taxes and

0:39:55.230 --> 0:39:57.969
<v Speaker 17>red tape. And within that AFR article that was just

0:39:57.989 --> 0:40:00.410
<v Speaker 17>shown on the screen, it says that in order to

0:40:00.450 --> 0:40:03.310
<v Speaker 17>even open up a cafe in Victoria, you need 34

0:40:03.310 --> 0:40:06.280
<v Speaker 17>different licenses before you can even pass over a cup

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.399
<v Speaker 17>of coffee. Now, Ben Carroll is coming out saying that

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:13.430
<v Speaker 17>he is fiscally conservative, but You've got to remember, he's

0:40:13.450 --> 0:40:16.299
<v Speaker 17>been part of this government for so many years now.

0:40:16.420 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 6>And I think that that's going to.

0:40:17.380 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 17>Really stick with him. It's going to be hard to

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.500
<v Speaker 17>shake it. Jess Wilson has certainly come out and said

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:24.819
<v Speaker 17>that she'll be able to get the budget back to

0:40:24.860 --> 0:40:27.060
<v Speaker 17>a cash surplus within six years. And that's the sort

0:40:27.100 --> 0:40:29.660
<v Speaker 17>of thing that I think Victorians want to hear because

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:33.210
<v Speaker 17>you were once an economic powerhouse and it's just devastating

0:40:33.250 --> 0:40:34.550
<v Speaker 17>to see what's happened in the state.

0:40:36.060 --> 0:40:39.589
<v Speaker 2>Basket casters, you've got to love these Labor MPs or leaders,

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:43.310
<v Speaker 2>don't you, Dan? Kevin Rudd was an economic conservative too

0:40:43.370 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 2>until he blew the budget when he took over from

0:40:45.340 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 2>John Howard. We had no debt in Australia then. He

0:40:47.900 --> 0:40:51.070
<v Speaker 2>went crazy in the GFC. And, of course, now suddenly

0:40:51.130 --> 0:40:53.170
<v Speaker 2>he's an economic conservative too when he wants to win

0:40:53.210 --> 0:40:57.670
<v Speaker 2>an election, says Ben Carroll. The gas crisis in Victoria,

0:40:57.950 --> 0:41:02.050
<v Speaker 2>there's a leaked government briefing note that's making it plain.

0:41:02.090 --> 0:41:04.250
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about it, you and I. The IPA now

0:41:04.290 --> 0:41:08.170
<v Speaker 2>has warned about it, that the state faces critical gas shortages,

0:41:08.350 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 2>which means bills will be higher and higher and blackouts

0:41:12.410 --> 0:41:20.379
<v Speaker 2>are likely unless there's billions spent in new infrastructure. Yeah,

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:20.660
<v Speaker 2>you're right.

0:41:20.700 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 14>We have been warning about this for a very long time. And,

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:25.839
<v Speaker 14>you know, sadly, this day was always going to come.

0:41:25.890 --> 0:41:27.750
<v Speaker 14>And we've also had warnings, by the way, from the

0:41:27.810 --> 0:41:31.150
<v Speaker 14>energy market operator. This is not just the IPA or

0:41:31.210 --> 0:41:33.590
<v Speaker 14>News 24. This has come from the institutions that are

0:41:33.610 --> 0:41:36.190
<v Speaker 14>there to oversee the actual energy system, saying that we're

0:41:36.210 --> 0:41:38.549
<v Speaker 14>going to have what they call demand side management. You

0:41:38.590 --> 0:41:40.779
<v Speaker 14>know what that means? That means blackouts. It means you're

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:42.180
<v Speaker 14>going to have to turn off your fridge. You're going

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 14>to have to turn off everything that's running in your

0:41:44.380 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 14>house to stop the system collapsing. And we've seen actually

0:41:47.060 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 14>large industrial players over the last couple of years being

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 14>told they have to load shed, which means they have

0:41:51.820 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 14>to turn off their power for a certain amount of time. So,

0:41:54.700 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 14>you know, this is what happens. This is the inevitable

0:41:57.100 --> 0:42:01.739
<v Speaker 14>result of policies like net zero. When you're prioritizing costly,

0:42:02.340 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 14>inefficient power sources, purely for ideological reasons over coal and

0:42:07.620 --> 0:42:10.660
<v Speaker 14>over gas, you're going to get shortages. You're going to

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:14.060
<v Speaker 14>get higher prices. Businesses, as you've just discussed, are going

0:42:14.100 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 14>to the wall. This is one of the major issues

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 14>facing any business here are energy costs, let alone when

0:42:19.020 --> 0:42:22.930
<v Speaker 14>you're talking about industrial and manufacturing players. So, look, sadly,

0:42:22.969 --> 0:42:25.469
<v Speaker 14>this day has been long coming. I hope that we

0:42:25.510 --> 0:42:28.070
<v Speaker 14>don't get blackouts, but it's going to be difficult to avoid.

