WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 19 February

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>From the Skying Center. This is Paul Murray Live. Thank you,

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Sherry Weller, the man k. There is a lot to

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>get to tonight. CLIVEE. Palmer is now in the twenty

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty five election. This is huge news. His preferences, what

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is the plan for the advertising, all of that. Our

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>team spoke with him earlier today. I'll show you his

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>comments in long form in a moment or two's time.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>The Prime Minister yet again spinning lies about the economy.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you the truth after another set of economic

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>data came out today that nobody really wants to talk

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about because of course it doesn't fit the narrative that

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>everything is behind us. Wage growth not pretty in Australia

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and our dear friend Meghan Kelly exclusive the only place

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you see on Aussie TV is here every Wednesday night.

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go, Paul Marie, let's do this thing. Disagree, disagree.

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 2>That's her, that's her personality. She always sounds drunk.

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>She's an idiot. Who could we be speaking of We we

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>get to it in a moment or two's time. So

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the biggest story in politics today is that Clive Palmer

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>is getting back into the race. The United Australia Party,

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>which he has led over a couple of elections, will

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>not be the name. Instead, a new name will be

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>coming forward. We'll talk about that in a moment or

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>two's time, but I want to talk about a few

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>things as the trumpet of Patriots is the new name

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of the party. Fascinating imagery. Of course he sponsored Tucker

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Carlson coming out here, very strong message to a bunch

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of people who do not like the offering that is

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>currently there for the major parties. But which of the

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>major parties will be the recipients of the preferences? This

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>matters because I want to have a look at the

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>performance of the parting United Party or its previous names,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but basically the impact of the Clive Palmer teams in

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>multiple elects. Now the biggest response for Clyde Palmer in

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of a number of people are into the Senate

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and himself into the Lower House was in twenty and thirteen.

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Now these are national numbers. The total number of people

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.239
<v Speaker 1>who voted in the Lower House for the Parmi United

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Party or its other names seven hundred and nine twenty

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>thirteen basically didn't exist in twenty sixteen, twenty nineteen four

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty eight thousand votes in the Lower House

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and they had their second best performance of all time

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>at the most recent election. As you can see, the

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>same is there when it comes to the Senate, where

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>even though the number of actual votes in the Lower

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Upper House was lower because it was in

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>smaller population areas, he was able to get multiple people

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>up at that election. Things went a little bit backwards

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen as more center right votes went to

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Scott Morrison and the Liberal Party, hence the quote unquote

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>miracle victory Welsaw coming. And then when it was bugg

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of them all, well the number started to creep up

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>over half a million. All of that a huge impact

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>on Australian politics. Now, I can't stand, can't stand when

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>people want to turn around and say, well, this much

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>money for only this many seats. The reality is the

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>money matters. Also, preferences matter. If you've got anywhere between

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, half a million to seven hundred thousand people

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Lower House voting one for the Trumpet Party,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>well what are they going to do with the number two?

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>If they decide to go everywhere and then eventually make

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a decision between Labor and Liberal. The Liberals will not

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>get anywhere close to minority government. Instead, it will end

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>up being a scenario where most likely at the Labor

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Party will get returned. It will still be a minority government.

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>But preferences matter. Now. There have been times in the

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>past where Clyp Palmer has made it very clear about

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>how he feels about the major parties. And perhaps the

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>single biggest impact that Clide Palmer will have with his

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>efforts here is the sheer weight of advertising. His ads

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest, are often much better than the major

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>party ads. They are much they hit a lot harder,

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot more straight shooting, and a lot of people. When,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>as we're showing you before, there's a frustration with the

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>offering that is around right now, when the ads are

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>as tight and as clearly defined as they have been

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in the past, well we know what's going to happen here.

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>But remember, preferences matter. So in twenty nineteen, a lot

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of the people who backed in the part of the

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>United Party, they gave their preference to Scott Morrison, and

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll be straight up, those preferences and one nation preferences

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>were the reason that Bill Shorden was not the Prime

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Minister of Australia. This was his position when it came

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to preferences. However, in twenty twenty two, by not directing

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>anything towards the Liberal Party or the Labor Party, it

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>meant that people were able to frankly exhaust their votes

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>before they got to the major parties and a chance

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of the twenty nineteen repeat was not going to happen.

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Here is what he said in fact to us in

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two.

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 3>We're preferencing all of the Freedom parties and others. There's

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 3>no preferences at all given to the Liberal, Labor or

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>the Greens.

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Now I mentioned that advertising spend now sometimes sixty million,

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes eighty million, one hundred million dollars. It's his money.

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>He can do what he wants with it. I'm tired

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of this idea in Australian politics about good billionaires who

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>back in the teals, bad billionaires who want to shake

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>things up and make sure that a certain type of

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Australian voter is represented in the ballot. Now you know

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that I've had an up and down relationship and it

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is way more positive of recent years than it was

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in the past with Clyde Palmer, because perhaps our views

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.679
<v Speaker 1>have now aligned about the future of the country. Now,

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this is the advertising that was seen everywhere when he

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>was going hard against Bill Shordan and against labor rollin.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Takee Bill Shorten doesn't care about you.

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 3>He wants to destroy jobs, close coal industry, increase power prices,

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 3>increase taxes.

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Now again that amount of very clear messaging, it moved votes,

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and it changed the election result from the one that

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the camera people thought was inevitable to the

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>one that we knew was resonating on the ground that

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Bill Shorten was not going to be the Prime minister.

