WEBVTT - The internet thinks we’re doing motherhood wrong

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Heyat's las quick one before we get into it. Like

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>many of you, we are in the depths of school holidays,

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>so we're rerunning a couple of our absolute favorites for you.

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>If you miss these the first time around, you're in

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>for a treat. And if you didn't trust me, they

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>more than hold up for a second.

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Listen, enjoy, and just a quick note from my laptop

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 2>microphone with Spider Man playing in the background.

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 3>This show used to be called Witching Hour, so.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 2>You'll see just how far the production value has come

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>from this episode to the ones we now produce today.

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 3>But as Law said, I think the conversation still holds.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>This podcast was recorded on the lands of the boon

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Warong people of the Kulin Nation, the land on which

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>we're lucky enough to raise our sons and daughters, always was,

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and always will be Aboriginal Land.

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to Witching Hour, the show by Ready

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 2>or Not, the looks at what's exciting, delighting, intriguing, and

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>frustrating us when it comes to making work.

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm Lou.

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Loz. Kicking things off with a good news story.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I actually saw a very funny start this week that

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>said means nothing in relation to work or motherhood really,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but it did say if you leave parties without saying goodbye,

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you can save two days per year. Research suggests that

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>average goodbyes at a party take around two to three

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>minutes per person. At a gathering with ten to twenty people,

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at twenty to sixty minutes just to say

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>bye by multiple events per year, and skipping farewells could

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>save you up to forty eight hours annually or two

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>full days.

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 2>That does relate to mums, because I will take anything

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>I can get, just quickly. I got a little bit

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 2>drunk on Saturday night and people are at my house,

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and I smoke smoke bombed from my own house and

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 2>went to bed without saying. I was so tired. I

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 2>couldn't keep up with conversation. Hads was there, and I thought,

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>even though it was all the girlies and none of

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 2>his mates, I thought, I'm sneaking off.

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm so tired.

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You do it, You go go. You've just saved yourself

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>probably what twenty minutes. It's time to wrap things up.

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 3>And kicking them out, So I just left. I love

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 3>that lossy.

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned that Siena hadn't been listening to you tell

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 2>me what happened on the hearing test.

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 3>I want to know all about it.

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 2>For anyone that thinks, like genuinely that maybe they're not

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 2>listening is more than a not listening problem.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So just to preface it by saying, I booked

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>center in for a hearing test, and when I went

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to actually get the hearing test for Siena, they said

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of people that book hearing tests wanting to

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>do it before either school starts kinder starts. More as

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like a I don't want to say tickbox thing, but

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>more as a peace of mind thing. So even if

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, my child's pretty good, if you have

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>any concerns, couldn't recommend more highly just to put your

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>mind at ease. Secondly, I just think that the school

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>holidays really got to me this time around. They were

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>really long and over the course of like, oh, it's

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>six weeks, eight weeks, I just don't even know how long.

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a freaking long time. Sienna would ask me

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>multiple times, what did you say? What I can't hear you?

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Can you turn the tava up? I can't hear it?

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, okay, She's actually usd so many

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>times now that I'm getting to the point of frustration.

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to book in a hearing test. Went

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to the hearing test, took three minutes, was so quick.

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>They were so great with kids. There are no problems.

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 3>So the problems are in the house, not in the yst.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Problems.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you sit down with Siena and get the prognosis

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 2>and you go, Now, your hearing is great?

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 3>So what the fuck are we going to do about communication? Sweetie, stylist?

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I know you're only four, but we need to have

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 3>a talk.

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I said to write my husband Ry. I

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, okay, so there's nothing wrong me. He's like,

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, so we just spent one hundred and sixty

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>five bucks for nothing. I'm like, no, not for nothing.

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>The sanity for me knowing that I wasn't going insane

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>because I genuinely thought to myself, does she have a

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>hearing problem? At least now I can confidently say no,

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not not a specific issue. There's nothing wrong with

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>her ears or her hearing. It's just selective.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's very selective. Once the TV out wants the

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 3>mummy down.

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Imagine if our kids had volume buttons for us, I'd.

