WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 16 April

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.920
<v Speaker 1>From the sky Center.

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 2>This is Paul Murray Live. Hello Sharry. What a debate

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 2>and what a game changer for Peter Dutton. Extraordinary stuff

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>in the past hour over on the ABC. Full analysis

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 2>with Team Red, Team Blue and the team in the

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 2>middle in a moment or two time. But first the countdown,

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 2>of course onto this election tonight officially the halfway point.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Why because we have just seventeen days until the election,

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 2>six until early voting starts. For the past hour, the

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister and alternative Prime Minister have been debating on

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>the ABC and their Western Sydney studios. No audience, no worms,

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>no one but you to decide who won and who loss.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>And those of us who had been waiting hoping for

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 2>the moment that Peter Dutton went on attack, well it

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 2>was there time and time and time again. Here are

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the five things I think you need to know about

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 2>this debate. This was good stuff from Peter Dutton and

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>those of us that have been cheering him on, well

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>we were punching the air tonight.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Approach the third of May, many Australians will be asking

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 3>themselves are you better off today than you were three

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 3>years ago? People have seen food prices go up by

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent. Their mortgages have gone up on twelve occasions

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 3>over the last two years. The government's brought in a

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 3>million people, all of whom want homes, and all of

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>whom are competing against young Australians for that rental property

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 3>or to purchase a home. That's a million people, which

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 3>is seventy percent higher than any two year period in

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 3>our country's history. And that your government has modeled negative

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>gearing changes NCGT changes, the Treasurer has done that.

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 2>That's not right.

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, it is a publish This Prime Minister has a

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 3>problem with the truth. And it's not just in relation

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 3>to this debate. There are many aspects that you could

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 3>pick up during the course of this campaign. With the

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister constantly telling people they're much better off now

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 3>just defies the reality in their own lives. There are

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 3>thirty thousand small businesses which have gone bankrupt over the

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>course of the last three years, a record number in

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 3>our country's history. Over the last twelve months, households have

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 3>been in a recession for seven consecutive quarters almost two

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>There's been a three fold increase in the expansion of

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 3>the public service compared to the repgular years. We have

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 3>the highest per capita rate of public servants in the world.

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 2>It was fantastic. Honestly, I can't wait to see what

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 2>everyone else thought about it. But I thought that was

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 2>one of the best displays I've seen in a debate.

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Not harsh, not aggressive, not nasty, but just hold the issue,

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>hold the issue, turn the defense into attack. It was

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 2>very well done, very well prepared. As for Anthony Abernezi,

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 2>he had many bad moments, but his worst moment was

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 2>on a central question three years ago. It was two

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred and seventy five dollars cut in power bills. He

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 2>was held to that account tonight by David Spears, and

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll have more to say about his moderation of this

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 2>debate in a moment. But he has no answers on

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 2>when power bills are going to go down because he

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 2>wants to avoid what has been the failure of his

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 2>promise last time. I'm going to show you the entirety

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 2>of a back and forth that I think was very

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>bad for the Prime Minister.

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 4>You and Chris Bowen keep saying that renewables are the

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 4>cheapest form of power. When will we see our power

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 4>bills come.

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Down they are.

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, what we know is that renewables are the cheapest

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 5>form of power, not because of what we say, but

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 5>because of what the Australian Energy market operator says. The

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 5>bills come down and what the market is delivering. See,

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 5>Peter has to have government, state, taxpayer funded. We stick

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 5>with your taxpayer funded, taxpayer funded proposals. What we're dealing

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 5>with here. During the former government, twenty four out of

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 5>twenty eight coal fire power stations announce their closure. We

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 5>need to get supply and certain in energy security. We

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 5>can't wait till the twenty forties a nuclear Just.

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Stick with your plan, mister albinezy. When will the bills come.

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 5>Down under our plan? We know that renewables are the

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 5>cheapest form of power and that is why we are

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 5>doing that, rolling it out, including through gas. Peter Ray's

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 5>gas gas is now thirteen dollars.

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 4>It was thirty dollars and when we came cheaper, when.

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 5>We came off, thirteen is cheaper than thirty.

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 4>When do we see the bills come down?

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, what we need to do is to roll out

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 5>renewable to make sure there's energy security, make sure it's

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 5>backed up by batteries, by hydro and by gas. That

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 5>is what all of the private sector is backing and

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 5>investing in.

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>We take the pick, Oh the Peter dudn't thing is

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 2>all about taxpayers money. Remember there's spending twenty billion dollars

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>on rewiring the nation. Because they're trying to tell you

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 2>that the three wheeled car is going to be able

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 2>to win Batist. It can't. It may one day, but

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 2>it can't today. Let alone the billions of dollars in subsidies,

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 2>government payments, let alone the destruction of the earth in

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 2>order to save the atmosphere and all of that. Because

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 2>Australia is one percent of the world's problem, China continues

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 2>to thumb it's nose at the rest of the world.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget, of course, that many of the products that

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 2>this government is saying we have to put in by

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>law in solar and wind are made by slave labor

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 2>in China. Terrible, terrible answer. Prime Minister doesn't have a number,

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 2>doesn't even have a trajectory. It's just renewables, the cheaper.

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 2>The problem is they have to be built. And as

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I have said he for fifteen years, I have talked

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 2>not about the existence of climate change, but the cost

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 2>of the transition, the CSIO RO told us years ago,

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 2>was one tea for trillion dollars to go from what

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 2>was the system to the new system. All of that

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 2>either comes from the taxpayer or it goes to a

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 2>private company. The private company then sends it on to

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 2>you as a bill. This bloke is a champion, world

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 2>champion gas lighter. But when he came up against a

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 2>bloker was willing to call him out and the questions,

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 2>which were spectacular, he just fumbles. He was terrible tonight.

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I know his champions will say it doesn't matter, move on.

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 2>A draw is enough. If this is not a draw,

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you I've watched it. It is not a draw,

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 2>which brings us to the moderation. Now, you know, David

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 2>Spiers and I worked here for a long time together.

0:05:58.200 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>In fact, the very first election I over covered was

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and four when I was a kid

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 2>and he was basically a teenager. I thought he was

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 2>spectacular tonight because the questions were not about gotcha's, but

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 2>instead the questions were, you know what, let's get off script.

