1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:03,120 Speaker 1: The big Footy issues from every angle, dissected by a 2 00:00:03,160 --> 00:00:06,400 Speaker 1: team that follows the game closer than anyone else wherever 3 00:00:06,440 --> 00:00:08,920 Speaker 1: you are around the planet. This is your ultimate guide 4 00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:12,560 Speaker 1: to the AFL. This is the Fox Footy Podcast. 5 00:00:15,640 --> 00:00:18,680 Speaker 2: We've hit the cold depths of winter and this is 6 00:00:18,760 --> 00:00:23,160 Speaker 2: when the pretenders and contenders are truly separated. It's why 7 00:00:23,239 --> 00:00:26,480 Speaker 2: the all important power rankings are so crucial at this 8 00:00:26,600 --> 00:00:28,720 Speaker 2: time of the year as we attempt to get a 9 00:00:28,720 --> 00:00:33,000 Speaker 2: firm grasp of those premiership contention trends. Will go through 10 00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:36,640 Speaker 2: the eighteen team rankings, dissect all the big issues in 11 00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:38,280 Speaker 2: fair or fast, and there's a lot of them. This 12 00:00:38,360 --> 00:00:42,240 Speaker 2: week the Mailbag, the wisdom of Kevin Sheedy, the expert tips, 13 00:00:42,320 --> 00:00:44,519 Speaker 2: and a lot more. On the Fox Footy Podcast, Ben 14 00:00:44,560 --> 00:00:47,519 Speaker 2: Waterworth with you as is Crow's Comma belivea Max Law. 15 00:00:47,760 --> 00:00:48,400 Speaker 2: Hello MAXI. 16 00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:51,559 Speaker 3: They won a close game and used up all of 17 00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:54,040 Speaker 3: their terrible, terrible losses in the space of about twelve 18 00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:55,920 Speaker 3: minutess what an incredible Friday night. 19 00:00:55,920 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 2: That was close losses over how many forever about. 20 00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:02,440 Speaker 3: Seven dec I think somehow it's quite impressive. 21 00:01:02,520 --> 00:01:04,040 Speaker 2: It was a very good effort from the Crows. We'll 22 00:01:04,040 --> 00:01:06,280 Speaker 2: talk about that very shortly. Also joining us is our 23 00:01:06,360 --> 00:01:09,360 Speaker 2: hard working night our a bit flat after the Tigers 24 00:01:09,720 --> 00:01:13,480 Speaker 2: disappointment from Saturday. Jack Jovanovski Hello, JJ. 25 00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:15,679 Speaker 4: Hello, Well, it's good to be back. It wasn't It 26 00:01:15,720 --> 00:01:16,679 Speaker 4: wasn't pleasant viewing on. 27 00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:18,720 Speaker 3: On Saturday, though first quarter was okay. 28 00:01:19,319 --> 00:01:22,680 Speaker 4: It was promising, too promising. It builds up the expectation. 29 00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:27,200 Speaker 2: It's quite some thing to be in the office when 30 00:01:27,240 --> 00:01:30,480 Speaker 2: you get when Jack's doing Richmond team tips and he 31 00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:33,200 Speaker 2: particularly and he confidently. 32 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:34,920 Speaker 3: Nail it every week. Who's coming in and out of 33 00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:35,240 Speaker 3: the side. 34 00:01:36,120 --> 00:01:38,000 Speaker 2: It's not Richmond enough because of course he's a very 35 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:41,080 Speaker 2: good objective reporter. Well, but no, his knowledge of some 36 00:01:41,240 --> 00:01:43,680 Speaker 2: very fringe Richmond plays he is quite astounding. 37 00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:48,400 Speaker 4: Well, I mean i'd like to think that I get 38 00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:50,880 Speaker 4: close sometimes. I mean there are a few. 39 00:01:51,240 --> 00:01:54,080 Speaker 3: Did you not get the exact four ins and outs 40 00:01:54,080 --> 00:01:54,840 Speaker 3: a week or two ago? 41 00:01:55,040 --> 00:01:56,480 Speaker 4: I did, and I let everyone know about it. 42 00:01:56,520 --> 00:01:57,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, it was good. 43 00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:00,760 Speaker 3: But it doesn't sound like you're being because I brought 44 00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:02,440 Speaker 3: it up this time. So it's fine. 45 00:02:02,920 --> 00:02:06,240 Speaker 2: Just apologies for no record last week and this delayed drop. 46 00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:08,280 Speaker 2: I was sick last week and then we initially we 47 00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:11,480 Speaker 2: had a sort of replacement team ready to go. Sea 48 00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:12,440 Speaker 2: was also ready to host. 49 00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:15,160 Speaker 3: Apparently Zita has quit on us like three times in 50 00:02:15,200 --> 00:02:18,240 Speaker 3: a row. Let's be honest here. Look, I'm not saying 51 00:02:18,280 --> 00:02:20,720 Speaker 3: that he needs to be dropped for team morale reasons, 52 00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:24,200 Speaker 3: just permanently to the reserves, but I think it's a consideration. 53 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:26,959 Speaker 2: Anyway. We're here and we're recording, and that's the most 54 00:02:26,960 --> 00:02:28,640 Speaker 2: important thing. Just a quick word on the Hall of 55 00:02:28,680 --> 00:02:33,079 Speaker 2: Fame last night, I can't remember in probably since working here, 56 00:02:33,240 --> 00:02:36,919 Speaker 2: just a such an emotional is not the right word, 57 00:02:36,960 --> 00:02:40,440 Speaker 2: but there was just so much content, I suppose in 58 00:02:41,320 --> 00:02:45,520 Speaker 2: last night in terms of the wonderful storylines of Aaron 59 00:02:45,520 --> 00:02:49,240 Speaker 2: Phillips and Daisy Pierced getting in in the same class, 60 00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:53,560 Speaker 2: and of course that beautiful moment where Aaron paid tribute 61 00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:55,760 Speaker 2: to her dad, Greg Phillips is also in the Hall 62 00:02:55,800 --> 00:02:58,079 Speaker 2: of Fame as well, So that was that was fantastic, 63 00:02:58,680 --> 00:03:04,320 Speaker 2: The absolute sportsman's like speech from Peter Daly, who was 64 00:03:04,400 --> 00:03:07,840 Speaker 2: clearly the most in demand person post event, and Gary 65 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:10,679 Speaker 2: was just Gary, like he just totally own the room, 66 00:03:10,760 --> 00:03:12,639 Speaker 2: like it was his own sportsman night. But we sort 67 00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:14,240 Speaker 2: of got the rollercoaster of emotions there. 68 00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:16,520 Speaker 3: It was a fantastic knight, and so the Peter Daly 69 00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:17,799 Speaker 3: one was the best one for me because I haven't 70 00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:19,160 Speaker 3: really heard of him. To be honest, I'm not a 71 00:03:19,160 --> 00:03:21,680 Speaker 3: sandful expert. I know some of my footy history, but 72 00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:25,160 Speaker 3: a lot of it. But that's why ideally you induct 73 00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:27,400 Speaker 3: these older players when they have the chance to be 74 00:03:27,520 --> 00:03:30,160 Speaker 3: at the event, give a speech, tell the stories they've 75 00:03:30,200 --> 00:03:33,480 Speaker 3: been telling their grandkids and everyone else for fifty years, 76 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:35,960 Speaker 3: but they've reversed them perfectly and they can do all 77 00:03:36,000 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 3: these incredible lines. Jerry did a fantastic job interviewing them. 78 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:40,920 Speaker 3: He always does and gets the best out of them. 79 00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:43,320 Speaker 3: It's a fantastic night and you can understand why so 80 00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:45,640 Speaker 3: many of the people who are involved always say it's 81 00:03:45,680 --> 00:03:47,280 Speaker 3: the best night on the footy calendar, because it would 82 00:03:47,280 --> 00:03:49,440 Speaker 3: be so much fun to be around that vibe. 83 00:03:49,560 --> 00:03:52,640 Speaker 2: Nick Revolt and Luke Coodge also inducted as well. Revolt well, 84 00:03:52,680 --> 00:03:54,320 Speaker 2: it was of eligible a couple of years ago, but 85 00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:57,360 Speaker 2: was in person, yes this time. And of course Luke 86 00:03:57,360 --> 00:03:59,720 Speaker 2: Codge the fresh guy into the Hall of Fame. But 87 00:03:59,800 --> 00:04:02,800 Speaker 2: let's go max into the power rankings, where we've got 88 00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:07,160 Speaker 2: Collingwood and Geelong at the top and then we've got 89 00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:10,960 Speaker 2: who's Adelaide over Brisbane, Brisbane over at Brisbane over Adelaide 90 00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:14,920 Speaker 2: despite the result on the weekend, but so did we 91 00:04:15,040 --> 00:04:19,080 Speaker 2: learn do we learn much about either team in from 92 00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 2: that result? 93 00:04:19,920 --> 00:04:22,520 Speaker 3: So I thought what Matthew Nick said after that game 94 00:04:22,640 --> 00:04:25,839 Speaker 3: was absolutely perfect, both in his suit of your narrative 95 00:04:25,880 --> 00:04:27,839 Speaker 3: birth perfectly, but I think it was also an incredibly 96 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:31,200 Speaker 3: honest admission that we were lucky because we deserve some luck, 97 00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:34,159 Speaker 3: we will do some luck, and therefore we can't go 98 00:04:34,240 --> 00:04:36,360 Speaker 3: out of this night saying oh yeah, we're totally fine. 99 00:04:36,400 --> 00:04:39,080 Speaker 3: We're a contender now. Like the simplified narrative is okay, 100 00:04:39,080 --> 00:04:43,039 Speaker 3: they beat the Braining Premiere is great, win Adelaide's finally 101 00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:45,560 Speaker 3: for real, But you know there was some fortune in it. Yes, 102 00:04:45,560 --> 00:04:47,239 Speaker 3: they kicked in accurately at the start of the game, 103 00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:49,640 Speaker 3: and yes they had a role in Brisbane not kicking 104 00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:53,200 Speaker 3: a goal on the fourth quarter, But clearly Brisbane had 105 00:04:53,240 --> 00:04:55,400 Speaker 3: their chances and could have probably should have won. 106 00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:59,040 Speaker 2: And I think Chris Fagan, as respectfully as he possibly 107 00:04:59,040 --> 00:05:02,039 Speaker 2: could suggest said postgame, we lost that game. 108 00:05:02,120 --> 00:05:03,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think you said we should have won. Yeah, So, 109 00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:06,080 Speaker 3: which I think is totally fair. So if anything, I 110 00:05:06,120 --> 00:05:08,080 Speaker 3: came out of that game slightly more confident in Brisbane, 111 00:05:08,240 --> 00:05:10,560 Speaker 3: who I was worried about because they hadn't had that 112 00:05:10,600 --> 00:05:12,800 Speaker 3: many great games and the Essendon game at home the 113 00:05:12,839 --> 00:05:15,080 Speaker 3: week before was less than impressive. But no, they showed 114 00:05:15,120 --> 00:05:17,800 Speaker 3: a lot on the road and tricky conditions against another 115 00:05:17,839 --> 00:05:20,240 Speaker 3: good team. But Adelaide lived up to the standard at 116 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:22,279 Speaker 3: least of that game, and it was a quality watch, 117 00:05:22,360 --> 00:05:24,159 Speaker 3: which is what we wanted and not what we got. 118 00:05:24,600 --> 00:05:26,200 Speaker 3: Sometimes over the last couple of weeks. 119 00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:29,560 Speaker 2: Yea, if the Crows win, are sorry. If the Lions win. 120 00:05:29,640 --> 00:05:32,920 Speaker 2: The disposal camp by seventy two, jack clearances by nearly twenty, 121 00:05:33,240 --> 00:05:36,719 Speaker 2: contestable by nearly thirteen by thirteen, inside fifties by thirteen, 122 00:05:36,720 --> 00:05:39,599 Speaker 2: and I think uncontested marks by eighteen, which we know 123 00:05:39,720 --> 00:05:42,919 Speaker 2: is their go to style. It's say Brisbane wins that, 124 00:05:43,440 --> 00:05:45,279 Speaker 2: maybe not nine times out of ten, but ten times 125 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:47,400 Speaker 2: out of ten. So there's a lot of learnings for 126 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:48,440 Speaker 2: the Lions to come away with. 127 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:50,800 Speaker 4: I think there's there's a lot of good in that. 128 00:05:50,839 --> 00:05:53,760 Speaker 4: But then also Max, I would ask you, are you 129 00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:58,479 Speaker 4: concerned about the inability to capitalize on that dominance because 130 00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 4: we've seen a few times this year now and you know, 131 00:06:01,960 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 4: Kingy's and these kinds of people will question the Danaher 132 00:06:05,120 --> 00:06:10,760 Speaker 4: absence and Ty Gallup came into the time, so you're 133 00:06:10,760 --> 00:06:13,320 Speaker 4: getting a few different a few different looks at different 134 00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:15,280 Speaker 4: sort of forward mixes. He concerned at all about their 135 00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:17,480 Speaker 4: inability to actually capitalize. 