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Just go back at the kitchen, my mummy.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 2>I want you to cook for me, but I don't

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 2>want you to talk exactly right.

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And I also want to just follow up on last

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>episode where I complained about parts because so many people

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>have kindly suggested alternative studios, of which I have already

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>tried it. Three of your recommendations and I'm trying another.

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Guess so efficient you are nuts? How have you already

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 3>gone to three?

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Because I couldn't help myself. I feel like when people

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>recommend something, and also people should know this about me,

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I jump on stuff immediately, like I don't have any

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>rationale when it comes to trying stuff. If someone gives

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>me a recommendation, I'm like, oh, try it, that's all

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I need, just a quick little you should do.

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 2>So if someone says I went to the best sex

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 2>club on the weekend, you're all right, Well, I.

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>Guess I give it a crack.

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Pregnant with my third what could possibly go wrong? Oh

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 3>my god?

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not that far. But thank you for all your recommendations.

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Some have been excellent. I have a front runner at

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the moment, but I'm going to try another two and

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>then I feel like five is enough for me. There

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>was lots, so sorry be thanks so many.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you think was the I feel like universal

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Practice was one of the most mentioned.

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>What else was most mentioned? Do you remember bump in Maulvin?

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I think was bump in Maulvin was mentioned. I did

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>try their be Active was also mentioned. I've also tried

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>their Core plus was another one, yeah, which I tried

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the other day, which was really good. And then another

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>one called Bumps. There's been heaps, like, there's so many,

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and peaches I think another.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>One patrees, Yes, that was another thing.

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so there's quite a few. I sadly won't be

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>able to do all of them, because what.

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you mean, You've got so much time on your

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 3>hands with.

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 2>You you're one day a week ready or not, job,

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 2>your two children, and your pregnancy.

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Why aren't you fitting that in?

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Like I would actually love to trial

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>them all just so that I can offer other people

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>advice and be like this, I was not good, this

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>time is great, go to this instructor whatever. But I

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>have tried quite a lot, So I've got two more

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to go and then I'll make my final decision.

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Maybe come back to us.

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 2>We won't rank them, because I'm sure they're all great businesses,

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 2>but just come back to us with what personally for

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 2>you ends up being the one. Okay, Okay, next time

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I will So today, what are we talking about? When

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>will we stop judging the mums? I've seen a bit

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 2>of discourse on my Instagram this week about dms coming

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 2>in to mums very unsolicited. They might be mentioning that

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 2>things have been a little bit hard lately. They might

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 2>be mentioning that they're wanting to rip out their eyeballs

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 2>a bit. Most of it is said in jest, a

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 2>bit of a laugh, bit of fun. We all love

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 2>our kids, but every now and then it's hard. Let

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 2>the mum speak what I say, why can't we stop

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 2>judging them? I will give you a few stories, and

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 2>then I'll ask you why you still think that we

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 2>do this so much and what can we do about it?

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 2>And then secondly, you're bringing to me the hidden bias

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 2>in job applications, why women are being turned off by

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 2>the questions we don't ask men.

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Take it away, my friend.

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Or you're taking it away. I know that we often

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>do this, We often do this, but in fact, today.

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>You ate it when I do this, take it away.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 2>I am friends with myself, so take it away. My

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 2>friend Planning from Little Label, a children's and women's wear brand,

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 2>recently posted a real In it, she shows the utter

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 2>chaos that is being a working mum during the school

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 2>holidays and make some jokes about wanting to get a

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 2>one way ticket to Fiji I would like one also,

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 2>and wanting to rebout her eyeballs. It's linked in the

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 2>show notes, so go there for further context. But it's

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>just meant for a bit of fun. Someone came into

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 2>her DMS with some unsolicited advice saying that she should

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 2>be a bit more grateful.

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 3>And while some.

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Of the people that did come into a DMS were

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 2>able to have roba conversations and offer reasons why they

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>think she shouldn't share it, some people were just downright mean.

