Speaker 1: Late General, welcome the Late Debate.
Speaker 2: Well, good evening, thanks for joining us on the Late Debate.
Speaker 2: James Macpherson with Liz Stauer and Caleb Bond coming up.
Speaker 2: A journalist is embarrassed when he wrongly assumes the people
Speaker 2: he's interviewing are racist, just like him. Will show you
Speaker 2: that a little later. Plus when we look at the
Speaker 2: paper's agenda, row erupts in Paris as biological men compete
Speaker 2: in women's events, And what happens to regional Australia if
Speaker 2: Rex Airlines goes under All of.
Speaker 3: That coming up a little later.
Speaker 2: But first, we're all very well aware that there's a
Speaker 2: housing crisis. But in Victoria the housing crisis is being
Speaker 2: made even worse by their cultural Heritage process. Now that
Speaker 2: process demands that land slated for development first undergoes checks
Speaker 2: to see if there's any culturally significant sites or artifacts
Speaker 2: before any houses can be built. Well, according to The
Speaker 2: Herald's Son, that process is laying developments by eighteen months
Speaker 2: or more and pushing up housing prices. The developers have
Speaker 2: to pay holding costs on the land while it sits
Speaker 2: idle as indigenous groups inspect the property for artifacts, taking
Speaker 2: sometimes years to do so, and on top of that,
Speaker 2: indigenous groups are charging developers one thousand dollars a day
Speaker 2: just to meet with them, and fifteen hundred dollars a
Speaker 2: day for Indigenous people to oversee cultural heritage advisors also
Speaker 2: being paid by developers as they search the property for artifacts. Now,
Speaker 2: Urban Development Institute of Australia CEO Linda Allison, she told
Speaker 2: The Herald's son the holding costs of the delays can
Speaker 2: make projects completely unfeasible, and those costs just inevitably if
Speaker 2: the development does go ahead, get passed on to the
Speaker 2: home buyer and that just makes housing even less affordable.
Speaker 2: So what to do about this problem? Will the liberal
Speaker 2: opposition have made themselves useful for once, and they've come
Speaker 2: up with a pretty good suggestion. Why don't we put
Speaker 2: time limits on the indigenous groups to search for artifacts
Speaker 2: before development can take place? And why don't we put
Speaker 2: caps on the amount of money they can charge developers
Speaker 2: to give certainty and to keep costs down. Sounds pretty sensible,
Speaker 2: but Victorian Premier Jacina Allen has described those suggestions as
Speaker 2: quote racist and nasty, which just goes to prove that
Speaker 2: when you vote for clowns, you end up getting an
Speaker 2: entire circus Calebrin Liz. The Victorian government are claiming to
Speaker 2: fight the housing crisis while exacerbating the housing crisis with
Speaker 2: a racist policy that if you dare point it out,
Speaker 2: gets you labeled racist.
Speaker 4: I mean, this is beyond laughable, especially because it has
Speaker 4: such real world effects. In the middle of housing crisis,
Speaker 4: which is nationwide but also notably in Victoria, this government
Speaker 4: has committed to building two point two four million houses
Speaker 4: by twenty fifty one. That's roughly eighty thousand a year
Speaker 4: till twenty fifty one.
Speaker 5: Meanwhile, the rate at which they're.
Speaker 4: Building houses currently has dropped to an all time low
Speaker 4: in thirty years. This is a thirty a three decade low,
Speaker 4: and projects are being held up by this in a
Speaker 4: state that has one percent Aboriginal people.
Speaker 5: So it's like, who are you.
Speaker 4: Actually helping out here by tying the hands of developers
Speaker 4: who are building these dwellings that we all desperately need
Speaker 4: in every single state. Don't call your set you're You're
Speaker 4: not a serious government. You are not a serious government,
Speaker 4: You're not a serious leader. The premiere set on Tuesday. Oh,
Speaker 4: this is these cultural heritage laws are only affecting one
Speaker 4: percent of development, really one percent, I don't think. So
Speaker 4: they have to do the same as WA did, and
Speaker 4: WA ditch their cultural heritage laws just after just over
Speaker 4: one month of it coming into effect because it was
Speaker 4: simply too hard. They realized the error of their ways.
Speaker 4: They ate humble Pie and they just said, look, we've
Speaker 4: repealed it.
Speaker 1: Well, I can build you two million houses within that timeframe.
Speaker 1: They'll just be made of lego. You won't actually be
Speaker 1: able to live in them. But you never know. These days,
Speaker 1: they'll probably do something like that and say, look we
Speaker 1: did it, here's your two million houses. But I love
Speaker 1: the fact that, of course she attacks the opposition's idea that,
Speaker 1: you know, for a modest stuff, put a cap on
Speaker 1: the costs. We'll put a time frame on when all
Speaker 1: this stuff has to be done, and that there should
Speaker 1: be audits of the approvals that they then give, so
Speaker 1: that at least there's some oversight over the system that's
Speaker 1: somehow nasty racial division. At the same time, the Allen
Speaker 1: government is reviewing these cultural heritage secretly because it knows
Speaker 1: that there's something wrong with them. But it didn't want
Speaker 1: you to know that they were reviewing the cultural hero
Speaker 1: digital because because she's worried about how that might look. Oh,
Speaker 1: you know, we're admitting that there's a problem here. We
Speaker 1: couldn't possibly have anyone see that because it might be racist.
Speaker 1: I just love that, one by one, all of these
Speaker 1: little things are starting to fall apart in some way,
Speaker 1: you know, And I feel like the Voice was the
Speaker 1: vanguard for all of this. Once the Voice fell over,
Speaker 1: it was sort of like open season for people to
Speaker 1: actually start openly admitting that there was something wrong with
Speaker 1: Indigenous affairs in this country because all of a sudden
Speaker 1: we felt emboldened or we I mean, we've been talking
Speaker 1: about it for a long time, but people who otherwise
Speaker 1: had previously felt uncomfortable voicing their opinion because they were
Speaker 1: worried that they'd be called racist for doing so, have
Speaker 1: started coming out and saying, yeah, actually we have a
Speaker 1: few problems here. So little by little, whether it's the
Speaker 1: laws in WA, whether it's this, whether it's concerns around spending,
Speaker 1: people are starting to speak up a little bit. But
Speaker 1: the fact that she didn't want to tell us that
Speaker 1: this investigation was going on, I think says it all.
Speaker 1: Even she, in her heart of hearts, just inter Allen
Speaker 1: knows there's something wrong here, but you can't admit it.
Speaker 1: And of course, the first part of fixing a problem
Speaker 1: is admitting that there is a problem in the first place.
Speaker 1: It's pretty basic stuff. But they can't even do that.
