Speaker 1: Late General Man, Welcome to the Late Debate.
Speaker 2: Thanks for joining us on the Late Debate.
Speaker 3: I'm James Macpherson with Liz Storra and Caleb Bond coming
Speaker 3: up tonight. One of the fastest retractions you will ever
Speaker 3: see an American TV host smears Elon Musk and then
Speaker 3: just a couple of minutes later issues a groveling apology
Speaker 3: that in.
Speaker 2: A short time plus.
Speaker 3: We'll look at what's making news tomorrow, including Victorian police
Speaker 3: to lower recruitment academic standards in order to try to
Speaker 3: get new offices on board, and the famous racing track
Speaker 3: Mount Panorama could be off limits to the public after
Speaker 3: an Indigenous group claims it's a sacred site and not
Speaker 3: for Ford or Holden.
Speaker 2: We'll look at that a bit later as well.
Speaker 3: But first, Australian childcare centers and schools will later this
Speaker 3: month celebrate Harmony Day. Personally, looking at the education standards
Speaker 3: of our kids, I wish they'd just focus on reading,
Speaker 3: writing and arithmetic, but they're going to do Harmony Day
Speaker 3: and as part of that on March twenty first, kids
Speaker 3: will try different foods, they'll wear costumes from different cultures,
Speaker 3: sing different songs and the whole idea is to sort
Speaker 3: of experience and understand the cultural backgrounds of other kids
Speaker 3: in the class. Harmony Day fairly innocious, you would have thought,
Speaker 3: But not so according to the Australian Human Rights Commission,
Speaker 3: who've labeled Harmony Day a cover for racism.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: They say kids shouldn't be celebrating each other. No, no,
Speaker 3: they should be learning about how our nation was built
Speaker 3: on racism. Because in seventeen eighty eight white people arrived
Speaker 3: from Britain, Indigenous groups were disenfranchised, and that's what our
Speaker 3: children need to be learning about, because structural racism continues
Speaker 3: until this day.
Speaker 2: Goodness me.
Speaker 3: You want to talk about structural racism its structures like
Speaker 3: the Australian Human Rights Commission that are part of that
Speaker 3: if it exists. Listen to what they said in a
Speaker 3: report about Harmony Day to schools. This is their device
Speaker 3: I quote. The problem with Harmony Day is that the
Speaker 3: focus on harmony can gloss over racism.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: You can have too much harmony. It can stop people
Speaker 3: from discussing it. This is for childcare centers. Or it
Speaker 3: can cause people to think that speaking up upsets the
Speaker 3: idea of a harmonious Australian society. It distracts from recognizing
Speaker 3: and addressing the harm that racism causes to communities. The
Speaker 3: Australian Human Rights Commission putting the harm back into harmony.
Speaker 3: Harmony is a distraction, they claim, a distraction from what
Speaker 3: from what they would love to be doing, which is
Speaker 3: training our children in the fine arts of grievance and guilt.
Speaker 3: That's right, all the colored kids can feel aggrieved and
Speaker 3: all the white kids should feel guilty. To that end,
Speaker 3: the Australian Human Rights Commission wish to rename Harmony Day
Speaker 3: the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and
Speaker 3: push that through our Kindi's caleb, these guys are nuts.
Speaker 4: I mean you can just imagine the kids go, oh
Speaker 4: my god, I can't wait to celebrate the International Day
Speaker 4: for the Elimination of Racial Discriminations.
Speaker 1: Say it once and say it tries with the kid.
Speaker 4: I mean, seriously, the idea of Harmony Day is that
Speaker 4: we love our neighbors and we recognize that we all
Speaker 4: live together in one country and let's all get along
Speaker 4: because that's a nice way to live. That's not good enough,
Speaker 4: because the point here what they've actually led out of
Speaker 4: the cat they have led out of the bag is
Speaker 4: that none of it is really about harmonizing all of us.
Speaker 4: And I've made this point before when we talk about
Speaker 4: reconciliation when it comes to Indigenous people, we're told we
Speaker 4: must achieve reconciliation, which, if you follow the definition of
Speaker 4: reconcile the prefix to reconciliation, it means that we come
Speaker 4: together and we come to some sort of agreement on
Speaker 4: what has happened before, and now we move together as
Speaker 4: one will know that's not what they want. They don't
Speaker 4: want us to live in harmony. They don't want us
Speaker 4: to reconcile. They want to con genuinely point out the differences.
Speaker 4: The point is not to achieve harmony. The point isn't
Speaker 4: even to end racial discrimination, because of course there is
Speaker 4: no literal end to racial discrimination if you follow this
Speaker 4: to its logical conclusion, because there are never enough reparations
Speaker 4: that can be paid for the alleged racial discrimination that
Speaker 4: has occurred before you were even a glint in your
Speaker 4: father's eye. What they want is to divide us, and
Speaker 4: they've got to start with the kids, because imagine if
Speaker 4: the kids start thinking that it's all hunky dory that
Speaker 4: we can all live together in harmony in the one country. Well,
Speaker 4: then you don't have a racism industry anymore, do you.
Speaker 5: This is the Human Rights Commission basically peddling critical race theory,
Speaker 5: even on toddlers, being like, you're doing a terrible job,
Speaker 5: but we're not talking about harmony. We want to teach
Speaker 5: them from infancy, the politics of grievance, identity politics. How
Speaker 5: are all so divided? And like you say, the black
Speaker 5: kids can then feel aggrieved because they've just learned about
Speaker 5: the injustices of the past. None of their generation is
Speaker 5: responsible for or ours, let us not forget, And then
Speaker 5: all the white kids can be like, oh, for heaven's sake,
Speaker 5: I had no idea. We're here thanks to all the
Speaker 5: dreadful things that we've done. Why would you want to
Speaker 5: feel little kids' heads with this. I'm actually not in
Speaker 5: favor of Harmony Day either, because this is teaching race
Speaker 5: theory of a different kind, telling these kids, oh, he's
Speaker 5: perfectly normal and good and wholesome and right, and everyone
Speaker 5: should be doing it. This idea of multi culturalism, which
Speaker 5: I've said before and will continue to say it is
Speaker 5: a farce. A multi ethnic society absolutely but a society
Speaker 5: that doesn't work, which we discuss every other night for
Speaker 5: different reasons on this show and all the others. A
Speaker 5: society that doesn't have a cohesive culture, a society that
Speaker 5: doesn't rally around at least one particular religion anymore. No, No,
Speaker 5: we want these kids to understand that despite having cultures
Speaker 5: that clash, religions that are completely at odds with each other,
Speaker 5: inherently held values hailing from those incredibly different cultures, we're
Speaker 5: all just a melting pot and we should all get
Speaker 5: together in harmony. Don't We talk about every single night
Speaker 5: how this isn't working so well, especially in light of
Speaker 5: what's playing out currently in the Middle East. It's simply
Speaker 5: not true. So whether you're teaching kids' critical race theory
Speaker 5: or harmony, harmony, it's all about harmony. Multiculturalism is amazing,
Speaker 5: and all culturals, all cultures are equal. No they're not.
