Speaker 1: On scor Wields Australia. This is the winder Panicky Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Riata Panekey Show. Coming
Speaker 2: up tonight. Mass union rallies cause havoc in Melbourne and Sydney.
Speaker 2: A whistleblower speaks sad about the Dan and Catherine Andrews
Speaker 2: crash scandal. Has Bullas offered significant losses after an astonishing
Speaker 2: plot involving exploding pages. Army Horowitz with the latest on that,
Speaker 2: and later in the hour, I'll speak of the security
Speaker 2: expert about the direct link between the Democrats reckless rhetoric
Speaker 2: and assassination attempts against Donald Trump. And Tonight's Left He's
Speaker 2: losing It, features superstar Taylor Swift.
Speaker 3: This is something that I know is right, and you guys,
Speaker 3: I need to be on the right side of history
Speaker 3: and if he doesn't win that at least at least.
Speaker 2: Day time today, around fifty thousand construction workers in Melbourne
Speaker 2: and a smaller number in Sydney. We're our protesting labour's
Speaker 2: handling of the CFM and you saga. Several union figures
Speaker 2: spoke at the rally in Melbourne. Here's some of what
Speaker 2: they had to say.
Speaker 1: We're drawing a line in the sand.
Speaker 4: So what does that mean.
Speaker 5: It means that we're not going to let any employer
Speaker 5: use administration to take wages and conditions backwards. Part of
Speaker 5: the campaign is to repel these thirty laws.
Speaker 2: Yeah, read the.
Speaker 5: Thirty laws, because what do you understand today? You touched
Speaker 5: the sea tomorrow are you going to touch another union
Speaker 5: with the thirty laws?
Speaker 2: Joining me now is Deputy Executive Director of the Institute
Speaker 2: of Public Affairs Daniel wild Dan. Electrical Trades Union Victorian
Speaker 2: Secretary Troy Grace said employers were on notice that building
Speaker 2: unions would strike for seventy two hours across the state
Speaker 2: if companies resist that. The unions a line in the
Speaker 2: sand campaign this lot, I've got to say, I used
Speaker 2: to getting their way in Melbourne. In particular, what do
Speaker 2: you make of the threats of further industrial action?
Speaker 6: We'll read it as a couple of things I think
Speaker 6: are really interesting. We're seeing basically the implosion of the
Speaker 6: labor and union movement. As you know that the Labor
Speaker 6: Party was originally established as the political arm of the
Speaker 6: unions when it was first set up, and this is
Speaker 6: a massive disruption to that. I think Basically what we're
Speaker 6: seeing is the modern Labor Party no longer represents workers.
Speaker 6: We've seen that also with the recently announced departure of
Speaker 6: Bill Shorten on the right of the Labor Party. And
Speaker 6: all you have to do is look at well, what
Speaker 6: does a Labor Party stand for today? It stands for
Speaker 6: mass migration, which suppresses wages. They stand for this climate
Speaker 6: fanaticism which is destroying industry, and they're also hostile to
Speaker 6: Australian values and the Australian way of life, which is
Speaker 6: against the interests of working class Australians. So I think
Speaker 6: this campaign by the CFMAU and other construction related industries
Speaker 6: is going to continue for some time and it is
Speaker 6: going to cause I think a lot of pain for
Speaker 6: labor politically because there has been this cozy relationship for
Speaker 6: so many years. But you know, your typical union member
Speaker 6: today is not the blue collar worker it once was.
Speaker 6: It's basically aging public servants that are just waiting for
Speaker 6: their defined benefit schemes to be paid out.
Speaker 2: Now, Dan more explosive claims I've emerged today about Victoria
Speaker 2: Police's conduct after Daniel and Catherine Andrews crashed into a
Speaker 2: teenage cyclist In twenty thirteen, the Herald Son's reporting that
Speaker 2: former leading Senior Constable Scott Hanley said his patrol car
Speaker 2: was en route to the ble Garry crash site with
Speaker 2: lights and sirens when a senior constable from Rye jump
Speaker 2: the core. Mister Hanley has provided a sworn statement to
Speaker 2: lawyers for Ryan Mewlman, that's the fifteen year old at
Speaker 2: the time who was struck by the end Andrew's a
Speaker 2: family suv. This police officer labels the manner in which
Speaker 2: he was pulled off the case that evening as irregular
Speaker 2: and significant departure from standing operating procedures. Dad Andrews has
Speaker 2: responded to yesterday's bombshell report, labeling it a set of
Speaker 2: appalling conspiracy theories and Victoria Police DAN thus far refusing
Speaker 2: to reopen their investigation. Is that good enough? Because that
Speaker 2: report yesterday raised so many more questions. There were already
Speaker 2: a lot of unanswered questions, and surely we cannot have
Speaker 2: this saga remain in this fashion where there's no clarity
Speaker 2: around what happened, who did what, and at who's behest.
Speaker 6: That's exactly right, reader, The investigation should be reopened. I
Speaker 6: think this could go down as one of the biggest
Speaker 6: political scandals in Victoria's history. And that's saying something giving
Speaker 6: everything that Victorians have endured over the last decade. As
Speaker 6: you rightly wrote in your column for the Herald Sun Reader,
Speaker 6: this is about trust in the police more than it
Speaker 6: is about anything else. We saw an abusive trust throughout
Speaker 6: COVID where we had a two tiered policing system, where
Speaker 6: we had the Black Lives Matter protesters could go out
Speaker 6: and protest. In fact, many of the police supported that
Speaker 6: during lockdowns said if you were Zoe Bueller putting your
Speaker 6: opinion out opposed to lockdowns, that you were arrested. And
Speaker 6: many other Victorians were brutally treated by police and the
Speaker 6: police were basically turned into a political operation of Daniel Andrews.
Speaker 6: So I think to a lot of people in the community,
Speaker 6: they see crime going up, they see this two tier
Speaker 6: policing system, and now they see what appears to be
Speaker 6: appears to be a monumental cover up that could go
Speaker 6: to the very top of the Victorian police leadership. And
Speaker 6: that's why there needs to be an investigation and a
Speaker 6: cleanupt of that leadership.
