WEBVTT - Dr Emma Beckett has 5 academic degrees…this is her top health advice

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Healthy Ish. Dear listeners, thanks for joining us

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>today on this daily podcast from Body and Soul. I

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>am Felicity Harley, malecular nutritionist. Doctor Emma Beckett has five

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>academic degrees relevant to nutrition, food science, and human health,

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and she has a new book out. It is called

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>You Are More Than What You Eat. She popped into

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the studio to discuss the prevalence of nutritional disinformation. Oh yeah,

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it is everywhere people. How to spot the red flags

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>next time you're scrolling social media. Plus, she shares her

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 1>number one tip for eating healthy full. Now, make sure

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to our other sister podcast, Extra Healthy Ish,

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>where she unpacks how diret culture gas lights us. You

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>can search for Extra Healthy Ish wherever you get your podcasts. Emma,

0:00:58.480 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you in the studio.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Excited to be here. Thank you so nice.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Last time, listeners, we did do it via our online studio,

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's so much better when it's in the flesh.

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Technology is great, but three D is better.

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I like that.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:11.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm into that. And congratulations on your new book.

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much.

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm really excited. How does it feel?

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 3>It feels really empowering to have it out there in

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 3>the world. I think while you're writing, you don't realize

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 3>how many thoughts and ideas that you have, and then

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 3>seeing them all together, I feel really proud of the

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 3>information and the perspectives that I've managed to put out there.

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>There's some different perspectives. Let's talk about one of those,

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>which some people might disagree with, but I like it.

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Keeping it simple is stupid. It's actually one of the

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>titles of the chapters in your book. You want to

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>bring complexity back into the nutritional conversation.

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Explain to us what this means.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so this sounds scary, I know. And often what

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>we do in communications and nutrition particularly is we try

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 3>and keep things simple, and sometimes that's for marketing, and

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>sometimes that's for motivation purposes, because no one's going to

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 3>do what you say if you go listen. This is

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 3>really hard. But complexity isn't the same as difficulty, and

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 3>complexity is about the fact that we can't simply predict

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 3>what's going to happen in complex systems, and so it

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 3>means that some of the things we think we're doing

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of benefit are actually a waste of

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 3>our time and money, and some of the things that

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 3>we're really stressed about because we're not doing it's actually

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of okay because your body is taking care of that.

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>So leaning into complexity isn't about going this is hard,

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 3>let's not bother. Leaning into complexity is about going, Okay,

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 3>I don't need to follow rules, I can apply tools,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 3>and I can stress a little bit less about all

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 3>of this healthy eating stuff.

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Actually, one point you do make in your book is

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that you know trusting your body. Our bodies are designed

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>for us to survive, aren't they, And often we don't.

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>We just think I must follow this rule or this

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>person's telling me this, do that, but often we don't

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>actually listen to what our body's trying to tell us.

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and because biology is complicated, our bodies are capable

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 3>of so much more than we think they are. They're

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 3>very robust, but knowing that they're robust doesn't mean that

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 3>we should torture them. So it's about being in balance

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 3>and flux with your body and your situation, rather than

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 3>trying to stick to rigid rules of correctness or rigid

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 3>ideas of perfection.

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>How does this oversimplification end up in manifesting diet trends

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Because and diet culture. I think that's another big message

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of your book, is how we all just get sucked

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>into diet culture thinking we are being healthy.

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 3>So the oversimplification is how the diet cycle happens, and

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 3>we keep jumping from one just to the next, just

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 3>to the next simple to the next easy, and inevitably

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 3>each one of those things fails because of course we

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 3>can't do one thing or just quit one thing, or

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 3>just add one thing, just do this, just do this.

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean you talk about the word just, don't you. Yeah,

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>And of.

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Course it doesn't work, but we keep on that cycle

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 3>of just trying the next thing and just trying the

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 3>next thing, and then each time it fails, we don't

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 3>blame the diet. We blame ourselves and we go, Okay,

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 3>well I wasn't good enough at that one. I'll try

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the next one. And so just keeps popping up, and

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.799
<v Speaker 3>the simplification keeps popping up to keep us on the cycle.

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 3>But it's keeping us distracted. So it's pulling you towards

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 3>problems that don't need solving, like our body shapes, and

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 3>pulling us away from problems that we would really love

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 3>if we could solve, like keeping bodies nourished and healthy.

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about a bit about nutrition information on social media,

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>because there is a hell of a lot of it

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's often so hard to know what's I mean.

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 2>You've got five academic degrees, What's I mean? You can find.

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Science and a study for anything you want to preach

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>on social media.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Can't you?

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So how can we get better at sorting the bs

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>from the legit?

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 3>So the number one thing is stop taking advice from

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 3>people based on their appearance, because their appearance is not

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 3>necessarily connected to what it is that they're doing, and

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't mean you're going to look like that if

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 3>you follow what they're doing, that is then further connected

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 3>to the bigger picture of check your biases. So we

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 3>talk a lot about critical thinking, but people think they're

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 3>being critical in nutrition a lot. And what we really

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>need to do is unpack why do I believe this?

