WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 3 October

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>On scolds Astodio.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 2>This is the winder Panalty Show.

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.239
<v Speaker 3>Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panecky Show coming

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 3>up tonight, a massive program.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 4>We've saved the best for last.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Douglas Murray will be with me shortly with a message

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 3>for the Australian anti Israeli activists who plan to march

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 3>on October seven. Also joining me tonight is Nick Kata,

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Kreshua Gator and Kimsey Schofield.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 4>And an extended edition of.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Left Is Losing It, starring multiple MSNBC anchors including Nicole Wallace.

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 5>The Audacity is it? Someone should start that star star?

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 5>Are you effing kidding me?

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's start with those planned protests on October seven. Opposition

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 3>leader Peter Dutton has criticized Victorian premierges Into Allen for

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 3>her government's weak response to these anti Israeli agitators, and

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 3>he pointed out that the Labor government was more than

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 3>willing to stamp out protests during the COVID era.

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 6>I think the Premier is at odds with the majority

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 6>of Victorians who would not support the celebration of death.

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 6>So what is the justification for the Premier here not

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 6>to do everything at her disposal to stop these protests

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 6>from taking place. She was part of a government that

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 6>deployed the police force here in Victoria during the course

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 6>of COVID to enforce the rule of law, and I

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 6>think the Victorian Labor Party should have the same resolve

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 6>in relation to this issue. If there is a will,

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 6>there is a way to stop these protests, Let's bring in.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Nick Caton, our senior fellow at the Menzies Research Center

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 3>and a columnists with the Australian newspaper Nick Peter Darton

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 3>makes a fair point at BET. I can't imagine how

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 3>devastating it would be for members of the Jewish community

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 3>to deal with protests on October seven, on the first

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 3>anniversary of what was the biggest massacre of Jews since

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 3>the Holocaust.

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. It's a very sad day Reta. I've been

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>anticipating this day for some time, knowing we'd get to

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that anniversary and we'd have to look back and think

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>about those horrible events, the most devastating attack on Jewish

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>people since the Holocaust. The thought that anybody would be

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>on the streets protesting against Israel and in favor of

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>those Hamas terrorists and indeed the Hesbalah terrorist organization as

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>well is just chilling. I just don't know what gets

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>into people. And I know that every right minded Australian,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever they feel about the Middle East, will be sympathizing

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Jewish community on Monday, who has suffered a

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>grievous loss. And what Jacinta Allen is doing once again,

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>she's siding with the extremists on the fringe, and she's

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>not supporting every day Victorians who want to be able

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to go about their business and take to the streets

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>if they so choose to mourn and to share those

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>memories together. It is deeply seekening. But finally, I just

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>say this reader on this topic, I thought people like

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Jacinta Allen was supposed to be in favor of peaceful multiculturalism.

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Whatever happened to that idea that we could all just

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>get along and put our differences aside and all be

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the same side. You know, that's what

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>multiculturalism is surely about. But this is a horrible phenomena,

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>the rise of this anti semitism and pro terrorist sentiment

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 1>which is just fueling anger and making Australian streets a

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>very uncomfortable place to be for people from the Jewish community.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, in Sydney, the planned pro Palestinian anti Israeli protest

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>is going to go ahead, despite police applying to the

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 3>New South Wales Supreme Court to stop the event. Nick

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 3>at least New South Wales has a permit system. There's

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 3>nothing of the sort here in Victoria. And the leftist

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 3>activists are loving that. They proudly call Melbourne the protest

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 3>capital of Australia.

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, indeed, but look, I mean, this is a chance

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>for the New South Wales police to redeem themselves after

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that appalling incident last year on October the ninth. We've

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>got to remember those October ninth demonstrations at the Sydney

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Opera House were not authorized reta. They just chose to

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>march on down towards the Opera House and the police

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>were too weak to stop them. I just hope that

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>the police are ready for a proper exercise in strong

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>policing this time and aren't going to take that lenient

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>view they did on October ninth. We'll all be watching.

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>This is their chance to prove that they can keep

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the peace without fear or favor. And I think what

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the New South Wales Police do on Monday will be

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>very critical.

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, we can't allow mob rule, and that's what's

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 3>been happening. It seems that the police force is trying

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 3>to appease those that they fear are going to become

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 3>agitated and violent if they try to stop them doing.

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 4>Whatever it is they're doing now.

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 3>In a further sign of the growing frustration of the

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Australian business community with the Albanezi government, the Business Council

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 3>of Australia has lash proposed industrial relation changes from one

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 3>of Australia's largest unions, with the group's chief executives saying

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 3>that implementing the act used plans would and I quote,

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 3>take a sledgehammer to the economy by adding cost and

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 3>complexity for businesses at the worst possible time, while not

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 3>improving productivity. Nick Again, this is a huge departure from

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 3>the way some in big business held hands with Sally

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 3>McManus and the ACTU. You'll remember that job summit where

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 3>they were thinking they were all going to come out

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 3>winners and the Business Council of Australia I think at

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the time got played badly. Is big business finally waking up.

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look sitting in terms of sitting around the campfire

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>singing Kumbaya and holding hands doesn't work. They should have

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>known that, of course, but you know, I suppose they

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they had to go at trying to do things a

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 1>nice way. But look, the alban Easy government has just

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>done well since it came into government. It's been doing

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>making up for the favors the union movement has done

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it and make it paying back the debt to the

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>union movement which gives millions of dollars to the Labor Party,

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>as we know, by making the laws once again in

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>favor of the unions, the big unions who just take

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the public for granted and just just go out there

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>out for themselves. So I'm glad the BCA and the

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Mining Council, incidentally, the Minerals Council have woken up to

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this now because you know, we really have to resist

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this anti government. It's anti sorry, this anti business government

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>which has come in with no idea how the real

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>economy works, and she's making life very very hard for

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>ordinary Australians.

