WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 11 May

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>From the Skying Center. This is Paul Murray Live. All right,

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>so cayleb let me explain to the jail person after

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the show. All right, after the show, thank you so

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>much for watching wherever you're happy to be big Sunday

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>night ahead, including our bold predictions for the week ahead.

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>But as the weather starts to cool off in much

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the country, it gets even better in the magical

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>state of Queensland. And that's the next location for our

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ourtown event once a month where we go to regional

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Australian and we celebrate all that he is awesome. You

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>can join us a couple of sun day's time, the

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifth of May. Now as well, I have been

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>banging on and on and all the planning meetings for

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:41.639
<v Speaker 1>these things. I want to do it outside. I want

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to do it outside. But what about the weather. Well,

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>fingers crossed, no rain in cans Or. Of course it'll

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>be for some reason a magic wet season Sunday. But

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>we'll be outside having fun pool side and yeah, I

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>may well not wear the toles. Don't worry. Sunday the

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifth of May. Outoud. It's gone news dot com

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that you outdown at skinem dot Au. All right, off

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the top, let's go for the brownie points. I love

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is Sharn She's of course the mother to my beautiful

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>two kids. We have been together since year eleven at school.

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>We've been together for a long time, and of course

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>she was my favorite person in the world, and then

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>as the mother, becomes the favorite person in the world

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>to my two beautiful daughters in Asher and Zadi, who

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>probably need to go to bed it is a school night.

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So mums are the ones who sacrifice, the ones who

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>have to do it all and then a whole lot more.

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>And in our house that is beautiful shann me doing

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this job is the greatest professional thrill I had in

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>my life. But it means I don't tuck my kids in,

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and it means often I can be sleeping when the

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>kids get up in the morning. So she does all

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>the hard work and I love her oh so much

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and I will forevermore to my beautiful mum Jude as well,

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>love you, Thank you for all of your sacrifices. We

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>had a lovely time with Stanley and the team. It

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>leaves for Tuna on Friday night, which was fabulous. Happy

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>birthday to her, as well, and to all of the

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>mums who are the new mums first around, to all

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of those that have seen many a Mother's Day before,

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and also strength and love to all that we think

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>about on this particular day because Mum's no longer with us.

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So again, strength and love and happy Mother's Day. What

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful time it is as we all celebrate and

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.839
<v Speaker 1>love the most important people in our family. Well, of course,

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>today was everything from I'll meet you for brunch, I'll

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>pick you up, I'll take you for a drive, let's

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>go up the mountains. We'll go for a drive, we'll

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have some fish and chips.

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Love.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Whatever Mum wants to do, we do it, and we

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>try to do it in droves. Few other people, well,

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they're a little different than you and I because they're

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>up and fight and fit, and they are out and

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>about and all around the country people were doing all

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>sorts of runs for the mums that they have no

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have lost through things like ovarian and breast cancer, or

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the women who have survived it, or of course the

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>men who love those women. Oh, so to everyone who

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>was involved in those runs today, again, congratulations to each

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and every one of you, and love to your mums too.

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 3>The wife was diagnosed and she has come through that

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 3>experience very well. So we're celebrating with a runner.

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 4>She walked into our house today and she said, oh,

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 4>they're going for a ten care line.

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Now. One of the unique ways that people have mentioned

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>mothers today was by the Defense Force. Good on this

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>then normally they do this for say Christmas Day, but

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the Australian Defense Force, via their media organization, has gone

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>off and given an opportunity for the people who are

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>serving their country and are not able to see their

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>mums today, be it from the other part of the

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>country or maybe the other side of the world. As

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you can see, they had their chance to say Happy

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Mother's Day, so on their behalf, happy Mother's Day to

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>their mums.

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 5>Hey mom, it's me your favorite daughter. Happy Mother's Day.

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Love you guys, and thank you so much for your service.

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>All right now, I could sit here and do what

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>we kind of did maybe too much of last week

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>but still relevant, which was to go over the reaction

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to the election. But I'm not going to put you

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>through that tonight. Relax, even though I could you all

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of the details from all of the entrials, including the

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>ABC who went and found people who said the reason

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>they didn't vote for the Liberal Party was because the

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>slogan get austrated back on track was too clothes to

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>make Astra make America great again. What no back on

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>track was a reference to the fact that more than

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of the country thinks the country is in

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the wrong direction, the wrong track, but anyway. And then

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there were the people who said that it's all the

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>work from home stuff, and that's the reason why they

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>decided to invote whatever. You've heard it all before, you've

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>also heard almost any and every person with any tangential

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>or serious connection of the Liberal Party saying, well, their

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>plan is for the next three years, any.

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 6>And all the policies we took to the election we

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 6>will need to review and revisit. It doesn't mean we're

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 6>going to dub them all, but it also doesn't mean

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 6>we automatically keep them.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 7>There is nothing wrong with the Liberal Party's values, but

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 7>its capacity to project those values through policy, through leadership,

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 7>through through its language, through its offering to the public

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 7>is I think where we let ourselves down.

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Now valuable conversation and one that we have to have

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in droops and drabs over the next three years. But

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I probably rule a line under Okay, that's too much.

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>When this person turns up on the ABC and basically, look,

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take a bet hasn't voted Liberal a

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>few elections in her life, but we'll see. And her

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>suggestion for how the Liberal Party can turn itself into

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>anything but the Liberal Party to save itself from anything

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>about the Liberal Party.

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 8>I wish that someone from the Liberal Party would bring

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 8>me in for a day.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd given them a course on something. It'd be very helpful.

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 6>What would you say to them, I would say, wake

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 6>up tomorrow and decide you're the teals.

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 4>Wake up tomorrow and don't just emulate the kind of candidates.

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 8>You pick, but the kind of policies that they.

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Agree on collectively. You need to be socially progressive.

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 8>You are living one hundred years ago and you are

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 8>dreaming of this old Australia that no one in this

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 8>country wants or foresees as the future.

