Speaker 1: Guying center. This is Paul Murray live a simpic. I
Speaker 1: don't need any of that, Charry, this is all natural
Speaker 1: and this has taken forty six years to build. All right,
Speaker 1: thank you, dull it all right.
Speaker 2: There is so much drama happening in one state in Australia,
Speaker 2: and it is Tasmania.
Speaker 1: I know most people don't live there.
Speaker 2: I know we all love it, but drama, drama, drama, baby,
Speaker 2: and it gets even wilder tonight. Even the ABC is
Speaker 2: calling out the Prime Minister has been a bit of
Speaker 2: an empty suit on his let's all you know, thanks
Speaker 2: for the ninety four seats.
Speaker 1: Now, let's work out what we're going to do for
Speaker 1: the next three years and some.
Speaker 2: Home truth, some tough talk, no happy talk about the
Speaker 2: garbage that's going on in the United States at the moment, surprise, surprise,
Speaker 2: much of the Trump aiding meeting in Australia not willing
Speaker 2: to tell you the true story. But first, Australia has
Speaker 2: quite a lot of politicians. We know about the more
Speaker 2: than one hundred and fifty that are in the Lower House,
Speaker 2: and the six different senators from each of the states,
Speaker 2: a couple from the different territories, and all day, every day.
Speaker 2: These are the people who get to tell us how
Speaker 2: we have to live, and all of them pretend that
Speaker 2: they can feel our pain, even though, as I have
Speaker 2: told you many times before, there have been three pay
Speaker 2: rises in the first term of the Aberaneze government. The
Speaker 2: first one was two point seventy five percent, the second
Speaker 2: one was their biggest they had received in a decade,
Speaker 2: and just last year the second biggest pay rise in
Speaker 2: the last decade.
Speaker 1: They are well and truly well remunerated.
Speaker 2: As millions of Australians work harder than ever for what
Speaker 2: feels like less money at the end of the pay cycle,
Speaker 2: let alone Australia being in a per capita recession for
Speaker 2: most of the past three years, getting ready for more
Speaker 2: of the same for the next three years because of productivity.
Speaker 2: And don't worry, I won't be going into great detail
Speaker 2: about products tonight. Our living standards are down to nineteen
Speaker 2: fifty nine. And despite the fact of all of this,
Speaker 2: despite the fact of cost of living crisis, despite the
Speaker 2: fact of and it's exactly the same after the election
Speaker 2: as it was before the election, of three million people,
Speaker 2: this close to homelessness of more than three million households,
Speaker 2: that will have run out of food most probably by
Speaker 2: this time. Each and every week, a disgraceful decision has
Speaker 2: been made to give our politicians another freaking pay rise,
Speaker 2: the fourth since the Labor Party won in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 2: and just so happened to be timed weeks after a
Speaker 2: federal election. We learned today that the Renumeration Tribunal has
Speaker 2: given another two point four percent now, meaning that the
Speaker 2: Prime Minister is going to get an extra fourteen and
Speaker 2: a half thousand dollars a year on top of the
Speaker 2: last pay rise, the one before that and the one
Speaker 2: before that. No wonder, these people are cockerhop so happy
Speaker 2: to be part of the club now. Years ago a
Speaker 2: decision was made because of course politicians, if they were
Speaker 2: in charge of their own pay, they'd be blowback. But
Speaker 2: now a independent tribunal, the Renumeration Tribunal, is the one
Speaker 2: that decides whether the politicians of Australia deserve a pay rise.
Speaker 2: And they've come out with their determination and here is
Speaker 2: some details about it. Anthony Abernezi and other politicians has
Speaker 2: set for a plumbed up pay packet. The Prime Minister
Speaker 2: will go from six hundred and seven thousand dollars a
Speaker 2: year to six hundred and twenty two thousand dollars. He
Speaker 2: did nothing to deserve the pay rise. Backbencher will now
Speaker 2: go from two thirty three to two thirty nine thousand dollars,
Speaker 2: or the opposition leader will go up by ten thousand
Speaker 2: dollars to four hundred and forty two thousand dollars. That,
Speaker 2: of course, because she was not the previous lead out
Speaker 2: the last election, so she gets the loading that takes
Speaker 2: her to more than four.
Speaker 1: Hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: Someone who will be earning even more than the alternative
Speaker 2: prime minister is the bloke who considers himself to be
Speaker 2: the next prime minister, Jim Charmers, the one who feels
Speaker 2: your pain, the one who says he needs not just
Speaker 2: this election, but another election before they can put in
Speaker 2: place what's needed to fix the country. Four hundred and
Speaker 2: forty eight thousand dollars cabinet ministers, including a lot of
Speaker 2: the freeloaders and the free riders that we've talked about
Speaker 2: over the years, is now four hundred and twelve thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: What a disgrace.
Speaker 2: These people are already earning a big chunk of change
Speaker 2: on top of that, they have staff who including were
Speaker 2: given extra staff in the last parliament so they could
Speaker 2: film themselves to TikTok videos, despite the fact that TikTok
Speaker 2: is banned by the Australian government. They of course have
Speaker 2: the printing allowances. They've got the ability to walk into
Speaker 2: Parliament and defame anyone they want because they're a special
Speaker 2: breed of human. But there's even more detail which is
Speaker 2: going to annoy you, because it's not just a pay
Speaker 2: rise for politicians. You see, the same people who got
Speaker 2: the same three pay rises of the last term in
Speaker 2: Parliament are very senior public servants, the public servants that
Speaker 2: are already paid more than the Prime Minister or the
Speaker 2: Minister of the day of which they are supposedly answerable to.
Speaker 2: These people have all of the same travel entitlements. They're
Speaker 2: all the ones flying up the front of the plane.
Speaker 2: These are all the people who think they are more
Speaker 2: important than you and I and the Independent Tribunal bangs
Speaker 2: in the fourth pay rise in three years for these people.
Speaker 1: The believable.
Speaker 2: Australians are going backwards to a standard of living that
Speaker 2: is back in nineteen fifty nine. Hunger, homelessness, hard work.
Speaker 2: These people. Four pay rises since twenty twenty two, unbelievable.
Speaker 2: See this is another example of what I've banged on
Speaker 2: about for a long time. And I don't care if
Speaker 2: I'm going to be the last soldier left after the
Speaker 2: war or I'll be the one stuck on an island
Speaker 2: still yelling into the sky. The plan of the modern
Speaker 2: machine is that you will be dependent on government the
Speaker 2: way that center left or even wilder left governments like
Speaker 2: Andrews in Victoria, Palachet in Queensland, Cook in Western Australia.
Speaker 2: The way they run the system is they want a
Speaker 2: triangle of dependency where the majority of the country has
Speaker 2: its hand out for welfare and any suggestion of it
Speaker 2: being pulled back would mean never vote for a changing government.