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>The effect of those ads is really important. The effect

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>of those preferences, including one nation ones deeply important to

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this being a tighter contest and one where a liberal

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>party could maybe make its way towards its own version

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of a minority government. If not, then we are essentially

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about what I believe to be the more likely outcome.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>If there is not such a spend and is not

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>such a preference discipline, that most likely Albanezi finds a

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>way to hold on to minority government, not because I

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>want him to, but because that's just the reality of

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>things as we see now. Our team had a chance

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to Clyde Palmer after his announcement today and there's a

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:06.679
<v Speaker 1>few issues here about what he is trying to achieve

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>by putting the machine back together again.

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 3>I think the excessive waste that goes on in government,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 3>and I'm a taxpayer too, and I'm one of the

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 3>largest taxpayers in the country, and seeing that Donald Trump's

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 3>tremendous victory in the United States and the revealing things

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 3>that Musk has found when he's done the review that

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the nearly four trillion dollars of government EXPANSI is being

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 3>wasted every year. Being a former member of Parliament, I

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 3>know that's true in Australia too. I had endless lobbyists

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 3>coming to see me every time I was a member.

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Nearly all day my Kalander was made up a lobbyist.

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it's the same for all of the parties,

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 3>and the uniparty we have the Liberal and Labor Party

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 3>just work together and we get the same old thing

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 3>happening every year. We've got to change this country and

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 3>we've got to cut back on government expense. We have

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>common sense solution for things.

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So about bureaucracy and about what examples he would suggest.

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>He told our team this, well, I.

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Think everywhere there's thirty six thousand public servants that Alban

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 3>EASi has put on. At the same time, our standard

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 3>living has dropped in each half of each year. So

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 3>you really have to set priorities with your expenditure and

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 3>say I can't exceed that expenditure. This is how much

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 3>money the government should have every year. This is how

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 3>much money will spend, and they just don't do that.

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 3>They keep on spending money to their mates in the unions,

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the Labor Party in particular, and the Liberals spend money

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 3>with consultants. So I mean it's not spent on you.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So preferences. Has he made that early decision or are

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we going to all have to wait? I think we

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>all know what the answer is going to be.

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 3>We haven't decided the preferences. And it's a democratic party.

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 3>The trumpets for patriots, so I think we've got to

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 3>wait and see. They'll be announced in the coming weeks.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 3>We're still deciding here will preference. But one thing I'll

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 3>tell you, We've just done a poll that will be

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>out next week. Trump's policies are popular in Australia. People

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 3>want change and they want us to come together and

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 3>do that, and we'll be doing that. We're looking forward

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 3>to a great campaign. It's a chance for me to

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 3>spend some more money making people have the public debate

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 3>in Australias means that the Liberal Party can spend ninety

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 3>million dollars a year, the Labor Party can spend ninety

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 3>million dollars a year, but so can other people, so

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 3>that there's a purity of ideas. Australians need a real choice.

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree be fascinating to see that preference discussion will

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>determine whether Peter Dutton is a chance or no chance

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>at this coming upcoming election. We'll wait, We'll all see

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'll keep talking to Clive. We'll look forward to

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe him and other people joining us around the country

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>as we do our pub tests. Remember the first of those,

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it is going to be in the razor thin seat

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of Gilmour on the south coast of New South Wales

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>on Monday night. After we've celebrated the good people of

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Bateman's Bay fighting back after the fires and there's so

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>many things to celebrate. We'll do that on Sunday and

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>then we're off to Vegas. Baby. Now let's deal with

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the Prime minister. This bloke lied his way into office.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the truth. We all know two hundred and seventy

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>five dollars power that never happened. We also know that

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a labor government will lo The cost of living was

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a lie. Why because by any and all metrics, we

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>know what the reality was. That's their promise. This is

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the reality since they became the government. Your health costs

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>are up by thirteen percent, your petrol's up by about

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent, food is up by about seventeen percent, housing

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is up by about eighteen percent, and insurance is on

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>its way towards nineteen percent. Not to mention how much

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>people have had to pay extra on top of the

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>home loans you've had to pay anywhere. If you were

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>at say four hundred thousand, it's fourteen nine hundred and

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>forty dollars extra a year that you've been paying since

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this bloke became the Prime minister. Or if you've got

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>one point two or more, it's forty four thousand, eight

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars. Yet the same people who lied that the

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>cost of living was going to get better under them

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>are now lying that Apparently everything will get worse under

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Peter Dunton. Talk about projection. That's lie number one. Line

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>number two revolves around the Prime Minister, and of course

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the man who will desperately love to lead the Labor

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Party sooner rather than later, he will have his champions

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to do so after the next election, should the minority

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>government be the one that is put in place, And then,

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 1>of course is I'll make grim Jim charmers well. Line

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>number two. They have tried to tell you that the

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>economy is growing, all is fine, nothing to see here.

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>The word recession, it just is, is nowhere in the books.

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Inflation is down, wages are up, unemployment is low, and

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 4>one point one million jobs have been created during the

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 4>course of this alban Ezi labor government.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 1>But the reality of Australia's growth is that, at best

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you could describe it as a car that's out of tune,

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>idling at the lights and slightly moving forward. As you

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>can see from September in twenty two to September quarter

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in twenty four, the past four quarters zero point two

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>percent growth, zero point two percent growth, zero point two

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>percent growth, zero point three percent growth. Remember, as soon

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>as it's under zero for two quarters in a row

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>than we are in recession. So we are only just

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and I mean just out of one and principally that's

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>because of state and federal government spending. The employment of

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a football stadium full of staffers and people working in

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and around the public service is the reason why we

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>are not in recession. But of course the reality is

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that the average Australium is in a recession. Have a

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>look at this graph. This is actually a symbol of

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>just how far growth has fallen off since when they

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>took office. Worse and worse and worse until basically it is,

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>as I said, the car that's out of tune, that

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is idling. That's the reality. So when they talk about

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>economic growth, they are talking about bugger all of it.

