Speaker 1: On Scorn Louds Australia.
Speaker 2: This is the reader Panety Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the REATA Pannecky show coming
Speaker 3: up tonight. Premier disenter Alan jard at the Bush Summitt
Speaker 3: in Bendigo. Why will locals in our own electorate fed
Speaker 3: up with the Victorian premieur speak to doctor Joanna Howe
Speaker 3: about the disturbing, chilling testimony of a brave nurse who
Speaker 3: detailed how Australian newborns who are unwanted are treated in
Speaker 3: our hospitals. We'll bring you the latest from the US
Speaker 3: with James Morrow.
Speaker 4: And we always leave a little time.
Speaker 3: For lefties losing it. Even the lefties are mocking the Democrats.
Speaker 5: The Democrats and people who prosecuted sexual predators and.
Speaker 3: Joining me now a Sky News contributor prove mcswede prove.
Speaker 3: Victorian Premier just Inter Allen was at the Bush Summit
Speaker 3: in Bendigo, her electorate and it didn't go well. She
Speaker 3: gave a lengthy speech, but then she was heckled by
Speaker 3: locals furious with the high cost of energy and the
Speaker 3: manner in which renewable projects are impacting their communities.
Speaker 6: It also provides not just a more secure form of energy.
Speaker 6: It's a cheaper form of energy. We're nearly at forty percent.
Speaker 6: So how do we get excuse ladies and generains.
Speaker 3: What are we going to do to get this sector well?
Speaker 1: Jameson of the.
Speaker 6: Community, with respect to the audience, I am going to
Speaker 6: finish that sentence. Victoria has the lowest amongst the lowest
Speaker 6: wholesale energy prices in the national energy market.
Speaker 3: National Senator Bridget McKenzie was also at the Bush summit
Speaker 3: and she responded to Premier Allan's claims.
Speaker 7: For the Premier to sit in this town and tell
Speaker 7: this audience on the TV and in this room that
Speaker 7: being serious about climate change means you need to.
Speaker 8: Trash our ability.
Speaker 7: To produce food in this country, I think says everything
Speaker 7: you need to know about the Labor Party. If you
Speaker 7: want to be a prosperous, sustainable and sovereign country in
Speaker 7: twenty ninety, you're not going to do it with wind
Speaker 7: and solar renewables. You're going to do it with a
Speaker 7: baslow power generation that is net zero emissions like nuclear
Speaker 7: power generation.
Speaker 3: Prue. This is a huge issue in regional areas throughout
Speaker 3: the country where they're not being consulted. When they are consulted,
Speaker 3: their views are disregarded and they're having these projects inflicted
Speaker 3: on their communities. And as an Australian, I don't live
Speaker 3: in the bush, but I do travel around the country,
Speaker 3: and the damage being done to the natural environment, never
Speaker 3: mind the cost of it, is a I just wonder
Speaker 3: if city people don't really know what's happening out there,
Speaker 3: and once they find out, I think they're going to
Speaker 3: be just as furious at the damage being done to
Speaker 3: our beautiful countryside.
Speaker 1: I agree with you, Rita. You know, the Regional Australia.
Speaker 1: Regional Australia has been the poor cousin of the city
Speaker 1: slickers for so long, but it's great to see that
Speaker 1: they're now starting to become more vocal. I mean, they're
Speaker 1: not buying this clap trap that this government and all
Speaker 1: the labor governments are selling, which of course is that
Speaker 1: renewable story. The narrative just doesn't work. They're seeing with
Speaker 1: their own eyes how the environment is being destroyed, how
Speaker 1: they have been relegated to second class citizens, that they
Speaker 1: can't even afford to produce because of the cost of energy,
Speaker 1: and the fact that their farms in a lot of
Speaker 1: cases are being decimated, you know, obtained by the government
Speaker 1: for the environment, and then they plow through kilometers of
Speaker 1: Christine Environment great agricultural land to put in their transmission lines.
Speaker 1: So it's happening in the bush. But I think also
Speaker 1: we're seeing as we did in Northern Territory, and we'll
Speaker 1: see in Queensland. I think Australians generally are onto the
Speaker 1: scam and it won't be long before labor will learn
Speaker 1: a very hard lesson. But of course in the meantime
Speaker 1: they're ruining this country and the economy.
Speaker 3: Well, I can tell you I was there in Bendigo
Speaker 3: this morning. The crowd listened politely for quite a length
Speaker 3: of time to the speech and then the interview that
Speaker 3: we saw a little bit of there. But when she
Speaker 3: started talking about this is a cheaper form of energy,
Speaker 3: I think it was just it was all they could
Speaker 3: cope with. And I don't blame a few of them
Speaker 3: for making their feelings known because they've been ignored. This
Speaker 3: is what what we keep hearing, that they are actually
Speaker 3: voicing their opinions, and those opinions they don't care about
Speaker 3: it that the city slickers come in. They've got a
Speaker 3: plan and they implemented and the locals are really they're
Speaker 3: treated like a nuisance. Now let's go to the UK.
Speaker 3: A woman in London is fighting for her life in
Speaker 3: hospital after being one of three people stabbed actually Nottinghill Carnival.
Speaker 3: Former Scotland Yard detective Mike Neville said the notting Hill
Speaker 3: Carnival is the ultimate example of two tier policing that've
Speaker 3: had lots of problems at this particular event over the years.
Speaker 3: There's allegations offices are too scared to make arrests or
Speaker 3: check for weapons at the Caribbean Carnival for fear of
Speaker 3: looking racist. The same goes for segments of the media.
Speaker 4: It has to be said, prou.
Speaker 3: Here is a report from sky News UK last hour.
Speaker 9: They've given us an update that they've made thirty eight
Speaker 9: arrests and recovered four knives and they said a man
Speaker 9: believed to be in his twenties has been stabbed. His
Speaker 9: injuries are not life threatening, but overall it's been a
Speaker 9: really peaceful and enjoyable.