Speaker 2: More people than ever before work for the government, getting
Speaker 2: pay rises like four in three years, which means any
Speaker 2: suggestion of a reduction, and that means don't change the government.
Speaker 2: And then anyone in private industry, your biggest client is
Speaker 2: supposed to be the local state or federal government, because
Speaker 2: then you too will not rock the boat. And if
Speaker 2: you set up that triangle, you don't just go past
Speaker 2: fifty percent, you get to sixty percent. You get the
Speaker 2: seventy percent of the country who will never change the government.
Speaker 2: As long as everyone doesn't rock the boat, the tide
Speaker 2: rises for all that are inside the triangle, for everyone
Speaker 2: outside who is having to work harder to pay for
Speaker 2: more of it, just shut up and keep paying. Honestly,
Speaker 2: this is an absolute disgrace.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't it be.
Speaker 2: Wonderful if just a single person in the system said no,
Speaker 2: I don't want it. And there have been examples of
Speaker 2: premiers in different states saying no, no, no, Thanks for
Speaker 2: the advice, but not on now. Watch it's not going
Speaker 2: to take place simple test of whether the newly freshly
Speaker 2: re elected forever prime Minister and his ministers truly care
Speaker 2: about those that are doing it tough. But of course
Speaker 2: you and I both know this will be the extent
Speaker 2: of the conversation.
Speaker 1: Now let's get to Tazzy now. You know I love Tazzy.
Speaker 2: I love going now, I love doing our towns, I
Speaker 2: love holiday in there. It is an absolutely spectacular part
Speaker 2: of Australia. I spent a lot of time in the North.
Speaker 2: No offense to the South, but I just think it's
Speaker 2: a ripping joint right lon Cesteren They've even got their
Speaker 2: own casino.
Speaker 1: It is a spectacular part of Australia.
Speaker 2: Well, as you know, there's a lot of drama, drama,
Speaker 2: drama when it comes to the politics that's playing out
Speaker 2: in Tasmania. And I understand my old mate Peter Burner
Speaker 2: used to say, there's the compassion pie. There's so many,
Speaker 2: so many things you can get about it any one day.
Speaker 2: And the intricacies of Tasmanian politics may not be at
Speaker 2: the absolute tippy top of your to do list when
Speaker 2: it comes to problems. But what a story is playing
Speaker 2: out in Tasmania. For those that are just joining the drama.
Speaker 2: Let me bring you up to date with the bold
Speaker 2: and the beautiful of the Apple Aisle. The Labor Party,
Speaker 2: who have ten seats in the Parliament and you need
Speaker 2: way more than that to form the majority, has been
Speaker 2: able to slowly but surely rant and rave about debt,
Speaker 2: football stadiums and ferries, so much so that they have
Speaker 2: got together with the Greens. And even then there's not
Speaker 2: enough people to pass something or to become a government.
Speaker 2: So they have got many, in fact, all by one
Speaker 2: of the cross bench to vote with them no confidence,
Speaker 2: no confidence in the government. The premier who convention would
Speaker 2: suggest is supposed to hand in his gut and badge
Speaker 2: as a way of keeping his party in power. Says no, no,
Speaker 2: I'm not going anywhere. So we go back to the
Speaker 2: Labor Party going okay, the same people that were able
Speaker 2: to get them, plus the Greens and the cross Bench,
Speaker 2: would they all be able to form some sort of
Speaker 2: a government to land between now and the official next
Speaker 2: election of Tasmania. Will know, they say no deals with
Speaker 2: the cross Bench or the Greens, so they're happy to
Speaker 2: tear the joint down but then want to walk away
Speaker 2: from the consequences. Well, this time last night I told
Speaker 2: you that the Premier went to the Governor of Tasmania
Speaker 2: to say, hey, we can't get anything done in the parliament,
Speaker 2: which means we need a new election. And rather than
Speaker 2: just saying okay, I don't like the idea of elections
Speaker 2: you know, every fifteen months, but still okay, that's the
Speaker 2: way it works, off to election, she said no, I'll
Speaker 2: get back to you by the end of the week,
Speaker 2: which meant one hell of a day today for the
Speaker 2: Tasmanian Premier, Jeremy Rothcliffe. Now these are now obviously the
Speaker 2: collective media that was ripping into him today. They think
Speaker 2: that he is the problem. He is the man who
Speaker 2: won't go. He is the one who's trying to put
Speaker 2: himself into a pair of concrete shoes that won't move
Speaker 2: from his perspective, and I completely respect it. He deserves
Speaker 2: every right and if his party room wants to roll him,
Speaker 2: but if they won't, then he deserves to stand. And
Speaker 2: if the other bloke won't former government, then why are
Speaker 2: we off to an election? We'll have a listen to
Speaker 2: some of the questions he was copping today and then
Speaker 2: there's one in particular that will just bowl you over.
Speaker 1: Talk radio still foot the callers asking for you to
Speaker 1: stand outs.
Speaker 3: Not punish you for taking them to unnecessary and constantly
Speaker 3: elect Halma no longer has confidence in you, don't You
Speaker 3: no longer have the confidence of the Tasmanian people.
Speaker 2: So some uses an illegitimate motion of no confidence figure
Speaker 2: And firstly, he's not bringing on the election. It was
Speaker 2: the opposition who do what oppositions do, which is trying
Speaker 2: to put the black eye as hard as they can
Speaker 2: in on a government. But you've got to have the
Speaker 2: stones to be willing to replace the government. You see,
Speaker 2: this is all so wild that nobody's got candidates, nobody's
Speaker 2: got a plan for how to win an election. They've
Speaker 2: just run a federal campaign. There's no money in terms
Speaker 2: of the campaign costs for both of the parties. But
Speaker 2: have a listened to a particular exchange with one reporter
Speaker 2: who just has given up even pretending to be respectful
Speaker 2: of the elected premier of Tasmania.
Speaker 1: You are the premier.
Speaker 4: You can stop this now, you can resign.
Speaker 5: You don't have the confidence of a house.
Speaker 1: You're not a legitimate premier.
Speaker 4: So what are you doing here?
Speaker 1: You're not a legitimate premier.
Speaker 2: Okay, now, yeah, he's right out on the edge, but
Speaker 2: that's why he wanted an election. The governor turns around
Speaker 2: and says, I'm not going to give you an election
Speaker 2: because it was a subtle message of the Liberal Party
Speaker 2: change your leader, or to the Labor Party. How can
Speaker 2: you stitch together a government so we don't have to
Speaker 2: have an election.
Speaker 1: Premier Rockcliff's response.
Speaker 3: I am Premier and I'm here today focusing on what
Speaker 3: Tasmanians want us to focus on, and that is delivering
Speaker 3: better health services. You know very well the wind saw
Speaker 3: an opportunity, but he deceived the cross bench he deceived
Speaker 3: the Parliament and he deceived the Tasmanian people.