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Now, just before you go, we're hearing that Senator Fatima Payman,

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 3>who was a Labor Senator and then quit the party

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 3>to become an independent. She's apparently only weeks away from

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 3>launching her own political party. She's got help now. Her

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 3>new chief of staff is the preference whisperer Glen Drury.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Does that mean she's going to succeed because he has

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 3>been remarkably successful in the past in having candidates with

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 3>very small number of votes win seats.

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, you wouldn't be surprised. You look at some of

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the riff rap that ends up in the Senate read

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of different party banners through this preference system. It happens, right,

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think what worries me about Senator Payment's idea

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of what a party should be. I mean, sure, she's

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>free to set up her own party more than Marria

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I say, but if she's going to build her party

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>around Islamism, then that's deeply troubling. We've never before in

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Australia had a political party built around a religion or

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a faith. That's a development which none of us want

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to see. We like to think that politics is politics.

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Faith is another thing. And if they're going to turn

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>this into a party that's defined by the Islamic religion,

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that is extremely troubling and we should all be worried

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>about that.

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Nikita, thank you for your time this evening. Thank you

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 4>joining me now.

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Is best selling author of groundbreaking works, including his latest

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 3>The War on the West. Douglas Murray Douglas, I'm keen

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 3>to get your thoughts on the major escalation in the

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Middle East with Iran's direct attacks against Israel.

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 4>But first, the vice.

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Presidential debate was on yesterday, and again we had the

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 3>moderators trying to be participants.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 4>But despite that, jd.

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Vance put in a solid performance that even the New

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 3>York Times called dominant.

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 7>You've got to pretend that Donald Trump didn't deliver rising

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 7>take Coompey, which of course he did. You've got to

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 7>pretend that Donald Trump didn't deliver lower inflation, which of

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 7>course he did. And then you've simultaneously got to defend

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 7>Kamala Harris's atrocious economic record.

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Douglas, what are your thoughts on the debate and how

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 3>much impact, if any, will it have on the election.

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, the received wisdom, Rita is that VP

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 8>picks don't have that much influence on the race. That

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 8>I don't think is actually true. I think they do

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 8>have more influence thans often said, but it's also often

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 8>said that the VP debates don't have all that much influence,

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 8>and again I don't think that's the case. On this occasion.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 8>This was the first time for the American public to

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 8>see JD. Vance and Tim Walls going head to head

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 8>and to judge both men. I have to say, I mean,

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 8>I think that it's pretty clear and that the New

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 8>York Times was for once right. I think the evening

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 8>was JD. Vance's. He seemed to be on top of

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 8>all of the issues that came up. He was respectful,

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 8>he was was sharp, he was likable, and much more.

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 8>And Tim Walls was, to use one of his own

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 8>favorite words, well, he was weird. He looked all the

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 8>time as if he had walked in from somewhere else,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 8>from some other set or some other job application. It

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 8>looked like somebody who turned up for the wrong job

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 8>interview and then was rather startled to discover it was

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 8>the vice presidential debate. And of course he had the

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 8>worst the evening, worst moment of the evening when he

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 8>was asked about why he lied about being in China

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 8>at the time of Channeman Square, and he replied by saying,

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 8>I think the American public. You know, know that I

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 8>grew up in a house with a family, among Americans,

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 8>and you know, we have food on the table, and

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 8>we had a table and food.

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 6>And.

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 8>He just he just, I mean, even the biased moderators

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 8>did end up, after about what felt like forty eight

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 8>hours of this waffle, did end up saying, yeah, but

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 8>what about your claim that you were in Tiana and

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 8>square and and he did that great clintonism. I think

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 8>a phrase it wasn't a word that wasn't in the

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 8>language until the Clintons, which was I misspoke, And you know,

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I suppose it could happen to any of us. Rita,

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 8>I sometimes claim to have been at the D Day landings.

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 8>I often claim to have been there waving the Titanic

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 8>off as she sets sail. You know, it's easily done,

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 8>and it's just, you know, if you do catch me

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 8>doing it, Rita, I just misspoke, that's all.

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 4>It's an innocent mistake.

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 3>And I know you grew up in a household with

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 3>a family, and you had your dinners on tables with

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 3>four legs, so it's all tables. And now you are

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 3>focused on the facts, the consequential issues of this debate

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 3>and election. But others in the media are fixated on

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 3>other things like JD.

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 4>Vance's beard.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not talking about teen Vogue here, but Politico,

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 3>which has published this, Yes, Vance's beard matters. Vance is

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 3>the first White House wanna Be to wear facial hair

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 3>in eighty years. They go on to say how masculine

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 3>beards are and I quote that can be positive to some,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 3>reading a strength and competence, but to others, specially women,

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 3>it can be negative, conveying aggression and opposition to feminist ideals.

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 3>And this isn't the first time Politico has published a

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 3>piece about JD.

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 4>Vance's facial hair.

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 3>There was this in July with the headline yes JD

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Vance's beard matters. Here is a whin I am kine

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.239
<v Speaker 3>on your thoughts, Douglas.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 8>It's very strange, isn't it. I mean, it suggests that

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 8>anything that looks like masculinity and competence would put off women.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 8>I have to say, I think the only women would

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 8>think that are ones with pretty big beards themselves. Quite frankly,

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 8>I don't think that most women find I don't think

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 8>most women find men having hair to be off putting.

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 8>I don't actually think Contra Politico and these other rather

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 8>sexist publications actually that women are disturbed by competence. This

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 8>is just the extraordinary sort of demonstration that we've seen

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 8>for a long time of the way in which, frankly,

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 8>people keep on wanting to make these elections about things

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 8>other than the issues. And whenever the Republicans have been

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 8>accused of doing that, the Democrat media said, that's because

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 8>they don't have anything to run on. They're out of ideas.

