WEBVTT - What Now? |  William Tyrrell: 11

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Here we are surprise there is no inquest, despite the

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:11.159
<v Speaker 1>fact that we told people at the end of the

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>last episode that there was going to be an inquest,

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 1>and we may have suggested that the inquest was going

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to answer some of the questions outstanding about what happened

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to William Tyrrel and everything that's been done in the

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>ten years since. The big news is that actually that's

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>not happening because I found out on Tuesday, and all

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>credit to the person who gave us this tip, who

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to and shall remain nameless, the inquest isn't

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>going ahead because and I can this is what the

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Coroner's Court have sent me. I can now confirm that

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the coroner has closed the evidence in this inquest and

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>vacated the hearing dates, a timetable for written submissions has

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>been set down, and a date for the delivery of

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Her Honor's findings as the coroner has not yet been fixed.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So what we're going to do in this episode is

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>instead of saying here's what's going to come in the inquest,

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>this week, we're going to talk about what this decision

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>means and what the inquest is going to look at

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and what it now will not look at and we're

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about what this podcast will do next

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>because we're not finished, are we far from it?

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>And for the.

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>First time in this episode, we're going to give the

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>perspective of the police from the man who actually led

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the force for years during the most controversial period of

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the William Tiole investigation. And I'm pleased because the police

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't been talking to us during this podcast series, and

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, they've got a reason to, which is

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that they don't want to say anything while the inquest

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is ongoing. And they've probably also got a reason to

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>which is that we have criticized them. And it's good

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to be able to hear from them,

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>get their perspective, particularly from the person who was in charge.

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we're going to do in this episode.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Dan Box, I'm Nina Young and from news dot

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>com dot Au. This is Witness William Tyrrell Episode eleven.

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>What now?

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So Dankrona has closed evidence yeap and is asking

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>for written submissions. Yeah, what does that mean?

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, so this is interesting. So closing the evidence means

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>she's not going to hear anything else in open court,

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>she's only going to make her decisions based on what

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>she's heard up to this point. Written submissions is basically well,

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>all the lawyers involve representing all the different parties, So

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the police, biological family, foster family, the state government are

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in there, some persons of interest I imagine Frank Abbott

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>who is an interested person and gets to represent himself.

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>They get the opportunity to essentially make an argument, and

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for the first time they're not dealing in facts, they

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>were able to say, this is our opinion of what

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you the coroner should find right. But again, and this

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>goes back for me to one of the things I

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>struggle with with this inquest. Written submissions means everything's written

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>down and sent to the coroner. I don't know if

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be made public. It's not going to

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>be heard in open court. I've written to the court

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and said will those be made public? And I haven't

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>heard back yet. So everything is kind of being done

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at this point behind closed doors. Yeah, And the problem

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>with that is you have to trust that everything is

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>being done properly. It's not held up to the light

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to examine it.

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 3>So at this point it seems like we're not going

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>to hear anything from the police investigation from the last

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 3>four years in the court in public.

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>That is that is actually a big deal, and it's

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the thing that so when I got this news that

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>tip from that person who shall remain nameless. And also

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I should say we've had a lot of tips, and

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this podcast is better because people have been getting in

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>touch and have been sending us tips and things to

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>follow up and things to chase. And we probably should

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>at some point come back and actually say thank you

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to people and tell them the tips that have come

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in and how we followed them up. And we will

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 1>do that, but not right now, because you asked me

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a question. You asked me essentially, what will happen to

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>all the work that the police have done over the

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>past four years. It took me a day or two

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to really process this when I got that tip. What

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>the decision by the coroner means is before this year,

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we thought the inquest had finished once before, back in

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>October twenty twenty, and at that point the coroner said

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>she was going to hand down her findings, so she

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>was basically saying the work is done. But just before that,

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the police had made a decision to focus on the

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>foster mother as a possible suspect, and since then they've

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>spent four years working on that investigation, had those massive

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>forensic search at Kendall for four weeks. Yeah, They've seized

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the car, the foster grandmother's car. We've had media leaks,

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we've had pressure tactics, a child has been taken away

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>from the foster parents. All of that has happened. But

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>now the coroner is saying she doesn't want to hear

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>from the police, so she's refused to call David Laidlaw,

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the lead detective, to give evidence at the inquest, and

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>she's now closed the evidence. And I think that means

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that the coronial team don't think those four years have

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>produced anything that shows what's happened to William. I mean

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the inquest has heard, you know, from the lead lawyer.

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>He said, it's beyond argument that no forensic evidence has

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>been located that provides a clue to his disappearance. And

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's beyond argument that there's no eyewitness who's provided any

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>account of how William left the house where he was

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>reported missing. So four years of police work looking at

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>one particular suspect and the coroners basically said she's not impressed.

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that means that she won't be considering

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of that evidence.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I think she has to consider it.

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 3>What does she have to consider what she allowed to

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 3>be shown in the court.

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>She has to consider everything that is tendered in evidence.

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that she doesn't want to hear him

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>answer any questions about it, including you know, why they

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>pursued that investigation, why they looked at William's foster mother,

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>what basis they had for that. She doesn't want to

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>interrogate that at all. She doesn't want the details in

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>his statement to become part of the public record. That

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>suggests she's not impressed that they have cracked the case,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and that means you've got to ask have the police

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>been looking in the right direction for four years? And

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>if they haven't, then have they missed the opportunity to

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>look at someone else.

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 3>We said at the start of the series that an

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 3>inquest is not a criminal trial. It's not trying to

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 3>find who's responsible. It is trying to find out the

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>cause of a death, or if there was a death

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 3>at all. What do you think this inquest will find?

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Ah?

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's inevitable now that the inquest is going

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to come back with an open finding, And an open

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>finding is basically where the inquest comes back and says,

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, or.

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 3>On the basis of probability, William died on the twelfth

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 3>of September. Yeah, something like that.

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that is quite likely the colonel will come

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>back and say that, on the basis the available evidence William.