Speaker 2: And in that column I called for immunity to be
Speaker 2: offered full immunity to any of the police officers who
Speaker 2: may be involved in any sort of cover up if
Speaker 2: a cover up did take place. I think, Dan, that's
Speaker 2: the only way we are going to get some answers
Speaker 2: on this, because this is just shaking the public's faith
Speaker 2: in the Victorian justice system and particularly Victoria Police. Now,
Speaker 2: for a second week in a row, Senator Pauline Hanson
Speaker 2: has failed to have her Sex Discrimination Act Acknowledging Biological
Speaker 2: Reality Bill considered by the Parliament. The bill would, as
Speaker 2: the name suggests, recognize biological reality and remove protections on
Speaker 2: the basis of gender identity from the Sex Discrimination Act.
Speaker 2: Labour's Katie Gallagher, she's the Minister for Finance and Women,
Speaker 2: had this to say.
Speaker 7: But when you have bills that seek to harm people,
Speaker 7: including young people, we will draw the line.
Speaker 8: That is a red line for us.
Speaker 7: We do not apologize. We know how vulnerable the diverse
Speaker 7: community is, we know how they struggle. We do not
Speaker 7: think the Senate is a qualified place for that debate.
Speaker 2: Dan, I find this astonishing, this attitude that the Senate
Speaker 2: is not qualified to debate women's rights and protecting women's
Speaker 2: only spaces, that it's too sensitive of a discussion to
Speaker 2: be having in the upper house of the Australian Parliament.
Speaker 8: Well, that's right.
Speaker 6: I mean it shows the anti democratic, anti freedom of
Speaker 6: speech attitude of Labor and Senator Gallagher, who is a
Speaker 6: chronic underperformer in the Senator in the Senate. You know,
Speaker 6: how can you have a Minister for Women that can't
Speaker 6: even define what a woman is. You've got this issue
Speaker 6: with Act. She refers to harm. You know that it's
Speaker 6: harming the so called community. But these are the words
Speaker 6: that are used actually in the proposed misinformation laws that
Speaker 6: Labor has put forward, which would basically seek to empower
Speaker 6: a massive new unelected bureaucracy to shut down debate. So
Speaker 6: we're getting a taste of what that.
Speaker 1: Will look like.
Speaker 6: If you're a mainstream Australian who believes that men are
Speaker 6: men and women are women, and that women shouldn't be
Speaker 6: having to deal with men invading their spaces and so forth,
Speaker 6: then your opinion is going to be shut down. It's
Speaker 6: not just going to be in Parliament, it's going to
Speaker 6: be on social media if those misinformation laws are implemented.
Speaker 6: We all want to be respectful of other's decisions in life.
Speaker 6: But we need to be able to have a debate
Speaker 6: about this. And this is just another egregious example of
Speaker 6: how this government is seeking to shut down debate and
Speaker 6: democracy in Australia.
Speaker 2: And it doesn't seem to be much consideration for mainstream opinions.
Speaker 2: Like you said, they're a whelming majority of Australians know
Speaker 2: that men are men, women are women, and that women
Speaker 2: deserve to have protections in their spaces. When we're talking
Speaker 2: about women's shelters, women's changing rooms, even women's prisons and
Speaker 2: women's sport, I mean, these are the areas where women's
Speaker 2: rights seems to have been forgotten because people are worried
Speaker 2: about insulting or offending certain activist groups from the trans community.
Speaker 2: It's just madness that fifty percent of the population is
Speaker 2: having its rights infringed upon to satisfy a tiny, tiny minority. Now,
Speaker 2: this is very interesting from the US. A watchdog group
Speaker 2: wants to highlight hypocrisy, and it's doing this by offering
Speaker 2: a million dollars to Queers for Palestine or indeed any
Speaker 2: LGBTQ advocacy organization if they will host a gay pride
Speaker 2: parade in Gaza or the West Bank. The President of
Speaker 2: this group New Tolerance campaign Greek Angelo said their legitimate
Speaker 2: offer is a wake up call to Quis for Palestine
Speaker 2: and Gaze for Gaza movements. What do you reckon, Dan?
Speaker 2: Do you think they're going to have any anyone taking
Speaker 2: them up on their offer?
Speaker 6: Well, I won't be holding my breath, reader, And you know,
Speaker 6: I think one of the things that this highlights is
Speaker 6: a lot of the hypocrisy that we see and the
Speaker 6: fact that the so called pro Palestine or pro hamas
Speaker 6: you know, protesters and movement is really an anti Western
Speaker 6: ideological movement which is often founded on ignorance, you know,
Speaker 6: ignorance of history, ignorance of culture, and all of the
Speaker 6: internal contradictions that we see every single day. The fact
Speaker 6: is that the Western world is is tolerant to diverse
Speaker 6: lifestyles and different ways of living in a way that
Speaker 6: many other cultures simply are not.
Speaker 9: So.
Speaker 6: Look, I'm going to be very interested to see how
Speaker 6: this plays out, and like I say, I'm not going
Speaker 6: to be holding my breath for them to take up
Speaker 6: that very generous offer.
Speaker 2: Now, before you go, I want to get your thoughts
Speaker 2: on this shocking story from the UK, A Rotherham gang
Speaker 2: rape survivor who suffered terrible abuse from the age of eleven,
Speaker 2: was ordered by a judge to remove demands for her
Speaker 2: abuses to be deported from her planned statement. Twenty two
Speaker 2: years on from when the abuse began. Seven of her
Speaker 2: abuses were sentenced to a combined one hundred and six
Speaker 2: years in prison. However, the survivor told gb News, if
Speaker 2: someone's not born here and they're here to exploit children
Speaker 2: after the sentences, they should be deported. The Foreign Office
Speaker 2: should absolutely give Pakistan full punishment if they refuse to
Speaker 2: accept grooming gang rapers. But Dan, how can a victim
Speaker 2: of crime be told that she's not allowed to call
Speaker 2: for abuses to be deported. Surely that's her right. If
Speaker 2: she wants to make a statement like that, of.
Speaker 6: Course she should be able to. And everything that was
Speaker 6: said in that by that victim I think is common sense.