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 8>I would have said that at the point that you're

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 8>having to talk about JD. Vance's beard and how it

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 8>might put off non bearded women, you're really in the sticks,

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 8>because frankly, there was a lot more that came out

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 8>of the vice presidential debate, and there should be a

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 8>lot more coming out of it, because America, like Australia

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 8>and other Western democracies, faces huge problems. It faces immigration crisis,

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 8>it faces financial crises, if faces international crises. And the

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 8>fact is, I'm afraid that just as we have a

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 8>lot of people in the political class who are just

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 8>not up to dealing with these things, so we have

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 8>a lot of people in the legacy media class who

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 8>are so unable to actually work out what's going on

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 8>in the world, in the economy, and much more that

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 8>all they can do is zoom in on facial hair

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 8>and it's their fault, not jd Vance's.

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Now, let's turn our minds to the escalating conflict in

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East, with Israel hitting targets in Bayrout, hitting

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Hezbila strongholds. Yesterday we saw Iran launch around two hundred

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 3>missiles at Israel, some of which struck Israeli airfields. Israel

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 3>has promised to hit back Iran with precision and power.

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 8>Douglas.

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 3>President Joe Biden is talking about reintroducing sanctions on Iran,

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 3>but he has ruled out supporting Israeli strike on Iran's

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 3>nuclear sites. How do you see the US's support of

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Israel and what we can expect to see from Israel next.

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 8>First of all, when Donald Trump left office, the Mullers

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 8>and Tehran were begging him to lift the sanctions because

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 8>they weren't able to do anything and at home they

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 8>were in real trouble. And when Joe Biden into office,

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 8>of course, he did lift many of those sanctions, and

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 8>he gave a huge cash bonanza to the revolutionary Islamic

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 8>government in Tehran. It's only because they've had this cash

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 8>bonanza that they can afford to continue to arm these

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 8>colonialist armies like Hamas in Gaza, like hesbal Lah in Lebanon,

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 8>and the Huti militias in Yemen. It's only because of

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 8>the cash bonanza that the Mullers have had that they're

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 8>able to do all.

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Of these things.

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 8>It's a little late in the day now for Joe

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 8>Biden to talk about turning off the spigot in his

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 8>last few days in office. I wish he would, but

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 8>I bet he won't. As for the actual retaliation, sorry,

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 8>we've been here before some months ago, when hundreds and

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 8>hundreds of rockets were fired from Iranian territory from the

0:16:55.280 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 8>Iranian government and its forces at Israel. That was. That

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 8>was these readies were told by Joe Biden famously that

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 8>they should keep the win because an international force managed

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 8>to shoot down almost all of those rockets. Well, this

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 8>is another occasion when they've done it. First of all,

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 8>by the way, it's a sign of the Muller's weakness.

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 8>Their forces have been decimated in their Hamas forces there,

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 8>hes Bee Laugh forces have been decimated in Lebanon, including

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 8>their murderers who're not only murderer Israelis, but murdered two

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 8>hundred and forty one American servicemen in nineteen eighty three

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 8>in the in the marine Beirut Barracks bombing. So once

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 8>again Israel has been doing the work that America should

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 8>have done in getting those terrorists. The hooties in Yemen

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 8>are discovering quite fast that if you launch rockets at Israel,

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 8>they'll do something.

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Back at you.

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.719
<v Speaker 8>And now the Iranian Revolutionary government is having to do

0:17:55.760 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 8>it itself because it's terror proxies have been being wiped

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 8>out one by one in the last year, and so

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 8>they think they can dare to do this. My suggestion

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 8>should be that if you send ballistic missiles into another country,

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 8>that country has the right to respond, and Israel should

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 8>respond with a full force that its government and military

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 8>believe it should respond with, and I would hope that

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 8>America and any other country would do likewise. You can't

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 8>tell me, nobody can tell me that if hundreds of

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 8>ballistic missiles have been fired into Australia or Great Britain,

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 8>or Canada or America in the last couple of days,

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 8>that we would listen to An ally telling us don't

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 8>do anything back. Sorry, no, too late for that time

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 8>them all has got a lesson closer to home.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 3>And I do wonder whether the reality is that even

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 3>if Israel do eliminate Iran's proxies Hamas and Hezbollah, until

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 3>there's regime change in Iran, unless there's real pressure applied

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 3>on Iran, that we're still going to have this issue continue.

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Israel's going to continue to be under threat from whatever.

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Group Iran fund.

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 8>The whole region.

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 3>The absolutely, and it's yeah, it's beyond Israel.

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 3>How do you see Katar's role not just in this

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 3>conflict in the Middle East, but the enormous influence it

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 3>has in the West.

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 4>And how does such.

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 3>A tiny country only around three hundred thousand odd citizens.

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 4>Most of the.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Population there are expatriates and migrant workers haws, such a

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 3>tiny country managed to have this profound influence in the West.

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, with Katar, it's just this just money,

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 8>that's all. That's all just money. That's Catar is only

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 8>only virtue. And if you say you read to it,

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 8>it's a few hundred thousand people sucking off the teats

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 8>of the royal family who themselves, just enriched themselves and

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 8>of course live lives of enormous luxury. Otherwise, as you mentioned,

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 8>there's this slave class that the s the slave State

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 8>of Katar keeps there, and that's the country. They've managed

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.959
<v Speaker 8>to do a significant amount of buying up in the West,

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 8>in Britain, universities like King's College, London, in America, serious

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 8>Ivy formerly Serious Ivy League colleges and much more. And

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 8>if you ask where a lot of the hatred and

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 8>bigotry and racism of the last year has come from,

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 8>it's Katar doing this buying up influence. Abroad, I would

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 8>suggest that people turn this around, whether you like it

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 8>or not. In the last two years since Putin invaded Ukraine,

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:53.479
<v Speaker 8>the international community managed to snap sanctions and really pretty

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 8>heavy handed in many ways, sanctions against almost anyone associated

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 8>with Vladimir Putin, seized oligarch's yachts and houses, and much more. Abroad. Well,

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 8>I would suggest it's high time since the terrorists sponsing,

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 8>sponsoring slave State of Katar has been wreaking its own

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 8>mini form of havoc. Mini compared to their friends in Tehran.