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I hate saying this, and I apologize to those people

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>who might listen and find this confronting on William. I

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>think the coroner will probably come back and say, on

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the basis the available evidence, William is dead. But then

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I think on the basis of the evidence that the

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>coroner's got, I don't think they can say how he died,

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>who was involved, what happened. So they're going to come

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>back with what is normally called an open finding, which

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>means basically, we don't know. And the thing is normally

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in those cases and I've seen this happen. The coroner

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>will then refer the case back to the police Unsolved

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Homicide Team for reinvestigation. But here David Laidlaw, the man

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>who's been leading the investigation, is in the unsolved Homicide Team.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>He's one of their leaders, and others on the strike

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>force are in the Unsolved Homicide Team. So if the

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>coroner refers it back to unsolved, she's referring it back

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to the same people who've been the same people who've

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>been investigating it and who she is now saying I

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to hear from. As well as all the

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>other things we talked about earlier in this series about

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the Unsolved Homicide Team in terms of delays, I mean

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>massive delays, backlogs of hundreds of cases they haven't looked at,

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>missing evidence, unopened cases, nineteen cases unsolved homicides sitting on

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>David Laidlaw's desk for a year that he didn't look at.

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So if the coroner refers it back to that team,

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where this goes next, and I don't

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>know if that would be the right decision, but I

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>think that is what the inquest will find. Okay.

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 3>So we were hoping, and this is probably a bit

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 3>of a false hope, we were hoping that they'd be,

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, this last week of the inquest, and that

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 3>was going to tie all the question we have up

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 3>in a nice bow. That's probably never going to happen.

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>You know a number of people who've said that to

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>me in the past couple of days since we broke

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the news on news dot com do AU that the

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>inquest now wasn't going ahead. It's effectively just been stopped.

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>The number of people have said, but we were waiting

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to hear the answers, or but it was supposed to

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>resolve this, and in fairness it was that's what those

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>processes are set up to do.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it was probably a false hope, but

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 3>everyone has that hope. You want, you want the inquest

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 3>to come to the end, give you all those answers,

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 3>and everyone goes, ah, finally that makes sense. We're not

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 3>going to get those answers. It looks like, no, what

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 3>questions do you still have?

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the interesting thing now is what the

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>inquest won't talk about. And I think one of the

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>key things that the inquest is not going to talk

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>about is the police investigation itself, because the coroner has

0:10:55.400 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>said that she is not investigating the police investigation, and

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that's been born out by her actions. The coroner has

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>chosen not to call There's been three lead detectives on

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this case over the last ten years. The Coroner's chosen

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>not to call two of them, hands her up and

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Gary Jubilin to give evidence at all, and David laidlaw

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the thirds of those lead detectives. The police actually asked

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that he give evidence of the most recent hearing and

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the coroner refused it. And the coroner isn't looking at

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>why the police have done what they've done or how

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they've done what they've done. And that's fine if you

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>assume the police have done a good job, But if

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to find out what happened to a missing child,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you actually have to ask if the police

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>did a good job, and if not, what went wrong,

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>what's missing, because asking those questions is how you start

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 1>to stop this happening again, And maybe asking those questions

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is how you start putting right this investigation. The quest

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to.

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Ask that, and I think if we examine what's happened

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 3>in the last four years, you're going to find some faults.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's the thing. If the inquest doesn't look at

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the last four years, then no one is going to

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>examine what the police have done in that time. The

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>other thing I think the inquest is not going to

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about is the care system itself. So this is

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the system that William Tirel wass a foster child, which

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>means the state government has parental responsibility for him and

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens to him. So that's the same state government

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>department that threatened journalists with prison if we revealed the

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that he was a foster child at the start.

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>It's the same state government department that went to court

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>fighting to keep that fact hidden. And when you do

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>look at that system, it's overloaded. Last year there were

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>reports that over one hundred vulnerable kids and young people

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>were living in an emergency accommodation such as hotels, motels

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and car parks because there's such a shortage of foster cares.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>The Department of Communities and Justice, which is the relevant department,

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>estimates that they need an extra six hundred foster cares

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>each year to catch up with the backlog. There's about

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand children on the New South Wales Child Protection Register,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So fifteen thousand kids like William, is that system looking

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>after them? No, the system's not working, okay. So there's

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>been reports in the last year that there are over

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand reports that one of those kids is

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>at risk of significant harm in roughly the year from

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty two to twenty twenty three, but just one in

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>four of those is actually seen within a month.

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 3>That's really scary.

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>That's really scary. That's one hundred thousand kids or more

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>at risk of harm and only one in four is

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>seen by the government department within a month. And the

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 1>very worst performing area was the mid North Coast and

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>New South Wales, which is where William went missing. Now

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's a coincidence, but that's something that like surely

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>that bears examination. I'm not saying William was one of

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>those kids, but they are kids just like he was,

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and they need protecting. And I don't think the inquest

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to look at that system at all. There's

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>one other thing I don't think the inquest will talk about.

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the inquest will look at itself if

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd be amazed. And I say that as a cynical

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>crime reporter who's seen a few of.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 3>These, it's an unusual inquest.

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 2>It's complete.

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen anything like that, and I've spoken to

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>multiple homicide detectives who've done this stuff. For years and

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>have never seen anything like this the way it's played out.

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at so he got We mentioned the

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>decision not to call hands up and Gary Jubilin, who

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>were the lead detectives. The inquest isn't going to question

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that decision because they made that decision. The Inquest isn't

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>going to question whether possibly the coronial team was led

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>too closely by the police that came in after Gary's

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>career sort of flamed out, and who didn't really want

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with Gary or what he was looking

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>at because of all that fallout, and the inquest probably

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and I might be wrong, and if I am wrong,

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>then all credit to them. The Inquest isn't probably going

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to question whether it made sense to have the police

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>investigation after Gary left, which was looking particularly at Frank Abbott,

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>who now has a conviction for child sex offenses. The

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>inquest isn't going to look at whether it made sense

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>for them to be investigating that at the same time

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the police are investigating him, which meant that evidence gathered

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>by the police was sent to Frank Abbott in his

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>jail cell for him to read. And I don't know

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>if the inquest is going to public ask itself why

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>they never asked Frank Abbot to give any evidence, because

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>after everything we heard about people telling the inquest that

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>he'd said he knew where William Toole was buried, that

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>he had a history of frankly disturbing behavior and allegedly

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>violent behavior. After all of that.

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 3>And a deathbed confession from a best friend.

