WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 10 March 

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:04.519
<v Speaker 1>On sky leaves Australia.

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the Wider Panalty Show. Good evening and welcome

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>to the Riata Pattey Show. Coming up tonight, worrying data

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 2>showing more than three in four jobs created in Australia

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 2>last year were underwritten by taxpayers. Adam Crichton will be

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 2>here to discuss that and the day's top headlines. The

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Green sees the balance of power in the WA Upper

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>House Professa Ian Plimer and what that will mean for

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>WA's resource sector. The Great Josh Hammer will have the

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>latest from the US, Europe and Syria where Islamus are

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 2>slaughtering religious minorities, including Christians, and later in the hour,

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Kinsey Schofield will tell us what famous celebrity has fled

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump's America for New Zealand and we never ever forget

0:00:54.280 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Left is losing it. Goodnight at first, The latest News

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 2>poll is out and the Coalition is failing to gain ground,

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 2>with fifty five percent of voters saying they don't believe

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the Coalition is ready to govern and Opposition leader Bitter

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Dutton's personal approval rating has dropped while the Prime Minister

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>has increased his lead. He's gone from five points to

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 2>a nine point lead in just the past month, and

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>we can't look overlook Labor having its own issues. They

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 2>continue to trail the coalition fifty one to forty nine

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>percent two party preferred. Labour's primary vote is on thirty

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 2>two percent, trailing the coalition on thirty nine. Let's bring

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 2>in senior fellow and chief economist at the Institute of

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Public Affairs, Adam Crichton. Adam, what do you make of

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 2>this starter? It's not particularly great news for either side,

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>but I think the Prime Minister will be happy at

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 2>has increased his lead over the opposition leader.

0:01:58.920 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's true.

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Look at six weeks or so that I've been back

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in Australia, obviously I've been hobby watching politics. I have

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>noticed that over that six weeks I would say that

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Dutton's chances have been marginally declining, and also in that

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>space he's been more and more like the Labor Party. So,

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>for instance, Labor proposed the eight and a half billion

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars on Medicare and then straightaway Dutton backed it. So

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>all that good stuff, at least from my point of view,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>from last year that we saw on the nuclear energy

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. That's I think when the opposition leader

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>was doing much better, but now his chances of declining.

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I do wonder about some of the advice

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 2>he's receiving. It took the Liberal Party ten months to

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 2>pose the voice, which they should have done in approximately

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 2>ten minutes because it was on the face of a

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 2>bad policy. Didn't need to see further detail. But when

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 2>he did oppose it, and he articulated that position so well,

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>so strongly, I think that really is what made him

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 2>seem like a future leader of the country, and he

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 2>stepped back from that a little bit. Yeah, certainly, that's right.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And then I think I saw last week Financial Review

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that the tials of all people are proposing to index

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the tax scales, like that is something the Liberal Party

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>should be proposing, you would think from first principles, right,

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>because the fact is at the moment they are not indexed,

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and so it is an annual tax increase year after year.

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, well done teals for that, But that's

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>something that should be coming from the coalition.

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, absolutely. And on a bunch of other issues where

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I think they're on very solid ground, a lot of

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 2>these so called cultural issues. Again, there's a reluctance to

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>lean into those fights, despite the fact that you would

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 2>have the majority of labor voters with you, never mind

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 2>conservative voters. But let's look at data that is far

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 2>more disturbing than any news poll. The Australian Financial Review

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>reports more than three quarters of new jobs created in

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four were in government funded industries, talking things

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 2>like education, health. Now, about one third of the four

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred and eighty seven thousand jobs created last year were

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 2>in the public sector, but more than three quarters of

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>all jobs were underwritten essentially by the government. Adam, that's

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 2>not great news, and not surprisingly, guess what productivity has

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 2>also pummitted?

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, certainly the productivity in these so called non market

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>sectors has historically and still is been very low. Basically,

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fact that more than three quarters in

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the public sector is very very concerning for Australia's future

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>prospects because obviously all these workers are financed from tax revenue,

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and of course tax revenue slows economic growth. It's actually

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>worth pointing out that on the IPA's own research, it's

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>actually worse than three quarters. It's more than eighty two

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>percent of jobs since August twenty twenty two have actually

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>have actually come from the public sector, so two.

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 2>And a half years, so not just the past year.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Was so the growth extraordinary because overall, if you look

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>at all of the jobs in the economy, some I

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>think eighteen percent are in the non market sector, and

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>yet that relatively small, small sector has accounted for more

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>than eighty percent of the new jobs.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 4>Very worrying.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what percentage the NDIS and all the related

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 2>industries are possible for, because that just seems to be, well,

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 2>we reletely unsustainable.

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>We certainly saw Bill Shorton, I think he said that

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>five hundred thousand people were employed because of the NDOTS.

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Now they are probably classified as private sector workers on

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>some measures, right, but of course in reality they are

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>really public sector workers, and they are a drain on

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the productivity of the economy, it must be said.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 2>Oh absolutely. And I think it's like immigration, where you

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 2>can bring in an influx of people and really gain

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 2>the data and make it look like you've had a

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 2>big growth in GDP and everything's going well, we're having

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 2>economic prosperity and growth, but when you look at the

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 2>per capita data, it doesn't look so flash And this

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 2>seems to be a little bit of that. Yeah, the

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 2>job numbers look great, Unemployment is at a low level.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 2>But if the taxpayer is underwriting all this, and.

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Look they certainly are. I mean, you know, we've had

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>over the past three or four years the biggest increase

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in income tax in real terms pretty much in thirty

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>or forty years in Australia. And yet, and yet both

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>sides of politics go on about so called tax cuts,

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.679
<v Speaker 1>the Stage three tax cuts. Well, look, inflation was far worse,

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and so because those brackets aren't index, people have actually

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>had a big increase in tax and all of that

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>extra money has been spent on these sorts of public

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>sector jobs. It's very worrying both sides are not really

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>putting forward good solutions for Australia's future.

