WEBVTT - How Australia is taking advantage of one neighbour’s climate crisis

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nicole Johnston and you're listening to seven AM. In

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>late twenty twenty three, Australia signed a landmark treaty with Tuvarlu,

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a low line Pacific nation threatened by climate change, promising

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a special visa pathway, disaster support and closer security ties.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>The deal is now in force and the first climate

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>refugees have begun arriving in Australia, and this year Tavarlu

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>will help host key Pacific climate talks ahead of KOPP.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>But the questions at the heart of this agreement have

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>not gone away, as rising seas threaten the future of

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>one of our smallest neighbors. Is Australia offering a genuine

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>lifeline or using the climate crisis to deepen its own

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 1>influence in the Pacific. Today we're bringing you an episode

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>where Ange McCormack speaks to national correspondent for the Saturday Paper,

0:00:56.320 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Mike Sekham on the agreement between Australia and Tuvarlu and

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>whether Australia is helping them or themselves. It's Sunday, March

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine. The episode first ed in November twenty twenty three.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Mike. Earlier this month, Prime Minister Anthony Albanesi was in

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the Cook Islands for the Pacific Islands Forum and he's

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 2>a prised some by announcing this new agreement with a

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 2>small Pacific island nation to Varlu. Can you tell me

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 2>about what happened.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, it was announced at the conclusion of the

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Pacific Islands Forum, where Albanizi had a joint press conference

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 3>alongside the Prime Minister of Tuvalu, Prime Minister Natano.

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, thank you so much, Prime Minister Natano, and thank

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 4>you for your leadership in approaching Australia with this request.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Wearing matching blue shirts as they tend to do at

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 3>these international summits, and they announced a quote groundbreaking unquote

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 3>agreement between the two nations.

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 4>And the Australia to Varalu Fellipili union will be regarded

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 4>as a significant day in which Australia acknowledged that we

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 4>are part of the Pacific family that with that comes responsibility.

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>And this I must say came as a surprise to

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 3>almost everyone, including a lot of the two voluons. It

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 3>seems to have been an Australian initiative and was not

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 3>flagged in advance. And I might say there seems to

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 3>be a growing amount of criticism within the nation itself

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 3>about the lack of consultation. But anyway, that aside, it's

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 3>called the Australian two volue Phallippeely Union, that being from

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>the two voluon word for traditional values of good and neighborlinness,

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 3>care and mutual respect.

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 4>The treaty covers three main areas of cooperation, climate change,

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 4>human mobility and security.

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 3>What we promised. What Australia promised was more assistance to

0:02:54.840 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 3>cope with climate change, so that involves reclaiming some land

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 3>on the island. They're planning to increase the land area

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 3>for the capital by about six percent. It recommitted Australia

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.559
<v Speaker 3>to providing aid and assistance in response to natural disasters

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 3>like cyclones, as well as public health emergencies and an

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 3>interesting one, military aggression against Tuvalu. Most notably though, it

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>also provided for what it called a special Human Mobility

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Pathway which would allow two valuins access to Australia. So

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 3>this would allow up to two hundred and eighty, the

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister said, to migrate to Australia per year, not

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 3>only to live or study or work, but it would

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 3>also give the maxis to education, health, income and family

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 3>support on arrival. So it's a pretty generous sort of

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 3>a deal in that regard. And Albanize he called it

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 3>the most significant agreement between Australia and the Pacific island

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 3>nation ever and he's probably right.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 2>And how important is this agreement to two Valu? Why

0:03:58.360 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 2>did they sign up for it?

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, we often talk about the existential threat of

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 3>climate change in the kind of abstract term, but you know,

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 3>in this case, Tuvalu is literally experiencing it. Rising sea

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 3>levels are happening before their eyes. The Foreign Minister of

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Tuvalu famously recorded a speech to a climate change conference

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>summit in twenty twenty one standing knee deep in water

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 3>in Tuvaluk.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 5>We are living the realities of climate change sea level

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 5>rise as you stand watching me today at CLOP twenty six.

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 5>We cannot wait for speeches when the sea is rising

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 5>around us all the time.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 3>To some of these low lying nations like tu Valu,

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 3>it's a very very big threat. I mean, can we

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 3>shift from a minute a long way from you know,

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 3>little tropical two Volu to big frigid Greenland To underline

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 3>this point, Greenland's ice cap is melting at an ever

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 3>increasing rate, and there are some scientific estimates that suggest

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 3>it could melt away entirely if the globe warms by

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 3>just one point six degrees above pre industrial levels, which

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 3>isn't much when you consider we're already warmed to a

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 3>by about one point two degrees, and if the Greenland

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 3>ice cap melts, that would raise global sea levels by

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 3>seven meters. Now at its highest point, two volu is

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 3>just four point six meters above the current sea level,

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 3>So you know, you can see why the fate of

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 3>the Greenland ice sheet is of considerable interest to people

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 3>a long way away and two valu so it could,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 3>and given the current trajectory of global greenhouse gas emissions,

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 3>it likely will, I'm afraid to say, vanish beneath the

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 3>waves within a few generations. So the country is in

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 3>the process of essentially replicating itself in the metaverse as

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 3>a way of safeguarding its culture and its sovereignty in

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 3>the event of the loss of the land and the

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 3>displacement of its people.