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 8>Across the region and the wider world, we make it clear.

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 8>Actually we aren't going to be bought and they're the

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 8>vulnerable ones here, and I hope that that is made clear,

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 8>and it should be. I'd like to see them, like

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 8>the revolutionary Islamic government in Tehran, strangled and throttled by

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 8>sanctions and more, because they have got away with buying

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 8>us up at too cheap a price for too long.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 8>And I hope it changes.

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Before you go. October seven anniversary is days away, the

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 3>first anniversary of the terrorist attacks launched by her Mass

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 3>and here in Australia there will be anti Israeli protests

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 3>held on October seven taking place. Shamefully, they expect to

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 3>see terrorist flags, the flags of Hazbullah, for example, flying in.

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Melbourne and Sydney. This is the.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Worst casualty attack against the Jewish population since the Holocaust,

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 3>and yet we're going to have people Douglas marching against Israel,

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 3>the only Jewish state, on that day. And I do

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 3>wonder about the left's unholy alliance with Islamist forces and

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 3>how much of a genuine threat it is. Do you

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 3>see it as I do, as a threat to Western civilization?

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 8>You know, retail When I was in Australia, recently, I

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 8>saw you, I saw these protests as in Sydney and Melbourne.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 8>They're a world away from this aspect of the world,

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 8>a total world away. Australia has suffered some terror attacks

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 8>in recent years, most noticeably against its citizens in Bali.

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 8>But these people marching on the streets of Australian cities,

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 8>the Australian public should know who these people are. They're

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 8>terrorists and the terrorist sympathizers. They're sympathizing and supporting exactly

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 8>the same people as the people who massacred the Australian

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 8>holiday makers in Bali. These are sick people and they've

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 8>got a mesage for them. They're also losing. They are losing.

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 8>The people whose flags they are going to wave in

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 8>great Australian cities are the flags of organizations that are

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 8>going into the dust as we speak. These people will

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 8>look back on this in ten years time with about

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 8>as much pride as a group of neo Nazis in

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 8>the nineteen fifties waving a swastika. Hamaz is nearly gone,

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 8>the hooties are almost gone. Hezbala is almost gone in

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 8>its entirety. The idea that you would have these losers

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 8>and terrorrist sympathizers in cities across Australia doing this. I

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 8>tell them they are on the losing side. Most of

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:14.239
<v Speaker 8>their friends are gone already. They're admiring dead murderers. They

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 8>should think on that.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 4>They certainly should think on that.

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Douglas Murray, thank you so much for a time This

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 3>evening pleasure as always.

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 4>Still to come.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 3>You won't want to miss this extended edition of Lefty's

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Losing It.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 4>And Kosher Gada joins me with the latest from the US.

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back.

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Now it's time for Lefty's Losing Ed. We'll be looking

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 3>at the mass media meltdown on MSNBC, CNN and other

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 3>networks following the great Vice presidential debate. But first let's

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 3>hear from the main white dude for Kamala, her husband,

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 3>Doug Ermov, who stands accused of ulfully slapping a former girlfriend.

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 3>And we know he cheated on his first wife with

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 3>the natty, even got the natty pregnant. But please, Doug,

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 3>lecture us about toxic masculinity.

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 9>There's too much of toxicity.

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 10>It's masculine toxicity out there, and we've kind.

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 9>Of confused what it means to be a man, what

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 9>it means to be masculine.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 8>Where you've got this trope out.

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 11>There that you've got to be tough and angry and

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 11>lash out to be strong.

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 3>You don't say, Doug, Thank god, no one would claim

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 3>that you are reshaping the concept of masculinity.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 10>How your role has reshaped the perception of masculinity. And

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 10>I'm not sure you've planned on that, but you are

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 10>an incredibly supportive spouse. Has that been an evolution for you?

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 10>And do you think that's part of the role you

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 10>might play as first gentleman.

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 6>It's funny.

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 3>I've started to think a lot about this.

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 6>I've always been like this.

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 5>My dad was like this.

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Always been like this.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Yikes, Lefty losing it is a regular on this segment.

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 3>We've become accustom to the unhinged musings of Joyanne Reid.

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 3>And here's yet another example.

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 12>And so I think that the people who want the

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 12>fistfight are the base of the Democratic Party.

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 8>Democrats want to see.

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 12>Someone get up there and give a knuckle sandwich to

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 12>Donald Trump.

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 13>That's what they want.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 3>But when it comes to MSNBC, you know, there is

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 3>great competition among the divorce from reality left. They all

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 3>want to be the most radical, the most crazy. And

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Nicole Wallace came in with this effort after jd Vance's

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 3>dominant performance in the vice presidential debate. Even the New

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 3>York Times called it dominant. But according to Wallace, jd

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 3>Vance fact checking the bias moderators who happen to be

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:51.360
<v Speaker 3>female amounted to mansplaining and that would repel female voters.

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 5>And I actually think if you're a woman, that might

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 5>be the worst moment jed Vance had because he was

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 5>going to mansplain right over that mute button.

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 13>He was.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 5>And again I don't pretend to know however we'll react

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 5>to this. I think that a lot of women in

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 5>positions of authority that should command respect just by virtue

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 5>that dynamic will see themselves and some doo that disrespected

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 5>them and talked over you know. I mean there was

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 5>a moment like that with the vice presidential in their

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 5>Pence debate.

