1 00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:06,680 Speaker 1: From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Claire Harvey. 2 00:00:06,760 --> 00:00:13,520 Speaker 1: It's Friday, March sixth, twenty twenty six. Journalist Chung Lei, 3 00:00:13,640 --> 00:00:16,720 Speaker 1: who was falsely imprisoned for three years in China, is 4 00:00:16,760 --> 00:00:21,360 Speaker 1: accusing Melbourne's Rising Festival of censorship, claiming it canceled a 5 00:00:21,400 --> 00:00:25,599 Speaker 1: play about her imprisonment, just months after the board offensively 6 00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:29,960 Speaker 1: checked if she would publicly oppose a Chinese government funded artwork. 7 00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:35,440 Speaker 1: One of the world's most formidable fighting forces who help 8 00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:39,520 Speaker 1: defeat isis for Kurds, based in northern Iraq, are backed 9 00:00:39,560 --> 00:00:42,519 Speaker 1: by the CIA and now set to begin a ground 10 00:00:42,560 --> 00:00:48,199 Speaker 1: campaign against the Iranian regime from the Middle East to 11 00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:51,000 Speaker 1: the White House. The Australian has reporters on the ground 12 00:00:51,080 --> 00:00:54,520 Speaker 1: around the world and an unrivaled team of newsbreakers and 13 00:00:54,680 --> 00:00:58,400 Speaker 1: analysts here at home. Join our subscribers at the Australian 14 00:00:58,480 --> 00:01:01,080 Speaker 1: dot com dot au to make make sure you understand 15 00:01:01,120 --> 00:01:06,560 Speaker 1: this story and all the news better than anyone today. 16 00:01:06,600 --> 00:01:09,120 Speaker 1: One of our favorites here on the Front, Greg Sheridan, 17 00:01:09,319 --> 00:01:12,119 Speaker 1: is here to think through the big question about this war. 18 00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:15,760 Speaker 1: Is it legal? And if it's not, doesn't matter. Greg's 19 00:01:15,760 --> 00:01:23,640 Speaker 1: here in just a moment. Greg Sheridan is The Australian's 20 00:01:23,680 --> 00:01:24,440 Speaker 1: Foreign editor. 21 00:01:24,560 --> 00:01:24,840 Speaker 2: Greg. 22 00:01:24,959 --> 00:01:28,440 Speaker 1: As the US military pounds Iran and sinks its navy, 23 00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:31,320 Speaker 1: there's a debate blowing up internationally about whether or not 24 00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:34,240 Speaker 1: this war is legal. What do you think? 25 00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:39,440 Speaker 2: Yes, I think it's legal. But international law is a 26 00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:43,160 Speaker 2: sort of a fictional concept anyway. International law didn't prevent 27 00:01:43,240 --> 00:01:46,560 Speaker 2: Russia from invading Ukraine. It didn't prevent China from taking 28 00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:50,080 Speaker 2: the South China Sea when the Court of Permanent Arbitration 29 00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:54,920 Speaker 2: decided that China had no claims whatsoever to the islands 30 00:01:54,960 --> 00:01:58,480 Speaker 2: that it had stolen or created. And also international law, 31 00:01:58,520 --> 00:02:01,760 Speaker 2: there is no legislation, there is international parliament, there is 32 00:02:01,800 --> 00:02:05,080 Speaker 2: no court, and there is no jurisdiction. The only jurisdiction 33 00:02:05,160 --> 00:02:08,240 Speaker 2: that exists is the Yuan Security Council. Given that the 34 00:02:08,360 --> 00:02:10,720 Speaker 2: United States is a permanent member of the Security Council 35 00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:12,840 Speaker 2: with a veto, I think it's very unlikely that the 36 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:16,640 Speaker 2: Security