1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:04,080 Speaker 1: A trial like this sometimes seems like a competition naturally, 2 00:00:04,160 --> 00:00:07,760 Speaker 1: one side against another, like we're competing against each other, 3 00:00:07,920 --> 00:00:10,600 Speaker 1: like a boxing match or a football match, or netball 4 00:00:11,039 --> 00:00:13,159 Speaker 1: or whatever it is. The truth is more like the 5 00:00:13,240 --> 00:00:16,800 Speaker 1: high jump, more like the high jump. This is important. 6 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:20,520 Speaker 1: Only the prosecution has to get over the bar. Defense 7 00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:23,639 Speaker 1: doesn't have to do anything. Defense doesn't have to jump 8 00:00:23,680 --> 00:00:26,520 Speaker 1: any bar. Aaron Patterson doesn't have to jump any bar 9 00:00:26,680 --> 00:00:30,280 Speaker 1: at all. The prosecution has to clear the bar. And 10 00:00:30,320 --> 00:00:32,959 Speaker 1: that's the highest bar known to the law. And that's 11 00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:34,040 Speaker 1: where you are now. 12 00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:37,960 Speaker 2: To stick with Colin Mandy's sporting analogies, it was the 13 00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:41,839 Speaker 2: final siren on the defense's argument on the innocence of 14 00:00:41,920 --> 00:00:45,960 Speaker 2: Aaron Patterson. Today, her barrister talked to the jury for 15 00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:49,279 Speaker 2: the whole day, telling them that probably and maybe are 16 00:00:49,280 --> 00:00:51,559 Speaker 2: not enough to convict his clients. 17 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:56,560 Speaker 1: You are at innocent with Aaron Patterson. That's your starting point. 18 00:00:56,880 --> 00:01:00,880 Speaker 1: The starting point is innocence. She is assumed innocent of 19 00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:04,040 Speaker 1: these charges. She doesn't have to prove her innocence to 20 00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:07,280 Speaker 1: you because she is innocent, and it is for the 21 00:01:07,319 --> 00:01:11,960 Speaker 1: prosecution to disprove her account of accidental poisoning beyond reasonable 22 00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:15,319 Speaker 1: doubt before you can move from that position, before you 23 00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:17,160 Speaker 1: can find her guilty of anything. 24 00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:22,880 Speaker 2: He talked about her testimony Asian gross, Aaron's phones, and 25 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:27,640 Speaker 2: what he said were ridiculous propositions put forward by the prosecution. 26 00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:30,640 Speaker 2: It was a big day and we'll break it all 27 00:01:30,800 --> 00:01:34,800 Speaker 2: down for you. I'm Brook Greebit Craig, and this is 28 00:01:35,800 --> 00:01:40,759 Speaker 2: the Mushroom Cook. It's stayed thirty five of Aaron Patterson's 29 00:01:40,840 --> 00:01:43,720 Speaker 2: murder trial, and I'm here with my colleague, court reporter 30 00:01:43,959 --> 00:01:44,760 Speaker 2: Laura Possella. 31 00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:48,040 Speaker 3: After three days, we've arrived at the end of mister 32 00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:49,280 Speaker 3: Mandy's closing address. 33 00:01:49,520 --> 00:01:50,200 Speaker 2: Yes we have. 34 00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:54,160 Speaker 3: So the jurors are done hearing from witnesses, they're done 35 00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:57,840 Speaker 3: hearing from barristers, and next week, in the ninth week 36 00:01:57,880 --> 00:02:01,680 Speaker 3: of this trial, they'll hear from Justice Christopher Bale. But 37 00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:04,920 Speaker 3: more about that later today. Mister Mandy picked up where 38 00:02:04,920 --> 00:02:08,120 Speaker 3: he left off yesterday with the day after the lunch. 