Speaker 3: Day for people, mostly peaceful stabbing Prough. I mean, it's
Speaker 3: almost a comedy routine, but they just have got this
Speaker 3: approach where they were treated very differently. If the ethnic
Speaker 3: background of those party goers was different. How did the
Speaker 3: UK get here? May mean this is just racist, is
Speaker 3: what it is. You can call it reverse racism, positive discrimination,
Speaker 3: it's all the same thing.
Speaker 8: It's racism.
Speaker 1: Well we're seeing it here too, Reta. I mean in UK,
Speaker 1: of course, we've seen so much tolerance by the police
Speaker 1: turning a blind eye to what's going on with all
Speaker 1: the protests and they're concerned about allegations of racism or
Speaker 1: racial profiling. They're racially motivated protests and this is the
Speaker 1: problem that we're seeing it here in Australia and around
Speaker 1: the world, where police tiptoe around it, and you know,
Speaker 1: it all comes down to the question of whether there
Speaker 1: is enough ability to integrate in these countries anymore. With
Speaker 1: this alarming amount of immigration, the are porous borders that
Speaker 1: people who live in the West are wondering how these
Speaker 1: cultures are ever going to blend and live in harmony.
Speaker 3: All they need to do is just treat everybody the same,
Speaker 3: So you just apply the law and you don't make
Speaker 3: special compensations for people because of their background. I mean,
Speaker 3: that is the least we should be expecting from authorities,
Speaker 3: including the police force. But You're right, we're seeing signs
Speaker 3: of it right here Australia and should it be stamped
Speaker 3: out very quickly. Let's talk about the ABC. We're getting
Speaker 3: an insight into what led to the resignation of Managing
Speaker 3: director David Anderson. The Australian reports Anderson had a difference
Speaker 3: of opinion with ABC check Kim Williams over the recent
Speaker 3: Four Corners investigation into the workplace culture at seven seven networker.
Speaker 3: Multiple sources told The Australian that Williams expressed a view
Speaker 3: that the episode, fronted by investigative reporter Louise Milligan, failed
Speaker 3: to meet the high editorial standards of Four Corners. Mister
Speaker 3: Anderson and his Director of News and Current Affairs, Justin Stevens,
Speaker 3: thought otherwise, well, Anderson.
Speaker 8: Is gone or going?
Speaker 3: What do you make of this development?
Speaker 1: Well, having seen Kim Williams in action before, I found
Speaker 1: it really interesting and refreshing that this government appointed him
Speaker 1: to that position because he wouldn't tolerate the nonsenses going
Speaker 1: on in the ABC. And yeah, he was very quick
Speaker 1: to specify what the rules the new order was going
Speaker 1: to be and from that, of course, David Anderson was
Speaker 1: a dead man walking as will probably some of the
Speaker 1: so called stars of the ABC, who I think feel
Speaker 1: that they are born to rule and that it's their
Speaker 1: way or the highway for anyone who wants to change it.
Speaker 1: Kim William Williams is a force to be reckoned with.
Speaker 1: So I think it will be fascinating to see what
Speaker 1: happens and how this unfolds. But we may be as
Speaker 1: taxpayers starting to get more bang for our buck down
Speaker 1: the track.
Speaker 3: I think you're getting very optimistic there proof. I think
Speaker 3: the ABC is by the staff for the staff, and
Speaker 3: I think in the end they always get their way. Now,
Speaker 3: this is a worrying story, not surprising. Afghanistan under the
Speaker 3: Taliban continues to be a horror show for women. They're
Speaker 3: now banning women from even looking at a man who
Speaker 3: she's not related to, and girls remain banned from secondary school.
Speaker 10: Afghan women are now banned from showing their faces or
Speaker 10: speaking out loud in public, and they can't even look
Speaker 10: at a man that they're not related to. It's part
Speaker 10: of a new law passed by the Taliban, the hardline
Speaker 10: Islamic group that has ruled Afghanistan since Western forces left
Speaker 10: in twenty twenty one. The rules say a woman must
Speaker 10: cover her body and face in public to avoid tempting others.
Speaker 10: They also ban women from singing or reading aloud in
Speaker 10: public and make it illegal for anyone to play music through.
Speaker 3: The Taliban claim that this new set of laws is
Speaker 3: going to promote virtue.
Speaker 1: You know, the patriarchy is alive and well and thriving,
Speaker 1: not just in the Middle East, which is more like
Speaker 1: the Middle Ages as we know, but also in the West.
Speaker 1: This oppression of these women in the Middle East is
Speaker 1: just so distressing, but it is part of their culture
Speaker 1: and I cannot see you know now the Western forces
Speaker 1: left what in twenty twenty one, leaving billions of dollars.
Speaker 1: This was Biden, of course, leaving all this million, multimillion
Speaker 1: dollar equipment for them to avail themselves of. And we
Speaker 1: of course are seeing here in Australia women are being oppressed.
Speaker 1: They're being denied their actual female the feminine biological birthright
Speaker 1: these days. So it's alive and well and thriving throughout
Speaker 1: the world. But you obviously feel very sad for these
Speaker 1: women in Afghanistan, These young girls who can't go to school,
Speaker 1: have no real future, while Talaban are in power and
Speaker 1: I don't know that America or any of the Western
Speaker 1: countries would have the fortitude or willingness to step in
Speaker 1: and try and change it now and prove.
Speaker 3: One of the things that has always appalled me about
Speaker 3: the feminist movement, the modern feminist movement, not only are
Speaker 3: they not standing with women in the West who are
Speaker 3: fighting for their sex based rights, trying to protect their sports,
Speaker 3: their areas where the we're talking about change rooms, shelters,
Speaker 3: websites that might want to be women only, but they're
Speaker 3: not doing anything to really advocate for the most oppressed
Speaker 3: women in the world, and that is the ones who
Speaker 3: are living under Islam, where they are second class citizens,
Speaker 3: they are systematically subjugated. You look at the treatment of
Speaker 3: women in Afghanistan and you don't see rallies, you don't
Speaker 3: see efforts to put pressure on that government to have boycotts.
Speaker 3: It just doesn't seem to be top of mind for
Speaker 3: the Sisterhood.
Speaker 1: Well, I think the Sisterhood's very selective, aren't they about
Speaker 1: who they will advocate for, and very much pick and choose.