Council is going to impose a penalty on the 37 00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:20,359 Speaker 2: United States. So I think international law is a kind 38 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:23,680 Speaker 2: of a fiction anyway. But even within the terms of 39 00:02:23,680 --> 00:02:27,400 Speaker 2: international law, countries are allowed to defend themselves and you 40 00:02:27,440 --> 00:02:29,440 Speaker 2: can make a very strong case. I wrote a column 41 00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:32,120 Speaker 2: about this the other day that Iran has been attacking 42 00:02:32,120 --> 00:02:35,040 Speaker 2: the United States for forty seven years. It's been doing 43 00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:40,720 Speaker 2: so mainly they not exclusively through proxies, in order that 44 00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:44,960 Speaker 2: the United States would feel inhibited from responding. Because if 45 00:02:44,960 --> 00:02:47,480 Speaker 2: they can say, well, look, has Bala did it, they'll 46 00:02:47,600 --> 00:02:50,120 Speaker 2: get the US to respond to has below They can 47 00:02:50,160 --> 00:02:52,280 Speaker 2: say that Huties did it. So theret he has attacked 48 00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:55,640 Speaker 2: American ship in on Iran's orders, with Iran support, with 49 00:02:55,720 --> 00:02:59,600 Speaker 2: Iran's money, perhaps with Iran's weapons, and the Americans hit 50 00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:04,360 Speaker 2: back at the hooties. But eventually Donald Trump has decided 51 00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:09,560 Speaker 2: that Grayson tactics won't shield you from an American retaliation. 52 00:03:09,760 --> 00:03:15,120 Speaker 2: If you hit America, even if you've disguised the agents 53 00:03:15,160 --> 00:03:19,079 Speaker 2: that do it so that they don't be your uniform 54 00:03:19,160 --> 00:03:22,480 Speaker 2: or something, he couldn't care less, and he's going to 55 00:03:22,560 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 2: hit you. If you hit him, he's going to hit you. 56 00:03:24,639 --> 00:03:27,200 Speaker 2: And the world is much safer place when the bad 57 00:03:27,240 --> 00:03:29,400 Speaker 2: guys are scared of the American president. You know, the 58 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:34,680 Speaker 2: Iranians took American diplomats hostage under Jimmy Carter the minute 59 00:03:34,760 --> 00:03:38,120 Speaker 2: Ronald Reagan was elected. They released them all because they 60 00:03:38,160 --> 00:03:40,960 Speaker 2: held Carter in content. They were scared of Bragan and 61 00:03:41,040 --> 00:03:42,640 Speaker 2: it's a good thing. When the bad guys in the 62 00:03:42,640 --> 00:03:45,080 Speaker 2: world are scared of the American president, we're all a 63 00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:47,000 Speaker 2: lot safer, Yeah, Greg. 64 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:50,280 Speaker 1: There's some talk from people like Canadian Prime Minister Mark 65 00:03:50,360 --> 00:03:53,320 Speaker 1: Carney about hegemon's a word that I hope never to 66 00:03:53,360 --> 00:03:57,160 Speaker 1: hear again. And Australia is a middle power. Of Canada 67 00:03:57,200 --> 00:04:00,480 Speaker 1: is a middle power. There's clearly some hesitancy from UK 68 00:04:00,560 --> 00:04:03,160 Speaker 1: Prime Minister kir Stellma. He certainly hasn't allowed the US 69 00:04:03,200 --> 00:04:06,760 Speaker 1: to use his bases. Does any of that kind of 70 00:04:06,840 --> 00:04:09,559 Speaker 1: matter in the way we think about it? Should Australia 71 00:04:10,080 --> 00:04:14,120 Speaker 1: be worrying about whether, for example, the US President has 72 00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:16,320 Speaker 1: the right under American law to do this, whether he 73 00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:20,440 Speaker 1: needed congressional approval, whether the UN Charter would regard this 74 00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:21,440 Speaker 1: as self defense or not. 75 00:04:22,160 --> 00:04:25,159 Speaker 2: It doesn't matter the beings what the UN Charter would regard. 