WEBVTT - Albo v Trump: Oct 20. Let’s goooooo.

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>It's been so much talk about whether or not you're

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>getting a face to face meeting with journals.

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to tell you when I'm out there in

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the real world, I do not get asked about it.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 3>The Prime Minister keeps on saying that everyone's overplaying the

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 3>fact that he hasn't managed to have a meeting, and

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 3>the media is obsessed with it, and we should all

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 3>give it a rest.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 1>We're obsessed with it.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 4>Will you have a face to face meeting with Donald Trump? Well,

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 4>when we do, you'll know about it, so it's not

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 4>booked up.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 3>But the truth is this is a really important bilateral relationship.

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 3>The government acknowledges that the United States is our most

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 3>important security partner, and the president has been in office

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 3>since January and was elected last November, which is coming

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 3>up for eleven months ago, and the two of them

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 3>haven't eyeballed each other yet.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Karen Middleton is a political journalist and author of Albanesi

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Telling It Straight, and while Anthony Alberanzi has been playing

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:56.639
<v Speaker 4>down the fact that he hasn't had a one on

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 4>one meeting with Trump yet, Karen says it actually tells

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 4>us a lot about the state of the relationship between

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 4>our two countries. Now, finally, after a huge effort from

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 4>the Australian government, there's a date on the calendar with

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 4>the two leaders set to meet in the Oval Office

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 4>on the twentieth of October. So will it go the

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 4>way of Zelenski's meeting in the Oval Office? And how

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 4>is the Prime Minister preparing for this unpredictable face off.

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm Ruby Jones and you're listening to seven AM today

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 4>Karen Middleton on Albanezy Trump and what Australia stands to

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 4>win and lose. It's Monday, September twenty nine. So Karen,

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 4>given how long Trump has been in office, now, what

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 4>does it say to you that it has taken this

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 4>long for a date for a meeting to be set.

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, you could say he's a busy man.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 3>He's got a long list of people who want to

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 3>see him. But I think it's hard to avoid the

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 3>conclusion that Australia was not right up there among his

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 3>top priorities. The two leaders had agreed to meet on

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 3>the sidelines at the G seven in Canada, and the

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 3>President then had to leave early because of developments in

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East. So that's a very plausible explanation for

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 3>early departure. But he has left summits early before without

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 3>such a plausible explanation. And if you look at the

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 3>company that Albanezi was in at the bottom of the

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 3>list of meetings that Donald Trump had scheduled at the summit,

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 3>it suggests that these were all people with whom he

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>had some kind of disagreement. You know, the leaders of Mexico, India,

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 3>South Korea, and of course the president of Ukraine who

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump famously ambushed in the Oval Office earlier in

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 3>the year. These were all people with whom Donald Trump

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 3>has had skirmishes or disagreements in recent times, and all

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 3>of them, Anthony Alberanzi were the people who got their

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 3>meetings canceled. And on top of that, soon after the summer,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump either spoke to or met with all of

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 3>those others, but not Anthony Albernizi. So it's hard to

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 3>avoid this conclusion that there was some kind of.

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 4>A message in there. Okay, So, while publicly Anthony Alberzi

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 4>has been saying that not having a meeting with Trump

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 4>is not a very big deal, can we assume that

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 4>privately the government has been trying to make this meeting happen.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 4>What do we know about what has been going on

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 4>behind the scenes to get to this point.

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, it certainly seems that's the case. They've been looking

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 3>forward to the meeting in Canada, and I think since

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 3>then they've been trying to make sure that that a

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 3>meeting does take place. We saw the Defense Minister, Richard Miles,

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 3>who's also the Deputy Prime Minister, race off to Washington

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 3>in late August. They still haven't really explained what that

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 3>was about, but he did meet with Marco Rubio, the

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 3>secondary State and National Security Advisor, who's also the person

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 3>in the administration responsible for coordinating the president's bilateral meetings,

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 3>so maybe there is a clue there. He came home

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 3>and a week later there was another phone call between

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>the President and the Prime Minister, and it seems that

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe it was that call, or even a subsequent one

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 3>that we hadn't heard about, that has locked in this

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 3>October twenty date. And since then, we've had a number

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>of announcements from the government that would be probably received

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 3>positively in the United States, like what, well, we know

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 3>the United States administration wants Australia to increase its defense

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 3>spending from somewhere around two point three percent of GDP

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 3>to three point five percent of GDP. The government has

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 3>pushed back on that and said, what we'll do is

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 3>decide what we need to acquire, what capability we need,

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 3>and we're not going to be tied to a percentage.