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I know you've got an answer on this, and you've

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 2>got an answer on that. And you can tell me

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 2>what you're doing on housinggain, you can tell me what

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 2>you're going to do when it comes to petrol. No, No,

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to shape the questions in a way that

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 2>forces them to have to think on their feet. And

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 2>when they tried to move back to the stump speech,

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 2>he wouldn't let them do it, honestly, Spearzy ten out

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>of ten, mate, well done.

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Can you honestly say that your plans will make housing

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 4>any more aford? Australians will ultimately have to pay for

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 4>the debt here, mister Alberezi, what do you say to them?

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:42.679
<v Speaker 4>Where's the money going.

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 2>To come from?

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 4>Your cuts to the public service going to be enough

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 4>to cover it all? It's the one big change you'd

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 4>like to be remembered for. It's your one thing. Reform

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 4>about some elements of the renewables roll out, particularly offshore

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 4>wind in places like the Hunter in New South Wales,

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 4>what do you say to those locals and those local

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 4>community concerns, when will we see our power bells come down?

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's busy. I know that doesn't help you with

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 2>the mates on Blue Scope or whatever that thing is,

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Blue Sky, whatever, the lefty version of Twitter is. But

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 2>for those of us who watched you in mind for

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>a while, it was great to see those questions. And

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 2>those who think that he was doing anything other than

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the people's work, well, I think you just wanted him

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 2>to be holding the hands and asking the questions that

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 2>the Green Left wanted ask. I thought it was good.

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Get them off the script, get them off the separate answers,

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 2>pull them back onto some stuff that makes them have

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 2>to think on their feet. Also, Prime ministers hit hit

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 2>after hit, or should I say lie after lie after lie,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>They miss the mark. Take your pick on how these worked.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 2>What about this garbage that he had to say about superannuation,

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 2>which remember is only for first home buyers, only for

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 2>first home buyers, but he pretends it's for any and

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 2>everyone who's going to put their hand up on an

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 2>auction for the next twelve months. Have a look at

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 2>this for a swing and a miss.

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 5>If you give everyone super access to up to fifty

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 5>thousand dollars and everyone at the auction will just have

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 5>fifty thousand dollars more, And of.

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Course the debt on there. Watch this budget this year,

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>not some right wing thing tank. I didn't pull the

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 2>number out of my ample backside. No one trillion dollars

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 2>in their own books that they will swear by as

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 2>if it is the truly holy text of the Great

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Saint Jim Charmers one point two trillion dollars. But the

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 2>gas lodder in chief, he wants you to think the

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 2>debt's going down. It's going up.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 5>Where are the only government in the last twenty years

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 5>that have produced consecutive budget surpluses. And we've harved the

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 5>deficit this year as a direct result of the responsible

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 5>economic management that we have. Then debt is one hundred

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 5>and seventy seven billion dollars less.

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 2>And then when it comes to the nuclear situation, and

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I mispronounce it as badly as he does. Have a

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 2>look at this again, swing and miss from the Housing

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 2>commission boy, of course, who's just the same as you.

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Forget the million dollar property on the hill. No, he's

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 2>just like us.

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 5>That's before they get to the six hundred billion dollars

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.479
<v Speaker 5>they need for their nuclear reactors.

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, there you go.

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It looks like it's true.

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 5>We know what happened last time the cuts came to health,

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 5>they came to education, fifty billion dollars out of hospitals,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 5>thirty billion dollars out of schools.

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>This plock is so shameless in his lives, all right,

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 2>which is far left group, turns around and makes up

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 2>a number about how much it's going to cost when

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 2>it comes to nuclear They get to six hundred billion dollars.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 2>The CSIRO, that far right wing think tank, says that

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 2>it's between half and a trillion dollars half five hundred

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 2>billing and a thousand billion dollars for the transition that

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 2>he would prefer. Now, all of this gets the heads

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 2>nodding in the in the drum circles of some universities

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 2>around the country, but in the real world it's garbage.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Both of their plans are very expensive, but one is

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 2>one that will make sure the twenty four to seven

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 2>there is support for the grid. The other, I repeat,

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 2>it's the three wheel car. They're telling you he's going

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 2>to set a new lap record at Bathist. Itat won't happen,

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 2>and it certainly won't happen without the mega costs associated

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 2>time and time again. And then of course we've got

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to talk about Donald trump book.

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 5>When President Trump made the announcement that every single country

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 5>in the world will be hit with tariffs. The alternative

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 5>Prime Minister suggested that we should put defense and our

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 5>defense relationship with the United States on the bargaining table.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Forgive me, that is bullshit. So fifth and final, Dunton

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>won this. He won it clean, He won it clear

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 2>and even. It'll take you a few group texts for

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the lefties to work out what the pushback is because

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I can't see it. Did Albahavi's moment? Sure everyone does

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 2>in a debate, but if you're actually paying attention here,

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Dunton was on the attack. The PM had the worst

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 2>moment because sustained word moment. The questions pull them off script,

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 2>which means albow is all at sea. Remember he's trying

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 2>to tell you everything's better when you know everything's worse

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 2>than it was three years ago. When he tries to

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 2>throw a lie, you know them not to be true.

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 2>That's why I say done one by a country mile.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 2>My thoughts, you can tell me yours Pault's Gonews dot

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 2>com dot A, You, my colleagues, my friends, the people

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 2>I rush to get to tonight because we all know

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I like talking until about half past It's none other

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 2>than Laura is Chris Kenny loving to see you both

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 2>all right, how far off the mark?

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 7>Am I?

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Laura?

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 8>No, I think you're right. I think this style suits Peter.

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 8>I didn't think he was more cautious tonight. He was

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 8>aware that he was speaking to an ABC audience, so

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 8>he's a little bit more cautious, particularly on the Donald

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 8>Trump question. Do you trust him? Well, he doesn't know him,

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 8>that's fair enough. But I thought, you know, that shows

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 8>that he knows he's on the back foot. He's being

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 8>extra cautious.

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 9>But you know he didn't know.

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>He still went for it.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 8>I thought he still went for it absolutely. And sorry, no, no,

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 8>I keep talking notes are we talking?

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Call my mom? No, I'm trying to people.

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 7>Look.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 8>But I did think it does show that Anthony Alberinezi

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 8>on the power price issue, that is his weakest spot,

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 8>and the Coalition have not gone him enough on that.

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 8>And there was the moment there in that debate where

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 8>Speezy pushed him on coal or you're saying we shouldn't

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 8>extend the life of coal. Oh no, I'm not saying that,

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 8>but doesn't have an answer for it. So he's kind

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 8>of throwing out the confetti gun on all of these things,

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 8>but none of It quite quite adds up, and I

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 8>think people are sick of being told that renewables are

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 8>the most reliable and cheapest form of energy. They might

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 8>be down the track maybe in ten years, but they

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 8>aren't right now. And that is the reason your power

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 8>bills correct.