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>From a best friend which seemed to suggest that Frank

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Abbot had a connection to that friend and may have

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>been in a car that drove somebody who matched William's

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>description north on the day he went missing, none of

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that was actually followed up by asking Frank Abbot any

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>questions about it. Yeah, I don't think the inquest is

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>going to ask itself whether that was the right decision,

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think the coroner is necessarily gonna, in

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>her findings, is going to ask herself the question whether

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the inquest could have done more to guide or rein

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in the police in the past four years, now that

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we know they've spent those four years looking at Williams

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Foster Mum, and yet we're not going to hear from

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the lead detective about what they were doing or why

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they were doing it. None of that has been asked,

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if we're going to hear why

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't asked.

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 3>So we have been asking these questions, we've been doing

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 3>our best to try and answer them. But we are

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 3>just a podcast, right So who do you think is

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 3>the best person to ask these questions answer them.

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to say it was you and me, but

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not. We're We're two reporters sitting in a podcast

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>studio in Sydney, and we don't have the resources or

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the expertise to do this work. I think we need

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a public inquiry, and I know Alana Smith, who in

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the last episode accused me of contractual shit fuckery, will

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>be pleased to hear that because that's what she thinks,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and she thinks that we should be calling for it.

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's also the one thing that everyone agrees on.

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Both William's biological family and his foster family. Bill Spedding,

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>who was the first suspect held up by the police,

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Gary Juberlin, who led the investigation for several years, they

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all have said to us that they think there should

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>be a public inquiry. And the thing with a public

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>inquiry is it's got powers to investigate the police. It's

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>got powers to seize documents. It's run by people who are,

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.959
<v Speaker 1>with the greatest respect to you and me, much smarter

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and know what they're doing with this thing. No, definitely,

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I've seen them work. I mean, look, I say, in

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>this case, we've talked about the Unsolved Homicide Team. Most

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of the evidence that we've talked about there about the

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>flaws in how that has run in the past. Massive

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>flaws came from a special Commission of inquiry into the

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>police's handling of hate crimes against LGBTQI people. That inquiry

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>was phenomenally well run. It was aggressive, It searched out

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the truth. It actually solved unsolved homicides while it was

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>doing its job that the police hadn't. Can you imagine

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>something with that kind of power and ability to uncover

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>what happened looking at this case, looking at how it's

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>been handled by the state government, by the police, maybe

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>even by the media, and calling all of them to

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>account and also saying, you know what, maybe this is

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what you missed.

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think this it needs sunlight.

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>All reporters say that everything needs sunlight.

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 3>But this does. If you're going to be publicly accusing people,

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 3>which they've done effectively, effectively effectively multiple times.

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, publicly they have.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So if you're going to be publicly accusing people,

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 3>you can't just walk away from that and leave those

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 3>people with their lives destroyed, like you have to answer

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 3>those questions publicly.

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, okay, So this is something the coroner is going

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to have to grapple with, is those people who have

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>been accused did they do it? So you've got okay,

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>so just the ones that have been identified. He got

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Paul Savage, the neighbor who doesn't have any real alibi

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>for what he was doing at the time William went missing.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>You've got Frank Abbott, who's now been convicted child sex offenses.

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>You've got a person who we actually haven't mentioned in

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, but we have in some of the news

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>reporting on news dot com dot au who I'm not

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>going to name, but the police called him Gorillas in

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the mist. That was their nickname for him. He lived

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>very close to where William went missing, and he had

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a montage of photos at the end of his bed

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>which included photos of William. You've got Tony Jones, who

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>both has no alibi and now has a child sex conviction,

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and you've got other local pedophiles or sex offenders, all

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of whom have been publicly identified over the past decade

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>as people the police are looking at, and the coroner

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to have to look at that, and she's

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have to say something.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 3>So there was a time when it seemed outwardly to

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the public that they were about to solve this case.

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>That the police were about to solve them. There was

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and most people believed it, and in fact I believed it. Yeah,

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So I remember seeing that story that broke front page

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Daily Telegraph September twenty twenty one, saying the

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>police had a new suspect and they were confident they

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>were going to crack the case, and that new suspect

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>was William's foster mother. I remember reading that and thinking

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the police must have really good evidence to be saying

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:07.719
<v Speaker 1>that publicly.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 3>And in such a strong way.

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>It's such a strong way and to give you some

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>context to that. So that article came out and then

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the next month, October twenty twenty one, the foster mother

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 1>was told she's going to face questions of the Crime Commission,

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the secretive, powerful body. You can't tell anyone,

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be questioned there. And then about a

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>week after that, Ben Fordham, who's the radio host on

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>one of Sydney's biggest radio stations, two GB.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 4>Ben said this, it's now been more than seven years

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 4>since the disappearance of William Tyrell. But I can tell

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 4>you this, New South Wales Police believe they will crack

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 4>this case. They don't say that lightly. I've had discussions

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 4>with members of the New South Wales Police Force. They

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 4>believe the mystery of William Tyrell will be solved.

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Then a few days after Ben said that, the police

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>sees the gray Masda III that Williams foster grandmother owned

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and Williams foster mum drove the morning he went missing.

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>A couple of days after that, Williams foster mother is

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 1>questioned at the Crime Commission in secret and a child

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is taken from her. Day after that, the police seek

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>an apprehended violence order preventing Williams foster parents having any

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>contact with that child, who we can't identify. And a

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>few days after that the police launch this massive search

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in Kendall. It's on every TV news bulletin, it's in

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>every newspaper. They literally dig up tons and tons of

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>earth and civet. That's the detail the cops go into.

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And I remember at the time this very senior cop,

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Detective Chief Superintendent Darren Bennett. He says there's hundreds of

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>officers involved in that search, and he says the searches

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>are in response to evidence we have obtained in the

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>course of the investigation, not speculative in any way. So

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>he's saying they've got evidence, that's what they're acting on.

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And he says it's highly likely that if we found something,

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it would be a body.

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 3>I remember that and I remember thinking, they're about to

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 3>find the body.

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, because he's just told you we've got evidence,

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we're about to find a body. And then the day

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>after that, there's another article in the Daily Telegraph and

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>all credit to the Daily Telegraph. If you want to

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>know about crime in New South Wales, it's the place

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to read. It's this article that says inside the police

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking on the case. So at this point we know

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the police are looking at the foster mum, but we

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know why. But this article starts talking about inconsistencies

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in her evidence, and by now it's widely being reported

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in the media that the police are looking at whether

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>William fell from the balcony in his house and his

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>foster mum dispose of his body. So that's out there.

