Speaker 1: On scolds Astodio.
Speaker 2: This is the winder Panalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panecky Show coming
Speaker 3: up tonight, a massive program.
Speaker 4: We've saved the best for last.
Speaker 3: Douglas Murray will be with me shortly with a message
Speaker 3: for the Australian anti Israeli activists who plan to march
Speaker 3: on October seven. Also joining me tonight is Nick Kata,
Speaker 3: Kreshua Gator and Kimsey Schofield.
Speaker 4: And an extended edition of.
Speaker 3: Left Is Losing It, starring multiple MSNBC anchors including Nicole Wallace.
Speaker 5: The Audacity is it? Someone should start that star star?
Speaker 5: Are you effing kidding me?
Speaker 3: Let's start with those planned protests on October seven. Opposition
Speaker 3: leader Peter Dutton has criticized Victorian premierges Into Allen for
Speaker 3: her government's weak response to these anti Israeli agitators, and
Speaker 3: he pointed out that the Labor government was more than
Speaker 3: willing to stamp out protests during the COVID era.
Speaker 6: I think the Premier is at odds with the majority
Speaker 6: of Victorians who would not support the celebration of death.
Speaker 6: So what is the justification for the Premier here not
Speaker 6: to do everything at her disposal to stop these protests
Speaker 6: from taking place. She was part of a government that
Speaker 6: deployed the police force here in Victoria during the course
Speaker 6: of COVID to enforce the rule of law, and I
Speaker 6: think the Victorian Labor Party should have the same resolve
Speaker 6: in relation to this issue. If there is a will,
Speaker 6: there is a way to stop these protests, Let's bring in.
Speaker 3: Nick Caton, our senior fellow at the Menzies Research Center
Speaker 3: and a columnists with the Australian newspaper Nick Peter Darton
Speaker 3: makes a fair point at BET. I can't imagine how
Speaker 3: devastating it would be for members of the Jewish community
Speaker 3: to deal with protests on October seven, on the first
Speaker 3: anniversary of what was the biggest massacre of Jews since
Speaker 3: the Holocaust.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. It's a very sad day Reta. I've been
Speaker 1: anticipating this day for some time, knowing we'd get to
Speaker 1: that anniversary and we'd have to look back and think
Speaker 1: about those horrible events, the most devastating attack on Jewish
Speaker 1: people since the Holocaust. The thought that anybody would be
Speaker 1: on the streets protesting against Israel and in favor of
Speaker 1: those Hamas terrorists and indeed the Hesbalah terrorist organization as
Speaker 1: well is just chilling. I just don't know what gets
Speaker 1: into people. And I know that every right minded Australian,
Speaker 1: whatever they feel about the Middle East, will be sympathizing
Speaker 1: with the Jewish community on Monday, who has suffered a
Speaker 1: grievous loss. And what Jacinta Allen is doing once again,
Speaker 1: she's siding with the extremists on the fringe, and she's
Speaker 1: not supporting every day Victorians who want to be able
Speaker 1: to go about their business and take to the streets
Speaker 1: if they so choose to mourn and to share those
Speaker 1: memories together. It is deeply seekening. But finally, I just
Speaker 1: say this reader on this topic, I thought people like
Speaker 1: Jacinta Allen was supposed to be in favor of peaceful multiculturalism.
Speaker 1: Whatever happened to that idea that we could all just
Speaker 1: get along and put our differences aside and all be
Speaker 1: you know, on the same side. You know, that's what
Speaker 1: multiculturalism is surely about. But this is a horrible phenomena,
Speaker 1: the rise of this anti semitism and pro terrorist sentiment
Speaker 1: which is just fueling anger and making Australian streets a
Speaker 1: very uncomfortable place to be for people from the Jewish community.
Speaker 3: Well, in Sydney, the planned pro Palestinian anti Israeli protest
Speaker 3: is going to go ahead, despite police applying to the
Speaker 3: New South Wales Supreme Court to stop the event. Nick
Speaker 3: at least New South Wales has a permit system. There's
Speaker 3: nothing of the sort here in Victoria. And the leftist
Speaker 3: activists are loving that. They proudly call Melbourne the protest
Speaker 3: capital of Australia.
Speaker 1: Yes, indeed, but look, I mean, this is a chance
Speaker 1: for the New South Wales police to redeem themselves after
Speaker 1: that appalling incident last year on October the ninth. We've
Speaker 1: got to remember those October ninth demonstrations at the Sydney
Speaker 1: Opera House were not authorized reta. They just chose to
Speaker 1: march on down towards the Opera House and the police
Speaker 1: were too weak to stop them. I just hope that
Speaker 1: the police are ready for a proper exercise in strong
Speaker 1: policing this time and aren't going to take that lenient
Speaker 1: view they did on October ninth. We'll all be watching.
Speaker 1: This is their chance to prove that they can keep
Speaker 1: the peace without fear or favor. And I think what
Speaker 1: the New South Wales Police do on Monday will be
Speaker 1: very critical.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, we can't allow mob rule, and that's what's
Speaker 3: been happening. It seems that the police force is trying
Speaker 3: to appease those that they fear are going to become
Speaker 3: agitated and violent if they try to stop them doing.
Speaker 4: Whatever it is they're doing now.
Speaker 3: In a further sign of the growing frustration of the
Speaker 3: Australian business community with the Albanezi government, the Business Council
Speaker 3: of Australia has lash proposed industrial relation changes from one
Speaker 3: of Australia's largest unions, with the group's chief executives saying
Speaker 3: that implementing the act used plans would and I quote,
Speaker 3: take a sledgehammer to the economy by adding cost and
Speaker 3: complexity for businesses at the worst possible time, while not
Speaker 3: improving productivity. Nick Again, this is a huge departure from
Speaker 3: the way some in big business held hands with Sally
Speaker 3: McManus and the ACTU. You'll remember that job summit where
Speaker 3: they were thinking they were all going to come out
Speaker 3: winners and the Business Council of Australia I think at
Speaker 3: the time got played badly. Is big business finally waking up.
