1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,120 Speaker 1: Now voters in the seat of Black are gearing up 2 00:00:03,160 --> 00:00:06,360 Speaker 1: for a by election. It's after David Spears announced on 3 00:00:06,800 --> 00:00:12,360 Speaker 1: the weekend on Saturday he'll be quitting Parliament amid the 4 00:00:12,360 --> 00:00:16,240 Speaker 1: white powder scandal, which he alleges as a deep fake. 5 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:20,319 Speaker 1: He released a video on the weekend revealing he was 6 00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:24,360 Speaker 1: arrested and charged with drug offenses and will fight to 7 00:00:24,400 --> 00:00:27,760 Speaker 1: clear his name. The Liberals are on the lookout for 8 00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:30,240 Speaker 1: a candidate to stand in the seat, as are the 9 00:00:30,280 --> 00:00:34,720 Speaker 1: other parties too. Labor holding a meeting today to select 10 00:00:34,960 --> 00:00:38,080 Speaker 1: its candidate in the by election. How's this going to 11 00:00:38,080 --> 00:00:40,280 Speaker 1: play out? Could it be? Well? It certainly will be 12 00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:44,519 Speaker 1: a test for their new leader, Vincent Tazia. Emeritus Professor 13 00:00:44,520 --> 00:00:46,879 Speaker 1: Clem McIntyre has been looking at state politics for a 14 00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:51,680 Speaker 1: very long time. Clem, good morning, Good morning. Now what 15 00:00:51,880 --> 00:00:54,040 Speaker 1: is going to happen here? Obviously the Libs will be 16 00:00:54,120 --> 00:00:57,480 Speaker 1: trying their hardest to avoid another Dunstan debacle. 17 00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:01,320 Speaker 2: Yes, that's right, will all. We've got to remember that 18 00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:04,920 Speaker 2: the Liberals have got a history of factional disputes over 19 00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:10,440 Speaker 2: selection of candidates and they don't always work as harmoniously 20 00:01:10,440 --> 00:01:13,600 Speaker 2: as as they might. So the Liberals have got to 21 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:17,040 Speaker 2: find their candidate. Labor of course will put somebody up. 22 00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:20,360 Speaker 2: We imagine the Greens will. Those are the three parties 23 00:01:20,400 --> 00:01:23,880 Speaker 2: that contested the election last time around, but it's open 24 00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:27,560 Speaker 2: to any party. And of course at by elections we 25 00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:31,720 Speaker 2: frequently see probably a large number of independents than of 26 00:01:31,800 --> 00:01:34,679 Speaker 2: the general election, because all the focuses on one seat. 27 00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:38,000 Speaker 2: Independence tend to get lost in the noise of a 28 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:41,520 Speaker 2: general election, but if there's if it's just one by 29 00:01:41,560 --> 00:01:45,280 Speaker 2: election on then independents often think they've got a bit 30 00:01:45,319 --> 00:01:50,280 Speaker 2: more of a chance there. And someone like Jeff brock 31 00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:52,840 Speaker 2: in the seat of Frome was first elected at a 32 00:01:52,880 --> 00:01:57,520 Speaker 2: by election, of course, so I expect we'll see more 33 00:01:57,600 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 2: than the three candidates who stood at twenty twenty two. 34 00:02:00,600 --> 00:02:03,080 Speaker 2: The three parties I should say und stood in twenty 35 00:02:03,080 --> 00:02:03,560 Speaker 2: twenty two. 36 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:06,320 Speaker 1: There'd be a lot of support for David Spears in 37 00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:10,440 Speaker 1: the electorate. I imagine he was certainly quite popular as the 38 00:02:10,480 --> 00:02:15,400 Speaker 1: local member. And when our own Roberin went out there 39 00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:20,400 Speaker 1: when the alleged deep fake video first surface, she spoke 40 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:22,440 Speaker 1: to people in the electorate. Now this is anecdotal to 41 00:02:22,480 --> 00:02:25,640 Speaker 1: some degree. Its certainly not a professionally conducted pole, but 42 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:29,200 Speaker 1: there was a great deal of support for David Spears. 