WEBVTT - Sharri | 1 April

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News.

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 2>This is Sharry Good Evening.

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Tonight, Labor Insiders reveal and overly confident alban Easy is

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 3>drawing up a list of those he believes turned against.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Him when it looked like he wouldn't win.

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 3>That exclusive in a moment, and I'll reveal the gobsmacking

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 3>message I received from one of the Prime Minister's top advisors.

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 2>You won't believe what they've.

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 3>Sent This as Peter Dutton reassure's panicked coalition voters. Ray

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Hadley will be on the show live to fire up,

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 3>and on the show, the ABC's Media Watch defends nine

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 3>journalist Nick McKenzie's self confessed breach of ethics as a

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 3>lapse in judgment and.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>That he was just overly trusting.

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>More on that in a moment, Plus, a submarine expert

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 3>will explain what Chinese intelligence is really up to with

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 3>its spy ships.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>That's later in the show Tonight.

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Albanezi seems confident on the campaign trail, but behind the

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 3>scenes there's internal disunity consuming the party. Labor Inside has

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>revealed that Albanisi, convinced he's going to win, is drawing

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 3>up a list of those who turned against him when

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 3>his chips were down. The vibe around Albinizi is that

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>he's flying now. He's set to win comfortably, even pick

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>up some seats.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 2>That's what he's.

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Telling people, and he's looking at who's stuck with him.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 3>During the difficult months when he was flailing politically and

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 3>it looked like he was in trouble, alban Ezi and

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>those closest to him are carefully examining who peeled off,

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>who was with.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:43.919
<v Speaker 2>Him and who wasn't.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 3>One labour source told me there's definitely a list being

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>drawn up about who's stuck with him. The treasurer is

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 3>not on that list. You recall how right after the

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty two election, alban Ezi unceremoni nearly dumped popular

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 3>political rival Tanya Plibasek from her beloved education portfolio and

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 3>stuck her in a lower profile portfolio designed to hurt

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 3>her support where she'd come up against the environmentalists. This

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 3>is the fate that awaits those perceived to have abandoned

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 3>alban Easy in recent months. Labor operative Cameron Milner said

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Albanisi has been known for being deeply paranoid and vengeful

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 3>like this his whole political life Labor and Peace were

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 3>expecting the election to go poorly, a minority government at best,

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 3>and they were starting to prepare for that outcome, and

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 3>even ministers were privately speaking about the prospect of a

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>first term loss and a dut and win. Now we

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 3>reported that Tony Burke was already making moves for a

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 3>future potential leadership run. It's a theme others knew about.

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Anne was canvassed in the media. The Prime Minister was

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>less than pleased with this. Now Labor and P Josh

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Burns is another who's not in Albanize's good books, all

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 3>for the crime of inviting Tanya Plibisek to launch his

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 3>campaign office. He wrote here on Instagram a special shout

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 3>out to my friend and powerhouse Tanya Plibisek for kicking

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 3>us off.

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 2>And plibask meanwhile.

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Has posted a selfie to Instagram with the Treasurer just

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>last week where she wrote really proud of this guy.

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 4>So just coming out of the budget, super proud of

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 4>what Treasurer Jim Chalmers delivered tonight.

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>And in truth, the Prime Minister considers both Jim Chalmers

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>and Tanya Plibisek future leadership rivals and a threat to him,

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 3>perhaps because they're both quite obviously smarter than him. There

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 3>was also a profile pace on Plibsek in March where

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 3>a source was quoted as saying that, compared to Tanya,

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Albo comes across as an ineffectual buffoon.

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 2>He's weak, he's.

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Arrogant, he can't handle criticism, and he's not connecting with

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 3>the electorate to the point where Peter Dutton, of all people, could.

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Win the election. Albo's been a disaster. So there you go,

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>in ineffectual buffoon.

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 3>That was from a labor source, no suggestion the source

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 3>was connected to Plivask Now. Plivsk in this same profile

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 3>piece where she was interviewed, praised Jim Chalmers's job on

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 3>the economy. And meanwhile Chalmers has fielded more than his

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 3>fair share of leadership speculation.

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 5>How are you feeling about the election, because if the

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 5>government was to lose your favorite to become a position leader.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 6>Look, I spent all of my time thinking about the

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 6>budget and the economic plan and what we would do

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 6>as a government and as a country if we win

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 6>the election. I spend absolutely no time thinking about what

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 6>I would do if we lost the election. I'd much

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 6>rather be the Treasurer of Australia than the leader of

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 6>the Opposition. I enjoy the work I do for Anthony.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 6>In our team, we work very very closely together.

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, charmers can't be accused of disloyalty. This is all

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 3>about the Prime ministers insecurities and who he perceives to

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.239
<v Speaker 3>be his rivals. Now I put questions to the Prime

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Minister's head of Communications today, Fiona Sugden. I asked about

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Albanezi in his inner circle, drawing up lists of who

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 3>worked against him when it looked like his political fortunes

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 3>were suffering. A response a laughing face emoji. Now this

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 3>story has come from labor insiders.

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 2>It's of course well sourced.

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Yet this is the childish response from the Prime Minister's

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 3>office on day five of a five week campaign. It's extraordinary,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 3>you can genuinely say a Prime Minister's media office has

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 3>never responded to questions.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 2>With an emoji before.

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 3>It shows perhaps how arrogant Albert Easy is. And it

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 3>comes a day after we learned he would adopt a

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 3>single outcome from our Sky News antisemitism summit. It's incredibly disrespectful.

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 3>But irrespective of this juvenile response, the reality is that

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 3>Albinizi is carefully looking at who stood by him in

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>the period.