136 00:06:17,560 --> 00:06:20,320 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, that's actual thing I think looking I think 137 00:06:20,320 --> 00:06:22,320 Speaker 3: it was on first crack they showed that last year 138 00:06:22,360 --> 00:06:25,239 Speaker 3: they were fifth for forward efficiency in terms of turning 139 00:06:25,240 --> 00:06:28,080 Speaker 3: inside fifty into goals, twelve or thirteenth this year. So 140 00:06:28,080 --> 00:06:32,200 Speaker 3: that's a genuine drop off, and logically Danaher's absence as 141 00:06:32,200 --> 00:06:34,440 Speaker 3: one of the better key forwards in the comp is 142 00:06:34,480 --> 00:06:38,000 Speaker 3: going to play a role in that. You know, they're 143 00:06:38,560 --> 00:06:40,239 Speaker 3: nine and three with a draw in a good position. 144 00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:42,520 Speaker 3: They have got a hard run home, so some tough 145 00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:44,000 Speaker 3: games and if they drop those, they could be in 146 00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:46,200 Speaker 3: trouble of dropping in risk of dropping out of the 147 00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:48,800 Speaker 3: top four. But I think that that's a flow that 148 00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:51,360 Speaker 3: is fixable because you can just have sometimes a very 149 00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:53,920 Speaker 3: efficient day and w and that can win you a final. 150 00:06:54,120 --> 00:06:56,320 Speaker 3: So it's not the most devastating one, but it's a 151 00:06:56,360 --> 00:06:58,839 Speaker 3: concern in the same way that I've been concerned about 152 00:06:58,880 --> 00:07:01,200 Speaker 3: the lines for a little while. The percentage is still 153 00:07:01,520 --> 00:07:03,320 Speaker 3: not the worst in the top eight anymore because a 154 00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:05,560 Speaker 3: few teams have had some troubles, but it's certainly the 155 00:07:05,600 --> 00:07:07,360 Speaker 3: worst amongst the top five. Although I look at the 156 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:10,320 Speaker 3: top four in the ladder now Collingwood, Brisbane, Adelaide, Gelong 157 00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:13,040 Speaker 3: that for the first time sounds like the right top 158 00:07:13,080 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 3: four right. That feels like the four best teams are 159 00:07:15,880 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 3: in there right now. 160 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:19,880 Speaker 2: So two teams who are not in there are Hawthorne 161 00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:23,240 Speaker 2: and the Bulldogs who played as we record six six 162 00:07:23,320 --> 00:07:25,960 Speaker 2: days ago, long time ago. Was this a flinch reaction though, 163 00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:28,720 Speaker 2: Maxie Hawthorne went from seventh to fifth and the Dog 164 00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:29,960 Speaker 2: went from third to sixth. 165 00:07:30,200 --> 00:07:33,600 Speaker 3: No, So, as I've talked about the big Bulldogs believe, 166 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:36,760 Speaker 3: I'm the world's biggest Bulldogs believer the BBB. 167 00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:39,720 Speaker 2: Yes, it's be cute. 168 00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:43,080 Speaker 3: They have done quite a lot right this season, but 169 00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:46,720 Speaker 3: not beating good teams is a problem. Being one and 170 00:07:46,840 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 3: six against the top nine it means something. It doesn't 171 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:52,000 Speaker 3: mean nothing, even if they've been competitive in every one 172 00:07:52,040 --> 00:07:54,600 Speaker 3: of those games, so you have to take that into account. 173 00:07:55,000 --> 00:07:57,400 Speaker 3: It's gonna hurt them on the ladder, like there are 174 00:07:57,920 --> 00:08:00,760 Speaker 3: three games out of the top four. Now they can 175 00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:03,200 Speaker 3: make that up over their last eleven games, but it 176 00:08:03,200 --> 00:08:06,000 Speaker 3: will be tricky, so that is a problem. They're going 177 00:08:06,040 --> 00:08:08,320 Speaker 3: to end up having the same season of elimination final 178 00:08:08,520 --> 00:08:11,000 Speaker 3: deciding the year and either they lose that or they 179 00:08:11,040 --> 00:08:12,720 Speaker 3: go all the way to the Grand Final based. 180 00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:15,200 Speaker 2: On history the Sorry Jack they play and kild Her 181 00:08:15,240 --> 00:08:17,680 Speaker 2: on Thursday night the Bulldogs. You're at the game for 182 00:08:17,760 --> 00:08:20,400 Speaker 2: Hawthorne Dogs as well. Did you come away from that 183 00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:24,520 Speaker 2: more glass half empty about the bulldogs prospects for this year? 184 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:27,160 Speaker 4: I don't think so. I think it said more about 185 00:08:27,240 --> 00:08:30,960 Speaker 4: Hawthorne and their response, like they really upped their intensity 186 00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:33,720 Speaker 4: and pressure from the week before. But on the Bulldogs, 187 00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:36,679 Speaker 4: I think it's interesting because we hear about Bevo and 188 00:08:36,679 --> 00:08:39,800 Speaker 4: how he's quoted as a once in a lifetime coach, 189 00:08:40,360 --> 00:08:42,640 Speaker 4: and I think it's interesting with Sam Darcy to come 190 00:08:42,679 --> 00:08:50,240 Speaker 4: back this weekend is when or will he ever truly 191 00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:53,880 Speaker 4: consider moving Aaron Norton back to defense, because if there 192 00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:58,280 Speaker 4: are issues in key defense and someone like Norton, who 193 00:08:58,280 --> 00:09:00,600 Speaker 4: has great hands, tried. 194 00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:02,439 Speaker 2: Out key defender is a junior come right. 195 00:09:02,400 --> 00:09:05,240 Speaker 4: Through Sam Darcy's back He's going to be the focal 196 00:09:05,240 --> 00:09:09,280 Speaker 4: point of regardless of whether Norton's fort or not. So yeah, 197 00:09:10,360 --> 00:09:12,720 Speaker 4: and again King's being honest. This is like the big 198 00:09:12,760 --> 00:09:16,320 Speaker 4: magnet move which everyone is sort of wonders about, but 199 00:09:16,360 --> 00:09:16,960 Speaker 4: we never see it. 200 00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:18,800 Speaker 3: We talked about it for years. Basically, I feel like 201 00:09:18,800 --> 00:09:21,200 Speaker 3: when they've had their issues last year, they fixed it 202 00:09:21,240 --> 00:09:23,679 Speaker 3: by moving Rory Lob back, and Lob has had an 203 00:09:23,720 --> 00:09:25,520 Speaker 3: okay year, but not the year that he had in 204 00:09:25,559 --> 00:09:27,440 Speaker 3: the second half of last season, so that's their problem. 205 00:09:27,440 --> 00:09:29,920 Speaker 4: And he's had to move Lob foward during games in 206 00:09:29,960 --> 00:09:33,360 Speaker 4: the second half to just to get some scoring impact 207 00:09:33,360 --> 00:09:35,920 Speaker 4: because we're still not getting it from Norton, and I 208 00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:40,400 Speaker 4: think Norton being a non factor last Days and Night 209 00:09:40,520 --> 00:09:43,319 Speaker 4: was a big part of why they lost. So it's 210 00:09:43,360 --> 00:09:44,319 Speaker 4: just something I wonder about. 211 00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:46,880 Speaker 3: I think it's their scoring has not been a problem 212 00:09:46,920 --> 00:09:49,440 Speaker 3: this year. Is the thing the defense has, So that's 213 00:09:49,480 --> 00:09:50,720 Speaker 3: the main thing they need to fix. If you want 214 00:09:50,760 --> 00:09:52,959 Speaker 3: to sacrifice a little bit of scoring force and defense, 215 00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:55,319 Speaker 3: I think that would make some sense. He does feel 216 00:09:55,640 --> 00:09:57,440 Speaker 3: I'm not gonna say he's being stubborn about it, but 217 00:09:57,520 --> 00:10:00,800 Speaker 3: Luke Beverytt has his intricacies. He has his ways, such 218 00:10:00,800 --> 00:10:02,480 Speaker 3: as playing Ride and Gardener on the weekend. I know 219 00:10:02,520 --> 00:10:04,520 Speaker 3: he has an incredible VFL form, but it felt like 220 00:10:04,520 --> 00:10:06,320 Speaker 3: a very oh that's the bevau thing to do. And 221 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:09,000 Speaker 3: then Ryan Gardner has, you know, a down night, let's say. 222 00:10:09,440 --> 00:10:11,120 Speaker 3: So those are the sort of things that you have 223 00:10:11,160 --> 00:10:12,560 Speaker 3: to deal with. He's trying to find a solution. 224 00:10:12,679 --> 00:10:13,000 Speaker 2: Clearly. 225 00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:15,320 Speaker 3: With Darcy in there, maybe it gives him more leverage, 226 00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:19,840 Speaker 3: more options. But if they don't do something, they're fighting 227 00:10:19,880 --> 00:10:21,280 Speaker 3: for one of those spots in the bottom half of 228 00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:21,559 Speaker 3: the eight. 229 00:10:21,600 --> 00:10:23,440 Speaker 4: Again, that was their lowest score of the year as well. 230 00:10:24,040 --> 00:10:26,600 Speaker 3: It was their first properly bad game for the year, 231 00:10:26,920 --> 00:10:27,720 Speaker 3: so we can't panic. 232 00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:30,719 Speaker 4: They weren't getting anywhere near as low score of that 233 00:10:30,880 --> 00:10:31,720 Speaker 4: I reckon for the rest of the. 234 00:10:31,720 --> 00:10:32,760 Speaker 3: Year, certainly not at Marvel. 235 00:10:33,840 --> 00:10:36,600 Speaker 2: So the Hawks response was strong and we were expecting, 236 00:10:37,840 --> 00:10:40,600 Speaker 2: and the Port Adelaide response was strong against the Giants. 237 00:10:40,679 --> 00:10:42,520 Speaker 3: Yeah, it felt like a completely different team after the buy, 238 00:10:42,559 --> 00:10:43,000 Speaker 3: didn't they? 239 00:10:43,800 --> 00:10:47,559 Speaker 2: So the Giants are now there? Are they still in 240 00:10:47,559 --> 00:10:48,800 Speaker 2: your power? They just eighth? 241 00:10:48,960 --> 00:10:52,160 Speaker 3: Then they're still ninth. They're ninth because who else am 242 00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:53,439 Speaker 3: I going to put above them? It's not like there's 243 00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:55,960 Speaker 3: anyone really that convincing in the bottom nine. There's more. 244 00:10:56,040 --> 00:10:57,400 Speaker 2: I think we've said a couple of times in his 245 00:10:57,480 --> 00:10:59,719 Speaker 2: podcast this year there's a chasm between the top eight 246 00:10:59,800 --> 00:11:03,320 Speaker 2: nine and the rest this year. But Jack, what's up 247 00:11:03,360 --> 00:11:07,640 Speaker 2: with the Giants in particular, because they were the most 248 00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:11,920 Speaker 2: common Premiership tip amongst I think it was thirty five 249 00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:16,800 Speaker 2: Fox Footy pundits pre season and they are at the 250 00:11:16,920 --> 00:11:19,920 Speaker 2: moment in some doubt you'd think to play finals. 251 00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:21,880 Speaker 4: Yes, I was one of them to tip the Giants 252 00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:25,640 Speaker 4: of the flag. I guess since round six you've seen 253 00:11:25,960 --> 00:11:28,120 Speaker 4: a drop off in a few key areas and have 254 00:11:28,200 --> 00:11:30,720 Speaker 4: had some key injuries. I think Brenton Daniel's missing a 255 00:11:30,720 --> 00:11:34,480 Speaker 4: lot of footy has been He's not great, obviously, Jake 256 00:11:34,520 --> 00:11:37,120 Speaker 4: Stringer has hasn't had anywhere near the kind of start 257 00:11:37,160 --> 00:11:40,240 Speaker 4: to his Jedibirst ten years he would have liked. Josh 258 00:11:40,320 --> 00:11:43,760 Speaker 4: Kelly's been injured, Finn Callahan, so there are clearly some absences. 259 00:11:43,800 --> 00:11:46,760 Speaker 4: But after round six you see massive drop offs in 260 00:11:47,679 --> 00:11:51,440 Speaker 4: like their ability to score off intercept from clearance and 261 00:11:51,480 --> 00:11:53,800 Speaker 4: even converting their chances once they go forward. So it's 262 00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:57,360 Speaker 4: a lot of the midfield has been a worry and 263 00:11:57,400 --> 00:11:59,120 Speaker 4: of course like you have a few names missing there, 264 00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:02,560 Speaker 4: but you just worry about their ability to actually score 265 00:12:02,600 --> 00:12:05,439 Speaker 4: from clearances. Generate clearances be first at a footy. So 266 00:12:06,760 --> 00:12:10,520 Speaker 4: they've been really poor in the last six rounds especially. 267 00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:13,160 Speaker 3: And if it was bad last year though, like they 268 00:12:13,200 --> 00:12:15,480 Speaker 3: were bad from clearances last year and they overcame it 269 00:12:15,520 --> 00:12:18,080 Speaker 3: and should have beaten the two eventual Grand finals in 270 00:12:18,120 --> 00:12:22,200 Speaker 3: those finals. So you just imagine how worried we would 271 00:12:22,240 --> 00:12:24,720 Speaker 3: be about them, even more so if they didn't have 272 00:12:24,760 --> 00:12:26,000 Speaker 3: Sam Taylor and Jack Buckley. 