Speaker 1: On scoring lis Oscodio. This is the Reader Panalty Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Reader Paney Show. Coming
Speaker 2: up tonight, more NDS failures as billions of tax paid
Speaker 2: funds are squandered and watered while those in need are
Speaker 2: put at risk. The always brilliant Douglas Murray joins me
Speaker 2: tonight before the first ad rag and he warns there
Speaker 2: is nothing moderate about the modern left. We'll cross to
Speaker 2: the US to speak to Army Horowitz about another hair
Speaker 2: brained Biden policy that is directly transferring wealth from the
Speaker 2: working class to the wealthy, and kinseysco Field will tell
Speaker 2: us which celebrities are behaving badly later in the hour,
Speaker 2: and a Star Wars inspired edition of Lefties Losing It
Speaker 2: And how are you telling me with a street feast
Speaker 2: that's c three pos Street. I think it's canon that
Speaker 2: RGD two is a lesbian bring in Sky News contributor
Speaker 2: Kosher Gate and our Kosher Victorians are fed up with
Speaker 2: their state police force. With public confidence in Victoria Police
Speaker 2: falling to its lowest levels since records began, just fifty
Speaker 2: eight percent of those surveys said they were satisfied with
Speaker 2: policing servers with the same numbers, saying they have confidence
Speaker 2: in the police. Victoria police really want those numbers to
Speaker 2: be in the eighties at not in the fifties. We're
Speaker 2: a long way from that. Former Victoria Police Chief Commissioner
Speaker 2: Kel Glare said, Unfortunately, what we saw through COVID and
Speaker 2: the lockdowns was many police actions being unreasonable, violent and indefensible.
Speaker 2: Victoria police was seen as tools of the government, not independent,
Speaker 2: and that custom dearly and kosher. In recent weeks we've
Speaker 2: seen judgments to that effect from a judge in a
Speaker 2: courtroom saying police were the instigators of violent clashes used
Speaker 2: unreasonable force. We can kind of understand these figures.
Speaker 3: Indeed, I think this is one of many consequences on
Speaker 3: the long bow of consequences from the fiasco that was
Speaker 3: the way governments conducted themselves around the world. In COVID,
Speaker 3: you saw fauci hearings in the US, different but related
Speaker 3: all these years later, and the anger is very palpable
Speaker 3: among people. So the police were not policy makers, but
Speaker 3: they were policy enforcers. They did misuse discretion in terms
Speaker 3: of how to bring their force to bear, and I
Speaker 3: think it's not a surprise that those results are there.
Speaker 3: There's a second undercurrent two, which I think is the
Speaker 3: politicization of all institutions, including the police force. And that's
Speaker 3: another piece to that that people don't trust institutions. There's
Speaker 3: a crisis of credibility, and there is a loss of
Speaker 3: this trust in terms of how well they're executing themselves
Speaker 3: and exercising their force. And that's part of this as well.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, And we saw some of those indefensible actions just
Speaker 2: before or with some of that vision that was on screen.
Speaker 2: We cannot forget that, and that really hasn't been a
Speaker 2: reckoning for most of that. I know there's a lawsuit
Speaker 2: happening now from five people who were arrested violently, but
Speaker 2: there were so many others who were affected in a
Speaker 2: fairly dramatic fashion. Now let's talk about liberal MP Bridget
Speaker 2: Archer signing a letter to the PM along with more
Speaker 2: than a dozen crossbenches backing the International Criminal Courts pursuit
Speaker 2: of Israel. The letter warned against efforts to undermine the
Speaker 2: independence and the impartiality of the ICC. That's incredible. The
Speaker 2: ICC is neither impartial or independent in any meaningful sense.
Speaker 2: And I will be speaking to Douglas Murray about that
Speaker 2: very shortly but kosher. These few remaining bedwetters within the
Speaker 2: Liberal Party are doing enormous damage. The reason why it
Speaker 2: took book the Liberal Party ten months coming out against
Speaker 2: the Voice ten months because of this tiny number and
Speaker 2: bridget Archa, I mean she should just go and join
Speaker 2: the Teals and say if she can get elected.
Speaker 3: Indeed, I think the problem both parties have, but certainly
Speaker 3: the Liberal Party is when we live in this world
Speaker 3: of a little bit of the coalition of different fringe ideas,
Speaker 3: where there's maybe seventy eighty percent in common with the
Speaker 3: Liberal Party, but there is that twenty to thirty percent
Speaker 3: that isn't that becomes a very difficult coalition to govern,
Speaker 3: and so opposition leader has his hands full with doing that.
Speaker 3: He should exercise any consequences that he may or any
Speaker 3: mechanisms he may have to show leadership within that. I
Speaker 3: think another thing too, though, is to show more higher
Speaker 3: contrast positions on the eighty percent where most of these
Speaker 3: folks do agree in their constituents agree immigration, free speech, energy,
Speaker 3: the economy, and coloring and bold colors and not pestels
Speaker 3: on those issues. To really show contrast against the other
Speaker 3: side of the Aisle might help corral the party in
Speaker 3: favor of what their constituents want to see and showing
Speaker 3: more contrast as it's to getting maired in these few
Speaker 3: areas where there's there's this issue and this lack of consensus.
Speaker 2: Now the Herald Sun reveals the National Disability Insurance Scheme,
Speaker 2: then dis is failing some of our most vulnerable. With
Speaker 2: an intellectually disabled boy, this example is an incredible This
Speaker 2: poor kid has experienced more than five hundred critical incidents,
Speaker 2: five mere death experiences in less than two years because
Speaker 2: of these catastrophic failures, and Kosher taxpayers are forking out
Speaker 2: two million dollars a year just for this one child's
Speaker 2: NDIS program. This scheme is not only being rartered, being misused,
Speaker 2: but it is unsustainable. How can we afford this?