Speaker 6: This is one of the most I think, evil shocking
Speaker 6: episodes we've ever seen, what's happened in the UK, the
Speaker 6: cover ups that took place, the fact that so many
Speaker 6: people knew about what was happening and were evolved in it,
Speaker 6: but didn't speak out for a range of reasons. Now
Speaker 6: we've got the justice system that seems to be protecting
Speaker 6: the perpetrators of this crime rather than giving restitution to
Speaker 6: the victim. I mean, the victim appears to be saying
Speaker 6: that it doesn't matter how long these people spend in jail,
Speaker 6: because nothing is going to take away what's been done
Speaker 6: to her and for her to feel whole and to
Speaker 6: be restituted. She wants these people to be deported on
Speaker 6: what basis could that be denied other than this rampant
Speaker 6: political correctness where I assume those in the judicial system
Speaker 6: that are worried about it are scared of getting called
Speaker 6: racist or something. But clearly, if you've committed that kind
Speaker 6: of crime, you should be kicked out of the country immediately.
Speaker 2: Well, they've seemed to have forgotten what was behind that
Speaker 2: Rotherham scandal and so many more like it across the UK.
Speaker 2: And it was precisely this PC attitude of not wanting
Speaker 2: to offend certain groups that allowed this grooming and abuse
Speaker 2: to run rampant for many years, impacting more than a
Speaker 2: thousand girls, and to have it now be parent when
Speaker 2: someone's been sentenced, to have the victim not be able
Speaker 2: to give the court the statement she wants to give
Speaker 2: it just shows they've learned really very little from that
Speaker 2: entire saga. Daniel Wilde, thank you so much for your
Speaker 2: time this evening.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 2: Joining me now is a renowned geologist and author. Impriman.
Speaker 2: Let's start with the showdown between chief executives and the
Speaker 2: Prime Minister in Sydney last night. The annual Business Council
Speaker 2: of Australia dinner was on and apparently it was ten
Speaker 2: the corporates who have backed labor and a variety of
Speaker 2: leftist causes, from Net zero to the Voice, are now
Speaker 2: complaining about labour's industrial relation, laws, regulations and taxes. What
Speaker 2: do you think is behind the shift in attitude from
Speaker 2: some of the CEOs of our biggest corporations.
Speaker 10: Well, the CEO should have known how labor has performed
Speaker 10: in the past. Whatever labor does, the costs go up.
Speaker 10: People have got to remember from history the industrial relations
Speaker 10: becomes absolutely chaotic.
Speaker 1: When we have a labor government. People should know that
Speaker 1: contracts get canceled. People should know that a major that's
Speaker 1: been the performance of labor when they've been in government.
Speaker 10: Why are the surprise now and these CEOs should not
Speaker 10: have been backing labor. They should have from day one
Speaker 10: been standing up against Labor, against some of the crippling policies.
Speaker 1: That they had.
Speaker 10: The CEOs that stood up again and now they're complaining.
Speaker 1: So I think they're chickens home.
Speaker 2: Well yeah, at least now they seem to be focused
Speaker 2: on the bottom line, which is a refreshing change from
Speaker 2: the social engineering that was seemed to be preoccupying them
Speaker 2: in the past. Anthony alb Easy, though, is not backing
Speaker 2: away from his government's agenda, despite this new criticism from
Speaker 2: the corporate sector. Business Council of Australia's Chief executive, Brand
Speaker 2: Black has worn that Labour's IR laws are making companies
Speaker 2: far more unlikely to hire people locally and that major
Speaker 2: employers are now opting to invest overseas. Is that happening
Speaker 2: with the big end of town in Are they shifting
Speaker 2: their investment overseas because of our IR laws? Is the
Speaker 2: effect that dramatic?
Speaker 10: Well, it'll be dramatic for mister Albani also because if
Speaker 10: he doesn't back off, he'll be in the backbenches. You
Speaker 10: cannot have governments changing the rules when you are making
Speaker 10: long term investments. Now, that's what's been happening in Australia
Speaker 10: since we've had a labor government and the capital is
Speaker 10: with a push of a key, it can just go
Speaker 10: anywhere else in the world. And that's what's happening. Why
Speaker 10: would you risk spending hundreds of millions.
Speaker 1: Of dollars when you are likely to have your costs increased.
Speaker 1: All of your due dealers ince calculations have given you
Speaker 1: a certain amount of tolerance, and all of that gets
Speaker 1: thrown out by government decisions. So this is something that
Speaker 1: companies do all the time. They look at their costs. Well,
Speaker 1: I wish governments would do that.
Speaker 10: Companies look at saying well, can we get better bang
Speaker 10: for our buck somewhere else?
Speaker 1: And there are some places where it was very very
Speaker 1: expensive to operate.
Speaker 10: I come to you from breaken Hill. This was a
Speaker 10: union mining town. This was a very very expensive place
Speaker 10: to operate. Fortunately it was the world's richest and biggest
Speaker 10: are body. Those days are now finished. But in former
Speaker 10: times this was the Golden Cow. Now those conditions don't
Speaker 10: exist any longer. If we're manufacturing a widget, we're competing
Speaker 10: with Thailand or United Arab Emirates. If we're actually trying
Speaker 10: to build something, we're competing with other people around the world.
Speaker 10: We have to keep our costs down and maybe governments
Speaker 10: should think of something else. And I'll give mister Albanize
Speaker 10: an election winner. This won't cost you any mate. The
Speaker 10: election winner is why don't you cut your costs? Then
Speaker 10: you don't have to put up taxes. It's pretty simple.
Speaker 2: I don't think you'll be taking that advice, but we
Speaker 2: thank you for it. Don't think i'll ask you about
Speaker 2: UK labors. Well, he should because it's mandatory. But UK
Speaker 2: Labor's Secretary of State for Energy Security Net zero at
Speaker 2: Miller brand Well, he thinks that solar farms are a
Speaker 2: fantastic idea for the UK.
Speaker 11: It's a sunny day here in Nottinghamshire and I'm a
Speaker 11: solar farm, a solar farm powering the equivalent of eleven
Speaker 11: thousand homes. Now, solo farms like this are controversial for
Speaker 11: some people, but we do need them.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 2: That's all well and good in but there's a little problem.
Speaker 2: The UK only receives around fourteen hundred hours of sunshine
Speaker 2: per year on average, so it's about sixty days. How
Speaker 2: is that going to work? How is any sort of
Speaker 2: reliance on solar farms going to provide energy security for
Speaker 2: the good folks of the UK.
Speaker 10: Well, I can't say that Ed miller Brand's been out
Speaker 10: the sun too long because he's showing the effects of that.