Speaker 2: And that's the problem that these left progressive governments have.
Speaker 2: They back themselves into a corner where they declare all
Speaker 2: of these things grand moral issues. They demonize anybody who
Speaker 2: disagrees with them, and then when they find their ideological
Speaker 2: policies aren't working, how do they ever go back on
Speaker 2: them Because they've just said anyone who questions it is
Speaker 2: a racist, so they can't possibly backflip. They just have
Speaker 2: to try and massage things as best they can. The
Speaker 2: only way you get rid of these policies is you
Speaker 2: vote them out and you get a government that is
Speaker 2: going to govern according to practicalities rather than a preconceived
Speaker 2: and immovable ideology.
Speaker 5: Well, I wouldn't hold we are talking about Victoria. I've
Speaker 5: got to say, though, we're not.
Speaker 1: And I read these numbers, one thousand dollars a day
Speaker 1: just just to have a meeting. We're not even talking
Speaker 1: about the dig here. It's just all about meeting with
Speaker 1: the developers. I keep reading this stuff and going, my god.
Speaker 1: I always said I'd never do one of those ancestry
Speaker 1: dot Com tests because I didn't want to hand my
Speaker 1: DNA over to some private black rock. But I really
Speaker 1: feel like I should go and take one and see
Speaker 1: if I've got some aboriginal blood in me, because, for
Speaker 1: Heaven's sake, if I could get one thousand dollars a
Speaker 1: day to do some of this work, I'm sure I
Speaker 1: could do it in conjunction with the work that I
Speaker 1: do here on sky News as well, just sort of
Speaker 1: keep me busy during the day, I'd be rolling in it.
Speaker 1: And it's the same with all the money that they
Speaker 1: give them to do welcomes to country. I mean, some
Speaker 1: people are charging like ten thousand dollars a pop to
Speaker 1: do those welcomes to country on the basis of their
Speaker 1: race alone. And that's that's the real problem with it.
Speaker 1: I don't think there's anyone in the country who wouldn't
Speaker 1: want to preserve actual cultural artifacts if they can be
Speaker 1: found anywhere, because of course they are historical pieces that
Speaker 1: ought to be preserved. But when you hold all this
Speaker 1: stuff up and put that above everything else, I mean,
Speaker 1: for heaven's sake, what are we going to get to
Speaker 1: the point where mum and dad want to subdivide their property.
Speaker 1: And before you do that, someone's got to come in
Speaker 1: and dig the whole joint up before you can even
Speaker 1: do that. If you decide you want to put a
Speaker 1: new driveway in your house, they'll start saying, well, we've
Speaker 1: got to do a dig underneath the concrete that was
Speaker 1: already there by the way, but you're replacing it, so
Speaker 1: we've got to look under that as well. But where
Speaker 1: does this stuff end?
Speaker 2: Well, And this is the problem with a lot of
Speaker 2: this stuff, particularly with relation to indigenous affairs, is that
Speaker 2: little industries grow up around some of these exact virtue
Speaker 2: signaling efforts, whether it's cultural heritage issues where you go
Speaker 2: and you meet with a developer and your charge a fee,
Speaker 2: and then you've got some archaeologists, but we better have
Speaker 2: an indigenous person overseeing the archaeologists charge a fee.
Speaker 3: You'd like to welcome to country will charge a fee.
Speaker 2: And so to try and undo some of these things, well,
Speaker 2: you know now you're trying to undo entire little industries
Speaker 2: that have grown around it. People are not letting go
Speaker 2: of those things easily.
Speaker 5: And neither should they.
Speaker 4: I mean this affects homeowners, that affects farmers, that affects
Speaker 4: miners big time. Not so much a big deal in Victoria,
Speaker 4: but it certainly was in Wa. And so the extrapolation
Speaker 4: of a policy that says indigenous affairs and cultural heritage
Speaker 4: are more important than major infrastructure projects, we've seen several
Speaker 4: of them topple over this throughout the nation, as well
Speaker 4: as just putting roofs over people's houses. To genuinely ask
Speaker 4: people in the middle of a housing crisis to believe
Speaker 4: that cultural heritage and finding a significant rock in your
Speaker 4: backyard is more important than building homes for the future,
Speaker 4: and not even on the for the future, where on
Speaker 4: the back foot right now, we're desperately behind need to
Speaker 4: build these things. Nobody's buying that, No practical person is
Speaker 4: buying that. And that's what you need in a leader
Speaker 4: to say, of course we respect cultural heritage. Of course
Speaker 4: that is one of the values that we uphold, But
Speaker 4: more so we uphold keeping a roof over people's heads.
Speaker 4: And with a growing population like ours, this has to
Speaker 4: be the number one priority. That's really not that hard
Speaker 4: to do. But what do you see in this premiere,
Speaker 4: Like she's she's got a BA in something that, by
Speaker 4: the way, I could not find what her being. I
Speaker 4: challenge anyone out there to tell me what Jacinta Alan's
Speaker 4: BA is. Okay, because everything we know, Bachelor of Arts
Speaker 4: are useless.
Speaker 5: I can say that because I have too, but I
Speaker 5: can't find.
Speaker 4: I cannot find anywhere on the great world Wide Web
Speaker 4: what her BA is in, which is a little bit troubling,
Speaker 4: but would also indicate she'd rather people didn't know the
Speaker 4: person running your state as a Bachelor of us. How
Speaker 4: much real world experience does someone have when they're genuinely
Speaker 4: saying I'm more scared of being called a racist or
Speaker 4: a bigot than I am about the housing crisis in
Speaker 4: my state.
Speaker 5: Unbelievable.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Okay, before we move on with the other topics
Speaker 2: we want to talk about tonight, we've just received breaking
Speaker 2: news that Rex Airlines have entered voluntary administrations.
Speaker 3: That news has just come to hand.
Speaker 2: A bit later in the show will explain more about
Speaker 2: what that means and how that will affect people who
Speaker 2: are planning to fly on REX. But they've just entered
Speaker 2: voluntary administration. That news just breaking. Well, we've been talking
Speaker 2: about the insanity of Victoria, but there's another place you
Speaker 2: can go if you want to see some insanity and
Speaker 2: sorry shames.
Speaker 1: Just before we move on, this is big news. REX
Speaker 1: going into voluntary administration and the fact that we still
Speaker 1: have in this country basically a duopoly of airlines right
Speaker 1: so you've got Virgin and Quantus. Now REX it's important
Speaker 1: to the regions is humongous because, as Paul was talking
Speaker 1: about on his program before, without REX, there's no way
Speaker 1: to get in or out of a lot of parts
Speaker 1: of the country except with a car, and we're talking
Speaker 1: about driving for hours and hours and hours to get anywhere.