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 2>When it looked like momentum was against him.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 3>He's noting who was preening their own leadership credentials or

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 3>cozying up to an alternative leader. This isn't about loyalty though,

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 3>It's about disunity. Now it shows how for Albinizi, politics

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 3>isn't about the governing of the nation. It's about personal

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 3>factions and vendettas he accused Peter Dutton both yesterday and

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 3>today of measuring the curtains in the lodge or in

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Kiribilly House. But Albanez he is already looking at who

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 3>to promote and demote from the ministry based on perceived loyalty,

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 3>based on who launched their campaign or who told journalists

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 3>they had leadership ambitions. This is toxic disunity from labor

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 3>right at the start of an election campaign. And if

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the Prime Minister isn't careful, his hubris an appetite for

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 3>revenge will come back to bite him now. The ABC

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 3>last night on its Media Watch program went pretty lightly

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 3>on journalist Nick McKenzie over the sensational audio in which

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 3>he admitted to breaching his own ethics during their war

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 3>crimes case against Ben Roberts Smith. Now, the worst that

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Media Watch host Linton Besser said about Mackenzie was that

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 3>he had a lapse in judgment and perhaps he was

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 3>over trusting.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 7>It was a private conversation which Mackenzie could not have

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 7>known was being recorded, but these words would prove a

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 7>major lapse of judgment from such an experienced player. Mackenzie's

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 7>misguided and over trusting assurances to a witness.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Yep, a lapse in judgment and over trusting assurances.

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, how did the ABC.

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Not take Mackenzie to task for failing to publicly explain

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 3>what he meant when he said he breached his ethics? No,

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 3>I shouldn't tell you.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 7>I've just breached my ethics doing that Like this is

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 7>where like this is the leadership position.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 8>Now if he knew that, impeat to you that.

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Media Watch directed questions during his program to me to

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Nine's witness, who nine claims is a victim of domestic violence.

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 7>So we contacted Person seventeen to ask for access to

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 7>the full tape. She declined to respond to our queries.

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 3>To the West Australian newspaper and to Nine itself. I

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 3>think it's telling that Media Watch thinks everyone else has

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 3>questions to answer except the very person at the center

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 3>of the story, the journalist who admits in a secret

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 3>recording to breaching his own ethics. Now Bessa has told

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 3>us today he did put questions to Mackenzie and that

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Nine responded. But in Nine's response they simply accused other

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 3>media of a smear campaign. It's a laughable response to

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 3>the very revelation of serious recordings that have now sparked

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 3>a fresh Federal court hearing. But it's not really good enough,

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 3>is it for Australia's most celebrated journalists to refuse to

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 3>publicly answer questions about what he means when he said

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 3>he breached his ethics in a way that would have

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 3>displeased his lawyers.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Of course, he used more colorful language.

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Now can you imagine if a NewsCorp journalist, God Forbid,

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 3>had been caught such a tape. Media Watch would have

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 3>had a field day, as would The Guardian, Criichie and Nine.

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Yet the ABC last night even defended Mackenzie over the

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 3>part of the audio recording where he divulged details of

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.239
<v Speaker 3>a sensitive an ongoing police investigation.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 7>But Mackenzie was embellishing because he himself had already published

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 7>to the world details of two live AFP investigations into

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 7>Ben Robert Smith in the two years prior. And while

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 7>it's true there'd been no reporting that AFP agents had

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 7>moved into the building, a detail Sharry Markson pointed out

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 7>in her statement to Media Watch, Robert Smith had already

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 7>been tipped off about the AFP's surveillance and was using

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 7>bernafines to avoid it, which Markson failed to tell her viewers.

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Now, just a reminder, here's what Mackenzie did say on

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 3>that secret recording.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>No one knows about the police investigation.

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 9>It's extensive.

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 3>If I'm going place.

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 10>Investigation, phone tabs, task force, a whole new task.

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Force has been still love in Brisbane, an entire new

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 1>task force.

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.599
<v Speaker 8>There's police living in his apartment block under assumed identities

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 8>as we speak, like the guides.

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, But according to Media Watch, Mackenzie was just embellishing

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 3>and somehow this was turned into a criticism of me.

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Now to be clear, as better acknowledged, Mackenzie divulged details

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 3>of undercover officers living with false or assumed identities in

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Ben Roberts Smith's own apartment block, and yes, this could

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 3>have jeopardized the police operation. Media Watch also claimed last

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 3>night that obtaining the legal strategy in relation to Person

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 3>seventeen wouldn't have made a jot of difference to the

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 3>outcome of the war crimes case.

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 7>And it's hard to see how those first person accounts

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 7>are in any way change by Mackenzie's misguided and over

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 7>trusting assurances to a witness he knew to be unreliable

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 7>and who made not a jot of difference to the

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 7>final outcome.

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Now in the judgment, the judge said that he did

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 3>not accept Robert Smith's evidence regarding Person seventeen, although he

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 3>did not find her evidence sufficiently reliable to accept that

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 3>her serious allegations were true. What we don't know is

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 3>whether his rejection of Robert Smith's evidence on that issue

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 3>might have influenced the judge's view of Ben Robert Smith's

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 3>credibility when it came to the war crimes witnesses. You

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 3>can never know how much this influence would have extended.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 3>There's also the question of whether other legal strategy was

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 3>obtained by nine and provided by Emma Roberts or her

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 3>friend as Ben Robert Smith's father, the former Justice of

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 3>the Supreme Court, Len Roberts, said there are questions about

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 3>what legal strategies of Ben's was Mackenzie referring to, and

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 3>how did knowledge of them affect the conduct of the

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 3>case before Justice Pisanco worryingly that might be impossible to know.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 3>The issue is whether or not it resulted in an

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 3>unfair trial, and he said there were questions too about

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 3>what privileged information or material Ben's ex wife, Emma and

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 3>her friend Danielle Scott told Mackenzie or gave to him. Further,

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 3>if Mackenzie was prepared to speak to P seventeen as

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:29.359
<v Speaker 3>he did on the recording, did he have similar conversations

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 3>with other witnesses, If so, who and what did he

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 3>say to them? Now During a legal challenge, as you know,

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Ben Robert Smith's lawyers argued that his email account had

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 3>been accessed at least one hundred and one times, including

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 3>by his ex wife's friend Danielle Scott, and Emma later

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 3>admitted that she had allowed her close friend Danielle to

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 3>access her ex husband's email accounts, but she said only

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 3>in relation to their marriage breakdown. So there's now been

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 3>an admission that ben Robert Smith's emails were accessed in

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 3>relation to Person seventeen and in relation to the marriage breakdown.