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 5>As our land disappears, we have no choice but to

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 5>become the world's first digital nation. Our land, our ocean,

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 5>our culture are the most precious assets of our people

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 5>and to keep them safe from harm. No matter what

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 5>happens in the physical world will move them to the island.

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 3>They need to figure out where their citizens might go

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 3>if and when this happens, and signing this agreement with

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Australia is perhaps one part of the solution. But this

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 3>wasn't purely a deal about climate change threats and good

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 3>neighborliness in inverted commerce and mutual respect. It actually contained

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 3>quite a bit of detail about security and defense related matters.

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, So there's a bit more to this union than

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 2>just Australia helping out one of its neighbors. What's Australia

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 2>getting out of this?

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, you're right, there's a lot more to it. Interestingly,

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the word sovereignty appeared in the statement a lot.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 3>The agreement committed us to mutual respect and support for

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 3>each other's sovereignty, and that is at the heart of

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 3>the Falloppeely Union. But some of the detail in the

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>treaty itself suggests that it would significantly impact on two

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 3>Valu's sovereignty, which typically is defined as a nation's ability

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 3>to determine its own affairs. So let me quote some

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.679
<v Speaker 3>of the wording of the actual agreement, Tuvalu shall mutually

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 3>agree with Australia any partnership, arrangement or engagement with any

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 3>other state or entity on security and defense related matters.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Such matters include, but are not limited to, defense policing,

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 3>border protection, cybersecurity, critical infrastructure including ports, telecommunications, and energy infrastructure.

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 3>In other words, two Volu would need Australia's agreement before

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 3>it could deal with other countries in any of these

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 3>listed areas. Australia has effectively a veto and it's pretty

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 3>clear that this relates to one nation in particular, that

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 3>nation being China.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Coming up after the break, how Australia is using tuvalue

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 2>to its strategic advantage, Mike, This treaty that Australia has

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>agreed to with Suvalu would give Australia a veto power

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 2>over any deals to Volume might consider with China and

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 2>other countries in the region. What's Australia concerned about exactly, Well.

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 3>What we're concerned about is Chinese efforts to grow China's

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 3>influence in the Pacific, which have been underway for some years,

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 3>most recently, I guess they were heightened last year after

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the Solomon Islands signed a security packed with China, which

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 3>underline a shift in the Solomon's foreign policy towards Beijing,

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 3>and it was the first known bilateral security agreement between

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 3>China and a country in the Pacific. It was shrouded

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 3>in some secrecy, but it seemed to revolve mostly about

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 3>China being able to provide police and security support to

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 3>the nation. But the bigger concern for Australia was that

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 3>the deal might allow China to one day build a

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 3>military base in the Solomon Islands. Tuvalu at the moment

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 3>is one of the few nations that still officially recognizes Taiwan,

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 3>so they're not yet in Beijing's orbit, and Australia doesn't

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 3>want them to go there. All the Pacific nations, I

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 3>guess you would say, have essentially become to a greater

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 3>and lesser extent pawns in this big geostrategic game being

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 3>played out between much bigger neighbors China, the US and Australia.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 2>So if this, from Australia's point of view, is about

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 2>limiting China's influence in the region, is this the start

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 2>of something bigger? Potentially will Australia approach other Pacific countries

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 2>in the same way.

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, Albinizi indicated as much. The government, it seems would

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 3>be willing to enter similar agreements on a sort of

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 3>bespoke case by case basis was the way it was put.

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 4>And are you hoping other Pacific nations like Caravas or

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 4>Nauru might take up a similar deal with Australia.

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.719
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's a matter for those nations. I think what

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 7>this does signal is how we are prepared to approach

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 7>our membership of the Pacific family.

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 3>So the offer is there from Australia.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 7>I think what it says is we're prepared to be

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 7>a real partner of choice, an engage partner.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Of course, this one is relatively small beer, inasmuch as

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 3>two volu only has about eleven two hundred citizens. Other

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 3>countries are much more populous. But the idea for allowing

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 3>two Voluons to come to Australia as climate refugees has

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 3>actually been kicking around for some time. Back in twenty nineteen,

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 3>former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd offered a suggestion that kind

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 3>of fell somewhere between what you might call latter day

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 3>imperialism and corporate buyout. And what he proposed was that

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Australia accept the entire population of two Valu and possibly

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 3>other Pacific countries if and when those countries became uninhabitable

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 3>in exchange for their and I'm quoting here their territorial seas,

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 3>their vast exclusive economic zones, including the preservation of their

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 3>fisheries reserves. So in other words, we would get the

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 3>people and we would also get access to essentially their

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 3>territorial waters and all that lay beneath. Anyway, that proposal

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 3>didn't fly, but it does raise a lot of interesting

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 3>questions about the rights of climate refugees. If a country

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 3>is submerged, well does statehood survive if the former residents

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 3>move to another country, Can they maintain the citizenship rights

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 3>of their former home that is no longer their or

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 3>is no longer habitable, and can they pass those on

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 3>to their children? What happens to the territorial waters around

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 3>a sunken nation in the case of Tuvalu, would two

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 3>valuins located somewhere else still control the fishing and other rights.

