Speaker 1: On scoring lils Australia. This is the Reader Panekey Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the readA Panehy Show. Coming
Speaker 2: up tonight. Well look at how a New York Times
Speaker 2: journalist was behind a leak that saw hundreds of Australian
Speaker 2: Jews being doxed. We look at the real story behind
Speaker 2: that ugly scandal with James Morrells on the program tonight.
Speaker 2: Prophecy in Hima on the Albaniza government's latest renewable spendeth
Speaker 2: on the move to make misogyny an act of terror
Speaker 2: pro McSween. We'll be here to discuss that and much more,
Speaker 2: and later in the hour. Kinsey Schofield joins me with
Speaker 2: the latest on why Hollywood stuff Blake Lively is being
Speaker 2: canceled and we never forget left He's losing it Tonight
Speaker 2: starring our own ABC. And of course Kamala, she's a
Speaker 2: regular contributor. She's snatching patents.
Speaker 3: Now I will snatch their pattern so that we will
Speaker 3: take over. And yes we can do that, Yes, yes
Speaker 3: we can do that. Yes we can do that. It's
Speaker 3: the question is do you have the will to do it.
Speaker 2: I have the will to do it. Joining me now
Speaker 2: is Sky News contributor Proue McSwain. Prue. Let's start in
Speaker 2: Melbourne where far left activists crash date women's rights protest
Speaker 2: on the weekend and course trouble they behave violently forcing
Speaker 2: police to move in.
Speaker 4: A women's rights rally has descended into chaos at Parliament
Speaker 4: House this morning after it was crashed by trans rights activists.
Speaker 4: Police say around one hundred and fifty of the counter
Speaker 4: protesters gathered, allegedly throwing eggs and water buliments at the speakers.
Speaker 4: A thirty six year old Brunswick woman has been arrested
Speaker 4: accused of assaulting police.
Speaker 2: But those standing up for women's rights didn't let themselves
Speaker 2: be intimidated into silence by these protesters. They danced as
Speaker 2: lines of police held back the trans rights activists through
Speaker 2: these counter protesters. They have the habit of getting unruly,
Speaker 2: often violent, and we see that again and again with
Speaker 2: the left, particularly right here in Melbourne.
Speaker 5: We sure do I mean this trans rights aggression is
Speaker 5: really revealing in that all these trans who want to
Speaker 5: be in women's spaces and treated as women, but they're
Speaker 5: showing this bent for male aggression that they're seeking to
Speaker 5: shut down women who want to stand up for their
Speaker 5: rights and to speak. It is really appalling and distressing
Speaker 5: to see. And I also really feel it's shocking that
Speaker 5: we have to label these women who are standing up
Speaker 5: for themselves as brave.
Speaker 6: I mean, what's brave.
Speaker 5: About wanting to speak as a woman and talk about
Speaker 5: your rights. I mean, it's just disgusting that we've got
Speaker 5: to this situation where you have to be brave to
Speaker 5: speak and to say what you really believe and what
Speaker 5: you stand for. I mean, we're at this ridiculous stage
Speaker 5: now where you know, politicians, so many bureaucrats cannot even define.
Speaker 2: What a woman is anymore.
Speaker 5: You know, the denigration of women and their role in
Speaker 5: society is so concerning, and we need more of these
Speaker 5: brave women to come and speak out and just say
Speaker 5: this is not acceptable behavior.
Speaker 2: And these women, I know a few of them. I've
Speaker 2: had them on this program. They're from all sorts of backgrounds.
Speaker 2: Prove they're not all right wing reactionaries as some of
Speaker 2: the media would have you believe. Some of them have
Speaker 2: been long long activists who you would describe as leftists,
Speaker 2: but they've almost been red pelled by this issue when
Speaker 2: they see how the left has treated the issue of
Speaker 2: women's rights, women's spaces, women's sport, and it's a coalition
Speaker 2: from all sorts of backgrounds, but they are quite brave.
Speaker 2: They shouldn't have to be, but they are. Now we've
Speaker 2: got in the UK the Labor government there treating what
Speaker 2: it calls extreme misogyny as terrorism. That's what they are
Speaker 2: planning to do to combat the so called radicalization of
Speaker 2: young men online. Home Secretary of At Cooper has ordered
Speaker 2: a review of the country's counter extremism strategy to address
Speaker 2: the gap in tackling violence against women and girls. Now,
Speaker 2: this could man prove that teachers will be legally required
Speaker 2: refer to students they suspect of extreme misogyny to the
Speaker 2: government's counter terrorism program the same way they would if
Speaker 2: they saw someone who was a for example, an Islamist extremism.
Speaker 2: I would I'd love to see the definition of what
Speaker 2: constitutes extreme misogyny because quite often the very same people
Speaker 2: who for years overlooked the grooming scandal in that country
Speaker 2: and to this day we're really not address what happened.
Speaker 2: There were thousands of girls were systematically brutalized, and political
Speaker 2: correctness or authorities do very little for many years, the
Speaker 2: very same types get very upset through about sexist jokes
Speaker 2: or banter that they deem to be extreme misogyny.
Speaker 5: Exactly, misogyny, racism. These are words that are now being
Speaker 5: weaponized and you know we've seen in Australia recently with
Speaker 5: Dunton being called a racist by Zali Stegel, and you
Speaker 5: know it's a means of trying to shut people's opinions down. Now,
Speaker 5: certainly there are examples of misogyny, don't get me wrong,
Speaker 5: but I just feel like in this case, how do
Speaker 5: you define it? How is it going to be used
Speaker 5: in the courts and reported. It's something that's very concerning
Speaker 5: about this trend in the UK and the fact that
Speaker 5: it's a power leaver by this government to control and
Speaker 5: to I believe, just push its own political agenda. So
Speaker 5: it'll be fascinating to see what happens over there and
Speaker 5: very concerning, but let's hope it doesn't happen here.