Speaker 3: We can on a human level. It's such a heartbreaking story,
Speaker 3: but it's yet another example of government bloat and government
Speaker 3: over each and as Maggie Thatcher said, eventually you run
Speaker 3: out of other people's money, so it is not sustainable,
Speaker 3: and this is just another infrastructure out there that's relying
Speaker 3: on taxpayer money. Government bodies are never efficient at how
Speaker 3: they operate, so it's no surprise. It's only going to
Speaker 3: have more stress on the system with immigration, which is
Speaker 3: the issue of our time, and more and more of
Speaker 3: that is going to be brought to bear on all institutions,
Speaker 3: including the NDIS. And I would also make a broader
Speaker 3: point that it's a little bit of an indictment on
Speaker 3: society for many reasons that so much care is outsourced
Speaker 3: to these government institutions, whether it's aged care, disability care. Yeah,
Speaker 3: there are reasons for it, economic reasons and others, but
Speaker 3: it is something about our society. I think that's getting
Speaker 3: us to this point where we outsource the difficult parts
Speaker 3: of life to these organizations that are just never going
Speaker 3: to be run efficiently. And that's why you see scenarios
Speaker 3: like this popping up.
Speaker 2: It is a greatest societal ill, isn't it that families
Speaker 2: are reluctant to And you said there's economic reasons for it,
Speaker 2: There's all sorts of reasons for it. But yeah, I
Speaker 2: think if there is a broader issue there. Now, let's
Speaker 2: talk about the US, and the Wall Street Journal is
Speaker 2: perhaps stating the obvious here. In a feature piece called
Speaker 2: Behind Closed Doors, Biden shows signs of slipping in a
Speaker 2: well researched piece. The Wall Street Journal interviewed forty five
Speaker 2: insiders close to the president, both Republicans and Democrats, who
Speaker 2: said when President Biden met with congressional leaders in the
Speaker 2: West Wing in January to negotiate a Ukraine funding deal
Speaker 2: here well, he read from notes to make obvious points,
Speaker 2: or paused for extended periods, and sometimes closed his eyes
Speaker 2: for so long that some in the room wondered whether
Speaker 2: he had tuned out. And I wonder what've fallen asleep?
Speaker 2: Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy told The Wall Street Journal.
Speaker 2: I used to meet with him when he was Vice president.
Speaker 2: I'd go to his house. He's not the same person.
Speaker 2: He would ramble, he always had cards. He couldn't negotiate
Speaker 2: another way. He was going to he was going back
Speaker 2: to all the old stuff that had been done for
Speaker 2: a long time. And he was shocked when I'd say, no,
Speaker 2: mister President, we talked about that meetings ago. We had
Speaker 2: done with that kosher. I don't think anyone is too
Speaker 2: shocked by this, other than rusted on Democrats. His decline
Speaker 2: is obvious. It's not just behind closed doors. I played clips.
Speaker 2: I could play clips nightly on this program. And the
Speaker 2: change in him, even from four years ago is dramatic.
Speaker 2: It really is.
Speaker 3: And anybody who's had an aging relative that goes through
Speaker 3: that nose. It is not linear, and the change month
Speaker 3: to month can accelerate and be much more than it
Speaker 3: was even a year ago. Some tell us, don't believe
Speaker 3: your lying eyes. Just believe what the reports are, the massage.
Speaker 3: But the whole world can see this. And the thing
Speaker 3: with journalism historically is, I was think of it where
Speaker 3: there are two phases to it. One is discovery and investigation,
Speaker 3: and then one is shaping and influencing public opinion. And
Speaker 3: we could argue that the latter has become more of
Speaker 3: the journalism is about these days compared to the former.
Speaker 3: So to me that was interesting in this not so
Speaker 3: much the report, but why why now is more and
Speaker 3: more of the media coming out and cheaping public opinion
Speaker 3: or providing cover for something, And everybody thinks, is it
Speaker 3: going to be that switcheroo at the August convention?
Speaker 2: Were not coming? It's not too far away. It's going
Speaker 2: to be who. We won't get into that because the
Speaker 2: same names come up over and over again. We're just
Speaker 2: gonna have to wait and see Now, as if convicting
Speaker 2: Donald Trump in a sham travel wasn't enough for the left,
Speaker 2: the Guardian are now asking the question, what does Trump
Speaker 2: have in common with Adolf Hitler? No, really, this isn't
Speaker 2: a parody side. This is the Guardian. Some would argue
Speaker 2: it is a parody site, and they quote Hank the Berg,
Speaker 2: a professor of German at the University of Sheffield in Britain,
Speaker 2: who said, I looked at the rhetorical strategies and their
Speaker 2: public relations operations, and I began to see how similar
Speaker 2: they are in many ways. It's like it's twenty fifteen
Speaker 2: sixteen all over again. Kosher. Of course, the Guardian repeats
Speaker 2: a number of lies as facts, including the thoroughly debunked
Speaker 2: very fine people on both sides lie kosher. Do we
Speaker 2: just laugh at this? This is just another case of
Speaker 2: a lefty is losing it? Or should we be concerned
Speaker 2: about the dangerous disinformation that this represents and the fact
Speaker 2: that there is a sizeable percentage of Americans who think
Speaker 2: democracy will die if Trump is re elected.
Speaker 3: I think it's both. You took the words right out
Speaker 3: of my mouth. It's so twenty fifteen. That old chestnut
Speaker 3: of equating Hitler to Trump. We're back at it again.
Speaker 3: I do think the potency of that comparison has diminished,
Speaker 3: and the swath of people who feel that is shrinking,
Speaker 3: but it is still quite significant, and therefore we should
Speaker 3: worry when this kind of rhetoric is put out there,
Speaker 3: even though obviously they have the right to do that.
Speaker 3: The other thing that I find interesting as an American,
Speaker 3: there are so many people because I think he's Dutch,
Speaker 3: if I remember correctly, he's a professor of German at
Speaker 3: the University of Sheffield in the UK, And there's so
Speaker 3: many people foreigners who are so emotionally invested in discussing
Speaker 3: the former president or even when he was currently president.
Speaker 3: And you know, I get it. The US has outside
Speaker 3: influence on all countries in the world. Understand that, But
Speaker 3: the level of emotional investment in this thing I just
Speaker 3: always find a little bit amusing. Holland has a lot
Speaker 3: of issues, and maybe this Dutch professor might be well
Speaker 3: advised to focus on his own issues instead of always
Speaker 3: talking about.