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>All of this has happened in a few weeks and

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it's being reported the police are considering common assault charges.

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And then on two GB Ben Fordham is talking to

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the Police Commissioner.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 4>The new South Wales Police Commissioner, Mick Fuller is on

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 4>the line. Commissioner, good morning to you, Good morning Ben,

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 4>this is a big development.

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Well then, we've.

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 5>Never given up on finding what happened to William Tyrell,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 5>and I've said that from day one when I started

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 5>as the commissioner, and I brought a new team on

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 5>board under Detective Chief Inspector Dave laid Law through probably

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 5>the state's experienced homicide investigator, and he pulled together probably

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 5>one of the best teams we've seen and they inherited

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 5>what was a bit of a mess and have really

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 5>cleaned up that investigation and they've got a clear strategy

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 5>all right, just on.

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 4>The foster parents. Some of the areas that you're searching

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 4>are less than one kilometer from the house on Benaron

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 4>d where William vanished. Can I ask why you haven't

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 4>searched these areas before?

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, the areas have been searched, Ben, But if you

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 5>can imagine initially we're searching for a missing ball and

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 5>that search area expanded, then you know, I suppose that

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 5>the transition of the investigation was looking at some persons

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 5>of interest that were clearly not and I think sometime

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 5>was wasted on that in bush Land as overgrowing, and

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 5>so a frushet of eyes under the new team, under

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 5>Detective Cheap inspector laid Law, and you know they've been

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 5>particulously pulling apart this matter.

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 4>How many suspects have you narrowed the investigation down to?

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.479
<v Speaker 5>You know, my understanding is from the investigators is that

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 5>there is certainly one person in particular that we are

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 5>looking closely at.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Commissioner, let me ask you lastly on this, how confident

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 4>are you about the suspect that your detectives have in mind?

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 5>Look, I'll say this, Ben, confident that the team who

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.479
<v Speaker 5>has the investigation at the moment, I'm confident they can

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 5>solve it. I truly believe that, and I have from

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 5>the start, and I would ask if people continue to

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 5>be patient and just trust in the offices that are

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 5>currently investigating the matter, that they are the best.

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So in that interview on TGB, Mick Fuller, the police Commissioner,

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>gives the investigation his full support. He talks about how

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>previously and he means under Gary Jubilin the investigation was

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a mess and that it wasted time looking at the

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>wrong people. And I know from speaking to Gary he

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>furiously disagrees with that. Mick Fuller, the Commissioner also says

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>that the new lead detective Gary's replacement, David Laidlaw, is

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the most experienced homicide investigators in the state

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and his team is the best. And he says they

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>now have one suspect and he's confident they can solve it,

0:27:53.480 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and he asks people to trust the police. So, Mick Fuller,

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>he oversaw this case four years he's now left the police,

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to ask him how he felt about

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it now. And I also wanted to talk to him

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>because we have spent a good part of this series

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>criticizing the police, hopefully fairly, but we have said this

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>went wrong, that went wrong, this could have been done better.

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>And I know that that's easy for us when we

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it's like to be in their position.

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So I asked Mick Fuller about that. And bear in

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>mind this interview was actually recorded a few days ago,

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>before we knew that the inquest was done. It wasn't

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>coming back. So the first thing I asked Mick was

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>how he looked back on his time in the police force.

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 6>The sense of purpose that you get helping people. It's

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 6>very difficult to get that feeling in other walks of life.

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 6>So I always found on one hand the rewarding nature

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.719
<v Speaker 6>of helping people, and then on the other hand it

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 6>was it's such a great team environment, and you know,

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 6>you meet some amazing people and have some unbelievable experiences.

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 6>So I think, you know, certainly that sense of purpose

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 6>for mine is something that you know, I miss.

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Why did you actually join the police in the first place?

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 6>Could you go back to nineteen eighty seven and there

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 6>was a huge recruitment campaign and there were lots of ads,

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 6>and I thought to myself, it looked like a job

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 6>that would be rewarding and lots of funs. So yeah,

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:48.719
<v Speaker 6>I threw in for that with thousands of other young people,

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 6>and you know, really, once I joined, I never looked back.

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>When William went missing, Mick was working as a senior

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>officer in the police force, but he didn't have anything

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to do with the case itself, so his first experience

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of William's disappearance was watching the news on TV like

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>most people. I asked if he was briefed on the

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>William Twole investigation when Mick was promoted and took over

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the police force in twenty seventeen.

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 6>No, it certainly wasn't in the handover and it's not

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 6>that obviously he's not.

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 2>An important case.

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 6>But if you keep in mind that when I retired

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 6>in early twenty two, there were over four hundred and

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 6>forty active cold cases suspected homicides dan, so you know,

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 6>this is certainly the most high profile case. You know,

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 6>there are lots of other families hoping and praying for

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 6>answers as well.

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And did you feel that responsibility as commissioner.

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 6>Oh, definitely, you definitely did, because you were meeting people,

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, as a request from government. You were meeting

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 6>people at events. You know, you would speak regularly at

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 6>rotary dinners and you would bump into people, so it

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 6>was always front of mind because you were constantly out

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 6>in the community do you remember.

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>When maybe the first time the case did come across

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>your desk.

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 6>I certainly remember the issues towards the end of Gary

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 6>Jubilant's time with the case. You know, it was a

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 6>complex time for the investigation. It was a complex time

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 6>for Gary. But when things that are making the front

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 6>page of the paper or the lead stories, as the commissioner,

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 6>you need to have some understanding of where it's at

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 6>because the media are going to ask questions about the

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 6>investigation and have we let William yrel down.

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about the end of Gary's time as the

0:31:55.200 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>lead detective, the decision to remove him. It wasn't actually yours.

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>It was made by Mick Willing, who was acting as

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>your delegate. But it was kind of made in your name,

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>so I imagine you would have been briefed on it

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>at the very least.

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 6>Of course, But as a commissioner of Police, you can't

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 6>possibly get involved in the in the minutia. You know,

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 6>you've gotten in superintendent's chief superintendent, you've got assist commissioner

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 6>and a deputy commissioner before any of that would.