Speaker 10: But as you quite rightfully mentioned, England is a place
Speaker 10: where the sun doesn't shine very much, and he wants
Speaker 10: to power eleven zerusand homes with solar power.
Speaker 1: Or that's fine, what are you going to do at night?
Speaker 1: What are you going to do on a cloudy day?
Speaker 10: He calls them solar farms. Farms are productive, they produce
Speaker 10: something that's useful. Destroying farmland to put in Chinese made
Speaker 10: solar panels isn't a very sensible thing. UK has got
Speaker 10: big island gas fields, big cold fields, he's got a
Speaker 10: nuclear industry. It's a very small, wet, cloudy island sitting
Speaker 10: out in the water.
Speaker 1: It doesn't get much sun.
Speaker 10: It can't be more stupid than to try to make
Speaker 10: England a solar country.
Speaker 2: Oh well, that they'll find new ways to be stupid.
Speaker 2: E and Plymber, thank you so much for your time
Speaker 2: this evening.
Speaker 1: Thank you for having me.
Speaker 2: Still to Karma left he's losing it.
Speaker 9: And Army Horowitz with the latest on the astonishing attack
Speaker 9: targeting his fill of fighters with exploding pages.
Speaker 2: Welcome back. Now it's time for lefties losing it. We've
Speaker 2: got not one, but two Ladies of the view coming
Speaker 2: up shortly. But first let's start with Taylor Swift. Possibly
Speaker 2: the biggest pop star in the world today, and she's
Speaker 2: recently endors Kamala Harris, but it's not the first time
Speaker 2: she's backed a political candidate. Sadly, to Piers, Swift, who
Speaker 2: has built a stellar Korea writing songs about her many
Speaker 2: bad choices, appears to be what is called a low
Speaker 2: information voter. I just have a look at this ill informed,
Speaker 2: emotional die tribe about Republican Marsha Blackburn.
Speaker 1: Eller Swift comes out against Trump.
Speaker 12: I don't care if they're write that I'm sad that
Speaker 12: I didn't two years ago, but I can't change that.
Speaker 3: I'm saying right now that this is something that I
Speaker 3: know is right, and you guys, I need to be
Speaker 3: on the right side of history.
Speaker 12: And if he doesn't win, then at least I at
Speaker 12: least I tried. It really is a big deal. She
Speaker 12: votes against against fair pay for women. She votes against
Speaker 12: the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, which is
Speaker 12: just basically protecting us from domestic abuse and starking, starking,
Speaker 12: she votes. She thinks that that if you're a gay couple,
Speaker 12: or even if you look like a gay couple, you
Speaker 12: should be allowed to be kicked out of a restaurant.
Speaker 12: It's really basic human rights and it's right and wrong
Speaker 12: at this point. And I can't see another commercial and
Speaker 12: see her disguising these policies behind the words Tennessee Christian values.
Speaker 2: That's from Swiss twenty twenty Netflix documentary Miss Americana, and
Speaker 2: the nonsense she's spewing there is about Republican Marsha Blackburden.
Speaker 2: Guess what, even in her home state in twenty eighteen,
Speaker 2: Taylor's activism failed to move the dial Marsha black Burn
Speaker 2: one with a big majority in Tennessee. Huge. Now let's
Speaker 2: check in with the mad ramblings of the ladies of
Speaker 2: the View, and apparently it's opposite day on the program,
Speaker 2: because despite two assassination attempts against Donald Trump in as
Speaker 2: many months, and a number of other violent attacks from
Speaker 2: the left, it is the Republicans and Trump that are
Speaker 2: to blame. Let's hear this angry tirade from Whoopy Goldberg.
Speaker 2: Remember when she was likable and sane.
Speaker 13: And also, let's start this thing, you know, let's start this.
Speaker 8: Both sides stuff.
Speaker 14: It's a bunch of because it's not correct.
Speaker 8: It is not both sides.
Speaker 2: It is one clear side.
Speaker 13: And you can point to many, many reports, you can
Speaker 13: point to all kinds.
Speaker 14: Of stuff that's been reporting.
Speaker 8: You guys have to you have to pull it back.
Speaker 4: This is not us to them.
Speaker 14: This is you got to stop doing what you're doing.
Speaker 8: Gad and what you're doing, mister t because you are.
Speaker 2: You are not helping the situation, projection and lies. That's
Speaker 2: all the Left have. They accuse their opponents of precisely
Speaker 2: what they're guilty of. And we have another lady from
Speaker 2: the view chief Ninkompoop and a Navarro who went on
Speaker 2: CNN to share more conspiracy theories. She's moved on from
Speaker 2: the Russian collusion hoax business. Now she's suddenly worried about
Speaker 2: the folks in Springfield, Ohio.
Speaker 13: The problem is that Donald Trump, who I think you know,
Speaker 13: if you were doing hurricane categories, he's hurricane category five,
Speaker 13: whereas the other side might be a two. And Donald
Speaker 13: Trump and JD. Vans are not questioning the rhetoric right
Speaker 13: now because of their rhetoric because of what he said
Speaker 13: in that debate.
Speaker 8: There's been thirty three.
Speaker 13: Bombing threats in Springfield, Ohio that would not have happened
Speaker 13: but for this false conspiracy theory being spread by the
Speaker 13: vice presidential and presidential Republican candidate, and those Haitians and Springfield,
Speaker 13: Ohio and those students and the people that are victims
Speaker 13: of these threats and everything that's going on there, don't
Speaker 13: have twenty four to sevens a secret service, right, They're
Speaker 13: on their own.
Speaker 10: You know, she.
Speaker 2: Forgot to mention a couple of key facts, and I
Speaker 2: know the few ladies and CNN are allergic to facts.
Speaker 2: But every single bomb threat was a hoax, and their
Speaker 2: higher governor has confirmed that the hoaxes originated from overseas.
Speaker 2: I wonder who could be behind these bomb threat hoaxes.
Speaker 2: Who's the most of a game? Donald Trump's running mate JD.
Speaker 2: Vans has been schooling the leftist activists in the US media.
Speaker 2: Is one example. President Biden passed a series of executive actions,
Speaker 2: and illegal border crossings are now at their lowest levels
Speaker 2: in about five years, so much so that Greg Abbott
Speaker 2: is no longer bussing people.