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 3>It's all very legally fraught and it's something that experts

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 3>in international refugee law are looking at very closely. Along

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 3>the way. In doing this story, I spoke to one

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 3>of the foremost experts. Actually, I spoke to Professor Jane McCadam,

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 3>who's the director of the Kaldor Center for International Refugee

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Law at the University of New South Wales, and she

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 3>confirmed this two Valu deal is the world's first bilateral

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 3>agreement specifically on climate mobility, and she suggests more agreements

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 3>could follow. But she also said that the specific two

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 3>volu agreement was perhaps not the biggest thing to come

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 3>out of the Pacific Island's Forum. Another big development at

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 3>the forum meeting that was downplayed was the endorsement of

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 3>something called the Pacific Regional Framework on Climate Mobility. But

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 3>it addressed something even bigger, I think than the relocation

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 3>of Pacific Island people. It addressed the controversial subject of

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 3>the extent to which the countries that emit large amounts

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 3>of greenhouse gases should have to compensate those who have

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 3>suffered loss and damage as a result. So, as McAdam said,

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 3>in the Pacific, your identity is absolutely bound up with

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 3>the land and the sea, and so being dislocated from

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 3>that can have quite traumatic intergenerational consequences. I'll quote her.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 3>We say very clearly that displacement and loss of home

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 3>is arguably the greatest form of loss and damage, and

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 3>that's in the Pacific Mobility framework. These are big questions

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 3>for the world at large. To what extent should the

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 3>countries that have primarily caused climate change have to compensate

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 3>those who will be most severely impacted. And that's going

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 3>to be a major agenda item for the next big

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 3>climate conference in Dubai, which starts at the end of

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 3>this month.

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 2>So, Mike, this union has a lot more to it,

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 2>I think than how it was framed, you know, as

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 2>this friendly agreement between two neighbors. It's been done with

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 2>security considerations in mind, and it also kind of gives

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 2>the impression that Australia is taking some kind of action

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 2>on climate change. But is there a more cynical or

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 2>critical reading of this agreement that's kind of being glossed

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>over here.

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think cynical at all. Definitely critical, I would say,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 3>because this agreement looks like it's doing something about climate change.

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean it addresses I guess you would say, the

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 3>effects of climate change. What it doesn't do is address

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the causes two valuins are essentially on a sinking ship,

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 3>and having Australia rescue them isn't stopping climate change. It's

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 3>just responding to the arms of our own Doing more

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 3>effective climate policy would be something that stops climate change

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 3>in the first place, you know, like reducing our alliance

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 3>on fossil fuels. So I spoke with a noted physicist,

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 3>doctor Bill Hare, a veteran of the climate sphere, and

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 3>he's the chief executive and senior scientist at Climate Analytics.

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Quoting him, the political class seems to be doubling down

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 3>on more gas and to some extent, more coal. He,

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 3>like others, see the two volue deal as essentially checkbook diplomacy,

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 3>you know. He said, they've kind of bought off two

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 3>valu They're buying support in the Pacific for their geostrategic interests.

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 3>And while this treaty and possibly others to follow will

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 3>be a lifeline, every decade we go on with emissions

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 3>at present levels means another ten or fifteen sentiment is

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 3>of long term sea level rise. And that's the bottom line.

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 3>So you know the word phallippeally that means good neighbor.

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, it poses the question would a good neighbor

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 3>let its actions destroy the land and the homes of others.

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 3>It's about time we started addressing not just the symptoms,

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 3>but the cause of this existential threat to our neighboring countries.

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Mike, thanks so much for your time today.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Edge.

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back tomorrow with an episode on the Manosphere

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>where we speak to misogyny and extremism researcher doctor Stephanie

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Westcott about why she thinks Louis Thrux's latest documentary missed

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the mark.

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 6>I understand Louis Theroux's style and it works really well

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the time, but what it did in

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 6>this instance, I think was actually just replicate the same

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 6>position that lots of people are taking when they hear

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 6>Manisphere type ideas or suggestions, which is just to sort

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 6>of step back and observe and not necessarily step in

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 6>to clarify or rebuke.

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nicole Johnston. This is seven AM. Thanks for listening.