Speaker 1: From Schwartz Media. I'm Daniel James. This is seven AM.
Speaker 1: A sleek Chinese made ute is suddenly one of the
Speaker 1: most popular vehicles on Australian roads. It's cheap, fast and
Speaker 1: packed with tech. But behind its rise, our questioned security
Speaker 1: agencies are struggling to grapple with because the cars we
Speaker 1: drive today are no longer just cars. They are also
Speaker 1: data collection tools, and in a tense geopolitical climate, the
Speaker 1: lines between convenience and surveillance are blurring today. Senior follow
Speaker 1: at the Lower Institute and contributed to Australian Foreign Affairs
Speaker 1: Richard McGregor on the BYD Shark, China's quietly tightening technological
Speaker 1: grip on Australian infrastructure and what it means for national security.
Speaker 1: It's Monday, JUNEO, So, Richard, I wanted to start with BYD.
Speaker 1: These cars are everywhere on Australian roads right now. What
Speaker 1: can you tell me about them and how they became
Speaker 1: so popular here?
Speaker 2: Well? BYD is actually quite an old company by Chinese standards,
Speaker 2: at least twenty years old. It was originally a battery company,
Speaker 2: you know, a Chinese entrepreneur and Shenzen set it up
Speaker 2: more than a decade ago, Warren Buffett invested in BYD,
Speaker 2: but it really didn't, you know, start to develop rapidly
Speaker 2: as a company and as a global company and as
Speaker 2: a global car company until about three four years ago
Speaker 2: when their models went well. I guess they started making
Speaker 2: better cars. When Chinese EV manufacturing generally started to develop
Speaker 2: rapidly and in fact become much better, much cheaper, even
Speaker 2: in some respects more technologically advanced than Western models, and
Speaker 2: it just became a BMH and Paul, we're sitting inside
Speaker 2: the bod Shark today. We're going to redo some of
Speaker 2: the tests and Bad's most popular car in Australia is
Speaker 2: a Yuit called the Shark six. Is it faster, Yes
Speaker 2: it is. Has it got more tech in it? Yes
Speaker 2: it does. Is it cheaper also, yes?
Speaker 1: So it's winning at the moment, isn't it.
Speaker 2: It's a hybrid, not an EV, but it's past all
Speaker 2: of the most stringent sort of off road tests that
Speaker 2: Ossie's throw up for their utes, even more so than Toyota.
Speaker 3: One of the things I wanted to do was really
Speaker 3: push the limit of the Shark.
Speaker 1: To do that, you've got to go and cross the
Speaker 1: simps and desert. I reckon.
Speaker 2: It became massively popular very quickly in Australia this year,
Speaker 2: and I think became one of the largest selling cars
Speaker 2: in the country in a matter of months.
Speaker 1: So for a lot of people, these cars are appealing
Speaker 1: because they're relatively affordable electrical hybrid vehicles. That's not necessarily
Speaker 1: how Canberra season, how are they looking at this situation
Speaker 1: as it's unfolding.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I guess the first thing the slight qualification. They're
Speaker 2: not just affordable, they're good. You know, Chinese tech used
Speaker 2: to be cheap but not necessarily good. Now Chinese tech
Speaker 2: is cheap or competitively priced, but also often the best.
Speaker 2: So that's a totally new ballgame. I guess that's why
Speaker 2: Canberra is looking at it with such anxiety. And I
Speaker 2: guess the key issue here is that everything these days
Speaker 2: is effectively bundles of software controlled by the host country
Speaker 2: or companies in the host country and updated by them
Speaker 2: and having access to them. Now, according to Chinese law,
Speaker 2: any Chinese company, private, public, or otherwise must give complete
Speaker 2: access to that country's security services if asked. You know,
Speaker 2: there's no system of warrants or judicial view or you know,
Speaker 2: judges looking at it or anything like that. It's just
Speaker 2: one and part of the entire system. So countries like
Speaker 2: Australia which don't have a trusted relationship with China, are
Speaker 2: we happy with having large parts of the data generated
Speaker 2: by our economy are potentially open to the Chinese government
Speaker 2: and Chinese security services.