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Look, I get it bad loss too on the Trot

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>They did win an election. What in twenty nineteen, you're

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>living one hundred All this stuff this is a bit

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like remember in the nineties when all the Howard Hages

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>used to talk about the nineteen fifties. The nineteen fifties,

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So okay, let me say this about the plan for

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this show going forward. Now, you know I like data.

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>When there's data, I'm going to talk about data. I'm

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to hide the reality of things. But I'm

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>also not going to wallow in things. I get it.

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot a few complain emails last week,

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and I always want to be the show that's confident

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and forward facing and fight fight, fight. But we couldn't

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>have spent last week pretending that the result wasn't what

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it was. And I'm not going to ignore it for

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the next three years. But let's turn to some positives.

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And regardless of who ends up being the leader, isn't

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.239
<v Speaker 1>it going to be fantastic that you Sto Nampa jimper

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Price will end up as the deputy leader of the

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Liberal Party. Now this is a fascinating move. Now we

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>know that there is a lot of trouble with the

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>National Party blowing up that she's left a version of

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the National Party to join the Liberal Party, and that

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>will mean that presumably she's not going to be running

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Senate again in two years. Time. She made

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>some references to a coastal community I think in New

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>South Wales. I'll double check, so maybe she might be

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>coming to the Lower House from something like that in

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>three years time. But regardless of who the leader is,

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>just JEPI Price looks like she will beat the deputy leader.

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Should be still in this spine and she'll be able

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>to argue with anyone anywhere what she believes in. Whether

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this turns an election or not, we'll all find now.

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But if nothing else, that's what you want in your

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>political leader, right You want that if you're somebody who's

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a hardcore green, labor liberal or whatever, that you want

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody in the leadership structure not to say the things

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that are on double check. Is this going to work?

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Not going to work? Somebody who's going to shoot straight.

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Three examples of her shooting straight today. Number one.

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 8>I have made the decision, and the decision wasn't taken lightly.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 8>You know, I'm very passionate about our country and the

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 8>direction in which it is going because I've seen how

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 8>socialism has destroyed the lives of those that I love

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 8>in remote communities, and with the Labor government now in

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 8>power for three more years, it is the most marginalized

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 8>who miss out the most, you know, let alone every

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 8>day Australians.

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 7>In all of this.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 8>And so I guess the fighter in me feels I'm

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 8>obliged to step up.

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Good honor now again. She could be one of these

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>people who, like some that were rumored, are going to

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>fit it out for a couple of years. Wait, a

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.239
<v Speaker 1>couple of elections, burn the front bench, burn the back bench,

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and then when there's two Liberals left, there'll be the

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>one that miraculously will become leader and three years later

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll win seventy six seats. No, she's gone with this,

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>bugger this, I'm into the fight again. By effectively walking

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>away from the National Party the Country Liberal Party, which

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is again aversion of the National Party in the Northern Territory, Well,

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they won't pre select her again to be a senator

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>even if she is the deputy leader of the Liberal

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Party because of these internal games. So her putting her

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>hand up to say I want to be the deputy

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>leader means she can find her way towards a winnable

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>seat the next election. Then three years after that, guess

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>whom we might be talking about as a potential prime Minister.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't miss including about where her own party decided

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to make some choices and win the wrong direction.

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 8>After the result of their referendum, it was evident what

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 8>we needed to do. Instead of looking at the polls

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 8>and thinking, look, we're not going to win this, we

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 8>had to get in there and actually change the narrative,

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 8>lead the narrative in the argument, and also hang around

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 8>the neck of the Prime minister his failings pin his

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 8>lies to him.

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't completely agree with that because, as I have

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>said before, remember Bob Hawk lost a whole bunch of referenda,

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>but he still won a whole bunch of terms. So

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there's not always a straight line, and she's not saying that,

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>but there's not a straight line between losing a referendum

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and losing government. But the opportunity to knock off the

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>first term government, as historically difficult as that was, well, again,

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>most of the country disappeared for the Prime minister, most

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of the country didn't vote a preference one for the

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party. Most of the country still thinks that we're

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>headed in the wrong direction. So those were all vital

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>things that seem to have been missed. But she does

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>have a preference about who on Tuesday should be the

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>leader of the Liberal Party. She's running with the former

0:09:58.240 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>shadow treasurer Angus Taylor.

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 8>He is a pragmatic, deep thinking individual who I would

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 8>absolutely be privileged to serve beside going forward for the

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 8>benefit of the Liberal Party.

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, I don't know what's going to happen inside the

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Liberal Party room. It's hard to work out exactly where

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the factions sit in how many of this and how

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>many of that, and what the goldilocks position is here

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>after the election, because with just forty seats, even way

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>down from the way down of twenty twenty two, it's

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>hard to work out exactly who is going to be

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>going in which direction. But Susan Lee, she believes that

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>she is the best person for the job. She of

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>course came forward along with Angus Taylor and did the

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>unusual thing because normally it's about talking to your collicus.

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>They're the only ones that are going to make the decisions.

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter what people on TV or radio think

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>about this, but they're deciding to include the people and

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>doing some videos to kind of make themselves look sort

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of a bit inevitable. Dare I say so?

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 2>Here?

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Is what Susan Laigh had to say today. Susan Leo

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I should say about why she wants to be the

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>next leader of the Liberal Party and thus alternative Prime Minister.

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 9>I've listened. We got it wrong. We need to do

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 9>things differently going forward, and we do need a fresh approach.

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 9>So on Tuesday morning, when the Liberal Party room meets

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 9>in Canberra, I will be putting myself forward for the

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 9>position of Leader of the Federal Party. We do need

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 9>to reflect a modern Liberal party meeting modern Australians in

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 9>every single walk of life across the country.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>As for Angus Taylor, and again, the big move in

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and around your cint nampajinper Price is not just to

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>move votes, but also to move expectations that he will

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>be next in line. This was his pitch over the weekend.

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 10>This moment demands experience, energy and a plan. Australians want

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 10>more than opposition. They want a real alternative, one that

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 10>understands them, one that earns back their trust. I'm standing

0:11:56.800 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 10>for leader to make sure we're ready. Let's regroup, rebuild

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 10>and get back in the fight now.