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And that of course means that while the government is

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>technically keeping its head above water, we borrowed money and

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>all the rest of it, the average Australian is going backwards.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Why because the cost of everything see what I mentioned

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds ago versus the wages that you have,

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>let alone the pay rises you are not getting means

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you are going backwards. You are in a per capital

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>recession that's gone on for about two years now. Today

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bureau of Statistics told us that we are the

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:30.359
<v Speaker 1>lowest wage growth since twenty twenty two. That's the reality

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of what is happening right now, the longest per capita

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 1>recession on record. The national economic figure is not a

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty picture. But that doesn't mean that Albo and charmers

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>won't continue trying to tell you that everything is awesome

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>when you know what the reality actually is, which brings

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>us to economic lie number three. They love pretending that

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone's got a pay rise in the past three years.

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>What's the word they say, over and over again.

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 5>Wages, wages, wages, wages, pages, wages, wages, wages.

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well guess what with the wages scenario being one

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>where as I said, we have had as little growth

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>as since twenty twenty two, we're in a world of

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>trouble here. This is just the reality now, sure the

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>public service gets pay rise and living standards back to

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties. A detailed look at what the Reserve

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Bank actually had to say while they made the decision

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to cut rates by four fifths of bug rule. Yesterday

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Australian newspaper said, calculating the real household disposable

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>income per capita was around one percent lower than prior

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic, So we're back before before all of

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the savings that happened in the pandemic. The RBA said

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>recent years had been among the weakest periods in growth

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in real income since the nine in sixties, as families

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>budgets were slugged with high rate hikes and a surge

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in income tax. So they lie, they lie, they lie, Oh,

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not in a recession. Well you are. But the

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>government gets to say that just puttering along because in

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>part they hire tens of thousands of people, and they

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>gave those people endless pay rises, not to mention themselves

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>as politicians, where they gave themselves three pay rises. The

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>public servants got their biggest pay rise in a decade.

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You go backwards. Lie, lie, lie. We'll keep talking about

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it between now and the election. So speaking of latest poll,

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think this one's probably a little closer to

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>reality and important to set expectations here where we know

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that there has been much speculation there's a minority government

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's almost definitely on its way, whom will have the

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>most number of seats to form that minority. Well, according

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to some it may well be a toss up. We

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>know that recent polling had very strong suggestions that Peter

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Dunn's team could get seventy three seats in the Parliament,

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Labour could be pushed down to sixty six. Well, today

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>new poll. I want to get to which is the

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>freshwater pole. This one is in the Financial Review and

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this one might be slightly more realistic in

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of where we sit before the election is called.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course, anything can change, nothing is inevitable in all directions.

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Fifty one forty nine in terms of the primary vote. Finally,

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal and National Party has a four in front

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of it that should traditionally be able to win an election.

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>But that big number of fifteen is basically with the

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>exception of the Parmer effort, which we will see in

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the next of the While and One Nation. Basically the

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>rest of that is center left vote center left vote,

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly with local independence that are backed in or by

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the Teel money. As for the preferred prime minister bang

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>on forty three percent each, look at the prime minister's

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>precipitous fall since becoming the prime minister. Look at the

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>gains that Peter Dutton has made but also look thirteen

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>percent of people who still haven't made their mind up. Now,

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>as always I say, look at that number, split it

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in half. Well what ends up happening then? Obviously it's

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>not going to split fifty to fifty. It'll break in

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other towards the election and that

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>will give us an indication of where we are going.

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But again, Albo and how much of a pong he

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>gives the Australian people have look at that from whence

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>he became the Prime Minister to where he sits today

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>with more people disapproving of his job performance than approving

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>of his performance. So what is the seat prediction? On Sunday?

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>We were looking about seventy three seats as the best

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>case scenario when it came to the Liberal National Party,

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and I told you that that seemed a little generous.

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>So the suggestion now is that it will be Labor

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>on seventy one seats. They will have more seats than

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the coalition at sixty seven now ten seats, massive massive

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>change puts in a very competitive position potentially for three

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>years down the train. And at seventy one seats, you

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>would imagine that we're going to get something of a

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>replica of the twenty ten election that we know was

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>a massive thumping for Labor just three years later. But

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>pay attention watch on here. Obviously Labor would be able to,

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in my view, get the five crossbenches mixture of left

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>wing teals and I think the Victorian teals in particular,

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we're back in labor. I think that people like Helen

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Haynes will back in labor. And then of course there

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is a scenario of people like Rebecca Shark you who

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have always said whoever has the most number of seats

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>gets the negotiation first. So yes, even more polling, even

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>more data, even more indication that yes we're headed towards

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a minority, but whom we don't know. But we're going

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to have to play whack a mole with the lies

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and the misrepresentations in the media will put up between

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>now and that all important election. Hence why the advertising

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of people like Clyde Palmer really matters because it comes

0:18:55.440 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>up and over the top awful star already in Tasmania

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>today with one hundred and fifty whales that have become

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>stranded on a beach in Tasmania. This is what we

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>understand as to why and what happened.

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 6>One hundred and fifty seven of what appear to be

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 6>false killer whales are stuck on the sand near Arthur

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.959
<v Speaker 6>River in the state's northwest. It's believed one hundred and

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 6>thirty six of them are still alive as authorities race

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 6>to save for the others.

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Poor buggers to the people that are trying to keep

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>as many of them alive as possible. They're doing their

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>work throughout the night, but sadly it does not look

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>good for their future. But why did it happen?