Speaker 5: All people are equal, yes, but all cultures absolutely not.
Speaker 5: Kids should be told our culture is the best. That's
Speaker 5: how you raise little patriots who are ready to defend
Speaker 5: and fight for what they know to be right. For
Speaker 5: as long as they have a melting pot. They're like, well, okay,
Speaker 5: so everyone's right, even though people essentially believe incredibly different
Speaker 5: things to each other. It doesn't work.
Speaker 2: So I have a suggestion.
Speaker 3: So the Australian Human Rights Commission want to rename Harmony Day, right,
Speaker 3: Their suggestion is what is an International Day for the
Speaker 3: Elimination of racism.
Speaker 2: I've got another suggestion.
Speaker 3: We rename Harmony Day Australia Day every day on January
Speaker 3: twenty six. But here's the serious point. You've got to
Speaker 3: harmonize around something exactly. So to have harmony, there's got
Speaker 3: to be something that you harmonize around. So surely what
Speaker 3: we harmonize around is the fact we are all Australian.
Speaker 3: January twenty sixth Harmony Day.
Speaker 2: I agree.
Speaker 3: Change the name of it Harmony Days, a bit call
Speaker 3: Australia Day.
Speaker 2: It could really work.
Speaker 4: And then what it kind of proves really is that
Speaker 4: you give them an inch, they'll take a mile. Like okay,
Speaker 4: So we started to acknowledge that we shouldn't be racist,
Speaker 4: but then that's not good enough because apparently it hides racism.
Speaker 1: Like how do you win? You don't win this battle.
Speaker 1: That's the point.
Speaker 3: Well, I forget which one of you said, the racism
Speaker 3: industry but of course, if Harmony Day works, the Australian
Speaker 3: Human Rights Commission doesn't need it's fifty million dollar a
Speaker 3: year funding allowance because there'll be nothing for it to do.
Speaker 2: And I think that's the thing that really gets their go.
Speaker 5: We can scrap it. Tell you who is scrapping critical
Speaker 5: race theory in the classroom is Trump's administration. They gave
Speaker 5: schools until the twenty eighth of February to get rid
Speaker 5: of all their DEI nonsense or their critical race indoctrination
Speaker 5: out of the classroom or lose their federal funding. Now
Speaker 5: what school is going to put up their hands and say, oh, yes,
Speaker 5: we'll just shut up shop because well, we want to
Speaker 5: keep teaching this nonsense. None of them. But the Trump
Speaker 5: administration didn't stop there after February twenty eighth. They've launched
Speaker 5: just last week an online portal called Getting Rid of DEEI,
Speaker 5: which is for the use of parents, of students, everyone
Speaker 5: on the ground. That will of course be the ones
Speaker 5: aware if schools are not obeying this edict from the
Speaker 5: federal government. They say, jump online. We want to know
Speaker 5: what schools are breaking the rules. They literally tell people,
Speaker 5: if you're using this porthole, describe it as much detail
Speaker 5: as possible, the discriminatory practice taking place. They call these
Speaker 5: illegal discriminatory practices. They want to identify potential areas for investigation.
Speaker 5: This is incredible. This portal says the US Department of
Speaker 5: Education is committed to ensuring all students have access to
Speaker 5: meaningful learning free of divisive ideologies and indoctrination. So while
Speaker 5: we've got our Human Rights Commission literally saying you're not
Speaker 5: shoving this down kids and throats hard enough, you've got
Speaker 5: the Trump administration saying you will. We're gutting this out
Speaker 5: of the entire schooling system, and if you break the rules,
Speaker 5: mom and dads around the country are going to dob
Speaker 5: you in and you will lose your federal funding.
Speaker 3: I love this so much, especially as a parent who's
Speaker 3: had kids come home from school with books where they've
Speaker 3: got a picture of an indigenous person under a tree
Speaker 3: looking incredibly happy. And then besides that, there's a picture
Speaker 3: of a modern city and there's smoke coming out of
Speaker 3: factory stacks, and the implication clearly is that Australia was
Speaker 3: this idyllic paradise until white people arrived with their industrial revolution,
Speaker 3: and your kids are getting bombarded with that right from
Speaker 3: an early age to now my kids in university. And
Speaker 3: we had that story just the other night about Macquarie University,
Speaker 3: where young people are being taught that if they're not Indigenous,
Speaker 3: they're a settler and a guest in this country. And
Speaker 3: you've got lecturers starting the semester by telling students if
Speaker 3: you address me by female pronouns, though I am a female,
Speaker 3: I will ignore you. So it's rammed down kids' throats continually.
Speaker 3: Parents in this country you complain it falls on deaf ears,
Speaker 3: but in the United States now you can make a
Speaker 3: legitimate complaint and the Education Department will listen and do
Speaker 3: something about it.
Speaker 4: And I'm sure those books your sons were sent home
Speaker 4: with were made by modern printers and then modern binders
Speaker 4: and all this sort of modern technology that then allows
Speaker 4: us to read books about how it was such an
Speaker 4: idyllic lifestyle before the white man rocked up by the bye.
Speaker 1: But I think it's fantastic.
Speaker 4: They should call it the did Dorbin Division and expand
Speaker 4: it from you know, beyond schools to everywhere. Right every
Speaker 4: time you see DEI report it to the government and
Speaker 4: then they can go in and do something about it.
Speaker 4: I do wish that perhaps it would lob in my
Speaker 4: emails first so that we've got the stories here to
Speaker 4: do first before everyone else gets onto them. But that's
Speaker 4: sort of been your only outlet thus far. Right, If
Speaker 4: there's something going on in a school, or there's something
Speaker 4: going on that you think is dodgy in terms of
Speaker 4: DEI that the only way you could do anything about
Speaker 4: it was to go to the media and get a
Speaker 4: journalist to report on the story and then hope they
Speaker 4: created enough of a ground swell for something to be done.
Speaker 4: Now you've got a government that is proactively wanting to
Speaker 4: do things. They're saying, look, if you see it, tell us.
Speaker 4: It's a bit like the cops, or as if you
Speaker 4: see something, if you hear something, say something, And they're
Speaker 4: applying exactly the same logic here, and so it should
Speaker 4: be because the parents are the eyes and.
