Speaker 1: On scoring Needs Australia.
Speaker 2: This is the Weader Penalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panny Show.
Speaker 4: Coming up tonight you look at the fallout from the
Speaker 4: extraordinary Zelenski outburst. Josh Hammer will bring up some notch
Speaker 4: of sober analysis instead of some of the hyperbolean propaganda
Speaker 4: we've seen over the weekend. Gary Hartgrave will have the
Speaker 4: day's at top stories, including some whole numbers from the
Speaker 4: Prime minists that are going to cause concern. Elon Musk's
Speaker 4: the fourteenth Baby with yet another woman. Kinsey Skofield will
Speaker 4: have the latest and left.
Speaker 3: He's Losing It features more than one deranged Democrat.
Speaker 5: Can't sleep at night because it's beached well, body can't
Speaker 5: allowed the circulation. But I think we should revisit the
Speaker 5: possibility of a siphlus diagnosis.
Speaker 3: And talking about lefties losing it.
Speaker 4: Will have Peter Garrett's ugly attack against gena.
Speaker 3: Ryan Hart shortly will be.
Speaker 4: Getting into that, but first A video has emerged on
Speaker 4: social media appearing to show two young Australian children, they
Speaker 4: certainly seem to have Australian accents telling a Jewish influencer
Speaker 4: in an online video that Hitler should have killed you guys.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 4: This is the same Jewish influencer who exposed the two
Speaker 4: New South Wales nurses who were subsequently removed from their
Speaker 4: positions Palestine.
Speaker 5: Palestine bro only if Hitler killed you guys.
Speaker 2: Kid alongo there, don't say these words. Google max vifer
Speaker 2: before you skip me m A X space v E
Speaker 2: hi f e R Google max vifer, max viper max
Speaker 2: vifer Australia.
Speaker 3: Oh that's you.
Speaker 2: We fight anti Semitism on here. You can't say these
Speaker 2: things him and.
Speaker 6: Educate these younger kids from the very young age.
Speaker 3: That little kid said, if only Hitler had killed you guys.
Speaker 4: Just shocking stuff. Joining me now for more on this.
Speaker 4: As Sky News contributor Gary Hardgrave, Gary, the influencer there
Speaker 4: seemed to make those kids away fairly quickly who he
Speaker 4: was that they can't say that, and they appear to
Speaker 4: have googled him and then cut the chat short. But
Speaker 4: it doesn't change the fact that you've got young kids
Speaker 4: sharing that sort of retric online and it makes you
Speaker 4: despair for what they're hearing in their homes, in their
Speaker 4: schools and their communities, and how they've come to that position.
Speaker 1: Exactly firstly, read a happy birthday to you. I hope
Speaker 1: you enjoy the rest of it. Let me say that
Speaker 1: seeing those kids mouthing those words just proves to me
Speaker 1: just how indoctrination has taken over education in Australia. And
Speaker 1: sadly there are hate preachers in our country. Now I'm
Speaker 1: in Brisbane. We have a smaller and happier pond here
Speaker 1: with some great preachers at various mosques, but you know,
Speaker 1: in Sydney and in Melbourne, there just seems to be
Speaker 1: this putrid hatred that's being flogged onto kids, and it's
Speaker 1: awful to think these kids might think that this sort
Speaker 1: of conduct is really acceptable and read of. The Other
Speaker 1: thing I'd say, in a broader sense is that a
Speaker 1: lot of people in the Christian community are forgotten that
Speaker 1: we should be doing to others as we would have done,
Speaker 1: you know, to us, And so that golden rule thing
Speaker 1: seems to have slipped the kind of moral spine that
Speaker 1: should be and always was throughoutur country. So you know,
Speaker 1: these kids should be called out. I'm glad we didn't
Speaker 1: identify them, but their parents, their grandparents, their aunts, their uncles,
Speaker 1: those influencing them really should hang their head in shame.
Speaker 1: It shouldn't have come to this.
Speaker 7: It's awful.
Speaker 4: Now Victoria could be a blood bath for Labor in
Speaker 4: the upcoming federal election with a fresh red Bridge pole
Speaker 4: Room feeling that Labor has lost significant ground in five
Speaker 4: marginal seats and three others across the state and that
Speaker 4: Victoria is now the state where voters perceive the Liberal
Speaker 4: Party most favorably doesn't turn up for the books. Across
Speaker 4: the five Victorian seats tracked in this new pole, Labour's
Speaker 4: two party preferred vote has shrunk from fifty one point
Speaker 4: four percent in twenty twenty two to just forty three
Speaker 4: percent at the moment, and if that forty three percent
Speaker 4: was reflected across the state, Labour could also lose aston Chism, McEwen,
Speaker 4: Bruce and Dunkly, and the Herald Sun's reporting that the
Speaker 4: party has already written off seats like aston Chism and McEwen,
Speaker 4: with their efforts to be focused on holding on to Bruce,
Speaker 4: Dunky Hawk, Kranger might and hold Gary. It also seems
Speaker 4: that the opposition leader and the Liberal Party are ahead
Speaker 4: of Labor according to this pole when it comes to
Speaker 4: key issues like cost of living, economic management, health and crime.
Speaker 4: This is going to cause all sorts of concern for
Speaker 4: the AOP.
Speaker 3: If this poll is accurate and this is.
Speaker 4: A labor aligned firm, then Anthony Albanize is in some
Speaker 4: trouble in Victoria.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and he deserves to be. And the Peter Dunton's credit,
Speaker 1: he has been working very very hard in getting to
Speaker 1: meet as many people as possible. Not everyone as met him,
Speaker 1: but everyone who does says, Wow, he's actually a really
Speaker 1: nice bloke and I actually think he stands for stuff
Speaker 1: and I actually can see him doing the job. But look,
Speaker 1: the residual of those who aren't sure about him have
Speaker 1: just got to realize that Albow ate up to the job.
Speaker 1: And we're suffering economically, we're suffering as a society as
Speaker 1: a nation, and national securities in peril, and everywhere you
Speaker 1: turn you just know Elbow has just lost all momentum
Speaker 1: as far as common sense and thinking about the values
Speaker 1: that underpined our nation. So you know from Victorians they
Speaker 1: desperately wanted a better liberal state parliamentary team. They've got
Speaker 1: a better leader than I had, and I think that's
Speaker 1: an impact as well. So I guess Rita it's a
Speaker 1: case of film me once twice, three times, four times,
Speaker 1: shame on you, but fully fifth or sixth.
Speaker 3: Time, shame on me.
Speaker 1: I think people are now having a close look and saying,
Speaker 1: you know what, the other mother a hopeless This blow
Speaker 1: can't be that bad. Let's give him a go. And
Speaker 1: I think that's a good thing for Australia. Well knowne Victoria.