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 10>And by the way, Ring Chris, did I get it wrong? No,

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 10>he smashed it out of the park. This is the

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 10>Peter Dutton we know and love. I've been wanting to see.

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 10>This is what we should have seen from day one

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 10>of the election campaign, face to face making the strong

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 10>points to alber and EZI. I've written this up for

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 10>The Australian and he makes this point, whem this one

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 10>power It's like the cartoons albanize.

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 1>He got knocked from pillar to post.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 10>Why because on these key policy issues he's all at sea.

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 10>And the other key point is that Peter Dunnon pulled

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 10>him up on his dishonesty. This plot was just on

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 10>national television effectively denying that they've been modeling on negative gearing,

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 10>and within twenty seconds that well, actually he couldn't deny it.

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>The honesty thing is a real problem.

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Spearsy was good Spears.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 10>He tried to mock Dutton for coming up with cost

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 10>of living.

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Measures in an election campaign.

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 10>Dunton comes back and say it's not actually it coincides

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 10>when people are doing it.

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Tough ca Pow, well done.

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 10>But when it came to energy prices again shows how

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 10>the press gallery each day is not doing the job.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 10>Because he was asked four times Albanezi today, four times

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 10>when will prices come down?

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And he did not answer at once. Refuse to answer it.

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 10>Now that should be asked of him every day at

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 10>every press conference.

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Why isn't it now? I can tell how this gets

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 2>processed by some parts of the media. You saw in

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>one of those answers that Anthony Aberneze's talking Peter dudn't

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 2>takes his glasses off now obviously very minor moment, but

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 2>that will become a photo guardian probably running it on

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 2>their front right now, panics don't all the rest of it.

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I liked the clearly the ABC had a bit of

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>a rule about when and when they weren't on camera.

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 2>That was obviously important because certainly when you turn around

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 2>and you watch things like the C and N debate,

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 2>if they're just there both the whole time, you started

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to see when they don't think they're on camera, they

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>start to wilt away. I thought that was interesting about

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>how the thing was stage Again, I'll get back into

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the best questions and the worst questions, but let's get

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 2>back to our former colleague here. What I liked at

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the center of the questions that were asked, and for

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 2>the Channel seven debate that's coming and the Channel nine

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>debate that's coming, watch that model, which is, don't let

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 2>them just blither what they say all day every day.

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Just say, look, basically, you've got twenty three hours in

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the day to talk the way you

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 2>want to talk. I'm going to ask you the question

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to answer. And I liked that, and

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I liked the follow up. And it's a test of

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>both of them whether they make it or they don't.

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, absolutely's Busy's all class, and he knows how.

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>To follow up and let it breathe. Let's say.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 8>But look, I think the problem with this campaign in

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 8>general is that, particularly on the labor side, it's trying

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 8>to get out a ten second line for TikTok that's

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 8>run over and over and over again. There is no

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 8>contest of ideas until you get a debate like this

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 8>or a people's forum, right, and all you're doing and

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 8>you see it from every minutes at the housing debate,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 8>they just want to get their lines up and then

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 8>you've got ALPHQ. Look, liberals are doing it as well,

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 8>and they're running it on TikTok. There's no contest of

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:01.239
<v Speaker 8>ideas allowed. And this is why these baits are so important,

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 8>and you've got to watch them in full to get

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 8>an idea of how both men interact with each other

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 8>and interact with an audience, interact with a host like David.

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 8>But Paul I still find there is just like this

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 8>thread of borification through the campaign. And maybe that's because

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 8>we're fully invested in it each and every day, but

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 8>it is just so anti ambitious and that is how

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 8>Labor has framed this for the last three years.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And it does.

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Water but in finis and I agree, but I think

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 2>that this is often when you are playing a defensive

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 2>game as a government, which is if you can try

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 2>to board down as much as possible, then it's better

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the devil, you know, right, and certainly Albinizi who's been

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to and despite the fact they have a go

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>at Trump as much as they do. He follows the

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Trump strategy of flooding the zone. Let's talk about the

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen a bunch, let's talk about the fifteen hundred

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 2>different thelms. But when it is down to so okay, great,

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>you get rehired for three years when the power prices

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 2>come down, bye bye bye bye, blah blah bah.

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 10>Well, this is the point with the debate. Let's get

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 10>back to debate. But where does it sit. Well, it

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 10>sits just after halfway through the election campaign, when we've

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 10>got the Easter break and the Anzac Day holidays to come,

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 10>and is there time for the coalition to get any momentum?

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 10>Big question marks about that. That's the way Labors wanted it.

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 10>They wanted to be a boring, piecemeal, superficial election campaign

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 10>and they've got that so far. But this sort of

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 10>performance tonight from Peter Dutton is exactly what he needed

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 10>to do.

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>As I say, he should have been doing it weeks ago.

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:39.479
<v Speaker 10>But it was a very good performance and just on

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 10>that point with Spearsy trying to get him to talk

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 10>about what they don't want to talk about. Sure, but

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 10>the thing tonight was that Peter Dutton didn't let that

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 10>control him right at the outset, He's asked about their

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 10>housing policies by Spearsy and Dunton goes straight to immigration.

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 10>How that's the killer point. Immigration is what's driving this,

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 10>and Spearsy then tries to drive him back to his

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 10>own policy. Sure, but he kept doing that during the debate,

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 10>getting that back onto his strong ground and pushing it

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 10>back onto alb and easy. It's not happening enough. It

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 10>should happen all the time now to be fair. Of course,

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 10>Peter dunn't got hit with a couple himself in that debate.

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 10>He had to admit a mistake about the way he

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 10>framed the Indonesian thing yesterday, and I think the climate

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 10>change stuff, do you believe it or not? That's a

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 10>bit awkward for him as well. So he had a

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 10>couple of awkward moments, but overall it was done playing

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 10>politics where it needs to be played, especially from opposition

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 10>on the front foot.

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 8>I'm not sure about the immigration thing. Yeah, it does

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 8>work in some cohorts, but it does a work in

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 8>the seats where it needs to.

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>It works everywhere.

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 8>Does it work in lessons in.