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Get to me.

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>But you would have supported the decision made by your subordinate.

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 6>No of course, of course, and and uh and and

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 6>not just because of what unfolded around behaviors. And you know,

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 6>I'll call it noble course corruption. But if you talk

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 6>to victims groups, then they're they're often frustrated from lack

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 6>of progress, which is not always the case, but they

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 6>will tell you that a fresh set of eyes on

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 6>conflicts and solved particularly homicide, is the best being for

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 6>the case.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Can I just go back to the one thing you

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>said there? You mentioned noble cause corruption, which you and

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I both know that phrase kind of echoes back to

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the wood World Commission into New South Wales police corruption

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and this idea that police officers at the time were

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>giving the green light to criminals as a way, at

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>least in their minds or in their justification of doing

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the greater good, and that was the noble cause to

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>their corruption. But why use it in this context?

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 6>The noble cause corruption is for mine, is more linked

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 6>to police try and solve the case thinking they're doing

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:52.719
<v Speaker 6>the wrong thing by short cutting the rules or breaking

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 6>the rules, which is very different to the corruption that

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 6>we saw around the Royal Commission.

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's still the pursuit of the greater good. And

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>then like you said cutting corners or breaking some rules,

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and you think that maybe what's happened here.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 6>Although I think in terms of Gary's case, you know

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 6>that matter has been through the courts and finalized, so

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 6>I you know, look, I've never spoken to Gary about it.

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I read about it in the papers.

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 6>Obviously he was a retired police officer at this stage.

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 6>But you know, I think that it would be difficult

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 6>to dispute that just to interrupt Gary.

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Jubilin does dispute that Gary hates the idea of noble

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>cause corruption and he insists everything he did on the

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>William two and investigation was legal and in the interests

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of trying to find a missing child. Now, of course

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the courts did not agree with Gary, and Mick Fuller

0:34:55.640 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>does accept that the way Gary's career ended wasn't straightforward.

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 6>You know, he worked tirelessly, he had a long career

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 6>and you've you know, you can't help but feel a

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 6>little sorry the way he finished his time with New Sulasspoints.

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 1>After Gary left the force, you went on two GB

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and you talked about how the New Strikeforce had one

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>particular suspect they were looking at and described the investigation

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that they'd taken over as being a bit of a mess.

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Was that what you were talking about then, this kind

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of position that Gary got into, or were you talking

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>about something more broadly?

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:40.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that Gary's focus.

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 6>Pause enormous angst in the actual task.

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Force itself there.

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 6>And I think one of the challenges in these cases

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 6>is that they are complex. They've been running, you know,

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 6>something over a decade. They have been multiple in investigations

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 6>and often in these cases.

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 2>There are multiple inquests.

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 6>Now what I see comes out of that there is

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 6>that multiple victims come out of that. People feel as

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 6>though they're being victimized. And the frustration for me as

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 6>the commissioner, was always there is only one victim in

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 6>this case, which is William Terrrial.

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So there are other people who maybe see themselves as

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>victims or in some ways become victims. And I mean,

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest, there's been a lot of a lot

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of that around this case. All of that draws focus

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>from the person who is at the center of it

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and is the central victim.

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, And that's like in quest and coronial. The cranial

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:50.720
<v Speaker 6>process is so important because the current group that strike

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 6>force raised there is actually reporting to the coroner. And

0:36:55.840 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 6>I think that is sometimes lost on people, is is

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 6>that Dave laid Law and his team a collecting information

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 6>on behalf of the coroner using the coroner's powers.

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Given what you said about how the police at the

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>moment of reporting to the coroner, Is it a problem

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>then that the Coroner's refused a request to call Dave

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Laidlaw was a witness and said that the reason being

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that the statement he provided, she'd ask for an account

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of the evidence and he hadn't given that he'd given

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>her essentially an account of his opinion, and so she

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>declined to call him. Is that a problem then?

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it's a problem because if Dave Laidlaw

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 6>has given a science statement from what he believes, you know,

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 6>they've arrived that, then the coroner has that Now you know,

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 6>the coroner could deserve the right to call Dave back

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 6>at any time, obviously, and it wouldn't be the first

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 6>time that counsel wasting, the coroner or those representing the

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 6>families disagree with police or disagree with the coroners. But

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 6>I think as long as it's made public and the

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:13.439
<v Speaker 6>public understand that you know the terms of what has

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 6>been accepted and what hasn't.

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 2>It's important also.

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 6>To note when Dave label Or and his team started,

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 6>they went back from scratch and they had over nine

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 6>hundred persons of interest. I won't say suspects that they

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 6>were persons of interest. And when I had finished up,

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 6>I finished up in January twenty twenty two. I've got

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 6>my last breaking on sometime in twenty twenty one. But

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 6>even at that stage then they still had around ten

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 6>persons of interest that they were looking at. So, you know,

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:56.359
<v Speaker 6>in terms of tunnel vision for Roseanne, I didn't get

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 6>a feeling from that during my time.

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting because, of course, in that interview on two GB,

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the other thing you talked about was I think you

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>were asked specifically was there one person they're looking at,

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>because that had been on the front page of the

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Daily Telegraph, and you confirmed there was one person they're

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 1>looking at in particular. And you also sort of wholeheartedly

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>back to the Strike Force. I think you said it

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.720
<v Speaker 1>was one of the best, if not the best teams

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Force had put together.

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 6>OK, And they laid Law is extremely confident, detective, very apolitical,

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 6>independent of thought. So when he was picked around the

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 6>team and pulled the team together. They were certainly a

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 6>very experienced group. Now people may not like they laid

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 6>Law's opinion on where they have landed, but at the

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 6>same time, you know, I think that they have run

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 6>extremely professional investigation.

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So when you in the interview you said that, yeah,

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they're focusing on one person in particular, at the time,

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>they still had maybe I think you said, sort of

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:09.879
<v Speaker 1>ten persons of interest, but they were focusing on this

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>one person in particular at that point.

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 7>I think statistically, when you look at these type of cases,

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 7>if you look at the domestic homicide, in those cases,

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:27.320
<v Speaker 7>seventy percent of the perpetrators are known to the victim.