Speaker 4: Well Anthon now Beneezi was out there during Marty Gral
Speaker 4: Let's have a look at one way down. This has
Speaker 4: really become a far left activist event masquerading as a
Speaker 4: game lesbian pride parade. Albo was asked some fairly easy
Speaker 4: question by questions by the ABC's Jeremy for Fernandez.
Speaker 8: Who's on your queer party playlist when you leave the
Speaker 8: parade a night?
Speaker 1: Well, obviously Kylie, Obviously he's playing out at home Bush.
Speaker 2: It's got to be some chance she'll.
Speaker 9: Turn up here later on.
Speaker 4: As we'll see, Marty gar has been hijacked by the
Speaker 4: far left activist class.
Speaker 3: Just watch this.
Speaker 2: One, two, three, four kick the Liberals up the door.
Speaker 2: But we don't need to because they already left. The
Speaker 2: Liberals there, they left, so.
Speaker 5: We're just here. They're not a community motive.
Speaker 1: Previous agms because they were currently ing us on they.
Speaker 10: Don't support her on coll they don't supportationwide.
Speaker 2: They've been attacking us on purity blockers, and they've been
Speaker 2: putting people in our community.
Speaker 3: Intention oh dear.
Speaker 4: And there was all sorts of other activism there. People
Speaker 4: are saying that, you know, the police should be defunded.
Speaker 4: They're pushing pro Palestinian positions, saying, you know, in the genocide,
Speaker 4: you could never have a Pride rally in Gaza or
Speaker 4: the West Bank Gary, but that point seems to be
Speaker 4: lost on these activists.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and the trouble is it's the activist class that's
Speaker 1: frankly driving labor out the door. Every day. Australians are
Speaker 1: over this, I've got to tell you, they really are.
Speaker 1: And look, they're entitled to their views and they're allowed
Speaker 1: to express it because that's what freedom and a democracy allows.
Speaker 1: And you know, if people want to be stupid, they're
Speaker 1: allowed to be stupid. There's lots of ways to do it,
Speaker 1: you know, lots of social media stuff. But you know,
Speaker 1: every day Australians aren't offended by somebody who happens to
Speaker 1: be gay. And there's plenty of gay men and women
Speaker 1: who just get about their lives. They're worried about paying
Speaker 1: high electricity bills too. They're worried about all the same
Speaker 1: things everybody else is. So I don't know why these
Speaker 1: people assume they can hire a group of the community
Speaker 1: out into a pilot say this is what they think.
Speaker 1: They don't think that gay man will make their own
Speaker 1: minds about stuff and indeeds, That's the way it should be.
Speaker 1: It really should be. I mean, we've seen this attempt
Speaker 1: to divide in the past on multiple lines, types of religion,
Speaker 1: types of expression, whatever it might be. But if we're
Speaker 1: all Australians and we all work together and we find
Speaker 1: the things we're all angry about, I think that's where
Speaker 1: the vote goes. And frankly, everybody's angry about the high
Speaker 1: price of electricity, ruining our economy, ruining our family, ruining
Speaker 1: our chance to buy and build things here because we
Speaker 1: just can't afford it anymore. And whether you're gay or not,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. That's just the reality that frankly unites us.
Speaker 4: Now let's turn our attention to Australia's involvement in the
Speaker 4: unfolding situation in Ukraine. Prime Minister Anthony Albineazi and made
Speaker 4: it clear that Australia stands with Zelensky no matter what,
Speaker 4: and the UK has responded with a new pro military campaign.
Speaker 4: A Kistar May is pledging boots on the ground if needed.
Speaker 11: The first priority of this government, of any government, is
Speaker 11: the security and safety of the British people, to defend
Speaker 11: the national interest, particularly in these volatile tyames.
Speaker 4: What do you think Australia's ongoing support of Ukraine is
Speaker 4: going to look like? Will we pledge boots on the
Speaker 4: ground as well as kirs Darma has done or is
Speaker 4: it going to be great of funding?
Speaker 3: What do you think that support is going to me?
Speaker 1: No one's supporting Putin, but no one wants to have
Speaker 1: him so upset that he won't actually negotiate a peace,
Speaker 1: and no one wants to give away Ukraine to get
Speaker 1: that piece either, and that's certainly been the stand of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Look, the simple reality is Rita that Europe
Speaker 1: has been waiting for America an intervene on everything. And
Speaker 1: the worry now is that if the NATO Pact is
Speaker 1: fully followed, an attack on one means an attack on
Speaker 1: them all, and under the US alignment with NATO, they'll
Speaker 1: have to go on the ground. I don't think that
Speaker 1: sounds very good to me. I'm all for peace. I
Speaker 1: don't want people to be slaughtered. I don't want there
Speaker 1: to be fighting on either side. And frankly, the idea
Speaker 1: that there seems to be people on the left internationally
Speaker 1: now trolling the whole concept of let's have a war,
Speaker 1: let's fight this, let's put more boots on the ground,
Speaker 1: let's throw more money at it. It's completely contrary to
Speaker 1: what I thought the left wanted. If John Lennon was
Speaker 1: right here now, right, I'd suggest he would say, give
Speaker 1: piece a chance. And so let me just say it
Speaker 1: for you. So, I think what Donald Trump did on
Speaker 1: the weekend Our Time Friday in America was actually exposed
Speaker 1: to the fact that Zelenski was just chasing the chasing
Speaker 1: the money. And I don't know whether he's got my
Speaker 1: dignity left out of all of it, but it's not
Speaker 1: a popular opinion. A lot of media in this country
Speaker 1: running that sort of Zolensi was right. Trump was wrong.
Speaker 1: But you know, Trump arrangement syndrome is pretty endemic in
Speaker 1: this country right now.
Speaker 3: It certainly is.
Speaker 4: And I'll be talking to Josh Hammer about this after
Speaker 4: the break because so much of the coverage, particularly in
Speaker 4: this country, has just been borderline delusional to unhinged. I've
Speaker 4: just been shocked even the character risation of what happened
Speaker 4: in that meeting. It's clear that so many people talking
Speaker 4: about it haven't actually bothered to watch the fifty minute interaction,
Speaker 4: because that press conference went for fifteen minutes, and if
Speaker 4: you watch the whole thing, your impression of it could
Speaker 4: be very different to that five to six minute bit
Speaker 4: that everyone's highlighting. Before you go, Gary, just quickly, former
Speaker 4: Midnight Oil frontman Peter Garrett, former Australian minister in the
Speaker 4: Federal Government. Peter Garrett was on stage at the Perth
Speaker 4: Festival with his band The Alter Egos on Friday night
Speaker 4: and he encouraged the attendees to pretend they're dancing on
Speaker 4: Gina Reinhart's grave. Gary, Such an ugly, unnecessary, divisive bit
Speaker 4: of commentary from someone who should know better.
