WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 5 May

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome the Late Debate. Good evening and welcome to the program.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caleb Bond with Liz Storer and filling in for

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 2>tonight James McPherson is Danika di Giorgio, who, of course

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 2>you can see as one half of Doneka and James

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 2>on a Sunday night, or two halves of Doaneka on

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 2>a Friday night. Of course, you know, we know the

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 2>coalition is stuffed at the moment here in this country,

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>but it's a different story over in the UK, where

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Nigel Farage's Reform Party had an excellent result on the weekend.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.639
<v Speaker 2>We'll tell you a bit more about that later on.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 2>In the papers, some of the coalition's biggest donors, the

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Party's biggest donors, are saying they may not ever

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 2>donate to the party again, what's that telling you? And

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 2>obviously you were watching our election coverage here on Sky

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 2>News on Saturday night, but one of the ABC Star

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>guests in its coverage has had some, let's say, rather

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 2>not so nice things to say about the program he

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>was part of. Will tidy his assessment a little bit later.

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 2>But amongst all the other stuff that has happened in

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>this election and we'll get into some.

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Of it very shortly.

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 2>A story that you may have missed and one that

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 2>you may well be happy about. You're not getting text

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 2>messages from Hfong anymore from the Trumpet of Patriots telling

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 2>you which way to vote, getting about ten of them

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 2>a day, as we were, and you may well never

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 2>get them again, because Clive Palmer has said it's time

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 2>to hang up his hat. He says, after all this time.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Of course, he started more than a decade ago, the

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Palmer United Party, and then he started the United Australia Party,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 2>which he for some reason de registered after the last election,

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 2>even though he got a senator in Victoria, Ralph Babett.

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Then tried to re register it for this year and

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 2>couldn't do so, so he started the Trumpet of Patriots,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 2>which by the way, pulled one point eighty five percent

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 2>of the national votes. All those millions of dollars that

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Clive spent was basically a donation to the news media

0:01:58.920 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>in the form of advertiser.

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Can we thank him for that because it's keeping us

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in work? But he says it's time.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 2>To say goodbye. He says, I'm seventy one and I'm

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 2>getting too old for politics. I'd rather spend time helping

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the tens of thousands that are homeless and hungry in

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>this country. That's why I've donated five million to food Bank.

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So it would seem.

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Finally it is cyanara from mister Palmer in this regard.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 2>And I talked about those text messages before, seventeen million

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>text messages Trumpet of Patriots sent out ten thousand complaints.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Palmer said they received about those and as I said before,

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>they turned that into one point eight five percent of

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the national vote. So I'm not sure that was the

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 2>greatest return on investment. And of course Sewell and Wrightson,

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 2>who we kept seeing in the advertisements saying you know

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 2>she'd be the next Prime Minister of Australia, she pulled

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 2>three point four percent in the seat of Hunter, so

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 2>a great success. It was againleause it seems he's finally

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 2>woken up and decided and maybe I shouldn't piss my

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 2>money up the wall.

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think this is sad.

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 4>I like Clyve.

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 3>I love the love.

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 5>That he has for this country because despite what you

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 5>think of him personally, he loves this country and that

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 5>is why he's happy to what it looks like on

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 5>the outside, squander tens of millions of dollars every time

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 5>we have a federal election. Because he believes in these

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 5>policies which many of us actually agree with, he simply

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 5>doesn't have everything else that it takes to get something

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 5>like this.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Off the ground.

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 5>But I'm sorry to see the back of him. I mean,

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 5>this is a guy who during all that COVID nonsense,

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 5>he was very staunchly, adamantly against it all.

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 3>And think what you will of hydroxy chloroquin.

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 5>My point about this is that this guy spend over

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 5>thirty million dollars importing a ton of it before the

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 5>TGA was like, where, we're actually not going to be

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 5>using this to treat COVID, but thanks anyway. How many

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 5>people do you know who would gladly do that? And

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 5>that was a donation. He was like, I'm doing this

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 5>off my own bat. I'm trying to help my country.

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 5>This is something that I see as a solution. It

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 5>turned out not to be. But he's someone who believes

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 5>in what he believes in, and he's happy to put

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 5>his money where his mouth is. And yet now he's

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 5>talking about, you know what, I'm just going to go

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 5>the philanthropic route and help all the people who don't

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 5>have money and desperately need help in this country. That's

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 5>the heart of the guy, and that's why I.

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 4>Like the problem. The problem that I have with Clive

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 4>Palmer is he doesn't know when to stop with his advertising.

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 4>I honestly feel like he thinks that we're all sitting

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 4>there and we get a text and he were like, yes,

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 4>it's the trumpet of patriots. Yes, thank goodness, thank you

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 4>for that message, when really we go, oh no, no,

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 4>not again, please spare us. And look, I do applaud

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 4>the guy for giving it a crack. He's tried, He's tried.

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 4>He is a you know, like him, all owe them.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 4>He is actually a successful Australian businessman. You know, you

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 4>don't get to where you are, you don't get to

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 4>that position without having some successes. He knows what to do.

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 4>But the problem is is he goes overboard and he

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 4>bombards us and that's what drives us nuts. And as

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 4>for Suellen Wrightsen, as you mentioned, Caleb dubbed Australia's next

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Prime minister look good on the ambition was out look

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 4>the ambition. I applaud her for having the ambition. Okay,

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 4>but now the poor woman's had to delete all of

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 4>her social media, can't She's had enough. She doesn't want

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 4>to you know, obviously it's been very embarrassed. But look,

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 4>come on, the campaign overall was a full nightmare. It's

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 4>time to go, Clive. You've given it a crack. But

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 4>well done for bowing out.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it gets me about it though, is obviously

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 2>last election he did get a seat in the Senate

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 2>in the form of Ralph but as I said before,

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 2>then for some reason to register the party, and you

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 2>could argue that in twenty nineteen the preferences flowed in

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 2>a way from all that money he spent, you know,

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 2>teams of millions of dollars in order to help Morrison

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:58.359
<v Speaker 2>get re elected.

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>But what has he achieved this time?

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Because I don't think he's got anything to show for

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>the money he spent this time. And that was always

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the question is what does he actually want to do?

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Because of course, you know, Trumpet and Patriots or United

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Australia Party is never going to seriously get up.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>So what was the point of spending all this money.