Speaker 8: To other cities.
Speaker 2: Let me ask you these fundamental questions.
Speaker 11: Yes, will families be separated under your mass deportations?
Speaker 15: Again, I do want to answer this question about families
Speaker 15: and about deportations.
Speaker 1: But you made this point that border crossings are lower.
Speaker 15: Border crossings at the southern border are lower because the
Speaker 15: Harris administration is sending more immigrants through the ports of entry.
Speaker 15: So instead of coming through the southern border, they're now
Speaker 15: being flown at taxpayer expense to the ports of entry
Speaker 15: all over our country. The number of illegal crossings they
Speaker 15: are not any lower. They're just shuffling how the people
Speaker 15: are coming into the country in the first place.
Speaker 2: And this is very deportation work efficiently.
Speaker 8: But Greg Abbat's not.
Speaker 15: Setting vital others and I don't want to make borders
Speaker 15: are who makes it more efficient for illegal immigrants to
Speaker 15: come into this country.
Speaker 1: That's why we have the problem that we have.
Speaker 2: And what he said, there is one hundred percent accurate
Speaker 2: new data from the US Customs and Border Protection shows
Speaker 2: nearly five hundred and thirty thousand migrants have flown into
Speaker 2: the US under the Biden administration's mass prole program for
Speaker 2: countries such as Haiti and Cuba, Venezuela and the figure
Speaker 2: is just from June to August this year. Fox News's
Speaker 2: Bill mil Lugen reports that another eight hundred and thirteen
Speaker 2: thousand migrants have scheduled appointments via the custom Border Protection
Speaker 2: one app at ports of entry to be released into
Speaker 2: the US. And these are all called lawful pathways. Now,
Speaker 2: these were created by the Biden administration, so these numbers
Speaker 2: don't count as illegal crossings. You can see precisely what
Speaker 2: they are doing. Here joining me now is filmmaker and
Speaker 2: journalist Army Horoids Army. That's more than a million migrants
Speaker 2: the Biden admin has allowed into the US via these programs,
Speaker 2: and they're here to stay. They're not going to be
Speaker 2: leaving America because authorities admit they just don't have the
Speaker 2: resources to police those who overstay their visas.
Speaker 8: Look, Jendi Vance is very good at this. Here is
Speaker 8: small art.
Speaker 14: He has a command of the issues and knows how
Speaker 14: to use them as a rhetorical weapon. But frankly, to me,
Speaker 14: it really that underscores the failure of Trump at the
Speaker 14: debate to effectively use immigration as the necessary rhetorical weapon
Speaker 14: he needed.
Speaker 8: He whiffed at it.
Speaker 14: He kept highly he used as a stand in for
Speaker 14: this important immigration issue. This false idea of people in
Speaker 14: Ohio eating pets that was a standing for immigration. When
Speaker 14: we have all of these data points, these important real
Speaker 14: data points like the CDB data point, to use to
Speaker 14: really highlight the problem at the border, that's the problem.
Speaker 8: What do we do we allowed look, other than.
Speaker 14: Admittedly creating hilarious memes, what it did was it allowed
Speaker 14: the Democrats to reduce the potency of.
Speaker 8: The immigration argument.
Speaker 14: It basically boiled down the immigration argument to deflect it
Speaker 14: into and and change the narrative into.
Speaker 8: A fact check. That is a failure.
Speaker 14: We cannot focus on those things that are distracting and
Speaker 14: frankly untrue. Look, the president President Trump should be running
Speaker 14: away with this election. The number one and number two
Speaker 14: issues in the country, the economy and immigration.
Speaker 8: He has massive leads on.
Speaker 14: But instead of running away with the election and making
Speaker 14: a having a large lead, the lead is actually increasing
Speaker 14: for Kamala Harris and it's it's the Republican Party needs
Speaker 14: to take a hard look at how the president President
Speaker 14: Trump is running this race because he has a chance
Speaker 14: of losing it when really this should be a win
Speaker 14: for him.
Speaker 2: We'll get back to the polls and this issue. I
Speaker 2: disagree with you. Yes, he's not a jd Vance, is
Speaker 2: not a vivek Ramswami or Ron de Santas. He's not
Speaker 2: a politician.
Speaker 8: Who can.
Speaker 2: Do these debates in the manner that they would have
Speaker 2: completed them. But it was three against one. And though
Speaker 2: this whole cat and dog business has absolutely enraged the left,
Speaker 2: it has brought attention to the illegal immigration issue and
Speaker 2: the legal migration issue, and there's focus on towns like Springfield, Ohio,
Speaker 2: when they're really they were ignored up until then. So
Speaker 2: I'm not entirely sure that the outcome isn't what he
Speaker 2: would want, but I do agree with you that, yeah,
Speaker 2: if you had a jd Vance in his ear, he
Speaker 2: would have been able to just fact check a lot
Speaker 2: of the nonsense that we heard during that debate in
Speaker 2: a far more effective manner. Now, I want to ask
Speaker 2: you about what has Buller has suffered In recent hours.
Speaker 2: Nine people have died and three thousand have been injured
Speaker 2: after a coordinated cyber attack on the militant group Hez
Speaker 2: Bulla saw thousands of pages explode. Arab media reporting that
Speaker 2: around five hundred hes Bulla fighters were blinded in the attack,
Speaker 2: which took place mostly in Beirute in southern Lebanon, and
Speaker 2: also Damascus in Syria. Members of the terrorist organization were
Speaker 2: previously told by their leaders to stop using mobile phones
Speaker 2: smartphones to avoid Israeli surveillance. They were handed pages instead.
Speaker 2: ARMI tell me about how this attack occurred and what
Speaker 2: we know about it.
Speaker 14: Yeah, well, no, we knows for certain yets. But obviously
Speaker 14: there are a number of theories, and I think those
Speaker 14: theories are probably true. Listen, one thing that Mossad is
Speaker 14: known for is ingenuity and creativity, right, That's really what
Speaker 14: it has. And they have a history of really interesting
Speaker 14: ways of getting at their enemies. For example, where they
Speaker 14: killed Mugnia, the Husbala leader, Iranian leader, they actually put
Speaker 14: explosives in his head rest in his car.
Speaker 8: Sounds easy, extremely complicated.