Speaker 12: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I first met Peter Garrett about nineteen seventy eight. He
Speaker 1: was an activist then in the Parliament. When I served
Speaker 1: with him, he was a pleasant enough sort of fellow,
Speaker 1: but an activist then and he's now out of the parliament.
Speaker 1: He's an activist again for him, it's still nineteen seventy six,
Speaker 1: That's how I read it. He's still really in these
Speaker 1: harder hearts in the nuclear Disarmament Party. He really hasn't
Speaker 1: understood mainstream in Australia, but he writes really good songs.
Speaker 1: So this is the problem. But you know, picking on
Speaker 1: Gena Reinhart probably well without that, it's been a while
Speaker 1: Garrett in Australians. Well, yeah, I know what I'm just saying.
Speaker 1: This is this bloke. Garrett's a little bit sort of
Speaker 1: he's worn out down the path of the same old stuff.
Speaker 1: We've moved on. Peter, you need to as well. But
Speaker 1: Gina Reinhart, she contributes so much of this country. How
Speaker 1: dare he big on it?
Speaker 12: I'd say.
Speaker 3: Absolutely.
Speaker 4: And you know what, it's been a long time between
Speaker 4: Drenks as far as the last great song Garrett's written,
Speaker 4: and in the meantime Gena Einhart has contributed a great more,
Speaker 4: great deal more to this country he ever will.
Speaker 3: Gary hart Grave, thanks for your time tonight.
Speaker 4: Joining me now is esteemed geologist and author Professor Ian Pott. Firstly,
Speaker 4: in you work closely with Gina rein Hart, what was
Speaker 4: your reaction to that shocking bit of I don't even
Speaker 4: know what you call it, shocking bit of.
Speaker 3: Hate from Peter Garrett. Such a stupid.
Speaker 4: Thing for a man of his vintage to say this
Speaker 4: used to be a senior federal minister in the Australian government.
Speaker 12: Well, he's a failed senior federal minister, as many of
Speaker 12: them are in the current government. And I think he's
Speaker 12: on tune. Labor and the left are uncouth, they're vile,
Speaker 12: they're driven with bile and hatred. And here he is
Speaker 12: an unsuccessful, failed federal minister criticizing one of the greatest
Speaker 12: success people that we've seen in this country. She is
Speaker 12: the greatest Australian, this woman that this country has ever produced.
Speaker 12: She has built businesses from nothing. She has employed thousands,
Speaker 12: thousands and thousands of people in Western Australia. He picked
Speaker 12: the wrong venue because he's playing an away game. He's vile,
Speaker 12: he's uncouth, whereas those on the conservative side tend to
Speaker 12: be more reserved, tend to have values and tend to
Speaker 12: have principles. So he really showed his disclosure.
Speaker 3: You work with Gina.
Speaker 12: Einharder of a number of the companies.
Speaker 3: For many years.
Speaker 4: You know her well, and to me, it's always very
Speaker 4: illuminating that people who pretend to be for women's rights,
Speaker 4: pretend to be for women's empowerment, doing nothing to praise
Speaker 4: a woman who is obviously a great Australian who contributes
Speaker 4: so much, employs so many people, like you said, is
Speaker 4: the biggest taxpayer in this country, supports so many charities,
Speaker 4: quietly support so many athletes, and yet she gets no
Speaker 4: credit for that. In a male dominated field, she is
Speaker 4: the most successful, and yet they give her no credit
Speaker 4: for that.
Speaker 3: Now, let's get to New South Wales.
Speaker 4: They've abandoned the proposal to follow Queensland and requiring newly
Speaker 4: installed air conditioners to be able to be remotely throttled
Speaker 4: by the government during peak demand on hot days. This
Speaker 4: is after research from Queensland's implementation of the system revealed
Speaker 4: that the true energy reduction from this big brother system
Speaker 4: is far lower than expected. I can't believe that anybody
Speaker 4: would contemplate this in a free world, that you've got
Speaker 4: Australians who can't turn on their own air conditioners which
Speaker 4: they pay a fortune to run during peak periods because
Speaker 4: we don't have enough energy.
Speaker 12: Well, when I was a kid. Air conditioning was free.
Speaker 12: We just opened or closed window.
Speaker 4: Now we have advanced, had a lot of help on
Speaker 4: a thirty five degree day.
Speaker 12: And on thirty five degrees days we can now cool
Speaker 12: the air and we can dehumid the year. Now, I
Speaker 12: see that's an advance. And what the attempts are being
Speaker 12: made by bureaucrats is to crank back those advances because
Speaker 12: they have destroyed a very efficient and reliable energy system
Speaker 12: and in order to save energy, they want to have
Speaker 12: people sweat themselves to death and cook while they're working. Now,
Speaker 12: why don't they fix up their own game. Why don't
Speaker 12: they fix up the energy system rather than penalizing everybody.
Speaker 12: We're penalized enough with our electricity bills. We don't have
Speaker 12: to be penalized at work.
Speaker 4: Well in Victoria, offshore wind plans have been left in
Speaker 4: the Surrey after Chris Bowen announced the decision to reject
Speaker 4: a feasibility license for the Sea Dragon project off the
Speaker 4: Gippsland coast because of a small overlap in his seven
Speaker 4: hundred square kilometer proposal with a project by another company.
Speaker 4: Chris Bowen has also revealed on Friday that US owned
Speaker 4: Renewables operate a blue Float.
Speaker 3: Energy has asked.
Speaker 4: The other is the government to pause its application for
Speaker 4: its project in the Illawarra south of Sydney until after
Speaker 4: the election.
Speaker 3: These projects seem to all be sort of in disarray.
Speaker 4: Well with the taxpayer fun stop, these projects seem to
Speaker 4: have all sorts of feasibility issues.
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 12: Labour's getting a thrashing in the Illawarra area and also
Speaker 12: in the Newcastle area because they want to spoil a
Speaker 12: wonderful coastline with these monstrosities that kill whales and slice
Speaker 12: and dice birds. Now they know that it's unpopular, they
Speaker 12: know there's an election coming up very soon, and so
Speaker 12: they've just paused it. Now, this is going to come
Speaker 12: back again if they get voded in, especially if there's
Speaker 12: a coalition between the Dark Greens at Adam Band's party
Speaker 12: the Light Greens which are the Deals and Labor. So
Speaker 12: I wouldn't believe a word that.
Speaker 3: That's the bound up with. Yeah, they will come back,
Speaker 3: plus some if you.
Speaker 12: Under a different name, and this will be a wonderful new.
Speaker 3: And more tax pay dollars. This is interesting news.
Speaker 4: Mercedes Benz is Orbit admitting that their ev.
Speaker 3: Push was a massive mistake.
Speaker 4: The Order mortem motive Giant is now committing to bringing
Speaker 4: back it's V eight engines and a bid to win
Speaker 4: back customers.