273 00:12:26,160 --> 00:12:29,240 Speaker 4: The interesting thing about them, I think is Adam Kingsley 274 00:12:29,280 --> 00:12:31,840 Speaker 4: really brought that Richmond style of play from his time 275 00:12:31,920 --> 00:12:34,160 Speaker 4: as an assistant there, and you see the same sort 276 00:12:34,160 --> 00:12:36,880 Speaker 4: of surge mentally, which is a lot of post clearance, 277 00:12:37,000 --> 00:12:39,640 Speaker 4: a lot of post clearance, first of the ball pressure 278 00:12:39,720 --> 00:12:42,720 Speaker 4: after the clearance. Richmond went never a really big senate 279 00:12:42,800 --> 00:12:46,240 Speaker 4: clearance or contested ball team, but they were always like 280 00:12:46,360 --> 00:12:50,200 Speaker 4: a post clearance team and territory after the clearance. 281 00:12:50,320 --> 00:12:52,120 Speaker 3: And the care attack is what makes the Giants look 282 00:12:52,120 --> 00:12:53,640 Speaker 3: so dangerous when they get on top of someone. 283 00:12:53,679 --> 00:12:55,480 Speaker 4: But they haven't looked dangerous in the last six weeks, 284 00:12:55,520 --> 00:12:57,439 Speaker 4: especially trying to move the ball from the back. 285 00:12:57,240 --> 00:13:01,000 Speaker 2: Half from a just under the job. To the power rankings, 286 00:13:01,040 --> 00:13:05,160 Speaker 2: Melbourne's ahead of Carlton now and I think after I 287 00:13:05,200 --> 00:13:08,120 Speaker 2: was at the game on Monday, great spectacle as always, 288 00:13:08,559 --> 00:13:11,800 Speaker 2: and the D's were brave and Collingwood. I didn't come 289 00:13:11,800 --> 00:13:15,439 Speaker 2: away from that game thinking Collingwood had gone down the 290 00:13:15,640 --> 00:13:18,920 Speaker 2: Premiership pecking order or anything like that. It was actually 291 00:13:19,000 --> 00:13:21,959 Speaker 2: almost brilliant that they found another way to win, which 292 00:13:22,040 --> 00:13:25,480 Speaker 2: was what Craig mccraye's stress afterwards as well, is that 293 00:13:25,280 --> 00:13:30,320 Speaker 2: that was as gutsy as it as it gets. But 294 00:13:30,400 --> 00:13:34,160 Speaker 2: Melbourne was super impressive. Arguably should have won the game, 295 00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:35,320 Speaker 2: Probably should have won the game. 296 00:13:35,360 --> 00:13:38,680 Speaker 3: Actually, yeah, it's at at very least a coin flip. Yeah, 297 00:13:38,880 --> 00:13:41,240 Speaker 3: that was Melbourne playing up to the standard of Collingwood, 298 00:13:41,240 --> 00:13:43,240 Speaker 3: I would say, and that's why I've put them in. 299 00:13:43,240 --> 00:13:44,840 Speaker 3: I don't think Melbourn's going to make the eight. I 300 00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:46,959 Speaker 3: think their draws too hard and they've already lost. 301 00:13:46,760 --> 00:13:49,160 Speaker 2: Eight games, so they to go through their draw because 302 00:13:49,200 --> 00:13:53,079 Speaker 2: because that at the moment they are playing better than 303 00:13:53,280 --> 00:13:56,200 Speaker 2: a lot of the teams competing for that seventh Feith spot. 304 00:13:56,240 --> 00:13:58,520 Speaker 3: They've won five of their last eight and they should 305 00:13:58,559 --> 00:14:01,320 Speaker 3: have won two of them. They probably you could say 306 00:14:01,320 --> 00:14:03,800 Speaker 3: they should have been in Collingwood, you know, close games, 307 00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:06,240 Speaker 3: thesecents happened point game, and then the Saint Kilda game 308 00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:09,120 Speaker 3: as well if they hadn't kicked seven twenty one they 309 00:14:09,200 --> 00:14:11,080 Speaker 3: definitely could have and should have won that, and then 310 00:14:11,120 --> 00:14:14,000 Speaker 3: the Hawthorne game, which is their biggest loss of this patch. 311 00:14:14,360 --> 00:14:15,920 Speaker 3: They are in it completely at three quarter time. 312 00:14:15,920 --> 00:14:17,000 Speaker 2: It's the fourth quarter blowout. 313 00:14:17,240 --> 00:14:19,800 Speaker 3: So they've had a really good eight weeks, are really 314 00:14:19,800 --> 00:14:22,640 Speaker 3: like a top eight quality eight weeks. The zip and 315 00:14:22,680 --> 00:14:25,160 Speaker 3: five start and some close losses and bad kicking is 316 00:14:25,160 --> 00:14:27,160 Speaker 3: going to cost them a spot in the finals. I 317 00:14:27,200 --> 00:14:28,040 Speaker 3: don't know if you're pulling up. 318 00:14:28,080 --> 00:14:30,640 Speaker 2: I've got to here Port Adelaide. They play in Adelaide 319 00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:31,800 Speaker 2: this weekend, one of the. 320 00:14:31,720 --> 00:14:34,200 Speaker 3: Two really tough games to tip this week too one. 321 00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:37,800 Speaker 2: Then a couple of tough ones Gold Coast in Gold 322 00:14:37,840 --> 00:14:42,320 Speaker 2: Coast and then Melbourne in Adelaide. So they're on the 323 00:14:42,400 --> 00:14:45,800 Speaker 2: road for three consecutive games playing the other weeks. 324 00:14:46,600 --> 00:14:49,280 Speaker 3: Yes, no, so that's the problem. They've got a lot 325 00:14:49,280 --> 00:14:50,760 Speaker 3: of top eight teams left, so they're going to have 326 00:14:50,800 --> 00:14:52,840 Speaker 3: to take some scalps. And they've played well enough to 327 00:14:52,880 --> 00:14:54,920 Speaker 3: take those gaps if they played like they did against colling. 328 00:14:54,720 --> 00:14:56,520 Speaker 2: With you say they were playing Melbourne, Yeah, no, No, they're 329 00:14:56,560 --> 00:14:57,840 Speaker 2: playing the Adelaide Crows. 330 00:14:57,640 --> 00:14:59,360 Speaker 3: In Adelaide, Adelaide, That's what I mean. In the City 331 00:14:59,360 --> 00:15:00,320 Speaker 3: of Churches Ring the else. 332 00:15:00,560 --> 00:15:00,800 Speaker 2: Yes. 333 00:15:01,400 --> 00:15:03,680 Speaker 3: So look, yeah, if they're good enough to take their chances, 334 00:15:03,720 --> 00:15:05,760 Speaker 3: they'll get there. But I think realistically the only team 335 00:15:05,760 --> 00:15:07,400 Speaker 3: that can make it from the bottom ten is Carlton, 336 00:15:07,560 --> 00:15:11,680 Speaker 3: right because I think Carlton, while impressive for only one 337 00:15:11,760 --> 00:15:14,840 Speaker 3: quarter against Essendon, was pretty impressive in that one quarter. 338 00:15:15,280 --> 00:15:16,560 Speaker 3: And they've also got the drawer to do it. I 339 00:15:16,560 --> 00:15:18,680 Speaker 3: think they've only got two games left against the top nine. 340 00:15:19,080 --> 00:15:21,400 Speaker 2: So yeah, So their next five weeks, so they've got 341 00:15:21,400 --> 00:15:24,960 Speaker 2: West Coast in Perth this weekend, then North Melbourne at 342 00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:29,240 Speaker 2: BMCG then they fly to Port Adelaide at the Fly 343 00:15:29,360 --> 00:15:32,000 Speaker 2: to Adelaide to take on the Power. Then those two 344 00:15:32,080 --> 00:15:35,840 Speaker 2: top two. There's top games against Collingwood and the Brisbane, 345 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:37,760 Speaker 2: the Brisbane games at Marvel Stadium. 346 00:15:37,600 --> 00:15:40,000 Speaker 3: And then they've got some more winnable ones after. 347 00:15:39,840 --> 00:15:43,320 Speaker 2: That Melbourn, Hawthorne, Fremantle, Gold Coast, Port Adelaide, Essendon. 348 00:15:43,720 --> 00:15:47,200 Speaker 3: There are enough games that Carlton at their best can win. 349 00:15:47,720 --> 00:15:50,120 Speaker 3: You know, they're maxing out at like thirteen wins, so 350 00:15:50,160 --> 00:15:52,440 Speaker 3: you're sneaking in. But if the Giants are going to 351 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:53,840 Speaker 3: keep falling over, if the board dogs are going to 352 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:55,720 Speaker 3: keep stuffing up, if the Dockers do what they did 353 00:15:55,800 --> 00:15:58,920 Speaker 3: last year, there's some spots available. That's the only realistic 354 00:15:58,920 --> 00:16:01,360 Speaker 3: scenario I can see. So many teams, they've already got 355 00:16:01,680 --> 00:16:03,840 Speaker 3: so many losses. You can basically only a four to 356 00:16:03,880 --> 00:16:06,520 Speaker 3: ten losses and there are most teams in that bottom 357 00:16:06,520 --> 00:16:09,440 Speaker 3: ten are already on eight losses. Yeah, so you need 358 00:16:09,440 --> 00:16:11,640 Speaker 3: to have a miracle run. It says why those last 359 00:16:11,680 --> 00:16:13,680 Speaker 3: few years we've gotten used to it almost but they're 360 00:16:13,720 --> 00:16:16,200 Speaker 3: the exceptions against the rule, not the rule. 361 00:16:16,400 --> 00:16:18,720 Speaker 2: And two brave performances from Essen in the last couple 362 00:16:18,760 --> 00:16:20,200 Speaker 2: of weeks and you've got them in the bottom four. 363 00:16:20,640 --> 00:16:22,760 Speaker 3: Well, Port Adelaid did win, so I did to move 364 00:16:22,800 --> 00:16:25,080 Speaker 3: them up. You know, it's always tough this ranking businesses. 365 00:16:25,240 --> 00:16:27,880 Speaker 3: Their midfield has had some really good periods in both 366 00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:30,280 Speaker 3: of those games against Brisbane and Carlton the second and 367 00:16:30,280 --> 00:16:32,320 Speaker 3: third quarters they've got on top of those games. So 368 00:16:33,040 --> 00:16:36,040 Speaker 3: it's a year of not contending. We know that's sort 369 00:16:36,080 --> 00:16:37,600 Speaker 3: of the point of this year. It's why they did 370 00:16:37,640 --> 00:16:40,080 Speaker 3: nothing the Bombers in the trade period and the off season, 371 00:16:40,280 --> 00:16:43,800 Speaker 3: apart from drafting Isaac CaCO. But they're showing signs. Defensively, 372 00:16:43,840 --> 00:16:46,600 Speaker 3: they've been better, not great, but better. And the midfield 373 00:16:46,640 --> 00:16:48,400 Speaker 3: has showed some signs too, even though Zach Merrit's been 374 00:16:48,400 --> 00:16:50,560 Speaker 3: moved all over the ground, like playing forward I think 375 00:16:50,560 --> 00:16:53,600 Speaker 3: for the entire fourth quarter on Sunday nights. So they're 376 00:16:53,600 --> 00:16:56,160 Speaker 3: doing things, they're trying things. There's reasons to be optimistic 377 00:16:56,160 --> 00:16:57,480 Speaker 3: about them, even if they're not going to do a 378 00:16:57,480 --> 00:16:59,280 Speaker 3: lot of this year though. Have you said that they've 379 00:16:59,280 --> 00:17:01,080 Speaker 3: won as many games the Bulldogs, who I love? 380 00:17:01,280 --> 00:17:03,320 Speaker 2: So you do love the Bulldogs? That is very true. 381 00:17:03,440 --> 00:17:06,080 Speaker 2: Hey Jack, did you enjoy helping cover the West Coast v. 382 00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:07,159 Speaker 2: North Melbourne Sunday? 383 00:17:07,280 --> 00:17:10,520 Speaker 4: It was a great watch, really good watch. I actually 384 00:17:10,560 --> 00:17:13,600 Speaker 4: felt because I really like Andrew mcqualter, and I felt 385 00:17:13,600 --> 00:17:16,080 Speaker 4: really bad for him because, like with the amount of 386 00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:18,840 Speaker 4: territory dominance I had, it was just like a really 387 00:17:18,840 --> 00:17:21,159 Speaker 4: hard watch as a neutual, let alone a fan of 388 00:17:21,200 --> 00:17:23,399 Speaker 4: the Eagles. 389 00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:25,320 Speaker 2: Classic bottom three game, wasn't it? 390 00:17:25,320 --> 00:17:28,080 Speaker 3: It was like they realized they weren't playing at an AFL ground, 391 00:17:28,119 --> 00:17:29,600 Speaker 3: so they didn't need to play an AFL standard. 392 00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:33,120 Speaker 2: Will hold your fire on the south West, will save 393 00:17:33,200 --> 00:17:35,840 Speaker 2: it or save your bullets for this segment and. 394 00:17:35,760 --> 00:17:38,560 Speaker 1: Now on the Fox Foody podcast, another strong edition of 395 00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:41,640 Speaker 1: Australia's favorite segment, Fair or Fast. 396 00:17:41,720 --> 00:17:45,600 Speaker 2: Big edition of Fair or Fast Strong Melbourne theme off 397 00:17:45,640 --> 00:17:50,560 Speaker 2: the top, oh bias Max Max Gorn biting back at 398 00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:54,200 Speaker 2: Stephen May was a tipping point for him after publicly 399 00:17:54,359 --> 00:17:56,639 Speaker 2: carrying his club for many years. 400 00:17:56,800 --> 00:18:00,639 Speaker 3: Fair or Fast tipping point for Max Horn. Yes, No, 401 00:18:00,720 --> 00:18:02,280 Speaker 3: I think that's a fast. I think this was just 402 00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:06,200 Speaker 3: sort of relatively healthy player behavior between two veterans of 403 00:18:06,240 --> 00:18:06,639 Speaker 3: a club. 404 00:18:06,920 --> 00:18:11,400 Speaker 2: Don't often see a captain push a teammate though. 405 00:18:11,320 --> 00:18:14,440 Speaker 3: No, I can understand being frustrated in that moment, and 406 00:18:14,560 --> 00:18:17,760 Speaker 3: I think I could also understand getting frustrated with Stephen May. 407 00:18:18,520 --> 00:18:22,680 Speaker 3: End of sentence. He could be a difficult teammate at times, 408 00:18:22,720 --> 00:18:24,760 Speaker 3: I imagine based on what we've seen of him. So 409 00:18:25,040 --> 00:18:27,959 Speaker 3: it's look, these things happen. It played in a very 410 00:18:28,080 --> 00:18:31,399 Speaker 3: public way because of the time of the game and 411 00:18:31,440 --> 00:18:33,640 Speaker 3: the platform of the game and all of that stuff. 