Speaker 1: So the essential service they provide in that way is
Speaker 1: very important. But also the work that they were trying
Speaker 1: to do to get into the broader domestic market, as
Speaker 1: in they started out you know, Sydney to Melbourne and
Speaker 1: vice versa, and then with Adelaide to Melbourne, they've expanded
Speaker 1: from Adelaide to Perth recently. It was such an important
Speaker 1: thing to try and break up the market, and I
Speaker 1: suspect that what is happening here is that that attempt
Speaker 1: to break into that broader domestic market has failed, and
Speaker 1: that's really worrying for what it means for consumers. In
Speaker 1: terms of the prices they have to pay for an
Speaker 1: airfare because Rex had very competitive prices in terms of
Speaker 1: flying with them, their service was excellent and iPhone with
Speaker 1: them many times domestically generally, their prices are much better
Speaker 1: than anyone else. Their service is really good, the staff
Speaker 1: are really good. By the way, they don't give an
Speaker 1: acknowledgment of country on their flight, which which was encouragement
Speaker 1: enough for me to use them. And even with such
Speaker 1: a great product, they've fallen over. Essentially, what that means
Speaker 1: for us as a country in consumers is really concerning
Speaker 1: because if you can't break into that market, and others
Speaker 1: have tried, Bonds have tried to do it. If you
Speaker 1: can't break into that market, where are we going to
Speaker 1: end up? I mean, this is just a green flag
Speaker 1: to Quantus and Virgin essentially to say you have total
Speaker 1: control of the market, much like the supermarkets, and you
Speaker 1: can charge whatever you want. If the government doesn't get
Speaker 1: involved here in some way, mostly from the regional perspective,
Speaker 1: because they just can't do without these flights, we are
Speaker 1: going to be in a world of pain. I just
Speaker 1: can't see how the couldn't get involved.
Speaker 2: And there's a good argument for the government to be
Speaker 2: involved because these regional centers provide so much of the
Speaker 2: wealth of this country, provides so much of the tax
Speaker 2: revenue that the least the government can do is make
Speaker 2: sure that they're able to give from place to place.
Speaker 2: Adam Bant put out a tweeked earlier today saying the
Speaker 2: government should just wholesale buy Rex Airlines.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure many people would go for it.
Speaker 4: A bailout or a bailout subsidized. Did it for quantas
Speaker 4: during the pandemic. People aren't opposed to a bailout for
Speaker 4: once we can agree on a good.
Speaker 5: Expenditure of taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 4: Our government seems to love to spurge half the.
Speaker 5: Things they spend our money on.
Speaker 4: We're like Kenya not This is something that, as you've
Speaker 4: just said, Caleb, is very important to people. We don't
Speaker 4: want to see this duopoly constantly having the monopoly on
Speaker 4: anyone who wants.
Speaker 5: To board a flight in Australia.
Speaker 4: And we cannot say enough with regards to Rex's importance
Speaker 4: when it comes to the regions. So if the government
Speaker 4: is just going to allow Rex to roll.
Speaker 5: Over here and die, how are we going?
Speaker 4: How on earth are they going to ensure that some
Speaker 4: sort of service is still available to the regions. If
Speaker 4: they can't, then they simply can't allow this to happen.
Speaker 5: They can't allow REX to just well.
Speaker 1: And that would be the thing, right if the government
Speaker 1: doesn't intervene here and provide some sort of bailout, then
Speaker 1: the government will have to create a service. I mean,
Speaker 1: they simply can't leave people high and dry. And that
Speaker 1: might be a mixture of state governments chucking in money
Speaker 1: along with the federal government, but they can't leave people
Speaker 1: high and dry if you can't fly out of a
Speaker 1: place like Port Lincoln in South Australia or you know
Speaker 1: the multiple other places that rec services. I know that
Speaker 1: Quantus through Quantuslink, does a lot of its own regional
Speaker 1: services now, but again we're talking about one of the
Speaker 1: big duopoly companies, and so they will take this as
Speaker 1: a green flag to jack up their prices in terms
Speaker 1: of their regional services. But for places that are serviced
Speaker 1: only by res if they were to lose those flights,
Speaker 1: I mean, they would be incandescent with rage and I
Speaker 1: think ultimately it would cost us the taxpayer more because
Speaker 1: if they don't put something else in there, be it
Speaker 1: a government run airline or otherwise they're going to be
Speaker 1: left high and dry.
Speaker 4: You just to be clear, are we agreeing with Adam
Speaker 4: Ban right now?
Speaker 3: Well that we are to some degree.
Speaker 4: It would be cheaper to simply buy them out or
Speaker 4: bail them out, then to watch them die and then.
Speaker 5: Just go Okay.
Speaker 4: Now we've got to come up with something that is
Speaker 4: either state or federally funded to service the regions. I mean,
Speaker 4: all the infrastructure is there, the planes are there, the
Speaker 4: things up and running. It just needs an injection of funds.
Speaker 2: The other news that's just coming through is that apparently
Speaker 2: res have canceled flights between major airports and they are
Speaker 2: currently in the process of contacting passengers who've got flights ticketed.
Speaker 2: So we'll have more about that when we look at
Speaker 2: the newspapers later in the program. Obviously that's a developing story.
Speaker 2: We're talking about the madness of Victoria. The other place
Speaker 2: you can go to see madness is the view on
Speaker 2: American television where Whoopy.
Speaker 3: Goldberg holds court. The funny thing about Woopy Goldberg is
Speaker 3: that if.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump so much it looks at so much as
Speaker 2: looks sideways, she is all upset and outraged about it.
Speaker 2: But when Christians are mocked, slandered and ridiculed at the
Speaker 2: opening ceremony of the Olympic Games, well, she says, ah,
Speaker 2: it's no biggie, just change the channel.
Speaker 3: Have a listen.
Speaker 5: Come on, y'all, it's the Olympics. Stop. I'm not trying
Speaker 5: to do anything except talk about the history, and they're
Speaker 5: showing you the history. There are more too.
Speaker 6: Many people in the picture for it to be the
Speaker 6: twelve Disciples and then the seven or eight other people
Speaker 6: who are in the picture.
Speaker 5: The more people.
Speaker 4: When you're not happy with something and it bothers, you
Speaker 4: don't take twenty hours to write an email.
Speaker 1: You're in the TV.
Speaker 5: Off, watch something else.
Speaker 2: Yeah, just change the channel and watch, you know, the
Speaker 2: other Olympics. You can't do that, of course, because there's
Speaker 2: only one Olympic Games and it's for the entire world.