Speaker 14: When they killed the engineer amas Ayash, who's called the
Speaker 14: engineer who was a leader of Crazy's IEDs that plagued Israel,
Speaker 14: they were able to get explosives into his cell phone
Speaker 14: to use that. What seems to have happened here is
Speaker 14: that they were they did was what we think they did,
Speaker 14: was they they put explosives into the pagers. Now I
Speaker 14: spent time in southern Lebanon, in the Becav Valley in Beirut,
Speaker 14: and I spent time with Czbolah And when I had
Speaker 14: to contact them, I couldn't call them on cell phones.
Speaker 8: They didn't have cell phones. They knew they were easily hacked.
Speaker 14: They were all using pagers and because they thought that
Speaker 14: this analog system was harder to hack. In fact it
Speaker 14: is so what we think is Israel did was it
Speaker 14: didn't go digital. But when analog found the manufacturer, which
Speaker 14: was in Taiwan, of these pagers, somehow infiltrate the supply chain,
Speaker 14: whether in Taiwan the manufacturer facility or on a route
Speaker 14: to to Lebanon, covertly were able to open up all
Speaker 14: of these thousands of pagers, put in plastic explosives, resealed
Speaker 14: them so they couldn't be seen and noticed as being
Speaker 14: tampered with, and then sat there for we don't know
Speaker 14: how long, UH until they thought it was the right
Speaker 14: time UH to use them and the remotely access to
Speaker 14: pagers to overheat, thereby triggering the explosives.
Speaker 8: That's what the going theory is. It is an incredible coup.
Speaker 14: They were able to pull off UH kind of blows
Speaker 14: it was that that that pun with intent uh for
Speaker 14: these uh, these these husband of fighters who are now
Speaker 14: going to see their seventy two virgins. But Franklin had
Speaker 14: their equipment blown off, So that kind of that kind
Speaker 14: of sucks for them.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 14: But you know, by the way, you know, I want
Speaker 14: to highlight one more thing about this issue we take
Speaker 14: this seriously for a moment, is that it also points
Speaker 14: out there's a couple of days ago, right before this,
Speaker 14: the Biden administration was pressuring Israel to stop escalating what's
Speaker 14: happening in Lebanon.
Speaker 8: Really, Israel has to stop escalating.
Speaker 14: Do I have to remind the president that Husabelah has
Speaker 14: been bombing the north for almost a year on a
Speaker 14: daily basis. The bombing is so bad that Israel's had
Speaker 14: to evacuate the entire the entire north of Israel has
Speaker 14: been evacuated because they can't live under those conditions. Yet
Speaker 14: Biden is lecturing Israel that it can't escalate those things.
Speaker 14: A couple of days before this happened, you know, shades
Speaker 14: and shades of when Biden told Israel after Iran sent
Speaker 14: three hundred missiles and rockets and drones in an unprecedented
Speaker 14: attack against the state of Israel. What ad detail Israel?
Speaker 14: He said, do not retaliate, otherwise you will lose my support.
Speaker 14: This is the situation that Israel finds itself in visa
Speaker 14: vis this administration, and so.
Speaker 2: Much pressure on the Netanyahu government to come to a
Speaker 2: ceasefire agreement, even though her Mass continuously refused to really
Speaker 2: meet any sort of reasonable conditions. The pressure seems to
Speaker 2: be entirely on Neshanyahu as opposed to Hermas, who started
Speaker 2: this entire catastrophe. Going back to US politics, I want
Speaker 2: to get your thoughts on this new ad campaign from
Speaker 2: a conservative group that's targeting illegal immigrants in the US,
Speaker 2: warning them not to vote in the upcoming election. The
Speaker 2: Spanish language ads worn non citizens that voting in a
Speaker 2: federal election is a crime punishable by deportation, but army.
Speaker 2: The campaign also tells Hispanic voters that it's their patriotic
Speaker 2: duty to vote those of them who are citizens. What
Speaker 2: are the polls telling us about the Hispanic vote, Because
Speaker 2: it's been a very fascinating exercise to observe how it's
Speaker 2: gone towards the Trump camp. But I think since Harris
Speaker 2: was installed as a dada that laid has diminished.
Speaker 14: Well, I think one of the great geopolitical mistakes the
Speaker 14: Democratic Party has made is that it looks there's no
Speaker 14: question that it has encouraged I legal immigration into this
Speaker 14: country and encourage Hispanics to come into this country because
Speaker 14: in their view, they think ultimately when they become citizens,
Speaker 14: that they will all vote the Democratic Party. And it's
Speaker 14: true that first generation Hispanics outside of Cubans, have been
Speaker 14: a bulwark for the Democratic Party. But what all the
Speaker 14: polls and all the studies have shown is that Hispanics
Speaker 14: are conservative, They're Catholic, they're hardworking, and they have migrated
Speaker 14: toward the Republican Party over time. And I think it's
Speaker 14: going to be end up being a catastrophe for the
Speaker 14: Democratic Party. But I want to point something else out
Speaker 14: about the illegal voting. Look, I think that there's no
Speaker 14: question that there is illegal voting. There is voter fraud
Speaker 14: that happens. It happened to me personally. I want to
Speaker 14: point that out now. When I did my voter ID video.
Speaker 14: The reason why I did that videos because when I
Speaker 14: went to vote after maybe six months after my father
Speaker 14: passed away and I voted in Los Angeles.
Speaker 8: The way it works there is.
Speaker 14: You go, you give your name, there's a book, and
Speaker 14: in that book it lists all the names alphabetical order,
Speaker 14: so all the horrorses were in order. And I saw
Speaker 14: my father's name was in there, which made sense, he
Speaker 14: only died a few months before. But his name was checked,
Speaker 14: and I asked them why is his name checked? They said, well,
Speaker 14: somebody came in, gave his name, his address, and they
Speaker 14: voted for him. That was clear voter fund And by
Speaker 14: the way, I showed in the California Board of Elections
Speaker 14: never got back to me, never cared. But the important
Speaker 14: point here is that, look, is there a mass that
Speaker 14: you know there? Again, what the Democrats are doing is saying, well,
Speaker 14: there is no massive amount of illegals voting. That's a falsehood.
Speaker 8: That's not real.