Speaker 3: And they wasted a lot.
Speaker 4: Of money and argue they damaged their brand with this
Speaker 4: mad green push.
Speaker 3: But reality is caught up with them.
Speaker 12: Well, reality has caught up with them and many many
Speaker 12: other car manufacturers in Europe who realize that the EV
Speaker 12: is not the car. We tried evs in the first
Speaker 12: part of the twentieth century. They didn't work, they were
Speaker 12: not successful, they were very expensive, they had a short life,
Speaker 12: and all of a sudden, they've reinvented the wheel. Mercedes
Speaker 12: Benz has gone back to what they do well and
Speaker 12: that's made very very good internal combustion engines and machines.
Speaker 12: And they are joining many many other companies that realized
Speaker 12: we have been drinking the kool aid. It affected us.
Speaker 12: We've got to get back to basics. And the basics
Speaker 12: are create a good car that people are going to
Speaker 12: buy and we will make a profit.
Speaker 3: That's it.
Speaker 4: And EV's could be fine if you're talking about a tiny,
Speaker 4: tiny little country where you travel to all three kilometers occasionally,
Speaker 4: but in a country like Australia in America, it's just
Speaker 4: not practical. And I remember the last couple of times
Speaker 4: I've been in the States, when you go to rent
Speaker 4: a car, the evs are so cheap because nobody wants them.
Speaker 4: They've just gooked.
Speaker 3: I just got them sitting in the yard there collecting dust.
Speaker 4: With a supplimber. Thank you so much for your time tonight.
Speaker 4: Thank you still doing karma. Lefties Losing It? Plus some
Speaker 4: much needed sober analysis on the extraordinary Zelenski outburst.
Speaker 3: John Chama joins us next welcome back. It's time for
Speaker 3: lefties losing ed.
Speaker 4: Let's start with a couple of Democrat operatives embarrassing themselves
Speaker 4: with their Trump delusions. Is the diabolical Alexander Vindman saying
Speaker 4: that JD. Vance and Donald Trump should apologize to Zelenski.
Speaker 3: He demands it.
Speaker 11: Evans owned apology, President Trump.
Speaker 10: Oh, is Zolenskin apology for the way he's treated?
Speaker 3: I demand it. I demand that he demands it. Oh
Speaker 3: did God?
Speaker 4: Even the CNN panel will amused by that foolishness. But
Speaker 4: for a really severe, incurable case of tedious lunacy, we
Speaker 4: cannot go past this mad rand from James Carville.
Speaker 5: I'm talking about madness like King George the third kind
Speaker 5: of madness, and it could be a combination of being
Speaker 5: a fat slab, which it could be that she's can't
Speaker 5: sleep at night because his beached whale body can't allow
Speaker 5: the circulation it needs.
Speaker 6: You.
Speaker 5: I don't know, God, I don't know. I'm not a
Speaker 5: sleep specialist or a medical doct but I think we
Speaker 5: should revisit the possibility of a Simphlis diagnosis.
Speaker 3: Oh my god, no wonder.
Speaker 4: The Democrats are practically unelectable at the moment.
Speaker 3: Let's look at Saturday Night Live.
Speaker 12: Now.
Speaker 3: They had their own take on the Zelenski blow up.
Speaker 4: And sadly, it was about as funny as a burst appendix.
Speaker 12: Sorry, if I you.
Speaker 9: Know, you say you want to end this war, but frankly,
Speaker 9: you don't have the cards. Okay, I have the cards.
Speaker 1: All right, I have skip, I have draw for, I have.
Speaker 9: Rehearse, I have get out of jail free. The Supreme
Speaker 9: Court gave me.
Speaker 5: That one speak at Chew and jar Man and jar Reside.
Speaker 2: All I'm missing is a jar melion.
Speaker 4: Not only did that guy look nothing like Trump or
Speaker 4: sound anything like Trump, the whole thing was so lame
Speaker 4: and unfunny. And what's worse is that they had the
Speaker 4: best Trump impersonator available. Shane Gillis was on the show
Speaker 4: Here is on kill Tony shortly before the election, and
Speaker 4: I warn.
Speaker 3: You this is a little blue, but it's actually funny.
Speaker 2: Everybody.
Speaker 9: Oh hey, what a great lady. I talked to her,
Speaker 9: a backstage and wonderful woman. The tits are real. Excuse me,
Speaker 9: excuse me. A lot of people are saying they're tits
Speaker 9: are fake. They're not fake. I touched them and great tits,
Speaker 9: wonderful tits, American tits. And that's that's the thing that
Speaker 9: we've lost under this administration. Where are the American tits anymore?
Speaker 4: But instead, Saturday Night Live had gill Is doing a
Speaker 4: new skit. Now it was okay, it was amusing enough,
Speaker 4: but he should have been playing Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: Let's have a quick look at that new skit.
Speaker 8: The suspects are believed to be four white I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: What's going on?
Speaker 5: Oh?
Speaker 9: Nothing, No, just relieved that the police have a quite
Speaker 9: identified the suspects. Exactly, very quite.
Speaker 8: Okay. Police are looking for looters.
Speaker 9: Huh.
Speaker 8: Hear that these looters were spotted after wildfires devastated homes
Speaker 8: in Hunt Valley townships.
Speaker 2: I just read the story.
Speaker 3: That's enough.
Speaker 8: Looks like they stole televisions, bikes. Who do you think
Speaker 8: that was? What kind of you think that was?
Speaker 13: Job?
Speaker 8: Do? All right? Police are wanting to look out for
Speaker 8: the alleged ringleader, local man named Ethan Kapowski. Dammit.
Speaker 4: Now, since we delving into the world of comedy, let's
Speaker 4: hear from comic John Christ mocking social justice warriors and
Speaker 4: grandstand on the internet. About time these massive hypocrites were
Speaker 4: called out, just.
Speaker 6: Like on the internet, Just like we stand with Ukraine.
Speaker 2: I go, you don't even have custody of your kids
Speaker 2: doing what?
Speaker 6: Who are you talking to? Pick up your kids from
Speaker 6: soccer practice? Then we'll talk about foreign policy. Kevin, we
Speaker 6: are living on stolen land. I'm like, you're stolen your parents'
Speaker 6: cell phone? Play out, you're on stolen minutes, Brittany, who
Speaker 6: are you talking to now?
Speaker 4: I've been waiting all we can to speak with my
Speaker 4: next guest about the extraordinary scenes in the Oval office
Speaker 4: and the fallout from the Zelenski effet, including Kirs Starmer's
Speaker 4: comments about boots on the ground joining me now as
Speaker 4: a Newsweek Senior editor at Large and article three Projects
Speaker 4: in your Council Josh Hammer. Josh, I've seldom seen more misinformation,
Speaker 4: more ill informed emoting masquerading as analysis on any issue
Speaker 4: than what transpired to the White House. It's why I'm
Speaker 4: eager to get your sober, reality based commentary. I watched
Speaker 4: the full interaction. It goes for around fifty minutes, and
Speaker 4: it's eye opening. I'd suggest to any pundit commenting on
Speaker 4: this issue.