Speaker 2: Now, well done for the control because we know the
Speaker 2: question was designed to make him blow up and expose
Speaker 2: some personality flaw before the people of Tasmania. Well, guess
Speaker 2: what tonight? The governor is not going to make us
Speaker 2: wait till the end of the week. The governor has said, yes,
Speaker 2: you can have an election, and there will be one
Speaker 2: in the dead of winter. Poor Tasmanians have just had
Speaker 2: to go through a federal campaign. Will they have to
Speaker 2: go through a state campaign? And make this very clear,
Speaker 2: whatever the result is, the reason for the election is
Speaker 2: the Labor Party forcing the election. Yes, Jeremy Rockcliffe did
Speaker 2: not resign, but no one in his party chose to
Speaker 2: challenge either. Now, whether that is a fatal mistake that
Speaker 2: means the Liberal Party is wiped off the map or
Speaker 2: the Labor Party is punished for what they have done
Speaker 2: to force an election in Tasmania.
Speaker 1: Who knows.
Speaker 2: We'll all have to wait, watch and seeing together. But
Speaker 2: what about the drama.
Speaker 1: That me am? I the drama? I don't think I'm
Speaker 1: the drama. Maybe I am. I have a young team.
Speaker 2: Now, let's also have a look here at Big Australia
Speaker 2: now again regardless of what we all know to be
Speaker 2: the case in every pole that's ever put out by
Speaker 2: any organization that will tell us Australia thinks too many
Speaker 2: people too quickly.
Speaker 1: But of course to say that is some sort of racism.
Speaker 1: You and I both know it's not about that.
Speaker 2: It's just literally, if you keep adding hundreds of thousands
Speaker 2: of people and you haven't improved the system by hundreds
Speaker 2: of thousands, let alone built hundreds of thousands of homes,
Speaker 2: guess what. The very few homes that are left over
Speaker 2: have too many people looking for them, the prices go
Speaker 2: up up, and the people who are really struggling, like
Speaker 2: a single mum, like any single parent, like an older
Speaker 2: person living by themselves, where they are getting blasted out of.
Speaker 1: Particularly the rental market.
Speaker 2: More proof of that today, as always homepage make it
Speaker 2: sky news dot com dot Au because not only highlights
Speaker 2: of this and every other pro but stories like this.
Speaker 2: Australia's mass migration disaster is overwhelming. Labourer's housing plan availability
Speaker 2: has gone backwards by hundreds of homes every week. Australia
Speaker 2: is bringing in migrants faster than it can house them.
Speaker 2: That's our point. With Labour's mass immigration plans out pacing
Speaker 2: new home construction and shrinking the housing supply by more
Speaker 2: than one thousand homes every week. The State of Housing
Speaker 2: System twenty twenty five report, which they are looking into here,
Speaker 2: forecasts that the country will build only nine hundred and
Speaker 2: thirty eight thousand homes by June of twenty twenty nine.
Speaker 2: One point two million is what they promised in terms
Speaker 2: of immigration. What we will actually have to be building
Speaker 2: is two hundred and forty thousand extra homes on top
Speaker 2: of that, because to keep pace with immigration driven population growth,
Speaker 2: Australia needs to construct approximately two hundred and forty thousand
Speaker 2: homes annually.
Speaker 1: Believable. That's what we talk about on the show.
Speaker 2: Oh but to talk about it's nasty, to talk about
Speaker 2: it's racist. Again for the four hundred and eighty seven
Speaker 2: thousandth time, may I point to the asterisk, which is
Speaker 2: always we understand the role of immigration, we understand the
Speaker 2: role of multiculturalism.
Speaker 1: It's not about that.
Speaker 2: It's literally about infrastructure keeping up with Australia and its
Speaker 2: population as it is today. But because the federal government
Speaker 2: needs to keep pumping up the number of people paying
Speaker 2: tax in the country. Business wants to sell the more
Speaker 2: customers in the country, it's just put into the too
Speaker 2: hard basket. We end up in a scenario with thousands
Speaker 2: of people living intents, plenty of others going broke, trying
Speaker 2: to pay off the home that they are trying to
Speaker 2: do so via interest rates or via rent, and the
Speaker 2: politicians's job it is to deal with this.
Speaker 1: They don't care because.
Speaker 2: They've got four pay rises, four pay rises in the
Speaker 2: past three years. Talk about America now and the situation
Speaker 2: that has been playing out there for some time, particularly
Speaker 2: the riots in Los Angeles. Now, you know a lot
Speaker 2: about all of this, but let's make this nice and clear.
Speaker 2: For those that may have tuned into this story a
Speaker 2: couple of days late, maybe only paid half attention to
Speaker 2: the six PM news, Let's tell you some home truths here.
Speaker 2: Much of the media would like to pretend that all
Speaker 2: of this is about one issue and one issue only.
Speaker 4: I think a lot of people believe that we're talking
Speaker 4: about mass deportation plans that would just sort of effect
Speaker 4: on documents and immigrants.
Speaker 6: That's not true.
Speaker 7: There are twenty two million people that live in mixed
Speaker 7: status families.
Speaker 8: So the American would be deported too.
Speaker 1: That's what targetment.
Speaker 6: Families will be deported.
Speaker 7: The methods that this administration has deployed are extreme, threatening,
Speaker 7: not just undocumented immigrants, but the entire rule of law
Speaker 7: in America.
Speaker 9: The Trump administration is that they don't care if you're
Speaker 9: complaining with the law. There are terrorizing communities, and they're
Speaker 9: ambushing immigrants outside of courthouses, restaurants, workspaces place.
Speaker 2: Let's get by to first principles here. A country that
Speaker 2: does not police its borders is no country. It's just
Speaker 2: a place where people can come and go and hang
Speaker 2: out and do whatever they want. The reality is is
Speaker 2: that the United States, like every other serious country in
Speaker 2: the world, polices its borders. It's why you've got to
Speaker 2: fill out a form before you fly to the United States.
Speaker 1: It's why you've got to apply before you move to.
Speaker 2: The United States. It's why you have to apply before
Speaker 2: you can move and work in the United States. Not
Speaker 2: only so you know who's coming in, but you know
Speaker 2: how many are coming in. What is not Okay's illegal immigration.
Speaker 2: When people decide no forms, no cues, bugger it and
Speaker 2: buy the millions.
Speaker 1: During the Biden.
Speaker 2: Years, they just simply walked over a border, and even
Speaker 2: if they were detained or met by somebody with a badge,
Speaker 2: they were more often than not let go or as
Speaker 2: we know, bust all over the country, meaning that every
Speaker 2: he became a border city. Put simply, if by now
Speaker 2: you don't know and you don't tell people when you're
Speaker 2: talking about these issues that there is legal immigration and
Speaker 2: illegal immigration, then you are playing a very silly game.