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 3>But since then you've certainly seen announcements that are about

0:04:58.480 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 3>defense spending.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 2>So today's investment is another way we're delivering record defense

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>funding to bolster Australia's capabilities. We're investing in our capability

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 2>and we're investing in our relationships.

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 3>We saw one recently a twelve billion dollar upgrade of

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 3>the Henderson Defense Precinct in Western Australia, which is where

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 3>the Orchest submarines will be based and will be used

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 3>as a maintenance hub for American submarines as well. And

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 3>we've also seen Richard Miles start talking about using a

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 3>different metric, a different way of assessing the percentage of

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 3>defense spending.

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>The percentage GDP number is not one that we focus on,

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and partly that's because others do, sure, but

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously the Americans do. And these are your numbers about

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>what it's getting to. Two point three percent.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 4>So what will this mean?

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but partly why we don't focus on it is

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>because you can look at a different arrange of different measures.

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Meaning it says if they were using the formula that

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 3>NATO users, then we'd be up to two point eight

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 3>percent already. So you've got those two things a bit

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 3>of a hint that they are, while not wanting to

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 3>change Australian policy to suit the United States, prepared to

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 3>take some steps to appease their concerns. And we also

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 3>saw Penny Wong make an announcement recently on Russian sanctions.

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Now Australia has sanctions against Russian ships and they're added

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 3>to a number of Russian ships that might be transporting

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Russian oil. We also have a companion measure that is

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 3>a Russian oil price cap, and we certainly know that

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump doesn't like other countries buying Russian oil and

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 3>is wanting to push that price down. So that is

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 3>another mechanism, another announcement quietly made that won't displease the

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 3>American president. I think what they're trying to do is

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 3>to be seen to be a good ally, a good friend,

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 3>but not shift Australian policy in response to pressure. From

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 3>the United States, and it's quite a fine line to walk.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Coming up advice for the prim Minister on how to

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 4>handle the meeting. So, Karen, as you've said, the government

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 4>has been working hard to please Trump ahead of finally

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 4>securing this meeting, but on a number of matters Albanize

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 4>has done the opposite. So there was the recognition of Palestine.

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 4>There was his big speech about more regulation for tech companies.

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 4>He also talked about climate change. So how do you

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 4>think that Albenze is doing it trying to balance his

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 4>own objectives and this need to have a good relationship

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 4>with the US president when a lot of the time

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 4>these two things are so diametrically opposed.

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And the tension here is because he's got a

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 3>domestic audience and then he's got this international relationship that

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 3>is important to Australia, and he knows that he has

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 3>support from home for a lot of those measures, and

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 3>support particularly for not bowing down to what Donald Trump wants,

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 3>not changing Australia's positions because of Donald Trump. But he

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 3>doesn't want to make him angry. He doesn't want to

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 3>unnecessarily antagonize. So he's got to now find a way

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 3>to forge a personal relationship and offer Donald Trump the

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 3>positives in the relationship. Now we know that President Trump

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 3>is a person who's looking for what the United States

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 3>and what he personally can achieve from these relationships, and

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 3>so Australia has to present the positive side, what orcast

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>will mean for the US and what mutual benefit, as

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 3>the governments would see it, those two countries can get

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 3>out of that submarine impact. What Australia can offer things

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 3>like you know, Australian superannuation funds and out going around

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the United States saying hey, we've got a two trillion

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 3>dollar pot of money to invest in your country and

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, in good projects. So that's something that we'll

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 3>appeal to the US president. And Australia has critical minerals

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 3>to offer. So these are the kinds of things that

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Albanezi will now be presenting, not changing the Australian

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 3>policy and having to defend it. And I think the

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 3>suggestion is you do better as Donald Trump if you

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 3>stick to your guns in a sense and don't be

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 3>seen to be blown with the window or in weak

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 3>in any way. But saying here, this is what I

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 3>can offer you, this is what our country brings. This

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 3>is why we can work well together.

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 4>And Albanezi has so far rejected calls from within the

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 4>Trump camp to replace Kevin Rudd as ambassador to the US.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 4>So tell me about what Rudd has been doing and

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 4>how that's complicating the situation.

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, it is complicated. I mean, Kevin Rudd is a

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 3>former Prime minister, so he has higher status as an ambassador. Unfortunately, though,

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 3>there are key people in the Trump administration who don't

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 3>like him. Kevin RhD had made some very forthright comments

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 3>on social media before Donald Trump was a re elected

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 3>president that were highly critical of him in it quite

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 3>a personal way. Now they've been deleted, but they were noted,

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 3>and these are the kinds of things that do anger

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 3>some in the Trump administration and certainly President Trump himself.