Speaker 1: So what are the concerns that the national security agencies have?
Speaker 1: I mean, what kind of scenarios are they imagining that
Speaker 1: can happen with China having access to all of this data.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it sounds kind of conspiratorial and crazy, but I
Speaker 2: think it's pretty straightforward. Let's take the example of cars again,
Speaker 2: you know cars, electric cars and the like, you know,
Speaker 2: which in turn are going to become sort of driverless cars.
Speaker 2: They're always training themselves on the surrounds. In other words,
Speaker 2: they're little data collecting machines. So they're filming where they're going,
Speaker 2: they're processing that data. Often they're filming where they're going
Speaker 2: and filming faces on the street, for example, and you know,
Speaker 2: collecting information about citizens. Now, in some respects that's quite normal.
Speaker 2: You know, evs in America do that as well. That
Speaker 2: they're all training themselves to be better cars, as it were.
Speaker 2: But do we worry about an American car like we
Speaker 2: would like a Chinese car. There are some people in
Speaker 2: Australia who couldn't care less. There are others who would
Speaker 2: be deeply concerned. I think today it's basically common sense
Speaker 2: that China would be collecting data and using data, just
Speaker 2: as by the way Facebook does, you know, Instagram does,
Speaker 2: et cetera, et cetera. Everybody's collecting data, and we as
Speaker 2: a country have to think about how that's collected, who's
Speaker 2: collecting it, and how it's used. And at the moment
Speaker 2: that's dominated by Chinese companies in Australia.
Speaker 1: Is there any way that we can store the daily
Speaker 1: that those cars collect on shore in Australia.
Speaker 2: Well, that's one of the debates onshore storage. For example.
Speaker 2: You know Donald Trump has tried to find ways for
Speaker 2: TikTok to remain available in the US. Was actually banned
Speaker 2: by a law passed by Congress. Trump he keeps putting
Speaker 2: off that ban. And the particular proposal in the United
Speaker 2: States was to get companies owned by Oracle, the software company,
Speaker 2: to store TikTok data onshore in the US so it
Speaker 2: couldn't potentially be accessed by the parent company in China
Speaker 2: and by extension, the Chinese authorities. So yes, that is
Speaker 2: one possible thing that we could do. There are others
Speaker 2: who say that's not enough or it's not foolproof, because
Speaker 2: there are other ways of accessing the data and we
Speaker 2: might struggle to monitor that. But to give you another
Speaker 2: example about the US, for example, the Biden administration brought
Speaker 2: in new rules which banned connected cars in other words,
Speaker 2: evs collecting data from untrusted entities. In other words, it's
Speaker 2: China from the United States, a rule that comes into
Speaker 2: force in twenty twenty seven. Would we do that? You know,
Speaker 2: it would be very hard to do that in Australia.
Speaker 2: In the US, there aren't many Chinese ebs in Australia.
Speaker 2: We don't tariff cars anymore. We gave up our car
Speaker 2: industry a bit over a decade ago. So you know,
Speaker 2: the influx of Chinese cars has been great for Australian consumers.
Speaker 2: And it's the government really going to force consumers to
Speaker 2: pay more or force those cars out. That's very difficult
Speaker 2: to see. It's a very costly decision, costly economically, of course,
Speaker 2: but costly diplomatically as well.
Speaker 1: With China and a great technical challenge too.
Speaker 2: Would imagine it's a technical challenge particularly from middle sized
Speaker 2: economy like Australia, which doesn't have the resources of China
Speaker 2: or the United States.
Speaker 1: After the break the diplomatic impact of banning Chinese technology, Richard,
Speaker 1: we're talking about Canberra's security concerns around Chinese technology and
Speaker 1: the Chinese government's access to our data. So has our
Speaker 1: government ever acted on these concerns.
