WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 14 September

0:00:02.660 --> 0:00:04.939
<v Speaker 1>This is Paul Murray Live.

0:00:06.620 --> 0:00:08.940
<v Speaker 2>Well done, Shari. Don't forget, buy not just one, but

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:11.540
<v Speaker 2>buy two. It's a good cause. Great authors that are

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>behind it. It was a privilege to be at the

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:15.460
<v Speaker 2>launch last week. We love you, Shari. All right, let's

0:00:15.500 --> 0:00:17.450
<v Speaker 2>get straight to this. Tonight, you got us on a

0:00:17.460 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 2>blockbuster night. One of those ones where we need two,

0:00:20.340 --> 0:00:23.410
<v Speaker 2>but we've only got one hour. So no mucking around, OK?

0:00:23.670 --> 0:00:26.310
<v Speaker 2>Jacinta Price will be here. We know there's a bit

0:00:26.329 --> 0:00:28.990
<v Speaker 2>in the news in relation to Pauline Hanson. and a

0:00:29.050 --> 0:00:32.330
<v Speaker 2>podcast from a very, very long time ago. But more importantly,

0:00:32.350 --> 0:00:35.909
<v Speaker 2>Jacinta Price is the shadow... Jacinta Dampa Jimpa Price, I

0:00:35.930 --> 0:00:38.150
<v Speaker 2>should say, of course, is the shadow small business minister.

0:00:38.170 --> 0:00:39.870
<v Speaker 2>We're going to talk about the massive problems that are

0:00:39.890 --> 0:00:43.030
<v Speaker 2>happening there, more evidence of that over the weekend. One

0:00:43.090 --> 0:00:48.330
<v Speaker 2>Nation have absolutely nailed the position when it comes to migration,

0:00:48.550 --> 0:00:50.909
<v Speaker 2>if the polls are to be believed. We discussed that

0:00:50.930 --> 0:00:53.389
<v Speaker 2>in a moment or two's time. And, yeah, we have

0:00:53.430 --> 0:00:58.100
<v Speaker 2>to deal with this... The Minister for Freebies was watching

0:00:58.190 --> 0:01:02.190
<v Speaker 2>last night's show and she talked about it in the

0:01:02.310 --> 0:01:03.810
<v Speaker 2>Parliament today.

0:01:05.390 --> 0:01:08.330
<v Speaker 3>Mr Speaker, I can honestly say I have never agreed

0:01:08.390 --> 0:01:11.410
<v Speaker 3>more with Paul Murray than on this point.

0:01:11.790 --> 0:01:15.510
<v Speaker 2>Never. I have never. My favourite detail, by the way.

0:01:15.550 --> 0:01:17.550
<v Speaker 2>In fact, can we just get ready to play that again, OK?

0:01:17.709 --> 0:01:19.090
<v Speaker 2>But do it with no sound. I want you to

0:01:19.150 --> 0:01:21.860
<v Speaker 2>pay attention, not to the minister, not to Tony Boop,

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 2>but have a look at the Deputy Prime Minister when

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>my little name gets brought up. Oh, yuck! Yucky poos!

0:01:30.230 --> 0:01:32.250
<v Speaker 2>We'll deal with all that in a couple of minutes' time.

0:01:33.010 --> 0:01:35.930
<v Speaker 2>It was a strange afternoon. All right. As for our town,

0:01:35.990 --> 0:01:38.209
<v Speaker 2>we will be in Bathurst in a couple of weeks' time.

0:01:38.330 --> 0:01:41.150
<v Speaker 2>Cannot wait to be there. Now the race, of course,

0:01:41.190 --> 0:01:44.309
<v Speaker 2>second week in October, but we bring the party early, baby.

0:01:44.350 --> 0:01:47.610
<v Speaker 2>We always do. Sunday the 27th of September. If you'd

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.310
<v Speaker 2>like to join us in Bathurst for our town, let's

0:01:50.420 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 2>fill the room. Come on, Orange. Come on, Oberyn.

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Come on, Lithgow.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Wherever you are, get there. It's part of the school

0:01:56.700 --> 0:01:58.980
<v Speaker 2>holidays in New South Wales, so no excuses, all right?

0:01:59.430 --> 0:02:06.330
<v Speaker 2>Our town at news24. com. au. Our town at news24. com. au. Now, an

0:02:06.390 --> 0:02:10.670
<v Speaker 2>update on Albo's red-hot rort, as we have shown and

0:02:10.730 --> 0:02:13.770
<v Speaker 2>as we have discussed before. This is more than half

0:02:13.810 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 2>a B for billion dollars that the government put aside

0:02:17.500 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 2>to give out to mainly Labor electorates, and he had

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.239
<v Speaker 2>to be invited to get the money. Now, they say, well,

0:02:24.260 --> 0:02:25.899
<v Speaker 2>all of this is just completely normal, and the other

0:02:25.940 --> 0:02:27.740
<v Speaker 2>guys were going to promise more. Hang on. This is

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 2>a slush fund. It's a rort. And it was a

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.270
<v Speaker 2>way of being able to go sort of door-to-door in

0:02:34.330 --> 0:02:37.210
<v Speaker 2>local areas and promise a pool here and a sporting

0:02:37.250 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 2>club there. They're not the first to do it, but

0:02:39.470 --> 0:02:44.540
<v Speaker 2>this thing from independent observers is a rort. Roll the tape.

0:02:46.340 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Prima facie, it looks like the misuse of public money

0:02:50.460 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 2>or serious pork barrelling, as it's sometimes called.

0:02:53.300 --> 0:02:59.020
<v Speaker 4>For every dollar spent in a coalition seat, $ 3.

0:02:57.780 --> 0:03:01.690
<v Speaker 5>20 was spent in a notionally ALP-held seat.

0:03:02.930 --> 0:03:06.950
<v Speaker 2>Now, I keep talking about this because it's our money.

0:03:07.030 --> 0:03:09.429
<v Speaker 2>It's not their money. It's our money to give away.

0:03:09.470 --> 0:03:12.110
<v Speaker 2>We're in a deficit. We owe the world a trillion dollars,

0:03:12.130 --> 0:03:14.460
<v Speaker 2>but let's borrow and send it only to the places

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 2>where the Labor Party either is going to win a

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 2>seat or think they're going to win a seat, right?

0:03:19.900 --> 0:03:23.500
<v Speaker 2>Something that even Channel 9 called out as being something

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:24.660
<v Speaker 2>that stinks.

0:03:26.260 --> 0:03:30.130
<v Speaker 6>Whereas the sports rort scandal involved a selection process that

0:03:30.150 --> 0:03:34.860
<v Speaker 6>was corrupted by politics... Labor's infrastructure grants program seemed to

0:03:34.900 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 6>have no process at all except to curry political favour.

0:03:39.380 --> 0:03:42.060
<v Speaker 3>Sports rots was pork barrelling by deception.

0:03:42.550 --> 0:03:45.290
<v Speaker 1>This is pork barrelling by design.

0:03:46.130 --> 0:03:50.790
<v Speaker 2>Well, the update. The Senate has yet again surprised us.

0:03:50.830 --> 0:03:54.110
<v Speaker 2>Last week they did exactly the right thing. Everyone but

0:03:54.150 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 2>the Labor Party voting to get rid of the cap

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 2>on veterans. I'll get to that a little bit later. Today,

0:04:01.180 --> 0:04:06.540
<v Speaker 2>the Senate has now established an inquiry into the red-hot rorts.

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.990
<v Speaker 2>This means the story's not going away. Now, the government

0:04:12.030 --> 0:04:14.790
<v Speaker 2>may want to say, look at this podcast from six

0:04:14.870 --> 0:04:20.890
<v Speaker 2>years ago. But the reality is, this is red-hot. This

0:04:21.150 --> 0:04:27.010
<v Speaker 2>is about the Labor Party picking... the organisations they want

0:04:27.029 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 2>to give money to. The perfect example, the Merrickville Golf Club,

0:04:30.270 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 2>that miraculously was getting money from the Prime Minister, who

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.580
<v Speaker 2>happened to own an investment property sort of on the

0:04:37.700 --> 0:04:39.979
<v Speaker 2>edge of the golf course, that if the golf course

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.070
<v Speaker 2>had been shut down, would be turned into apartments. And maybe,

0:04:43.130 --> 0:04:46.850
<v Speaker 2>just maybe, that would have changed the outlook of anyone who, say,

0:04:47.029 --> 0:04:50.430
<v Speaker 2>owned a house on the edge of the golf club.

0:04:50.450 --> 0:04:53.089
<v Speaker 2>But you can't say that. You can't say that because this,

0:04:53.130 --> 0:04:54.990
<v Speaker 2>of course, is a Prime Minister who is above that

0:04:55.029 --> 0:04:59.090
<v Speaker 2>sort of pettiness. He doesn't play that game. Because look

0:04:59.130 --> 0:05:02.010
<v Speaker 2>what happens when he was asked that question in the

0:05:02.050 --> 0:05:02.770
<v Speaker 2>Parliament today.

0:05:03.930 --> 0:05:06.589
<v Speaker 7>My question is to the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister

0:05:06.630 --> 0:05:10.830
<v Speaker 7>reportedly owns a multi-million dollar investment property just 200 metres

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.580
<v Speaker 7>away from Marrickville Golf Club, where he holds an undisclosed

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 7>honorary membership. Noting the Prime Minister's previous answers in this House,

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.060
<v Speaker 7>did the Prime Minister's decision to hand a $ 6 million

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 7>grant to Marrickville Golf Club to upgrade its clubhouse and

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.099
<v Speaker 7>remove the sewage stink increase the value of his investment

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:31.780
<v Speaker 7>property down the road?

0:05:32.700 --> 0:05:33.860
<v Speaker 2>Thanks, Mr Speaker.

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.980
<v Speaker 4>That wasn't so much a question as a smear.

0:05:42.700 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 2>And its imputations.