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 7>Unable to navigate? There might be some geographical thing that

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 7>stopped them then run them aground the studden maybe deep

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 7>to shallow. There could also be a sick individual which

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 7>has led ashore the others and they've all gone, oh,

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 7>we're going this way. And then while are they strand

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 7>acoustic awareness or acoustic sounds that might have spooked the animals.

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 7>There could be killer whales in the area and maybe

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.239
<v Speaker 7>they've gone, oh, let's get out of here. I don't know,

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 7>or maybe there's so many different things.

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Moreri IFO about that is light to returns tomorrow. Pete

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Stefanovik with First edition here on Sky News. Now let's

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about bushfires. Now, I know that there have been

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>some in multiple regions around the country. Compared to the

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>worst predictions that were put up for this summer, we

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>have not got anywhere near those fingers crossed. That remains

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the case for the rest of this summer. But obviously,

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>as things like the US California fires, even when you

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>get into cold weather, those winds are around, it's going

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to be trouble. But guess what. A former CSIO Forestry

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>chief agrees with the common sense view that you actually

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>have to do more control burning. You have to do

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>more cleaning of the forests to make sure that if

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>a fire starts that it will not turn into a rager.

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Writing in the latest edition of The Weekly Times, this

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>doctor said that fuel reduction burning was an essential tool

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in bush fire management. Burning a mild intensity increases the

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for safe for a more successful firefight. When bush

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>fires occur in fuel reduced areas, they are reduced in severity,

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>generate less embers and release less emissions of smoke and carbon.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So even a bloke who was around the CSAR agrees

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>with the common sense here and that it is essential

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the land management practice in Victoria's fire prone environment. We

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>need more mild fire in the landscape, not less. And

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>today the first interview was done with Sean Hannity with

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the President of the United States, Donald Trump, and he's

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>very energetic offsider in Elon Musk. This is a fascinating

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>conversation because you were able to watch the body language

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and clearly they're very friendly, right, So forget all that

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>garbage that you know one is secretly jealous of the other,

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>or one's trying to take power off the other. That's

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>just rubbish, right. They look like two blokes who were

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.959
<v Speaker 1>very happy to be in each other's company. Now, there

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>were a couple of moments from this that I wanted

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to show you though, which was Elon Musk talking about

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the concept of accountability that one of the things that

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>he is able to do, who is to make sure

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that when Trump tells the government to do something, they

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 1>actually do it.

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 8>What we're doing here is one of the biggest functions

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 8>of the Doors team is just making sure that the

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 8>presidential executive orders are actually carried out. And this is

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 8>I just want to plant this is a very important

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 8>thing because the president is the elected representative of the people.

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 8>So it's representing the will of the people. And if

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 8>the bureaucracy is fighting the will of the people and

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 8>preventing the present the president from implementing what the people want,

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.959
<v Speaker 8>then what we live in is a bureaucracy and not

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 8>a democracy.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent absolutely important, I mean how often and

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they make this point right. So in Washington, d C.

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Where most of the bureaucrats for the federal government are

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>or in the adjoining areas, ninety three percent of them

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 1>would have voted for Harris not Trump. Therefore, if they

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>could go slow, if they could challenge, if they could ignore,

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>if they could wait it out, which is pretty much

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>what I were able to do in the first four years,

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>well then they would be able to deny Trump the

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>ability to actually do what people elected him to do.

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>But one of the good things about what Musk is

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is that he's following the hammer. And

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously Congress at some point in time has to step

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in and turn many of the executive orders into the

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>actual law of the land and see how many Democrats

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>would be willing to it. One day vote against some

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of these things all part of the strategy of the

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections in a couple of years time, and of

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>course the presidential the best part of four years away.

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Mask also talks about the Trump derangement syndrome that he

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>saw with his own eyes.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 8>They call it like Trump duration syndrome. And you don't

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 8>realize how real this is until like it's you count

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 8>reason with people. So like I was at a friend's

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 8>birthday party and aligis birthday dinner and it was like

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 8>a nice quiet dinner and everything was everyone was behaving normally,

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 8>and they happened to mention, this is before the election,

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 8>like a month or two before, appen to mention the

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 8>president's name, and it was like they got shot with

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 8>a dirt and the juggular that contained like the metha,

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:03.479
<v Speaker 8>fhatamine and rabies. Okay, wow, I'm like, what is Guys

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 8>like you can't have like a normal conversation and it's

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 8>like it's like that to become completely irrational.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And also about the types of things that he is finding.

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't it be amazing if somebody was willing to be

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>able to put the writer road through the Austradinian system

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and find things like these.

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 5>They signed a contract and a government agency and it

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 5>has three months and the guy leaves that signed the

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 5>contract and nobody else is there and they paid the

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 5>contract for ten years. Yeah, so the guy is getting

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 5>checks for years and years and years, and he's telling

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 5>his family. Obviously maybe it was crooked, maybe paid to

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 5>get the contract, or may be paid that they didn't

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 5>terminate it. But you know, we have contracts that go forever,

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 5>and they've been going for years, and they're supposed to

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 5>end in three months or five months or two years

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 5>or something, and they go forever.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>So the guy is.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 5>Either crooked, you know where he knew this was going

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 5>to happen, or he's crooked because he's getting payments and

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 5>he knows he shouldn't be getting it.

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating stuff. By the way. Bit of breaking news, which

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 1>is just dropped on the Sydney Morning Herald's website is

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that Chinese naval ships have been spotted one hundred and

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty nautical miles from Sydney. Now they are apparently steadily

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>moving their way down the East coast, and they had

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.719
<v Speaker 1>been doing so for the past couple of days. Why

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>are we learning about this via the media. Why is

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the federal government not calling our attention to this. Oh,

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>that's right. China wouldn't want to upset them, would you.