Speaker 1: But you're right, the world's standing by appalled at what
Speaker 1: we're seeing. But whether they think it's just too hard
Speaker 1: Biden and the West tried to take on well clear
Speaker 1: out the Taliban, but of course cut and run and
Speaker 1: empowered them even more.
Speaker 3: Pre McSween thanks for your time tonight. This year's Naplan
Speaker 3: results revealed one in three Australian students are failing to
Speaker 3: meet basic proficiency benchmarks, with nearly half a million pupils
Speaker 3: requiring intervention to help them catch up. Joining me now
Speaker 3: is the IPA's national manager of that class action program,
Speaker 3: Colleen Harken. Colleen Education Unions and more than one state
Speaker 3: education minister says the answer to this is more funding.
Speaker 3: Is that how you say it?
Speaker 11: No, Look, in the last fifteen years, the budget for
Speaker 11: education has more than doubled, so we're at seventy nine
Speaker 11: billion dollars a year now, and in that same period
Speaker 11: our results have gone backwards. So a teenager, a fifteen
Speaker 11: year old is now about fourteen or fifteen months behind
Speaker 11: where they were sixteen years ago. So money is actually
Speaker 11: clearly not the issue. What really needs to happen is
Speaker 11: an address of how the teachers are taught. IPA's research
Speaker 11: shows it about a year and a third of an
Speaker 11: university teacher training course is full of woke decolonization, all
Speaker 11: of that sort of stuff. So the teacher has not
Speaker 11: been trained properly to do the job that they're supposed
Speaker 11: to be able to do, and explicit teaching is not
Speaker 11: being a focus. So it's the effect of money versus
Speaker 11: results is not there. What actually has to happen is
Speaker 11: an address of where the problem starts and that doesn't
Speaker 11: cost money, that will actually save us money.
Speaker 3: But we've known this for so long I think anyone
Speaker 3: who is not a leftist activist would acknowledge the curriculum
Speaker 3: is a problem. It has just been hijacked by social
Speaker 3: engineering and politics and isn't really focused on academic excellence.
Speaker 3: But how do we do something about it because we
Speaker 3: had a supposedly conservative federal government in for decade and
Speaker 3: didn't really do much to fix the curriculum.
Speaker 11: No, and the national curriculum actually specifically states that Aboriginal
Speaker 11: and Torres Straate Island's history and culture and sustainability are
Speaker 11: the priorities. Yeah, it doesn't state that children learning to
Speaker 11: read and write and be competent and not have a
Speaker 11: third of the nation's children. Failing that doesn't sort of
Speaker 11: seem to be that the message is not getting through.
Speaker 3: And the contentious, divisive activism that is pushed onto vulnerable children,
Speaker 3: impressionable children, often with their parents really ignorant. A lot
Speaker 3: of parents don't know what's happening in the classroom. Of
Speaker 3: course they speak to their kids. I might see the
Speaker 3: homework they're doing, but the day to day content of
Speaker 3: their curriculum. I think a lot of people would be
Speaker 3: shocked by just how political it is when you'd expect
Speaker 3: them just to be taught facts and how to think
Speaker 3: about things critically rather than what to think.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 11: Absolutely, most parents would be quite unaware of what their
Speaker 11: children are being taught. And that's because what they call
Speaker 11: the cross curriculum priorities, that it is mandated that there's
Speaker 11: no subject that's called ideology or colonization or climate emergency,
Speaker 11: but it's embedded into every subject, at every year level,
Speaker 11: at every opportunity. And no young child is going to
Speaker 11: come home and say, I learned how to count today
Speaker 11: through aboriginal dance. But that's actually what's happening. And the
Speaker 11: parents who do, who are alluded to this, are actually
Speaker 11: finding out after the damage has already been done, When
Speaker 11: young children as young as five and six are going
Speaker 11: home crying about the Stolen Generation, for example, and they've
Speaker 11: been taught that within reading or within equity inclusion and
Speaker 11: all these sorts of things. So it's highly politicized, or.
Speaker 3: They're needing psychological care because they have climate anxiety. I've
Speaker 3: spoken to child's psychologists about this. They actually treat kids
Speaker 3: who should be well. They are the most privileged, luckiest
Speaker 3: kids in the world really to be living in Australia
Speaker 3: at a time of peace and prosperity, but their mental
Speaker 3: health is damaged because they're basically told the world's ending
Speaker 3: and them and everyone they love is going to die.
Speaker 12: It is just.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's borderline child abuse if you ask me. Now,
Speaker 3: I want to ask you about this University of Melbourne
Speaker 3: study that has found some classroom layouts, including the very
Speaker 3: fashionable open classroom model, well it's apparently negatively affecting literacy.
Speaker 3: The lead researcher, Professor Gary Rand, said he was shocked
Speaker 3: by the strength of the findings and the clear difference
Speaker 3: in academic achievement between the two settings. So sixty five
Speaker 3: percent of the kids developed their literacy at a faster
Speaker 3: rate when they were in an enclosed classroom. So the
Speaker 3: results were very really quite striking and surprising. He said,
Speaker 3: this is pretty compelling data. What percentage of classrooms do
Speaker 3: we know are this open plan model? Because I know
Speaker 3: it is fashionable and popular.
Speaker 11: Yeah, so it's a i'll call it a fad that's
Speaker 11: been around for decades and it's based on an allegiance
Speaker 11: to a flawed ideology that children are actually the masters
Speaker 11: of their own learning. So this inquiry learning sort of
Speaker 11: scenario where you sit around in groups and there might
Speaker 11: be multiple groups and multiple classrooms. Some of these classrooms
Speaker 11: have up to one hundred children Oh great in them,
Speaker 11: and I mean we've all been in busy restaurants and
Speaker 11: shopping centers that make it very difficult to hear, and
Speaker 11: how exhausting that is, and how exhausting it is to concentrate.
Speaker 11: And what's really interesting is most of these open playing
Speaker 11: classrooms are found with young children whose auditory skills are
Speaker 11: still developing and they don't even yet have the language
Speaker 11: skills to fill the gaps if they didn't hear. So
Speaker 11: that research has there's been you know, research previously, but
Speaker 11: that's a Melbourne based one and again it reinforces the
Speaker 11: fact that these environments are not helpful to the children
Speaker 11: in those classrooms.