Speaker 2: Now to our one of our favorite former Pms, Kevin Rudd,
Speaker 2: he's being accused of turning the US embassy into a
Speaker 2: party palace, spending thousands of dollars on booze butlers, a
Speaker 2: barbecue This is in his role as ambassador to the US.
Speaker 2: In addition to galas and dinners and a brand new
Speaker 2: barbecue that cost around fifteen thousand dollars, he also hosted
Speaker 2: a twenty three thousand dollar Pride party. There were blos loons,
Speaker 2: pro catering of course, and two drag queens. We can't
Speaker 2: just have one. This is according to a report from
Speaker 2: the Daily Telegraph. Now Rudd has released a statement in
Speaker 2: response saying that the article in News Corporation newspapers includes
Speaker 2: severe misrepresentations, and it goes on to say doctor Rudd's
Speaker 2: spending represents a twenty five percent reduction on the level
Speaker 2: spent before the pandemic proe. I do like how many
Speaker 2: times Kevin Rudd refers to himself in the third person
Speaker 2: in this statement. Very normal, Very normal.
Speaker 5: Oh well, you know, I'm not a fan of Kevin
Speaker 5: Rudd in any way, readers. So the only reason I
Speaker 5: could perhaps excuse it is that if he didn't spend
Speaker 5: all this money, if he didn't show this large ess,
Speaker 5: then I don't think anyone would come to his parties.
Speaker 5: But it is, you know, typical of a labor that
Speaker 5: you know, they like to push their working class roots.
Speaker 5: But when it comes to time when they can put
Speaker 5: there's snouts in the trough, they're the first ones to
Speaker 5: spend up big. And you know, look, we know that
Speaker 5: other ambassadors have probably thrown lavish parties too, but you
Speaker 5: just can't help feeling that Kevin's doing it to milk
Speaker 5: every moment he can because with Trump, if he happens
Speaker 5: to get in, I think his days will be numbered.
Speaker 2: It will be very interesting to see if Trump will
Speaker 2: forgive and forget. I don't think you will now. Peter
Speaker 2: Dutton is said to be dead serious about a federal
Speaker 2: intervention in the New South Wales Liberal Party. This according
Speaker 2: to the Daily Telegraph, and follows the state branch's failure
Speaker 2: to meet a crucial deadline to register one hundred and
Speaker 2: forty candidates in eighteen local council elections. The federal party
Speaker 2: could take control of the state division if a review
Speaker 2: finds that they are unprepared for the upcoming federal election,
Speaker 2: potentially leading to state President Daln huh Owen being stripped
Speaker 2: of his control. Dutton and several other senior and members
Speaker 2: of parliament are demanding some answers to this deadline debacle.
Speaker 2: They're going to be meeting on September three to assess
Speaker 2: the situation and prove. All I can say is can
Speaker 2: they also please make some time to look at the
Speaker 2: vic Libs because I want to hugue you they're even
Speaker 2: a bigger basket case than what we've seen in his
Speaker 2: South Wales.
Speaker 5: What I can't understand, reader, is why they even need
Speaker 5: to do a review. It's there for everybody to see
Speaker 5: that they have been so appallingly slack. Richard Shields has
Speaker 5: taken the fall, but you know Don Harwin was the
Speaker 5: man who was to assume that task and he couldn't
Speaker 5: even do that. God knows what he does with his time.
Speaker 5: But the total level of incompetence that goes through that
Speaker 5: party and the factionalism. Look, we know that their factions
Speaker 5: are left and right, but this new South Wales divisi
Speaker 5: has been appalling for years and you know they all
Speaker 5: stitch up to get their moderates, their so calledgressives in there,
Speaker 5: and so their Labor light as we know, and you
Speaker 5: know Dunton needs to step in, but the joint needs
Speaker 5: a total clean out. And what is embarrassing when we
Speaker 5: look at how Labor performs in terms of campaigning, They
Speaker 5: always have their act together when it comes to these
Speaker 5: kinds of things administrative basics, but also when it comes
Speaker 5: to running campaigns. There's streets of head of their Liberal party.
Speaker 5: And I don't know if it's just arrogance from the
Speaker 5: Liberals that they feel they cannot be advised, or their
Speaker 5: egos get in the way of taking any counsel and advice.
Speaker 6: Whatever it is.
Speaker 5: They You know, you look at them and you think
Speaker 5: they don't deserve to even have a second chance, which
Speaker 5: I know they're trying to get from their electoral Commission,
Speaker 5: but I don't think that's going to happen. But don't
Speaker 5: get in there, fix it up and clean it out,
Speaker 5: and clean Victoria out.
Speaker 2: Well, let's hope so, because the state divisions have underperformed
Speaker 2: for some time, you could argue, particularly here in Victoria.
Speaker 2: Before you go, I'm just going to bring you some
Speaker 2: footage of the Logis and Reagan making an unexpected appearance.
Speaker 7: Time now for a world exclusive.
Speaker 2: A message from the woman who represented a country.
Speaker 5: At the Olympic Games and has become a global sensation.
Speaker 2: Reygun, that's true, Raygun. Here, I just want to say
Speaker 2: congrats to all the Logan nominees and best of luck tonight.
Speaker 2: Please feel free to pull out any of my signature
Speaker 2: moves in celebration, have fun and look after each other, Prue,
Speaker 2: are we sick and tired of this?
Speaker 5: Yeh.
Speaker 2: We still have no real answers on how someone who
Speaker 2: is so terrible a breakdancing came to compete in the
Speaker 2: Olympics in breakdancing. Until they can answer that question, I
Speaker 2: don't know if I want to see any more appearances.
Speaker 5: Well, the thing is she's got an agent, you com bet,
Speaker 5: and this is the part of the commercialization of her.
Speaker 5: When this happened, I thought, this kid's going to make
Speaker 5: a lot of money, and clearly it started Rita.
Speaker 2: Maybe that's been the plan all along. From McSwain, thank
Speaker 2: you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 5: Thank you.