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Defense have revealed that the Chinese flotilla was spotted off

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the north coast of Queensland and there was an Australian

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>military plane that apparently knew about this last week. There's

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>also a scenario here where the Australian military plane was

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>involved in a dangerous incident apparently with the Chinese People's

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Liberation Army in the South China Sea at the same time.

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>So let's see what happens here. There's going to be

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>plenty more news on that by the time we reconvene

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow night. But that's the reporting over on the Channel

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>line websites tonight. Now let's get to the let's get

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to the pub test. We're on Monday. If you would

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>like to join us in the seat of Gilmore in

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Bateman's Bay four politics on the Telly Politics Paul Murray style,

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>send me an email pop test at skyonies dot com. A.

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>If you've got a question for the candidates, that would

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>be great as well. But if you just like to

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>be there, pup test at skinies dot com. A you

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we've got a full house for our town. So the overflow.

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>If you'd like to to come and see how TV

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is made and done right, you send me an email

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>for Monday night pup test at Skyies dot com dot

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>A you all right, quick break back with more. We've

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>got all killer, no filler tonight, Meghan Kelly in a

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>moment or two his time, Conroy versus Bishop, both in

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the man cave, more in a sect, don't go anywhere.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for watching in the man cave

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>yet again has the voice recovered? He's just here to help,

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of course labor who is bootstraps more than the great

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Conroy, the carry out a chair, bronwin Bishop, and

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we've got a big chunk of time to go at

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it tonight. Hello to both of you. All right, So

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Palmer's back in the game now. As I explained, look

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>what sets he wins. Good luck to him. But preferences matter.

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Preference discipline from the right helped Morrison win, in fact

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>got Morrison to win in twenty nineteen when the preferences

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>were not flowing in twenty two well, the result went

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the way that it did, and also the weight of

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the advertising. I mean you remember the Blitzkreig that was

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>coming against Bill Shorten helped Morrison in nineteen they barg

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of them all message, well, help do the me in

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in twenty two so Bromwell Palmer, Yeah.

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 9>Well he's a force to be reckoned with. He really is,

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 9>and people who underestimate him are foolish. Yes, so I

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 9>agree with all the analysis that you've done with but

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 9>there are two other things I'd add. He's already come

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 9>out and said there only two sexes. And the most

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 9>successful ad that the Republicans ran the one that says

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 9>there about they and them, where about you?

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was great.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 9>It was a very powerful ad, and the liberal parties

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 9>the data hasn't gone there. The second thing is that

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 9>his determination on waste is also resonates with people, and

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 9>the other one that resonates, of course is immigration. So

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 9>he's got a lot to play with and he won't

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 9>be playing soft, he won't be pulling back, He'll be

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 9>full on.

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, so.

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 9>It's going to affect, in my view, the way that

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 9>the Coalition is going to have to couch its policies.

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And also Steve and I mean look in the conversation

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that our team had with him today, what he said

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>publicly today. Look, he might be on a journey towards

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that greater preference discipline of twenty nineteen because a lot

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of the issues that he's having a crack at obviously

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>are anti where the government is. However, part of the

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump of it all is bugger them all. So whether

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>he repeats the same preference situation in twenty two, which was, look,

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you only need six numbers, so we're going to list

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>basically US plus five. But what's your thought of this

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and what's your caution to labor people going who cares?

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 9>No?

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 10>No, you shouldn't say who cares? I mean, he's a

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 10>proven electoral force. In twenty nineteen, he destroyed Bill Shortened

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 10>with his advertising campaign. He wasn't that successful in terms

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 10>of his electoral wins, just like in twenty two, but

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 10>he destroyed Shorten with that campaign. But I think Brombin's

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 10>points were spot on. The differences with what Trump's been

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 10>successful in doing in the US are that on the

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 10>sort of trans issues in particular them argument that you

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 10>just highlighted. The Liberals are closer to Labor on it

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 10>than they are to Trump slash Parma. So it's going

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 10>to be very hard to say vote for Dutton because

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 10>he'll be better on this, because they're about the same,

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 10>just like Labor on refugees. To take Robin's other points,

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 10>Labor has had to tack to the center and essentially

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 10>still keeping place most of what Scott Morrison and Tony

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 10>Abbott did.

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 11>No, that's not true.

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's only two of the three leaks, still not insignificant.

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>The tripod.

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 10>Coming in and landing, so at the moment you might

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 10>not like it, but the boats haven't really on mass

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 10>And I lived when the boats came on MATS.

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I was in cabinet.

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 10>This was a disastrous that's not quite so I'm not

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 10>saying no boats have turned up and be saying in

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 10>the public consciousness that migration issue is not as potent

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 10>because Labour's tactles deliberals trans issues.

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 11>It's becoming libered tractor.

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 9>With regard to the anti semitism, No, it's making it more.

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 10>I am with you. One hundred percent of the anti

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 10>semitism issue is Chris Men's. We talked about it Ryan

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 10>Parks last week playing blinders. Sometimes the FEDS are a

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 10>little clunkier in terms of their respond.

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 11>They're not just clunky there so damn weak, But.

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 10>I don't think it's broken the dam to become a

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 10>full on migration stylish. I accept there's a good argument

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 10>taking place about what's the role of multiculturalism.

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 9>If something doesn't happen happening, if something doesn't happen soon.

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 9>With charges being brought against those two nurses, it is

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 9>going to really heat up.

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 11>Why are they not charged?

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 9>And by the way, whatever happened to the person who

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 9>stabbed the Christian bishop in the eye?

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 11>Well, has he been charged?

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I remember roughly at the time that

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe charges were. But I'll go and double check

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for you gladly and get back to you next time.