Speaker 3: To actually watch that full.
Speaker 4: Encounter before opining about what happened in the White House.
Speaker 4: But Josh, these negotiations have been underway for some time,
Speaker 4: and some of the crazy reasons. A Lenski decided to
Speaker 4: renegotiate the deal in front of the world's media and
Speaker 4: decided to do it by being incredibly rude, incredibly dismissive
Speaker 4: of both the President and the Vice President.
Speaker 2: It's one of the most astonishing things I think I've
Speaker 2: ever seen in politics. You know, you know, I was
Speaker 2: actually recording an episode of my own show, The Josh
Speaker 2: Hammer Show, while this was happening live the White House,
Speaker 2: and I recorded a whole segment on the rush of
Speaker 2: Ukraine deal because I assumed that it was basically a
Speaker 2: done deal. And then I saw what happened, and I
Speaker 2: text my producer. I was like, oh my god, we
Speaker 2: have to redo the entire segment, Like, what the heck
Speaker 2: just happened at the White House here? I mean, what
Speaker 2: was Zelenski thinking? I mean, I, like you, Reta, have
Speaker 2: watched this entire exchange there. You know, it almost seems
Speaker 2: to me like he went in there with the full
Speaker 2: intention of just blowing this up. And I'm not entirely
Speaker 2: sure exactly what he's trying to do other than the
Speaker 2: fact that one, I don't think he's very good at this.
Speaker 2: I don't think Vladimir Lenski is very good at this
Speaker 2: whole international politics thing too. He must have the worst
Speaker 2: advisors in the world. Remember when he did that campaign
Speaker 2: stop with Kamala Harrison Pennsylvania Abthumunitions Factory. He has gone
Speaker 2: all in repeatedly for the left, four Liberals, four Democrats there,
Speaker 2: and he doubled down and tripled down quadrule down in
Speaker 2: utterly spectacular fashion there. Donald Trump and JD. Van's read,
Speaker 2: Let's be very clear here, they did nothing wrong. Nothing.
Speaker 2: I cannot name a single thing that I think they
Speaker 2: did wrong. On the contrary, they had extraordinary patience there.
Speaker 2: They spends roughly thirty five minutes out of that fifty
Speaker 2: five minut or so Egene here trying to get Zelensky
Speaker 2: to actually agree to the deal that he'd basically, in
Speaker 2: theory already agreed to. Well, the whole thing's mass, the
Speaker 2: whole thing's mass. But Zelenski is entirely to blame for it.
Speaker 2: He really is one hundred percent to blame here.
Speaker 4: I think, Well, when you do watch the entire exchange,
Speaker 4: you do see that Donald Trump in particular was uncharacteristically
Speaker 4: patient and diplomatic, as Zelenski just was dismissive, would make comments,
Speaker 4: would roll his eyes. It was just I just don't
Speaker 4: know why that performance took place. And I do wonder
Speaker 4: whether this relationship between Zelenski and the Trump administration is salvagable.
Speaker 4: I hope for the sake of the Ukrainian people it
Speaker 4: is salvagable and it's done quickly. But even some of
Speaker 4: Zelenski's biggest supporters, including Senator Lindsay Graham, who has campaigned
Speaker 4: endlessly for further funding for Ukraine, even he was appalled
Speaker 4: by what happened in the Oval office. And I've got
Speaker 4: to say this is significant. This is his comments shortly
Speaker 4: after the press conference ended.
Speaker 14: What I saw in the Oval office was disrespectful, and
Speaker 14: I don't know if we can ever do business with
Speaker 14: Zolenski again.
Speaker 1: I don't.
Speaker 14: I think most Americans saw a guy that they would
Speaker 14: not want to go in business with. The way he
Speaker 14: handled the meeting, the way he confronted the President was
Speaker 14: just over the top. He either needs to resign and
Speaker 14: send somebody over that we can do business with, or
Speaker 14: he needs to change.
Speaker 4: That's from mal Vladimir Zelenski's most ardent backer arguably over
Speaker 4: the past three years, and Secretary of State Mirco Rubio
Speaker 4: explains here the administration's frustrations with Zelenski and the discussions
Speaker 4: he had about that mineral still, which Zelenski backed in
Speaker 4: the meetings they had.
Speaker 10: And he said, sure, want to do this deal. It
Speaker 10: makes all the sense in the world. The only thing
Speaker 10: is I need to run it through my legislative process.
Speaker 10: They have to approve it. I read two days later
Speaker 10: that Zelensky's out there saying I rejected the deal. I
Speaker 10: told him no way, that we're not doing that. Well,
Speaker 10: that's not what happened in that meeting. So you start
Speaker 10: to get upset by somebody we're trying to help these guys.
Speaker 10: Donald Trump's President Trump's not the kind of person that's
Speaker 10: going to sit there and take that. He's very transparent.
Speaker 10: He's going to tell you exactly how he feels. And
Speaker 10: he sent the message that he's not going to get
Speaker 10: gained here. He's willing to work on peace because he
Speaker 10: cares about Ukraine and he hopes Zelensky will be a
Speaker 10: partner in that and not someone who's out there putting
Speaker 10: the sort of counter messaging to try to hustle us
Speaker 10: in that regard. That's not going to be productive here, Josh.
Speaker 4: This hustling, these strategies may have worked with the last administration.
Speaker 4: We do know Joe Biden lost his temper with Zelenski
Speaker 4: and shouted at him, but in the end he kept
Speaker 4: writing these massive checks on behalf of the American people.
Speaker 4: But the American people don't want this anymore. They don't
Speaker 4: want to be funding this war. This was an election issue.
Speaker 4: We know precisely where President Trump stands on this issue.
Speaker 3: So again, I do.
Speaker 4: Wonder why Zelenski took the route he took knowing this
Speaker 4: administration's position on this entire catastrophe.
Speaker 2: So here's my best guess. I mean, one. I genuinely
Speaker 2: meant what I said for you, Enscuo. I think the
Speaker 2: Vlaimir Zelensky is kind of an idiot when it comes
Speaker 2: to international geopolitics. I actually do not think he understands
Speaker 2: American political dynamics particularly well. By the way, he would
Speaker 2: be far from the first foreign leader to fail to
Speaker 2: properly understand American political dynamics or politics can be a
Speaker 2: little complicated. Not necessarily his fault there, but he also
Speaker 2: just totally mistook the year. I mean, the year is
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five. I think that I think that he
Speaker 2: still thinks the year is twenty twenty two and that
Speaker 2: Joe Biden is still in charge, because again he has
Speaker 2: made his bed with the Democrats. He did that whole
Speaker 2: campaign stop with Kamala Harris there. He's just completely unwilling
Speaker 2: to read the room and to see the teeleies and
Speaker 2: recognize what they are. By the way, the deal that
Speaker 2: he should have agreed to, that I still ultimately has
Speaker 2: a chance if Zelenski steps down and is replaced by
Speaker 2: different leader. There. This mineral rights deal actually a pretty
Speaker 2: good deal for Ukraine. The US is not going to
Speaker 2: go all in at this point on a NATO esque
Speaker 2: security guarantee with boots on the ground thing for Ukraine.