Speaker 1: Perfect example.
Speaker 2: In the United States, for some reason, much of the
Speaker 2: establishment and access media, and much of the activist media
Speaker 2: as well, never used the term illegal immigration. They just
Speaker 2: say migration, pretending that somebody who didn't fill out of form,
Speaker 2: who just walked over the border is exactly the same
Speaker 2: as the person who filled out the paperwork and waited
Speaker 2: in a queue for years.
Speaker 1: Perfect example.
Speaker 5: Demonstrations for immigration raids, federal immigration rates, controversial immigration policies,
Speaker 5: immigration crackdowns.
Speaker 8: Immigration crackdown, federal deportation.
Speaker 6: Rates, Donald Trump's immigration policy.
Speaker 2: No, not immigration policy, illegal immigration policy, and unbelievably, you
Speaker 2: have seen when and there was an attempt by the
Speaker 2: United States government to go and collect people who had
Speaker 2: not filled out the form, not weighted in the queue,
Speaker 2: not done the right thing. That those people were being arrested,
Speaker 2: but of course because people don't want to go, they're
Speaker 2: nabbed off the streets, they are kidnapped, and all the
Speaker 2: other invective. The reality is people have been warned since
Speaker 2: day dot of this administration that if you are here illegally,
Speaker 2: go or we're going to come for you. In fact,
Speaker 2: will even help you fill out the forms to get
Speaker 2: out of here, and will pay for you to get
Speaker 2: out of here. So a whole bunch of protests which
Speaker 2: started in and around downtown and the place where the
Speaker 2: Immigration Enforcement Agency is located. Okay, in that place where
Speaker 2: those people were doing their job of enforcing the obvious
Speaker 2: difference between legal and illegal immigration, people started to turn up,
Speaker 2: and in the past few days we know how wild
Speaker 2: it has gotten. And the very same nasty players in
Speaker 2: the American media who say no difference, no difference between
Speaker 2: legal and illegal immigration, well, they want to pretend that
Speaker 2: there's some sort of a resistance movement that is building
Speaker 2: against a president for enforcing the obvious laws that are
Speaker 2: no different in Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Norway, or the
Speaker 2: United States, legal or illegal immigration.
Speaker 8: He is absolutely panicked by the protests against him to
Speaker 8: the point where he's already playing the biggest cards that
Speaker 8: he's got and he's not even six months into this term.
Speaker 8: I just think, I think we're getting the test really early,
Speaker 8: and I think that he's failing.
Speaker 1: Now. Again.
Speaker 2: You can like, you can dislike, you can think it's
Speaker 2: good but Trump bad Trump. But enforcing this law is
Speaker 2: something that even Obama talked about. Okay, but just because
Speaker 2: Orange Man bad everything and they want to pretend that
Speaker 2: he's starting World War III or Civil War two point zero.
Speaker 2: But let's get to another little fact that again you
Speaker 2: probably didn't see six PM news in Australia, you barely
Speaker 2: have seen it in mainstream news in the United States,
Speaker 2: which is, you know how, there's an awful lot of
Speaker 2: people that for some reason are waving the Mexican flag,
Speaker 2: particularly in the protests which started in California are now
Speaker 2: starting to bounce up all around the country. Why are
Speaker 2: they doing that? Well, let's actually have a listen to
Speaker 2: one of the protesters who explains why people are waving
Speaker 2: the Mexican flag in California when the American government is
Speaker 2: enforcing who can stay because they're legal, and who should
Speaker 2: go because they're not.
Speaker 10: We've been here for thousands of years before you guys
Speaker 10: showed up screw up everything. We think we should organize
Speaker 10: together with the US working class and fight together and
Speaker 10: create a vero system where anti capitalists. We think socialism
Speaker 10: does work, real socialism, not Venezuela, not Cuba, not editing
Speaker 10: that that they try to sell us and socialism, and
Speaker 10: where we leave it would be a more humane system
Speaker 10: that will tell you of our people's necessities.
Speaker 2: Is there a country we can look to to kind
Speaker 2: of model the socialism idea?
Speaker 10: The only motto would be Soviet Union. In the first
Speaker 10: four years after that it became a mass Yeah.
Speaker 2: So some of the people that are protesting are protesting
Speaker 2: because of the enforcement of the laws that again every
Speaker 2: president has enforced, I repeat Obama, hundreds of thousands of deportations.
Speaker 2: He of course was the one who did the caging
Speaker 2: of kids. But you know, Orange, bad, Bad, he invented.
Speaker 1: All of this stuff.
Speaker 2: Some of the people that are in those protests are
Speaker 2: nothing to do with that question of legal versus illegal immigration.
Speaker 2: They're trying to, among other things, say this isn't even America.
Speaker 2: This was Mexico. It still will remain Mexico, and eventually
Speaker 2: we can boot out the Americans and turn it back
Speaker 2: into the territorial lands of which it was before. Deals
Speaker 2: were done, in fact, literally sold by the Mexican government
Speaker 2: to the American government way back when.
Speaker 1: And then there's this story that you.
Speaker 2: May will have heard a version of today in the
Speaker 2: Australian media.
Speaker 5: Los Angeles mayor has announced an almost immediate curfew. After
Speaker 5: five straight days of unreased Los Angeles is in lockdown tonight.
Speaker 5: A curfew is in place across downtown LA.
Speaker 1: Part of Los Angeles is tonight under a curfew. Those
Speaker 1: who are there are barred from being on the streets
Speaker 1: because you see, it's all widely out of control.
Speaker 2: Why because of Orange Man Bad deciding to send in
Speaker 2: the troops. That's the reason for the curfew. Except that's
Speaker 2: not the reason for the curfew. Even the lefty mayor
Speaker 2: who was the one who put this curfew in in
Speaker 2: a very small part of downtown.
Speaker 1: But still all of Los Angeles is under lockdown.
Speaker 2: Please Anyway, the reason that's the case is because of
Speaker 2: the looting that took place over the multiple days of
Speaker 2: the protest, which apparently were about this. Because it, as
Speaker 2: I've just shown, you really could be about that, and
Speaker 2: please explain how the enforcement of immigration law means?
Speaker 1: This is okay crazy?
Speaker 2: And again the far left mayor of Los Angeles, who
Speaker 2: couldn't be a bigger Trump hater, actually explains, and did
Speaker 2: you see this in much of the Australian media today
Speaker 2: The curfew has nothing to do with the immigration stuff.
Speaker 2: It has to do with the psychos that are running
Speaker 2: from shop to shop bashing things in.