Speaker 1: The ears of the schools, and.
Speaker 4: You know, you can imagine why a department wouldn't know
Speaker 4: what's going on in every single school everywhere. So unless
Speaker 4: someone does blow the whistle, these things will just continue
Speaker 4: to happen.
Speaker 1: So thank god someone's come up with a way.
Speaker 4: Who would have thought, you know, the idea of a
Speaker 4: website where you can go on and say something's.
Speaker 1: Happening at my school and it goes off to the government.
Speaker 1: So novel. Why did no one think of this before? Strange,
Speaker 1: isn't it.
Speaker 4: While we're in the United States and talking about Trump, etc.
Speaker 4: He would have seen, I'm sure over the weekend his
Speaker 4: meeting with the Ukrainian president, LORDI mu Zelensky. Now I'm
Speaker 4: not going to go chapter and verse into it, because well,
Speaker 4: if you haven't seen the coverage, you have definitely been
Speaker 4: living under a rock. But as a small reminder of
Speaker 4: how things went, he was a little bit of the
Speaker 4: meeting between Zelenski and Donald Trump the other day.
Speaker 6: Cabinet, we gave you, through the stupid president, three hundred
Speaker 6: and fifty billion dollars. We gave your military equipment, and
Speaker 6: you've met are brave, but they had to use our
Speaker 6: military one of if you didn't have our military equipment.
Speaker 6: If you didn't have our military equipment, this war would
Speaker 6: have been over.
Speaker 4: In two weeks now, Zelensky has gone to the US
Speaker 4: to publicly sign a minerals sharing deal between Ukraine and
Speaker 4: the US that would then become a major plank of
Speaker 4: negotiating an end to the war between Ukraine and Russia.
Speaker 4: They set up a great trap for Zelenski. There he
Speaker 4: walked in, he became argumentative, and they were just as
Speaker 4: argumentative back, they being Trump and his Vice president J. D. Vance,
Speaker 4: who also took up the torch against Zelenski.
Speaker 1: Take a look, have you said thank you once? A
Speaker 1: lot of times.
Speaker 7: You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October,
Speaker 7: offer some words of appreciation for the United States of
Speaker 7: America and the president who's trying to save your country.
Speaker 4: Now, there's been a lot of talk since then that
Speaker 4: Vance overstepped the line. And how dare he speak directly
Speaker 4: to Zelenski and say you should be more grateful for
Speaker 4: what we have done to you, as though he were
Speaker 4: the petulant child in the room. I must remind people
Speaker 4: this is not the first time this has happened, and
Speaker 4: it's not the first time it's happened under a Democrat
Speaker 4: administration either. It's just that in that case, it didn't
Speaker 4: happen publicly. It happened over the phone talking about Joe Biden. Now, yes,
Speaker 4: it didn't happen publicly, but that's not the fault of
Speaker 4: Joe Biden. Nor is it the fault of JD Vans
Speaker 4: that the situation in which they got argumentative was in
Speaker 4: front of reporters, as Zelensky could have avoided that just
Speaker 4: as well as anyone else could have. But this has
Speaker 4: happened before, Biden said when he was president to Zelenski,
Speaker 4: you should be more grateful, Tager listen.
Speaker 8: In this conversation, President Biden called President Zelensky to tell
Speaker 8: him about a roughly one billion dollar package of additional
Speaker 8: equipment and weapons for the Ukrainian military coming from the
Speaker 8: United States. During the course of the call, President Zelensky continued.
Speaker 8: According to a number of officials who we spoke with who
Speaker 8: are familiar with the call, president Zelensky continued to talk
Speaker 8: about the additional equipment and weapons and support that he
Speaker 8: and his military needed. According to these officials, they said
Speaker 8: that President Biden finally just got frustrated and lost his
Speaker 8: temper and told President Zelensky, look, you could be a
Speaker 8: little bit more great for he knew that the narrative
Speaker 8: out there needed to be that the Ukrainian people and
Speaker 8: President Zelensky were grateful for it. If this was the
Speaker 8: support was going to continue at that same level kit like.
Speaker 4: It's basically a carbon copy of the conversation that Vance
Speaker 4: and Trump had with Zelensky, except that that one was
Speaker 4: done behind closed doors. The other one with Trump and Advanced,
Speaker 4: you actually got to see in public. The position of
Speaker 4: the Bard administration and the Trump administration on.
Speaker 1: That specific point is exactly the same. But the problem here.
Speaker 4: Of course, is that if you actually want to end
Speaker 4: the war, which is Trump's stated goal, He's got no
Speaker 4: other state of goal here except to end this war,
Speaker 4: and I think Zelensky to some degree wants to achieve that.
Speaker 4: But the problem is you have to seed ground in
Speaker 4: order to do it. Both Russia and Ukraine have to
Speaker 4: make some kind of concessions in order to end this war. Now, Zelensky,
Speaker 4: for moral reasons, doesn't want to make those concent sessions.
Speaker 4: And I understand why. For moral reasons he wouldn't want
Speaker 4: to make those concessions because Russia started this war, etc.
Speaker 4: That's fine, but there ain't going to be an end
Speaker 4: to the war unless you're willing to make those concessions.
Speaker 4: And if you don't do that, more people die, and
Speaker 4: this just goes on and on and on forever, and
Speaker 4: that's not good.
Speaker 1: For anyone. I mean, Russia's not losing this war.
Speaker 4: Sure, Ukraine's been able to keep them at bay to
Speaker 4: some degree for a very long time. Now, this war's
Speaker 4: gone a lot longer than we thought it would, But
Speaker 4: Russia's not losing this war. The only way to end
Speaker 4: it as if they both say we'll give up some ground.
Speaker 1: But it doesn't seem like that's going to happen.
Speaker 3: And what's interesting is that Macron Zelensky was offered an
Speaker 3: opportunity to apologize on Fox News and decline to apologize
Speaker 3: for his behavior. He's run off to Europe. He's meeting
Speaker 3: with Starma and Macron and others, and now they're trying
Speaker 3: to come up with a peace plan. But it depends
Speaker 3: again on the goodwill of America, because America have to
Speaker 3: back it. One thing that no one's really reflected on,
Speaker 3: I don't think, and that is Trump had been saying
Speaker 3: for some time that European countries need to look after
Speaker 3: their own defense, they need to raise their defense budgets.
Speaker 3: He's been quite adamant that that needs to happen. America
Speaker 3: can't just keep on carrying the whole world. And the
Speaker 3: meeting that Starmer had with mccron and other European leaders.