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 5>I guess he figured if he could get another Ralph

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 5>for that into the Senate or anywhere for that matter.

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Then it'd be worth it.

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 5>I love Senator Ralph Babet is an absolute wild card.

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 5>But when you look at the state of politics in

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 5>this country, the more wild cards we have the better.

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 5>He's now on the sidelines being like, I'm glad the

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 5>Liberals lost the fake Conservatives.

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 3>What were they going to do anyway?

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 5>And we do we need to see a radical revamp

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 5>of what was once the Conservative Party, and hopefully this

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.799
<v Speaker 5>catastrophic loss for the Libs is going to give birth

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 5>to that revamp that's been a long time in coming

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 5>and unfortunately it's just taking this catastrophe to get there.

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, I agree with you, but I also do

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 4>think Clive Palmer provided an alternative that I think that

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 4>the Liberals should have provided. Indeed, because he was straight

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 4>to you know, the man. When he says something, he

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 4>says it, and that's what we needed in this country.

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 4>So again like him, all owe him. He actually gave

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 4>a genuine alternative which we didn't see from the Liberal Party.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, while we're talking about all this election stuff and

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 2>we're going to get into more of than nitty gritty now,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 2>you have to feel bad for Peter Datknoan, amongst all

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 2>the other things that happened obviously, you know, the worst

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>result for the Coalition since the nineteen forties, since the

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Coalition has existed. I believe he's lost his own seat

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 2>of Dixon. So after twenty four years in politics, he's

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>had to bow out of the entire game. And he

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 2>may well be glad of that because it means he

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have to hang around and deal with all the

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 2>recriminations in the Liberal Party now. But to add insult

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 2>to injury, we found out today that Donald Trump, the

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 2>guy that he was linked to all through the campaign.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, they kept saying what was a dogie? What

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 2>was the line that Jim Chalmers came out with the

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>dogie Dutton?

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it was right. I mean that they worked

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>so hard the Labor.

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Party to link Peter Dutton to Donald Trump, and Donald

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Trump doesn't even know the guy's name.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 6>Albanis.

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm very friendly with I haven't I don't know anything.

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 6>About the election. He's been very very nice.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 3>To me, very respectful to me.

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 6>I have no idea who the other person is that

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 6>ran against.

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Him, And you know, we've had a very good relationship

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the poor fella, How.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 2>Bad must you feel after they linked.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Him so much to Trump and Trump? I don't even

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>know who he is.

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Interesting though, that he says, there, you know, I've got

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 2>a great relationship with Alberans and they had a phone

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 2>call today, actually Alban Easy and Donald Trump. But he's

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 2>talking about how great the relationship with albo is and

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't even know the guy who was apparently going

0:08:58.400 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 2>to be Trump two point zero.

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, why would you?

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 5>Because I think Trump's people knew Albanezi was a sure win.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:07.599
<v Speaker 5>So it's not like you're going to do any extensive

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 5>research on the potential other prime minister.

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 3>It was pretty obvious this was well. I always said anyway.

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 5>I know a lot of people were hopeful that this

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 5>could be a liberal when but I kept telling you,

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 5>just come back to the electoral math. It doesn't matter

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 5>what the polls say, and it doesn't matter what the

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 5>liberals are promising. At the end of the day, the

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 5>electoral math was staunchly in favor of Labor, and in

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 5>my humble opinion, it wasn't a case of will Labor win?

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 5>It was only a case of buy how much? And

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 5>that is what we've seen take place ever since. But

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 5>how do you like this, because we've been slamming, just

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 5>like Dutton got slammed for being like, oh, copy paste

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 5>Trump and he's bringing all these Trumpian policies and that

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 5>his campaign did bend over backwards to try and be like,

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 5>oh no, no, no, that's not us, that's not who we are, that's.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Not what we're trying to do.

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 5>But at the same time, Alban Easy was being slammed

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 5>as having no relationship whatsoever with Trump. Just the other

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 5>week he was saying, Oh, I don't have Trump's phone number.

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 5>I don't even think he is a phone. No, we

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 5>don't speak whatsoever. Well, very different tune today. You would

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 5>have thought they've been mates for ages. Here he was

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 5>talking about what a wonderful phone call he'd just had

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 5>with the President of the United States.

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 7>I had a very warm and positive conversation with President

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 7>Trump just a short while ago. We talked about her.

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 7>Orcus and Tarifs will continue to engage. We will engage

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 7>with each other on a face to face basis at

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 7>some time in the future.

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 5>Turns out they're the ones who have been best friends

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 5>all along.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>What a twit.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 4>Who would have thought? Who would have thought. You know

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 4>the funniest thing about this whole thing is that Anthony

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 4>Albaneze he couldn't actually get a call for Donald Trump

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 4>several months of course we had the tariff slapped on us.

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 4>But suddenly, wow, what by some miracle, he manages to

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 4>actually get on the blower to Donald Trump. And while

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 4>all is forgiven, they're all suddenly best friends for life

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 4>and holding hands. And what does this prove? What does

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 4>this prove? Well, you had the Labor Party saying, oh,

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 4>we don't want cut and paste US policies. You had

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 4>the Greens calling Peter Dutton the t MoU Trump. You

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 4>had Jason Claire out there day in day out saying, oh,

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 4>we've got to be very careful we don't import a

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 4>US based health system here in Australia. And all this

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 4>proves was that, well, actually, Donald Trump and Peter Dutton

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 4>had nothing to do with each other. Peter Dutton was

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 4>never a threat from the very beginning, never a threat.

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 4>But I think it does open a broader conversation though

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 4>about the Liberal Party's policies here because the Libs they

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 4>went into the center, they went center left with their policies.

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 4>So as a voter. You don't actually have any clear

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 4>distinction between the Labor Party and the Liberal Party. I

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 4>actually think that the Liberals should have been more like Trump.

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 4>And I'm not necessarily saying by way of policy, but

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking by way of decisiveness. If you're going to

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 4>put out a policy, you stick with it. Instead of course,

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 4>they backflipped on their key policies and Peter Dutton at

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 4>the start of the campaign, you'll remember he was very firm.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 4>He said, I'm only going to stand in front of

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 4>one flag, the Australian flag. Australia Day is to be

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 4>celebrated on January twenty sixth. What is a woman? It's

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 4>an adult female. But towards the last couple of weeks

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 4>he hasn't been able to answer that they backpedaled on it.