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Another example came up in my social media stories very

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>shortly after this from Bridget Gaiale. She's been interviewed on

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Ready or Not before, and her first Instagram story was

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 2>a selfie of her child cuddling her, saying that her

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 2>daughter sort of didn't want a bar of her she'd

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 2>picked her up from daycare or wherever, and her daughter

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>didn't really want much from her she had in her

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 2>DM someone responding saying, I hope you can repair your

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 2>relationship with your daughter. That would never happen with me

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and my daughter. Bridget and I went on to have

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 2>a conversation about this, saying as if that person has

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>never had their child speak badly to them or not

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 2>win a bar of them, and that.

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 3>It's all just part and parcel.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 2>The next day she was absolutely loving her mum sick

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>as we know, light and.

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Shade and motherhood in all these situations.

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 2>Third example happened I reckon about a year ago, Lozzie,

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 2>when I told you you sent me a video of

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Sienna just having one of those windy days the way

0:08:58.800 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 2>kids always do.

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you sent me a video of you walking

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 3>down the street.

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Me like, oh look, I'm looking forward to getting in

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 2>the office today. For anyone that knows you, you absolutely

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 2>love being a mum. You'll always talk about the positivity.

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 2>But on that day you needed a break. When I

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 2>told you to whack that on the radio ho Arts story,

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 2>someone replied, poor child, I'm unfollowing, and we well, you

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 2>mostly had a laugh about it. I was upset because

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I take a thing to heart and this happens all

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>the time. These are not three ISO loaded incidents, but

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 2>it did spark something inside of me. And my question

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 2>for you is why do we still judge mums so much?

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 2>And how do we stop doing it? Well, I don't

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 2>know the answer to either. Mat we all do it,

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 2>and anybody that says they don't would be lying. I

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 2>think we're all trying to do our best at doing

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 2>it less. Obviously, judgment creates conversation when you are judging someone,

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 2>When you have a strong opinion on something, when something bothers,

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 2>you speak about it, whether it's in a positive or

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 2>a negative light, creates connection because there'll be people that

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 2>agree with you and people that don't. And more importantly,

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 2>it creates conversation. It gives you something to talk about.

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>Where I think society is really polarizing is genuinely about

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>topics like parenting or mums and what we should and

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be doing. Because traditionally there was this view that

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody's still trying to break or a stigma that like

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>being a mom means you're like really nurturing and warm

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and always available to your children, and that's kind of

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>a concept that I think has become more so prevalent butt.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Because there's more options, but like society hasn't caught up yet,

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Like is it a s yes, do you think?

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's really odd. It's so bad, it's really sad.

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Back in the day, Like I remember my parents when

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>I was younger, I used to go out for dinner

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>with them and they would genuinely just ignore me, and

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 1>I would sit under the table, like looking at chewing

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.839
<v Speaker 1>gum on the table, sometimes eating it when I was

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like four, and just like coloring in under the table,

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and that was acceptable. No one ever said to them, oh,

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, that it is so disgraceful, Like how could

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you take your children out and not engage with them?

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. I had fun,

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they had fun. If I was to do that today,

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the amount of looks that I would get, I'm not

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>putting my child in an unsafe environment under a table.

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>They're safe. Okay, maybe they're eating some stale old chewy,

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're not going to die.

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh they've done that before probably.

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, But the amount of looks that I would

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 1>get would be out of control. And I don't know

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>if it's social media or like what it is, but

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like there's this heightened sense of judgment towards everything,

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>not just that but everything.

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like the blessing and the curse of more

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 2>choice because we are in this sticky period where we're

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 2>getting more choice, but we're like in a transition period.

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 2>I feel like women and mums had less choice back

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 2>in the day for the vast majority. Do you think

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 2>almost that there's so much choice means our decisions feel

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 2>so loaded because we're always.

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Trying to get it right, but we don't actually know

0:11:59.200 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 3>what is right.

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Everything's right, and everything's wrong.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that is so true.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And for all these people that say things like, oh,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, my child would never do that, maybe they wouldn't.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>But what I will say is that at some point

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in your life you are going to face a situation

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>with your child where they disagree with what you are doing,

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>unless you run a militant operation at home, of which

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>there's all sorts of problems with, right.