Speaker 2: We're being warned of dire consequences after the Albanese government
Speaker 2: blocked a one billion dollar gold mining project in New
Speaker 2: South Wales. Environment Minister Tania Plimasek vetoed the project on
Speaker 2: contested indigenous heritage grounds. This decision was made despite the
Speaker 2: Orange Local Aboriginal Land Council stating there were no unmanageable
Speaker 2: concerns and questioning the credibility of those opposing the projects,
Speaker 2: suggesting some may be seeking to hijack Aboriginal cultural heritage
Speaker 2: to push other agendas. Miners have also warned of a
Speaker 2: new and unprecedented sovereign risk to resources investment in Australia
Speaker 2: following this decision by Tanua Plivask Joining me now is
Speaker 2: esteem geologist Professor Ian Plymer, and this decision came after
Speaker 2: four years, more than four years of assessment. And it's
Speaker 2: a curious one to say the least, where you've got
Speaker 2: different indigenous groups holding very different positions on what this
Speaker 2: project means.
Speaker 8: Well, it's got a long history. The mcfillmey's deposit has
Speaker 8: been explored for a very long period of time and
Speaker 8: it's taken a long period to develop it and a
Speaker 8: lot of that's due to red tape and green tape
Speaker 8: and now black tape. And the New South Wales government
Speaker 8: recognized it was of great significance and awarded it a
Speaker 8: State Significant development now that should have been recognized by
Speaker 8: the Commonwealth. There are some seven hundred and ten jobs
Speaker 8: that will be created during construction and two hundred and
Speaker 8: sixty jobs long term jobs in an area where there
Speaker 8: is a lot of unemployment. And the company concerned has
Speaker 8: done all the right things. They've been through the process,
Speaker 8: which has taken years and years and years. They've got
Speaker 8: state approvals, they've had the local Aboriginal people give it
Speaker 8: the seal of approval, and then that has been hijacked
Speaker 8: by the Commonwealth, And in effect, what the Commonwealth is
Speaker 8: doing is taking away the powers of the state government,
Speaker 8: allowing the state government to wallow in debt and not
Speaker 8: have a mechanism of paying back that debt. Now, this
Speaker 8: is not the first time it's happened, and it's not
Speaker 8: the first time it's happened. Under Tanya Plepose, she's got
Speaker 8: form and too often it's happened. And we now have
Speaker 8: major investors such as the Japanese are saying Australia is
Speaker 8: becoming very high risk, and the Japanese ambassador to Australia
Speaker 8: that did a couple of years ago. And what we
Speaker 8: are now creating is a country that will thrive on basketware. Now,
Speaker 8: the market for baskets isn't that great, So to use
Speaker 8: all of the high powered skills that we've developed over
Speaker 8: one hundred and fifty years in this country to make
Speaker 8: us a mining powerhouse, all of that has been thrown
Speaker 8: out of the window. Someone in Canberra has decided to
Speaker 8: be an activist to override the state government and to
Speaker 8: create more unemployment in rural New South Wales. Now this
Speaker 8: is a major issue if you want to actually create
Speaker 8: productive employment in Australia.
Speaker 2: He is a massive worry and as the sector says,
Speaker 2: it sets a very dangerous precedent. Indeed, now let's go
Speaker 2: to the largest of the alban Easy government towards the
Speaker 2: renewable sector. It seems to be unending. They have pumped
Speaker 2: another one hundred and sixty million dollars, this time into
Speaker 2: our Westpac Bank fund that offers discounted loans to pay
Speaker 2: for energy efficient upgrade aids to homes. Is this a
Speaker 2: good use of taxpayer money in and when is the
Speaker 2: market manipulation in this area going to end? It seems unsustainable.
Speaker 2: Excuse the pun.
Speaker 8: Well, the only thing sustainable about renewables are that the
Speaker 8: grants keep coming, the subsidies keep coming, and we pour
Speaker 8: consumers pay tax and then we have to as a
Speaker 8: result of that paying tax, we have more high cost electricity.
Speaker 8: This is a waste of taxpayers money. Maybe the power
Speaker 8: system should be sorted out and maybe we should be
Speaker 8: thinking very seriously about having the high energy, extremely efficient
Speaker 8: coal fire generators or nuclear power. And what about the
Speaker 8: an Z, what about the Common loth what about the
Speaker 8: other organizations that provide land? Why is it only Westpac?
Speaker 8: Who's up who? Who's helping who? In this? And a
Speaker 8: low interest loan for trying to fix up a government
Speaker 8: stuff up is not what I see as a very
Speaker 8: good use of money. It doesn't look like good government
Speaker 8: and to me it's just more pork barreling with the
Speaker 8: government's refusing to acknowledge that renewables will never deliver. There
Speaker 8: will never be net zero in Australia, and no matter
Speaker 8: how much of our money we throw, we end up
Speaker 8: paying more money ourselves. So I think this pork barreling
Speaker 8: is signaling that there must be an election coming up soon.
Speaker 2: Yes, it's not far away, regardless of when they call it,
Speaker 2: it's going to come sooner than we think. Now before
Speaker 2: you go, the Financial Review is warning that we may
Speaker 2: soon need to import liquified natural gas. This would have
Speaker 2: been thought unthinkable just a few years ago. We're a
Speaker 2: resource rich country, but because of falling production there are shortages.
Speaker 2: The squeeze on gas comes after years of producers struggling
Speaker 2: to develop new projects in the southeast and they hindered
Speaker 2: by government regulations, restrictions outright bands in some places, and
Speaker 2: prices are going up and the supply is now in question.
Speaker 8: Well, this has been a stuff up ten years in
Speaker 8: the making. We know that Victoria has considerable gas reserves
Speaker 8: in the Gippsland basin on shore, that there is gas
Speaker 8: on shore in the Otway Basin, but you can't drill
Speaker 8: for gas on shore in Victoria. This is the stuff
Speaker 8: up from originally the Nationals, then supported by the Liberals
Speaker 8: and then really pushed home by the labor in government
Speaker 8: in Victoria. So we've got a lot of gas in
Speaker 8: New South Wales which hasn't been touched. We've got a
Speaker 8: huge amount of gas in Queensland and there are just
Speaker 8: massive difficulties trying to get this gas where people can
Speaker 8: use it. Now we use gas for home heating and
Speaker 8: home cooking, but we also use gas to grow food.