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 4>So if you're not going to provide a point of difference,

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 4>you're not going to bring the country with you. Well, no,

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 4>one day, you lose votes. And that is what Donald

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Trump did well.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 2>And this is what really annoyed me about the way

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the campaign was run for the Libs, because there was

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 2>always the problem that Dutton was apparently not likable. You know,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 2>people didn't see Dutton as the kind of bloke they'd

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 2>want to have a beer with in the same way

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 2>they might Anthony Albanizi.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>But you were never going to overcome that.

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, unless you can change the way that Peter

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Dutton presents in front of a camera, and he's been

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 2>in politics for a very long time, you're never going

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>to change that. And everyone who knows him personally will

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 2>say that he's got a wicked sense of humor and

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>he's great company, and he's a great guy. But for

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 2>whatever reason, that has never translated on screen. So forget

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 2>about trying to soften him, which they tried to do

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and failed dismally at. It's never going to happen. They

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 2>should have just let him lean into what he can

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 2>do on screen, which is be a hard taskmaster and

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 2>put it to Peter, put it to Anthony Alberizi. And

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the record will now show that Labor ran

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>a dirty campaign against Peter Dutton, but a very effective one.

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 2>They played the man rather than the ball but it worked,

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think people got to the ballot box and

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 2>they didn't necessarily endorse Albanesi and say.

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Gee, I love this elbow bloke.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 2>He's the best Prime Minister Australia he's ever had. But

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 2>they were dead certain that they didn't want Peter Dutton

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 2>anywhere near the lodge. It was the result of a

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 2>personal campaign that they ran against him. But at no

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 2>point did the Coalition let Peter Dutton do the same

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 2>thing to Albanzi.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 5>No, Well, they were all obsessed with like we've got.

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 3>To soften his image. And I actually think that was.

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 5>The downfall of Pete Dutton because the one thing in

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 5>politics that is worth its weight in gold is authenticity.

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 5>And if you're just yourself, whether people like it or lumpet,

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 5>people know, okay, this guy stands for something and he's

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 5>being himself. I'm looking at the genuine article, so I

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 5>know what I do or don't want to vote for.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 5>And we know in politics perception is reality. And so

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 5>what Labor was able to create this narrative around who

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 5>Peter Dutton is and this hardliner and oh he's so

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 5>Trump Voldemort, et cetera and so on, which was such

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 5>a low blow. The guy has alopecia for crying out loud,

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 5>if you want to pick on his baldness, that is just.

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Way too low.

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 5>But it worked, Like you say, and at the end

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 5>of the day, after all the votes accounted, that's all

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 5>that matters. So obviously the big question now is who

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 5>will be the new Liberal leader. We know Dan Tian's

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 5>hat is in the ring. We know Susan's Lay's hat

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 5>is in the ring. We know Angus Taylor's hat is.

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 3>In the ring.

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 5>These are the three names that are being bandied about.

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 5>But we know one Liberal senator by the name of

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 5>Holly Hughes, a regular hero on Sky News, has said,

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 5>whoever it is, it can't be Angus Taylor.

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 8>I know who I won't be supporting. I think when

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 8>you've had roles leading what was supposed to be the

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 8>economic narrative, when you were supposed to be putting.

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Together tax policies, when.

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 8>You were supposed to be delivering that sort of messaging

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 8>for the coalition, when you are aky member of the

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 8>EERC we're quite frank clear as a shadow who submitted

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 8>seven costed policies last October and.

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 4>Then never heard anything back.

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 8>There's certain people that I think need to do a

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 8>lot of reflection themselves on what their role was the

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 8>miss laws and perhaps putting your hand up for the

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 8>leadership is not exactly where your strength lies.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 5>We certainly didn't see a strong performance from Angus Taylor

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 5>this campaign. I don't think anyone would argue with that,

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 5>and certainly anyone who watched the debate, I think it

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 5>was pretty much across the board.

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Everyone was like, ah, yeah, Charmers won that one.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, even though we know what team we support, Chalmers

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 5>won that debate, and that seemed to be a reoccurring

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 5>theme whenever you saw Angus Taylor on our screen.

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 4>I agree, And the problem is is that the Liberals

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 4>really did, I think, failed to sell an economic narrative,

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 4>and August Taylor, being the shadow Treasurer, he was key

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 4>part of that. And the guy's a smart guy. You

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 4>cannot deny he is a Rhodes scholar. He knows what

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 4>he's talking about. But I don't think he particularly came

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 4>across as strong in that debate that you were talking about, Liz.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't think he came across strong. There are a

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 4>lot of fumbles, but you look at the other candidates

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 4>as well, and I've got to say I'm actually disappointed

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 4>that Andrew Hasty, the West Australian, dropped out of the

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 4>race late this afternoon. I thought he would have been

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 4>a brilliant opposition leader. He is strong. He would have

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 4>been a great representative for WA who often feels like

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 4>they are the loaner of the country. I would know

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 4>that I'm from Western Australia. But the problem is is

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 4>that the Liberals also hid him throughout the campaign because

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 4>of comments that he made back in twenty eighteen. I

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 4>think Susan Lee is now the best out of all

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 4>of them. Why because the Liberals have a women problem.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Now the voters think that the Liberal Party have a

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 4>women problem, So you put Susan Lee in there. She's

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 4>probably the most known out of them as being the deputy,

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 4>so she does have that public profile. But you've got

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 4>to sell her as the package. You've got to sell

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 4>her in a way that they didn't sell Peter Dunnon.

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 4>She's a grandmother, she's got kids of her own. You've

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 4>got to appeal to that market. I do think that

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Dan Teene is particularly strong on immigration, but they're going

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 4>to be in the wilderness for many years no matter

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 4>what Caleb that thing.

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Which is why Hasty doesn't want to put his hand

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 2>up yet. In there's an argument, there's an argument to

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 2>be made that if you don't want to put your

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 2>hand up now and you want to come in and

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 2>collect all the prizes later, then you perhaps don't deserve to.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Collect all the prizes.