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.260
<v Speaker 4>Its imputations are completely false.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.460
<v Speaker 2>So, of course, the Prime Minister would never do such

0:05:50.500 --> 0:05:54.700
<v Speaker 2>a thing. But what's to suggest that every single one

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:56.940
<v Speaker 2>of the how many more projects that ended up where

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:58.900
<v Speaker 2>the Labor Party wanted it to go, as opposed to

0:05:58.940 --> 0:06:01.849
<v Speaker 2>the 150 members of the Parliament, who, let's be honest,

0:06:01.890 --> 0:06:03.849
<v Speaker 2>the way this scheme should work is if there is

0:06:03.890 --> 0:06:06.250
<v Speaker 2>to be a pot of money that the federal government

0:06:06.390 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 2>wants to put out in place... for the 150 different

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.060
<v Speaker 2>places around the country, then why not just an equal

0:06:14.100 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>distribution of that money amongst the 150 MPs? And whoever

0:06:18.490 --> 0:06:20.450
<v Speaker 2>wins the seat, well, their projects are the ones that

0:06:20.470 --> 0:06:23.310
<v Speaker 2>get funded, right? But no, no, no, no, no. This

0:06:23.370 --> 0:06:26.910
<v Speaker 2>is a very special fund, a better fund. And as

0:06:26.950 --> 0:06:30.390
<v Speaker 2>even Channel 9 said, they didn't use the colour-coding system

0:06:30.430 --> 0:06:34.550
<v Speaker 2>that did the libs in. They just had no system whatsoever. Well, thankfully,

0:06:34.610 --> 0:06:36.750
<v Speaker 2>a Senate inquiry into all of this means it ain't

0:06:36.790 --> 0:06:41.310
<v Speaker 2>going away. Good to see. Good to see the questions

0:06:41.370 --> 0:06:43.330
<v Speaker 2>still being asked and good to see the Prime Minister

0:06:44.270 --> 0:06:48.029
<v Speaker 2>getting very indignant about his answers. Wait, watch and see.

0:06:48.150 --> 0:06:50.450
<v Speaker 2>There's plenty more in all of this. And again, while

0:06:50.550 --> 0:06:52.290
<v Speaker 2>the government's going to say, well, of course it's completely

0:06:52.330 --> 0:06:53.810
<v Speaker 2>OK because we're the ones who set the rules and

0:06:53.830 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 2>we didn't break the rules, the spirit of the system

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.060
<v Speaker 2>is something worth talking about. Do you think it's fair

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.100
<v Speaker 2>that half a B4 billion dollars is put aside for

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 2>the government to spend as it wishes, based, funnily enough,

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.930
<v Speaker 2>off its political interests... Nothing to see here.

0:07:12.590 --> 0:07:12.910
<v Speaker 1>Nothing.

0:07:15.430 --> 0:07:18.110
<v Speaker 2>Now, another way of complimenting the greatest Prime Minister of

0:07:18.170 --> 0:07:20.620
<v Speaker 2>all time, I'm sure is very happy for my shout-out today,

0:07:21.300 --> 0:07:23.620
<v Speaker 2>it is, of course, H.Y. Alba. Now, why do we

0:07:23.700 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 2>say this? Because remember when petrol prices were going through

0:07:27.700 --> 0:07:30.580
<v Speaker 2>the roof, yes, because of a war in Iran, one that,

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 2>of course, this government did not start, but as I

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.830
<v Speaker 2>have spoken about for years, I think it's immoral that

0:07:36.870 --> 0:07:42.540
<v Speaker 2>this country, 52 cents of every litre of petrol has

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.660
<v Speaker 2>a tax that goes to the federal government. Supposedly it's

0:07:45.700 --> 0:07:50.340
<v Speaker 2>about roads. Seriously? Been on any roads outside of our

0:07:50.380 --> 0:07:53.790
<v Speaker 2>major cities anytime soon? The money, if it exists, is

0:07:53.830 --> 0:07:59.390
<v Speaker 2>being squirrelled somewhere else. The reality of the times are

0:07:59.470 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that we are under so much financial pressure that the

0:08:01.860 --> 0:08:03.620
<v Speaker 2>government should get out of the way. This is not

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 2>like a tax on tobacco. This is about how you

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.910
<v Speaker 2>power the vehicle that takes the family everywhere, yourself to work,

0:08:12.470 --> 0:08:14.370
<v Speaker 2>or it's the one you use for work. But you

0:08:14.390 --> 0:08:16.330
<v Speaker 2>should be able to go off and get an EV. Okay,

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:18.940
<v Speaker 2>if you can afford it, fine. But you may notice

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>every car on the road isn't exactly a brand new car.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.940
<v Speaker 2>There are these things called used cars because some people

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.140
<v Speaker 2>actually have to use their own money to buy a car.

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.050
<v Speaker 2>Unlike the people in Canberra, of course, have the car

0:08:31.900 --> 0:08:36.109
<v Speaker 2>bought for them by us, the taxpayer. So when we originally,

0:08:36.270 --> 0:08:39.150
<v Speaker 2>months and months ago, were saying, hey, there's a problem here.

0:08:39.590 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 2>It's immoral that you take 52 cents. And the government

0:08:43.179 --> 0:08:45.500
<v Speaker 2>was saying, well, stiff cheddar, pal.

0:08:47.260 --> 0:08:50.260
<v Speaker 1>We're back in the coalition's plan to slash the fuel excite.

0:08:50.860 --> 0:08:53.780
<v Speaker 8>Well, what the coalition seems to be proposing is no

0:08:53.940 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 8>ongoing cost of living help.

0:08:55.580 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 5>Will you match it up?

0:08:57.540 --> 0:08:58.620
<v Speaker 1>No, we've got our own budget.

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.949
<v Speaker 2>We've got our own cost of living agenda. And then

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.020
<v Speaker 2>the opinion polls started saying, yeah, cut the damn tax,

0:09:05.140 --> 0:09:07.850
<v Speaker 2>all right? You'll already take enough. Remember, the single biggest

0:09:07.870 --> 0:09:10.830
<v Speaker 2>source of revenue to the federal government is the working

0:09:10.890 --> 0:09:16.780
<v Speaker 2>man and woman. People who are pay-as-you-go. Second biggest source,

0:09:16.830 --> 0:09:19.970
<v Speaker 2>company tax, but that's not even half that comes from

0:09:19.990 --> 0:09:23.630
<v Speaker 2>the workers. Third biggest, the GST, which, again, doesn't even

0:09:23.670 --> 0:09:26.210
<v Speaker 2>touch the sides of the amount of money that the

0:09:26.290 --> 0:09:28.430
<v Speaker 2>worker gives to the government to piddle up against the

0:09:28.470 --> 0:09:30.790
<v Speaker 2>wall on half a billion dollars' worth of projects that

0:09:30.820 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>help them out politically. See how this becomes a circle? Well,

0:09:34.860 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 2>of course, they ended up doing it because it was

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the right thing to do, but also the pressure they

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>couldn't ignore.

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 4>We're announcing the Commonwealth Government will halve the fuel excise

0:09:45.420 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 4>on petrol and diesel for three months. We're making fuel

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:53.130
<v Speaker 4>cheaper today because we understand that Australians are under serious pressure.

0:09:54.330 --> 0:09:58.790
<v Speaker 2>But apparently that pressure completely disappeared because the price of petrol, yes,

0:09:58.990 --> 0:10:02.130
<v Speaker 2>ever so slightly started to come back down and they

0:10:02.170 --> 0:10:05.340
<v Speaker 2>did it in a cheeky fashion rather than just one

0:10:05.380 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 2>big up because everyone had noticed that and they'd start

0:10:07.020 --> 0:10:10.599
<v Speaker 2>blowing up. Their theory is treat the Australian people like mushrooms,

0:10:10.620 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, keep them in the dark, feed them, the

0:10:13.100 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 2>obvious diet, right? That's their whole plan. Their plan is

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 2>no one's paying attention. So they slowly but surely brought

0:10:19.260 --> 0:10:21.900
<v Speaker 2>the tax back up and right now 52 cents in

0:10:21.980 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 2>the dollar. That was their decision, their help for the

0:10:25.380 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 2>working man and woman. Well, it was only for this

0:10:28.179 --> 0:10:29.020
<v Speaker 2>amount of time, right?

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:33.210
<v Speaker 5>Australian government is keeping its options open when it comes

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.630
<v Speaker 5>to further discounts of the fuel excise.

0:10:37.110 --> 0:10:41.150
<v Speaker 2>So the conversation today is there is a chance that

0:10:41.250 --> 0:10:44.350
<v Speaker 2>the government is going to do it again. Now, of course,

0:10:44.610 --> 0:10:49.650
<v Speaker 2>they shouldn't be... ever taking 52 cents of every single litre.

0:10:49.950 --> 0:10:52.930
<v Speaker 2>And when they reduce it to 25 cents for every

0:10:52.970 --> 0:10:56.490
<v Speaker 2>single litre, yes, it helps. But it's still half of

0:10:56.530 --> 0:10:58.590
<v Speaker 2>the problem that, in my view, they should be getting

0:10:58.750 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>out of that game. Why? Because everything else is expensive.

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:04.980
<v Speaker 2>Like when you go into the servo and you get

0:11:05.020 --> 0:11:06.859
<v Speaker 2>your bread and your milk, let alone any of the

0:11:06.900 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 2>other guff and garbage that's in there. All right? Let

0:11:10.020 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 2>alone when you go to the other shops, let alone

0:11:11.860 --> 0:11:14.179
<v Speaker 2>the place you've just come from or you're going to.

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 2>All of it's more expensive. So this is a way

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.210
<v Speaker 2>of the government recognising that they're getting between point A

0:11:20.230 --> 0:11:23.090
<v Speaker 2>and B, that point A and point B costs more

0:11:23.150 --> 0:11:25.569
<v Speaker 2>than they did four years ago when this mob came

0:11:25.590 --> 0:11:28.250
<v Speaker 2>to power, that they're getting to point A and point B, well,

0:11:28.270 --> 0:11:31.329
<v Speaker 2>they should make that as cheap as possible. And guess what?

0:11:32.050 --> 0:11:35.650
<v Speaker 2>The pressure might be coming their way again to do it. Why?

0:11:35.670 --> 0:11:35.740
<v Speaker 5>Why?

0:11:36.300 --> 0:11:39.260
<v Speaker 2>Because petrol prices are starting to rise again. Why? Because

0:11:39.300 --> 0:11:42.059
<v Speaker 2>the Iran war has not ended. Wasn't it supposed to

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 2>be done in two weeks? Anyway, separate topic. As you

0:11:45.780 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 2>can see, unleaded 91 and E10 in Sydney from about

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 2>$ 1. 60 to more than $ 2. 10. About $ 1. 70 to about $ 2. 10

0:11:51.559 --> 0:12:06.580
<v Speaker 2>in Melbourne. And in Brisbane, from about $ 1. 70 to almost $ 2. 20,

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the average price there being some of the highest in

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.020
<v Speaker 2>the country, meaning there is a chance we are going

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.780
<v Speaker 2>to maybe, just maybe, see a reduction in the tax.

0:12:16.540 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Because one thing that definitely happens is that when petrol

0:12:19.540 --> 0:12:22.300
<v Speaker 2>starts to go up, so does inflation, because petrol is

0:12:22.350 --> 0:12:25.230
<v Speaker 2>part of inflation. And who is currently looking at inflation?

0:12:25.630 --> 0:12:26.510
<v Speaker 2>The Reserve Bank.

0:12:27.350 --> 0:12:27.530
<v Speaker 1>I.e.