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, the WA election was over the week ken the

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Liberals performed terribly. The government has been returned their Labor

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 2>government with a massive majority. I'll be talking to Professor

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Implymer about that a little bit later. But is this

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 2>good news for Anthony Alberanezi or I've heard some political

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 2>experts say it's actually bad news because whatever grievances West

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Australians have they'll take it out on him rather than

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 2>this tack company.

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's hard to I mean, it's hard to know.

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Western Australia is so far away. I'm not an ex

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like a country to itself. But that said, look,

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I think overall probably bad for the Coalition because they

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>were expected to pick up more than five or six

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>seats and I think that's all they're going to end

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>up with in the Parliament. Badly. They've got a kind

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of reflex Victoria State Pole. Right, there was a big

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>swing away from Labor, but it didn't really go to

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the Liberals very much, you know, it kind of went

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to Teals. In fact, I think the Teals are going

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to win a seat in the West Australian Parliament for

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the first time aus a Teal type candidate. Look, I

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's great for the Coalition, but that said,

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>as you point out, I mean it can go the

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>other way too. You have to speak to some cychologists

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>on that.

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll find that in a month or two.

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 2>It's not too far away. Let's talk about something a

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit different. Veteran comedian David Hughes he was forced

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 2>to remove a group of women from his show at

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 2>the Adelaide Fringe Festival because well, they kept chattering away.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 2>They kept just disrupting the show, annoying people sitting around them.

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's have a look at the footage and you can

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 2>see Hughesy gets pretty angry. He gives him a couple

0:07:53.840 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 2>of warnings and then he loses it. Adam house Since said,

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 2>I gave the group of women multiple chances that were

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>infuriating audience members near them and me and as they

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 2>were in the second row. So yeah, there was definitely

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 2>annoying hughes And I would say there's nothing worse than

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>if you're watching a comedy show or any sort of

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 2>live performance and you've got people chattering away. It's a distraction.

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 2>It takes away from the experience and you might remember.

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this made the news in Americay

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>it probably did because it made headlines around the world.

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 2>But a comic Arch Barker last year bou to day

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>breastfeeding mum from his program because the baby was making

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of noise. He got absolutely slammed for it.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 2>But I've got to say I'm with the comics on

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 2>this one. That mum and baby went on the project

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 2>to you know, to protest what had happened, and even

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 2>for during a TV interview, the baby's making little noises.

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 2>As cute as it may be, it's actually very disruptive. Yeah.

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Look, certainly I'm with both of these comedians on this.

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the bigger threat though, for comedians generally in

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Australia was always impositions on free speech. These new laws

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that are being passed by state parliaments, especially in Victoria

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and New South Wales where it is now illegal I

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>understand to severely ridicule a group quote unquote severely ridicule.

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 1>So no, stand up's going to get very very hard.

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 1>So maybe these women did not find him very funny,

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but even so they were being very rude and they

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>should have been.

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 5>Us to live.

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh absolutely, if you're sitting in the second role, really

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 2>anywhere where there's people around you, you've just got to

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 2>shush it, unless there's audience participation called for Adam Krisch,

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 2>I thought we were going to fight about that one.

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 2>I thought you were going to take the lady's side,

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 2>But here we are. Sorry about the unity ticket behind Husy.

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for your time to joining me. Now is a

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 2>esteem geologist and author, Professor Ian Plimer, and I wanted

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 2>to start by getting your thoughts on the WA election.

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 2>You know the state very well. They contribute greatly to Australia.

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 2>WA is a mining state, it's a resources stronghold. They

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 2>seem to be very much conservative in their values. We

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 2>certainly saw that with the race based Voice referendum last year.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Sixty three and a half percent voted no. But then

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 2>we have state labor winning election after election with massive landslides.

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Why is that, Well, it is a resource state. They

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 3>use a huge amount of energy. Most of their energy

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 3>comes from gas, some comes from diesel gen sets that

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 3>remote minds and some are soul. West Australia would not

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 3>be as prosperous as they are without the royalties of

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 3>mining and the labor govern in Western Australia over the

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 3>last couple of terms has been fairly care about destroying

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 3>the mining industry with high royalties. Our Greens of course,

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 3>want to completely destroy the mining industry, the gas industry

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 3>and any other industry. I want people living in caves

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 3>and sniffing.

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 6>Plants to live.

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 3>So in Western Australia we have a very very different

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 3>situation from.

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 6>In Eastern Australia.

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Western Australia has little manufacturing, it has mining.

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 7>And the Liberals just didn't dent the electric The Liberals

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 7>should have fought much harder on matters of resources, matters

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 7>of aboriginal.

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 6>Matters, closing down minds. They didn't. And it's very little

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 6>different from Victoria.

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Victoria has drove a pathetically weak biberal party, as does

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 3>Western Australia.

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, those Aboriginal herits laws. And we only had in

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>the last two weeks a farmer who's been fined for

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 2>building a little bridge on his own land because it

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 2>may have disturbed I think it was a rainbow serpent

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 2>if I remember correctly. So that issue is enormous there potentially,

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 2>and the Libstins seem to really lean into it much.

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned WA Labour's relatively same position on mining and

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>climate policies. That may all be under threahy in because

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the Greens are set to seize power the balance of

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 2>power in the Upper House and prior to the election

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 2>they made it clear they'll leverage this to push for

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 2>a Climate Change Act with all sorts of hard left

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:52.239
<v Speaker 2>green policies. What impact could this have on Western Australia

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 2>in well.