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 6>And then when you take these unusual cases of a

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 6>child being abducted or murdered, it's over ninety something percent

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 6>cases where the victim knows the perpetrator. So certainly, statistically,

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 6>they were discussing a number of options around you know,

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 6>who was close to wire you And.

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you know if what they had ever went beyond

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>statistics in terms of why they were looking at this

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>one person particular.

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 6>I never tested they've laid law or the team about

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 6>why they were or weren't doing something. You know as

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 6>the commissioner, I would never force an opinion in relation

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 6>to how an investigation.

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Should be wrapped.

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 6>And the commissioner's perspective is that you just want to

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:21.800
<v Speaker 6>make sure that when you stand up in front of

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 6>the media, you can hand on heart say that you've

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 6>put all the resources and you know you've got your

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 6>best people working on these cases.

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's looking back, that is how you look at it.

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 1>It was the best team that you could put onto it,

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>and it was the resources it demanded.

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, And again the anti challenge in those comments is

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 6>that I know this four hundred and forty other families

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 6>sort of drop their heads feeling as though that they're

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 6>not getting the same attention. But look, I always gave

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:55.240
<v Speaker 6>time to victims' families on the basis that they deserve

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 6>to be heard.

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Just on that point, you said you always gave victims

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:05.360
<v Speaker 1>families time. You were publicly criticized by William's foster parents,

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.959
<v Speaker 1>so not his birth parents, but his foster parents who

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 1>did come out. There was a podcast they spoke on,

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and they wrote letters and including criticizing both the decisions

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to take Gary Jibbling off the case. But what they

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 1>perceived is a lack of action and also personally a

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 1>lack of response in your part. They said they wrote

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 1>your letters, so they left your phone messages and they

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 1>said they never heard back from you.

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.879
<v Speaker 6>Look, I honestly if they feeled as though that in

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 6>some way that you know, I let William down, then

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 6>you know, of course that would you know, I would

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 6>say sorry for that. But at the same time, I

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 6>think what was more important was a clean slate and

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 6>again doing our best to focus on solving solving the matter.

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 6>And you know in that, you know, I ensured that

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 6>the resources were provided and the task force was properly funded.

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.799
<v Speaker 6>But look, if they had criticized me, you know, I

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:12.359
<v Speaker 6>accept the criticism. Dan. It's a complex job and there's

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:15.720
<v Speaker 6>lots of moving parts and you try to keep people

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:18.760
<v Speaker 6>happy all the time but often fail.

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Were you actually aware of that criticism at the time.

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 6>Though, No, no, no, I wasn't. But again then, as

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:33.839
<v Speaker 6>a Commissioner of Police that in Australia, I often got

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 6>plenty of praise from people, but equally there were plenty

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 6>of people that were unhappy. And it's not that you

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 6>ignore that, but you can't let that impact on daily

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 6>decisions because Unfortunately, every day someone is a victim of

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 6>a serious crime.

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's one of the things you take on

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:56.880
<v Speaker 1>when you take on a role like that, I'd imagine

0:43:57.040 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 1>is you know, you become a public figure for the

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>good and the bad, and there's going to be both

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and to steer your way through that, isn't it?

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 2>No, it is.

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 6>But at the same time, if they feel as though

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 6>that somehow they didn't get vict and care from me,

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 6>then you know, of course I'm apologetic about that, but

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 6>there was no malice to that. But again, you'll spread

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 6>pretty thin at the best of times, but there was

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 6>certainly no malice in that, and you know, accept their criticism.

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Just a couple of last things I'd like to ask you,

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 1>if possible. One is this investigation in terms of the

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:44.879
<v Speaker 1>public understanding of this investigation turned on its head when

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it became public that the strike force was looking at

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>one person, particularly being William's foster mother, that was on

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>front page of the Daily Telegraph. Were you aware that

0:44:58.200 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>story was coming at the time, because a lot of

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:02.280
<v Speaker 1>people in the police weren't aware.

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 6>No, I wasn't aware that the Daily Telegraph was going

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 6>to run a story on it. Look I know, Gary

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 6>has been interviewed since his retirement and said that, you know,

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 6>he had looked at the poster parents at one stage

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 6>and discounted them.

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:18.799
<v Speaker 2>So I.

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:23.760
<v Speaker 6>Think it would be unreasonable to think that that story

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 6>shocked anyone, particularly now you Look. Do you, as a

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 6>police officer have off the record conversations with journalists? Yeah,

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 6>absolutely you do, and I'm sure you rely on those

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:40.719
<v Speaker 6>every day. But I certainly have never come out publicly

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 6>on any case and said something that would cause prejudice

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:55.360
<v Speaker 6>against an outcome, because you have to remember that even

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 6>if I had a hunch and that Hunt was right

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 6>and I said something to prejudice, then your cause more

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 6>damaged than good dance.

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So the case, were you involved in any off the

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 1>record conversations before that story came out?

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.760
<v Speaker 6>Look, I honestly don't recall it. I truly don't, but

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:17.920
<v Speaker 6>but I will say this, I had plenty of off

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 6>the record conversations, and as the commissioner, I was sort

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 6>of prided myself on being available and having an opinion. Now,

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 6>backgrounding a story is one thing, but if you know,

0:46:34.080 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 6>there's a suggestion that somehow that I had maliciously given

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 6>information for a public story, as commissioner.

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, then it's just not true. There's no suggestion.

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 6>Of any But did I talk to journalists, yep, journalists

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 6>still ring me?

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:53.319
<v Speaker 2>Now, yeah, yes they do.

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:57.280
<v Speaker 6>But you know, I think, you know, I don't feel

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:00.440
<v Speaker 6>like I've been let down by a journalist, and I

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 6>don't feel as though that I've ever used that maliciously

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:04.360
<v Speaker 6>to damage anyone.

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, last thing, looking back now, you're obviously out of

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the police and your time as commissioner has finished. This

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:16.879
<v Speaker 1>investigation hasn't looking back at it now, what are your

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about the case?

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 6>I feel it in my heart that in these cases

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:25.319
<v Speaker 6>you could look back in hindsight and say, look, the

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:30.800
<v Speaker 6>first three days were consequential in probably solving the case,

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:35.880
<v Speaker 6>and there was a focus on William being a missing person.