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, over many years I've sat here, been part of

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the fights about the lefties of the Liberal Party or

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the right we have a Liberal Party or the Bedweaders,

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>who of course are worried about their own back seats.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And in many ways, whichever third is left out is

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the one that the media turns to to cause as

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>much trouble as possible. Why because they aren't interested in

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal Party being competitive, let alone winning. So can everyone,

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what happens on Tuesday, not start a blood

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>feud that runs for the next three years, but back

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in whoever wins on Tuesday for the next three years.

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Because Dave Shama puts it.

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 6>Right, and I think it's very important that which whatever

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 6>the outcome is, everyone respects the result, and everyone gets

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 6>behind the new leader and make sure that they have

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 6>the best prospects of success as possible. I know that's

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 6>not going to be easy, but you know, we don't

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 6>have the luxury of being able to tear ourselves apart

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 6>over the next year or two. Our party rems not enough,

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 6>Our level of public support is not high enough to

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 6>indulge ourselves in that way.

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Strong strong, strong point. I might have a little bit

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to say into the future about how the Liberal Party

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>can show a little bit more discipline even when yes,

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>there will be some MPs that are dissatisfied with the leader,

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>but I'll get to that a bit later. But before

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we get to Tuesday, we go through Monday and tomorrow

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is when there will be a decision about the future

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of the National Party. Now, remember they held on to

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>all of their seats. But there is an absolute belief

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>from people like Matt Canavan that it is time to

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be absolute about anti ned zero, to stand in a

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>very strong position and if that even means walking away

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>at times from what the Liberals want, then that's what

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.079
<v Speaker 1>they should do. Well, David Little Proud who says no

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>greatest strength together while standing up for regional areas. This

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>vote happens tomorrow morning, full coverage in the morning and

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>throughout the day here on Sky News. For the current leader,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>this is what he's saying publicly this weekend.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 11>I'm proud of my record. I'm comfortable, mind skin, but

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.599
<v Speaker 11>it's the party room's decision. I'll have those conversations with

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 11>those members of the party room in a respectful way

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.719
<v Speaker 11>and whatever happens happens. But I'm still committed to the

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 11>National Party.

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And as for Matt Canavan, his pitch about why he

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.719
<v Speaker 1>now remember, well, just at an Opjeb Price, we'll be

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>running to be deputy Liberal leader. That wouldn't make her

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the deputy Opposition leader. The deputy Opposition leader is always

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the leader of the National Party. Hence why they become

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the deputy prime minister. Not just the deputy Liberal becomes

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the deputy prime minister. This is what Matt Canavan had

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to say in his pitch again the vote tomorrow.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm running because I think we have to end the

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 2>tyranny of groupthink in our country. Over the last few years,

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 2>A Paul has come down in our nation, which has

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 2>not allowed the debate, which has seen any kind of

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 2>descent from the prevailing view is somehow disloyal. I think

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 2>austrained people deserve a choice, a proper choice. I don't

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 2>think we got that at the election because I felt,

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 2>especially at the National's Party, we pulled our punches sometimes

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 2>we explicitly decided to turn the volume down on our

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 2>party in an ultimately futile attempt to help the Liberals

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 2>win seats in the city. That strategy didn't work, so

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 2>we need a new plan.

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So Monday's National Party, Tuesday's Liberal Party and who knows

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>when the Greens will make their decision about whom their

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>next leader is after Adam Bant lost his seat and

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>she just didn't this weekend people just stop me in

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the street to express their grief. Well, that race seems

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a three way one between Sarah Hanson Young

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>who would be the person who spend the most time

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in the parliament, Marine Ferruki who remember, if you attack

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>her anything is racist, same way Sarah Hanson Young. I

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>can show you the book where she even calls our

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>people like me for commenting about her at all, that

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they are sexist. And of course the super woke, super

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>lefty current Deputy leader from Queensland, the Rissa Waters. Now,

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to be able to tell you what any

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of these people had to say about their pitch, or

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>if any of these people are actually confirming that they

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>are running to be the leader of the party. But

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>guess what. The party that claims to be the most

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>connected to the people, the most downward democracy, the ones

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>who constantly have mass meetings of their party, guess what,

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>duck egg, nothing, zero tumbleweed. It's all playing out behind

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>closed doors. Remember that next time they lecture any other

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>political Party about how they work these people. If they

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>have a battle of two, it could well end up

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>being voted upon by those MPs. But in every leadership

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>change since they became the party that they have become,

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>since Bob brown Butt on his past, it is not

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>fought over watch this space. On Friday, the Prime Minister

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>walked in front of a massive party room. Why because

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>there's more than ninety people in there now is MPs

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for the Labor Party. I'll save you the victory moments.

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You can watch that on almost every other version of

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the media right now. But as you know, two ministers

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>were dropped from current ministries, one the Attorney General, that

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>being Mark Dreyfus, and the Industry and Science Minister Ed Husick.

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>He has gone now. I'm sure it doesn't help Ed

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that I publicly say that I like the guy. But

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I like the guy when way back when in opposition,

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we had him on the program often as just a

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>backbench Labor MP who was always honest and open about

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>his opinions. He was also absolute about his beliefs, which

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>means sometimes you come to serious disagreements. But the wonderful

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.959
<v Speaker 1>thing that I like about Ed in particular is that

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>he sees the humanity in his political opponents, and when

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a conversation away from the microphones, away from

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the cameras, he is a thoroughly decent person. Again, I'm sorry, Ed,

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I know that that puts you into a column with albow,

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>but I cannot lie. You're a very good and decent man. Now.

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Mark Dreyfus has of course been Attorney General for some

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>period of time. I'm not a fan of how he

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is publicly. I recognized he's had a very difficult private

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>life after his wife passed away in the past twelve months,

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>So not good on top of all of that to

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>be moved on in terms of your political career. Both

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>remain labor in pas, but they will not be mens. Well. Today,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Ed Husick decided to do what very few labour people

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>do when the machine rolls over them. He didn't go

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>quietly into the night. He had already been booked for

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>an interview on the Insiders program with David Spears this

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>morning over on the ABC. This was before he was

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>dumped as a minister, But rather than pulling out of

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that appearance, he held on to that appearance, which, when

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>he was able to speak his mind and it will

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>ruffle feathers, it may cost him future career progression. But

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy who's never going to go down

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>without a fight and will always be looking you in

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>the eye when the fight is on.