0:12:27.690 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 2>There is a direct link between petrol prices, inflation, interest rates.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 2>The government is in a whole world of trouble because

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.300
<v Speaker 2>of interest rates. They could, they just could, do something

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:44.060
<v Speaker 2>about lowering the amount we pay at the bowser. But,

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.090
<v Speaker 2>of course, to do that would mean they have to

0:12:46.150 --> 0:12:52.850
<v Speaker 2>admit they've been wrong. That couldn't possibly be the case, right? Now,

0:12:53.070 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 2>every time the issue of immigration is brought up, Australians

0:12:57.780 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 2>think there are too many people coming into the country,

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.650
<v Speaker 2>not because they're a bunch of knuckle-dragging racists, but because

0:13:05.610 --> 0:13:07.950
<v Speaker 2>we remember, those of us who were alive 30 years ago,

0:13:08.010 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 2>when 18 million people lived in the country. 30 years later,

0:13:10.910 --> 0:13:15.420
<v Speaker 2>it's 28 million people. In 30 years' time, we're pushing

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 2>to 40, 50 million people. And to anyone who lives

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 2>in a big city or a small country town, the

0:13:22.540 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 2>roads aren't keeping up, the infrastructure doesn't keep up, there's

0:13:25.970 --> 0:13:29.250
<v Speaker 2>not enough places in aged care, there's battles to be

0:13:29.330 --> 0:13:31.550
<v Speaker 2>able to afford to keep people in their homes so

0:13:31.570 --> 0:13:35.030
<v Speaker 2>they don't go into aged care, and so on. So

0:13:35.090 --> 0:13:39.010
<v Speaker 2>Australians have always believed that the party that taps the

0:13:39.050 --> 0:13:41.390
<v Speaker 2>brakes is the one that is going to give us

0:13:41.429 --> 0:13:44.810
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a relief from those pressures. Because theoretically,

0:13:44.870 --> 0:13:48.069
<v Speaker 2>government is... trying to catch up to those pressures so

0:13:48.130 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 2>rather than keep racing ahead why not bring it back

0:13:50.510 --> 0:13:53.980
<v Speaker 2>to some level of equilibrium in the news 24 pulse

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:58.500
<v Speaker 2>just last week we spoke about this here and australians

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.900
<v Speaker 2>have a very clear view 66 say we should decrease

0:14:03.020 --> 0:14:08.270
<v Speaker 2>immigration levels all right 27 say stay the same seven

0:14:08.290 --> 0:14:10.990
<v Speaker 2>percent say increase well good luck to the teals who

0:14:11.030 --> 0:14:13.699
<v Speaker 2>think that all the members of Treasury who may think that,

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.650
<v Speaker 2>but the extreme majority of Australians, 66%, say, come on.

0:14:18.070 --> 0:14:20.050
<v Speaker 2>When you want to get more detailed about it, 42%

0:14:20.050 --> 0:14:26.430
<v Speaker 2>want a big decrease. 24%, on top of the 42%,

0:14:26.430 --> 0:14:30.580
<v Speaker 2>want a small decrease. About a quarter, so stay the same.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.820
<v Speaker 2>The rest of it, again, is the cut-up of the 7%. Well,

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:39.660
<v Speaker 2>there's a bit more in this today. The Resolve organisation, well,

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>they ask a whole bunch of questions and unlike us,

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 2>they don't dump it all on one day. They try

0:14:43.100 --> 0:14:46.740
<v Speaker 2>to sort of get a week's worth of little stories.

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:46.630
<v Speaker 1>Out of it.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.739
<v Speaker 2>Instead, we give you all the data at once. That's

0:14:48.780 --> 0:14:51.820
<v Speaker 2>every second Tuesday on this program and at the website

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.750
<v Speaker 2>of news24. com. au. Yet another reason to subscribe, by the way.

0:14:55.210 --> 0:14:57.310
<v Speaker 2>And when you subscribe, say you're doing it to watch

0:14:57.330 --> 0:14:59.510
<v Speaker 2>a little more Paul Murray live. They do get the comments.

0:15:01.590 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Methods of reducing migration. 62% cut the refugee intake from

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>20,000 to 13,000. Ban partner and family visas for international students, 48%.

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:16.620
<v Speaker 2>Redraw the UK free trade agreement so UK backpackers are

0:15:16.660 --> 0:15:22.030
<v Speaker 2>obliged to work in the same regional areas as other backpackers, 47%.

0:15:22.030 --> 0:15:24.150
<v Speaker 2>What a surprise. When people are asked, they have a

0:15:24.190 --> 0:15:27.410
<v Speaker 2>clear view, which is the current system, it ain't working.

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.810
<v Speaker 2>And there's one and one party only who is not

0:15:32.230 --> 0:15:35.350
<v Speaker 2>trying to hide behind the eternal story of growth for

0:15:35.370 --> 0:15:39.130
<v Speaker 2>the economy. The Ponzi scheme of more people pay more tax,

0:15:39.370 --> 0:15:42.170
<v Speaker 2>which means the government spends more money, including half a

0:15:42.210 --> 0:15:49.030
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars on itself. So One Nation's plan cut $ 750, 000

0:15:47.870 --> 0:15:51.670
<v Speaker 2>over three, 750,000 people, I should say, over the next

0:15:52.030 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 2>three years. Now, which evil right wing country would do that? Oh,

0:15:58.300 --> 0:16:02.420
<v Speaker 2>that's right, the left-wing party, Justin Trudeau's party, from Canada.

0:16:04.140 --> 0:16:08.070
<v Speaker 2>This is what One Nation has explained the position to be.

0:16:08.570 --> 0:16:13.290
<v Speaker 2>The Labor-Liberal political cartel has sacrificed Australian living standards to

0:16:13.330 --> 0:16:17.710
<v Speaker 2>serve vested interests and demanding continued mass migration. Vested interests

0:16:17.770 --> 0:16:21.050
<v Speaker 2>and elite economists will shriek at the prospect of these cuts.

0:16:21.690 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>But in Canada... It shows you that you can cut

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.850
<v Speaker 2>migrant numbers, take the pressures off rent and still grow

0:16:27.090 --> 0:16:31.890
<v Speaker 2>the economy. You're kidding me. And people thought when you

0:16:31.910 --> 0:16:34.190
<v Speaker 2>said North America, she was going to talk about the

0:16:34.270 --> 0:16:34.810
<v Speaker 2>orange man.

0:16:34.850 --> 0:16:35.230
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no.

0:16:35.290 --> 0:16:40.130
<v Speaker 2>Instead, the Prime Minister of Canada. Oh, that knuckle-dragging racist

0:16:40.210 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 2>that he is. He certainly has not had the blackface

0:16:44.100 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>history of Justin Trudeau, so maybe, just maybe, he's not

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:53.250
<v Speaker 2>as diverse as Mr Katy Perry is these days. Unsurprisingly,

0:16:53.550 --> 0:16:56.410
<v Speaker 2>the people who are addicted to more people coming in

0:16:56.450 --> 0:17:00.450
<v Speaker 2>because either it produces more tax or it produces more

0:17:00.730 --> 0:17:04.310
<v Speaker 2>cheap labour or it produces more demand for the stuff

0:17:04.330 --> 0:17:07.060
<v Speaker 2>that they pay went cray-cray today.

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 8>One Nation's policy is a recipe to destroy the Australian

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.460
<v Speaker 8>economy and drive the Australian economy into recession.

0:17:16.940 --> 0:17:19.580
<v Speaker 2>I am deeply concerned about what it means. They need

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:24.110
<v Speaker 2>to explain all this. Alright, so let's deal with all

0:17:24.130 --> 0:17:25.870
<v Speaker 2>of this in a moment or two's time. There we go.

0:17:25.990 --> 0:17:29.390
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. So, little mention in the Parliament. Mum will

0:17:29.430 --> 0:17:33.149
<v Speaker 2>be proud that her little bogan boy got mentioned today

0:17:33.190 --> 0:17:36.610
<v Speaker 2>and by none other than the future Prime Minister, Annika Wells.

0:17:39.270 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Mr Speaker, I can honestly say I have never agreed

0:17:42.260 --> 0:17:45.300
<v Speaker 3>more with Paul Murray than on this point.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:52.859
<v Speaker 2>Never. I have never. That's because he's the guy that, remember,

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 2>we talked about his rorting when it came to those

0:17:55.820 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 2>free public flights where he could have just gone to Melbourne,

0:17:58.260 --> 0:18:00.340
<v Speaker 2>but no, he lives sort of in Geelong, so he

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:02.500
<v Speaker 2>got dropped off there. Not that there's a link at all.

0:18:02.540 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 2>He just philosophically disagrees with me. Anyway, it's all to

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 2>do with social media. So let's be very clear. In

0:18:10.700 --> 0:18:15.460
<v Speaker 2>what I thought was not the biggest cuddle of a

0:18:15.500 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 2>minister I've ever given, in fact quite the opposite, But still,

0:18:20.500 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 2>it got the mention today. So I'm not going to

0:18:23.100 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 2>do that thing where I'm going to show you a

0:18:24.740 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 2>video of me on my show thing, right? I'm just

0:18:27.420 --> 0:18:32.310
<v Speaker 2>going to read what I said about the supposed plan

0:18:32.330 --> 0:18:35.690
<v Speaker 2>to change social media in the country, okay? Why did

0:18:36.310 --> 0:18:39.330
<v Speaker 2>they get out there? Well, now, forgive the grammar. It's

0:18:39.369 --> 0:18:41.350
<v Speaker 2>all off the top of my head. But here's me

0:18:41.390 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 2>reading it back to you. Now, as you know, I

0:18:43.460 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 2>don't really have a problem with the overall idea of

0:18:45.780 --> 0:18:50.020
<v Speaker 2>these social media laws if it is simply to create

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 2>a scenario where if you want to press a button

0:18:52.820 --> 0:18:54.340
<v Speaker 2>and the only stuff you can see on your social

0:18:54.380 --> 0:18:56.980
<v Speaker 2>media feed are the people you follow, well, you don't

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:58.420
<v Speaker 2>press the button and it looks exactly the way it

0:18:58.460 --> 0:19:01.250
<v Speaker 2>currently does, which is the algorithm. That's what I said.

0:19:02.350 --> 0:19:03.929
<v Speaker 2>The reason I got a mention in Parliament, though, was

0:19:03.970 --> 0:19:06.939
<v Speaker 2>because I wasn't complimentary of the way the opposition has

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 2>been playing this, and I'll get to why in a second. Now,

0:19:10.500 --> 0:19:12.540
<v Speaker 2>I think that strategically the opposition is in the wrong

0:19:12.580 --> 0:19:17.490
<v Speaker 2>place with how hard they've gone with their no early. Why? Because, again,

0:19:17.530 --> 0:19:21.230
<v Speaker 2>despite the heavy scepticism of this mob, despite my very

0:19:21.290 --> 0:19:25.350
<v Speaker 2>deep suspicion in and around how slippery a fish the

0:19:25.369 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 2>communications minister can and often is being, and she mentions

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.790
<v Speaker 2>me in Parliament, right? Anyway... Is this one of those

0:19:33.830 --> 0:19:37.230
<v Speaker 2>things where the kick is right in front and you

0:19:37.270 --> 0:19:38.950
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be the person who unnecessarily made it

0:19:39.070 --> 0:19:43.389
<v Speaker 2>too hard to make the obvious kick in front? Whoa, whoa, crazy.