Speaker 1: Yeah, look sitting in terms of sitting around the campfire
Speaker 1: singing Kumbaya and holding hands doesn't work. They should have
Speaker 1: known that, of course, but you know, I suppose they
Speaker 1: they had to go at trying to do things a
Speaker 1: nice way. But look, the alban Easy government has just
Speaker 1: done well since it came into government. It's been doing
Speaker 1: making up for the favors the union movement has done
Speaker 1: it and make it paying back the debt to the
Speaker 1: union movement which gives millions of dollars to the Labor Party,
Speaker 1: as we know, by making the laws once again in
Speaker 1: favor of the unions, the big unions who just take
Speaker 1: the public for granted and just just go out there
Speaker 1: out for themselves. So I'm glad the BCA and the
Speaker 1: Mining Council, incidentally, the Minerals Council have woken up to
Speaker 1: this now because you know, we really have to resist
Speaker 1: this anti government. It's anti sorry, this anti business government
Speaker 1: which has come in with no idea how the real
Speaker 1: economy works, and she's making life very very hard for
Speaker 1: ordinary Australians.
Speaker 3: Now, just before you go, we're hearing that Senator Fatima Payman,
Speaker 3: who was a Labor Senator and then quit the party
Speaker 3: to become an independent. She's apparently only weeks away from
Speaker 3: launching her own political party. She's got help now. Her
Speaker 3: new chief of staff is the preference whisperer Glen Drury.
Speaker 3: Does that mean she's going to succeed because he has
Speaker 3: been remarkably successful in the past in having candidates with
Speaker 3: very small number of votes win seats.
Speaker 1: Well, you wouldn't be surprised. You look at some of
Speaker 1: the riff rap that ends up in the Senate read
Speaker 1: of different party banners through this preference system. It happens, right,
Speaker 1: But I think what worries me about Senator Payment's idea
Speaker 1: of what a party should be. I mean, sure, she's
Speaker 1: free to set up her own party more than Marria
Speaker 1: I say, but if she's going to build her party
Speaker 1: around Islamism, then that's deeply troubling. We've never before in
Speaker 1: Australia had a political party built around a religion or
Speaker 1: a faith. That's a development which none of us want
Speaker 1: to see. We like to think that politics is politics.
Speaker 1: Faith is another thing. And if they're going to turn
Speaker 1: this into a party that's defined by the Islamic religion,
Speaker 1: that is extremely troubling and we should all be worried
Speaker 1: about that.
Speaker 4: Nikita, thank you for your time this evening. Thank you
Speaker 4: joining me now.
Speaker 3: Is best selling author of groundbreaking works, including his latest
Speaker 3: The War on the West. Douglas Murray Douglas, I'm keen
Speaker 3: to get your thoughts on the major escalation in the
Speaker 3: Middle East with Iran's direct attacks against Israel.
Speaker 4: But first, the vice.
Speaker 3: Presidential debate was on yesterday, and again we had the
Speaker 3: moderators trying to be participants.
Speaker 4: But despite that, jd.
Speaker 3: Vance put in a solid performance that even the New
Speaker 3: York Times called dominant.
Speaker 7: You've got to pretend that Donald Trump didn't deliver rising
Speaker 7: take Coompey, which of course he did. You've got to
Speaker 7: pretend that Donald Trump didn't deliver lower inflation, which of
Speaker 7: course he did. And then you've simultaneously got to defend
Speaker 7: Kamala Harris's atrocious economic record.
Speaker 3: Douglas, what are your thoughts on the debate and how
Speaker 3: much impact, if any, will it have on the election.
Speaker 8: Well, you know, the received wisdom, Rita is that VP
Speaker 8: picks don't have that much influence on the race. That
Speaker 8: I don't think is actually true. I think they do
Speaker 8: have more influence thans often said, but it's also often
Speaker 8: said that the VP debates don't have all that much influence,
Speaker 8: and again I don't think that's the case. On this occasion.
Speaker 8: This was the first time for the American public to
Speaker 8: see JD. Vance and Tim Walls going head to head
Speaker 8: and to judge both men. I have to say, I mean,
Speaker 8: I think that it's pretty clear and that the New
Speaker 8: York Times was for once right. I think the evening
Speaker 8: was JD. Vance's. He seemed to be on top of
Speaker 8: all of the issues that came up. He was respectful,
Speaker 8: he was was sharp, he was likable, and much more.
Speaker 8: And Tim Walls was, to use one of his own
Speaker 8: favorite words, well, he was weird. He looked all the
Speaker 8: time as if he had walked in from somewhere else,
Speaker 8: from some other set or some other job application. It
Speaker 8: looked like somebody who turned up for the wrong job
Speaker 8: interview and then was rather startled to discover it was
Speaker 8: the vice presidential debate. And of course he had the
Speaker 8: worst the evening, worst moment of the evening when he
Speaker 8: was asked about why he lied about being in China
Speaker 8: at the time of Channeman Square, and he replied by saying,
Speaker 8: I think the American public. You know, know that I
Speaker 8: grew up in a house with a family, among Americans,
Speaker 8: and you know, we have food on the table, and
Speaker 8: we had a table and food.
Speaker 6: And.
Speaker 8: He just he just, I mean, even the biased moderators
Speaker 8: did end up, after about what felt like forty eight
Speaker 8: hours of this waffle, did end up saying, yeah, but
Speaker 8: what about your claim that you were in Tiana and
Speaker 8: square and and he did that great clintonism. I think
Speaker 8: a phrase it wasn't a word that wasn't in the
Speaker 8: language until the Clintons, which was I misspoke, And you know,
Speaker 8: I mean, I suppose it could happen to any of us. Rita,
Speaker 8: I sometimes claim to have been at the D Day landings.
Speaker 8: I often claim to have been there waving the Titanic
Speaker 8: off as she sets sail. You know, it's easily done,
Speaker 8: and it's just, you know, if you do catch me
Speaker 8: doing it, Rita, I just misspoke, that's all.
Speaker 4: It's an innocent mistake.
Speaker 3: And I know you grew up in a household with
Speaker 3: a family, and you had your dinners on tables with
Speaker 3: four legs, so it's all tables. And now you are
Speaker 3: focused on the facts, the consequential issues of this debate
Speaker 3: and election. But others in the media are fixated on
Speaker 3: other things like JD.
Speaker 4: Vance's beard.
Speaker 3: And I'm not talking about teen Vogue here, but Politico,
Speaker 3: which has published this, Yes, Vance's beard matters. Vance is
Speaker 3: the first White House wanna Be to wear facial hair
Speaker 3: in eighty years. They go on to say how masculine
Speaker 3: beards are and I quote that can be positive to some,
Speaker 3: reading a strength and competence, but to others, specially women,
Speaker 3: it can be negative, conveying aggression and opposition to feminist ideals.
Speaker 3: And this isn't the first time Politico has published a
Speaker 3: piece about JD.
Speaker 4: Vance's facial hair.