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 3>And why do I want to believe it? Do I

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 3>want to believe it because you know that would make

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 3>my life a lot easier if it was true. Do

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 3>I want to feel better about myself?

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Really, unpacking you know, why we want to believe these

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 3>things is a really big picture thing. It's a lot

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 3>of work. It doesn't happen overnight, but it's really used.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>To a little point actually, because I haven't heard anyone

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>say that before. Anyway, carry on, But.

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 3>In terms of like things you can do now, it's

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 3>looking out for the red flags. It's going. Is someone

0:05:58.040 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 3>saying this is all I need to do? Are they

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 3>saying easy or simple or just? Or are they selling

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 3>you a diet that has a name? Does it sound

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 3>too good to be true? Well, then it probably is.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Are there strict rules? Is it exclusionary? Does it look

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 3>down on other people who don't eat that way? So

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 3>if it feels like it's a bit of a diet faction,

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 3>if it feels like it's too good to be true,

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 3>probably is, And probably you don't need to be that

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 3>strict to get the results that you want. But take

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 3>the bits from different people's advice and apply the bits

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 3>that work in your life rather than trying to emulate

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 3>these specific named diets sold by these very specific looking

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 3>kinds of people.

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>How do you approach social meniuactive on socials? How do

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you as an academic and expert? What sort of advice

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>do you take from other people?

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's about taking information and filtering that

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 3>through your context. So I always say on social media,

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>this is not advice. This is information, and you choose

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 3>what to do with it. And I think a lot

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 3>of people want to sell the entire story and bring

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 3>people along with them, and whether that's because they're doing

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 3>it to make money or whether they're doing that because

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 3>they truly believe in what it is they're sharing with people.

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 3>But there is no one single way of doing this.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 3>So big red flag is if anyone tell you there's

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 3>only one way to do it, that person is either lying, misinformed, or.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Trying to sell something very lazy.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like that idea of information actually because it's

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, so often we sold advice, but sharing it

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>as information is I'm not telling you to do something.

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You take on what I'm saying and if it works

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>for you, great, If it doesn't, it doesn't because every

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>single body, as I say that in air quotes, is different.

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Every body is different, and every life is different, so

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the context is different. And I don't think we talk

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 3>enough about context because I think people think that science

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 3>is about having the right or the wrong answer and

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 3>telling people they should or need to do. But science

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 3>is much more complex than that, and it's about applying

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 3>knowledge and solutions in an appropriate way to the situation.

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 3>And that is going to look different for everyone. And

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 3>sometimes people don't like hearing that as an answer because

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 3>they just want to be doesn't.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Give me a solution, does it?

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 3>But it gives you lots of solutions. So instead of

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>looking for the one solution, having options means you can

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 3>flex through those options as your context changes through your day,

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 3>your week, your month, your year.

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Now with all your academic degrees relevant to nutrition, food science,

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and human health, and as I read in your book,

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>we make around three hundred decisions about food every day.

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>What's your number one message when it comes to an

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>ex meal?

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Healthy eating? I mean, what do you call it now?

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm like questioning, I'm like picking up what is it

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>healthy eating? Or how do you frame it?

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 3>I think healthy eating is a good way to say it.

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's a lot of judgment that comes with

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the term we use around healthy eating. You know, eating well,

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 3>for example, puts that kind of good bad judgment on it,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 3>so we try to avoid that. But healthy is something

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 3>we can strive for. Acknowledging that health will look different

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 3>to each person in their context. But my number one

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 3>thing with healthy eating is stop trying to be perfect,

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 3>because we keep looking at perfect and going how will

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 3>I get there? And you know, we model perfect, and

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 3>we look at a perfect plate of steamed vegetables or

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 3>raw vegetables, and if you can't access those, if they

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 3>don't taste good, if you don't know how to cook them,

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 3>if you don't want to eat them, then that's not

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 3>perfect anymore. So just be perfectly imperfect, and you know,

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 3>eat the vegetables in the way that works for you.

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 2>And enjoy your next meal.

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 3>Because if it's not enjoyable, then that's going to be

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 3>a very difficult road to healthy eating. And being stressed

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 3>and being unhappy that's not healthy either.

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, amen, Emma, thank you for coming on healthy, thank

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 2>you for having me. Well there you have it.

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Some red flags you need to look out for next

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>time you ask social media and see that well easy

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>or effortless tag that hack on TikTok perhaps may not

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>be what it's all sold as. I hope you enjoyed

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this chat with Emma. Grab a new book. It is

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>called You Are More Than What You Eat.

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 2>It is out now.

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>And also I will leave a link to Emma's last

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>chat on healthy Ish where we discussed ozenpic. If you

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>did enjoy this one, though, tell us rate and review

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this episode, or you can subscribe to our other sister podcast,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Extra healthy Ish Anything Else. Head to body and soold

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com dot you follow us on socials grob Our

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>print edition which is out in your local Sunday paper,

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and until tomorrow, it's still healthy Ish