Speaker 8: We cannot make fertilizers without gas. We cannot make metals,
Speaker 8: we cannot smelt metals without gas. In the state I'm
Speaker 8: in at present port period, they take two petadules of
Speaker 8: gas every year to convert concentrate into metals. We all
Speaker 8: use those metals. We can't use plastics without gas, so
Speaker 8: in effect we've kicked a magnificent own goal. This is
Speaker 8: partly due to the Commonwealth and partly due to the
Speaker 8: States having an ideological objection to a natural material. It's
Speaker 8: gas that makes our lives richer and it gives us
Speaker 8: a better standard of living. So I think it's an
Speaker 8: absolute travesty where we export huge amounts of gas in Australia,
Speaker 8: and because of such a stuffer, we also are looking
Speaker 8: as if we're going to have to import gas. Australia
Speaker 8: has a very large amount of gas. It's not that
Speaker 8: we have a shortage of gas, it's that we have
Speaker 8: a shortage of common sense.
Speaker 2: You are so right, and I can tell you my
Speaker 2: latest gas bill that was a travesty in itself. In
Speaker 2: it was seven hundred and forty fifty dollars for two months.
Speaker 2: I mean that is I can understand why there are
Speaker 2: people out there who are too terrified to heat their
Speaker 2: homes properly, too terrified to cool them properly in summer,
Speaker 2: because the bills now are just astronomical. At a time
Speaker 2: we're told that renewables are cheaper, and the more we
Speaker 2: invest in them, the cheaper our energy costs are going
Speaker 2: to be. We know that is not the experience, professor Implyma,
Speaker 2: thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 8: Thank you for having me.
Speaker 2: Still to come, Lefties losing it and how New York
Speaker 2: Times journalists was behind a leak that saw hundreds of
Speaker 2: Australian Jews docks. James Mora joins me. Next, you're watching
Speaker 2: the Reata Panny Show, and now it's time for lefties
Speaker 2: losing it. Let's start lefties with this almighty group meltdown
Speaker 2: on CNN because Nancy Mayce allegedly mispronounced Queen Kamala's name.
Speaker 2: Watch this demented carry on.
Speaker 6: Kamala Harris, you're doing years ago.
Speaker 2: Ay, let me get in here, because did you hear
Speaker 2: that he said you're a white woman disrespecting a black woman?
Speaker 2: Why by calling her the name everyone has called her
Speaker 2: for years, decades? How long was she in public life
Speaker 2: before we were told that her name should be pronounced differently?
Speaker 2: And can someone alert the president because he's still pronouncing
Speaker 2: it this way? Heard today to make a major announcement,
Speaker 2: reffords the Lord But back to the mass meltdown on CNN.
Speaker 2: Look at the reprehensible way they treat a lone conservative woman,
Speaker 2: a woman who carries the trauma of being a rape victim,
Speaker 2: and who showed far more grace than I'd be capable
Speaker 2: of facing this barrage of lunacy.
Speaker 9: When you disrespect Kamala Harris by saying you will call
Speaker 9: her whatever you want, I know you don't intend it
Speaker 9: to be that way. That's the history and legacy of
Speaker 9: white disregard for the humanity of black people.
Speaker 6: So now you're calling me a race that is complete.
Speaker 9: You don't have to disrespect is.
Speaker 6: Respect you are.
Speaker 9: What's discussing is your respect of her.
Speaker 2: She doesn't know what a woman is.
Speaker 6: And if twenty five years.
Speaker 9: Ago women don't have the ability to tell Black women
Speaker 9: who paid the price of blood to make this country
Speaker 9: what it has to tell them, they're not real.
Speaker 7: Women, twenty five years.
Speaker 2: Just hysteria and hyperbole. There. There's much more of that
Speaker 2: lefty losing in madness, but I won't subject you to
Speaker 2: it because this next bit is even better. Remember Don Lemon,
Speaker 2: before I seen in sacked him, he's back doing box
Speaker 2: pops and being laughed at by the good folk in
Speaker 2: Jersey in Atlantic City. First, he tries to shame Trump
Speaker 2: backers by suggesting their sexist Who do you support?
Speaker 7: I plete the fifth Trump for the wind?
Speaker 10: Tell me why.
Speaker 7: I can't really call that right now.
Speaker 2: But I just feel like she's not good for president.
Speaker 2: She's good vice but not for the actual le role
Speaker 2: for the country.
Speaker 6: Does it have anything to do with being a woman?
Speaker 8: No, no, because I feel like women, they're not gonna
Speaker 8: give me an act.
Speaker 6: Your money's on here, yea, Who do you want Trump?
Speaker 8: Why don't you like Harris?
Speaker 6: Oh shung? Have an experience?
Speaker 11: He's the vice president.
Speaker 6: She's a senator. No experience, No, no, no.
Speaker 2: It doesn't get any better when don talks to women.
Speaker 6: I want Donald Trump.
Speaker 11: I just feel we need somebody that has a stronger
Speaker 11: background with the military and the world in general.
Speaker 7: She was a prosecutor and an attorney general and a
Speaker 7: senator and the vice president.
Speaker 2: Is he there to learn what voters think or to
Speaker 2: lecture them about why Harris is better? This next interaction
Speaker 2: is frankly bonkers.
Speaker 7: Four years ago, it was a lot better.
Speaker 8: I made a lot more money than I do.
Speaker 12: Now.
Speaker 10: I know you feel that way, but that's not actually
Speaker 10: what the record shows. The economy is absolutely better Underbided.
Speaker 11: No, I'm serious, what are the fact I.