76 00:04:25,200 --> 00:04:27,919 Speaker 2: I mean, look at the UN. You know, China is 77 00:04:27,960 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 2: often on the Human Rights Committee, The International Year of 78 00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:33,000 Speaker 2: Women is often chaired by Saudi Arabia. I mean, the 79 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:36,680 Speaker 2: whole thing is preposterous. Now, it has a certain power 80 00:04:36,800 --> 00:04:39,800 Speaker 2: reality you've got to take account of that, but it's 81 00:04:39,839 --> 00:04:43,039 Speaker 2: not a moral arbiter or anything like that shouldn't affect 82 00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:46,080 Speaker 2: us one way or the other. All those questions about 83 00:04:46,080 --> 00:04:50,280 Speaker 2: Trump's authority and everything are good practical questions because they 84 00:04:50,360 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 2: might have a political consequence in America and that might 85 00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:57,080 Speaker 2: limit his discretion down the track. They had nothing to 86 00:04:57,120 --> 00:04:59,920 Speaker 2: do with us, really, and they don't affect them morale 87 00:05:00,279 --> 00:05:03,200 Speaker 2: or otherwise in the war. I'm not absolutely convinced this 88 00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:05,880 Speaker 2: war was the right thing to do, but I'm not 89 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:10,480 Speaker 2: the least bitswayed by these kind of silly process arguments. 90 00:05:11,040 --> 00:05:13,279 Speaker 2: You know, I've been around a long long time in 91 00:05:13,279 --> 00:05:17,000 Speaker 2: this game, and I can remember Gareth Evans writing more 92 00:05:17,040 --> 00:05:20,880 Speaker 2: eloquently than Mark Kearney on the importance of middle plower 93 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:24,400 Speaker 2: diplomacy and coalitions of middle powers can achieve this and 94 00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:26,320 Speaker 2: that and all the rest of it. But you know, 95 00:05:26,360 --> 00:05:28,960 Speaker 2: the underlying reality of life is that the strong do 96 00:05:29,080 --> 00:05:31,520 Speaker 2: what they will and the weak can see what they must. 97 00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:34,919 Speaker 2: And your best chance in the world is to be 98 00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:38,880 Speaker 2: an alliance with a strong power. And you want your 99 00:05:38,920 --> 00:05:44,200 Speaker 2: own power. You want real national power that you can exercise. 100 00:05:44,480 --> 00:05:48,320 Speaker 2: So if Australia like Haspolla had two hundred thousand missiles, 101 00:05:48,760 --> 00:05:52,680 Speaker 2: everybody would be very cautious about doing circumnavigation to the 102 00:05:52,720 --> 00:05:57,159 Speaker 2: Australian mainland. So you want your own power. Of course, 103 00:05:57,200 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 2: you want coalitions with like minded middle powers where you 104 00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:02,360 Speaker 2: can get them, and the purpose of that is mainly 105 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:05,919 Speaker 2: to try to persuade the big powers to cooperate with you. 106 00:06:06,279 --> 00:06:09,760 Speaker 2: But the most important thing is your alliance with a 107 00:06:09,760 --> 00:06:15,760 Speaker 2: big power. China is