Speaker 3: They all said that European nations need to lift their
Speaker 3: defense spending to three point five percent of GDP. The
Speaker 3: average is one point seven percent across the European Union
Speaker 3: at the moment. So whatever happens out of this, Trump
Speaker 3: has achieved one of his stated goals, and that is
Speaker 3: to cajole the Europeans into, hey, stop free loading of
Speaker 3: America and start to look after your own defense.
Speaker 5: But at this point, once America has pulled the plug,
Speaker 5: and it well and truly has, it doesn't matter what
Speaker 5: France and the UK do, because what also nobody talks
Speaker 5: about is obviously this is an incredibly expensive war, but
Speaker 5: Russia is out beforeilming both the united efforts of the
Speaker 5: US and NATO when it comes to making artillery, and
Speaker 5: that's something everyone seems to have missed. This has been
Speaker 5: such an exercise in highlighting the fact that NATO hasn't
Speaker 5: been able to turn spending power into firepower quick enough.
Speaker 5: All the artillery that the US has sent to the
Speaker 5: Ukraine is not coming out of stocked full shelves bountiful
Speaker 5: with artillery. It's been coming off conveyor belts. Russia and
Speaker 5: you can google this for yourself. Has absolutely outstripped the
Speaker 5: combined efforts of the US and NATO when it comes
Speaker 5: to just pumping out its own artillery. They have industrial capacity.
Speaker 5: NATO has proved that it clearly does not, even with
Speaker 5: the US on its side. But what I can't believe
Speaker 5: is how many commentators today we're condemning Vance, we're condemning
Speaker 5: Trump like this had come as some sort of surprise.
Speaker 5: These guys had said for months in the lead up
Speaker 5: to the election, appealing to their base, who is furious
Speaker 5: at the amount of money that has been spent on
Speaker 5: this war, they have said, and you will remember, Trump
Speaker 5: was like, within twenty four hours, within twenty four hours,
Speaker 5: I get into the White House, it's gonna be over now.
Speaker 5: Of course he hasn't been able to deliver on that.
Speaker 5: But people saying, oh, Trump advanced just totally embarrassed themselves.
Speaker 5: And this was humiliating. Do you think this wasn't calculated?
Speaker 5: Do you genuinely think this wasn't choreographed? They are playing
Speaker 5: to the base. Trump doesn't find this embarrassing at all. Remember,
Speaker 5: the guy comes from TV. He loves the theater, he
Speaker 5: loves the drama. He revels in this kind of thing.
Speaker 5: And you can bet your bottom dollar that these two said, wait,
Speaker 5: we promised our base we would not be doing business
Speaker 5: with this guy going forward. Now are being featured him
Speaker 5: sitting in the White House. It looks rather cozy. We
Speaker 5: need to send a message to the base that we
Speaker 5: are standing by the things that we promised them. And
Speaker 5: what I can't believe is the Lensky's attitude, knowing that
Speaker 5: that is what this administration had been saying four months
Speaker 5: in the lead up. In fact, on February nineteenth, this
Speaker 5: is what Trump wrote on his own social account. He said,
Speaker 5: think of it a modestly successful comedian VLADIMIRS. Skeolensky. Zolensky
Speaker 5: rather talk to the United States of America into spending
Speaker 5: three hundred and fifty billion dollars to go into a
Speaker 5: war that couldn't be won, that never had to start,
Speaker 5: but a war that he without the US and Trump
Speaker 5: will never be able to settle. The United States has
Speaker 5: spent two hundred billion dollars more than Europe, and Europe's
Speaker 5: money is guaranteed while we'll get nothing back. Why didn't
Speaker 5: sleepy Joe Biden demand equalization in that this war is
Speaker 5: far more important to Europe than it is to us.
Speaker 5: We have a big, beautiful ocean as separation. On top
Speaker 5: of this, Zelenski admits that half of the money we
Speaker 5: sent him is missing. That's a true story. He refuses
Speaker 5: to have elections, is very low in Ukrainian polls, and
Speaker 5: the only thing he was good at was playing Biden
Speaker 5: like a fiddle. A dictator without elections, Zolensky better move
Speaker 5: fast or he is not going to have a country left.
Speaker 5: In the meantime, we are successfully negotiating an end to
Speaker 5: the war with Russia, something all admit only Trump and
Speaker 5: the Trump admin can do. Biden never tried. Europe has
Speaker 5: failed to bring peace, and Zelensky probably wants to keep
Speaker 5: the gravy train going. I love Ukraine, but Zelensky has
Speaker 5: done a terrible job. His country is shattered and millions
Speaker 5: have unnecessarily died, and so it continues very provocative to
Speaker 5: say the least. This is what Zelensky knew he was
Speaker 5: walking into in this meeting, and yet his attitude talking
Speaker 5: over the leader of the free world. You'd think you'd
Speaker 5: just be like, Okay, no matter what they do, grin
Speaker 5: and bear it. But this narrative coming out of the
Speaker 5: mainstream media that this guy was here and he was
Speaker 5: just to cement a minerals deal. That was the point
Speaker 5: of this. Put the wall to one side for two seconds.
Speaker 5: This was a minerals deal, and we're supposed to believe
Speaker 5: that it was thrown out the window because Zelenski was
Speaker 5: a little bit rude, a little bit short, do me
Speaker 5: a favor. This administration knew exactly what they were doing,
Speaker 5: making an example out of him, voicing the frustration of
Speaker 5: millions of Americans, and it worked. They're on side well.
Speaker 4: Anlys Nielsen made the point on Paul Murray's program before
Speaker 4: Us that they essentially gave him enough rope to hang himself,
Speaker 4: and he jumped into the trap and gave them the
Speaker 4: trigger to do what they wanted to do.
Speaker 1: He played that really dumb. The way he went into
Speaker 1: that meeting.
Speaker 4: It could have been a lot more civil than it was,
Speaker 4: but he took debait and handed them the easy wins.
Speaker 3: It's going to say, you know, you could say that
Speaker 3: Trump and Vance made an example of him. Zelenski made
Speaker 3: a pretty good example of himself. I thought, hey, moving on.
Speaker 3: You know, the other day I told a story on
Speaker 3: this program about a TV special run back in nineteen
Speaker 3: eighty six.
Speaker 2: It was called The Mystery of El.
Speaker 3: Capone's Vault, and television networks all over the world ran
Speaker 3: this special where they blew up el Capone's vault and
Speaker 3: everyone was fascinated by what they would find in there.
Speaker 3: Of course, when it was blown open, the worldwide television
Speaker 3: audience was greatly disappointed because there was just some dirt
Speaker 3: and some empty whiskey bottles.