Speaker 2: But Caleb, do you reckon the view would react like
Speaker 2: that if it was Islam that had been mocked at
Speaker 2: the Olympics. Do you think they'd be Oh, look, if
Speaker 2: you don't want to watch Islam being mocked, just change
Speaker 2: the channel.
Speaker 3: It would have been an entirely different tune. For sure.
Speaker 1: I'm so glad that the lefties have finally woken up
Speaker 1: to the idea that if you don't like what someone
Speaker 1: else is saying, perhaps you should just ignore it and
Speaker 1: not be offended by it. I mean, are they Are
Speaker 1: they now going to make this their doctrine that they
Speaker 1: you know, like all you people who watch Guy and
Speaker 1: use and write in and every night, there's certain people
Speaker 1: who write to me, like nearly every night and just
Speaker 1: complain about what we're talking about. I'm like, why don't
Speaker 1: you just change the channel? Why do you sit there
Speaker 1: hating what you're watching every single night and getting so
Speaker 1: offended by it and then going off complaining on social
Speaker 1: media and writing in complaints to actbur and all this
Speaker 1: sort of stuff. If you don't like it, switch it off.
Speaker 1: If they're going to do that in general, then I'm
Speaker 1: all on board. Well, welcome to the free speech world.
Speaker 1: I love it. I'm glad you finally worked it out.
Speaker 1: But of course we're not just talking here about you know,
Speaker 1: I'll switch it off because I don't particularly like what
Speaker 1: I'm watching. Like, we're talking about a program that is
Speaker 1: going to be watched by children. We know he's going
Speaker 1: to be watched by children. We drag Queen's parading around.
Speaker 1: We're talking about a program, or I call it a program,
Speaker 1: but the opening ceremony, and that, as you pointed out,
Speaker 1: went after only one religion, not others. I mean, the
Speaker 1: you know, just switch it off. It's the bloody Olympics,
Speaker 1: for heaven's sake. I mean she was talking about it
Speaker 1: as though it's the Olympics. It's the Olympics. What's the problem.
Speaker 1: That is the problem, that it is the Olympics.
Speaker 5: Ceramon do with anything.
Speaker 4: Let's keep in mind it wasn't just the Last Supper.
Speaker 4: At one point they had a ginormous golden calf on stage,
Speaker 4: straight out of the Book of Exodus. Then they had
Speaker 4: a beast or some weird mysterious cloaked figure writing what
Speaker 4: looked for all the world like either a pale horse
Speaker 4: or a white horse straight out of the Book of
Speaker 4: Revelation right there, one of the horse riders of the Apocalypse.
Speaker 4: I mean, these people were celebrating, dancing around a golden cuff.
Speaker 4: That imagery, that symbolism is powerful, and it wasn't lost
Speaker 4: on anyone who is marginally familiar, much less.
Speaker 5: Belongs to the Christian faith.
Speaker 4: And for someone like Whoopi Goldberg, who is herself a
Speaker 4: member of the LGBTQ community.
Speaker 5: So it's no wonder that she's like, I didn't see
Speaker 5: a problem with it. What's the matter with this?
Speaker 4: Whereas for Christians, we know that all of this is
Speaker 4: actually spelled out in our Bibles. It is spelled out
Speaker 4: in our Bibles. The Bible says, as it was in
Speaker 4: the day of Sodom and Gomorrah, so shall it be.
Speaker 4: The Bible says, in the last days, mockers will come
Speaker 4: with their mockery, saying where is your Christ?
Speaker 5: Where is your God? Now?
Speaker 4: Jesus himself said, hey, they hated me first, so if
Speaker 4: the world hates you, don't worry. I'm the og and
Speaker 4: they hate me because I called them out on their
Speaker 4: evil deeds. Like all of this is foretold, and any
Speaker 4: Christians watching this just goes, well, hello, mockers, thanks for
Speaker 4: fulfilling more prophecy.
Speaker 5: Where there you are? Okay, yep, go on.
Speaker 2: Christians weren't imagining it, because, like you said, if it
Speaker 2: was just one thing, you might say, maybe a coincidence,
Speaker 2: But there were numerous Bible references.
Speaker 3: Where ridicule was involved.
Speaker 2: It was no very obviously, no mistake. It was no misunderstanding.
Speaker 2: On the view, a couple of the other panelts went
Speaker 2: on to say, you know, we should just focus on
Speaker 2: the Olympians rather than what happened in the opening ceremony.
Speaker 2: But that's our complaint, isn't it. We wish the Olympics
Speaker 2: would focus Olympians. That would have been nice, anthy the
Speaker 2: other thing they said. And I can't believe this. One
Speaker 2: of the co hosts on the view said, look all
Speaker 2: these Christians complaining we're tired of being bitten over the
Speaker 2: head with religious messages. We were beaten over the head
Speaker 2: with a religious message by the Olympic opening ceremony. Then
Speaker 2: when we can plain about it, we're the ones who
Speaker 2: were the Bible bashes.
Speaker 1: I know, isn't ridiculous, but look at least one person's
Speaker 1: talking sense about all of this. Donald Trump had his
Speaker 1: say on Fox News.
Speaker 3: Have you watched any of the Olympics.
Speaker 6: I thought that the opening ceremony was a disgrace. Actually
Speaker 6: I thought it was a disgrace.
Speaker 5: The marking of the Last Supper.
Speaker 7: I thought it was Catholics and Christians across the last
Speaker 7: the glover outraged.
Speaker 6: I mean, they can do certain things. I thought it
Speaker 6: was terrible.
Speaker 5: Can you say at the next Olympics of your present
Speaker 5: there won't be You'll have enough influence on the organizers
Speaker 5: that we won't be, you know, insulting Christians.
Speaker 3: We won't be.
Speaker 6: Having a Last Supper as portrayed the way they put
Speaker 6: at the other night. I just think, look, come for everybody.
Speaker 6: I'm very open minded. You do understand you know me
Speaker 6: better than most people know me. I'm very open minded.
Speaker 6: But I thought what they did was a di squares.
Speaker 1: And so say all of us, I can't wait to
Speaker 1: see what the Olympic opening ceremony might look like in
Speaker 1: La if Donald Trump is president at the time.
Speaker 3: But we're all all very nervous about the closing ceremony.
Speaker 1: Well yeah, well there is that to come to me.
Speaker 4: Given the Olympics have taken down the footage of their
Speaker 4: own opening ceremion, I'm sure someone's in a back room
Speaker 4: somewhere desperately amending making a few changes to the closing ceremony.
Speaker 1: Now version of that before we continue on with the Olympics.