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 12>We've had a sort of bare faced ambition and a

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 12>deputy prime minister wheeled a factional club to reshape the ministry.

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 12>I think when people look at a deputy prime minister,

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 12>they expect to see a statesman, not a factional assassin.

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a while in terms of all the things

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.239
<v Speaker 1>said about politicians, that's hardly in the outrageous category. But

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>for a labor person to criticize another labor person publicly

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>while they are serving in the same government, big deal,

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>big deal, specifically going after a person who is in

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the leadership structure. Big deal, big deal. Now it says

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that's basically it. He said what he's going to say,

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and he goes off to the back bench, hoping that

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>his talents will bring him back to the front bench.

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>But we'll all have to wait, watch and see. He

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>also goes on here to say the Prime Minister should

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>have overruled those who decided to push him out of

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the way because he was a quote unquote valued member

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Prime Minister's team.

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 12>The PM had great authority coming out of the election.

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 12>I think if you'd exercise it in a way that

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 12>provided for stability and a strong team that had been

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 12>there and could go forward, no one would have quibbled

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 12>about that.

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>So I was going to ask you about the role

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Prime Minister.

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 12>Do you think he should have intervened or not? Well,

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 12>of course, right like I'm not going to sit here

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 12>with false modesty.

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Of course, for what it's worth it do you are

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>always welcome in the man cave. I look forward to

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you being able to do so now as a back

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>bench imp will not impress the boss, and I know

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you will still be loyal to the course, but you

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>are always welcome here. He's a good bloke. He really

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>is at the opposite end of things. Jim Chalmers, the

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>man who, well, looking at the result a couple of

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, in fact last week, would be saying, how

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>good's this. We're back for seventeen terms. The Libs will

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>never rule again. We've got them all locked in, which

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>means I'm eventually going to take over as leader. But

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. I'm not in a rush because Albo's going

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>to be there for five elections and I can be

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there for five elections. So he's out and about telling

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone who'll listened this weekend. Then he needs more than

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>two terms to fix the economy, so already banking on

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>another election win after this one. I'll be honest, this

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is the sort of stuff that people think is a

0:20:54.840 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit egotastic, a little bit into one's own supply. However,

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>no one can pretend that forty is a much smaller

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>number than ninety. And even if there's ten seats that

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>are dropped at the next election, and why would they

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>who knows? That still puts them into a majority plus four,

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>so that lose twenty guess what a long way? A

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>long way from a change. So Charmers thinks, basically, Okay,

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be the Costello to this blokes Howard.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But I won't do what Costello did, which was constantly

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>run down Howard. I won't find a way to throw

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the leader under the bus. I will be his best

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>mate right up until the end, whenever that end will

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>be either by the politicians or the people's choosing. Well,

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what I know. We're not allowed as

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>those that didn't vote for the government to criticize the

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>government in any way, shape or form, because if we

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>do well, of course we're fighting culture wars, or we're

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>speaking from one hundred years ago or all that other

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>passive aggressive rubbish. No free country. We can still speak

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>against power. Believe it or not, it is okay. Just

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of little pieces of information that were happening

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Australian economy that clearly didn't affect the election,

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but are an example that while yes they're going to

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>say we've turned the corner, and clearly the majority of

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Australians believe that we have turned the corner, that we're

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>not all the way around the corner. Yet again from

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that far right wing thing tank what is it? The

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Australian Bureau of Statistics. All household types saw rises in

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterly cost of living costs in the March quarter. That's

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>according to the Bureau of Statistics. You know, little stuff

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like health, housing and food were main contributors to high

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>living costs. The acting the head of Prices and Statistics

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>says that the rise in pharmaceutical products, medical and hospital services, electricity.

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>But I thought that had gone down. That's apparently what

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the majority of people believe, along with fruit and vegetables

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have contributed to higher living costs for all household types.

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>This quarter, households with government payments i e. Those who

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>need welfare and get welfare the most. Guess what, they

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>saw the largest rise in their cost of living. Yet

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>they kept voting for the same people meantime, again just

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>to show how they need another seventeen years in power

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the Australian economy, which we are not

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed to criticize, because if we are, we are somehow

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 1>talking down the Australian economy. And the majority of voters

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>clearly seemed to suggest that they thought the current mob

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>with the better mob to deal with it, or they

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't care about these issues. The task in front of

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chalmers again Australian Bureau of Statistics. The amount of

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>money that households have been spending has fallen, so costs

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>are spending down. What about building homes because you know,

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>like a couple of million people brought into the country

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>which they were able to turn into some sort of

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>attack on everyone else has ever been brought into the

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>country or come to the country rather than you just

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>saying it's an extra million people on top of all

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of the other queues that exist in the country. They're

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>good at what they do, the Labor Party are they well,

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>guess what the number of houses being approved? That also

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>felt the total number of dwellings fail eight and a

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>bit percent in March. Nothing to see here? What one

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>two million people into the country via immigration. Just fifteen

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand houses approved in three months? Nothing to see here?

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for voting for us again, perfect example. Right, I'm

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to sit here not sucking my thumb. Game

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>recognizes game. Labor is amazing and being able to change

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the subject Labor is amazing at being able to pretend

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that those of us who spoke about whether or not

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you should just keep adding more people to a queue.