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's it. Can I talk about again the way

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the media kind of treats good billionaire bad billionaire, right,

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I just, I just it is so naked, right,

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>which is that you know, taxpayer and lefty media. You know,

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to give money to a teal, good billionaire, right,

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>if you want to go and are as it is

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>bad billionaire about the advertising to try to stand up

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and try to challenge the system. But also can we

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>also tell the truth here too, which is all of

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that song and dance about the system changing. All of

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't apply to this election. That applies to the

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>next elections. All that theater of the Teals blowing up

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at the government was garbage. So perhaps also the reality

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>with Palming here too is that he knows the laws

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>have changed, so this is the last chance to do

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>what he has done in the past. Those changes, Steven,

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>are worth talking.

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 10>No, absolutely, I mean I couldn't agree with you more

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 10>that the Teals theater last week. It doesn't come into

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 10>four so settle down. But more importantly, both parties want

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 10>to make sure that neither of the billionaires involved in

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 10>this game can absolutely dominate an election in the way

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 10>Parimat did in nineteen and so both parties have an

0:32:55.880 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 10>interest in making sure that the billionaires can't buy elections.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 10>Is a good position for both parties to take, and

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 10>I commend Dutton and the Liberal Party for showing leadership

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 10>and going no, we're not interested in anyone being able

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 10>to buy.

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll all do the hard work.

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 10>Where you and I will probably disagree, Paul, as we

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 10>usually do, are funding. But this is a better place

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 10>to be than a Teal billionaire or a Partmer billionaire

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 10>buying election.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>But also where I do blob. Sorry Broum, we're not

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>jumping in a second, and then plus jump to where

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to go where I am on this right.

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>The thing I hate about these electoral reforms as well

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:39.239
<v Speaker 1>is that unions are independent. Unions are literally in the

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>constitution of the Labor Party, literally fifty percent every MP

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>must be a member. They control votes, they decide who

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is in the ministry or not on it. But they're

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>completely independent. So basically every party gets out spent ten

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to one if the individual individual unions decide to line

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>up against them. That's a nice little quirk of the brain.

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, and there have been attempts to fight it. In fact,

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 9>there was a high court decision when someone took took

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 9>a case and I'm successful. So I've often wondered why

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 9>the Liberal Party doesn't form a union and it can

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 9>then have all the money funnel through there, just like

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 9>the Labor Party does.

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>They can start with the super Innuation Fund.

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 11>That was done to give money to the Labor Party membership.

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just never happened.

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 10>I remember Andrew Robb, the National Farmers Federation, made an

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 10>article in the bulletin in nineteen ninety eight, after all

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 10>these rules of passes. I'm looking forward to seeing the

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 10>disclosures after the nineteen ninety eight election to see how

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 10>much money these super funds have given to labor and

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 10>you announce what none never happen.

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 11>I've been through. I've been through a few of the

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 11>trust trusts that.

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 9>Run those super fund we're talking about it, and you

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 9>will find the directors the money is paid director union.

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>To be the third party, to be the third party

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>hammer for the Labor Party.

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 10>But isis the weakness in your argument is that unions

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 10>have been donating to more than the Labor Party for

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 10>many years. Okay, they've given money to the Greens, They've

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 10>given the ETU. This is my point for meus a

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.240
<v Speaker 10>whole bunch of unions have given money to the Greens.

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 10>Some have given it to Brian Harrodine over.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 9>The years, the vast majority of it and on those

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 9>super funds, the money for the directors has paid straight

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 9>to the union and it's in their account.

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 10>So let me explain to you what happens if the

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 10>union official takes the annual fee. Everyone attacks the UNI

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 10>officials are getting double dipping. So they go, okay, we

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.760
<v Speaker 10>won't take the money, just give it to the union.

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 10>Everyone attack them secretly funneling money into the Who.

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 9>Actually takes the money is Wayne Swan, of.

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Course independent chair and he does a lot of work

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the president of the party President.

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 10>And when when the former head Peter Collins share former former.

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 11>Leader party, the.

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 10>Parliamentary leader party he was chairing, I guess what, he

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 10>took the money as well, and.

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 9>A thousand dollars and he gets to pay.

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk about Wayala because not only are we

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in a scenario where the South Australian governor has now

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>forced it into administration, but something's going to happen tomorrow

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 1>because both the Premier and the Prime Minister are going

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to Whaler. Now we did an outtown from Wayala, so

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I know how important it literally is to the town

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want those jobs to disappear. But Bromman,

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 1>what does this little moment in time tell you?

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, first of all, well if you look at Wyaler

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 9>and what's happened, it is the icon of everything is

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 9>wrong with green policies. Everything has gone wrong for a

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 9>whiler from the moment they blew up the coal fired

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:08.720
<v Speaker 9>power station to now being thieves in the night taking

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 9>electricity from Victoria nor state cut it off?

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>What should just get up there? And the extension.

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 9>Cost absolutely Then you think you've got sixty three million

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 9>dollars being played by mister Bowen out of some off

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 9>budget entergy over here, which allows them to have a.

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 11>Surplus of course.

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow as well.

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 9>From what I read, and it seems to me that

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 9>we're going to have a nationalization policy on the sly, Well,

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:39.879
<v Speaker 9>this is the so.

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what we've seen as opposed to nuclear reactors

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 1>nationalization policy. But is that what we're going to see.

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to is the sense here that we're not

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>just going to have government support, We're going to have

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>some form of government ownership of this.

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 10>I think there is enough private sector interest that it

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 10>will ultimately end up in private hands. I think the

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.720
<v Speaker 10>government are going through a transition to get it from

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 10>Gupta to like bluescoping in the papers today saying well

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 10>on the economics of it, we would look at it

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 10>the government putting five hundred million. I've never had a

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:13.359
<v Speaker 10>private company turned down five hundred mil. But there are

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 10>other suitors I think that want those assets.