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, sure does because the places where they have the

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 10>highest levels of immigration are the ones who are most

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 10>keen on orderly immigration.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 8>Yes, and I get the idea of you know, climbing

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 8>up the ladder and pulling the ladder.

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Up, pulling up the ladder, just being fair.

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 10>People who have come here fairly want everybody to come

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 10>here fairly.

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>You'll find no parts of the country more fairly.

0:18:58.760 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 8>We're not talking about both.

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 10>Well, they think there's too many, too quick.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 8>Different than coming well, I know, I think, well, I

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 8>think a lot of this is that also don't have

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 8>the workers.

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not talking about the illegally.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 10>I think there's a lot of a lot of concern

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 10>that people come here as international students as a backdoor

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 10>way into the company and.

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.479
<v Speaker 2>Family reunion and all of those things as well. But

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 2>about that Wes sin Sydney question. The reason that I think,

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 2>and I know that there's there's been this conversation and

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 2>we've seen it in certain places, right Andrew Clenell door

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 2>knocking in Paramatta. Some people did interpret that as conversation

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 2>about immigration, trying to turn it into something cultural. But

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 2>think about mayors like Frank Carboni, Fairfield mayor Blacktown mayor

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 2>all of those places where essentially they go to Sydney,

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 2>they go to Melbourne and the people in the mayors,

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 2>the mayors of the areas where people end up going

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 2>are saying hey, who who whoa enough dially saying things

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 2>like that. So again it's look, it's juggling.

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 8>Knives, juggling knives going. Does it work in Adelaide? Does

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 8>it work in Tazzi? I mean Adelaide's I've got a

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 8>ten percent one student accommodation rate that.

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 10>I think immigration is the big issue of the campaign

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 10>that the Coalition haven't hit on enough. I think right

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 10>around the country, housing crisis, cost of living crisis, everybody knows,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 10>driven by record immigration, out of control immigration.

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the point. It's not as if this is

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>what Labor said it would do.

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 10>It's tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands more than their

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 10>own plans.

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think they can mention that enough. And

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing.

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 10>Xenophobic about it. It's about managing our immigrant nation problem, that's.

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 8>Right, But it's still you know, no one's really touching

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 8>on the supply side as much as they need to.

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 8>It's all just tinkering around the edges. And the biggest

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 8>problem here, Chris, is the cost of building or renovating

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 8>at the moment, it's totally out of control and neither

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 8>leader is talking about that. If you really want to

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 8>talk about how to build homes, I mean, councils get

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 8>out of the way. But also the cost of labor.

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 8>There's not enough tradees coming exactly with.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 10>All these immigrants, but no trade's coming in. Well, the

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 10>Union is playing a role in that.

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 8>Perhaps, okay, well, but is it a problem with the

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 8>number of immigrants or we're not getting the right skills

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 8>two very separate issues. Both if you could fix the

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 8>skilled migration issue, I mean you'd be on your way.

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So of course.

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 2>But also but also I think that it speaks to

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 2>what I hear in the conversation is a generational failure

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 2>that we have had to tell kids it's okay to

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>be your trading. It's actually advantageous, it's good to be

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 2>a trade. I'm going way back to the Kim Beasley.

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 8>Much money they're making at the moment.

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 10>Yes, which is one of the plenty all play plenty

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 10>and a lot of theatre that Dutton has Harry out

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 10>there on the campaign. Trill with you saying something, I'm

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 10>proud my son's are trading and I'll.

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Tell you load of middle income are not load the

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 2>intern asset right off that labor basically trashed down to

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 2>one thousand dollars in the budget, then quickly hurriedly shoved

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 2>it up again for twelve months. There's a lot of

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 2>tradees ABN's all right, and those people want the ability.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 2>So the idea of the working class only being the unionized, no, no, no,

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 2>there's plenty of people out there being the subby's being

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 2>their own. Now a poll just dropped from the Financial Review.

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 2>This one is from the fresh Water Organization. At the

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 2>halfway point, they say fifty to fifty. Now what's interesting

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 2>about this is they say the primary vote the Liberal

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Parties at thirty nine, the Labor Parties is at thirty two.

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 2>But this is the even more interesting because they actually

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 2>put the numbers on seats. They say the coalition will

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 2>win nine seats at this upcoming election. Labour would lose seven,

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 2>which would of course take it from the majority position

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 2>of seventy six down to seventy one. Now let's imagine

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 2>that is the final result. Well, obviously, guess who forms government.

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 2>It'll be the current government. The night messcenario for Albernezi

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 2>is just how many he would need. Because Rebecca Sharky,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 2>who yes, has said Dutton gets the first crack at it.

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 2>She's also said, whoever has the most number of seats,

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 2>that's a more stable person. But that's only seventy two.

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 2>Then of course maybe Bob Cadott, that's only seventy three. Okay,

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 2>you start looking around, Helen Haynes, who's to the left,

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.719
<v Speaker 2>seventy four and then we're off to Tealtown. All right,

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 2>we're off to Tealtown. We're off to Greenstown that pole

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 2>and again you're responding to it in real time. But

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean the mats and all that matters is the seats,

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and we've seen the fall that's happened when it comes

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 2>to the coalition. Obviously the Coalition would love to win

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 2>an election, but if they end up in the mid

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 2>to late sixties, then it's a better two term option

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 2>than where they've been. And for Labor, who's already pretty

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 2>cocky saying that, you know some people saying we're on

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 2>their way to eighty mate, they'd go needing seven. What

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 2>do you think of that?

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 8>Pot, Laura, Well, you can't disagree with the trend. I mean,

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 8>you can argue with individual polls like Freshwater. The numbers

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 8>are interesting, absolutely, but the trend has not been going

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 8>Dotton and the Coalition's way. Since the campaign began. I've

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 8>been thinking about as to why that is, and I

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 8>think this debate tonight showed why. In many ways, I

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 8>thought Dutton was good, but he was cautious, perhaps a

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 8>bit too cautious. I mean, when he first became opposition leader,

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 8>it was his era. I just want to get things done.

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 8>I don't care if people love me. These are my ideas.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 2>The voice he took the sixty to forty position of voice. Absolutely,

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 2>this is malin in the sand, old defender.

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 8>Nuclear, he defended, He was across the detail. He still

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 8>is and that and people gave him a lot of

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 8>credit for having balls to have actually have a crack

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 8>at something. I think since the campaign begun and there's

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 8>so much noise, there's so much feedback. Every day, there's

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 8>you know, there's press conferences, the press gallery is in

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 8>your face every day. You're going to question after question,

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 8>and you're being wedged on certain things. I think some

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 8>of his best instincts are a little bit dampened at

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 8>the moment. I think he needs to get that back.