Speaker 2: That was it. Well, history repeats.
Speaker 3: The whole world was waiting with baited breath at the
Speaker 3: weekend for the release of the Epstein files, which the
Speaker 3: Trump administration had promised and which Attorney General Pam Bondi
Speaker 3: had blown up to be bigger than ben her. Here
Speaker 3: she is speaking prior to the release of those files.
Speaker 3: This was on February twenty first.
Speaker 9: The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients.
Speaker 5: Well, that really happen.
Speaker 9: It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's
Speaker 9: been a directive by President Trump.
Speaker 5: I'm reviewing that.
Speaker 9: I'm reviewing JFK files, MLK files. That's all in the
Speaker 9: process of being reviewed, because that was done at the
Speaker 9: directive of the president from all of these agencies.
Speaker 3: So she's getting us ready and then five days later
Speaker 3: she was building it up even more.
Speaker 9: There are well over this will make you sick. Two
Speaker 9: hundred victims, two hundred. We have to make sure that
Speaker 9: their identity is protected and their personal information. But other
Speaker 9: than that, I think tomorrow the personal information of victims.
Speaker 9: Other than that, I think tomorrow, Jesse breaking news. Right now,
Speaker 9: you're going to see some Epstein information being released.
Speaker 3: We're going to see some Epstein information released. So binders
Speaker 3: were given out to particular people. The Epstein files phase
Speaker 3: one the most transparent administration in history. All that information
Speaker 3: was later posted online with this disclaimer from the Trump
Speaker 3: administration quote, the first phase of declassified files largely contains
Speaker 3: documents that have previously been leaked but never released in
Speaker 3: a formal capacity. Caleb, it was a bit of a
Speaker 3: nothing burger. It was like blowing open El Capone's safe
Speaker 3: and there was a bit of dirt and some empty bottles.
Speaker 2: Nothing. We didn't already know.
Speaker 1: What more could you ask for it.
Speaker 4: It's like when you know things turn up in newspapers
Speaker 4: and then five days later the government say we've got
Speaker 4: a brand new announcement for you we already knew about
Speaker 4: did Bevans say? This is really odd because Cash Patil,
Speaker 4: who's now in charge of the FBI, has previously talked
Speaker 4: about how he wants this to believe be released.
Speaker 1: He's read the files, et cetera.
Speaker 4: Pam Bondie is now saying that the reason we didn't
Speaker 4: get any more information in this tranch of documents is
Speaker 4: because the FBI refused to release them. Cash Patel has
Speaker 4: not publicly commented about this since Pam said that some
Speaker 4: three days ago. Now, there is something weird going on
Speaker 4: here right now now, whether that is that there are
Speaker 4: staff in the FBI that didn't release it and now
Speaker 4: Patel's trying to work behind the scenes, who knows, but
Speaker 4: he hasn't acknowledged publicly why any of this has happened
Speaker 4: or how any of this has happened. So it would
Speaker 4: lead you to us, why have we not actually seen
Speaker 4: anything that's of any interest yet. And the fact that
Speaker 4: they trumpeted it so hard the release right like they
Speaker 4: got influencers in and podcasters and whatever and gave them
Speaker 4: advanced copies of the documents, which was a bit weird
Speaker 4: to begin with. I mean you know, it's reasonably standard
Speaker 4: that media get embargoed versions of documents so that they
Speaker 4: can publish a story at the same time as something
Speaker 4: is released publicly. That's normal and standard practice, so you
Speaker 4: can get the praises of these things as quickly as possible.
Speaker 4: But it wasn't just a he is document in secret
Speaker 4: treat it secretly put your report out at this time
Speaker 4: on this date. They got them in in a publicity
Speaker 4: stunt and got them to walk around waiving the documents
Speaker 4: around to show that they had them, and then when
Speaker 4: they opened them up found there was nothing inside.
Speaker 1: The whole thing is bizarre.
Speaker 5: And they had to know it would massively backfire because
Speaker 5: these influences, these podcasters. Basically, if you're an American podcaster
Speaker 5: or similar with over a million followers, you get invited
Speaker 5: to these things now, which is a great plus. But
Speaker 5: some of these guys are the ones that have been
Speaker 5: following the Epstein story for years and years and years.
Speaker 5: It was six years ago now that this guy suddenly
Speaker 5: turned up dead, and just when people thought they were
Speaker 5: getting justice, no information has come to light, and they
Speaker 5: were told that they would get new stuff in this
Speaker 5: lever arch file that each of them got and as
Speaker 5: you said, Caleb, it was talked up as like, oh,
Speaker 5: please don't discuss this yet. You know, they didn't use
Speaker 5: the word embargo, but it was very much implied that
Speaker 5: you are being let into the inner sanctum with this
Speaker 5: information it's not yet to go public, to which these
Speaker 5: guys went home, read through that lever Arch file and said,
Speaker 5: this stuff is years old. There is not one scaic
Speaker 5: of new information that has come to light. What was
Speaker 5: this entire fiasco about. So they've really shot themselves in
Speaker 5: the foot, particularly Pam Bondi because of course she's very
Speaker 5: new as Attorney general. This is Trump's pick. People have
Speaker 5: very high expectations. This is something that the Trump team
Speaker 5: trumpeted for ages that they were going to do. Same
Speaker 5: with the JFK files. Haven't seen any of those either,
Speaker 5: have you know me? Neither keep me posted. These guys
Speaker 5: are owed answers and they're still seeing absolutely nothing. So
Speaker 5: this is a massive embarrassment. Then Pam turns around, like
Speaker 5: you say, he blames the FBI and says, but I've
Speaker 5: given them a deadline eight am Friday. They've got to
Speaker 5: give me the stuff that they haven't given me yet.
Speaker 5: But when The leaders of the FBI now are Cash Pattel,
Speaker 5: who's talked about this at length and how much he
Speaker 5: wants to bust it wide open. His deputy Don Borngino
Speaker 5: has also talked about this at length for years. This
Speaker 5: guy's in the no, he knows what he's talking about. Again,
Speaker 5: we're supposed to believe that the FBI are the ones
Speaker 5: who are like pussy footing around this, not being upfront
Speaker 5: and hon us not blowing it open like they promised.
Speaker 5: Everyone's smelling a rat right now and saying this guy,
Speaker 5: why won't you reveal anything to us? And what Bondi
Speaker 5: was saying there about, Oh, you know, it's about keeping
Speaker 5: the victims their information. Nobody is expecting that what they
Speaker 5: want is the client list. You promised a client list.
