Speaker 1: Lately.
Speaker 2: Welcome late babe, thanks for joining us. I'm James Macpherson
Speaker 2: with Liz Storer and Joe Hildebrand coming up tonight. You've
Speaker 2: heard about kids throwing tantrums, but what about mums and
Speaker 2: New Sydney business is giving mothers the chance to do
Speaker 2: just that. We'll talk about that shortly. Plus when we
Speaker 2: get to the papers, amp demanding that staff give permission
Speaker 2: for them to be filmed working from home, and new
Speaker 2: data shows just how badly small businesses are doing at
Speaker 2: the moment. We'll get to all of that later, but first,
Speaker 2: if you want more evidence that America dodged a bullet
Speaker 2: last November by electing Donald Trump, will look no further
Speaker 2: than the man who wanted to be Vice president, Tim Waltz. Now,
Speaker 2: before we get to him, I've got to explain Trump
Speaker 2: derangement syndrome for you. Because it's so bad. People are
Speaker 2: fire bombing Tesla dealerships and vandalizing Tesla's because Tesla founder
Speaker 2: Elon Musk worked for Donald Trump. The violence in the
Speaker 2: vandalism has put great pressure on sales and pushed the
Speaker 2: Tesla stock price down. Now, you would think that politicians
Speaker 2: of all stripes would come out and condemn this domestic terrorism.
Speaker 2: But on the left, they're actually encouraging it. None more
Speaker 2: so than the man who was Kamala Harris's running mate
Speaker 2: he wanted to be Vice president, Tim Walls. Now, this
Speaker 2: is a man who just six months ago was campaigning
Speaker 2: on bringing joy and unity to America. Here he is
Speaker 2: speaking last night.
Speaker 3: Saying on my phone, I don't some of you know
Speaker 3: this on the iPhone, they've got that little stock app.
Speaker 3: I added Tesla to to give me a little boost
Speaker 3: during the day two twenty five and dropping.
Speaker 2: So, and.
Speaker 3: If you own one, if you own one, we're not
Speaker 3: blaming you. You can you can take dental floss and
Speaker 3: pull the Tesla thing off, you know, and take out
Speaker 3: of just telling you.
Speaker 2: Would have made a terrible VP and makes a terrible
Speaker 2: stand up comedian. But here's a man who wanted to
Speaker 2: be vice president of America barracking for the failure of
Speaker 2: American manufacturers, in this case, Tesla, who employed more than
Speaker 2: one hundred and twenty thousand people. What happened to We're
Speaker 2: all Americans. But it's even more ridiculous than that. This
Speaker 2: guy is the governor of Minnesota, and the state of
Speaker 2: Minnesota has one point eight million shares in Tesla ostensibly
Speaker 2: to fund aged pensions, his CNN pointing out that anomaly.
Speaker 4: I'm talking about Tim Walls and his comments about the
Speaker 4: Tesla stock he says against him a boost to see
Speaker 4: that start going down.
Speaker 5: That poor guy didn't check his portfolio and his own
Speaker 5: pension plan for state.
Speaker 6: It's beyond stupid what he did.
Speaker 5: He's talking down a three and a half percent weiting
Speaker 5: his own pension plan.
Speaker 6: I mean, what's the matter with that guy.
Speaker 2: Doesn't check the well being of his own constituency. That's
Speaker 2: their investigar mind, what a bozo.
Speaker 4: Tasla Steed Board of Investment. They have a one point
Speaker 4: six million shares in Tasla and their retirement fund two
Speaker 4: hundred and eleven thousand shares in an un retirement fund.
Speaker 4: It's a relatively small amount, but that's one company, one
Speaker 4: single stock, and that's because Tasla is a huge.
Speaker 2: Partly attack Grill, the man who wanted to be vice president,
Speaker 2: the governor of Minnesota is literally cheering as his constituent's
Speaker 2: pension accounts de value. Elon Musk had the last laugh, though,
Speaker 2: in response to Tim Waltz tweeting, if you need a
Speaker 2: little boost. Look at Tesla stock. Musk tweeted in return,
Speaker 2: sometimes when I need a little boost, I look at
Speaker 2: the JD. Vance portrait in the White House. JD Vance
Speaker 2: being the Vice President, and I think the Lord. Elon
Speaker 2: Musk said, Liz, could you believe this guy? I mean,
Speaker 2: no wonder the Democrats are polling It was at twenty
Speaker 2: nine percent. It's surprising they're getting that much support when
Speaker 2: they are this device.
Speaker 6: Am I a surprised, No, not at all. This is
Speaker 6: just more of the same.
Speaker 7: Couldn't get about that clip was how much he was
Speaker 7: coming across as a stand up comedian, like literally just
Speaker 7: walking up and down the stage. I was like, this
Speaker 7: guy does stand up all of a sudden, So much
Speaker 7: makes sense all that time he was taking the mix.
Speaker 7: But what makes this even worse is he is the
Speaker 7: chair of the SBI in the state of Minnesota.
Speaker 6: As the governor, you chair the SBI, and he didn't know.
Speaker 6: This guy didn't even.
Speaker 7: Know that they had shares, much less that many in Tesla.
Speaker 7: But what we're seeing happen here is extremely insidious because
Speaker 7: despite being the richest man in the world, sixty percent
Speaker 7: of Elon's Musk wealth is tied up in Tesla, so
Speaker 7: he's seen that take a nosedive in recent times. I mean,
Speaker 7: his estimated net worth has plunged from four hundred and
Speaker 7: eighty six billion, oh dad, to three hundred and thirty billion.
Speaker 6: I mean, what a catastrophy.
Speaker 7: Still the richest man god for the McDonald's loose change menu, indeed.
Speaker 6: But they know if they can keep this up for
Speaker 6: long enough.
Speaker 7: It was already struggling prior to Tesla coming under attack
Speaker 7: in a very well way by these domestic terrorists, they
Speaker 7: can keep this up for long enough. They genuinely are
Speaker 7: targeting the apple of Elon's eye and indeed his well.
Speaker 8: Yeah, look, I've said for gosh a year or two
Speaker 8: now that Tesla will actually suffer, because the whole point
Speaker 8: of buying an EV especially at Tesla, is that you
Speaker 8: are essentially virtue signaling to the rest of the automotive
Speaker 8: community that you're a right on guy, that this is
Speaker 8: what you believe in, that these are your values, and
Speaker 8: that's all well and good. People buy cars that you
Speaker 8: know that say something about them. And suddenly when elong
Speaker 8: sort of go like a sort of pantomime villain with
Speaker 8: a sort of curly mustache. Ah, I'm a Republican now
Speaker 8: now I'm a Trumpson. Everyone says who, And you know,
Speaker 8: Waltz makes a point that you know there will be
Speaker 8: people who are desperately trying to us dental floss to
Speaker 8: pull the badgers, the Tesla badgers off their cars, And
Speaker 8: I think it is I picked it ages ago. I
Speaker 8: knew it was going to happen, and it is happening.