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 3>If McKenzie admits to obtaining the legal strategy in relation

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 3>to Person seventeen, it raises questions about whether other legal

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 3>strategy or emails were also provided. Now nine is now

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 3>trying to separate the domestic violence allegations relating to Person

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 3>seventeen from the war crimes Once, but it was nine

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 3>that wanted to use unproven domestic violence allegations to further

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 3>trash Robert Smith's reputation. They joined the two accusations war

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 3>crimes and domestic violence, but they're now trying to separate

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 3>them and say that they're unconnected to the case.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Now I have learned that.

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Nick mackenzie has been backgrounding journalists against Person seventeen, his own,

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 3>who he claimed was a victim of domestic violence. He's

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 3>been telling journalists that she's psychotic, she was his witnessed.

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 3>I asked nine about this today and in response, Nine

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 3>sent me the same statement that they've been sending versions

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 3>of to all media for over a week now. They

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 3>refuse to answer specific questions or address the new issues

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 3>that have been raised in recent days now, I personally

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 3>think there's a long way to go in this story.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 3>From nine's end, What did nine know about McKenzie's admissions

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 3>that he obtained Robert Smith's legal strategy? Did he obtain

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the legal strategy in relation to other areas? Aside from

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 3>person seventeen, hows nine investigated this at all?

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 2>How could they.

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Come out to defend McKenzie so quickly if they hadn't

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 3>done a proper investigation into his self confessed breach of ethics?

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 2>And if they have, what did the investigation find?

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 3>When was this investigation and was the nine board made

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 3>aware of it?

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 2>And when?

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 3>These are all questions I have been and will continue

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 3>to pursue now. Just to be clear, I don't have

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 3>a side here. I've got no issue with either Ben, Robert.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Smith or Nick McKenzie.

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm a journalist and I'm reporting on a highly concerning

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 3>tape where a reporter admits to breaching his ethics in

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 3>pursuit of a war hero who he claimed committed war crimes.

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 3>And I also think that if you're going to doggedly

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 3>pursue a Victoria Cross recipient and accuse him of war crimes.

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 3>You have to play fair, and Mackenzie, in his own

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 3>words on the tape, claims to have access Robert Smith's

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 3>confidential legal strategy from his ex wife and her friend,

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 3>and that wouldn't seem to be playing fair. We need

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to know if anything else was accessed and how far

0:16:55.040 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 3>this went. So let's return to the election campaign now,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 3>and joining me is Liberal Senator Holly Hughes and Skyney's

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 3>contributor Steve Price.

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to you both.

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 11>Well.

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Peter Darton was in Victoria today trying to wider down

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 3>concerns about slipping Pole numbers and he was also wants

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 3>to win over marginal seats in Melbourne.

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Here he was with Andrew Clennel.

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 5>Today, Labor see you personally as a drag on the

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Liberal vote in Victoria.

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 12>What do you say to that, Well, I've seen the

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 12>Prime Minister's numbers and I wouldn't be scribing too much

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 12>of I as a PM about his position. He's not

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 12>far off where to CID realities and Victoria at the moment.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 12>And people know in relation to this project that if

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 12>you vote for Anthony Obernizi, you're voting against this Melbourne

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 12>rail link and the airport link.

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 5>How many seeds are you going to win here?

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I hope to win.

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 12>I think we can win a number of seats and

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 12>I think we can form government, as I've said consistently,

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 12>and we will demonstrate to Victorians and Austrains that there

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 12>is a much better way for our country.

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, Steve Price, we just heard Darton say

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 3>there that he's hoping to win a number of seats Victoria.

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 3>This is really the hope for the coalition side. What's

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 3>your reaction to the mood.

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 2>On the ground.

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 5>Labour's completely toxic the brand in Victoria. You and I've

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 5>talked about this before, Shari, I mean the dissenter Allen government.

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 5>They're polling numbers are atrocious. She's not been able to

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 5>con the public like Daniel Anders was able to do.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 5>The suburban rail loop, which now we know is not

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 5>going to be funded by a coalition government if it

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 5>gets elected, is a mess. There's a big hole in

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 5>the ground. It's costing billions and billions of dollars. No

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 5>one wants to go from Cheltenham to box Hill, and

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 5>Cinda Allen's determined to hold herself to it. So what's

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 5>happened here? Is Peter Dutton, I think very cleverly has

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 5>said okay, we'll put money into other projects, but not

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 5>this one. But Victorians have got a great history of

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 5>money being ripped up and wasted on things that never happened.

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean you go all the way back to when

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 5>Daniel Andrews became premier here. He ripped up and wasted

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 5>a billion dollars of taxpayers money by not building a freeway.

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 5>He then spent eight hundred million dollars giving the Commonwealth

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Games to Glasgow in Scotland. So there's nothing about labor

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 5>that people in this state enjoy, and I think in

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 5>the outer suburbs, particularly with the petrol exercise policy, which

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 5>I'll being interested in what Holly says about how that's biting.

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 5>That is going to be the big thing. People filling

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 5>their cars up three days a week to sit on

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 5>the Monash Freeway for an hour and a half every

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 5>day in and out burning up petrol. They know that

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 5>the tank of petrol that they are going to get

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 5>a discount from Peter Dunton is well worth it and

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 5>I think he will win a swager seats in Melbourne.

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, Holly, I was speaking earlier in the show about

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 3>labor disunity. How's the coalition feeling, how a Liberal MP's

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 3>feeling given the polling does show there has been a

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 3>recovery for labor.

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, look, I mean I think everyone was aware that

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 13>we would always see a tightening up of the polls

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 13>as soon as the election was called. I think for

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 13>a lot of people, and us included in the bubble,

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 13>we've all been looking at this for months and months

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 13>and months now in anticipation of the election being called.