Speaker 2: Imagine telling a grown man he's wrong about being better
Speaker 2: off four years ago because Don's figures say so. No
Speaker 2: wonder they laughed in his space. That sort of form,
Speaker 2: we'll see Don Lemon elevated to the lefty losing it
Speaker 2: Hall of Fame. And here's one last clip from his
Speaker 2: time in New Jersey.
Speaker 6: Trump or Harris Trump, that's who's going to win.
Speaker 10: That's who's going to win. Who you support? I support Trump?
Speaker 10: All the people that came to this country legally. It's
Speaker 10: not fair that they're letting all ten thousand to fifteen
Speaker 10: thousand people or twenty thousand people here legally. Did you
Speaker 10: know Biden with flying the men? Did you know Biden
Speaker 10: with flying the men?
Speaker 11: I gotta get out of Atlantic City? Where are we
Speaker 11: going to next?
Speaker 6: Now?
Speaker 2: Watch this totally authentic interaction between Kamala Harris and Tim Walls.
Speaker 2: They won't do any interviews, but they will provide content
Speaker 2: like this. Here. Tim worries that he's a white guy tacos.
Speaker 2: His words, not mine. He worries that is white guy
Speaker 2: tacos won't be spicy enough for Kamala.
Speaker 10: Think they have white gay tacos and that.
Speaker 2: Like mayonnaise and tuna. What are you doing?
Speaker 11: Pretty much ground beef and cheese.
Speaker 2: That's okay.
Speaker 6: Do you put any flavoring? I know, here's the deal.
Speaker 11: No, they said to be careful and let her know this.
Speaker 9: That black pepper is the top of the spice level
Speaker 9: in Minnesota.
Speaker 3: You know, I'm the first vice president, I believe, who
Speaker 3: has ever grown chili peppers.
Speaker 2: I'm trying to expand my food. No, we oh, oh dear,
Speaker 2: now here is the real Kamala in the days before
Speaker 2: every word was carefully scripted. Now, I've heard us say
Speaker 2: some crazy things, but surely she would never snatch a patient.
Speaker 3: I will snatch their patent so that we will take over.
Speaker 3: And yes we can do that.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes we can do that.
Speaker 3: Yes we can do that. It's the question is do
Speaker 3: you have the will to do it. I have the
Speaker 3: will to do it.
Speaker 2: She's got the will. People watch out a very communist
Speaker 2: of her. Now back to CNN, and yes, they are
Speaker 2: among the Democrats' most enthusiastic propaganda atlets here they are
Speaker 2: tell the American people to forget about the high prices,
Speaker 2: the illegal immigration crisis, crime, Just feel the joy. There's
Speaker 2: so much joy, Frank.
Speaker 12: Go ahead.
Speaker 11: I think Trump Girl's jealous of the joy right now.
Speaker 11: There's so much anger coming from Trump's speeches. Joy is
Speaker 11: real and it's important. People can make fun of it
Speaker 11: and say focus on the policy. But if you ask
Speaker 11: political scientists and psychology professors, they'll tell you the emotions
Speaker 11: matter in pology. Yes, sometimes they matter a lot more
Speaker 11: than the policies. And that's I think the big story
Speaker 11: this week.
Speaker 2: Yes, Brian, if you ask political scientists and psychology professors,
Speaker 2: they'll tell you emotions matter. The Nazis knew that too.
Speaker 2: They love the joy message. Theirs was strength through joy,
Speaker 2: and their propaganda arms were just as enthusiastic about gas
Speaker 2: lighting the nation. And talking about gas lighting the nation,
Speaker 2: here is our own national broadcaster, the taxpayer funded outlet
Speaker 2: that receives more than a billion dollars of Australian taxpayer
Speaker 2: money every single year. And just what and marvel at
Speaker 2: this completely fair balance and not at all hysterical rant
Speaker 2: from on one of the ABC's highest paid journalists.
Speaker 13: But Donald Trump poisoned American politics in a new way.
Speaker 13: He's clearly taken America to a dark place. Do you
Speaker 13: also hold him responsible for the dark place that he
Speaker 13: took your family to with the terrible attack on your
Speaker 13: husband and your home.
Speaker 2: Yep, that was Sarah Ferguson last week interviewing former Speaker
Speaker 2: of the House Nancy Pelosi. The Trump derangement syndrome remains
Speaker 2: off the charts of the ABC and Ferguson and her
Speaker 2: overpaid underwork team seem to have learned nothing from their
Speaker 2: previous failures. Remember the three part series we were treated
Speaker 2: to on the Trump Russian collusion hoax. Yeah, they've learned nothing.
Speaker 2: We will have plenty more lefties losing it content with
Speaker 2: my next guest, including looking at the way a New
Speaker 2: York Times reporter helped docs hundreds of Jewish people right
Speaker 2: here in Melbourne. But first, though Kamala refuses to do
Speaker 2: an interview, she did, for just a minute answer a
Speaker 2: question without the benefit of an autoqueue, and it did
Speaker 2: not go well. Here she's asked about how she plans
Speaker 2: to pay for these policies she's announcing. See if you
Speaker 2: can work out the phrase or advisors have clearly drilled
Speaker 2: into her head in terms.
Speaker 7: Of the tax credits we know that there's a great
Speaker 7: return on investment.
Speaker 2: And when we increase home ownership in.
Speaker 10: America, what that means in terms of increasing the.
Speaker 3: Tax base, not to ment your property tax base, what
Speaker 3: that does to fund schools?
Speaker 2: Again, return on investment. I think it's a mistake for
Speaker 2: any person who.
Speaker 6: Talks about public policy.
Speaker 3: To not critically evaluate how you measure the return of investment.
Speaker 2: Return on investment. In the four leaves, she said it
Speaker 2: four times in about forty seconds. It's like a kid
Speaker 2: cramming for an exam. Just keep repeating it until it sings.