39 00:02:08,680 --> 00:02:11,600 Speaker 2: Yes, he started with the evidence that Aaron was drinking 40 00:02:11,639 --> 00:02:14,920 Speaker 2: coffee on July thirty, and that's the day after that 41 00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:15,720 Speaker 2: deadly meal. 42 00:02:16,360 --> 00:02:20,000 Speaker 3: This evidence came from Erin's son, who told an investigator 43 00:02:20,040 --> 00:02:22,280 Speaker 3: that that morning when he woke up and came into 44 00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:25,960 Speaker 3: the kitchen, he saw his mum drinking coffee, but when 45 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:28,800 Speaker 3: she was giving evidence, Erin said that she was actually 46 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:32,240 Speaker 3: drinking tea. Mister Mandy said today, though, that it was 47 00:02:32,360 --> 00:02:35,720 Speaker 3: perfectly reasonable for him to assume she was drinking coffee 48 00:02:35,720 --> 00:02:39,040 Speaker 3: that morning, considering most days he would wake up to 49 00:02:39,040 --> 00:02:39,840 Speaker 3: see her doing that. 50 00:02:40,760 --> 00:02:43,160 Speaker 2: Now, moving on to Aaron driving her son to a 51 00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 2: flying lesson that afternoon, mister Mandy told the jury the 52 00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:51,400 Speaker 2: prosecution's case was that Erin was faking being ill, but 53 00:02:51,520 --> 00:02:54,600 Speaker 2: he disputed this, saying why would she go on this 54 00:02:54,760 --> 00:02:57,960 Speaker 2: journey If she was faking being unwell, she would go 55 00:02:58,080 --> 00:02:58,520 Speaker 2: to bed. 56 00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:01,600 Speaker 3: Alistairs may remember that it was on this journey to 57 00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:04,560 Speaker 3: Tiab that Erin said she had to pull over on 58 00:03:04,600 --> 00:03:06,880 Speaker 3: the side of the road to go to the toilet 59 00:03:06,919 --> 00:03:10,679 Speaker 3: in a bush because she was experiencing diarrhea. She said. 60 00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:13,320 Speaker 3: When they later stopped at a service station, she went 61 00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:15,919 Speaker 3: into the toilet to dispose of the tissues she had 62 00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:19,520 Speaker 3: used to clean herself up. CCTV footage shows that she 63 00:03:19,600 --> 00:03:23,160 Speaker 3: only spent nine seconds in the toilet. In its closing 64 00:03:23,200 --> 00:03:26,399 Speaker 3: address earlier this week, the prosecution argued that if Erin 65 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:28,880 Speaker 3: really did have diarrhea that day, she would have spent 66 00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:31,240 Speaker 3: more time in there, at the very least to wash 67 00:03:31,280 --> 00:03:33,800 Speaker 3: her hands. But today mister Mandy made a point of 68 00:03:33,800 --> 00:03:36,640 Speaker 3: saying that the prosecution didn't even ask her in cross 69 00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:40,200 Speaker 3: examination what she was doing in those nine seconds while 70 00:03:40,200 --> 00:03:41,480 Speaker 3: she was in the toilet. 71 00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:45,000 Speaker 2: Now moving on to Erin leaving Lean at the hospital 72 00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:49,080 Speaker 2: after five minutes on July thirty one, Mister Mandy said 73 00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:51,520 Speaker 2: she left because she was not prepared for what she 74 00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:55,760 Speaker 2: walked into. These are his words, but not his voice. 