Speaker 6: I have declared a local emergency and issued a curfew
Speaker 6: for downtown Los Angeles to stop the vandalism, to stop
Speaker 6: the looting.
Speaker 2: Sorry, did you hear Donald Trump and any of that?
Speaker 2: Did you hear the migration policies in any of that? Again,
Speaker 2: even let's imagine, and it's not true, but let's imagine
Speaker 2: the first day was about the migrant This clearly just
Speaker 2: became the free for all for anyone who wanted to
Speaker 2: do whatever the heck they wanted. Well, thankfully, the curfew
Speaker 2: seems to have worked. And again, spare thought for the
Speaker 2: poor men and women who have to enforce the law
Speaker 2: when they're up against craziness like what you have seen,
Speaker 2: reinforced by a political class who, for whatever reason, think
Speaker 2: there is no difference between legal and illegal. But I
Speaker 2: guarantee living gated communities, or if they don't, they've got
Speaker 2: four locks on their doors and most likely a security
Speaker 2: guard who's guarding at each and every night in the
Speaker 2: Mayor's mansion or the governor's mansion or Pelosi's house. And
Speaker 2: all of these people again fired up by a media
Speaker 2: that wants to pretend there's no difference between somebody who
Speaker 2: waited in line and somebody who just jumped the queue. Well,
Speaker 2: thankfully the LAPD have got control of their city.
Speaker 11: Tonight there was a large group in front of the
Speaker 11: Federal Building, upwards of seven hundred protesters wrapping up their
Speaker 11: night and swiftly made their way out of the downtown
Speaker 11: area with only a few stragglers to speak of.
Speaker 2: Again, I get millions of people don't like Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: the majority of Australians don't like Donald Trump. But for
Speaker 2: goodness sake, illegal versus legal immigration not a hard concept
Speaker 2: for people to get their head around. And those who
Speaker 2: want to bury their head in the sand or just
Speaker 2: lighter people, including those who are reporting about it on
Speaker 2: the other side of the world, feeding.
Speaker 1: Now a much happier moment. Before we get into our
Speaker 1: debate this evening.
Speaker 2: The AFL Hall of Fame held the ceremony last night
Speaker 2: in Melbourne, and it was a wonderful celebration of great
Speaker 2: legends of the game, both male and female. But I
Speaker 2: want to specifically focus in on young Aaron Phillips. Aaron
Speaker 2: Phillips was somebody who I think dreamt of playing basketball
Speaker 2: but then ended up being able to play AFLW. She
Speaker 2: was one of the first female athletes to go in.
Speaker 2: Of course, the star of the Adelaide Crows going into
Speaker 2: that Hall of Fame. Massive congratulations to her and her
Speaker 2: teammates and her family. But as the father of two daughters,
Speaker 2: I must say this moment in her speech just filled
Speaker 2: my heart until it was overflowing. In terms of a
Speaker 2: daddy daughter moment, this is pretty cool.
Speaker 4: I can't imagine how hard it would have been to
Speaker 4: tell your thirteen year old daughter that she couldn't play
Speaker 4: the game that she loves anymore, and twenty seven years
Speaker 4: later she's standing next to you in the Hall of Fame.
Speaker 7: It's just.
Speaker 4: Thank you for teaching me again that I loved And
Speaker 4: even though you knew it was never going to take
Speaker 4: me anywhere at the time, you still taught me anyway.
Speaker 1: How good is that?
Speaker 2: Congratulations to her and everyone else who joins the list
Speaker 2: of legends of one of the great sports of the world.
Speaker 2: All right, quick breakback. We we'll plea you want to
Speaker 2: talk about and lots to debate. FightNight here on Port
Speaker 2: Murray Live, Wednesday Night, Ding Ding, Let's go.
Speaker 1: All right before we begin our debate.
Speaker 2: Right now, you can see around Australia the strawberry moon.
Speaker 1: This is the last moon of spring.
Speaker 2: The reason is called a strawberry moon is simply because
Speaker 2: it's named after the berries. Because for farmers it's a
Speaker 2: particularly important time of year. This is what you can
Speaker 2: see around the world. By this time tomorrow we'll be
Speaker 2: able to see some of the pictures here in Australia.
Speaker 2: You've missed it on the East coast, but on the
Speaker 2: West coast you get to look out. In the next
Speaker 2: little while it will be pretty much over Western Australia
Speaker 2: as we speak. So when there's some lovely pictures of
Speaker 2: that tomorrow, I'll show you.
Speaker 1: Lucy Zelek's here. Oh we love Lucy, don't we rot
Speaker 1: I love you.
Speaker 2: And Stephen Conry is always just here to help, isn't he.
Speaker 1: On a Wednesday night. All right, hey, Steven, we love
Speaker 1: you too.
Speaker 2: By it's always it's always fun. All right, now let's
Speaker 2: talk about to albow. Of course, you know, freshly re
Speaker 2: elected ninety seven seats rule forever, you know all the
Speaker 2: rest of it, right well, as you know, he turned
Speaker 2: around and gave your speech yesterday at the Press Club,
Speaker 2: of which a big talk fest is the idea for productivity,
Speaker 2: a problem that Jim Chalmers says can't be even solved
Speaker 2: in the next term, and it'll have to be after that.
Speaker 2: But interestingly, there is this sort of drum beat of
Speaker 2: people towards the center left saying, hey, look, I know
Speaker 2: you didn't promise much at the election, but if you've
Speaker 2: won by this much, time to burn a backbach. You've
Speaker 2: got like twenty MPs that you can up against the wall.
Speaker 2: And there have been a few movements, including apparently more
Speaker 2: progressive people being moved to the upper echelons of the
Speaker 2: public service, who of course get the same pay rise
Speaker 2: as the politicians do at the moment. Then there's also
Speaker 2: the opinion stuff like this one here, which is Albanze's
Speaker 2: cautious approach risks a repeat of Turnbull's wasted majority. Okay,
Speaker 2: first things, First, Turnbull didn't have a majority. Tony Abbott
Speaker 2: had a majority, and then Malcolm Turnbull in the back
Speaker 2: and then he burnt the majority. So let's not pretend
Speaker 2: that Malcolm Turbull had a majority, okay. And then the
Speaker 2: third one here written by the poster who does it
Speaker 2: for the Turnbull Times, where he writes that at a
Speaker 2: time of global and political upheaval, can Albanizi really resist
Speaker 2: calls to be more ambitious?
Speaker 1: All right, Lucy, what do they mean? What does the
Speaker 1: left really want out of Albow?
Speaker 2: Is there assumption that because they've won this one, they'll
Speaker 2: win everyone, So bugger it?
Speaker 1: Put the foot down.