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 13>There's a lot of Australians out there doing it really

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 13>tough on cost of living. You know, there were some

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 13>box pops the day after the budget and people like,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 13>what's the budget?

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 2>What are you talking about? They didn't even know what

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 2>it was on.

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 13>It's so so, I think, and they have the same

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 13>vote as you and I, But so I think the

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 13>mood is good.

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 2>The mood is positive.

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 13>We know that we have a huge battle ahead of us.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 13>Twenty two seats is an enormous ask. There hasn't been

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 13>a first term government kicked out since nineteen thirty one.

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 13>This is a very big ask and we certainly are

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 13>the underdogs. But we know that Australians just can't of

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 13>Ford three more years of this government in the way

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 13>they've already destroyed our country and what they will continue

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 13>to do the wrecking ball through.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Now we've been talking about the terrifying prospect of if

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 3>there is a minority government cobbled together with the Greens. Well,

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Adam about the leader of the Greens, would play a

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 3>big role in that. He's now come out and we

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 3>mentioned this briefly on the show last night. He's insinuated

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 3>that Israel is somehow to blame for her mass, the

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 3>terror groups, executions of the brave Palestinians who protested against

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 3>the terror group. I mean, Steve, this is just beyond

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 3>the pale. This is appalling and we need to see

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 3>this strongly condemned by senior government ministers.

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 5>Yes, the Prime Minister should come out and condemn it.

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 5>Everybody should come out and condemn it. Adam Bant, really

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 5>he is such a destructive politician. I mean, he holds

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 5>this seat in Melbourne and he's held it for a

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 5>number of elections. Now that's a very very Green seat

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 5>and so he's going to get re elected. But to

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 5>come out and say something like that, I mean part

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 5>of the problem though is and I think Hollywood agree

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 5>with this that if you talk to young people, the

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 5>Greens brand is still somehow seen as some sort of

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 5>friendly environmental party, whereas we know that they are a

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 5>dangerous bunch of activists. I do think because I talked

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 5>to them. I talked to a nineteen year old kid

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 5>tonight who said, oh, well, the Greens are going to

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 5>save the planet. They still believe that. They don't see

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 5>that the Greens have been involved in all this activism

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 5>about Palestine and bants going on. They're blaming Israel for

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 5>what happened on October seven. The young people still look

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 5>at Greens and go, Okay, they're going to help with

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 5>windmills and solar panels and we're all going to live

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 5>happily ever after. Trust me, that's what they think.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 2>There haven't been an environmental party for a very very

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 2>long time.

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 13>And you know, we know with there's zelotry over climate change.

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 13>You know, if there's a koala habitat in the way

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 13>of a transmission line or a solar farm, well goodbye koalas.

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 13>So they're very much got their sort of triangle of priorities,

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 13>and climate change is at the top. Forget about everything else,

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 13>and you know, the environment has more further and further

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 13>down that list.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 2>But I think Stave's right.

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 13>You know, young people, whether it's there, indoctrinated through a

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 13>Marxist education system. They then go to a university system

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 13>where they continue to be fed this left wing ideology

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 13>and rubbish. And so I think my daughter's going to

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 13>vote for the first time this election now.

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I've met her. She's not voting for the she is

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 2>not voting Greens. But all of my kids know.

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 13>That if they want to be disinherited, not that there's

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 13>a lot there, but you know, vote for the Greens.

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 13>But my daughters makes me very very proud.

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 2>The fact that she's not there wonderful. But you know,

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking to her, but also her friends.

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 13>We had a couple over tonight and I was with

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 13>one this afternoon and making sure that parents are having

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 13>those conversations with their kids about the destruction that the

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 13>Greens will create.

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 2>They will kill.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 13>These kids, but they will literally kill these kids future.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 2>It's they are the.

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 13>Magic putting economic party. I mean, they honestly think everything

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.239
<v Speaker 13>should be free, free dental stub your toe, get an

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 13>MDIs like.

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 13>They are unbelievable in their economic recklessness, just.

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Very quickly thirty seconds.

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Steve, there's a polling in the Cinni Morning Herald today

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 3>that suggests that Australians really don't like what they see

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to the United States president. How do

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 3>you think this is playing out with the election campaign here?

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think the way it's playing out here is

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 5>the big problem for Anthony Albanese. You can't get Donald

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 5>Trump to answer the phone. But I think Holly's party

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 5>needs to concentrate in on this. The tariff decisions will

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 5>come out on Thursday. But the only Australian Donald Trump

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 5>is aware of currently is Minwu Lee, who won the

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 5>Houston Open golf tournament on the weekend, and there's probably

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 5>going to be favorite in the Master's golf when it

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 5>happens in a week's time. Donald Trump won't even talk

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 5>to Anthony Albanese. When did we last have an Australian

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 5>Prime minister who could not get the US President on

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 5>a phone call?

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Agreed story I broke.

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 3>And yet Holly, this is playing out badly for Peter Darton.

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 13>Look and I think that Labor are going to try

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 13>Peter Dutton Donald Trump, But I think what if you

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 13>notice Donald Trump, he was about making America great again.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 13>He wasn't about I'm going to make it great for

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 13>all my friends as well. And I think what Australians

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 13>are missing is we need someone that's going to stand

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 13>up and say we're going to make Australia great again.

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 13>And I think that's where Peter Dutton can really use

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 13>that strength and he will stand up for Australians. He'll

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 13>stand for the economy in our national security, not that

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 13>little handsome boy who will be busy sucking up to China.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, and it's not Clive Palmer who's taking over that

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 3>slogan either.

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 13>Oh all right, Trump at Patriots I still don't understanding.

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 2>So frustrating, Holly. Here's Steve Price. Great to see you both.

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Erry.

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Now, today's RBA decision left interest rates on hold, and

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 3>it may have been an election shaping decision. Here was

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 3>the Governor, Michelle Bullock making that call.