Speaker 3: Yeah, this whole student led teaching is recipe for failure. Now,
Speaker 3: a review into the future of Victoria's into school sporting
Speaker 3: program is underway, aiming to shift the focus away from
Speaker 3: year round team sports and competitions things like football and rowing,
Speaker 3: and instead focus more on things like yoga and plati is.
Speaker 3: The Associated Public c School's sporting program is seeking to
Speaker 3: remove heightened senses of competition amongst private schools by embracing
Speaker 3: more recreational sports and activities. Calling this one has got
Speaker 3: parents at private schools fired up like nothing else. What
Speaker 3: do you make of this?
Speaker 11: And understandably because parents who choose to send their children
Speaker 11: to an independent school they know well ahead that Saturday
Speaker 11: morning sport is part of the deal. And it's been
Speaker 11: known for a long time sporting activity is good for
Speaker 11: mental health and physical health, and that there's a lot
Speaker 11: to be learned from competitive sport, resilience, team effort, failure,
Speaker 11: all of those sorts of you know, good skills, expl
Speaker 11: turning up to correcting, being on the getting out of bed,
Speaker 11: no off you go. So they're all terrific skills. But
Speaker 11: what this is really interesting is it's an example of
Speaker 11: another breakdown of social cohesion, because what these schools do
Speaker 11: very well is build a sense of positive community spirit.
Speaker 11: Children who go out of these schools love to represent
Speaker 11: their school. Where there's school colors, they go and support
Speaker 11: each other. You see it all the time in the
Speaker 11: people don't like to refer to it, but the old
Speaker 11: boys they love it right. So they're building a positive
Speaker 11: framework about their community. And this is just an example
Speaker 11: of breaking down that social cohesion.
Speaker 3: I just do not see the upside. I don't know
Speaker 3: why they would even contemplate this. There's a plenty of downside.
Speaker 3: And you know, at the end of the day, if
Speaker 3: there's a particular kid who doesn't want to participate, then
Speaker 3: that's a choice the family can make. But like you said,
Speaker 3: you send your kids to these schools partly because of
Speaker 3: the sporting programs and everything that brings to a child's life.
Speaker 3: Colleen har Can thank you so much for your time.
Speaker 3: It's no problem still to come. Left is losing it
Speaker 3: and lies, damn lies, and the Democrats. James Morrow will
Speaker 3: be here to unhappily later to make.
Speaker 8: Years welcome back.
Speaker 3: Now it's time for lefties losing it. Let's start lefties
Speaker 3: with a little frivolity, and you know, despite the North
Speaker 3: Korean style media campaign, the Democrats are in trouble when
Speaker 3: even John Stewart is mocking the DNC and he's lefty
Speaker 3: crowd are lapping it up.
Speaker 5: They had a guy yelling screw the billionaires.
Speaker 13: Followed immediately by a very happy billionaire.
Speaker 5: It's all okay.
Speaker 10: If it's our billionaire.
Speaker 3: They had guys.
Speaker 10: Making fun of people for going to Yale, and a
Speaker 10: bunch of people who.
Speaker 3: Went to Yale.
Speaker 13: The Democrats had people who prosecuted sexual predators.
Speaker 3: And that was actually funny. I'm as shocked as anybody now.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure what this next clip is, but I
Speaker 3: find it weird and wrong. Can we stop trying to
Speaker 3: sexualize kids? Just who is this aimed at?
Speaker 8: I am gay? Are your name? And if not, would
Speaker 8: you like to.
Speaker 14: Try to be gay?
Speaker 2: We're taking new applications and it's really fun.
Speaker 14: You get magical powers and free honey buns. Your mom
Speaker 14: is gay and so is your dad.
Speaker 10: If you're not gay, it's.
Speaker 3: Really too bad, weird, weird. You'll remember the infamous reporting
Speaker 3: from CNN claiming that the BLM riots were fiery but
Speaker 3: mostly peaceful. What's more, peaceful than entire buildings destroyed. But
Speaker 3: over in the UK they are also borrowing from this playbook.
Speaker 9: And in the last hour they've given us an update
Speaker 9: that they've made thirty eight arrests and recovered four knives,
Speaker 9: and they said a man believed to be in his
Speaker 9: twenties has been stabbed. His injuries are not life threatening,
Speaker 9: but overall it's been a really peaceful and enjoyable date.
Speaker 3: Mostly peaceful and enjoyable. Stabbings wonderful, and guess what, there
Speaker 3: are a couple more stabbings later that day. Now to
Speaker 3: more words lefties losing it want to ban by deeming
Speaker 3: them racist akin to using the N word. It won't
Speaker 3: surprise you that the list is utterly ridiculous and designed
Speaker 3: to protect race bats and DEI advocates from criticism.
Speaker 15: Ten ways you say the N word without seeing the
Speaker 15: N word. If you use any of these terms or
Speaker 15: phrases in reference to black people, you are just as
Speaker 15: racist as the person that actually uses the N word.
Speaker 15: Here are the words doug, ghetto, welfare, queen, lazi, spader,
Speaker 15: race scrifter, threatening, angry, dangerous, or you say that we're
Speaker 15: playing the victim, or we are a diversity higher. What
Speaker 15: you actually mean to say is the N word. Just
Speaker 15: stop it. If you say these words are phrases, you
Speaker 15: were calling us the N word. If you say these
Speaker 15: ignorant racist terms or phrases around your children, you're also
Speaker 15: teaching your children to be racist, just like you.
Speaker 3: Now, more lefties losing it with my next guess. We
Speaker 3: heard a lot of lies of the DNC, from Biden
Speaker 3: repeating the fine People hoax again, to Kamala's Pinocchio performance,
Speaker 3: to Michelle Obama telling the crowd Trump wants to outlaw IVF,
Speaker 3: but Trump seems to climb.
Speaker 7: Otherwise taking away our freedom to control our bodies, the
Speaker 7: freedom to become a mother through iv F, Like I.