Speaker 2: What a mineral rights deal does do, though, or some
Speaker 2: sort of economic arrangement, it gives the United States real, meaningful,
Speaker 2: tangible skin in the game that actually does make them invested,
Speaker 2: quite literally in the outcome of peace and prosperity and
Speaker 2: economic growth and the shared pie and all that stuff
Speaker 2: in Ukraine. So if Zelenski had two wits about him,
Speaker 2: if he had any common sense whatsoever, he would have
Speaker 2: read the room. He would have gone in there. Thank you,
Speaker 2: mister President, Thank you, mister Vice President, for your taxpayers
Speaker 2: who has spent one hundred and fifty billion dollars or
Speaker 2: whatever the heck is gargantuan, some has been there. Thank
Speaker 2: you for the fact that you campaigned relentlessly on peace,
Speaker 2: and yet here you are inviting me here to the
Speaker 2: Oval Office. By the way, I noticed that you're meeting
Speaker 2: with me before Vladimir Putin. I'm flattered by that. Thank
Speaker 2: you for that. There like there's misplaying your hand and
Speaker 2: then there's misplaying the most important mean that your country
Speaker 2: has had in a century. And he's done the latter,
Speaker 2: not the former.
Speaker 4: That's all he needed to do he needed to wear
Speaker 4: a suit. It's a small thing, but it shows respect.
Speaker 4: Or in the Oval office, in meeting the president, the
Speaker 4: leader of the free world, wear a suit, be deferential,
Speaker 4: be polite, just conduct yourself how you would with hopefully.
Speaker 3: Any world leader, and walk away.
Speaker 4: With an advantageous still for your people, for your country
Speaker 4: that has been devastated by three years of war which
Speaker 4: Russia started with this invasion.
Speaker 3: But do we want peace?
Speaker 4: Because there are only three options here, And even the
Speaker 4: most pro ardent Ukraine expert who's honest, will tell you
Speaker 4: this that we can either have the war continue, and
Speaker 4: that's only going to work in Ukraine's favor. They're only
Speaker 4: going to their only chance of winning is if there's
Speaker 4: troops sent from around the world, boots on the ground,
Speaker 4: and we're going to talk about that shortly, which is
Speaker 4: potentially the start of World War three against the nuclear
Speaker 4: power in Russia. Second option is that you give up
Speaker 4: and Russia wins. No one wants that. The third option
Speaker 4: is peace with an advantageous still for Ukraine, and this
Speaker 4: is what was being worked out. So for it to
Speaker 4: be blown up in this fashion, I think is just devastating.
Speaker 4: And you talked about Vladimir Zelenski not understanding the American dynamic,
Speaker 4: the current politics.
Speaker 3: Have a look at this polling.
Speaker 4: On Ukraine and how much opinions have shifted amongst the
Speaker 4: American people, or not just this conflict, but opinions on
Speaker 4: Zelenski himself. This poll, I hastened to add, was taken
Speaker 4: before the meeting.
Speaker 2: Your support for Ukraine is too much.
Speaker 13: Back when the war began, back in February of twenty
Speaker 13: twenty two, it was just seven percent. Up like a
Speaker 13: rocket ship, my goodness. Up now in February of twenty
Speaker 13: twenty five to forty one percent, and the clear majority
Speaker 13: of Republicans, and of course Republicans are in charge of
Speaker 13: the US. Now sixty two percent of Republicans say that
Speaker 13: the US support for Ukraine is too much.
Speaker 2: What a difference from just three years ago.
Speaker 13: Feelings towards Zelensky have changed also dramatically. Look at this
Speaker 13: confidence Lensky will do the right thing when it comes
Speaker 13: to world affairs. Back in twenty twenty two, it was
Speaker 13: the clear majority, seventy two percent, through the floor, through
Speaker 13: the floor.
Speaker 2: By twenty twenty four, just forty eight percent.
Speaker 4: I think after that performance in the White House, the
Speaker 4: figure is going to be far lower, Josh. And again,
Speaker 4: Trump got elected on an American First agenda. It underpins
Speaker 4: his entire platform, and it seems that's lost on so
Speaker 4: many political pundits.
Speaker 3: It seems to have been lost on most of the.
Speaker 4: EU, because that means something that's more than just USA
Speaker 4: chance and high fives. That means you do what's best
Speaker 4: for the American people, and the American people have made
Speaker 4: it clear.
Speaker 3: That they do not want to fund these less wars.
Speaker 2: That's exactly correct, by the way. I'm actually kind of
Speaker 2: surprised per Harry Enton's graphic there on seeing them, a
Speaker 2: little surprised that that forty one percent of Americans who
Speaker 2: think that there's too much PORP. I would think that
Speaker 2: number would actually be even higher. I think the number
Speaker 2: probably will go up even higher now over the next
Speaker 2: week or so after that meeting on Friday. I guess
Speaker 2: we'll see what it is. But Donald Trump's the art
Speaker 2: of the deal guy Rita. I mean, this is the
Speaker 2: guy who became famous with the whole art of the
Speaker 2: deal thing. He became famous hosting The Apprentice. He loves
Speaker 2: deal making, and this is a deal that he literally
Speaker 2: campaigned on. This is One of the hallmarks of his
Speaker 2: campaign was bringing this internal conflict in eastern Ukraine and
Speaker 2: Russia to an end. You know, the media tends to
Speaker 2: focus so much, rida oftentimes on the Middle East and
Speaker 2: the war in Gaza and Lebanon and all that there.