0:42:29.770 --> 0:42:33.180
<v Speaker 2>You've got taxpayers, of course, paying the power bills, the

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 2>gas bills of a lot of industry to keep them

0:42:35.219 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, in Victoria too. You've got an enormous supply

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 2>of gas in the ground in Victoria that they're too

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:45.420
<v Speaker 2>green and too woke to get out of the ground.

0:42:45.780 --> 0:42:48.860
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we are a laughingstock internationally, aren't we, Jamie?

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.850
<v Speaker 17>Peter, I'm glad you actually said that to me because

0:42:52.950 --> 0:42:55.350
<v Speaker 17>I came across an article a few days ago and

0:42:55.930 --> 0:42:58.230
<v Speaker 17>it was in the Japan Times and you're not going

0:42:58.250 --> 0:43:01.900
<v Speaker 17>to believe what the headline was. Australia's energy transition offers

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:03.500
<v Speaker 17>a warning to the world.

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 6>And as I read through this article, it's what you've.

0:43:06.940 --> 0:43:08.940
<v Speaker 17>All been saying and we've been calling for is that

0:43:08.980 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 17>you don't turn off your baseload power until you've got

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.320
<v Speaker 17>a reliable substitute.

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 6>Of which we have not.

0:43:16.070 --> 0:43:19.430
<v Speaker 17>And this article was saying Australia is filled with resource

0:43:19.489 --> 0:43:21.850
<v Speaker 17>rich minerals of which we are choosing not to use

0:43:21.930 --> 0:43:24.110
<v Speaker 17>like uranium and coal.

0:43:24.570 --> 0:43:26.790
<v Speaker 6>And the entire article, it said, this is a warning

0:43:26.810 --> 0:43:27.330
<v Speaker 6>to the world.

0:43:27.350 --> 0:43:30.410
<v Speaker 17>Have a look at Australia and do everything opposite to

0:43:30.450 --> 0:43:31.189
<v Speaker 17>what they have done.

0:43:31.790 --> 0:43:32.950
<v Speaker 6>We are literally a joke.

0:43:34.510 --> 0:43:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Dan, if you stuffed up, right, if you were accused

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:44.879
<v Speaker 2>of wasting and hiding $ 260 million of COVID payments, you'd

0:43:44.900 --> 0:43:46.779
<v Speaker 2>be out in your ear or maybe you'd be in

0:43:46.860 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 2>court charged with a crime. Well, not so if you're

0:43:49.700 --> 0:43:53.259
<v Speaker 2>a Victorian bureaucrat, A story today in The Age that

0:43:53.380 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 2>two such bureaucrats accused of covering up COVID grants that

0:43:58.100 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 2>should not have been paid to businesses that were not eligible,

0:44:02.380 --> 0:44:07.359
<v Speaker 2>well now they've been promoted into top jobs with the NDIS.

0:44:10.820 --> 0:44:13.419
<v Speaker 14>Well, this is not good enough. And, you know, looking

0:44:13.460 --> 0:44:15.910
<v Speaker 14>at the numbers, they're staggering. I think something a bit

0:44:15.950 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 14>over 100 million of that was actually given to businesses

0:44:19.410 --> 0:44:22.710
<v Speaker 14>that had been that had ceased operating some six months

0:44:22.750 --> 0:44:25.850
<v Speaker 14>before the pandemic even kicked off. You know, so this

0:44:25.910 --> 0:44:29.170
<v Speaker 14>is insane what happened. And as you suggest, the cover up,

0:44:29.210 --> 0:44:31.350
<v Speaker 14>the cover up is worse than the crime, as they

0:44:31.390 --> 0:44:34.360
<v Speaker 14>often say. And so to me, this gets down to

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:38.570
<v Speaker 14>an issue of trust. The NDIS is one of the

0:44:38.610 --> 0:44:41.830
<v Speaker 14>single biggest spending programs in the nation's history. It is

0:44:41.870 --> 0:44:44.690
<v Speaker 14>the fastest growing spending program that we have on the books.

0:44:45.270 --> 0:44:47.670
<v Speaker 14>It is eating up a larger and larger share of

0:44:47.710 --> 0:44:50.190
<v Speaker 14>the economy, yet many people are not even getting the

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:52.700
<v Speaker 14>help that they need. We're spending an insane amount of money,

0:44:52.739 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 14>but people aren't actually getting what they need out of it.