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 4>We've come a long way and it hasn't been easy,

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 4>but we have made good progress on bringing inflation down

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 4>and keeping unemployment low. This is a good position for

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 4>the economy to be in as we are aproach a

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 4>period of uncertainty. But we have to be careful not

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 4>to get ahead of ourselves. Inflation pressures remain and cost

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 4>of living pressures are still very real for many Australians.

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 3>All right to discuss, let's bring in Farmer Treasury Assistant

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Secretary David Pearl.

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 2>David, great to see you again.

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Look what's your take on the RBA's decision today. Does

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 3>this show that their rate cut at the last board

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 3>meeting was the wrong decision?

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, Sharry. As you reported very well at the time,

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 9>the decision the RBA board made in February was probably

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 9>the worst one I've ever seen. It was an unjustified

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 9>rate cut based on the RBA board zone criteria, as

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 9>I said on your program at the time, and it

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 9>wasn't urgent. If the RBA wanted to be more convinced

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 9>that inflation was under control, they could have waited until

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 9>the next quarterly inflation read out in May. So, frankly,

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 9>the credibility of the RBA board was damaged in February,

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 9>and that's why I didn't think there was any chance

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 9>they would go anywhere near cutting the interest rate again.

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 9>Today they've got some credibility to make.

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Up, credibility to make up tough words. Look, the fact

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 3>that the rates cuts weren't even discussed today. Do you

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 3>think this leads to the case that there might have

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 3>been some political interference from the Treasury secretary you worked

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 3>closely with, Stephen Kennedy. Do you think this is something

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 3>that should be investigated.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 9>It should be, although there are tight lips in central

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 9>banking and Treasury circles. As you know, Let's go back

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 9>to the cameras being in the room. To me, that

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 9>was the absolute give way, and I know that you

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 9>hit upon this too, Sharry.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 2>There are two.

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 9>Scenarios with the cameras being in the room, which was unprecedented.

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 9>I don't remember it happening recently. No, it's not not

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 9>what banks do. There are two scenario. One Stephen Kennedy

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 9>or Jim Charmers pressured Michelle Bullock to go against her

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 9>own institution's interests and let the cameras in, knowing that

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 9>the rate cut was.

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 2>In the can.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 9>Or two, Michelle Bullock, under her own initiative welcome those

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 9>cameras in without any political pressure. And frankly, I don't

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 9>believe the latter. So I don't know whether there's ever

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 9>going to be a smoking gun. We might have to

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 9>wait for some post election deep throats to start speaking up.

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 9>But that decision stank. It was an urgent, it wasn't warranted.

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 9>And if you look at the RBA board statement today, Sharry,

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 9>they say where on hold activity is picking up in

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 9>the economy, the labor market is still tight, with labor

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 9>shortages in some parts of the economy, and productivity is flatlining.

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 9>So even though wages are moderating, the cost pressure from

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 9>wages is rising. On the other side of the equation,

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 9>you've got the Trump un certainly effect. I get that,

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 9>but looking purely at the Australian economy, there's still not

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 9>a compelling reason. And let's not forget that after the

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 9>energy price supports are removed at the end of this year,

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 9>a headline inflation rate will be above three percent for

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 9>the twelve months beyond that. So I'll leave it at that.

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 9>I think it wasn't a very good decision, but the

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 9>Trump uncertainty is clearly weighing on their minds at the moment.

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, Michelle Bilick did address that. Here's which you

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 3>had to say about the tariffs.

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 4>The impact on inflation is less certain because, on the

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 4>one hand, if supply.

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Dominates.

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 4>So if the impact on tariffs on supply dominates, then

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 4>you might see arise in inflation. But it's also possible

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 4>that trade diversion might end up with cheaper goods coming

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 4>into Australia, So there's competing impacts there.

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 3>What do you think about the impact of the tariffs.

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's the Alimini and steel tariffs. There could

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 3>be further tariffs, although as they reported last night, it

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 3>looks like Australia might get an exemption.

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 9>The economic impact is really through China. If there's any

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 9>uncoupling between the US and China, the two most significant

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 9>economies in the global economy, Australia would be seriously affected.

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 9>People forget that the US and China have interlocking economic interests.

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 9>The US consumer has been the source of demand for

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 9>Chinese goods, and the Chinese government or Chinese investors have

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 9>lent money to the US government to fund its deficits.

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 9>So if you uncouple, if you pull that apart, Australia

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 9>would suffer enormously. Now we're not close to that yet,

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 9>but if the Liberation Day tariff announcement later this week

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 9>results in escalating trade measures, then there'll be a supply

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 9>shop for the world economy and for the Australian economy ultimately,

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 9>and that will make things very difficult because when there's

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 9>a supply shock, just as like we saw with Opek

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 9>in the seventies, output and activity comeback and prices go up.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 9>So not a good.

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Time, all right, David Pearl, former Assistant Treasury Secretary, appreciate

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 3>your time. Now still to come the war of words

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 3>over where Peter Dutton would.

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Live if he wins the next election.

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, Albert took another site today and radio legend Ray

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Hadley will be live in studio for his no holds

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 3>barred analysis on the election. Don't miss it, that's next,

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 3>welcome back. Well, the Prime Minister is clearly trying to

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 3>keep the campaign conversation on health, rolling out the tried

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 3>and tested medi scare campaign. Now his other pointed whack

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 3>at Peter Dutton has been rebuking Dudden's claimed that he'd

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 3>live in Kurabilly and Sydney, not in the Canberra bubble

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 3>if he wins. He was alb and easy on about

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 3>this again today and now.

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 5>We're going to have a Queen Zone who sees himself

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 5>as been the Prime Minister of Sydney as well.

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 8>If Peter Dutton is elected. I see myself.

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm a proud Sydney Sider as a Prime Minister for Australia.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 3>And joining us now is radio legend Ray Hardley Ray.

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Great to see you again.

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 11>I missed you last week with all the budget coverage,

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 11>but we're back this week. He's grasping a straw as

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 11>the Prime Minister, identifying Peter Dutton as a Queenslander. Of

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 11>course you're going to have to live at Kirribilly House.

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 11>I mean it's just a fighter com plea if you're Prime.