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 2>But there's also an argument that it's not worth burning

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 2>good talent early because if things go really badly at

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 2>the next election, you know, that could be the end

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 2>of it. But of course there is a man called

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 2>John Winston Howard who famously lost an election as Opposition

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 2>leader and then came back and became the second longest

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 2>serving Australian Prime minister in history. So it's not like

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 2>there isn't a roadback from this stuff. But Angus Taylor,

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, one of the biggest mistakes that the Coalition

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 2>made in this campaign was to not allow the tax

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 2>cut that Labors said they were not a sed to

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 2>the tax cut that Labour said they would pass on,

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, five dollars a week. It was seventeen billion dollars,

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 2>which in the context of a trillion dollar debt that

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 2>we already have, wasn't a great deal of money. So

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 2>you have Angus Taylor come out and say we won't

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 2>pass on that tax cut.

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Now there are two problems with that. It handed a

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>free kick to Labor.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean he fell for the three card trick, and

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 2>they then got to say for the rest of the

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 2>campaign that this is the Liberal Party, the coalition that

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 2>won't give you a tax cut, and that was born

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 2>out in the polling that people legitimately started to think

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 2>that the Labor Party was more likely to be the

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 2>party that would give them a tax cut. So they

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 2>handed that as a free kick, and it was never

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 2>going to get through the Senate anyway. I mean that

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 2>was legislated within two days, that tax cut. So if

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 2>the Coalition would form government, they'd have to repeal it,

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 2>which means they'd have to get it through the set

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 2>And do you think the Senate would ever allow a

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 2>tax cut.

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>To be repealed.

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 2>It was one of the dumbest decisions they made. So

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 2>as far as I'm concerned, he's not up to the job.

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Susan Lay I don't think is particularly electable.

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, she just doesn't do it for me. I

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think she's been particularly.

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Impressive as the deputy leader of Liberal Path.

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 5>It could be a smart move for the Libs, though

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 5>it gives them that massive point of difference. She would

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 5>be the first female leader of the Liberal Party again

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 5>in terms of a revamp, optical and otherwise, it could

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 5>be really helpful for them. And I think Dan Tian

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 5>being such a part of the Old Guard now, if

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 5>it were Angus Taylor, if it were Dan Teen, they're

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 5>considered Dutton's right hand men already, So if what the

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 5>Libs want is to do a revamp, I think Susan

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 5>Lay is actually the.

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Best though he's proven himself to be a good campaigner.

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 2>And I was down in the western districts of Victoria

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 2>last week at the races in Warnabulle and everywhere were

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the signs for Alex Dyson because he got money out

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 2>of the Climate two hundred mod this time, and it

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 2>was absolutely everywhere we stay in Port Fairy and every

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 2>second bloody house in Port Fairy had an Alex Dyson

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 2>sign on it. And I spoke to Tea and at

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 2>the races on Thursday and said are you worried? And

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 2>everyone I spoke to at the races during the week said, jeez,

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I Reckon Teen's in a bit of travel.

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And he managed to hold him off. There was a massive.

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 2>Campaign that Alex Dyson ran down there and he managed

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 2>to fend it off.

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So he has some campaigning chops, which which clearly the

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>coaletion struggled with.

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 4>But he's been strong as well. But I think overall

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 4>we have to ask the question as well, is this

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 4>almost like the death of the Conservatives, because we're not

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 4>just seeing it here in Australia. We're seeing it the

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 4>Canadian election that was held last week as well. The

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 4>Conservatives were decimated. But you look at what's happening as

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 4>well over in the UK. The Conservatives are not performing

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 4>very well over there. But you know who is actually

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 4>outperforming the Conservatives Nigel for Raja's Reform Party. Now, over

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 4>the weekend the local council elections were held in the

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 4>UK and Reform did so much better than expected. In fact,

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 4>it took out multiple counties and it really really was

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 4>a warning sign. I would say to the Labor Party

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 4>that hey, people have genuinely han that had enough. But

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 4>also it just goes to show that when you actually

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 4>are tough, when you talk tough, when you walk the

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 4>walk and talk the talk like Nigel Farage, and you're

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 4>not scared to back away, you actually can make a

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 4>key difference. Here was Nigel Farage sending a message to

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 4>other parties.

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 6>The measure to Keir Starmer sarcastically, is please keep doing

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 6>what you're doing, and the message it can be made

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 6>not is well. Frankly, the Conservative Party's finished today. It's gone,

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 6>it's dying in the shahs. It has no future, It

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 6>stands for nothing.

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 5>It serves no purpose, any chance of doing a deal

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 5>with them to unite the right.

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 6>I don't want to do a deal with them. We're

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 6>going to win the next election on our own.

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Nigel Franch, thank you very much, thank you. And

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 4>you know what, he probably may have a good chance.

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 4>The polls are right now in reforms favor. Why because

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 4>people over there have had enough of mass immigration. They're

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 4>sick to death of jobs being given to immigrants who've

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 4>come to the country as opposed to people who were

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 4>born and raised there. Hello, we're seeing issues here in

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 4>this country as well. But what I particularly like about

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Nigel Ferajus he's not mucking around. He said that he's

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 4>coming after DEI in councils. Have a look.

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 6>We are going to be quite radical. Work from home.

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 6>Forget it. If you're a DEI officer, I suggest you

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 6>look for another job.

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 1>So things are going to be different.

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 6>We can't wagh magic ones. We don't pretend to, but

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 6>it'd be a very different approach to local government.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 4>So I think that this result was quite telling and

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 4>it goes to show, as I said, when you actually

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 4>have policies and you stick to them and you don't

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 4>back down, you don't go all scared, you don't go

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 4>all light like what we saw with the Liberal Party here.

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 4>You can actually make a difference when you have a

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 4>point of difference. It was a really really successful win

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 4>over a former even former gb News host Darren Grimes.

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 4>He even managed to get a seat in one of

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 4>the councils, which was which was quite quite astonishing and

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 4>good on and he's done very well up there. But

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 4>I really think that Reform is a party. We need

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 4>something like that here in Australia because we don't have

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 4>it the Conservatives. If you're going to move over to

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 4>the left like the labor left, then what's the point

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 4>You're not taking voters with you.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 5>And this is just remarkable in a matter of months.

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 5>So it was just August last year UK went to

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 5>the polls.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 3>We know that Kirstarmer got up.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 5>Reformer party just got fourteen percent of the vote share, modest,

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 5>not too bad. Here we are in the following year

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 5>and in these local elections they romped in thirty percent

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 5>of the vote, winning six hundred and seventy seven council seats.