Speaker 3: There was this in July with the headline yes JD
Speaker 3: Vance's beard matters. Here is a whin I am kine
Speaker 3: on your thoughts, Douglas.
Speaker 8: It's very strange, isn't it. I mean, it suggests that
Speaker 8: anything that looks like masculinity and competence would put off women.
Speaker 8: I have to say, I think the only women would
Speaker 8: think that are ones with pretty big beards themselves. Quite frankly,
Speaker 8: I don't think that most women find I don't think
Speaker 8: most women find men having hair to be off putting.
Speaker 8: I don't actually think Contra Politico and these other rather
Speaker 8: sexist publications actually that women are disturbed by competence. This
Speaker 8: is just the extraordinary sort of demonstration that we've seen
Speaker 8: for a long time of the way in which, frankly,
Speaker 8: people keep on wanting to make these elections about things
Speaker 8: other than the issues. And whenever the Republicans have been
Speaker 8: accused of doing that, the Democrat media said, that's because
Speaker 8: they don't have anything to run on. They're out of ideas.
Speaker 8: I would have said that at the point that you're
Speaker 8: having to talk about JD. Vance's beard and how it
Speaker 8: might put off non bearded women, you're really in the sticks,
Speaker 8: because frankly, there was a lot more that came out
Speaker 8: of the vice presidential debate, and there should be a
Speaker 8: lot more coming out of it, because America, like Australia
Speaker 8: and other Western democracies, faces huge problems. It faces immigration crisis,
Speaker 8: it faces financial crises, if faces international crises. And the
Speaker 8: fact is, I'm afraid that just as we have a
Speaker 8: lot of people in the political class who are just
Speaker 8: not up to dealing with these things, so we have
Speaker 8: a lot of people in the legacy media class who
Speaker 8: are so unable to actually work out what's going on
Speaker 8: in the world, in the economy, and much more that
Speaker 8: all they can do is zoom in on facial hair
Speaker 8: and it's their fault, not jd Vance's.
Speaker 3: Now, let's turn our minds to the escalating conflict in
Speaker 3: the Middle East, with Israel hitting targets in Bayrout, hitting
Speaker 3: Hezbila strongholds. Yesterday we saw Iran launch around two hundred
Speaker 3: missiles at Israel, some of which struck Israeli airfields. Israel
Speaker 3: has promised to hit back Iran with precision and power.
Speaker 8: Douglas.
Speaker 3: President Joe Biden is talking about reintroducing sanctions on Iran,
Speaker 3: but he has ruled out supporting Israeli strike on Iran's
Speaker 3: nuclear sites. How do you see the US's support of
Speaker 3: Israel and what we can expect to see from Israel next.
Speaker 8: First of all, when Donald Trump left office, the Mullers
Speaker 8: and Tehran were begging him to lift the sanctions because
Speaker 8: they weren't able to do anything and at home they
Speaker 8: were in real trouble. And when Joe Biden into office,
Speaker 8: of course, he did lift many of those sanctions, and
Speaker 8: he gave a huge cash bonanza to the revolutionary Islamic
Speaker 8: government in Tehran. It's only because they've had this cash
Speaker 8: bonanza that they can afford to continue to arm these
Speaker 8: colonialist armies like Hamas in Gaza, like hesbal Lah in Lebanon,
Speaker 8: and the Huti militias in Yemen. It's only because of
Speaker 8: the cash bonanza that the Mullers have had that they're
Speaker 8: able to do all.
Speaker 3: Of these things.
Speaker 8: It's a little late in the day now for Joe
Speaker 8: Biden to talk about turning off the spigot in his
Speaker 8: last few days in office. I wish he would, but
Speaker 8: I bet he won't. As for the actual retaliation, sorry,
Speaker 8: we've been here before some months ago, when hundreds and
Speaker 8: hundreds of rockets were fired from Iranian territory from the
Speaker 8: Iranian government and its forces at Israel. That was. That
Speaker 8: was these readies were told by Joe Biden famously that
Speaker 8: they should keep the win because an international force managed
Speaker 8: to shoot down almost all of those rockets. Well, this
Speaker 8: is another occasion when they've done it. First of all,
Speaker 8: by the way, it's a sign of the Muller's weakness.
Speaker 8: Their forces have been decimated in their Hamas forces there,
Speaker 8: hes Bee Laugh forces have been decimated in Lebanon, including
Speaker 8: their murderers who're not only murderer Israelis, but murdered two
Speaker 8: hundred and forty one American servicemen in nineteen eighty three
Speaker 8: in the in the marine Beirut Barracks bombing. So once
Speaker 8: again Israel has been doing the work that America should
Speaker 8: have done in getting those terrorists. The hooties in Yemen
Speaker 8: are discovering quite fast that if you launch rockets at Israel,
Speaker 8: they'll do something.
Speaker 3: Back at you.
Speaker 8: And now the Iranian Revolutionary government is having to do
Speaker 8: it itself because it's terror proxies have been being wiped
Speaker 8: out one by one in the last year, and so
Speaker 8: they think they can dare to do this. My suggestion
Speaker 8: should be that if you send ballistic missiles into another country,
Speaker 8: that country has the right to respond, and Israel should
Speaker 8: respond with a full force that its government and military
Speaker 8: believe it should respond with, and I would hope that
Speaker 8: America and any other country would do likewise. You can't
Speaker 8: tell me, nobody can tell me that if hundreds of
Speaker 8: ballistic missiles have been fired into Australia or Great Britain,
Speaker 8: or Canada or America in the last couple of days,
Speaker 8: that we would listen to An ally telling us don't
Speaker 8: do anything back. Sorry, no, too late for that time
Speaker 8: them all has got a lesson closer to home.
Speaker 3: And I do wonder whether the reality is that even
Speaker 3: if Israel do eliminate Iran's proxies Hamas and Hezbollah, until
Speaker 3: there's regime change in Iran, unless there's real pressure applied
Speaker 3: on Iran, that we're still going to have this issue continue.
Speaker 3: Israel's going to continue to be under threat from whatever.
Speaker 4: Group Iran fund.
Speaker 8: The whole region.
Speaker 3: The absolutely, and it's yeah, it's beyond Israel.
Speaker 4: Absolutely.
Speaker 3: How do you see Katar's role not just in this
Speaker 3: conflict in the Middle East, but the enormous influence it
Speaker 3: has in the West.
Speaker 4: And how does such.
Speaker 3: A tiny country only around three hundred thousand odd citizens.
Speaker 4: Most of the.
Speaker 3: Population there are expatriates and migrant workers haws, such a
Speaker 3: tiny country managed to have this profound influence in the West.