Speaker 2: And to have those thoughts of thoughts. Perhaps in twenty sixteen, okay,
Speaker 2: you were stupid, but now it's inexcusable because they had
Speaker 2: four years of him in power, and if you are
Speaker 2: an international observer, his foreign policy positions and the policies
Speaker 2: were really much sounder than what we have seen in
Speaker 2: the last three and a half years. So how you
Speaker 2: could see him as some sort of a Hitler is
Speaker 2: beyond me. A koshergator, thank you so much for your
Speaker 2: time joining me now is the author of international best sellers,
Speaker 2: including his latest, The War on the West. Douglas Murray,
Speaker 2: let's start with the UK. The election is less than
Speaker 2: a month away and labor well in front, and you've
Speaker 2: warned that the modern left is in no way moderate
Speaker 2: and this election could unleash a labor government that is
Speaker 2: radically left and dangerous. What will a massive labor landslide
Speaker 2: mean for the UK?
Speaker 4: Well, the first thing about it is that, of course mean,
Speaker 4: it'll mean we have more of one hundred MPs who
Speaker 4: nobody has any idea about, nobody has any idea of.
Speaker 4: We can just well just have to expect or guess
Speaker 4: what their political.
Speaker 1: Inclinations will be.
Speaker 4: The thing we do know is the people who will
Speaker 4: obviously be empowered kire Starma, Angela Rena, you know, David Lammy,
Speaker 4: these are all people who are sort of people we've
Speaker 4: got to know a bit, and their political inclinations are
Speaker 4: pretty clear. They've hidden them from the public a bit
Speaker 4: in recent months, in particular, as the election has come
Speaker 4: closer and closer, they've sort of they've become more more
Speaker 4: vague about their political ideology and more and more vague
Speaker 4: about what they might do once they're in power. But
Speaker 4: you know, David Lammy, for instance, you know, is somebody
Speaker 4: who just a little while ago, he's likely to be
Speaker 4: the next Foreign secretary. Just a little while ago, was
Speaker 4: on a radio show and he said that not only
Speaker 4: can a man become a woman, but that if you
Speaker 4: become if you take the right drugs, a man can
Speaker 4: grow a cervix. I know it's news to me and
Speaker 4: indeed to all biologists and everyone the field of medicine.
Speaker 4: But this is a man who believes that a man
Speaker 4: can grow a cervix if you give him the right pills.
Speaker 4: So we do know, we do actually know where they're
Speaker 4: coming from a range of issues.
Speaker 1: They're just keeping it quiet.
Speaker 4: At the moment in the hope that they will glide
Speaker 4: silently into office.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I fear that they're clever enough to shut their
Speaker 2: mouths about their true positions on many issues so they
Speaker 2: can get that landslide. We know immigration is a massive
Speaker 2: issue in this election. The Tories, well, no one really
Speaker 2: trusts them because they talk tough about immigration during election campaigns,
Speaker 2: but they've been allowing more than a million into the
Speaker 2: UK annually labor. We know don't really even believe in borders.
Speaker 2: And then we've got the BBC given the likes of
Speaker 2: this character, the Bishop of Dover, Reverend Rose Hudson Wilkin
Speaker 2: a platform, she says illegal immigrants have to cross the
Speaker 2: Channel because France is not a safe country.
Speaker 5: You talk about France being a safe place. I visited
Speaker 5: a cemetery where there are people those who have migrated
Speaker 5: there who are dying there on that soil, in comparison
Speaker 5: to what we're talking about people dying trying to cross
Speaker 5: the channel. So please don't tell me that that is
Speaker 5: a safe place and Douglas.
Speaker 2: She also said we must stop differentiating between illegal and
Speaker 2: legal migration, because there ought to be no difference.
Speaker 4: She is a famous diversity higher in the church. She
Speaker 4: was recruited by the former Speaker John Burco as his
Speaker 4: personal chaplain because he was just desperate to make sure
Speaker 4: he had somebody who's not just black but a woman
Speaker 4: to signal his own virtue. He turned out to be
Speaker 4: a difficult character anyway. But yes, she's she's one of
Speaker 4: those people whose grift is she's in the church and
Speaker 4: she tells everyone how racist they are and how sexist
Speaker 4: they are, and she makes her way.
Speaker 1: Up very happily by doing that. And now she's the
Speaker 1: Bishop of Dover. I don't know. I mean she sees
Speaker 1: a different France.
Speaker 4: I was in Paris yesterday and I saw, you know,
Speaker 4: a sort of a beautiful, charming for rather a traffic
Speaker 4: clogged city ahead of the Olympics. It's got all sorts
Speaker 4: of problems France and Paris, in particular, sorts of security problems,
Speaker 4: largely brought along by illegal migrants.
Speaker 1: Who have the potential to carry out terrorist attacks. But
Speaker 1: the idea that France is and Paris is this.
Speaker 4: Sort of you know, hellhole where migrants are just sort
Speaker 4: of dying. I don't know, I don't know what the
Speaker 4: conditions are that would would please somebody like Bishop Rose.
Speaker 4: If if twenty first century France isn't good enough and
Speaker 4: twenty first century Britain definitely won't be good enough, where
Speaker 4: is good enough. And I suppose maybe you know a
Speaker 4: suite at the RITS for.
Speaker 1: Every illegal migrant.
Speaker 4: Just make sure we dodge, you know, dodge all accusations
Speaker 4: of bigotry. It's preposterous, of course, but I'm hoping that
Speaker 4: the grift of these sorts of figures is up quite soon.
Speaker 1: It's high time.
Speaker 2: Now you've written a fantastic piece for the New York
Speaker 2: Post on the increasingly political and hostile behavior of the ICC.
Speaker 2: The International Criminal Court runs wild, threatening Israel and anyone
Speaker 2: who criticizes it. Tell me about the ICC's response to
Speaker 2: the twelve US senators that criticize its conduct.