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean, he's I think he looks like he's been

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 8>too worried about being painted as being aggressive because that's

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:55.479
<v Speaker 8>what Labor has been able to do.

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's really hard for him.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 8>But I just think that those instincts that he had

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 8>when he first became leader and will into this term

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 8>were spot on and he needs to get a little

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 8>bit at that.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think.

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 10>But I think that's exactly what happened tonight, Paul. That's

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 10>I mean, he got onto the front foot.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>And look he does it. He's not aggressive in his manner.

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 8>You've taken this party in the most conservative bent that's

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 8>ever been. I mean that was not challenged by him

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 8>or Peter Dunton. But it's just playing on TikTok tomorrow.

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Well it's the nonsense they going on.

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 10>But let's get back to this pole though, right, because

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 10>it's only one pole. But if the Liberal Party gets

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 10>a nationwide but almost timary vote of thirty nine, I'm

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 10>telling you it's not going to be that hung parliament.

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 10>You're talking about that just about win on thirty nine

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 10>given what you get getting from one nation and the others,

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 10>because it's not going to be uniform.

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, they're getting.

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 10>Those swings in the outer suburban and regional seats and

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.239
<v Speaker 10>Labors vote, then the Greens will be holding up in

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 10>the cities and you'll see some till Suaits disappear if

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 10>they get thirty nine. They'd be very happy with a

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 10>thirty nine primary. So that's very very interesting. But of

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 10>course just one pole, just one other thing. But when

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 10>you talk about the trend in the polls, it really

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 10>Labor hasn't been picking up anything, correct, It's been a

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 10>bit of the edge coming off the coalition primary vote.

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's what it's all about.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 8>Peter Dutton Patriots One nation, One nation, Yeah, one nation.

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 10>So that's what it is. Dutton's got to just attract

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 10>people back to the Coalition.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 8>And that alone its in and of itself. I mean

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 8>Albo's saying tonight that Dunton's taking the party in the

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 8>most conservative bent that it's been in recent.

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 10>Times, modern era.

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just appointing.

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 8>That's not true and this poll does show that. I

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 8>mean there's a lot of people on the right that

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 8>don't think Dutton's been conservative enough. In every Conservative leader

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 8>in the last twenty years for the standard.

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 10>Dross that's a standard dross you get from your socialist

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 10>left prime minister. Anyone you know who believes in the private.

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Schools is some sort.

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Of can I also say too, I think one of

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 2>the issues that is fiddling with a lot of liberals,

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 2>be either the supporters, the advisors, or maybe even the

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 2>principles right is the blitzkrieg on social media, I think

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 2>is giving them a distorted depiction of what people all

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 2>over the country are seeing.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 2>I think clearly labor multifaceted hitting from every legue, different angle.

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 2>The idea that you don't even speak about what a

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.719
<v Speaker 2>policy is, you just play all good Booker music and

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 2>put it with Darth Vader on it. I mean, this

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 2>is a level of campaigning that I think is getting

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 2>in their head a bit, and I think they don't

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 2>need to be reminded. As massive and important as that

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 2>area is, and it is, it ain't where everyone is.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Can I just throw you one more thing about this pole,

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 2>because in real time we'll try and just again how

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 2>issues are falling. It's one pole who knows, all right,

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 2>we know where the greater trend is. We know where

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the poles and the bookies are. Okay, have a look

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 2>at this because on the left hand side, in the

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 2>yellow the priority of issues cost of living, housing, healthcare, economy.

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 2>All right on the other side is who's winning that debate.

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 2>Cost of living right now is thirty three to labor

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 2>thirty five to the coalition thirty two with a neither.

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Housing is thirty five to labor, thirty one to the

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 2>coalition thirty four. Who knows? In healthcare? Unsurprisingly where the

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister wants to get it, it's forty two to

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 2>thirty one. On the economy, that's interesting here, it's thirty

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 2>two to thirty eight. So labor leads on welfare, healthcare, family, education,

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 2>employ but employment, housing all the same, Climate change, labor up,

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 2>cost of living lives up, industrial action, labor up, economy

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 2>lives up, infrastructure lives up, tax lives up, immigration lives

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 2>up forty to twenty seven, Defense forty two to twenty seven,

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 2>and crime, that issue that they all want to pretend

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 2>is not in this campaign, not allowed feats.

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 10>That they don't have electricity or energy in there at

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 10>the sub level.

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 2>See when I was for my sins watching of course

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the Bolt report here on Sky News on the main

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 2>computer and on the side computer has happened accidentally. See

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 2>what they were doing over there on the seven thirty

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 2>report and they were showing Katie Allen going around her

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>seat of Chisholm or trying to get the seat of

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Chisholm before Member for Mensis. And guess what came up? Crime, crime, crime,

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 2>and it was crime from people who spoke a second

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 2>language at home. So again, what's being said at the

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 2>door to door level, what's being done at the letterbox level.

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 2>These are all things none of us see and we'll

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 2>all sit there and be surprised about as such on

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 2>the night last one here and Laura, you know that

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 2>I had thoughts on this throughout the day, But I

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 2>want to show you a reporter from the Age asking

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a question of the alternative prime Minister. Now we know

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 2>that treading dollars in debt isn't the third rail of

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Australian politics. We know that power prices not a third

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 2>rail of Australian politics. Tax not a third rail of

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Australian politics. But how on earth does anyone answer a

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 2>question like this?

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 7>During your campaign, law to your National's leader spoke extensive

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 7>about how much of a man you were. Your deputy

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 7>Opposition leader spoke and gave ode to the boys in

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 7>Blue and the tradees. You talk about mining, construction, agriculture

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 7>and energy being the four killers of the economy. In

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 7>your own campaign launch speech you mentioned women twice, and

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 7>that was in relation to how you protect them from

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.479
<v Speaker 7>domestic violence and crime. A lot of your campaign has

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 7>been at petrol stations. You've been in trucks. When you

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 7>speak to about female dominated industries like education, you talk

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 7>about the work agenda. What are you offering modern working women?

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm offering them a chance to get home?