Speaker 1: By the way, Virgin Australia has just said that if
Speaker 1: you have a REX flight that has been canceled within
Speaker 1: the next twenty sorry, forty eight hours, get in contact
Speaker 1: with them and they will rebook you on a Virgin
Speaker 1: flight free of charge. If you have a flight that's
Speaker 1: being canceled beyond forty eight hours, still get in contact,
Speaker 1: but of course it won't be the top priority. But
Speaker 1: repeating that, Virgin Australia has offered to rebook you on
Speaker 1: a Virgin flight free of charge. Continuing on with the Olympics,
Speaker 1: there are two boxers who were banned last year from
Speaker 1: participating in the World Championships. They are Iman Califf of
Speaker 1: Algeria and lynn U Ting of Taiwan, which, of course
Speaker 1: at the Olympics they call Chinese Taipei because you know,
Speaker 1: we can have Palestine which isn't a globally recognized state,
Speaker 1: but we can't call Taiwan by its real name because
Speaker 1: that might upset the Chinese. Well, these two particular boxers,
Speaker 1: before they were to participate in the World Championship, were
Speaker 1: undertaking gender testing, which is part of the rules for
Speaker 1: that competition, and they were found, according to the president,
Speaker 1: to have been the president of the what's it called,
Speaker 1: the International Boxing Association, not the President of the United States.
Speaker 1: They were found to have x y chromosomes ie they
Speaker 1: were men. They also had very high testosterone levels, so
Speaker 1: they were barred from competing at the World Championship, but
Speaker 1: the IOC has given them the all clear to compete
Speaker 1: at the Olympics. Now, listen to one person who actually
Speaker 1: competed against one of these people, a califf. This opponent
Speaker 1: said when I fought with her, still calls this individual
Speaker 1: her I felt very out of my depth. Her blows
Speaker 1: to me hurt a lot. I don't think I'd ever
Speaker 1: felt like that in my thirteen years as a boxer,
Speaker 1: nor in my sparring with men. Thank God, that day
Speaker 1: I got out of the ring safely, and it's good
Speaker 1: that they finally realized, except of course, that the IOC
Speaker 1: doesn't seem to have realized this.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 1: It's a bit of a strange case where these two
Speaker 1: people have, as far as we can tell, always presented
Speaker 1: as women, so there's no particular record of them having
Speaker 1: been men previously. But when the World Boxing Association has
Speaker 1: done the testing on them, they've come back and said, well,
Speaker 1: your testosterone levels are those of a man. Now, scientific
Speaker 1: testing has proven before that even if you are transgender,
Speaker 1: someone who has gone through male puberty has punching power
Speaker 1: about one hundred and sixty three percent higher than that
Speaker 1: of someone who hasn't gone through male puberty. The fact
Speaker 1: that a test was taken by another organization, but that
Speaker 1: doesn't matter, and just a year ago the test was
Speaker 1: taken proved the high testosterone levels that the IOC would
Speaker 1: now say, no problems, you can come and compete here
Speaker 1: in the women's division is insane.
Speaker 4: And of all the sports, no boss exception where you
Speaker 4: know women are going to be beaten within an inch
Speaker 4: of their lives. Just like the opponent's testimony that you
Speaker 4: just read, I was lucky to escape with my life,
Speaker 4: she said.
Speaker 5: It is unthinkable.
Speaker 4: We've seen this happen in swimming, in different ball games, the.
Speaker 5: Team sports, but boxing.
Speaker 4: Really and on the Olympic stage. It does wonder if
Speaker 4: after well, very much trumpeting and championing and celebrating, trans
Speaker 4: writes in their opening ceremony, now they feel beholden to like, well,
Speaker 4: we've got to practice what we preach at the cost
Speaker 4: of women, women being beaten to a pulp.
Speaker 5: Is that really what it's.
Speaker 4: Going to take, Olympics Committee, for the world to watch
Speaker 4: these women bruised and bleeding, barely make it out of
Speaker 4: the ring alive. This should spark a complete outrage in
Speaker 4: nations across the world because they will be watching these
Speaker 4: matches and the inequality males have, well, people with greater testosterone,
Speaker 4: if they have gone through mal puberty, they have greater
Speaker 4: muscle mass, they have greater bone density, they have greater
Speaker 4: capacity in their cardiac like there is just absolutely no comparison,
Speaker 4: and these women going to get absolutely smashed.
Speaker 2: You make a really good point, and that is, once
Speaker 2: you're committed to this ideology, there's no room for gray
Speaker 2: and there's no room for you know, being cute with it.
Speaker 2: So at the opening ceremony they had multiple drag queens.
Speaker 2: They had women with beards who clearly were biological men.
Speaker 2: Once you go down that road, there's no room to say, well,
Speaker 2: you know, a man can be a woman except in
Speaker 2: the sport of boxing. So you can be a man
Speaker 2: who's swimming against women but not fighting against you.
Speaker 3: You can't do that.
Speaker 2: You either commit to this ideology or you don't. A
Speaker 2: transman is a trans woman, is a woman, or he's not.
Speaker 2: And so your point is well made. How could they
Speaker 2: allow this in boxing? But if you're going to allow
Speaker 2: this at all, you've got to allow it everywhere. The
Speaker 2: great irony, of course, is while they continue to ignore
Speaker 2: X Y chromosomes, they do antidoping because God.
Speaker 3: Forbid that you have a little bit of extra something
Speaker 3: or other.
Speaker 5: To want someone to have an advantage.
Speaker 3: Can not be a different gender. And that's fine.
Speaker 1: They've been pretty ropey on some of the antidoping testing
Speaker 1: as well. I mean, you know, you've only got to
Speaker 1: look into WADA and the way that it's treated China
Speaker 1: in some of its regimes to know that there is
Speaker 1: a problem there. But you know, when you've got so
Speaker 1: many world sporting bodies and Feena, the World Swimming Body
Speaker 1: was one of the first to come out and say
Speaker 1: that we won't allow transgender women to compete in the
Speaker 1: women's category, and I think there's been a similar edict
Speaker 1: from the World Soccer Organization as well. But you know,
Speaker 1: this is not a fringe idea that you don't let
Speaker 1: transgender women compete in women's sport. How the IOC cannot
Speaker 1: see that just as a matter of fairness, right, And
Speaker 1: when you think of the Olympics, the first thing you
Speaker 1: think of is a fair fight. I mean literally a
Speaker 1: fight when it comes to boxing. But if you don't
Speaker 1: have fairness in sport, where can you have fairness?
Speaker 2: The moment they decided that if a man feels like
Speaker 2: a woman, he is a woman, fairness goes out the window.
Speaker 2: Where's fairness is completely irre relevant. It's all ideological and
Speaker 2: that's the end of it, no matter who bears the consequence.
Speaker 5: And it's not just boxing.