Speaker 2: In Joining me now is Sky News hoster the US
Speaker 2: Report never missed out on Fridays and also Sunday mornings
Speaker 2: on Outsiders James Morrow. They hit Joe Biden in the
Speaker 2: basement for much of the last presidential campaign. They have
Speaker 2: a different tactic with Kamala but it's arguably even more underhanded.
Speaker 1: Well, what have we been now? Three weeks? I think
Speaker 1: it's been since Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schuber and the
Speaker 1: rest of the Democrat old guard knocked on the door
Speaker 1: of the Oval office and said to Joe Biden, Joe,
Speaker 1: your time is up. And yet we have seen virtually
Speaker 1: nothing come out of the Harris campaign in terms of
Speaker 1: real media. And the clip you just played, reader, is
Speaker 1: the reason why. I mean, this is the most shallow
Speaker 1: candidate I have ever seen approach to national stage. Here
Speaker 1: she is all talking points. What she is underneath those
Speaker 1: talking points is some really really hard left. I mean
Speaker 1: I was prepared to think that maybe she was, you know,
Speaker 1: just drifting with the win in California. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: she actually believes this stuff. We saw this with the
Speaker 1: lunatic price control stuff, We're seeing it with this and
Speaker 1: you know, phrases like return on investment, Well that just
Speaker 1: gives her a lot of cover because she goes, oh no, no, no,
Speaker 1: where you see, we don't need to actually make the
Speaker 1: number stack up. You know, it'll have some payoff down
Speaker 1: the road somewhere, and so you know, it's all a sham, Reader,
Speaker 1: it is.
Speaker 2: Meanwhile, in Chicago, businesses near the Democrats National convention venue
Speaker 2: are boarding up their shops to prevent damage from writers,
Speaker 2: protesters other violent left is The Democrats convention begins tomorrow.
Speaker 2: Joe Biden is expected to speak on the first night,
Speaker 2: and these major protests are already underway in the city center.
Speaker 2: We've got groups, pro Palestinian groups, abortion demonstrations. The left
Speaker 2: seems to have an extremist problem, James. That's been normalized
Speaker 2: for far too long. And sadly, some of those radicals
Speaker 2: aren't just in the straits, they're in the party.
Speaker 1: Well, Rita, come on, now, let's be fair. I mean,
Speaker 1: you remember how during the Republican National Committee they had
Speaker 1: to board up all the windows to make sure that
Speaker 1: rioting Republicans didn't go and smash the city apart. Right,
Speaker 1: Oh no, wait, sorry, that didn't happen. This is the thing,
Speaker 1: you know, every time the Democrats get together, even if
Speaker 1: they're doing something that's supposed to be like, you know,
Speaker 1: for their own side, they have this hugely destructive streak.
Speaker 1: That's the only word that I can think of her.
Speaker 1: I mean, I remember being in New York for the
Speaker 1: twenty twenty election when Joe Biden beat Donald Trump. But
Speaker 1: you know, they were boarding up all this the windows down,
Speaker 1: Fifth Avenue down, Madison Avenue down, in Soho because they
Speaker 1: were worried that if Trump won, there were going to
Speaker 1: be you know, the vanguard of the democratic tolerant is
Speaker 1: full left. We're going to come out and show her.
Speaker 1: They felt about this, and this continued through the Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matters right in twenty two or in twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: This is a long, long thing with the Democrats, with
Speaker 1: the left arguably going back to the French Revolution.
Speaker 2: Frankly, reader, let's not have a history lesson right now,
Speaker 2: you're so right. I was there in New York in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, and I was shocked by how many shops,
Speaker 2: buildings were boarded up. They'd learned from experience, And as
Speaker 2: soon as Joe Biden was declared the winner, it came
Speaker 2: down those particilars, worts came down.
Speaker 6: Yeah, they weren't.
Speaker 2: They weren't worried about the left righting any longer. Now,
Speaker 2: let's have a look at this video from a frustrated voter.
Speaker 2: They took to TikTok to blast the Biden Harris administration
Speaker 2: for well failing to prioritize hard working Americans over illegal immigrants.
Speaker 7: But I need my president tell me why what so hard?
Speaker 12: All these years, of these decades, couldn't get a business loan?
Speaker 12: But I bust my mind to get the money to
Speaker 12: create my business. And we got immigrants coming here and
Speaker 12: they're getting money money. We're doing nothing but just being here.
Speaker 12: It's not right and I want answers.
Speaker 2: James. There are many clips like this on social media,
Speaker 2: on different platforms, and often they're heart wrenching.
Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely, I mean, you know, her sentiment is not unique. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: you know, this is what we see. In the last
Speaker 1: three or four years, we've seen something on the order
Speaker 1: of ten million illegal aliens come into the into the country.
Speaker 1: We know that there are only the most cursory checks
Speaker 1: on the ones that actually do encounter border guards, you know,
Speaker 1: with the mass killers and all sorts of other people
Speaker 1: who have been revealed to have been let into the country.
Speaker 1: And it's shocking too because we know that the US
Speaker 1: is now spending I've seen one statistic that says as
Speaker 1: much as four hundred and fifty billion dollars on all
Speaker 1: the housing and clothing and everything else for these groups
Speaker 1: and people you know who are working hard, are trying
Speaker 1: to meet the rent, trying to you know, as this
Speaker 1: woman is start a business, make it, you know, do
Speaker 1: the American thing, do things right. Look at this and
Speaker 1: they're rightly furious, and I think this is where the
Speaker 1: Democrats have a huge problem. You know, they used to
Speaker 1: be the party that would represent people like that woman,
Speaker 1: and now they've just abandoned her.
Speaker 2: They have, and if she doesn't vote for them, they
Speaker 2: say she's not really black. So that's pretty much what
Speaker 2: they think of segments of the voter base. Now, let's
Speaker 2: talk about this New York Times reporter. This story is astonishing.