Speaker 14: Well, look, it's not real that all the illegal immigrants
Speaker 14: are voting. But let me tell you something which people
Speaker 14: seem to miss, certainly Democrats do, is that in New
Speaker 14: York City where I am, the New York City Council
Speaker 14: and the mayor passed a law for non citizens to vote,
Speaker 14: to actually allow them to vote only by the grace
Speaker 14: of the judicial system and the court they threw that out,
Speaker 14: but the city is still appealing it, and Mayor Adams
Speaker 14: is still supporting this law to allow non.
Speaker 8: Citizens to vote.
Speaker 14: So when you tell me this is not a real argument,
Speaker 14: this is something that Democrats are in fact trying to pass.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, i'man Horowitz. Thank you so much for your time,
Speaker 2: This evening is your pleasure. And still to come. A
Speaker 2: security expert joins me to talk about the direct link
Speaker 2: between the Democrats dangerous retric and assassination attempts against Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Welcome back. The left continue to play down the attempts
Speaker 2: on Donald Trump's life, and they're continuing their dangerous, inflammatory
Speaker 2: retrig trying to paint the former president as evil, a
Speaker 2: modern day Hitler, threat to democracy. And worse, here is
Speaker 2: White House Press Secretary Queen Jean Pierre. Earlier today, President
Speaker 2: Biden has been clear eyed about the threat that the
Speaker 2: former president represents to our democracy.
Speaker 15: He's been clear eyed about that.
Speaker 2: Joining me now is Critical Dynamics Director of Law Enforcement Training,
Speaker 2: Keith Hanson. Kay, thank you for your time. Is the
Speaker 2: retrick we are hearing from the Democrats directly responsible for
Speaker 2: the attempts on Donald Trump's life.
Speaker 4: Oh no, no, no, I mean it's it's completely completely disconnected.
Speaker 4: I mean, you know, we're we're all intelligent enough to know,
Speaker 4: especially the mentally defective people. The leftists of the United
Speaker 4: States are are certainly smart enough to understand that, you know,
Speaker 4: we're dealing with an intellectually superior class here. So they
Speaker 4: speak in metaphors that the average person just can't really understand.
Speaker 4: So when they talk about crosshairs, they're you know, they're
Speaker 4: not really talking about right full cross hairs. And when
Speaker 4: they call him Hitler, they're not really implying that, you know,
Speaker 4: he's responsible for the death of six million people. We
Speaker 4: we just can't comprehend as And you remember it was
Speaker 4: Nancy Pelosi who said about Barack Obama, he's so intelligent
Speaker 4: that the vast majority of us really cannot begin to
Speaker 4: grasp or appreciate the depths of his intelligence. So I
Speaker 4: think it's just us, you know, sub intellectual peons that
Speaker 4: are just you know, misinterpreting the words of these incredibly
Speaker 4: intelligent leaders and and and acting uh unaccordingly. So I I,
Speaker 4: you know, there's there's no connection there at all. Sorry
Speaker 4: the fact that.
Speaker 2: I appreciate the sarcasm.
Speaker 4: But you know, it's one of those things like we
Speaker 4: we we have to at least take a sarcastic approach
Speaker 4: to this here, because I mean, the truth of the
Speaker 4: matter is is that this is vile, This is reprehensible,
Speaker 4: it is evil, and and yes, to answer your question
Speaker 4: in a very serious way, uh I, I do believe
Speaker 4: that the Democrats and the progressive left in the United
Speaker 4: States is directly responsible for the optic and violence. And
Speaker 4: this has been going on, This inflammatory, incendiary, violent rhetoric
Speaker 4: has been going on since Donald Trump first descended that
Speaker 4: elevator or escalator in the Trump Tower in twenty fifteen.
Speaker 4: He has been targeted, he has been slandered, he has
Speaker 4: been maligned, he has been threatened, and the again, the
Speaker 4: mentally defective left in this country takes that as a
Speaker 4: direct marching order. We've seen it once in Butler Township.
Speaker 4: We've seen it twice in Florida. And I have to
Speaker 4: be honest with you, Unless we really start getting serious
Speaker 4: about protecting this man and other representatives elected representatives in
Speaker 4: this country or candidates, we're going to see a lot
Speaker 4: more of this.
Speaker 8: Well.
Speaker 2: I fear what would happen to the country if if
Speaker 2: one of these attempts was successful. The suspect in this
Speaker 2: second assassination attempt has social media posts that are word
Speaker 2: for word what we're hearing from the Democrat leadership, just
Speaker 2: supporting what you've just said about this retrick and how
Speaker 2: it can inflame people who are not mentally sound. And
Speaker 2: the talk has not stopped, it's in fact, they're doubling
Speaker 2: down on it. Does that make you fear that another
Speaker 2: attempt on President Trump's life is just around the corner?
Speaker 4: Unfortunately?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Speaker 4: I think the answer to that is yes. And more
Speaker 4: to the point, I think that there's a lot of
Speaker 4: people who look at this as a game. I'm seeing,
Speaker 4: you know, a lot of memes and a lot of cartoons,
Speaker 4: and a lot of not coming from President Trump, but
Speaker 4: you know, coming from Trump's supporters. Hey O in two
Speaker 4: as if to say, oh, you know, you tried twice
Speaker 4: and failed. Trace it's going to become, I believe, a situation,
Speaker 4: unless it's taken seriously at the highest levels of government,
Speaker 4: it's going to become a situation where somebody is going
Speaker 4: to try to be the person who actually is successful,
Speaker 4: and they may spend the rest of their life in prison,
Speaker 4: or they may die, but you know, they will have
Speaker 4: achieved what nobody else has done, and perhaps they're looking
Speaker 4: at it as some type of active humanitarianism where they're
Speaker 4: going to save the world, or again it's just a
Speaker 4: mentally defective person. But it sets up a very dangerous
Speaker 4: stage where somebody will try to do this. And again
Speaker 4: I've said this many times that Secret Service and all
Speaker 4: of the force multiplying agencies that are involved in protecting
Speaker 4: not only President Trump but Vice President Vance or President
Speaker 4: a little wishful thinking there, but the nominee Vance as
Speaker 4: well as as the current president and vice president. Unless
Speaker 4: they start taking this seriously, we're facing a very very
Speaker 4: serious crisis here and we cannot again, we cannot turn
Speaker 4: away from the fact that the rhetoric from the Democrat
Speaker 4: Party and the progressive left in this country is absolutely
Speaker 4: fueling us.