43 00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:33,160 Speaker 2: Yes, and I heard some sort of oox pops over 44 00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:36,640 Speaker 2: the weekend which were also quite supportive of him. So 45 00:02:36,680 --> 00:02:40,840 Speaker 2: the personal vote will be considerable. That will disappear how 46 00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 2: much that personal vote, you know, personal support for David 47 00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:51,760 Speaker 2: Spears is affected by the circumstances of his resignation. Whether 48 00:02:51,800 --> 00:02:57,639 Speaker 2: that drives more people away from the party or builds 49 00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:02,919 Speaker 2: up some almost sympathy remains to be seen. But I 50 00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:07,079 Speaker 2: suspect once it comes to election time an unfamiliar name 51 00:03:07,080 --> 00:03:10,880 Speaker 2: on the ballot paper won't help the Liberal Party. It's 52 00:03:10,919 --> 00:03:14,440 Speaker 2: always difficult measuring the personal support for candidate rather than 53 00:03:15,720 --> 00:03:18,799 Speaker 2: the party, but certainly at the last election, the swing 54 00:03:18,880 --> 00:03:24,200 Speaker 2: against David Spears in the primary vote was smaller than 55 00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:26,560 Speaker 2: it was across the rest of the state. Though the 56 00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:29,280 Speaker 2: swing in two party preferred terms was I think about 57 00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:31,960 Speaker 2: six and a half percent, which was not far off 58 00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:38,440 Speaker 2: the broad average. So David Spears won other election in 59 00:03:38,520 --> 00:03:41,920 Speaker 2: twenty twenty two with just over two and a half 60 00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:46,120 Speaker 2: percent margin, which makes it very tight. And the redistribution 61 00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:51,640 Speaker 2: for the seat of Black looks like it's favoring labor 62 00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:54,480 Speaker 2: a bit, so the margin will be even targe. I 63 00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:57,440 Speaker 2: think nominally it's still a Liberal seat, but even tighter 64 00:03:57,480 --> 00:04:00,680 Speaker 2: than the two point seven percent that was won by 65 00:04:00,960 --> 00:04:04,760 Speaker 2: the last time. So Labor we'll be looking at lips 66 00:04:04,760 --> 00:04:07,320 Speaker 2: at this challenge. They famously, of course, one seat of 67 00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:11,400 Speaker 2: Dunstan when Steven Marshall left the Parliament. We don't often 68 00:04:11,440 --> 00:04:15,720 Speaker 2: see governments win seats from the opposition at bi electors. 69 00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:19,000 Speaker 2: If Labor can pull off another one, then that will 70 00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:24,679 Speaker 2: be an extraordinary result and Vincent Tasia, the new Liberal leader, 71 00:04:24,720 --> 00:04:30,839 Speaker 2: will be looking over his shoulder, I think, because it 72 00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:33,279 Speaker 2: would be a very dark day for the Liberal Party. 73 00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:34,680 Speaker 2: Surely they lose this seat. 74 00:04:34,800 --> 00:04:37,760 Speaker 1: Surely they couldn't change leaders again with the election well 75 00:04:37,880 --> 00:04:38,920 Speaker 1: just over a year away. 76 00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:46,080 Speaker 2: No, I think that would well, yes, we anticipate what 77 00:04:46,120 --> 00:04:49,040 Speaker 2: the Liberal Party do with our own, our own peril, izink, 78 00:04:49,240 --> 00:04:52,520 Speaker 2: because they're not a happy They're not a happy party 79 00:04:52,520 --> 00:04:58,520 Speaker 2: in lots of ways. But the critics of Vincentazi will 80 00:04:58,560 --> 00:05:01,920 Speaker 