Speaker 2: Newton Times reporter was behind the lake of a What's
Speaker 2: apped group of Jewish creatives, which led to its members
Speaker 2: being doxed, harassed, in some cases threatened by pro Palestinian
Speaker 2: activists in Australia. Now, Natasha Frost, a New York Times
Speaker 2: reporter based in Melbourne, downloaded and shared nine hundred pages
Speaker 2: of content from the chat that was launched by Jewish
Speaker 2: professionals in the wake of the October seven attacks, sharing
Speaker 2: them with a pro Palestinian individual she was writing a
Speaker 2: puff piece about. Now she insists. Frost insists she had
Speaker 2: nothing to do with the ugliness that followed. James. I
Speaker 2: spoke to some of the victims of this doxing. Some
Speaker 2: of them had to close or move their businesses, some
Speaker 2: moved from their home. What action has the New York
Speaker 2: Times taken against this so called journalist.
Speaker 1: Well, it'll surprise you to learn. readA virtually nothing. They
Speaker 1: said that they've taken appropriate action against the journalists, but
Speaker 1: we don't know that means, I mean, is there a
Speaker 1: note in her file? Does she not get an invite
Speaker 1: to the Christmas party this year? Who knows. But the
Speaker 1: crazy thing is too that the reporter herself put out
Speaker 1: a statement Rita, where she said, I really regret that
Speaker 1: this happened. This has put me in danger. Like, hello,
Speaker 1: you put all these hundreds of other people in danger
Speaker 1: and you're the victim here. You know, this seems to
Speaker 1: breach an awful lot of journalistic ethics to you know,
Speaker 1: it's one thing to get you know, the WhatsApp group,
Speaker 1: that's the sort of thing that people might report on,
Speaker 1: but then to share it with a subject who you
Speaker 1: know is likely not going to have positive intentions with that,
Speaker 1: that's just really beyond the pale. It's absolutely shocking. As
Speaker 1: you say, some of the cases people have actually, as
Speaker 1: you say, had their businesses had to close, they've had
Speaker 1: to move suburbs, their children have been under threat, and
Speaker 1: again it just goes to show how crazy it is, Rita.
Speaker 1: We've gone from in eight years, We've gone from hey
Speaker 1: it's okay to punch a Nazi to hey, it's okay
Speaker 1: to Dock's a Jew.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the same group, by the way, the very same
Speaker 2: people promoting it's one of kwams. Don't start with kamala
Speaker 2: and then diagrams.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 2: Jeff Blaiha made this point on this scandal on X
Speaker 2: and I think he speaks for many. He said, you
Speaker 2: either forward nine hundred pages of private conversations to an
Speaker 2: anti Israeli activist, you're writing a praiseworthy piece out of
Speaker 2: intentional malice, or out of a stupidity so destructively boundless
Speaker 2: that you should be fired instantly for your unsuitability for
Speaker 2: the job. Knowing between I think that sums it up.
Speaker 2: It's either was done out of malice or pure stupidity,
Speaker 2: and I would think both those scenarios deserve sacking. I mean,
Speaker 2: the damage that followed this was astonishing. It was it
Speaker 2: impacted so many people in a really severe fashion. Now
Speaker 2: I want to ask you about Argentina's Trump is being
Speaker 2: called that President jave Milay. He's They've released a new
Speaker 2: video in honor of the country's national Children's.
Speaker 14: Day BI and pisand of Licostin.
Speaker 2: Very interesting. That's not the sort of messaging we get
Speaker 2: in our schools. It's almost the polar opposite jet.
Speaker 1: It's I mean, I'm just such a shocked by that.
Speaker 1: It's like, you know, where do we all get online
Speaker 1: to go to Argentina? This is this is you know,
Speaker 1: simple sort of good sensor. It used to be simple
Speaker 1: good sense, but now it seems like, you know, Argentina
Speaker 1: is leading the way on this stuff. And I just
Speaker 1: note to bring it back around to the Democrat National
Speaker 1: conventional to spoke about at the start of the segment
Speaker 1: compared to trast this here in Argentina, and you know,
Speaker 1: they're reverence for children in the family, with the fact
Speaker 1: that the Democrat Convention is proudly going to have outside
Speaker 1: a big old truck where you can sign up to
Speaker 1: get him aseectomy or an abortion, which is like tells
Speaker 1: you everything you need to know about where these two
Speaker 1: sides of politics are no wonder. Of course, the left
Speaker 1: absolutely hates Malay because he's talking about you know, family
Speaker 1: and children and all of these things, which to them,
Speaker 1: you know, they want to break down because they don't
Speaker 1: like the family. So the families are like, you know,
Speaker 1: cells of resistance against the state and their ideology. They
Speaker 1: can't stand it.
Speaker 2: Absolutely and they predicted all sorts of doom and gloom
Speaker 2: if he was elected, and everything thus fastings to be
Speaker 2: going particularly well in Argentina. He's really done what Trump
Speaker 2: I guess intended to do in his first term. He
Speaker 2: has just stripped the bureaucracy. He has gone through acts
Speaker 2: departments and is really having an incredible impact on the
Speaker 2: country in a very short period of time.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, and you look, you know, not just
Speaker 1: the actional departments, but you look at actual things like
Speaker 1: you know, inflation, the performance of the economy just going gangbusters.
Speaker 1: It's a great growth story.
Speaker 2: Now, absolutely, James Morrow, thank you so much for your
Speaker 2: time this evening.
Speaker 1: Thanks reader.
Speaker 2: Still to come, Harry and Meghan's Colombian tour embarrasses the
Speaker 2: Royals and why Blake Lively is under attack Welcome back.
Speaker 2: Joining me now is entertainment and royal reporter Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey,
Speaker 2: Harry and Meghan are wrapping up their four day tour
Speaker 2: of Columbia, where they visited a town founded by escaped
Speaker 2: slaves and described as a beacon of anti colonialism. Earlier
Speaker 2: this year, they post for photos with the anti Monica's
Speaker 2: Prime Minister of Jamaica, and critics asay the quasi royal
Speaker 2: toua is chapening the royal brand, and one could argue
Speaker 2: that it's even could be seen as an attack against
Speaker 2: Western colonialism and by extension, the Royal Family.