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:46.959
<v Speaker 3>This is huge.

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 5>They crushed Labor, they crushed the Conservatives. Labor lost over

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and sixty seats. The Conservatives lost over six

0:24:55.720 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 5>hundred seats in these local elections. So those guys are

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 5>absolutely really You will remember, just months after the national

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 5>election last year, over two million English people signed a

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 5>poll saying, please, we are crying out Parliament go to

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 5>an early general election because.

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 3>We already have by a remorse.

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 5>They had punished the Conservatives at election because the Conservatives

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 5>had not delivered on their Brexit promises, namely to clamp

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 5>down on the mass rampant immigration that was sweeping the UK.

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Kiss Starmer then became Prime Minister, took the narrow win

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 5>and proceeded.

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>To just keep doing.

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 5>All these progressive policies that everyone in the UK had

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 5>said very loudly they didn't want any more. But worse

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 5>than that, Kiers Starma then enacted these draconian policies to

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 5>silence everyone and censor everyone who was still complaining, still noticing,

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 5>still posting on their socials being like my country's being

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 5>overrun and I'm absolutely sick of it. And that's where

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 5>reform is now absolutely transcendent because they're just like, Okay,

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 5>the Conservatives aren't cutting.

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 3>It for you.

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 5>We are replacing them. We will be the Conservative party

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 5>that you long to see. It's going to be really

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 5>interesting when they go back to the polls for a

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 5>general election reform.

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 3>I have no doubt that Farage can do this.

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 5>And he means business when he says, you guys are

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 5>dead in the water.

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 3>We're going to win a majority government.

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 5>By ourselves come the next general election.

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 3>We're just getting started.

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, they picked up another MP on the weekend as

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 2>well as the election, so they've now got their fifth

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 2>MP in the Parliament in the UK. And of course

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 2>they have a first pass the post system in the UK,

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 2>which makes things a little more difficult in terms of

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.239
<v Speaker 2>getting candidates over the line because you look like at

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 2>a party like the lib Dems for instance, and they've

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>got you know, seventy eighty odd seats or something, but

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 2>they only pull two or three percent of the national vote,

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 2>but they have strong support in small parts of the country.

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 2>So on a first past the post model you can

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 2>actually get a lot of candidates in. So the trouble

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 2>for the Reform Party is to be able to turn

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 2>national support into a genuine first past the post result

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 2>in multiple electorates. But to make it clear just.

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>How extraordinary this was.

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 2>In the council elections, there's one thy six hundred and

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 2>forty one seats across the UK. Six hundred and seventy

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 2>seven of them, forty one percent went to the Reform Party.

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 2>The lib Dems won three hundred and seventy, the Tories

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and nineteen, as Liz said before, that's down

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 2>six hundred and seventy seven on where they were, and

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Labor one ninety eight, which is down one hundred and

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 2>eighty nine seats. So the Tories and Labor, the two

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 2>major parties, combined one quarter of the seats the council

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 2>seats in the UK, and Reform, what was previously a

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 2>minor party that started up last year about four or

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 2>five weeks before for the general election in the UK,

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 2>has taken forty one percent of them. I mean, that

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely extraordinary. But the one thing I will say,

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the advantage that Reform, and Farage has in the UK

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to the situation we have here is that

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Reform is essentially the only alternative Conservative party that exists

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 2>in the UK, whereas here you've got one Nation, and

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 2>you've got Rennick and you've got family First. But we

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 2>are so trumpet to patriots, we are so splintered that

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the effort to actually create a genuine alternative to the

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Party or the Coalition would require a lot of

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 2>people to knock their heads together and have to make

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 2>sacrifices on their various little bug bears and whatever to say,

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 2>we've got to get together and create something here that

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 2>could actually be a genuine alternative, because the way it

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 2>is at the moment, you could never do what Reform.

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 4>The thing is, the Conservatives are being decimated right now

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 4>across the world, other than Donald Trump, who has done

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 4>exceptionally well. But again it comes down to good life leadership.

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 4>And people criticize Nigel Farage saying he's Donald Trump two

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 4>point right. Hey, the guy is highly successful because he

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 4>says it like it is and that's the difference. And

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 4>I do agree, well, correct, It's all about authenticity. It's

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 4>not about backing away I do agree. Here in Australia

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 4>it is very different. But it also comes down to

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 4>the Liberal Party pulling up their socks. And I believe

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 4>that they can get there, but they're not going to

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 4>get there anytime soon. That is the problem. So who's

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 4>going to come up in the ranks and actually do it.

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Can you imagine how the Tories must feel. They could

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 2>have had Nigel Farage.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 4>And it will be Averen story.

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 2>They said no and he's gone and proven and wrong.

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 2>And I can't get over this business. Today Donald Trump

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 2>saying he's going to put one hundred percent tariff on

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>films made overseas that are then screened in Hollywood, and

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 2>here he is talking about it.

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 4>We're making very few movies now, Harleywood, He's being displayed.

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>You haven't jarfenent grossly and garpending.

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 4>Governor that allows that to happen.

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not just blaming nations, but other nations, a

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of them have stolin.

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm moving in them.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 2>So he says Hollywood is dying and we have to

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 2>do something to try and revive Hollywood. I mean, I

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 2>would suggest there are a multitude of reasons that Hollywood

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 2>is dying. I mean, it went woke and no one

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 2>wanted to watch the crap that was coming out of it.

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Just look at the snow white film that Disney just

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 2>put out. Of course, Disney's now miraculously turned around and said, oh,

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe we won't make woke films anymore. Funny about that,

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 2>because reality eventually comes to bad. Also, has anyone noticed

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 2>that there are no original ideas in the movie industry anymore?

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, can we stop with all the remakes that

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 2>seems to be all they put out.

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Now, remake after remake after remake.

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 2>They've genuinely run out of ideas. So no wonder Hollywood

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:45.719
<v Speaker 2>is in trouble. And I wish I could tell you

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the detail around this plan, but it doesn't actually exist.