constrained in Taiwan, not because you know, Brazil, 108 00:06:16,240 --> 00:06:20,279 Speaker 2: Mexico and Australia in an alliance of middle powers will 109 00:06:20,279 --> 00:06:24,840 Speaker 2: issue a stern press release if China invades Taiwan. It's 110 00:06:24,880 --> 00:06:29,280 Speaker 2: constrained in Taiwan because the United States military might attack it. 111 00:06:29,839 --> 00:06:33,679 Speaker 2: And everything that we regard as benign in the global 112 00:06:33,760 --> 00:06:37,120 Speaker 2: world order since World War II is essentially rested on 113 00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:41,800 Speaker 2: American power and American primacy. We dressed that all up 114 00:06:42,120 --> 00:06:46,400 Speaker 2: as an international system because the Americans were so benign. 115 00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:50,720 Speaker 2: They provided public goods for free, and they shared their 116 00:06:50,760 --> 00:06:53,920 Speaker 2: authority through a range of institutions. You know, the World Bank, 117 00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:57,840 Speaker 2: the International Monetary funded all that. But they're not as 118 00:06:57,839 --> 00:07:01,120 Speaker 2: absolutely powerful as they were, and as a result of that, 119 00:07:01,160 --> 00:07:05,840 Speaker 2: you don't get a glorious flourishing of middle power creativity. 120 00:07:06,200 --> 00:07:10,120 Speaker 2: You get China and Russia deciding what happens. And a 121 00:07:10,200 --> 00:07:13,800 Speaker 2: world dominated by China and Russia is a vastly more 122 00:07:13,840 --> 00:07:16,560 Speaker 2: horrible place than a world dominated by America. 123 00:07:22,320 --> 00:07:25,280 Speaker 1: How much do you think this is targeted at, and 124 00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:29,360 Speaker 1: obviously not literally China and Russia giving them a reason 125 00:07:29,360 --> 00:07:31,520 Speaker 1: to think again if they thought, for example, they might 126 00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:35,560 Speaker 1: invade Taiwan or go further than Ukraine in Europe. 127 00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:39,400 Speaker 2: That's a very complex question. It's an interesting and complex question. 128 00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:43,200 Speaker 2: Very hard to know what's in Trump's mind, but I 129 00:07:43,280 --> 00:07:46,440 Speaker 2: certainly have tried very hard and talk to a lot 130 00:07:46,480 --> 00:07:48,720 Speaker 2: of people to work out what the implications are for 131 00:07:48,880 --> 00:07:52,920 Speaker 2: China and Russia. Now there are some implications which will 132 00:07:52,960 --> 00:07:56,800 Speaker 2: worry China and Russia. So Trump is shown he will 133 00:07:56,840 --> 00:08:00,560 Speaker 2: take decisive military action if he thinks is if he 134 00:08:00,600 --> 00:08:04,160 Speaker 2: wants to. Now, China and Russia held Joe Biden in 135 00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:06,640 Speaker 2: content and knew that he would never take any action 136 00:08:06,720 --> 00:08:10,560 Speaker 2: about anything, and so they fell unconstrained. Trump's a different 137 00:08:10,640 --> 00:08:13,880 Speaker 2: kettle of fish, and Trump also has a bigger military 138 00:08:13,880 --> 00:08:18,080 Speaker 2: budget than Biden had, and also China and Russia had 139 00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:21,840 Speaker 2: a very useful ally in Iran provided drones for Russian 140 00:08:22,640 --> 00:08:26,720 Speaker 2: use in Ukraine, had provided oil for China at knockdown rates. 