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:57.460
<v Speaker 14>It is a failure of a system and the public

0:44:57.480 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 14>doesn't trust it. The public already has a very low

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:04.259
<v Speaker 14>regard for public servants and bureaucrats, especially in Victoria, because

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 14>of how they became politicised throughout COVID. So what needs

0:45:08.260 --> 0:45:10.660
<v Speaker 14>to happen is there needs to be a restoration of trust.

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 14>And you're not going to get that by pointing people

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:17.340
<v Speaker 14>to these very important positions that have a history of failure.

0:45:17.620 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 14>And I would say a history of having gone along

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.799
<v Speaker 14>with the politicisation of the public service. So I think

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:26.590
<v Speaker 14>this spells more trouble for a public service in Victoria

0:45:26.610 --> 0:45:29.330
<v Speaker 14>that is unfortunately held in pretty low regard.

0:45:29.090 --> 0:45:29.420
<v Speaker 8>As it is.

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're taking the Victorian disease and you're making it

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:38.109
<v Speaker 2>national with steroids on it, actually, because you're going from

0:45:38.130 --> 0:45:41.610
<v Speaker 2>a couple of hundred million to hundreds and hundreds of million,

0:45:41.690 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars on the NDIS. I honestly think it's criminal.

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:48.180
<v Speaker 2>I honestly think this stuff has got to be stamped

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:51.180
<v Speaker 2>on and you've got to wonder who these individuals are.

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 2>They're not named in the article. What connection they have

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:59.060
<v Speaker 2>to politicians. If IBAC says these two players are responsible

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 2>for this amount of loss and I'll call it corruption,

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 2>they should not be getting a job anywhere in the country,

0:46:05.660 --> 0:46:08.780
<v Speaker 2>let alone be promoted to the public service in Canberra.

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:10.450
<v Speaker 2>I'll leave it there. Thank you both for your time.

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:12.810
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to a quick break. After the break, some

0:46:12.850 --> 0:46:19.790
<v Speaker 2>good words with Kel. Welcome back. Well, I promised you

0:46:19.810 --> 0:46:22.690
<v Speaker 2>more time, Kel. My readers, my listeners will be happy.

0:46:23.190 --> 0:46:25.810
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring you in now because we're about that time

0:46:25.850 --> 0:46:28.649
<v Speaker 2>of year before we start to come in with all

0:46:28.690 --> 0:46:31.310
<v Speaker 2>of these words of the year from all the various dictionaries.

0:46:31.330 --> 0:46:34.930
<v Speaker 2>We've got one out there now. It's not even October,

0:46:34.969 --> 0:46:37.230
<v Speaker 2>is it? Well, it is October. It's not even November.

0:46:37.590 --> 0:46:42.460
<v Speaker 2>This one's from dictionary.com and the word is maxing.

0:46:43.620 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 18>Yes, as always, when they bring out their word of

0:46:46.060 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 18>the year, it's got to be something really trendy and

0:46:48.620 --> 0:46:50.690
<v Speaker 18>fairly new. I mean, we've been talking for years about

0:46:51.010 --> 0:46:53.310
<v Speaker 18>maxing out your credit card, but this one with the

0:46:53.330 --> 0:46:56.170
<v Speaker 18>double X in the middle is different. This is an online,

0:46:56.430 --> 0:47:00.770
<v Speaker 18>very cute spelling of maxing. And it means optimising a

0:47:00.830 --> 0:47:04.689
<v Speaker 18>part of your life. And normally, dictionary.com tell me it's

0:47:04.910 --> 0:47:07.790
<v Speaker 18>used in combination with other things. So they can talk

0:47:07.810 --> 0:47:11.989
<v Speaker 18>about looks maxing as one word, which means maximising.

0:47:12.010 --> 0:47:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Sleep maxing. I love to sleep max.

0:47:14.140 --> 0:47:14.580
<v Speaker 7>Yes.

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 18>Well, looks maxing is maximising your appearance. Token maxing is

0:47:20.500 --> 0:47:23.850
<v Speaker 18>maximising your use of AI at work. There's even one

0:47:23.890 --> 0:47:26.930
<v Speaker 18>called non-maximising, which is how you make your life better

0:47:27.190 --> 0:47:30.590
<v Speaker 18>by behaving like an Italian grandmother. It is really very,

0:47:30.670 --> 0:47:33.180
<v Speaker 18>very silly, but it is often silly words that get up.

0:47:33.190 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 18>And you're right about the time of year. Still October.

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:38.740
<v Speaker 18>It's a bit like Christmas turning up earlier and earlier

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 18>every year in the supermarkets. Well, now they're doing the

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 18>word of the year as early as this. It's as

0:47:44.420 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 18>though they're saying no new words will turn up between

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:47.550
<v Speaker 18>now and the end of the year.