Speaker 5: You promised that this thing was going to peel paint
Speaker 5: off the walls and justice was going to be served
Speaker 5: at last on these rich and powerful people that participated
Speaker 5: in a child sex trafficking ring, and still we got nothing. Meanwhile,
Speaker 5: Gealing Maxwell is serving twenty years basically in a really
Speaker 5: nice place with the ankle bracelet on for crimes that
Speaker 5: involve no one, apparently involve absolutely nobody seems incredible.
Speaker 4: Bondie said, you know, promises made, promises kept seepack when
Speaker 4: it came to the release of these documents. I don't
Speaker 4: think at this point you'd say the promise has been kept,
Speaker 4: would you.
Speaker 5: No, not at all to Romania now, where here we
Speaker 5: have another European country who is trying to get a
Speaker 5: right leading government. We've seen this in the Netherlands. We've
Speaker 5: seen this in France, We've seen this in Italy. We've
Speaker 5: seen this across the board as countries in the European
Speaker 5: Union go the European Union is not serving our interests.
Speaker 5: We want a radical We want someone who is going
Speaker 5: to put our country first. Well, this guy called Kaylin
Speaker 5: George Estu, Sorry mate if I've mispronounced your name. He's
Speaker 5: heading up what Once again the mainstream media is calling
Speaker 5: a far right party. They love to do this. They're
Speaker 5: even using the whole oh he loves Russia, his mates
Speaker 5: with Putin, even though the guy has literally said, quote,
Speaker 5: I'm not a fan, end quote. Just to make it
Speaker 5: really clear, do not try to be smirched me with that.
Speaker 5: I know it's worked in the past for you, but
Speaker 5: I am not a Putin fan. Well, he run. He
Speaker 5: won the first round of elections in Romania. They have
Speaker 5: a complicated system there, but all went well during the
Speaker 5: first round. The second row was stymied, and now this
Speaker 5: guy ends up in prison. He was just in a
Speaker 5: car on his way to a rally when he was
Speaker 5: taken into custody in Romania on what I can only
Speaker 5: tell is trumped up chargers. Now it's very hard to
Speaker 5: know what are the facts and figures about this. Who
Speaker 5: knows much about Romanian politics, but this looks like a
Speaker 5: stitch up, as most stitch ups are when it's pertaining
Speaker 5: to a right leaning leader trying to get up in
Speaker 5: the EU who has made great promises to their country.
Speaker 5: They have the popular vote, and so the media goes
Speaker 5: to town on them, as do the powers that be,
Speaker 5: to make sure that they never actually get the gong.
Speaker 5: But check out the crowd protest trying to get Kaylin
Speaker 5: George Escue out of jail. Look at the masses that
Speaker 5: are gathered to say, get our guy out of prison.
Speaker 5: We elected him in the first round, we'll elect him
Speaker 5: in every other round. You guys are trying to stick
Speaker 5: our guy, and you've arrested him, you've indicted him, and
Speaker 5: on what charge. It's very hard to believe any of this.
Speaker 5: But once again, this is what they tried to do
Speaker 5: with Lee Penn, with smirching her as some crazy right
Speaker 5: wing nut job. This is what they did with Garrett
Speaker 5: Wilda's crazy nut wing right job. You can go through
Speaker 5: each of the countries. Germany, they tried this on really
Speaker 5: hard with the AfD. Didn't work. They have the popular vote,
Speaker 5: and here we are in Romania. It just seems like
Speaker 5: copy paste.
Speaker 3: It's always interesting when they use smears like far right,
Speaker 3: which as far as I can tell, means you believe
Speaker 3: in God, country and family.
Speaker 5: They probably have very hard immigration policies.
Speaker 2: They've called him a.
Speaker 3: Populist, which I guess is true since he did win
Speaker 3: the first round of the election, an ultranationalist, which means
Speaker 3: he rejects the EU globalist fantasy and he believes in
Speaker 3: national sovereignty, and he's admirer of Trump, which is one
Speaker 3: of the worst things you can be these days.
Speaker 2: Calling in sixth.
Speaker 3: Position going into the first round of the presidential election,
Speaker 3: so literally came out of nowhere to win that first round.
Speaker 3: And one of the charges against him is and I quote,
Speaker 3: setting up an organization with fascist, racist, and xenophobic characteristics,
Speaker 3: which sounds like a very subjective sort of criminal charge.
Speaker 4: Well, yeah, and they're claiming that he's set up some
Speaker 4: sort of anti Semitic group. And the reporting out of
Speaker 4: the Romanian media has been all this stuff leaked from
Speaker 4: the charges that they're they're laying against him, saying he
Speaker 4: tried to lead some coup against the government and that's
Speaker 4: anti constitutional. Look, if governments just listened to their people,
Speaker 4: you wouldn't have to deal with people like him in
Speaker 4: the first place, would you.
Speaker 1: You wonder how you end up with these supposedly far.
Speaker 4: Right candidates because people have got no other choice. Seriously,
Speaker 4: just listen to people when they say they want their
Speaker 4: countries to be looked after. Quickly, before we go to
Speaker 4: a break, If you've been watching this program for the
Speaker 4: better part of two years, if you've been reading my columns,
Speaker 4: you'll know I've been banging on about the illicit tobacco
Speaker 4: trade and the fact that it was all created by
Speaker 4: the federal government because they charge it a high heaven
Speaker 4: with tobacco excise. If you try to buy a packet
Speaker 4: of daries down at the supermarket, and.
Speaker 1: Would you believe it? Everyone else has now jumped on board.
Speaker 4: There's been some great reporting over the weekend from the
Speaker 4: nine newspapers and sixty Minutes last night Nick Nick mackenzie sorry,
Speaker 4: great investigation. Four Corners has run an investigation this evening
Speaker 4: on the ABC about this booming illicit tobacco trade. If
Speaker 4: you're not a smoker and you don't know exactly how
Speaker 4: easy it is to buy a packet of illegal cigarettes
Speaker 4: with no tax on it, and exactly how cheap they are,
Speaker 4: this is how easy it is.
Speaker 5: Hi, thanks Manchester Satires plase just one packs.
Speaker 1: For thirteen bucks a pack o good.
Speaker 4: That's going on in thousands of tobacconists and convenience stores
Speaker 4: across the country, basically with zero impunity. The money that
Speaker 4: you spend on that elicit packet of cigarettes goes on
Speaker 4: to fund all sorts of other crime human trafficking, murder, etc.
Speaker 4: That's the sort of stuff that goes on. Because the
Speaker 4: crime gags are forgetting about drugs. Now they're getting involved
Speaker 4: in elicit tobacco why because the federal government created this market.