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 6>This will have a magic impact.

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 3>I think any green labor deal ends up putting people

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 3>to work in topic heavy industry like the resources industry,

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 3>and it ends up being a really massive backward step.

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 3>So this is the time when Labor should be talking

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 3>to the Liberals about how they can manage a state

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 3>which relies on resources and doesn't rely on the Greens.

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 3>The Greens have produced nothing. All they do is put

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 3>people out of work. So this is a perfect opportunity

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 3>for the Nationals to live and Labor to talk together.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 6>In the Upper House and try to get some common sense.

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Because if the Greens have the balance of power, then

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Western Australia is going to lose a huge amount of revenue.

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 3>This revenue goes to schools and the police and roads,

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 3>et cetera.

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 6>You can see the results of that revenue.

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Western Australia's got some wonderful new roads over very long distances.

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 3>The infrastructure is fabulous and that is because of mining royalties.

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 3>This is what the Greens will kill off. And so

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I think the Labor government has to be very circumspect

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 3>about talking to the Greens at all and maybe compromise

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 3>and do a deal with the Libs and the Nats.

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Imagine that labor coalition coalition in the WA Upper House

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 2>to sidestep the Greens. It's definitely what's best for the state.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Whether it's going to happen or not, we'll see. Now.

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump's top economic advisor, Kevin Hassett, who is the

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 2>chair of the White House National Economic Council, his flag

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>that an Australian exemption from Donald Trump's metal tariffs is

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 2>highly unlikely. And I do wonder if President Donald Trump

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 2>heard about the output of the WA premiere I have

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 2>a listen to this little bit of reckless idiocy.

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 8>Jd Vance is a knob.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, you've got to have one unprofessional moment, Danja.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 9>That was it.

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Does Donald Trump still represent a dark road for the world.

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, I certainly think he represents an uncertain one.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 2>So again, let me just say, at times.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Of uncertainty, you need a steady hand experience had at

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the wheel.

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 2>And what a reckless bit of stupidity from Premier Roger

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Cook there.

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, Premier Cook should be concerned about Western Australia and

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 3>that is it. It's not his place to talk about

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 3>anything international. And I think what he's done is destroy

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 3>relationships between the Commonwealth of Australia and the USA. And

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 3>that was an absolutely dopey comment to make in front

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 3>of a labor audience to get a cheap laugh. Now,

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Western Australia depends upon the Commonwealth for this country to function,

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 3>and what he is doing is giving even more reason

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 3>for the US to say it, well, we're not going

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 3>to take your steel, We're not going to take you aluminium.

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 6>And we have to remember that.

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of energy that's embedded in aluminium more

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 3>than any other metal. Zinc is the next one in

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the line, and steel is further down the track. So

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 3>our energy systems are so chaotic and have been destroyed

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 3>so much that we actually subsidize the massive amount of

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 3>energy that goes into making steel and making aluminium. So

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 3>as a result of our bad energy policies, we have

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 3>the USA saying, well, wait a minute, your aluminum and

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 3>steel are subsidized. We don't want to compete with people

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 3>who subsidize their commodities.

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 6>That they export to US.

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 3>They go away, And I think President Trump has many

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 3>reasons to tell Australia to go and take a big jump.

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I think the Well and Roger Cork's just give it

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>him another one.

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Well he has, and that joins Ambassador rud that joins

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Minister Penny Wong, that joins the Prime Minister. He has

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 3>all the reasons in the world, so go away.

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Well this is the problem. We need them more than

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 2>they need us. That's just the way it is. So

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't think it's too difficult as

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 2>a state premier just to be diplomatic and not say

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 2>something that's stupid on camera. Goodness, mate, Professor I Plymer,

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for your time tonight.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 2>Still to come Lefties Losing It plus the Great Josh Hammer,

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 2>we'll have the latest from the US, Europe and Syria

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 2>where Islamists are slaughtering religious minorities, including Christians. You're watching

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 2>the Reader Panny Show, and it's time for lefties losing it.

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with a reality show. It's called Love is Blind,

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 2>where the bride left the groom at the altar because

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 2>his views on trans rites and BLM were not to

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 2>her liking.

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 10>I've always wanted a partner to be on the scene wavelength,

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 10>and so today.

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 8>I can't.

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Yep. The bride then explained why she dumped Ben.

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 11>He asked him about like Black Lives matter, and I'm

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 11>no expert, but like when I asked him about it,

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 11>he was like, I guess I never really thought too

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 11>much about it.

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 4>That affected me.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 11>I watched a sermon online from about yeah, sexual identity,

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 11>and it was traditional.

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 2>The horror a church with traditional views on gender, Like,

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, men are men and women are women. Dude, Ben,

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 2>you dodged a bullet. Move on, count your lucky stars.

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Europe where the topless feminists are back.

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 2>This time they are doing Nazi salutes and chanting about

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump and onsk. I've got to say, this sort

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 2>of performative activism is really rather tyresoon. I go, yeah,

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 2>like I said, tiresome. Then the ladies let off some

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 2>smoke bombs and chanted about fascists and marched around pretending

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 2>to be nazis not a bra or brain cell to

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 2>be seen amongst this lot. Look, I'm just surprised I

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 2>didn't see Justin Trudeau amongst those ladies. He's got more

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 2>feminine energy than any gal I know.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 4>On a personal level, I've made sure that every single

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 4>day in this office, I put Canadians first that I

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 4>have people's backs, and that's why I'm here to tell

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 4>you all we got you, even in the very last

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 4>days of this government. We will not let Canadians down

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 4>today and long into the future.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 2>Cool story, bro, you think we've forgotten about what you

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 2>did to Canadian truckers and their supporters just for protesting

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 2>against your insane lockdowns. Please, your tears aren't going to

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 2>save you, or your legacy is trash. Now let's go

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 2>to CNN, where the usual suspects are screeching crazy stuff

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 2>about fascism. Apparently we're in the middle of a totalitarian

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 2>fascist coup.