0:19:43.790 --> 0:19:45.629
<v Speaker 2>Paul wants to censor the internet.

0:19:46.150 --> 0:19:46.940
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't.

0:19:49.020 --> 0:19:54.379
<v Speaker 2>If... there is a plan to create a button to

0:19:54.420 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 2>give adults a choice, I can't get that worked up

0:20:00.100 --> 0:20:05.050
<v Speaker 2>about it. But absolutely set in stone that I am totally,

0:20:05.210 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 2>absolutely and clearly opposed to is the power being given

0:20:09.740 --> 0:20:13.180
<v Speaker 2>to the minister or any single individual to nuke stuff

0:20:13.260 --> 0:20:16.209
<v Speaker 2>on the internet because they define it as harmful and

0:20:16.250 --> 0:20:19.470
<v Speaker 2>they won't tell us what that means. They will not

0:20:19.510 --> 0:20:24.619
<v Speaker 2>show us word for word what that definition is. Now,

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.740
<v Speaker 2>we're making a request to see the legislation, but there

0:20:27.790 --> 0:20:29.830
<v Speaker 2>are plenty of people who've talked about this already online

0:20:29.850 --> 0:20:33.290
<v Speaker 2>who've said it's not publicly available. It's only being circulated

0:20:33.330 --> 0:20:36.510
<v Speaker 2>amongst those that are negotiating it. So that will be

0:20:36.670 --> 0:20:41.610
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow's story, potentially. But if you saw the show last night,

0:20:42.090 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 2>can I be clear again? I think that the battle

0:20:46.220 --> 0:20:49.020
<v Speaker 2>is finally going to happen in the Senate, which means

0:20:49.060 --> 0:20:54.100
<v Speaker 2>let it play out in the Senate. And sadly, tonight...

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 2>The Greens are starting to talk about probably voting for

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.740
<v Speaker 2>the laws as they are, including the kill switch for

0:21:01.780 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 2>the minister. My point was, if the opposition stayed in

0:21:06.180 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the game for as long as possible, it would be

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:13.869
<v Speaker 2>able to negotiate potentially that switch being blown away, or

0:21:14.109 --> 0:21:18.429
<v Speaker 2>if the switch stays, then you can go nuts. But

0:21:18.450 --> 0:21:20.189
<v Speaker 2>if it plays the Greens in, they're not just going

0:21:20.210 --> 0:21:21.790
<v Speaker 2>to want one switch, they're going to want a whole

0:21:21.850 --> 0:21:25.149
<v Speaker 2>panel of stuff to cancel. including the people and the

0:21:25.190 --> 0:21:26.710
<v Speaker 2>content they disagree with.

0:21:28.790 --> 0:21:32.709
<v Speaker 3>Researchers and educators have informed the development of this draft

0:21:32.730 --> 0:21:37.430
<v Speaker 3>digital duty of care, but those opposite have responded no.

0:21:38.170 --> 0:21:43.070
<v Speaker 3>Even Paul Murray from News24 gets this. Even Paul Murray

0:21:43.170 --> 0:21:45.570
<v Speaker 3>can see that the Leader of the Opposition has made

0:21:45.609 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 3>a strategic error here by saying no to basic safety

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 3>standards to keeping kids safer online. Mr Speaker, I can

0:21:52.780 --> 0:21:56.139
<v Speaker 3>honestly say I have never agreed more with Paul Murray

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:57.859
<v Speaker 3>than on this point.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Never. I have never.

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.300
<v Speaker 3>And yet, despite even this, despite the invocation of Paul Murray,

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:06.340
<v Speaker 3>the Opposition Leader is saying no.

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:08.780
<v Speaker 2>Even I don't say my name that much.

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Anyway.

0:22:11.090 --> 0:22:12.730
<v Speaker 2>The thing I really appreciate about all of this at

0:22:12.770 --> 0:22:16.020
<v Speaker 2>the very end of my point about this is, if

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 2>nothing else, I just want to thank Annika Wells for

0:22:17.780 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 2>giving us a very, very small part of her comments

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.500
<v Speaker 2>today that I can take out of context like she

0:22:24.580 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of did my comments today. So, for example, next

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.699
<v Speaker 2>time I talk about, you know, how much spending she

0:22:30.740 --> 0:22:32.370
<v Speaker 2>does when it comes to travel and when I turn

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.250
<v Speaker 2>around and say, hey, you know what, not the best

0:22:34.290 --> 0:22:37.110
<v Speaker 2>way of spending the public's money, then I now have

0:22:37.430 --> 0:22:42.290
<v Speaker 2>ready-made a little comment from Annika Wells to be able

0:22:42.330 --> 0:22:48.350
<v Speaker 2>to say thank you. At least we can agree on that. Mr.

0:22:48.380 --> 0:22:51.389
<v Speaker 3>Speaker, I can honestly say I have never agreed more

0:22:51.609 --> 0:22:54.109
<v Speaker 3>with Paul Murray than on this point.

0:22:54.510 --> 0:22:54.790
<v Speaker 2>Never.

0:22:55.450 --> 0:22:56.010
<v Speaker 1>I have never.

0:22:59.010 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Alright, enough, enough, enough. But still, that's my point, okay?

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 2>We will discuss it all in a couple of minutes'

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:07.540
<v Speaker 2>time with people who are in the Senate and in

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.510
<v Speaker 2>the fight, including, of course, the great Matt Canavan. As

0:23:10.550 --> 0:23:13.090
<v Speaker 2>you know, I love an opinion poll, and I'm keen

0:23:13.109 --> 0:23:14.989
<v Speaker 2>to see what's happening when it comes to Victoria. Has

0:23:15.010 --> 0:23:17.889
<v Speaker 2>there been a change of fortune since Ben Carroll has

0:23:17.930 --> 0:23:24.940
<v Speaker 2>become the Premier? Jacinta Allen is now in the review mirror. Answer? No. Again,

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.340
<v Speaker 2>the opinion poll just dropped in The Age tonight. It

0:23:27.380 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 2>was on the Channel 9 News at 6pm in Melbourne.

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.939
<v Speaker 2>Labor support since the poll before Jacinta Allen got the

0:23:34.980 --> 0:23:40.020
<v Speaker 2>boot is down two points. The Libs and Nats up

0:23:40.220 --> 0:23:43.220
<v Speaker 2>one point, One Nation up at one point, meaning there

0:23:43.260 --> 0:23:46.909
<v Speaker 2>has been essentially no change to everyone's fortunes since the

0:23:46.950 --> 0:23:51.729
<v Speaker 2>change of Premier. Unless, of course, you have a look

0:23:51.750 --> 0:23:54.869
<v Speaker 2>at the preferred Premier stakes. Now, this, of course, is

0:23:54.890 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 2>between Ben Carroll, Jess Wilson, Warren Pickering. And even after

0:24:00.700 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 2>all of the outrage last week, guess what happened to

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.420
<v Speaker 2>Warren Pickering as the Premier of Victoria?

0:24:06.900 --> 0:24:06.970
<v Speaker 1>Up.

0:24:08.210 --> 0:24:14.690
<v Speaker 2>Right? Ben Carroll, down four points as preferred Premier from

0:24:14.750 --> 0:24:21.909
<v Speaker 2>when Jacinta Allen was the Premier. Jess Wilson, down 15 points. Now,

0:24:21.940 --> 0:24:24.420
<v Speaker 2>she is still most likely to end up winning the election. Why?

0:24:24.460 --> 0:24:27.859
<v Speaker 2>Because when you put the Lib Nats at 28%, together

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.580
<v Speaker 2>with One Nation's 23%, we are now starting to blast

0:24:32.100 --> 0:24:34.850
<v Speaker 2>to the number that is necessary to unseat the government, Pickering.

0:24:35.180 --> 0:24:37.940
<v Speaker 2>Of course, from zero up to eight. But the number

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 2>worth really focusing on, the hope for Labor, is if

0:24:41.460 --> 0:24:44.810
<v Speaker 2>they make it all about Jess Wilson, all about Warren Pickering,

0:24:44.990 --> 0:24:47.410
<v Speaker 2>that maybe some of the undecided goes back to Carroll.

0:24:48.450 --> 0:24:50.330
<v Speaker 2>But as I always say to you about undecided, cut

0:24:50.369 --> 0:24:52.929
<v Speaker 2>it in half and see what happens. Well, even if

0:24:52.970 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 2>you cut it in half, there'll be a scenario where

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 2>you give half to Wilson, half to Carroll, Wilson will

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:05.209
<v Speaker 2>still end up in front. So wait and watch this place. Space. Now,

0:25:05.230 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 2>of course, roads, still a mega, major issue in Victoria. Why?

0:25:09.060 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Because it's been ignored by this government for as long

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.020
<v Speaker 2>as they have existed. Not last week, not last premiere.

0:25:14.300 --> 0:25:17.580
<v Speaker 2>All three of them, multiple versions, multiple elections, the look

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.790
<v Speaker 2>over here of Andrews, the how do you say that,

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.830
<v Speaker 2>of Alan and the... I'm definitely not those two guys,

0:25:24.070 --> 0:25:25.330
<v Speaker 2>but I was in the room and agreed with them

0:25:25.350 --> 0:25:27.950
<v Speaker 2>all the time. Sort of Thunderbirds Act that he gets

0:25:28.010 --> 0:25:30.899
<v Speaker 2>involved with. And we've told you just last week, the

0:25:30.940 --> 0:25:36.980
<v Speaker 2>Auditor-General found half of Victoria's roads are in poor condition. Potholes. Now, again,

0:25:37.220 --> 0:25:39.109
<v Speaker 2>can't fix a pothole. I don't trust you to be

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.570
<v Speaker 2>able to fix the state. Can't fix the hole in

0:25:42.630 --> 0:25:45.190
<v Speaker 2>my street. I don't trust you to fix the state.

0:25:46.410 --> 0:25:48.950
<v Speaker 2>And the news that rolled out of Melbourne this morning

0:25:49.790 --> 0:25:51.620
<v Speaker 2>is that this has turned deadly.

0:25:53.220 --> 0:25:57.109
<v Speaker 3>A 71-year-old motorcyclist died when he hit a pothole on

0:25:57.150 --> 0:25:58.070
<v Speaker 3>the Western Highway.