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 3>So women should be treated as a cools unless they're

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 3>leftist active is mass writing, as impartial journalists or more writers,

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 3>then you should just let them lie without feedback. And

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 3>here is right child madout claimbing that JD. Vans was

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 3>just slick and Tim Walls was the clear winner.

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 9>That one of these candidates is much slicker than the other,

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 9>is a much more practiced kind of professional debate style speaker,

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 9>and the other candidate one. There was one bad moment

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 9>for Tim Walls in this debate where he got mixed

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 9>up and embarrassed and answering a question about exactly what

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 9>month he had been in China in relation to the

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 9>tiena Men Square protests.

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that awkward moment when he lied about lying and

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 3>then led some more.

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 14>Governor Walls, you said you were in Hong Kong during

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 14>the deadly Tieneman Square protests in the spring of nineteen

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 14>eighty nine, but Minnesota Public Radio and other media outlets

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 14>are reporting that you actually didn't travel to Asia until

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 14>August of that year. Can you explain that discrepancy?

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, and the folks out there, it didn't get

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 2>at the top of this. Look. I grew up in small,

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 2>rural Nebraska count of four hundred town that you rode

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 2>your bike with your buddies still the streetlights come on,

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and I'm proud of that service.

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 3>What now you are proud of riding bikes with your

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 3>buddies until the lights come on?

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Now, what does that mean?

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 3>And what has it got to do with lying about

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 3>where you were during the Tenhem Square massacre. Wolves answer

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 3>was so bizarre that even the buyer, CBS Motorator, was

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 3>compelled to ask a follow up question. After he waffled

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 3>on like that for more than two minutes, just nonsense

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 3>about himself that had nothing to do with a question.

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 14>Asked Governor just to follow up on that. The question was,

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 14>can you explain the note?

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 2>All I said on this was is I got there

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 2>that summer and misspoke on this, So I will just

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>That's what I've said.

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Tim Walls is so dopey that he makes Joe Biden

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 3>look cognitively sharp. Joe has said some bizarre stuff over

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 3>the years, but he's never claimed to be mates with

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 3>school shooters.

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's set in that office with the Sandiog parents.

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I've become friends with school shooters.

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Tim Walls is a masterful communicator, isn't he.

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 7>Jen.

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 10>We've talked about this a little bit when we were

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 10>sitting over there waiting. I think Tim Walls is one

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 10>of the best communicators out there in democratic.

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 8>Politics, and he was.

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 10>He propelled himself onto the ticket because he is such

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 10>an effective, good communicator.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 3>As we document MSNBC hosts losing it, we cannot overlook

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 3>the thoroughly wacky Simone Sanders here. She seems to be

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 3>upset the tim Wolves was not feral enough. There was

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 3>too much niceness.

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 12>There were so many niceties on that debate station.

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 8>I am.

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 12>Just kind of like, well, if you agree so much

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 12>with Jdvans, why should they vote for you. I fully

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 12>believed that Governor Walls went out there tonight and did

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 12>what was practicing debate prep, did what the strategy was

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.959
<v Speaker 12>that the team put together. That was not the Governor

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 12>Walls that we that I had seen out on the

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 12>campaign trip. That's not the Governor Walls that I had

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 12>seen during the beepstakes.

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, of course, Wallace and Meadow are there on the

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 3>panel nodding along.

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 4>And Sanders wasn't done yet.

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 3>She also thought the biased SBS moderators were not biased enough.

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 12>That's not the Margaret and Nora that I know. Margaret

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 12>don't do that on Sunday morning. So I just think

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 12>that I know that there's so many people out there

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 12>that want normal they want normalcy, They just want, you know,

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 12>just be able to just disagree with that a lot

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 12>of things I agree with. This is not a normal lucture.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 15>JD.

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 12>Vance is actually not Paul Ryot and Donald Trump shore

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 12>as heck has not Mett Romney.

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but just.

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 3>When you think Sanders might be the front runner for

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the most unhinged take of the night, we got this

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 3>from MSNBC anchor Nicole Wallace.

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 5>It's the audacity. I agree with you that we're in

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 5>year nine and no one knows how to cover the audacity.

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 5>The audacity is that someone should just stop it, stop

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 5>stop Are you efting kidding me?

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 4>And they shouldn't.

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 5>They should have dropped that at bomb, right, I mean

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 5>they should have just we this is a debate. This

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 5>may be the only chance people have to see the difference.

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Now you thought it's just unhinged women on MSNBC, then

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 3>you're wrong. That have many, many equally unhinged men. We

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 3>just heard Joy Read talking about Trump being punched in

0:31:56.040 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the face, and here is MSNBC panelist Eddie Glawd saying

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 3>the same thing, along with a bunch of other wild.

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 4>Crazy crap. This is Msnbasa, folks, and.

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 16>This man is running around here busting his chops, scaring

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 16>the hell out of communities, right, and we're trying to

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 16>figure out how to how to keep that in middle,

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 16>you know, locked in on her when she needs to

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 16>bust him in his mouth.

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 8>I'm saying it like that because he's dangerous.

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 16>He's dangerous to particular people, and the history of the

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 16>country is such that we can't play fast and loosed

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 16>with it fast.

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 5>And loose, because isn't it incumbent on all of us

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 5>to protect the people who are endangered by him? But

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 5>you never have.

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 16>That's the that's the rub, you never have.

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Of course, Nicole Wallace didn't challenge any of that insane Richard,

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 3>including the comment about busting Trump in the face and

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 3>about his claims that Trump is a danger.

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 4>No, she just agreed with him.

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 3>All this after two assassination attempts in two months.

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 4>And the mad rant went on further.

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Here is Eddie claiming Trump being elected again will leave

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 3>children traumatized.