Speaker 5: Did, we want to make it easier for mothers and
Speaker 5: families to have babies, not harder. That includes supporting the
Speaker 5: availability of fertility treatments like IVF in every state in America.
Speaker 5: Like the overwhelming majority of Americans, including the vast majority
Speaker 5: of Republicans, Conservatives, Christians, and pro life Americans, I strongly
Speaker 5: support the availability of IVF for couples who are trying
Speaker 5: to have a precious baby.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is Guy News, host of The US Report.
Speaker 3: Am I Outsider's co host James Morrow. James, there was
Speaker 3: a great deal of victriol at the Democratic National Convention,
Speaker 3: a lot of lies. But what sort of a boost
Speaker 3: did it give the Democrats? And who do I believe there?
Speaker 3: Because I'm hearing two very different accounts about the Republican
Speaker 3: stance on IVF and Donald Trump's stance on IVF.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, Donald Trump laid it out right there.
Speaker 2: And there's this whole thing that the Democrats are trying
Speaker 2: to lean into, this idea that the Republicans have some
Speaker 2: whole plan to ban abortion, that Donald Trump's a huge
Speaker 2: social conservative on that score. I mean, if you look
Speaker 2: at Donald Trump in his personal life, you know, I
Speaker 2: just don't think that he's a kind of a medal
Speaker 2: in the bedroom with government kind of guy. But the
Speaker 2: thing is that the Democrats, they are leading very much
Speaker 2: into the whole abortion reproductive rights issue simply because for them,
Speaker 2: they've decided to rebrand themselves as a party of freedom.
Speaker 2: And yet this is literally the only thing where they
Speaker 2: want to remove restrictions on anything. You know, the Democrats
Speaker 2: are all about creating new rules, new bureaucracies, new restrictions
Speaker 2: on all sorts of human activities. I mean, you know,
Speaker 2: right down to you know, the showerhead you use and
Speaker 2: what you use to cook your food and what car
Speaker 2: you drive to work and all of this sort of thing.
Speaker 2: So there's a real double game they're playing there. And
Speaker 2: the thing is they can get away though, with these
Speaker 2: sort of lives about what the GOP platform is because
Speaker 2: they are not being fact checked on this at all.
Speaker 2: The President care the press is carrying water for them,
Speaker 2: and they say, oh, well, you know, like whatever, our
Speaker 2: job now is to get Harris over the line.
Speaker 3: That seems to be the number one priority for the
Speaker 3: overwhelming majority of the US media. They're not even shy
Speaker 3: about it. It's North Korean style antics. Really, it's this
Speaker 3: sort of thing you would expect from state media in
Speaker 3: North Korea. Now let's talk about Robert F. Kennedy endorsing Trump.
Speaker 3: I'm still unsure about what this will mean for the
Speaker 3: Trump campaign, and I don't think you can expect to
Speaker 3: see all his supporters simply switching to Trump. Maybe I
Speaker 3: know some of them won't even bother voting. But before
Speaker 3: I get your analysis, let's listen to Kennedy explain why
Speaker 3: he left the Democrats.
Speaker 14: It'll become the Party of war, censorship, corruption, big farmer,
Speaker 14: big tech, big egg and big money. Wanted abandoned democracy
Speaker 14: by canceling the primary to see you that I decline
Speaker 14: of the sitting president. I left the party.
Speaker 3: The Party of war, censorship and corruption. James, what impact
Speaker 3: will Kennedy's endorsement have, Well.
Speaker 2: I think what it's going to do. The analysis that
Speaker 2: I've seen shows that Kennedy voters will probably break about
Speaker 2: three to two for Trump. So there's a small boost
Speaker 2: there in some of those swing states. It could make
Speaker 2: quite a difference, of course, because you know, it's like
Speaker 2: with our marginal electorates in Australia. You know, this is
Speaker 2: this is where it actually matters. It's not about the
Speaker 2: popular votes but getting over the line in different states.
Speaker 2: But what Kennedy said there was a complete break with
Speaker 2: the Democratic Party, and I think the diagnosis that he
Speaker 2: made was largely correct. I mean it is, as I
Speaker 2: suggest before, the Democrats, who really are all about, you know,
Speaker 2: controlling the narrative, controlling the media, controlling social media, controlling
Speaker 2: what people can say, controlling what people can think. You know,
Speaker 2: whether it's through wokeness and political correctness in HR or
Speaker 2: whether it is through more sinister things you've seen, like
Speaker 2: you know, the way the White House worked with Twitter
Speaker 2: before it was owned by Elon Musk and Facebook to
Speaker 2: dial down stories that were unflattering to the Biden family
Speaker 2: and stories about COVID and things like that. You know,
Speaker 2: so Kennedy is really right there. I mean, he's basically
Speaker 2: taking a kind of a libertarian position possibly on some things,
Speaker 2: will be you know, further out there on a lot
Speaker 2: of other things. But you know, like I kind of
Speaker 2: not hugely bothered by that because he's not doesn't have
Speaker 2: an official position. He's throwing his support to Trump. And
Speaker 2: if you want to talk about Bonker's positions, just look
Speaker 2: at the Democrat Party platform, which Kamala Harris has inherited.
Speaker 3: Well, look at her VP pick and his track record
Speaker 3: never mind hers. But again, the media uninterested in really
Speaker 3: scrutinizing any of that. In fact, they've gone out of
Speaker 3: their way to rebrand Kamala as some amazing leader when
Speaker 3: a couple of months ago she was the problem. She
Speaker 3: will one of the Biden Whitehouse's biggest problems.
Speaker 8: How long will.
Speaker 3: This honeymoon last? Though, because there has to be a
Speaker 3: point where you would hope that questions would be asked
Speaker 3: about her track record, her performance, what she really stands for,
Speaker 3: because we're getting again this play where she's the tough prosecutor,
Speaker 3: But then we know the state of California and law
Speaker 3: enforcement there and the impact she had whilst she was
Speaker 3: a g So, I mean, that's at odds with her
Speaker 3: being a law and order figure. How are they going
Speaker 3: to bamboozle the American people all the way to November.