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, like that society would be like a child

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 2>never backlashes against.

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You, exactly. So there's like two different views on the

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>same behavior. Where I think I find it, honestly bizarre,

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is the courage of people to leave negative comments so

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>publicly and openly. I would never.

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Imagine dming a mum that you didn't agree with looszi, like,

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 2>unless I would just never about like leaving a gun

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 2>in her child's bedroom, which even still I wouldn't respond,

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 2>But you know, unless it was a very obvious, blome,

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 2>black and white version of like, you know, negligence, I'm

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 2>not going there.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 3>And even then I'm still probably not going there.

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>I find it unbelievable that people feel so empowered and

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>so politically correct that their opinion is the rolid yeah,

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and they really stick by it. Like if someone's posting

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a reel of their day and what their life looks like,

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.839
<v Speaker 1>and you're navigating the complexities of having a tantrum and whatever,

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>let them be. If you don't like the content, don't comment,

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just go to.

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 3>The next Oh a way.

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I have something else that semi relates to this, and

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 2>this is that Mama Maya put up a piece that

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I saw that the title was along the lines of

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 2>if this feels like the longest school holidays you've ever had,

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 2>it is because they have been the longest, Like maybe

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 2>it was a few days longer than last year or whatever,

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 2>compared to you know, in relation to how the days

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>of the week are full, and maybe it's like, you know,

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 2>two days longer.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 3>Whatever.

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, I didn't really read the article, but I was

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 2>interested in the comments because there were a lot, and

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I noticed something batter within myself. So a lot of

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 2>the people wrote back, very peacefully, just saying they actually

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 2>haven't felt long. To me, I am dreading them ending

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 2>and that's lovely, that's like a nice opinion.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 3>No backlash tied to it.

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Then there was, of course the people that are like,

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 2>reality check, if you have kids, you're going to have

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 2>to parent them, like don't hate spending time with your child,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 2>or don't even bother having children.

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Now that's what we're going to do.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Which is absolutely not about But I find myself, even

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 2>though I haven't entered school holidays yet, I feel like

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 2>by the end of school holidays, I will be one

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 2>of those moms that's like, WHOA, love you so much,

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 2>had the best time with you, but I also need

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 2>you back in school.

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Why did I get triggered by even the peaceful versions

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>of people saying, oh no, I've really enjoyed this, Like

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the ones they weren't being nasty, they weren't being judgment

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 2>or they were just saying, oh, no, I've loved this period.

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Why does even that trigger me?

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Because I think it comes back to potentially me thinking

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 2>that's what makes a perfect mum as opposed to wanting

0:14:58.640 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 2>your kids to go back to school.

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 3>What did you think got on?

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>No, I think you've nailed it. That's exactly right. Innately,

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna feel like some form of guilty in some way,

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and it could be like I catch myself sometimes I'm like,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, it seems just driving me mad today,

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, like yesterday I had a really long day

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>with the kids, Like, yeah, it's one day, I get it.

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And it was a really nice morning. But then in

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the afternoon, Zay found a tomato sauce bottle. He literally,

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know how it happened. He squeezed into

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the storiere. Yeah, there was just everywhere, And all I

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>could think to myself is I took my eyes off

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you for two minutes to unload the laundry and hang

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it on the line, and now I have to clean

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>this Crap's like the next ten minutes. It's so fuch

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to use carve it in soores. I'm like, don't touch anything.

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And in that split moment, I was like, oh, this

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is so frustrating. And I did catch myself and I

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>spoke to a girlfriend. I'm like, oh my god, I'm

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>just so peeved, like I've fucking got tomato sauce everywhere.

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>She's like, yeah, kids are just hard, man. I'm like yes,

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And in that moment, that's what I need somebody to

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>say to me. Kids can be really hard. I love

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>being a mum, but if that friend it turned around

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a meeting laws, you should be grateful. You've got amazing kids. Mate.