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, all we've been told is that Trump wants

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 2>to put one hundred percent tariff on films that come

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 2>from overseas. We don't know whether that means that it

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 2>would be one hundred percent tariff on the production cost

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 2>that would then have to be paid by the production

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 2>company so their film could be screened in the US,

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 2>or whether it means that the cinemas would have to

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 2>pay one hundred percent tariff on the tickets that they sell,

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 2>or the netflixes and all the other streaming services of

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 2>the world, or the television stations of the world would

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 2>have to pay another one hundred percent on top of

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 2>what they've already paid in rights in order to screen

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the film, or whether it's the total box office taking.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>No one knows what this actually leans. I mean, this

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was a brain fart from Donald Trump.

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Seriously, he's an ounce They've got to make it work now.

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 3>All the Hollywood exects, by the way, like, we got

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 3>no heads up about this.

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 5>We found out about it when it came out of

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 5>the man's mouth. And given the scrambling the Trump admin

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 5>is now trying to do.

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 3>To enact this, apparently it's happening.

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't think they knew either, because obviously a movie

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 5>isn't a product. It doesn't travel through ports, so how

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 5>is such a tariff going to work. It's also startled

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 5>a lot of other people in different other sectors because

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 5>they're like, well, hang on a minute, we thought these

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 5>tariffs would just be on products. Now you mean to

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 5>tell me we're talking movies. Who else is he going

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 5>to hit up?

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 5>But this was Trump's post from his Truth social platform.

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 5>He said the movie industry in America is dying a

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 5>very fast death.

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I'd say that's a great thing.

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 5>But anyway, other countries are offering all sorts of incentives

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 5>to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States.

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 5>Hollywood and many other areas within the USA are being devastated.

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 5>This is a concerted effort by other nations and therefore

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 5>a national security threat. Oh, this is reaching hysteric levels,

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 5>ladies and gentlemen. It is in addition to everything else,

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 5>messaging and propaganda.

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't agree more.

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 5>How about you get rid of the Pentagon Department that

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 5>works in collusion with Hollywood to pump this crap out.

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 5>It's therefore, I am authorizing the Department of Commerce and

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 5>the United States Trade Representative to immediately begin the process

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 5>of instituting a one hundred percent tariff on any and

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 5>all movies coming into our country that are produced in

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 5>foreign lands. We want movies made in America again in

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 5>his usual caps, Now, he's not wrong. According to data

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 5>from prod pro, spending on film production TV production in

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 5>the United States has gone down by twenty eight percent

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 5>just between twenty twenty one and twenty twenty four. That

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 5>is a lot of money we're talking about, and he

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 5>wants to keep it in the country. But you can't

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 5>deny that if you haven't made things. The production companies

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 5>are obviously like, well, we can produce this cheaper elsewhere anyway,

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 5>not to mention all the exotic locations that they film in.

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Of course they're going to do it, but rather than.

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Make it more affordable for them to do so in

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 5>the US, he's just saying, no, I'm going to make

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 5>it far too expensive for you to do it anyway.

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Try use VHS. That's why you think so well, I.

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Highly doubt a billionaire like Donald Trump still on the

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 4>old VHS. Yeah, but look, you never know. Look but

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 4>one can dream. But I completely this was a thought bubble.

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 4>There is no doubt this is a thought bubble. This

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 4>is not only going to cripple the overseas market, We're

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 4>going to be impacted here in Australia as well by this.

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Don't forget there's been major films. If you look back,

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 4>there's been major films film here. It's going to have

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 4>an impact on our market. It's going to cripple the

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 4>independent movie scene. I was reading as well, over seventy

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 4>five percent of box office Hollywood films actually reportedly come

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 4>from outside of the US, so it probably will encourage

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Hollywood to seek to move out of the United States.

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 4>But you know, Hollywood only has itself to blame here, because,

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 4>as you said, Caleb, Hollywood went woke years ago snow white.

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 4>For example, there was that ridiculous one Amelia Perez where

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 4>it was a Mexican drug law and that was transgender.

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, where are they getting this from. They've got

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 4>quotas for when you win awards. They've got quotas. You

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 4>have to have certain demographics to win awards. So you know,

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 4>maybe if I actually stopped with this white nonsense, they

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 4>could revive the movie scene. It's very clear Donald Trump

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 4>has no idea what he's doing here with this one.

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:15.760
<v Speaker 4>I've got to say, I think this was a complete

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 4>thought bubble. I think there'll be a lot of pushback

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:17.919
<v Speaker 4>as well.

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 2>You may have a point though. Crocodile Dundee was pretty

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 2>good Australian propaganda, wasn't it.

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 5>It was bring back Crocodile Dundee before we leave you

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 5>for a break tonight. Chinese, one of their humanoid robot factories,

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 5>has made headlines around the world for all the wrong reasons.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 5>It's called China's Unitree Robotics. They were supposed to be

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 5>showcasing this humanoid robot called H one, and well it

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 5>went very badly in fact, with someone kind of This

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 5>guy was lucky to escape with his life. There's a

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 5>humanoid absolutely going tropo. These guys are running for their lives.

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 5>They almost got bashed in the head, taken out by

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:05.879
<v Speaker 5>this robot, which Unitree is trying to sell.

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 3>You can go online and buy one of these now.

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 5>I think sales are probably going to plummet, but it

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 5>certainly doesn't dissuage the fears that so many people have

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 5>about these humanoid robots. Elon Musk has been like, oh,

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 5>we're going to produce five to ten thousand of them

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 5>in the next few years. Those people, those techie people,

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 5>are very excited about this expanding industry, and the rest

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 5>of us are watching on with horror at things like

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:35.240
<v Speaker 5>this terrifying.

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 2>It's incredible to think where we could be going. I

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 2>just got to say, that thing looks like me. When

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I went through my bit slips at Warnable Lab, I

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 2>realized that back two inns All Week book, He's cleaned

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 2>me up I meaning two minute noodles for the rest

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:48.919
<v Speaker 2>of the year, it would see. After the break we'll

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 2>get into the papers, big time Liberal donuts.

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Saying they may will never donate to the party again.

0:36:54.920 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 2>That is how bad things have become. Don't go away,

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 2>all right, let's get into tomorrow's papers. We'll start with

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.919
<v Speaker 2>the Australian, where I have to say, right up the top,

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the best story I've seen all week, perhaps all year,

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 2>a bit of avoidance from the election. Oscar Piastre, who

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 2>has won again in the US. I mean he is

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 2>just it and a bit boy from Brighton in Melbourne.