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, Laura, it is impossible, impossible for any politician

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 2>to adequately answer the question of the satisfaction of the

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 2>person whom he's asking it. And as the representative of

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 2>all women on this panel, you've seen how this has

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 2>played out. You saw how badly it played out for

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Scott Morrison, and this was deployed, I think to get

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 2>in his head. He answered as best as he could

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 2>the idea that somehow sexism is petrol bowsers. What do

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you think of a question like that, and what do

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 2>you think of how Peter dunn't answered it and how

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 2>fair or unfair it was to frame him in that way.

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 8>The whole exchange. The Teta tet went for about five

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 8>minutes as well, so we just saw part of his

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 8>answer there. It's worth going back and having a look

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 8>because I think on his feet this question being asked

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 8>to him, he couldn't have entered it better. There was

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 8>a follow up from the journalist. I think, you know,

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 8>not a bad question if you want to frame it

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 8>in that way, but yeah, not fair. It should be

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 8>asked to Anthony Abernezi well as well. If it is

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 8>asked Anthony Abernezi, there would have been a whole day

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 8>of a whole team pouring over answers and strategizing this.

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 8>But I think this is a feature of this campaign

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 8>that's not getting as much traction as it did when

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 8>Scott Morrison was the Prime minister. Did you see also

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 8>David little Proud describing one of the candidates of having

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 8>you know, all the pull of a chi chihuahua. Then

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 8>you had Clara O'Neills saying, oh, he's comparing it to

0:31:55.560 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 8>a dog. I mean women's equality is when you can

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 8>make comments like that and have those comments when there

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 8>is just not even a batter of an eyelead because

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 8>the same questions are asked to men.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So, look, I mean there is. I mean how I

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know.

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 8>How to answer that question, to be honest, I mean

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 8>there is. We want a quality right, Yes, what she

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 8>suggesting that housing is Amen's demain.

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 10>Sexist gentral stations are only for men.

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Apparently, this is insane.

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 11>This is this question, This is insane politically.

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 8>But the line, the invisible line that she was trying

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 8>to draw, yeah.

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Bok, Look it's insane.

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 10>She's some I don't know who she is, but what

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 10>she's done in gender studies at at the Tribe University

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 10>or something. But it's just about pushing some pathetic agenda.

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 10>It's just there to embarrass people. It should be dismissed

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 10>as nonsense. But that's what they're tempting him to do.

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 10>If he dismisses it as nonsense, then they portray him

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 10>as a misogynist. I've noticed on social media tonight, Zoey

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 10>Daniel and others.

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Are cutting it up. It's all about that women and

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>tills and lefties. It is mine numbingly stupid.

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 8>It's mind numbingly stupid. I agree with you, but this

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 8>is what you get when you have a boring campaign

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 8>where most politicians just want to give you line.

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>No, I disagree. I disagree.

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 10>This is what you get when you're a right of

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 10>center politician. You never see that deport against the left.

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 8>Not yeah, that's that's absolutely a fair comment. But you

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 8>get these these journals are on a bus, right, They've

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 8>got Stockholm syndrome there for a week, they get swapped out.

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 8>They're getting the same boring answers every day that are

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 8>designed just to be on high rotation on TikTok. You're

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 8>on that bus. You're trying to think of an answer

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 8>a question that's going to.

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Get What's name, I don't know. Well, here's an idea

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for her.

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 10>What if she turns up at Anthony Albernesei's presser tomorrow

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 10>and asks him, given the renewables are the cheapest form

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 10>of energy, when will our power prices come down, and

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 10>keep asking it until the answers?

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 2>That would be challenging anything else about man and correct

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 2>anything else, anything else about the debate where we sit tonight,

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 2>that we've got to mention.

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 8>Before one the last question. Actually, I thought the last

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 8>question from Speezy was really good, you know, given the.

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Camp I was preparing in this last minute before the show,

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 2>they did really.

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Think it's to remind us.

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 8>Do you really think oh it was you know, do

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 8>you really think that other guys as bad as you're.

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Making It was all.

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 8>Part of the campaigning and there was a little bit

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 8>of softness that you know, they find it.

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I give in, but they I would have gone hard.

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't much as I think.

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 8>I think that was good for Peter because Anthony Abernezi

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 8>stands up every day and says is terrible. But obviously

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 8>they do talk across the aisle, you know, they do

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 8>have private meetings.

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is the thing.

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 2>And look, I say this about politics right as hard

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 2>as I fight it, I know the participants love their families,

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 2>have their friends, you're like, and the best thing about

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 2>a result, and a definitive result is that there's that

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 2>elective breathe out, unlike of course twenty ten, where when

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 2>it's a dead result, everyone stays in that phase for

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 2>a long time. Chris, anything last worth mentioning?

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 6>Not really, mate.

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 10>I just think pet you don't needs to resurrect the

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 10>campaign over the East to break and maybe this was

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 10>just a start.

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, Thank you guys, do appreciate it. We'll see

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 2>you five o'clock, nine o'clock and on the other side

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 2>of the break on Murray Life. Thanks for watching, Thank

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 2>you for watching. If you are just joining us. The

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 2>second leader's debate has taken place over on the ABC.

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 2>I think Peter Dutton did very, very well. He was

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 2>on the attack for most of it, or at least

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 2>had good responses. So I really liked the moderation because

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 2>they didn't just get into their preset answers. Instead, they

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 2>were starting to be pulled into territory that they didn't

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about, and that wasn't good for Anthony Abernezi.

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I think many of his pushbacks were just blatant, sort

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 2>of Haymaker lies. But that's my worldview. Let's find out

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 2>what Roman Bishop and Stephen Conroy thought of it, and

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 2>we'll start with you. Why am I one hundred percent wrong?

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 2>And this is the greatest performance from the greatest prime

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 2>minister of all time.

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 9>No, look, I think that was probably Perry Dutton's best

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 9>performance of the campaigner And I think Chris Kenny said,

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.280
<v Speaker 9>you know, if he'd been if he'd have kicked off

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 9>his campaign like this two and a half weeks ago,

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 9>he might not be having the bumps in the polling

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 9>that you're seeing today, But I don't score it as

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 9>a decisive victory. I think Albot was very solid as well,

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 9>and I think that it was a quality debate. And

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 9>like you, I give kudos to Spearsy. He pressed both ladies,

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 9>he pressed them fairly, he held them to account. He

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 9>wanted to get past, as you say, the scripted answers.

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 9>I think he did a good job of that, and

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 9>I think it was a quality performance across the whole debate.

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 9>So I would score it as a draw. But I

0:36:56.400 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 9>do absolutely agree that it was Dutton's best performance elevated

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 9>to the godlike status that you have, Paul.

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 6>It was performance.