Speaker 8: Well, you know, with Katar, it's just this just money,
Speaker 8: that's all. That's all just money. That's Catar is only
Speaker 8: only virtue. And if you say you read to it,
Speaker 8: it's a few hundred thousand people sucking off the teats
Speaker 8: of the royal family who themselves, just enriched themselves and
Speaker 8: of course live lives of enormous luxury. Otherwise, as you mentioned,
Speaker 8: there's this slave class that the s the slave State
Speaker 8: of Katar keeps there, and that's the country. They've managed
Speaker 8: to do a significant amount of buying up in the West,
Speaker 8: in Britain, universities like King's College, London, in America, serious
Speaker 8: Ivy formerly Serious Ivy League colleges and much more. And
Speaker 8: if you ask where a lot of the hatred and
Speaker 8: bigotry and racism of the last year has come from,
Speaker 8: it's Katar doing this buying up influence. Abroad, I would
Speaker 8: suggest that people turn this around, whether you like it
Speaker 8: or not. In the last two years since Putin invaded Ukraine,
Speaker 8: the international community managed to snap sanctions and really pretty
Speaker 8: heavy handed in many ways, sanctions against almost anyone associated
Speaker 8: with Vladimir Putin, seized oligarch's yachts and houses, and much more. Abroad. Well,
Speaker 8: I would suggest it's high time since the terrorists sponsing,
Speaker 8: sponsoring slave State of Katar has been wreaking its own
Speaker 8: mini form of havoc. Mini compared to their friends in Tehran.
Speaker 8: Across the region and the wider world, we make it clear.
Speaker 8: Actually we aren't going to be bought and they're the
Speaker 8: vulnerable ones here, and I hope that that is made clear,
Speaker 8: and it should be. I'd like to see them, like
Speaker 8: the revolutionary Islamic government in Tehran, strangled and throttled by
Speaker 8: sanctions and more, because they have got away with buying
Speaker 8: us up at too cheap a price for too long.
Speaker 8: And I hope it changes.
Speaker 3: Before you go. October seven anniversary is days away, the
Speaker 3: first anniversary of the terrorist attacks launched by her Mass
Speaker 3: and here in Australia there will be anti Israeli protests
Speaker 3: held on October seven taking place. Shamefully, they expect to
Speaker 3: see terrorist flags, the flags of Hazbullah, for example, flying in.
Speaker 4: Melbourne and Sydney. This is the.
Speaker 3: Worst casualty attack against the Jewish population since the Holocaust,
Speaker 3: and yet we're going to have people Douglas marching against Israel,
Speaker 3: the only Jewish state, on that day. And I do
Speaker 3: wonder about the left's unholy alliance with Islamist forces and
Speaker 3: how much of a genuine threat it is. Do you
Speaker 3: see it as I do, as a threat to Western civilization?
Speaker 8: You know, retail When I was in Australia, recently, I
Speaker 8: saw you, I saw these protests as in Sydney and Melbourne.
Speaker 8: They're a world away from this aspect of the world,
Speaker 8: a total world away. Australia has suffered some terror attacks
Speaker 8: in recent years, most noticeably against its citizens in Bali.
Speaker 8: But these people marching on the streets of Australian cities,
Speaker 8: the Australian public should know who these people are. They're
Speaker 8: terrorists and the terrorist sympathizers. They're sympathizing and supporting exactly
Speaker 8: the same people as the people who massacred the Australian
Speaker 8: holiday makers in Bali. These are sick people and they've
Speaker 8: got a mesage for them. They're also losing. They are losing.
Speaker 8: The people whose flags they are going to wave in
Speaker 8: great Australian cities are the flags of organizations that are
Speaker 8: going into the dust as we speak. These people will
Speaker 8: look back on this in ten years time with about
Speaker 8: as much pride as a group of neo Nazis in
Speaker 8: the nineteen fifties waving a swastika. Hamaz is nearly gone,
Speaker 8: the hooties are almost gone. Hezbala is almost gone in
Speaker 8: its entirety. The idea that you would have these losers
Speaker 8: and terrorrist sympathizers in cities across Australia doing this. I
Speaker 8: tell them they are on the losing side. Most of
Speaker 8: their friends are gone already. They're admiring dead murderers. They
Speaker 8: should think on that.
Speaker 4: They certainly should think on that.
Speaker 3: Douglas Murray, thank you so much for a time This
Speaker 3: evening pleasure as always.
Speaker 4: Still to come.
Speaker 3: You won't want to miss this extended edition of Lefty's
Speaker 3: Losing It.
Speaker 4: And Kosher Gada joins me with the latest from the US.
Speaker 4: Welcome back.
Speaker 3: Now it's time for Lefty's Losing Ed. We'll be looking
Speaker 3: at the mass media meltdown on MSNBC, CNN and other
Speaker 3: networks following the great Vice presidential debate. But first let's
Speaker 3: hear from the main white dude for Kamala, her husband,
Speaker 3: Doug Ermov, who stands accused of ulfully slapping a former girlfriend.
Speaker 3: And we know he cheated on his first wife with
Speaker 3: the natty, even got the natty pregnant. But please, Doug,
Speaker 3: lecture us about toxic masculinity.
Speaker 9: There's too much of toxicity.
Speaker 10: It's masculine toxicity out there, and we've kind.
Speaker 9: Of confused what it means to be a man, what
Speaker 9: it means to be masculine.
Speaker 8: Where you've got this trope out.
Speaker 11: There that you've got to be tough and angry and
Speaker 11: lash out to be strong.
Speaker 3: You don't say, Doug, Thank god, no one would claim
Speaker 3: that you are reshaping the concept of masculinity.
Speaker 10: How your role has reshaped the perception of masculinity. And
Speaker 10: I'm not sure you've planned on that, but you are
Speaker 10: an incredibly supportive spouse. Has that been an evolution for you?
Speaker 10: And do you think that's part of the role you
Speaker 10: might play as first gentleman.
Speaker 6: It's funny.
Speaker 3: I've started to think a lot about this.
Speaker 6: I've always been like this.
Speaker 5: My dad was like this.
Speaker 4: Always been like this.
Speaker 3: Yikes, Lefty losing it is a regular on this segment.
Speaker 3: We've become accustom to the unhinged musings of Joyanne Reid.
Speaker 3: And here's yet another example.
Speaker 12: And so I think that the people who want the
Speaker 12: fistfight are the base of the Democratic Party.
Speaker 8: Democrats want to see.