412 00:18:33,520 --> 00:18:37,600 Speaker 2: And also the fact that cameras captured the incident and 413 00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:41,520 Speaker 2: then captured Max walking straight out as well. 414 00:18:41,760 --> 00:18:43,919 Speaker 3: But the best thing about it, honestly was how he 415 00:18:43,960 --> 00:18:48,240 Speaker 3: has responded ever since. One of the classiest in the game, 416 00:18:48,359 --> 00:18:52,240 Speaker 3: like the doing multiple interviews afterwards with multiple different media outlets, 417 00:18:52,359 --> 00:18:54,760 Speaker 3: going on radio on Monday morning is usual spot talking 418 00:18:54,800 --> 00:18:58,080 Speaker 3: about it pretty openly Tuesday morning. Brother, He's just fantastic 419 00:18:58,080 --> 00:19:00,040 Speaker 3: with that stuff, so he really diffused it quite an. 420 00:19:00,680 --> 00:19:04,880 Speaker 2: Jack Simon Goodwin's winging over how Ed Langdon was adjudicated 421 00:19:05,000 --> 00:19:08,879 Speaker 2: after hard time alfter halftime was sour grapes fair or 422 00:19:08,920 --> 00:19:10,399 Speaker 2: fast fair? 423 00:19:11,080 --> 00:19:14,239 Speaker 4: I think it was sour grapes because I think it 424 00:19:14,280 --> 00:19:17,159 Speaker 4: was a pretty pretty hard tag in the first half 425 00:19:17,400 --> 00:19:20,480 Speaker 4: and I can only recall maybe one or two free 426 00:19:20,560 --> 00:19:22,439 Speaker 4: kicks that he gave away in the first half, So 427 00:19:22,960 --> 00:19:25,400 Speaker 4: I think he was right in this sense that they 428 00:19:25,720 --> 00:19:28,000 Speaker 4: might have shifted the adjudication a little bit in the 429 00:19:28,000 --> 00:19:30,159 Speaker 4: second half. But it was a really tight tag. And 430 00:19:30,920 --> 00:19:33,760 Speaker 4: you spoke to Billy Frampton who said, yes, one of 431 00:19:33,800 --> 00:19:35,840 Speaker 4: the hardest tags he's seen in person. Yes, he did 432 00:19:35,920 --> 00:19:37,920 Speaker 4: say that, and yeah, I mean you could see on 433 00:19:37,920 --> 00:19:41,119 Speaker 4: the broadcast and like our guys noted, it wasn't just 434 00:19:41,480 --> 00:19:45,000 Speaker 4: Langdon who it was everyone from Melbourne who really tried 435 00:19:45,040 --> 00:19:46,919 Speaker 4: to put a body in him when they could, and 436 00:19:47,280 --> 00:19:49,240 Speaker 4: Langdon made sure to let him to let Nick know 437 00:19:49,320 --> 00:19:51,280 Speaker 4: about it when he would have the odd stuff up. 438 00:19:51,320 --> 00:19:54,399 Speaker 4: But it's obviously hard to You can never actually fully 439 00:19:54,480 --> 00:19:56,679 Speaker 4: quell his influence, but you can contain it, and I 440 00:19:56,720 --> 00:19:59,879 Speaker 4: think Langdon did it as good as he could have 441 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:00,760 Speaker 4: possibly done. 442 00:20:01,520 --> 00:20:04,320 Speaker 2: I don't think I've seen Ed Langdon tag before, but 443 00:20:04,680 --> 00:20:09,320 Speaker 2: I'm actually quite enjoying this approach from Simon Goodwin where 444 00:20:09,320 --> 00:20:14,040 Speaker 2: he's picking players from his team to play run with 445 00:20:14,200 --> 00:20:19,240 Speaker 2: slash tagging roles based on their strengths against specific opposition 446 00:20:19,359 --> 00:20:21,879 Speaker 2: players at the moment. So he saw there a different 447 00:20:21,880 --> 00:20:28,160 Speaker 2: guy Oliver go to Newcombe at Hawthorne a few weeks ago. 448 00:20:28,200 --> 00:20:30,600 Speaker 2: We saw Langdon go to Deskos because he's a bit 449 00:20:30,640 --> 00:20:32,960 Speaker 2: more of that running player as well. And Jack Viney 450 00:20:32,960 --> 00:20:36,199 Speaker 2: and Trent Rivers have also done run with jobs. Sparrow 451 00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:37,520 Speaker 2: has done a job in the past. I'm not sure 452 00:20:37,680 --> 00:20:39,600 Speaker 2: in this sort of specific four or five week block 453 00:20:39,600 --> 00:20:41,080 Speaker 2: when Melbourne have gone on a bit of a run. 454 00:20:41,119 --> 00:20:45,480 Speaker 2: But it's different from Simon Goodwin that he's just turning 455 00:20:45,560 --> 00:20:49,080 Speaker 2: to a tager but only for maybe one game this season. 456 00:20:49,080 --> 00:20:52,240 Speaker 3: He is arguably since round six, the coach of the year. 457 00:20:52,680 --> 00:20:53,520 Speaker 2: It's fair statement. 458 00:20:53,600 --> 00:20:55,479 Speaker 3: Like the way that the Melbourne has turned around at 459 00:20:55,480 --> 00:20:58,520 Speaker 3: season and those sorts of moves, the unique options that 460 00:20:58,560 --> 00:21:01,560 Speaker 3: they've found, it's really impressive. I just like that we've 461 00:21:01,600 --> 00:21:03,560 Speaker 3: finally come to a point where we're saying Collinwood deserves 462 00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:06,320 Speaker 3: more free kicks, because no one's complained about that all year, 463 00:21:06,320 --> 00:21:06,680 Speaker 3: have they? 464 00:21:06,760 --> 00:21:09,720 Speaker 2: That they get a few max if Geelong can fit 465 00:21:09,760 --> 00:21:12,960 Speaker 2: another two star players in their salary cap. Fans have 466 00:21:13,200 --> 00:21:15,639 Speaker 2: every right to be skeptical, fair or fast. 467 00:21:15,800 --> 00:21:19,240 Speaker 3: This is this was it. I mean, it was spoken 468 00:21:19,280 --> 00:21:21,000 Speaker 3: on TV, so it's not clickbait, but it was the 469 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:24,639 Speaker 3: most baity comment humanly possible to make. Even though I 470 00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:26,480 Speaker 3: do not doubt the veracity of the report. 471 00:21:27,920 --> 00:21:34,199 Speaker 2: Mitch Cleary quoted Steve Hawking from a coterie pregame function. 472 00:21:34,320 --> 00:21:36,639 Speaker 3: Well, and we know that club figures have no reason 473 00:21:36,720 --> 00:21:38,360 Speaker 3: to exaggerate to the coterie, do they? 474 00:21:38,480 --> 00:21:41,399 Speaker 2: And Chris Scott. Chris Scott was on soon after the 475 00:21:41,440 --> 00:21:43,719 Speaker 2: report aired and certainly did not deny it. 476 00:21:44,400 --> 00:21:48,840 Speaker 3: There's a realistic scenario where he is talking about over 477 00:21:48,840 --> 00:21:51,040 Speaker 3: the next few years Delong's will have some cap space 478 00:21:51,080 --> 00:21:53,840 Speaker 3: opening up because of Dangerfield and duncan gu through the 479 00:21:54,000 --> 00:21:57,439 Speaker 3: likes camera in the club. Yes, hopefully Cameron's got more 480 00:21:57,480 --> 00:21:59,360 Speaker 3: than two or three years left, but you know at 481 00:21:59,400 --> 00:22:03,160 Speaker 3: some point so maybe in that context that would open 482 00:22:03,240 --> 00:22:05,879 Speaker 3: up some space. But also you can always do funny 483 00:22:05,880 --> 00:22:07,800 Speaker 3: things to the salary cap, and you can always move 484 00:22:07,960 --> 00:22:09,280 Speaker 3: salaries around and stuff. 485 00:22:09,280 --> 00:22:12,720 Speaker 2: But Chris Scott said, in this competition where they try 486 00:22:12,760 --> 00:22:15,639 Speaker 2: to equalize a much as possible, it can be a 487 00:22:15,880 --> 00:22:19,560 Speaker 2: real competitive advantage if you can use your salary cap wisely. 488 00:22:19,440 --> 00:22:24,000 Speaker 3: And Geelong has clearly done so in numerous ways. There 489 00:22:24,000 --> 00:22:26,240 Speaker 3: are questions over said things that I don't think they've 490 00:22:26,280 --> 00:22:29,000 Speaker 3: been sanctioned other than what appear to be some looming 491 00:22:29,040 --> 00:22:32,160 Speaker 3: fines over things not being disclosed. Yep. So like AfOR 492 00:22:32,280 --> 00:22:34,880 Speaker 3: W player getting a car, so you know, normal stuff. 493 00:22:35,000 --> 00:22:36,840 Speaker 3: Every club has this sort of stuff. Gelong just gets 494 00:22:36,840 --> 00:22:42,080 Speaker 3: a lot more attention because of the appearance of abnormalities, 495 00:22:42,320 --> 00:22:45,800 Speaker 3: let's say, because you know, it's like the sleepy hollow 496 00:22:45,800 --> 00:22:48,199 Speaker 3: perception of people not actually investigating the club. I think 497 00:22:48,200 --> 00:22:49,080 Speaker 3: people look into the minnow. 498 00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:53,080 Speaker 2: Speaking of the Cats and big name players, Jack Bailey 499 00:22:53,160 --> 00:22:56,359 Speaker 2: Smith really didn't need to host Andrew Dillon at his abode. 500 00:22:56,680 --> 00:22:57,440 Speaker 2: Fair or fast. 501 00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:00,600 Speaker 4: I think that's fair. I don't know. I don't have 502 00:23:00,640 --> 00:23:02,920 Speaker 4: a massive opinion on this, but did he offer? 503 00:23:03,080 --> 00:23:06,840 Speaker 3: Is that what I texted him a deal? Come over? 504 00:23:06,960 --> 00:23:07,600 Speaker 3: What a chat? 505 00:23:08,200 --> 00:23:10,639 Speaker 2: I don't know if it was, he would have directly texting, 506 00:23:10,720 --> 00:23:13,760 Speaker 2: But it does sound like Bailey's played a bit of 507 00:23:13,760 --> 00:23:15,280 Speaker 2: a role in initiating. 508 00:23:15,680 --> 00:23:18,040 Speaker 4: Being willing to be transparent. It can't be a bad thing. 509 00:23:18,080 --> 00:23:20,639 Speaker 4: And I mean he could have met it the club 510 00:23:20,720 --> 00:23:24,040 Speaker 4: or maybe AFL HQ. But he's He's got a nice 511 00:23:24,240 --> 00:23:26,920 Speaker 4: property out there wed Hope, so it's a nice acreage. 512 00:23:26,920 --> 00:23:32,520 Speaker 2: From what I recall, Max Southwest Western Australia just put 513 00:23:32,520 --> 00:23:35,840 Speaker 2: in a compelling case for the twentieth AFL license, fair 514 00:23:35,920 --> 00:23:36,280 Speaker 2: or fast. 515 00:23:36,280 --> 00:23:38,360 Speaker 3: I think if anything, West Coast North would have made 516 00:23:38,359 --> 00:23:40,120 Speaker 3: them withdraw from contention. 517 00:23:40,240 --> 00:23:42,680 Speaker 2: I'm talking more about hands Over Ah. 518 00:23:43,200 --> 00:23:45,520 Speaker 3: What a odd name. I'm sure it's named after a person. 519 00:23:45,680 --> 00:23:46,320 Speaker 2: Yes, I think it is. 520 00:23:47,200 --> 00:23:50,400 Speaker 3: Look, I think it's a great option for the twentieth team, 521 00:23:50,400 --> 00:23:51,879 Speaker 3: and I've long thought that w A should host the 522 00:23:51,880 --> 00:23:54,440 Speaker 3: twentieth team. The problem is WA doesn't want the twentieth team. 523 00:23:54,680 --> 00:23:57,080 Speaker 3: The WAFC doesn't want the twentieth team because they run 524 00:23:57,400 --> 00:24:00,000 Speaker 3: West Coast and Fremantle and love the sort of duopola 525 00:24:00,240 --> 00:24:03,160 Speaker 3: that they have over the state and the strong financial 526 00:24:03,160 --> 00:24:06,000 Speaker 3: situation they're in. So I think that would be a 527 00:24:06,000 --> 00:24:10,440 Speaker 3: major problem to overcome. But in terms of actual realistic options, 528 00:24:10,840 --> 00:24:13,119 Speaker 3: Camera's off the table because the AFOL doesn't want to 529 00:24:13,119 --> 00:24:16,320 Speaker 3: cannibalize the Giants zone. It wants to give them Western 530 00:24:16,359 --> 00:24:18,160 Speaker 3: Sydney and Canbra, So you can't put a team in Cambra, 531 00:24:18,200 --> 00:24:19,520 Speaker 3: which would be the best option otherwise. 532 00:24:19,520 --> 00:24:21,680 Speaker 2: So I immediately think then of Nord. 533 00:24:23,000 --> 00:24:25,840 Speaker 3: I think the problem is that putting a third team 534 00:24:25,840 --> 00:24:28,240 Speaker 3: in Essay is like putting a third team in WA, 535 00:24:28,359 --> 00:24:31,320 Speaker 3: but every element is worse other than the history of normal. 536 00:24:31,400 --> 00:24:34,520 Speaker 2: I was about to say, though, it's because it sounds 537 00:24:34,560 --> 00:24:38,359 Speaker 2: like in if you're putting a team in southwest Western Australia, 538 00:24:38,600 --> 00:24:41,040 Speaker 2: it feels like it might have to be a new 539 00:24:41,200 --> 00:24:43,680 Speaker 2: ish team. I don't know if you're a team coming, 540 00:24:43,720 --> 00:24:45,560 Speaker 2: but nor would would be an established covers a bit 541 00:24:45,680 --> 00:24:50,120 Speaker 2: like to the Dolphins, though they're not the Redcliffe Dolphins. 542 00:24:50,520 --> 00:24:51,960 Speaker 2: It's got a lot of Redcliffe vibe. 543 00:24:52,000 --> 00:24:54,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, the only benefit it would have is the fact 544 00:24:54,240 --> 00:24:56,440 Speaker 3: that it has the established brand and established fan base 545 00:24:56,480 --> 00:24:58,879 Speaker 3: and stuff like that. But otherwise Adelaide does not have 546 00:24:58,880 --> 00:25:02,399 Speaker 3: as much money as much population like they have Adelaide Over. 547 00:25:02,440 --> 00:25:04,359 Speaker 3: You're going to play some great games, but it's still 548 00:25:05,000 --> 00:25:07,359 Speaker 3: a smaller area. Whether you're putting the third team in 549 00:25:07,359 --> 00:25:09,919 Speaker 3: Perth itself or you're giving it that actual location of 550 00:25:09,960 --> 00:25:12,880 Speaker 3: the Southwest, which I think Bunbury is what two hours say, 551 00:25:12,960 --> 00:25:15,159 Speaker 3: it's a fair drive yet so it's not right nearby, 552 00:25:15,280 --> 00:25:18,320 Speaker 3: so it is actually a different location which differentiates the 553 00:25:18,320 --> 00:25:20,600 Speaker 3: team itself. That gives it a location. You still play 554 00:25:20,600 --> 00:25:23,880 Speaker 3: the Derby's or the Derby's in Adoptus and they play 555 00:25:23,920 --> 00:25:26,240 Speaker 3: their other games at hands Over if you read it 556 00:25:26,280 --> 00:25:28,080 Speaker 3: a lot of that or something else, whatever's realistic. I 557 00:25:28,080 --> 00:25:30,240 Speaker 3: don't know. I think that's still the best option because 558 00:25:30,240 --> 00:25:32,640 Speaker 3: there's just so much money there. There's clearly an inbuilt 559 00:25:32,880 --> 00:25:35,679 Speaker 3: massive audience for footy that you can continue to build on. 560 00:25:35,760 --> 00:25:37,359 Speaker 3: I mean, given the waiting lists and things like that 561 00:25:37,359 --> 00:25:39,159 Speaker 3: they have for tickets there, it just makes all the 562 00:25:39,160 --> 00:25:39,720 Speaker 3: sense in the world. 