Speaker 2: Well, they're using the vibe. This is all politics of
Speaker 2: the vibe. It is the vibe of the thing, as
Speaker 2: we say in Australia. Know, this is the thing. They
Speaker 2: are basically actively avoiding doing anything that might break this
Speaker 2: spell of you know, joy and the other people are weird,
Speaker 2: you know, and all this kind of mean girl in
Speaker 2: group high school politics, which is basically what it comes
Speaker 2: down to what they're trying to practice here. It's now
Speaker 2: I think was it's the twenty twenty sixth of August.
Speaker 2: They had said a couple of weeks ago that Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris would do would do a sit down interview by
Speaker 2: the end of the month. Well, the end of the
Speaker 2: month is coming up on us fast. I don't see
Speaker 2: the media much except for a few people really baying
Speaker 2: for that sort of scrutiny. I don't think they want
Speaker 2: to give her that scrutiny because Kamala Harris as soon
Speaker 2: as she starts to talk off script, you know, and
Speaker 2: has to start defending things, and we're talking about things like,
Speaker 2: you know, price controls. She floated that the other day,
Speaker 2: taxes on your unearned or unrealized capital gains, which is bonkers,
Speaker 2: higher corporate taxes, and a lot of stuff in the
Speaker 2: DNC platform, including things like basically a huge amnesty program
Speaker 2: for illegal aliens to get them to become eventually citizens.
Speaker 2: And you'd assume Democrat voters she's gonna have to own
Speaker 2: all that, she's gonna have to answer to that. She's
Speaker 2: also running away from debates. I don't even know that
Speaker 2: if they're going to wind up doing one with Trump
Speaker 2: now when Trump and I think agreed to three with Biden.
Speaker 2: So that's where we are. Early voting is going to
Speaker 2: start in some of these states soon. So this is
Speaker 2: really it's just you know, our last quarter of the game,
Speaker 2: running out the clock, hoping that they can get over
Speaker 2: the line. But it's really sinister, and really, these are
Speaker 2: the people who keep banging on about threats to democracy, right, Well,
Speaker 2: I don't see them really engaging with this in the
Speaker 2: spirit of democracy at all.
Speaker 3: Well, they invalidated fourteen million votes when they installed Kamala
Speaker 3: and yeah, ran Biden out of town. So that's a
Speaker 3: pretty big threat to democracy right there, undermining the democratic process. Now,
Speaker 3: you mentioned fact checking sites and how they take the
Speaker 3: day off whenever the Democrats say something, and that's seems
Speaker 3: to be the case here with PolitiFact insisting that Donald Trump,
Speaker 3: well haven't taken a day off. They've gone out of
Speaker 3: their way to find something false that is actually true.
Speaker 3: They're saying that Donald Trump is false to assert that
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris ever supported abolishing the Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Speaker 3: ICE as we call it, but even CNN reported on
Speaker 3: her support for that in twenty eighteen.
Speaker 13: Have a look a bol of schase. This is a
Speaker 13: refrain that we've heard increasingly from your democratic colleagues, some
Speaker 13: even potential twenty twenty contenders, like Bernie Sanders, Senator Kamala Harris,
Speaker 13: Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senator Kirsten Jill Brann. They've all called
Speaker 13: to a ball of shade.
Speaker 3: Who is fact checking the fact checkers. But this is
Speaker 3: a case with a range of policies, isn't it. James fracking,
Speaker 3: for example, which is a massive issue in the crucial
Speaker 3: swing state of Pennsylvania. She was on the record, there's
Speaker 3: so many videos of her saying I would ban fracking
Speaker 3: on day one, and now apparently she's done a complete Again,
Speaker 3: is that credible?
Speaker 2: Well, it's not credible. And you know, Rita, there's another
Speaker 2: example of this. We had this a couple of weeks
Speaker 2: ago when everybody was saying, you know, Kamala Harris, you
Speaker 2: were the borders are. Joe Biden named you the borders are.
Speaker 2: Your responsibility was to deal with stuff with the southern border.
Speaker 2: She never went and visited the southern border. And then
Speaker 2: you know, once she started getting caughd all that you
Speaker 2: suddenly had the press go in on a full court
Speaker 2: press sect. Oh no, no, no, no, she was never
Speaker 2: the borders are. When thankfully the internet hasn't gone full
Speaker 2: nineteen eighty four yet and you can still go back
Speaker 2: and find you know, all the same ount let's end
Speaker 2: mecc and then all these guys say, you know, Kamala Harrison,
Speaker 2: name borders are by Joe Biden. You this back in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty or twenty one, and then of course she
Speaker 2: absolutely nothing. Remember Rita when she was asked about why
Speaker 2: she hadn't been to the border that time, and she said, well,
Speaker 2: I've never been to Europe either. I mean, this is
Speaker 2: you know, like, this is what we're dealing with. That's why,
Speaker 2: that's why they don't want to put her in front
Speaker 2: of the press. But the press also doesn't want to
Speaker 2: have her put in front of them because they might
Speaker 2: actually have to ask a hard question.
Speaker 3: Well, the press, you would think, would least try to
Speaker 3: be a little bit more balanced after the debarcle of
Speaker 3: well being exposed about lying about Biden's cognitive decline, because again,
Speaker 3: for three and a half years, if not more, they
Speaker 3: presented any doubts about Biden's cognitive abilities as right wing
Speaker 3: conspiracies and disinformation and a threat to democracy until that
Speaker 3: infamous debate where suddenly, for about two weeks, actually did
Speaker 3: their job. Now I want to ask you about piece
Speaker 3: he wrote that has inspired a fairly bizarre response I
Speaker 3: would say from the editor of New Matilda, Chris Graham,
Speaker 3: he is a taking issue with your piece on Labour's
Speaker 3: immigration policy, where you use data from the IPA to
Speaker 3: illustrate how labor is bringing in a tsunami of migrants
Speaker 3: one point one five million since they took power under
Speaker 3: a Big Australia by stealth program, he wrote. Chris Graham wrote,
Speaker 3: the author of the IPA report is a man named
Speaker 3: doctor Kevin You and speaking of you, if you like me,
Speaker 3: saw that surname and thought to yourself, hmmm, you sound
Speaker 3: pretty migranty to me. You'd be correct. He's a photo
Speaker 3: of doctor You. He's from South Korea, Nolvy in Sydney.