0:25:58.330 --> 0:26:01.310
<v Speaker 7>Peter Mason was riding along the Western Highway near.

0:26:01.170 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Ballarat when tragedy struck and the pothole still hasn't been repaired.

0:26:08.150 --> 0:26:10.310
<v Speaker 2>How have I left the best till last? Tonight is

0:26:10.350 --> 0:26:13.570
<v Speaker 2>no sooks, no lefties. No sooks, no lefties, all right?

0:26:13.770 --> 0:26:16.109
<v Speaker 2>That's what's happening straight after the break. It's what's happening

0:26:16.150 --> 0:26:19.130
<v Speaker 2>with Senator Jacinda at Napa Jimpa Price. I think it's

0:26:19.150 --> 0:26:21.530
<v Speaker 2>been clear from the start of the program. No sooks,

0:26:21.609 --> 0:26:24.470
<v Speaker 2>no lefties. You're in the right place. A reminder, come

0:26:24.630 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 2>to Bathurst. Couple of weekends' time. Ourtownatnews24. com. au. Ourtownatnews24. com. au. And, yep,

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.940
<v Speaker 2>we'll talk about the social media stuff, the big red button,

0:26:33.109 --> 0:26:34.890
<v Speaker 2>whether it's going to go or whether Greens are going

0:26:34.910 --> 0:26:36.730
<v Speaker 2>to make it happen. All of that in a moment

0:26:36.770 --> 0:26:39.050
<v Speaker 2>or two's time here on News 24. Thanks so much

0:26:39.090 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 2>for watching. Hi, everyone. Thank you very much. Don't forget

0:26:44.619 --> 0:26:47.369
<v Speaker 2>all the podcasts, all the highlights, all the videos, including

0:26:47.380 --> 0:26:48.850
<v Speaker 2>the ones that may or may not be taken out

0:26:48.890 --> 0:26:51.030
<v Speaker 2>of context. See what was actually said on the show

0:26:51.330 --> 0:26:57.430
<v Speaker 2>at news24. com. au. Get the podcast, news24. com. au. No sooks, no lefties.

0:26:57.450 --> 0:26:59.910
<v Speaker 2>The bloke who's the leader of the National Party, he's

0:26:59.970 --> 0:27:02.190
<v Speaker 2>our mate. He's a senator from Queensland. He's none other

0:27:02.250 --> 0:27:04.290
<v Speaker 2>than Matt Canavan. He's joining us now in Canberra. And

0:27:04.350 --> 0:27:07.310
<v Speaker 2>no sooks, no lefties means Carlos Quaremba, member of One

0:27:07.350 --> 0:27:11.629
<v Speaker 2>Nation in the Upper House in South Australia, joins us now. So, Matt...

0:27:11.970 --> 0:27:13.770
<v Speaker 2>You may have noticed an opinion poll the past couple

0:27:13.790 --> 0:27:15.820
<v Speaker 2>of days, and I know there's one every 30 seconds,

0:27:15.900 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 2>but still, I was fascinated that 23% of people have

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.619
<v Speaker 2>lost faith in the Prime Minister because of the lies

0:27:23.660 --> 0:27:26.699
<v Speaker 2>that became law when it came to the budget. Even

0:27:26.980 --> 0:27:29.270
<v Speaker 2>specific to note, and the black in this are the

0:27:29.290 --> 0:27:31.950
<v Speaker 2>people who have lost faith in the Prime Minister, was

0:27:31.990 --> 0:27:37.409
<v Speaker 2>the 16% of Labor voters who have lost trust in

0:27:37.530 --> 0:27:41.619
<v Speaker 2>Albanese since the broken promise issue. Does this bloke actually

0:27:41.670 --> 0:27:43.939
<v Speaker 2>realise the corner that he has painted himself and the

0:27:43.980 --> 0:27:48.020
<v Speaker 2>government into and they think they're too clever by half

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.860
<v Speaker 2>solution to get out of it isn't working? It's not landing.

0:27:52.810 --> 0:27:53.810
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I don't know, Paul.

0:27:53.830 --> 0:27:55.629
<v Speaker 9>I actually haven't looked at that poll too much and

0:27:55.650 --> 0:27:57.890
<v Speaker 9>I'm not just saying the usual things. As a politician,

0:27:57.910 --> 0:27:59.189
<v Speaker 9>I just haven't stopped today.

0:27:59.210 --> 0:27:59.950
<v Speaker 2>I get it.

0:28:00.810 --> 0:28:03.010
<v Speaker 9>But I really haven't had a chance to look at

0:28:03.030 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 9>it in detail. But I know just talking to people,

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 9>you don't need a poll to see that People have

0:28:07.940 --> 0:28:09.980
<v Speaker 9>lost trust and faith in this government. Of course, part

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 9>of that is that the government lied to them at

0:28:12.460 --> 0:28:16.860
<v Speaker 9>the election last year, bald-faced lies, and proven liars don't

0:28:16.900 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 9>seem to have a lot of trust with people. They

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 9>are proven liars now, the Labor Party. There's another thing,

0:28:20.780 --> 0:28:24.980
<v Speaker 9>of course, though, that's driving sentiment against the government here,

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:29.350
<v Speaker 9>and that's the complete, well, loss of control of the economy,

0:28:29.380 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 9>but also just failure to seemingly understand people's tough economic conditions.

0:28:36.420 --> 0:28:41.100
<v Speaker 9>We hear from the Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, constantly that it's

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.270
<v Speaker 9>sunny outside. When people can see it's raining in their

0:28:44.310 --> 0:28:46.890
<v Speaker 9>own lives, their living standards are falling, things are getting tougher,

0:28:46.910 --> 0:28:49.050
<v Speaker 9>things are getting more expensive. I mean, Jim Chalmers is

0:28:49.070 --> 0:28:53.910
<v Speaker 9>the world's worst weatherman. You know, he can't even describe

0:28:54.290 --> 0:28:57.470
<v Speaker 9>weather conditions that are happening today, let alone forecast what

0:28:57.530 --> 0:28:59.690
<v Speaker 9>they're going to happen tomorrow. And tomorrow it's looking like

0:28:59.730 --> 0:29:02.270
<v Speaker 9>the storm clouds are gathering for our country with bond

0:29:02.310 --> 0:29:04.830
<v Speaker 9>rates going up. And in that environment, that was happening

0:29:04.850 --> 0:29:07.470
<v Speaker 9>before the budget a few months ago. In that global

0:29:07.670 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 9>economic environment, full of uncertainty, full of trepidation, the government

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.820
<v Speaker 9>decided to break promises, tell lies for a start, but

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.860
<v Speaker 9>then also jack up taxes massively. And that's exactly the

0:29:17.900 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 9>wrong recipe we need. We need to lower taxes massively.

0:29:20.150 --> 0:29:22.969
<v Speaker 9>We need pro-economic growth policies to guide us through what

0:29:22.990 --> 0:29:26.650
<v Speaker 9>are pretty traumatic economic environments right now.

0:29:26.650 --> 0:29:30.790
<v Speaker 2>100%. And look, if the media was occasionally, just occasionally

0:29:30.850 --> 0:29:34.250
<v Speaker 2>interested in just the odd vegetable in the news coverage,

0:29:34.330 --> 0:29:36.430
<v Speaker 2>we would talk about things like those bond rates because

0:29:36.470 --> 0:29:38.790
<v Speaker 2>they are an indication about where we're going into the

0:29:38.850 --> 0:29:42.380
<v Speaker 2>future and it ain't pretty. right? But again, look over here, podcast, podcast,

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.140
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to all of that. Carlos, again, the visceral

0:29:46.220 --> 0:29:49.310
<v Speaker 2>sense from some people, right? Now, again, also, I'm big

0:29:49.330 --> 0:29:52.550
<v Speaker 2>enough to notice that 55-45 still remains the 2pp, there's

0:29:52.570 --> 0:29:54.830
<v Speaker 2>the internal fight On the right right now, it might

0:29:54.850 --> 0:29:58.650
<v Speaker 2>be getting a little bit closer than 55-45. But the

0:29:58.710 --> 0:30:02.430
<v Speaker 2>intensity of those that are outside of the Prime Minister's

0:30:02.530 --> 0:30:05.470
<v Speaker 2>tent is pretty intense.

0:30:07.390 --> 0:30:09.980
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, mate, I think things are heating up for the

0:30:10.020 --> 0:30:13.060
<v Speaker 8>Prime Minister because for too long he's lied about so

0:30:13.100 --> 0:30:15.370
<v Speaker 8>many things. But now I don't think he even knows

0:30:15.390 --> 0:30:18.450
<v Speaker 8>which way he's up. If he's falling off a stage

0:30:18.590 --> 0:30:22.030
<v Speaker 8>or he's just lying about the economy, people have had

0:30:22.070 --> 0:30:24.870
<v Speaker 8>a gutful and I think that's why they're gravitating towards

0:30:25.390 --> 0:30:28.260
<v Speaker 8>One Nation and Pauline because we've called it the way

0:30:28.300 --> 0:30:30.460
<v Speaker 8>it is from day dot and if you don't like it,

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.780
<v Speaker 8>it is what it is. But we've never had an

0:30:33.020 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 8>issue with these sort of things.

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, Carlos, I mentioned before about One Nation, a very

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.700
<v Speaker 2>hardcore cut when it comes to, migration. We've seen everything

0:30:43.780 --> 0:30:46.300
<v Speaker 2>from the people saying the problems when it comes to

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:50.540
<v Speaker 2>the tax base, to the worker base. Let's get specific

0:30:50.580 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 2>about South Australia. If you cut off a system of

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 2>anyone being able to come into the country to do

0:30:54.900 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 2>the job that South Australians don't want to do, does

0:30:57.540 --> 0:31:00.420
<v Speaker 2>that not create a problem or is the theory that

0:31:00.900 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the people get offered more to do the jobs they

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.540
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have otherwise do, meaning they would start doing it?

0:31:08.330 --> 0:31:09.290
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's correct, Paul.

0:31:09.350 --> 0:31:12.030
<v Speaker 8>And look, in South Australia, we've got a Premier who's

0:31:12.070 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 8>made it very clear that he's all about mass migration,

0:31:15.100 --> 0:31:19.020
<v Speaker 8>irrespective of what damage that does to our state. I

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.110
<v Speaker 8>speak to a lot of businesses, and yes, they do

0:31:21.140 --> 0:31:23.090
<v Speaker 8>struggle to get workers, but at the same time, they

0:31:23.110 --> 0:31:25.990
<v Speaker 8>say the same things. Australians don't want to do the job. Well,

0:31:26.090 --> 0:31:29.770
<v Speaker 8>I'm sorry, that's unacceptable. We have 690,000 people in this

0:31:29.810 --> 0:31:33.190
<v Speaker 8>country that aren't working, roughly costing us around $ 19 billion

0:31:33.250 --> 0:31:35.570
<v Speaker 8>a year. Let's get some of those people back to

0:31:35.610 --> 0:31:38.070
<v Speaker 8>work before we keep bringing people in. And I think

0:31:38.090 --> 0:31:40.090
<v Speaker 8>that's what's going to be better for productivity. It's going

0:31:40.110 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 8>to be better for the economy. It's going to be

0:31:41.620 --> 0:31:42.860
<v Speaker 8>better for the country as a whole.