563 00:25:39,880 --> 00:25:41,840 Speaker 2: Nice part of the world, Bumbrey, good place to watch 564 00:25:41,840 --> 00:25:45,040 Speaker 2: the sunset because it's right on the yes right western 565 00:25:45,040 --> 00:25:47,280 Speaker 2: coast of so I have been there before, and it 566 00:25:47,400 --> 00:25:50,280 Speaker 2: is a longer drive from Perth to Bumbrey than it 567 00:25:50,320 --> 00:25:52,879 Speaker 2: needs to drive from Melbourne CBD to Geelong. 568 00:25:53,160 --> 00:25:55,520 Speaker 3: But that's okay, and it's a growing also part of 569 00:25:55,840 --> 00:25:56,240 Speaker 3: the state. 570 00:25:56,320 --> 00:26:01,600 Speaker 2: I believe Jack scrap Opening Round and bring in Northern Round, 571 00:26:01,800 --> 00:26:02,880 Speaker 2: fair or fast. 572 00:26:05,640 --> 00:26:09,159 Speaker 4: I go fair. I'm tended to say fast, but I 573 00:26:09,160 --> 00:26:11,760 Speaker 4: think it's fair. I think that the concept that Brownie 574 00:26:11,840 --> 00:26:13,840 Speaker 4: raised makes heaps of sense. 575 00:26:13,680 --> 00:26:15,320 Speaker 3: On the couch from Monday night, I believe. 576 00:26:15,400 --> 00:26:20,119 Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, So scrap Opening Around and instead at maybe 577 00:26:20,160 --> 00:26:22,080 Speaker 4: like around fifteen or sixteen round a band. 578 00:26:22,080 --> 00:26:26,560 Speaker 2: Almost now is time for holiday school holidays, term two 579 00:26:26,600 --> 00:26:27,680 Speaker 2: school holidays. 580 00:26:27,280 --> 00:26:31,040 Speaker 4: Basically, and you can still have those those games hosted 581 00:26:31,080 --> 00:26:34,000 Speaker 4: by those four Northern clubs at this point of the 582 00:26:34,040 --> 00:26:38,160 Speaker 4: year without I guess, compromising the way the latter looks 583 00:26:38,200 --> 00:26:41,560 Speaker 4: in the opening portion of the season and upsetting whoever. 584 00:26:41,640 --> 00:26:44,719 Speaker 4: Because the good point he raised was in comparison to 585 00:26:45,480 --> 00:26:48,560 Speaker 4: Las Vegas and the NRL is that was he called 586 00:26:48,600 --> 00:26:53,960 Speaker 4: it unifying, whereas whereas Opening Around has sort of device horizes. Yeah, 587 00:26:54,200 --> 00:26:58,239 Speaker 4: it's been a divisive sort of like I personally liked it, 588 00:26:58,240 --> 00:26:59,719 Speaker 4: like I don't really have an issue with it. I mean, 589 00:26:59,720 --> 00:27:01,320 Speaker 4: it's makes that latter a bit hard to read. 590 00:27:01,359 --> 00:27:04,040 Speaker 3: But you know, surely it's annoying for fantasy as well, 591 00:27:04,119 --> 00:27:05,440 Speaker 3: or you just not play it. I don't know how 592 00:27:05,440 --> 00:27:05,919 Speaker 3: it works. 593 00:27:06,840 --> 00:27:09,680 Speaker 4: Fantasy is annoying enough on sign they're worrying about we're 594 00:27:09,640 --> 00:27:13,879 Speaker 4: worrying about round. But yeah, like I could also, but 595 00:27:14,000 --> 00:27:15,760 Speaker 4: like doing it at this point in the year I 596 00:27:15,760 --> 00:27:17,879 Speaker 4: think makes plenty of sense too, because over two weeks 597 00:27:17,960 --> 00:27:20,480 Speaker 4: makes it. I mean, like five weeks is a drag. 598 00:27:20,520 --> 00:27:22,080 Speaker 3: I think that was the other point was that the 599 00:27:22,080 --> 00:27:24,040 Speaker 3: buys I just stretched out way too long at this 600 00:27:24,080 --> 00:27:25,680 Speaker 3: point over five weeks this season. 601 00:27:25,680 --> 00:27:27,720 Speaker 4: You can see why because I want to have a 602 00:27:27,800 --> 00:27:29,800 Speaker 4: minimum seven games one of the five weeks, so you're 603 00:27:29,800 --> 00:27:32,040 Speaker 4: not missing much footy, which I also can appreciate, and 604 00:27:32,400 --> 00:27:35,320 Speaker 4: like I'm not complaining either, but yeah, if you can 605 00:27:35,320 --> 00:27:37,280 Speaker 4: get it over and done with within a fortnight and 606 00:27:37,320 --> 00:27:41,440 Speaker 4: you can still have that like Northern States Celebration sort 607 00:27:41,440 --> 00:27:44,800 Speaker 4: of time period and you can get fans up and 608 00:27:44,840 --> 00:27:48,199 Speaker 4: about in that part of the country at that at 609 00:27:48,200 --> 00:27:50,439 Speaker 4: this time of the year, then it's a positive. 610 00:27:50,640 --> 00:27:52,520 Speaker 2: Whether I think is normally better if you channel you're 611 00:27:52,520 --> 00:27:53,320 Speaker 2: in a rob Jail. 612 00:27:53,119 --> 00:27:55,880 Speaker 3: There well because comparative to Melbourne, the weather would better, 613 00:27:55,880 --> 00:27:57,639 Speaker 3: which is the important thing for the people who they 614 00:27:57,640 --> 00:28:00,280 Speaker 3: want to get flying up to Queensland. Like Collegood wants 615 00:28:00,280 --> 00:28:01,960 Speaker 3: to sell all its home games to the Gold Coast 616 00:28:01,960 --> 00:28:04,440 Speaker 3: anyway around that time of year, so they always seem 617 00:28:04,440 --> 00:28:05,480 Speaker 3: to play them up there. I think they do on 618 00:28:05,480 --> 00:28:07,920 Speaker 3: a Friday night this year it's Friday. The other point 619 00:28:07,920 --> 00:28:11,439 Speaker 3: on that, the idea that the buys make the season 620 00:28:11,480 --> 00:28:13,280 Speaker 3: drag and we lose the momentum in the season. I 621 00:28:13,320 --> 00:28:15,600 Speaker 3: feel like that would happen anyway. No one's going to 622 00:28:15,680 --> 00:28:18,879 Speaker 3: pay full incredible attention to footy for twenty five weeks. 623 00:28:19,240 --> 00:28:21,159 Speaker 3: It's just unrealistic. So there's always going to be a 624 00:28:21,200 --> 00:28:23,000 Speaker 3: middle dip and then it peaks back up once we 625 00:28:23,040 --> 00:28:24,040 Speaker 3: get closer to the finals. 626 00:28:24,040 --> 00:28:26,320 Speaker 2: So just because we're so accustomed to like a nine 627 00:28:26,359 --> 00:28:28,920 Speaker 2: game round and then once you take a couple of 628 00:28:29,400 --> 00:28:32,160 Speaker 2: games out, that's the sense of losing momentum. 629 00:28:32,200 --> 00:28:35,159 Speaker 3: Does a second Saturday night game really make things that 630 00:28:35,200 --> 00:28:38,080 Speaker 3: more exciting? Is it doing that? Much? Like I understand 631 00:28:38,120 --> 00:28:39,720 Speaker 3: you'll have a few fan bases who dip out for 632 00:28:39,760 --> 00:28:41,320 Speaker 3: a week or two when the teams have a buy, 633 00:28:41,480 --> 00:28:43,000 Speaker 3: but I really don't think. I think that's just a 634 00:28:43,080 --> 00:28:44,960 Speaker 3: natural thing in the dead of winter anyway, that we're 635 00:28:45,000 --> 00:28:46,440 Speaker 3: going to lose a little bit more interest. 636 00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:53,280 Speaker 2: Max Fixing the MRO matrix must be Greg Swan's top priority, 637 00:28:53,320 --> 00:28:54,080 Speaker 2: fair or fast. 638 00:28:54,760 --> 00:28:56,720 Speaker 3: Well, I haven't looked at every priority, but it's certainly 639 00:28:56,800 --> 00:29:00,280 Speaker 3: up there. Wouldn't it be definitely fair? There's there's so 640 00:29:00,360 --> 00:29:02,240 Speaker 3: much you can do to make changes that I think 641 00:29:02,240 --> 00:29:04,480 Speaker 3: a lot of people agree with. There's this perception now 642 00:29:04,480 --> 00:29:06,840 Speaker 3: as well that they're making purely outcome based decisions. I 643 00:29:06,880 --> 00:29:09,320 Speaker 3: think a lot of it is about communication, explaining what 644 00:29:09,360 --> 00:29:11,440 Speaker 3: they're doing, explaining why they're doing it. I know Michael 645 00:29:11,480 --> 00:29:14,240 Speaker 3: Christian does do some radio interviews, usually with Jared Yes, 646 00:29:14,800 --> 00:29:18,400 Speaker 3: but getting out there and explaining what the process is 647 00:29:18,440 --> 00:29:21,080 Speaker 3: would help a little bit in terms of people internalizing 648 00:29:21,120 --> 00:29:23,160 Speaker 3: what the MRO is doing, the narratives that get pushed 649 00:29:23,160 --> 00:29:25,560 Speaker 3: out there. But also just changing it so that there 650 00:29:25,560 --> 00:29:27,960 Speaker 3: are more buttons and switches to pull, hull and push 651 00:29:28,000 --> 00:29:31,280 Speaker 3: and whatever would be really nice because we know that 652 00:29:31,600 --> 00:29:33,280 Speaker 3: Paulka is getting three weeks is going to keep getting 653 00:29:33,280 --> 00:29:36,600 Speaker 3: brought up. It had to be zero or three, and 654 00:29:36,640 --> 00:29:38,280 Speaker 3: we want to have somewhere in the middle that would 655 00:29:38,280 --> 00:29:40,320 Speaker 3: be nice, and changing the rules in some way would 656 00:29:40,320 --> 00:29:42,120 Speaker 3: allow them to do that, although, as I've said before, 657 00:29:42,280 --> 00:29:44,440 Speaker 3: you're just making more gray area so people will complain 658 00:29:44,520 --> 00:29:44,920 Speaker 3: it no matter. 659 00:29:45,200 --> 00:29:48,600 Speaker 2: This has also come about because of the Tom Stewart 660 00:29:48,880 --> 00:29:53,520 Speaker 2: bump on Noah Anderson. If it's a centimeters either side, 661 00:29:54,040 --> 00:29:57,000 Speaker 2: that we're looking at a completely different case here. 662 00:29:57,120 --> 00:29:58,800 Speaker 3: So Jack and I were talking about this on the weekend. 663 00:30:00,040 --> 00:30:02,760 Speaker 3: I believe it was in talking points on the Philosophy website. Yes, 664 00:30:02,920 --> 00:30:05,680 Speaker 3: the problem with this incident is that he didn't do 665 00:30:05,720 --> 00:30:09,280 Speaker 3: anything wrong, and that you felt like he should have 666 00:30:09,360 --> 00:30:12,440 Speaker 3: done something wrong with what he did. It felt because 667 00:30:12,440 --> 00:30:15,560 Speaker 3: it was so close to being such a devastating injury 668 00:30:15,600 --> 00:30:18,160 Speaker 3: slash suspension for a player who has formed in this 669 00:30:18,240 --> 00:30:21,920 Speaker 3: area too. Let's not forget that against Richmond. So was 670 00:30:21,960 --> 00:30:24,680 Speaker 3: that Pristia he hit? Yeah, never Figet of course. 671 00:30:25,840 --> 00:30:28,560 Speaker 2: So fair to say Jack Reebell when we were discussing 672 00:30:28,560 --> 00:30:30,280 Speaker 2: this on Saturday, well, it was quick to remind us 673 00:30:30,280 --> 00:30:32,080 Speaker 2: of the plant. I'd the same question, who did he hit? 674 00:30:32,440 --> 00:30:36,240 Speaker 2: And Jack very quickly deal Presty good Man oil man. 675 00:30:36,560 --> 00:30:38,840 Speaker 2: So it felt like you should have done something wrong. 676 00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:40,880 Speaker 2: The problem is that you can't write the. 677 00:30:40,880 --> 00:30:43,840 Speaker 3: Rules to make that exact thing that he did illegal, 678 00:30:44,160 --> 00:30:46,760 Speaker 3: but you just you need to disincentivize it as much 679 00:30:46,760 --> 00:30:50,520 Speaker 3: as possible. Theoretically, having already copped a massive suspension for 680 00:30:50,600 --> 00:30:54,560 Speaker 3: doing a very similar thing, would disincentivize him from trying 681 00:30:54,560 --> 00:30:57,479 Speaker 3: to bump someone near the ball, but a little bit 682 00:30:57,520 --> 00:31:00,440 Speaker 3: off it. I don't know. It's a very want to 683 00:31:00,440 --> 00:31:01,200 Speaker 3: actually monitor. 684 00:31:01,240 --> 00:31:04,840 Speaker 4: Isn't it that incident itself? I can't remember an incident 685 00:31:04,880 --> 00:31:08,760 Speaker 4: where something so different could have happened despite the fact 686 00:31:08,800 --> 00:31:10,920 Speaker 4: that it was a fair hit. The initial hit is fair. 687 00:31:11,400 --> 00:31:14,680 Speaker 4: If the whiplash effective Anderson's head hitting the ground results 688 00:31:14,680 --> 00:31:18,560 Speaker 4: in a concussion, is Stuart then liable for a three 689 00:31:18,600 --> 00:31:18,959 Speaker 4: week ban? 690 00:31:20,000 --> 00:31:23,640 Speaker 2: I think it all comes back to is the act 691 00:31:23,840 --> 00:31:25,920 Speaker 2: itself a reportable incident? 692 00:31:26,840 --> 00:31:28,560 Speaker 3: So that's what That was my point that we were 693 00:31:28,560 --> 00:31:29,200 Speaker 3: discussing this. 694 00:31:29,440 --> 00:31:30,360 Speaker 4: We competed it to Meek. 695 00:31:30,760 --> 00:31:33,720 Speaker 3: Yes, load Meet got off because he was still contesting 696 00:31:33,720 --> 00:31:35,880 Speaker 3: the ball, and even though he caused a concussion with 697 00:31:35,960 --> 00:31:39,320 Speaker 3: his action, he was still doing a non reportable. 698 00:31:38,800 --> 00:31:41,480 Speaker 2: And Stewart did look like he went past the ball. 699 00:31:41,960 --> 00:31:44,640 Speaker 4: Like the ball is in a proximity, but they are 700 00:31:44,680 --> 00:31:48,440 Speaker 4: not directly contesting the ball like Meek was, which I 701 00:31:48,440 --> 00:31:53,280 Speaker 4: think is different because obviously, like you said, Max, people 702 00:31:53,320 --> 00:31:56,160 Speaker 4: are talking about al chemo reaction. But we make that 703 00:31:56,360 --> 00:31:59,640 Speaker 4: incident is the precedent that you can have a concussion 704 00:31:59,680 --> 00:32:02,720 Speaker 4: happen as a result of a football accident, if you 705 00:32:02,720 --> 00:32:03,480 Speaker 4: want to call it that. 706 00:32:03,640 --> 00:32:05,120 Speaker 3: Which is good, which is what people have been asking 707 00:32:05,120 --> 00:32:07,120 Speaker 3: for several years now. So we've come to that point 708 00:32:07,120 --> 00:32:09,160 Speaker 3: where we have got that president Now, I feel like. 709 00:32:09,120 --> 00:32:15,760 Speaker 4: Because Stewart is not directing contesting the ball, if that hit, 710 00:32:15,880 --> 00:32:19,320 Speaker 4: despite it being fair, causes a concussion because of the 711 00:32:19,320 --> 00:32:23,440 Speaker 4: whiplash effect, then I tend to think he might have 712 00:32:23,520 --> 00:32:26,480 Speaker 4: copped a ban, which I just think is And the 713 00:32:26,560 --> 00:32:30,640 Speaker 4: thing that Key makes clear last Saturday is the fact 714 00:32:30,680 --> 00:32:33,800 Speaker 4: that we can't as observers of the game distinguished between 715 00:32:34,320 --> 00:32:37,040 Speaker 4: whether something black and white is going to be reported 716 00:32:37,160 --> 00:32:39,720 Speaker 4: or not. I think that is the biggest. 