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not quite there, but I thought it was a

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 2>pretty good showing. Broman, what did you think of it?

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 11>I thought Dutton was the clear winner. And as for

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 11>your comments about Albanisi, Steven, he was the biggest fibbre

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 11>of the night, that's for sure. And the constant use

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 11>of figures which are wrong, denied, just untrue constantly make

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 11>people angry. And I have to say, when I was

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 11>listening to a lot of the debate driving in the car,

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:41.800
<v Speaker 11>and when I hear him trot out six hundred billion

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 11>dollars for nuclear power stations. I want to scream back

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 11>at him because it's such a lie, but it doesn't

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 11>get challenged enough and that makes me cross.

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>That's why I sweed back at it.

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 2>But again, what I love about a debate we saw

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 2>this year here with huge audiences for the People's Forum,

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 2>no doubt the same when it comes to the ABC one,

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 2>hopefully the same for seven and nine. It means they're

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 2>not seeing it in bites, they're not seeing it in

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:07.280
<v Speaker 2>selective grabs, they're not seeing it in TikTok. They're watching

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:09.399
<v Speaker 2>it for an hour. They're seeing the body language, they're

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 2>seeing how things respond, and I think that's good. So

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to ask you both an uncomfortable question. First,

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 2>what was the worst moment for your leader? Stephen? I

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 2>think on your feet. What was the worst moment for Albo?

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I say it was the power?

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 9>I think now, I think both you and Chris Kenney

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 9>made the point that Dutton hasn't targeted that enough in

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 9>the campaign. I think that's where it's obviously a tough one.

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:38.399
<v Speaker 9>They made a promise, real world came along and it

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 9>became challenging to deliver it. They have done good things

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:46.760
<v Speaker 9>in energy price reduction, but when you ask the question,

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 9>you can see that they're cautious about doubling down on it.

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 9>Peter Dutton's the same. He won't promise when the first

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 9>fall because of the gas reservation in the next three years. Peter,

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 9>I think that I agree with you and Chris Kenny

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 9>Billimps have not done enough to press on that issue.

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, this is the man you can think on

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 2>his feet. Brom Win the same, but I'll ask it

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the same way. What was the worst moment for done?

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 11>When Peter Dublin was asked about did he believe in

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:20.240
<v Speaker 11>climate change? It was a wooly answer and maybe cringe.

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Right because it opens the door to that left at tank.

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 11>No, because the whole point is is that there is

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 11>a commitment made to twenty fifty. That's the commitment, yes,

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 11>and the nuclear plan is designed to make that commitment.

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 11>In the meantime. Right now, you've got things to do

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:39.720
<v Speaker 11>to keep the lights on, to keep the country going,

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 11>and that is you keep maintenance on the coal fire

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 11>at power stations to keep them working and keep you

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 11>put the gas in as in accordance with the policy

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 11>is outlined. Good policy. That's the answer. It's not a

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 11>question is this flood worse than that flood? Is this

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.440
<v Speaker 11>heat wave worse than that heat wave? It's a question.

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 11>We made it commitment. This is how I'm going to

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 11>fulfill it.

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and certainly the line you know, I'm not a scientist.

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 2>We know how that'll get spun in that.

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 11>And if I hear the word much for the science again,

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 11>I'll scream, because.

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:11.799
<v Speaker 1>There is no such thing.

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 11>There are various scientists who say different things.

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's all. Now, I want to get back

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to this pole out of the financial review. It is

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the dipping poles, it's the best for

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 2>the Libs in a little while where the dip is

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 2>still there but the prime is at thirty nine. If

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 2>their prime is at thirty nine and the era is

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, the statistical eraor well, then they're going to

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 2>be doing a lot better. Obviously they could end up

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 2>doing a lot worse. But I tell you what with

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:42.720
<v Speaker 2>some of these poles, labor losing according to this seven

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 2>seats the coalition winning nine, meaning they would also get

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 2>back a couple of Teal seats presumably there as well.

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 2>But more interestingly, let's get to that issues that I

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 2>mentioned before. Number one issue in the country cost a

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 2>living well. That's changed by three percent in the past

0:40:57.440 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 2>since March, and that's now in the favor of the

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 2>coalition thirty five to thirty three. Similar number in the middle,

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 2>but still important right considering how much we've discussed In housing,

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Labour leads that thirty five to thirty one. There's been

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:12.919
<v Speaker 2>a six point change in that over the past little while.

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:17.439
<v Speaker 2>In healthcare unsurprisingly massively dominant issue for the Labour Party

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 2>at fifty two, sorry, forty two, thirty one. But crime

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 2>now crime at ranks immigration, climate change, defense, tax, welfare, employment, education, infrastructure,

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 2>family and industrial relations. The Leaves are leading on that

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 2>thirty nine to twenty seven, and the lead keeps growing.

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 2>What did you think of all of those stats that

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.359
<v Speaker 2>I've just screened at you? But of any of them,

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 2>what gives you hope? Will gives you concern?

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 11>Romin Well, I think when you hear regularly on the

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 11>radio in the mornings that there's been another drive by

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 11>shooting and one person's dead, that resonates with everybody. When

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 11>you look at the crime road in Victoria, you understand

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 11>why Victorias have no faith in their government or their

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 11>police force anymore. When you look at the crime in

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 11>the regions, what's happening in places like Mare, around Dubbo,

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 11>in different cities around New South Wales, but also up

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 11>around North Queensland where it is horrendous, And then of

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 11>course you've got the dreadful incidences of domestic violence in

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 11>the Northern territory. I can go state by state, but

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:35.720
<v Speaker 11>I think the interesting thing is that the other issues

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 11>which you mentioned in their order of precedence before, I

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 11>think the question that people are waking up to is

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 11>that this entire country runs on diesel, and that's why

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 11>the tax cut in the petrol and diesel tax is

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 11>so vital because it doesn't only affect mums and dads,

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 11>pensions and everybody else who'd get nothing out of a

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 11>tax cut, but it does bring down the actual cost

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 11>of living by lowering the cost of transportation, and that

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:13.359
<v Speaker 11>is why those issues are so important, Steve. And one

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 11>other issue, I think the reason that Dublin's tale was

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 11>up to light and why it was so good despite

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 11>what I said about the climate change issue.

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that he's been out in the field.

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 11>He's been out talking to people, he's been out in

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 11>the Electric so I was over in Western Australia on

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.359
<v Speaker 11>the weekend. He was in Western Australia. He's hearing what

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 11>people are saying and what they're complaining about and why

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 11>they don't like this government.