75 00:03:56,400 --> 00:04:00,000 Speaker 1: An extremely intensive five minute interaction where she was told 76 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:02,600 Speaker 1: that she would be admitted and transferred to a different 77 00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:05,640 Speaker 1: hospital in Melbourne. Doctor Foote told her that that's what 78 00:04:05,800 --> 00:04:09,240 Speaker 1: needed to happen, so she was not refusing treatment. She 79 00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:11,960 Speaker 1: was saying there were things she needed to do before 80 00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:15,680 Speaker 1: she could be admitted and transferred. She had diarrhea, she 81 00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:19,640 Speaker 1: was dehydrated, but she was still functioning, and she was 82 00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:23,040 Speaker 1: plainly struggling to process what she was being told and 83 00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:25,839 Speaker 1: her mind turned to the practical considerations. 84 00:04:26,880 --> 00:04:29,720 Speaker 3: Mister Mandy then took the jury to Erin's second presentation 85 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:33,000 Speaker 3: to hospital about an hour and a half later. He 86 00:04:33,080 --> 00:04:37,440 Speaker 3: reiterated again that on the prosecution case Erin was faking illness, 87 00:04:37,880 --> 00:04:40,160 Speaker 3: but he said his client was reluctant to receive treatment 88 00:04:40,200 --> 00:04:43,400 Speaker 3: that day because of her history of hating hospitals and 89 00:04:43,480 --> 00:04:47,120 Speaker 3: discharging herself against medical advice. He told the jury that 90 00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:49,680 Speaker 3: what she did that day was actually not consistent at 91 00:04:49,720 --> 00:04:53,000 Speaker 3: all with what a person faking illness would do. In 92 00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:56,599 Speaker 3: another theatrical moment from mister Mandy, he raised his arms 93 00:04:56,800 --> 00:04:57,839 Speaker 3: and said the following. 94 00:04:58,480 --> 00:05:01,960 Speaker 1: The allegation is that she was reluctant to be admitted 95 00:05:02,040 --> 00:05:05,720 Speaker 1: to be hooked up to medications because she was pretending 96 00:05:05,800 --> 00:05:09,760 Speaker 1: to be sick. But that's a contradictory argument. Count possibly 97 00:05:09,800 --> 00:05:12,880 Speaker 1: makes sense if you're pretending to be sick, if you 98 00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:15,880 Speaker 1: got to be saying to the medical staff, hook me up, 99 00:05:16,040 --> 00:05:18,559 Speaker 1: pump me full of drugs, I am very, very sick. 100 00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:19,080 Speaker 3: Please. 101 00:05:20,480 --> 00:05:23,440 Speaker 2: Now moving on to the Asian grocer, mister Mandy said 102 00:05:23,480 --> 00:05:26,560 Speaker 2: it would have been remarkable if Aaron gave everyone the 103 00:05:26,680 --> 00:05:29,240 Speaker 2: exact same account as to what happened. 104 00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:32,479 Speaker 3: The jury has previously heard that in the week after 105 00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:36,400 Speaker 3: the lunch there was a medical investigation, a health investigation, 106 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:41,560 Speaker 3: a child protection investigation, and a police investigation all under 107 00:05:41,560 --> 00:05:45,080 Speaker 3: way at the same time. Mister Mandy explained that there 108 00:05:45,080 --> 00:05:48,599 Speaker 3: were many people asking Aaron many questions about where the 109 00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:51,960 Speaker 3: mushrooms in the beef Wellingtons had come from. In a 110 00:05:51,960 --> 00:05:55,200 Speaker 3: previous episode, we ran through all the varying accounts Aaron 111 00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:59,000 Speaker 3: gave about the location of the Asian grocer. Today, mister 112 00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:01,239 Speaker 3: Mandy explained where those accounts did vary. 113 