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 4>Did I mention this hysteric is a professor.

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 16>Because we've got to keep this troubler date out of

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 16>office because if he comes in, our babies are going

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:26.959
<v Speaker 16>to be in danger because remember, those young children are

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 16>going to grow up with the memory of having to

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 16>not go to school for the threat of bombs, and

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 16>somebody told them that their moms and dads eat cats

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 16>if they eat cats and dogs. I'll get myself together

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 16>with Claire.

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 11>Okay, taken at it.

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 4>Deep breaths, Yes, deep breaths.

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you should have got yourself together before you went

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 3>on television and spewed a bunch of deliberate lies in

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:55.239
<v Speaker 3>hysteria and the electis media had a new word to

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 3>describe JD. Vance's dominant performance in the debate. That wasn't

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 3>a word like dominant or informed, competent, confident, No, no, no,

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 3>that had something better.

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 4>A backhander. See if you can sport it. In this compilation.

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 5>Jd Vance was as slick as an eel last night.

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 8>He was too slick. Maybe he's a little too slick

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 8>for that. Vance came off a bit slick tonight.

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 5>Jady Vance was a very slick debater.

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 8>The slicker speaker. I think he looked at shifty.

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 10>He looked slick.

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:23.919
<v Speaker 14>Over and over.

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 16>You heard lide and kind of slick answers from JD.

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 6>Vance.

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 7>Jady Vance changes personalities like most people change suits. Slick, slick, slick.

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 9>When you look over at JD Vance, you see slick guys.

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 6>We all know, having worked with Van Jones, how these

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 6>Yale educated looks very slick.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 12>No matter how slick JD may have sounded today, there

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 12>is nothing decent about him.

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 6>This man is standing here in lying to the country,

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 6>and that's where JD. Vance was his slickest.

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 11>You know.

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 8>JD.

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Vance was very slick, but he was slick like a

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 3>snake oil snake oil salesman.

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 12>JD.

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.040
<v Speaker 2>Vans is slick and smooth, but he is still.

0:34:59.880 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 3>A And let's end, left is losing it with the

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 3>epicenter of lefty lunacy.

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 4>Yes where ending with the ladies of the view.

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Here is Woopy Goldberg claiming that the far left Hollywood

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 3>echo chamber, well, it's actually right wing. This is a

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 3>response to actor Zachary Levi coming out as conservative, knowing

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 3>full well that it's probably going to damage or even

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 3>end his career.

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Within my industry.

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 8>As you can probably imagine, Hollywood is a very very

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 8>liberal town and this very well could constitute career suicide.

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 17>So, okay, that's not necessarily true. From the beginning of

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 17>Hollywood there have been it's always been a very right

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 17>leaning town. But I know, you don't know much about

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 17>the Hollywood history.

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 8>So let me school you.

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh dear whoop, He's going to be schooling us.

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 4>This should be good.

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 3>I bet you'll be able to name just dozens of

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 3>prominent conservatives in the industry, famous actors we've all heard of.

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 3>She could barely remember the term Republicans there.

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 4>I bet she doesn't know too many.

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 17>But the truth of the matter is very few people

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 17>seem to bait it because they're Republican. John Voight who

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 17>is working, Dennis Queen, who is working people who work

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 17>to stop that. It's more bs and it's unnecessary.

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 3>She managed to name two dudes, and those two dudes

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 3>have had their careers impacted negatively because of their politics.

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 3>Talk about proving zachlyly Vice point completely Joining me now

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 3>is Sky News contributor Kosher Gaeta Kosher. We've heard a

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 3>lot about JD. Van's man explaining during that debate, do

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 3>you think Nicole Wallace has a point there? Will the

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:58.280
<v Speaker 3>female audience been repelled by that sort of behavior from JD.

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Vance or even if so what he was saying was factual,

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 3>is the fact that he was speaking over to female

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 3>motor writers a bad look.

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 15>No, I never understood the man explaining concept. You explain

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 15>and it doesn't matter what parts you have on the

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 15>other side when you're on the receiving end of explanations.

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 15>I think that was grasping for Straws. What he did do,

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.320
<v Speaker 15>I think was actually very masterful where he did what

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 15>all Trump supporters very frustrated that Trump didn't do in

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 15>the first debate, where he fought back against the incorrect

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:31.359
<v Speaker 15>fact check, but he did it still in a nice way,

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 15>a firm but nice way. And I think overall what

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 15>comes across from Jadvans and what people remember is he

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 15>actually showed a different dimension of his personality, somebody who's

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 15>a bit softer and charming, even as opposed to the

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 15>combative Jad Evans that we've seen, which also has its place,

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 15>and he kept everything in the realm of that. I

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 15>don't think man explaining is something that people are going.

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 4>To take away from it now.

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 3>And I did say a very interesting bit of analysis

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:59.720
<v Speaker 3>that he had the lowest li likeability or approval writing

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:04.879
<v Speaker 3>of them for candidates Trump, Harris Walls, and they said

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 3>that is an absolute condemnation of the media, because if

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 3>you look at the individuals, he's by far, by any

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of objective measure, probably the most intelligent, likablll and

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 3>normal and relatable, especially given his background, and yet he's

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 3>been painted as this bogey man by so many in

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 3>the media. Now, the Biden Harris administration's inadequate response to

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 3>the victims of Hurricane Helene continues, with the Vice President

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 3>finally touching down in Georgia today or about a week

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 3>after the damage was inflicted, and she had this to say.

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 15>And the federal relief and assistance that we have been

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:55.359
<v Speaker 15>providing has included FEMA providing seven hundred and fifty dollars for.

0:38:55.440 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Folks who need immediate needs being met kosher.