141 00:08:27,520 --> 00:08:30,920 Speaker 2: That ally probably has disappeared, at least for some time, 142 00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:34,080 Speaker 2: because even if the Iranian regime hangs on, it will 143 00:08:34,120 --> 00:08:38,800 Speaker 2: be much diminished. On the other hand, there are some 144 00:08:38,920 --> 00:08:42,160 Speaker 2: upsides to this for China and Russia. If this all 145 00:08:42,200 --> 00:08:46,040 Speaker 2: goes bad for Trump, then America may be paradoxically even 146 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:48,720 Speaker 2: weaker at the end of it than it was at 147 00:08:48,760 --> 00:08:53,240 Speaker 2: the start. Also, if this leads to a sustained increase 148 00:08:53,280 --> 00:08:56,600 Speaker 2: in the price of oil, that probably helps Russia because 149 00:08:56,640 --> 00:09:00,600 Speaker 2: it's still basically an energy exporter. And then finally, no 150 00:09:00,679 --> 00:09:03,360 Speaker 2: one in the West, neither the United States, nor Western 151 00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:07,880 Speaker 2: Europe nor US, has made any serious effort to increase 152 00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:11,840 Speaker 2: the production of armaments and munitions to the level that 153 00:09:11,960 --> 00:09:15,840 Speaker 2: is needed. We've had years of war in Ukraine, massive 154 00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:20,280 Speaker 2: Chinese military buildup, We've had endless talk fests, but no action. 155 00:09:20,520 --> 00:09:23,720 Speaker 2: You know, in Australia, We're going to acquire a submarine 156 00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:26,600 Speaker 2: sometime when landed and Emoi comes back as doctor Spock 157 00:09:26,679 --> 00:09:30,080 Speaker 2: in Star Trek one hundred and twelve or something. Meanwhile, 158 00:09:30,160 --> 00:09:33,040 Speaker 2: China is producing nuclear submarines at a rate of knots, 159 00:09:33,720 --> 00:09:38,960 Speaker 2: and this war in Iran uses up a huge amount 160 00:09:39,280 --> 00:09:44,080 Speaker 2: of American high tech weaponry, particularly missile interceptors. We're at 161 00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:46,080 Speaker 2: the back of the queue to ever get a Patriot 162 00:09:46,120 --> 00:09:50,319 Speaker 2: missile interceptor, but America can produce about five hundred of 163 00:09:50,320 --> 00:09:53,520 Speaker 2: them a year, using about five hundred of them a minute. 164 00:09:53,559 --> 00:09:57,440 Speaker 2: I'm exaggerating, of course in Iran. So that's a big 165 00:09:57,880 --> 00:10:02,040 Speaker 2: civilization wide failure by the West. So that might help 166 00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:06,240 Speaker 2: Russia and China because the Europeans want are buy weapons 167 00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:08,880 Speaker 2: from America to give to Ukraine, but you can't do 168 00:10:08,960 --> 00:10:12,760 Speaker 2: that if the American arsenal is too low. China, if 169 00:10:12,760 --> 00:10:16,120 Speaker 2: it does decide to take action in Taiwan, might calculate well, 170 00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:19,960 Speaker 2: America no longer has enough of the high tech munitions 171 00:10:19,960 --> 00:10:22,559 Speaker 2: that it needs. So there are pluses and minuses for 172 00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:25,760 Speaker 2: Russia and China. And I don't think the net assessment 173 00:10:25,840 --> 00:10:28,640 Speaker 2: is you know, you can't do a net assessment yet. 174 00:10:30,520 --> 00:10:33,000 Speaker 1: It's always worth having a look at what the White 175 00:10:33,040 --> 00:10:35,120 Speaker 1: House is putting out in terms of its messaging, and 176 00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:38,960 Speaker 1: in this instance it's pretty bombastic. I want to play 177 00:10:38,960 --> 00:10:42,079 Speaker 1: you a quick grab from Pete Hegsith the Secretary of War. 178 00:10:43,320 --> 00:10:47,120 Speaker 3: This was never meant to be a fair fight, and 179 00:10:47,280 --> 00:10:50,480 Speaker 3: it is not a fair fate. We are punching them 180 