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You see, they made it it sound like we were

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>criticizing the queue, not the government for adding people to

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the queue, or the reason the queue was as long

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>as it was. And guess what, the people in the

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>queue bought it. They agreed. It's unbelievable, but it is

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the way it is. And yes, a week on, the

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>smile is back, the pep is in our step and

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we will always fight, fight, fight, because that's the way

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that we live, live live, regardless of who is the

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.199
<v Speaker 1>leader of this party or that party, whether they're already

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>planning on a third and a fourth term publicly not privately,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they're saying it publicly. Well, the joy of a free

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>country is even if you are the last person left

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>who disagrees with the machine that is in charge. Well,

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>guess what we will steal? As the band would call itself,

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>rage against it all Right, quick break back with more

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>plenty to talk about hit tonight. Remember going I send

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>men in my Politsguardnews dot com dot a you, but

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the main emails is our town at skynews dot com,

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>dott you cans couple of weeks last Sunday in May

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>join us for an ourtown outside in Queensland as we

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>start to get a little bit cool and head our

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:18.239
<v Speaker 1>way towards winter. Just firing up tonight, though, thanks for watching. Well,

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I knew I was going to see Darren Bunnett in

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the man cave, but perhaps I should read my notes

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>from Wonderful Lucy, the wonderful life saving executiveroducer of this program,

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and I would have noticed that Christy McSweeney is here

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Hello one and all look so abating.

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a high school reunion.

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm so great, isn't it? And isn't it high school terristity?

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 7>It is?

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 5>Indeed, we'll talk about that would have the.

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 13>Whole polay school face. You were just quite, you didn't

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 13>know anything. I love it, Okay. So whatever happens with

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 13>the liberal leadership, just see the damper. Juber Price will

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 13>be the deputy. We haven't heard of anyone suggesting that

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 13>there's going to be a contest there. So it's kind

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 13>of all or nothing in terms of leadership for Susan

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 13>Lee moving from deputy up or Angus Taylor from treasurer

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 13>up Christie. If you want to say which way if

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 13>you would vote, fine, but let's talk about the center

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 13>of it all. Incredibly popular with people who voted for

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 13>the coalition last sea. Yeah, and clearly somebody who was

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 13>effective and can reach beyond that number, as we saw

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 13>when it came.

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>To the Voice. So I've got to say I liked

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it either way. When it comes to a leader, that

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have a person who can sit in

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the man cave or go on Q and A and

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:25.959
<v Speaker 1>be just as persuasive.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think she's fantastic, and I will say uncommon

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 4>to senators. She actually has faced an election of the

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 4>public in local government in the Alice where she's from.

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 4>So and she's also prosecuted the No case, which was

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 4>a mini campaign. Sure, so there's a lot of senators

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 4>putting their two cents in who have never actually Dawn

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 4>often faced the public and ran for general election, and

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 4>she has.

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 5>So I make that point.

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Look, I will also make the point to be Devil's

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 4>advocate here, being in Parliament three years, not in the

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 4>Liberal Party and taking on the role of deputy leader

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:11.959
<v Speaker 4>is a really difficult cultural bridge to cross. Deputy leadership

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 4>is about the factional issues, the dealings, who's upset with who,

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 4>who's jostling for promotion, issues within the wider coalition diaspora,

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 4>and the deputy leader, whomever it may be, is going

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.239
<v Speaker 4>to have to take a significant role in working with

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 4>the federal director in that root and branch restructure of

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 4>the party. And someone with no cultural history of the

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 4>Liberal Party, I think that's a really big bow to draw.

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 5>So that's all I'll put there.

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 4>That's a risk not taking away from what a wonderful.

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Politician she is, and this is the thing. Right, if

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you watch your show for long enough, you know on

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>nights like this we'll be having conversations like this. It's

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.239
<v Speaker 1>not about advocacy for one thing or the other. It's

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>about understanding all of those things so that if one

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>thing happens, you can start to put to an two together. Right. Interestingly,

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought when just into namperjiper Price was on with

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the Outsiders this morning, I liked what she said about

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the campaign. Thus gone, let me explain why after you

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>hear from her.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 8>We ran an election driven by fear and that should

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 8>never have been the case because the Australian people could

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 8>see that some of us had some wonderful policies, but

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 8>we were stifled from being able to give that message,

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 8>tell Australians what it was we were providing what we

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 8>had on offer and do it with conviction.

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>That was a lost opportunity, Jarren. When I was talking

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>with Nigel Farag last week and they just had that

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal result in a completely different voting system. But in

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the local council elections right where think about reform, which

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't exist a couple of years ago, has more seats,

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>higher percentage of the vote than any other existing political party. Right,

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>he talked about the power of being a happy warrior,

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's such a thing that so many

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>politicians need to be reminded. Now I get it, you're

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>running for the most serious of jobs. Is not just about,

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, giggling and taking the piss all the time,

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but being a happy warrior is really important when you're

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to convince people not just that you can be

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the leader, but that you're going to be a decent

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>person along the way.

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, Look, there's a couple of things to send a

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 3>price in her interview. I think part of the problem

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 3>the fear was provided by someone else. It was provided

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 3>by Trump and look at Farage. Farage, even when Zelenski

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 3>and Trump were in the White House, everyone in the

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 3>British Parliament backed the Ukraine and that included Faraj correctly

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 3>seeing it at the time that the fear in the

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Australian election was provided a little bit by Ukraine but

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot. By the day our share market tanked. That

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 3>fear was inserted, whether the Liberal Party liked it or not,

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 3>and it flipped the switch to almost to kind of

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 3>do you want to change horses mid stream to go

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 3>back to the old wag the dog analogy that labor

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 3>became the safe pair of hands. Do you want to

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 3>take a risk? So I don't think the Liberals ran

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 3>a bad campaign in the sense that, you know, the

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 3>campaign they wanted to run, they couldn't run correct. And

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 3>that wasn't their fault. They couldn't run it in the

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 3>hand fault. Now, hey, I'm there. I'm going to change

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 3>that a little bit. You've got to be adaptable. But

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 3>the campaign that they had designed, they in the end

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 3>they couldn't run it correct. Well, as we show, it

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 3>was a factor, whether you like it or not.

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as I showed everyone last week right one

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of the things. And again I'm not going to go

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>too deep into it. I know how it bore some,

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>but for the point of understanding, okay, was that in

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>February mortgage holders fifty one forty nine to labor. Then

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the first of the interest rate cuts fifty to fifty did.