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I know I am every day. That's a given. I

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>just need to vent and everybody's entitled to do that,

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's about your kids, your work, your body. Sometimes

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the chair that you're sitting in, whatever

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it might be. We are humans. We have fluctuations in

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>mood and tempereds in needs. Like, come on, let's just

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>give each other a little bit of grace and stop

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the negative comments when people do say something that maybe

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't picture perfect.

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that is a beautiful way to end this segment,

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 2>is that kids can be hard, and you are okay

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 2>if you don't love every single moment. So if you

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 2>crawl to the end of the finish line of those

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 2>school holidays, you do bloody good.

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Mum, well done.

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>The hidden bias in job applications Why women are being

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>turned off by the questions we don't ask men. A

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>recent news story made headlines when a female up of

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Defense Force was asked about her menstrual cycle as

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>part of the recruitment process. I see your face. Yes,

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>while this is extreme, it raises a larger issue. So

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the subtle and not so subtle ways the application process

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>still isn't designed with women in mind. Now, I want

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>to say, yes, this is an extreme situation, and of

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>course I'm very aware that there are some professions that

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>do need like a medical documental medical records when you apply.

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I am slightly confused by the menstrual cycle thing.

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Is it an interesting one?

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I'll just quickly almost go against my initial reaction. Part

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 2>of me wonders, is it like we want the workforce

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 2>to understand more what happens with menstrual cycles and menopause

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 2>and all of those things.

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Is there any way in which this is a positive

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Know unless they're doing training based on the phase that

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you're in of your mental instrumental.

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Sitting you in a classroom while you're during your period,

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 2>but then when you're lout tealing.

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 3>You are out there running. Like, if it's something like that,

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 3>maybe you can get around it. But you're going to

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 3>tell me more.

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely odd. And I will say, in this particular instance,

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this person was applying for a photography job, like, how

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is this relevant taking photos? I don't really understand, but

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it has raised the questions.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 3>So a photography job in the Defense Force? Is that

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 3>what you're saying? Yes, okay, that doesn't make any sense.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's odd.

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinly stop lining, like you are out there fighting. Yeah.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And in her defense, the Defense Force had said, it's

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>just a stock standard template. Yeah, get it mate, we're

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five now.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Like the application process, Yeah, if that's for specific people

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>have that question, like in specific job ads or in

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>specific job descriptions. But you don't need to be having

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that for everyone, Like, come on, this is in the

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties. You have the ability, yeah, to adopt your

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>PD or your recruitment process, not adopt to adapt your

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>application requirements to the candidate like that's just rubbish, But

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it had me thinking more about the bias in recruitment.

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So invasive questions aren't the only issue. Let's talk about

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the subtle gender bias that women face during the recruitment process,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, assumptions about their availability due to children or

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>maternity leave, etc. Studied by McKinsey and Company found that

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>women are at one point two times more likely to

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 1>be judged on their personal attributes during interviews, while men

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 1>are more likely to be judged on their professional experience.

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Interesting one, so the impact of poorly designed applications on

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>female candidates. How a lack of flexibility and job applications,

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>especially in terms of hours, remote work, and interview times,

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>often leads to women to opt out of applying. So

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>unless the job says like flexi or you know in

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>your case how you're looking specifically for part time, many

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>people won't even apply. I know that we've talked about it,

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>saying you can negotiate at the end, but so many

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>women are like no, that's just an absolute no go,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>which means we're not getting the right people in the

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 1>right jobs. And according to research by catalysts. Women are

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>more likely than men to quit the hiring process early

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>if they feel that the company's culture isn't family friendly

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>or inclusive. I would add a third one. There often

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>what happens is there is that unseen. And the other

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 1>thing that I would say is that we know that

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in the recruitment process, women are far less likely to

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>negotiate salary if a band isn't given. So we're already

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>doing it a service to ourselves, and so as a

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.959
<v Speaker 1>recruitment process, what could we do to make this better?

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>This is just a list that I've put together, my

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>own lists of ways that we could make the job

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>application process more inclusive and supportive, primarily of female applicants.

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Maternity leave transparency. I don't know about Ulu, but after

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I had Sienna and I was considering another job, I

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>found it really, really difficult to access companies' maternity leaf policies,

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>so which at the time, if I'm honest, was a

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>really really big factor for me. I want a job security.