00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:54,240 Speaker 3: while they're down, which is exactly how it should be. 181 00:10:54,920 --> 00:10:57,160 Speaker 1: And this is a video published by the White House 182 00:10:57,200 --> 00:11:07,960 Speaker 1: on social media. Who were winning this fight? Greg, I'm 183 00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:09,600 Speaker 1: not sure if you play a lot of the video 184 00:11:09,679 --> 00:11:12,280 Speaker 1: game Call of Duty, but that's what it's like. This 185 00:11:12,400 --> 00:11:15,160 Speaker 1: is how the White House wants Americans to see the war. 186 00:11:15,320 --> 00:11:17,120 Speaker 1: And if I were an eighteen year old boy, I 187 00:11:17,120 --> 00:11:19,360 Speaker 1: would find it very exciting. In fact, I'm a forty 188 00:11:19,400 --> 00:11:21,000 Speaker 1: eight year old woman and I still find that does 189 00:11:21,040 --> 00:11:24,079 Speaker 1: get my pulse racing. I must admit, what do you think? 190 00:11:24,120 --> 00:11:28,280 Speaker 1: Does it make you feel squeamish or impressed, or alarmed 191 00:11:28,480 --> 00:11:31,120 Speaker 1: or worried that Pete Hegzeff is the Secretary of War? 192 00:11:31,640 --> 00:11:35,240 Speaker 2: There's no doubt part of Trump's genius. It certainly doesn't 193 00:11:35,240 --> 00:11:37,840 Speaker 2: appeal to me. But part of Trump's genius is an 194 00:11:37,920 --> 00:11:43,520 Speaker 2: ability to communicate to people who don't consume traditional news 195 00:11:43,559 --> 00:11:47,040 Speaker 2: media or politics in general. So that is a key 196 00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:51,240 Speaker 2: part of his voting coalition. And young men have been 197 00:11:51,280 --> 00:11:55,360 Speaker 2: absolutely critical. You know, you read learned articles in American journals. 198 00:11:55,360 --> 00:11:58,760 Speaker 2: Why did the brother go for Trump and all this 199 00:11:58,920 --> 00:12:02,520 Speaker 2: sort of thing. Well, you know, Claire, you and I 200 00:12:02,559 --> 00:12:06,840 Speaker 2: are adults. I'm a few decades your senior, but adults 201 00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:10,040 Speaker 2: generally don't respond to that kind of stuff much. And 202 00:12:10,760 --> 00:12:13,319 Speaker 2: I think it's you know, my own pride would be 203 00:12:13,400 --> 00:12:16,800 Speaker 2: that it's very unbecoming to the dignity of a White 204 00:12:16,800 --> 00:12:19,640 Speaker 2: House or a president. On the other hand, on the 205 00:12:19,679 --> 00:12:23,400 Speaker 2: other hand, maybe I wouldn't put you in this category. 206 00:12:23,400 --> 00:12:26,240 Speaker 2: But maybe I'm a kind of a dinosaur. And this 207 00:12:26,440 --> 00:12:31,079 Speaker 2: is the way communication goes on now with a lot 208 00:12:31,080 --> 00:12:35,000 Speaker 2: of people who you know, consume TikTok and video games. 209 00:12:35,760 --> 00:12:39,960 Speaker 2: There was nothing inherently wicked in what HeiG Seth said 210 00:12:40,600 --> 00:12:45,040 Speaker 2: or in that video game video. But you know, I 211 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:47,200 Speaker 2: think matters of life and death ought to be treated 212 00:12:47,240 --> 00:12:50,840 Speaker 2: with much more gravity. And one of the very unpleasant 213 00:12:50,840 --> 00:12:54,280 Speaker 2: revolutions of the Trump era is that matters of great 214 00:12:54,360 --> 00:12:57,679 Speaker 2: gravity are not dealt with with great gravity. I mean, 215 00:12:57,720 --> 00:13:02,200 Speaker 2: it's as if contemporary culture is a conspiration against the series, 216 00:13:02,840 --> 00:13:05,880 Speaker 2: and this is an element of that. However, it's obviously 217 00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:09,320 Speaker 2: part of what Trump thinks, you know, sells with part 218 00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:12,440 Speaker 2: of his base and public support for the war effort 219 00:13:12,520 --> 00:13:14,400 Speaker 2: is not very strong in the United States, so I 220 00:13:14,400 --> 00:13:17,840 Speaker 2: guess they want to communicate with every American they possibly can. 221 00:13:22,800 --> 00:13:27,200 Speaker 1: Coming up. Can Iran possibly pull a secular democracy out 222 00:13:27,240 --> 00:13:44,760 Speaker 1: of the rubble? Speaking of sophistication, you've written very evocatively, Gregan. 