Speaker 3: And here's a bonus punchline. The author of the Daily
Speaker 3: Telegraph story is their national affairs editor James Morrow.
Speaker 8: Morrow is also an immigrant.
Speaker 3: Well this is very interesting, James. I think I knew
Speaker 3: Matilda seemed to think migrants to this country are obligated
Speaker 3: to support open borders Big Australia.
Speaker 2: What sort of I mean, Rita. They you know they
Speaker 2: caught me out here, yes, oh you know you couldn't
Speaker 2: tell me my voice in constant talking about New York
Speaker 2: that I actually don't come from here. But you know,
Speaker 2: this was a really bizarre hit, or attempted hit by
Speaker 2: these guys, because if you think about it, you know
Speaker 2: what is the left always say, oh, well, you know,
Speaker 2: we're all immigrants to this country, you know, unless we're
Speaker 2: you know, Aboriginal or indigenous. You know, we're all migrants
Speaker 2: to this country, and so we don't really have any
Speaker 2: sort of standing here. And then suddenly it's sort of
Speaker 2: like they're running the whole. You know, we grew here,
Speaker 2: you flew here. Line on myself and the doctor from
Speaker 2: the IPA who did the numbers, they can't, by the way,
Speaker 2: RITA criticize the numbers. The numbers are one hundred percent
Speaker 2: spot on that more migrants have been brought in under
Speaker 2: this term of government than in any other previous term
Speaker 2: of government, you know, in a century. So the numbers
Speaker 2: are completely correct. So what do they do on the left, Well,
Speaker 2: they attack the person who's saying it, and they say, well,
Speaker 2: you don't have the right to talk about that because
Speaker 2: you're a migrant. Well i'll tell you something. The reason
Speaker 2: why reader, I talk about migration and a lot of
Speaker 2: other issues in this country and involved and I'm involved
Speaker 2: in public life here is because I'm a migrant and
Speaker 2: I love this country and I want to keep it
Speaker 2: great and I want to see him become greater.
Speaker 3: Well, It's such a lefty tactic, isn't it.
Speaker 2: Total.
Speaker 3: Don't dispute the data, just say you're not allowed to
Speaker 3: hold that opinion because, like you said, you flew here,
Speaker 3: I a grew here about it. Just the most bizarre piece,
Speaker 3: James Morrow, thank you for your time this evening.
Speaker 2: Thanks reader.
Speaker 3: Coming up next, chilling testimony from a brave midwife blowing.
Speaker 4: The whistle on I want to Babe's.
Speaker 8: Blow in my life.
Speaker 3: You're watching the reader Penny show my next topic. Distressing
Speaker 3: to some viewers. A parliamentary hearing in Queensland heard horrific
Speaker 3: accounts from a courageous midwife who explained what happens when
Speaker 3: unwanted babies are born alive.
Speaker 12: To give you a first example, a mother made a
Speaker 12: decision to a born a baby at twenty one plus
Speaker 12: week's gestation. The process began in the morning with music
Speaker 12: prostyl given throughout the day. The process took all day
Speaker 12: and the baby was only delivered early hours of the
Speaker 12: night shift where skeleton staff was on.
Speaker 3: Judy Louise Atseatt, who is a clinical midwife and has
Speaker 3: worked in maternity and birthing units for around fourteen years,
Speaker 3: also told the hearing about how babies cling on to
Speaker 3: life for hours, receiving no medical assistance to save their
Speaker 3: lives or to alleviate their pain.
Speaker 12: This baby moved vigorously, gasp for breath and had a
Speaker 12: palpable heart rate. To make it clear, this baby was
Speaker 12: alivee it was over four hundred grams, so the baby
Speaker 12: was a good way the parents of us to not
Speaker 12: desire to see or hold this baby. Midlis and doctors
Speaker 12: were left holding this little life while it continued to
Speaker 12: While they continue to provide cares for other women we're
Speaker 12: birthing and walking them babies into the world. This baby
Speaker 12: boy fought for his life for five hours before taking
Speaker 12: his final breath. This is not uncommon occurrence.
Speaker 3: Five hours, five hours. The inquiry into Babies Born Alive
Speaker 3: was looking into enthrining legislative protection for babies to survive abortion,
Speaker 3: either in the form of palliative care for those who
Speaker 3: will not live long or medical care for those who will.
Speaker 3: Joining me now, as professor of law at the University
Speaker 3: of Adelaide, doctor Joanna Howe, doctor how that testimony is harrowing.
Speaker 3: It certainly moved United Australia Senator Ralph Babbett to introduce
Speaker 3: an urgency motion asking Senators to vote on the importance
Speaker 3: of medical care for babies who survive abortion, but it
Speaker 3: was defeated.
Speaker 16: It's unbelievable, reader, thirty two votes to eighteen that was
Speaker 16: voted down, which tells you something about the quality of
Speaker 16: people that are in our Senate. Universally unanimously, Labor and
Speaker 16: the Greens voted against that motion, and it was a
Speaker 16: simple motion.
Speaker 3: It was a motion that.
Speaker 16: Said, if a baby is born alive after an abortion,
Speaker 16: they should be entitled to equal protection under the law.
Speaker 16: So it is absolutely it's just disturbing, Like, I actually
Speaker 16: can't understand how anybody, any Australian could vote against emotion
Speaker 16: calling for equal treatment for those children, especially after the harrowing, groundbreaking,
Speaker 16: courageous testimony of Louise ad Set the day before, who
Speaker 16: blew the lid on this whole thing.
Speaker 4: Well, why aren't we seeing other midwives, nurses, doctors speaking
Speaker 4: out if this is happening regularly, and surely Moore would
Speaker 4: be speaking out.
Speaker 16: Reader, they can't. So Louise ad Set had parliamentary privilege.
Speaker 16: She was she was giving evidence to a parliamentary inquiry
Speaker 16: in Queensland, and so an employer can't take punitive action
Speaker 16: against you for something you say to a parliamentary inquiry,
Speaker 16: but any other midwife who speaks out about this will
Speaker 16: lose their job. That is just the reality of this.