Speaker 1: Even the police agree.
Speaker 4: Sixty Minutes last night and the nine newspapers today were.
Speaker 1: Quoting Rowan Park.
Speaker 4: He's the former head of the Border Forces Tobacco Task Force,
Speaker 4: and he says the Federal Health Department's ideological zealotry in
Speaker 4: relation to elicit tobacco has caused the problem and continues
Speaker 4: to fuel it.
Speaker 1: These are the people who.
Speaker 4: Are trying to combat the illicit tobacco trade that is
Speaker 4: being run by organized crime. The government is at fault.
Speaker 4: If they weren't so greedy with their tax, the government
Speaker 4: wouldn't be funding indirectly murder, rape, all sorts of stuff
Speaker 4: in this country right now. This is what happens when
Speaker 4: you go overboard on tax. They've been worn so many
Speaker 4: times on this and they've done nothing. If you're the
Speaker 4: leader of the Hells Angels or any of the other
Speaker 4: Middle Eastern crime gangs, I'll tell you what, they won't
Speaker 4: be voting for Peter Dutton. They'll all be voting for
Speaker 4: Anthony al but Easy, and they should be sending him
Speaker 4: a letter of thanks for giving them a brand new
Speaker 4: market that has been so damn lucrative.
Speaker 2: We're going to go to a break when we come back.
Speaker 3: Well, it's making news tomorrow, including the racetrack. Mount Panorama
Speaker 3: could be off limits to the public after an Indigenous
Speaker 3: group claims it's a sacred sight.
Speaker 2: All of that and law in a moment.
Speaker 3: Welcome back. Well, let's give you the first look at
Speaker 3: tomorrow's front pages. We'll start with the Herald's Sun, which
Speaker 3: has got a great story on the front page.
Speaker 2: The headline reads Easier to be a Cop.
Speaker 3: Police in Victoria are loosening their academic standards to lift
Speaker 3: an abysmal recruitment rate. The force has relaxed several education
Speaker 3: and health requirements for some recruits. The article goes on
Speaker 3: to say applicants who receive an Australian Tertiary Admission ranking
Speaker 3: of sixty five or above will no longer be required
Speaker 3: to sit the entrance exam. Just for context, the average
Speaker 3: ATAR in Victoria last year was sixty nine point five,
Speaker 3: So you can now score sixty five fairly well below average,
Speaker 3: and that will be considered good enough for the Victorian Police.
Speaker 3: Of course, you can score lower than that and score
Speaker 3: your spot in the federal government's cabinet. I love this
Speaker 3: quote in the article from Chief Commissioner Rick Nugent.
Speaker 2: He says there is no.
Speaker 3: Minimum ATAR study score or education level required to join
Speaker 3: Victoria Police.
Speaker 2: That's hardly a ringing endorsement.
Speaker 4: No, I mean, I've got to say, I'm looking at
Speaker 4: your doodles on the front of the Herald Sun tomorrow, James.
Speaker 1: I am shocked. I tell you the things he draws.
Speaker 1: I was on his newspapers.
Speaker 4: But if you were thinking of joining the coppers, right,
Speaker 4: would you really go?
Speaker 5: Hmm?
Speaker 1: I can't be there, goes my pen off.
Speaker 4: That is, I can't be bothered being a copper anymore
Speaker 4: because I'd have to take a test in order to
Speaker 4: be entered into the police force. Is that really the
Speaker 4: thing that's preventing anyone from signing up to the police
Speaker 4: force in Victoria. I don't think it is. As if
Speaker 4: they can say this is going to get one single
Speaker 4: extra person into the police force. I can't see how
Speaker 4: it's going to do anything. If you're that lazy that
Speaker 4: you don't want to take a test to become a
Speaker 4: police officer, do we even want you as a police
Speaker 4: officer in the first place.
Speaker 2: Get some more people in, but they'd be all the
Speaker 2: wrong kind of people.
Speaker 5: Yeah. The message is if you don't do well at school,
Speaker 5: there's always the Victorian Police.
Speaker 2: We'll give you a gun.
Speaker 5: Don't worry, We'll give you a gun and a chaser
Speaker 5: for good measure to the front page of the Northern
Speaker 5: Territory News. Now show us the Mondays Northern Territory government
Speaker 5: wants federal cash on the table for port buy out. Yes,
Speaker 5: ladies and gentlemen, we're talking about the Port of Darwin.
Speaker 5: Could it be at last stump it up? The Northern
Speaker 5: Territory Government is sending representatives on a key mission to
Speaker 5: Canberra that could see the Federal Labor government put up
Speaker 5: the cash to buy the Port of Darwin from Chinese
Speaker 5: operator's land bridge. Ultimately it will be a case of
Speaker 5: stump up or shut up on the table for the
Speaker 5: Albanesi government. Now, I'm sure you, like any rational thinking person,
Speaker 5: thinks is absolutely nuts that this port that was once
Speaker 5: bonded to eternity by the Japs during World War Two,
Speaker 5: because port's are very important strategic logistical I mean they
Speaker 5: make or break, especially during wartime, that we just handed
Speaker 5: it over to our chief enemy, thank you, Malcolm Turnbull
Speaker 5: for a pole tree just over half a million dollars
Speaker 5: and they have it for ninety nine years. This is
Speaker 5: the stupidest thing I have ever seen in my entire life,
Speaker 5: and yet ALBANSI stood by it. Remember in twenty twenty
Speaker 5: three there was a blistering report that came out. Morrison
Speaker 5: also did one because he was like, well, you know,
Speaker 5: got to be seen to be doing something. Every defense
Speaker 5: expert has screened their lungs out over this, saying we've
Speaker 5: got to buy it back, We've got to break this agreement.
Speaker 5: And then Albanesi came out and said, look, we've had
Speaker 5: a review and it's all a okay. Three days before
Speaker 5: he announced that he was going to China to visit
Speaker 5: Jijingping and be called a handsome boy. So this farce
Speaker 5: has continued for a very long time. Tensions are very
Speaker 5: high with regards to our relations with China, especially now
Speaker 5: that Trump's in the White House. The tiny has never
Speaker 5: been better. But do you I think this government's actually
Speaker 5: going to do something about it.
Speaker 3: This is the sort of thing you do in the
Speaker 3: lead up to an election where national defense is becoming
Speaker 3: an issue. People are doubting your commitment to it, so
Speaker 3: you hint that we're going to do this, and then you.
Speaker 2: Win the election and you forget all about it. I
Speaker 2: think that might be what.
Speaker 1: Happens here, maybe, though I don't know that.