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 5>So scared, but we are in the middle of a

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 5>totalitarian fascist coup in this country, and we don't call

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 5>it that. When we soft pedal it, we don't have

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 5>a real discussion about it. At least here I could

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 5>say those words. We can have that discussion. You will

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 5>not see those words in the New York Times or

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 5>the Washington We.

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 8>Were being honest.

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 12>There should be a breaking news banner on CNNA emmesody

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 12>all day long.

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 8>We are in dictatorship.

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, l now, when the Washington Post and New York

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Times is a left or anti Trump enough for you?

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Then you may need therapy, not a spot on a

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 2>CNN panel show. Next CNN will be offering this guy

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 2>a regular gig make America great again.

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 6>Oh not figures.

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 2>This is this is the part that I love.

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 6>That's why you're a mag.

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 5>Mag.

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 6>I'm happy.

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 8>You're mad.

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 2>You're mad, you're mad.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 8>Don't touch me, Hey, don't touch me.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 10>You touch me, you don't get away from me.

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it always the way the bullies cry and pretend

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 2>to be the victims. This is what the Left has become.

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 2>They're the cry bullies. Now let's look at a real

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>case of racism in the streets. A girl minding her

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 2>own business being attacked and followed for having her hair

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>in braids. Apparently only folk of certain skin tones are

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 2>allowed to have their hair in that style these days. Ugliest,

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 2>we weren't that it's greats.

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 6>Take that out now, really, re take that out?

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, okay, what's your take that shit out?

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 7>Now?

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Take this out? Now? Take that out. It's hot, it's

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 2>ugly though.

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 8>Like I'm looking her hair.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't look back. Now. For the record, white folk,

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 2>and i'd imagine everyone else has been braiding hair for

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 2>thousands of years. Vikings to h all the way back

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 2>to the venus of Wildendorf some thirty thousand years ago.

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 2>But apparently it's offensive now. Well, that young lady being

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 2>harassed and chased has addressed a controversy. And the crazy

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 2>thing is, there's plenty of people who agree with the aggressor.

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 2>They say, a white woman having her hair in braids

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 2>is cultural appropriation.

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 9>I'm allowed to wear breads. So yesterday, when I was

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 9>feeling some crazy ladies chasing me out of the store

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 9>screaming about my breed, saying it's disgusting, trashy, cultural appropriation,

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 9>she was literally expecting me to rip my hair out

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 9>right then and there.

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 2>I can't just rip my breads out.

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 9>She then follows me all the way to my car,

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 9>screaming to the top of her lies. And I just

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 9>cannot believe somebody gets that offended over a hairstyle like this.

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 9>If she can wear a wig, I can wear breaths.

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Funny, how no one ever accuses Beyonce of cultural appropriation

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 2>for having blonde hair or putting out a country album. Well,

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I guess it wasn't really country after all, was it. Now?

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Remember the border crisis, the illegal immigration crisis that Joe

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Biden created. We saw millions cross that US southern border

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 2>illegally every year under the Biden administration. The media made

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 2>it clear though, that this issue was not one the

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 2>president could easily fix. Like good little state propagandists, they

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 2>repeated the lie that Joe Biden was poalas to fix

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 2>his own mess.

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Republicans keep saying Biden doesn't need Congress, he can stop

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 3>what's happening at the border all by himself.

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 13>Can you fact check that for us, because we here

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 13>all though that's not true.

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 8>Republicans have been saying largely wrongly.

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Right because saying that the president can close the border

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 2>unilaterally on his own, president actually doesn't have the authority

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 2>under the law to do that.

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>There's only so much President Biden can do with executive action,

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and he did try to do whatever he could.

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 2>They actually are doing everything they can.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 11>The president hands are tied.

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 6>There's only so much that he can do.

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 10>President Biden has issues for executive orders, but there's only

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 10>so much he can do within his purview.

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 12>What an intractable a problem this is for the president

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 12>with no easy solutions.

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 2>No easy solutions here. There are no easy solutions here, folks.

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 12>They need Congress to act to fix the broken immigration system.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 8>This cannot happen without Congress resourcing this.

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 2>There's only so much a president can do with his

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 2>pen and his phone. But surprise, surprise, the media was

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 2>wrong yet again, and this was something President Trump was

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 2>happy to point out during his address to Congress.

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>The media and our friends in the Democrat Party kept

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>saying we needed new legislation.

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 6>We must have.

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 11>Legislation to secure the border.

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 3>But it turned out that all we really needed was

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 3>a new president.

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh that was a bit of a mic drop moment,

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 2>wasn't it. Yes, it turns out the president didn't need

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Congress didn't need new legislation because in under a month,

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump has managed to secure the border with illegal

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 2>crossings at a twenty five year low. Must have hurt

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 2>CBS to report the undeniable facts.

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 5>Illegal border crossings have sung to the lowest level in

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 5>at least twenty five years.

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 2>We know what's behind the strap and border cross Look.

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 10>I think we have to first emphasize how stunning and

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 10>remarkable this trop is. Fewer than nine thousand migrants were

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.199
<v Speaker 10>processed at the US Mexico border after crossing into the

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 10>country illegally in February. That is compared to Sundays during

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 10>the Biden administration, when border patrol recorded more than that

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 10>on twenty four hour time spans, including up to ten

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 10>thousand people in a single day.