Speaker 2: If fewer advising the former president, would you be insisting
Speaker 2: he wear a bulletproof vests at all times, every time
Speaker 2: he's out of mare Lago essentially, And how would you
Speaker 2: handle the rallies, the meats and greats he does, and
Speaker 2: of course he does like a game of golf. Can
Speaker 2: he be adequately protected when you do have well, you've
Speaker 2: had eight years of this crazy retrick and God knows
Speaker 2: how many people are out there who've got ideas about
Speaker 2: being the one to take him out.
Speaker 4: Yeah, well, I mean I think you know, each individual venue,
Speaker 4: each individual rally, each individual appearance, each individual visit to
Speaker 4: the golf course in a non official capacity presents a
Speaker 4: very unique security threat. Clearly the threat is elevated. We've
Speaker 4: had not one attempt, but now two attempts. He is
Speaker 4: arguably the most targeted person in this country, perhaps even
Speaker 4: the world. And so, yeah, the security protocols have to
Speaker 4: be reviewed individually. And the bottom line is that, yeah,
Speaker 4: I mean, he should be wearing a vest, he should
Speaker 4: be limiting the exposure that he has until he can
Speaker 4: have some reasonable assurance that the people who are tasked
Speaker 4: with his safety and security actually have their game together.
Speaker 4: And to be honest with you, looking at a secret
Speaker 4: service that is filled with DEI hires courtesy of people
Speaker 4: like Kimberly Cheedle and the rest of the Obama administration
Speaker 4: and the Biden administration, I would have serious doubts about
Speaker 4: the ability of many of these people to adequately protect
Speaker 4: any dignitary.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, we saw the scenes in Butler and some
Speaker 2: of those agents seem to be completely lost and unfit
Speaker 2: for the job, to say the least. The mediatric around Trump,
Speaker 2: I think is also adding fuel to the fi just
Speaker 2: the Democrats, it's the media who have normalized these sort
Speaker 2: of talker and promoted it, and our publications in Australia,
Speaker 2: I've got to tell you are not much better. You
Speaker 2: could argue they're worse. I want to just bring to
Speaker 2: your attention an academic publication, the Conversation they have a
Speaker 2: piece of the moment claiming these attempts on Trump's life
Speaker 2: are nothing out of the ordinary, and US presidential history
Speaker 2: calling them fairly common place, despite also noting that the
Speaker 2: last attempt was in nineteen eighty one against Republican President
Speaker 2: Ronald Reagan. That was six presidents a co you're security experts,
Speaker 2: how extraordinary are the threats against Donald Trump? Is this
Speaker 2: what every presidential candidate can expect? Are we seeing something
Speaker 2: that's quite out of the ordinary.
Speaker 4: I think we're experiencing something that is significantly out of
Speaker 4: the ordinary, because we're dealing with an individual who is
Speaker 4: out of the ordinary. This is an This is a
Speaker 4: person who is extremely polarizing. People for whatever reason, either
Speaker 4: love him or they hate him. And the people who
Speaker 4: hate him. The media in this country has made They've
Speaker 4: literally built their ranks off of covering Trump NonStop. I mean,
Speaker 4: think about Twitter. Back when Twitter was one hundred and
Speaker 4: forty characters, Trump could reach out with Twitter and literally
Speaker 4: stop the presses. Oh my god, there's a lot of
Speaker 4: pearl clutching. Oh my god, Trump tweeted something or Trump
Speaker 4: said something. And I think Trump is really one of
Speaker 4: the first people, real powerful people in this country who
Speaker 4: has defied, or I should say defied the standard paradigm,
Speaker 4: which is you make your statements through the media. But
Speaker 4: Trump knew that he couldn't trust the media, that the
Speaker 4: media was corrupt. The media was pushing an agenda. They
Speaker 4: had this hegemonic view of the United States, and it
Speaker 4: did not involve conservative principles, It did not involve capitalism.
Speaker 4: It involved the furthering of these progressive, democratic socialist policies.
Speaker 4: And anything that stands in stark contrast to that worldview
Speaker 4: will be treated as a pejorative. It will be put down,
Speaker 4: it will be suppressed, it will be belittled, it will
Speaker 4: be made fun of. And you know, the one thing
Speaker 4: that I've said many times, Rita, is that when a
Speaker 4: Democrat makes an accusation towards an opponent. You can absolutely
Speaker 4: take it to the bank that it is a twisted,
Speaker 4: projected confession that the person who utters the accusation is
Speaker 4: they themselves representing a political body and an ideology that
Speaker 4: is guilty of far worse things than anything they're accusing
Speaker 4: their political opponents up. This is standard practice for people
Speaker 4: who have an iota of critical thinking. We look at
Speaker 4: this and we take everything in through that lens. But unfortunately,
Speaker 4: the public education system in this country has bred a generation,
Speaker 4: several generations of politically, socially and economically illiterate people, and
Speaker 4: so these people take it at face value. Hell, in
Speaker 4: this country, you know how many people are getting their
Speaker 4: news from fifteen to twenty second segments and blurbs on TikTok,
Speaker 4: which is arguably populated by the stupidest human beings on
Speaker 4: the planet. And these people not only fill our society.
Speaker 4: But here's the scary thing. They vote, and they breed
Speaker 4: and they produce more stupid people who go out and
Speaker 4: vote for the first person who comes along and promises
Speaker 4: them whatever little treat that happens to tickle their fancy.
Speaker 4: Welcome to the world of American politics. It's not getting
Speaker 4: any better, it's only getting worse. And now that the
Speaker 4: violence is ramping up, literally because the calls for violence
Speaker 4: are ramping up. I think this is kind of the
Speaker 4: you know, to coin a phrase from COVID, the new normal.
Speaker 4: It's scary, but it's true.
Speaker 2: I think everything you've said points to the fact that
Speaker 2: this is going to be the most consequential election we
Speaker 2: have seen in a very long time. Keith Hanson, thank
Speaker 2: you so much for your time.
Speaker 4: This evening my pleasure. Thank you, Ridder, And that's it
Speaker 4: for me.
Speaker 2: I'll see you at eleven tomorrow night with Douglas Murray.
Speaker 2: Don't go anywhere. Newsnight is up next.