223 00:13:44,800 --> 00:13:47,840 Speaker 1: We've talked about here on the front how Iran is 224 00:13:48,080 --> 00:13:52,240 Speaker 1: a very sophisticated culture, this ancient Persian culture that has 225 00:13:52,280 --> 00:13:54,200 Speaker 1: given us so much in the rest of the world, 226 00:13:55,440 --> 00:13:59,000 Speaker 1: this society has been cowed by a couple of generations 227 00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:03,600 Speaker 1: now of dick ruthalist dictators. Is there a possibility that 228 00:14:04,160 --> 00:14:07,360 Speaker 1: in the rubble of whatever's left when these air strikes stop, 229 00:14:07,559 --> 00:14:11,240 Speaker 1: that the Iranian people will be able to throw up 230 00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:14,920 Speaker 1: someone who can lead them into a secular democracy or 231 00:14:15,400 --> 00:14:16,480 Speaker 1: is that a fantasy. 232 00:14:17,280 --> 00:14:19,200 Speaker 2: Well, I'll tell you the truth, Claire, I'm not particularly 233 00:14:19,240 --> 00:14:23,360 Speaker 2: optimistic about it. In Iran, the society is at war 234 00:14:23,440 --> 00:14:26,320 Speaker 2: with the state. There's no doubt. There is no society 235 00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:28,640 Speaker 2: in the world in which there is a bigger contradiction 236 00:14:29,160 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 2: between the society and the state. The problem is that 237 00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:35,280 Speaker 2: in Iran, the state has all the guns. One of 238 00:14:35,280 --> 00:14:38,160 Speaker 2: the things that the Iranian authorities have done quite cleverly, 239 00:14:38,200 --> 00:14:41,840 Speaker 2: although it's very sinister and wicked. In killing so many 240 00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:46,160 Speaker 2: of their citizens, they have spread guilt right throughout the 241 00:14:46,200 --> 00:14:50,120 Speaker 2: whole of the regime, from the top to the bottom. 242 00:14:51,360 --> 00:14:53,600 Speaker 2: Where there's a greater chance I think, and I'm not 243 00:14:53,680 --> 00:14:56,120 Speaker 2: even particularly optimistic here, but I think there's a greater 244 00:14:56,240 --> 00:15:00,760 Speaker 2: chance of this is that you get a more reasonable dictatorship. Now, 245 00:15:01,080 --> 00:15:04,000 Speaker 2: you know, dictatorships come in all shapes and sizes, and 246 00:15:04,040 --> 00:15:09,080 Speaker 2: there are what the political theorists sometimes called repressive responsive regimes, 247 00:15:09,400 --> 00:15:12,800 Speaker 2: regimes which are still the sort of dictatorships if you 248 00:15:12,880 --> 00:15:15,360 Speaker 2: go against the region that put you in jail, but 249 00:15:15,440 --> 00:15:17,520 Speaker 2: they give you a lot of freedom in the rest 250 00:15:17,560 --> 00:15:22,240 Speaker 2: of your life, and they also respond to the genuine 251 00:15:22,280 --> 00:15:26,240 Speaker 2: concerns of their society. A lot of examples of those 252 00:15:26,400 --> 00:15:29,800 Speaker 2: around the world and in history. And you know, I 253 00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:32,360 Speaker 2: quoted one anon of US official as say to me 254 00:15:32,480 --> 00:15:34,960 Speaker 2: not so long ago that what the Americans wanted was 255 00:15:35,160 --> 00:15:38,800 Speaker 2: a dictator who didn't commit genocide against his own people, 256 00:15:38,920 --> 00:15:42,120 Speaker 2: didn't go after nuclear weapons, and didn't attack America and 257 00:15:42,160 --> 00:15:46,800 Speaker 2: its allies. Well, that's a pretty modest set of requests. 