Speaker 2: To give you a context here, let me take you
Speaker 2: back to twenty eighteen when the then government of Prime
Speaker 2: Minister Malcolm Turnbull effectively banned the Chinese Telecommunications Company by
Speaker 2: Way from bidding to be the sort of chief contractor
Speaker 2: for Australia's five G TELCA network.
Speaker 3: The decision we took was really one based on hedging
Speaker 3: against future risks. I mean, the reality is the nature
Speaker 3: of the five G network is that you cannot any
Speaker 3: longer reasonably distinguish between the core and the radio access network.
Speaker 2: And this was basically because the government decided that they
Speaker 2: couldn't be sure that effectively Australia would maintain control and
Speaker 2: access to the network. You know, should there be a
Speaker 2: conflict of any kind, should relations with China plummet dramatically.
Speaker 3: Intent can change in a heartbeat, so you've got to
Speaker 3: hedge and take into how the risk that intent can
Speaker 3: change in the years ahead. Remember a threat as a
Speaker 3: combination of capability and intent, So in areas of national
Speaker 3: security where naturally cautious, prudent and hedging.
Speaker 2: And that was a big decision at the time. It
Speaker 2: was one of the tipping points in the change in
Speaker 2: attitude of Beijing to Australia and which resulted in China
Speaker 2: taking punitive trade measures against Australia in twenty twenty you know,
Speaker 2: banning wine, bali, lobsters, coal, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 4: And relations between China and Australia appear to be further
Speaker 4: deteriorating China's.
Speaker 2: China has banned bali imports from Australia's largest exporter CBH,
Speaker 2: claiming the product had harmful weeds in its grain.
Speaker 4: If this is confirmed by the government, the move would
Speaker 4: further inflame tensions between the two countries, which appear to
Speaker 4: be heading towards a trade hall.
Speaker 2: But if you go fast forward now twenty twenty five,
Speaker 2: in retrospect, the Highwai decision looks very easy because it
Speaker 2: was cost free. Effectively cost free in this respect, we
Speaker 2: didn't have to rip anything out of our telecommunications network.
Speaker 2: We just bought a different system from Rickson. But now,
Speaker 2: if you look at the Australian consumer and industrial economy
Speaker 2: and the evs or hybrid vehicles are part of this,
Speaker 2: it's dominated by China evs. Eighty percent or so of
Speaker 2: evs and Australia are made in China, including Teslas, by
Speaker 2: the way, which are made in the Tesla factory in Shanghai.
Speaker 2: The same goes for solar panels, are same goes for
Speaker 2: wind farms. So the five G decision was easy in retrospect.
Speaker 2: But imagine the impact of a decision now of the
Speaker 2: Australian government to somehow regulate Chinese electric vehicles and hybrid vehicles.
Speaker 1: And as consumers, Richard, do you think people should be
Speaker 1: worried about their data being gathered by byd and other
Speaker 1: Chinese companies and given to the Chinese government.
Speaker 2: Look, I don't think individual Australians necessarily have to worry.
Speaker 2: You know, your data or my data is not particularly
Speaker 2: meaningful to the Chinese. But we do have a duty
Speaker 2: and obligation to protect parts of the Australian economy, individuals
Speaker 2: in Australia who particularly play a role in the national
Speaker 2: security establishment. It's basically about sovereignty one way or another.
Speaker 2: You know, are we able as a sovereign nation to
Speaker 2: manage our own data and stop it being accessed by
Speaker 2: foreign entities that we don't trust and that we're in
Speaker 2: conflict with on other issues. So you don't want to
Speaker 2: induce sort of, you know, widespread paranoia about every bit
Speaker 2: of Chinese technology. You've got to make judgments in particular cases,
Speaker 2: and if there is a risk, you have to try
Speaker 2: and mitigate that risk.