Speaker 12: Oh yeah, hell for little let's go, let's destroy the
Speaker 12: economy by putting in renewable and it blackouts, brownouts. We
Speaker 12: want more of that stuff. We want everything also to
Speaker 12: be for free. So when you're asking the question, what
Speaker 12: are they expecting Albow, it's gimmi, gimmy, gimmey. We're in
Speaker 12: that era of you know, of the generation now who
Speaker 12: were demanding that the university fees be paid for and
Speaker 12: that basically they're given a house on a plot of
Speaker 12: land that, by the way, doesn't exist thanks to ol
Speaker 12: Bow because they haven't.
Speaker 1: Built you one.
Speaker 12: So it's really quite interesting to watch how this plays out.
Speaker 12: Now we know that Olbow's quite calculating, and I don't
Speaker 12: think it's in his DNA to be, you know, quite
Speaker 12: gregarious when it comes to these sorts of things. I mean,
Speaker 12: just have a look at how he's handled the situation
Speaker 12: with Donald Trump at the moment, you know, Chinese warships
Speaker 12: when they were circumnavigating this and seaboard nothing to see,
Speaker 12: he nothing to say about it.
Speaker 2: So but we set our own policy, Lucy, Yeah, well
Speaker 2: what are that we We do not capch out to
Speaker 2: any how could you say this?
Speaker 12: So it's a really interesting time and it's interesting to
Speaker 12: also see the left demanding more of him, right. I
Speaker 12: was speaking to a lady at the post office the
Speaker 12: other day, an elderly woman, and she said, I don't
Speaker 12: get me started on Albanize's pledge about the Medicare card
Speaker 12: and you know how you don't have to take out
Speaker 12: your own bank cards. She said, it's a line. It's
Speaker 12: an absolute nonsense.
Speaker 2: Never forget eighty five percent of GPS surveys from their
Speaker 2: own professional association say that was garbage. But you know, whatever,
Speaker 2: we voted for it. We vited for it one hundred percent.
Speaker 2: So Stephen helped me out here as a boke who's
Speaker 2: tried to fight the left within the Labor Party, but
Speaker 2: now it's in charge of the machinery. It's in charge
Speaker 2: of the Prime Minister's office. Now many of the gallery
Speaker 2: of which that they will play to, both metaphorically or
Speaker 2: literally in terms of the press gallery is saying the same.
Speaker 1: Thing, we want more, we want more, be more ambitious.
Speaker 2: But obviously one of the successes of the way that
Speaker 2: things were played at the election was by literally offering
Speaker 2: not a single policy that had a downside to it.
Speaker 2: But help me out, what do they really want? What's
Speaker 2: the progressive wish list? Not the stuff that you think
Speaker 2: is going to happen. But you know the old lefties
Speaker 2: have always wanted from a prime minister with ninety something se.
Speaker 11: Well.
Speaker 7: I mean, the good news is Albow is not going
Speaker 7: to be sucked into or egged on into policies that
Speaker 7: we didn't take to the last election. So you know
Speaker 7: those cries you've correctly identified from more left leaning outlets.
Speaker 7: The Prime Minister Albo said he was going to govern
Speaker 7: from the center. He campaigned from the center, and he
Speaker 7: will stay in the center. So whatever they think they're
Speaker 7: arguing for, and I know none of them actually put
Speaker 7: up any ideas.
Speaker 2: Well, that's that's that's why I'm asking you, because I've
Speaker 2: read all these and the gentermen say, hey, you know
Speaker 2: what we want universal this guaranteed that you know, I
Speaker 2: know that Albo probably would love a little bit of
Speaker 2: universal childcare as his legacy. Gillard with the NDI is
Speaker 2: and again all these things just who cares what how
Speaker 2: it's paid for in generations. But you know he kind
Speaker 2: of missed it with the voice, so he'll want to
Speaker 2: come up with something central thing.
Speaker 7: Yeah, probably the most outrageous thing that might be being
Speaker 7: talked about is, you know, dental care might be on
Speaker 7: medicare truly revolutionary, outrageous policies you're trying to trying to
Speaker 7: mean at the corner has some secret lefting. Well, you're
Speaker 7: over there with all those lefties, you know, universal dental
Speaker 7: care for You've got to be careful. We'll get your
Speaker 7: membership card in a minute if you're not careful. In
Speaker 7: the middle point of these PEO So those people out
Speaker 7: on the left demanding things they weren't even prepared to
Speaker 7: put up a policy agenda themselves. So when they sort of,
Speaker 7: you know, call on elbow to go down the progressive path,
Speaker 7: they don't offer any policies, not the that surprises me.
Speaker 7: And Albo will do what he said, deliverates promises from
Speaker 7: the election. You will keep supporting the US Alliance, he
Speaker 7: will maintain a relationship with China for our trading importance,
Speaker 7: and he will govern from the center. So I did
Speaker 7: read those articles. I had a bit of a chuckle
Speaker 7: and put them away and never thought about him until
Speaker 7: I knew.
Speaker 1: We were going to be talking.
Speaker 2: I think as well about the concept of the Turnbull majority,
Speaker 2: the one that.
Speaker 1: Sorry, what what he didn't he stole? Turnal majority stole.
Speaker 2: And then up all right, yeah.
Speaker 1: Let's get just a joke.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the drama, drama, drama in Tasmania. And I'm not
Speaker 2: mocking Tasmania. You know again, I love it, I love
Speaker 2: visiting it. I want nothing but the best. I think
Speaker 2: that the behavior of the Labor Party and what they
Speaker 2: did trying to pull on this moment. Then the governor
Speaker 2: sort of I'll get back to it. It's just crazy
Speaker 2: the way that it's played out. But Lucy, you know,
Speaker 2: at the heart of this for some people is the
Speaker 2: immovable position of the premiere when it comes to we
Speaker 2: want an AFL team, we need a stadium for it.
Speaker 2: Others say, well that money could go somewhere else. But
Speaker 2: if the central claim that was behind the motion of
Speaker 2: no confidence was the state's got too much debt, well, sorry,
Speaker 2: in all the speeches that I've heard and read, I
Speaker 2: don't know what the alternative solution is in terms of
Speaker 2: what the Labor Party are saying. So who got what
Speaker 2: they really wanted out of this election?
Speaker 1: Nobody?
Speaker 12: Who did?
Speaker 1: Who did?
Speaker 12: I mean when you factor in and we spoke about
Speaker 12: this last week, right because we were at the time
Speaker 12: where we were discussing it, he was on the precipice
Speaker 12: of going in for the vote. He lost the no
Speaker 12: confidence vote. Now, as you said, rightly, it's gone back
Speaker 12: to the governor who's going to decide what she's going
Speaker 12: to do when she needs a bit of time around it.
Speaker 12: You know, by all accounts, Jeremy Rockcliffe is saying and
Speaker 12: his party members are saying that they fully support him
Speaker 12: in this role. They stand by him. I just find
Speaker 12: that it's very interesting that you know this is all
Speaker 12: coming about now particularly when there was some text messages leaked.