717 00:32:39,320 --> 00:32:43,880 Speaker 2: Issue because to see a clean bump, and it ultimately 718 00:32:43,920 --> 00:32:45,760 Speaker 2: was a clean bump, and then so to see a 719 00:32:45,760 --> 00:32:49,440 Speaker 2: clean bump like that is actually almost jarring these days. 720 00:32:49,640 --> 00:32:52,400 Speaker 2: Can you think of the last clean hip and shoulder 721 00:32:53,640 --> 00:32:57,560 Speaker 2: between that one and maybe Sydney Stack on Jack Viney 722 00:32:57,560 --> 00:32:59,760 Speaker 2: in that Anzac Eve game a few years ago. I 723 00:32:59,760 --> 00:33:02,400 Speaker 2: can't think of a like a clean hip and shoulder 724 00:33:02,440 --> 00:33:04,120 Speaker 2: that was not that celebrated. 725 00:33:04,320 --> 00:33:07,200 Speaker 3: No, it's it did feel out of place, and I 726 00:33:07,200 --> 00:33:09,640 Speaker 3: think that's what made it more of a reaction, a 727 00:33:09,720 --> 00:33:10,880 Speaker 3: gutraw reaction. 728 00:33:10,640 --> 00:33:14,160 Speaker 2: Because what because normally these days the bumps go wrong. Yes, 729 00:33:14,280 --> 00:33:16,200 Speaker 2: more bumps that go there's way more bumps that go 730 00:33:16,240 --> 00:33:18,400 Speaker 2: wrong than than a perfectly done or. 731 00:33:18,400 --> 00:33:20,400 Speaker 3: We certainly paid more attention to them because they went wrong. 732 00:33:20,440 --> 00:33:24,720 Speaker 2: That's right, and Jack coss I pick it's likely call 733 00:33:24,800 --> 00:33:29,240 Speaker 2: to sign a twelve point five million dollar Demon's contract 734 00:33:29,280 --> 00:33:33,240 Speaker 2: extension is a wild trade script flip fair. 735 00:33:33,160 --> 00:33:36,040 Speaker 4: Or fast oh fair, one hundred percent fair if he 736 00:33:36,160 --> 00:33:39,120 Speaker 4: signs this, because I mean it really did. I mean 737 00:33:39,320 --> 00:33:41,959 Speaker 4: it was definitely trending in the direction of him leaving 738 00:33:42,240 --> 00:33:43,000 Speaker 4: at the end of this year. 739 00:33:43,080 --> 00:33:44,760 Speaker 3: Everyone in the no seemed to think he was going 740 00:33:44,760 --> 00:33:45,480 Speaker 3: to Freo. 741 00:33:45,880 --> 00:33:48,440 Speaker 4: And I just wonder whether Melbourne have just come to 742 00:33:48,480 --> 00:33:52,040 Speaker 4: the table with the money, because one point four a 743 00:33:52,160 --> 00:33:56,640 Speaker 4: year is an incredible amount, and I think it's really 744 00:33:56,720 --> 00:34:00,520 Speaker 4: interesting when you consider the fact that Nosiah could maybe 745 00:34:00,560 --> 00:34:03,880 Speaker 4: get one point two tops sort of thing. And it's 746 00:34:03,920 --> 00:34:05,880 Speaker 4: a different discussion around because there's such. 747 00:34:05,760 --> 00:34:09,560 Speaker 2: Different players I'd pay more for than Nasi Wang. 748 00:34:09,560 --> 00:34:12,880 Speaker 4: And I think that's an interesting discussion, like because you 749 00:34:12,960 --> 00:34:16,400 Speaker 4: like these center forward players that he talks about, but 750 00:34:16,440 --> 00:34:19,719 Speaker 4: then they also talk about these damaging halfbacks who sort 751 00:34:19,719 --> 00:34:22,760 Speaker 4: of do whatever they want underposed, but other reasons why 752 00:34:23,160 --> 00:34:27,000 Speaker 4: you get, you know, attacking chains from the back half. 753 00:34:27,320 --> 00:34:28,719 Speaker 4: I mean, I just think it's really interesting. I think 754 00:34:28,719 --> 00:34:29,680 Speaker 4: one point for is a lot. 755 00:34:30,400 --> 00:34:32,760 Speaker 3: It is, but that is like changing money and convincing 756 00:34:32,800 --> 00:34:35,280 Speaker 3: money the Freemantle surely can't pay because. 757 00:34:35,280 --> 00:34:36,759 Speaker 4: I was going to say, do we think he was 758 00:34:36,840 --> 00:34:39,400 Speaker 4: going to get anywhere near that at Fremantle? 759 00:34:39,920 --> 00:34:41,799 Speaker 3: I think you'd be giving up what at least two 760 00:34:41,840 --> 00:34:44,400 Speaker 3: or three hundred thousand a year, which over a decade 761 00:34:44,480 --> 00:34:45,600 Speaker 3: is what two or three milion. 762 00:34:45,680 --> 00:34:47,359 Speaker 2: The Dogs have got a lot of guys on long 763 00:34:47,440 --> 00:34:50,319 Speaker 2: term contract extensions in the past couple of years as well. 764 00:34:50,640 --> 00:34:52,080 Speaker 3: Yeah, that would that would have to play a role 765 00:34:52,080 --> 00:34:53,879 Speaker 3: in that. So that if it's if it's a money thing, 766 00:34:54,640 --> 00:34:57,400 Speaker 3: I mean we can accept that. It's funny how if 767 00:34:57,400 --> 00:34:59,239 Speaker 3: it was a money thing and he left everyone up 768 00:34:59,280 --> 00:35:01,120 Speaker 3: in arms, But if it's the money thing in these days, 769 00:35:01,280 --> 00:35:02,360 Speaker 3: it's like, oh good, loyalty. 770 00:35:03,320 --> 00:35:05,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, just one. I hadn't put in Faro fast, but 771 00:35:05,680 --> 00:35:08,280 Speaker 2: I think probably worth discussing is we're talking about Nasaia 772 00:35:08,280 --> 00:35:12,440 Speaker 2: Wang and a Miller. Just then and now, there was 773 00:35:12,480 --> 00:35:16,879 Speaker 2: a report from Caroline Wilson on Monday night that the 774 00:35:17,360 --> 00:35:21,520 Speaker 2: Taylor Walker incident that saw him cop a six game 775 00:35:21,600 --> 00:35:27,880 Speaker 2: ban in twenty twenty one for racially abusing a sample player, 776 00:35:29,040 --> 00:35:34,800 Speaker 2: Robbi Young, Robbie Young, is partially why Nasaiah won't entertain 777 00:35:34,960 --> 00:35:38,840 Speaker 2: going to the Adelaide Crows very very quickly. His manager 778 00:35:38,880 --> 00:35:43,040 Speaker 2: came out and denied it. Taylor Walker clear called his 779 00:35:43,120 --> 00:35:47,200 Speaker 2: manager to gain further understanding, which Walker then revealed on 780 00:35:47,360 --> 00:35:50,520 Speaker 2: radio on Tuesday morning, and then on Tuesday night it's 781 00:35:50,600 --> 00:35:57,160 Speaker 2: a Walker called Wang Oh, call call, and either way 782 00:35:57,239 --> 00:35:59,719 Speaker 2: that the two have had a conversation of direct conversation 783 00:36:00,600 --> 00:36:04,200 Speaker 2: to try and clear the air here. Caro still one 784 00:36:04,239 --> 00:36:09,520 Speaker 2: hundred percent stands by her story as well, accused the manager, 785 00:36:09,560 --> 00:36:12,400 Speaker 2: Ben Williams, of not knowing his client or not knowing, 786 00:36:12,880 --> 00:36:15,360 Speaker 2: not knowing his klin, not knowing truly what wangone Miller 787 00:36:15,480 --> 00:36:20,520 Speaker 2: thinks of that of this situation, it's a bizarre situation 788 00:36:20,600 --> 00:36:24,800 Speaker 2: where that a report that polarizes fans, turns fans against 789 00:36:24,840 --> 00:36:26,440 Speaker 2: the media, no doubt. 790 00:36:26,920 --> 00:36:27,000 Speaker 4: So. 791 00:36:27,120 --> 00:36:31,200 Speaker 3: I think Caroline Wilson has such a strong, long track 792 00:36:31,239 --> 00:36:33,920 Speaker 3: record that I am sure that there is some kernel 793 00:36:33,960 --> 00:36:37,040 Speaker 3: of truth to the broadness of her report, which was, 794 00:36:37,080 --> 00:36:40,160 Speaker 3: to be fair, the tweet that everyone saw simplified it. 795 00:36:41,040 --> 00:36:43,640 Speaker 3: The story that she gave was that one of the 796 00:36:43,719 --> 00:36:45,719 Speaker 3: reasons he doesn't want to go to the Crows, and 797 00:36:45,719 --> 00:36:48,319 Speaker 3: I don't think anyone expected Wangana Miller to be picking 798 00:36:48,320 --> 00:36:50,320 Speaker 3: the Crows anyway. It seems like it's between Port Adelaide 799 00:36:50,320 --> 00:36:53,359 Speaker 3: and Kilda. He's got much stronger ties to Port. One 800 00:36:53,400 --> 00:36:56,280 Speaker 3: of the reasons was that during the gather Around special 801 00:36:56,320 --> 00:36:59,360 Speaker 3: that was on nine, Eddie Maguire talked to Text about 802 00:36:59,400 --> 00:37:03,000 Speaker 3: the racism incident and the framing of it came out 803 00:37:03,000 --> 00:37:05,239 Speaker 3: with him looking like the victim of Text being oh, 804 00:37:05,320 --> 00:37:07,319 Speaker 3: you went through this, even though it's something that he 805 00:37:07,360 --> 00:37:11,480 Speaker 3: actively did. And it is entirely realistic to me that 806 00:37:11,680 --> 00:37:14,319 Speaker 3: Wangane Miller I was talking to fellow indigenous men about 807 00:37:14,360 --> 00:37:16,759 Speaker 3: this and thought, geez, that's a bit rough, isn't it. 808 00:37:16,840 --> 00:37:20,280 Speaker 3: That's a bit that's not great. Don't agree with that. 809 00:37:20,280 --> 00:37:22,520 Speaker 3: That's a very realistic opinion. To have, because that's the 810 00:37:22,560 --> 00:37:24,200 Speaker 3: opinion I would have had while looking at that as well. 811 00:37:24,200 --> 00:37:25,480 Speaker 3: I think a lot of people would have had that. So, 812 00:37:26,600 --> 00:37:31,680 Speaker 3: if that conversation was had between Wangane Miller and other people, 813 00:37:31,760 --> 00:37:34,520 Speaker 3: and Caroline Wilson got wind of that, which it sounds 814 00:37:34,560 --> 00:37:36,240 Speaker 3: like the way that she would get that type of story, 815 00:37:36,440 --> 00:37:38,400 Speaker 3: that's realistic to me. Does it mean that it's the 816 00:37:38,440 --> 00:37:40,200 Speaker 3: reason he's not going to the Crows? No, does it 817 00:37:40,239 --> 00:37:42,759 Speaker 3: mean it's some reason that he has less interest in 818 00:37:42,800 --> 00:37:46,560 Speaker 3: going to the Crows? Entirely possible. But managers and players 819 00:37:46,600 --> 00:37:48,359 Speaker 3: coming out and denying a story also does not mean 820 00:37:48,400 --> 00:37:51,160 Speaker 3: it's not true that this is always The default position 821 00:37:51,239 --> 00:37:55,120 Speaker 3: is that someone said journalists report the story, it's denied 822 00:37:55,120 --> 00:37:57,640 Speaker 3: by a club, a player, a manager, whoever, and everyone says, oh, 823 00:37:57,640 --> 00:38:00,160 Speaker 3: the journalists must have been lying. Journalists, in not to 824 00:38:00,200 --> 00:38:03,320 Speaker 3: nine point n nine percent of chances circumstances, they're not lying. 825 00:38:03,480 --> 00:38:05,800 Speaker 3: They may have been given wrong information or been talking 826 00:38:05,800 --> 00:38:08,120 Speaker 3: to one person who had the wrong information and such 827 00:38:08,160 --> 00:38:11,439 Speaker 3: and such, but they don't lie. So there could also 828 00:38:11,440 --> 00:38:15,000 Speaker 3: be different circumstances, different views of incidents that make things 829 00:38:15,000 --> 00:38:18,200 Speaker 3: more complicated than this. It's just because of the glaring 830 00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:21,200 Speaker 3: nature of this report. It sounds so big and crazy 831 00:38:21,400 --> 00:38:23,719 Speaker 3: that everyone goes, well, it must be false. 832 00:38:24,280 --> 00:38:27,520 Speaker 2: And it prompted Ben Williams to get on the front foot, 833 00:38:27,560 --> 00:38:30,480 Speaker 2: and it prompted Taylor Walker to reach out to the 834 00:38:30,480 --> 00:38:31,160 Speaker 2: manager as well. 835 00:38:31,200 --> 00:38:33,200 Speaker 3: And to be fair with Ben Williams's statement that he 836 00:38:33,239 --> 00:38:35,400 Speaker 3: put out on Monday, I think sam had been reported 837 00:38:35,440 --> 00:38:39,840 Speaker 3: at first was that my client has not chosen the 838 00:38:39,880 --> 00:38:42,200 Speaker 3: Adelaide Crows. He has not rejected playing for the Adelaide 839 00:38:42,239 --> 00:38:45,120 Speaker 3: Crows because of the text Walker thing, which I read 840 00:38:45,200 --> 00:38:48,040 Speaker 3: as he's keeping Adelaide in the mix because it makes 841 00:38:48,040 --> 00:38:53,160 Speaker 3: his options broader. So it wasn't a I understand that 842 00:38:53,480 --> 00:38:55,719 Speaker 3: part of the story is also being denied, but that 843 00:38:55,800 --> 00:38:57,879 Speaker 3: doesn't mean that there is not a kernel of truth 844 00:38:57,920 --> 00:39:00,520 Speaker 3: in there somewhere. Even if it was reported and made 845 00:39:00,560 --> 00:39:01,800 Speaker 3: into a bigger thing than it needed to be. 846 00:39:02,200 --> 00:39:05,120 Speaker 2: He's going to be and he's still very much in demanded. 847 00:39:05,480 --> 00:39:07,960 Speaker 2: The Crows have had a long term offer on the 848 00:39:08,000 --> 00:39:10,839 Speaker 2: table for a while, but our colleague Will Faulkner has 849 00:39:10,880 --> 00:39:13,880 Speaker 2: been pretty big on the relate on as you mentioned, MAXI, 850 00:39:13,960 --> 00:39:17,680 Speaker 2: the closeness that Wangone Miller has to put Adelaide in 851 00:39:17,760 --> 00:39:19,520 Speaker 2: terms of the ties there a couple of good mates. 852 00:39:19,880 --> 00:39:22,440 Speaker 2: His uncle is Gavin Wanganaan, who's a premiership player put 853 00:39:22,440 --> 00:39:25,640 Speaker 2: Adelaide but a legend of that club. As well the 854 00:39:25,640 --> 00:39:27,520 Speaker 2: fact that he still hasn't re signed it Sin Kilda 855 00:39:27,600 --> 00:39:29,960 Speaker 2: at this stage. I know that there has been some 856 00:39:30,080 --> 00:39:35,160 Speaker 2: players in recent years Jack that have have decided late 857 00:39:35,200 --> 00:39:38,400 Speaker 2: to resign with their club, but usually certainly more than 858 00:39:38,400 --> 00:39:40,879 Speaker 2: fifty percent of the time you leave a decision this lake, 859 00:39:41,040 --> 00:39:43,000 Speaker 2: you're normally not staying at your initial club. 860 00:39:43,560 --> 00:39:46,719 Speaker 4: Yeah, I think someone obviously Nasaiah's got connections and he 861 00:39:46,920 --> 00:39:50,160 Speaker 4: met with jas Bergoyn and Jason on Francis already in 862 00:39:50,200 --> 00:39:54,080 Speaker 4: his by week. I think it would be a you know, 863 00:39:54,160 --> 00:39:56,440 Speaker 4: obviously two straight years where the Saints have copped pre 864 00:39:56,600 --> 00:39:59,839 Speaker 4: devastating blows in terms of key players choosing to. 865 00:39:59,760 --> 00:40:01,880 Speaker 2: Go elsewhere battle going to the Hawks. 