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 2>So we've gone from having up to ten thousand people

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 2>cross illegally in a day to less than that over

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 2>an entire month. Elections have consequences, folks. Let's bring in

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Newsweek's senior editor at Large and Article three Projects Senior

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Council Josh Hammer. Josh, this is a stunning achievement. There's

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 2>now other way to put it. Stunning turnaround in a month.

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 14>You know, Rida, there was a lot of misinformation in

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 14>that montage that were just on there. I saw Jonah

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 14>Goldberg a bunch of others saying that the president does

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 14>actually not have the authority to largely shut down the border,

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 14>well as the kings may be. I mean not to brag,

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 14>but I actually am a lawyer here I clerked on

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 14>a federal appeals cord. The president actually does have sweeping authority.

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.959
<v Speaker 14>It's actually codified at eight US Code, Section eleven eighty two,

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 14>sub section F. It goes back all the way to

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 14>the Immigration National the Act of the nineteen fifties a

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 14>foundational immigration statue there, and that basically says that the

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 14>president has, at his own discretion, the ability to shut

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 14>down the border to all admission of any classes or

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.239
<v Speaker 14>groups of migrants that he wants to. It is a

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:26.719
<v Speaker 14>sweeping delegation of immigration forcement authority from the Congress to

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 14>the president. That was actually the very statutory sub section

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 14>that was litigated as part of the so called travel

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 14>band case the first time during the first tru administration.

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 14>Now with the Trump versus Hawaii case there where the

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 14>court actually ruled five to four that yes, the statute

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 14>means what it says, the president has sweeping authority there.

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 14>So the court has said this there the commentators surprise, surprise,

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 14>or dead wrong on the actual law there. Donald Trump

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 14>is taking advantage what the law actually says, as was

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 14>litigated during his first administration there and the results, as

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 14>you said, speak for themselves. America has a secure southern border. Again,

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 14>the people voted for it, and God willing, yes, they

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 14>have it. And I think that the cartels are going

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 14>to learn a very hard wasn't here to the end

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 14>that they have not learned that a read because America's

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 14>southern border.

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 8>Right now, Rita is not open for business.

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Now let's move on, Josh, to the Democrats claiming to

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 2>be the party for women, for women's rights. But let's

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 2>see how they voted when it came time to protect

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 2>girls and women's sports from male athletes identifying as women.

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 2>Every single Democrat voted against the rights of women here,

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 2>and not only I would a hugger. Is this position

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 2>morally putred? It's also a fringe position. It's an extreme

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 2>position because around four and five Americans are clear on

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 2>this issue. As even CNN reported.

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 12>Transgender female athletes and women's sports, only eighteen percent of

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 12>the country says that they should be in fact allowed

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 12>to participate in women's sports. Compare this to the opposition.

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 12>I mean, my goodness, gracious, seventy nine percent. You rarely

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 12>get set nine percent of the country to agree on anything,

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 12>but they do in fact agree on the idea of

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 12>opposing transgender female athletes in women's sports. But it's not

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 12>just the hero and now, lord, it's not just the

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 12>hero and now. What we're actually seeing is a trend

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 12>on this particular issue, and it's going in the direction

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 12>of opposition.

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Josh that trend is interesting. In twenty twenty one, we

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 2>had sixty two percent who were opposed. Now the figure

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 2>is seventy nine, and I suspect it's even more than

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 2>that because this is one of the issues where people

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 2>have been shamed for holding a very much a common

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 2>sense mainstream view. Yeah.

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 14>Look, it's an eighty twenty issue, as you said there.

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 14>I mean, it's fascinating here in the States, realy, because

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 14>you see even very left wing politicians like Gavin Newsom

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 14>of California, who had this winding Watch interview with Charlie

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 14>Kirk on Gavin Newsom's own new podcast this week, and

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 14>even Gavin Newsom who literally became the first politician in

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 14>California history to issue same sex marriage licenses, you know,

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 14>back in the day whenever that was.

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 8>I mean, even this guy who was ahead of the

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 8>curve on that issue.

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.479
<v Speaker 14>There, he's saying that it's now deeply unfair when it

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 14>comes to biological males competing against females in women's athletic condition. Now,

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 14>to be clear, no one should believe Gavin Newsom for

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 14>a second. The guy's a snake. He's a total liar there.

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 14>He's trying to gear up for a twenty twenty eight

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 14>presidential run. I wish him nothing but the worst there,

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 14>but this is yet another losing issue for the Democratic

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 14>Party there and Rita.

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 8>This continues to be the structural issue for the Democrats.

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 14>I actually I wrote about this in my most recent column,

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 14>which is that you have this chasm between the Democratic

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 14>elites which are in total lunacy la la land when

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 14>it comes to the open borders issue, when it comes

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 14>to the transgender issue there, when it comes to any

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 14>of these other issues, the Green New Deal, environmental regulation,

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 14>let's not frack, let's not drill for natural gas, they're

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 14>in total la la lands. I mean even the Median Democrat,

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 14>as we just saw on that CNN graphic there, does

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 14>not agree with their own parties elites. So unless until

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 14>they can find some way to repudiate their own parties elites,

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 14>the ladies of the view the Barack Obama winging the

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 14>party there, unless how they can do that, they're just

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 14>going to continue to flounder in irrelevance. But again, as

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 14>someone who wishes have nothing but the worst, I'd say,

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 14>go on, and I.

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Think you're one hundred percent right about Gavin News them.

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I think he's just reading the room. He's seeing how

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 2>fringe and unpopular these positions are, and he's just trying

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 2>to position himself as some sort of centrist when you

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>only have to look at California to see that's not

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the case. Now, let's talk about this curious story about

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 2>what really happened during the Biden presidency and who was

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 2>pulling the strings it was really in charge because it

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 2>was clear it wasn't Joe Biden for much of the time.