0:47:48.900 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 2>We'll keep them coming. We'll stay on them right the

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:53.700
<v Speaker 2>way through to Christmas. Hey, Megan wants to know about

0:47:53.739 --> 0:47:57.320
<v Speaker 2>the expression, you know, I won't have a bar of that.

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:01.540
<v Speaker 2>She says, where does the bar come from in that expression?

0:48:02.380 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 18>Lovely expression because this is another one of ours. It

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:07.819
<v Speaker 18>always gets me excited, as you know, Peter, when I

0:48:07.860 --> 0:48:10.509
<v Speaker 18>discovered that something is an Australian coinage and that was

0:48:10.570 --> 0:48:13.750
<v Speaker 18>coined here in the early years of the 20th century. Now,

0:48:13.790 --> 0:48:15.810
<v Speaker 18>the bar, I won't have a bar of it, is

0:48:15.850 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 18>not an iron bar. It's not a bar in a pub.

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:21.220
<v Speaker 18>It's not a sandbar in a river. It's a bar

0:48:21.260 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 18>of music. When you say, I won't have a bar

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 18>of that, you're saying, I won't even listen to a

0:48:26.219 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 18>few notes of the song you're singing. Isn't that clever?

0:48:29.580 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 18>That's a lovely bit of Aussie invention.

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:33.570
<v Speaker 2>That's fantastic.

0:48:33.620 --> 0:48:33.859
<v Speaker 12>Yes.

0:48:33.890 --> 0:48:37.489
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is probably ours as well. Margaret wants a

0:48:37.510 --> 0:48:40.550
<v Speaker 2>bit of info about the phrase beating around the bush.

0:48:41.150 --> 0:48:45.250
<v Speaker 18>Actually, this is not ours. This is very old. Yes,

0:48:45.290 --> 0:48:48.290
<v Speaker 18>recorded 1505. It's a very old one. And it goes

0:48:48.350 --> 0:48:51.049
<v Speaker 18>back to the time when the landed nobility used to

0:48:51.330 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 18>go hunting and they would send out their staff on

0:48:54.340 --> 0:48:57.820
<v Speaker 18>the menial task of getting the birds out of their nests.

0:48:58.239 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh, they're called beaters.

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:00.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:02.840
<v Speaker 18>They were the beaters. They originally shot them with longbows

0:49:02.900 --> 0:49:07.060
<v Speaker 18>and crossbows and later with rifles. And a really lazy beater.

0:49:07.370 --> 0:49:09.410
<v Speaker 18>wouldn't bother beating the bush. They'd just walk around the

0:49:09.450 --> 0:49:12.660
<v Speaker 18>bush a bit and make a few gestures. They were

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 18>beating around the bush. So they were not doing the

0:49:15.580 --> 0:49:19.009
<v Speaker 18>job properly. They were avoiding the job. And ever since then,

0:49:19.030 --> 0:49:21.990
<v Speaker 18>avoidance has been... beating around the bush.

0:49:23.710 --> 0:49:25.069
<v Speaker 2>Have we got time for Sick as a Dog?

0:49:25.090 --> 0:49:25.529
<v Speaker 6>Have we got one?

0:49:26.050 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, yeah. Sick as a Dog is also fairly old,

0:49:29.700 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 18>about 1704. And it turned up at a time when

0:49:32.700 --> 0:49:35.580
<v Speaker 18>a whole bunch of similar expressions turned up. Sick as

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:37.800
<v Speaker 18>a dog, sick as a horse, sick as a parrot.

0:49:38.140 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 18>The one that caught on is sick as a dog.

0:49:40.110 --> 0:49:42.549
<v Speaker 18>And the thing that strikes me about this is it's

0:49:42.610 --> 0:49:45.009
<v Speaker 18>a very negative expression about dogs. You and I have

0:49:45.050 --> 0:49:48.150
<v Speaker 18>talked about this before, about every idiom about dogs in

0:49:48.210 --> 0:49:51.070
<v Speaker 18>English is negative. You know, you've gone to the dogs or,

0:49:51.090 --> 0:49:53.450
<v Speaker 18>you know, you've got the dog's disease or what have you.

0:49:53.780 --> 0:49:57.180
<v Speaker 2>So we love our dogs. Or the barking dog at

0:49:57.219 --> 0:49:59.140
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Bolt will get me into trouble. I'll leave it there.

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:01.299
<v Speaker 2>We'll come back to it tomorrow and then next week.

0:50:01.660 --> 0:50:03.340
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Kel. Here is Andrew.