866 00:40:02,160 --> 00:40:06,399 Speaker 4: But I think it's also really telling that it's either 867 00:40:06,480 --> 00:40:08,680 Speaker 4: going to be you know, back home, or he's going 868 00:40:08,719 --> 00:40:10,359 Speaker 4: to stay at San Kilda. It won't be like he's 869 00:40:10,360 --> 00:40:12,400 Speaker 4: going to leave to go to another Victorian club. So 870 00:40:12,560 --> 00:40:15,920 Speaker 4: I think it's clearly clearly pull to stay at Saint Kilda. 871 00:40:17,120 --> 00:40:19,840 Speaker 4: But yeah, if if I do. Guess right now, it 872 00:40:19,880 --> 00:40:24,719 Speaker 4: would seem like port Adelaide, But Adelaide in terms of 873 00:40:24,760 --> 00:40:28,040 Speaker 4: their direction is bloody tempting as well. I would think. 874 00:40:28,280 --> 00:40:32,080 Speaker 2: Is there a situation here where wagon a Miller leaves 875 00:40:32,080 --> 00:40:34,560 Speaker 2: Saint Kilda and sin Kilda doesn't get Tom to coning? 876 00:40:35,080 --> 00:40:36,680 Speaker 3: Certainly? Is certainly? 877 00:40:36,840 --> 00:40:38,279 Speaker 2: Is there a bit of a leaning towards Tom to 878 00:40:38,360 --> 00:40:39,960 Speaker 2: Coney staying at Carlton Now? 879 00:40:41,000 --> 00:40:44,040 Speaker 3: I think it's very hard to tell. Carlton's playing a 880 00:40:44,040 --> 00:40:47,000 Speaker 3: bit better. I guess maybe that helps, but he'd have 881 00:40:47,040 --> 00:40:48,279 Speaker 3: to give it quite a lot of money, like four 882 00:40:48,360 --> 00:40:50,080 Speaker 3: or five million to do it, which is a lot 883 00:40:50,120 --> 00:40:52,320 Speaker 3: of money to play for Carlton. 884 00:40:52,840 --> 00:40:55,279 Speaker 2: Yes, the Baggers. That is a long edition of Fair 885 00:40:55,400 --> 00:40:57,799 Speaker 2: or Fast And it's now time for this on the. 886 00:40:57,760 --> 00:41:00,640 Speaker 1: Fox Woody podcast. It's time to open up the mail bag. 887 00:41:01,000 --> 00:41:03,560 Speaker 1: Have a question for the panel tweet us every Monday 888 00:41:03,600 --> 00:41:05,959 Speaker 1: morning at Fox Footy mail Bag. 889 00:41:06,880 --> 00:41:09,080 Speaker 3: I think the problem is, so we did the mail 890 00:41:09,080 --> 00:41:12,160 Speaker 3: bag tweet last week, didn't do a show, and then 891 00:41:12,239 --> 00:41:14,200 Speaker 3: everyone's like, oh, well, maybe they won't be a show 892 00:41:14,200 --> 00:41:16,040 Speaker 3: this week. So only a few entries into the mail 893 00:41:16,080 --> 00:41:16,760 Speaker 3: bag this week. 894 00:41:16,640 --> 00:41:18,040 Speaker 2: And he left overs from last week that we can 895 00:41:18,440 --> 00:41:18,719 Speaker 2: you know. 896 00:41:18,719 --> 00:41:20,799 Speaker 3: I should have done that, but I didn't. That's right, 897 00:41:20,840 --> 00:41:23,400 Speaker 3: because I'm very responsible. So let's just read one question 898 00:41:23,960 --> 00:41:28,000 Speaker 3: from Ben not you, Ben right, who asks why do 899 00:41:28,120 --> 00:41:30,560 Speaker 3: the coaches never see an incident in which their player 900 00:41:30,640 --> 00:41:33,040 Speaker 3: is likely in trouble? I Eate Sam Durham, but have 901 00:41:33,200 --> 00:41:35,480 Speaker 3: seen every angle and analyzed it when they are not 902 00:41:35,840 --> 00:41:36,640 Speaker 3: I E. Stewart. 903 00:41:37,440 --> 00:41:40,160 Speaker 2: I think that's a fair question, to be honest. 904 00:41:40,640 --> 00:41:42,920 Speaker 3: You're not suggesting a level of citicism there are you Ben, 905 00:41:43,000 --> 00:41:46,239 Speaker 3: that coaches are saying how much they've seen to suit 906 00:41:46,280 --> 00:41:46,880 Speaker 3: their circumstance. 907 00:41:46,960 --> 00:41:49,840 Speaker 2: So coaches would be my hunt. I don't have a 908 00:41:49,920 --> 00:41:53,520 Speaker 2: lot of intimate detail and knowledge about this, but my 909 00:41:53,719 --> 00:41:55,719 Speaker 2: absolute hunchies and Jack can probably talk to it as well, 910 00:41:55,760 --> 00:41:59,359 Speaker 2: because he tens press conferences, like normally every club has 911 00:41:59,360 --> 00:42:03,279 Speaker 2: two to three men managers at every game, and that 912 00:42:03,560 --> 00:42:06,600 Speaker 2: those media managers would be monitoring what some of the 913 00:42:06,719 --> 00:42:08,959 Speaker 2: big talking points are at the time and what could 914 00:42:09,000 --> 00:42:11,680 Speaker 2: lead to questions at a press conference. And there's no 915 00:42:11,719 --> 00:42:15,000 Speaker 2: doubt but even if a coach does miss an incident, 916 00:42:15,880 --> 00:42:21,280 Speaker 2: that that would be at least briefed two coaches beforehand, surely, 917 00:42:22,120 --> 00:42:27,520 Speaker 2: So I just think they're trying to avoid giving maybe 918 00:42:27,600 --> 00:42:29,920 Speaker 2: avoid giving an opinion on it, but I think more 919 00:42:29,960 --> 00:42:32,640 Speaker 2: importantly giving an opinion that might get them into some 920 00:42:32,760 --> 00:42:33,840 Speaker 2: kind of trouble. 921 00:42:33,960 --> 00:42:36,759 Speaker 3: Yeah, because in the past, I think coaches, you know, 922 00:42:36,800 --> 00:42:39,200 Speaker 3: you might defend your player, but you might also be 923 00:42:40,239 --> 00:42:43,080 Speaker 3: attacking the matter review or the umpires for the decision 924 00:42:43,080 --> 00:42:44,759 Speaker 3: in the first place, and that can get you into trouble. 925 00:42:44,800 --> 00:42:46,960 Speaker 3: So that's something that's best avoided. That's why most of 926 00:42:46,960 --> 00:42:48,880 Speaker 3: the time they do say I haven't seen it, because 927 00:42:48,880 --> 00:42:51,239 Speaker 3: that's basically them saying no comment. Isn't it? 928 00:42:51,560 --> 00:42:54,920 Speaker 4: Yeah it is. And one of the funny things that 929 00:42:55,000 --> 00:42:58,640 Speaker 4: happened out of the Hawthorne Bulldogs game was the Jack 930 00:42:58,680 --> 00:43:03,239 Speaker 4: Genevan sort of want thing. It's the ball, And I 931 00:43:03,280 --> 00:43:05,959 Speaker 4: think part of his whole thing is that I asked 932 00:43:06,080 --> 00:43:10,160 Speaker 4: Mitchell after after the game and he said he didn't 933 00:43:10,200 --> 00:43:14,080 Speaker 4: see it, like jokingly, right, as if to joke on 934 00:43:14,080 --> 00:43:16,719 Speaker 4: the fact that coaches always say, oh, I haven't seen 935 00:43:16,760 --> 00:43:18,439 Speaker 4: it sort of thing like, and then he laughs because 936 00:43:18,480 --> 00:43:21,960 Speaker 4: then everyone lasts because obviously has seen it. And then 937 00:43:22,200 --> 00:43:25,759 Speaker 4: someone running as Hill fall up later and he didn't 938 00:43:25,800 --> 00:43:28,440 Speaker 4: want to answer, was just like nah, Like he's like, 939 00:43:28,480 --> 00:43:29,000 Speaker 4: do you want to answer? 940 00:43:29,000 --> 00:43:29,640 Speaker 2: It no. 941 00:43:29,719 --> 00:43:35,040 Speaker 4: So obviously these coaches, when their players and the wrong 942 00:43:35,960 --> 00:43:38,400 Speaker 4: don't really want to give much of a much of 943 00:43:38,440 --> 00:43:41,600 Speaker 4: an answer and opinion, which I can completely understand, and 944 00:43:41,680 --> 00:43:43,600 Speaker 4: they did. They one hundred percent get briefed. 945 00:43:44,560 --> 00:43:46,320 Speaker 3: They're playing the game, they're playing the media. They know 946 00:43:46,360 --> 00:43:46,799 Speaker 3: what they're doing. 947 00:43:47,000 --> 00:43:49,120 Speaker 4: I mean you see the media managers in the in 948 00:43:49,160 --> 00:43:51,320 Speaker 4: the actual press box, and then you know they're listening 949 00:43:51,400 --> 00:43:54,080 Speaker 4: to the radio, they're watching you know, the KO feed 950 00:43:54,200 --> 00:43:56,240 Speaker 4: or whatever, and they hear all the commentary. 951 00:43:56,320 --> 00:43:59,600 Speaker 2: So I've seen them making notes what quarter one, quarter, two, quarter, 952 00:43:59,640 --> 00:44:01,400 Speaker 2: three quarters four, potential talking points. 953 00:44:01,600 --> 00:44:04,800 Speaker 3: Doing their job. Thanks Ben, Thanks for everyone who wrote 954 00:44:04,800 --> 00:44:07,400 Speaker 3: in this week. My dad also sent in a photo 955 00:44:07,480 --> 00:44:10,919 Speaker 3: of me as a child wearing a Fox Footy channel hat, 956 00:44:11,120 --> 00:44:13,720 Speaker 3: but it got automatically hidden by the Fox Footy account, 957 00:44:14,000 --> 00:44:21,520 Speaker 3: which automatically hides tweets brutal, so that a cute photo 958 00:44:21,520 --> 00:44:24,440 Speaker 3: of me. I was ten, I was in Fiji. It 959 00:44:24,480 --> 00:44:27,160 Speaker 3: was a nice holiday from memory if you were wondering. 960 00:44:27,200 --> 00:44:28,480 Speaker 3: By the way, if you do tweet it and get 961 00:44:28,560 --> 00:44:31,279 Speaker 3: hidden as a reply by the Fox Footy account, it 962 00:44:31,360 --> 00:44:33,759 Speaker 3: was a bot. It's not us. We know it's over 963 00:44:33,840 --> 00:44:36,400 Speaker 3: active and does probably more than it should. But it's 964 00:44:36,680 --> 00:44:39,400 Speaker 3: one of the necessary evils of social media, because that 965 00:44:39,440 --> 00:44:42,000 Speaker 3: itself is unfortunately a necessary evil. 966 00:44:43,360 --> 00:44:44,920 Speaker 2: Now Kevin's back. 967 00:44:56,800 --> 00:44:59,960 Speaker 3: Cheety. He has a lot of things to say. Does 968 00:45:00,200 --> 00:45:04,080 Speaker 3: Kevin and I think, in honor of a big break 969 00:45:04,080 --> 00:45:07,040 Speaker 3: between our last stint of sheety wisdom, we deserve a 970 00:45:07,040 --> 00:45:10,160 Speaker 3: big dose dose Kevin Sheedy, who of course wrote the 971 00:45:10,200 --> 00:45:12,960 Speaker 3: book Pockets of Greatness with Tom Pryor in the year 972 00:45:13,040 --> 00:45:15,560 Speaker 3: nineteen ninety six, and then I read it out on 973 00:45:15,600 --> 00:45:23,319 Speaker 3: this podcast for comedic value. Kevin says, last Christmas, I 974 00:45:23,400 --> 00:45:26,520 Speaker 3: sat down and read about the Persians. The Christmas before that, 975 00:45:27,040 --> 00:45:29,239 Speaker 3: it was about the Greeks. I like to read a 976 00:45:29,239 --> 00:45:31,480 Speaker 3: book of history when I have the time. It clears 977 00:45:31,520 --> 00:45:33,960 Speaker 3: the mind and it gives you a feel. I realized 978 00:45:34,000 --> 00:45:36,600 Speaker 3: that often I'm only showing one person's opinions, but it 979 00:45:36,680 --> 00:45:39,000 Speaker 3: still gives you a fear. Look at the map of 980 00:45:39,040 --> 00:45:42,239 Speaker 3: the world today and there's no Persia. It's not there. 981 00:45:42,480 --> 00:45:46,120 Speaker 3: It's not a country anymore. What happened? Sure, it's an 982 00:45:46,120 --> 00:45:48,759 Speaker 3: approximately the same place on the map as Iran, But 983 00:45:48,840 --> 00:45:52,120 Speaker 3: what happened? I don't know where? Can I find out? 984 00:45:53,000 --> 00:45:57,400 Speaker 3: What's the bedding? Where called Australasia one day. Some people 985 00:45:57,440 --> 00:45:59,760 Speaker 3: may say you're daydreaming, but it gives you a system 986 00:46:00,120 --> 00:46:02,640 Speaker 3: basis for thought. That's how they brought in the House 987 00:46:02,680 --> 00:46:05,680 Speaker 3: of Lords and the aristocracy in England. It's probably the 988 00:46:05,719 --> 00:46:08,480 Speaker 3: reason that we have mayors another local government officials today. 989 00:46:08,920 --> 00:46:12,240 Speaker 3: Somebody powerful dream them originally, and we'll have them until 990 00:46:12,280 --> 00:46:16,239 Speaker 3: someone dreams up something better. I wonder how Princess die 991 00:46:16,280 --> 00:46:19,120 Speaker 3: and Prince Charles would have gone in Henry the eighth time. 992 00:46:19,680 --> 00:46:20,759 Speaker 3: Didn't he jump off. 993 00:46:20,680 --> 00:46:25,240 Speaker 2: A few heads. It's brilliant when you when you said, 994 00:46:25,440 --> 00:46:27,800 Speaker 2: when you look at the world today or the map 995 00:46:27,840 --> 00:46:29,120 Speaker 2: of the world today. I thought he was going to 996 00:46:29,360 --> 00:46:30,719 Speaker 2: say something very controversial. 997 00:46:31,719 --> 00:46:36,160 Speaker 3: I make sure to avoid anything particularly controversial go. 998 00:46:36,160 --> 00:46:38,080 Speaker 2: Down that path as well. Oh good to know that 999 00:46:38,160 --> 00:46:41,000 Speaker 2: Kevin back in nineteen ninety six was had a time 1000 00:46:41,080 --> 00:46:44,319 Speaker 2: for DNM and his own thoughts with some history books. 1001 00:46:44,360 --> 00:46:46,600 Speaker 3: I'm pretty sure you could look up what happened to Persia. 1002 00:46:46,719 --> 00:46:47,879 Speaker 3: I'm pretty sure there are. 1003 00:46:47,800 --> 00:46:49,840 Speaker 2: Some books, maybe ninety six. 1004 00:46:50,400 --> 00:46:53,719 Speaker 3: It would they had books in nineteen ninety six, as 1005 00:46:53,719 --> 00:46:54,439 Speaker 3: shown by the book. 1006 00:46:55,040 --> 00:46:57,840 Speaker 4: Like you said, he only reads one person's opinions, got 1007 00:46:57,880 --> 00:47:01,160 Speaker 4: a different points, but the tangency goes off on like 1008 00:47:01,320 --> 00:47:02,000 Speaker 4: from to thing. 1009 00:47:02,239 --> 00:47:03,560 Speaker 3: At the best part of it, that was all. That 1010 00:47:03,640 --> 00:47:05,560 Speaker 3: was all just in a row. No, I didn't edit 1011 00:47:05,640 --> 00:47:09,520 Speaker 3: that at all. Just consistent, just like a continuous, just 1012 00:47:10,520 --> 00:47:12,000 Speaker 3: Hall of Fame legend. That's what he is. 1013 00:47:12,160 --> 00:47:16,040 Speaker 2: Were you were you born in ninety ninety six, Jack, No, No, 1014 00:47:15,480 --> 00:47:19,399 Speaker 2: No good afternoon or evening or morning to Why would 1015 00:47:19,440 --> 00:47:21,640 Speaker 2: you want it to just making me feel old? What 1016 00:47:21,680 --> 00:47:23,759 Speaker 2: do you do, Max, I'm in the same ballpark as. 1017 00:47:23,680 --> 00:47:25,719 Speaker 3: You want to. You want to feel old because he 1018 00:47:25,760 --> 00:47:27,759 Speaker 3: picket when that contract ends, if he signs it, I'll 1019 00:47:27,760 --> 00:47:28,520 Speaker 3: be forty two. 1020 00:47:29,120 --> 00:47:30,920 Speaker 2: Didn't she didn't you point out that it was after that. 1021 00:47:31,000 --> 00:47:33,399 Speaker 2: It's going to be two years after the Brisbanel I know. 1022 00:47:33,840 --> 00:47:36,800 Speaker 3: That stadium will have been used actually built for a start. 