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:04.720
<v Speaker 3>There's been a lot of criticism about the measily sum

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 3>offered there. Obviously it will also be some short term

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 3>accommodation for certain people. But you compare that to the

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 3>largest and the money spent in total on illegal immigrants

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 3>housing them long term in hotels and elsewhere. And then

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 3>you look at the people who've been left homeless with

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Hurricane Helene, and their citizens have contributed taxes and they

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:31.720
<v Speaker 3>seem to be getting very little.

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, that juxtaposition in a government gone wild, the bloat

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 15>and spending to all sorts of foreign causes as you mentioned,

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 15>and then nothing for these victims for cigling the border.

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 15>For other natural disasters. Hawaii had these huge bushfire as

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 15>wildfire as a while back, and that was inadequate the

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 15>response the train derailment and the chemical spill disaster in

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 15>East Palestine, Ohio was another example where they just never

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 15>went and didn't do much in that case, a man

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 15>made disaster lost on people. And the other thing that

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 15>it reminds me of as Hurricane Katrina. In the bush

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 15>hears he was accused Bush of being too slow, and

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 15>I think he was. The response from FEMA and all

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 15>the things that he green lighted took a little bit

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:15.399
<v Speaker 15>too long, and the media made a huge story out

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 15>of that, and it really was a stine on his

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:20.360
<v Speaker 15>presidency that he never recovered from. So that juxtaposition is

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 15>also really interesting where it's just another media test and

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 15>you can see where they focus and where they give

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:26.879
<v Speaker 15>a free pass. And it's a shame because they're real

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 15>people who are really hurting and have.

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 3>Died absolutely, and some of them are people who can

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 3>least afford something like this happening. They just don't have

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the means to recover quickly from such a disaster. Now,

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 3>the Daily Mail is reporting that Kamala Harris's husband, Doug

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 3>aim Off, allegedly slapped his ex in the face so

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:52.280
<v Speaker 3>hard that she spun around while waiting in a valet

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:56.800
<v Speaker 3>line at the twenty twelve cant Film Festival. The Daily

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Mail reports further one of the alleged victims free and

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 3>said that the woman called him immediately after this incident,

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:09.320
<v Speaker 3>sobbing in the cab and describing the alleged assault. Daily

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Mail is not naming the woman, who is a successful

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 3>New York attorney, Kosha. This is an explosive story. It's

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 3>interesting to see which media outlets are following this which

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 3>ones are just completely ignoring it. But it is certainly

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 3>a story that The Daily Mail felt deserve to be published,

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 3>and they do seem to have spoken to multiple people

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 3>connected with this.

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so starnation confirmed yet, But you're right, there's a

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 15>lot of detail in it and a lot of corb

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.799
<v Speaker 15>reading witnesses are alleged corb reading witnesses. It is an

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 15>explosive story. Now, it is important to know that the

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 15>Dargam half is not on the ticket, so the scrutiny

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 15>that he deserves is something.

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Is being promoted, yes, only just I think a few

0:41:56.800 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 3>days ago Jensarki interviewed him and said he was a

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 3>new improved paragon of fel masculinity.

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 15>And that's the thing he stepped in it, Like why.

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Spoken about it in the past, about how he wants

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 3>to get rid of toxic masculinity and how imported.

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 15>That's a thing. So otherwise you could sort of draw

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 15>a line and see family members should be scrutinized, but

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 15>not to the same level of heat as the candidate himself,

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 15>except if you insert yourself into the limelight. And the

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 15>whole thing with the nanny allegedly where he had an

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 15>affair with his first wife with the nanny, that's one thing,

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 15>and then this thing. So when these people try to

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 15>present themselves as are moral betters and then these stories break,

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:38.359
<v Speaker 15>it is relevant, but I don't think people are going

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 15>to dig into it, and you won't find this story

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 15>into many outlets.

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 3>And I can assure you if it was the better

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 3>half of a Republican candidate, one who was going to

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 3>be vice president or president, even in this case, it

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 3>would be far more socrgny and the media would be

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 3>far more interested Koshagaia, thank you so much for your

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 3>time this evening. Still to calm, the allegations against p

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Diddy continue to pile up.

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Kinsey Scofield has the labors welcome back.

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in celebrity and royal commentator Kinsey Schofield.

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Kinsey, There's been a development in the.

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Case against disgraced rapper and media mogul music mogul shown

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Diddy Combs. He's now accused of sexually abusing dozens of people,

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 3>including miners. A lawyer representing more than a hundred of

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 3>his alleged victims has given a press conference.

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 11>Seeming that our investigators confirm and corroborate what we've been told.

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 11>Are names that will shock you. These are individual cases.

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:54.840
<v Speaker 11>There are indeed other perpetrators involved. They will be revealed

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 11>when that particular individual case is ready to be filed.

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 11>They already know who they are. And I'm talking here

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 11>about not just the cowardly but complicit bystanders. That is,

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 11>those people that we know watched this behavior cur and

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 11>did nothing. And I'm talking about the people that.

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Participated bystandards and participants.

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 4>What are we going to get nicked out of this?

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:24.320
<v Speaker 13>Kyskinsey When we watched the Diddy raids, we saw Homeland

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:29.240
<v Speaker 13>security collect hard drives, digital equipment, videotapes, DVDs every public

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 13>figure or celebrity that can be identified in Sean Comb's

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:36.280
<v Speaker 13>freak off videos. Those people are expected to be questioned

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 13>if they haven't already. The theory is that did he

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:42.280
<v Speaker 13>secretly filmed his parties to use the footage as blackmail,

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:46.320
<v Speaker 13>to control or have some sort of leverage against the participants.

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:48.879
<v Speaker 13>There are reports that Diddy has a list of over

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 13>two hundred celebrities that could be humiliated by what he

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 13>could reveal are worse? You know, could he take some

0:44:56.040 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 13>of these people down with him if he were to testify?