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I also wanted to make sure that if I did

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>get pregnant within the next two years, they had a

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>policy that would support my return to work and also

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>pay me while I was on parental leave, and I

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>found that very very few organizations have this openly available.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it almost.

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Should be public knowledge, like it should be on a

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 2>public sort of record.

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, I find it strange too, because for those organizations

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that do have a parental leaf policy, even if it's

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>six weeks, two weeks, three weeks, whatever it might be,

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is it not something that you want to promote.

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I feel like they do offer in job ads, but

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 2>you're not across the board, you're saying it.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>No. They normally say unless it's a large organization that

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>has like sixteen weeks, so their top of the range.

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>If they're a smaller organization that offer less than sixteen weeks,

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe they offer four.

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they won't mention the creation, they'll just mention the

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 2>way something. You're totally right, I've seen that.

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>He yes, and four is better than nothing. It also

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>depends on your financial situation, right, So sometimes I was

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of thinking to myself, Okay, I don't need sixteen weeks, Like, yeah,

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that would be great, but I probably don't want to

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>work for the likes of, you know, that large organization.

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>But I would really like something so that I've got

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>some form of income that I could take it half

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>pay for an extended period of weeks. So if companies

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that I was interested at the time advertised, we've got

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>four weeks of paid parental leave with a likelihood to

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>review this and increase it, right, I mean they're not

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>promising anything, but they're suggesting that there. It's front of

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>mind for that organization. I would have probably applied for it.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, more visibility, just give me when you're doing so

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 2>much digging.

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Also, you to ask a question like that in an

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>interview process, or even if you're the preferred applicant, Hey,

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>what's your maternity leave policy?

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 3>You will it because you're a confident person. So even

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 3>you don't do it, Yeah, because you never know. That's

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the scary thing.

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 2>It's like we want to say in twenty twenty five

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:01.719
<v Speaker 2>that you should be able to but you never know

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 2>what sort of hiring manager that person is and what

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 2>they're thinking deep down. It's so unfair, but it's another

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 2>form of the unconscious bias that females face often.

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the flexibility now is and location. I mean,

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we've heart done about this a freeing million times, but

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>as we know, many women are still balancing caregiving responsibilities.

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>And flexible hours or remote work options can be a

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>game changer for encouraging those people to apply for a role.

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.239
<v Speaker 1>When companies aren't advertising it or aren't even suggesting that

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the work can be done for the right applicant remotely

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>or on a part time basis, they're excluding half the

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>candidate pool totally.

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Like, I'm not even applying for jobs that say they're

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 2>on site five days a week because I'm like, there

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 2>are too many things that I need to negotiate.

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 3>I want to try and get a three.

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Day a week role and it has to be a

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 2>hybrid model, So that immediately just makes me go, there's

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 2>literally too much to negotiate.

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's no way they're going to give you the job.

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't even apply.

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Why would you put in there open to negotiation for

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the right candidate, Yes, it's easy.

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 2>All you're doing then, is getting a bigger talent, bigger

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 2>poolge to draw from.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The other thing I've seen in time and time

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>again that I think is really prohibiting women from applying

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>for roles is progression paths or learning and development opportunities.

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, women often feel that career progression can be

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>slow or less transparent. Due to maternity leave or family commitments,

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>if the employer clearly outlined potential career paths and the

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>company's approach to career progression for all employees. So I'm

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>not just saying women, including those who may take time

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>off atterney leave or family care, this would make life

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>so much easier, like so much so many organizations.

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Of how you grow Yeah, changes.

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So many people have a stipend at their company that

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>if they actually promote it, you'd be like, oh, how

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>good I can access like a stipend of one thousand

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year as a benefit to put towards career

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>progression within the company. Or maybe they say, you know,

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we're doing an intensive training program at the eighteen month

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>mark to help you develop and grow into other areas

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of the business that maybe of interest. Hello, it's so great.