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 2>It's been alleged that the majority of official documents signed

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 2>by President Joe Biden used the same outopen signature. This

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 2>is a report by the Heritage Foundation. It states we

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 2>gathered every document we could find with Biden's signature over

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the course of his presidency, all news the same autopen signature,

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 2>except for the announcement that the former president was dropping

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 2>out of the race last year. Josh, what do you

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 2>make of this report?

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 14>Well, it's funny because the last line there is when

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 14>I first saw this is where my mind immediately went. Actually,

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 14>I saw a lot of people on Twitter ex whatever,

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 14>calling of these days who when Joe Biden, in theory,

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 14>had that I'm dropping beyond the race announcement. You actually

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.959
<v Speaker 14>look at the signature, it looks a lot like a holograph.

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 14>I mean, that's not typically where my mind goes there.

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 14>But you know, read in recent years when it comes

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 14>to the Hunter Biden laptop, when it comes to COVID nineteen,

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 14>when it comes to the fact that, yeah, we all

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 14>knew that Joe Biden was running the country in geriatric

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 14>senile fashion, or a lot of these so called conspiracy

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 14>theories really are kind of coming true in real time there.

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 14>I guess the question for me is that as we

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 14>as we continue to learn more and more about just

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 14>the exact state of Joe Biden's physical and above all

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 14>mental health over the course of his horrific and historically

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:01.479
<v Speaker 14>all time atrocious president, as we continue to learn more

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 14>and more, and God will in Congress will do more investigations. Frankly,

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 14>I think we barely scratched the surface of this world

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 14>historical scandal. But as we learn more and more of

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 14>the question to me is going to be actually this

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 14>question of who really was pulling the strings. I will

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 14>tell you my own personal take on this rita. It's

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 14>not a novel take there. It's probably a common opinion

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 14>there I have long been on the opinion that it

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 14>actually is Barack Obama who was not necessarily running the

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 14>world per se.

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 8>But I think that Barack Obama was.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 14>Absolutely, probably more than any other figure, calling a lot

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 14>of the shots. There was this one very bizarre image

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 14>of him going to ten Downing Streets in London trying

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 14>to meet with the Prime Minister there.

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.239
<v Speaker 8>I mean, why would a former president do that.

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 14>He was also the first president in over one hundred

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 14>years to not physically vacate Washington, d C. He's stayed

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 14>in Kalorama, a very tony, upscale part of Washington see there.

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 14>I continue to think that Rita that Barack Obama actually

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 14>largely was governing in this Biden administration, which makes sense

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 14>because then he was the leading campaign trail surrogate for

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 14>Kamala Harris herself. There we all saw how that played

0:33:57.640 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 14>out by.

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 2>The way Joshua spoken previously about Donald Trump's strategy with

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 2>the Ukraine Russia War and the goal of having Europe

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 2>contribute in a much more meaningful way to their own defense,

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and it looks like Trump has again managed to get

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 2>the outcome he wanted despite all the hysteria, all the

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 2>doomsday commentary we've had from politicians and commentators, including I've

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 2>got to say, disappointingly some conservative commentators who should know better.

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Stop getting hysterical about the retric Look at the bigger picture,

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:33.919
<v Speaker 2>look at the strategy, look at the outcomes. Let's see

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 2>now from the head of the European Commission, Ursula Vonda Lyon.

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 13>Europe is ready to assume its responsibilities rearm Europe could

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 13>mobilize close to eight hundred billion euros of defense expenditures

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 13>for a safe and resilient Europe.

0:34:55.600 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Josh, did the president get his way again? He's been

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 2>wanting this, and really it should have been in place

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 2>all along. Europe shouldn't be depending on America to defend

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 2>it from Russia or any other aggressive force.

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, strikes me as another huge diplomatic, geopolitical, foreign affairs

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 14>victory for the presidents. You know, this very much builds RITA,

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 14>by the way, on what he accomplished the first time around.

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 14>So the first time around, you know, Donald Trump also

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 14>ruffled a lot of feathers when it comes to NATO.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 14>People tend to forget this, but he basically came in

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 14>there and he said in a series of speeches and pronouncements.

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 14>You know, you guys are not pulling your weight there.

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 14>You know the NATO treaty obligates. He just spends at

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 14>least two percent, ideally five percent of your gross domestic

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 14>product on defense spending, on military spending. There, And if

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 14>you look back over his first term from twenty seventeen

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:48.240
<v Speaker 14>to twenty twenty one, the total number of European countries

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 14>that actually met that bare minimum two percent thresholds roughly doubled.

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.879
<v Speaker 14>It was an astronomical increase there. So he's done this

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 14>before and he's doing it yet again there. But look,

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 14>Donald Trump is a national okay, he believes in strong sovereign,

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 14>independent nation states.

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 4>There.

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 14>What that means is that the United States is going

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.479
<v Speaker 14>to best partner with Europe when Europe can actually take

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 14>care of itself, when Europe and actually take care of

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 14>its own backyard. This notion that the US European Alliance

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 14>thrives when Europe is basically a glorified satropy, when they're

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.839
<v Speaker 14>basically a province of the global American Empire. There, that's

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 14>not a recipe for long term United States European stability. Frankly,

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 14>it's not a recipe for long term stability when it

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 14>comes to United States and any other country around the

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 14>world that we've been allied with in the past. There

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 14>So this is the Donald Trump foreign policy doctrine. It

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 14>works like a charm frankly the first time around, and

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 14>it's off to a heck of the start this time

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 14>around as well. I frankly think Rita is only going

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 14>to get better from here, if I had to guess.

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we've seen NATO be strengthened. We've seen the European

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 2>nations that have basically have done very little finally start

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 2>contributing to their own defense. And yet we've got the

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.320
<v Speaker 2>hysterics acting like this is the end of the world.