Speaker 4: Finocchiaro in the Northern Territory would actually he would just
Speaker 4: hand that a little freebach to Albanizi. But it's even
Speaker 4: worse than you described is in terms of that report,
Speaker 4: because it was three days before he said he was
Speaker 4: going to go to China, but he dropped it on
Speaker 4: a Friday afternoon, which is the oldest trick in the
Speaker 4: book when you're trying to bury a story. Six months
Speaker 4: after he had received that report. He sat on the
Speaker 4: report for six months before he decided to tell us
Speaker 4: that it was okay to keep the Port of Darwin
Speaker 4: in Chinese hands. It is absolutely staggering that that still exists.
Speaker 4: If he's got at least two brain cells, ALBERANIZI will
Speaker 4: do something about it. But I'm not going to breath
Speaker 4: because of course we saw how he treated those warships,
Speaker 4: Chinese warships floating around the Australian coast. I think China's
Speaker 4: just able to do what they want really basically. Oh
Speaker 4: also slide of hand in television. I've got another pen,
Speaker 4: and now I didn't get up out of my seat
Speaker 4: to retrieve.
Speaker 1: The one that I threw off the desk. F I
Speaker 1: can do.
Speaker 2: Anything made that's going to be so you had one
Speaker 2: in your pocket.
Speaker 4: Well, well I had one next to the desk. Look
Speaker 4: you know, you know I've always got pins because you
Speaker 4: never know when I'm going to have a hissy fit
Speaker 4: and throw one at my producer. Let's go to the
Speaker 4: Australian tomorrow where it is sacred status bid for iconic
Speaker 4: motor race site. The fringe indigenous group that brought down
Speaker 4: the billion dollar Blaney Mind Project has laid the groundwork
Speaker 4: for an unprecedented legal bid to declare the peak of
Speaker 4: Mount Panorama, overlooking Australia's iconic motor racing circuit, a sacred
Speaker 4: site after one of its former members ashes were scattered there.
Speaker 4: Can you imagine this, James, I know how much you
Speaker 4: enjoy your your supercars sport.
Speaker 1: Can you imation making it a sacred site?
Speaker 4: Actually it should be a sacred site because it is
Speaker 4: so bloody important to Australian culture, But not for the
Speaker 4: reasons they suggest.
Speaker 3: I've been to a couple of smoking ceremonies at Mount
Speaker 3: Panorama in nineteen eighty six and in nineteen eighty eight.
Speaker 1: It's smoking, so it's coming out of the back of
Speaker 1: the car.
Speaker 3: Yes, But this indigenous group applied for permission and received
Speaker 3: it from the council to go to this summit on
Speaker 3: Mount Panorama, to conduct a smoking ceremony, to sprinkle the
Speaker 3: ashes of an indigenous man who had no connection to
Speaker 3: Mount Panorama at the top of the mountain mark a tree,
Speaker 3: and now they've claimed it's a sacred site because this
Speaker 3: man's ashes have been sprinkled. Think about those surfers who
Speaker 3: go out after a mate gets taken by a shark
Speaker 3: or whatever, and they sprinkle their mate's ashes out in
Speaker 3: the ocean. What are they going to start to claim
Speaker 3: that that now belongs to them and their mates because
Speaker 3: ashes are there. This is unbelievable that they're doing this.
Speaker 3: We're going to go to a break when we come back.
Speaker 3: One of the most incredible retraction that you'll see on TV.
Speaker 3: An American show blasts elon Musk and then just moments
Speaker 3: later issues the glovalent groveling apology that's coming up with us.
Speaker 2: The moment welcome back.
Speaker 3: Well, LISZT TV hosts get it wrong occasionally, but this
Speaker 3: one was a doozy.
Speaker 5: Oh, this was deliberate. We all know that Musk derangement
Speaker 5: syndrome has taken off since Trump made it to the
Speaker 5: White House and decided to make this guy his sidekick.
Speaker 5: Lefty's love to hate him. So, of course that includes
Speaker 5: the panel of the View, but none more so than
Speaker 5: Joey Biha, who decided to just go full misinformation disinformation,
Speaker 5: spouting her hatred. For one, Elon Musk.
Speaker 10: Was upborn in this country, who was born under apartheid
Speaker 10: in South Africa, so has that mentality going on? He
Speaker 10: was pro apartid as I understand it. Now, I'm getting
Speaker 10: some flat because I said that Musk was pro apartheid.
Speaker 10: I don't really know for sure if he was. He
Speaker 10: grew up at that time when a part time was
Speaker 10: in phil Blom before the great Nelson Mandela fixed out
Speaker 10: he was around at that time, but maybe he was.
Speaker 5: Maybe he wasn't He might have.
Speaker 10: Been a young guy too, So don't be so emmy, O.
Speaker 5: Can you a very formose way of saying, I just
Speaker 5: made that up? I imagine if each of us were
Speaker 5: responsible and clearly supported whatever was going on in our
Speaker 5: nation of birth.
Speaker 4: Well, well, you know, Joy Biha was born in nineteen
Speaker 4: forty two, and I think Hippler was running around the
Speaker 4: world in nineteen forty two, wasn't he? She must be
Speaker 4: a Nazi. For goodness sake, how dumb can you get?
Speaker 5: Now?
Speaker 4: Look, it's no secret that I have a thing about
Speaker 4: people dressing well, particularly for the circumstance they are in.
Speaker 4: You might remember I had a spray in the early
Speaker 4: days of this program about Senator David Poe, cup Poke,
Speaker 4: cup po Cox sorry, rocking up to Parliament with so
Speaker 4: much as a suit and tie and he's walking around
Speaker 4: the corridors in a T shirt. Adam Sandler did much
Speaker 4: the same today at the Oscars. You know, I really
Speaker 4: couldn't give two rats about the Oscars, the degenerate nonsense
Speaker 4: that goes on there. But seriously, mate, if you're rocking
Speaker 4: up to an awards night, you can do better than this.
Speaker 7: And finally, for such a prestigious night, it's important that
Speaker 7: everyone is properly dressed.
Speaker 1: Okay, you're dressed well.
Speaker 7: Adam Gold here, what's.
Speaker 4: Up, my brother?
Speaker 5: What's going on?
Speaker 7: Adam?
Speaker 1: What are you wearing?
Speaker 5: What? What are you doing right now?
Speaker 2: And asking you what you're wearing?
Speaker 9: Nobody even thought about what I was wearing.
Speaker 1: You brought it up.
Speaker 2: There you go. He's the Zelenski of the Oscars. That's
Speaker 2: it from us. Stick around coming up is the readependent,
Speaker 2: his show, good Night