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 6>And I'm sure there's things that we all would have

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 6>liked to have done better back in twenty fourteen. So

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 6>I think, you know, at the same time, this is

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 6>a particularly challenging case. It was never going to be

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 6>easy to solve, and maybe it won't get sold this time,

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 6>but you know, people won't give up on William Tyrrell.

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.600
<v Speaker 6>You know, new police coming through that will take over

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:05.399
<v Speaker 6>this case from Dave laidlaw at some stage and will

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 6>do another fresh suit of eyes then. So you know,

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 6>I would love to say that this matter was sold

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 6>before I retired.

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately it wasn't.

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:18.799
<v Speaker 6>And sometimes it takes thirty forty years for these type

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 6>of matters to be solved, and unfortunately then sometimes they

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 6>never solved.

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So for me, the most significant part of what

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Mick Fuller said is at the end there he says

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the first three days of this investigation into William two

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>or were consequential in solving the case, and that there

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.319
<v Speaker 1>was a focus on William being a missing person in

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that time, and in hindsight, he says, I'm sure there's

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 1>things we all would have liked to have done better

0:48:56.880 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty fourteen. And I think that direct reference

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to that first fatal mistake not to protect what was

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:08.919
<v Speaker 1>a crime scene, to stop people going on it, because

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 1>we know hundreds of people were up and down that

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 1>street cars were driving up and.

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Down, cars weren't being stopped.

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Carl weren't being stopped, searched, identities of drivers taken to

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>allow all that to happen and not close it down

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and say we're going to look for forensic evidence.

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:27.480
<v Speaker 3>But we saw that the lessons have been learned from

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:28.280
<v Speaker 3>William's case.

0:49:28.360 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 1>They have, and the police policy has changed now relatively

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:35.360
<v Speaker 1>recently to allow or encourage cops to look at that

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 1>much much sooner.

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 3>In the piece, if you saw the response time on

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Cleo Smith.

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Cleo Smith was a girl who went missing in Western Australia,

0:49:42.920 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 1>so a different police force. But yes, that was done

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 1>much sooner. And look, you don't know if that's the

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that would have solved this, and you can't say that,

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 1>but Cleo Smith was found. She'd been abducted and she

0:49:54.840 --> 0:50:00.400
<v Speaker 1>was found within days. The other thing Mick fully says,

0:50:01.480 --> 0:50:04.879
<v Speaker 1>and this the more I think about it, the more

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this kind of I can't quite get past this is

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>he says, this is a particularly challenging case. It was

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:17.799
<v Speaker 1>never going to be easy to solve, and maybe it

0:50:17.840 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>won't get solved this time. And there's new police coming

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:24.240
<v Speaker 1>through that will take over this case from David Laidlaw

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:26.279
<v Speaker 1>at some stage and there'll be another fresh set of

0:50:26.320 --> 0:50:30.760
<v Speaker 1>eyes there. And sometimes it takes thirty or forty years

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for these cases to be solved. But by saying that,

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think implicitly he's saying that David laidlaw. The currently

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 1>detective might not solve this case because he's saying other

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:48.880
<v Speaker 1>police will take it from him. And he's also saying, unfortunately,

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:51.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes these cases are never solved. So you've got the

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:55.640
<v Speaker 1>guy who was responsible for the police for years while

0:50:55.680 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>William Toole was being looked for by his force saying

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're not going to find him, Maybe it's going

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to take decades, and maybe the current lead detective isn't

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the man who will solve this case.

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 3>That's significant because the case is with the DPP. They're

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:18.319
<v Speaker 3>considering charges against the foster mother right now, they're asked

0:51:18.320 --> 0:51:18.919
<v Speaker 3>to hold off.

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the police sent the brief of evidence to the

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Director of Public Prosecutions.

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Presumably now that the inquest is over they will get

0:51:29.680 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 3>back to considering that.

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Look, that is a really good point. The police sent

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a brief of evidence to the Director of Public Prosecutions

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:39.719
<v Speaker 1>for advice on whether they could charge William's foster mother.

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Now we don't technically know what that was about, but

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 1>there's been enough in the media that we know, and

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:49.759
<v Speaker 1>they said in court that it's to do with disposing

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of his body. And then there was months and the

0:51:52.960 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>DPP said nothing publicly, and then the cops said, look,

0:51:57.680 --> 0:52:00.359
<v Speaker 1>can you stop thinking about that until the inquest is done.

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:03.359
<v Speaker 1>And the inquest is now done, I think they'll wait

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:07.719
<v Speaker 1>until the coroner's findings. But at that point, yeah, the

0:52:07.800 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 1>cops will hopefully ask the DPP to make a decision,

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and the DPP's going to have to say whether they

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think William's fostermum can be charged, whether that decision will

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 1>ever be made public. It would be made public if

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>she is charged, but if not, although given the history

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of leaks in this case, probably find that one out.

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 1>But if she's not charged, or if she's charged and

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:40.319
<v Speaker 1>not found guilty, then you've got the police have looked

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 1>at this case for four years and haven't solved it.

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think we're really much further forward than

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we were ten years ago in terms of working out

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 1>what did happen to William on that day in twenty fourteen.

0:52:56.000 --> 0:52:59.319
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean, I think I think the inquest, to

0:52:59.360 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 3>give credit to the inquest, did a really good job

0:53:01.680 --> 0:53:05.200
<v Speaker 3>of examining the initial search for William and I think

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 3>effectively ruling out that he had wandered off. Yeah, so

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:14.279
<v Speaker 3>that I think at this point we can assume did

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:17.800
<v Speaker 3>not happen. Yeah, beyond that, there's a lot of questions.

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you there is one crucial witness who I

0:53:22.160 --> 0:53:26.000
<v Speaker 1>think has been overlooked, at least in the public mind,

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is William's sister, who was at the house

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on the day he was reported missing. She was four

0:53:34.280 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 1>years old, he was three. They were playing together on

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the front veranda of the house with William's foster mother

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and foster grandmother, and when she was asked by police

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:48.399
<v Speaker 1>what happened to him, she said, he was playing this

0:53:48.480 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>game Daddy Tiger, so running up and roaring and running away.