Speaker 1: Have we ever faced a large skyle sober attack from
Speaker 1: another country before?
Speaker 2: We have not, as far as I know, we have
Speaker 2: faced You know, a lot of entities in Australia have
Speaker 2: suffered cyber intrusions or cyber attacks if you like, but
Speaker 2: they're usually by private hackers, people we would call hackers
Speaker 2: Russians in the like. It might be Chinese entities as well.
Speaker 2: It could be all sorts of people, but not by
Speaker 2: a nation state, and that's very different. You know, countries
Speaker 2: like Taiwan, for example. I think Taiwan is the country
Speaker 2: which suffers the most cyber attacks by a state entity,
Speaker 2: obviously China in that case. You know, Taiwan is quite
Speaker 2: an advanced technological economy, but it is pretty helpless in
Speaker 2: the face of Chinese attacks and the like. So we're vulnerable.
Speaker 2: Everybody is vulnerable. I guess the issue here is the
Speaker 2: intent of a nation state in conducting a cyber attack
Speaker 2: on Australia. Why would they be doing it? What would
Speaker 2: they attack that The sorts of cyber attacks which have
Speaker 2: been rehearsed against the United States by the Chinese is
Speaker 2: turning off the water supply at different places for example.
Speaker 2: You know, you want to stop troops moving in the country,
Speaker 2: cut off the water near them, cut off the electricity
Speaker 2: in the light. So it's that sort of thing. Now,
Speaker 2: not making a moral point here, you know, I presume
Speaker 2: that the Americans are rehearsing the same sort of cyber
Speaker 2: intusions as the Chinese. It's a matter of you know,
Speaker 2: how a country is smaller country like Australia protects itself
Speaker 2: against that if it doesn't stop at how it identifies
Speaker 2: that attack, and how it shuts it down and then
Speaker 2: recovers from it.
Speaker 1: Richard, thank you so much for your time.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: You can read Richard McGregor's artical Trojan Horses How to
Speaker 1: Defend against Chinese Technology in the new edition of Australian
Speaker 1: Foreign Affairs. It's out today. Just before we go, I
Speaker 1: want to let you know that today's episode is our
Speaker 1: lastest part of Schwartz Media. Seven Am will continue in
Speaker 1: the same format, with the same team and in the
Speaker 1: same feed, but with new owners, an independent media company
Speaker 1: called Solstice Media. We love making the show and our
Speaker 1: commitment to independent journalism is stronger than ever. We have
Speaker 1: some exciting episodes planned and we hope you continue to
Speaker 1: follow and support our work. Also in the news tenure,
Speaker 1: Plippersek has criticized objections within the Liberal Party to apply
Speaker 1: quotas to address gender equity in the party. Pliposek told
Speaker 1: ABC News the Coalition is happy to have quotas for
Speaker 1: National Party and ps on the front bench, but rejects
Speaker 1: quotas to a dressed their unequal balance between men and
Speaker 1: women in Federal Parliament. Following Opposition leader Susan Lee's signaling
Speaker 1: she's open to the idea of quotas, shadowed Defense Minister
Speaker 1: and Lee's rival in the recent leadership stout, Shangus Taylor
Speaker 1: said he opposes changes that would promote Liberal women into
Speaker 1: winnable seats. Women make up less than a third of
Speaker 1: the Liberal Party's parliamentary team and a band LGBTQIA plus
Speaker 1: rights rally in Hungary has turned into a mass anti
Speaker 1: government demonstration. Tens of thousands of people of march through
Speaker 1: Budapest in a major rebuke of Prime Minister Victor Auban,
Speaker 1: who has curtailed the rights of the queer community over
Speaker 1: the past decade. In March, his government passed a law
Speaker 1: that allows pride marches to be banned, ostensibly to protect children.
Speaker 1: Victor Auburn faces a national election next year after fifteen
Speaker 1: years in power. I'm Daniel James. This is seven am.
Speaker 1: We'll be back tomorrow.