Speaker 12: Someone get up there and give a knuckle sandwich to
Speaker 12: Donald Trump.
Speaker 13: That's what they want.
Speaker 3: But when it comes to MSNBC, you know, there is
Speaker 3: great competition among the divorce from reality left. They all
Speaker 3: want to be the most radical, the most crazy. And
Speaker 3: Nicole Wallace came in with this effort after jd Vance's
Speaker 3: dominant performance in the vice presidential debate. Even the New
Speaker 3: York Times called it dominant. But according to Wallace, jd
Speaker 3: Vance fact checking the bias moderators who happen to be
Speaker 3: female amounted to mansplaining and that would repel female voters.
Speaker 5: And I actually think if you're a woman, that might
Speaker 5: be the worst moment jed Vance had because he was
Speaker 5: going to mansplain right over that mute button.
Speaker 13: He was.
Speaker 5: And again I don't pretend to know however we'll react
Speaker 5: to this. I think that a lot of women in
Speaker 5: positions of authority that should command respect just by virtue
Speaker 5: that dynamic will see themselves and some doo that disrespected
Speaker 5: them and talked over you know. I mean there was
Speaker 5: a moment like that with the vice presidential in their
Speaker 5: Pence debate.
Speaker 3: So women should be treated as a cools unless they're
Speaker 3: leftist active is mass writing, as impartial journalists or more writers,
Speaker 3: then you should just let them lie without feedback. And
Speaker 3: here is right child madout claimbing that JD. Vans was
Speaker 3: just slick and Tim Walls was the clear winner.
Speaker 9: That one of these candidates is much slicker than the other,
Speaker 9: is a much more practiced kind of professional debate style speaker,
Speaker 9: and the other candidate one. There was one bad moment
Speaker 9: for Tim Walls in this debate where he got mixed
Speaker 9: up and embarrassed and answering a question about exactly what
Speaker 9: month he had been in China in relation to the
Speaker 9: tiena Men Square protests.
Speaker 3: Yes, that awkward moment when he lied about lying and
Speaker 3: then led some more.
Speaker 14: Governor Walls, you said you were in Hong Kong during
Speaker 14: the deadly Tieneman Square protests in the spring of nineteen
Speaker 14: eighty nine, but Minnesota Public Radio and other media outlets
Speaker 14: are reporting that you actually didn't travel to Asia until
Speaker 14: August of that year. Can you explain that discrepancy?
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, and the folks out there, it didn't get
Speaker 2: at the top of this. Look. I grew up in small,
Speaker 2: rural Nebraska count of four hundred town that you rode
Speaker 2: your bike with your buddies still the streetlights come on,
Speaker 2: and I'm proud of that service.
Speaker 3: What now you are proud of riding bikes with your
Speaker 3: buddies until the lights come on?
Speaker 4: Now, what does that mean?
Speaker 3: And what has it got to do with lying about
Speaker 3: where you were during the Tenhem Square massacre. Wolves answer
Speaker 3: was so bizarre that even the buyer, CBS Motorator, was
Speaker 3: compelled to ask a follow up question. After he waffled
Speaker 3: on like that for more than two minutes, just nonsense
Speaker 3: about himself that had nothing to do with a question.
Speaker 14: Asked Governor just to follow up on that. The question was,
Speaker 14: can you explain the note?
Speaker 2: All I said on this was is I got there
Speaker 2: that summer and misspoke on this, So I will just
Speaker 2: That's what I've said.
Speaker 3: Tim Walls is so dopey that he makes Joe Biden
Speaker 3: look cognitively sharp. Joe has said some bizarre stuff over
Speaker 3: the years, but he's never claimed to be mates with
Speaker 3: school shooters.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's set in that office with the Sandiog parents.
Speaker 2: I've become friends with school shooters.
Speaker 3: Yes, Tim Walls is a masterful communicator, isn't he.
Speaker 7: Jen.
Speaker 10: We've talked about this a little bit when we were
Speaker 10: sitting over there waiting. I think Tim Walls is one
Speaker 10: of the best communicators out there in democratic.
Speaker 8: Politics, and he was.
Speaker 10: He propelled himself onto the ticket because he is such
Speaker 10: an effective, good communicator.
Speaker 3: As we document MSNBC hosts losing it, we cannot overlook
Speaker 3: the thoroughly wacky Simone Sanders here. She seems to be
Speaker 3: upset the tim Wolves was not feral enough. There was
Speaker 3: too much niceness.
Speaker 12: There were so many niceties on that debate station.
Speaker 8: I am.
Speaker 12: Just kind of like, well, if you agree so much
Speaker 12: with Jdvans, why should they vote for you. I fully
Speaker 12: believed that Governor Walls went out there tonight and did
Speaker 12: what was practicing debate prep, did what the strategy was
Speaker 12: that the team put together. That was not the Governor
Speaker 12: Walls that we that I had seen out on the
Speaker 12: campaign trip. That's not the Governor Walls that I had
Speaker 12: seen during the beepstakes.
Speaker 3: Right, of course, Wallace and Meadow are there on the
Speaker 3: panel nodding along.
Speaker 4: And Sanders wasn't done yet.
Speaker 3: She also thought the biased SBS moderators were not biased enough.
Speaker 12: That's not the Margaret and Nora that I know. Margaret
Speaker 12: don't do that on Sunday morning. So I just think
Speaker 12: that I know that there's so many people out there
Speaker 12: that want normal they want normalcy, They just want, you know,
Speaker 12: just be able to just disagree with that a lot
Speaker 12: of things I agree with. This is not a normal lucture.
Speaker 15: JD.
Speaker 12: Vance is actually not Paul Ryot and Donald Trump shore
Speaker 12: as heck has not Mett Romney.
Speaker 4: Okay, but just.
Speaker 3: When you think Sanders might be the front runner for
Speaker 3: the most unhinged take of the night, we got this
Speaker 3: from MSNBC anchor Nicole Wallace.
Speaker 5: It's the audacity. I agree with you that we're in
Speaker 5: year nine and no one knows how to cover the audacity.
Speaker 5: The audacity is that someone should just stop it, stop
Speaker 5: stop Are you efting kidding me?
Speaker 4: And they shouldn't.
Speaker 5: They should have dropped that at bomb, right, I mean
Speaker 5: they should have just we this is a debate. This
Speaker 5: may be the only chance people have to see the difference.
Speaker 3: Now you thought it's just unhinged women on MSNBC, then
Speaker 3: you're wrong. That have many, many equally unhinged men. We
Speaker 3: just heard Joy Read talking about Trump being punched in
Speaker 3: the face, and here is MSNBC panelist Eddie Glawd saying
Speaker 3: the same thing, along with a bunch of other wild.