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Minister, unless you're Malcolm Turmble, of course, and you've got

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 3>the mansion on the harbor, a better house, waterfront match.

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think I saw the worst impersonation I've seen.

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 11>There a lot of people that did Donald Trump magnificently

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 11>both here in the US. I saw the worst impersonation

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 11>of ever seen at the National Press Club from the

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 11>former Prime minister.

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But you see Malcolm does this all the time.

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 11>Don't forget that as a Prime minister he's responsible for

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 11>snowy two. It started at two billion only about seven

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 11>years ago, eight years ago. Then it went to six

0:32:58.080 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 11>Now it's up to thirteen, and we don't. And when

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 11>it's going to be finished, they keep the boring machines

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 11>keep falling in holes. Now you look at prime ministers

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 11>like John Howard, the gun buyback, Julia Gillard, God bless her,

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 11>the child sex abuse. Of course we're all commission legacies.

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 11>His legacy is a hole on the ground that's not

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 11>going anywhere, that's costing about eight.

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Times more than we thought it would cost, low out.

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 2>In time and cost.

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 3>And yet he thinks his advice about submarines is better.

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 11>Than orcast You see what Shariov studied this extensively. He

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 11>suffers with a thing called relevance deprivation syndrome. Now, when

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 11>I retired full time from media, I was very scared

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 11>that I'd also suffer, so I sought.

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Legal help about it and medigal help.

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 11>And they said, Ray, look, because you've been a media

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 11>commentator for over thirty five years, you're allowed to still

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 11>come on to Shari's program and talk about things without

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 11>being diagnosed with relevant deprivation syndrome. Unfortunately, for Kevin Rudd

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 11>and Malcolm Turble, they suffer greatly with it. It's diagnosed,

0:33:58.360 --> 0:33:59.479
<v Speaker 11>but nothing's done about it.

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 3>And the thing is right, in his current role as

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 3>the United States Ambassador.

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 2>To Washington, he can't say much.

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 3>He can't get on their Twitter saying undiplomatic things. Can

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 3>you imagine how hard it would be every night.

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 11>Was swindling around in Vegas in his attire of I

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 11>think Aaron Williams or boots like a Williams and his genes,

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 11>looking a real hipster, the rudster.

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah to him, no, no.

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 11>I had a conversation with him a long time ago

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 11>about pink bats and that's the last time I spoke

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 11>about the four young men lost their lives by Peter

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 11>Garrett's insanity, and then, to his credit, rud stopped it.

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 11>But Rudd must be really wanting to tweet or ex

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 11>or whatever you do these days about how funny is

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 11>turnbulls impersonation. But it's a bit delicate given he's the

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 11>ambassador that's got to deal with Trump. And look, whether

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 11>you're live Donald Trump, or you don't like Donald Trump,

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 11>or you think he's crazy, he is the president of

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 11>the free nation, the largest nation in the world, the

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:00.959
<v Speaker 11>free nation. He's been elected, and we've got to deal

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 11>with him. We've got to try and argue about Taris.

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 11>We've got to try and argue about getting more support

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.959
<v Speaker 11>for defense submarines, as you've mentioned, and so you can't

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 11>just put a red rag in front of him, you know,

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 11>and say he get this up here for the red,

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:13.879
<v Speaker 11>call him.

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 2>A village idiot, or say he's it traded to the West.

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Those insults that we've seen.

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Now I want to ask you about, coming back to

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 3>the local election campaign, this story that your colleague Ben

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Fordaen broke this morning about the Teal candidate Nicole Buell.

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well he gets some good emails, Ben, and having

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 11>worked with him for more than a decade, he's feracious

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 11>on these. But look, this is the Teal candidate for

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 11>Bradfield and that's a second crack at it now.

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 2>But this is a Liberal seat. Paul Fletcher's retire.

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 11>He lost a lot of ground in twenty twenty two

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 11>but retained at her expense.

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But she's a Teal now.

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.240
<v Speaker 11>The Teals are captain, coach and sole selectors for political

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 11>correctness and wakeness, so by any standard, in case people

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 11>in other parts of Australia haven't caught up with it,

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 11>she got a haircut by a nineteen year old teenager

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.720
<v Speaker 11>at a salon on the northern side of Sydney. Apparently

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 11>it was a very good haircut, but you'd be able

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 11>to explain to me, Sharry, I think ladies normally have

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 11>a wash than a cut.

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that how it works normally?

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:14.959
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, blakes don't do that.

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 11>You're just gonna get your haircut, hair wash, you wash

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 11>it when you get hand to get all the loose.

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 2>You've never heard this before. Men don't get a shampilla.

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>You've led a very sheltered life.

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 11>Maybe where I go, where it's only fifteen or twenty

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 11>dollars for SENI is maybe that's.

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Why it is. But anyway, so you get your hair

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>washed and cut.

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 11>So she then looks at the nineteen year old hairdresser

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 11>and says that haircut's amazing.

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't have to have sex with you. Now.

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 11>That wasn't acceptable to a teenager, of course, not in

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 11>nineteen sixty, let alone in twenty twenty five. And here

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 11>is a woman who's part of a team hypocrisy, be

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:56.879
<v Speaker 11>thy name, political correctness, wakeness, who thought it was a

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 11>joke and funny. She's now apologized. She's been barred by

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 11>the salon. They don't want that sort of person coming

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 11>to the salon. But I mean, you throw that in

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 11>with the Teels. Mike Kennan Brooks. I spoke about him.

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 11>I'm doing a piece for the Daily Telegraph, dot com,

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 11>dot au and their app and I spoke about it yesterday.

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 11>The Teals are all about climate. That's basically climate two

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 11>thousand climate. They're all about climate gritty, yes, and look,

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 11>I'm not dirty on billionaires buying jets. That's what billionaires do.

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 11>But here he is, on one hand saying.

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>We've got to do this. We've got to do that.