00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:05,080 Speaker 1: Imagine that if they all agreed exactly that she used 114 00:06:05,120 --> 00:06:08,520 Speaker 1: the same words and said the same exactly the same things, 115 00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:12,479 Speaker 1: it would be firstly totally unrealistic and the prosecution would 116 00:06:12,520 --> 00:06:16,520 Speaker 1: probably argue in those circumstances that it was very suspicious 117 00:06:16,520 --> 00:06:19,680 Speaker 1: that someone had such a well scripted account of what 118 00:06:19,839 --> 00:06:20,360 Speaker 1: was going on. 119 00:06:20,960 --> 00:06:23,679 Speaker 3: Mister Mandy then reminded the jury that during the Department 120 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:27,800 Speaker 3: of Health's investigation, an environmental health officer was never asked 121 00:06:27,839 --> 00:06:31,880 Speaker 3: to check any Asian grosses England Waverley. This was despite 122 00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:35,640 Speaker 3: Senior Public Health Advisor Sally Ane Atkinson telling the court 123 00:06:35,680 --> 00:06:38,520 Speaker 3: that she remembered telling this employee to check that suburb. 124 00:06:39,160 --> 00:06:42,120 Speaker 3: Mister Mandy said today that one of these two witnesses 125 00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:43,760 Speaker 3: must have been honestly mistaken. 126 00:06:44,560 --> 00:06:47,200 Speaker 2: Mister Mandy then went on to speak about Phone A 127 00:06:47,520 --> 00:06:51,839 Speaker 2: and Phone B as another reminder for our listeners. Phone 128 00:06:51,880 --> 00:06:55,520 Speaker 2: A was Erin's usual phone, which the prosecution alleged she 129 00:06:55,640 --> 00:06:59,279 Speaker 2: concealed from police, while Phone B was the dummy phone 130 00:07:00,360 --> 00:07:02,000 Speaker 2: she set up to hand to police. 131 00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:05,760 Speaker 3: But mister Mandy questioned today why Erin would go to 132 00:07:05,800 --> 00:07:08,720 Speaker 3: the effort of setting up Phone B just to hand 133 00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:11,520 Speaker 3: it to police as a dummy phone. He said, as 134 00:07:11,560 --> 00:07:14,200 Speaker 3: soon as investigators looked at the phone, they would have 135 00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:17,480 Speaker 3: realized it was not her usual phone. He reminded the 136 00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:19,840 Speaker 3: jury of her evidence that she set up Phone B 137 00:07:20,280 --> 00:07:23,600 Speaker 3: because Phonne A was damaged and she wanted to change devices. 138 00:07:24,280 --> 00:07:26,320 Speaker 3: This is what he said about the allegation from the 139 00:07:26,320 --> 00:07:28,760 Speaker 3: prosecution that Erin concealed Phone A. 140 00:07:29,240 --> 00:07:32,080 Speaker 1: If the intent was to conceal the existence of Phone A, 141 00:07:32,640 --> 00:07:35,760 Speaker 1: why continue using it? Better yet, why not get rid 142 00:07:35,760 --> 00:07:38,360 Speaker 1: of it at a much earlier stage. She had the 143 00:07:38,400 --> 00:07:41,800 Speaker 1: opportunity to dispose of it after she got home from hospital, 144 00:07:42,120 --> 00:07:44,160 Speaker 1: why not take her to the tip. If she had 145 00:07:44,200 --> 00:07:48,040 Speaker 1: planned the cold calculated murders that the Crown says she committed, 146 00:07:48,320 --> 00:07:51,560 Speaker 1: deliberate murders, the Crown says she's planning at least from 147 00:07:51,600 --> 00:07:55,160 Speaker 1: twenty eight April and had incriminating searches on her phone. 148 00:07:55,560 --> 00:07:58,280 Speaker 1: This would have been part of the plan. Surely it 149 00:07:58,280 --> 00:07:59,520 Speaker 1: would have been destroyed. 