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, Steve said to ask, but give me the

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 2>thirty second version of your response to the poll.

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:42.479
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 9>Look, it is clearly the best of the polls for

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 9>Dutton in the campaign, but it has the same consistent trend.

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 9>Its Labor bottomed out in November December, hand that's been

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 9>tracking up. So I think the trend it is Labour's friend,

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 9>and Dunton really needs to perform like he did tonight

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 9>every single day between now and the election day to

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 9>put himself in the frame to get past seventy, which

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 9>gives him a better chance to form minority governments. A

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 9>lot of those seats are within margin of errors and

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 9>so there could just easily be some of those seats

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:25.240
<v Speaker 9>to be on Labor.

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 6>So maybe Labor's only.

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 9>Losing five instead of seven, which puts it back into

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 9>a Labor I think the pole still shows a minority

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 9>Labor government. So all of the polls across Australia have

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:41.759
<v Speaker 9>shown over the last three or four weeks is the

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:42.359
<v Speaker 9>size of.

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 6>A labor minority government.

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 9>But I think it's a really good wake up call

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 9>for anyone in labor. Anyone in Labor is walking around

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:51.320
<v Speaker 9>saying this election is done and dusted.

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 6>We're heading to eighty seats.

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 9>This is a poll that should give people pause and

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:58.919
<v Speaker 9>they should go It is not one. It is not over.

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 9>Dutton is in proving and we have to double down

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 9>and be focused and targeted and on our best campaign

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 9>efforts like it.

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 2>I like caution at times like this, so I really

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 2>do all right, quick break back with more so we

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:15.320
<v Speaker 2>have some time on the other side of this, and

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm not two's time here on Paul Hurry life. I

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 2>can't wait. We're heading to Western Australia in a couple

0:45:26.160 --> 0:45:28.400
<v Speaker 2>of weeks time. Now. We love everywhere we go with

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 2>our town, but I love when we get in the

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 2>red dirt.

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I love it.

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Cal Gooley, can you join us? Not this next Sunday,

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 2>calgool in Western Australia. Ourtown that's gone news dot com

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 2>dot Au. Ourtown that's goews dot com dot Au. How

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 2>goods are going to be in Wa? Not this Sunday,

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 2>but next Sunday from when Bishop Stephen Conroy here, let's

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 2>talk about what Paul Kelly wrote in the Australian newspaper

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:50.280
<v Speaker 2>today when he's talking about what he believes is perhaps

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 2>some of the ghosts of the twenty twenty two faties

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 2>of the Libs that may will still be alive in

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. And I've got to say, well, I

0:45:56.880 --> 0:46:00.239
<v Speaker 2>disagree with many of the points. I think that there

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 2>was a very fair observation, which is that many people

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 2>have overestimated the result of the Voice to be indicative

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 2>of what might happen at an election. Bromin your thoughts

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 2>on what a bloke who's seen a lot has to

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:17.840
<v Speaker 2>say about some of the darker clouds around the Liberals.

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 11>No, I don't. I don't think he was right. I

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 11>think that the voice was very important issue. But I

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:32.479
<v Speaker 11>don't think no one lays it down over the map

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 11>of Australian and says it's all going to be repeated,

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:38.880
<v Speaker 11>that doesn't happen. But it was nonetheless very important. But

0:46:38.960 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 11>what I do think is relevant in this debate, or

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:46.800
<v Speaker 11>in this point in the election, is that there is

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 11>an attempt to try and say once again that there

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 11>is a woman problem with regard to the Coalition and

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 11>mister Dutton in particular. If there is a woman problem,

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 11>I've got to say it is Astra Alberan Easy his

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 11>actions towards Tanya Plebisset the other day. That was almost

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:08.760
<v Speaker 11>in the salt.

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:10.359
<v Speaker 2>It was that bad.

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:15.240
<v Speaker 11>It was a physical pushback. There's no love lost between

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 11>those two, that's for sure. She's a very well respected woman.

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, and also have looked at the primary vote a

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 2>central pole divided by a gender. Guess who has the

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 2>worst numbers at the moment when it comes to the

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 2>female to female it is not the coalition, but the

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 2>same lines get trodden out all the time. All right, Stephen,

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 2>what did you think of the analysis? And again, caution

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 2>for those people in the same way that you've just

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 2>said about your own people saying hey, you haven't won

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 2>anything yet, pull your heads in, work hard. For those

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 2>in the Libs who maybe did think that there was

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.879
<v Speaker 2>a direct correlation between places that went hard no as

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 2>being of possible targets, particularly places like out of western Sydney.

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:57.320
<v Speaker 9>If I could just respond to one of Brobmin's comments

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 9>there about the Albo Tanya into change, we must have

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:04.280
<v Speaker 9>been watching agent.

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:05.280
<v Speaker 1>It was awful.

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 9>Clip we must thought it was clipan no way awful.

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 6>This was almost in assultant pushback. Just stop it. So

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 6>now moving on.

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:22.359
<v Speaker 9>To Paul's question, I actually thought it was a really

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:23.240
<v Speaker 9>insightful article.

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 6>I think there was a lot of hubris.

0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 9>After the Voice was defeated on the conservative side of politics.

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 9>I regularly remember when you even used the phrase, Paul,

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.840
<v Speaker 9>everyone's saying, get the map out, let's lay the voice

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 9>over the electra because you turn that voice now. No, no,

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 9>I'm just saying you just mentioned, but described it because

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 9>we both heard it so many times that the voice

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 9>vote will resonate, it will stand up over the two years.

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:52.959
<v Speaker 9>The smartest thing that Albo did was you made sure

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 9>it was done and dusted and well before the action.

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:57.799
<v Speaker 9>You remember the people saying, no, no.

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 6>You should differ it, you should defer it. They've got

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:01.440
<v Speaker 6>going down.

0:49:04.920 --> 0:49:07.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, I apologize five seconds if you can do it.

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 11>I'm just going to say, Stephen, it is still relevant.

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:15.280
<v Speaker 11>It's not the defining issue that it was at the time,

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 11>but it is still relevant to say that there is

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:22.359
<v Speaker 11>a willingness for people to consider what your attitude is

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 11>to the whole question.

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:27.959
<v Speaker 2>Of the all right, the bells are ringing. The bells

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 2>are ringing for you can do it all again. Next week.

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you. Then.

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:34.800
<v Speaker 2>It's mixed