Speaker 4: It's amazing. The International Criminal Court, you and I have
Speaker 4: talked about before.
Speaker 1: Each of it.
Speaker 4: The International Criminal Court having launced that it was going
Speaker 4: to seek to prosecute to Prime Minister nettin Yahoo of Israel,
Speaker 4: the first time it is sought to go after a democratically
Speaker 4: elected leader, got a letter from twelve US senators, and
Speaker 4: the very good letter it was saying, you know, if
Speaker 4: you come for our allies, you come for us effectively
Speaker 4: as an all, you know, one for all, all for
Speaker 4: one letter, and the ICC responded, I what a kangaroo
Speaker 4: court it is without wanting to offend kangaroos. The ICC
Speaker 4: responded by saying, if to criticize the court in this manner,
Speaker 4: may itself be a crime. It breaks Article fifty million
Speaker 4: of the Rome Statute of Bladi blah. And they, the
Speaker 4: court said, we're above criticism because if you if you
Speaker 4: criticize us, that might.
Speaker 1: Also be a crime.
Speaker 4: Well, they cited the Road Statute. America is not a
Speaker 4: signatory to the Roman Statute. Whether or not the ICC judges,
Speaker 4: whether A Mile Clooney or whoever it was writing the
Speaker 4: letters that day knew that.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but for.
Speaker 4: A self appointed self you know, aggrandizing international judge to
Speaker 4: threaten US senators is a real sign that this body is,
Speaker 4: as I said at the beginning, not what it purports
Speaker 4: to be.
Speaker 1: It's one of these.
Speaker 4: Another one of these international bodies that you know, holds
Speaker 4: itself out as one thing and is another.
Speaker 1: And the thing it is is a highly partisan, highly.
Speaker 4: Political court that is not a real court, that has
Speaker 4: not got real judges, But it has a real impact
Speaker 4: in the world because the number of real people who
Speaker 4: believe that it is what it says.
Speaker 2: It is, including most of our media sadly. Now, let's
Speaker 2: hear from a American political commentator, a woman who was
Speaker 2: the national press secretary for the Bernie Sanders twenty twenty
Speaker 2: presidential campaign. She was a senior politics editor at The Intercept.
Speaker 2: She's now with the Heel. So I tell you all
Speaker 2: this to show that she's not just some random nincom
Speaker 2: poop we're found on Twitter, but it's supposed to be
Speaker 2: a serious commentator who here claims that her Masks just
Speaker 2: want democracy. They don't want to kill Jews. They want
Speaker 2: to create a country like America.
Speaker 6: There has to be a one steat solution, which means
Speaker 6: that there cannot when people when Hamas is talking about
Speaker 6: eliminating Israel, it's talking about killing all of the Jews.
Speaker 2: It's about eliminating the idea.
Speaker 6: It's about it's about limiting the idea of the Jewish steed,
Speaker 6: inning a Jewish state, ant no national stat and having
Speaker 6: a steat more like what we have in America.
Speaker 2: Douglas. Some of her panelists were bursting out laughing at that.
Speaker 2: But again, she holds a fairly more senior position. She
Speaker 2: is not just some kid from a university campus. And
Speaker 2: to be that frightfully ignorant of her mass and what
Speaker 2: that charter is and what they say they want to achieve.
Speaker 2: I'm not easily shocked, but I was.
Speaker 1: Shocked by that.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean it's shocking, really reach, and it's ignorance
Speaker 4: first of all, but then also in its sort of
Speaker 4: moral ignorance, because of course, I don't mean play this
Speaker 4: any other way around. Let's say if a white man
Speaker 4: explained to Brianna I think her name is brown, and
Speaker 4: Joy Taylor I think it is. Yes, if somebody explained
Speaker 4: that the white man said to her the KKK, which
Speaker 4: doesn't exist anymore, the kuducks Klan, you know, don't really
Speaker 4: dislike Black Americans.
Speaker 1: They just want to do bloody.
Speaker 4: Blah, she would say, how dare you how dare you
Speaker 4: whitesplain to me?
Speaker 1: How dare you?
Speaker 5: Man?
Speaker 1: Splain to me? What do you know?
Speaker 4: And soon but she thinks she has the knowledge about
Speaker 4: the current biggest enemy of the Jewish people, and.
Speaker 1: She thinks she has not only the knowledge, but the
Speaker 1: judgment and.
Speaker 4: The right to tell Jews that her version of what
Speaker 4: amaz is is correct, and that they should just kind
Speaker 4: of take her word or take her judgment or.
Speaker 1: Her reassurance that oh they don't really want to kill
Speaker 1: you all.
Speaker 4: They just want to They're just doing it for kind
Speaker 4: of social justice. And you know, the rape and the
Speaker 4: murder and the beheadings are sort of awkward. Interim. This is,
Speaker 4: as I say, not just I mean factually ignorant. As
Speaker 4: I said, it's something morally wicked about doing that. She
Speaker 4: would accept that in no other situation of something to
Speaker 4: explain what a terrorist group actually seeks to do is.
Speaker 1: No, no, no, no, just just trust me. Just trust me.
Speaker 4: Listen to me on this, not them. Don't listen to
Speaker 4: them when they see kill all the Jews. Trust me
Speaker 4: that I'm the brilliant interpreter of this group's words.
Speaker 2: Her name's Brianna droy Gray. I think I was so
Speaker 2: shocked by her comments there I forgot to actually name her.
Speaker 2: Thank you for that, Douglas, before you go, just quickly.
Speaker 2: We're seeing a fight back against the CRT critical race
Speaker 2: theory and diversity equity inclusion, the entire race obsessed dogma.
Speaker 2: We've seen DII programs dumped or wound back at a
Speaker 2: number of universe It is even Harvard's Faculty of Arts
Speaker 2: and Science has dropped its mandatory diversity statements. And yesterday
Speaker 2: The New York Times published this about the man who
Speaker 2: played a big part in pushing this ideology, Ibrahim x
Speaker 2: Kendy faces a reckoning of his own. The New York
Speaker 2: Times were shocked by this appalled. But is the grift
Speaker 2: over Douglas.