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Then the stock market stuff in relation to tariffs and

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>also the Zelenski stuff started to push it fifty one

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to forty nine, and then obviously ends up forty five,

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>which of course.

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Was the wider tax cuts too, which well inexplicably a

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 3>liberal party didn't back tax cards what they did and

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 3>they went into fifteen perpetual stations, but it gave people

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 3>the idea that momentum was shifting. Life has been difficult,

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 3>but it might be going to get a little bit better.

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 5>And the right cut came.

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 3>In and the right cup Paul mentioned the right and

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 3>also rate card and the tax card. They both just

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 3>gave people a bit of hope. And that's where you

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 3>get back to that happy warrior st that Albanezy, to

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 3>his great credit, ran an incredibly positive upbeat campaign and

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 3>he looked like he was on top of his brief

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 3>and three years ago he was a bit shakier, but

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 3>he looked in charge and in control. So that worked

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 3>for him.

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to which way the liberals go? Okay,

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And I've been really thinking about this, like in the

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>days off right, just thinking okay for a long time,

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>people who viewed the world in left and right. Maybe

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>now it's a little bit different in terms of age

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>modernity versus not necessarily looking backwards, but the idea of

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>how do we bring the best of our former days

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>into the future. I sort of think and I say,

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a person who says no Sook's no lefties

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>on TV. Right, that maybe this way of viewing the

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>world perhaps perhaps appropriate even six years ago in the

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. Just the language doesn't quite fit where people

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are today. Doesn't mean I won't use the term from

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>time to time, but I've just been thinking about it.

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So again, I'm sure you will have your views in

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of the who politically is best this, that and

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the other. But let's be honest here and again. If

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>friends can't be honest, then what's the point of being

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a friend? Right, Angus Taylor was either the bloke who

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>made the decision about knocking back the tax cuts or

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Susan Lee is the person who was in the room

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>approving many of the decisions that ultimately cost them in

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the campaign. Right, So, both these people are not in

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a clean skin environment, but they seem to because they're

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>not really doing interviews and all the rest of it.

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>That'll be the first seven thirty report that'll turn around

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and say this day and that day, And that's part

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of the joy of digging your way out. Remember when

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it came to Bill Shorten, he put his hand up

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the membership wanted elbow. He of course had the MP

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>stitched up, but he was the faceless man from the

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>rud Gillard rud stuff. People remembered that, and obviously in

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and around the tax stuff people are going to remember

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>that as a big problem of the last in a while.

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.320
<v Speaker 1>That's not me advocating for Susan Lee or pro Taylor,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but as a person who's run for the party and

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>certainly cares about them. Which way do you think that

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>they will go? How do they construct? How do they

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>look new by Wednesday?

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's two things here right, And I'm old enough

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 4>to be around for since the Howard government.

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 5>I've done this twenty odd.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 4>Years now, and it is true if you read in

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 4>the coverage that you know, John Howard used to say,

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 4>we're a broad church and I'm more than anyone hate

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 4>talking about how it amands is because I think it's.

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 5>A pre digital era.

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 4>It's almost like a pre modern Australia. You know, one

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 4>in eight people claim Indian heritage. Now in this country,

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 4>many of our large cities are thirty percent overseas board.

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 4>Howard didn't deal with that level of modernity day in Australia.

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't, but there is a great propensity of people

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 4>running for positions to stand up and talk about those things,

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 4>which doesn't actually tackle.

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 5>The real issues.

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:22.439
<v Speaker 4>And how do we deal with diversity, Well, they get

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 4>little and they get annoyed.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 1>To be too. Right, Aboriginal people didn't count as human

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and it was illegal to.

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Be gained, exactly right, and he was very happy with that,

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 4>all of us with women who are married not having

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 4>a job.

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 4>So if we went to an election with those views

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 4>of men's is of the nineteen forties, we'd be rightly decimated. Right,

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 4>So not all of it is applicable. You know, people

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 4>have to move on. But it's very hard to talk

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 4>about a modern Australia in a sense that needs to

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 4>be talked about when you are in the position of

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 4>pitching two members because members believe in things that aren't

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 4>necessarily reflective of what voters will Vos.

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Labor members or Greens members, members of parties way.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 4>Often right, So there's two issues here. You have to

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 4>pitch to the party room and then you have to

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 4>pitch to your branch members. But that has to be

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 4>fit for purpose in terms of an electual reality of

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 4>what people are actually going to vote for. And I

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 4>think there's a real struggle to intersect those two things

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 4>at the moment in the party with all candidates.

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>You've lived this in labor. You've seen these moments where, oh,

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>it's the end of times. If we go this way,

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to make everything worse. If we go that way,

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it'll make everything even worse.

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 3>After every big election loss, when you've been in government

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 3>for a while and you look at it and you say,

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 3>there's no way known we could ever win the seat

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 3>of Lindsay and the seat of Sydney in the same election.

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 3>We all go through these identity crises as political parties.

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 3>But I think the problem at the moment that the Liberals.

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 3>There's a few different problems, but women have not voted

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 3>for them a couple of elections in a row. Younger

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 3>people have not voted for them, a couple of elections

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 3>in a row. Curiously, at Christmas polling indicated sort of

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 3>second generation and cultury and linguistically diverse background. They did

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 3>have some standing, but by the time the election came

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 3>around that had fallen off too. So it's been reported

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 3>in some of the papers over the weekend there's pressure

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 3>on people from their own branch members, but they are

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Howard era boomers.

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 3>So there's a different mentality of your local branch compared

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 3>to those who have deserted the Liberals since they were

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 3>in government under three prime ministers. And that is the

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 3>identity crisis for that reason. Probably on that logic, think

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Susan Lee. But equally is Susan Lee. Brenda Nelson where

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 3>lovely bloke. But he wasn't there for the three years.

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 3>He was never going to be there for the three years, he.

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Said Malcolm Turmbull the day he became leader, telling him

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>he should be out of the room because you want

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a way of doom.