Speaker 2: But let me just say, the death toll in those conflicts,
Speaker 2: while every innocent life loss is obviously tragic, pales in
Speaker 2: comparison to the orders of magnitude. More people, oftentimes young men,
Speaker 2: who have just been slaughtered on the front lines on
Speaker 2: both sides of this conflict. An entire generation of you
Speaker 2: Ranians has essentially been lost that country. It's going to
Speaker 2: take a half century to a century to fully get
Speaker 2: back in terms of demographics, economy there. The whole country
Speaker 2: has been wrecked. So if Lamar Zelenski is still committed
Speaker 2: to this day till fighting till he retains every single
Speaker 2: square inch of territory, he will countenance no possible deal
Speaker 2: without a NATO S security guarantee. I ask you, mister Zelensky,
Speaker 2: at what cost, At what cost to your own country,
Speaker 2: to your own people that again has been just utterly
Speaker 2: devastated by this. All the people been slaughtered who have
Speaker 2: moved abroad there Ukraine is it's going to take my
Speaker 2: entire lifetime to recover from this. I'm not sure that
Speaker 2: Zelenski understands that. I think he probably does not, frankly,
Speaker 2: because again he's so high on his own supply from
Speaker 2: the four years of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and
Speaker 2: all the various Democratic boosters in the United States Senate
Speaker 2: in particular there. But if he can't get the job
Speaker 2: done Rita, he has to go, he has to resign
Speaker 2: and get someone in charge. We can actually get this
Speaker 2: piece still.
Speaker 4: Done, Joshua saying the British prime ministic case Stama Price.
Speaker 4: Why for standing with Zelenski at his time of need.
Speaker 4: Let's listen to what he had to say and see
Speaker 4: if you can catch the enormous contradiction.
Speaker 11: The UK is prepared to back this with boots on
Speaker 11: the ground and planes in the air, together with others.
Speaker 11: Europe must do the heavy listing. But to support peace
Speaker 11: in our continent and to succeed this effort must have
Speaker 11: strong US backing.
Speaker 4: Josh What are the chances that the US will back
Speaker 4: anything resembling boots on the.
Speaker 2: Ground, So, I mean read a creme if I'm wrong,
Speaker 2: but I think the contradiction that you're getting at is,
Speaker 2: on the one hand, here Starmer saying that Europe must
Speaker 2: take care of its own backyard, and then on the
Speaker 2: other hand, like two seconds later, he's saying it must
Speaker 2: have strong US backing as well. Look, the entire purpose
Speaker 2: of what Trump is trying to do, right, I say, Santa,
Speaker 2: I mean, the entire purpose what Donald Trump is trying
Speaker 2: to do in the Russia Ukraine theater is to transfer
Speaker 2: the baton, so to speak, to the Europeans to better
Speaker 2: patrol their own backyard. Look, America is in a difficult situation.
Speaker 2: Barack Obama, back in the year twenty fourteen, around then Rita,
Speaker 2: he became the first president in US history to formally
Speaker 2: disavow a long standing United States military doctrine that required
Speaker 2: that the US be militarily capable of winning two major
Speaker 2: conflicts simultaneous in the World States. Barack Obama conscientiously got
Speaker 2: rid of that. Since then, especially with the concombinant rise
Speaker 2: of China, the United States is in a somewhat precarious
Speaker 2: position in the world stage. We're basically in a century
Speaker 2: long great power competition with China. China's arrival, when it
Speaker 2: comes to the economy, when it comes to national security,
Speaker 2: when it comes to basically everything out there. What that
Speaker 2: means is that we cannot fund interminably a Slavic proxy
Speaker 2: war in Eastern Ukraine. There it's simply not in the
Speaker 2: American national interest to do so. That is the MAGA
Speaker 2: America first point. And on that point, Donald Trump and
Speaker 2: Jadvans are entirely right. By the way, if we cannot
Speaker 2: provoke the Russian bear so much, maybe just maybe we
Speaker 2: can sever the link between Vlaimir Putin and the Kremlin
Speaker 2: and Shi jimping in the Chinese Pola Borough, and maybe
Speaker 2: just maybe pull the Russians, not necessarily into the American
Speaker 2: sphere of influence, but at least in something remotely approximating neutrality.
Speaker 2: So if you can basically several of that russo sign
Speaker 2: a link between Russia and China, that would be a brilliant,
Speaker 2: absolutely brilliant active statesmanship. I'm not entirely I'm not saying
Speaker 2: that's going to happen. I'm not confidently predicting that there.
Speaker 2: But I do think that Donald Trump is such a
Speaker 2: successful historical deal maker that's probably in the back of
Speaker 2: his mind there and again, the Europeans have to take
Speaker 2: care of this. The Germans, the Poles, the French, the Brits.
Speaker 2: Come on, guys, muscle up and put some dollars down.
Speaker 4: Look, if europe can increase defense spending, if they can
Speaker 4: commit forces to protect their own continent, I think Donald
Speaker 4: Trump and most Americans will be enormously happy with that.
Speaker 4: But whether that's actually going to happen is the question.
Speaker 4: Before you go, The New York Post is reporting that
Speaker 4: Vice President JD. Vance was forced to move his family
Speaker 4: to an undisclosed like Haiti after pro Ukrainian protest has
Speaker 4: swarmed the ski resort where he was vacationing. What has
Speaker 4: been the reaction to Vance's part in this Zelenski blow up,
Speaker 4: particularly amongst the GOP, because there's been a lot of
Speaker 4: analysis that I think is again ill informed. I've I've
Speaker 4: read people saying that Donald Trump would be terribly upset
Speaker 4: with JD. Vance's interjections and upstaging him. I don't think
Speaker 4: that's the case at all. I think those two are
Speaker 4: very much on the same page.
Speaker 2: They are on the same page. In fact, if you
Speaker 2: go back to the Ohio Senate primary back in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty two where Gdvans beat out Josh Mandel and the
Speaker 2: various others there. He ran on this exact platform. Ukraine
Speaker 2: was actually a major issue for JD Vans, and actually
Speaker 2: things got really tense and one those Ohio Republican primary
Speaker 2: Senate to base Ages actually I think was doubling down
Speaker 2: so much on his stands on Ukraine. So Jed actually
Speaker 2: really believes on this issue. He's in locksta have agreeing
Speaker 2: with Donald Trump. By the way, these people are this
Speaker 2: ski resort disgusting, absolutely discussing. They are nothing new on
Speaker 2: the left. Obviously. I remember this footage of Ted Cruz
Speaker 2: getting dinner with his family in Washington, DC years ago.
Speaker 2: They blow up or not, they don't really blow up,
Speaker 2: but they go in there, they intrude on the restaurant there.
Speaker 2: They have to kick the people out. This is a
Speaker 2: disgusting tactic. Conservatives don't do this there. This is the
Speaker 2: unique province of the left and they should bow their
Speaker 2: heads and shame for because it's really just disgusting, lowball
Speaker 2: gutter stuff.
Speaker 4: It is lowball gutter stuff. But we are seeing this
Speaker 4: enormous political realignment. The left is suddenly now pro war
Speaker 4: and anti free speech.
Speaker 3: You wouldn't have called this a few years ago. Josh Havah,
Speaker 3: thank you so much for your time tonight.
Speaker 2: Thank you reader.