Speaker 8: I'm not surprised what was happening. But this is the
Speaker 8: thing that actually gets my go. When you lose, like
Speaker 8: Kamala Harris and Tim Wawtts just lost, you don't get
Speaker 8: to make the jokes. You don't get to flex, you
Speaker 8: don't get to say, ah, yeah, we lost control of
Speaker 8: the biggest country in the entire universe. We lost control
Speaker 8: of the leadership of the free world. Your Teslas socks
Speaker 8: are going down. Sucks for you. Like that is just
Speaker 8: the most demented kind of form of And I've seen
Speaker 8: politicians here, you know, trying to do hot takes on Twitter,
Speaker 8: and in the same way, it's like, shut up and
Speaker 8: try to win the next election. It's like that great
Speaker 8: line off The Simpsons, and the Simpsons has a great
Speaker 8: line for everything. Obviously, where Springfield is taking there is
Speaker 8: teasing shelbyvillecause shelby Bell sucks. That's why we beat them.
Speaker 8: But baseball almost half the time, it's like, you're right.
Speaker 2: The thing that strikes me about the Democrats is the
Speaker 2: absolute lack of humility. Having lost the election, and they
Speaker 2: lost it badly, you'd think you'd sit back and think, Okay,
Speaker 2: where do we go wrong? Where did we miss it?
Speaker 2: What can we learn? But they've done none of that.
Speaker 2: They've just doubled it. It's a lack of understanding what
Speaker 2: we've criticized. Yesterday, it was the same day that Elon
Speaker 2: Musk rescued two astronauts who'd been left in space four
Speaker 2: months forgotten by the Biden administration. So you're talking about flexing.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's inappropriate to flex when you lost, but
Speaker 2: if you're going to, don't flex against Elon Musk on
Speaker 2: the very day that he mops up the Biden mess
Speaker 2: in out of Space.
Speaker 7: Indeed, my favorite quote from this meeting that Tim was
Speaker 7: talking about was, and I quote, I'm not a vindictive
Speaker 7: person or anything, but I take great pleasure in the
Speaker 7: fact that this guy's life is about to get very
Speaker 7: very difficult. That is the definition of vindictiveness if you
Speaker 7: are taking pleasure in somebody else's pain because they have more.
Speaker 6: Than one up on you. Staying in the States, now
Speaker 6: we've seen this death row.
Speaker 7: Inmate, Jesse Hoffman Junior, become the fifth person in the
Speaker 7: United States of America to be executed via nitrogen gas.
Speaker 7: It's not been in vogue for long, and goodness knows,
Speaker 7: even amongst those states that do carry out capital punishment,
Speaker 7: there's not a lot of death so it's only been
Speaker 7: used five times, and some experts and the usual suspects
Speaker 7: love to bring it up each time, saying is this humane.
Speaker 7: It took nineteen minutes for this fellow to be declared dead,
Speaker 7: leading those questions to be raised yet again. We read
Speaker 7: in sky News UK nitrogen gas had only been used
Speaker 7: in death row executions four times before Jesse Hoffman Junior.
Speaker 6: Was executed in Louisiana on Tuesday.
Speaker 7: Has tried to argue the method was unconstitutional because it
Speaker 7: was cruel and unusual. I think a better question than
Speaker 7: is it cruel or is it painful?
Speaker 6: Is do we care this piece of crap?
Speaker 7: Twenty eight years ago, raped and murdered a twenty eight
Speaker 7: year old mother and wife.
Speaker 6: Her name was Mary Elliot. He raped and.
Speaker 7: Murdered her as she was just in the car park
Speaker 7: leaving work on her way to a date night with
Speaker 7: her husband the night before Thanksgiving.
Speaker 6: He was a car parking attendant.
Speaker 7: That's where he got her, and nobody knew where she
Speaker 7: was or what had happened until a duck hunter found
Speaker 7: her naked body by the river the next day. Can
Speaker 7: you imagine what Thanksgiving is like for the friends and
Speaker 7: family of Mary Elliot every single year since the The
Speaker 7: guys want you to feel sorry because, oh, he was
Speaker 7: convulsing as this nitrogen gas.
Speaker 6: Went into his system. Do me a favor.
Speaker 7: You could light this guy on fire and I would
Speaker 7: sit there watching, drinking a bucket of water.
Speaker 6: Do me a favor.
Speaker 7: I cannot stand it when the bleeding hearts come out.
Speaker 6: I'm a massive fan of capital punishment. By the way, I.
Speaker 7: Bet the state of Louisiana is only sorry that they
Speaker 7: had to pay for three square meals and a roof
Speaker 7: over this animal's head for the last.
Speaker 6: Twenty eight years. Why can't you pick up the pace
Speaker 6: a bit? But no good riddance, I say.
Speaker 7: And when people try to make this a matter of Oh,
Speaker 7: but is it humane. Experts, by the way, do insist,
Speaker 7: including the state. They do insist the nitrogen gas is painless,
Speaker 7: to which I say, it was too good for this guy.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I've got to say I'm opposed to capital punishment,
Speaker 8: but I'm certainly not going to die in the ditch
Speaker 8: for the rights of raping murderers to be treated moncuman.
Speaker 8: I mean, in a sense, it's a completely ridiculous argument,
Speaker 8: because either you argue, is capital punishment working and does
Speaker 8: it do what it is supposed to do, or is
Speaker 8: it something that a civilized country should not be partaking in,
Speaker 8: whether you get it via lethal injection or the electric chair,
Speaker 8: or by inhaling nitrogen.
Speaker 1: It's kind of.
Speaker 6: I really don't well.
Speaker 8: In the Enlightenment, of course, they considered hanging to be
Speaker 8: cruel and unusual punishment, and they said this is absolutely terrible.
Speaker 1: We shouldn't be hanging people.
Speaker 8: It's barbarous and they suffer before they die. And that's
Speaker 8: why the guy invented the guillotine, and that is actually why,
Speaker 8: because it would be more humane. And of course the
Speaker 8: revolution comes from and oh, let's be humane to thousands
Speaker 8: and thousands of people. We could be humane to like,
Speaker 8: you know, six hundred people a day, and that is
Speaker 8: exactly what they did.
Speaker 1: Why, it's absolutely true, that's right, and and that's why
Speaker 1: it was invented.