Speaker 4: Crazy crap. This is Msnbasa, folks, and.
Speaker 16: This man is running around here busting his chops, scaring
Speaker 16: the hell out of communities, right, and we're trying to
Speaker 16: figure out how to how to keep that in middle,
Speaker 16: you know, locked in on her when she needs to
Speaker 16: bust him in his mouth.
Speaker 8: I'm saying it like that because he's dangerous.
Speaker 16: He's dangerous to particular people, and the history of the
Speaker 16: country is such that we can't play fast and loosed
Speaker 16: with it fast.
Speaker 5: And loose, because isn't it incumbent on all of us
Speaker 5: to protect the people who are endangered by him? But
Speaker 5: you never have.
Speaker 16: That's the that's the rub, you never have.
Speaker 6: No.
Speaker 3: Of course, Nicole Wallace didn't challenge any of that insane Richard,
Speaker 3: including the comment about busting Trump in the face and
Speaker 3: about his claims that Trump is a danger.
Speaker 4: No, she just agreed with him.
Speaker 3: All this after two assassination attempts in two months.
Speaker 4: And the mad rant went on further.
Speaker 3: Here is Eddie claiming Trump being elected again will leave
Speaker 3: children traumatized.
Speaker 4: Did I mention this hysteric is a professor.
Speaker 16: Because we've got to keep this troubler date out of
Speaker 16: office because if he comes in, our babies are going
Speaker 16: to be in danger because remember, those young children are
Speaker 16: going to grow up with the memory of having to
Speaker 16: not go to school for the threat of bombs, and
Speaker 16: somebody told them that their moms and dads eat cats
Speaker 16: if they eat cats and dogs. I'll get myself together
Speaker 16: with Claire.
Speaker 11: Okay, taken at it.
Speaker 4: Deep breaths, Yes, deep breaths.
Speaker 3: Maybe you should have got yourself together before you went
Speaker 3: on television and spewed a bunch of deliberate lies in
Speaker 3: hysteria and the electis media had a new word to
Speaker 3: describe JD. Vance's dominant performance in the debate. That wasn't
Speaker 3: a word like dominant or informed, competent, confident, No, no, no,
Speaker 3: that had something better.
Speaker 4: A backhander. See if you can sport it. In this compilation.
Speaker 5: Jd Vance was as slick as an eel last night.
Speaker 8: He was too slick. Maybe he's a little too slick
Speaker 8: for that. Vance came off a bit slick tonight.
Speaker 5: Jady Vance was a very slick debater.
Speaker 8: The slicker speaker. I think he looked at shifty.
Speaker 10: He looked slick.
Speaker 14: Over and over.
Speaker 16: You heard lide and kind of slick answers from JD.
Speaker 6: Vance.
Speaker 7: Jady Vance changes personalities like most people change suits. Slick, slick, slick.
Speaker 9: When you look over at JD Vance, you see slick guys.
Speaker 6: We all know, having worked with Van Jones, how these
Speaker 6: Yale educated looks very slick.
Speaker 12: No matter how slick JD may have sounded today, there
Speaker 12: is nothing decent about him.
Speaker 6: This man is standing here in lying to the country,
Speaker 6: and that's where JD. Vance was his slickest.
Speaker 11: You know.
Speaker 8: JD.
Speaker 3: Vance was very slick, but he was slick like a
Speaker 3: snake oil snake oil salesman.
Speaker 12: JD.
Speaker 2: Vans is slick and smooth, but he is still.
Speaker 3: A And let's end, left is losing it with the
Speaker 3: epicenter of lefty lunacy.
Speaker 4: Yes where ending with the ladies of the view.
Speaker 3: Here is Woopy Goldberg claiming that the far left Hollywood
Speaker 3: echo chamber, well, it's actually right wing. This is a
Speaker 3: response to actor Zachary Levi coming out as conservative, knowing
Speaker 3: full well that it's probably going to damage or even
Speaker 3: end his career.
Speaker 2: Within my industry.
Speaker 8: As you can probably imagine, Hollywood is a very very
Speaker 8: liberal town and this very well could constitute career suicide.
Speaker 17: So, okay, that's not necessarily true. From the beginning of
Speaker 17: Hollywood there have been it's always been a very right
Speaker 17: leaning town. But I know, you don't know much about
Speaker 17: the Hollywood history.
Speaker 8: So let me school you.
Speaker 3: Oh dear whoop, He's going to be schooling us.
Speaker 4: This should be good.
Speaker 3: I bet you'll be able to name just dozens of
Speaker 3: prominent conservatives in the industry, famous actors we've all heard of.
Speaker 3: She could barely remember the term Republicans there.
Speaker 4: I bet she doesn't know too many.
Speaker 17: But the truth of the matter is very few people
Speaker 17: seem to bait it because they're Republican. John Voight who
Speaker 17: is working, Dennis Queen, who is working people who work
Speaker 17: to stop that. It's more bs and it's unnecessary.
Speaker 3: She managed to name two dudes, and those two dudes
Speaker 3: have had their careers impacted negatively because of their politics.
Speaker 3: Talk about proving zachlyly Vice point completely Joining me now
Speaker 3: is Sky News contributor Kosher Gaeta Kosher. We've heard a
Speaker 3: lot about JD. Van's man explaining during that debate, do
Speaker 3: you think Nicole Wallace has a point there? Will the
Speaker 3: female audience been repelled by that sort of behavior from JD.
Speaker 3: Vance or even if so what he was saying was factual,
Speaker 3: is the fact that he was speaking over to female
Speaker 3: motor writers a bad look.
Speaker 15: No, I never understood the man explaining concept. You explain
Speaker 15: and it doesn't matter what parts you have on the
Speaker 15: other side when you're on the receiving end of explanations.
Speaker 15: I think that was grasping for Straws. What he did do,
Speaker 15: I think was actually very masterful where he did what
Speaker 15: all Trump supporters very frustrated that Trump didn't do in
Speaker 15: the first debate, where he fought back against the incorrect
Speaker 15: fact check, but he did it still in a nice way,
Speaker 15: a firm but nice way. And I think overall what
Speaker 15: comes across from Jadvans and what people remember is he
Speaker 15: actually showed a different dimension of his personality, somebody who's
Speaker 15: a bit softer and charming, even as opposed to the
Speaker 15: combative Jad Evans that we've seen, which also has its place,
Speaker 15: and he kept everything in the realm of that. I
Speaker 15: don't think man explaining is something that people are going.