Speaker 4: We've got a story coming up in the papers regarding
Speaker 4: two zambient football players who have also been given the
Speaker 4: green light to compete despite the fact that well they're
Speaker 4: not women, are they? But they will be competing in
Speaker 4: the women's team. How would you like going up against
Speaker 4: that unfair advantage? I think so very much. But speaking
Speaker 4: of women, we've now got a group called White Women
Speaker 4: for Kamala Harris and they have had a ginormous get
Speaker 4: together online with thousands on a similar zoom call led
Speaker 4: by a former teacher now turned in influencer on TikTok
Speaker 4: and Instagram. Here she is heading up the meeting telling
Speaker 4: the thousands of white women who've tuned in how they're
Speaker 4: going to.
Speaker 5: Go about this.
Speaker 7: Thank you, hi, everybody. I am so honored to speak today.
Speaker 7: I am like shaking to just be among such incredible company.
Speaker 7: We are here because as if you were here earlier,
Speaker 7: you've heard BIPOC women have tapped us in as white
Speaker 7: women to step up, listen and get involved the selection season.
Speaker 7: As white women, we need to use our privilege to
Speaker 7: make positive changes. If you find yourself talking over or
Speaker 7: speaking for BIPOC individuals, or god forbid, correcting them, just
Speaker 7: take a beat and instead we can put our listening
Speaker 7: ears on. So do learn from and amplify the voices
Speaker 7: of those who have been historically marginalized, and use the
Speaker 7: privilege you have in order to push for systemic change.
Speaker 4: The uninitiated BIPOC means Black, Indigenous and people of color,
Speaker 4: so we must listen to them.
Speaker 5: Nobody talk over the top of them.
Speaker 4: And whatever they say is gospel truth. That's how we're
Speaker 4: running this campaign. But of course the men couldn't be outdone.
Speaker 4: Now we've got a white men for Kamala Harris. They
Speaker 4: too went hard.
Speaker 5: Check out this.
Speaker 8: I'm white, I'm a dude, and I'm for Harris.
Speaker 4: Over the last few years, you know, I've been thinking
Speaker 4: a lot about men.
Speaker 9: I'm not sure if you guys can recall that feeling
Speaker 9: you had on the night of Tuesday, November eight, twenty sixty,
Speaker 9: I stood over my kid's bed.
Speaker 3: And I wept White nationalist in Maga.
Speaker 2: They want to speak for you, you specifically as white men.
Speaker 1: In the marginalized communities that educate me every single day
Speaker 1: that this is a constant education for all of us.
Speaker 4: The world's problems can be summed up in three simple words,
Speaker 4: ladies and gentlemen, lack of testoster.
Speaker 3: It was a cool question. Why was there a black
Speaker 3: guard talking at the white men.
Speaker 5: I was just about to say, I love it.
Speaker 4: He would have tuned in and none of them would
Speaker 4: have had.
Speaker 5: The gods to be like, oh, this is white.
Speaker 4: Men for Kamala Harris, and you're clearly not white, and
Speaker 4: therefore no one would have.
Speaker 10: No one would have dar consegregation, No black men allowed
Speaker 10: on this SI, no one would maybe he identifies as white,
Speaker 10: and if he identifies as white, who are we.
Speaker 1: To tell you he's not, But to borrow a term
Speaker 1: from the sort of people that would go along to
Speaker 1: like white dudes for Harris or white chicks for Harris.
Speaker 1: I was triggered watching those videos, Like the cringe that
Speaker 1: was just flowing through me was like, this is so bad.
Speaker 1: But isn't it so funny that they're sitting there talking
Speaker 1: about how we've got to sort of endle this racial division.
Speaker 1: And it's literally like white women for Harris, white dudes
Speaker 1: for Harris. No one else was bringing the race into it.
Speaker 1: They have brought the race into it. But we're the
Speaker 1: anti racist ones because we're pointing out that we're white
Speaker 1: and we're having meetings exclusively for white people. I mean,
Speaker 1: for goodness sake, we're rewinding about seventy years in America,
Speaker 1: aren't we. But if you thought that was bad enough
Speaker 1: In terms of the campaigning for Kamala Harris, take a
Speaker 1: look at this. This is a real ad from the
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris campaign. I can't believe it is real, but
Speaker 1: this is a real ad.
Speaker 5: She didn't get Bill's past in Congress that I'll protect.
Speaker 1: Me and you wait, Latina Asia not LGBTQ.
Speaker 6: She can get this country back to where we can stand.
Speaker 5: Men to see from home without Well.
Speaker 1: So let me get this straight. Men dressed as women
Speaker 1: are telling us that Kamala Harris will make a good
Speaker 1: president because she's a woman. They couldn't get a woman
Speaker 1: in to tell us that. And by the way, this
Speaker 1: is another real ad with white mean in it, just
Speaker 1: after they've been saying how great Kamala is. Now she's
Speaker 1: crapping all over them, U smag a Republican's band abortion.
Speaker 1: But that's just the Start's just the start.
Speaker 4: If Trump gets elected, we want the government involved in
Speaker 4: all aspects of your sex.
Speaker 5: Life, way more involved, way more involved.
Speaker 1: When you have sexual intercourse, it should be illegal to
Speaker 1: use contraception, no pills, no condom.
Speaker 6: Your genitalists are reserved for pro creation.
Speaker 1: If you freeze twelve eggs, you should be required to
Speaker 1: have twelve babies or else you're a serial killer. And
Speaker 1: I'm definitely not a serial killer, are you? I mean,
Speaker 1: how is that not satire? How is it a real ad?
Speaker 1: Surely that's like from the Babylon b or something that
Speaker 1: cannot be real.
Speaker 5: Awhy?
Speaker 2: Why would you vote for Kamala Harris when they're putting
Speaker 2: out that kind of rubbish.
Speaker 3: We're going to go to a break. When we come back.
Speaker 2: What's making news in the papers, including, of course that
Speaker 2: breaking news that Rex Airline has been placed into voluntary administration.
Speaker 3: More on that after the break.
Speaker 2: All right, let's take a look at what tomorrow's newspapers
Speaker 2: will be talking about and Liz. Of course, the big
Speaker 2: story will be what's happening with Rex Airlines.
Speaker 3: The Australia are covering that tomorrow, of course they.
Speaker 4: Are, although it's already out of date given tonight's announcement,
Speaker 4: but their original headline reads Regional towns fear loss of Rex.
Speaker 4: The most I guess still applicable.
Speaker 5: Part of this.
Speaker 4: Column here says the airline flies dozens of routes across
Speaker 4: the continent that are not serviced by other carriers, piggybacking
Speaker 4: freight onto passenger flights and delivering an essential service to
Speaker 4: towns scattered throughout out back Australia. Of course, as we've discussed,
Speaker 4: this is already the concern.