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>With your agree to disagree with.

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 10>It's green energy style, still or it's more blue scope.

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 9>They have to stick in gas and then they're already

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 9>saying that they were.

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 10>It will be gas until if green hydrogen turns up,

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 10>So it's going to be run on gas and no

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.919
<v Speaker 10>one we're good on Malanowskas for taking just like your

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 10>government here in New South Wales, min said, I'm not

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 10>care about the ideology. We're keeping the power going. We're

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 10>going to play to get some of these coal fire

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 10>pire stations going, unlikely your party which is closing them

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 10>down under.

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 11>You mean, mister, it's now deserted and going to you.

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 10>It's still can't carrying to you e spelling. Bromwin did

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 10>the motion up on your Advent Committee?

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, So look it'll be fascinating to what happens

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>there tomorrow. But also I just want to I've got

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a about a minute here Douglas Murray at the Art

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>conference in the UK. Go and find the full speech.

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>It was amazing. He's part of it.

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 12>The idea that in order to welcome people into our societies,

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 12>we effectively have to pretend that we are uninteresting places,

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 12>unimportant places, until migration makes us interesting.

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Bromwin, how did it inspire you?

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, it was a fabulous speech, and that it was

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 9>a call to say be proud of our background. He

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 9>is called for reconstruction of the West narrative in the

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 9>West admiration for its own history. I think it's time

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 9>for a second renaissance that enlightened, that followed the Enlightenment followed,

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 9>and I think his words and the way he phrased

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 9>it is an inspiration to be followed.

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I make sure a pas it up on our socials.

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise you can see versions of it at skyiwes dot

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>com dot au. Lad lady, thank you very much. We'll

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>talk again shortly. Meghan Kelly from the United States. She

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is in fine form. Next, it's our favorite time of

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the week to talk to our favorite person in the world,

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the one and only and wonderful Meghan Kelly. There is

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>so much happening as always, but I want to go

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>back a couple of days so we can deal with

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the German politicians who were literally crying after Vice President JD.

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Vance gave them a speech telling them to pick up

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>their game.

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 13>Let me conclude, and this becomes difficult.

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 11>It's amazing.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:53.319
<v Speaker 2>I wish so much i'd been in the audience as

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 2>a member of the press, where I could have just said,

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, sir, sir on behalf of the world, where

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 2>are your balls asking? At least for America, but I

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 2>think my friends in Australia too. Yeah, we're just wondering

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 2>where they are. It's perfect, It's really actually kind of

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 2>perfect when you think about what's happened in Germany, which

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 2>is really one of the main perpetrators of the terrible

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 2>crackdown on free speech. England has given them a good

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:19.479
<v Speaker 2>run for their money. France is not so great either,

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 2>but I mean Germany I think is the worst. And

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 2>that's saying something in Europe where yeah, they used to

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 2>be known as like these hardcore authoritarian people, and now

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 2>it's if you insult a politician, you can be arrested

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 2>an insult, forget quote hate speech, which I mean, one

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:38.839
<v Speaker 2>of the things I love about America is you can

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 2>hate speech is fine, it's totally constitutional, it's legal. You

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 2>can't arrest somebody for hate speech. You then speak louder

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 2>and persuade people that if that other person is wrong.

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 2>That's really one of the fundamental bedrocks of our country.

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 2>But in Germany you can get arrested, not only for

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 2>so called hate speech, but for insulting someone. And they

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 2>justified that in this long sixty minutes piece where they

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:05.280
<v Speaker 2>were saying, oh yeah, I mean especially on the Internet,

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 2>because that lives forever. Oh, Paul, you mean someone can

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 2>say something hurtful about you on the Internet and people

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 2>could find it at any point in time, like in

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the future, when you've moved on past the contract, what

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 2>would you grow a pair like? Of course they're crying

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 2>over Elon and his tough talk. Of course, that's what

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 2>they're doing when they read insults about themselves online. That's

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:29.720
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing. When they used to read Compact Magazine,

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 2>which they closed because it was too in support of

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 2>the party that wants to crack down on the border issue.

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 2>They just it's like the kid who covers his ears

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and he's like, I can't hear it, I can't hear it,

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, no, you will hear me. No more

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:45.320
<v Speaker 2>ice cream. So the tears are the perfect metaphor for

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 2>what's happening in that country.

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Now we're birth of an era where the oscars used

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to mean something because it was sort of one of

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 1>those big showbies events and the Saturn Law fifty year

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>reunion was sort of the closest thing to an award show.

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>But then, rather than just celebrating a take VI show

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:02.879
<v Speaker 1>that you may have locked, or loved or not really

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>cared about for much of the past fifty years, they

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.319
<v Speaker 1>decided to very overtly do a screen you to half

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the country. Tom Hanks was involved in a skit where

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you just mocked Megaviters, and I couldn't help but think why.

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 2>You know what it reminded me of. I used to

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 2>do a lot of stories on domestic violence, and I

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 2>got to know a lot about how it works, and

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 2>it reminded me of an abuser who goes back to

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 2>a woman and puts on the mask. I'm charming, I'm

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 2>totally loving, I will never hurt you. You can trust me.

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 11>I get you.