Speaker 4: To take away from it now.
Speaker 3: And I did say a very interesting bit of analysis
Speaker 3: that he had the lowest li likeability or approval writing
Speaker 3: of them for candidates Trump, Harris Walls, and they said
Speaker 3: that is an absolute condemnation of the media, because if
Speaker 3: you look at the individuals, he's by far, by any
Speaker 3: sort of objective measure, probably the most intelligent, likablll and
Speaker 3: normal and relatable, especially given his background, and yet he's
Speaker 3: been painted as this bogey man by so many in
Speaker 3: the media. Now, the Biden Harris administration's inadequate response to
Speaker 3: the victims of Hurricane Helene continues, with the Vice President
Speaker 3: finally touching down in Georgia today or about a week
Speaker 3: after the damage was inflicted, and she had this to say.
Speaker 15: And the federal relief and assistance that we have been
Speaker 15: providing has included FEMA providing seven hundred and fifty dollars for.
Speaker 4: Folks who need immediate needs being met kosher.
Speaker 3: There's been a lot of criticism about the measily sum
Speaker 3: offered there. Obviously it will also be some short term
Speaker 3: accommodation for certain people. But you compare that to the
Speaker 3: largest and the money spent in total on illegal immigrants
Speaker 3: housing them long term in hotels and elsewhere. And then
Speaker 3: you look at the people who've been left homeless with
Speaker 3: Hurricane Helene, and their citizens have contributed taxes and they
Speaker 3: seem to be getting very little.
Speaker 15: Yeah, that juxtaposition in a government gone wild, the bloat
Speaker 15: and spending to all sorts of foreign causes as you mentioned,
Speaker 15: and then nothing for these victims for cigling the border.
Speaker 15: For other natural disasters. Hawaii had these huge bushfire as
Speaker 15: wildfire as a while back, and that was inadequate the
Speaker 15: response the train derailment and the chemical spill disaster in
Speaker 15: East Palestine, Ohio was another example where they just never
Speaker 15: went and didn't do much in that case, a man
Speaker 15: made disaster lost on people. And the other thing that
Speaker 15: it reminds me of as Hurricane Katrina. In the bush
Speaker 15: hears he was accused Bush of being too slow, and
Speaker 15: I think he was. The response from FEMA and all
Speaker 15: the things that he green lighted took a little bit
Speaker 15: too long, and the media made a huge story out
Speaker 15: of that, and it really was a stine on his
Speaker 15: presidency that he never recovered from. So that juxtaposition is
Speaker 15: also really interesting where it's just another media test and
Speaker 15: you can see where they focus and where they give
Speaker 15: a free pass. And it's a shame because they're real
Speaker 15: people who are really hurting and have.
Speaker 3: Died absolutely, and some of them are people who can
Speaker 3: least afford something like this happening. They just don't have
Speaker 3: the means to recover quickly from such a disaster. Now,
Speaker 3: the Daily Mail is reporting that Kamala Harris's husband, Doug
Speaker 3: aim Off, allegedly slapped his ex in the face so
Speaker 3: hard that she spun around while waiting in a valet
Speaker 3: line at the twenty twelve cant Film Festival. The Daily
Speaker 3: Mail reports further one of the alleged victims free and
Speaker 3: said that the woman called him immediately after this incident,
Speaker 3: sobbing in the cab and describing the alleged assault. Daily
Speaker 3: Mail is not naming the woman, who is a successful
Speaker 3: New York attorney, Kosha. This is an explosive story. It's
Speaker 3: interesting to see which media outlets are following this which
Speaker 3: ones are just completely ignoring it. But it is certainly
Speaker 3: a story that The Daily Mail felt deserve to be published,
Speaker 3: and they do seem to have spoken to multiple people
Speaker 3: connected with this.
Speaker 15: Yeah, so starnation confirmed yet, But you're right, there's a
Speaker 15: lot of detail in it and a lot of corb
Speaker 15: reading witnesses are alleged corb reading witnesses. It is an
Speaker 15: explosive story. Now, it is important to know that the
Speaker 15: Dargam half is not on the ticket, so the scrutiny
Speaker 15: that he deserves is something.
Speaker 3: Is being promoted, yes, only just I think a few
Speaker 3: days ago Jensarki interviewed him and said he was a
Speaker 3: new improved paragon of fel masculinity.
Speaker 15: And that's the thing he stepped in it, Like why.
Speaker 3: Spoken about it in the past, about how he wants
Speaker 3: to get rid of toxic masculinity and how imported.
Speaker 15: That's a thing. So otherwise you could sort of draw
Speaker 15: a line and see family members should be scrutinized, but
Speaker 15: not to the same level of heat as the candidate himself,
Speaker 15: except if you insert yourself into the limelight. And the
Speaker 15: whole thing with the nanny allegedly where he had an
Speaker 15: affair with his first wife with the nanny, that's one thing,
Speaker 15: and then this thing. So when these people try to
Speaker 15: present themselves as are moral betters and then these stories break,
Speaker 15: it is relevant, but I don't think people are going
Speaker 15: to dig into it, and you won't find this story
Speaker 15: into many outlets.
Speaker 3: And I can assure you if it was the better
Speaker 3: half of a Republican candidate, one who was going to
Speaker 3: be vice president or president, even in this case, it
Speaker 3: would be far more socrgny and the media would be
Speaker 3: far more interested Koshagaia, thank you so much for your
Speaker 3: time this evening. Still to calm, the allegations against p
Speaker 3: Diddy continue to pile up.
Speaker 4: Kinsey Scofield has the labors welcome back.
Speaker 3: Let's bring in celebrity and royal commentator Kinsey Schofield.
Speaker 4: Kinsey, There's been a development in the.
Speaker 3: Case against disgraced rapper and media mogul music mogul shown
Speaker 3: Diddy Combs. He's now accused of sexually abusing dozens of people,
Speaker 3: including miners. A lawyer representing more than a hundred of
Speaker 3: his alleged victims has given a press conference.
Speaker 11: Seeming that our investigators confirm and corroborate what we've been told.
Speaker 11: Are names that will shock you. These are individual cases.
Speaker 11: There are indeed other perpetrators involved. They will be revealed
Speaker 11: when that particular individual case is ready to be filed.
Speaker 11: They already know who they are. And I'm talking here
Speaker 11: about not just the cowardly but complicit bystanders. That is,
Speaker 11: those people that we know watched this behavior cur and
Speaker 11: did nothing. And I'm talking about the people that.