Speaker 1: Well, the.
Speaker 4: Self styled Ibram x Kendy was an obvious israel name
Speaker 4: not his real name, was a con artist from the beginning,
Speaker 4: and anyone could see that his work, such as it was,
Speaker 4: was such a low caliber. He would he made his
Speaker 4: own definitions up for words and then said if you
Speaker 4: didn't agree with him, you were the enemy. I mean,
Speaker 4: this is a man who wrote a whole book called
Speaker 4: how to be an anti Racist? That turned out to
Speaker 4: be the answer was be me me Ibram x Kendy. Shocking,
Speaker 4: isn't it that somebody who was so shockingly illiterate in
Speaker 4: the ways of thinking and much more should should should
Speaker 4: have ended up also being a horrible a grifter who
Speaker 4: raised was given rather millions of dollars to set up
Speaker 4: an entity on campus a very prestigious American university, and
Speaker 4: then suddenly the money went missing and nothing was done
Speaker 4: with the money. I mean, it's it's it's it's almost
Speaker 4: like Ibram x. Kendy decided to go and set up
Speaker 4: every racial negative stereotype he could and then enacted. It's
Speaker 4: it's a it's an appalling thing.
Speaker 1: He he he in the name of anti racism.
Speaker 4: He just made a lot of loot and then ran
Speaker 4: off with it and mismanaged it. And I'm glad that
Speaker 4: the have caught up with him. But just think of
Speaker 4: all of the people, all of the good people I
Speaker 4: think people, right David Dawn, who black cop who famously
Speaker 4: you know, lost.
Speaker 1: His life twenty riots.
Speaker 4: All those all those black people who whose names are
Speaker 4: not known, and who did not make you know, huge
Speaker 4: sums of money of this this anti racism grift and
Speaker 4: just got on with their life, knuckled down with great
Speaker 4: members of their community, and sometimes gave their lives to
Speaker 4: their community in the in the name of law and order.
Speaker 4: I just I just can't imagine the shame that de
Speaker 4: Niebra makes Kenny should feel for making a living of
Speaker 4: a set of claims that are provably false, defaming the
Speaker 4: country he's in, defaming the country he's from, and then
Speaker 4: and then just running off with the cash. It's it's
Speaker 4: it's astounding.
Speaker 2: But I think, like the founders of BLM, he may
Speaker 2: be shameless, so I don't think he'll be minding that
Speaker 2: too much. Douglas Murray, always a pleasure. Thank you for
Speaker 2: your time to see it. Still to come a Lefties
Speaker 2: losing it and Army Horrowitz on how full scale war
Speaker 2: is on the horizon in the Middle East. Welcome back.
Speaker 2: Now it's time for lefties losing it. You know, people
Speaker 2: are shocked when I say I've never seen Star Wars,
Speaker 2: have zera desire to see it. But more and more
Speaker 2: people are coming around to my point of view because
Speaker 2: Star Wars latest series has gone fully woke. It's had
Speaker 2: the full Disney treatment. Here is the creator and star
Speaker 2: talking about the Acolyte. Give be the gayest Star Wars
Speaker 2: and by a considerable margin.
Speaker 7: And you know this is going to be a talking
Speaker 7: point to talking I'm.
Speaker 2: Sure because nerds are gay. Some nerds are very not
Speaker 2: gay and are very threatened by.
Speaker 4: Well that's true, but in my world nerds are gay.
Speaker 1: This element of no, I don't think so.
Speaker 2: And yet people have told me that it's the gayest
Speaker 2: Star Wars. And are you telling me with a straight
Speaker 2: face that C three po is straight out.
Speaker 1: I think it's.
Speaker 2: Canon that ARCHI D two is a lesbian. That was
Speaker 2: Leslie Headland, who is a former personal assistant of Harvey Wednesday.
Speaker 2: Now she's a big deal in Disney and one of
Speaker 2: the stars Amandla Stenberg. And here is Amandla talking about
Speaker 2: another production. She starting, they Hate You Give? And what
Speaker 2: she hoped to achieve with it?
Speaker 1: What people watch the Hate You Give? What do you
Speaker 1: want them to walk away with?
Speaker 2: Because I know everyone has a slightly different feeling. Well,
Speaker 2: I mean white people crying actually was the goal? Rud
Speaker 2: White people crying was the actual goal. Well, the film
Speaker 2: was called The Hate You Give It back to Star Wars,
Speaker 2: which I know nothing about. So let's get a review
Speaker 2: of the later series from a trusted source. Here is
Speaker 2: Joel Berry, the managing editor of The Brilliant Babylon b.
Speaker 2: He said, the Acolyte is a queer Marxist vandalization of
Speaker 2: the myth of Star Wars. In the Akalolte, the force
Speaker 2: is a metaphor for cultural hegemonic power. The Jedi are
Speaker 2: a metaphor for cisgender white oppressors who hold the power
Speaker 2: for themselves. Yes, it really is that obnoxious and stupid.
Speaker 2: Looks like the only white folk will be crying are
Speaker 2: those dumb enough to be funding this tomfoolery. It all
Speaker 2: reminds me of that great South Park episode where they
Speaker 2: mocked the far left excesses of Disney.
Speaker 8: Where they're replacing every single character with Dumbe, who is diverse.
Speaker 2: But then Kenny's like this that I pought it's because
Speaker 2: of Kathy Kennedy.
Speaker 1: But then Kathley Kennedy.
Speaker 2: Just like, can't make it my name, and.
Speaker 8: Everyone in town is like, no, please, Kathy Kennedy's ruining everything.
Speaker 8: But Kathy Kennedy, I cut another gy, divers women in it,
Speaker 8: make it my lamb, and Disney's doctor kid go down
Speaker 8: to down dad.
Speaker 2: Yes, Kathleen Kennedy, president of Lucas Films owned by Disney,
Speaker 2: got the South Park treatment good and proper. And when
Speaker 2: you see the Akolaite you'll understand why.