Speaker 12: Did you see those exchanges between a labor staff and
Speaker 12: somebody said that getting Rockcliffe out of this position would
Speaker 12: actually be good for them because they know how well
Speaker 12: liked ease by the Tasmanian public.
Speaker 1: Turned to the right and put somebody of course.
Speaker 12: But you know, the thing that really frustrates me in
Speaker 12: all of this as well is the hypocrisy that surrounds this,
Speaker 12: this concept that you know, they've been steeped in so
Speaker 12: much debt. We mentioned it last week. Look at how
Speaker 12: much debt the various other states are in. Then they're
Speaker 12: not copying no confidence votes. I mean, hello, suburban rail
Speaker 12: loop down in Melbourne, Victoria. We're talking about things being
Speaker 12: over budget with respect to the fairies and the vessels
Speaker 12: there that they're waiting on that have been delayed, et cetera.
Speaker 12: But hello, by comparison, this isn't occurring by the states.
Speaker 12: Why are you waging such absolute anarchy and war on
Speaker 12: the Tasmanian people.
Speaker 2: But again my point, Stephen, is if the threshold of
Speaker 2: let's have an election because the management is out of control,
Speaker 2: are delayed, grossly delayed and grossly over budget, things like
Speaker 2: the fairies, or the lack of ports for them to
Speaker 2: go to or debt. Well again, as Lucy says, I
Speaker 2: think that's a really strong argument against the Victorian government.
Speaker 2: But let's talk about the rockcliff of it all here,
Speaker 2: because again we're not Tasmanians.
Speaker 1: I don't know the.
Speaker 2: Inner workings of how people are going to interpret things.
Speaker 2: At the last election, you know, it's the multiple terms
Speaker 2: of the Liberal Party that have been around, multiple leaders.
Speaker 2: They got more seats after deciding to extend the parliament.
Speaker 2: Stupid idea Lamby ran last time. I understand she's not
Speaker 2: running candidates this time. Does one nation step into that
Speaker 2: voie or does people rally around a premier who's had
Speaker 2: an idea wants to stick with it, or the sort
Speaker 2: of classical thing that all oppositions do, which is to
Speaker 2: turn up the noise as loud as possible and the exchanges.
Speaker 2: If you change the government, the noise goes down. What
Speaker 2: do you think about what's playing out in tasim.
Speaker 7: Well, I do think Paul, when you were in your
Speaker 7: intro you were very close to jumping a shark.
Speaker 1: Just to be clear, I do have a leather jacket
Speaker 1: on under this for you.
Speaker 7: No one is the no one is the elected premier.
Speaker 7: The people of Tasmania do not elect the premier. They
Speaker 7: elect a party that elects a leader, but the party
Speaker 7: hasn't got rid of him. Concept the fund now, let
Speaker 7: me just finish the fundamental concept is that leader then
Speaker 7: seeks a conference motion or demonstrates they've got the numbers
Speaker 7: to the Governor a General. That is how Parliament of
Speaker 7: Westminster democracy works. So a combination of the Labor Party,
Speaker 7: the Greens and the very unhappy Independence voted a motion
Speaker 7: of no confidence in Rockcliffe with have a motion no
Speaker 7: confidence in the government.
Speaker 1: So we're having an election.
Speaker 7: So Rockcliffe Rockcliffe then had no How does be clear
Speaker 7: Rockcliffe had a choice whether he would step down and
Speaker 7: allow another member of the Liberal Party to go to
Speaker 7: the Governor General and say I can command a majority
Speaker 7: on the floor. Rockcliffe wouldn't do that.
Speaker 12: He wouldn't step up support Stephen of his entire party.
Speaker 12: I mean, at what point are we going to say.
Speaker 1: That just this seems like.
Speaker 7: That's not a majority.
Speaker 12: But they're coming out and they're saying that they're but
Speaker 12: they're coming out and they're saying that they support him Stephen.
Speaker 12: Just semantics socide though right and talking about the Westminster
Speaker 12: system and all the rest.
Speaker 7: Of it constitution, that's.
Speaker 12: Fine, but that's okay, we're talking about that.
Speaker 1: But I want to really get you.
Speaker 12: I want to get to the crux of do you
Speaker 12: genuinely believe that this no confidence motion has merit that
Speaker 12: based on the way that Rockliffe and the Liberal Party
Speaker 12: have been running the show in Tasmania, his genuine grounds
Speaker 12: to put them back in an election situation and put
Speaker 12: the Tasmanian people through all of.
Speaker 2: This again, give me a bumper stick of Stephen, because
Speaker 2: I have to take a break.
Speaker 7: Yeah, the stadium is a significant issue, whether people are
Speaker 7: right or wrong on that.
Speaker 1: Afl are playing at hard.
Speaker 7: But the one that absolutely is the killer for them
Speaker 7: is have a look at the photos of the ferry
Speaker 7: docked in Scotland. Just have a look at it, because
Speaker 7: not only did they be to build to be a ferry,
Speaker 7: they didn't build a port big enough to go in.
Speaker 7: That level of incompetence deserves to be thrown out of governments.
Speaker 7: That is a huge suburban dismiss not very important, by the.
Speaker 12: Way, but they're over by forty five.
Speaker 1: I'm going to take a break don't worry about it.
Speaker 1: I've got to take a break.
Speaker 2: And by the way, where you're talking about me crossing
Speaker 2: the jumping the shark, the state has a governor, not
Speaker 2: a governor general.
Speaker 1: But that's okay, Stephen. We're all learning together, all right,
Speaker 1: quick break back with my.
Speaker 2: Some magic's matter more, some very scholarly work has been
Speaker 2: done by what I'm sure is right up there with
Speaker 2: the Ponds Institute, Escape dot Com that are you. These
Speaker 2: are the prettiest streets in all of Australia, apparently, Kiribilly
Speaker 2: Avenue in Sydney, Pink Lake Road in Esperance.
Speaker 1: Absolutely she's had his gorgeous this one in Victoria.
Speaker 2: Also the Great Ocean Road, no surprise there, and the
Speaker 2: GiB River Road in Western Australia.
Speaker 1: I agree with all of those. But anyway, well done.
Speaker 2: They got their friend mentioned on television, Escape dot com
Speaker 2: dot AU. All right here with Lucy Heilich and with
Speaker 2: Stephen Conroy both here to help. Let's just talk about
Speaker 2: what's been happening in America. Stephen, you heard what I
Speaker 2: had to say at the start. Here we look, there's
Speaker 2: a fundamental illegal versus illegal immigration, and then on top
Speaker 2: of that, We've got a whole bunch of other people
Speaker 2: wanting to cause an awful lot of mess, And the
Speaker 2: only reason LA was locked down was because of the
Speaker 2: lunatics that are running around destroying property, not Donald Trump thoughts.