150 00:08:00,400 --> 00:08:03,120 Speaker 3: He said. The fact Aaron continued to use phone A 151 00:08:03,120 --> 00:08:06,920 Speaker 3: after the lunch was more consistent with her account, telling 152 00:08:06,960 --> 00:08:09,920 Speaker 3: the jury that the prosecution were only alleging she concealed 153 00:08:09,960 --> 00:08:13,120 Speaker 3: Phone A to explain why certain evidence in the case 154 00:08:13,280 --> 00:08:17,040 Speaker 3: did not exist. He did admit that factory resetting phone 155 00:08:17,080 --> 00:08:20,040 Speaker 3: B was a stupid thing that his client did, but 156 00:08:20,120 --> 00:08:23,040 Speaker 3: he said it remained consistent with her panic state of mind. 157 00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:26,120 Speaker 1: His honor will direct you, as a matter of law, 158 00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:29,800 Speaker 1: that the law recognizes that there might be all sorts 159 00:08:29,840 --> 00:08:33,280 Speaker 1: of reasons why a person engages in conduct that to 160 00:08:33,600 --> 00:08:37,040 Speaker 1: everyone else in the outside world may make them look guilty. 161 00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:40,560 Speaker 1: There are all sorts of reasons why an innocent person 162 00:08:40,679 --> 00:08:44,000 Speaker 1: can engage in that type of conduct, like dumping the 163 00:08:44,040 --> 00:08:48,480 Speaker 1: dehydrator and lying. And you now have those reasons. Aaron 164 00:08:48,559 --> 00:08:51,280 Speaker 1: got into the witness box and told you she did 165 00:08:51,320 --> 00:08:55,439 Speaker 1: those things because she panicked when confronted with the terrible possibility, 166 00:08:56,000 --> 00:09:00,200 Speaker 1: terrible realization that her actions had caused the illnesses of 167 00:09:00,240 --> 00:09:03,560 Speaker 1: people that she loved. It doesn't excuse what she did, 168 00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:06,880 Speaker 1: not making an excuse about it. You can't jump from 169 00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:09,760 Speaker 1: there to what the crown wants you to conclude from 170 00:09:09,760 --> 00:09:11,080 Speaker 1: those items of evidence. 171 00:09:12,040 --> 00:09:15,600 Speaker 2: Mister Mandy then turned to discussing Aaron as a witness. 172 00:09:15,880 --> 00:09:18,920 Speaker 2: He reiterated that she did not have to give evidence. 173 00:09:19,800 --> 00:09:23,679 Speaker 1: She subjected herself to lengthy cross examination and our submission 174 00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:26,640 Speaker 1: to you and you would probably agree that the way 175 00:09:26,679 --> 00:09:30,760 Speaker 1: she answered questions was careful, even pedantic, and you might 176 00:09:30,840 --> 00:09:33,520 Speaker 1: think that's a very sensible way of approaching things. If 177 00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:35,920 Speaker 1: you are going to be cross examined for six days, 178 00:09:36,559 --> 00:09:39,560 Speaker 1: it is difficult to imagine a situation where you would 179 00:09:39,559 --> 00:09:42,760 Speaker 1: be placing yourself under such an incredible amount of scrutiny. 180 00:09:43,280 --> 00:09:46,160 Speaker 1: But she still made the decision. She didn't have to 181 00:09:46,200 --> 00:09:48,600 Speaker 1: do that, and when she chose to do it, she 182 00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:52,240 Speaker 1: made that decision as an innocent person, because that's what 183 00:09:52,280 --> 00:09:55,400 Speaker 1: she is right now and has been throughout the trial. 184 00:09:55,800 --> 00:09:58,120 Speaker 1: Presumed innocent of all the charges. 185 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:01,880 Speaker 2: Mister Mandy said she to the truth even when it 186 00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:05,720 Speaker 2: was deeply embarrassing, and had to admit she told lies. 187 00:10:06,440 --> 00:10:09,480 Speaker 2: He declared that his client came out of the extensive 188 00:10:09,520 --> 00:10:12,640 Speaker 2: cross examination unscathed. 