Speaker 7: I mean, I'd argue that the fifteen mentions of Prince
Speaker 7: Harry's hang down in Spare and Meghan's turking at the
Speaker 7: Beyonce concert cheapened the brand long ago. I think the
Speaker 7: issue has become bigger than that. You know, could Harry
Speaker 7: and Meghan become disruptive diplomatically? The Daily Expresses reporting that
Speaker 7: Prince Harry and Meghan's titles are up for discussion at
Speaker 7: Balmorel when the Royal family meets for their annual summer holiday.
Speaker 7: According to a source, not only will Harry and Meghan's
Speaker 7: tour beyond the agenda, but also their titles and peerages
Speaker 7: will be up for discussion. The source to explain that
Speaker 7: although it would be easy for King Charles to strip
Speaker 7: the Sussexes of their gifted titles prince, for instance, peerages
Speaker 7: are more difficult and require an Act of Parliament that's dukedom,
Speaker 7: earldom and barony. So are they risking with all of
Speaker 7: this you know with all of this, you know, Showbiz
Speaker 7: and glam their titles. I think the answer is yes,
Speaker 7: it's just.
Speaker 2: Bizarre to leave the royal family and then to go
Speaker 2: on these quasi royal tours. You decided you didn't want that,
Speaker 2: or perhaps they just don't want the duty aspect. They
Speaker 2: just want the adulation without any of the real work
Speaker 2: that goes into that day to day. We've got more
Speaker 2: Royal news coming up, but first. Britney Spears has posted
Speaker 2: another bizarre video on her Instagram page, prompting questions as
Speaker 2: to whether they she was better off under that conservatorship
Speaker 2: that her fans railed against for so long and was lifted,
Speaker 2: But now she's posting content like this, Kinsia, what's next
Speaker 2: for Britney? Am hyping it's not more of these videos?
Speaker 7: I mean, unfortunately, I can tell you that it likely is.
Speaker 7: You know, she's not hurting anybody, and the conservatorship provided
Speaker 7: a legal and managerial framework that allowed her to continue
Speaker 7: her career, release new music, perform live, something she's refused
Speaker 7: to do since losing that structured support system. Was her
Speaker 7: dad the right person for the job, I don't believe,
Speaker 7: so I tend to believe that he was emotionally abusive,
Speaker 7: which Brittany claims in her book. But we do expect
Speaker 7: her to have a brand new movie coming out, Crazy
Speaker 7: Rich Asians. Director John M. Chew is set to helm
Speaker 7: the project, which will be produced by Hollywood vet Mark Platt,
Speaker 7: And that's going to reopen a lot of wounds.
Speaker 2: That's interesting. Yeah, look, she's not hurting anybody, You're absolutely right,
Speaker 2: But she knows. Oh maybe she doesn't know that people
Speaker 2: look at these videos and they're mocking her, and I
Speaker 2: just wonder why she does it. We know she doesn't
Speaker 2: have a relationship with her boys, her children, which I
Speaker 2: think is just so sad that there's been no healing
Speaker 2: of the wounds there and it must see it must
Speaker 2: be terribly sad for her as well. Now The Times
Speaker 2: is reported that Prince William has no plans to invite
Speaker 2: his brother Harry to his coronation when the time comes,
Speaker 2: saying the two princes have not spoken in close to
Speaker 2: two years. Kinsy, is this information you have as well?
Speaker 2: Because a lot has happened over the last two years.
Speaker 2: You'd expect some conversations have occurred between these two.
Speaker 6: Well.
Speaker 7: When Prince Harry and Meghan reached out to Prince William
Speaker 7: and Catherine to wish Catherine well, you know it was
Speaker 7: ice called silence. This is actually coming from a scathing
Speaker 7: article titled Prince Harriet forty All he does is spend
Speaker 7: time looking back, and The Times reports that a source
Speaker 7: close to the Prince claims that Harry desperately wants to
Speaker 7: be admired like Prince William and Catherine and Missus being
Speaker 7: in Britain. And yes, apparently Prince William has not spoken
Speaker 7: to his brother in almost two years and will likely
Speaker 7: not invite him to his coronation now Kinsey.
Speaker 2: There's a move online to cancel actress Blake Lively as
Speaker 2: rumors of on set drama between her and her It
Speaker 2: Ends with US co stars continue to swell. Not only
Speaker 2: is Blake being accused of undermining her director and co
Speaker 2: star Justin Baldoni, she's apparently glossing over the films dark
Speaker 2: themes of domestic violence. She's been accused of being flippant
Speaker 2: with journalists who are asking serious questions about the subject matter.
Speaker 2: And there's also an old clips re emerging of her
Speaker 2: being route to reporters what's happening here? And now? This
Speaker 2: is a rare issue where I'm completely on the fence. Kinsey,
Speaker 2: I don't think I've ever seen a black Lively film
Speaker 2: or TV series, but I always understood her to be
Speaker 2: a media darling. Why is she now suddenly a public
Speaker 2: enemy number one in that world?
Speaker 7: You know, I think that this is a pylon. I'm
Speaker 7: with you. I don't really have an issue with her.
Speaker 7: Even when she did make a post about Catherine, the
Speaker 7: Princess of Wales, she apologized for it. You know, now
Speaker 7: these old interviews are coming up. I just I'm ready
Speaker 7: for it to be over because I really don't think
Speaker 7: that she at her core is a bad person or
Speaker 7: a mean girl.
Speaker 2: It is definitely a pylon. And some of the old
Speaker 2: videos that have been resurfaced and she's been slammed, really
Speaker 2: they're very minor issues there, so they're looking very hard
Speaker 2: to find anything damaging out at Kinsey Schofield, thank you
Speaker 2: so much for your time. That's it from May. I'll
Speaker 2: see you at eleven tomorrow. Up next is Newsnight