258 00:15:47,040 --> 00:15:50,080 Speaker 2: I think you're more likely to get that, and that 259 00:15:50,240 --> 00:15:54,000 Speaker 2: could be a half way house to a democracy. I mean, 260 00:15:54,040 --> 00:15:58,840 Speaker 2: democracies often emerged from enlightened dictators. I mean that happened 261 00:15:58,880 --> 00:16:02,160 Speaker 2: in Spain, that have and in Indonesia. It's very hard 262 00:16:02,160 --> 00:16:05,360 Speaker 2: to imagine going straight from the rule of the iotolers 263 00:16:05,920 --> 00:16:10,920 Speaker 2: to a representative democracy. The other thing is you generally 264 00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:16,600 Speaker 2: don't have the institutions, you know, independent courts, proper dispute 265 00:16:16,600 --> 00:16:21,480 Speaker 2: resolution mechanisms. The other thing is all the clients of 266 00:16:21,520 --> 00:16:25,120 Speaker 2: the regime own all the resources, so then not only 267 00:16:25,160 --> 00:16:28,320 Speaker 2: would there be demands for justice, there'd be demands for redistribution. 268 00:16:28,480 --> 00:16:31,440 Speaker 2: You know. One of the things the Ietolers do quite 269 00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:34,640 Speaker 2: cleverly to keep themselves in power is enrich the leaders 270 00:16:34,680 --> 00:16:38,400 Speaker 2: of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. So it's both a 271 00:16:38,440 --> 00:16:42,560 Speaker 2: theological and an ideological regime, and it's also a corrupt region, 272 00:16:42,840 --> 00:16:46,560 Speaker 2: whereas if you're a regime insider, you make lots and 273 00:16:46,600 --> 00:16:51,040 Speaker 2: lots of money. So out of all of that, I'm 274 00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:55,760 Speaker 2: not terribly optimistic, but everything is possible. Our history is 275 00:16:55,760 --> 00:16:59,680 Speaker 2: not governed by the common law of president. The Iranian 276 00:16:59,680 --> 00:17:03,600 Speaker 2: people yearn for something better than what they've got. You 277 00:17:03,600 --> 00:17:07,480 Speaker 2: can just see every provocation leads them out in the 278 00:17:07,480 --> 00:17:11,040 Speaker 2: streets demonstrating in huge numbers, and they know every time 279 00:17:11,080 --> 00:17:13,560 Speaker 2: they go out to demonstrate, there's a very good chance 280 00:17:13,760 --> 00:17:16,359 Speaker 2: they'll be killed. You know that young woman who was 281 00:17:16,480 --> 00:17:19,119 Speaker 2: murdered because she wore her hair too long. People, it 282 00:17:19,240 --> 00:17:21,680 Speaker 2: is to complain about Singapore in the old days, undeleak 283 00:17:21,720 --> 00:17:23,560 Speaker 2: on you. If you wore your hair too long in 284 00:17:23,600 --> 00:17:27,040 Speaker 2: Singapore and you're a bloke, you might get a compulsory 285 00:17:27,119 --> 00:17:29,200 Speaker 2: visit to the barbershop. Do you wear your hair too 286 00:17:29,200 --> 00:17:31,119 Speaker 2: long in Iran you get beaten to death in a 287 00:17:31,160 --> 00:17:35,919 Speaker 2: police cell. So it's a very savage regime. As I say, 288 00:17:35,960 --> 00:17:38,880 Speaker 2: I'm not particularly optimistic about a democracy, but I think 289 00:17:38,880 --> 00:17:42,080 Speaker 2: you could get a better dictatorship than you've got now. 290 00:17:45,359 --> 00:17:46,760 Speaker 1: Greg Sheridan, thank you very much. 291 00:17:47,080 --> 00:17:48,399 Speaker 2: Great to be with you, Claire. 292 00:17:53,320 --> 00:17:58,160 Speaker 1: Greeg Sheridan is The Australian's Foreign editor. Greg's analysis is erudite, 293 00:17:58,280 --> 00:18:01,159 Speaker 1: incisive and often very fun, and you can read it 294 00:18:01,280 --> 00:18:04,080 Speaker 1: any time at the Australian dot com dot a You