Speaker 16: Immediately after Louise gave that extraordinarily brave testimony, doctor Alicia
Speaker 16: Broom from the same hospital, who's an obstrician, gave evidence
Speaker 16: to the inquiry saying babies are not born alive and
Speaker 16: left to die, so essentially disputing the very credibility of
Speaker 16: this incredibly brave midwife who came forward to say this.
Speaker 16: The reality is the peak bodies ranscog Ama. They're all
Speaker 16: lined up, and any midwife or nurse who's on the
Speaker 16: ground dealing with these babies who are gasping for air,
Speaker 16: who are struggling to breathe, who are left on metal
Speaker 16: plates for up to hours, these midwives and nurses are
Speaker 16: not protected. But I have now, since Luiz gave that testimony,
Speaker 16: I've actually had five more midwives come to me and
Speaker 16: to speak to me about this. So I'm going to
Speaker 16: be airing these on my YouTube, but I'm going to
Speaker 16: have to disguise their voice and their face because otherwise
Speaker 16: who knows what will happen to them. So you know,
Speaker 16: this is a tragedy occurring under our very noses in
Speaker 16: our hospitals every single week in this country. It has
Speaker 16: to be fixed. We do need more people to come forward.
Speaker 16: But the reality is the medical profession is not safe
Speaker 16: for people like Louise to talk about this in ordinary life,
Speaker 16: to people like you and me on camera. It just
Speaker 16: won't protect them because this is legal, and you can
Speaker 16: only blow the whistle on stuff that's not illegal, and
Speaker 16: so so sorry, it can only blow the whistle on
Speaker 16: things that are illegal. And the reality is it is
Speaker 16: legal in our country and it happens once every seven
Speaker 16: days that a baby is born alive and left to
Speaker 16: die with our right to medical care.
Speaker 3: The nurses you've I've spoken to the midwives that have
Speaker 3: come forward since Louis's testimony. Are they also in Queensland?
Speaker 3: What have they told you?
Speaker 8: So?
Speaker 16: I've had one come forward from Victoria and the others
Speaker 16: are from Queensland and they have told me about these
Speaker 16: little babies who are born and one of them actually
Speaker 16: offered to adopt the baby, and she fought with the
Speaker 16: people above her to say, look, I want to take
Speaker 16: care of this baby. This baby can live and she
Speaker 16: was shut down and the baby was left to die.
Speaker 16: And that is just a heartbreaking story. But I've had
Speaker 16: other midwives and has come forward to tell me stories
Speaker 16: of these babies who they want to hold them, but
Speaker 16: they're not counted as patients. So under Queensland law, the
Speaker 16: Miles government actually did change the midwife to patient ratios
Speaker 16: in a positive way a few weeks ago, but these
Speaker 16: babies who are born alive after an abortion, they're not
Speaker 16: counted as patients. So one midwife told me of a
Speaker 16: situation where she wanted to hold this baby that was
Speaker 16: born alive and she wrapped them in a blanket, but
Speaker 16: then the coll bell rang, so she had to put
Speaker 16: the baby down and just leave that baby gasping for
Speaker 16: air in the dirty you know, and they go in
Speaker 16: the dirty pan room, so they go where the dirty
Speaker 16: dishes are and that's where they're left gasping for air
Speaker 16: until they passed. So it's an absolute natural disgrace. These
Speaker 16: senators who did not vote for this last week. It's
Speaker 16: just hard to comprehend and it shows you that we
Speaker 16: need it. And it wasn't a massive wake up call
Speaker 16: in this country, and.
Speaker 3: It wasn't just the Greens and Labor. We had liberal
Speaker 3: senators and what is the concern from these people? I mean,
Speaker 3: it seems to me insane not to be giving assistance
Speaker 3: to a baby that is gasping for breath, that somehow
Speaker 3: holds on to life for five hours despite not getting
Speaker 3: any medical assistance. Are they scared that if you acknowledge
Speaker 3: that this happens and have some sort of a pro
Speaker 3: says where they have to receive treatment, that it will
Speaker 3: put late term abortion under threat. Is that why they're
Speaker 3: voting against this motion. It's hard to understand why anybody
Speaker 3: would be against giving assistance to a baby that is
Speaker 3: struggling for breath.
Speaker 16: There were four liberals Senator Hume, Senator Birmingham, Senator Bragg
Speaker 16: and Senator Mariakovichik who voted against giving ecal treatment to
Speaker 16: children born alive. Senator Maria Covidchick stood up in the
Speaker 16: Parliament and gave four reasons as to why she was
Speaker 16: voting against ecal treatment for these babies. She said that
Speaker 16: we haven't had enough time to discuss this. She said,
Speaker 16: this is not urgent, She said, these babies, the data,
Speaker 16: she questioned, the data on this not being one baby
Speaker 16: a week, and she also said this is a decision
Speaker 16: between a woman and her doctor. Now, the reality is
Speaker 16: the Senate has had a Born Alive Protection bill for
Speaker 16: eighteen months on the books, so Covidchik needs to do
Speaker 16: a job and get up to speed. The data is
Speaker 16: very clear. It's one baby a week, and that's justin
Speaker 16: Queensland and Victoria, one baby a week who is born
Speaker 16: alive without a legal right to care. And this argument,
Speaker 16: but doctor How, it.
Speaker 4: How it doesn't make sense. Reader, I just think it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, if you think that data is wrong, if you
Speaker 3: think it's been overstated, fine you can still pass the legislation.
Speaker 3: The legislation isn't related to data. It's related to making
Speaker 3: sure a baby that's born alive after a failed abortion
Speaker 3: gets some medical care. So, whether it's one a week,
Speaker 3: one a year, why would that prevent you from passing
Speaker 3: the legislation. I think we need far more scrutiny, particularly
Speaker 3: from those liberal senators you mentioned, doctor Joana How, thank
Speaker 3: you for your time this evening, and that's.
Speaker 8: It from now.
Speaker 3: I'll see you at eleven tomorrow.
Speaker 8: Good night,