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 3>Do you want contrast? And if you want contrast and

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 3>you really want to take the ball up and have

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 3>the fight, then probably Taylor and Price is a better

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 3>way of creating a contrast.

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 4>And can I say of the jostling for the two candidates,

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:18.760
<v Speaker 4>don't discount a third candidate.

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 5>Yes, there's people yet.

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 4>To be called and yet to turn up, and I

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 4>know I've been part of them. There's many conversations going around.

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 4>People are very unhappy with either.

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Of the choices.

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Jim Wilson stuff.

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 4>Possibly and others don't discount it. And we see this

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 4>in politics all the time. We have the two favorite horses,

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 4>and then we have somebody very clever who has the

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 4>ability to bring.

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 5>Both sides come together.

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 4>And quite frankly, I've heard more sense from Tim Wilson

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 4>in the last three days than I have from.

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 5>Most people for a whole eighteen months on the front bench.

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 3>To be fair to Tim Wilson, that's an extraordinary win.

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Massive He's done it.

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 4>He's brought the boomers together with the teal shardon I

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Drinkers's extraordinary.

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 5>No one else has done it, and he's.

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Done it by self confessedly ignoring the party's advice on

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 4>how to run the cat pack.

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, my weird idea, wed, My weird idea is that

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you can make kind of the best of all worlds here, car,

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 1>which is that you can have your leader. Why not

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>two deputies? Right? Why not just into amper duper price

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Wilson Right. The only reason I talk about

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Tim Wilson with particular focus is he was so important

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen about the Franklin credit stuff. Right, He's

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>so apart from all the tea appeal, all of the stuff,

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 1>the ability.

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Wiry made a difference.

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 5>He's the only one with an economic message.

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>From really the back room of backroom of back rooms

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to the things that people were talking about was really important.

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's have some fun with the Greens, though, because apparently

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a three way race, but nobody's putting their hand up

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>formally to say they are one of the three. Every

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>time the Greens have changed their leadership, it's been behind

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>closed doors, uncontested, a straight line. You can draw all

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:00.479
<v Speaker 1>the way from Christine Milne all the way through after

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Bob Brown. So as a person who's worked a bit

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate, seen how they've gone, both of you

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>knowing that of course as a leader, right which one

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:13.720
<v Speaker 1>makes their problem worse and which one makes their problem

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>go away? Of Waters, Ferruki and Sarah Hanson Young.

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Waters will run. I think she would

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 3>probably be a good option in the same way. I

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 3>think he's a little bit divisive. But McKim wouldn't be

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 3>a bad option either. He pulled out today, I know

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 3>he pulled out. That's Ferruki causes problems like there's. I

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 3>don't see that brand of activism being popular for a

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 3>party leader over the next three years.

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how it plays outside. In news so

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.439
<v Speaker 1>was in Victoria. To be honest, like, if you're trying

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 1>to take the message into a place where you want

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to push a little further in South Australia, Western Australia

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and Tazzy, I'm not entirely sure that this is a

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>message for all political parties. What works in Sydney Melbourne

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily work over else.

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 3>I would probably go Sarah Hanson Young, given who is

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 3>on the table.

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>A member of her. Wonderful performance of the shadow treasurer

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>thowed I did.

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 5>No one takes the Greens treasury but brings. Seriously, it

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 5>doesn't matter.

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 3>It depends what their role is. If they want to

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 3>be a brutal activist party for three more years, go

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 3>with Ferruki. If they want to cut deals with labor,

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 3>because labor, the way the Senate vote is going to unfold,

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 3>the cross bench is now pretty much irrelevant. Labor can

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 3>pass with the support of the Coalition or the Greens.

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 3>So the Greens, if you want to play that constructive role,

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 3>you go with Hans and Young. If you want to

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 3>be activists, go with Ferouki. And that's really a matter

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 3>for them.

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 4>I think Larissa Waters is silable and centrist and would

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 4>be green step on a great right, would be yelling

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 4>at it, would be the best brand for the Greens

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 4>to say, Okay, well we too, like the coalition, figure

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 4>out who we are and what direction we're going to

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:04.879
<v Speaker 4>go in.

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 5>We're going to.

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 4>Put this centrist, experienced person who can negotiate with coalition

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 4>senators and Labors senators because she's got the experience of

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 4>doing so. Farouki is just a loose cannon of far left,

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, wave the flag just really bad and lib

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 4>is going to find that really difficult to negotiate a

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 4>pathway through with her.

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Because also, right that the joy of watching what Albow,

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:35.399
<v Speaker 1>what the Albanizi did in this election, right, you saw

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the weaponizing of and every idea they voted against it,

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:40.840
<v Speaker 1>or everything we tried to do. They wouldn't try to

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>help us, right, So I think both of those non

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:46.359
<v Speaker 1>labor parties are going to be looking at that as

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a message. I would suggest that both are going to

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:50.839
<v Speaker 1>find what Bill Shorten did for many years, which was

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just to kick up an absolute stick the day something's

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 1>announced and wave your fingers in question time, and then

0:42:58.040 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>at eleven thirty at night the night before everyone goes

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>vote for it so that you can quickly push it

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:04.359
<v Speaker 1>through to the next stage. Last word you, Darren.

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 3>I just think the Greens need to determine who they

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 3>are as a party. They vote nationally, but they were

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:14.799
<v Speaker 3>a bit unlucky that distribution in Melbourne and Wills saw

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 3>them lose bo FuG of them, but.

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>They were happy to get Liberal preferences to beat the

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party. When the Liberal Party stands on principle, they

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fall on their eyes.

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 3>No problem with that. But they just need to identify

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 3>who they are. They are largely people who would normally

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 3>vote Labor, but they wanted to be a bit more honest.

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 3>It's like a Democrat style.

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they are their own generations.

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 4>They had Morphed Dave totally more whichever.

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 3>If they are the latter, then they probably go through

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 3>a party.

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Now I am going slightly different. The amount of times

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>were being told to go to break, so we shall

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>do so right now and then back in a moment

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>here with a bold prediction for the weekend. Thanks for

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 1>watching Sunday Night. One for the hard cause, always one

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 1>for the hard course you're on, Paul Murray life. Thank you,

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:03.359
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for watching wherever you happen to be.