Speaker 8: A was the product of the Enlightenment because it would
Speaker 8: guarantee an instantaneous death. Now, I honestly don't give a
Speaker 8: flying fig about how you know whether this person twitched
Speaker 8: a bit before they died. Obviously what he did was terrible,
Speaker 8: But there's a couple of things. One is the fact
Speaker 8: that he was on death row for twenty nine years
Speaker 8: and it was the love of then I think is
Speaker 8: proof that capital punishment doesn't work, because what happens when
Speaker 8: you get a case like this is as soon as
Speaker 8: people know that it's a capital case, they will just
Speaker 8: go to every single possible length to try to get
Speaker 8: it overturned, which means they will pull everything they possibly can,
Speaker 8: so they will do appeal after appeal, they will comb
Speaker 8: through any kind of potential for new evidence so you
Speaker 8: can get a retrial. Every single possible conceivable delaying tactic
Speaker 8: will be employed because obviously everything's at stake and you've
Speaker 8: got nothing to lose.
Speaker 6: So it's not the capital punishment doesn't work. You're just
Speaker 6: saying we need to streamline.
Speaker 8: As a result, like you said, as a result, the
Speaker 8: taxpayers of the state of Louisiana paying to keep this
Speaker 8: person alive and behind bars for thirty years just for
Speaker 8: him to finally be killed, frankly three decades later than
Speaker 8: he should have been, because you know, a person in
Speaker 8: their mid forties is clearly a very different person when
Speaker 8: a teenage when they committed the crime. Where you're you know,
Speaker 8: your frontal cortex hasn't even I want to talk about much,
Speaker 8: but I'm saying, if you're going to kill someone, for
Speaker 8: justice to be justice, it has to be swift.
Speaker 2: If you want to talk about cruel and unusual punishment,
Speaker 2: keeping someone on death row for more than a decade
Speaker 2: would seem to me to be cruel and undusual.
Speaker 6: Still not bad enough for him.
Speaker 2: In terms of the is it a humane way to
Speaker 2: execute someone? I've always thought that's less about the welfare
Speaker 2: of the person and more about the welfare of our
Speaker 2: own souls. We do it humanly, not because we care
Speaker 2: about this person who is in person. We want to
Speaker 2: do it humanly because it says something about ourselves that
Speaker 2: though we have witnessed this great evil. We're not going
Speaker 2: to become in our own that's right.
Speaker 8: He's killing because style eye for an eye, bring it back.
Speaker 1: Is a bit differently.
Speaker 8: They us a little bit differently the UK as opposed
Speaker 8: to killing them with nitrogen. They let them pick whatever
Speaker 8: gender they want to be.
Speaker 1: It is amazing. Yes, criminals are free.
Speaker 8: To pick their gender in the UK because the government
Speaker 8: is refusing to force police to record biological sex. I
Speaker 8: would have thought that would be I mean all for
Speaker 8: people's right to choose their own identity, but in terms
Speaker 8: of actually being able to be identified potential kind of
Speaker 8: crimes and such. Would think you want to be able
Speaker 8: to say, all right.
Speaker 1: Does he have you know? Or who are you know?
Speaker 1: What I mean?
Speaker 8: Anyways, And in a better review publish from Wednesday said
Speaker 8: police forces and the NHS should collect data on sex
Speaker 8: as opposed to a person sex, not just you know
Speaker 8: how many times you're doing it at night with the misses,
Speaker 8: rather than just a person's self declared gender identity. It
Speaker 8: urged Vet Cooper, the Home Secretary, to issue a mandatory
Speaker 8: order to all forty three English and Welsh police forces
Speaker 8: and the British Transport Police to do so, but on
Speaker 8: Wednesday night. The government would not commit yes, the glove
Speaker 8: didn't fit, and they would not commit to implementing the recommendations,
Speaker 8: saying that the reportraub be sent through departments. Blah blah
Speaker 8: blah blah blah, nothing's ever going to happen.
Speaker 2: There's so many problems with this. I mean, firstly, if
Speaker 2: the police don't collect true and accurate data based on
Speaker 2: biology rather than people's self identification, you end up with
Speaker 2: men in female prisons. I think you want to talk
Speaker 2: about that shortly lives, because there was a classic example recently.
Speaker 2: But you also get police failing to catch criminals because
Speaker 2: there's been instances in the UK where they're looking for
Speaker 2: a woman but it's actually a man. In fact, I
Speaker 2: remember a case last year whether it was a missing person,
Speaker 2: and the description of the missing person because they wanted
Speaker 2: to use the preferred pronouns, was completely at odds with
Speaker 2: the person who they're actually searching for. Hence they never
Speaker 2: found the person. And then of course crime data is skewed.
Speaker 2: It's amazing how many women oh in sexual offenses in
Speaker 2: the UK. I don't know what's happened to the Dames
Speaker 2: of England, but maybe it's something in the water.
Speaker 7: Bace ramp and sex fat I'm committing weightful women in
Speaker 7: the UK.
Speaker 6: It's unbelievable. It's unprecedented.
Speaker 7: Actually, the rise of sex crimes in the UK committed
Speaker 7: by women just unbelievable. But every time one of these
Speaker 7: cases comes up, or indeed, anything to do with gender ideology,
Speaker 7: because it's not an ideology. If you ask me, notice
Speaker 7: who's pushing it. It's always the government. It is always
Speaker 7: the government, whether it's in the education system, whether it's
Speaker 7: in the health system, whether it's it doesn't matter where
Speaker 7: it is across the Western world, it's the government saying no,
Speaker 7: I'm not going to tell the police force that they
Speaker 7: need to make a note of their actual biological sex for.
Speaker 6: No reason whatsoever.
Speaker 7: We are supposed to believe that they do this just
Speaker 7: to save the butt hurt.
Speaker 6: Feelings of a tiny minority.
Speaker 7: Really, even when we're talking about keeping the community safe,
Speaker 7: we're supposed to believe that there's not.
Speaker 6: A larger agender at play here.
Speaker 7: No, no, we just want to make sure that a
Speaker 7: small group of people don't get annoyed or angry or
Speaker 7: their feelings When we say, hey, I'm a police person
Speaker 7: and you're you've committed a crime or for whatever.
Speaker 6: Reason your apartment of interest. I have to note your biological.
Speaker 8: Suggest but a man could commit sexual assault on a
Speaker 8: woman and then pretend to be a woman just so
Speaker 8: he gets sent to a woman's prison. What Tosh from
Speaker 8: I say, good day, I'd bite my thumb at.
Speaker 7: You is of course making this example because that's exactly
Speaker 7: what happened in Scotland for the two minutes that Nicola
Speaker 7: Sturgeon was first Minister. You will recall this case. It's
Speaker 7: now infamous. When double rapist Isla Bryson noticed the female name.
Speaker 7: This guy was as masculine as they come. I should
Speaker 7: have put more photos in there for you, just so
Speaker 7: you could witness just how masculine this individual is identified
Speaker 7: as female and got to go to a female prison.
Speaker 7: Until again, you and I are the real are the
Speaker 7: real keepers of justice here, until there was a public
Speaker 7: outcry so big this woman had to concede that, oh,
Speaker 7: actually Isla Bryson shouldn't be in a female prison, and
Speaker 7: he was transferred back to a male prison.