Speaker 8: There you are, Miss Kennedy, the Linguinian clam sauce. Excuse me,
Speaker 8: I believe I asked you to put a chicken in
Speaker 8: and make her gay.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 1: Yes, the chef was a little confused. What you meant
Speaker 1: by that?
Speaker 8: It means put a chicken the lnguini and make it kay.
Speaker 5: And I want a lame.
Speaker 2: Yeah, let's cover more lefties losing it with my next guess. Now,
Speaker 2: the Biden administration has canceled billions more in student dead
Speaker 2: The total stands at one hundred and sixty seven billion dollars.
Speaker 2: That's us with one intense student loan borrowers speak even
Speaker 2: of their dbts. But at least long suffering tax payers
Speaker 2: are getting value for their money. Let's look at what
Speaker 2: the kids are studying nowadays.
Speaker 3: And my concentration is environmental science and sustainable business.
Speaker 9: Hi. My name is Lax and my concentration is the
Speaker 9: performance of self.
Speaker 5: Hi I'm Gabael.
Speaker 3: My concentration as creative direction, production and there to say
Speaker 3: the arts, performance and written work.
Speaker 9: Hi. My name is Karina Gemis and my concentration is
Speaker 9: in journalism and Latin American studies, but an emphasis in
Speaker 9: human rights, collective memory, and political violence.
Speaker 3: Hi.
Speaker 2: My name is Reed and I study Music, business and
Speaker 2: gender studies.
Speaker 1: Hi.
Speaker 5: My name is Dominique and I studied care politics with
Speaker 5: a minor in disability studies.
Speaker 9: My name is Elliott Right and my concentration is art
Speaker 9: as a Social Mechanism.
Speaker 5: Hi.
Speaker 7: I'm Georgia and my concentration is dramatic writing and theatrical adaptation.
Speaker 8: My name is Noah Lawyer Kano, and my concentration is
Speaker 8: equilibrium or negotiated paradigms.
Speaker 2: Now, I'm not sure if those kids are going to
Speaker 2: join the unemployment queue or be tomorrow's tyrants in HR
Speaker 2: departments and big corporations. Who can tell?
Speaker 4: In Latin American women in visual culture, Yeah, Hi, I'm Melanie.
Speaker 2: I'm studying the unseen body and created spaces of Aracian
Speaker 2: exposure of the queer.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Hey, I'm Nina and I studied the arts, education and
Speaker 6: social justice.
Speaker 10: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I'm Joyous.
Speaker 3: I study dicolonial intimacies, indigenous politics of resistance.
Speaker 10: Yeah.
Speaker 9: And I studied remembering or forgetting, navigating international conflict and
Speaker 9: collective memory.
Speaker 10: Yeah.
Speaker 9: I'm fun And I study monstrosity the subalter in practices shoul.
Speaker 2: Actually I created it.
Speaker 9: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Hi, I'm none.
Speaker 6: I'm studying living artfully or as ritual therapy and pathway
Speaker 6: the decoloniality.
Speaker 9: I mean, I'm studying.
Speaker 1: Fashion history and understudy.
Speaker 9: Yeah, phenomenological approaches to black woman specifically.
Speaker 2: That's breaking journalists and documentary filmmaker Army Horowitz. I mean,
Speaker 2: we do love your content on this program, but you've
Speaker 2: seen what I've just looked at there. I'm not even
Speaker 2: sure it's real. It's so absurd. Are the American people
Speaker 2: getting value for money for the hundreds of billions that
Speaker 2: are destined to go to student debt forgiveness?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 7: He just broke my brain with that segment. Oh jeez, why,
Speaker 7: I don't know. I can't concentrate on what I was
Speaker 7: my bullet points when I was thinking about to discussion
Speaker 7: on this. Look, yeah he did. Okay, this is a
Speaker 7: Party of Democracy, right, subverting the will of Supreme Court,
Speaker 7: trying to find an ilegal way to essentially buy off
Speaker 7: a demographic, right the centillion dollars to pay off. But
Speaker 7: here's why he's so bad at this reado to pay
Speaker 7: off a demographic that doesn't vote the at and twenty
Speaker 7: nine vote is the least likely age group to vote.
Speaker 7: Yet he's the one who's going to continue the spiraling
Speaker 7: and inflation by spending this amount of money to buy
Speaker 7: off a group that simply they may like Biden, but
Speaker 7: they're not going to go the polling the polls because
Speaker 7: they're too lazy. No, what this does really though, in
Speaker 7: terms of the message it sends. The message it sends is, look,
Speaker 7: if you saved to send your kids to school, you're
Speaker 7: a sucker. If you work two jobs as a student
Speaker 7: to pay for your school, you're a sucker. If you said, hey,
Speaker 7: I'm not going to go to a fancy NYU school
Speaker 7: like those idiots whose pairents I'm sure are very proud
Speaker 7: they spent over a quarter million dollars to study whatever
Speaker 7: insanity they were studying. If you went to a school
Speaker 7: that I don't know, a community college, a state school,
Speaker 7: you're a sucker. These are the mess that are being
Speaker 7: sent by the Biden administration when they say words are
Speaker 7: going to pay off your debt. That's what it says.
Speaker 2: Now. I spoke to Douglas Murray about Brianna joined Gray's
Speaker 2: crazy comments about her mass But have a look at
Speaker 2: this clip of her rolling her eyes when a family
Speaker 2: member of a hostage held summer in Gaza asks her
Speaker 2: to believe October seven rape victims.
Speaker 9: And I really hope that you specifically will believe women
Speaker 9: when they say that they.
Speaker 2: All right, Thanks for joining stick around more Ray than
Speaker 2: coming up next. She did not like her being told
Speaker 2: that I can understand, perhaps, but there was just a
Speaker 2: callousness there, and given the comments she's made, she shouldn't
Speaker 2: be surprised by that response.
Speaker 7: That was one of the most despicable things I've seen
Speaker 7: on the air, frankly, But ultimately I'm kind of glad
Speaker 7: she did it, because, Okay, first of all, there's a
Speaker 7: woman who has called Israel a genocidal country, committing genocide
Speaker 7: in God's o, this is who we're dealing with. But
Speaker 7: ultimately I'm happy because really it exposes the truth of
Speaker 7: the left.