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 11>We've got to do this, We've got to do that,

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 11>We've got to really rain in everything. He buys a

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 11>jet to take his kids to the Formula one where

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 11>he sponsors the Williams team apparently, and thinks that's going

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 11>to pass muster. I mean, and then tips I think

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.240
<v Speaker 11>in twenty twenty two the second largest benefactor of the Teals.

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're a fair egan Teal.

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 11>If you should say, look, Mike, it's really generous of you,

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 11>but we can't take that money off you while you're

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 11>flying around the world in your private jet.

0:37:57.280 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't it doesn't make any sense, No.

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Exactly because they I think they've criticized in the past

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 3>the Liberal Party for taking money linked to coal companies

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 3>and the like, so that is Hypocrisy'd be interested to see, though,

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 3>if Mike connan Brooks is donating to the tills this

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:12.280
<v Speaker 3>time around.

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 11>It's something I'm going to Maybe he'll just take them

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 11>to various things in a jet so they don't have

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 11>to get on Quantus Virgin or Jetstar and just one

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 11>final thing. I was waiting to come on and heard

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 11>my former colleague and dear old mate Steve Price, Yes,

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:28.720
<v Speaker 11>who unlike me, has got angrier, has he's got older. However,

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 11>that's the story for me.

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 2>He's not retired like you now.

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 11>No, no, no, he'll do it eventually. But you see,

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 11>Victoria will be crucial I think in this election. I

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 11>was talking about it yesterday, thirty eight seats in Victoria,

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 11>and Steve confirmed what I thought, and he knows a

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 11>lot more about Victoria than I ever would. That sixteen

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 11>could be up for grabs there and that could swing

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 11>it the way of Peter Dutton, which is almost beyond

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 11>my comprehension. The Victoria could deliver a liberal national Party

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 11>government given their record running.

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean sixteen has got a bit.

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 3>They might pick up eight surely in Victoria, but sixteen

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 3>would be unheard of.

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 11>Well you need a five percent swing. That's what Peter

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.319
<v Speaker 11>Dutton needs. And I said yesterday in the Telly that

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 11>made a combination of Harry Houdini and David Copperfield to

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 11>pull some magic out of the magic round, because that's

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 11>what happened in the NRL on that May weekend.

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 3>But just quickly, what do you think about if you

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 3>went to the Prime Minister's office for a response and

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 3>they texted you back a laughing face emoji.

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that disrespectful?

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Well at least i'd answer them. They never used to

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 1>answer me so smiling image. You would put me.

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 11>In front of my normal response, which was neil zero zilch.

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Fair enough, all right, Ray Hadley, thank you for coming on.

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:47.320
<v Speaker 3>So you're on in the Telegraph online every.

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 11>Day every day at twelve oh one and talking about

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 11>basically what we're talking about tonight, the election campaign?

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Are those will see you back here next week.

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:57.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll be here for sure. Thanks a lot, all.

0:39:57.440 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, Still to come.

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 3>A submarine expert reveals how Chinese spy ships can monitor

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:05.280
<v Speaker 3>or even sabotage cables around the world.

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Plus, on the eve of Trumps.

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Liberation Day, is labor doing enough to protect Australia Foreign

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Shadow Foreign Minister David Coleman will be up next, and

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 3>joining me now is Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister David Coleman. David,

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:24.800
<v Speaker 3>good to see you again at the start of the

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 3>election campaign. Look, we just saw we had the budget

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 3>handed down last week and yet the Albanezy government has

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 3>continued its funding of ANRA.

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 2>This is the aid.

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Agency that we know has been linked to terrorism to Hermas.

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is a shocking judgment call to continue.

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 2>This isn't it?

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 10>Yes, it is shari.

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 2>This is wrong.

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 10>This is very simple. This should not be happening. The

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 10>government committed additional funding in the budget, so another twenty

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 10>million dollars. This is the organization where nine employees were

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 10>sacked on suspicion of being involved in the October seven massacres.

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 10>It appears the only consequence for those employees was losing

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 10>their job. They don't appear to have been prosecuted. There

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 10>doesn't appear to be a referral for prosecution. There is

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 10>no way that Australia should be giving money to UNRA.

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 10>We should be giving money to organizations that provide humanitarian support.

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 10>That's important, and humanitarian support is needed in Gaza, but

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 10>absolutely not through UNRA.

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 3>The Prime Minister has compared Australia's naval actions in the

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 3>South China see in near Taiwan in international waters to

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:40.919
<v Speaker 3>what this Chinese scientific research vessel is doing in our

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 3>territorial waters.

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this is the same.

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 10>No, it's not. And look it's pretty obvious what's going

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 10>on here, Shari. The Prime Minister is trying to minimize

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 10>the significance of this vessel. It is concerning, just like

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 10>the circumnavigation of Australia was concerning. This is the guy

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 10>who had to be told by Virgin Airlines pilot that

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 10>live firing exercises were being conducted off our coast. He

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 10>is just all over the place in this area. And

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 10>it would be bad enough if this was any matter

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 10>in the remit of the Prime Minister. But these are

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 10>obviously very important matters. They are serious matters and the

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 10>PM sits completely all over the shop.

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I reported last night that Kevin Right has been begging

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.720
<v Speaker 3>the Trump administration for a tariff exemption.

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Before the election.

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 3>Do you think Australia is doing enough to secure a

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 3>tariff reprieve from the Trump administration.

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it seems like a pretty low energy effort, Shari,

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 10>the PM said on Sundays, relying on officials. As we know,

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 10>there's been no visit, there's been no recent phone call.

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 10>It's very low energy. The more positive news is reports

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.359
<v Speaker 10>out of the US suggest that the focus of these

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 10>tariffs will be on the so called Dirty fifteen countries

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 10>with large, large tariff duties on the United States. We're

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 10>not one of those countries. We've got a free trade

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 10>agreement with the US and the US has got a

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 10>trade surplus with US, so very strong arguments for Australia

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 10>and some of that reporting out of the US is encouraging.

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 10>And let's hope that Australia is exempted, although if we are,

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 10>I don't think that will be due to the efforts

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:33.280
<v Speaker 10>of our low energy prime minister.