Speaker 6: But check this out. Here is Nikola.
Speaker 7: Sturgeon back in the day, tying herself in, not trying
Speaker 7: to answer really basic questions.
Speaker 9: Do you consider Isla Bryson to be a man or woman?
Speaker 10: And I am not getting into an individ This case
Speaker 10: is still sub judicy apart from infanty else and may
Speaker 10: you be considering Its great for me.
Speaker 11: To see what I did, but the individual case is.
Speaker 2: Still subjudacy and it's important for me as Cross ministers.
Speaker 11: But you believe people should be able to self identify
Speaker 11: their gender.
Speaker 2: What I would see is this individual case.
Speaker 12: It's not the boat, whether the trends or not.
Speaker 13: In this individual case, this is a person who has
Speaker 13: been convicted or.
Speaker 7: Read seriously, like, if that's not what it's about, what
Speaker 7: is it about? You've got a double rapist literally changed
Speaker 7: genders while awaiting trial.
Speaker 6: I mean, wow, how timely she was clear.
Speaker 8: Like she she said, look at before the courts. It's
Speaker 8: subdued to say I can't possibly comment any further, walks
Speaker 8: away and then she starts goes and besides, it's not
Speaker 8: about that.
Speaker 1: It's not because she is a ris.
Speaker 2: It's like, yes, So what it makes of what they've
Speaker 2: ended up with in the UK is if you identify
Speaker 2: as a woman, so you're a man identified as a
Speaker 2: woman but you still have male genitalia, then you cannot
Speaker 2: be jailed in a female prison, But if you don't
Speaker 2: have male genitalia, then you can be in a female prison.
Speaker 2: In other words, whether you're a male or a female
Speaker 2: depends on genitalia. But the whole argument is that doesn't
Speaker 2: work at the other anomaly, of course, is that if
Speaker 2: you're a violent sexual.
Speaker 1: Bataialia does have a bit to do with sexual assault.
Speaker 2: There's the irony, right. So the bottom line with all
Speaker 2: of this is we've just got to answer once and
Speaker 2: for all is gender a fixed biological reality? Is sex
Speaker 2: gender a fixed bological reality? Or is it interchangeable? And
Speaker 2: once you answer that question, everything else becomes obvious. But
Speaker 2: Keir Starma, the Prime Minister. Just two years ago he
Speaker 2: said that ninety nine point nine percent of women do
Speaker 2: not have a penis, which left open the possibility that
Speaker 2: a very small fraction of women do have penises. When
Speaker 2: pressed on that just prior to becoming Prime Minister, he
Speaker 2: had adjusted his answer, but only slightly. He said, well,
Speaker 2: I acknowledge that, according to quote unquote the biology, women
Speaker 2: have vaginas and men have penises, which still left him
Speaker 2: a little bit of regal room for anomaly. So unless
Speaker 2: you finally answer, this not.
Speaker 1: Something you want with either of those descriptions.
Speaker 2: Either babies agree that gender sex is a fixed biological reality.
Speaker 2: Once you agree, so there is every other question.
Speaker 1: Is there answers?
Speaker 2: Should I answer that suentimental principle and the rest becomes clear.
Speaker 8: There is such a simply explanation for this, and both
Speaker 8: sides just do not seem to be able to grasp it,
Speaker 8: and that is that gender and sex are two different things.
Speaker 8: Your sex is your biological sex, and that is whether
Speaker 8: you are male or female, although people are also born
Speaker 8: with both characteristics and the intersex or what used to
Speaker 8: be called amaphrodita. And then there is gender, which is
Speaker 8: how people identify, and that is what people consider a
Speaker 8: social contract. So you can solve all these problems by saying, right,
Speaker 8: the prison you get sent to is based on your sex,
Speaker 8: not by whatever gender you identify with. Now you can
Speaker 8: be you can identify as a woman, but if you
Speaker 8: are a biological man man, then you go to the
Speaker 8: male prison. You can be like Clinger in mash or
Speaker 8: you can be like I believe there's some other You.
Speaker 2: Know, sex and gender have been interchangeable until five minutes ago.
Speaker 2: Well that's a fact. The definitions of d The common
Speaker 2: understanding of these terms was always they mean the same
Speaker 2: thing until five minutes All animals activists tried to confuse
Speaker 2: us all I think all playing games.
Speaker 1: If you want to.
Speaker 8: Look at any other species of animal or any animal,
Speaker 8: and you would say it is this sex or that sex,
Speaker 8: it is a male sex or a female sex, you
Speaker 8: wouldn't say, oh, this is a female gender lion.
Speaker 1: So that's what they're talking about.
Speaker 8: And there have been different, you know, constructs of what
Speaker 8: men and women are meant to do and how they're
Speaker 8: meant to act throughout the ages. But again, if you
Speaker 8: just say, right, this is about sex, not about gender.
Speaker 8: Choose whatever gender you want, good luck to you in
Speaker 8: h wing. But this is for males sex males, and
Speaker 8: this is for sex females.
Speaker 1: You solve all the problems.
Speaker 2: Well, while they're allowing criminal in the UK to select
Speaker 2: their own gender and then preferred place of imprisonment, in Victoria,
Speaker 2: they're asking five year olds what gender they are, which
Speaker 2: would be pretty confusing if you're a kid. The LGBTQIA
Speaker 2: Plus Toolkit, endorsed by the Victorian Labor Government, has been
Speaker 2: provided to public libraries so that they know how to
Speaker 2: create safe, inclusive spaces, and the way they're going to
Speaker 2: do that is by asking children what are their preferred pronouns.
Speaker 2: Imagine that you take your five six year old to
Speaker 2: the library and some librarian who you've never met in
Speaker 2: your life, who has no right at all to speak
Speaker 2: to your child about anything other than books, asks your
Speaker 2: child are you a he or a she? Which seems
Speaker 2: like a pretty obvious question, even to a kid. So
Speaker 2: to be asked that when it is fairly obvious just
Speaker 2: by looking must be incredibly confusing. Well, the Victorian Upper
Speaker 2: House is going to debate this idea, and of course
Speaker 2: Labor have slammed the liberal opposition for saying that this
Speaker 2: should not happen, saying that they're involving in Trump style politics. Liz,
Speaker 2: as soon as you accuse your opponent of engaging in
Speaker 2: Trump style politics, I reckon you've lost the argument because
Speaker 2: you've just conceded you don't have one. Incidentally, Trump style
Speaker 2: politics can't be that bad. If Trump won in a landslide,
Speaker 2: clearly his politics resonate with people. But this is what
Speaker 2: the Equality Minister Vicky Ward is saying in Victorious. She's
Speaker 2: saying that this is just cultural warfare to harm people
Speaker 2: for no good reason. That is, by saying we don't
Speaker 2: want our children to be asked their pronouns by some
Speaker 2: random librarian. Cultural warfare. The Labor Party are calling it.