1023 00:47:37,480 --> 00:47:39,360 Speaker 4: God too soon, Sint kild On. 1024 00:47:39,400 --> 00:47:43,280 Speaker 2: The Bulldogs kick off this round for the Shane Burst Cup. 1025 00:47:44,480 --> 00:47:46,920 Speaker 3: So as I said, I think there are five pretty 1026 00:47:47,000 --> 00:47:50,000 Speaker 3: comfortable tips this round and two tricky ones. This is 1027 00:47:50,040 --> 00:47:51,400 Speaker 3: one of the comfortable ones. I'll be tipping the. 1028 00:47:51,360 --> 00:47:52,640 Speaker 2: Bulldogs all the Bulldogs. 1029 00:47:53,000 --> 00:47:55,040 Speaker 3: I mean, they did beat them by a million points 1030 00:47:55,080 --> 00:47:55,799 Speaker 3: eight weeks ago. 1031 00:47:55,880 --> 00:47:56,200 Speaker 2: They did. 1032 00:47:56,239 --> 00:47:57,880 Speaker 3: And Sam Darcy is back in time to face to 1033 00:47:57,920 --> 00:48:00,840 Speaker 3: them in the modest st kiled a thing possile. You 1034 00:48:00,880 --> 00:48:03,239 Speaker 3: think he's got a season ending injury. No, he's back 1035 00:48:03,280 --> 00:48:03,920 Speaker 3: to play. 1036 00:48:03,680 --> 00:48:08,719 Speaker 2: You again the Saints quote retweeted Zeta today, Who's Zeta 1037 00:48:09,000 --> 00:48:12,080 Speaker 2: confirming that Sam Darcy's back, and Celta said, of course 1038 00:48:12,080 --> 00:48:16,239 Speaker 2: he is. They know Jack who wins Dogs? Hawthorne and 1039 00:48:16,280 --> 00:48:20,839 Speaker 2: adelaide u test stadium Friday night games. Ricky Henderson Cup 1040 00:48:20,920 --> 00:48:21,399 Speaker 2: up for great. 1041 00:48:21,480 --> 00:48:23,600 Speaker 3: See this is proof the Devils don't need a new stadium. 1042 00:48:23,600 --> 00:48:26,759 Speaker 3: You can have Friday night games at you task in Lonceston, 1043 00:48:27,280 --> 00:48:30,239 Speaker 3: and I think this is one of the two tough ones. 1044 00:48:31,040 --> 00:48:35,360 Speaker 3: I'm leaning Hawks because of the home ground advantage, but 1045 00:48:35,400 --> 00:48:36,200 Speaker 3: that's the only reason. 1046 00:48:36,400 --> 00:48:39,919 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm the same. I just can't imagine them losing there. 1047 00:48:40,280 --> 00:48:41,920 Speaker 3: They bet the Giants there earlier this season in a 1048 00:48:41,960 --> 00:48:45,719 Speaker 3: pretty good game they and they were genuinely impressive against 1049 00:48:45,760 --> 00:48:47,640 Speaker 3: the Dogs. Like he said that that game was about more. 1050 00:48:47,800 --> 00:48:50,200 Speaker 3: The Dogs played poorly, but the Hawks really lifted their level, 1051 00:48:50,200 --> 00:48:51,680 Speaker 3: brought that pressure. If they do that again they should win. 1052 00:48:51,680 --> 00:48:52,839 Speaker 4: And think it's a bit of a turning point. 1053 00:48:53,080 --> 00:48:56,359 Speaker 2: Last week just going to look at your park here, 1054 00:48:56,560 --> 00:48:58,440 Speaker 2: how many Friday night games to see to be the 1055 00:48:58,600 --> 00:49:01,279 Speaker 2: very first Friday night game at York Park. 1056 00:49:01,480 --> 00:49:03,440 Speaker 3: But I bet it's also had like a probably a 1057 00:49:03,520 --> 00:49:05,400 Speaker 3: Tuesday afternoon game in COVID. 1058 00:49:05,560 --> 00:49:09,800 Speaker 2: I'd had a well, it's obviously back in twenty twenty 1059 00:49:09,840 --> 00:49:13,400 Speaker 2: two we had that random Anzac Day game between Hawthorne 1060 00:49:13,400 --> 00:49:15,680 Speaker 2: and Sydney that started at twelve thirty during the day. 1061 00:49:16,400 --> 00:49:19,200 Speaker 3: Of course, why wouldn't you It also hosted Did that 1062 00:49:19,239 --> 00:49:21,080 Speaker 3: hosts the final between the Dogs and the Bombers or 1063 00:49:21,120 --> 00:49:26,359 Speaker 3: was that in Hobart that was there was? Yeah, Giant 1064 00:49:26,400 --> 00:49:28,760 Speaker 3: Giants Swans also played a final there the Giants pipping. 1065 00:49:28,760 --> 00:49:29,800 Speaker 3: This one's from memory. 1066 00:49:30,239 --> 00:49:31,279 Speaker 2: Yeah, I have to have a look. I was just 1067 00:49:31,280 --> 00:49:34,040 Speaker 2: looking at the Hawthorne games. Certainly Hawthorne's first of a 1068 00:49:34,080 --> 00:49:36,279 Speaker 2: Friday night game at York Bark. I highly doubt there 1069 00:49:36,280 --> 00:49:37,959 Speaker 2: would have been a Friday night game at York Park. 1070 00:49:38,160 --> 00:49:40,840 Speaker 3: Besides that, to be fair, incredible fixturing. It is the 1071 00:49:40,840 --> 00:49:42,239 Speaker 3: best game of this weekend. 1072 00:49:42,000 --> 00:49:44,400 Speaker 4: And they've had their they've had their lighting issues in 1073 00:49:44,440 --> 00:49:45,600 Speaker 4: the past, so let's just get it. 1074 00:49:46,239 --> 00:49:47,480 Speaker 3: Didn't we have to move a game because it was 1075 00:49:47,520 --> 00:49:49,080 Speaker 3: going to be one of the lights wasn't working and 1076 00:49:49,120 --> 00:49:50,680 Speaker 3: we were worried about the power going out. 1077 00:49:50,480 --> 00:49:52,800 Speaker 2: And do vaguely remember that the lines and the Giants 1078 00:49:53,040 --> 00:49:55,040 Speaker 2: Jake Barrett Cup up for grabs here. 1079 00:49:55,040 --> 00:49:59,680 Speaker 3: Yes, Brisbane again. They just haven't been great at home 1080 00:49:59,680 --> 00:50:00,000 Speaker 3: this year. 1081 00:50:00,000 --> 00:50:02,400 Speaker 2: Giants beat did the Giants beat them the corresponding game 1082 00:50:02,440 --> 00:50:02,960 Speaker 2: last year? 1083 00:50:03,000 --> 00:50:05,760 Speaker 3: But that that was like they kicked like twelve goals 1084 00:50:05,800 --> 00:50:08,399 Speaker 3: two to seven goals sixty eight. 1085 00:50:08,680 --> 00:50:12,040 Speaker 2: Slick performance, stupid lines. 1086 00:50:12,080 --> 00:50:15,359 Speaker 4: But this is one of the games Jennibebis could pull out, 1087 00:50:15,480 --> 00:50:18,000 Speaker 4: I think, yeah, and also one of the very rare 1088 00:50:18,440 --> 00:50:19,879 Speaker 4: early afternoon starts at the cover. 1089 00:50:20,280 --> 00:50:22,360 Speaker 2: Yes, I suppose you can't afford to do that in 1090 00:50:22,360 --> 00:50:25,080 Speaker 2: the middle of June, though, correct in March in Geelong? 1091 00:50:25,400 --> 00:50:27,759 Speaker 2: Is he still the country? Is he still the Country Game? 1092 00:50:27,840 --> 00:50:30,560 Speaker 3: I hope so, because that is my favorite fake game 1093 00:50:30,600 --> 00:50:31,759 Speaker 3: that no one believes in. 1094 00:50:31,800 --> 00:50:34,040 Speaker 2: Glen kill Patrick Cup up for grabs Also it's the 1095 00:50:34,040 --> 00:50:36,080 Speaker 2: country game. But also with Sandy Roberts used to call 1096 00:50:36,120 --> 00:50:37,719 Speaker 2: it farm Day. 1097 00:50:38,640 --> 00:50:41,680 Speaker 3: Actually Kevin Sheedy invented the country game. We should be 1098 00:50:41,719 --> 00:50:44,040 Speaker 3: more positive about it, we should. I went, that's one 1099 00:50:44,080 --> 00:50:45,720 Speaker 3: of the few games I've ever covered at the ground 1100 00:50:46,000 --> 00:50:47,799 Speaker 3: because I don't usually do that. It was a it 1101 00:50:47,840 --> 00:50:50,040 Speaker 3: was a farm day, Farm Day, I remember walking through 1102 00:50:50,120 --> 00:50:53,560 Speaker 3: Yarra Park hay Bales and like a tractor for kids 1103 00:50:53,600 --> 00:50:54,839 Speaker 3: to stand. Toby would have loved that. 1104 00:50:54,920 --> 00:50:57,960 Speaker 2: Would Yeah, he actually would have the excavators there will 1105 00:50:58,000 --> 00:50:58,200 Speaker 2: be there. 1106 00:50:58,440 --> 00:51:02,719 Speaker 4: Yes, yes, Geelong Essendon have a thirty three percent winning 1107 00:51:02,760 --> 00:51:04,960 Speaker 4: percentage at the MCG since twenty twenty. 1108 00:51:05,360 --> 00:51:08,239 Speaker 2: It's not great, no thanks Jack, will Thork and German. 1109 00:51:09,040 --> 00:51:10,640 Speaker 2: I think they have a lower percentage against Gelong. 1110 00:51:10,840 --> 00:51:11,840 Speaker 3: To be fair, I walked to. 1111 00:51:11,960 --> 00:51:16,880 Speaker 2: Walk run North Melbourne and Fremantle North Melbourne home game 1112 00:51:17,239 --> 00:51:20,000 Speaker 2: at Opta Stadium, just Sinclear Cup up for grabs. 1113 00:51:20,239 --> 00:51:23,239 Speaker 3: This is already completely acceptable that they sold the two 1114 00:51:23,280 --> 00:51:25,520 Speaker 3: home games w A because they won one of them. Yes, 1115 00:51:25,560 --> 00:51:27,640 Speaker 3: they got over the line against West Coast. Just it 1116 00:51:27,719 --> 00:51:29,439 Speaker 3: means it's not a complete failure. They got their money, 1117 00:51:29,480 --> 00:51:32,800 Speaker 3: they got some points. They're gonna get pumped either way, surely. 1118 00:51:33,480 --> 00:51:36,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, a good result. He for Freo to get the 1119 00:51:36,200 --> 00:51:38,279 Speaker 2: ruse in w A, but they get an opt the 1120 00:51:38,280 --> 00:51:39,920 Speaker 2: stadium rather than in Bunbury. 1121 00:51:39,960 --> 00:51:41,239 Speaker 3: This is the month where they need to make their 1122 00:51:41,239 --> 00:51:44,920 Speaker 3: movie Dons and Saints and then Sydney Away, which is 1123 00:51:44,960 --> 00:51:47,600 Speaker 3: winnable as well. They probably should have won it last year. 1124 00:51:48,360 --> 00:51:50,240 Speaker 3: I did win last year because of Logan McDonald missing 1125 00:51:50,239 --> 00:51:50,800 Speaker 3: after the siren. 1126 00:51:50,840 --> 00:51:53,399 Speaker 4: They did so a winn ten and five at the bye. 1127 00:51:53,719 --> 00:51:54,959 Speaker 3: Yep, not bad. 1128 00:51:55,120 --> 00:51:57,480 Speaker 2: Port Adelaide and Melbourne dom Barry Cup. 1129 00:51:57,680 --> 00:52:01,440 Speaker 3: This is the other tough one. Jimmy Thompas surely. 1130 00:52:01,560 --> 00:52:07,680 Speaker 2: Jimmy Thomp's Jack Watts, Jack Tringove, Ben Newton. Rather fantastic 1131 00:52:07,719 --> 00:52:08,640 Speaker 2: contenders there. 1132 00:52:08,719 --> 00:52:09,920 Speaker 3: Just off the top of the dome, all of that. 1133 00:52:09,920 --> 00:52:11,399 Speaker 2: It's incredible research. 1134 00:52:13,239 --> 00:52:18,000 Speaker 3: In pleasant again, very tough tip. I'm going to go 1135 00:52:18,040 --> 00:52:19,960 Speaker 3: with the home team and Port Adelaide just because of 1136 00:52:20,000 --> 00:52:21,080 Speaker 3: the homegrown advantage. 1137 00:52:21,640 --> 00:52:23,680 Speaker 4: I say Melbourne very reasonable. 1138 00:52:23,760 --> 00:52:26,160 Speaker 3: They play pretty well in Adelaide, don't They had some 1139 00:52:26,200 --> 00:52:27,000 Speaker 3: good wins there. 1140 00:52:27,840 --> 00:52:31,640 Speaker 2: In Adelaide earlier this year gather Around they lost to Sorry, 1141 00:52:31,680 --> 00:52:34,239 Speaker 2: take that back year before they take that year before 1142 00:52:34,280 --> 00:52:35,480 Speaker 2: they went to gather Aroun, didn't they. 1143 00:52:35,320 --> 00:52:39,200 Speaker 4: They did the beat in this fixture last year or 1144 00:52:39,200 --> 00:52:39,720 Speaker 4: the year before. 1145 00:52:39,880 --> 00:52:41,640 Speaker 3: It sounds all right. 1146 00:52:41,760 --> 00:52:46,200 Speaker 2: The Eagles and the Blues finished the round. Callum Chambers 1147 00:52:46,239 --> 00:52:48,840 Speaker 2: Cup up for grab, Sam Petreski seating very stiff. 1148 00:52:49,239 --> 00:52:53,080 Speaker 4: Matt Owis can't play for your own cup. 1149 00:52:53,320 --> 00:52:55,920 Speaker 2: Don't be ridiculous, of course, you fool. 1150 00:52:56,640 --> 00:52:58,920 Speaker 3: Uh West Coast have shown some real signs over the 1151 00:52:59,000 --> 00:53:02,000 Speaker 3: last couple of weeks, like took it to Geelong for 1152 00:53:02,200 --> 00:53:05,759 Speaker 3: three quarters, should have thumped North for three quarters. They 1153 00:53:05,760 --> 00:53:07,759 Speaker 3: can figure out their fourths, they might be a good team. 1154 00:53:07,880 --> 00:53:10,719 Speaker 2: I think, what, Yeah, you're a big Andrew mcquarter fan. 1155 00:53:10,760 --> 00:53:13,920 Speaker 2: I think where pundits are starting to see the mcquarter 1156 00:53:14,040 --> 00:53:17,319 Speaker 2: system yep coming through went out during Adam Simpson's last year. 1157 00:53:17,360 --> 00:53:20,279 Speaker 2: I think punets we strugging the c A system. But 1158 00:53:20,800 --> 00:53:22,960 Speaker 2: it feels like in the past month it's starting to 1159 00:53:22,960 --> 00:53:24,600 Speaker 2: click for this young Eagle side. 1160 00:53:24,960 --> 00:53:26,840 Speaker 3: They'll get reads on the tip Carlton because they just 1161 00:53:26,880 --> 00:53:28,880 Speaker 3: have to win. Oh, I have to win, but it 1162 00:53:28,880 --> 00:53:32,120 Speaker 3: would be the most Carleton thing ever. Sunday Night game too, 1163 00:53:32,120 --> 00:53:35,160 Speaker 3: another Sunday Night, but no Bounce in between games this 1164 00:53:35,200 --> 00:53:37,960 Speaker 3: week it's a six to ten star no yes, disappointing 1165 00:53:37,960 --> 00:53:39,640 Speaker 3: for Bounce fans. All the kiddies left to stay up 1166 00:53:39,680 --> 00:53:43,839 Speaker 3: to nine. Enjoy that you enjoy that? I do. I 1167 00:53:43,880 --> 00:53:47,640 Speaker 3: love the Fox Footy program Bounce. And Andrew gays he 1168 00:53:47,680 --> 00:53:50,239 Speaker 3: reads the latter and then he says, ah, no no 1169 00:53:50,440 --> 00:53:53,080 Speaker 3: check chief, no check chief, nah Chief. 1170 00:53:54,480 --> 00:53:57,360 Speaker 2: It's good jack who wins between West Coast and calors 1171 00:53:57,360 --> 00:54:00,359 Speaker 2: on Carlton Carlton Baggers need to win otherwise be top 1172 00:54:00,360 --> 00:54:04,360 Speaker 2: of the agenda on the Fox Footy podcast next week potentially. 1173 00:54:04,760 --> 00:54:07,760 Speaker 2: Keep clicking back to Foxfooting dot com dot au. 1174 00:54:08,120 --> 00:54:11,080 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Fox Footy podcast. Like what 1175 00:54:11,160 --> 00:54:13,760 Speaker 1: you hear, hit subscribe and rate us on your preferred 1176 00:54:13,760 --> 00:54:17,000 Speaker 1: podcast platform. And for the best footy news and views, 1177 00:54:17,080 --> 00:54:20,400 Speaker 1: catch Fox Footy on channel five oh four. Keep clicking 1178 00:54:20,440 --> 00:54:22,920 Speaker 1: back to Foxfoodye dot com dot Au.