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 3>He has said in recent days how much he's not

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 3>a forgiver of his opponents. He's a hater of his opponents,

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 3>and he's not keen on working with people he doesn't like.

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 3>So that makes it more complicated. When you talk to

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 3>people familiar with how Australia is regarded in Washington, many

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 3>many of them say Kevin Rud is highly regarded that

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>some say they don't know that anyone else could have

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 3>done a better job at trying to open doors for Australia.

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 3>He's a globally recognized expert on China who speaks Mandarin. Obviously,

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 3>the whole issue around China is the issue in the

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 3>region that we live in at the moment in terms

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 3>of security. So you know, he brings a lot to relationship,

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 3>but there is this problem about whether they like him

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.359
<v Speaker 3>or not and whether that has made things slightly difficult.

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 4>And so this meeting between Trump and Albanezi, it's just

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 4>a few weeks away. What kind of advice do you

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 4>think that the Prime Minister is fielding on how he

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 4>should handle it?

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm sure he's getting plenty of free advice privately,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and he's certainly getting a lot publicly about how he

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 3>should go about it. Anthony Alberanezi himself has said, you know,

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 3>he's just going to be himself. That he likes to

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 3>think he gets on well with people, he can find

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 3>common ground, and that's what he'll be trying to do.

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 4>Trump is notoriously unpredictable, though, So what do you think

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 4>we should expect to come out of this? Is there

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 4>any risk that we could see some kind of Zelenski

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 4>like showdown. Do you think that Alberanezi would be worried

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 4>about that possibility.

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I'm sure he's worried about that possibility. And I

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 3>think there is always a risk because the President is

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 3>nothing if not unpredictable, and we've certainly seen him him

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 3>speak his mind in public to the discomfort of other

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 3>leaders when it suits him. But we've also seen him

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 3>get along with the leaders like so Kirstama in the UK,

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 3>who is whose politics are more like Anthony Avenesi's, who

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 3>also opposes a lot of Donald Trump's positions on big issues,

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 3>but they seem to get on well. And we've seen

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 3>in recent times that President Trump has changed his attitude

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 3>to Volodimese Elenski from Ukraine. He's now saying Ukraine could

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 3>be able to get all of its land back and

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 3>that Russia's got to stop. So, you know, he's a

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 3>mercurial person. He can be charming and also scathing, and

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Abnezi will be trying to get a little more

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 3>of the former a little less of the latter, while

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 3>also raising issues for Australia that are going to be difficult,

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 3>like tariffs, and we've just seen huge tariffs now being

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 3>announced for the pharmaceutical industry which would really impact Australian industry.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 3>So if Australia it might be able to dance around

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the tariff issue and not necessarily make a thing of

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 3>it because we did reasonably well compared to other countries,

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 3>we only getting a ten percent tariff, although we did

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 3>get hit. We are getting hip of steel and aluminium terriffs.

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to avoid that issue now and Anthony Ovens

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 3>he's going to have to focus a lot on how

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>to manage that. And of course the real elephant in

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 3>the room is the fact that Anthony Albaniz he've won

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 3>an election by distancing himself from Donald Trump and highlighting

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 3>the fact that his opponent was replicating Donald Trump's policies

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 3>and his government was not. That's a bit hard to

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 3>avoid and that's where we could run into problems and

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 3>where it could get slightly awkward if Donald Trump decides

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 3>to make an issue with it.

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, Karen, thank you so much for your time. Thanks Ruby.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Also in the news, Donald Trump's use of the military

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 4>on US soil is set to expand, with the President

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 4>saying he plans to send troops to Portland, Oregon. Trump

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 4>said immigration and customs enforcement facilities are under attack from

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Antifa and that he authorizes full force if necessary. Portland

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Mayor Keith Wilson rejected the claim and said there was

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 4>no need for troops in his city. Portland is run

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 4>by Democrats and is known as a sanctuary city, one

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 4>that limits cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. Trump has now

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 4>approved the use of the military to deal with domestic

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 4>issues in Memphis, Washington, d C. And Los Angeles. And

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 4>Anthony Alberonezi has ruled out a referendum to make Australia

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 4>a republic while he is Prime Minister, despite being in

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 4>favor of an Australian head of state. The Prime Minister

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 4>reaffirmed his position on Sunday that there would only be

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 4>one referendum during his time at leading the country, the

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 4>Voice referendum in twenty twenty three. Speaking on the ABC's

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Insiders program after meeting King Charles at Balmoral, he said,

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 4>while they did not discuss it, the King is aware

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 4>he's in favor of Australia becoming a republic. I'm Ruby Jones.

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 4>This is seven AM. Thanks for listening.