Speaker 2: Well quote, it's not.
Speaker 7: Wrong, just not in the way she means it. She
Speaker 7: actually hit the nail on the head. Yes this is
Speaker 7: cultural warfare, and.
Speaker 6: Yes you are harming people, little people.
Speaker 7: So this vote took place today in the Victorian Parliament
Speaker 7: and no surprise, this attempt by the Libs to can
Speaker 7: this LGBTIQ toolkit, which by the way is the state
Speaker 7: library's guidelines.
Speaker 6: So remember what I said five seconds ago. It was
Speaker 6: a bit longer than that. But whatever in.
Speaker 7: The previous topic, why is it always the government pushing this?
Speaker 6: And once again the Libs.
Speaker 7: Tried to take them on, said hey we need to
Speaker 7: amend this. We don't want kids in state libraries being
Speaker 7: asked what are your pronouns?
Speaker 6: That's going to upset parents.
Speaker 7: They didn't buy into that by bringing their kids to
Speaker 7: a library, and Labor voted them down twenty two to fourteen.
Speaker 7: This is social engineering.
Speaker 6: At its best.
Speaker 7: And did any of us know about this in September
Speaker 7: when they rolled out this LGBTIQ toolkit in state libraries.
Speaker 7: Was anyone made aware who voted for this, who was
Speaker 7: aware of this? Probably absolutely nobody until someone in the
Speaker 7: Liberal party was like, actually, let's take these guys on.
Speaker 7: This is taking it a step to far. Why are
Speaker 7: we indoctrinating children?
Speaker 6: God knows.
Speaker 7: If you live in Victoria, your kids are slam with
Speaker 7: it twenty four seven just through their schooling system, which
Speaker 7: I bring it up every time. Remember on your state's
Speaker 7: educational website it literally says, if you are unhappy with
Speaker 7: your child transitioning, we will do it behind your back
Speaker 7: at school.
Speaker 6: We don't care, We're going to do it. Do you guys?
Speaker 7: Remember this bang a song a few years ago plays
Speaker 7: in my head every time one of these stories comes
Speaker 7: up from the San Francisco's Men's Squire.
Speaker 9: Bill Convert your children.
Speaker 2: Someone's got to teach them not to Hey.
Speaker 14: We're coming far them, We're coming, are your hip, We're coming, f.
Speaker 1: We're coming my hardship.
Speaker 7: And then there was this this chance, which you may
Speaker 7: recall from the New York Pride parade. Yeah you are,
Speaker 7: because two men can't make your children, two women can't
Speaker 7: make children, So you can bet your bettom dollar, the
Speaker 7: agenda is very real, and they are coming for your children.
Speaker 8: Well, they're doing the things they're doing that obviously sarcastically
Speaker 8: that that is a piss take off. They are the
Speaker 8: accusation from the right that they're coming for our children.
Speaker 8: The problem is that they do that and take the
Speaker 8: piss and then they actually have these programs for children who.
Speaker 7: Have nothing, and this is they claim to be taking
Speaker 7: that that was nonsense.
Speaker 8: But this is the other thing I can't understand, Like
Speaker 8: if a kid is feeling like they are in the
Speaker 8: wrong body or whatever.
Speaker 7: Kids don't our own devices, but they don't.
Speaker 8: I don't think that they would either. But b most
Speaker 8: kids would have no idea what the word pronoun even mean.
Speaker 8: If you ask the kid, what are your pronouns, they'd
Speaker 8: say ice cream now please, And so they wouldn't ever
Speaker 8: say please because they're kids were not mine anyway. But
Speaker 8: the point is so yeah, and again it's the same
Speaker 8: thing just around the board, Like there's a difference between
Speaker 8: letting people you know who they want to be expressive.
Speaker 8: They want to be called themselves whatever they want, act
Speaker 8: however they want, as long as they're not hurting anyone else.
Speaker 8: That's fine, but it's when you say but the rest
Speaker 8: of the world has to comply with this, otherwise you're
Speaker 8: committing a hate crome. So it's not enough that someone says, oh,
Speaker 8: by the way, in case you're wondering, at the bottom
Speaker 8: of my email, these are my pronouns. It's that everyone
Speaker 8: has to put their pronouns just because someone might want
Speaker 8: to put their pronouns. And again, so so every kid
Speaker 8: has to be asked what their pronouns are just because
Speaker 8: some kid might have pronouns and I doubt very much
Speaker 8: that any kid would have.
Speaker 2: And it's pretty obvious why they're doing it with children,
Speaker 2: because if you want to reconfigure or reconstitute human sexuality
Speaker 2: and sexual norms, then it's no good talking to forty
Speaker 2: year olds or fifty year olds. You've got to talk
Speaker 2: to having any sex at all, and it'll be a
Speaker 2: generational thing. That's why they do it. And if you
Speaker 2: want to change the world, you start with kids. Everyone
Speaker 2: does it. The LGBT activists they're doing it as well.
Speaker 2: Just sin to Allen in Victoria, help me out here, Joe,
Speaker 2: because I'm not sure if she's auditioning for a role
Speaker 2: at the twenty thirty two Brisbane Games as a gymnast,
Speaker 2: her back from the back of being incredible, or maybe
Speaker 2: she wants a role in a Hollywood movie. Maybe she's
Speaker 2: been tonighter and done one of those acting courses that
Speaker 2: our public servants have been engaging in, because she has
Speaker 2: suddenly transformed, just in the last couple of weeks into
Speaker 2: a crime fighting superhero. Check this out from her Twitter feed.
Speaker 13: I have some important news to share. The Victorian Parliament
Speaker 13: has just passed Australia's first machete band.
Speaker 11: Getting these dangerous and deadly weapons off our streets. We
Speaker 11: have to keep community safety first. We have to put
Speaker 11: a jolt through the sea, which is why I'll be
Speaker 11: keeping you updated on how our tough new bail laws
Speaker 11: are going through the Victorian Parliament this week.
Speaker 2: So she's going to get machetes off the streets. The
Speaker 2: problem is it's not machetes committing crimes. It's typically young
Speaker 2: people who have been released on bail time and time
Speaker 2: again and they continue to reoffend. So she's going to
Speaker 2: get tough on bail laws. Today.
Speaker 13: I'm introducing this bill into the Victorian Parliament, the Tough
Speaker 13: New Bail Laws Bill. It makes community safety the priority.
Speaker 13: It makes getting bail shrd and easier for more people
Speaker 13: to be put on remand because breaking the law must
Speaker 13: come with consequences, and that is why the Parliament will sit,
Speaker 13: will see it all week, no matter how late, to
Speaker 13: get this bill passed, because every Victorian in every community
Speaker 13: across the state deserves to feel safe.