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 2>We're together, we're a partnership. But then as soon as

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:46.919
<v Speaker 2>the woman does something that could be anything to set

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 2>them off, the veil comes down and you realize this

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 2>has been someone pretending. This is this whole thing that's

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 2>been wooing me in has been an act, And oh

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 2>my god, I was almost fooled, you know, thank god,

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I saw the moment of reality. That's what that thing

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 2>was to me because Saturday Night Live hates conservatives. NBC

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 2>hates conservatives. They've been doing programming that is anti conservative,

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 2>anti Trump, pro leftist causes in the open now for

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:19.800
<v Speaker 2>twelve years and beyond, I mean, I haven't really watched

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 2>it with a political eye longer than that. And that

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday Night, they tried to reel us in by

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 2>just doing regular comedy that could appeal to anybody, like, see,

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 2>we're so fun. We've got all these big stars, so

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 2>we're towing the line and we're going to make everybody

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 2>love us and you can trust us. We're not going

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 2>to be too political. We're going to be the kind

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 2>of product that everyone can consume. And then the veil slipped,

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 2>and it slipped because that's who they really are, and

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 2>no one there thought there'd be a problem with that

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 2>skit with Tom Hanks. No one said, oh God, is

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 2>this beyond like should we not? Because it's all the

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 2>same left wing echo chambers. So they decided to take

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:07.399
<v Speaker 2>one of the most beloved, most popular American actors ever,

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Tom Hanks, and put him in a Trump Maga hat

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 2>and put him down at the end on what they

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:15.439
<v Speaker 2>called Black Jeopardy which is kind of like a joke

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 2>that black people don't watch normal Jeopardy, and so it's

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of like white Jeopardy. And he comes on Black

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Jeopardy and the black host comes over to shake his hand,

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 2>and he recoils at the thought of touching a black

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 2>man and doesn't want to shake the hand and only

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 2>does it when he's forced to by the very gracious

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:36.760
<v Speaker 2>black host.

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you, hey.

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 10>Now speaking to church, can I say something.

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 5>If more folks weren't to church, we wouldn't be in

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 5>this mess we're in now.

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:47.399
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I agree with what you doug. I'd

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>like to shake your hand, sir. Here we go. No, no, no,

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 1>wrong that it's just a handshake. You welcome to Black

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Jepardy anytime.

0:45:57.400 --> 0:45:57.879
<v Speaker 13>Thank you.

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 2>The veil was down, and we saw what they really

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 2>think of all of us, not just MAGA but anybody

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 2>on the right. They think you're a racist, they think

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 2>you're all the ists for all sorts of psychological reasons

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:13.319
<v Speaker 2>that we've gone into and don't need to hear. But

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 2>there was that piece of it, and then there was

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 2>how deeply offensive it was for Tom Hanks in particular

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:27.439
<v Speaker 2>to participate in this skit Tom Hanks, who started off

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 2>on this stupid show called Bosom Buddies, which I mean

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 2>maybe it was ahead of its time because it was

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 2>about two men who dressed as women in order to

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.320
<v Speaker 2>get the living arrangements they wanted. So it was guys dressed,

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, and sort of a drag and he was

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 2>hilarious and he was in nobody and it was a

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 2>stupid show that made us fall in love with him

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 2>because he was so funny and bumbling, and then parlay

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 2>that new a film career with great films like Sleepless

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:52.840
<v Speaker 2>in Seattle where he was a romantic lead, and Big

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 2>where he was a kid in an adult's body, and

0:46:56.280 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Philadelphia where he was a big time lawyer suffering from

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 2>HIV aids, like all these amazing Forrest Gump, which was

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:06.600
<v Speaker 2>seen around the world and everyone said the same thing,

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I love Tom Hanks. I love Tom Hanks, and in

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:15.879
<v Speaker 2>thanks to a nation to it of audiences that included

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 2>those guys who look like that with the T shirt

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 2>without the sleeves that are maybe a little rough around

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the edges, who aren't as quaffed as he is, with

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:29.399
<v Speaker 2>the perfect three quarter zip you know, sweater with their

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 2>maga hat On and yeah, Tom Hanks, their southern rural accent.

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 2>You absolute effing snob went to your movies and made

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:45.239
<v Speaker 2>you a billionaire, and your thanks to them is to

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:49.280
<v Speaker 2>mock and belittle them. In the two minutes you had

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 2>to portray what they might be like. Shame on you.

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Now, did you say the stuff of Kamala Harris? She's

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>just wandering around styge. I think a broad wide plog.

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest. I was respectful when she was the

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>vice president is but now she's just a free agent.

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>She was pieced, she was drunk because I know she's,

0:48:10.840 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, not the brightest bulb, but she was offered

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:16.800
<v Speaker 1>when she's talking to people.

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 13>And it doesn't mean we don't see the beauty and everything, right,

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 13>these things all coexist. But I believe we fight for something,

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:30.919
<v Speaker 13>not against it.

0:48:32.320 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 10>And that's where.

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:43.800
<v Speaker 2>You all right, let's go, Paul Marie, Let's do this thing. Disagree, disagree.

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 2>That's her, that's her personality. She always sounds drunk.

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:49.360
<v Speaker 1>She's an idiot.

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:51.400
<v Speaker 2>That's the way she talks.

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>She says absolutely nothing.

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 14>She tries to make it so really phoned. She's scaring

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:59.959
<v Speaker 14>a weary waves hoking. She sounds drunk a lot. She says,

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:06.800
<v Speaker 14>just reality and duality and just like something hates a vacuum.

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 11>Take care.

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:11.839
<v Speaker 2>That's who she is. So no, I don't think any

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 2>alcohol is involved. I think it's her and I.

0:49:16.520 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Love to disagreeing with her.

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:18.320
<v Speaker 11>I can't.

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>She always turned me around. Ulmays winds, Damn, how amazing

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:24.959
<v Speaker 1>she is making Cayley the only place you'll say here

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of Scottish Polmrie live on Wednesday nights. That's a show

0:49:27.719 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>for the night. Say tomorrow.