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 2>He will win the championship this year, mark my words.

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 2>But another story underneath it, completely hopeless, furious top Liberal

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 2>donors to close wallets. Top Liberal party donors are pulling

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 2>their financial support for the party, blaming the combination of

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 2>a disorganized election campaign and Peter Dathen's labor light policy platform,

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 2>saying without early wholesale changes, they won't be giving in

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 2>three years time. And it goes on to name some

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 2>of these people, soul Pats, Robert Milner and plenty of others.

0:37:55.440 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 2>Stockbroger Angus Aiken saying you know, we just can not

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 2>get over exactly how bad this was.

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>To quote soul Pats.

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Who's given more than a million dollars in the past

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 2>to the party said it's been a disaster. I will

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 2>be seriously thinking about whether I ever donate again.

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where they go to from now. It

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>was a very poor campaign. There were too many mixed messages.

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 2>They didn't convince voters that labor spending billions on renewables

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 2>is a bad idea. That Libs have to change their

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 2>way of thinking and get more of the swing voters.

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when you've got people who punt up a

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 2>lot of money, say I don't know that I'll ever

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:36.919
<v Speaker 2>give them money again, you own big traup.

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.439
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, this is a real worry for the Liberal Party.

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:42.919
<v Speaker 4>They would be absolutely crying to read this article because

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:44.760
<v Speaker 4>if you haven't got the money, you haven't got the backing,

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 4>then what's the point of putting out a campaign. But look,

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 4>they've done it to themselves. They will have to rebuild.

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 4>They're going to have to really convince donors that they

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:54.720
<v Speaker 4>are not in the wilderness, that they are going to improve,

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 4>that they're going to fix the mess but it's going

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 4>to take a lot of time. But they need that money.

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 5>It would be such a good time, like we were

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 5>talking about earlier, if there was a legitimate alternative like

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 5>worm have managed you out of the blue, like they

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 5>haven't even been around for that long at all, and

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 5>look what they have achieved. Because people are desperate for

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:19.720
<v Speaker 5>a Conservative party and they're like, well the Conservatives aren't

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 5>doing it for you, We're going to do it for you.

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 3>If one of those were to.

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 5>Spring up in Australia pretty soon, they could count on

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 5>these backers arguably just say hey, if those are the

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 5>policies that you want to see pushed, that's our bread

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 5>and butter. We're going to do it legitimately, unapologetically, and

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 5>we're going to create some wins in this country for

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 5>the Conservative vote. You wonder if you wouldn't Just like

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 5>the Conservatives in the UK, the Tories have lost a

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 5>lot of big donors to form. These guys could do

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.879
<v Speaker 5>the same if and when they actually exist, said here

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 5>in Australia.

0:39:57.640 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, it'd be good to see them given a scare,

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't it. One day scare they had on the weekend

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 2>is enough to shock them into action. But of course,

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 2>now that albow is back, all the old people are

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 2>starting to circle again, and one of them is Marsha

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Langton says. On the front of the aus Tomorrow sees

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the moment, Langton tells PM, and don't forget that Penny

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 2>Wong sort of suggested in the dying days of the

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 2>campaign that there could be a legislated voice, But Langton says,

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 2>here it says Anthony Albernez, he must use he's once

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:29.319
<v Speaker 2>in a generation election win to be courageous in Indigenous

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 2>policy and go beyond warm acknowledgments of traditional owners to

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 2>address extreme disadvantage. Voice and architect Marshall Langton says. The

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 2>wipeout of the coalition on Saturday is being seen by

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 2>some supporters of the Ularu statement from the heart as

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 2>a rejection, sorry of opposition attacks on welcome to Country ceremonies.

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 2>It's shunning of the Aboriginal flag and for an eleventh

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 2>hour attempt to convince voters that Labor had a secret

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 2>plan to revive.

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 1>An Indigenous voice.

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 2>To anyone who actually believes that, to to borrow a

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 2>line from the Prime Minister, who I believe he borrowed

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 2>from some influencer podcast, is you are de Lulu with no, Slulu,

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean to think that this election was actually a

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:16.839
<v Speaker 2>rejection of Datton saying that Welcome to Country is overdone

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 2>and that he would only stand in front of the

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Australian fact. I'm sorry, no one walked into a ballot

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 2>box Saturday and said I'm voting on the basis of

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 2>welcome in the country. They voted on the basis of

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 2>cost of living and the fact that they just didn't

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 2>like Peter Datton to say, well, this is a rejection

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 2>of wokeness and well, you know this is people saying, actually,

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 2>like work does something.

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. But you know what, though, the Liberals actually should

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 4>have gone harder on the voice. I think throughout the

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 4>campaign they should have they should have narrated it out.

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 4>As for Marsha, you know, they just pipe in their

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 4>heads up again now that Labor has been re elected.

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 4>And what struck me the other night now Beneze his

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 4>victory speech when he really enthusiastically acknowledged Elder's past president

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 4>emerging and that that line he was really husiastics So

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, the gang is back together. The gang are

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:03.320
<v Speaker 4>back together.

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Kate.

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, God help us always like to say

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 2>to that, but I don't. I just don't think if

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 2>they think that's what people were voting on.

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we'll look at the Herald's sun now. Now, this

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 4>is one of the most delicious moments of the election campaign.

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 4>If there is any Bant in fight to survive, hallelujah.

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 4>There eight Victorian seats remain in doubt as the race

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 4>titans in the Liberals favor in three key electorates, offering

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 4>the party a silver lining amid the devastating defeat. Greensley

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 4>that Adam Banty is at risk of losing his seat

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 4>of Melbourne to Labor, while t LMP Monk Ryan on

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:39.319
<v Speaker 4>Monday had to walk back claims she'd won Kugyong. God,

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 4>how embarrassing, admitting that the count was too close to call.

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 4>Postal votes in at Kuyong have favored the Liberal candidate there,

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Amelia Hamer, who on Sunday night said we can win this.

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:52.839
<v Speaker 4>So you've got doctor Monique Ryan. Firstly, she was out

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 4>there celebrating she'd won. I saw she even put on

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 4>her ex account Thank you Cooyong. She was all excited. Oh,

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 4>you might have to backpedal. How embarrassing. And as for

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Adam Bant, Trella see you later. Adam off you go goodbye.