0:31:43.820 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Matt, again, you're a person who understands, has spoken about

0:31:47.180 --> 0:31:49.220
<v Speaker 2>the need to bring the number down. The One Nation

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:53.430
<v Speaker 2>number is, well, as hard as they're going here, There'll

0:31:53.450 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 2>be plenty of people watching right now who go, yeah, great, awesome.

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.460
<v Speaker 2>But what's the consequence of the yeah, great, awesome?

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 9>Well, numbers do have to come down. I agree with

0:32:02.740 --> 0:32:05.980
<v Speaker 9>One Nation on that. But we do have to recognise

0:32:06.030 --> 0:32:08.570
<v Speaker 9>that there's an impact on our economy, on our budget

0:32:08.610 --> 0:32:12.260
<v Speaker 9>from any change in policy. The policy that was announced

0:32:12.300 --> 0:32:15.220
<v Speaker 9>by One Nation today did not have costings. They weren't

0:32:15.300 --> 0:32:19.239
<v Speaker 9>in the eight-page release that I saw. They didn't actually

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.410
<v Speaker 9>go through exactly what visa classes would be reduced in

0:32:22.490 --> 0:32:25.170
<v Speaker 9>each year. It was a total figure, but the annual

0:32:25.210 --> 0:32:27.650
<v Speaker 9>figure is really what industries want to know, and that's

0:32:27.670 --> 0:32:29.390
<v Speaker 9>why we've seen the reaction from the business community.

0:32:29.750 --> 0:32:32.910
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of that, we had Pauline Nowhere today.

0:32:32.930 --> 0:32:34.930
<v Speaker 9>I mean, this is a big announcement for One Nation,

0:32:36.250 --> 0:32:38.730
<v Speaker 9>and there was a video released on social media today

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 9>But the typical way things work in this place, particularly

0:32:42.460 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 9>when we're sitting, is you can answer a big policy,

0:32:44.380 --> 0:32:46.110
<v Speaker 9>get out there and explain it and answer any questions

0:32:46.140 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 9>that the media has. And, you know, that does call

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.250
<v Speaker 9>into question for me, is One Nation going to be

0:32:52.330 --> 0:32:55.650
<v Speaker 9>able to govern the country and get through the meat

0:32:55.690 --> 0:33:00.030
<v Speaker 9>grinder that is this building and the prime ministership? You've

0:33:00.050 --> 0:33:02.330
<v Speaker 9>got to be able to answer the tough questions. So, look,

0:33:02.370 --> 0:33:05.490
<v Speaker 9>maybe tomorrow we'll see Pauline pop up and answer those questions.

0:33:05.510 --> 0:33:07.170
<v Speaker 9>There's a lot of questions about this policy, about how

0:33:07.190 --> 0:33:08.970
<v Speaker 9>much it will cost, when it's going to happen each year.

0:33:10.350 --> 0:33:11.170
<v Speaker 1>The latest should be out there.

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, we certainly know that the media would have peppered

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.460
<v Speaker 2>lots of questions in and around podcasts and what was

0:33:15.850 --> 0:33:18.770
<v Speaker 2>said one month ago, a year ago, all of that.

0:33:19.010 --> 0:33:21.750
<v Speaker 2>The focus today was comments in and around Indigenous Australians.

0:33:21.950 --> 0:33:25.070
<v Speaker 2>Senator Jacinta Nampajimpa-Price joins us. Other side of the break,

0:33:25.090 --> 0:33:27.170
<v Speaker 2>we'll get her reaction to that. But let's talk about

0:33:27.190 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the social media laws that are currently being discussed. So, Matt, again,

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.940
<v Speaker 2>we've made it all very clear what today's game has been.

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:37.940
<v Speaker 2>The Greens are starting to say publicly that they're probably

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:41.330
<v Speaker 2>going to back this in, which means that this thing

0:33:41.390 --> 0:33:43.070
<v Speaker 2>is either going to be unchanged or will be a

0:33:43.090 --> 0:33:47.890
<v Speaker 2>more hyped up version than what's currently on the table. Again,

0:33:47.910 --> 0:33:51.290
<v Speaker 2>I want to see the legislation, but no one's showing

0:33:51.550 --> 0:33:55.410
<v Speaker 2>literally the legislation that's being debated right now. Because for me, again,

0:33:55.470 --> 0:33:58.210
<v Speaker 2>as somebody who's willing to give this, this much of

0:33:58.260 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 2>a benefit of the doubt to the concept in and

0:34:00.940 --> 0:34:03.460
<v Speaker 2>around the algorithm, right? But as soon as I hear,

0:34:03.740 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the minister has the right to blow anything

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.649
<v Speaker 2>off the internet that she finds harmful, And harmful, we know,

0:34:09.770 --> 0:34:13.910
<v Speaker 2>is a definition a mile wide and two millimetres deep. That's,

0:34:13.950 --> 0:34:16.740
<v Speaker 2>of course, what starts to concern me. But why can't

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:18.620
<v Speaker 2>they just hold up the piece of paper and say,

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:22.100
<v Speaker 2>when we say harmful, we mean this definition, this definition

0:34:22.260 --> 0:34:23.140
<v Speaker 2>and this definition?

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.779
<v Speaker 9>Well, there's a definition there in the exposure draft, Paul,

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.530
<v Speaker 9>but as you say, it's not well defined or constrained.

0:34:31.570 --> 0:34:32.270
<v Speaker 1>And obviously.

0:34:32.910 --> 0:34:35.390
<v Speaker 9>some of the things that the government has described as

0:34:35.430 --> 0:34:40.210
<v Speaker 9>harmful is, for example, people being attracted to right-wing politics

0:34:40.250 --> 0:34:45.219
<v Speaker 9>from being online. They never mention extreme left-wing individuals somehow.

0:34:45.300 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 9>It's always just people on the extreme right. Other things

0:34:48.060 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 9>that are harmful, from the very minister who will be

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 9>in charge here, Annika Wells, she thinks it's harmful that

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.180
<v Speaker 9>people no longer trust her anymore because of what they

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.910
<v Speaker 9>read on social media, at least according to her. As

0:34:58.989 --> 0:35:02.020
<v Speaker 9>we said earlier, I think Annika... People might not trust

0:35:02.060 --> 0:35:04.930
<v Speaker 9>you because you, I don't know, lied to them. That

0:35:04.989 --> 0:35:08.930
<v Speaker 9>might be at the heart of why the public aren't

0:35:08.950 --> 0:35:09.380
<v Speaker 9>trusting you.

0:35:09.390 --> 0:35:11.730
<v Speaker 2>And bushies were both house and currency.

0:35:12.630 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>All of this stuff is about trust ultimately, Paul.

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 9>Like if you're going to give people extraordinary power to

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:21.500
<v Speaker 9>decide what we can read and write and hear online...

0:35:21.660 --> 0:35:23.180
<v Speaker 9>You've got to be able to trust that person. They're

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.620
<v Speaker 9>not going to abuse that extraordinary power. And these people

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.069
<v Speaker 9>cannot be trusted, both because they lied, but also because

0:35:28.090 --> 0:35:31.049
<v Speaker 9>they're explicitly out there saying that one of the problems

0:35:31.070 --> 0:35:33.090
<v Speaker 9>with social media is that people don't vote for us anymore.

0:35:33.430 --> 0:35:35.009
<v Speaker 9>I don't think anybody with those sort of views should

0:35:35.050 --> 0:35:38.089
<v Speaker 9>be entrusted with this kind of oversight of what we say.

0:35:38.390 --> 0:35:40.990
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Carlos, your thoughts on what seems to be coming

0:35:41.010 --> 0:35:43.760
<v Speaker 2>down the pike? And again, with the Greens most likely

0:35:43.780 --> 0:35:45.700
<v Speaker 2>to back it, it's probably not going to change from

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:47.540
<v Speaker 2>what's being put in front of us right now.

0:35:49.940 --> 0:35:52.700
<v Speaker 8>No, that's a scary thought. I heard you saying earlier, Paul,

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 8>that you would hope that there was some sort of

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:56.760
<v Speaker 8>a button. Well, there is a button already. It's called

0:35:56.780 --> 0:35:58.989
<v Speaker 8>the off button. Just put the phone down, put the

0:35:59.030 --> 0:36:01.690
<v Speaker 8>social media down, get outside, get some fresh air into you.

0:36:02.030 --> 0:36:04.330
<v Speaker 8>But my concern is too, and this is what they're

0:36:04.350 --> 0:36:06.989
<v Speaker 8>not thinking about, is right now it might suit their purposes,

0:36:07.310 --> 0:36:09.820
<v Speaker 8>but what happens when the pendulum swings the other way,

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 8>as we've seen in the US? And these are the

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 8>things we don't need. We need open and honest debate

0:36:15.020 --> 0:36:17.020
<v Speaker 8>and discussion about things. And the minute we start to

0:36:17.060 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 8>silence people, all you're saying to everybody else is, Not

0:36:19.700 --> 0:36:21.700
<v Speaker 8>necessarily that I don't like, you know, don't trust what

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 8>you're saying, just that I don't like you. And I

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.060
<v Speaker 8>think that's a really bad society and a bad way

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 8>of setting things up.

0:36:27.180 --> 0:36:31.210
<v Speaker 2>Well, also, again, if this plan is as simple as

0:36:31.230 --> 0:36:34.650
<v Speaker 2>it's presented, everyone would be able to explain that and

0:36:34.670 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 2>to be able to say, hey, look, Despite what you hear,

0:36:36.500 --> 0:36:38.950
<v Speaker 2>this is what the plan is. Instead, we've got ministers

0:36:38.989 --> 0:36:41.810
<v Speaker 2>out and about, like, yeah, surprise, surprise, Anne Arleigh, who, remember,

0:36:41.830 --> 0:36:44.569
<v Speaker 2>was pretending that Pauline Hanson was going to ban what

0:36:44.610 --> 0:36:47.430
<v Speaker 2>people could say inside their house between their nonnas and

0:36:47.489 --> 0:36:49.950
<v Speaker 2>that garbage, right? And she's just saying the reason we

0:36:49.969 --> 0:36:51.510
<v Speaker 2>need to do something is because here's all the nasty

0:36:51.550 --> 0:36:53.779
<v Speaker 2>things that have been said about me on the internet. What?