Speaker 2: The Wall Street Journal is reporting that clashes between Israel
Speaker 2: and the terrorist organization his Billah escalating with a full
Speaker 2: blown war now an increasing possibility. Army.
Speaker 7: Yeah, let me tell you what's going on here. Okay,
Speaker 7: So Hezbollah for the most part through the beginning of
Speaker 7: the war, I was sitting mostly on the sideline. Now,
Speaker 7: I know you're saying, well, how could that be. They've
Speaker 7: been bombing Israel this whole time. Yeah, they have really
Speaker 7: in a very quiet, measured way. They have upwards of
Speaker 7: one hundred and twenty thousand rockets. They could be raining
Speaker 7: down hell fire Israel, and they have held back. Why
Speaker 7: because they saw Israel's prosecution of the war. They saw
Speaker 7: what happened to Gaza when Gaza attacked Israel, when Hamas
Speaker 7: attacked Israel. They said, we don't want any part of that.
Speaker 7: In fact, Israel has been very transparent to Lebanon. And
Speaker 7: what would happen if Kuzblah got involved in the war.
Speaker 7: They said, we are going to target your infrastructure. They
Speaker 7: are very clear about this and they showed it with
Speaker 7: the prosecution of the Gazan war. But let me tell
Speaker 7: you what has happened and why we are now in
Speaker 7: the precipice of the war because of Belah, Because kausin
Speaker 7: Bala has been watching and learning, and what have they learned.
Speaker 7: They looked at what the Biden administration has done when
Speaker 7: it comes to defending Israel. They saw them throw Israel
Speaker 7: under the bus when they thought it suited their political purposes.
Speaker 7: And now they say, if we now, this is the
Speaker 7: time to engage in a war, because we know that
Speaker 7: if Israel strikes back in a hard way to defend itself,
Speaker 7: Biden will turn on Israel, will not have his back
Speaker 7: and therefore give us the cover to do what we
Speaker 7: have to do. They will put the pressure for us
Speaker 7: to stop Israel from attacking Hesbela targets inside Lebanon. They
Speaker 7: are smart, they have learned, and that's the lesson they
Speaker 7: have learned. On how Biden has thrown Israel under the bus.
Speaker 1: Well he has.
Speaker 2: He has been inconsistent, if you want to be kind,
Speaker 2: but wake and unprincipled. Is that going to continue if
Speaker 2: this clash with Hesbela does escalate further? Or will will
Speaker 2: di Biden administration come to their senses?
Speaker 7: I mean, I can only see what I see on Gaza. No,
Speaker 7: I don't see that changing at all. In fact, I
Speaker 7: see that being even more vocal against Israel, saying, Israel,
Speaker 7: what are you doing start a second front against another country? No,
Speaker 7: I think it's the opposite. I don't think they would
Speaker 7: have Israel back. If you could prove me why they would,
Speaker 7: I could believe it. I don't see evidence of that
Speaker 7: at all.
Speaker 2: Mi Horowitz, thank you so much for your time to
Speaker 2: save me. Still to come, Megan Kelly after Kim Kardashian
Speaker 2: and she does not miss and Harry and Meghan missed
Speaker 2: out on another royal event. That's next. You're watching the
Speaker 2: Rita Patty Show. Joining me now is royal and entertainment
Speaker 2: reporter Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey, let's start with singer Adele. She
Speaker 2: lost it on stage at her Las Vegas residency because
Speaker 2: she thought someone in the audience was opposed to Pride.
Speaker 10: You come from up and show it, just set it
Speaker 10: priced out so ridiculous, let's stop, all right?
Speaker 2: She went full ghetto there, Kinsey, What was behind that outburst?
Speaker 2: She was so angry there? What was said?
Speaker 9: Well, she eves that the person and the audience yelled
Speaker 9: pride because it's Pride month, and she believes that that
Speaker 9: is what that person yelled. I mean, but the average
Speaker 9: price of adult tickets in Vegas are around two two
Speaker 9: hundred and fifty dollars a piece. And I just if
Speaker 9: you or I want to get yelled at by a
Speaker 9: woman in spank, so we can just.
Speaker 2: Call our relatives, you know.
Speaker 9: So I think that that's a pretty steep price to
Speaker 9: peter to be yelled at by a stranger.
Speaker 2: I know, if you're going to shove politics down people's throats,
Speaker 2: then don't be surprised if not one hundred percent of
Speaker 2: your audience is on board. And I've actually seen accounts
Speaker 2: where people near that man said, that's actually not what
Speaker 2: he said. It was he said made a comment about
Speaker 2: work sucks or something. The words were just misconstrued, so
Speaker 2: that would make it an even more absurd outburst from her.
Speaker 2: Now reality is, Kim Kardashian is on the cover of
Speaker 2: this month's Variety magazine as one of the latest celebrities
Speaker 2: to feature in their Actors on Actors series. She's an
Speaker 2: actor now, She's I guess in that American series? What's
Speaker 2: that the Is it a sci fi series? American horror
Speaker 2: or something like that? Broadcast to Megan, Kelly is not impressed.
Speaker 9: Though.
Speaker 10: It's one thing to see her enormous ass in the
Speaker 10: New York Post because I understand they're trying to sell
Speaker 10: magazines or newspapers. Where what's next She's going to be
Speaker 10: on the cover of Nature next to one of our
Speaker 10: Nobel scientists, Like she's going to be on the cover
Speaker 10: of Politico next to Trump.
Speaker 2: Like this is ridiculous. Megan's been on a fire, but
Speaker 2: she is in a series I can't remember the name
Speaker 2: is this? Uh?
Speaker 9: Is?
Speaker 2: She? She earned the right to be there, is what
Speaker 2: I'm trying to say. I'm trying to find a way
Speaker 2: to stick up for poor Kim because she is getting
Speaker 2: attacked since that roast where she was booed mercilessly. It's
Speaker 2: really coming through just how much of the public has
Speaker 2: stained for her.