189 00:10:12,320 --> 00:10:17,080 Speaker 1: Her account remained coherent and consistent. Day after day, even 190 00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:21,680 Speaker 1: when challenged rapid fire from multiple angles repeatedly. So the 191 00:10:21,720 --> 00:10:25,079 Speaker 1: significance of her evidence is this that his Honor will 192 00:10:25,080 --> 00:10:27,760 Speaker 1: give you a direction of law about the conclusions that 193 00:10:27,840 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 1: you might reach from erin giving evidence. First, if you 194 00:10:31,440 --> 00:10:34,200 Speaker 1: think her evidence was true, you must find her not 195 00:10:34,280 --> 00:10:37,320 Speaker 1: guilty of all of the charges. Second, if you're not 196 00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:40,160 Speaker 1: sure whether her evidence was true, but think it might be, 197 00:10:40,600 --> 00:10:43,440 Speaker 1: then you will have a reasonable doubt on the prosecution's 198 00:10:43,520 --> 00:10:46,280 Speaker 1: case and you would find her not guilty of all 199 00:10:46,360 --> 00:10:50,120 Speaker 1: the charges. Third, if that's not enough that you preferred 200 00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:54,560 Speaker 1: the prosecution case to her evidence, balancing those two things, nah, 201 00:10:54,679 --> 00:10:58,079 Speaker 1: prosecution a little bit better than aaron, that's not sufficient, 202 00:10:58,520 --> 00:11:01,600 Speaker 1: because that would be finding that the prosecution case is 203 00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:04,920 Speaker 1: preferable to the defense case. And it's not a question 204 00:11:05,080 --> 00:11:07,560 Speaker 1: in this case. I'll come back to this in a minute, 205 00:11:07,600 --> 00:11:10,240 Speaker 1: not a question of balancing two things. 206 00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:13,040 Speaker 3: It was at this point that mister Mandy took the 207 00:11:13,120 --> 00:11:16,880 Speaker 3: jury to the convoluted and ridiculous propositions he said were 208 00:11:16,880 --> 00:11:19,920 Speaker 3: made by the prosecution that we flagged at the top 209 00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:22,800 Speaker 3: of the episode. He said that there were at least 210 00:11:22,840 --> 00:11:25,840 Speaker 3: four telling the jury that it was ridiculous that Aaron 211 00:11:25,840 --> 00:11:29,520 Speaker 3: would commit murder without any motive to do so, Ridiculous 212 00:11:29,559 --> 00:11:31,760 Speaker 3: that she would use cancer as a lie to get 213 00:11:31,760 --> 00:11:35,200 Speaker 3: her guests to attend her lunch, ridiculous that she expected 214 00:11:35,200 --> 00:11:37,840 Speaker 3: the guests to take her secrets about her medical issues 215 00:11:37,920 --> 00:11:40,640 Speaker 3: to the grave with them, and ridiculous that she would 216 00:11:40,679 --> 00:11:43,280 Speaker 3: push ahead with her plan despite knowing she would be 217 00:11:43,320 --> 00:11:45,720 Speaker 3: in the spotlight as the cook. He then borrowed a 218 00:11:45,720 --> 00:11:49,520 Speaker 3: metaphor used by Crown Prosecutor Nnette Rodgers in her closing 219 00:11:49,559 --> 00:11:52,840 Speaker 3: address earlier this week. She referred to the case as 220 00:11:52,880 --> 00:11:56,680 Speaker 3: a jigsaw puzzle that they must piece together. But mister 221 00:11:56,720 --> 00:11:59,600 Speaker 3: Mandy said today, to force the evidence to fit the 222 00:11:59,640 --> 00:12:02,800 Speaker 3: image which on the puzzle box was like working backwards 223 00:12:02,840 --> 00:12:04,480 Speaker 3: from a place of assumed guilt. 224 00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:09,200 Speaker 1: You can't force jigsaw puzzle pieces together when puzzle pieces 225 00:12:09,200 --> 00:12:12,520 Speaker 1: don't fit naturally. When you are making the picture, You've 226 00:12:12,559 --> 00:12:15,800 Speaker 1: got the wrong picture, the wrong piece in the wrong spot. 227 00:12:16,360 --> 00:12:18,640 Speaker 1: It is not fitting naturally into that gap. 228 00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:22,000 Speaker 2: As he approached the end of his closing address, he 229 00:12:22,080 --> 00:12:25,080 Speaker 2: told the juris they could not decide the case by 230 00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:28,160 Speaker 2: asking themselves whose case is better. 