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.100
<v Speaker 2>Hang on, what? Like, the idea of the comments section

0:36:57.500 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 2>being the justification for the regulation, and then I get

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.850
<v Speaker 2>confused when the minister bangs around and talks about, you know,

0:37:03.870 --> 0:37:06.469
<v Speaker 2>won't someone think of the children, Matt? Because I thought

0:37:06.489 --> 0:37:08.570
<v Speaker 2>we passed a piece of legislation that already got the

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 2>children off social media.

0:37:11.890 --> 0:37:14.100
<v Speaker 9>I actually said that in the chamber today, Paul, in

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 9>question time. It became to me like that Simpsons episode,

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:18.460
<v Speaker 9>you know, won't somebody think.

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:18.900
<v Speaker 1>Of the children?

0:37:18.980 --> 0:37:22.770
<v Speaker 9>Like that was their whole justification for this without going

0:37:22.810 --> 0:37:25.110
<v Speaker 9>into that detail, as you say. And I think we

0:37:25.150 --> 0:37:27.770
<v Speaker 9>live in a country where, guess what, you should be

0:37:27.850 --> 0:37:31.980
<v Speaker 9>free to insult your politicians. I'm sorry, I've got a

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 9>coppet in my role and Carlos now has a role

0:37:34.460 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 9>and It comes with the territory, right? It's an Australian

0:37:37.660 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 9>tradition perhaps. Now, of course, people should be respectful. People

0:37:41.620 --> 0:37:48.700
<v Speaker 9>should not use explicit language. But you've got to be

0:37:48.739 --> 0:37:49.930
<v Speaker 9>able to cop it in this role.

0:37:49.950 --> 0:37:51.870
<v Speaker 1>If you can't cop the heat, get out of the kitchen.

0:37:52.270 --> 0:37:55.109
<v Speaker 2>All right. I want to talk quickly about data centres because, again,

0:37:55.570 --> 0:37:57.489
<v Speaker 2>I know I'm supposed to come here fully formed and

0:37:57.550 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 2>absolute in every single one of my views. I am

0:37:59.910 --> 0:38:03.940
<v Speaker 2>so legitimately 50-50 about data centers, right? Because every time

0:38:03.980 --> 0:38:05.860
<v Speaker 2>I read something, I get pushed into the camp of, oh,

0:38:05.900 --> 0:38:08.259
<v Speaker 2>this is the future. Or, okay, dear God, do everything

0:38:08.300 --> 0:38:11.690
<v Speaker 2>you can to stop it. Carlos, in South Australia, right,

0:38:12.170 --> 0:38:14.270
<v Speaker 2>so I'm trying to learn from people that I trust,

0:38:14.290 --> 0:38:16.310
<v Speaker 2>and I trust you both here. In South Australia, what

0:38:16.350 --> 0:38:19.090
<v Speaker 2>is the position when it comes to data centres? Are

0:38:19.130 --> 0:38:23.190
<v Speaker 2>local councils able to demand that the company fixes roads

0:38:23.270 --> 0:38:25.770
<v Speaker 2>for them? Is the South Australian government thinking about a

0:38:25.830 --> 0:38:28.109
<v Speaker 2>new tax? How is it rolling out, or do they

0:38:28.130 --> 0:38:30.530
<v Speaker 2>just buy a plot of land and you're living next

0:38:30.790 --> 0:38:34.489
<v Speaker 2>door to something that buzzes for 24 hours a day? Well.

0:38:35.090 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 8>Well, Paul, so far we've seen a lot of these

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:41.339
<v Speaker 8>data centres just buying up land and then going to

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.069
<v Speaker 8>the councils and going to the state government. But our

0:38:44.140 --> 0:38:46.390
<v Speaker 8>Premier has made it clear that data centres are going

0:38:46.450 --> 0:38:47.710
<v Speaker 8>ahead full steam.

0:38:48.010 --> 0:38:49.090
<v Speaker 1>But he is having a Royal.

0:38:48.930 --> 0:38:51.589
<v Speaker 8>Commission on AI, so I don't understand how that's going

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:54.870
<v Speaker 8>to work. My concern is, and it's a very simple one,

0:38:54.930 --> 0:38:56.609
<v Speaker 8>is how are we going to feed these things with

0:38:56.660 --> 0:38:59.420
<v Speaker 8>power when we have the most expensive power and the

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:03.380
<v Speaker 8>highest concentration of renewables, not to mention we're the driest

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 8>state in the driest country? So I don't even know

0:39:06.020 --> 0:39:08.470
<v Speaker 8>if these things are even going to get up. And so, look,

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:10.830
<v Speaker 8>I think it's important that we look into data centres

0:39:10.850 --> 0:39:13.549
<v Speaker 8>because obviously we want to possibly keep our data here

0:39:13.590 --> 0:39:15.310
<v Speaker 8>in Australia and we don't want to be left behind

0:39:15.330 --> 0:39:17.190
<v Speaker 8>when it comes to AI. But I don't know if

0:39:17.210 --> 0:39:19.230
<v Speaker 8>South Australia would be where I'd be sort of leaning

0:39:19.250 --> 0:39:23.299
<v Speaker 8>my AI and data centre direction. coming from because, as

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 8>I said, I think this Premier is just completely cooked.

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.569
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you can drop them all sort of end-to-end into

0:39:29.610 --> 0:39:33.020
<v Speaker 2>the ocean between, you know, the mainland and KI and

0:39:33.060 --> 0:39:35.540
<v Speaker 2>you'd be able to just drive to KI. Maybe that's

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:37.940
<v Speaker 2>the idea when it comes to water. But, Matt, there

0:39:37.980 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 2>must be a small part of you that is mildly

0:39:40.180 --> 0:39:44.500
<v Speaker 2>amused at the anger that these things produce when people

0:39:45.130 --> 0:39:47.690
<v Speaker 2>The political class, the media class and much of the

0:39:47.710 --> 0:39:50.580
<v Speaker 2>populace has been more than happy for the renewables revolution

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.020
<v Speaker 2>to just roll right on through a valley near you.

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:56.820
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, exactly right, Paul.

0:39:56.900 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 9>And no different from that renewable rollout, these developments have

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 9>got to get local support. And I think what David

0:40:03.660 --> 0:40:05.500
<v Speaker 9>Christopher said the other day was one of the more

0:40:05.820 --> 0:40:08.189
<v Speaker 9>sensible things that has been said and that he wants

0:40:08.230 --> 0:40:10.660
<v Speaker 9>to see is that if data centres come to town,

0:40:10.980 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 9>that people.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:14.259
<v Speaker 1>End up with more power or more water than what

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:15.060
<v Speaker 1>they had before.

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:19.049
<v Speaker 9>And this is not unusual when large-scale developments occur, particularly, say,

0:40:19.070 --> 0:40:21.690
<v Speaker 9>in the mining industry. Typically, they'll build a power station

0:40:21.710 --> 0:40:23.390
<v Speaker 9>that's often bigger than what they need.

0:40:23.570 --> 0:40:23.790
<v Speaker 1>Exactly.

0:40:23.930 --> 0:40:26.029
<v Speaker 9>And that energy needs and helps the rest, and often

0:40:26.050 --> 0:40:27.450
<v Speaker 9>that's the case with dams as well.

0:40:27.489 --> 0:40:28.390
<v Speaker 1>It helps build farming.

0:40:28.810 --> 0:40:30.549
<v Speaker 9>And so that's what needs to happen here, in my view,

0:40:30.590 --> 0:40:33.890
<v Speaker 9>that sensible approach that the likes of the Queensland government

0:40:33.989 --> 0:40:36.609
<v Speaker 9>are taking. And to do that, to have that excess power...

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:39.780
<v Speaker 9>We desperately need to use all of our energy resources.

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.750
<v Speaker 9>That's what we'll do. We're liberal and national parties. We

0:40:42.770 --> 0:40:46.469
<v Speaker 9>will make sure we use all our power sources, coal, gas, renewables, and,

0:40:46.510 --> 0:40:51.030
<v Speaker 9>of course, uranium, which is uniquely ready to power data centres.

0:40:51.050 --> 0:40:52.930
<v Speaker 9>That's what they're doing around the world in nuclear energy.

0:40:53.390 --> 0:40:55.779
<v Speaker 9>The fact we don't do it here is a really,

0:40:55.860 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 9>really big handbrake on any developments in technology we are

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:00.140
<v Speaker 9>potentially going to receive soon.

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, lads. I do appreciate it. No sooks, no lefties.

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:04.840
<v Speaker 2>How good's that on a Monday night? Let's put the

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:06.859
<v Speaker 2>cherry on top of all of that, which is none

0:41:06.900 --> 0:41:09.620
<v Speaker 2>other than the ultimate version of that, which is Senator

0:41:09.660 --> 0:41:13.100
<v Speaker 2>Jacinta Nampajimpa Price. She joins us next because we're going

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 2>to talk about what Pauline Hanson said in the podcast

0:41:15.020 --> 0:41:16.700
<v Speaker 2>a long time ago. But the reason we've got her

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 2>on is her role as the shadow small business minister because, unsurprisingly,

0:41:21.620 --> 0:41:23.819
<v Speaker 2>too many hitting the wall all day, every day, and

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 2>a million people working more than two jobs. Don't go anywhere.

0:41:32.270 --> 0:41:35.530
<v Speaker 2>So Pauline Hanson did a podcast some period of time ago,

0:41:35.930 --> 0:41:38.950
<v Speaker 2>but like a series of other comments on other podcasts

0:41:39.030 --> 0:41:41.330
<v Speaker 2>which have all been timed to land all at once

0:41:41.350 --> 0:41:43.690
<v Speaker 2>or at least to be reminded of, this is what

0:41:43.730 --> 0:41:44.810
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about today.

0:41:44.830 --> 0:41:51.370
<v Speaker 7>They're the most primitive race on earth and we're supposed

0:41:51.390 --> 0:41:54.190
<v Speaker 7>to be holding up and saying what they've achieved.

0:41:54.250 --> 0:41:55.390
<v Speaker 1>They've achieved nothing.

0:41:56.489 --> 0:42:00.300
<v Speaker 2>Senator Jacinta Nampajimpa Price is a person whose passion for

0:42:00.390 --> 0:42:02.870
<v Speaker 2>her people is has changed the country. It changed the

0:42:02.910 --> 0:42:06.529
<v Speaker 2>country certainly when she started talking publicly about this from

0:42:06.550 --> 0:42:08.870
<v Speaker 2>her time in the Council and Alice Springs all the

0:42:08.910 --> 0:42:11.169
<v Speaker 2>way through to the Senate, her leadership when it came

0:42:11.270 --> 0:42:15.270
<v Speaker 2>to the referendum, and she has rejected what's been said

0:42:15.469 --> 0:42:18.280
<v Speaker 2>by Senator Hanson, but she joins us this evening to

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.620
<v Speaker 2>talk a little more about it. Senator, lovely to see you.