Speaker 2: Five minutes ago she was talking with that same conviction
Speaker 2: about relaxing laws. But there you go backflip extraordinary. The
Speaker 2: amazing thing about this is that this new law, it's
Speaker 2: actually called the Tough Bail Bill, and the Victorian opposition
Speaker 2: along with the Cross benches are refusing to pass it
Speaker 2: with that name because they say tough bail bill. This
Speaker 2: is not tough at all, and just sin to Alan
Speaker 2: is saying no, no, no, it must pass with the
Speaker 2: name tough in the bill. So she's so committed to
Speaker 2: passing tough bail laws that she will not pass the
Speaker 2: laws unless it has the name tough in there, because
Speaker 2: of course you know that helps her politically.
Speaker 8: This is a classic old political trick and I just
Speaker 8: love it and I laugh my proverbial arth off when
Speaker 8: I heard the Tough Bail Bill and it's literally called
Speaker 8: the tough bail bill. And that means that every time
Speaker 8: the opposition or anyone the Greens or whoever say they
Speaker 8: oppose the tough bail bill, it's like we always like
Speaker 8: the legislation a better Future for our Children bill. It's
Speaker 8: like I oppose the better future for our children. Like
Speaker 8: no one wants to say that, and so you just
Speaker 8: call it something. You know, you know that everybody gets
Speaker 8: one hundred million dollars bill.
Speaker 1: You know, it's fantastic.
Speaker 8: It's something that's having about I don't know, probably since
Speaker 8: about the first rud government they started. In fact, I
Speaker 8: noticed some of the people who came up with the
Speaker 8: first incarnations and I.
Speaker 1: Just absolutely love it.
Speaker 8: But the other thing I love is the penetrating insights
Speaker 8: that have come to this this creat down. And again
Speaker 8: another thing, I remember a New South Wales politician saying
Speaker 8: something to the effect of it was trying to be.
Speaker 1: Really tough a bit like you know what.
Speaker 8: I it's something like, you know, I absolutely one hundred
Speaker 8: percent despise pedophilia.
Speaker 1: It's like, yeah, we all do, mate.
Speaker 8: Like what why to say that? Believe that breathing oxygen
Speaker 8: helps us to be alive? And again you say you've
Speaker 8: got just out coming up and saying breaking the law
Speaker 8: must come with consequence.
Speaker 1: No, when did you When did you realize that.
Speaker 2: Region that's exactly like government.
Speaker 1: This is just dawned on you now, like we know
Speaker 1: that's right.
Speaker 2: That's why.
Speaker 8: What did you think all these guys dressed in navy
Speaker 8: blue were doing wandering around the place. Why do you
Speaker 8: think we had those big buildings with the columns and
Speaker 8: the sort of courthouses and the funny men in wigs
Speaker 8: and black robes.
Speaker 1: What it's like, of course cons that's shades.
Speaker 8: Do you remember when there was that awful stabbing in
Speaker 8: Queensland and someone came and someone was stabbed with the
Speaker 8: Christian kitchen knife. Someone says, oh, well, we've got a
Speaker 8: band kitchen knives.
Speaker 1: It's like wow, it's like no more.
Speaker 8: Stabbing didn't occur on the set of Master Chef. It
Speaker 8: occurred in the middle of a youth crime epidemic that
Speaker 8: is running rampant through your regional centers. That's why it
Speaker 8: wasn't that the you know, people are seriously considering.
Speaker 1: I think maybe once we do it.
Speaker 8: We're not gonna We're we're going to restrict the sale
Speaker 8: of these knives and supernotes and again, yes, banded machetes. Obviously,
Speaker 8: that's probably a no brainer. When you've got people running
Speaker 8: down Chapel Street waving one around. I mean, the minute
Speaker 8: anyone's running down Chapel Street wearing anything that's even sort
Speaker 8: of not gender neutral, that's a warning sign, let alone
Speaker 8: a machete.
Speaker 2: I mean, there was a fifteen year old kid just
Speaker 2: the other day arrested for attacking someone with a machete
Speaker 2: in the street. This fifteen year old kid was, of
Speaker 2: course out on bail for previous offenses. Now that's right,
Speaker 2: attacking someone just carry smaller.
Speaker 6: Knights, victorious only during stage of.
Speaker 7: Switch plates and jolly deadly please machete.
Speaker 8: That is the problem everywhere, Like actually says we're the
Speaker 8: only state to have band machetes.
Speaker 1: It's like, yes, because you're the only state where people
Speaker 1: are running around.
Speaker 8: Terrorizing people with machetes, because you have a youth crime.
Speaker 7: Problem, because is you banned guns, so people start using knives.
Speaker 6: Now you're talking about banning knives. Guess what they're going
Speaker 6: to come up with something else.
Speaker 1: You're bringing back guns as the.
Speaker 6: I'd advocate for that. I'm no surprises that.
Speaker 2: Everyone knows that TikTok is on the nose with politicians
Speaker 2: the US until Trump on the election, we're going to
Speaker 2: ban it. So China has come out with a new
Speaker 2: social media platform called Red Note, which literally means little
Speaker 2: red book. That's say nod to the Communist Party.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: The problem with TikTok, of course, was concern over data
Speaker 2: safety because all companies in China have to provide information
Speaker 2: to the Communist Party. The same applies to Red Note.
Speaker 2: But it's more than just data privacy that's at issue.
Speaker 2: This social media platform seems to be spreading all sorts
Speaker 2: of myths and disinformation, which is really lies about the
Speaker 2: upcoming federal election, particularly when it pertains to policies from
Speaker 2: the coalition. Have look at these clips that are doing
Speaker 2: the rounds on this social media platform used by Chinese Australians.
Speaker 2: Talking here Peter Dutton threatening to deport Chinese Australians, when
Speaker 2: of course he said no such thing.
Speaker 9: Let me be clear about the resolve of future Coalition
Speaker 9: government under my leadership. Is My message to this recalcitrant
Speaker 9: minority is simple. You will not change us. If you
Speaker 9: do not subscribe to the Australian way of life, leave
Speaker 9: this country. What makes the Australian achievement so special is
Speaker 9: that we are a country built from migration, which is
Speaker 9: avoided boganization. Also, we thought there are people in our
Speaker 9: country today who do not want to change for Australia,
Speaker 9: but want Australia to change for them, and this cannot
Speaker 9: and will not stand. My message to this reckelcitrant minority
Speaker 9: is simple, you will not change us. If you do
Speaker 9: not subscribe to the Australian way of life, leave this country,
Speaker 9: um and food.
Speaker 6: The more Peter Dundant downsht so.
Speaker 2: Clearly, for many Chinese Australians whose English might not be
Speaker 2: so good, this is incredibly misleading. But thank god Liz
Speaker 2: the e Safety Commissioner is all over it.