Speaker 3: Participated bystandards and participants.
Speaker 4: What are we going to get nicked out of this?
Speaker 13: Kyskinsey When we watched the Diddy raids, we saw Homeland
Speaker 13: security collect hard drives, digital equipment, videotapes, DVDs every public
Speaker 13: figure or celebrity that can be identified in Sean Comb's
Speaker 13: freak off videos. Those people are expected to be questioned
Speaker 13: if they haven't already. The theory is that did he
Speaker 13: secretly filmed his parties to use the footage as blackmail,
Speaker 13: to control or have some sort of leverage against the participants.
Speaker 13: There are reports that Diddy has a list of over
Speaker 13: two hundred celebrities that could be humiliated by what he
Speaker 13: could reveal are worse? You know, could he take some
Speaker 13: of these people down with him if he were to testify?
Speaker 13: And it's everyone politicians, musicians, models, movie stars. There will
Speaker 13: be a lot of nervous people thanks to that press conference,
Speaker 13: thanks to the future court hearings. And I do wonder
Speaker 13: if Diddy and his team were concerned about his safety
Speaker 13: behind bars. I don't have to remind you what happened
Speaker 13: to Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton's bestie Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, and I can say there also climbed that Actidenzel
Speaker 3: Washington confronted Diddy at one of his parties back in
Speaker 3: two thousand and three, reportedly storming out after a hated
Speaker 3: screaming match with the rapper.
Speaker 4: What can you tell us about these reports?
Speaker 13: Yeah, I do think we're going to continue to hear
Speaker 13: a lot more of these types of stories because people
Speaker 13: feel safe to speak with Ditty behind bars. There's a
Speaker 13: real sense that he could spend the rest of his
Speaker 13: life in jail and that will give people the courage
Speaker 13: to speak up.
Speaker 3: Absolutely Now, The Daly Mail is reporting that the UK
Speaker 3: government's outgoing and its secretary, Simon Case, could potentially pin
Speaker 3: an explosive tell all on the breakdown of Harry and
Speaker 3: Meghan's relationship with the royal family.
Speaker 4: Kinsey, this is a surprise. What else can you tell us?
Speaker 13: This could be really juicy, reader. There have been reports
Speaker 13: of tension between Case and the Sussexes, particularly during the
Speaker 13: period leading up to Mexitt. It's understood that Simon Case
Speaker 13: was involved in internal discussions about how to handle media
Speaker 13: coverage around the couple's growing dissatisfaction within the royal family.
Speaker 13: He was also said to have played a significant role
Speaker 13: in orchestrating the separation of the households of Prince William
Speaker 13: and Prince Harry, so he has a lot of insider information.
Speaker 13: I'm here for it. I know that's horrible to say,
Speaker 13: but I would read that book.
Speaker 4: Simon, Well, is.
Speaker 3: There still an appetite for this sort of contest? Because
Speaker 3: we have heard so many reports, We've had so many
Speaker 3: news reports about Meghan being a horrible boy and Harry
Speaker 3: being whipped and all the shenanigans between Harry and Meghan
Speaker 3: and William and Kate.
Speaker 4: Is there still an appetite for this? Have we not
Speaker 4: heard it all before?
Speaker 15: Well?
Speaker 13: I heard a great quote today and it's the greatest
Speaker 13: source for royal gossip in the last four years has
Speaker 13: been Prince Harry. And ain't that the truth? And I
Speaker 13: think that it's I think it's his truth. If you
Speaker 13: think about the last four years of royal gossip, it's
Speaker 13: his truth. So I don't mind hearing it from somebody
Speaker 13: else's perspective because I don't necessarily think that Prince Harry
Speaker 13: has been completely honest with us. I think that he's
Speaker 13: had an ulterior motive, and that's to elevate his wife
Speaker 13: throughout the process.
Speaker 4: Well more on that.
Speaker 3: Camilla apparently has discouraged King Charles from reuniting with Prince Harry.
Speaker 3: The Daily Beast reports that Queen Camilla has told the
Speaker 3: King to ditch his plan reunion with Prince Harry. And
Speaker 3: this is all according to Camilla's friends who've spoken to
Speaker 3: the Daily Base.
Speaker 4: It looks like, do you.
Speaker 3: Believe this story? I always thought that Camilla would be
Speaker 3: working over time to heal those wounds. I know Harry
Speaker 3: has said some terrible things about her and wrote some
Speaker 3: terrible things about her in his book.
Speaker 13: I think that the Queen is severely and sincerely concerned
Speaker 13: about the King's health. It seems like Harry and Meghan
Speaker 13: they dig the sword even deeper at the height of
Speaker 13: some of the royal family's worst health crisises. When Prince
Speaker 13: Philip was in the hospital, they sat down with Oprah
Speaker 13: the days before the Queen died. She asked them to
Speaker 13: come visit her. They denied her that when the King
Speaker 13: announced he had cancer, Meghan quickly announced about American reviewer Orchard.
Speaker 13: It just seems like not only have their actions been
Speaker 13: incredibly hurtful, but it seems as they are completely oblivious
Speaker 13: to proper chorum when it comes to other people's vulnerability
Speaker 13: around illness. And I think that Camilla likely just wants
Speaker 13: some peace.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, that is a very good point and we
Speaker 3: can't forget that so much of what Harry and Meghan did,
Speaker 3: of the airing of the Dirty Laundry, the tell All interviews,
Speaker 3: it was happening whilst the Queen was in a terrible
Speaker 3: health where it was really her final months, and she
Speaker 3: went through it knowing the family was fractured and this
Speaker 3: nonsense was being said about her family. So I think
Speaker 3: that is really in the minds of many people, whether
Speaker 3: they're are monarchists or not, something that is unforgivable, but
Speaker 3: particularly for Harry because Harry was so close with his grandmother.
Speaker 13: I agree. You know, there are all these stories that
Speaker 13: we're seeing Harry push to the forefront of the Sussex
Speaker 13: brand because people still love Harry, and the feedback I'm
Speaker 13: getting is I'll never forgive Harry for the last four
Speaker 13: or five years and the way that he treated the
Speaker 13: Queen in her twilight years. So you're I think you're
Speaker 13: on the pulse when it comes to the public's reaction
Speaker 13: to Prince Harry today.
Speaker 3: Kinsey Schofield, thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 11: Thank you.
Speaker 4: That's it from May.
Speaker 3: I'll see you Tomorrow night at nine p thirty four
Speaker 3: Lefties losing it.
Speaker 4: Good Night,