0:53:52.120 --> 0:53:54.239
<v Speaker 1>He was playing that on the balcony and then he

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:58.759
<v Speaker 1>went off and he was finding Daddy's car. So that's

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what William's sister. I think he's probably the person who

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:09.960
<v Speaker 1>knows him best. And also she's four and probably I

0:54:10.000 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's capable of maintaining a lie to the

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:18.400
<v Speaker 1>police at that point, so I think that's honest. And

0:54:18.480 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of looking for Daddy's car, we do know

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that William's foster father had gone off. He'd driven away

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to make a work call and he was driving back,

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and we do know that that family had this history

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:34.399
<v Speaker 1>of going out to wait for him when he came

0:54:34.440 --> 0:54:37.319
<v Speaker 1>back from work, and the kids would be surprised and

0:54:37.320 --> 0:54:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they'd run to him. And William's sister is saying that

0:54:42.120 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 1>William went off to look for daddy's car. We also

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:50.240
<v Speaker 1>know that two of the neighbors who lived just opposite

0:54:50.320 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the house where William went missing, say they heard the

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:56.040
<v Speaker 1>sound of a car on gravel, and there was gravel

0:54:56.200 --> 0:54:59.920
<v Speaker 1>around the top of Benirum Drive. And we do know

0:55:00.160 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that the foster father's car, like a lot of cars,

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:09.080
<v Speaker 1>looked quite similar to one of the neighbors cars, and

0:55:09.120 --> 0:55:12.480
<v Speaker 1>there were people in the street. Paul Savage was out

0:55:12.520 --> 0:55:15.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time. He was packing his car. But William's

0:55:15.840 --> 0:55:20.799
<v Speaker 1>sister is now the one person in this that we

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>can't talk to or hear from in any form. She's

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>given evidence to the police, She's been interviewed by the

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:30.400
<v Speaker 1>police several times over the years, but in the inquest

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 1>every time they play that evidence, it's in close court

0:55:35.360 --> 0:55:39.439
<v Speaker 1>because fair enough, she's a child, she's vulnerable. They want

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:43.759
<v Speaker 1>to protect her. But in trying to protect her, they've

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 1>actually made it impossible for her evidence to be heard publicly.

0:55:49.200 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And if I'm honest, I don't see how hearing her

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:58.800
<v Speaker 1>evidence is going to harm her. And Okay, I'm not

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:00.640
<v Speaker 1>qualified to make that decision, and I'm not a child

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:04.239
<v Speaker 1>protection specialist, I'm not the coroner. But it does mean

0:56:04.280 --> 0:56:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that this one crucial witness who has said what she

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:10.840
<v Speaker 1>thinks William was doing at the time he went missing,

0:56:11.440 --> 0:56:13.680
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been heard from in public.

0:56:19.480 --> 0:56:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so we're coming to the end of the year. Yes,

0:56:23.400 --> 0:56:25.880
<v Speaker 3>we are coming to the end of the series for now,

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:27.080
<v Speaker 3>are we done?

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:28.360
<v Speaker 2>We have a.

0:56:28.320 --> 0:56:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Difference of opinion about this because I want to say

0:56:32.160 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're still doing and you don't want me to

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:34.400
<v Speaker 1>say it.

0:56:35.480 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 3>We have questions.

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say we have questions. So

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what will happen next, that written submission

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 1>process you talked about, which may or may not happen

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in public, I suspect won't. And then the inquest will

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:54.440
<v Speaker 1>report at some time the coroner will hand down her findings.

0:56:55.920 --> 0:56:59.239
<v Speaker 1>My guess is that will take a few months, but.

0:56:59.320 --> 0:57:01.359
<v Speaker 3>We will be there to report on that. We will

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:04.040
<v Speaker 3>will be there to report on any other significant updates

0:57:04.120 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 3>in the case.

0:57:04.760 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the thing you don't want me to talk

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:09.160
<v Speaker 1>about is that we still have questions. We do but

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:12.360
<v Speaker 1>more than questions, we have been working to fine answers.

0:57:12.400 --> 0:57:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And there's been a whole other investigation associated with this

0:57:16.920 --> 0:57:20.520
<v Speaker 1>one that you've been doing, particularly in the background, not

0:57:20.560 --> 0:57:22.120
<v Speaker 1>on your own. There's been a few of us working

0:57:22.200 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on it. But you have found things that surprised me.

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:32.760
<v Speaker 1>You have found things that frankly I cannot believe have

0:57:32.880 --> 0:57:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not been made public, and you've found things that at

0:57:35.520 --> 0:57:41.320
<v Speaker 1>times actually kind of shocked me. So those things are

0:57:41.360 --> 0:57:43.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the answers that we've been working on, and

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we are going to come back with this podcast to

0:57:48.360 --> 0:57:52.880
<v Speaker 1>look at those questions to give you those answers. And

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:57.360
<v Speaker 1>those answers are about things that have happened on the

0:57:57.360 --> 0:58:00.400
<v Speaker 1>mid North coast of New South Wales, which is where

0:58:00.400 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 1>William went missing. And it is beautiful country. It's white sand,

0:58:07.240 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it's thick forest, and it's also the home of some

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:19.160
<v Speaker 1>really troubling allegations. So this inquest may have stopped, but

0:58:19.280 --> 0:58:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this podcast hasn't. We still have questions and we are

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:25.720
<v Speaker 1>going to find answers and we will do that in

0:58:25.760 --> 0:58:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the next episode of Witness William Tyrell. A lot of

0:58:35.760 --> 0:58:39.200
<v Speaker 1>different people have been involved in making this series, among

0:58:39.240 --> 0:58:42.800
<v Speaker 1>them the executive producer is Nina Young. The sound design

0:58:42.920 --> 0:58:46.440
<v Speaker 1>was by Tiffany Dimack. The producers have been Emily Pigeon,

0:58:46.800 --> 0:58:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Adams, Jazzbar, Phoebe Zakowski, Wallace and Tabby Wilson. Research

0:58:52.520 --> 0:58:56.760
<v Speaker 1>by Adan Patrick, original music by Rory O'Connor. Our lawyer

0:58:56.880 --> 0:59:00.080
<v Speaker 1>is Stephen Coombs, the editor at news dot com. What

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a U is Kerry Warren, I'm Dan Box

0:59:12.200 --> 0:59:12.480
<v Speaker 6>M hm