Speaker 9: Well, it is really Ryan Murphy who's taking care of her.
Speaker 9: He's put her in American Horror Story with Emma Roberts,
Speaker 9: and then he's got another show coming up, a law
Speaker 9: show that he's including Kim Kardashian it. But we you know,
Speaker 9: we love a friendly reminder of how out of touch
Speaker 9: Kim is. She says in this Variety piece, Oh, we
Speaker 9: can never drive in a Rolls Royce down in Beverly
Speaker 9: Hills these days you get robbed. The comments read things
Speaker 9: like vapid to the core and rich girl problems. One
Speaker 9: friend wrote, I'll never forgive y'all for doing this to
Speaker 9: Chloe and how absolutely insulting is it for Chloe an
Speaker 9: incredible actual actor in this business and beyond. But my
Speaker 9: favorite was poor Chloe, why didn't they bring in North too?
Speaker 9: Surely that Lion King Hollywood bull performance qualifies her for this.
Speaker 2: Maybe she can get a Tony Award for that performance.
Speaker 2: Nactor Alec Baldwin and his wife Hilario, is that what
Speaker 2: we're calling her?
Speaker 9: Are?
Speaker 1: Said?
Speaker 2: To star in a reality series of their own. See
Speaker 2: Kim started a trend there and along with their seven children.
Speaker 2: But does anyone want to see an accuse man slaughterer
Speaker 2: and his fake Spanish wife whose real name is actually
Speaker 2: Hilary Lynn on TV Kinsey? Is there a market for this?
Speaker 2: I think it could work because Alec is so angry,
Speaker 2: so that creates good, compelling reality TV.
Speaker 9: Well, not only is this a man that is potentially
Speaker 9: facing jail time, you know, and has to put seven
Speaker 9: kids through college, but these two have a horrific pr
Speaker 9: problem and I think that that's the ultimate objective here,
Speaker 9: show everybody how likable we are. But reality stars reality
Speaker 9: shows are typically great four celebrity couples like Jessica Simpson
Speaker 9: and Nick Lashey, Britney Spears and Kevin Fetterline, Chloe Kardashian
Speaker 9: and lamar odom Rob Kardashian a black China. There's a
Speaker 9: pattern here.
Speaker 2: None of them are to yes, no man, Yeah, when
Speaker 2: you reil off those names, it's a curse. It's an
Speaker 2: absolute curse. Sure, the Kardashians have built these billion dollar
Speaker 2: empires in some instances off the back of that reality series,
Speaker 2: but many others have not only their relationships have crumbled,
Speaker 2: but their finances and other areas of their life. Now,
Speaker 2: let's talk Prince Harry and Meghan Markel. They're going to
Speaker 2: be missing from two big events on the Society calendar
Speaker 2: this year. They have been left off the invite list
Speaker 2: for the second year in a row for Trooping of
Speaker 2: the Color that's on next week and the King's official Birthday.
Speaker 2: They will not be making an appearance at the most
Speaker 2: exclusive wedding of the year. Despite Harry's close relationship with
Speaker 2: the groom, the Duke of Westminster. There are they being
Speaker 2: frozen out? Kinsey, I mean, I think that that's a
Speaker 2: no brainer.
Speaker 9: But reader, what I think is so interesting about these
Speaker 9: two stories, specifically that you point out not being invited
Speaker 9: to Trooping and the confirming that he's not appearing at
Speaker 9: the wedding. This is Harry's camp releasing this information likely
Speaker 9: to garner sympathy from the American audience. Someone from Harry
Speaker 9: and Meghan's team has continuously briefed People Magazine since that publication,
Speaker 9: and that publication alone attended the Nigeria trip alongside of them,
Speaker 9: and this is solidifiing the divide between Harry and his family.
Speaker 9: The palace won't have anything to do with these two
Speaker 9: water spouts. If they can continue to leak information, that
Speaker 9: is a.
Speaker 2: Very good point. I mean that could just be being
Speaker 2: tested here. Let's see if they stop leaking to the
Speaker 2: media against the family, and perhaps if they can go
Speaker 2: a few months without doing that, they'll be back in
Speaker 2: the good books a little bit and be invited to
Speaker 2: some of these events. And finally we're talking about Harry.
Speaker 2: And after Sean Lennon gave his two word review of
Speaker 2: Prince Harry's memoir, the two words were spare me. He's
Speaker 2: now being receiving death threats online. Poor Sean. This is
Speaker 2: John Lennon's son. He tweeted, I've had three to four
Speaker 2: death threats since making fun of Harry's book title and
Speaker 2: then later saying it was justified because as an idiot,
Speaker 2: and that he and I both deserve to be mocked
Speaker 2: ya Internet. I thought Sean's comments, and we did this
Speaker 2: custom on this program, were really quite measured and as
Speaker 2: you mentioned, that got a similar experience. They both both
Speaker 2: lost a parent at a young age and tragic circumstances,
Speaker 2: and he read that memoir with that context, and I
Speaker 2: think he wasn't particularly harsh in his judgment afterwards.
Speaker 9: Was he no, absolutely not, and he was. It came
Speaker 9: from a place of jest and innocence, And one of
Speaker 9: Harry and Meghan's fans tweeted him, Mark David Chapman should
Speaker 9: have dealt with your father before he had a chance
Speaker 9: to blank you out of his womb, Mark David Chapman, Raw,
Speaker 9: December of nineteen eighty. So Harry and Meghan the detolerance couple,
Speaker 9: the live laugh love couple. I feel like this fan
Speaker 9: base is a true reflection of who they are, and
Speaker 9: they need I mean, look at the cake conspiracies. They
Speaker 9: need to get these people in line if they want
Speaker 9: people to change their opinions of them, because this fan
Speaker 9: base is hateful and ugly.
Speaker 2: Kinsey Schofield, we always love getting your insights. Thanks for
Speaker 2: your time this evening, and that's it from May. Up
Speaker 2: next is News Night. I'll see you tomorrow. Fort Lefti's
Speaker 2: losing it nine thirty pm. Don't miss it.