Speaker 5: That is something that.
Speaker 4: They do exclusively, so without them where to from here?
Speaker 5: This article notes that they came to the.
Speaker 4: Brink of collapse and what would now appear just collapse.
Speaker 4: After Rex's costly expansion into major city routes, you would
Speaker 4: have thought that they would have just dropped those routes
Speaker 4: instead of expanding. They've already got the regionals, that's all
Speaker 4: up and running.
Speaker 5: They're going quite okay.
Speaker 4: But it was once they expanded into those major city
Speaker 4: routes that it's been like lights out, we actually can't
Speaker 4: hack this. Now we know that Virgin is now covering
Speaker 4: off on those routes free of charge, saying hey, we're
Speaker 4: going to pick up the slack here, and those regional
Speaker 4: services are still continuing for now. But what the future
Speaker 4: holds only the government can really decide at this point.
Speaker 2: Yeah, once you start taking on the major city routes,
Speaker 2: you're competing against Quantus and Virgin that have huge balance sheets.
Speaker 2: Rex just did not have of that, and so they
Speaker 2: were just leaking millions of dollars trying to compete there.
Speaker 3: And of course the tragedy with that.
Speaker 2: Is in trying to expand now it jeopardizes services to
Speaker 2: regional centers. And of course the problems that we're hearing
Speaker 2: about tonight have been forecast. REX staff and crew were
Speaker 2: being locked out of their hotel rooms in the last
Speaker 2: couple of days because the company hadn't paid hotel accommodation bills,
Speaker 2: and then when they tried to use the company's Uber account,
Speaker 2: they found.
Speaker 3: That hadn't been paid and they couldn't do that either.
Speaker 2: So there were warning signs in the past twenty four
Speaker 2: hours that this was all going to come to a head,
Speaker 2: and tonight it has.
Speaker 1: And I really feel sorry for those staff because they
Speaker 1: are genuinely some of the best in the business. They
Speaker 1: actually take they've got a great fite seriously and provide
Speaker 1: a great service. But see, we talk now about the
Speaker 1: fact that the government has to step in and fix
Speaker 1: all of this, but part of the reason we've ended
Speaker 1: up in this position in the first place is because
Speaker 1: of government in action. When REX decided that they were
Speaker 1: going to take on the law arger domestic market, and
Speaker 1: that started, as I said earlier, with Melbourne to Sydney
Speaker 1: and vice versa. Then they expanded Adelaide to Melbourne. They
Speaker 1: recently expanded into Perth as well. And a lot of
Speaker 1: this was the brainchild of the chairman of REX, John Sharp,
Speaker 1: who I have to say is a good guy and
Speaker 1: cares deeply about the airline and what it tries to
Speaker 1: do and it's ethos. But the federal government, despite the
Speaker 1: recommendations of a former chairman of the Productivity Commission, would
Speaker 1: not give REX sort of peak time slots, particularly at
Speaker 1: Sydney Airport, which means they can only fly at certain
Speaker 1: times of the day, and that has generally been somewhere
Speaker 1: around ten o'clock in the morning, at about four o'clock
Speaker 1: in the afternoon, or later in the evening. I think
Speaker 1: about actually about eight o'clock in the evening. So Rex
Speaker 1: was never really given a fair chance to muscle into
Speaker 1: the market because the federal government wouldn't open up the
Speaker 1: slots to allow them to actually anticipate in the market.
Speaker 1: So we say, sure, we want you to come in
Speaker 1: because it's good for competition, it's good for business to
Speaker 1: have another player trying to take on Virgin and Quantus.
Speaker 1: But if you don't give them a fair running and
Speaker 1: say well, you can have a slot at Sydney Airport
Speaker 1: at midday or at five pm, all the times that
Speaker 1: people particularly want to fly, you're trying to corral them
Speaker 1: into slots where they simply don't want to fly. I
Speaker 1: think Rex gave it a good go, but in some
Speaker 1: ways the system was gained against them, which is a
Speaker 1: real shame because we know how much control the federal
Speaker 1: government has over the planes that fly in and out
Speaker 1: of domestic airports and also internationally. I mean, don't forget
Speaker 1: when Virgin wanted to do a deal with a guitar
Speaker 1: that they wanted to have some extra flights to come
Speaker 1: into Australia internationally, and of course Quantus kicked up a
Speaker 1: stink about that, and then the federal government wouldn't give
Speaker 1: them the permission to bring extra flights in. So the
Speaker 1: government is intrinsically linked to how the air industry operates here.
Speaker 1: And then you had the handbringing of Albanesi in code
Speaker 1: today saying oh, you know, we already provide lots of
Speaker 1: support unconditionally to Rex. Well, you could have done something
Speaker 1: serious for them and allowed them to fly at times
Speaker 1: when people wanted to fly and for the consumer who
Speaker 1: is looking for a good service, which I would argue
Speaker 1: they've lost, particularly from Quantus. Certainly post COVID, you just
Speaker 1: don't get the sort of service out of Quantus that
Speaker 1: you used to. And if they're looking for an affordable flight,
Speaker 1: which was definitely a market that Rex was going for,
Speaker 1: you take all of that away and what are you
Speaker 1: supposed to do. I mean, a flight from Sydney to
Speaker 1: Melbourne these days at some point can be upwards of
Speaker 1: four hundred dollars and how can it cost four hundred
Speaker 1: dollars to fly from Sydney to Melbourne and vice versa.
Speaker 1: Someone else tries to come into the market, but they
Speaker 1: can't do it when people want to fly, well, of
Speaker 1: course they're going to collapse.
Speaker 4: And Transport Workers union boss Michael Caine has pointed the
Speaker 4: finger fairly and squarely at Quoni. Direct quote from him,
Speaker 4: he's accused quantus of quote coming down like a ton
Speaker 4: of bricks on the mainline routes to squeeze Rex out
Speaker 4: end quote, So he's obviously cognizant of what's happened. Most
Speaker 4: people would just be like, oh, REX has gone into administration,
Speaker 4: just like BONDSA did in April. The airline industry seems
Speaker 4: to be on the down, but it's really not. The
Speaker 4: government has played favorites, it would seem, and that is
Speaker 4: why we are seeing these smaller guys who are trying
Speaker 4: to get a leg up get absolutely nowhere. And another
Speaker 4: issue Michael Caine raises is the two thousand workers who
Speaker 4: are now going to be looking for other jobs but
Speaker 4: won't be able to be absorbed by other airlines.
Speaker 5: If indeed REX does end up going down.