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:23.859
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about that and all of the

0:42:24.020 --> 0:42:27.700
<v Speaker 2>noise around it? Yeah, sure. Look, I mean.

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.259
<v Speaker 5>I wasn't aware of those comments 12 months ago when

0:42:31.300 --> 0:42:35.020
<v Speaker 5>they first arose and I suppose I'm aware of them now.

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 5>And there's a little bit of my issue with the

0:42:39.739 --> 0:42:42.950
<v Speaker 5>situation is I've always one thing I've always done most

0:42:42.969 --> 0:42:48.089
<v Speaker 5>of my life is defend white Australians when they have

0:42:48.290 --> 0:42:54.140
<v Speaker 5>experienced racism from Indigenous Australians. I've always argued we should

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 5>view each other as human beings because obviously I have

0:42:58.410 --> 0:43:02.299
<v Speaker 5>both heritages, which I've always acknowledged, but fundamentally I'm Australian.

0:43:03.100 --> 0:43:05.700
<v Speaker 5>When it comes to such comments, on one hand, you

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:10.129
<v Speaker 5>can't argue that we need an education system that should

0:43:10.150 --> 0:43:14.950
<v Speaker 5>be teaching appropriately our history, which I agree with, by

0:43:14.969 --> 0:43:16.790
<v Speaker 5>the way, I agree. I've always argued we need to

0:43:16.810 --> 0:43:18.700
<v Speaker 5>learn our history in its entirety, the good, the bad,

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 5>the ugly, but we shouldn't be politicising our children. And

0:43:23.180 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 5>that I absolutely agree with. I've always agreed with that.

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:30.530
<v Speaker 5>And there has been an over politicisation and romanticism of culture,

0:43:30.969 --> 0:43:33.969
<v Speaker 5>which is doing us damage. But you don't throw the

0:43:33.989 --> 0:43:38.530
<v Speaker 5>baby out with the bathwater and you can't argue again

0:43:38.830 --> 0:43:41.370
<v Speaker 5>for those sorts of things, but then say the sorts

0:43:41.390 --> 0:43:45.550
<v Speaker 5>of things that a leader like Pauline Hanson has just

0:43:45.870 --> 0:43:47.790
<v Speaker 5>said to make those claims that.

0:43:47.750 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Are completely ignorant.

0:43:50.330 --> 0:43:53.850
<v Speaker 5>And I have been a cross-cultural educator as part of

0:43:54.190 --> 0:43:57.870
<v Speaker 5>my family business, including my white Australian father and my

0:43:58.350 --> 0:44:01.130
<v Speaker 5>Wurundjeri mother for two decades.

0:44:01.930 --> 0:44:02.569
<v Speaker 1>And that is.

0:44:02.570 --> 0:44:07.390
<v Speaker 5>About creating understanding, understanding of culture and the fact that

0:44:07.430 --> 0:44:10.110
<v Speaker 5>it's highly complex. In fact, we have one of the

0:44:10.140 --> 0:44:15.739
<v Speaker 5>most complex kinship structures, mathematical, highly complex kinship structures in

0:44:15.900 --> 0:44:20.460
<v Speaker 5>any other society on earth. And that is largely to

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:25.240
<v Speaker 5>benefit our genetics. So to ensure that incest would not occur.

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:27.299
<v Speaker 5>And I can't say the same for perhaps some of

0:44:27.410 --> 0:44:33.470
<v Speaker 5>the royal families of Europe, but that is just stating facts, right?

0:44:33.590 --> 0:44:36.790
<v Speaker 5>And so you can't make a blanket statement like that

0:44:37.250 --> 0:44:40.780
<v Speaker 5>and then argue for better education on the other side.

0:44:42.260 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 5>It is all about education. and it is about recognising

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 5>us as human beings. And the form in which she

0:44:48.420 --> 0:44:54.210
<v Speaker 5>used those words, the most primitive race on earth, speaks

0:44:54.270 --> 0:44:57.790
<v Speaker 5>directly to race. That's what it speaks directly to. She

0:44:57.810 --> 0:45:02.190
<v Speaker 5>didn't say primitive culture, she said primitive race. And again,

0:45:02.210 --> 0:45:05.770
<v Speaker 5>as I've been a cross-cultural educator for all these years,

0:45:06.150 --> 0:45:10.009
<v Speaker 5>I'm quite happy to bring Pauline up to speed, or

0:45:10.110 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 5>anybody else for that matter, And yes, we are Australians.

0:45:13.739 --> 0:45:17.700
<v Speaker 5>We're all Australians. And if we continue talking about race,

0:45:19.020 --> 0:45:21.990
<v Speaker 5>then we get away from the real issues that are

0:45:22.180 --> 0:45:25.770
<v Speaker 5>of importance, which is, yes, a better education for our

0:45:25.810 --> 0:45:29.330
<v Speaker 5>children and the decline of our society and our country,

0:45:29.690 --> 0:45:35.350
<v Speaker 5>the division, and a terrible Albanese government that is destroying

0:45:35.570 --> 0:45:41.540
<v Speaker 5>the place. I'm going to correct Pauline on this particular

0:45:41.620 --> 0:45:47.180
<v Speaker 5>issue because none of us, none of us as leaders

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:52.069
<v Speaker 5>in this country should be exempt from criticism, unfortunately. That's

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:53.620
<v Speaker 5>certainly how the job goes.

0:45:53.910 --> 0:45:57.370
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely. And there's no better person who has spoken

0:45:57.430 --> 0:46:01.230
<v Speaker 2>as eloquently, as passionately and as fearlessly about all of this, right?

0:46:02.219 --> 0:46:04.660
<v Speaker 2>And while, yes, there's all these excesses that have been

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:07.569
<v Speaker 2>pointed out and that we've talked about, the idea of

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:10.569
<v Speaker 2>things being reduced, yeah, you're 100%. All right. I just

0:46:10.590 --> 0:46:12.870
<v Speaker 2>really want to ask about small business because a survey

0:46:12.910 --> 0:46:15.190
<v Speaker 2>came out of it over the weekend. This isn't some

0:46:15.210 --> 0:46:16.830
<v Speaker 2>dinky-dye thing. It was a fair dinking thing that was

0:46:16.870 --> 0:46:19.530
<v Speaker 2>put together by the Chamber of Commerce and it shows

0:46:19.810 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 2>just how many are absolutely right on the line. And

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:24.900
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking about the difference between whether they go

0:46:24.940 --> 0:46:27.820
<v Speaker 2>to Saint-Tropez for summer or not. It's about whether it

0:46:27.860 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 2>exists or not.

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:30.340
<v Speaker 7>Mm.

0:46:31.150 --> 0:46:32.130
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look, absolutely.

0:46:32.170 --> 0:46:36.810
<v Speaker 5>It is really concerning because 62% of small businesses, you know,

0:46:37.210 --> 0:46:42.779
<v Speaker 5>for them, the rising cost of utilities and supply is

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:47.380
<v Speaker 5>what is one of their greatest concerns. And close to 49%

0:46:47.380 --> 0:46:51.989
<v Speaker 5>are struggling with their profitability and cash flow. You've got

0:46:52.530 --> 0:46:57.770
<v Speaker 5>close to 38% that have considered closing down And that's

0:46:57.910 --> 0:47:01.690
<v Speaker 5>really concerning in the past year. And almost 25% of

0:47:01.730 --> 0:47:05.820
<v Speaker 5>those businesses are considering closing in the next 12 months.

0:47:06.100 --> 0:47:09.580
<v Speaker 5>So that just demonstrates the pressure that these small businesses

0:47:10.140 --> 0:47:15.049
<v Speaker 5>are under. And then, you know, what's really, this is

0:47:15.070 --> 0:47:19.430
<v Speaker 5>the part that the government just does not understand when

0:47:19.450 --> 0:47:22.419
<v Speaker 5>it comes to these businesses. and they treat profit like

0:47:22.460 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 5>it's a dirty word, when profit is what is used

0:47:24.660 --> 0:47:27.340
<v Speaker 5>to put back into a business, to hire another person,

0:47:27.620 --> 0:47:29.919
<v Speaker 5>to be able to bring on an apprentice. And you've

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:41.100
<v Speaker 5>got 38.5% of business owners pay themselves less than $ 40, 000

0:47:37.980 --> 0:47:42.580
<v Speaker 5>a year. And this is just to stay open. This

0:47:42.660 --> 0:47:45.390
<v Speaker 5>is just to keep the doors open and to continue

0:47:45.770 --> 0:47:49.469
<v Speaker 5>to serve the Australian people and to contribute to the economy,

0:47:50.370 --> 0:47:53.069
<v Speaker 5>and to be able to employ others and pay them

0:47:53.110 --> 0:47:56.969
<v Speaker 5>a higher wage. And it's criminal what this government is

0:47:57.030 --> 0:48:00.930
<v Speaker 5>doing to small businesses and utterly ignoring them. And everywhere

0:48:00.950 --> 0:48:03.370
<v Speaker 5>I go, I ask small businesses, do you know who

0:48:03.390 --> 0:48:06.489
<v Speaker 5>the small business minister is? And they scratch their heads.

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 5>They don't know. They don't hear from Anne Alley at all.

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:13.900
<v Speaker 5>They don't hear boo from her. She should be ashamed

0:48:13.940 --> 0:48:14.400
<v Speaker 5>of herself.

0:48:14.910 --> 0:48:17.029
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Jeez, I really want you to be part of

0:48:17.070 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 2>a government. I just cannot wait to see you in

0:48:19.219 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 2>the heart of things, because we love talking to you.

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:23.259
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sorry it was so brief tonight, but lovely

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:24.910
<v Speaker 2>to talk to you. Thank you, Senator. Do appreciate it.

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:27.739
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Senator, just hit the Nambajimpa price. Quick break.

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Back with more. We've got a little time. I want

0:48:29.660 --> 0:48:31.840
<v Speaker 2>to show you some of these silly social media videos

0:48:31.900 --> 0:48:33.430
<v Speaker 2>that you pay for, whether we like it or not.

0:48:33.469 --> 0:48:35.230
<v Speaker 2>While you were working, what were they doing?

0:48:35.630 --> 0:48:35.810
<v Speaker 1>Next.

0:48:39.710 --> 0:48:41.890
<v Speaker 2>Before we go, the dumbest person on social media from

0:48:41.950 --> 0:48:45.299
<v Speaker 2>politics tonight is the member for Chisholm. Why? You see.

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:48.700
<v Speaker 5>You paid for it.

0:48:49.739 --> 0:48:55.410
<v Speaker 4>Here's the late debate.