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>For camaraderie those things too, Like I remember where we

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 2>had a day with two Channel nine journalists doing reporting

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 2>to camera training at Cricket Australia and it was so

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 2>beneficial and it still stands out as like one of

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 2>my best learning days. So it's not even just about

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 2>what it does for your career wise, it's really good

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 2>for like getting your group together and having a bit

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 2>of camaraderie outside of just drinking together, Like it's a

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 2>whole another experience that you can bring to your team,

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 2>and it makes you feel like you're growing within your team.

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 2>It makes you feel welcome there and like they want

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 2>you to stay there, and therefore you want to stay there.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and my other big thing, which I know I

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>harp on about twenty four to seven, is that return

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to work peace. If you are a large organization with

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a female workforce, even if it's twenty percent of your

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>workforce anyone, and you need to grow that target of

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the number of females. I find it so fascinating to

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>look at videos about women who have returned to work

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>at that organization, or a positive testimonial. I am a

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>marketing director, I have three young children. This workplace was

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>so supportive on my return to work. It's enabled me

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to enhance my career in the following areas. Like imagine

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>how powerful that would be.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you love a bit of a video testimonial, don't you.

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I do, but I also think, but I

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>see what you're saying.

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 2>It brings human to the workplace too, Like we're all

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 2>humans let's share the stories.

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, and so many women in the workplace are mums,

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and yet the stories that we tell usually are of

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>like cadets, like people just starting out in their careers.

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Don't talk about a graduate program. I'm like, dude, I'm

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>looking for a job with three children as in, but

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that ain't going to suit me. I love that you're

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>offering all this development when you're eighteen, but what about

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>when you're returning or switching careers, what are you offering?

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 2>Then it's an interesting one too, because if you're a

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 2>dad in a mum dad relationship or even a dad

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 2>dad relationship, if you're the secondary caregiver and you are

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 2>someone that wants to be more present at home and

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 2>to share more of the load, you're also going to

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 2>get better dads applying for jobs too, because they're going

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 2>to see how family friendly you are and that you've

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 2>got this drive to acknowledge that families exist and that

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:13.239
<v Speaker 2>you need to cater for that.

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 3>So it's actually probably going to increase your talent for

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 3>both male and fit that.

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one hundred percent, couldn't agree more. The whole process

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>needs to be overhauled. We need to be not asking

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>women about their bodies in the interview process. That's just

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>an absolute given. And if there are benefits for women,

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>even if they're small, even if you think, oh, I

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this will get me over the line,

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>likelihood is at the moment, from what I've seen, very

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 1>few companies are doing producing external campaigns that really encourage

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>women to apply. So by doing a small change by

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>instead of having a graduate speak about how great the

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 1>graduate program is, perhaps you could have a mum that

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>talks about has supported the environment was when they returned

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>to work, would be so much more of a flex

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly at a senior level. You're wanting senior women in

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>leadership positions. How are we targeting but women age thirty plus?

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly right.

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I would love to know in our DMS or email

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 2>us at Hello, at ready or not dot au what

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 2>has stood out to anyone as a mum applying for

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 2>a job. If you have a good story about something

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 2>that stood out to you that made you think that

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 2>you would be really welcome in that workplace, we would

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 2>love to hear. We need to speak to the mums.

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 2>That's the way to get them into environments that are inclusive.

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 2>I love this, Lossy I think that wraps us up.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 2>We're quite quick today. Good for us Short.

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And Sweet at my friend. It has been a busy week,

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>so this is a good thing.

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I actually am very happy with Short and Sweet because

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I just came off from a recording with Beyond the

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Bumps so I'm going to be Beyond the Bumps soon, which.

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Is very Oh yes, of course, a.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Longtime friend of mine.

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 2>We went to primary school together, literally started prep together, so.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 3>I've known her for a long time now. Really fun

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 3>chatting to them.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 2>We chatted for ages because we had a few technical glitches,

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>but we were recording for an hour and forty five minutes.

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 3>So you and I going short today. It's good because

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone could use less of my voice as if.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>If you have loved listening to today's episode, please leave

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>us a positive review or just any review and follow

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>us on Bready on our dot pode next week