Speaker 2: You've got the two victims here, right, You've got the
Speaker 2: traveling public who and it's incredibly annoying and upsetting when
Speaker 2: you spent hundreds of dollars on flights that now you're
Speaker 2: not sure what you will do, although, as you said,
Speaker 2: if people contact Virgin, Virgin are going to help out.
Speaker 2: But then you've got two thousand people, many of them
Speaker 2: with mortgages, with rakes about to go up again, power
Speaker 2: bills a sky high, who are now thinking what am
Speaker 2: I going to do for work?
Speaker 4: And it does seem that Rex was rather disingenuous when
Speaker 4: it came to dealing with their own staff, telling them, oh,
Speaker 4: it's just business as usual, you know, there's if anything
Speaker 4: kind of made it out to be misinformation, like any
Speaker 4: anything that you're hearing about this, you know, just keep
Speaker 4: going on with your work as if nothing's happening.
Speaker 5: And now these guys find out along.
Speaker 4: With the rest of us, that actually this is very serious.
Speaker 3: And it looks like Dabrams.
Speaker 2: You can't dare let slip that you're in trouble otherwise
Speaker 2: everyone stops booking.
Speaker 1: Site and sir correct and then all your creditors come
Speaker 1: running as well. And that's why they had the trading halt,
Speaker 1: because of course, if anyone caught wind of this before
Speaker 1: there was a trading halt, then the stock price would
Speaker 1: have absolutely plummeted once again. You have a complete cash
Speaker 1: flow problem because everyone's pulling their and their capital out
Speaker 1: of the company. And for just going back to what
Speaker 1: it means for the consumer, if there's not some sort
Speaker 1: of intervention from the government, and I don't mean just
Speaker 1: Rex here, but if there's not some sort of intervention
Speaker 1: from the government to create a more open domestic airline
Speaker 1: market that Bonds and Rex and others before it have
Speaker 1: tried to do. And never never forget that Anset fell
Speaker 1: over as well. You know, so many companies have tried
Speaker 1: to muscle in on the market, but without the cooperation
Speaker 1: of the government, you simply can't do it. And you've
Speaker 1: got to ask the question, why are they so protective
Speaker 1: of not so much Virgin, but Quantus in particular. I mean,
Speaker 1: remember all that money that was given in job keeper
Speaker 1: payments to Quantus, none of which has been paid back
Speaker 1: by Quantus, despite the fact that it made record profits
Speaker 1: directly after COVID. The federal government didn't jump in to
Speaker 1: bail out Virgin when they were going belly up during
Speaker 1: cod They had to rely on a private investor to
Speaker 1: come in and put that money in. I don't think
Speaker 1: that would happen with Quantus. We had this attachment to
Speaker 1: Quantus because it was once a government owned national carrier airline.
Speaker 1: But we've moved beyond that. There shouldn't be any protection anymore.
Speaker 1: The government should be trying to open up the market,
Speaker 1: and they simply unwilling to do it.
Speaker 2: Well, we're going to go to a break when we
Speaker 2: come back. A journalist embarrassed when he assumes the people
Speaker 2: he's interviewing are as racist as he is.
Speaker 3: That's coming up.
Speaker 2: Let's say a good lawyer never asks a question he
Speaker 2: doesn't already know the answer to, and this journalist asked
Speaker 2: a question that he assumed he knew the answer to,
Speaker 2: only to.
Speaker 3: Be shocked by the response.
Speaker 5: How many of you know a black man who has
Speaker 5: expressed to you that they're committed to voting for Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: For the brothers who have told you that were said
Speaker 1: that to you.
Speaker 5: Has the emergence of Kamala Harris achieved that all?
Speaker 2: You've got to love it when MSNBC they're sure they
Speaker 2: know what the answer is, because you know, they are
Speaker 2: so motivated by rac I think everyone else is to.
Speaker 3: Find No, these black men refuse to be you guys
Speaker 3: into a corner.
Speaker 4: Because a target demographic you're supposed to hate, Drum, come on,
Speaker 4: help me out here, and his back up question thinking
Speaker 4: I'll get him here. Yeah, but they've changed their minds now,
Speaker 4: aren't they? Because someone who's black. She's not really, but
Speaker 4: someone who's black is running for president. Surely they switch
Speaker 4: their votes now, And they're.
Speaker 2: Like, yeah, no, I love the imagery though he even
Speaker 2: had them sitting in the corner, don't you had them?
Speaker 2: But they refuse to be cornered.
Speaker 1: They're now going to have to get a group of
Speaker 1: Indians in the room to ask them as well, because
Speaker 1: of course that's that's what she actually.
Speaker 5: Is, is Indian and Jamaica.
Speaker 1: This this thing that the MSNBC is doing where they
Speaker 1: just sort of get a bunch of people in a
Speaker 1: room who are meant to belong to some sort of
Speaker 1: interest group and then asking them how they feel isn't working.
Speaker 1: Because we showed a clip last week of them asking
Speaker 1: a bunch of women what they thought of Kamala and
Speaker 1: they said she was stupid. So I'm glad he MISSINGBC
Speaker 1: is having it thrown.
Speaker 4: I think she's an idiot.
Speaker 1: One of the of all the stories I saw today,
Speaker 1: this one is my favorite. Pesto the penguin at Melbourne Aquarium.
Speaker 1: He's just a baby, but have a look at the
Speaker 1: size of this bugger.
Speaker 5: Behind me. We have Pisto. He is our newest time chick.
Speaker 5: He's about six months old. You know the look at me.
Speaker 5: Is our biggest baby ever at almost twenty heroes. It's
Speaker 5: his foster Pearance Tango one hutson't have done a really
Speaker 5: good job raising him.
Speaker 7: He eats about twenty five fish a day spread over
Speaker 7: fair feeds, which is about.
Speaker 5: Double ware adult King penguins kit.
Speaker 8: So this is allowing him to look up really quickly,
Speaker 8: so he can slitch in a.
Speaker 5: Few months time and he'll come out looking like one
Speaker 5: of those guys.
Speaker 1: I mean, I weighed four times as match as him,
Speaker 1: and I couldn't even eat as much as he eats
Speaker 1: in a day.
Speaker 5: It's incredible.
Speaker 3: Are we going to show that?
Speaker 2: We've got to show one more clip because that penguin
Speaker 2: reminded us of something else.
Speaker 8: Have a look.
Speaker 3: Also very large.
Speaker 2: Hey listen, that's it from us tonight, repeating that news
Speaker 2: Rex Airlines placed in voluntary administration.
Speaker 3: For more updates throughout the night on.
Speaker 2: What that means for the traveling public go to our
Speaker 2: website skynews dot com dot au. All the information, the
Speaker 2: latest will be there coming up. Now it's the Reef
Speaker 2: Penalty Show.