2: be out if they can't hold that seat, so it's 81 00:05:01,960 --> 00:05:05,919 Speaker 2: a real test for him. Well, whereas you know, Labor 82 00:05:05,920 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 2: will be delighted if they win it, but they can 83 00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:11,960 Speaker 2: easily explain a loss if the Liberals hold onto the seat. 84 00:05:12,160 --> 00:05:16,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, so the redistribution you mentioned that that takes effect currently, 85 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:18,600 Speaker 1: does it. It's not at the next election, it's in 86 00:05:18,600 --> 00:05:19,279 Speaker 1: place already. 87 00:05:20,480 --> 00:05:23,120 Speaker 2: No, you're quite right. The by election will be held 88 00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:28,600 Speaker 2: under the old old boundaries. But I'm just you know, 89 00:05:28,680 --> 00:05:33,279 Speaker 2: I'm reflecting on where the direction of that seat is going. Yes, okay, Yeah, 90 00:05:34,440 --> 00:05:37,000 Speaker 2: you're correct that the by election will be held under 91 00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:38,040 Speaker 2: the old boundaries, right. 92 00:05:37,920 --> 00:05:41,240 Speaker 1: As at the last stated elections. So all rightually, okay, 93 00:05:41,279 --> 00:05:44,960 Speaker 1: interesting times ahead, and you'd think at some point claim, 94 00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:48,440 Speaker 1: and this is just wildly speculating, I suppose, but the 95 00:05:48,560 --> 00:05:52,400 Speaker 1: Liberal Party might after forty odd years of more than that, 96 00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:56,279 Speaker 1: fifty sixty years of this sort of mess, yeah, would 97 00:05:57,080 --> 00:05:59,440 Speaker 1: have maybe found some time to sort it out between 98 00:05:59,440 --> 00:06:01,200 Speaker 1: the factions. 99 00:06:01,839 --> 00:06:07,040 Speaker 2: Well, there have been times when they have settled those disputes, obviously. 100 00:06:07,040 --> 00:06:08,120 Speaker 1: Stephen Marshall's times. 101 00:06:08,480 --> 00:06:12,080 Speaker 2: Yes, from the time Stephen Marshall became leader of the 102 00:06:12,600 --> 00:06:17,080 Speaker 2: party and he really emerged without clear factional support as 103 00:06:17,160 --> 00:06:25,359 Speaker 2: an undisputed, unopposed candidate when Isabelle Redmond stepped down. But 104 00:06:25,480 --> 00:06:30,200 Speaker 2: it's clear from the battles we've seen in pre selections 105 00:06:29,680 --> 00:06:33,240 Speaker 2: in recent days at both state and federal level and 106 00:06:33,680 --> 00:06:40,200 Speaker 2: fights over the organizational positions, that there are still deep, 107 00:06:40,320 --> 00:06:44,800 Speaker 2: deep divisions inside the South Australian Liberal Party division. And 108 00:06:45,440 --> 00:06:50,120 Speaker 2: it's as you say, it's very nearly. I think we're 109 00:06:50,760 --> 00:06:53,039 Speaker 2: fifty nine and a half years since Tom Playford lost 110 00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:56,040 Speaker 2: the election of nine to sixty five and the Liberals 111 00:06:56,080 --> 00:06:59,760 Speaker 2: have been in power for under twenty of those sixty 112 00:06:59,839 --> 00:07:03,360 Speaker 2: year so that's it's a very poor record for any 113 00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:08,520 Speaker 2: major party in Australia. Indeed, but they seem to keep, 114 00:07:09,880 --> 00:07:13,920 Speaker 2: you know, stumbling over the same the same internal fights. 115 00:07:14,320 --> 00:07:17,720 Speaker 1: Indeed, is it does it stem back to still haul 116 00:07:17,840 --> 00:07:21,240 Speaker 1: changing the electoral boundaries to get rid of the gerrymanda 117 00:07:21,320 --> 00:07:22,960 Speaker 1: that existed, Is that where it all began? 118 00:07:25,640 --> 00:07:29,920 Speaker 2: No, I think that the internal divisions inside the party, 119 00:07:29,960 --> 00:07:33,280 Speaker 2: that the tension between the moderates and the conservatives predates that. 120 00:07:34,400 --> 00:07:40,320 Speaker 2: And you speaking very simple terms, under under Tom Playford's 121 00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:45,440 Speaker 2: Liberal Country League, the rural parts of South Australia overrepresented 122 00:07:45,480 --> 00:07:49,560 Speaker 2: and they tended to return very conservative members of that 123 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:54,320 Speaker 2: of that party and the urban seats were the more 124 00:07:54,320 --> 00:07:58,800 Speaker 2: moderate members, so they were outgunned in terms of party numbers. 