Speaker 4: Still to come elon masks fourteenth baby with It Another Woman,
Speaker 4: Kinsey Schofield has the details. You're watching the Raider Panehy
Speaker 4: show and joining me now celebrity and royal commentator Kinsey's
Speaker 4: scho filled Kinsey as sources revealed to the Daily Now
Speaker 4: that the Oscars scrambled to pull together a memorium tribute
Speaker 4: to Gene Hackman in time for the ceremony following the
Speaker 4: sudden and mysterious death of him and his wife last week,
Speaker 4: with an official cause yet to be determined.
Speaker 3: What else can you.
Speaker 4: Tell us about this tragic story?
Speaker 3: Absolutely so.
Speaker 7: Jane was ninety five years old, his wife Betsy was
Speaker 7: just sixty four years old, and they were both found
Speaker 7: partially mammified at the couple's three point three million dollar
Speaker 7: mansion in Santa Fe, New Mexico, with pills strown around
Speaker 7: Betsy the wife in the bathroom, along with the deceased
Speaker 7: dog a few feet away from her. Jean's pacemaker last
Speaker 7: showed activity on February seventeenth, RITA. That's nine days before
Speaker 7: maintenance and security workers discovered their bodies. They did find
Speaker 7: two living dogs on the property. We are still trying
Speaker 7: to determine cause of death, but it could take a while.
Speaker 7: I mean, you know, they're going to have to wait
Speaker 7: for toxicology ecology results before we will have any sort
Speaker 7: of indication as to what happened.
Speaker 4: I was just absolutely tragic. Will bring you the latest
Speaker 4: as we learn what happened there. Now large portion of
Speaker 4: oscar's committee members have stained from voting this year because
Speaker 4: the selection of awards nominees has become to woke. This
Speaker 4: is according to an expert. They feel this is the
Speaker 4: end of the award show because smaller movies are now
Speaker 4: being nominated over the big blockbuster films that people actually
Speaker 4: end up seeing.
Speaker 3: And there's all these d eye requirements.
Speaker 4: Tell me about these, surely the Oscars aren't on their
Speaker 4: last legs.
Speaker 7: Well, I mean, the Academy now requires that the films
Speaker 7: that are considered they have to have at least two
Speaker 7: out of these four pieces of criteria to even be considered,
Speaker 7: which is focusing on underrepresented groups including racial and ethnic groups, women,
Speaker 7: people with disabilities, and the lgbt Q plus community.
Speaker 3: And I think you'll agree with me.
Speaker 7: People generally watch films for entertainment, storytelling, and emotional connection,
Speaker 7: not to be lectured to. If a movie prioritizes delivering
Speaker 7: a walk message over compelling characters and narratives, it feels
Speaker 7: forced and almost condescending coming from Hollywood. Oh.
Speaker 3: Absolutely. And you can see these.
Speaker 4: Programs with the TV shows or movies where they seem
Speaker 4: to be ticking a box and it just detracts from
Speaker 4: the art. It should just be about communicating something or
Speaker 4: entertaining or making people feel something. All these other considerations.
Speaker 3: Should not come into it.
Speaker 4: We're going to have to get to Megan Marcolf tried
Speaker 4: to avoid her tonight, but here we are. She's been
Speaker 4: caught up and yet another copycat scandal, this time evolving
Speaker 4: her new cooking book.
Speaker 3: It's been alleged that with Love, Meghan.
Speaker 4: Has been almost entirely copying from Pamela Anderson's show, Pamela's
Speaker 4: Cooking with Love, with a trailer for Megan's show in
Speaker 4: some sections being a frame by frame replica of Pamela's.
Speaker 3: Surely not, Surely.
Speaker 4: This is some sort of a wild coincidence, Kinsey, Oh,
Speaker 4: why is.
Speaker 7: Megan Michael making a cooking show because she's great at
Speaker 7: following recipes. But I'm cooking up her own ideas. But
Speaker 7: I think that Pamela Anderson did make a guest appearance
Speaker 7: on Meghan's father show, Married with Children.
Speaker 11: Maybe Meghan has been.
Speaker 7: A fan ever since Rita. Who knows, Maybe she's always
Speaker 7: been inspired.
Speaker 4: Now Elon Musk has somehow welcomed his fourteenth child already.
Speaker 4: It was only three or four days ago we were
Speaker 4: talking about the thirteenth child. Allegedly, this fourth child is
Speaker 4: with a schivon Zillis.
Speaker 3: We know that much. What else can you tell us, Kinsey.
Speaker 7: I can tell you this announcement doesn't bode well for
Speaker 7: Ashley Saint Clair, who Elon has yet to appropriately acknowledge,
Speaker 7: a topic I couldn't believe Joe Rogan completely ignored last
Speaker 7: week when he sat down with him. It did not
Speaker 7: feel you know, I expect more from Joe Rogan, is
Speaker 7: what I'm trying to say. But Elon has acknowledged this child.
Speaker 7: He hasn't actually acknowledged Ashley Saint Clair's so I'm sure
Speaker 7: she's really upset right now.
Speaker 4: I think she would be upset right now because he
Speaker 4: hasn't acknowledged that baby yet and Prince Harry. He has
Speaker 4: been accused of having a passive aggressive jab at Elon
Speaker 4: Musk and Donald Trump at the Upfront summit in Los Angeles,
Speaker 4: where he told the crowd that a sickness in leadership
Speaker 4: across sectors from politics to tech interesting can have a
Speaker 4: detrimental effect on millions ah.
Speaker 3: In leadership from politics to tech. What could he have
Speaker 3: been talking about.
Speaker 7: Kinsey, definitely a swape at Donald Trump and Elon Musk,
Speaker 7: who we both know are not only vindictive but incredibly powerful.
Speaker 7: Right now, you and I've discussed that Donald Trump will
Speaker 7: not deport Prince Harry, but the Mail on Sunday reports
Speaker 7: that President Trump remains committed to prosecuting criminal prosecution if
Speaker 7: Prince Harry allied on his visa application, and guess what, Rita,
Speaker 7: we expect it to get a few more details from
Speaker 7: the DHS about what's actually on his application in the
Speaker 7: next few days, which might disrupt Megan Markle's big premiere.
Speaker 7: So you know, fingers crossed that Prince Harry's visa information
Speaker 7: doesn't negatively affect the hype around Megan's show.
Speaker 4: Is it too cynical to think that she might actually
Speaker 4: love that because you can think of no greater promotion
Speaker 4: for any projects she has than her husband being under investigation,
Speaker 4: possibly facing charges, even though deportation has been taken off
Speaker 4: the table.
Speaker 3: Because Donald Trump feels so sorry for him.
Speaker 4: This is yeah, this is going to be a fascinating
Speaker 4: set of events to observe. Kinsey Schofield. We love speaking
Speaker 4: with you. Thanks for your time tonight, and that's all
Speaker 4: the time I've got tonight. I'll see you at eleven
Speaker 4: tomorrow night. Up next is Newsnight.