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, and the Prime Minister has asked a lot about

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 3>his handling of the US president today at the press conference.

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:44.360
<v Speaker 2>How do you think he has responded to this?

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we know we can't get the president of

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 3>the United states on the phone. What more should he

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 3>be doing and what would you do if you were

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Foreign Affairs minister.

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, it's really important chart that we have to

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 10>respond to the world as it is not how we

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 10>might like it to be. And obviously the Prime Minister,

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 10>as a fifty four year old deputy prime former deputy

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 10>Prime minister, made very disparaging comments about the president. That

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 10>probably doesn't help in building a relationship. To be frank,

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 10>we know that Peter Dutton successfully built relationships with both

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 10>the Trump administration and the Biden administration, got big deals done,

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 10>and that's what we do. We'll disagree where we have to,

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 10>but engage in a mature and sensible way. Our relationship

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 10>goes back many decades. It is a crucial relationship, but

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 10>it needs energy and it needs maturity and we don't

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:39.720
<v Speaker 10>see that from this government.

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, David Coleman, appreciate your time. Thank you.

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Now after the break and expert reveals the secret activity

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 3>Chinese spyships have been engaged in.

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 2>That's next.

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring you now the CEO of Tealercommunications Industry, Peak

0:44:56.960 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Body Communications Alliance, Luke Coleman.

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Luke, great to see you. Now you do a lot

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 2>of work.

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:07.879
<v Speaker 3>You're an expert when it comes to submarine cable security issues. Now,

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 3>is this an innocuous ship that we're seeing circumnavigating southern Australia.

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 3>What sort of activities could Chinese intelligence be undertaking on

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:18.879
<v Speaker 3>vessels like this.

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:25.320
<v Speaker 8>We have seen examples from around the world of where

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 8>what appears to be a civilian vessel or a research

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:34.240
<v Speaker 8>vessel has accidentally dropped its anchor and cut through submarine cables.

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:37.400
<v Speaker 8>It happened late last year in the Baltic Sea, it

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:41.399
<v Speaker 8>has happened more recently in Taiwan, and so I think

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 8>that we should really see this as a bit of

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:47.840
<v Speaker 8>an alarm bell going off that we have a vessel

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:50.800
<v Speaker 8>that is very close to critical infrastructure off the coast

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 8>of Australia. These submarine cables carry ninety nine percent plus

0:45:56.080 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 8>of Australia's Internet traffic. It is the very definition of infrastructure,

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:03.839
<v Speaker 8>and so Australia really does need to step up its

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:07.319
<v Speaker 8>efforts to protect these cables. Most people wouldn't realize that

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 8>there are about twelve cables coming into Australia today that

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:15.439
<v Speaker 8>carry almost all of our Internet traffic. If you cut

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 8>those twelve cables, you cut Australia off from the world.

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:22.319
<v Speaker 3>So what more can we be doing so we know,

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 3>just to backtrack of it, we know this Chinese vessel

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:27.799
<v Speaker 3>is charting a similar cost to the root of our

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 3>deep sea internet cables. As you've been saying, what more

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 3>can we do though to protect the cables.

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, Australia has a thing called submarine cable protection zones.

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 8>We have two zones off the coast of Sydney where

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 8>most of those cables come in. We have one zone

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:47.879
<v Speaker 8>off the coast of Perth. But the fact is those

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:51.399
<v Speaker 8>zones haven't been updated since two thousand and seven. Think

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:54.840
<v Speaker 8>of how far internet connectivity has come from two thousand

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 8>and seven to twenty twenty five. We've got cables that

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 8>land in Darwin, that land in Port Headland, in Marucci Door,

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 8>We've got cables that are planned to land in Melbourne

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 8>going over to New Zealand. Yet we don't have protection

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 8>zones in any of those places. So not only do

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 8>we need more protection zones, but we need active monitoring

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 8>of those protection zones. At the moment you submit an

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 8>application to get a cable landed in a protection zone,

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 8>but then there is no actual protection offered. Nobody is

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:27.959
<v Speaker 8>monitoring those zones. Nobody is enforcing those zones. In fact,

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 8>only recently we saw two major submarine cables off the

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:35.440
<v Speaker 8>coast of Perth that were cut by a ship's anchor.

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:38.400
<v Speaker 8>This is a very regular occurrence, about eighty percent of

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 8>cables that are damaged when a ship drops its anchor

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:44.320
<v Speaker 8>in a storm. Now that might appear to be perfectly innocent,

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 8>it may well be malicious. It's hard to tell in

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 8>a lot of circumstances. But the fact is we don't

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 8>have anybody patrolling these zones, enforcing ships that need to

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 8>be out of these zones to be actively protecting those cables.

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Luke, when you say that this could have been vicious,

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 3>was this done by a foreign vessel, a Chinese ship

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 3>or was it via local Australian ship.

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 8>I'm not actually accusing any malicious activity in this instance,

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 8>but we do see around the world that there have

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 8>been accusations of malicious activity from what would appear to

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:21.720
<v Speaker 8>be a cargo ship or a civilian vessel which drops

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 8>its anchor and cuts through submarine cables. The point that

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 8>I'm really seeking to enforce here is there is no

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 8>active enforcement regime in those cable protection zones. So not

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 8>only do we not have enough cable protection zones in Australia,

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 8>but we don't have agencies actively enforcing them to ensure

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 8>that chips aren't dropping their anchors, whether they're doing that

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:45.720
<v Speaker 8>innocently because there's a storm and they need to quickly anchor,

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 8>or if it is in the case of malicious activity,

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 8>we do need to be taking a much more proactive

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 8>role to ensuring that this critical infrastructure stays online.

0:48:56.120 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Really appreciate your insights tonight, Luke. Absolutely fascinating. Thank you

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:03.800
<v Speaker 3>for joining us. Terrifying stuff, especially when you think of

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Albaniz he just dismissed it or he didn't even know

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 3>which agency was in charge. Now I've got to congratulate

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Paul Murray. Awesome pub tests with Dutton last night and

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 3>here he is