231 00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:30,920 Speaker 3: It was at this point that he mentioned the sporting 232 00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:33,720 Speaker 3: analogy you heard At the top of the episode, he 233 00:12:33,760 --> 00:12:36,520 Speaker 3: spoke to the jury about the legal principles our criminal 234 00:12:36,600 --> 00:12:40,560 Speaker 3: justice system relies on, including the standard of proof beyond 235 00:12:40,679 --> 00:12:44,320 Speaker 3: reasonable doubt. He said these principles of a criminal trial 236 00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:47,400 Speaker 3: were like the Golden rules which protect us all from 237 00:12:47,400 --> 00:12:50,480 Speaker 3: being wrongfully convicted. He then launched in to his final 238 00:12:50,520 --> 00:12:51,880 Speaker 3: statement to the jury. 239 00:12:51,920 --> 00:12:54,600 Speaker 1: If you think that it's possible that Erin deliberately poisoned 240 00:12:54,600 --> 00:12:58,200 Speaker 1: the meal, you must find her not guilty. If you 241 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:01,440 Speaker 1: think that maybe Erin deliberately poison the meal, you must 242 00:13:01,480 --> 00:13:04,880 Speaker 1: find her not guilty. If you think that she probably 243 00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:09,000 Speaker 1: deliberately poisoned the meal, you must find her not guilty. 244 00:13:09,400 --> 00:13:12,040 Speaker 1: If you think that it's possible that she intended to 245 00:13:12,160 --> 00:13:15,400 Speaker 1: kill or cause really serious injury to Don or Gail 246 00:13:15,760 --> 00:13:19,200 Speaker 1: or Heather, you must find her not guilty. If you 247 00:13:19,240 --> 00:13:22,640 Speaker 1: think maybe she intended those things, you must find her 248 00:13:23,080 --> 00:13:26,880 Speaker 1: not guilty. If you think probably she intended those things, 249 00:13:27,200 --> 00:13:30,360 Speaker 1: you must find her not guilty. And if you think 250 00:13:30,360 --> 00:13:33,680 Speaker 1: that it's possible Aarin intended to kill Anne, you have 251 00:13:33,760 --> 00:13:38,040 Speaker 1: to find her not guilty. Maybe she intended to kill Anne, 252 00:13:38,280 --> 00:13:42,480 Speaker 1: not guilty, Probably not guilty. If you think at the 253 00:13:42,600 --> 00:13:45,880 Speaker 1: end of your deliberations, taking into account the arguments that 254 00:13:45,920 --> 00:13:48,920 Speaker 1: we've made that it is a possibility that this was 255 00:13:48,960 --> 00:13:54,320 Speaker 1: an accident, a reasonable possibility, you must find her not guilty. 256 00:13:54,360 --> 00:13:57,120 Speaker 1: And if you think that it is a reasonable possibility 257 00:13:57,360 --> 00:14:01,320 Speaker 1: that her evidence was true, you must find her not guilty. 258 00:14:01,760 --> 00:14:04,840 Speaker 1: And our submission to you is the prosecution can't get 259 00:14:04,840 --> 00:14:08,640 Speaker 1: over that high bar of beyond reasonable doubt. 260 00:14:09,080 --> 00:14:12,320 Speaker 2: And with that, mister Mandy was done. So after eight 261 00:14:12,360 --> 00:14:15,800 Speaker 2: weeks and more than fifty witnesses, the jury has now 262 00:14:15,840 --> 00:14:20,360 Speaker 2: been sent out to rest before Justice Bill delivers his charge. 263 00:14:20,680 --> 00:14:22,960 Speaker 3: And you mentioned the word rest their book, and that's 264 00:14:22,960 --> 00:14:25,920 Speaker 3: because the jury have a long weekend. They won't be 265 00:14:25,960 --> 00:14:29,360 Speaker 3: required to come back until early next week. So Justice 266 00:14:29,400 --> 00:14:31,400 Speaker 3: Bill told them to actually think about it like a 267 00:14:31,440 --> 00:14:34,240 Speaker 3: second Easter. I think they were very relieved to have 268 00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:37,600 Speaker 3: some time off before they begin their deliberations next week. 269 00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:40,760 Speaker 2: You're right about that, Laura, But in the meantime, go 270 00:14:40,840 --> 00:14:43,760 Speaker 2: to the mushroomcook dot com dot au for more