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Democracy itself is under threat. Now, before you go, Josh,

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 2>this is one of the most disturbing developments, but sadly,

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 2>entirely predictable. We are seeing some horrific footage out of

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Syria religious minorities, including Christians being tortured, being slaughtered, men, women, children,

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 2>and this horror was, as I said, sadly predictable. Tulsa

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Gabbard was amongst those who warned us about what would occur,

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 2>but there were people celebrating what happened in Syria, thinking

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 2>this was going to be the dawn of some new

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 2>age of democracy and human rights when we've got Islamists

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 2>in charge them. When Islamists are in charge, minorities are slaughtered.

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 14>So this goes back at least as far as the

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 14>Arab Spring, which started back in twenty ten twenty eleven

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 14>round there in Tunisia and really all throughout the hour world.

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:02.720
<v Speaker 14>There you had this massive conflation which with many people

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 14>on the neoliberal left and the neo conservative faux right,

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 14>you have this massive conflation between democracy and Islamism where

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 14>you saw kind of this democratic uprising or this populist uprising,

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 14>where this populous uprising was being done in the name

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 14>of what in the name of Shria supremacy of Islamism,

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 14>a radical fundamentalist Islam there, and you know that's basically

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 14>what happens here in Syria. I mean Bashar al Assad,

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 14>let's not mince words. I mean an absolute monster. I

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:30.280
<v Speaker 14>mean a death toll of hundreds and hundred thousands, arguably

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 14>over a million, an absolutely horrific person there, a total

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 14>pawn of the evil Iranian regime there in the world

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 14>is better off that he's not in power, but we

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:40.240
<v Speaker 14>should not be pretending like the current guy in Charles

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 14>al Jalani, who was a perpateetic jihadist over his entire

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.240
<v Speaker 14>career there. Former al Qaeda there, these are bad, bad,

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 14>bad people there, and frankly, at this point they're basically

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 14>just an extension of recip type Ertawan and the increasingly

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.839
<v Speaker 14>radical regime in Ankara Turkey there. So the Middle East

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 14>is totally in flux. But this is obviously, on a

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 14>pure humanitarian level, an absolutely har riffic situation there.

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 8>Reader. One thing I will add briefly is that it

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 8>is your.

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:08.240
<v Speaker 14>Right now is extending his reach into Southwestern series trying

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 14>to protect the Druze minority that is there in that

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 14>particular part of the country. There, maybe there'll be some

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 14>sort of some sort of momentum for kind of an

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 14>autonomous Dru's many nations here or something that would that

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 14>would be a fantastic development. Frankly, it's something that the

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 14>United States I think actually would do very well to

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 14>get behind. But at a bare minimum, let's not treat

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 14>these absolute gie hottest thugs and Damascus like there are

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 14>anything other than the thugs that they are.

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 2>And I think you're one hundred percent right there, that

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 2>there would be support in America for some sort of

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 2>intervention to try to protect those religious minorities. I think

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 2>that is the sort of military action that Americans, maybe

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 2>not an enormous majority, but I think many Americans would

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 2>be comfortable with. Josh Hammah, thank you so much for

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 2>your time tonight.

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 9>Riata.

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Still to come. The famous celebrity who has fled Trump's

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 2>America for New Zealand, kinsisco Field has the details. Welcome back.

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now is celebrity and role commentator kinseisco Field.

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 2>Kinsey Love is Blind star Sarah Carlton has been condemned

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 2>after she dumbed her partner Ben Mazenger at the Altar

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 2>during the season eight finale because of his views on

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 2>BLM and his church's views on gender. I played a

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 2>clip of this earlier in the program. Tell me what

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the reaction has been. I reckon this girl is going

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 2>to be offered a spot on The View or some

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 2>CNN correspondence gig. I don't know. I think this is

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 2>actually going to launch her.

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 11>Career, do you, Because from what I've seen is the

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 11>backlash is primarily negative and there is a lot of

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 11>sympathy for I mean, he could be the next Bachelor

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 11>as far as I you know, as I can tell,

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 11>because I'm seeing magawomen throwing themselves at him because they

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 11>really feel like they really feel like this is ridiculous.

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 11>If she was trying to go viral, I think she

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 11>went viral for all the wrong reasons because I've seen

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 11>a lot of ridicule. But as a nurse, is she

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 11>going to treat you differently if you've not been vaccinated?

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 11>Is she going to treat you differently if she knows

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 11>who you voted for? It makes you really uncomfortable to

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 11>know that this is her thought process.

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Because at the old time, they told each other they

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 2>they loved each other, and you thought, okay, well they're

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 2>going to get married. Not that I watched this program,

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 2>but I had to watch this segment for today's show.

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 2>And the only thing I would say against him is

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 2>that he had to wait for her to dump him

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 2>because there were red flags all over the place and

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he didn't see them. He wanted to

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:00.080
<v Speaker 2>get married then and there. I don't know if that

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 2>counts in his faber And now I agree with you,

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 2>of course, it's been a lot of mockery for this girl.

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 2>But as we know, there's a lot of mockery for

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:10.959
<v Speaker 2>the panelists on the View and pretty much the entire

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 2>MSNBCCNN lineup, but that doesn't stop them getting those roles.

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 2>So I still reckon she might have a bit of

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 2>a career in the media, have a short lived. There's

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of scuttle buckkinse at the moment about the Obamas,

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 2>whether they're getting a divorce, and it's back in the

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 2>headlines again.