Speaker 6: Yeah, because she's not. She's not Where is she when
Speaker 6: you need? Look? I just I do not know what
Speaker 6: to make of this. The first thing I.
Speaker 7: Thought when reading all about this red note was like, Okay,
Speaker 7: what fresh censorious hell is the government going to foist
Speaker 7: upon us in the name of Oh look, there's so
Speaker 7: much misinformation disinformation circulating.
Speaker 6: We've got to do something.
Speaker 10: Now.
Speaker 7: Here's the thing in the age of AI now, which
Speaker 7: is what that was obviously in.
Speaker 6: The age of AI.
Speaker 7: In the age of technology that we're living in, there
Speaker 7: is no getting this genie back in the bottle. You
Speaker 7: think that's bad, wait for the stuffs to come. Like seriously,
Speaker 7: you can give anything your head, your voice, somebody else
Speaker 7: can and have anyone saying anything at any given time
Speaker 7: and circulate.
Speaker 6: It can go completely viral exactly.
Speaker 1: And all those photos of me all over the internet.
Speaker 2: On that note, we're going to go to a break,
Speaker 2: but stick around. Coming up is the papers, including AMP
Speaker 2: demands staff agreed to be filmed when working from home.
Speaker 2: We'll talk about that in a month. Okay, welcome back.
Speaker 2: Let's check out what's making news tomorrow. We'll start with
Speaker 2: The Australian. There's some good stories on the front page
Speaker 2: of tomorrow's OS.
Speaker 7: Living there is indeed, and if you work for AMP,
Speaker 7: you especially want to listen up. AMP wants eyes on
Speaker 7: its staff, even at their home. Staff at AMP have
Speaker 7: been given one week to sign contracts that enable their
Speaker 7: employer to carry out continuous video surveillance of them, including
Speaker 7: when working from home, allowing the company to sell their
Speaker 7: personal information, and which could require them to undergo a
Speaker 7: medical examination by a doctor chosen by AMP workplace law
Speaker 7: expert Andrew Stewart said he had never seen a more
Speaker 7: one sided contract in favor of an employer, highlighting how
Speaker 7: the contract also prevented an employee seeking advice about it
Speaker 7: from a lawyer or accountant without amp's permission, and required
Speaker 7: terminated employees to assist a MP in any legal proceedings
Speaker 7: for up to seven years.
Speaker 1: That sounds reasonable enough. I can't understand what all the
Speaker 1: has been sign this. Oh my god, it is just
Speaker 1: that is just bonded part.
Speaker 8: And it's such a surprise for me too, because you know,
Speaker 8: a company that has had such a strong recent track
Speaker 8: record and its staffing arrangements, it's hr it's workplace culture.
Speaker 8: It strikes me stranging imp coming from this incredible position
Speaker 8: of moral and commercial strength, would suddenly be applying these
Speaker 8: kinds of onerous restrictions about its employees in.
Speaker 1: Their own home.
Speaker 2: Maybe their geniuses, Maybe it's a trick. Maybe they put
Speaker 2: this contract in front of prospective in plployees and if
Speaker 2: the prospective employee signs it, they know we don't want
Speaker 2: that person to try for us, because clearly we put.
Speaker 8: It's an example of the of an outrageous intrusion into
Speaker 8: your personal life that you were meant to only again again.
Speaker 2: Sign this and agree to it. Don't employ it, right.
Speaker 8: We only want people with the moral courage to speak
Speaker 8: out against these contracts.
Speaker 1: I'm sure we are forcedly sure. That's a test.
Speaker 6: It's a test. Don't sign it.
Speaker 12: Another headline on the os Bowen's net zero to one
Speaker 12: hundred car wreck the local loss of a Japanese the
Speaker 12: local boss rather sorry, mate, The.
Speaker 7: Local boss of a Japanese murdering giant has declared Australian
Speaker 7: car yards breaming with electric vehicles that people do not
Speaker 7: want to buy, and warned that the price of petrol
Speaker 7: cars could rise unless labor overhauls its vehicle emissions standards.
Speaker 7: In a new front in the growing industry push for
Speaker 7: Anthony Albanezi to revamp his climate and energy policy, Mitsubishi
Speaker 7: Motors Australia chief executive Sean Westcott. So the government needed
Speaker 7: to think the aggressive of the aggressiveness of its targets
Speaker 7: aimed at lowering the carbon footprint of new cars by
Speaker 7: sixty percent by twenty thirty.
Speaker 6: I mean, how do you like that it's less than
Speaker 6: five years away? Do you really think.
Speaker 7: You're going to make it less than sixty percent by
Speaker 7: twenty thirty.
Speaker 1: What a joke.
Speaker 2: This story is pretty funny because not only is the
Speaker 2: boss of Mitsubishi speaking out, but the boss of Toyota
Speaker 2: has also spoken out. But it's only recently that the
Speaker 2: boss of Toyota was standing with Chris Bowen as he
Speaker 2: introduced these new vehicle efficiency standards into the Parliament. Well
Speaker 2: now exact right later, he's saying it's going to be
Speaker 2: a challenge. The article goes on to quote the boss
Speaker 2: of Mitsubishi here in Australia saying we can't force people
Speaker 2: to buy evs. Trage achieves exactly what Chris Bowen is
Speaker 2: trying to come with these efficiency the standards, which I
Speaker 2: mean effectures. Reckon, they'll pay two point seven billion dollars
Speaker 2: in fines over the next five years because they just
Speaker 2: won't meet this government imposed quota of evs that have
Speaker 2: to be sold as compared to internal combustion engines.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 8: Look, and I am hearing things and things. My mechanic
Speaker 8: tells me he's always the first to know. According to him,
Speaker 8: Prince Charles is already dead. So yeah, but there is
Speaker 8: definitely issues with what is going on in the automotive
Speaker 8: industry and the emission standards that are being imposed that
Speaker 8: are being sort of worked.
Speaker 1: Around, I believe.
Speaker 8: I think Volkswagen and porschew already have some bit of
Speaker 8: experience in workarounds in emissions.
Speaker 1: It's a very interesting the one.
Speaker 8: Let's go to the Adelaide advertised Adelaide, I've always said,
Speaker 8: is the city of the future. It's Melbourne before Melbourne
Speaker 8: became too cool for school and collapsed under the weight
Speaker 8: of its own pretentiousness. And Adelaide also has the very
Speaker 8: good fortune to be governed by the mighty Peter Melanowskus.
Speaker 8: And this is what happens when you work for a
Speaker 8: mighty news court massthead such as the Advertiser, which is
Speaker 8: a magnificent paper that runs my column sometimes, and you
Speaker 8: need to go and get a campaign moving that gets
Speaker 8: people talking, that puts eyeballs on the front page, and
Speaker 8: it has people chatting at the pub over the water cooler,
Speaker 8: the old fashioned barbecue stuff.