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 4>Don't let the door hit you on your way out.

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 4>That's your only silver lining from this whole election campaign.

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 2>When you see now delicious not about to talk about

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:17.399
<v Speaker 2>Sidney sweeneyws on the front. Well, I mean you would

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.280
<v Speaker 2>think that would be It would be much much better

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 2>than Adam band, much better vision than Adam Banter or

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 2>menik Rah.

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's for sure.

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, for goodness sake, you know they say

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 2>don't count your chickens before then, and given the advice

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 2>of eggs these days, they're very expensive chickens to be counting.

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, wouldn't it be magnificent?

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 2>And we saw, of course that the Greens have gone backwards,

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 2>they lost two seats.

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>In Queens It I mean, how.

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Delicious would it be see Adam indeed, to see Adam

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 2>Bant go with them. I suspect Bant is going to

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 2>hold on and most of the Teals, it should be noted,

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:57.280
<v Speaker 2>even if two of them say go in Victoria, most

0:43:57.320 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 2>of them will hold on in the rest of the country.

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 2>So it's not like the days are over for the Teals.

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 2>But it is a window into their bravado to say

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 2>on election.

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And then the couch starts coming in. So sorry, I

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>got that wrong.

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 5>Very humiliating to the front page of the Townsville Bulletin.

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 5>Now odd story bin police to check waste come again.

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 5>Residents and ratepayers in Townsville will soon be treated to

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 5>a strange site on their streets, that of Townsville City

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 5>Council employees popping open their bins to take a look inside.

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 5>The move comes as a part of Townsville City Council's

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 5>new Bin health check program, running until September across seven suburbs.

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 5>These guys are going to be armed with clipboards. The

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 5>council's rubbish crops are doing visual checks of your recycling

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 5>bins on collection day to make sure there's no mix ups.

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 3>The mayor says this blitz is all about.

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:03.399
<v Speaker 5>Boosting recycling and cutting land fell So she says they

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 5>won't be rifling through rummish.

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Just taking a look.

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:10.720
<v Speaker 5>So to Townsville residence, all that matters is what's on top, okay,

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 5>So just whatever you do, make sure you sprinkle the

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 5>good stuff on top, get the tick from these clipboard

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 5>council employees and you're in the clear.

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, How would you like to be a bin coop.

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they wouldn't be the best job. Can you

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 4>imagine the smell out of everyone's bins?

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.399
<v Speaker 2>It reminds me of one of my favorite stories ever

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 2>published in the history of journalism, which was by a

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 2>little paper in a small town in the US where

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 2>the local government had decided that what was in the

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 2>bin once it was on the footpath was public property,

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:40.760
<v Speaker 2>so anyone could come.

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Along and take it.

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 2>So these small time journos of this little paper went

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 2>rifled through the bins of all the local politicians and

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:49.879
<v Speaker 2>then published what they found in their bins, and very

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 2>quickly that policy was turned back. I wonder whether that

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 2>might happen in this case. After the break, the conclave

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:59.799
<v Speaker 2>begins this week to decide who the new Pope will be.

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 2>What if it was Donald Trump will show you that

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 2>after this, Well, the new Pope will be decided this week.

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 2>But it would seems the White House has designs on

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump talk.

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh look, I think this is absolutely brilliant. Yes, it's

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 4>a big moment for the Vatican, of course, as they

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 4>look to elect a new pope, and we saw this

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:22.800
<v Speaker 4>fascinating image. It's an AI generated image that Donald Trump

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 4>has put out today of well, none other than himself

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 4>is he's nominated and selected himself to be the new Pope. Gosh,

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 4>if you don't you know he looks. This is the

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:33.719
<v Speaker 4>problem with AI. You never know what's real or fake.

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:35.880
<v Speaker 4>But you've got to have a look at this AI video.

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 4>And well, I thought it was a classic personally, isn't

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 4>it just brilliant? And look, of course the left to

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 4>the left, they're all upset, they say it's offensive. I

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 4>actually think it was quite funny. Personally, I think we

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:07.120
<v Speaker 4>shouldn't take things so seriously. He put it out as

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a joke. He thought it was funny,

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:11.320
<v Speaker 4>and you know what, we've got to take it with

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 4>a bit of humor. But AI is scary because it

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 4>didn't look real in my opinion.

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Well one was he who actually goes to Catholic church?

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:22.719
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I do. All thought it's hilarious. Trump's not even

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:23.320
<v Speaker 3>a Catholic.

0:47:23.400 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 5>He doesn't even attend church church of any description.

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 3>He's absolutely trolling.

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 5>And then the White House's official ex otherwise known as

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 5>Twitter account, re shared the video, so they're clearly just

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:37.800
<v Speaker 5>having a laugh.

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 3>Can everyone please come now?

0:47:39.600 --> 0:47:43.279
<v Speaker 2>I have to say, though surely being a poping a

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:47.359
<v Speaker 2>priest involves celibacy. I don't think Donald Trump would ever

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 2>get the job.

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:51.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean, for all his faults, and everyone's always rushed

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 5>to Trump's defense. And I've used the line myself to

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:55.880
<v Speaker 5>be like it was an elected to be pope. He

0:47:55.960 --> 0:47:59.280
<v Speaker 5>was now.

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Here, he has been light well.

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually well he's already had.

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 2>I had the second coming in the White House, so

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 2>who knows what he can do over at Vatican City.

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 2>But before we go, Tony Barry, who works with our

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:12.719
<v Speaker 2>mate Cos Samaras over at Redbridge. He's one of the

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 2>co directors of at Redbridge, was on the ABC's election

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 2>coverage on Saturday night. I know you weren't watching that,

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 2>you were watching us, but you would think, given he

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 2>was on the coverage, you would have wonderful things to

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:25.280
<v Speaker 2>say about it. But his assessment was thus, the ABC

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 2>was the only telecast of six hours of no data

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 2>analysis and insight, just six endless what I reckon journalism

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 2>ours unwatchable drivel. He said they should burn the ABC

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 2>to the ground quote unquote, and then sort the earth

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 2>underneath and on behalf of all of us. Tony Barry,

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:48.799
<v Speaker 2>we say thank you here, Thank you so much for

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 2>joining us.

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Tonight, Britta Panecky Show is Up.