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 11>Why is that, Well, because we're seeing Barack a solo

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 11>for at least the third time in recent months. According

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:42.879
<v Speaker 11>to TMZ, he was spotted at a Thai restaurant over

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 11>here in Sherman Oaks with both of his daughters, but

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 11>with alt Michelle. Last week, he was prominently seated at

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 11>this La Clippers game alongside the owner and his wife,

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 11>but without you know, Michelle. And that's the latest in

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 11>several solo events that he's attended between Jimmy Cordor's funeral

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 11>and then President Trump's inarguration in January. I thought it

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 11>was interesting because Megan Kelly is referring to this as

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 11>a soft launch divorce, so I guess the countdown is

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 11>on halft launch divorce.

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh that will be the next scene. Now you'll be

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 2>trialing the divorce before you make it official.

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:25.839
<v Speaker 8>Why not?

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Jimmy Carter funeral was the one that I

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 2>think got people really talking because there were these rumors.

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:34.280
<v Speaker 2>But then the fact that she wasn't by his side

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 2>for that the inauguration, you can say, well, you know,

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 2>she had a fundamental problem with the elected president. But yeah,

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:46.879
<v Speaker 2>this is unusual to have the multiple events where they're

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 2>not together because they have been pretty much throughout their

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 2>entire marriage, side by side, just about every event that

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:57.279
<v Speaker 2>can attend together. Now, Carnie West, has it been catfish?

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 2>What's happened here? He has apparently been scam by someone

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 2>impersonating Joe Rogan. West posted various screenshots of text conversations

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 2>with who he thought was Joe Rogan arranging a podcast

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:17.280
<v Speaker 2>appearance with him, but Joe Rogan swiftly replied on x saying, Hey, Kanye,

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know who you're talking to, but that's not me.

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 2>He can see. How can this happen? I mean we're

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 2>talking about big Star. Yes, surely someone's looking into his

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 2>communications before he makes commitments to appear on podcasts.

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 11>I mean I think if it was anybody but Kanye,

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 11>I would say yes. But Kanye is kind of a

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 11>loose cannon and doing his own thing right now, I

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:43.320
<v Speaker 11>will say I would not be surprised if it actually

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 11>comes to fruition now, because Rogan recently said that Kanye

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 11>was musically genius. He was talking to Antonio Brown on

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 11>his podcast last week. He said that Kanye was musically genius,

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 11>but he wishes he wouldn't sell T shirts with twastikas

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 11>on them, and he did say that he felt like

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 11>Kanye was messing with us. So perhaps he would invite

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:06.839
<v Speaker 11>Kanye on to have that debate with him and say,

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 11>do you really feel this way? Are you really trying

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 11>to sell this lifestyle or is this some big marketing

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 11>ploy now.

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Blake Lively was ambushed by a Justin Baldoni supporter outside

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 2>the Paramount Theater in Los Angeles where her new film

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 2>Another Simple Favor was having his opening night at the

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 2>annual south By Southwest Film Festival. Can say, there seems

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:34.360
<v Speaker 2>to be no end to this saga. At some point

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 2>people are going to move on, but it appears we're not

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 2>they yet.

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:40.759
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, you know, I'm interested in your take on this

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 11>because TV personality and entrepreneur Bethany Frankel recently came out

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 11>today and said she felt like we were bullying Blake

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:50.359
<v Speaker 11>Lively and Megan Markle, that we were crossing the line

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 11>a little bit, you know, showing up and protesting her movie.

0:45:54.880 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 11>And I don't. I think we're trying to hold people accountable.

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 11>That our WEAPONI seeing some really sensitive and culturally culturally

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 11>relevant topics, whether it be racism or me too. I

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 11>just think it's people trying to hold others accountable.

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 8>I don't see this as bullying.

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh.

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 2>I think Bethany is just trying to get a headline.

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 2>There's almost absurd thing I've heard. I mean, you'd be

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:28.359
<v Speaker 2>talking about hugely powerful, influential people who have behaved appallingly.

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 2>And in the case of Megan Markel, she hasn't just

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 2>played the victim. She has thrown mud at her husband's families.

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 2>She has suggested they are racist and that scuttle. But

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 2>those ugly rumors were circulating, making headlines around the world

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:50.320
<v Speaker 2>as the queen was ill. It was her final months,

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:54.000
<v Speaker 2>and to be dealing with this because of their just

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 2>attention seeking was absolutely disgusting. So yeah, I have very

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 2>little sympathy, And let's just have a look at the

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 2>reason why there's any criticism coming their way is because

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 2>they are putting out these projects. There's self delighted projects.

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:12.840
<v Speaker 2>In the case of Megan Markele the most absurd reality

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 2>show perhaps ever recorded. It makes Keeping Up with the

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Kardashian seem like some sort of noble projects. So you

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:21.879
<v Speaker 2>know what, if they stopped doing stupid stuff, would stop

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.480
<v Speaker 2>talking about it, That's all I could say. Just finally,

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Kinsey director James Cameron has fled America. He does not

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 2>want to be part of Donald Trump's presidency in any

0:47:31.680 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 2>shape or form, and is soon going to be a

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand citizen. Has there been any backlash to this

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 2>or is this generally supported? Yeah?

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 11>I mean I feel like everybody's like, bye, I have

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 11>The last thing I watched of his was Titanic. He

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:50.840
<v Speaker 11>says that we are going historically in a different direction,

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 11>and I'd say, you know, historically men were not supposed

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 11>to be in women's bathrooms. Teenage girls didn't have to

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 11>share locker rooms with biological men. In the form of

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 11>Hunter Baden's laptop. You know, like there's a million things

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 11>that happened under the Biden administration that I felt like

0:48:06.960 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 11>straight away from the Constitution, James.

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 2>Cameron, and that's all the time we have. I'll see

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 2>you tomorrow night at eleven. Don't go anywhere. Newsnight is

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 2>up next