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Christy McSweeney and Lovely Lovely Darren Lovely.

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 5>So lovely, I can smell the.

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:14.879
<v Speaker 3>Course Partisan Lovely were actually past a talking sticker.

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Course Lovely Christom big Sweeny. So a couple of people

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 1>took in and around elections, which was this one was

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 1>particularly disrespectful and nasty. Everyone was rude to each other

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and we all saw things like, you know, the they

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>pulled down my poster. Somebody else pulled down my post,

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and somebody drew a Hitler stars on my patterner what

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody did this on my post? Like okay, And there

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of it, and it did seem a

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 1>lot more agro. My personal solution to all of this

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is get rid of the posters. My solution to that

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't like running the gauntlet of the how to

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>vote thing, is not have the how to vote thing.

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>These crazy ideas. We're in the same way that you

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:49.720
<v Speaker 1>all know that everyone knows how to download a ticket

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>for a plane on their on their phone. You can

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 1>do that with a hat to vote, all right, But

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>political parties they still want to pretend that we have

0:44:56.640 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>to both master TikTok and morse code because there might

0:44:59.880 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be one voter somewhere, you know the way that it works.

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:05.839
<v Speaker 1>But you went through it as a candidate and as

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>an observer. Was this one nastier or was there just

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>more cameras covering it?

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, thank you Paul for pointing that out.

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 5>And there's a lot of people wanting to chat.

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 4>If you want to chat, you get out there and

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 4>you run for a marginal Satan raising mill, you get

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 4>in the ring.

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 5>You then come and talk to me.

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:29.919
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think that oh it's not less agro, it's

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 4>it's it is hotly contested at polling booths though, like

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 4>it's never been before. I think the last sort of

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:40.839
<v Speaker 4>five to six years to the last two elections, you're

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 4>swarmed by people.

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But you can't forget to that. For your LAC doctor.

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 4>You can get a lot of votes at the polling

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 4>booth though you will probably if you engage, if you

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 4>engage properly, right, I know, I did, you know going

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 4>up to speak to people and lots of people have

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:03.879
<v Speaker 4>no idea, are so disengaged and they think, oh, you.

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 5>Know, that woman knew what she was talking about and

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 5>answered my question.

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:11.399
<v Speaker 4>And sure the man with the dog was so nice and.

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 5>It does work.

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 5>I know it does, so get rid of it. People

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 5>hate it. It's effective, all right.

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>But Darren about ed husick. So Ed was already booked

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to go on Channel two this morning when he was

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a minister. Then of course he's not a minister. But

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>he turned up anyway. I mean they were expecting him,

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>they did pre promoted. He didn't just shove his way

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 1>onto the set. This is what he had to say

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>about the Deputy Prime minister. And it's pretty obvious that

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to say he is part of the problem.

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 12>We've had sort of bare faced ambition and a deputy

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 12>prime minister wheeled a factional club to reshape the ministry.

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:52.240
<v Speaker 12>I think when people look at a deputy Prime minister,

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 12>they expect to see a statesman, not a factional assassin.

0:46:56.840 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Now I love Ed, which you mightment I'm too close

0:46:58.600 --> 0:46:58.799
<v Speaker 1>to it.

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 3>What do you think of it too? I think he

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 3>has every right to be aggrieved. I think he did

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 3>a good job as a minister. But that is the

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 3>way the cookie crumbles. The factions do carve it up

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 3>on both of the major parties, and he, unfortunately, in

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 3>a world of you can't get rid of bow and

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 3>you can't get rid of Burke, you can't get rid

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 3>of Jason Claire, you can't get rid of Michelle Rowland.

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:26.319
<v Speaker 3>Someone had to go. Ed was last one, and Ed

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 3>was first one out. Now I feel sorry for him

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 3>because I think he made a great contribution. I'm not

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 3>sure that going on TV and carrying on helps you

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:38.360
<v Speaker 3>in the long term. But what do you do You

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 3>don't want to really? Do you want to take one

0:47:40.520 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 3>for the team in this case? Clearly not?

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Can I call bs on some of the people in

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cambra Press gallery who I know love my free advice,

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth, what they pay for it? Times? This

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:55.400
<v Speaker 1>has ruined the mood for the Labor Party after seven days.

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Can I say that I get it? It's not even

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 1>speed bump right, and believe me, I'm looking for hope.

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for signs. I'm looking down the tunnel. It's

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:08.439
<v Speaker 1>as dark as it's like. Yeah.

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Really, we had a Parliament last time where there was

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 3>no internal division on either side, and now they'll be

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 3>on both sides.

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, bold prediction. Christi McSweeney.

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh look, I'm just going to make more of a comment.

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Both parties have nothing left to do but fight themselves

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 4>the Labor Party because save once under a whopping majority,

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 4>and need to appoint people the coalition because they've got

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.919
<v Speaker 4>nothing else to fight with. So let's see what bold

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 4>predictions come out of those two excellent Darren.

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Look bold prediction. Let's we'll say, I reckon, Susan Lee,

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:45.640
<v Speaker 3>I reckon. I'm going to say for Rookie is going

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 3>to get it?

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I think it's kind of crazy, but I actually might

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 3>get it, all right. Nationals probably little Proud holds on,

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 3>but I'm not sure.

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 1>By the way. Matt Canning in on the show tomorrow night,

0:48:56.800 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to it.

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Who knows what the ministry is? The cave's are going

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:01.719
<v Speaker 3>to be.

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:04.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, fun as we all stand by for who's

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:08.759
<v Speaker 1>the Deputy Homelessness Minister. Such a campra game. Thank you

0:49:08.800 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>guys to appreciate it. We'll see you again next week.

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Man came more often whenever you came.

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 5>Love being in the man cap, all right, and we.

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Love you being here. We love you too, all right.

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:17.279
<v Speaker 1>That's our scheff to night. Thank you very much for

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 1>watching Royal Reports. Next Matt Canavan exclusive tomorrow