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 13>And it's everyone politicians, musicians, models, movie stars. There will

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 13>be a lot of nervous people thanks to that press conference,

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:13.280
<v Speaker 13>thanks to the future court hearings. And I do wonder

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 13>if Diddy and his team were concerned about his safety

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 13>behind bars. I don't have to remind you what happened

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:20.760
<v Speaker 13>to Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton's bestie Jeffrey Epstein.

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, and I can say there also climbed that Actidenzel

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Washington confronted Diddy at one of his parties back in

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and three, reportedly storming out after a hated

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:37.439
<v Speaker 3>screaming match with the rapper.

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:39.440
<v Speaker 4>What can you tell us about these reports?

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I do think we're going to continue to hear

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 13>a lot more of these types of stories because people

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 13>feel safe to speak with Ditty behind bars. There's a

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:48.880
<v Speaker 13>real sense that he could spend the rest of his

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 13>life in jail and that will give people the courage

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 13>to speak up.

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely Now, The Daly Mail is reporting that the UK

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:03.399
<v Speaker 3>government's outgoing and its secretary, Simon Case, could potentially pin

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 3>an explosive tell all on the breakdown of Harry and

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Meghan's relationship with the royal family.

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Kinsey, this is a surprise. What else can you tell us?

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 13>This could be really juicy, reader. There have been reports

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 13>of tension between Case and the Sussexes, particularly during the

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.879
<v Speaker 13>period leading up to Mexitt. It's understood that Simon Case

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 13>was involved in internal discussions about how to handle media

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 13>coverage around the couple's growing dissatisfaction within the royal family.

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:34.080
<v Speaker 13>He was also said to have played a significant role

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 13>in orchestrating the separation of the households of Prince William

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:41.440
<v Speaker 13>and Prince Harry, so he has a lot of insider information.

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:43.960
<v Speaker 13>I'm here for it. I know that's horrible to say,

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:45.240
<v Speaker 13>but I would read that book.

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:48.759
<v Speaker 4>Simon, Well, is.

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 3>There still an appetite for this sort of contest? Because

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:54.840
<v Speaker 3>we have heard so many reports, We've had so many

0:46:55.600 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 3>news reports about Meghan being a horrible boy and Harry

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 3>being whipped and all the shenanigans between Harry and Meghan

0:47:07.200 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 3>and William and Kate.

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:11.239
<v Speaker 4>Is there still an appetite for this? Have we not

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 4>heard it all before?

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:13.719
<v Speaker 15>Well?

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 13>I heard a great quote today and it's the greatest

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 13>source for royal gossip in the last four years has

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 13>been Prince Harry. And ain't that the truth? And I

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 13>think that it's I think it's his truth. If you

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 13>think about the last four years of royal gossip, it's

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 13>his truth. So I don't mind hearing it from somebody

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 13>else's perspective because I don't necessarily think that Prince Harry

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:37.399
<v Speaker 13>has been completely honest with us. I think that he's

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 13>had an ulterior motive, and that's to elevate his wife

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 13>throughout the process.

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Well more on that.

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Camilla apparently has discouraged King Charles from reuniting with Prince Harry.

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 3>The Daily Beast reports that Queen Camilla has told the

0:47:56.200 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 3>King to ditch his plan reunion with Prince Harry. And

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 3>this is all according to Camilla's friends who've spoken to

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 3>the Daily Base.

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 4>It looks like, do you.

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Believe this story? I always thought that Camilla would be

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 3>working over time to heal those wounds. I know Harry

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 3>has said some terrible things about her and wrote some

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:20.400
<v Speaker 3>terrible things about her in his book.

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 13>I think that the Queen is severely and sincerely concerned

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 13>about the King's health. It seems like Harry and Meghan

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:34.839
<v Speaker 13>they dig the sword even deeper at the height of

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 13>some of the royal family's worst health crisises. When Prince

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 13>Philip was in the hospital, they sat down with Oprah

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 13>the days before the Queen died. She asked them to

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 13>come visit her. They denied her that when the King

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:52.800
<v Speaker 13>announced he had cancer, Meghan quickly announced about American reviewer Orchard.

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 13>It just seems like not only have their actions been

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 13>incredibly hurtful, but it seems as they are completely oblivious

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 13>to proper chorum when it comes to other people's vulnerability

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 13>around illness. And I think that Camilla likely just wants

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 13>some peace.

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, that is a very good point and we

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:16.839
<v Speaker 3>can't forget that so much of what Harry and Meghan did,

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 3>of the airing of the Dirty Laundry, the tell All interviews,

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 3>it was happening whilst the Queen was in a terrible

0:49:25.680 --> 0:49:29.719
<v Speaker 3>health where it was really her final months, and she

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 3>went through it knowing the family was fractured and this

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:37.560
<v Speaker 3>nonsense was being said about her family. So I think

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 3>that is really in the minds of many people, whether

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 3>they're are monarchists or not, something that is unforgivable, but

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 3>particularly for Harry because Harry was so close with his grandmother.

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 13>I agree. You know, there are all these stories that

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 13>we're seeing Harry push to the forefront of the Sussex

0:49:56.080 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 13>brand because people still love Harry, and the feedback I'm

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:02.439
<v Speaker 13>getting is I'll never forgive Harry for the last four

0:50:02.480 --> 0:50:04.759
<v Speaker 13>or five years and the way that he treated the

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:07.879
<v Speaker 13>Queen in her twilight years. So you're I think you're

0:50:07.880 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 13>on the pulse when it comes to the public's reaction

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 13>to Prince Harry today.

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Kinsey Schofield, thank you so much for your time this evening.

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 11>Thank you.

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 4>That's it from May.

0:50:20.239 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 3>I'll see you Tomorrow night at nine p thirty four

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Lefties losing it.

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 4>Good Night,