125 00:07:58,800 --> 00:08:01,200 Speaker 2: But when steel Hall became and I think he recognized 126 00:08:01,200 --> 00:08:04,600 Speaker 2: that it was impossible to defend a result where Labor 127 00:08:04,680 --> 00:08:07,520 Speaker 2: was regularly winning more votes than the Liberal Party and 128 00:08:07,600 --> 00:08:12,520 Speaker 2: yet was failing to win those seats. So the idea 129 00:08:12,520 --> 00:08:14,920 Speaker 2: of one vote, one value is pretty central to our 130 00:08:15,760 --> 00:08:20,800 Speaker 2: sense of politics in Australia now and it's very difficult 131 00:08:20,840 --> 00:08:26,720 Speaker 2: to defend the situation that had existed up until up 132 00:08:26,760 --> 00:08:29,880 Speaker 2: until the mid sixties. But it compounded the problem in 133 00:08:29,920 --> 00:08:32,920 Speaker 2: the sense of the vision, the battles within the party. 134 00:08:33,480 --> 00:08:36,000 Speaker 2: And remember that that Steel Hall for a while stepped 135 00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:38,720 Speaker 2: away from the Liberal Party and formed the Liberal Movement, 136 00:08:38,880 --> 00:08:42,000 Speaker 2: which was reflecting those more moderate voices. 137 00:08:42,840 --> 00:08:46,360 Speaker 1: It's interesting, isn't it. You talk about the instability And 138 00:08:46,679 --> 00:08:50,040 Speaker 1: Mike Ran used to go on about the Liberal leaders 139 00:08:50,160 --> 00:08:53,560 Speaker 1: that he faced while he was both opposition leader around 140 00:08:53,559 --> 00:08:56,319 Speaker 1: premier and there were three when he was opposition leader 141 00:08:56,360 --> 00:09:00,360 Speaker 1: in Brown, Elson and Karen and then I've like account, 142 00:09:00,400 --> 00:09:04,920 Speaker 1: I'm trying to think it was Ian Evans, Martin Hamilton Smith, 143 00:09:05,160 --> 00:09:09,959 Speaker 1: Isabelle Ridabill and then Stephen Marshall. He's based off on 144 00:09:10,360 --> 00:09:12,120 Speaker 1: all of those. He used to go to town on 145 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:14,319 Speaker 1: that and Peter Melanowsk is already up to three in 146 00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:17,680 Speaker 1: Stephen Marshall David Spiers and Vincent Tazia. 147 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:21,360 Speaker 2: Yes, and if you think back since the eighties, the 148 00:09:22,520 --> 00:09:28,160 Speaker 2: Labor Party had John Bannon, Lenn Arnold, Mike ran Weatherll 149 00:09:28,240 --> 00:09:33,000 Speaker 2: and Melanowska. So that's just five in forty id years. 150 00:09:33,280 --> 00:09:37,000 Speaker 2: So yeah, it's not that Labour doesn't have its own 151 00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:40,280 Speaker 2: divisions and it's factional squabbles. They just managed to keep 152 00:09:40,280 --> 00:09:42,760 Speaker 2: them in house much more successfully and they manage that 153 00:09:42,840 --> 00:09:46,920 Speaker 2: process I think in a more professional way. The Liberal 154 00:09:46,920 --> 00:09:50,280 Speaker 2: Party arguments are just much more public and more telling 155 00:09:50,840 --> 00:09:53,959 Speaker 2: when it comes to, you know, sort of blood on 156 00:09:54,000 --> 00:09:57,240 Speaker 2: the floor at party meetings some time. Yea. 157 00:09:57,440 --> 00:10:01,120 Speaker 1: Indeed, all right, Clem, appreciate your time, Thank you, Thanks messy. 158 00:10:01,800 --> 00:10:07,640 Speaker 1: Professor Clem McIntire, Emeritus Professor on the issue of state 159 00:10:07,679 --> 00:10:10,360 Speaker 1: politics and what might happen in Black with a by 160 00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:15,200 Speaker 1: election looming, you presume if the resignation takes effect in 161 00:10:15,240 --> 00:10:21,480 Speaker 1: the next week when Parliament resumes, then I suppose two 162 00:10:21,520 --> 00:10:25,800 Speaker 1: months maybe December, early December potentially or early next year, 163 00:10:26,760 --> 00:10:30,800 Speaker 1: so we'll see. But by election looming with David Spears 164 00:10:30,840 --> 00:10:34,120 Speaker 1: announcing he will step down from State Parliament and the 165 00:10:34,160 --> 00:10:35,640 Speaker 1: seed of Black, we'll see what happens to