Speaker 7: Look, I think there's three different parts to this. The
Speaker 7: first is it's been widely reported now that Stephen Miller,
Speaker 7: the architect of all these policies, went into Homeland Office
Speaker 7: and screamed at them. These are the reports verified, screamed
Speaker 7: up them that they had to start deporting more people.
Speaker 7: So they moved from raiding the Venezuelan gangs to down
Speaker 7: at home depot to raid the workers at the home depot.
Speaker 7: So a bit of a difference there, but this has
Speaker 7: been brought on by Miller demanding that more people be deported.
Speaker 7: That was then just genuine uprising, limited by those who
Speaker 7: felt that this was not the right thing to do
Speaker 7: in terms of you told us you were going after
Speaker 7: Venezuelan gangs, not after.
Speaker 1: The way person now at home depot. No.
Speaker 7: No, And that's on pot of the three themes here
Speaker 7: that Donald Trump, who needs to change the narrative, is
Speaker 7: the master a changing the narrative, catching the Democrats flat
Speaker 7: for all the time. You know, are we talking about
Speaker 7: Jeffrey Epstein and Elon Musk this week?
Speaker 1: Absolutely? Sorry today?
Speaker 7: No heed, Yeah, no, no, he groveled. And as we know,
Speaker 7: Donald Trump is always happy to take some person who's
Speaker 7: criticism back as long as they kiss his ass. Hello
Speaker 7: Marco Rubio.
Speaker 12: Uh.
Speaker 1: Never happened in the Labor Party. I mean, when when
Speaker 1: you break it, you stay broken. Nobody ever papers that
Speaker 1: over writ in the Labor Party. Rats rats a rat Okay.
Speaker 1: So then unless they.
Speaker 2: Are at Greens right, and then you can will into
Speaker 2: your in the Senate, I've got a consistent.
Speaker 7: Position of I've got a consistent position they should all
Speaker 7: right or resign if they do that in the Senate.
Speaker 7: So then you've got whether or not it's justified. Beyond
Speaker 7: the National Guard, and I think where you know, to
Speaker 7: borrow the phrase where it's popular tonight, where he's jumped
Speaker 7: the shark, not in the way that I think will
Speaker 7: hurt him, but he's jumped the shark on the Marines,
Speaker 7: I think the National Guard. The looting, you can see
Speaker 7: there's a just vile element. I'm not sure the National
Speaker 7: Guard would need it ultimately in the looting, but the
Speaker 7: curfew all those things, absolutely, and you're right to point
Speaker 7: out it's for the looting and the rioting, not the
Speaker 7: demonstrations and the protests. Okay, very different issues. As you've said, correctly,
Speaker 7: whole bunch of people who you know took advantage of
Speaker 7: this to engage in criminal behavior, completely right, call their poor,
Speaker 7: completely right. But sending in the Marines is jumping that shark.
Speaker 12: Well I appreciate that, but why though, like you just
Speaker 12: I just want to know why is the jumping the
Speaker 12: shark though?
Speaker 7: Because they're not needed? And look, this is a bloke
Speaker 7: who won't deploy a troop in defense of Ukraine, but
Speaker 7: will deploy troops to attack his own citizens.
Speaker 1: That's why erection American is exactly.
Speaker 12: But is it to jack citizens or is it signal
Speaker 12: to say to the people that enough is enough?
Speaker 1: The fact that you have all of these people.
Speaker 12: Immigrants to actually they're committing strategy right thing by coming
Speaker 12: into the country legally.
Speaker 1: Season come on you, I love this, I love this.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna let you go all nights trouble check it out.
Speaker 1: But he can beat up a few.
Speaker 7: Protesters in Los Angeles by sending in the.
Speaker 1: Protesters is launching is right?
Speaker 12: Vandalizing cars, they're attacking police. Come.
Speaker 7: I'm one hundred percent with the curfew. I'm one hundred
Speaker 7: percent with the curfew.
Speaker 12: But don't send in a sign of strength to say, hey, women,
Speaker 12: business and enough.
Speaker 7: Sin of strength. It's their own people, it's their own people.
Speaker 12: One way Mexican flag reason says I love this country.
Speaker 1: I'm more than I refuse to go there.
Speaker 7: Sorry to half on, I mean to find some lunatic
Speaker 7: socialist Mexican to pretend that this is what there's really
Speaker 7: These writers are really about enough jumping the ship's standard.
Speaker 1: You see, that's just you. That's you work in the clock,
Speaker 1: in the clock. All right, I got the last word
Speaker 1: last time, you get it. This time, Lucy, you get it.
Speaker 1: Next week, I'm I'm in your backyard. She gets it
Speaker 1: down your back Thank you guys.
Speaker 2: Next week quick break at a final thought before we
Speaker 2: head off the late debate, don't go anywhere goods.
Speaker 7: Ah.
Speaker 1: That's treasure.
Speaker 2: Have a look at this sunken ship, sixteen billion dollars
Speaker 2: worth of treasure. It's been found in around the Caribbean.
Speaker 2: It's referred to as the Holy Grail of shipwrecks. We're
Speaker 2: just liking to show you some random things across the show.
Speaker 2: This apparently was a vessel that was sunk by the
Speaker 2: Royal Navy seventeen oh eight. What is inside at sixteen
Speaker 2: billion dollars worth of treasure? Good luck to the chat
Speaker 2: once you get back to the beach. About your bit,
Speaker 2: my bit, your bit, my bit quickly? Something I want
Speaker 2: to say in favor of the police. You know on
Speaker 2: the show we are pro police and I stand by
Speaker 2: the news of Welds Police in particular with industrial action
Speaker 2: they have planned because they are sick and tired of
Speaker 2: having to transport people in between prisons. They are not
Speaker 2: the corrections department. They are not the prison's department. They
Speaker 2: the police department. And also, as always we send strength
Speaker 2: and love to the people who run towards people on
Speaker 2: the toughest day of their.
Speaker 1: Life, all day, every day.
Speaker 2: Story today that New South Wales police are being pushed
Speaker 2: to find the root cause of psychological injuries because in
Speaker 2: the years between mid twenty nineteen mid twenty four, psychological
Speaker 2: injury now make up seventy four percent of compensation costs,
Speaker 2: totaling one point seventy five billion dollars, compared to just
Speaker 2: twenty six percent for physical injuries. I believe this is
Speaker 2: yet again more information that we should be moving towards
Speaker 2: a Royal commission into the trauma that is faced by
Speaker 2: our emergency services, both professional and volunteer. If you've got
Speaker 2: a story Seminemma Paulitskynews dot com dot au.
Speaker 1: Here's a late debate