Speaker 1: So you think, right, we want.
Speaker 8: To get a campaign up that Peter Melanowskus will listen
Speaker 8: to that tells Peter how much farmers are suffering and
Speaker 8: what he needs to do to help them.
Speaker 1: So what do they do they go and get.
Speaker 8: Nine farmers all called Pete, to tell Pete what he
Speaker 8: needs to do so they can write the headline for.
Speaker 1: Pete's sake too.
Speaker 8: Good quality pabloid journalism at its best. So farmers called
Speaker 8: Peter have a message for their premiere namesake a coincidence,
Speaker 8: he said, all having to be Collpete. We need help
Speaker 8: for Pete's sake. The Peters of the bush are herding.
Speaker 8: They're in the midst of a record breaking drought and
Speaker 8: they need help. They want another bloke called Peter who
Speaker 8: runs the state, to hear their plight. Today the advertiser
Speaker 8: launchers for Pete's sake again, always come up with the
Speaker 8: headline first and then the story will take care of himself.
Speaker 1: A campaign telling the stories of farmers called Peter to
Speaker 1: call for help in the region.
Speaker 2: In journalism, eighteen year old cadet journalists.
Speaker 1: You're sitting there minding your own business.
Speaker 8: You're just sipping your morning coffee, and the chief of
Speaker 8: stuff come off.
Speaker 1: You go, mate, got a great idea.
Speaker 8: We want you to go and find everyone you can
Speaker 8: in the phone book called Kevin Rudd and everyone.
Speaker 1: And have it all the time like something. Say you
Speaker 1: know Rudd road. You know, it's like you'll need to be.
Speaker 8: All the people on Rudd Road to tell us why
Speaker 8: Australia is heading down the wrong road or.
Speaker 1: Everyone, every everyone.
Speaker 8: A poll of two hundred people called John Howard it
Speaker 8: is just quality, quality stuff.
Speaker 1: There you go, it'sn't been proud.
Speaker 2: Let's go to the front page of the Daily Telegraph.
Speaker 2: Small business battlers are choked out engine failure, reads the headline.
Speaker 2: The engine room of Australia's economy is spluttering, with hard working,
Speaker 2: self employed small business owners now and estimated eighteen percent
Speaker 2: worse off than in twenty twenty two. That's quite a
Speaker 2: decline and it comes as food prices, energy insurance, rent
Speaker 2: and wage increases of fuel to surge in hospitality businesses shuttering.
Speaker 2: I think that should be shutting, with closures hitting a
Speaker 2: record high of nine point three percent in the year
Speaker 2: to February according to creditor Watch. I don't think anyone
Speaker 2: is really surprised by that headline. Obviously, all of those
Speaker 2: cost increases plus wages are affecting small business owners and
Speaker 2: there's only so much you can increase the price of
Speaker 2: your coffee or your croissant before people just aren't buying
Speaker 2: them anymore. So little wonder small business owners are doing
Speaker 2: it tough, Liz.
Speaker 7: Indeed, and before we go to a break to the
Speaker 7: front page of the Old's Son, We've just told you
Speaker 7: about Alan in Victoria getting rid of machetes. They're band
Speaker 7: now and you've got tough fail laws. And this is
Speaker 7: the splash of the paper the very next day. Youth
Speaker 7: crime highest in recorded history seven four hundred and sixty
Speaker 7: four home invasions.
Speaker 6: In past year. Can you even leave that government shamed?
Speaker 1: As shot?
Speaker 7: Crime stats revealed you've failed Victoria. But still we face
Speaker 7: months waiting for tougher laws to keep us safe. I
Speaker 7: rather imagine that's going to really take the wind out
Speaker 7: of her sales.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 8: Actually, interestingly, another exclusive revelation contained within this top secret report.
Speaker 1: Breaking the law must come with consequences.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, you heard it here. First, let's go to
Speaker 2: a break. When we come back, you've heard about toddler's
Speaker 2: doying tantrums. Well, Sidney, mums are being invited to throw tantrums.
Speaker 2: Will show you that in a moment. All right, we've
Speaker 2: all been to shopping centers and watch toddlers throw tantrums
Speaker 2: as mums stand there not knowing what to do. But
Speaker 2: what about mums throwing tantrums? Well, mums in Sydney's in
Speaker 2: a wester being offered the chance to throw tantrums in
Speaker 2: a non judgmental environment. I'll let organizer Julius Steboska explain.
Speaker 10: We bring a pillow just in case you actually want
Speaker 10: to hit something, because we all know that toddlers do
Speaker 10: that too. And then after that, once we move through
Speaker 10: the anger phase, often mothers start to feel sadness because
Speaker 10: the anger is just like the outer layer, and the
Speaker 10: inner layer is the sadness. And so we give the
Speaker 10: opportunity to grieve, to shed some tears in that safe environment,
Speaker 10: and then we wrap ourselves in blankets and we feel
Speaker 10: really nice and held.
Speaker 2: I'm sure Julia is a wonderful person, but I can't
Speaker 2: imagine why kids are struggling at the moment.
Speaker 6: If that's full, that is just beyond embarrassing.
Speaker 7: Call child Protection services and are in charge of children.
Speaker 8: We've got pillows before.
Speaker 6: We go tonight. Check this out.
Speaker 7: You all know of the massive ego of Donald J. Trump,
Speaker 7: and he's in his honeymoon period as the once again
Speaker 7: ruling king of the free world, and yet He's taken
Speaker 7: a little bit of time out of an interview on
Speaker 7: the Ingram Circle to tell people he has identified at
Speaker 7: least one thing that Joe Biden can do that he cannot.
Speaker 5: Well, the only thing I totally admired about sleepy Joe
Speaker 5: Biden is the following. He'd go to a beach, He'd
Speaker 5: lay down in a cart, barely able to get his
Speaker 5: feet through the sand. He'd lay down and within minutes
Speaker 5: he's sleeping, and you have cameras watching him. I could
Speaker 5: never do that.
Speaker 2: I would never be able to sleep like that.
Speaker 5: That's about the only thing I think that was wonderful.
Speaker 5: He was a disaster. This man was a disaster.
Speaker 6: I don't sleep much. You don't sleep much.
Speaker 5: A lot of people that love what they're doing don't
Speaker 5: sleep much, I find, And so far it's been okay,
Speaker 5: don't tell.
Speaker 6: Me this man has no humility. Check that out, living proof.
Speaker 2: The ability to sleep anywhere, at any time is a
Speaker 2: great skill. You got to admire Biden.
Speaker 8: It's nothing more humble than telling people what an incredibly
Speaker 8: hard worker you are.
Speaker 7: But also, was it sleeping or just slipping into Unconsciousesit
Speaker 7: we gotta go.
Speaker 2: That's it from us stick around. Coming up is the
Speaker 2: Reader Pendery Show Goodn't I